Algebraic Geometry (Intersection Theory) Seminar
|
|
- Claud Briggs
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Algebraic Geometry (Intersection Theory) Seminar Lecture 1 (January 20, 2009) We ill discuss cycles, rational equivalence, and Theorem 1.4 in Fulton, as ell as push-forard of rational equivalence. Notationise, e ill let scheme mean an algebraic scheme over a field, variety ill mean a reduced and irreducible scheme, and a point ill mean a closed point. Let \ be a scheme and Z \ a subvariety. Then b@ßb œ b8ßb here 8 is a generic point of Z. For a variety \, let V \ be the field of rational functions. Let \ be a variety ith Z \ a subvariety of codimension one. Then bzß\ has dimension, and V bzß\ œ V \. For any! Á < V \ œ V bzß\ ith < œ +Î, for +ß, bzß\. For any! Á = b, j b ÎW. Zß\ Zß\ Definition. Let \ be a variety and Z \ a subvariety ith codimension. Then there is a ell-defined homomorphism ord Z À V \ Ä such that ( for < V \ œ V b, < œ +Î, ith +ß, b ): Zß\ (i) ord < œ ord + ord,, (ii) ord Z Z Z Z + œ j b Î+, and Zß\ (iii) ord, œ j b Î,. Z Zß\ Example. If \ is a veriety hich is regular in codimension one, this means for any Z \ a subvariety ith codimension, b Zß\ is a discrete valuation ring. Cycles and rational equivalence Definition. Let \ be a scheme. A 5 -cycle on \ is a finite formal sum 8 cz d ß 8 here Z \ are 5 -dimensional subvarieties of \. Let ^ \ œ e 8 cz d lz are a 5-dimensional subvarieties f, so 5 Any element α œ eαf 5! ^ \ œ 9 ^ 5 \. 5! ^ O 5 is called a cycle. Zß\
2 For \ a scheme, let \ ßÞÞÞß\ > be irreducible components of \. For each \, e have geometric multiplicity 7 œ j b\ ß\. Notice \ has a generic points ( ( b b is an Artinian ring). \ ß\ œ ( > Notation. We define c\ d œ 7 c\ d ^ \ (this is a cycle). œ We ant to give an equivalence relation on cycles. Let \ be a scheme and [ \ a 5 -dimensional subvariety. For < V [, e define cdiv < d œ ord < czd. cod Z [ [ Z œ Notice a 5 -cycle α is rationally equivalent to!, ritten α µ!, if there are a finite number of 5 -dimensional subvarieties [ \ and < V [ such that α œ cdiv < d. All the cycles equivalent to! are ritten Rat 5 \. We can no define the cycle class, E 5\ œ ^ 5\Î Rat 5\, ith E \ œ 9 E \ œ 9 ^ \Î Rat \ ! 5! Examples. (1) E 5 \ z E 5 \ red, since \ and \ reduced have the same subvarieties. (2) If \ œ \ \ # ÞÞÞ \ >, then ^ \ œ 9 > ^ \ and E \ œ 9 > E \. œ œ () If dim \ œ 8, then E 8\ œ ^ 8\, then there are no 5 -dimensional subvarieties, so there is nothing to mod out by. (4) If \ and \# are subschemes of \, then is an exact sequence. E 5 \ \ # Ä E 5 \ ŠE 5 \# Ä E 5 \ \ # Ä! Z
3 (5) If Z is an irreducible component of \, then for any cycle class α E \, e define the coefficient of Z in α to be the coefficient of czd in any cycle hich represents α (since α œ 8 cz d). (6) If \ œ spec O, then E \ œ ^ \ œ (just one point).!! c B d 5 cb d! c: d (7) If \ œ, then E \ œ ^ \ œ and E \ œ Pic œ. (8) Let Z be a 5 -dimensional variety. Assume e have 0 À Z Ä a dominant function ( 0 Z œ, or other ay to think about it is that 0 maps a generic point of Z to a generic point of, or even 0 V Z ). Let's look at the fibers 0! and 0 (i.e., if œ B! À B, e have! œ À! and œ! À ). Then 0! and 0 are purely 5- dimensional subschemes, so c0! 0 d œ cdiv 0 d. Push-forard of cycles Let 0 À \ Ä ] be a proper morphism of to schemes. Then for a unique α ^ \, e ant to understand 0 α ^ ]. Assume α is a 5-cycle ith α œ 8cZd ith Z a 5-dimensional subvariety. We ant 0 czd œ? ^ ] to have some (covariant) functorial property relating \ and ]. If 0 À \ Ä ] and 0 À Z Ä [ œ 0 Z ( 0 Z is a subvariety of ] ). We ant (1) dim [ dim Z means 0cZd œ!. (2) dim [ œ dim Z means V Z ä V [ has degree cv [ À V Z d We then call 0 czd œ cv Z À V [ d c[ d (so 0 α is ell-defined). Theorem. [1.4] If 0 À \ Ä ] is a proper morphism and α is a 5-cycle on \ hich is rationally equivalent to!, then 0α is rationally equivalent to zero on ]. Proof. We rite α œ cdiv < d for < V Z for some 5 -dimensional subvariety of \. That is, α œ cdiv < d œ 8cZd. codim Z Z Z œ Z
