Pinning consensus in networks of multiagents via a single impulsive controller
|
|
- Beatrix Hutchinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Pinning consensus in networks of multiagents via a single impulsive controller Bo Liu, Wenlian Lu and Tianping Chen, Senior Member, IEEE arxiv:36.474v [math.oc] Jun 3 Abstract In this paper, we discuss pinning consensus in networks of multiagents via impulsive controllers. In particular, we consider the case of using only one impulsive controller. We provide a sufficient condition to pin the network to a prescribed value. It is rigorously proven that in case the underlying graph of the network has spanning trees, the network can reach consensus on the prescribed value when the impulsive controller is imposed on the root with appropriate impulsive strength and impulse intervals. Interestingly, we find that the permissible range of the impulsive strength completely depends on the left eigenvector of the graph Laplacian corresponding to the zero eigenvalue and the pinning node we choose. The impulses can be very sparse, with the impulsive intervals being lower bounded. Examples with numerical simulations are also provided to illustrate the theoretical results. Index Terms consensus, synchronization, multiagent systems, impulsive pinning control. I. INTRODUCTION Coordinated and cooperative control of teams of autonomous systems has received much attention in recent years. Significant research activity has been devoted to this area. In the cooperation, group of agents seek to reach agreement on a certain quantity of interest. This is the so-called consensus problem, which has a long history in computer science. Recently, consensus problem reappeared in the cooperative control of multi-agent systems and has gained renewed interests due to the broad applications of multi-agent systems. A great deal of papers have addressed this problem. For a review of this area, see the surveys [], [] and references therein. The basic idea of consensus is that each agent updates its state based on the states of its neighbors and its own such that the states of all agents will converge to a common value. The interaction rule that specifies the information exchange This work is jointly supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 673, 69745, and 67339, the Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of P.R. China No. 9, the Shanghai Rising-Star Program (No. QA44), the Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship from the European Commission (FP7-PEOPLE--IIF-34), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation No. M565. Bo Liu is with School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People s Republic of China, and Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6- Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo , Japan (liu7bo9@gmail.com). Wenlian Lu is with Centre for Computational Systems Biology, and Laboratory of Mathematics for Nonlinear Science, School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, People s Republic of China (wenlian@fudan.edu.cn). Tianping Chen is with the School of Mathematical Sciences, Fudan University, 433, Shanghai, China. (Corresponding author, tchen@fuan.edu.cn). between an agent and its neighbors is called the consensus algorithm. The following is an example of continuous-time consensus algorithm: ẋ i (t) = a ij [x j (t) x i (t)],i =,,n (),j i where x i (t) R is the state of agent i at time t, a ij for i j is the coupling strength from agent j to agent i. Let a ii = n,j i a ij for i =,,,n, we can have ẋ i (t) = a ij x j (t), i =,,n. () A topic closely related to consensus is synchronization, which can be written as the following Linearly Coupled Ordinary Differential Equations (LCODEs): dx i (t) dt = f(x i (t),t)c a ij x j (t), i =,,n (3) where x i (t) R m is the state variable of the ith node at time t, f: R m [, ) R m is a continuous map, A = [a ij ] R n n is the coupling matrix with zero-sum rows and a ij, for i j, which is determined by the topological structure of the LCODEs. There are lots of papers discussing synchronization in various circumstances. It is clear that the consensus is a special case of synchronization (f =, m = ). Therefore, all the results concerning synchronization can apply to consensus. It was shown in [3], [4] that under some assumptions, we have lim xi (t) ξ j x j (t) =, i =,,n, (4) where [ξ,,ξ n ] is the left eigenvector of A corresponding to the eigenvalue satisfying n ξ j =. Since in the consensus model, ξ j x j (t) = ξ j x j () (5) for all t >, we have lim i(t) ξ j x j () =, i =,,n. (6) It can be seen that the agreement value n ξ jx j () strongly depends on the initial value, which means that the
2 agreement value of the consensus algorithm is neutral stable (or semi-stable used in some papers). The concept of neutral stability is used in physics and other research fields. For example, the principal subspace extraction algorithms and principal component extraction algorithms discussed in [5], [6]. A set of equilibrium points is called neutral stable for a system, if each equilibrium is Lyapunov stable, and every trajectory that starts in a neighborhood of an equilibrium converges to a possibly different equilibrium. Similarly, a set of manifolds is called neutral stable for a system, if every manifold is invariant, and when there is a small perturbation, the state will stay in another manifold and never return. In [5], the manifold discussed is neutral stable, and if the algorithm is restricted to the manifold, the equilibrium is stable. Instead, in [6], the equilibrium is neutral stable and the Stiefel manifold is stable. In consensus algorithm, the consensus manifold S = {x R n : x = x = = x n } is the set of equilibrium points, which is stable. Instead, every point x S is neutral stable. However, in some cases, it is desired that all states converge to a prescribed value, say, some s R. For example, in a military system, if one wants to use a missile network to attack some object of the enemy, then it is required that all the missiles from different military bases should finally hit the same point (see [9]). Generally, for this purpose, one can make every state x i (t) converge to s by imposing a negative feedback term [x i (t) s] to agent i. However, due to the interaction of the network, it is not necessary to impose controllers on all the nodes. This is the basic idea of the pining control technique, which is an effective class of control schemes. Generally, in a pinning control scheme, we only need to impose controllers on a small fraction of the nodes. This is a big advantage because in large complex networks, it is usually difficult if not impossible to add controllers to all the nodes. Recently, pinning strategies have been used in the control of dynamical networks. For example, decentralized adaptive pinning strategies have been proposed in [6], [7] for controlled synchronization of complex networks. And pinning consensus algorithms have been proposed in [], []. Most works on pinning control consider pining a fraction of the nodes. However, there are a few works that consider pinning only one node. In [7], it was proved that if ε >, the following coupled network with a single controller dx (t) = f(x (t),t)c n a j x j (t) dt dx i (t) dt cε[x (t) s(t)], = f(x i (t),t)c n a ij x j (t), i =,,n can pin the complex dynamical network (3) to s(t), if c is chosen suitably. Therefore, the following coupled network with a single controller { ẋ (t) = n a ijx j (t) [x (t) s], ẋ i (t) = n a (8) ijx j (t), i =,,n can make every state x i (t) converge to s. (7) It is worth noticing that the above mentioned works all consider continuous time feedback controllers and the disadvantage of such controllers lies in that the controller must be imposed at every time t. So it is not applicable to systems which can not endure continuous disturbances. One can ask if we can pin the network only at a very sparse time sequence to make every state x i (t) converge to s for the consensus algorithm (). Actually, to avoid such disadvantages, some discontinuous control schemes, such as act-and-wait concept control [], [], intermittent control [3], [4] and impulsive technique [9], [5] [8] have already been developed and used in the control of dynamical systems. Particularly, in recent years, impulsive technique has been successfully used in many areas such as neural networks [9], control of spacecraft [6], secure communications [7] and so on. Compared to continuous-time controllers, impulsive controllers have some obvious advantages. First, we only need to impose controllers at a very sparse sequence of time points. Besides, it is typically simpler and easier to implement. Recently, impulsive control techniques have been used in the controlled synchronization and consensus of complex networks. For example, in [4], an impulsive distributed control scheme was proposed to synchronize dynamical complex networks with both system delay and multiple coupling delays. In [3], impulsive control technique has been used in projective synchronization of drive-response networks of coupled chaotic systems. In [5], the authors used impulsive control technique to synchronize stochastic discrete-time networks. In [9], the authors proposed an impulsive hybrid control scheme for the consensus of a network with nonidentical nodes. Yet in these works, the controllers are imposed on all the nodes of the networks. To take advantage of both the impulsive and pinning control techniques, impulsive pinning technique has been proposed which combines these two control techniques as a whole. That is, the impulsive controllers are imposed only on a small fraction of the nodes. For example, in [], [], impulsive pinning control technique is used to stabilize and synchronize complex networks of dynamical systems. In this paper, we will introduce this technique into the pinning consensus algorithm. We show if the underlying graph has spanning trees, then a single impulsive controller imposed on one root is able to drive the network to reach consensus on a given value when the impulsive strength is in a permissible range and the impulse is sparse enough. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section II, some mathematical preliminaries are presented; In Section III, the sufficient conditions for pinning consensus via one impulsive controller on strongly connected graphs are proposed and proved; The results are extended to graphs with spanning trees in Section IV; Examples with numerical simulations are provided in Section V to illustrate the theoretical results; And the paper is concluded in Section VI. II. MATHEMATICAL PRELIMINARIES In this section, we present some notations, definitions and lemmas concerning matrix and graph theory that will be used later.
