Measuring Masses and Spins of New Particles at Colliders! K.C. Kong
|
|
- Valentine Griffin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Measuring Masses and Spins of New Particles at Colliders! K.C. Kong Fermilab High Energy Physics Seminar Michigan State University January 23, 2007
2 Hints for New Physics Beyond the Standard Model Dark Matter: 23% of the unknown in the universe Best evidence for new physics beyond the Standard Model: if the dark matter is the thermal relic of a WIMP, its mass should be of the weak scale ( ) 1 2 ( ) 2 MW IMP Ω W IMP 10 2 α 1 T ev Requires a stable (electrically) neutral weakly interacting particle at O(1) TeV To be stable, it should be the lightest particle charged under a new symmetry Electroweak precision measurements There is no evidence of deviations of the EW observables from the SM predictions New physics contributions to the EW observables should be suppressed Possible if new particles are charged under a new symmetry under which SM is neutral Their contributions will be loop-suppressed and the lightest particle is stable Collider implications: Pair production of new particles Cascade decays down to the lightest particle give rise to missing energy plus jets/leptons
3 Confusion scenario What is new physics if we see jets/leptons + /E T at the colliders? The standard answer: Supersymmetry with R-parity for a long time, this was the only candidate From the above discussion, we see that any new physics satisfying hints we have may show up at the LHC with similar signals Michael Peskin s name for different kinds of new heavy particles whose decay chains result in the same final state (copied from Joe s slide, Is Particle Physics Ready for the LHC? ) How can we discriminate SUSY from confusion scenarios? How do we know new physics is SUSY? Measuring spins and masses is important!
4 Outline New physics beyond the SM is expected to be discovered at the LHC but will we know what it is? Example: Universal Extra Dimensions (5D) Relic Density of KK Dark Matter and Direct Detection Limit Collider Phenomenology of UEDs: Spin Determination Mass Measurements: bump, edges in cascade decay, m T, m T 2 Spin and Mass measurement at LC Summary
5 Universal Extra Dimensions (Appelquist, Cheng, Dobrescu, hep-ph/ ) Each SM particle has an infinite number of KK partners The number of KK states = ΛR (Λ is a cut-off) n 2 R 2 + m2 KK particle has the same spin as SM particle with a mass, SM particles became massive through electroweak symmetry breaking KK gauge bosons get masses by eating 5th components of gauge fields (Nambu- Goldstone bosons) and EWSB shifts those masses All vertices at tree level satisfy KK number conservation m ± n ± k = 0 or m ± n ± k ± l = 0 KK number conservation is broken down to KK-parity, ( 1) n, at the loop level The lightest KK partner at level 1 (LKP) is stable DM? KK particles at level 1 are pair-produced KK particles at level 2 can be singly produced Additional allowed decays: 2 00, 3 10, No tree-level contributions to precision EW observables New vertices are the same as SM interactions Couplings between SM and KK particles are the same as SM couplings Couplings among KK particles have different normalization factors There are two Dirac (KK) partners at each level n for one Dirac fermion in SM
6 Mass Spectrum : Tree level and radiative corrections (Cheng, Matchev, Schmaltz, hep-ph/ , hep-ph/ ) Tree level mass m n = ( n R) 2 + m2, e 1 is stable Radiative corrections are important! All but LKP decay promptly missing energy signals
7 Relic Density Code Kong and Matchev (UF, 2005) Fortran Includes all level 1 KK particles has a general KK mass spectra (all KK masses are, in principle, different) can deal with different types of KK dark matter (γ 1, Z 1, ν 1 ) improved numerical precision use correct non-relativistic velocity expansion ( σv = a + b v 2 ) use temperature dependent degrees of freedom (g = g (T F )) Servant and Tait (Annecy/ANL, 2002) First code (γ 1 or ν 1 dark matter) has cross sections in Mathematica, assuming same KK masses use approximate non-relativistic velocity expansion use approximate degrees of freedom (g = 92.25) Kribs and Burnell (Oregon/Princeton, 2005) has cross sections in Maple, assuming same KK masses (γ 1 dark matter) do not use non-relativistic velocity expansion deal with coannihilations with all level 1 KK Kakizaki, Matsumoto and Senami (Bonn/KEK/Tokyo, 2006) interested in resonance effects (γ 1 dark matter)