4 For this cycle, e can assume \ œ Z and ] œ 0 Z. We can assume \ is a variety and ] is a variety and 0 À \ Ä ] is a proper surjection. No e use the belo proposition. Proposition. [1.4] Let let < V \. Then 0 À \ Ä ] be a proper, surjective morphism and (a) 0 cdiv < d œ! if dim ] dim \. (b) 0 cdiv < d œ cdiv R < d if dim ] œ dim \, < here R < is determinant of V \ Ä V \ as an V ] -linear morphism ( R V V ] ). Proof. Case 1. Let ] œ spec O for O a field. Let \ œ 5 ith 0 À 5 Ä spec O. Since V \ œ O >, and < V \ œ O > ( < œ +Î, ith +ß, O c> d), e can assume < O c> d is an irreducible polynomial (since cdiv < d œ cdiv + d cdiv, d, so if e prove it for cdiv + d and cdiv, d (and e kno + and, are polynomials), then e have shon it for cdiv < d). Furthermore, let T œ < be a maximal prime ideal ( T \ œ 5 is a closed point). In this case, ord T < œ (since b: œ O c> d < ), and ord U < œ! for U O c> d ith U Á T. Finally, consider the point T 5. Then T œ ˆ > O > (it corresponds to the prime ideal generated by > in the ring O > ). The ay to visualize this is that O c> d is for everything but, and O > is for everything but!. Call degree < œ.. Then < œ ˆ. 2ˆ > >, some poly. For # # example, < œ > œ ˆ ˆ. Then on, e have > > # cdiv < d œ c: d. ct d and 0 cdiv < d œ cv T À Od. cv T À Od œ.. œ!, ith V T œ O c> dî<. Case 2. If 0 À \ Ä ] is finite, set ith O œ V ] and P œ V \ and O ä P. Also, assume all varieties in cdiv < d map to a variety [ ] of codimension. Let E œ b [ß] (the generic point of this image) and 7 œ 7 [ß]. Consider the commutative diagram 5
5 Spec P Ä \ ] Spec E Ä \ Æ Æ Æ 0 Spec O Ä Spec E Ò ] ith E ä F ä P and dimf œ dim E œ. Finally, F has finitely many maximal ideals 7 such that 7 E œ 7. There is a one-to-one correspondence beteen, ez \l0 Z œ [ f and { 7 Fl7 E œ 7} Þ Also, from the diagram, F Œ O œ P and F Œ O œ P. No assume < F. Then computationally, div < œ ord < cz d, and Z E Z 0 cdiv < d œ ord < cv Z À V [ dc[ d Z Z 7 œ j F Î< cv Z À V [ dc[ d. Z 7 No e use to lemmas from the back of the book (A.2. and A.2.2), that state if 7ßE Ä F ß7 is a push-forard, 7 je F7 Î< œ cf7 Î7 À EÎ7 d j F7 Î< œ ord R < c[ d œ = ord R < c[ d. Z Alternate Definition of Rational Equivalence E Let Z ä \ Ä ith Z a 5 -dimensional variety and \ Ä \. Then the fibers 0! \ e! f and 0 \ e f are purely 5-dimensional subvarieties of Z. Then if 0! \ e! f, e can define div 0 œ c0! d c0 d and : div 0 œ : c0! d : c0 d here : c0! d œ Z! and : c0 d œ Z. Proposition 1.6. A cycle α in ^ 5 \ is rationally equivalent to zero if and only if there are 5 -dimensional subvarieties Z ßÞÞÞßZ > of \ such that projections from Z to are dominant ith > α œ cz! d cz d œ E. E
6 Proof. We have α œ cdiv < d ( < V [, [ a 5 -dimensional sub- < variety of \). Then consider [ Ä and e have Z ä \ Ä and divc< d œ : cdiv 0 d œ cz! d cz d (here 0 À Z Ä ). Lecture 2 (January 27, 2009) Recall from last time that for \ a scheme, 8 cz d is a 5-cycle, and ^ \ 5 is ^ \ œ e 8 cz d lz are 5-dimensional subvarieties f. 5 Furthermore, ^ \ œ 9 ^ 5\. For [ X 5 -dimensional, < V [, 5! cdiv < d œ ord czd. cod [ Zœ Z < Furthermore, recall that RatV\ œ eeldiv < f ( < µ!). We defined ith E 5\ œ ^ 5\Î Rat5\ E \ œ 9 E 5\. 5! Theorem 1.4. For 0 À \ Ä ] a proper morphism, e define 0 À ^ \ Ä ^ ] \ 5 5 by 0 czd œ deg ZÎ[ c[ d ([ œ 0 Z ). Then for α µ! on \, 0 α µ! on ]. We ill motivate this theorem by seeing its application to Bezout's Theorem on plane curves. Bezout's Theorem on plane curves For JßK plane curves in # ith deg J œ 7ß deg K œ 8, if JßK intersect ith no common roots, then TßJ K œ 7 8, the intersection multiplicity of J and K at T. Assume J is irreducible. Then for all K plane curves, V J, so TßJ K TßJ K œ ord ˆ. K K T K K
7 Then for all J, V K, Hence, J J TßJ K TßJ K œ ord ˆ. TßJ K œ TßJ K Given J a plane curve, < V J, We ant to sho ord T < œ!. cdiv < d œ ord < ctd. Take 1 À J Ä. Then 1 cdiv < d œ ord <. c1td in, : T T J J (ith. the degree of J ) and notice ord < œ cdiv ; d (; V ).\ Alternate Definition of Rational Equivalence Proposition 1.6. If + µ! in ^ 5 \ if and only if α œ cz! d cz d : Z \ ith 0 À Z Ä dominant ith T À \ Ä \, satisfying Z! œ TJ! and Z œ TJ. Theorem 1.7. If 0 À \ Ä ] is a flat morphism (of relative dimension 8), define 0 À ^ 5] Ä ^ 5 8\ by 0 czd œ c0 Zd ( Z a variety). Then for α µ! in ^ 5], 0 α µ! in ^ \ 5 8. Note. Ramin says: Keep in mind, for flat morphisms, it essentially means that the dimensions of fibers are constant. This is hat it means to be flat, it makes these morphisms nice in the aforementioned sense. [not really a quote, just paraphrase] Specifically, for 0 C a fiber of a flat morphism 0 À \ Ä ], the dimension is given by dim \ dim ]. Lemma For all subschemes ] ]ß 0 c] d œ c0 ] d. Proposition 1.7. Consider the fiber square ith 1 flat and 0 proper: 1 \ Ä \ 0 Æ Æ 0
