V (f) :={[x] 2 P n ( ) f(x) =0}. If (x) ( x) thenf( x) =


 Ashlyn Kelly
 3 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 20 KIYOSHI IGUSA BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY 2. Projective varieties For any field F, the standard definition of projective space P n (F ) is that it is the set of one dimensional F vector subspaces of F n+. For example, P (R) is the set of lines through the origin in R 2. These are specified by slope 0 apple <. So, P (R) = R/ Z is a circle. However, there are many points missing. As an a ne scheme, the circle implicitly also contains all points in the punctured disk (the interior of the circle) and a generic point. As a projective variety, the puncture will be filled in. (These are the two circles at infinity identified to one point.) 2.. Lecture 7. Basic properties of projective space. In order to construct the scheme theoretic version of ndimensional projective space P n (k) we need to take P n ( ). This is defined to be the space of all one dimensional vector spaces in n+. This is also the quotient space of n+ \0 modulo the identification x ax for all a 6= 02. Note that the homogeneous coordinates X i are NOT functions P n ( )!. But homogeneous polynomials define subsets of P n ( ). First, a polynomial f[x] 2 k[x] ishomogeneous of degree d if for all 2 and x 2 n+, f( x) = d f(x). [Thanks to Mac for correcting an earlier version!] Given such a polynomial we can define If (x) ( x) thenf( x) = V (f) :={[x] 2 P n ( ) f(x) =0}. d f(x) = 0. So, V (f) iswelldefined. Definition 2... If S = {f } is a set of homogeneous polynomials f 2 k[x 0,,X n ] then let V (S) = \ V (f )={[x] 2 P n ( ) f (x) =08f 2 S}. f 2S The Zariski topology or ktopology on P n ( ) is defined by letting V (S) as above be the closed subsets. Let U i = {[x 0,,x n ] 2 P n ( ) : x i 6=0}. These are open subsets of P n ( ) since they are the complements of V (X i ). We claim that U i = n for all i, but we took i = 0 for simplicity. Then we have a bijection: ' 0 : n = U0 given by ' 0 (x,,x n )=[,x,,x n ]. The inverse mapping is given by x,, x n [x 0,,x n ] 2 U 0 x 0 x 0 So, ' 0 is a bijection. Proposition ' 0 : n = U 0 is a homeomorphism (using the Zariski topology on both sets). Proof. () As pointed out above, ' 0 is a bijection. (2) For any f(x) 2 k[x,,x n ], let f(x) 2 k[x 0,,X n ] be the unique homogeneous polynomial of the same degree as f so that f(,x,,x n )=f(x,,x n ). The formula for f is as follows. Suppose that f(x) = X =(a,,a n) c X where X = X a Xa 2 2 Xan n
2 LECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A 2 Let d = max =degf where = P a i.then f(x) is given by f(x) = X Then f(x) is homogeneous of degree d. (3) For any f(x) 2 k[x,,x n ]wehave c X d 0 X ' 0 (V (f) n )=V ( f) \ U 0 This is easy to check: (x,,x n ) 2 V (f) i f(x,,x n ) = 0. But ' 0 (x,,x n )= [,x,,x n ]whichliesinv ( f) \ U 0 i f(,x,,x n ) = 0. But f(,x,,x n ) = f(x,,x n ). So, these are the same conditions and the two sets are equal as claimed. This proves that ' 0 is an open mapping (taking open sets to open sets) since it takes basic open sets in n to basic open sets in U 0. Next, suppose that g 2 k[x 0,,X n ] is homogeneous. Then V (g(,x,,x n )) = ' 0 (V (g) \ U 0 ) This again is easy to prove. So, ' 0 is continuous. Since ' 0 is continuous and open, it is a homeomorphism. This proposition ( n = U 0 ) is interpreted to mean that P n ( ) is given by adding points at to n. To understand this, let H i = {[x] 2 P n ( ) x i =0} Then P n ( ) = U i ` Hi and U i = n, H i = Pn ( ). The second isomorphisms is given by [x,,x n ] 2 P n ( ) $ [x,,x i, 0,x i+,,x n ] 2 H i The reason that H 0 is considered to be the set of points at is the following calculation which only makes sense when = C: apple lim [,tx,,tx n ]= lim t! t! t,x,,x n =[0,x,,x n ] since t! 0 as t!.thus [0,x,,x n ]= lim t! ' 0(tx) which corresponds to points in a straight line in n going to infinity. We will quickly verify that the theorems which hold in the a ne case also hold for projective space. The lemmas work as expected. But the theorem has a surprise that I need to explain. Definition A homogeneous ideal in k[x 0,,X n ] is an ideal generated by homogeneous polynomials. Every polynomial is a sum of homogeneous polynomials: f = P m d=0 f [d] where f [d] is called the homogeneous component of f of degree d. For example: f = {z} X 3 + XY {z + YZ } + {z} 5 f [3] f [2] f [0] Lemma An ideal a is homogeneous i it contains the homogeneous components f [d] of each of its elements f.