8 Improved result (Kong, Matchev, hep-ph/ ) Improvements in our calculation: Include all coannihilations: many processes (51 51 initial states) Keep KK masses different in the cross sections: Use temperature dependent g Use relativistic correction in the b-term a: γ 1 γ 1 annihilation only (from hep-ph/ ) b: repeats the same analysis but uses temperature dependent g and relativistic correction c: relaxes the assumption of KK mass degeneracy MUED: full calculation in MUED including all coannihilations with the proper choice of masses Preferred mass range: GeV for < Ω CDM h 2 < 0.129
9 Dark matter in nonminimal UED The change in the cosmologically preferred value for R 1 as a result of varying the different KK masses away from their nominal MUED values (along each line, Ωh 2 = 0.1) (Kong, Matchev, hep-ph/ ) In nonminimal UED, Cosmologically allowed LKP mass range can be larger If = m 1 m γ 1 is small, m mγ LKP is large, UED escapes collider searches 1 But, good news for dark matter searches
10 CDMS (Spin independent): B 1 and Z 1 LKP (Baudis, Kong, Matchev, Preliminary) SuperCDMS (projected) A (25 kg), B (150 kg), C (1 ton) q1 = m q 1 mγ 1 mγ 1 Z 1 LKP in nonminimal UED: Q1 = m Q 1 m Z1 m Z1 g1 = = 0.1
11 Typical event in SUSY and UED B 1 g g q R q L q q q q l g 1 g 1 q 1 Q 1 q q q q l χ 0 2 l l Z 1 l 1 l Both have similar diagrams same signatures! At first sight, it is not clear which model we are considering The decay chain is complicated A lot of jets correct jet identification is difficult ISR/FSR add more confusion UED discovery reach at the Tevatron and LHC: (Cheng, Matchev, Schmaltz, hep-ph/ ) Reach at the LHC: R TeV with 100 fb 1 in 4l + /E T channel UED search by CMS group (full detector simulation) B 1
12 How to discriminate: Level 1 just looks like MSSM with LSP dark matter: (Cheng, Matchev, Schmaltz, hep-ph/ ) Can we discriminate SUSY from UED? * N = 1 SUSY SUSY UED How many new particles 1 KK tower Spin of new particles differ by 1 2 same spins Couplings of new particles same as SM same as SM Masses SUSY breaking boundary terms Discrete symmetry R-parity KK-parity = ( 1) n Dark matter LSP ( ) LKP (γ 1) Generic signature /E T /E T ** Couplings among some KK particles may have factors of 2, 3, *** with dark matter candidates Finding KK tower: Datta, Kong, Matchev, hep-ph/ Spin measurements: Barr, hep-ph/ Smillie, Webber hep-ph/ Datta, Kong, Matchev, hep-ph/ Cross section: Datta, Kane, Toharia, hep-ph/
13 Implementation of UED in Event Generators Datta, Kong and Matchev (UF, 2004) Full implementation of level 1 and level 2 in CompHEP/CalcHEP (spin information) Provided for implementation in PYTHIA Two different mass spectrum possible: A general mass spectrum in Nonminimal UED All masses/widths calculated automatically in Minimal UED Used for dark matter study/collider studies Used for ATLAS and CMS (4l + /E T, nj + ml + /E T ) Alexandre Alves, Oscar Eboli, Tilman Plehn (2006) Level 1 QCD and decays only in MADGRAPH (spin information!) Wang and Yavin (Harvard, 2006) Level 1 QCD and decays only in HERWIG (full spin information) Smillie and Webber (Cambridge, 2005) Level 1 QCD and decays only in HERWIG (full spin information) Peskin (Stanford, in progress) Level 1 QCD and decays only in PANDORA (full spin information) El Kacimi, Goujdami and Przysiezniak (2005) Level 1 QCD and decays only in PYTHIA (spin information is lost) Matrix elements from CompHEP/CalcHEP
14 Spin measurement spin measurement is difficult LSP/LKP is neutral missing energy There are two LSPs/LKPs cannot find CM frame Decay chains are complicated cannot uniquely identify subchains Look for something easy : look for 2 SFOS leptons, χ 0 2 l ± l l ± l or Z 1 ll 1 L l+ l γ 1 Dominant source of χ 0 2 /Z 1: squark/kk-quark decay q q χ 0 2 q l ± l ql ± l or Q 1 qz 1 ll 1 L l+ l γ 1 : SUSY: UED: q Q 1 Z1 χ 0 2 q l l ± (near) l (far) l 1 γ 1 Study this chain: Observable objects are q and l ± Can do: M l + l, M ql and M ql + where M 2 ab = (p a p b ) 2 Which jet? Which lepton? Charge of jets (q and q)? M l + l, Asymmetry = A + = Masses don t discriminate ( ) ( ) dσ dσ dm ql + dm ( ) ( ql (Barr,Phys.Lett.B596: ,2004) dσ dσ dm ql ++ dm )ql
15 Dilepton distribution Look for spin correlations in M l + l Choose a study point in one model and fake mass spectrum in the other model SUSY: UED: q Q 1 Z1 χ 0 2 q l l ± (near) l (far) l 1 γ 1 (Kong, Matchev Preliminary and Smillie, Webber hep-ph/ ) Why are they the same?