3 First, we introduce following definitions and notations from [4]. Definition : Suppose A = [a ij ] n i, Rn n. If ) a ij, i j, a ii = n a ij, i =,j i,,n; ) real parts of eigenvalues of A are all negative except an eigenvalue with multiplicity, then we say A A. Definition : Suppose A = [a ij ] n i, Rn n. If ) a ij, i j, a ii = n a ij, i =,j i,,n; ) A is irreducible. Then we say A A. It is clear that A A. By Gersgorin theorem and Perron Frobenius theorem, we have the following result. Lemma : [4]. If A A, then the following items are valid: ) If λ is an eigenvalue of A and λ, then Re(λ) < ; ) A has an eigenvalue with multiplicity and the right eigenvector [,,...,] ; 3) Suppose ξ = [ξ,ξ,,ξ n ] R n (without loss of generality, assume n ξ i = ) is the left eigenvector of i= A corresponding to eigenvalue. Then, ξ i holds for all i =,,n; more precisely, 4) A A if and only if ξ i > holds for all i =,,n; 5) A is reducible if and only if for some i, ξ i =. In such case, by suitable rearrangement, assume that ξ = [ξ,ξ ], where ξ = [ξ,ξ,,ξ p ] R p, with all ξ i >, i =,,p, and ξ = [ξ p,ξ p,,ξ n ] R n p with all ξ[ j =, p ] j n. Then, A can A A be rewritten as where A A A R p p is irreducible and A =. Remark : By Lemma, for A A, let Ξ = diag[ξ,,ξ n ] be the diagonal matrix generated by the left eigenvector of A corresponding to the eigenvalue. Then ΞA A Ξ A is symmetric. Therefore, its eigenvalues are real and satisfy = λ > λ λ 3 λ n. A weighted directed graph of order n is denoted by a triple {V,E,A}, where V = {v,,v n } is the vertex set, E V V is the edge set, i.e.,e ij = (v i,v j ) E if and only if there is an edge from v i to v j, and A = [a ij ], i,j =,,n, is the weight matrix which is a nonnegative matrix such that for i,j {,,n},a ij > if and only ifi j ande ji E. For a weighted directed graph G of order n, the graph Laplacian L(G) = [l ij ] n i, can be defined from the weight matrix A in the following way: a ij i j l ij = a ik j = i. k=,k i A (directed) path of length l from vertexv i to v j is a sequence of l distinct vertices v r,,v rl with v r = v i and v rl = v j such that (v rk,v rk ) E(G) for k =,,l. A graph G is strongly connected if for any two vertices v and w of G, there is a directed path from v to w. A graph G contains a spanning (directed) tree if there exists a vertex v i such that for all other vertices v j there s a directed path from v i to v j, and v i is called the root. Remark : From graph theory, a graph is strongly connected if and only if its graph Laplacian L satisfies L A. III. PINNING CONSENSUS ON STRONGLY CONNECTED GRAPHS Consider the following consensus algorithm with a single impulsive controller: ẋ(t) = Lx(t), t t k, x r (t k ) = b k [s x r (t k )], x i (t k ) =, i r. k =,,, (9) wherel = [l ij ] is the graph Laplacian of the underlying graph, b k is the strength of the impulse at time t k, and = t < t < t <. Without loss of generality, in the following, we always assume s = (by letting y i (t) = x i (t) s and consider the new system of y) and r = (by suitable rearrangement when necessary). In this case, what we need to do is to prove lim x i(t) =, i =,,n () for the following system ẋ i (t) = n l ijx j (t),i =,,n, t t k, x (t k ) = ( b k)x (t k ), x i (t k ) = x i(t k ),i =,3,,n. () Given x(t) = [x (t),,x n (t)], denote x(t) = ξ i x i (t), () i= where [ξ,,ξ n ] is the left eigenvector of L corresponding to the eigenvalue satisfying n i= ξ i =, and t k = t k t k, k =,,,3,. We also define the following Lyapunov function V(x(t)) = ξ i [x i (t) x(t)]. (3) i= Remark 3: Quantity x(t) and function V(x(t)) were introduced in [4] to discuss synchronization. X(t) = [ x (t),, x (t)] is the non-orthogonal projection of [x (t),,x n (t)] on the synchronization manifold S = {[x,,x n] R nm : x i = x j, i,j =,,n}, where x i = [x i,,xm i ] R m, i =,,n, and x i represents the transpose of x i. V(t) is some distance from [x (t),,x n (t)] to the synchronization manifold S. And synchronization is equivalent to the distance goes to zero when time t goes to infinity, i.e., lim V(t) =. (4) With the two functions x(t)and V(t), we will prove the system with one impulsive controller () can reach consensus on by proving lim V(t) = (5)
4 and lim = (6) x(t) simultaneously. The following theorem is the main result of this paper. Theorem : Suppose L A, or equivalently, the underlying graph is strongly connected, and there exist < η η < /ξ such that b k [η,η ] for each k. If x(), then there is a constant T > such that () will reach consensus on s, when t k T for each k. Remark 4: It is interesting to note that the permissible range of the impulsive strength is dependent on ξ and decreasing with ξ. Since in a strongly connected graph, ξ <, we can always choose η >. Actually, in a network of n nodes, min i ξ i /n. So, by properly choosing the pinning node, we can always let η > n except for the case ξ i = /n for each i, in which η < n but can be arbitrarily close to n. The proof of Theorem is divided into several steps. First, we prove Lemma : If L A, then V(t k ) V(t k )e λ max i {ξ i } t k, (7) where λ > is the smallest positive eigenvalue of the symmetric matrix ΞLL Ξ. Proof: Denote δx(t) = [x (t) x(t),,x n (t) x(t)]. Then V(t) = ξ i [x i (t) x(t)] [ n l ij x j (t) ] = i= i= ξ i l ij [x i (t) x(t)][x j (t) x(t)] = δx(t) [ΞLL Ξ]δx(t) λ δx(t) λ max i {ξ i } V(t). This implies (7). Remark 5: By routine approach, it is desired to prove V(t k ) CV(t k ) for some constant C. Unfortunately, it is difficult to prove it directly. Instead, we prove following Lemma. Lemma 3: Let, η, η be constants satisfying < η η < /ξ, < < min{ξ,/η ξ }, the impulsive strength b k [η,η ] for each k, x(t) is a solution of the system (). If t k max ( i{ξ i } ξ V(t k ln ) ) λ x (t k ), k =,,,, (8) then, we have and x(t k ) [ η (ξ )] x(t k ) (9) V(t k ) x (t k ) [4η ( ξ )] /ξ 4η ξ ( ξ ) [ η (ξ )] () for k =,,,. Proof: First, by (7), we have which implies V(t k ) V(t k )e λ max i {ξ i } t k, () x (t k ) x(t k ) V(t k )/ξ x(t k ). () ξ By (), we have x(t k ) = x(t k ) b kξ x (t k ) Thus, for k =,,,, = ( b k ξ ) x(t k ) b k ξ [ x(t k ) x (t k )]. (3) { x(t k ) [ b k(ξ )] x(t k ) x(t k ) [ b k(ξ )] x(t k ), (4) which implies { x(t k ) [ η (ξ )] x(t k ) x(t k ) [ η (ξ )] x(t k ). (5) Noting x(t k ) = x(t k ), we have x(t k ) [ η (ξ )] x(t k ), (6) which is just the inequality (9). On the other hand, noting the fact that x (t k ) = x (t k ) and (8), we have λ max i {ξ i } t k V(t k ) x (t k ) V(t k )e x (t k ) = ξ (7) Furthermore, by the assumption n ξ j = and inequality (ab) (a b ), we have V(t k ) = ξ [x (t k ) x(t k )] ξ i [x i (t k ) x(t k )] i= = ξ [x (t k ) x(t k ) b k( ξ )x (t k )] ξ i [x i (t k ) x(t k )b kξ x (t k )] i= { n ξ i [x i (t k ) x(t k )] i= b kξ ( ξ ) x (t k )b kξ ξ i x (t k )} i= = V(t k )b kξ ( ξ )x (t k ) V(t k )η ξ ( ξ )x (t k ). (8)
