For personal use only

Transcription

1 ASX ANNOUNCEMENT Date: 6 January 2015 Exploration Programme Update Highlights Initial geochemical soil sampling programmes completed Elevated copper and nickel anomalies defined on interpreted geological structures Large areas of calcrete defined by ground mapping coincident with anomalous radiometric responses defined in Victory Mines Limited (ASX: VIC) ( Victory or the Company ) is pleased to provide an update on exploration activities at the Station Bore project, which is approximately 80km north of Wiluna (see Figure 1). The surface geochemical survey and calcrete mapping programme at the Station Bore project (E69/2872) has now been completed and analytical results received and modelled. Figure 1 Station Bore Project Location Victory Mines Limited ABN Principal Place of Business: Unit 1, 249 Balcatta Road, Balcatta WA 6021 Telephone Fax Registered Office: Level 11, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 Telephone Fax

2 At the Station Bore project, some 80km north of Wiluna in the Eastern Goldfields, the Company completed a surface geochemical survey which consisted of 260 samples collected every 100 metres on lines spaced 500 metres apart. The sampling covered major structural features which were defined from an aerial magnetic and radiometric survey which was flown in A surface calcrete mapping programme was also undertaken to more closely define areas for further uranium exploration. These areas were initially defined from a low level (25 metres), close spaced (100 metres) combined magnetic and radiometric geophysical survey conducted in The areas of calcrete are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 Surface Calcrete Locations Victory Mines Limited ABN Principal Place of Business: Unit 1, 249 Balcatta Road, Balcatta WA 6021 Telephone Fax Registered Office: Level 11, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 Telephone Fax

3 The surface samples (which were approx. 500g in size) were then subject to analysis by a Niton XL3t XRF analyser. The collected samples were taken to a central point where they were analysed in the field. The device was calibrated in soil mode and routinely tested against pre-prepared industry standards. The copper and nickel results (as shown in Figures 3 and 4) were defined by concentrations detected by the Niton XRF device. The nickel and copper results are shown as Figures 3 and 4, are draped over the TMI magnetics. The dashed black lines show structures interpreted from the 2012 geophysical survey. There is a close correlation between the elevated nickel results and the interpreted structure in the north of the tenement and adjacent to the interpreted geological structure along the eastern side of the tenement, while there is a strong correlation between the elevated copper results along the eastern side of the tenement on the same interpreted geological structure. Figure 3 Nickel Results Determined by Niton XRF Analyser (ppm) Victory Mines Limited ABN Principal Place of Business: Unit 1, 249 Balcatta Road, Balcatta WA 6021 Telephone Fax Registered Office: Level 11, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 Telephone Fax

4 Figure 4 Copper Results Determined by Niton XRF Analyser (ppm) The results from the surface sampling programme are very encouraging and the Company is very much looking forward to conducting further exploration. Having elevated copper and nickel results over interpreted geological structures is viewed as being significant in a tenement that is very much under-explored. The Station Bore project is joint venture of which Victory is the manager and operator and in which Victory owns 70% of the project. Victory Mines Limited ABN Principal Place of Business: Unit 1, 249 Balcatta Road, Balcatta WA 6021 Telephone Fax Registered Office: Level 11, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 Telephone Fax

5 Planned follow up work will be to expand the surface geochemical programme to 1. Infill the areas already defined on a closer spaced pattern to more clearly define the anomalies 2. Extend the surface sampling programme to areas that have not yet been sampled to assist in define further areas of interest. Enquiries: Elizabeth Hunt Company Secretary Ben Jarvis Six Degrees Investor Relations or The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr Peter Peebles who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a Member of the AIG. Mr Peebles is employed by Darlington Geological Services Pty Ltd and is also the Technical Director of Victory Mines Ltd. Mr Peebles has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Peebles consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Victory Mines Limited ABN Principal Place of Business: Unit 1, 249 Balcatta Road, Balcatta WA 6021 Telephone Fax Registered Office: Level 11, 216 St Georges Terrace, Perth WA 6000 Telephone Fax

6 JORC Code, 2012 Edition Table 1 report template Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data Sampling techniques Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Samples collected near surface by shovel approx. 200mm below ground level. All elements analysed by hand held Niton XL3T XRF analyser. Niton XRF analyser calibrated in Soil mode Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where industry standard work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay ). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Not applicable as identification of mineralisation is in early stages of exploration Samples of approx. 0.5kg collected which were anlaysed by Niton XRF analyser for all elements. Drilling techniques Drill sample recovery Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc). Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential Sample recoveries recorded. Samples averaged 0.5 kg in size. Not applicable as sampling produced uniform 0.5 kg samples. Not applicable as sampling produced uniform samples No relationship determined between recovery and grade.

7 loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Regolith only was recorded. Not applicable as regolith only noted Not applicable as regolith only noted Subsampling techniques and sample preparation Quality of assay data and laboratory If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument Not applicable Samples dry No sample preparation required as samples nalysed by Niton XRF analyser Niton XRF calibrated prior to analysis in Soil mode. No field duplicates submitted. Sample sizes are considered suitable for surface geochemical studies.. Niton XL3T XRF analyser calibrated in soil mode with 30 second readings.

8 tests Verification of sampling and assaying Location of data points Data spacing and distribution Orientation of data in relation to geological structure make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established. The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control. Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. Niton XRF analyser calibrated in Soil mode.. Not carried out as exploration results derived from industry acceptable standards with appropriate QA QC control measures. Not applicable Sample data collected in the field and data entry completed in the office by experienced personnel No adjustments made. Sample points determined by hand held GPS device which has a deemed accuracy of +- 3 metres. This is considered sufficient for early stage exploration activities Coordinated determined in GDA94 Zone 51 Not applicable for surface geochemical studies. Samples collected on a nominal100m x 500m sample spacing, although some spacing either closer (200m) or wider (1km) Spacing considered acceptable for early stage surface geochemical sampling No composite sampling applied Sample lines oriented approximately normal to interpreted geological features. Not applicable

9 Sample security Audits or reviews The measures taken to ensure sample security. The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. Not applicable as samples analysed in the field No audits or reviews conducted Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results (Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.) Mineral tenement and land tenure status Exploration done by other parties Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area. Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. E69/28724 owned by Proto Resources & Investments Ltd in which Victory Mines has a 70% interest. Victory manages the project. Tenement granted for 5 year period which expires on 2/02/2017 Previous exploration included limited LAG sampling and geophysical studies Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Geology is greenstones intruded by granitoids. Mineralisation style yet to be determined. Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar All sample points and sample assay data is included in the two maps which are included in the body of the report

10 Data aggregatio n methods Relationshi p between mineralisati on widths and intercept lengths Diagrams Balanced reporting o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg down hole length, true width not known ). Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views. Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Appropriate maps and plans are included in the body of the report Not applicable at this stage of exploration

11 Other substantive exploration data Further work Exploration Results. Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances. The nature and scale of planned further work (eg tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive. Aerial geophysical surveys undertaken in The results of these surveys (together with structural interpretation) released in an ASX announcement by Victory Mines Ltd on 5 th February 2013 Infill areas already defined on a closer spaced pattern to more clearly define the anomalies and also to extend the surface geochemical programme to cover areas which have yet to be sampled. These areas can be determined from the maps included in the body of the report.