16 Dilepton distribution How do we fake the M l + l distribution? (Smillie, Webber hep-ph/ ) (Kong, Matchev Preliminary) Phase Space : dn d ˆm = 2 ˆm SUSY : dn d ˆm = 2 ˆm UED : dn d ˆm = 4(y+4z) (1+2z)(2+y) r = (2 y)(1 2z) y+4z ( ˆm + r ˆm 3 ) where ˆm = m ll m max ll, y = ( ) 2 m l m and z = χ 0 2 ( m ) χ m l r 0.4 in msugra
17 Spin measurement : Barr method SUSY: UED: q Q 1 Z1 χ 0 2 q l l ± (near) l (far) l 1 γ 1 dp/dm^ 4 3 (Barr,Phys.Lett.B596: ,2004) 4m^ 3 Invariant mass distribution of q and l (near) dp P S d ˆm = 2 ˆm from phase space dp 1 d ˆm = 4 ˆm3 for l + q or l q in SUSY dp 2 d ˆm = 4 ˆm(1 ˆm2 ) for l q or l + q in SUSY m^ 4m^ (1-m^ 2) m^ ˆm = ( mnear lq m near ) lq max Complications: Which jet? Which lepton? We don t distinguish q and q Asymmetry: A + = ( ) ( ) dσ dσ dm ql + dm ( ) ( ) ql dσ dσ dm ql ++ dm ql
18 Barr method SUSY: UED: q Q 1 Z1 χ 0 2 q l l ± (near) l (far) l 1 γ 1 Look at correlation between q and l (Barr, hep-ph/ ) Complications: Which (quark) jet is the right one? (Webber, hep-ph/ cheated, picked the right one) One never knows for sure. There can be clever cuts to increase the probability that we picked right one (work in progress) Which lepton? : near and far cannot be distinguished must add both contributions. Improvement on selection (work in progress) Don t know q or q But more q than q at the LHC in t-channel production Can distinguish charge of leptons: look at ql + and ql separately and compare
19 Barr method q P 1 P 2 P 1 P q q q 2 q q q q χ 0 2 l χ 0 2 l + χ 0 2 l χ 0 2 l + fq l L l + ll l l R l + lr l q P 2 P 1 P 2 P q 1 q q q q q q χ 0 2 l χ 0 2 l + χ 0 2 l χ 0 2 l + f q l L l + l L l lr l + l R l f q + f q = 1
20 Barr method (Datta, Kong, Matchev, hep-ph/ and Smillie, Webber, hep-ph/ ) Choose a study point : UED500 and SPS1a (L = 10fb 1 ) Each M ql distribution contains 4 contributions ( ) ( dσ dp2 = f q + dp ) 1 dm ql + dm n dm f ( ) ( dσ dp1 = f q + dp ) 2 dm ql dm n dm f ( dp1 + f q + dp ) 2 dm n dm f ( dp2 + f q + dp ) 1 dm n dm f Asymmetry: A + = ( dσ dm ( dσ dm ) ql + ( ) dσ dm ) ql + + ( ) dσ dm ql ql f q + f q = 1 If f q = f q = 0.5, A + = 0 (for example, in the focus point region)
21 Asymmetry Asymmetry with UED500 mass spectrum (L = 10fb 1 ) (Datta, Kong, Matchev, hep-ph/ ) Asymmetry with SPS1a mass spectrum (L = 10fb 1 ) (Kong, Matchev Preliminary) Z 1 ll 1 L l+ l γ 1 Chirality Z 1 ll 1 R l+ l γ 1 χ 0 2 l l L l + l χ 0 2 l l R l + l
22 SPS1a msugra point (Kong, Matchev Preliminary) x = ( m χ 0 2 m q ) 2, y = ( ) 2 m l m, z = χ 0 2 ( m χ 0 1 m l How to fake SPS1a asymmetry five parameters in asymmetry : f q, x, y, z, m q three kinematic endpoints : m qll, m ql and m ll m qll = m q (1 x)(1 yz) m ql = m q (1 x)(1 z) m ll = m q x(1 y)(1 z) two parameters left : f q, x minimize χ 2 in the (x, f q ) parameter space minimum χ 2 when UED and SUSY masses are the same and f q 1 10% jet energy resolution + statistical error χ 2 better but not enough to fake SPS1a in UED effect of wrong jets asymmetry smaller? Flavor subtraction? (work in progress) ) 2, f q = N q, f q = N q, f q +f q = 1 Nq+N q Nq+N q
23 How do we measure masses?: bump hunting! (Datta, Kong, Matchev, hep-ph/ ) Bump hunting!: ex. two resonances in UEDs Level 2 resonances can be seen at the LHC: up to R 1 1 TeV for 100 fb 1, M 2 ab = (p a + p b ) 2 covers dark matter region of MUED Mass resolution: δm = 0.01M V2 for e + e δm = M V ( M 2 V 2 1T ev ) for µ + µ Narrow peaks are smeared due to the mass resolution Two resonances can be better resolved in e + e channel Is this a proof of UED? Not quite : resonances could still be interpreted as Z s Smoking guns : Their close degeneracy M V2 2M V1 Mass measurement of W ± 2 KK mode However in nonminimal UED models, degenerate spectrum is not required just like SUSY with a bunch of Z s need spins to discriminate