3 22 KIYOSHI IGUSA BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY Proof. (() This implication is clear since then a is generated by the homogeneous components of its elements. ()) Let a be a homogeneous ideal. Then it is generated by homogeneous polynomials f with degree d. Any element h 2 a has the form h = X g f where g are arbitrary polynomials. Then, the homogeneous components of h are: h [d] = X g [d d ] f where the sum is over those so that d apple d. Since this is a linear combination of some of the f, h [d] 2 a for all d as claimed. Lemma The radical of any homogeneous ideal is homogeneous. Proof. Suppose that f 2 r(a). We need to show that each component f [d] of f lies in r(a). But f 2 r(a) impliesf n 2 a. Writef as a sum of components: Then f = f [d] + f [d ] + f n =(f [d] ) n + (lower terms) 2 a By the previous lemma, the top degree homogenous component lies in a: (f [d] ) n 2 a. But this implies that f [d] 2 r(a). But then f f [d] = f [d ] + (lower terms) 2 r(a) By induction on d, f [i] 2 r(a) for all i. So, r(a) is a homogeneous ideal by the previous lemma. Now we can follow all steps in the proof of Proposition 4 in [4]. Theorem There is an order reversing bijection: ( ) homogeneous radical ideal a k[x0,,x n ] ${closed subsets of P a 6= (X 0,,X n ) n ( )} a! V (a) I( ) where I( ) is the ideal generated by all homogenous polynomials f which vanish on. Proof. The reason that the homogeneous ideal (X 0,,X n ) is excluded in the bijection is because there are two ideals mapping to the same set (the empty set) in P n ( ), namely a = (X 0,,X n ) and a = k[x]. However, I(;) =k[x]. So, the required equation I(V (a)) = a does not hold for a =(X 0,,X n ). Also the proof does not work for this ideal. It is clear that = V (I( )) for all closed sets. So, we need to show that a = I(V (a)). But a I(V (a)) is clear. So, we just need to show that a I(V (a)). Let V (a) ={x 2 n+ f(x) =08f 2 a} Then we have a = r(a) =I(V (a)) So, we just need to show that I(V (a)) I(V (a)) when V (a) is nonempty. There are three cases:
4 LECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A 23 () a = k[x], V (a) =;, V (a) =; (2) a =(X 0,,X n ), V (a) ={0}, V (a) =; (3) V (a) is nonempty and V (a) is the cone on V (a). I.e., (2.) V (a) ={ x [x] 2 V (a)}. For every [x] 2 V (a) and homogeneous f 2 I(V (a)) we have f(x) = 0. By (2.) this implies f( x) = 0 for all. So, f 2 I(V (a)). So, I(V (a)) I(V (a)) whenever (2.) holds which is Cases () and (3). So, the theorem holds in all cases but excluded Case (2). We glossed over the general discussion of homogeneous prime ideals (in the next subsection). I just said the following was clear using the obvious definitions: a closed subset of P n ( ) is irreducible if it is nonempty and not the union of two proper closed subsets, and, by a homogeneous prime ideal we mean an ideal having both of those properties. But we always need to exclude the case (X 0,,X n ). (We include it in the definition of homogeneous prime ideal but exclude it in all theorems.) Corollary In the correspondence above, irreducible closed subsets correspond to homogeneous prime ideals not equal to (X 0,,X n ). Proof. In Case 3 in the above proof, the homogeneous ideal s is prime i V (a) isirreducible i V (a) is irreducible. Cases,2 are excluded in the definition of irreducible set. Example Let f = XW k[x, Y, Z, W]. Let = V (XW it this way: YZ. This is a homogeneous polynomial of degree 2 in YZ) P 3 ( ). This may be more familiar when we write = apple x, y z,w :det=0 Since f cannot be factored as a product of polynomials of lower degree (necessarily linear), (XW YZ) is prime and is irreducible. Last week we discussed regular functions on open subsets of irreducible sets f : U!. By definition these are functions which are given locally by rational functions f(x) = g(x) h(x). Mumford emphasized that, in some cases, the same fraction cannot always be used throughout the set U. Here is an example. apple apple x, y x, y X = z,w : x 6= 0, Y = z,w : y 6= 0 Let U = X [ Y. Let f : U! be given by ( z f = x on X on Y on the intersection X \ Y w y we have that x, y are both nonzero and z x = zw xw = zw yz = w y so f is well defined. (We forgot to check the case when w = 0. But the equation xw = yz implies that z = 0 in that case and we get z x =0= w y.) This is an example of a regular function U! for which there is no single rational functional expression which works on all of U.
5 24 KIYOSHI IGUSA BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY 2.2. Segre embedding. Mumford uses this example (in another book [5]) to introduce the following construction. (I changed the notation: elements of should be lower case letters. Capital letters are elements of the polynomial ring k[x 0,,X n ].) Definition The Segre embedding is given by : P n P m! P n+m+nm ([x i ], [y j ]) 7! [z ij = x i y j ]. In other words, each of the n + homogeneous variables X i is multiplied by each of the m + variables Y j to get (n + )(m + ) variables Z ij = X i Y j : For example, when n = m = we get: n+ m+! (n+)(m+) P ( ) P ( )! P 3 ( ) ([s, t], [u, v]) 7! [ {z} su, {z} sv, {z} tu, {z} tv ] x y z w Theorem The Segre embedding is a monomorphism with image (P n P m )=V (Z ij Z k` Z i`z kj ) Proof from [5]. (We did the case n = m = in class.) is injective: Suppose ([x], [y]) = ([x 0 ], [y 0 ]). Then there is a 6= 0 in so that x 0 i y0 j = x iy j for all i, j. Byrenumberingwe may assume x 0,y 0 are nonzero. Then x 0 0 y0 0 = x 0y 0 6= 0. So, we can rescale the coordinates of x, y, x 0,y 0 and assume that x 0 = y 0 = x 0 0 = y0 0 =. But then =. So, for every i, x 0 i y0 0 = x iy 0 making x 0 i = x i. Similarly yj 0 = y j for all j. So, ([x], [y]) = ([x 0 ], [y 0 ]). is surjective: Suppose [z] 2 V (Z ij Z k` Z i`z kj ) P n+m+nm ( ). Then, one of the coordinates is nonzero. Renumbering and rescaling we can assume that z 00 =. Then let x i = z i0 and y j = z 0j.Then z ij = z ij z 00 = z i0 z 0j = x i y j for all i, j and [z] = ([x], [y]). So, is a bijection. Lecture 8 Corollary The image of the Segre embedding is irreducible. The idea is to use the topology. The closed subsets of P n ( ) are V (S) ={[x] 2 P n ( ) : f(x) =08f 2 S [X] d } where [X] d denotes the set of degree d homogeneous polynomials in variables X with coe cients in. Since = we are in the realm of standard algebraic geometry. Since k, there are more closed set than kclosed sets. I.e., every kclosed set is closed. The following is clear. Lemma Every kclosed set which is irreducible is kirreducible. Lemma For every [c] 2 P m (k), themapping c([x]) = ([x], [c]) is continuous in the ktopology. c : P n ( )! P n+m+nm ( ) given by