5 By (5) and (8), we have V(t k ) x (t k ) V(t k )η ξ ( ξ )x (t k ) [ η (ξ )] x (t k ) V(t k ) [ η (ξ )] x (t k ) 4η ξ ( ξ ){[x (t k ) x(t k )] x (t k )} [ η (ξ )] x (t k ) [4η ( ξ )]V(t k )4η ξ ( ξ ) x (t k ) [ η (ξ )] x (t k ) [4η ( ξ )] /ξ 4η ξ ( ξ ) [ η (ξ )]. (9) This proves (). From Lemma 3, we can directly have the following corollary. Corollary : Let, η, η be constants satisfying < η η < /ξ, < < min{ξ,/η ξ }, C = [4η ( ξ )] /ξ 4η ξ ( ξ ) [ η (ξ )], (3) For any given initial value x(), let T = max i{ξ i } λ and t k T for each k, then [ max{lnc,ln[v()/ x ()]}ln ξ x(t k ) [ η (ξ )] x(t k ), k =,,3,. Now we can give the proof of Theorem. Proof: First, since η < /ξ, we can choose < < min{ξ,/η ξ }. From (6), we have which implies x(t k ) [ η (ξ )] k x() (3) k x(t lim k ) = since η (ξ ) <. Combining the fact that x(t) is constant on each (t k,t k ), we have lim =. x(t) On the other hand, from Corollary, let t k T, we have which leads to Since on each (t k,t k ), this also implies and V(t k ) C x (t k ), lim k V(t k ) =. V(t) V(t k )e λ max i {ξ i } (t t k), lim V(t) = lim [x i(t) x(t)] =. ], Thus, lim x i(t) = lim [x i (t) x(t)] lim =. x(t) The proof is completed. Remark 6: In [], Zhou et.al discussed pinning complex delayed dynamical networks by a single impulsive controller. In that paper, the authors proposed a novel model. However, the coupling matrix A is assumed to be a symmetric irreducible matrix and orthogonal eigen-decomposition is used and plays a key role. Therefore, the approach can not apply to our case. Remark 7: In [], Lu et.al, discussed synchronization control for nonlinear stochastic dynamical networks by impulsive pinning strategy. In that strategy, at each impulse time pointt k, the authors select several nodes with largest errors, and adding controllers to those nodes. Therefore, one needs to observe all states x i (t k ) at each t k. In our strategy, we only need to know the state x (t k ) and one controller is enough. From Theorem, we can have the following corollary in the case that the impulsive strength is a constant. Corollary : Suppose L A, or equivalently, the underlying graph is strongly connected, and b k = b (,/ξ ) for each k. If x(), then there exists a constant T > such that (9) will reach consensus on s when t k T for each k. IV. PINNING CONSENSUS ON GRAPHS WITH SPANNING TREES In this section, we will generalize the results obtained in previous section to graphs with spanning trees. In such case, by suitable arrangement, we can assume that L has the following m m block form: L L L L =.... (3) L m L mm where L ii R pi pi is irreducible, and [L i,,l i(i ) ] for i =,,m. Let [ξ,,ξ n ] be the normalized left eigenvector of L corresponding to the eigenvalue. From Lemma, ξ i > for i =,,p, and ξ i = for i = p,,n. Thus x(t) = p i= ξ ix i (t). We will prove Theorem : Suppose the underlying graph is of the form (3), and there exist < η η < /ξ such that η b k η for each k. If x(), then the consensus algorithm () can reach consensus on a given value s when t k T for a large enough T. Proof: Let x(t) = [X (t),,x m(t)] with X i (t) = [x mi(t),,x mi (t)], where m = and m i = m i p i. Since x() = p i= ξ ix i, by applying Theorem to the subsystem of X (t), we can find T > such that if t k T for each k, then lim x i(t) =, i =,,p. Consider the subsystem of X (t), we have: Ẋ (t) = L X (t) L X (t). (33)
6 Denote Y (t) = L X (t). Then (33) can be rewritten as: Thus, Ẋ (t) = L X (t)y (t) (34) X (t) = e Lt X () e L(t s) Y (s)ds. (35) Since the L, at least one row sum of L is negative, which implies that L is a non-singular M-matrix and its eigenvalues µ,, µ p can be arranged as < Re(µ ) Re(µ p ). Then, e Lt Ke Re(µ)t for some constant K >. And X (t) K X () e Re(µ)t It is obvious that To show K e Re(µ)(t s) Y (s) ds lim K X () e Re(µ)t = lim X (t) =, we only need to estimate the second term on the righthand side of (35). Since lim Y (t) =, for any >, there exists t > such that Y (t) for each t t. Furthermore, Y (t) is uniformly bounded. Let Y > be an upper bound of Y (t). Then for t > t Re(µ ) ln Y, e Re(µ)(t s) Y (s) ds = t e Re(µ)(t s) Y (s) ds Y e Re(µ)(t s) ds = Y Re(µ ) e Re(µ)t [e Re(µ)t ] Re(µ ) [ e Re(µ)(t t) ] e Re(µ)(t s) Y (s) ds t e Re(µ)(t s) ds = Y Re(µ ) e Re(µ)(t t) [ e Re(µ)t ] Re(µ ) [ e Re(µ)(t t) ] ] Re(µ ) [ e Re(µ)t Re(µ ) Re(µ ) Because is arbitrary, we have Thus, lim e Re(µ)(t s) Y (s) ds = lim X (t) =. For i = 3,,n, we have Ẋ i (t) = L ii X i (t) Y i (t), where Y i (t) = i L ijx j (t). By induction, if we already have lim X j(t) = for j =,,i, then we have lim Y i(t) =. (36) By a similar analysis as above, we can show that lim X i(t) =. Similarly, we can have a corollary from Theorem when the impulsive strength is constant. Corollary 3: Suppose the underlying graph is of the form (3), and b k = b (,/ξ ) for each k. If x(), then the consensus algorithm () can reach consensus on a given value s when t k T for a large enough T. V. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS In this section we will provide two simple examples to illustrate the theoretical results. The first example considers a strongly connected graphs. And the second one concerns a graph that is not strongly connected but has a spanning tree. A. Example In the first example, we consider a directed circular network. (Fig. shows an example of a circular network with nodes.) It is obvious that this network is strongly connected. If we assign each edge with weight, then the graph Laplacian is L = Then we haveξ i =. for eachi, andλ = Randomly choose an initial value x() whose x() = The objective is to drive the network to reach a consensus on value. After calculation, we have V() =. [x i () x()] =.5935, i= V()/ x () = Let b k = for each k, then we can set η = η =. Choose =.999. Then, C = [4η ( ξ )] /ξ 4η ξ ( ξ ) [ η (ξ )] =