24 How do we measure masses?: cascade decays! Cascade decays! (Bachacou, Ian Hinchliffe, Paige, hep-ph/ ) q L χ 2 0 q L l R - l R + (near) χ 1 0 l R - (far) M max ll = M max qll = ( )( ) M 2 χ 0 M 2 lr M 2 lr M 2 χ M 2 lr ( )( ) M 2 q M 2 χ L 0 M 2 χ 2 0 M 2 χ M 2 χ 0 2 Events/0.5 GeV/100 fb / 197 P P P Events/20 GeV/100 fb / 25 P P E-03 P P P M ll (GeV) M llq (GeV)
25 How do we measure masses?: cascade decays! Cascade decays! (Bachacou, Ian Hinchliffe, Paige, hep-ph/ ) q L χ 2 0 q L l R - l R + (near) - l R 0 χ 1 (far) M max ql = M min llq ( )( ) M 2 q M 2 χ L 0 M 2 χ 2 0 M 2 lr 2 M 2 χ 0 2 with M ll > M max ll / / 12 P P P / 11 P P P Events/20 GeV/100 fb Events/20 GeV/100 fb M lq (GeV) M llq (GeV)
26 How do we measure masses?: cascade decays! Cascade decays! (Bachacou, Ian Hinchliffe, Paige, hep-ph/ ) (M min llq )2 = 1 4M2 2M e 2 [ M 2 1 M M 2 1 M 2 2 M 2 e M 4 2 M 2 e M 2 2 M 4 e M 2 1 M 2 2 M 2 q M 2 1 M 2 e M 2 q + 3M 2 2 M 2 e M 2 q M 4 e M 2 q + (M 2 2 M 2 q ) ] (M1 4 + M e 4)(M M e 2)2 + 2M1 2M e 2(M 2 4 6M 2 2M e 2 + M e 4) with M ll > M max ll / 2 M 1 = M χ 0 1, M 2 = M χ 0 2, M e = M lr and M q = M ql
27 How do we measure masses?: m T m T! M 2 W m 2 T (e, ν) ( p et + p νt ) 2 ( p et + p νt ) 2
28 What if there are two missing particles?: m T 2 (Barr, Lester, Stephens, hep-ph/ , m(t2): The Truth behind the glamour ) (Lester, Summers, hep-ph/ ) m 2 l = m E l T = p T E χ0 1 T = ( p T [ E l T E χ0 1 T cosh ( η ) ] p l T p χ0 1 T ) 2 + m 2 ] η = 1 2 log [ E + pz E p z (tanh η = p z E, sinh η = p z m 2 ( T p l T, p χ0 1 T, m ) E T and cosh η = E E T ) m m T m l ( ) E l T E χ0 1 T p l T p χ 1 T We don t measure p χ0 1 T Most of new physics have at least two missing particles in the final state
29 What if there are two missing particles?: m T 2 (Barr, Lester, Stephens, hep-ph/ , m(t2): The Truth behind the glamour ) (Lester, Summers, hep-ph/ ) l + p 1 q 1 /E T = q 1 + q 2 = ( p 1 + p 2 ) l p 2 q 2 l l + If q 1 and q 2 are obtainable, m 2 l max { m 2 T ( ) ( )} p1, q 1, m 2 T p2, q 2 But /E T = q 1 + q 2 the best we can say is that m 2 l m 2 T 2 [ ] min max {m 2 T ( p 1, q 1 ), m 2 T ( p 2, q 2 )} /q 1 +/q 2 =/E T
30 What if there are two missing particles?: m T 2 (Barr, Lester, Stephens, hep-ph/ , m(t2): The Truth behind the glamour ) (Lester, Summers, hep-ph/ ) m 2 l m 2 T 2 [ ] min max {m 2 T ( p 1, q 1 ), m 2 T ( p 2, q 2 )} /q 1 +/q 2 =/E T m 2 Rely on momentum scan can be reduced to one dimensional parameter scan can not get analytic differential distribution Have to assume m χ 0 1 correlation between m l and m χ 0 1
31 The Cambridge m T 2 Variable Demystified q 1y (Kong, Matchev, Preliminary) q 1y q 2 < q 1 q 1x q 1x q 1 good: uniform scan bad: non-uniform scan bad: how far should we scan? good: compact scan 0 q 1x, q 1y # p 1 q 2 q 1, 0 θ 2 2π q 1 + q 2 = /E T
32 The Cambridge m T 2 Variable Demystified (Kong, Matchev, Preliminary)
33 The Cambridge m T 2 Variable Demystified (Kong, Matchev, Preliminary) p 1 p2 m 2 T 2 [ ] min max {m 2 T ( p 1, q 1 ), m 2 T ( p 2, q 2 )} /q 1 +/q 2 =/E T P vis P miss Constraint: m 2 T ( p 1, q 1 ) = m 2 T ( p 2, q 2 ) q 1 q 2 q m2 q m2 = p 1 p 2 > 0 massless case (m = 0): WW production, m χ 0 1 << m l 2a p 1 p 2 = q 2 q 1 2c /E T e = c a c a q 2 a q 1 c Solution: q 1 = p 2 and q 2 = p 1 Warning: q 1 and q 2 are NOT neutrino momenta