6 LECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A 25 Proof. Every kclosed set in P n+m+nm ( ) is an intersection of sets V (f) ={[z] 2 P n+m+nm ( ) : f(z) =0} for homogeneous f 2 k[z]. The inverse image of this in P n ( ) is c (V (f)) = {[x] 2 P n ( ) : f(x i c j )=0} Since f has coe cients in k and c j 2 k, thisisakclosed set in P n ( ). We need to go to the topology to get the statement that is continuous for all [c] 2 P m ( ). Lemma P n ( ) is irreducible in the topology. c : P n ( )! P n+m+nm ( ) Proof. P n ( ) = V (0) and 0 is a homogeneous prime ideal in [X]. I forgot one subtlety: We didn t prove the correspondence between prime ideals in [X] and irreducible subsets of P n ( ). But, we can go to V (0) = n+.thisis irreduciblesince isinfinite:ifn =0 this is clear since proper closed subsets of are finite. Suppose it is true for n. Then for any two proper closed subsets Y,Z, lety, z 2 n so that y 6 Y and z 6 Z. Then there are only finitely many points in y \ Y and z \ Z. Let w 2 so that (y, w) /2 Y,(z,w) /2 Z. ThenY \ n w and Z \ n w are proper closed subsets of n w whose union is the whole. But, by induction on n, n w is irreducible. Contradiction. We can now complete Mumford s proof [5] that the image of the Segre embedding : P n ( ) P m ( )! P n+m+nm ( ) is irreducible in the topology and therefore irreducible in the ktopology. Proof of Corollary Suppose not. Then is the union of two proper closed nonempty subsets. The complements of these closed subsets are disjoint nonempty open sets U,U 2. We would like to say that the inverse images of these are open subsets of P n ( ) P m ( ). However, we do not (yet) know the topology on such a product space. (It is NOT the product topology!) But we can use the continuity in each variable. Since : P n P m! is onto by definition, we have disjoint nonempty subsets (U ), (U 2 ). Let ([a], [b]) 2 (U ) and ([c], [d]) 2 (U 2 ). This means that [a] 2 b (U ), [c] 2 d (U 2) So, we have two nonempty subsets b (U ), d (U 2) of P n ( ) which are open in the  topology. Since P n ( ) is irreducible, any two open sets meet. So, there is [e] intheintersection. So, ([e], [b]) 2 (U ) and ([e], [d]) 2 (U 2 ). This implies that e (U ), e (U 2 ) are nonempty open subsets of P m ( ). Since P m ( ) is irreducible, they meet at some point ([e], [f]). This means ([e], [f]) lies in U \ U 2 which is a contradiction. Another proof of the same thing can be given using graded rings and graded ideals Graded rings and graded ideals. Definition A graded ring is a ring R which is decomposed as an infinite direct sum: R = R 0 R R 2 so that R n R m R n+m. Elements in R d are said to be homogeneous of degree d. The condition R n R m R n+m means deg(fg)=degf +degg if f,g are homogeneous. The equation R = L R d means that every element of R is equal to a sum of homogeneous components which all lie in R.
7 26 KIYOSHI IGUSA BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY The basic example is R = k[x,,x n ]. A graded ring can be constructed from its pieces as follows. Let R 0 be a ring and let R n be R 0 modules. Let µ n,m : R n R m! R n+m be an R 0 bilinear mapping which is () commutative: µ n,m (a, b) =µ m,n (b, a) for all a 2 R n,b2 R m. (2) associative: µ(a, µ(b, c)) = µ(µ(a, b),c) for all a, b, c in R n,r m,r k. (3) µ : R 0 R n! R n gives the action of R 0 on R n. Then R = L R n is a graded ring. A graded ideal can be constructed using the same idea. Definition A graded ideal in a graded ring R = L R d is a sequence of R 0 submodules I n R n so that I n R m I n+m. Proposition Graded ideals are the same as homogeneous ideal in R = L R n. Proof. A graded ideal I = L I n is clearly an ideal. It is homogeneous since it is generated by elements of S I n. (Keep in mind that there is one element 0 which is in all I n and all R n but, otherwise, the sets R n are disjoint.) Conversely, any homogeneous ideal a in a graded ring R is a graded ideal since a contains I n = a \ R n and a = L I n. The grading makes it easier to talk about projective algebraic sets: V (I) ={[x] 2 P n ( ) : f(x) =08f 2 I d 8d} Definition Let R = L R n, S = L S m be graded kalgebras. Then a graded k homomorphism of degree d is a homomorphism of kalgebras ' : R! S so that '(R n ) S dn for all n. (Note that all rings are Zalgebras.) Proposition (a) The kernel of any graded homomorphism ' : R! S of graded rings is a graded ideal in R: ker ' = L (ker ' n : R n! S dn ) (b) Conversely, any graded ideal I R is the kernel of a degree graded homomorphism: ' : R S = L R n /I n given in degree n by the quotient map R n S n = R n I n. Going back to our example, one way to show that an ideal is prime is to show that it is the kernel of a graded homomorphism. In our case, I =(XW XY ) is the kernel of the (degree 2) graded homomorphism: ' : k[x, Y, Z, W]! k[s, T, U, V ] '(X) = SU '(Y ) = SV '(Z) = TU '(W ) = TV It is clear that XW YZ 2 ker '. To show that ker ' = I =(XW YZ), we should compare: ker ' d : R d! S 2d and I d =(XW YZ)R d 2