7 var(t) Fig.. A circular network consisting of nodes. 3.5 Fig. 3. nodes. time t.5 5 x The variation of the trajectories of the circular network with var(t) Fig...5 time t.5 5 x Pinning consensus to on a circular network with nodes. Then we get the lower bound for the duration between each successive impulse is T = maxi {ξi } Cξ ln = λ trees but is not strongly connected. If we assign each edge with weight, then in the graph Laplacian (3), L = Thus ξi =. for i, ξi = for i, and λ =.38. Randomly choose the initial value x() where x () =.399. The objective is to drive the network to reach consensus on the value. After calculation, we have: In the simulation, we set tk = 867 for each k. The simulation result is presented in Figs.,3. Fig. shows the trajectories of the network, and Fig.3 shows the variations of the trajectories with respect to time t which is defined as var(t) = n X V () = X ξi [xi () x ()] = i= V ()/x () = xi (t). i= It can be seen that the network will asymptotically reach a consensus on value. Let bk = 5 for each k, then we can set η = η = 5. Choose =.9. Then we have C= [ 4η ( ξ )] /ξ 4η ξ ( ξ ) = [ η (ξ )] B. Example In this example, we consider a network that is not strongly connected but has a spanning tree. We start from a circular network with nodes (shown in Fig.) and construct a larger network by randomly adding new nodes to the network. At each step, randomly choose a node i from the existing network, then a new node j is added to the network such that there is a directed edge from i to j. Continuing this procedure until the network has nodes, we obtain a graph that has spanning Thus the lower bound for the intervals between each successive impulse is T = maxi {ξi } Cξ ln = λ In the simulation, we choose tk = 5. The simulation result is presented in Figs.4, 5. It can be seen that the network will asymptotically reach a consensus on.
8 x i (t) Fig time t var(t) Fig Pinning consensus to on the graph that has spanning trees time t The variation of the trajectories on a graph that has spanning trees. VI. CONCLUSIONS In this paper, we investigate pinning consensus in networks of multiagents via a single impulsive controller. First, we prove a sufficient condition for a network with a strongly connected underlying graph to reach consensus on a given value. Then we extend the result to networks with a spanning tree. Interestingly, we find the permissible range of the impulsive strength is determined by the left eigenvector of the graph Laplacian corresponding to the zero eigenvalue and the pinning node we choose. Besides, a sparse enough impulsive pinning on one node can always drive the network to reach consensus on a prescribed value. Examples with numerical simulations are also provided to illustrate the theoretical results. The pinning synchronization in complex networks via a single impulsive controller is an interesting issue, which will be worked out soon. REFERENCES [] W. Ren, R.W. Beard, and E.M. Atkins, A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination, in Proceedings of 5 American Control Conference, pp , 5. [] R. Olfati-Saber, Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no., pp. 5-33, 7. [3] W. Lu, T. Chen, Synchronization of coupled connected neural networks with delays, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I, Regular Papers, vol. 5, no., pp , 4. [4] W. Lu, T. Chen, New approach to synchronization analysis of linearly coupled ordinary differential systems, Physica D, vol. 3, pp. 4-3, 6. [5] T. Chen, S. Amari, and Q. Lin, A unified algorithm for principal and minor component extraction, Neural Networks, vol., no. 3, pp , 998. [6] T. Chen, Y. Hua, and W. Yan, Global convergence of oja s subspace algorithm for principal component extraction, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol.8, (998) pp [7] T. Chen, X. Liu, and W. Lu, Pinning complex networks by a single controller, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Regular Papers, vol. 54, no. 6, pp , 7. [8] K. Moore, and D. Lucarelli, Forced and constrained consensus among cooperating agents, in IEEE international conference on networking, sensing and control, pp , 5. [9] Z. Yang, and D. Xu, Stability analysis of delay neural networks with impulsive effects, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II- Express Briefs, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 57-5, 5. [] F. Chen, Z. Chen, L. Xiang, Z. Liu, and Z. Yuan, Reaching a consensus via pinning control, Automatica, vol. 45, pp. 5-, 9. [] T. Insperger, Act-and-wait concept for continuous-time control systems with feedback delay, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp , 6. [] T. Insperger and G. Stepan, Act-and-wait control concept for discretetime systems with feedback delay, IET Control Theory and Applications, vol., no. 3, pp , 7. [3] W. Xia and J. Cao, Pinning synchronization of delayed dynamical networks via periodically intermittent control, Chaos, vol. 9, no., 3, 9. [4] X. Liu and T. Chen, Cluster synchronization in directed networks via intermittent pinning control, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol., no. 7, pp. 9-,. [5] X. Liu, Stability results for impulsive differential systems with applications to population growth models, Dynamics and Stability of Systems, vol. 9, no., pp , 994. [6] X. Liu, and A. Willms, Impulsive controllability of linearly dynamical systems with applications to maneuvers of spacecraft, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol., no. 4, pp , 996. [7] T. Yang, and L. Chua, Impulsive stabilization for control and synchronization of chaotic systems: Theory and application to secure communication, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I-Foundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 44, no., pp , 997. [8] T. Yang, Impulsive Systems and Control: Theory and Applications. Huntington, NY: Nova Science,. [9] B. Liu, and D. Hill, Impulsive consensus for complex dynamical networks with nonidentical nodes and coupling time-delays, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 49, no., pp ,. [] W. Xiong, D. Ho, and Z. Wang, Consensus analysis of multiagent networks via aggregated and pinning approaches, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol., no. 8, pp. 3-4,. [] J. Zhou, Q. Wu, and L. Xiang, Pinning complex delayed dynamical networks by a single impulsive controller, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Regular Papers, vol. 58, no., pp ,. [] J. Lu, J. Kurths, J. Cao, N. Mahdavi, and C. Huang, Synchronization control for nonlinear stochastic dynamical networks: pinning impulsive strategy, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 3, no., pp. 85-9,. [3] L. Guo, Z. Xu, and M. Hu, Projective synchronization in drive-response networks via impulsive control, Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 5, no. 8, pp , 8. [4] Z. Guan, Z. Liu, G. Feng, and Y. Wang, Synchronization of complex dynamical networks with time-varying delays via impulsive distributed control, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-I: Regular Papers, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 8-95,.