8 ] Ä 1 ] X2/81 is flat, 0 is proper, and for all α ^ \, 0 1 œ 1 0 α in ^ ]. Note. Ramin says What is a fiber square? Think about a product structure. What is a product? The product of to sets \ and ] is the Cartesian pairs BßC such that you have to projections onto B and onto C. The above is the situation hen B and C don't have any maps onto any other thing. No, if you did have a third map, then you'd ant the collection of pairs BßC hich actually map into the same thing in D. Set theoretically, for a diagram ^ Ä ] Æ Æ 0 \ Ä 1 ^, the fiber product is ^ \ ] given by ^ œ e BßC l1 B œ 0 C f. Suppose you have specv Ä Spec W and Spec X Ä Spec W and you ant to construct something Ä Spec V and Ä Spec X (diagram). First thing you do is reverse the arros so you get W Ä Vß W Ä X, and then the ring you construct is V Ä V Œ WX and X Ä V Œ WX. Then you consider the spectrum of these rings and that is the fiber product. Problem is, schemetheoretically you have to do this locally, so you have to make sure the data glues together. Proof. For \ and ] varieties ith α œ c\ d, assume surjective. Then 0 \ œ ] and 0 c\ d œ. c] d. We ant 0 c\ d œ. c] d. Take \ œ Spec P and ] œ Spec O ith OßP fields, and let ] œ Spec E ith E local Artinian, and E œ Spec F ith F œ EŒ O P. Then e are done by Lemma A.1.. We are no ready to prove the main theorem. Theorem 1.7. If 0 À \ Ä ] is a flat morphism (of relative dimension 8), define 0 À ^ 5] Ä ^ 5 8\ by 0 czd œ c0 Zd ( Z a variety). Then for α µ! in ^ 5], 0 α µ! in ^ 5 8\ Proof. Let α µ! in ^ O]. Then α œ cz! d cz d ith Z! œ ;:!, for
9 : À Z8 Ä and ; À ] Ä ] ith 0 À \ Ä ]. Take [ œ 0 Z a subscheme. Then 2 À [ Ä and : À \ Ä \ so that e can construct a fiber square So 0 \ Ò ] : Æ Æ 0 \ Ò ]. 0 0 α œ 0 c; :! d c; : d œ 0 ; c:! d c: d and then by the previous proposition, this equals : 0 c:! d c: d œ : 0 c:! d c: d œ : c2! d c2 d and so by Theorem 1.4 it suffices to sho c[ d œ 7 c[ d for [ œ - c d [. Need 2 œ 2l ith 2 T œ 7 c2 T d for T œ!ß. [ 1.8 An Exact Sequence See Proposition 1.8 and Example Lecture (February, 2009) Recall that if \ is a variety and Z \ is of codimension, then e defined a= b Zß\ (regular functions in the local ring), then j b Zß\ Î =. Furthermore, recall that a 5-cycle is a finite formal sum Z \ßdim Zœ5 8<cZd. Divisors Definition. Let \ be a variety ( 8-dimensional). Then a Weil divisor is an 8 -cycle on \. Furthermore, ^ \ œ abelian group of Weil divisors. 8 Definition. A C artier divisor on \ is defined by e Yαß0α f œ H, here Y α \ is open, and \ œ - αyα, and 0α are non-zero functions in V Yα œ V \ that satisfy (1) 0 α Î! on Yα, (2) 0α Î0 is a unit on Yα Y (a unit is nohere-vanishing, regular). Definition. The 's are called the local equation of. 0 H α
10 Definition. If H is a Cartier divisor of \, and Z \ is a subvariety of codimension ß then e can define an order function on the divisor, ord H ³ ord 0. Z This is ell-defined (independent of our choice of local equations) because they differ by a unit: ord 0α œ ord?0, here? is a unit in b Y Y ß\. Z α α Definition. The associated Weil divisor to H is chd œ ord HcZd. Z \ß codim Note. There are only finitely many Z \ of order ZH Á!. Definition. Let Div \ œ group of Cartier divisors. Let H œ Yαß0α ßI œ Yαß1α. Then e define H I œ Yαß0α1α. We also induce a homomorphism Div \ Ä ^ \ ith H È chd. Definition. For any 0 V \, e define a Principle Cartier Divisors div 0 by all local equations œ 0. Definition. To Cartier divisors H and are linearly equivalent if there exists an 0 V \ such that H œ H div 0. Definition. Pic \ œ Div \ Î µ, here µ is the above linear equivalence. Hence, H œ H div 0 Ö chd ch d µ! as 8 -cycle. This induces Pic \ Ä E \. 8 Definition. The support of a Cartier divisor HÎ\ denoted supp H, or khk is the unit of all subvarieties ^ \ such that if H œ Yαß0α then 0α is not a unit of b \ß^. Or 0α somehere on some ^ \ (that is, 0α has a zero or a pole on ^ \). Example. If \ is defined by D œ BC, then B œ D œ! is a Weil divisor, but not a Cartier divisor. This is because there is no ay to have local equations about the cycles define B œ D œ! exclusively. If D œ! Ö B œ D œ! or C œ D œ!. No matter hat local equation you choose, you ill alays get another line. $ # Line bundles as pseudo-divisors Definition. A pseudo-divisor is a triple Pß^ß= here P œ line bundle, ^ œ closed subset of \ (support), and s œ nohere vanishing section on \ ^. H 8
11 We say Pß^ß= œ P ß^ ß= if (i) ^ œ ^ ß (ii) b À P ĵ 5 P s.t. 5l \ ^ sends = È =. In other ords, they are equal if on the closed subsets e have isomorphic line bundles. (Recall isomorphism of line bundles!) Definition. For \ an algebraic scheme, E a Cartier divisor, a divisor H determines a line bundle b H by the sheaf of sections on the b\ -subsheaf generated by Î0 on Y (ith \ œ - Y ). Definition. A cartier divisor H is effective if the 0 œ = Hl Y for = H b\, here = H is the canonical section (i.e., if H has a canonical section that is regular, it is effective). Definition. A canonical divisor H determines a pseudo-divisor b H ßkHkß=. If Pß^ß= if khk œ ^ and b H z P. B H \ Lemma. If \ is a variety, any pseudo-divisor Pß^ß= is represented by a cartier divisor H such that (1) If ^ Á \, the operation is unique. (2) If ^ œ \, the operation is unique up to linear equivalence. Definition. If H is a pseudo-divisor on an 8-dimensional variety ith support khk, then the Weil divisor class is chd E khk. Definition. If E œ Pß^ß= and F œ P ß^ ß= are pseudo-divisors, then 8 E F œ PŒP ß^ ^ ß=Œ=, and, E œ P ß^ßÎ= here the tensor product is taken over the trivial bundle, PŒP ß^ß=Œ=. Definition. Let 0 À \ Ä \ ith H œ Pß^ß= Î\. Then 0 H œ 0 Pß0 D ß0 =. Notice 0 H H œ 0 PŒP ß^ ^ ß=Œ= œ 0 PŒP ß0 ^ ^ ß0 =Œ= œ 0 P Œ0 P ß0 ^ 0 ^ ß0 = Œ0 =. Intersecting ith divisors