8 LECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A 27 Lemma If R = k[x 0,,X n ] then R 0 = k and R d a vector space over k of dimension with basis given by the monomials n+d n X = X a 0 0 Xan n where := P a i = d and all a i 0. n+d n Proof. There are monomials of degree d in n + variables. This is obvious from some examples: Take n =2,d= 7. The statement is that there are n+d n = 9 2 = 36 monomials in three letters of degree 7. To see this consider X 3 Y 2 Z 2 = XXX YY ZZ We put partitions between the letters. There are d letters and n partitions. The monomial is completely determined by the position of the partitions. For example: corresponds to Y 4 Z 3 (no X s): You are only allowed to put X i between the ith and i + st partitions. Since you choose n out of n + d placed to put your partitions, you get n+d n. We say that X has multidegree =(a 0,,a n ). In the case at hand we have: d +3 dim R d = = d + (d + 3)(d + 2) 3 6 d + dim I d =dimr d 2 = = d + d(d + ) 3 6 and the di erence is dim R d /I d = d + 6 (d2 +5d +6 d 2 d)=(d + ) 2. On the other hand, '(R d ) is spanned by monomials S a T b U c V e where a + b = d = c + e. There are (d + ) 2 such monomials. So, by linear algebra, I d =ker' d. So, I =ker' is a prime ideal. (Maybe not the most e cient way to prove this. But, when you get used to it, you can do this calculation very fast.) A similar calculation works for the general case k[z]! k[x, Y ] '(Z ij )=X i Y j Example Here is an example in [4]. The twisted cubic is V (I) P 3 ( ) where I is the kernel of the degree 3 graded homomorphism ' : k[x, Y, Z, W]! k[s, T ] '(X) = S 3 '(Y ) = S 2 T '(Z) = ST 2 '(W ) = T 3 Since ' is graded, the kernel I is a graded ideal in k[x, Y, Z, W]. The claim is: I =(XZ Y 2,YW Z 2,XW YZ) Certainly, these lie in ker '. It is also easy to see that ' d : R d! S 3d
9 28 KIYOSHI IGUSA BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY is surjective. Furthermore, any two monomials in the inverse image of S a T 3d a di er by a element of I d. So, I =ker'. (Proof: We can assume a apple 3d a. Then for any monomial X i Y j Z k W ` in ' (S a T 3d a ), we have k + ` 0. So, we can exchange all X terms using the relations XZ Y 2,XW YZ modulo I d.thenwehavei = 0. Next we can eliminate either Y or W in the expression using YW = Z 2. We are left with either Y Z or Z W which is unique.) The graded homomorphism ' : k[x, Y, Z, W]! k[s, T ] gives a morphism f ' : P ( )! P 3 ( ) defined by f ' ([s, t]) = [s 3,s 2 t, st 2,t 3 ] This is welldefined since, if we replace [s, t] with the equivalent [s 0,t 0 ]=[ s, t] then f ' ([s 0,t 0 ]) = [ 3 s 3, 3 s 2 t, 3 st 2, Claim: Let denote the image of this mapping. Then =V (I) where I =(XZ Y 2,YW Z 2,XW YZ). Proof: It is clear that V (I) since each generator of I is a homogeneous polynomial which is zero on the image of f '. Conversely, suppose that [x, y, z, w] 2 V (I). Then xz = y 2,yw = z 2,xw = yz. Also, either x 6= 0 or w 6= 0 (otherwise x = y = z = w =0 which is not allowed). Suppose w 6= 0. Then we may assume w =. Then, y = z 2 and x = yz = z 3. So, [x, y, z, ] = [z 3,z 2,z,] = f ' ([z,]) is in the image of f '. Lecture 8 ends here. We skipped the next subsection because it is routine Irreducible algebraic sets in P n. We need to verify that the arguments used in the a ne case carry over to the homogeneous case. Lemma A homogeneous ideal a in k[x] is prime i it satisfies the following. For any two homogenous polynomials f,g, iffg 2 a then either f 2 a or g 2 a. Remark This can be rephased (and generalized) in two equivalent ways: () A graded ring R = L R n is a domain i there are no nonzero elements f 2 R n,g 2 R m so that fg = 0. (2) A graded ideal I = L I d in a graded ring R = L R d is prime i for all f 2 R n \I n, g 2 R m \I m, fg 2 R n+m \I n+m. Proof. Prime ideals certainly have this property. Conversely, suppose that a is homogeneous and has this property. Let f,g be arbitrary polynomials so that fg 2 a. Let f [n],g [m] be the highest degree terms in f,g. Then f [n] g [m] 2 a since it is the highest degree term in fg. So, either f [n] or g [m] lies in a, sayf [n] 2 a. Then(f f [n] )g 2 a. By induction, either f f [n] 2 a (which implies f 2 a) or g 2 a. So, a is prime. By a similar argument we have the following. Lemma A homogeneous ideal a in k[x] is primary i it satisfies the following. For any two homogenous polynomials f,g, iffg 2 a then either f 2 r(a) or g 2 a. Write this in terms of graded ideals in any graded ring. 3 t 3 ]
10 LECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A 29 Proof. We may assume that none of the homogeneous components of g lie in a. Then f [n] g [m] 2 a implies that f [n] 2 r(a). Let k be minimal so that (f [n] ) k g 2 a. Then (f f [n] )(f [n] ) k g =(f [n] ) k fg (f [n] ) k g 2 a and (f [n] ) k g/2 a. So, f f [n] 2 r(a) (whichimpliesf 2 r(a) by induction on the number of homogeneous components of f). Using these lemmas, the proof in the a ne case carries over to show the following. Proposition Every homogeneous radical ideal in any graded Noetherian ring is the intersection of finitely many homogeneous prime ideals. Theorem Irreducible closed subsets of P n ( ) correspond to homogeneous prime ideal in k[x] not equal to (X 0,,X n ). Furthermore, every closed subset of P n ( ) can be expressed uniquely as a finite union of irreducible subsets. Note: the uniqueness is a topological property. The proof of Proposition.4.2 works in any topological space. Lecture Projective schemes. The purpose of this section is to construct the projective analogue of Spec(R) and prove the analogue of Theorem.9.3. We continue using the color code: red for schemes, blue for varieties. Definition Let R = L R d be a graded ring. Then Proj(R) is defined to be the following topological space (together with a sheaf which will be constructed later). As a set Proj(R) is the set of homogeneous prime ideals in R which are not equal to the ideal L d>0 R d. In the special case R = k[x 0,,X n ], this is the ideal (X 0,X,,X n )which was excluded before. The topology on Proj(R) is given as follows. For any f 2 R, let V (f) ={P 2 Proj(R) :f 2 P } These sets are defined to be closed. General closed sets are intersections of these sets: V (S) = \ V (f) ={P 2 Proj(R) :S P } f2s In the case R = k[x] we have a bijection: irreducible closed subsets of P n ( ) $ P 2 Proj(k[X]) Theorem There is a continuous epimorphism : P n ( ) Proj(k[X]) given by ([x]) = P where P 2 Proj(k[X]) corresponds to the irreducible set [x]. Proof. We first show is surjective. Let P be a homogeneous prime ideal in R = k[x 0,,X n ], P 6= (X 0,,X n ). Then P 6= (X 0,,X n ) prime ) V (P ) 6= {0} n+ irreducible We know that V (P ) has a generic point y 2 n+. And y 6= 0 since, otherwise, V (P )= 0={0}, the excluded case. So, y gives a point [y] 2 P n ( ). Let = V (P ). Claim: [y] =.(Thus ([y]) = P.) Pf: [y] = 0 = V (I) wherei is some graded ideal. But y 2 V (I) closed V (P )implies V (I) =V (P )impliesi = P. So, 0 =.