9 [5] Y. Tang, S. Leung, W. Wong, and J. Fang, Impulsive pinning synchronization of stochastic discrete-time networks, Neurocomputing, vol. 73, pp. 3-39,. [6] P. DeLellis, M. di Bernardo, and M. Porfiri, Pinning control of complex networks via edge snapping, Chaos, vol., 339,. [7] H. Su, Z. Rong, M. Chen, X. Wang, G. Chen, and H. Wang, Decentralized adaptive pinning control for cluster synchronization of complex dynamical networks, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B: Cybernetics,.
Distributed Adaptive Synchronization of Complex Dynamical Network with Unknown Time-varying Weights
International Journal of Automation and Computing 3, June 05, 33-39 DOI: 0.007/s633-05-0889-7 Distributed Adaptive Synchronization of Complex Dynamical Network with Unknown Time-varying Weights Hui-Na
More informationComplex Laplacians and Applications in Multi-Agent Systems
1 Complex Laplacians and Applications in Multi-Agent Systems Jiu-Gang Dong, and Li Qiu, Fellow, IEEE arxiv:1406.186v [math.oc] 14 Apr 015 Abstract Complex-valued Laplacians have been shown to be powerful
More informationResearch Article Mathematical Model and Cluster Synchronization for a Complex Dynamical Network with Two Types of Chaotic Oscillators
Applied Mathematics Volume 212, Article ID 936, 12 pages doi:1.11/212/936 Research Article Mathematical Model and Cluster Synchronization for a Complex Dynamical Network with Two Types of Chaotic Oscillators
More informationConsensus of Information Under Dynamically Changing Interaction Topologies
Consensus of Information Under Dynamically Changing Interaction Topologies Wei Ren and Randal W. Beard Abstract This paper considers the problem of information consensus among multiple agents in the presence
More informationConsensus Problem in Multi-Agent Systems with Communication Channel Constraint on Signal Amplitude
SICE Journal of Control, Measurement, and System Integration, Vol 6, No 1, pp 007 013, January 2013 Consensus Problem in Multi-Agent Systems with Communication Channel Constraint on Signal Amplitude MingHui
More informationConsensus Tracking for Multi-Agent Systems with Nonlinear Dynamics under Fixed Communication Topologies
Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science Vol I WCECS, October 9-,, San Francisco, USA Consensus Tracking for Multi-Agent Systems with Nonlinear Dynamics under Fixed Communication
More informationConsensus of Multi-Agent Systems with
Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with 1 General Linear and Lipschitz Nonlinear Dynamics Using Distributed Adaptive Protocols arxiv:1109.3799v1 [cs.sy] 17 Sep 2011 Zhongkui Li, Wei Ren, Member, IEEE, Xiangdong
More informationConsensus Seeking in Multi-agent Systems Under Dynamically Changing Interaction Topologies
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, SUBMITTED FOR PUBLICATION AS A TECHNICAL NOTE. Consensus Seeking in Multi-agent Systems Under Dynamically Changing Interaction Topologies Wei Ren, Student Member,
More informationDistributed Robust Consensus of Heterogeneous Uncertain Multi-agent Systems
Distributed Robust Consensus of Heterogeneous Uncertain Multi-agent Systems Zhongkui Li, Zhisheng Duan, Frank L. Lewis. State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, Department of Mechanics
More informationOn the Scalability in Cooperative Control. Zhongkui Li. Peking University
On the Scalability in Cooperative Control Zhongkui Li Email: zhongkli@pku.edu.cn Peking University June 25, 2016 Zhongkui Li (PKU) Scalability June 25, 2016 1 / 28 Background Cooperative control is to
More informationResearch Article H Consensus for Discrete-Time Multiagent Systems
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 05, Article ID 8084, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/0.55/05/8084 Research Article H Consensus for Discrete- Multiagent Systems Xiaoping Wang and Jinliang Shao
More informationConsensus Seeking in Multi-agent Systems Under Dynamically Changing Interaction Topologies
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, SUBMITTED FOR PUBLICATION AS A TECHNICAL NOTE. 1 Consensus Seeking in Multi-agent Systems Under Dynamically Changing Interaction Topologies Wei Ren, Student Member,
More informationConsensus of Hybrid Multi-agent Systems
Consensus of Hybrid Multi-agent Systems Yuanshi Zheng, Jingying Ma, and Long Wang arxiv:52.0389v [cs.sy] 0 Dec 205 Abstract In this paper, we consider the consensus problem of hybrid multi-agent system.
More informationAnalysis of stability for impulsive stochastic fuzzy Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with mixed delays
Analysis of stability for impulsive stochastic fuzzy Cohen-Grossberg neural networks with mixed delays Qianhong Zhang Guizhou University of Finance and Economics Guizhou Key Laboratory of Economics System
More informationResearch Article Input and Output Passivity of Complex Dynamical Networks with General Topology
Advances in Decision Sciences Volume 1, Article ID 89481, 19 pages doi:1.1155/1/89481 Research Article Input and Output Passivity of Complex Dynamical Networks with General Topology Jinliang Wang Chongqing
More informationGraph and Controller Design for Disturbance Attenuation in Consensus Networks
203 3th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 203) Oct. 20-23, 203 in Kimdaejung Convention Center, Gwangju, Korea Graph and Controller Design for Disturbance Attenuation in
More informationOUTPUT CONSENSUS OF HETEROGENEOUS LINEAR MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS BY EVENT-TRIGGERED CONTROL
OUTPUT CONSENSUS OF HETEROGENEOUS LINEAR MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS BY EVENT-TRIGGERED CONTROL Gang FENG Department of Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering City University of Hong Kong July 25, 2014 Department
More informationAverage-Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Direct Topology Based on Event-Triggered Control
Outline Background Preliminaries Consensus Numerical simulations Conclusions Average-Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Direct Topology Based on Event-Triggered Control Email: lzhx@nankai.edu.cn, chenzq@nankai.edu.cn
More informationTracking control for multi-agent consensus with an active leader and variable topology
Automatica 42 (2006) 1177 1182 wwwelseviercom/locate/automatica Brief paper Tracking control for multi-agent consensus with an active leader and variable topology Yiguang Hong a,, Jiangping Hu a, Linxin
More informationConsensus seeking on moving neighborhood model of random sector graphs
Consensus seeking on moving neighborhood model of random sector graphs Mitra Ganguly School of Physical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India Email: gangulyma@rediffmail.com Timothy Eller
More informationMulti-Robotic Systems
CHAPTER 9 Multi-Robotic Systems The topic of multi-robotic systems is quite popular now. It is believed that such systems can have the following benefits: Improved performance ( winning by numbers ) Distributed
More informationResearch on Consistency Problem of Network Multi-agent Car System with State Predictor
International Core Journal of Engineering Vol. No.9 06 ISSN: 44-895 Research on Consistency Problem of Network Multi-agent Car System with State Predictor Yue Duan a, Linli Zhou b and Yue Wu c Institute
More informationRECENTLY, the study of cooperative control of multiagent
24 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL., NO. 2, APRIL 24 Consensus Robust Output Regulation of Discrete-time Linear Multi-agent Systems Hongjing Liang Huaguang Zhang Zhanshan Wang Junyi Wang Abstract
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.oc] 14 Dec 2015