12 Definition. If H is a pseudo-divisor on a scheme \ and Z is a 5- dimensional sub- variety of \, define HcZd or H Z in E5 khk Z to be 4 H, a pseudo-divisor on Z ith support khk Z. Then H Z is the Weil divisor class of 4 H œ c4 Hd. Note: If H is a Cartier divisor, and Z Î khk, then H retracts (pullback) to a Cartier divisor by 4 H. Definition. Let α œ 8ZcZd be a 5-cycle. Then the support of α, kαk is the union of subvarieties ith non-zero coefficients. Definition. Each H czd is a class in E5 khk kαk. We define the intersection class H α œ 8 H czd Z. Proposition. If H is a pseudo-divisor on \ and α is a 5-cycle, then (1) H α α œ H α H α, (2) H H α œ H α Hš () If 0 À \ Ä \ is a morphism, then there is 8 Z 1 À 0 khk kαk Ä khk 0 kαk ith 1 0 H α œ H 0 α. (4) Same as above but other direction. (5) If H is a pseudo-divisor ith b\ H is trivial, then H α œ! Lecture 4 (February 10, 2009) Theorem 2.4 Let HßH be Cartier divisors on an 8-dimensional variety \. Then 8 # H ch d œ H chd in E khk kh k, here ch d œ 8 cz d ^ \. codim Zœ 8 Proof. Assume H and are effective Cartier divisors that intersect properly (that is, there is no codimension subvariety of \ in their intersection, khk kh k). Recall the folloing fact: H
13 Let E be a local domain of dimension #. Take +ß+ E. Define / E +ßEÎ+ E as follos: +! Ä ker Ä EÎ+ E Ä EÎ+ E Ä coker Ä! Then let / E +ßEÎ+ E œ je coker je ker (length of cokernel minus length of kernel). Next, e ill need the lemmas: Lemma A.27. +ßEÎ+ E œ j E Î+ E j EÎ +E. e E E ht œ : SpecE Lemma A.28. e +ßEÎ+ E œ / + ßEÎ+E. E Note: For the above lemma, e ant H chd œ 7 ca d. EÎ H ch d œ 7 ca d to be Case 1 Assume H and are effective that intersect properly. Calculate the coefficient of [ in H ch d, ith dim E œ #. Then all primes ith ht correspond to a subvariety Z of codimension. Hence, H ch d œ ht œ : SpecE 8 cz d ÞÞÞ Here, 8 œ ord Z +. Since b Z ß\ œ E ß e further have 8 œ j E Î+ E. To continue, e first must compute E ith H ch d œ 8 H cz d, E H cz d œ 7 c[ d. Well, the coefficient of [ in H cz d is by the lemma. [ Z codim [ œ j EÎ+ E j EÎ + œ / +ßEÎ+ E EÎ EÎ Case 2 Assume H and are effective. We il reduce to the case of proper intersection. H E
14 Lemma. If H and H are Cartier divisors on \ and 1 À \ Ä \ is a proper birational morphism, ith 1 H œ F Gß 1 H œ F G ß kfk kg k 1 kf k kg k 1 kh k. khk ß We have four pairs on \, FßF ß FßG ß GßF ß and GßG. If the theorem holds true for each pair, then it is true in general. Definition. Let HßH be effective divisors on \. Define & HßH œ max ord ord e H H l codim Z œ f. Z Z \ Note that HßH intersect properly if and only if & HßH œ!. If & HßH!, then e blo up \ along khk khk. We get 1 À \ Ä \ ith exception divisor Iß so 1 H œ G I and 1 H œ G I. Then (a) G G œ g (b) if & HßH!, then & GßI & HßH and & G ßI & HßH. Case Assume H is effective. Let 1 be the denominator of the ideal sheaf of H. Then e can have a blo-up 1 À \ Ä Fl \ Ä \ ith 1 H œ G I 1 ith I an exceptional divisor. Then e can just consider the pair Gß H and Iß1 H and apply these to case 2. 1 Case 4 Let H and H be arbitrary divisors. Let 1 be the denominator of the ideal sheaf of H. We can have 1 À \ Ä Fl \ Ä \ ith 1 H œ G I. 1 Consider the pairs Gß1 H and Iß1 H. We can apply case to this and e're done! (of theorem) Corollary Let H be a pseudodivisor on \. Let α ^ 5\ and α µ!. Then H α œ! in E khk ßE khk kαk. 5 5 Corollary Let H and H be pseudo-divisors on \. Then for any α ^ 5 \. H H α œ H H α As cycles, H ch d Á H chd, but as classes, they are equal.
15 Example Consider #. Consider the situation. First, e have H œ 1 G œ G I (principal), and H œ 1 G œ G I (principal), # # here by principal e mean b\ z b\ H and b\ z b\ H respect- ively. We have H ch d œ H cg d cid œ ðñò H cg d H cid : # #, here : is just a point (: ^! khk kg# k ) and E! khk E :. Notice! H cg# d ^! khk kg# k œ ^! l:l. W ecan also think of H cg# d E! kg # k and in that case : œ!, because G# œ. Thus, H cg# d œ :. On the other hand, H cid œ!. Why? Because ki k khk in ^ I. Hence, ðñò H cg d H cid œ : ^ I : #!. Notice that since I œ, the other one turns out to be ;. Hence, they are non-equal as cycles, but are as classes. Definition. Let H ßÞÞÞßH 8 be pseudodivisors on \. For any α ^ 5\, define H ÞÞÞ H α œ H H ÞÞÞ H α E kh k ÞÞÞ kh k kαk. 8 # More generally, for any homogeneous polynomial of degree., ith integer coefficients. Then T X ßÞÞÞßX 8 T H ßÞÞÞßH α E kh k ÞÞÞ kh k kα k !