11 30 KIYOSHI IGUSA BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY Next we show is continuous. Take a closed subset V (f) Proj(R). Then (V (f)) ={[y] 2 P n ( ) : f 2 I([y])} = V (f). But V (f) P n ( ) is a closed subset by definition. So, is continuous. Corollary The continuous epimorphism : P n ( ) Proj(R) is also an open mapping. Therefore, Proj(R) has the quotient topology. Proof. Every open subset of Y = P n is a union of basic open sets Y f where f 2 k[x] is homogeneous. But Y f is the complement of V (f). And (V (f)) =V (f) implies that (Y f ) is the complement of V (f) in Proj(R). So, is an open mapping as claimed. Example Let k = R and consider P ( )! Proj(R[X, Y ]). Then P (R) =R [ is a circle and P ( ) = [. The elements of P ( ) are [,x] for x 2 and =[0,x]= [0,y] 8x, y. P ( ) has three kinds of points: () P (R) is the set of closed point x = {x}, x 2 R and. (2) P (C) is the set of x =[y] so that x is finite (consisting of [y] and [y], the complex conjugate of [y]. (3) P ( )\P (C) is the set of generic points. This comes from dimension theory. The only homogeneous ideal in R[X, Y ] which is not maximal is 0. Consider Proj(R[X, Y ]) as the quotient space of P ( ) under the identification [x] [y] if ([x]) = ([y]). This gives the following. P (C) =C [ is a sphere. The equator is P (R). The identification is z z. This identifies the top hemisphere with the bottom hemisphere. All other points are generic and therefore are identified to one point in Proj. So, Proj(R[X, Y ]) is a 2dimensional disk with one generic point which we view as being smeared over the entire disk (like peanut butter on a cracker). Spec(R) = [ (generic point) We did another example. The key point was: Given ' : R! S a graded homomorphism of degree d, there is an induced mapping ' : Proj(S)! Proj(R) sending P to Q = ' (P ). This mapping is continuous since since f 2 ' (P ), '(f) 2 P. (' ) (V (f)) = {P : f 2 ' (P )} = V ('(f)) 2.6. Projective space as union of a ne spaces. Recall that P n ( ) = S U i where U i = {x i 6=0}. Then n = Ui (x,,x n ) 7! [x,,x i,,x i+,,x n ] Projective space (together with its structure sheaf) is the basic example of a variety which is not a ne but rather made up of a ne varieties pasted together. We need to study this so
12 LECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A 3 that we can generalize the construction later. The a ne pieces U i are pasted together along their intersection. This pasting is given by isomorphisms of open subsets of irreducible sets. We want to see how U i,u j are pasted together. By symmetry we can assume i =0,j =. We look at U 0 \ U and see where it goes to under the equivalence n = U i. x 0 6=0 x 6=0 U 0 U = U 0 \ U x 0,x 6=0 = V 0 V x y n x 6=0 x 6=0 n The image of U 0 \U under the equivalences U i = n are shaded. The image under both maps is the set V 0 = V = {x 6=0}. The mapping : V 0! V is the pasting map: :(x,,x n ) 7! [,x,,x n ]/x 7!, x 2,, x n x x x This is a regular function with 2 = id. In the drawing, (x) =y. Since V 0,V are given by X 6= 0, the ring of regular functions on V 0 and V is V 0 = V = k[x 0,X,X 2,,X n ]/(X 0 X ) = R Then ' : V = V0 is given by ' (X 0 )=X,' (X )=X 0 and ' (X i )=X 0 X i for i 2. This is an automorphism of R as kalgebra with (' ) 2 = id. In my notes I verified that the ring isomorphism ' induces an isomorphism (' ) : Spec( V 0 )! Spec( V ) which is compatible with the homeomorphism in the sense that (' ) sends the prime ideal (x) to (y) ify = (x). But I don t think I got to that in class. We will do this again later (verify that the pasting together of a ne varieties is compatible with the pasting together of corresponding a ne schemes).
NOTES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A. Contents Introduction Affine varieties 22
NOTES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A KIYOSHI IGUSA BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY Contents Introduction 1 1. Affine varieties 2 1.1. Weak Nullstellensatz 2 1.2. Noether s normalization theorem 2 1.3. Nullstellensatz
More informationLECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A
LECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A KIYOSHI IGUSA BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY Contents Introduction 1 Overfield 1 1. A ne varieties 2 1.1. Lecture 1: Weak Nullstellensatz 2 1.2. Lecture 2: Noether s normalization
More informationCourse 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................
More informationMath 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes
Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes 1 Affine Schemes Let R be a commutative ring with 1. Definition 1.1. The prime spectrum of R, denoted Spec(R), is the set of prime ideals of the ring R. Spec(R) = {P R
More informationDMATH Algebraic Geometry FS 2018 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski. Solutions Sheet 1. Classical Varieties
DMATH Algebraic Geometry FS 2018 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski Solutions Sheet 1 Classical Varieties Let K be an algebraically closed field. All algebraic sets below are defined over K, unless specified otherwise.
More informationCHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES
CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ. ANDREW SALCH 1. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz. The last lecture left off with the claim that, if J k[x 1,..., x n ] is an ideal, then
More information3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions
24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice
More informationFILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.
FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0
More informationInstitutionen för matematik, KTH.
Institutionen för matematik, KTH. Contents 7 Affine Varieties 1 7.1 The polynomial ring....................... 1 7.2 Hypersurfaces........................... 1 7.3 Ideals...............................
More informationAlgebraic varieties. Chapter A ne varieties
Chapter 4 Algebraic varieties 4.1 A ne varieties Let k be a field. A ne nspace A n = A n k = kn. It s coordinate ring is simply the ring R = k[x 1,...,x n ]. Any polynomial can be evaluated at a point
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes!
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes! 1. Some algebraic geometry The subject of algebraic groups depends on the interaction between algebraic geometry and group theory.
More information12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem
12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem 95 12. Hilbert Polynomials and Bézout s Theorem After our study of smooth cubic surfaces in the last chapter, let us now come back to the general theory of
More information= Spec(Rf ) R p. 2 R m f gives a section a of the stalk bundle over X f as follows. For any [p] 2 X f (f /2 p), let a([p]) = ([p], a) wherea =
LECTURES ON ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY MATH 202A 41 5. Affine schemes The definition of an a ne scheme is very abstract. We will bring it down to Earth. However, we will concentrate on the definitions. Properties
More informationPROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasiaffine varieties
PROBLEMS, MATH 214A k is an algebraically closed field Basic notions Affine and quasiaffine varieties 1. Let X A 2 be defined by x 2 + y 2 = 1 and x = 1. Find the ideal I(X). 2. Prove that the subset
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More information10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann
82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It
More informationTROPICAL SCHEME THEORY
TROPICAL SCHEME THEORY 5. Commutative algebra over idempotent semirings II Quotients of semirings When we work with rings, a quotient object is specified by an ideal. When dealing with semirings (and lattices),
More informationSpring 2016, lecture notes by Maksym Fedorchuk 51
Spring 2016, lecture notes by Maksym Fedorchuk 51 10.2. Problem Set 2 Solution Problem. Prove the following statements. (1) The nilradical of a ring R is the intersection of all prime ideals of R. (2)
More informationSummer Algebraic Geometry Seminar
Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar Lectures by Bart Snapp About This Document These lectures are based on Chapters 1 and 2 of An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry by Karen Smith et al. 1 Affine Varieties
More informationMath 145. Codimension
Math 145. Codimension 1. Main result and some interesting examples In class we have seen that the dimension theory of an affine variety (irreducible!) is linked to the structure of the function field in
More informationMATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA
MATH 101B: ALGEBRA II PART A: HOMOLOGICAL ALGEBRA These are notes for our first unit on the algebraic side of homological algebra. While this is the last topic (Chap XX) in the book, it makes sense to
More informationMath 203A  Solution Set 1
Math 203A  Solution Set 1 Problem 1. Show that the Zariski topology on A 2 is not the product of the Zariski topologies on A 1 A 1. Answer: Clearly, the diagonal Z = {(x, y) : x y = 0} A 2 is closed in
More informationRings and groups. Ya. Sysak
Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak 1 Noetherian rings Let R be a ring. A (right) R module M is called noetherian if it satisfies the maximum condition for its submodules. In other words, if M 1... M i M i+1...
More informationABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES
ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES Affine Varieties Notation. Let k be a field, such as the rational numbers Q or the complex numbers C. We call affine nspace the collection A n k of points P = a 1, a,..., a
More informationAlgebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties
Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties Trang June 16, 2010 1 Lecture 1 Let k be a field and k[x 1,..., x n ] the polynomial ring with coefficients in k. Then we have two
More informationMATH 205B NOTES 2010 COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 53
MATH 205B NOTES 2010 COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 53 10. Completion The real numbers are the completion of the rational numbers with respect to the usual absolute value norm. This means that any Cauchy sequence
More informationCOMPLEX VARIETIES AND THE ANALYTIC TOPOLOGY
COMPLEX VARIETIES AND THE ANALYTIC TOPOLOGY BRIAN OSSERMAN Classical algebraic geometers studied algebraic varieties over the complex numbers. In this setting, they didn t have to worry about the Zariski
More informationAlgebraic Geometry. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014
Algebraic Geometry Andreas Gathmann Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2014 Contents 0. Introduction......................... 3 1. Affine Varieties........................ 9 2. The Zariski Topology......................
More information12. Linear systems Theorem Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an Amorphism then L = φ O P n
12. Linear systems Theorem 12.1. Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an Amorphism then L = φ O P n A (1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections s 0, s
More informationne varieties (continued)
Chapter 2 A ne varieties (continued) 2.1 Products For some problems its not very natural to restrict to irreducible varieties. So we broaden the previous story. Given an a ne algebraic set X A n k, we
More informationHomogeneous Coordinate Ring
Students: Kaiserslautern University Algebraic Group June 14, 2013 Outline Quotients in Algebraic Geometry 1 Quotients in Algebraic Geometry 2 3 4 Outline Quotients in Algebraic Geometry 1 Quotients in
More informationMath 203A  Solution Set 1
Math 203A  Solution Set 1 Problem 1. Show that the Zariski topology on A 2 is not the product of the Zariski topologies on A 1 A 1. Answer: Clearly, the diagonal Z = {(x, y) : x y = 0} A 2 is closed in
More informationAlgebraic Varieties. Chapter Algebraic Varieties
Chapter 12 Algebraic Varieties 12.1 Algebraic Varieties Let K be a field, n 1 a natural number, and let f 1,..., f m K[X 1,..., X n ] be polynomials with coefficients in K. Then V = {(a 1,..., a n ) :
More informationMATH32062 Notes. 1 Affine algebraic varieties. 1.1 Definition of affine algebraic varieties
MATH32062 Notes 1 Affine algebraic varieties 1.1 Definition of affine algebraic varieties We want to define an algebraic variety as the solution set of a collection of polynomial equations, or equivalently,
More informationTopological properties
CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological
More information(dim Z j dim Z j 1 ) 1 j i
Math 210B. Codimension 1. Main result and some interesting examples Let k be a field, and A a domain finitely generated kalgebra. In class we have seen that the dimension theory of A is linked to the
More informationHARTSHORNE EXERCISES
HARTSHORNE EXERCISES J. WARNER Hartshorne, Exercise I.5.6. Blowing Up Curve Singularities (a) Let Y be the cusp x 3 = y 2 + x 4 + y 4 or the node xy = x 6 + y 6. Show that the curve Ỹ obtained by blowing
More informationChapter 2 Linear Transformations
Chapter 2 Linear Transformations Linear Transformations Loosely speaking, a linear transformation is a function from one vector space to another that preserves the vector space operations. Let us be more
More informationAlgebraic Varieties. Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra
Algebraic Varieties Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra Algebraic varieties represent solutions of a system of polynomial
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #15 10/29/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #15 10/29/2013 As usual, k is a perfect field and k is a fixed algebraic closure of k. Recall that an affine (resp. projective) variety is an
More informationResolution of Singularities in Algebraic Varieties
Resolution of Singularities in Algebraic Varieties Emma Whitten Summer 28 Introduction Recall that algebraic geometry is the study of objects which are or locally resemble solution sets of polynomial equations.
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS J. WARNER Let k be an algebraically closed field. varieties unless otherwise stated. 1. Definitions and Examples For simplicity we will work strictly with affine Definition 1.1. An algebraic
More informationThe most important result in this section is undoubtedly the following theorem.
28 COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 6.4. Examples of Noetherian rings. So far the only rings we can easily prove are Noetherian are principal ideal domains, like Z and k[x], or finite. Our goal now is to develop theorems
More informationExercise Sheet 3  Solutions
Algebraic Geometry DMATH, FS 2016 Prof. Pandharipande Exercise Sheet 3  Solutions 1. Prove the following basic facts about algebraic maps. a) For f : X Y and g : Y Z algebraic morphisms of quasiprojective
More informationMATH 631: ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: HOMEWORK 1 SOLUTIONS
MATH 63: ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: HOMEWORK SOLUTIONS Problem. (a.) The (t + ) (t + ) minors m (A),..., m k (A) of an n m matrix A are polynomials in the entries of A, and m i (A) = 0 for all i =,..., k if and
More informationBEZOUT S THEOREM CHRISTIAN KLEVDAL
BEZOUT S THEOREM CHRISTIAN KLEVDAL A weaker version of Bézout s theorem states that if C, D are projective plane curves of degrees c and d that intersect transversally, then C D = cd. The goal of this
More information(1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections
7. Linear systems First a word about the base scheme. We would lie to wor in enough generality to cover the general case. On the other hand, it taes some wor to state properly the general results if one
More information10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz
10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz 91 10. Noether Normalization and Hilbert s Nullstellensatz In the last chapter we have gained much understanding for integral and finite ring extensions.