Cooperative Output Regulation of Discrete-Time Linear Time-Delay Multi-agent Systems Yamin Yan and Jie Huang arxiv:1510.05380v2 math.oc 14 Dec 2015 Abstract In this paper, we study the cooperative output
More informationarxiv: v1 [cs.sy] 4 Nov 2015
Novel Distributed Robust Adaptive Consensus Protocols for Linear Multi-agent Systems with Directed Graphs and ExternalDisturbances arxiv:5.033v [cs.sy] 4 Nov 05 YuezuLv a,zhongkuili a,zhishengduan a,gangfeng
More informationStability and hybrid synchronization of a time-delay financial hyperchaotic system
ISSN 76-7659 England UK Journal of Information and Computing Science Vol. No. 5 pp. 89-98 Stability and hybrid synchronization of a time-delay financial hyperchaotic system Lingling Zhang Guoliang Cai
More informationResearch Article Pinning-Like Adaptive Consensus for Networked Mobile Agents with Heterogeneous Nonlinear Dynamics
Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 69031, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/014/69031 Research Article Pinning-Like Adaptive Consensus for etworked Mobile Agents with Heterogeneous onlinear
More informationMULTI-AGENT TRACKING OF A HIGH-DIMENSIONAL ACTIVE LEADER WITH SWITCHING TOPOLOGY
Jrl Syst Sci & Complexity (2009) 22: 722 731 MULTI-AGENT TRACKING OF A HIGH-DIMENSIONAL ACTIVE LEADER WITH SWITCHING TOPOLOGY Yiguang HONG Xiaoli WANG Received: 11 May 2009 / Revised: 16 June 2009 c 2009
More informationAdaptive synchronization of chaotic neural networks with time delays via delayed feedback control
2017 º 12 È 31 4 ½ Dec. 2017 Communication on Applied Mathematics and Computation Vol.31 No.4 DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6330.2017.04.002 Adaptive synchronization of chaotic neural networks with time delays
More informationDistributed Adaptive Consensus Protocol with Decaying Gains on Directed Graphs
Distributed Adaptive Consensus Protocol with Decaying Gains on Directed Graphs Štefan Knotek, Kristian Hengster-Movric and Michael Šebek Department of Control Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague,
More informationLinear Algebra and its Applications
Linear Algebra and its Applications 431 (9) 71 715 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Linear Algebra and its Applications journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/laa On the general consensus protocol
More informationResearch Article Delay-Dependent Exponential Stability for Discrete-Time BAM Neural Networks with Time-Varying Delays
Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume 2008, Article ID 421614, 14 pages doi:10.1155/2008/421614 Research Article Delay-Dependent Exponential Stability for Discrete-Time BAM Neural Networks with
More informationON SEPARATION PRINCIPLE FOR THE DISTRIBUTED ESTIMATION AND CONTROL OF FORMATION FLYING SPACECRAFT
ON SEPARATION PRINCIPLE FOR THE DISTRIBUTED ESTIMATION AND CONTROL OF FORMATION FLYING SPACECRAFT Amir Rahmani (), Olivia Ching (2), and Luis A Rodriguez (3) ()(2)(3) University of Miami, Coral Gables,
More informationDiscrete-Time Distributed Observers over Jointly Connected Switching Networks and an Application
1 Discrete-Time Distributed Observers over Jointly Connected Switching Networks and an Application Tao Liu and Jie Huang arxiv:1812.01407v1 [cs.sy] 4 Dec 2018 Abstract In this paper, we first establish
More informationConsensus Analysis of Networked Multi-agent Systems
Physics Procedia Physics Procedia 1 1 11 Physics Procedia 3 1 191 1931 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia Consensus Analysis of Networked Multi-agent Systems Qi-Di Wu, Dong Xue, Jing Yao The Department of
More informationDiscrete-time Consensus Filters on Directed Switching Graphs
214 11th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA) June 18-2, 214. Taichung, Taiwan Discrete-time Consensus Filters on Directed Switching Graphs Shuai Li and Yi Guo Abstract We consider
More informationSynchronization of a General Delayed Complex Dynamical Network via Adaptive Feedback
Synchronization of a General Delayed Complex Dynamical Network via Adaptive Feedback Qunjiao Zhang and Junan Lu College of Mathematics and Statistics State Key Laboratory of Software Engineering Wuhan
More informationTheory and Applications of Matrix-Weighted Consensus
TECHNICAL REPORT 1 Theory and Applications of Matrix-Weighted Consensus Minh Hoang Trinh and Hyo-Sung Ahn arxiv:1703.00129v3 [math.oc] 6 Jan 2018 Abstract This paper proposes the matrix-weighted consensus
More informationSynchronization and Bifurcation Analysis in Coupled Networks of Discrete-Time Systems
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 48 (2007) pp. 871 876 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 48, No. 5, November 15, 2007 Synchronization and Bifurcation Analysis in Coupled Networks of Discrete-Time
More informationConsensus Control of Multi-agent Systems with Optimal Performance
1 Consensus Control of Multi-agent Systems with Optimal Performance Juanjuan Xu, Huanshui Zhang arxiv:183.941v1 [math.oc 6 Mar 18 Abstract The consensus control with optimal cost remains major challenging
More informationIN the multiagent systems literature, the consensus problem,
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS II: EXPRESS BRIEFS, VOL. 63, NO. 7, JULY 206 663 Periodic Behaviors for Discrete-Time Second-Order Multiagent Systems With Input Saturation Constraints Tao Yang,
More informationZeno-free, distributed event-triggered communication and control for multi-agent average consensus
Zeno-free, distributed event-triggered communication and control for multi-agent average consensus Cameron Nowzari Jorge Cortés Abstract This paper studies a distributed event-triggered communication and
More informationChap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability
Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability 1. Controllability of Linear Systems 1.1. Kalman s Criterion Consider the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu where x R n : state vector and u R m : input vector. A :
More informationEXISTENCE AND EXPONENTIAL STABILITY OF ANTI-PERIODIC SOLUTIONS IN CELLULAR NEURAL NETWORKS WITH TIME-VARYING DELAYS AND IMPULSIVE EFFECTS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2016 2016, No. 02, pp. 1 14. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu EXISTENCE AND EXPONENTIAL
More informationActive Passive Networked Multiagent Systems
Active Passive Networked Multiagent Systems Tansel Yucelen and John Daniel Peterson Abstract This paper introduces an active passive networked multiagent system framework, which consists of agents subject
More informationConsensus, Flocking and Opinion Dynamics
Consensus, Flocking and Opinion Dynamics Antoine Girard Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Université de Grenoble antoine.girard@imag.fr International Summer School of Automatic Control GIPSA Lab, Grenoble, France,
More informationScaling the Size of a Multiagent Formation via Distributed Feedback
Scaling the Size of a Multiagent Formation via Distributed Feedback Samuel Coogan, Murat Arcak, Magnus Egerstedt Abstract We consider a multiagent coordination problem where the objective is to steer a
More informationStructural Consensus Controllability of Singular Multi-agent Linear Dynamic Systems
Structural Consensus Controllability of Singular Multi-agent Linear Dynamic Systems M. ISAL GARCÍA-PLANAS Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Departament de Matèmatiques Minería 1, sc. C, 1-3, 08038 arcelona
More informationFormation Control of Nonholonomic Mobile Robots
Proceedings of the 6 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June -6, 6 FrC Formation Control of Nonholonomic Mobile Robots WJ Dong, Yi Guo, and JA Farrell Abstract In this paper, formation