16 If 8 œ 5ß ] œ kh k ÞÞÞ kh8k kαk is complete, define the intersection # to be H ÞÞÞ H α œ ' T H ßÞÞÞßH α. 8 \ D 8 Note. The integral means if α œ 8 ct d ith \ over 5 then ' α œ 8 c5 : 5 d. \ If Z is a pure 5 -dimensional subscheme of \, then Chern classes of line bundles 8 8 T H ßÞÞÞßH Z œ T H ßÞÞÞßH czd. Let P be a line bundle on a scheme \. We can define a homomorphism G P _ À ^ \ Ä E \ ith α œ 8 cz d È G P α 5 5 as follos. For any 5-dimensional subvariety Zß PlZ œ bz G here G is a cartier divisor on V Þ Then G P czd œ cgd E \. 5 Note that if P œ b \ H for a pseudo-divisor on \, then G P α œ H α. Proposition 2.5 (a) If α µ! on \, then G P α œ!. So e have G P À E \ Ä E \. 5 5 (b) If PßP are line bundles on \, α ^ \, then G P G P α œ G P G P α. (c) If 0 À \ Ä \ is a proper morphism, P is a line bundle on \, α is a 5- cycle on \, then 0 G 0 P α œ G P 0 α. (d) If 0 À \ Ä \ is flat of relative dimension 8, and P is a line bundle on \, ith α a 5 -cycle on \, then G 0 P 0 α œ 0 G P α. (e) If PßP are line bundles ith α ^ \ß then 5 5 G PŒP œ Definition. If P ßÞÞÞßP 8 are line bundles on \ßα E 5 \, and e have a homogeneous polynomial T X ßÞÞÞßX of degree., then 8
17 In particular, T G P ßÞÞÞßG P α E \ G P E \. Definition. Let H be an effective divisor on \ and let À H Ä \ be the inclusion. Define the Gysin homomorphism À ^ 5\ Ä E5 H α È α œ H α. Proposition 2.6. (a) If α µ! on \, then α œ!. So e have À E 5\ Ä E5 H. (b) If α Z 5 \, then α œ G b H α. (c) If α ^5Hß, then here R œ b H. (d) If \ B α œ G R α, \ is purely 8-dimensional, then (e) If P is a line bundle on \, then for any α ^ \ÞJ?<>2/<ß 5 c\ d œ chd. G P α œ G P α C P G P α œ G P G P α. Lecture 5 (February 16, 2009) (1) T is projective if and only if T is proper. (2) b I ß proj EcB ßÞÞÞßB d.! / T T I Ä \, ith E \. α So = I α ³ T α (1) 0 À \ Ä \ß 0 = 0 I α œ = I 0 α. (a) (1) = 8 I œ! if!. (2) =! I α œ α.
18 \ H œ ˆ H ˆ b \ deg O. # \ \ \ \ \ \ g œ H œ b O œ b O œ... \ I œ ˆ # H H ˆ # deg O O G œ # # # degˆ # # HO H O G œ degˆ H H O # # # # # # # O G. # #
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 6
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 6 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Divisors 2 1.1. Crash course in Cartier divisors and invertible sheaves (aka line bundles) 3 1.2. Pseudo-divisors 3 2. Intersecting with divisors 4 2.1.
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 7
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 7 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Intersecting with a pseudodivisor 1 2. The first Chern class of a line bundle 3 3. Gysin pullback 4 4. Towards the proof of the big theorem 4 4.1. Crash
More informationAPPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS
APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS We review in this appendix some basic definitions and results that we need about Chow groups. For details and proofs we refer to [Ful98]. In particular, we discuss
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 12
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 12 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Rational equivalence on bundles 1 1.1. Intersecting with the zero-section of a vector bundle 2 2. Cones and Segre classes of subvarieties 3 2.1. Introduction
More informationChern classes à la Grothendieck
Chern classes à la Grothendieck Theo Raedschelders October 16, 2014 Abstract In this note we introduce Chern classes based on Grothendieck s 1958 paper [4]. His approach is completely formal and he deduces
More information12. Linear systems Theorem Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an A-morphism then L = φ O P n
12. Linear systems Theorem 12.1. Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an A-morphism then L = φ O P n A (1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections s 0, s
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 16
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 16 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Where we are 1 1.1. Deformation to the normal cone 1 1.2. Gysin pullback for local complete intersections 2 1.3. Intersection products on smooth varieties
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES HONGHAO GAO FEBRUARY 7, 2014 Quasi-coherent and coherent sheaves Let X Spec k be a scheme. A presheaf over X is a contravariant functor from the category of open
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 18
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 18 CONTENTS 1. Invertible sheaves and divisors 1 2. Morphisms of schemes 6 3. Ringed spaces and their morphisms 6 4. Definition of morphisms of schemes 7 Last day:
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More informationk k would be reducible. But the zero locus of f in A n+1
Math 145. Bezout s Theorem Let be an algebraically closed field. The purpose of this handout is to prove Bezout s Theorem and some related facts of general interest in projective geometry that arise along
More informationCHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998
CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley 18 February 1998 This chapter gives some preliminary material on number theory and algebraic geometry. Section 1 gives basic
More informationmult V f, where the sum ranges over prime divisor V X. We say that two divisors D 1 and D 2 are linearly equivalent, denoted by sending
2. The canonical divisor In this section we will introduce one of the most important invariants in the birational classification of varieties. Definition 2.1. Let X be a normal quasi-projective variety
More informationMATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE
MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE 1 2 STEFAN GILLE 1. Rings We recall first the definition of a group. 1.1. Definition. Let G be a non empty set. The set G is called a group if there is a map called
More informationthe complete linear series of D. Notice that D = PH 0 (X; O X (D)). Given any subvectorspace V H 0 (X; O X (D)) there is a rational map given by V : X
2. Preliminaries 2.1. Divisors and line bundles. Let X be an irreducible complex variety of dimension n. The group of k-cycles on X is Z k (X) = fz linear combinations of subvarieties of dimension kg:
More informationBEZOUT S THEOREM CHRISTIAN KLEVDAL
BEZOUT S THEOREM CHRISTIAN KLEVDAL A weaker version of Bézout s theorem states that if C, D are projective plane curves of degrees c and d that intersect transversally, then C D = cd. The goal of this
More informationLINE BUNDLES ON PROJECTIVE SPACE
LINE BUNDLES ON PROJECTIVE SPACE DANIEL LITT We wish to show that any line bundle over P n k is isomorphic to O(m) for some m; we give two proofs below, one following Hartshorne, and the other assuming
More informationR-Equivalence and Zero-Cycles on 3-Dimensional Tori
HU Yong R-Equivalence and Zero-Cycles on 3-Dimensional Tori Master thesis, defended on June 19, 2008 Thesis advisor: Dr. DORAY Franck Mathematisch Instituut, Universiteit Leiden Acknowledgements I would
More information(1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections
7. Linear systems First a word about the base scheme. We would lie to wor in enough generality to cover the general case. On the other hand, it taes some wor to state properly the general results if one
More information3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X).