34 The Cambridge m T 2 Variable Demystified (Kong, Matchev, Preliminary) massive case (m 0) num = 16 e ( 1 + ( 1 + e 2) µ 2)3 2 ( e + cos(φ) ) ( 1 + e cos(φ) ) sin(φ) ( 1 + ( 1 + e 2) µ 2) ( 2 ( 1 + e 2 + e 4) ( 1 + e ) ( 1 + e ) ( 2 + e 4) µ 2 4 e ( 1 + e 2 + ( 1 + e 2) µ 2) cos(φ) + e 2 ( 2 + ( 2 3 e 2 + e 4) µ 2) cos(2 φ) ) sin(φ) 2 den = 8 ( e 2 + e 4) 4 ( 2 + e 2) ( 2 5 e e 4) µ 2 + ( 8 16 e 2 12 e e 6 3 e 8) µ 4 8 e ( 4 ( 1 + µ 2)2 + 2 e 2 ( 2 3 µ 2 + µ 4) + e 4 ( µ 2 + µ 4)) cos(φ) + 4 e 2 ( ( 6 + e 2 + e 4) µ 2 + ( e 2 2 e 4 + e 6) µ 4) cos(2 φ) + e 3 µ 2 ( 8 ( 2 + e 2 + ( 2 + e 2) µ 2) cos(3 φ) + e ( 4 ( 2 + e 2)2 µ 2) cos(4 φ) ) 4 sin 2 θ = num den
35 The Cambridge m T 2 Variable Demystified (Kong, Matchev, Preliminary) Applications: Mass correlation even if there are two missing particles: W and slepton pair production Can be used for background rejection N = σ BR L ɛ = fixed σ > σ 0 (BR = 1) m < m 0
36 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Is there another mass measurement? KS test? (Kong, Matchev, Preliminary) Difficulties: Not enough statistics Cuts distort shapes of the distributions
37 SUSY vs UED at LC in µ + µ + /E T channel e µ e µ e + Z Z 2 γ B 2 µ D 1 µ S 1 µ + µ + S 1 D 1 B 1 B 1 µ + e + Z γ µ L µr µ L µ R µ + Angular distribution ( dσ d cos θ )UED 1 + E2 µ M 2 1 µ 1 Eµ 2 +M 2 cos 2 θ 1 µ cos 2 θ ( dσ ) d cos θ SUSY 1 cos2 θ µ energy distribution Threshold scan Photon energy distribution
38 The Angular Distribution (LC) (Battaglia, Datta, De Roeck, Kong, Matchev,hep-ph/ ) Entries / 0.1 ab cos θ µ ( ) dσ d cos θ 1 + UED cos2 θ ( ) dσ d cos θ 1 cos2 θ SUSY
39 The µ Energy Distribution (LC) (Battaglia, Datta, De Roeck, Kong, Matchev,hep-ph/ ) Entries / 0.1 ab ) E max/min = 1 2 M µ (1 M2 N M µ 2 γ(1 ± β) M µ : mass of smuon or KK muon M N : LSP or LKP mass γ = 1 with β = 1 M 2 1 β 2 µ /Ebeam 2 (µ boost) p µ (GeV)
40 Threshold scans (LC) (Battaglia, Datta, De Roeck, Kong, Matchev,hep-ph/ ) Mass determination Cross section at threshold in UED β in MSSM β 3 (β = ) 1 M2 E beam 2
41 The Photon Energy Distribution (LC) (Battaglia, Datta, De Roeck, Kong, Matchev,hep-ph/ ) e µ D 1 e γ µ D 1 Z Z 2 Z Z 2 γ B 2 γ B 2 e + γ µ + D 1 e + µ + D 1 Events/500 fb Smuon production is mediated by γ and Z On-shell Z 2 µ 1 µ 1 is allowed by phase space Radiative return due to Z 2 pole at E γ = s M 2 Z 2 2 s E photon (GeV)
42 The Angular Distribution at the LHC p µ p µ p Z Z 2 γ B 2 µ D 1 µ S 1 µ + µ + S 1 D 1 B 1 B 1 µ + p Z γ µ L µr µ L µ R µ + (Datta, Kong, Matchev, Preliminary) If we simply do the same trick as in linear collider, it doesn t work There is no fixed CM frame
43 Exact Beamstrahlung Function Required Analytic solutions are limited for small Υ only Good agreement with simulation data This is true for LC Can t use same solution for large Υ Need new approximation No analytic solution for large Υ in the case of high energy e + e colliders such as CLIC Solve rate equation numerically instead or Use simulation data Caution : Implementation in event generators Most event generators have one of these two parametrizations Either numerically worse or has normalization problem How to fix the event generator Use old parametrizations and fake parameters Use numerical solution/simulation data and import in the event generator A lot of soft photons at high energy e + e colliders distort physical distributions, e.g. E µ
44 Summary LHC is finally coming New physics beyond the SM is expected to be discovered but will we know what it is? Many candidates for new physics have similar signatures at the LHC (SUSY, UEDs, T-parity...). Crucial to know spin information of new particles. Important to know mass spectrum. Need to develop new methods: m T 2... Issues at LC: beamstrahlung...
Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter
Kaluza-Klein Dark Matter Hsin-Chia Cheng UC Davis Pre-SUSY06 Workshop Complementary between Dark Matter Searches and Collider Experiments Introduction Dark matter is the best evidence for physics beyond
More informationEfficient coannihilation process through strong Higgs self-coupling in LKP dark matter annihilation
Efficient coannihilation process through strong Higgs self-coupling in LKP dark matter annihilation Masato Senami (ICRR, University of Tokyo) senami@icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp in collaboration with Shigeki Matsumoto
More informationCosmological Constraint on the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension Model
Cosmological Constraint on the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension Model Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn University) September 7, 2007 @ KIAS In collaboration with Shigeki Matsumoto (Tohoku Univ.) Yoshio Sato (Saitama
More informationKaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea. Fig. from B. Greene, 00
Kaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea Fig. from B. Greene, 00 Kaluza-Klein Theories - basic idea mued mass spectrum Figure 3.2: (Taken from [46]). The full spectrum of the UED model at the first KK level,
More informationCosmological Constraint on the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension Model
Cosmological Constraint on the Minimal Universal Extra Dimension Model Mitsuru Kakizaki (Bonn Univ. & ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) 20 September, 2006 @ SISSA In collaboration with Shigeki Matsumoto (KEK) Yoshio
More informationTheoretical Developments Beyond the Standard Model
Theoretical Developments Beyond the Standard Model by Ben Allanach (DAMTP, Cambridge University) Talk outline Bestiary of some relevant models SUSY dark matter Spins and alternatives B.C. Allanach p.1/18
More informationExploring Universal Extra-Dimensions at the LHC
Exploring Universal Extra-Dimensions at the LHC Southampton University & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 Problems to be addressed by the underlying theory The Nature of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking The
More informationPotpourri: DM and Physics BSM at HE Colliders. Konstantin Matchev
Potpourri: DM and Physics BSM at HE Colliders Konstantin Matchev University of Florida Cornell University Fermilab, February 17, 2004 Cast of characters Senior personnel K. Matchev (UF, Cornell), (Anton,
More informationNeutralino spin measurement with ATLAS detector at LHC
Neutralino spin measurement with ATLAS detector at LHC M. Biglietti 1,2, I. Borjanovic 3, G. Carlino 2, F. Conventi 1,2, E. Gorini 3,4, A. Migliaccio 1,2, E. Musto 1,2, M. Primavera 3, S. Spagnolo 3,4,
More informationSUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches
SUSY Phenomenology & Experimental searches Alex Tapper Slides available at: http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/tapper/lecture.html Reminder Supersymmetry is a theory which postulates a new symmetry between fermions
More informationEarly SUSY Searches in Events with Leptons with the ATLAS-Detector
Early SUSY Searches in Events with Leptons with the ATLAS-Detector Timo Müller Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz 2010-29-09 EMG Annual Retreat 2010 Timo Müller (Universität Mainz) Early SUSY Searches
More informationSupersymmetry at the ILC
Supersymmetry at the ILC Abdelhak DJOUADI (LPT Paris Sud). Introduction 2. High precision measurements 3. Determination of the SUSY lagrangian 4. Connection to cosmology 5. Conclusion For more details,
More informationDark matter and collider signatures from extra dimensions
KAIST TF, A. Menon, Z. Sullivan, PRD 86 (2012) 093006 L. Edelhäuser, TF, M. Krämer, JHEP 1308 (2013) 091 TF, KC Kong, SC Park, JHEP 1305 (2013) 111, arxiv:1309.xxxx COSMO 2013, Cambridge Outline Universal
More informationPseudo-Dirac Bino as Dark Matter and Signatures of D-Type G
and Signatures of D-Type Gauge Mediation Ken Hsieh Michigan State Univeristy KH, Ph. D. Thesis (2007) ArXiv:0708.3970 [hep-ph] Other works with M. Luty and Y. Cai (to appear) MSU HEP Seminar November 6,
More informationNew Physics at the TeV Scale and Beyond Summary
New Physics at the TeV Scale and Beyond Summary Machine and Detector Issues 1. Correlated Beamstrahlung David Strom New Theoretical Ideas: 1. Signatures for Brane Kinetic Terms at the LC Tom Rizzo 2. Implementing
More informationSummary: Beyond the Standard Model WG
Summary: Beyond the Standard Model WG Nobuchika Okada (KEK) on behalf of the BSM conveners: Graham Kribs (IAS/Oregon) N.O. (KEK) Maxim Perelstein (Cornell) Sabine Riemann (DESY) ILC Workshop, Snowmass
More informationMissing Energy (E/ T ) at the LHC: The Dark matter Connection