More informationA course in. Algebraic Geometry. Taught by Prof. Xinwen Zhu. Fall 2011
A course in Algebraic Geometry Taught by Prof. Xinwen Zhu Fall 2011 1 Contents 1. September 1 3 2. September 6 6 3. September 8 11 4. September 20 16 5. September 22 21 6. September 27 25 7. September
More informationProjective Varieties. Chapter Projective Space and Algebraic Sets
Chapter 1 Projective Varieties 1.1 Projective Space and Algebraic Sets 1.1.1 Definition. Consider A n+1 = A n+1 (k). The set of all lines in A n+1 passing through the origin 0 = (0,..., 0) is called the
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 4: MORE ABOUT VARIETIES AND REGULAR FUNCTIONS.
ALGERAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 4: MORE AOUT VARIETIES AND REGULAR FUNCTIONS. ANDREW SALCH. More about some claims from the last lecture. Perhaps you have noticed by now that the Zariski topology
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES
AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES BROOKE ULLERY Abstract. This paper gives a basic introduction to modern algebraic geometry. The goal of this paper is to present the basic concepts of algebraic geometry,
More informationdiv(f ) = D and deg(d) = deg(f ) = d i deg(f i ) (compare this with the definitions for smooth curves). Let:
Algebraic Curves/Fall 015 Aaron Bertram 4. Projective Plane Curves are hypersurfaces in the plane CP. When nonsingular, they are Riemann surfaces, but we will also consider plane curves with singularities.
More informationMath 203A  Solution Set 1
Math 203A  Solution Set 1 Problem 1. Show that the Zariski topology on A 2 is not the product of the Zariski topologies on A 1 A 1. Answer: Clearly, the diagonal Z = {(x, y) : x y = 0} A 2 is closed in
More information2. Prime and Maximal Ideals
18 Andreas Gathmann 2. Prime and Maximal Ideals There are two special kinds of ideals that are of particular importance, both algebraically and geometrically: the socalled prime and maximal ideals. Let
More informationYuriy Drozd. Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry. Kaiserslautern 1998/99
Yuriy Drozd Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry Kaiserslautern 1998/99 CHAPTER 1 Affine Varieties 1.1. Ideals and varieties. Hilbert s Basis Theorem Let K be an algebraically closed field. We denote by
More informationπ X : X Y X and π Y : X Y Y
Math 6130 Notes. Fall 2002. 6. Hausdorffness and Compactness. We would like to be able to say that all quasiprojective varieties are Hausdorff and that projective varieties are the only compact varieties.
More informationAlgebraic Geometry. Instructor: Stephen Diaz & Typist: Caleb McWhorter. Spring 2015
Algebraic Geometry Instructor: Stephen Diaz & Typist: Caleb McWhorter Spring 2015 Contents 1 Varieties 2 1.1 Affine Varieties....................................... 2 1.50 Projective Varieties.....................................
More information12 Hilbert polynomials
12 Hilbert polynomials 12.1 Calibration Let X P n be a (not necessarily irreducible) closed algebraic subset. In this section, we ll look at a device which measures the way X sits inside P n. Throughout
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CAUCHER BIRKAR
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CAUCHER BIRKAR Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Affine varieties 3 Exercises 10 3. Quasiprojective varieties. 12 Exercises 20 4. Dimension 21 5. Exercises 24 References 25 1. Introduction
More informationMath 203A, Solution Set 6.
Math 203A, Solution Set 6. Problem 1. (Finite maps.) Let f 0,..., f m be homogeneous polynomials of degree d > 0 without common zeros on X P n. Show that gives a finite morphism onto its image. f : X P
More informationCommutative Algebra. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2013/14
Commutative Algebra Andreas Gathmann Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2013/14 Contents 0. Introduction......................... 3 1. Ideals........................... 9 2. Prime and Maximal Ideals.....................
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY (NMAG401) Contents. 2. Polynomial and rational maps 9 3. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz and consequences 23 References 30
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY (NMAG401) JAN ŠŤOVÍČEK Contents 1. Affine varieties 1 2. Polynomial and rational maps 9 3. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz and consequences 23 References 30 1. Affine varieties The basic objects
More informationReid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed.
Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed. Answer: Note that the first generator factors as (y
More informationwhere m is the maximal ideal of O X,p. Note that m/m 2 is a vector space. Suppose that we are given a morphism
8. Smoothness and the Zariski tangent space We want to give an algebraic notion of the tangent space. In differential geometry, tangent vectors are equivalence classes of maps of intervals in R into the
More information9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up
72 Andreas Gathmann 9. Birational Maps and Blowing Up In the course of this class we have already seen many examples of varieties that are almost the same in the sense that they contain isomorphic dense
More informationLecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman
Lecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman October 17, 2006 TALK SLOWLY AND WRITE NEATLY!! 1 0.1 Integral Domains and Fraction Fields 0.1.1 Theorems Now what we are going
More informationNOTES ON FINITE FIELDS
NOTES ON FINITE FIELDS AARON LANDESMAN CONTENTS 1. Introduction to finite fields 2 2. Definition and constructions of fields 3 2.1. The definition of a field 3 2.2. Constructing field extensions by adjoining
More informationIntegral Extensions. Chapter Integral Elements Definitions and Comments Lemma
Chapter 2 Integral Extensions 2.1 Integral Elements 2.1.1 Definitions and Comments Let R be a subring of the ring S, and let α S. We say that α is integral over R if α isarootofamonic polynomial with coefficients
More informationMATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE
MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE 1 2 STEFAN GILLE 1. Rings We recall first the definition of a group. 1.1. Definition. Let G be a non empty set. The set G is called a group if there is a map called
More informationInfiniteDimensional Triangularization
InfiniteDimensional Triangularization Zachary Mesyan March 11, 2018 Abstract The goal of this paper is to generalize the theory of triangularizing matrices to linear transformations of an arbitrary vector
More informationChapter 1. Affine algebraic geometry. 1.1 The Zariski topology on A n
Chapter 1 Affine algebraic geometry We shall restrict our attention to affine algebraic geometry, meaning that the algebraic varieties we consider are precisely the closed subvarieties of affine n space
More informationMATH 221 NOTES BRENT HO. Date: January 3, 2009.