3. Lecture 3 3.1. Freely generate qfh-sheaves. We recall that if F is a homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers in the sense of the last lecture, then we have a well defined pairing F(X) H 0 (X/S) F(S)
More informationINTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 23
INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 23 RAVI VAKIL Contents 1. More background on invertible sheaves 1 1.1. Operations on invertible sheaves 1 1.2. Maps to projective space correspond to a vector
More informationwhere Σ is a finite discrete Gal(K sep /K)-set unramified along U and F s is a finite Gal(k(s) sep /k(s))-subset
Classification of quasi-finite étale separated schemes As we saw in lecture, Zariski s Main Theorem provides a very visual picture of quasi-finite étale separated schemes X over a henselian local ring
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASSES 47 AND 48
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASSES 47 AND 48 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. The local criterion for flatness 1 2. Base-point-free, ample, very ample 2 3. Every ample on a proper has a tensor power that
More informationMath 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition
Math 249B. Geometric Bruhat decomposition 1. Introduction Let (G, T ) be a split connected reductive group over a field k, and Φ = Φ(G, T ). Fix a positive system of roots Φ Φ, and let B be the unique
More informationLECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL
LECTURE 7: STABLE RATIONALITY AND DECOMPOSITION OF THE DIAGONAL In this lecture we discuss a criterion for non-stable-rationality based on the decomposition of the diagonal in the Chow group. This criterion
More informationDIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES
DIVISORS ON NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN We now begin a closer study of the behavior of projective nonsingular curves, and morphisms between them, as well as to projective space. To this end, we introduce
More informationVector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo. 1. The notion of vector bundle
Vector bundles in Algebraic Geometry Enrique Arrondo Notes(* prepared for the First Summer School on Complex Geometry (Villarrica, Chile 7-9 December 2010 1 The notion of vector bundle In affine geometry,
More informationDiagonal Arithmetics. An introduction : Chow groups.
Diagonal Arithmetics. An introduction : Chow groups. May 25, 2015, IMPA, Rio de Janeiro Objects of interest k a field, X /k of finite type, equidimensional, d = dim(x ). Objects of interest k a field,
More informationMA 206 notes: introduction to resolution of singularities
MA 206 notes: introduction to resolution of singularities Dan Abramovich Brown University March 4, 2018 Abramovich Introduction to resolution of singularities 1 / 31 Resolution of singularities Let k be
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 43 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Facts we ll soon know about curves 1 1. FACTS WE LL SOON KNOW ABOUT CURVES We almost know enough to say a lot of interesting things about
More informationZero-cycles on surfaces
Erasmus Mundus ALGANT Master thesis Zero-cycles on surfaces Author: Maxim Mornev Advisor: Dr. François Charles Orsay, 2013 Contents 1 Notation and conventions 3 2 The conjecture of Bloch 4 3 Algebraic
More informationHolomorphic line bundles
Chapter 2 Holomorphic line bundles In the absence of non-constant holomorphic functions X! C on a compact complex manifold, we turn to the next best thing, holomorphic sections of line bundles (i.e., rank
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 2
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 2 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Last day 1 2. Zeros and poles 2 3. The Chow group 4 4. Proper pushforwards 4 The webpage http://math.stanford.edu/ vakil/245/ is up, and has last day
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES
AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES BROOKE ULLERY Abstract. This paper gives a basic introduction to modern algebraic geometry. The goal of this paper is to present the basic concepts of algebraic geometry,
More informationPreliminary Exam Topics Sarah Mayes
Preliminary Exam Topics Sarah Mayes 1. Sheaves Definition of a sheaf Definition of stalks of a sheaf Definition and universal property of sheaf associated to a presheaf [Hartshorne, II.1.2] Definition
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETR CLASS 24 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Normalization, continued 1 2. Sheaf Spec 3 3. Sheaf Proj 4 Last day: Fibers of morphisms. Properties preserved by base change: open immersions,
More informationINTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 14
INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY, CLASS 14 RAVI VAKIL Contents 1. Dimension 1 1.1. Last time 1 1.2. An algebraic definition of dimension. 3 1.3. Other facts that are not hard to prove 4 2. Non-singularity:
More information1 Existence of the Néron model
Néron models Setting: S a Dedekind domain, K its field of fractions, A/K an abelian variety. A model of A/S is a flat, separable S-scheme of finite type X with X K = A. The nicest possible model over S
More informationLEVINE S CHOW S MOVING LEMMA
LEVINE S CHOW S MOVING LEMMA DENIS NARDIN The main result of this note is proven in [4], using results from [2]. What is here is essentially a simplified version of the proof (at the expense of some generality).
More informationTopics in Algebraic Geometry
Topics in Algebraic Geometry Nikitas Nikandros, 3928675, Utrecht University n.nikandros@students.uu.nl March 2, 2016 1 Introduction and motivation In this talk i will give an incomplete and at sometimes
More informationn P say, then (X A Y ) P
COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 35 7.2. The Picard group of a ring. Definition. A line bundle over a ring A is a finitely generated projective A-module such that the rank function Spec A N is constant with value 1.