Missing Energy (E/ T ) at the LHC: The Dark matter Connection Tao Han University of Wisconsin Madison at Cornell University (Sept. 25, 2009) (Collaborators: Ian-Woo Kim, J.H. Song) Outline Outline Missing
More informationContributions by M. Peskin, E. Baltz, B. Sadoulet, T. Wizansky
Contributions by M. Peskin, E. Baltz, B. Sadoulet, T. Wizansky Dark Matter established as major component of the Universe: CMB determination of its relic density further confirmed by SNs and galaxy clusters;
More informationPhysics at e + e - Linear Colliders. 4. Supersymmetric particles. M. E. Peskin March, 2002
Physics at e + e - Linear Colliders 4. Supersymmetric particles M. E. Peskin March, 2002 In this final lecture, I would like to discuss supersymmetry at the LC. Supersymmetry is not a part of the Standard
More informationConstraints on UED Models
KAIST TF, C. Pasold, PRD85 (2012) 126007 TF, A. Menon, Z. Sullivan, arxiv:1207.4472 TF, KC Kong, SC Park, arxiv:1210.xxxx KIAS-SNU Workshop on Particle Physics and Cosmology Outline UED Review Modifying
More informationProbing SUSY Dark Matter at the LHC
Probing SUSY Dark Matter at the LHC Kechen Wang Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy Texas A&M University Preliminary Examination, Feb, 24 OUTLINE Supersymmetry dark matter (DM) Relic
More informationWIMPs and superwimps. Jonathan Feng UC Irvine. MIT Particle Theory Seminar 17 March 2003
WIMPs and superwimps Jonathan Feng UC Irvine MIT Particle Theory Seminar 17 March 2003 Dark Matter The dawn (mid-morning?) of precision cosmology: Ω DM = 0.23 ± 0.04 Ω total = 1.02 ± 0.02 Ω baryon = 0.044
More information14th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, 24 August 2009
M. Biglietti University of Rome Sapienza & INFN On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 1 14th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, 24 August 2009 Theoretically favored candidates for
More informationAbdelhak DJOUADI (LPT Orsay/Next Southampton)
SUSY@ILC Abdelhak DJOUADI (LPT Orsay/Next Southampton) 1. Probing SUSY 2. Precision SUSY measurements at the ILC 3. Determining the SUSY Lagrangian 4. Summary From the physics chapter of the ILC Reference
More informationSearch for SUperSYmmetry SUSY
PART 3 Search for SUperSYmmetry SUSY SUPERSYMMETRY Symmetry between fermions (matter) and bosons (forces) for each particle p with spin s, there exists a SUSY partner p~ with spin s-1/2. q ~ g (s=1)
More informationSEARCH FOR EXTRA DIMENSIONS WITH ATLAS AND CMS DETECTORS AT THE LHC
SEARCH FOR EXTRA DIMENSIONS WITH ATLAS AND CMS DETECTORS AT THE LHC S. SHMATOV for ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia E-mail: shmatov@cern.ch A brief review
More informationModel Discrimination with the CMS Detector: a Case Study
Cornell University Floyd R. Newman Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics Model Discrimination with the CMS Detector: a Case Study Julia Thom Cornell University (RWTH Aachen) Particle Physics Seminar
More informationDiscovery Physics at the Large Hadron Collider
+ / 2 GeV N evt 4 10 3 10 2 10 CMS 2010 Preliminary s=7 TeV -1 L dt = 35 pb R > 0.15 R > 0.20 R > 0.25 R > 0.30 R > 0.35 R > 0.40 R > 0.45 R > 0.50 10 1 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 [GeV] M R Discovery
More informationSupersymmetry at the LHC
Supersymmetry at the LHC Howard Baer Florida State University SUSY at LHC SUSY signatures SM backgrounds GEANT figure msugra : ~ g m 0 = 1000 GeV, m 1/2 = 500 GeV, A 0 = 0, ~ ul ~ t1 t - W + b ( jet4,
More informationThe ILC and its complementarity to the LHC
The ILC and its complementarity to the LHC Outline: 1. ILC physics motivation 2. ILC LHC synergy 31 st Johns Hopkins Workshop Heidelberg 2007 3. LHC ILC implications Klaus Desch Universität Bonn The Terascale
More informationPhysics at the ILC. Ariane Frey, MPI München 38. Herbstschule Maria Laach Ariane Frey, MPI München
Physics at the ILC Beyond the Standard Model: Supersymmetry Extra Dimensions Heavy Z, Z, Strong EWSB Precision Physics (top, W, ) CLIC top, W LHC ILC Synergy Ariane Frey, MPI München 1 Higgs Profile Use
More informationNon-Minimal Kaluza Klein Dark Matter
Non-Minimal Kaluza Klein Dark Matter Henrik Melbéus Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden EPS-HEP 2011 Henrik Melbéus (KTH) Non-Minimal Kaluza Klein Dark Matter July 21, 2011 1 / 15 Introduction
More informationMICROPHYSICS AND THE DARK UNIVERSE
MICROPHYSICS AND THE DARK UNIVERSE Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine CAP Congress 20 June 2007 20 June 07 Feng 1 WHAT IS THE UNIVERSE MADE OF? Recently there have been remarkable advances
More informationSearches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Jay Wacker. APS April Meeting SLAC. A Theoretical Perspective. May 4, 2009
Searches for Physics Beyond the Standard Model A Theoretical Perspective Jay Wacker SLAC APS April Meeting May 4, 2009 1 The Plan Motivations for Physics Beyond the Standard Model New Hints from Dark Matter