MATH 22 NOTES BRENT HO Date: January 3, 2009. 0 Table of Contents. Localizations......................................................................... 2 2. Zariski Topology......................................................................
More information8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions
70 Andreas Gathmann 8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions 13 When it comes to actual computations, Euclidean domains (or more generally principal ideal domains) are probably the nicest rings
More informationAlgebraic structures I
MTH5100 Assignment 110 Algebraic structures I For handing in on various dates January March 2011 1 FUNCTIONS. Say which of the following rules successfully define functions, giving reasons. For each one
More informationMAS 6396 Algebraic Curves Spring Semester 2016 Notes based on Algebraic Curves by Fulton. Timothy J. Ford April 4, 2016
MAS 6396 Algebraic Curves Spring Semester 2016 Notes based on Algebraic Curves by Fulton Timothy J. Ford April 4, 2016 FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431 Email address: ford@fau.edu
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013 As usual, all the rings we consider are commutative rings with an identity element. 18.1 Regular local rings Consider a local
More information(1) A frac = b : a, b A, b 0. We can define addition and multiplication of fractions as we normally would. a b + c d
The Algebraic Method 0.1. Integral Domains. Emmy Noether and others quickly realized that the classical algebraic number theory of Dedekind could be abstracted completely. In particular, rings of integers
More informationReview of Linear Algebra
Review of Linear Algebra Throughout these notes, F denotes a field (often called the scalars in this context). 1 Definition of a vector space Definition 1.1. A F vector space or simply a vector space
More information9. Integral Ring Extensions
80 Andreas Gathmann 9. Integral ing Extensions In this chapter we want to discuss a concept in commutative algebra that has its original motivation in algebra, but turns out to have surprisingly many applications
More informationExploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry
Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry Victor I. Piercey University of Arizona Integration Workshop Project August 610, 2010 1 Introduction In this project, we will describe the basic topology
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS
REPRESENTATION THEORY, LECTURE 0. BASICS IVAN LOSEV Introduction The aim of this lecture is to recall some standard basic things about the representation theory of finite dimensional algebras and finite
More informationTheorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u.
5. Fields 5.1. Field extensions. Let F E be a subfield of the field E. We also describe this situation by saying that E is an extension field of F, and we write E/F to express this fact. If E/F is a field
More informationMath 6140 Notes. Spring Codimension One Phenomena. Definition: Examples: Properties:
Math 6140 Notes. Spring 2003. 11. Codimension One Phenomena. A property of the points of a variety X holds in codimension one if the locus of points for which the property fails to hold is contained in
More informationCOMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 15(3), (1987) A NOTE ON PRIME IDEALS WHICH TEST INJECTIVITY. John A. Beachy and William D.
COMMUNICATIONS IN ALGEBRA, 15(3), 471 478 (1987) A NOTE ON PRIME IDEALS WHICH TEST INJECTIVITY John A. Beachy and William D. Weakley Department of Mathematical Sciences Northern Illinois University DeKalb,
More informationMath 40510, Algebraic Geometry
Math 40510, Algebraic Geometry Problem Set 1, due February 10, 2016 1. Let k = Z p, the field with p elements, where p is a prime. Find a polynomial f k[x, y] that vanishes at every point of k 2. [Hint:
More informationMath 210B. Artin Rees and completions
Math 210B. Artin Rees and completions 1. Definitions and an example Let A be a ring, I an ideal, and M an Amodule. In class we defined the Iadic completion of M to be M = lim M/I n M. We will soon show
More informationAN EXPOSITION OF THE RIEMANN ROCH THEOREM FOR CURVES
AN EXPOSITION OF THE RIEMANN ROCH THEOREM FOR CURVES DOMINIC L. WYNTER Abstract. We introduce the concepts of divisors on nonsingular irreducible projective algebraic curves, the genus of such a curve,
More informationMath 203A  Solution Set 3
Math 03A  Solution Set 3 Problem 1 Which of the following algebraic sets are isomorphic: (i) A 1 (ii) Z(xy) A (iii) Z(x + y ) A (iv) Z(x y 5 ) A (v) Z(y x, z x 3 ) A Answer: We claim that (i) and (v)
More informationMath 762 Spring h Y (Z 1 ) (1) h X (Z 2 ) h X (Z 1 ) Φ Z 1. h Y (Z 2 )
Math 762 Spring 2016 Homework 3 Drew Armstrong Problem 1. Yoneda s Lemma. We have seen that the bifunctor Hom C (, ) : C C Set is analogous to a bilinear form on a Kvector space, : V V K. Recall that
More informationMath 216A. A gluing construction of Proj(S)
Math 216A. A gluing construction o Proj(S) 1. Some basic deinitions Let S = n 0 S n be an Ngraded ring (we ollows French terminology here, even though outside o France it is commonly accepted that N does
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More information4.4 Noetherian Rings
4.4 Noetherian Rings Recall that a ring A is Noetherian if it satisfies the following three equivalent conditions: (1) Every nonempty set of ideals of A has a maximal element (the maximal condition); (2)
More informationPure Math 764, Winter 2014
Compact course notes Pure Math 764, Winter 2014 Introduction to Algebraic Geometry Lecturer: R. Moraru transcribed by: J. Lazovskis University of Waterloo April 20, 2014 Contents 1 Basic geometric objects
More informationB 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.
Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2
More information1 Hilbert function. 1.1 Graded rings. 1.2 Graded modules. 1.3 Hilbert function
1 Hilbert function 1.1 Graded rings Let G be a commutative semigroup. A commutative ring R is called Ggraded when it has a (weak direct sum decomposition R = i G R i (that is, the R i are additive subgroups,
More informationLecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).
Lecture 2 1. Noetherian and Artinian rings and modules Let A be a commutative ring with identity, A M a module, and φ : M N an Alinear map. Then ker φ = {m M : φ(m) = 0} is a submodule of M and im φ is
More information14. Rational maps It is often the case that we are given a variety X and a morphism defined on an open subset U of X. As open sets in the Zariski
14. Rational maps It is often the case that we are given a variety X and a morphism defined on an open subset U of X. As open sets in the Zariski topology are very large, it is natural to view this as
More information4. Images of Varieties Given a morphism f : X Y of quasiprojective varieties, a basic question might be to ask what is the image of a closed subset
4. Images of Varieties Given a morphism f : X Y of quasiprojective varieties, a basic question might be to ask what is the image of a closed subset Z X. Replacing X by Z we might as well assume that Z
More information