More informationAutomatica. Distributed discrete-time coordinated tracking with a time-varying reference state and limited communication
Automatica 45 (2009 1299 1305 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Automatica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Brief paper Distributed discrete-time coordinated tracking with a
More informationDelay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
International Journal of Automation and Computing 7(2), May 2010, 224-229 DOI: 10.1007/s11633-010-0224-2 Delay-dependent Stability Analysis for Markovian Jump Systems with Interval Time-varying-delays
More informationFinite-Time Consensus Problems for Networks of Dynamic Agents
Finite- Consensus Problems for Networks of Dynamic Agents arxiv:math/774v [math.ds] 5 Jan 7 Long Wang and Feng Xiao Abstract In this paper, finite-time state consensus problems for continuous-time multi-agent
More informationA Graph-Theoretic Characterization of Structural Controllability for Multi-Agent System with Switching Topology
Joint 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and 28th Chinese Control Conference Shanghai, P.R. China, December 16-18, 29 FrAIn2.3 A Graph-Theoretic Characterization of Structural Controllability
More informationGeneralized projective synchronization of a class of chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems with uncertain parameters
Vol 16 No 5, May 2007 c 2007 Chin. Phys. Soc. 1009-1963/2007/16(05)/1246-06 Chinese Physics and IOP Publishing Ltd Generalized projective synchronization of a class of chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems with
More informationDistributed Coordinated Tracking With Reduced Interaction via a Variable Structure Approach Yongcan Cao, Member, IEEE, and Wei Ren, Member, IEEE
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 57, NO. 1, JANUARY 2012 33 Distributed Coordinated Tracking With Reduced Interaction via a Variable Structure Approach Yongcan Cao, Member, IEEE, and Wei Ren,
More informationProjective synchronization of a complex network with different fractional order chaos nodes
Projective synchronization of a complex network with different fractional order chaos nodes Wang Ming-Jun( ) a)b), Wang Xing-Yuan( ) a), and Niu Yu-Jun( ) a) a) School of Electronic and Information Engineering,
More informationConsensus Problems in Complex-Weighted Networks
Consensus Problems in Complex-Weighted Networks arxiv:1406.1862v1 [math.oc] 7 Jun 2014 Jiu-Gang Dong, Li Qiu Abstract Consensus problems for multi-agent systems in the literature have been studied under
More informationA Cross-Associative Neural Network for SVD of Nonsquared Data Matrix in Signal Processing
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOL. 12, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2001 1215 A Cross-Associative Neural Network for SVD of Nonsquared Data Matrix in Signal Processing Da-Zheng Feng, Zheng Bao, Xian-Da Zhang
More informationObtaining Consensus of Multi-agent Linear Dynamic Systems
Obtaining Consensus of Multi-agent Linear Dynamic Systems M I GRCÍ-PLNS Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Departament de Matemàtica plicada Mineria 1, 08038 arcelona SPIN mariaisabelgarcia@upcedu bstract:
More informationTime-delay feedback control in a delayed dynamical chaos system and its applications
Time-delay feedback control in a delayed dynamical chaos system and its applications Ye Zhi-Yong( ), Yang Guang( ), and Deng Cun-Bing( ) School of Mathematics and Physics, Chongqing University of Technology,
More informationResearch Article Synchronization Analysis of Two Coupled Complex Networks with Time Delays
Discrete Dynamics in ature and Society Volume, Article ID 9, pages doi:.55//9 Research Article Synchronization Analysis of Two Coupled Complex etworks with Time Delays Weigang Sun, Jingyuan Zhang, and
More informationConsensus of Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems with Intermittent Communication
Journal of Systems Science and Information Aug., 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 328 342 DOI: 10.21078/JSSI-2017-328-15 Consensus of Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Systems with Intermittent Communication Lü XU School
More informationBifurcation control and chaos in a linear impulsive system
Vol 8 No 2, December 2009 c 2009 Chin. Phys. Soc. 674-056/2009/82)/5235-07 Chinese Physics B and IOP Publishing Ltd Bifurcation control and chaos in a linear impulsive system Jiang Gui-Rong 蒋贵荣 ) a)b),
More informationResearch Article Mean Square Stability of Impulsive Stochastic Differential Systems
International Differential Equations Volume 011, Article ID 613695, 13 pages doi:10.1155/011/613695 Research Article Mean Square Stability of Impulsive Stochastic Differential Systems Shujie Yang, Bao
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.oc] 22 Jan 2008
arxiv:0801.3390v1 [math.oc] 22 Jan 2008 LQR-based coupling gain for synchronization of linear systems S. Emre Tuna tuna@eee.metu.edu.tr May 28, 2018 Abstract Synchronization control of coupled continuous-time
More informationExact Consensus Controllability of Multi-agent Linear Systems
Exact Consensus Controllability of Multi-agent Linear Systems M. ISAEL GARCÍA-PLANAS Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Departament de Matèmatiques Minería 1, Esc. C, 1-3, 08038 arcelona SPAIN maria.isabel.garcia@upc.edu
More informationDistributed Tracking ControlforLinearMultiagent Systems With a Leader of Bounded Unknown Input
518 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 58, NO. 2, FEBRUARY 2013 Distributed Tracking ControlforLinearMultiagent Systems With a Leader of Bounded Unknown Input Zhongkui Li, Member,IEEE, Xiangdong
More informationH Synchronization of Chaotic Systems via Delayed Feedback Control
International Journal of Automation and Computing 7(2), May 21, 23-235 DOI: 1.17/s11633-1-23-4 H Synchronization of Chaotic Systems via Delayed Feedback Control Li Sheng 1, 2 Hui-Zhong Yang 1 1 Institute
More informationEffects of Scale-Free Topological Properties on Dynamical Synchronization and Control in Coupled Map Lattices
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 47 (2007) pp. 361 368 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 47, No. 2, February 15, 2007 Effects of Scale-Free Topological Properties on Dynamical Synchronization
More informationControlling a Novel Chaotic Attractor using Linear Feedback
ISSN 746-7659, England, UK Journal of Information and Computing Science Vol 5, No,, pp 7-4 Controlling a Novel Chaotic Attractor using Linear Feedback Lin Pan,, Daoyun Xu 3, and Wuneng Zhou College of
More informationPeriodic Behaviors in Multi-agent Systems with Input Saturation Constraints
5nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 10-13, 013. Florence, Italy Periodic Behaviors in Multi-agent Systems with Input Saturation Constraints Tao Yang, Ziyang Meng, Dimos V. Dimarogonas,
More informationControl and synchronization in systems coupled via a complex network
Control and synchronization in systems coupled via a complex network Chai Wah Wu May 29, 2009 2009 IBM Corporation Synchronization in nonlinear dynamical systems Synchronization in groups of nonlinear
More informationFormation Control and Network Localization via Distributed Global Orientation Estimation in 3-D
Formation Control and Network Localization via Distributed Global Orientation Estimation in 3-D Byung-Hun Lee and Hyo-Sung Ahn arxiv:1783591v1 [cssy] 1 Aug 17 Abstract In this paper, we propose a novel
More informationA Note to Robustness Analysis of the Hybrid Consensus Protocols
American Control Conference on O'Farrell Street, San Francisco, CA, USA June 9 - July, A Note to Robustness Analysis of the Hybrid Consensus Protocols Haopeng Zhang, Sean R Mullen, and Qing Hui Abstract