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY I, FALL 2016. DIVISORS. 1. Weil and Cartier divisors Let X be an algebraic variety. Define a Weil divisor on X as a formal (finite) linear combination of irreducible subvarieties of
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 19
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASS 19 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Recap of Last day 1 1.1. New facts 2 2. Statement of the theorem 3 2.1. GRR for a special case of closed immersions f : X Y = P(N 1) 4 2.2. GRR for closed
More informationClassification of Complex Algebraic Surfaces
ALGANT Master Thesis in Mathematics Classification of Complex Algebraic Surfaces Alberto Corato Advised by Prof. Dajano Tossici Università degli Studi di Padova Université de Bordeaux Academic year 2017/2018
More informationCurves on P 1 P 1. Peter Bruin 16 November 2005
Curves on P 1 P 1 Peter Bruin 16 November 2005 1. Introduction One of the exercises in last semester s Algebraic Geometry course went as follows: Exercise. Let be a field and Z = P 1 P 1. Show that the
More informationOn Mordell-Lang in Algebraic Groups of Unipotent Rank 1
On Mordell-Lang in Algebraic Groups of Unipotent Rank 1 Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley and ICERM (work in progress) Abstract. In the previous ICERM workshop, Tom Scanlon raised the question
More informationSegre classes of tautological bundles on Hilbert schemes of surfaces
Segre classes of tautological bundles on Hilbert schemes of surfaces Claire Voisin Abstract We first give an alternative proof, based on a simple geometric argument, of a result of Marian, Oprea and Pandharipande
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ANDREW SALCH 1. Affine schemes. About notation: I am in the habit of writing f (U) instead of f 1 (U) for the preimage of a subset
More informationABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES
ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES Affine Varieties Notation. Let k be a field, such as the rational numbers Q or the complex numbers C. We call affine n-space the collection A n k of points P = a 1, a,..., a
More informationNOTES ON DIVISORS AND RIEMANN-ROCH
NOTES ON DIVISORS AND RIEMANN-ROCH NILAY KUMAR Recall that due to the maximum principle, there are no nonconstant holomorphic functions on a compact complex manifold. The next best objects to study, as
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Proper morphisms 1 2. Scheme-theoretic closure, and scheme-theoretic image 2 3. Rational maps 3 4. Examples of rational maps 5 Last day:
More informationPorteous s Formula for Maps between Coherent Sheaves
Michigan Math. J. 52 (2004) Porteous s Formula for Maps between Coherent Sheaves Steven P. Diaz 1. Introduction Recall what the Thom Porteous formula for vector bundles tells us (see [2, Sec. 14.4] for
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 41
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 41 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Normalization 1 2. Extending maps to projective schemes over smooth codimension one points: the clear denominators theorem 5 Welcome back!
More informationMath 797W Homework 4
Math 797W Homework 4 Paul Hacking December 5, 2016 We work over an algebraically closed field k. (1) Let F be a sheaf of abelian groups on a topological space X, and p X a point. Recall the definition
More informationBASE POINT FREE THEOREMS SATURATION, B-DIVISORS, AND CANONICAL BUNDLE FORMULA
BASE POINT FREE THEOREMS SATURATION, B-DIVISORS, AND CANONICAL BUNDLE FORMULA OSAMU FUJINO Abstract. We reformulate base point free theorems. Our formulation is flexible and has some important applications.
More informationSTEENROD OPERATIONS IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY
STEENROD OPERATIONS IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY ALEXANDER MERKURJEV 1. Introduction Let p be a prime integer. For a pair of topological spaces A X we write H i (X, A; Z/pZ) for the i-th singular cohomology group
More informationON A THEOREM OF CAMPANA AND PĂUN
ON A THEOREM OF CAMPANA AND PĂUN CHRISTIAN SCHNELL Abstract. Let X be a smooth projective variety over the complex numbers, and X a reduced divisor with normal crossings. We present a slightly simplified
More informationTHE STRUCTURE OF THE MODULI STACK OF ELLIPTIC CURVES
THE STRUCTURE OF THE MODULI STACK OF ELLIPTIC CURVES CHARMAINE SIA ABSTRACT. We study the multiplication-by-p map on an elliptic curve, which gives a stratification of the moduli stack of elliptic curves
More informationK-theory, Chow groups and Riemann-Roch
K-theory, Chow groups and Riemann-Roch N. Mohan Kumar October 26, 2004 We will work over a quasi-projective variety over a field, though many statements will work for arbitrary Noetherian schemes. The
More informationMODULI SPACES OF CURVES
MODULI SPACES OF CURVES SCOTT NOLLET Abstract. My goal is to introduce vocabulary and present examples that will help graduate students to better follow lectures at TAGS 2018. Assuming some background
More informationNONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN
NONSINGULAR CURVES BRIAN OSSERMAN The primary goal of this note is to prove that every abstract nonsingular curve can be realized as an open subset of a (unique) nonsingular projective curve. Note that
More informationOn a theorem of Ziv Ran
INSTITUTUL DE MATEMATICA SIMION STOILOW AL ACADEMIEI ROMANE PREPRINT SERIES OF THE INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS OF THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY ISSN 0250 3638 On a theorem of Ziv Ran by Cristian Anghel and Nicolae
More informationNéron Models of Elliptic Curves.
Néron Models of Elliptic Curves. Marco Streng 5th April 2007 These notes are meant as an introduction and a collection of references to Néron models of elliptic curves. We use Liu [Liu02] and Silverman
More informationMATH 8254 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY HOMEWORK 1
MATH 8254 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY HOMEWORK 1 CİHAN BAHRAN I discussed several of the problems here with Cheuk Yu Mak and Chen Wan. 4.1.12. Let X be a normal and proper algebraic variety over a field k. Show
More informationFormal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings
Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely
More informationCHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES
CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES BRIAN OSSERMAN In this note, we introduce the concept which plays the role of compactness for varieties completeness. We prove that completeness can be characterized
More informationTROPICAL SCHEME THEORY
TROPICAL SCHEME THEORY 5. Commutative algebra over idempotent semirings II Quotients of semirings When we work with rings, a quotient object is specified by an ideal. When dealing with semirings (and lattices),
More informationdiv(f ) = D and deg(d) = deg(f ) = d i deg(f i ) (compare this with the definitions for smooth curves). Let:
Algebraic Curves/Fall 015 Aaron Bertram 4. Projective Plane Curves are hypersurfaces in the plane CP. When nonsingular, they are Riemann surfaces, but we will also consider plane curves with singularities.
More information1.5.4 Every abelian variety is a quotient of a Jacobian
16 1. Abelian Varieties: 10/10/03 notes by W. Stein 1.5.4 Every abelian variety is a quotient of a Jacobian Over an infinite field, every abelin variety can be obtained as a quotient of a Jacobian variety.
