TEST REPORT. Page : 1 of 9 Report No. RT14R-U E Date: Oct. 13, : The following submitted sample(s) said to be:-

Transcription

1 Applicant Address : PSMC Co., Ltd. : #52, Banyeo-1dong, Haeundae-gu, Busan, Korea Page : 1 of 9 Sample Description : The following submitted sample(s) said to be:- Name/Type of Product Name of Material Sample ID No. Manufacturer/Vendor : Lead Frame : Cu Alloy-C194 : RT14R-U : PSMC Co., Ltd. Sample received : Oct. 06, 2014 Testing Date : Oct. 06, 2014 ~ Oct. 13, 2014 Test Type Test Method(s) Test Result(s) : RoHS wet chemical analysis : Please see the following page(s). : Please see the following page(s). * Note 1 : The test results presented in this report relate only to the object tested. * Note 2 : This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of the testing laboratory. Approved by, Authorized by, E.Y.Lee / Lab. Technical Manager H.W.Yoo / Lab. General Manager

2 Page : 2 of 9 Test Item Unit Test Method MDL Result Cadmium (Cd) With reference to IEC Edition 1.0 : 2013, by acid digestion and 0. Lead (Pb) determined by ICP-OES 5 20 Mercury (Hg) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+ ) (For metal) Hexavalent Chromium (Cr 6+ ) (For metal) Tested by : YK Cho, HJ Kim - - With reference to IEC Edition 1.0 : 2013, by acid digestion and determined by ICP-OES With reference to IEC Edition 1.0 : 2008, by Spot test With reference to IEC Edition 1.0 : 2008, by boiling water extraction and determined by UV-VIS Spectrophotometer 2 N.D. (Threshold of 1 ) (Threshold of 0.02 with 50 cm 2 ) Negative Negative Notes : = ppm = parts per million with 50 cm 2 = milligram per kilogram with 50 square centimeter < = Less than N.D. = Not detected ( <MDL ) MDL = Method detection limit Positive = A positive test result indicated the presence of Cr(VI) at the time of testing, equal to or greater than threshold of 1 for spot test procedures or 0.02 for boiling water extraction procedures with a sample surface area of 50 cm 2 used. However, it shall not be interpreted as the Cr(VI) concentration in the coating layer of the sample and should not be used as a method detection limit for this qualitative test. Negative = A negative test result indicates above positive observation was not found at the time of testing. When the spot test showed a negative result, the boiling water extraction procedure shall be used to verify the result.

3 Page : 3 of 9 Test Item Unit Test Method MDL Result Polybrominated Biphenyl (PBBs) Monobromobiphenyl Dibromobiphenyl Tribromobiphenyl Tetrabromobiphenyl With reference to Pentabromobiphenyl IEC Edition 1.0 : 2008, Hexabromobiphenyl by solvent extraction and Heptabromobiphenyl determined by GC/MS Octabromobiphenyl Nonabromobiphenyl Decabromobiphenyl Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether (PBDEs) Monobromodiphenyl ether Dibromodiphenyl ether Tribromodiphenyl ether Tetrabromodiphenyl ether With reference to Pentabromodiphenyl ether IEC Edition 1.0 : 2008, Hexabromodiphenyl ether by solvent extraction and Heptabromodiphenyl ether determined by GC/MS Octabromodiphenyl ether Nonabromodiphenyl ether Decabromodiphenyl ether Tested by : MB Song Notes : = ppm = parts per million < = Less than N.D. = Not detected ( <MDL ) MDL = Method detection limit

4 Page : 4 of 9 Test Item Unit Test Method MDL Result Antimony (Sb) With reference to US EPA 3052, by acid digestion and 2 N.D. determined by ICP-OES Bromine (Br) With reference to EN 14582, by oxygen combustion with 30 N.D. bomb and determined by IC Chlorine (Cl) With reference to EN 14582, by oxygen combustion with 30 N.D. bomb and determined by IC Fluorine (F) With reference to EN 14582, by oxygen combustion with 30 N.D. bomb and determined by IC Iodine (I) With reference to EN 14582, by oxygen combustion with bomb and determined by IC 30 N.D. With reference to US EPA Perfluorooctanoic acid 3550C & 8321B, by ultrasonic (PFOA) extraction and determined by LC/MS/MS 0.1 N.D. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) Tested by : YK Cho, Shirley Park Notes : = ppm = parts per million < = Less than N.D. = Not detected ( <MDL ) MDL = Method detection limit With reference to US EPA 3550C & 8321B, by ultrasonic extraction and determined by LC/MS/MS 0.1 N.D.

5 Page : 5 of 9 * View of sample as received;-

6 Page : 6 of 9 Flow Chart (IEC Edition 1.0) Receipt Sampling/ Grinding or Cutting Pb, Cd, Hg Cr 6+ PBBs /PBDEs Metal For different material, digest the sample with appropriate acid *1 Confirm the tested samples are totally dissolved *3 Make up with deionized water Spot test *2 Negative Get 50cm 2 sample Boiling water extraction Make up with deionized water and add diphenyl-carbazide solution Weigh sample and add organic solvent Soxhlet extraction or solvent extraction Concentrate the extract and make up with organic solvent Analyzed by ICP-OES Analyzed by UV-VIS Analyzed by GC-MS Remarks : *1 : List of appropriate acid: Material Acid added for digestion Polymers HNO 3, HCl, HF, H 2O 2, H 3BO 3 Metals HNO 3, HCl, HF Electronics HNO 3, HCl, H 2O 2, HBF 4 *2 : If the result of spot test is positive, Chromium (VI) would be determined as detected. No further analysis is required. *3 : The samples were dissolved totally by pre-conditioning method according to above flow chart.

7 Page : 7 of 9 Flow Chart (Metal Testing) Receipt Sample preparation Sample measurement NO Microwave digestion with HNO 3 / HCl / HF Total digestion YES Analyzed by ICP-OES ** Remarks : The samples were dissolved totally by pre-conditioning method according to above flow chart.

8 Page : 8 of 9 Flow Chart (Halogen) Receipt Sample preparation Sample weighing Bomb preparation Combustion Absorption solvent preparation of absorption solution Cooling, for 1hr Collection of halides make up Vol. 100mL Analyzed by IC

9 Page : 9 of 9 Flow Chart (PFOS, PFOA) Receipt Sample preparation Loading in a vial Methanol loading Ultrasonication Filtering & Cleaning Make up (Methanol) Analyzed by LC/MS/MS ***** End of ***** This report is made solely on the basis of your instructions and/or information and materials supplied by you. It is not intended to be a recommendation for any particular course of action. Intertek does not accept a duty of care or any other responsibility to any person other than the Client in respect of this report and only accepts liability to the Client insofar as is expressly contained in the terms and conditions governing Intertek's provision of services to you. Intertek makes no warranties or representations either express or implied with respect to this report save as provided for in those terms and conditions. We have aimed to conduct the Review on a diligent and careful basis and we do not accept any liability to you for any loss arising out of or in connection with this report, in contract, tort, by statute or otherwise, except in the event of our gross negligence or wilful misconduct.