More informationConsensus Stabilizability and Exact Consensus Controllability of Multi-agent Linear Systems
Consensus Stabilizability and Exact Consensus Controllability of Multi-agent Linear Systems M. ISABEL GARCÍA-PLANAS Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Departament de Matèmatiques Minería 1, Esc. C, 1-3,
More informationDecentralized Stabilization of Heterogeneous Linear Multi-Agent Systems
1 Decentralized Stabilization of Heterogeneous Linear Multi-Agent Systems Mauro Franceschelli, Andrea Gasparri, Alessandro Giua, and Giovanni Ulivi Abstract In this paper the formation stabilization problem
More informationFinite-time hybrid synchronization of time-delay hyperchaotic Lorenz system
ISSN 1746-7659 England UK Journal of Information and Computing Science Vol. 10 No. 4 2015 pp. 265-270 Finite-time hybrid synchronization of time-delay hyperchaotic Lorenz system Haijuan Chen 1 * Rui Chen
More informationHegselmann-Krause Dynamics: An Upper Bound on Termination Time
Hegselmann-Krause Dynamics: An Upper Bound on Termination Time B. Touri Coordinated Science Laboratory University of Illinois Urbana, IL 680 touri@illinois.edu A. Nedić Industrial and Enterprise Systems
More informationFunction Projective Synchronization of Fractional-Order Hyperchaotic System Based on Open-Plus-Closed-Looping
Commun. Theor. Phys. 55 (2011) 617 621 Vol. 55, No. 4, April 15, 2011 Function Projective Synchronization of Fractional-Order Hyperchaotic System Based on Open-Plus-Closed-Looping WANG Xing-Yuan ( ), LIU
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.data-an] 28 Sep 2009
Synchronization in Networks of Coupled Harmonic Oscillators with Stochastic Perturbation and Time Delays arxiv:99.9v [physics.data-an] Sep 9 Yilun Shang Abstract In this paper, we investigate synchronization
More informationStability and Disturbance Propagation in Autonomous Vehicle Formations : A Graph Laplacian Approach
Stability and Disturbance Propagation in Autonomous Vehicle Formations : A Graph Laplacian Approach Francesco Borrelli*, Kingsley Fregene, Datta Godbole, Gary Balas* *Department of Aerospace Engineering
More informationAnti-synchronization Between Coupled Networks with Two Active Forms
Commun. Theor. Phys. 55 (211) 835 84 Vol. 55, No. 5, May 15, 211 Anti-synchronization Between Coupled Networks with Two Active Forms WU Yong-Qing ( ï), 1 SUN Wei-Gang (êå ), 2, and LI Shan-Shan (Ó ) 3
More informationTracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique
International Journal of Automation and Computing (3), June 24, 38-32 DOI: 7/s633-4-793-6 Tracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique Lei-Po Liu Zhu-Mu Fu Xiao-Na
More informationConsensus Problems in Networks of Agents with Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents with Switching Topology and Time-Delays Reza Olfati Saber Richard M. Murray Control and Dynamical Systems California Institute of Technology e-mails: {olfati,murray}@cds.caltech.edu
More informationResearch Article Adaptive Control of Chaos in Chua s Circuit
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 2011, Article ID 620946, 14 pages doi:10.1155/2011/620946 Research Article Adaptive Control of Chaos in Chua s Circuit Weiping Guo and Diantong Liu Institute
More informationAn Event-Triggered Consensus Control with Sampled-Data Mechanism for Multi-agent Systems
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control An Event-Triggered Consensus Control with Sampled-Data Mechanism for Multi-agent Systems Feng Zhou, Zhiwu Huang, Weirong
More informationResearch Article On the Stability Property of the Infection-Free Equilibrium of a Viral Infection Model
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society Volume, Article ID 644, 9 pages doi:.55//644 Research Article On the Stability Property of the Infection-Free Equilibrium of a Viral
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I: REGULAR PAPERS, VOL. 57, NO. 1, JANUARY
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I: REGULAR PAPERS, VOL 57, NO 1, JANUARY 2010 213 Consensus of Multiagent Systems and Synchronization of Complex Networks: A Unified Viewpoint Zhongkui Li, Zhisheng
More informationNetworked Control Systems, Event-Triggering, Small-Gain Theorem, Nonlinear
EVENT-TRIGGERING OF LARGE-SCALE SYSTEMS WITHOUT ZENO BEHAVIOR C. DE PERSIS, R. SAILER, AND F. WIRTH Abstract. We present a Lyapunov based approach to event-triggering for large-scale systems using a small
More informationNCS Lecture 8 A Primer on Graph Theory. Cooperative Control Applications
NCS Lecture 8 A Primer on Graph Theory Richard M. Murray Control and Dynamical Systems California Institute of Technology Goals Introduce some motivating cooperative control problems Describe basic concepts
More informationCONVERGENCE BEHAVIOUR OF SOLUTIONS TO DELAY CELLULAR NEURAL NETWORKS WITH NON-PERIODIC COEFFICIENTS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2007(2007), No. 46, pp. 1 7. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) CONVERGENCE
More informationDistributed Tracking Control for Multi-Agent Systems Under Two Types of Attacks
Preprints of the 9th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Distributed Tracking Control for Multi-Agent Systems Under Two Types of Attacks Zhi Feng and Guoqiang Hu Abstract:
More informationOn non-consensus motions of dynamical linear multiagent systems
Pramana J Phys (218) 91:16 https://doiorg/117/s1243-18-159-5 Indian Academy of Sciences On non-consensus motions of dynamical linear multiagent systems NING CAI 1,2,4, CHUN-LIN DENG 1,3, and QIU-XUAN WU
More informationScaling the Size of a Formation using Relative Position Feedback
Scaling the Size of a Formation using Relative Position Feedback Samuel Coogan a, Murat Arcak a a Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley Abstract
More informationRobust Gain Scheduling Synchronization Method for Quadratic Chaotic Systems With Channel Time Delay Yu Liang and Horacio J.
604 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I: REGULAR PAPERS, VOL. 56, NO. 3, MARCH 2009 Robust Gain Scheduling Synchronization Method for Quadratic Chaotic Systems With Channel Time Delay Yu Liang
More information1520 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 49, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER Reza Olfati-Saber, Member, IEEE, and Richard M. Murray, Member, IEEE
1520 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 49, NO. 9, SEPTEMBER 2004 Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays Reza Olfati-Saber, Member, IEEE, and Richard
More informationOn Asymptotic Synchronization of Interconnected Hybrid Systems with Applications
On Asymptotic Synchronization of Interconnected Hybrid Systems with Applications Sean Phillips and Ricardo G. Sanfelice Abstract In this paper, we consider the synchronization of the states of a multiagent
More informationDelay-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Multiple Time Delays
Delay-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Multiple Time Delays Yong He, Min Wu, Jin-Hua She Abstract This paper deals with the problem of the delay-dependent stability of linear systems
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.oc] 29 Sep 2018
Distributed Finite-time Least Squares Solver for Network Linear Equations Tao Yang a, Jemin George b, Jiahu Qin c,, Xinlei Yi d, Junfeng Wu e arxiv:856v mathoc 9 Sep 8 a Department of Electrical Engineering,
More informationConsensus in the network with uniform constant communication delay
Consensus in the network with uniform constant communication delay Xu Wang 1 Ali Saberi 1 Anton A. Stoorvogel Håvard Fjær Grip 1 Tao Yang 3 Abstract This paper studies the consensus among identical agents
More information