More informationGeometric motivic integration
Université Lille 1 Modnet Workshop 2008 Introduction Motivation: p-adic integration Kontsevich invented motivic integration to strengthen the following result by Batyrev. Theorem (Batyrev) If two complex
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Problem Set #10 Due: 12/3/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Problem Set #10 Due: 12/3/2013 These problems are related to the material covered in Lectures 21-22. I have made every effort to proof-read them, but
More informationThe Segre Embedding. Daniel Murfet May 16, 2006
The Segre Embedding Daniel Murfet May 16, 2006 Throughout this note all rings are commutative, and A is a fixed ring. If S, T are graded A-algebras then the tensor product S A T becomes a graded A-algebra
More informationChow Groups. Murre. June 28, 2010
Chow Groups Murre June 28, 2010 1 Murre 1 - Chow Groups Conventions: k is an algebraically closed field, X, Y,... are varieties over k, which are projetive (at worst, quasi-projective), irreducible and
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 37
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 37 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Application of cohomology: Hilbert polynomials and functions, Riemann- Roch, degrees, and arithmetic genus 1 1. APPLICATION OF COHOMOLOGY:
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASSES 43 AND 44
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASSES 43 AND 44 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Flat implies constant Euler characteristic 1 2. Proof of Important Theorem on constancy of Euler characteristic in flat families
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 48
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 48 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. A little more about cubic plane curves 1 2. Line bundles of degree 4, and Poncelet s Porism 1 3. Fun counterexamples using elliptic curves
More informationArithmetic Algebraic Geometry
Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry 2 Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry Travis Dirle December 4, 2016 2 Contents 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 Affine Varieties.......................... 1 1.2 Projective Varieties........................
More informationAlgebraic Geometry Spring 2009
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 27 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Quasicoherent sheaves of ideals, and closed subschemes 1 2. Invertible sheaves (line bundles) and divisors 2 3. Some line bundles on projective
More information0.1 Spec of a monoid
These notes were prepared to accompany the first lecture in a seminar on logarithmic geometry. As we shall see in later lectures, logarithmic geometry offers a natural approach to study semistable schemes.
More informationCharacteristic classes in the Chow ring
arxiv:alg-geom/9412008v1 10 Dec 1994 Characteristic classes in the Chow ring Dan Edidin and William Graham Department of Mathematics University of Chicago Chicago IL 60637 Let G be a reductive algebraic
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 26
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 26 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Proper morphisms 1 Last day: separatedness, definition of variety. Today: proper morphisms. I said a little more about separatedness of
More information3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions
24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice
More informationLecture 3: Flat Morphisms
Lecture 3: Flat Morphisms September 29, 2014 1 A crash course on Properties of Schemes For more details on these properties, see [Hartshorne, II, 1-5]. 1.1 Open and Closed Subschemes If (X, O X ) is a
More information1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties
0. Brief overview Cycles and bundles are intrinsic invariants of algebraic varieties Close connections going back to Grothendieck Work with quasi-projective varieties over a field k Affine Varieties 1.
More informationAlgebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism
Algebraic Cobordism Lecture 1: Complex cobordism and algebraic cobordism UWO January 25, 2005 Marc Levine Prelude: From homotopy theory to A 1 -homotopy theory A basic object in homotopy theory is a generalized
More informationLine Bundles on Plane Curves
Stanford University Outline 1 2 3 The general question: Let X be a variety and L an effective line bundle. Inside of X PΓ(X, L), V L is the closed subscheme whose fiber over a line [s] PΓ(X, L) is the
More informationwhere m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism
8. Smoothness and the Zariski tangent space We want to give an algebraic notion of the tangent space. In differential geometry, tangent vectors are equivalence classes of maps of intervals in R into the
More informationINTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY
INTERSECTION THEORY CLASSES 20 AND 21: BIVARIANT INTERSECTION THEORY RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. What we re doin this week 1 2. Precise statements 2 2.1. Basic operations and properties 4 3. Provin thins 6
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24
FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Vector bundles and locally free sheaves 1 2. Toward quasicoherent sheaves: the distinguished affine base 5 Quasicoherent and coherent sheaves
More informationSmooth morphisms. Peter Bruin 21 February 2007
Smooth morphisms Peter Bruin 21 February 2007 Introduction The goal of this talk is to define smooth morphisms of schemes, which are one of the main ingredients in Néron s fundamental theorem [BLR, 1.3,
More informationPARABOLIC SHEAVES ON LOGARITHMIC SCHEMES
PARABOLIC SHEAVES ON LOGARITHMIC SCHEMES Angelo Vistoli Scuola Normale Superiore Bordeaux, June 23, 2010 Joint work with Niels Borne Université de Lille 1 Let X be an algebraic variety over C, x 0 X. What
More informationSCHEMES. David Harari. Tsinghua, February-March 2005
SCHEMES David Harari Tsinghua, February-March 2005 Contents 1. Basic notions on schemes 2 1.1. First definitions and examples.................. 2 1.2. Morphisms of schemes : first properties.............
More informationDIVISOR THEORY ON TROPICAL AND LOG SMOOTH CURVES
DIVISOR THEORY ON TROPICAL AND LOG SMOOTH CURVES MATTIA TALPO Abstract. Tropical geometry is a relatively new branch of algebraic geometry, that aims to prove facts about algebraic varieties by studying
More informationarxiv:alg-geom/ v1 21 Mar 1996
AN INTERSECTION NUMBER FOR THE PUNCTUAL HILBERT SCHEME OF A SURFACE arxiv:alg-geom/960305v 2 Mar 996 GEIR ELLINGSRUD AND STEIN ARILD STRØMME. Introduction Let S be a smooth projective surface over an algebraically
More informationUnder these assumptions show that if D X is a proper irreducible reduced curve with C K X = 0 then C is a smooth rational curve.
Example sheet 3. Positivity in Algebraic Geometry, L18 Instructions: This is the third and last example sheet. More exercises may be added during this week. The final example class will be held on Thursday
More informationSynopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4. Proposition (4.1.6). The canonical homomorphism ( ) is surjective [(3.2.4)].
Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4 4.1. Definition of projective bundles. 4. Projective bundles. Ample sheaves Definition (4.1.1). Let S(E) be the symmetric algebra of a quasi-coherent O Y -module.
More information9. Integral Ring Extensions
80 Andreas Gathmann 9. Integral ing Extensions In this chapter we want to discuss a concept in commutative algebra that has its original motivation in algebra, but turns out to have surprisingly many applications
More informationHYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA
HYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA OFER GABBER, QING LIU, AND DINO LORENZINI Abstract. Let X/S be a quasi-projective morphism over an affine base. We develop in this article a technique
More information