More informationThe Standard Model and Beyond
The Standard Model and Beyond Nobuchika Okada Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Alabama 2011 BCVSPIN ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE IN PARTICLE PHYSICS AND COSMOLOGY Huê, Vietnam, 25-30,
More informationEW Naturalness in Light of the LHC Data. Maxim Perelstein, Cornell U. ACP Winter Conference, March
EW Naturalness in Light of the LHC Data Maxim Perelstein, Cornell U. ACP Winter Conference, March 3 SM Higgs: Lagrangian and Physical Parameters The SM Higgs potential has two terms two parameters: Higgs
More informationSearch for Extra Dimensions with the ATLAS and CMS Detectors at the LHC
Available on CMS information server CMS CR 2006/086 October 31, 2006 Search for Extra Dimensions with the ATLAS and CMS Detectors at the LHC Sergei Shmatov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna,
More informationarxiv:hep-ex/ v1 30 Sep 1997
CMS CR 997/0 SEARCHES FOR SUSY AT LHC arxiv:hep-ex/970903v 30 Sep 997 For the CMS Collaboration Avtandyl Kharchilava Institute of Physics, Georgian Academy of Sciences, Tbilisi ABSTRACT One of the main
More informationHiggs Signals and Implications for MSSM
Higgs Signals and Implications for MSSM Shaaban Khalil Center for Theoretical Physics Zewail City of Science and Technology SM Higgs at the LHC In the SM there is a single neutral Higgs boson, a weak isospin
More informationSimplified models in collider searches for dark matter. Stefan Vogl
Simplified models in collider searches for dark matter Stefan Vogl Outline Introduction/Motivation Simplified Models for the LHC A word of caution Conclusion How to look for dark matter at the LHC? experimentally
More informationDetecting and Distinguishing Top Partners
Detecting and Distinguishing Top Partners Ayres Freitas and Devin Walker After the discovery of tt+e/ T events at a hadron collider it will be crucial to determine the properties of the new particles which
More informationCMS. Saeid Paktinat. On behalf of the CMS Collaborations. (IPM, Tehran)
SUSY @ CMS (IPM, Tehran) On behalf of the CMS Collaborations outline SUSY Common Signatures Some Examples Conclusion 2 Why SUperSYmmetry(1) SM describes a lot of experimental results very precisely, but
More informationPhenomenology of Fourth Generation Neutrinos
Phenomenology of Fourth Generation Neutrinos Linda Carpenter May 2010 With A. Rajaraman & D. Whiteson Constraints on a 4 th Generation Z width from LEP Z pole measurements Direct search bounds S and T
More informationInclusive searches in ATLAS: How can we discover SUSY in 2009
Inclusive searches in ATLAS: How can we discover SUSY in 2009 George Redlinger Brookhaven National Laboratory (for the ATLAS Collaboration) University of Michigan LHC Dark Matter Workshop 6-10 Jan 2009
More informationSUSY Models, Dark Matter and the LHC. Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University
SUSY odels, Dark atter and the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Texas A& University 11/7/11 Bethe Forum 11 1 Discovery Time We are about to enter into an era of major discovery Dark atter: we need new particles to explain
More informationis particle physics ready for the LHC? Joe Lykken Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
is particle physics ready for the LHC? Joe Lykken Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Hinchliffe s theorem: when a title is in the form of a question, the answer is always no outline countdown to the
More informationStudy of supersymmetric tau final states with Atlas at LHC: discovery prospects and endpoint determination
Study of supersymmetric tau final states with Atlas at LHC: discovery prospects and endpoint determination University of Bonn Outlook: supersymmetry: overview and signal LHC and ATLAS invariant mass distribution
More informationSUSY searches at LHC and HL-LHC perspectives
SUSY searches at LHC and HL-LHC perspectives Maximilian Goblirsch-Kolb, on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations 26.10.2017, LCWS 2017, Strasbourg SUSY particle production in p-p collisions Two main
More informationSUSY Searches at CMS in the Fully Hadronic Channel
SUSY Searches at CMS in the Fully Hadronic Channel Project B2 - Supersymmetry at the Large Hadron Collider Christian Autermann, Sergei Bobrovskyi, Ulla Gebbert, Kolja Kaschube, Friederike Nowak, Benedikt
More informationA SUPERSYMMETRIC VIEW OF THE HIGGS HUNTING
UC @ Santa Barbara Feb. 2nd, 2011 A SUPERSYMMETRIC VIEW OF THE HIGGS HUNTING Tao Liu UC @ Santa Barbara Higgs Boson And Particle Physics The Standard Model (SM) is a successful theory of describing the
More informationReview of ATLAS experimental results (II)
Review of ATLAS experimental results (II) Rachid Mazini Academia Sinica Taiwan CTEQ 2012 summer school Lima, Peru 30 July -8 August Rachid Mazini, Academia Sinica 1 Outline part II Higgs searches H, H
More informationIMPLICATIONS OF PARTICLE PHYSICS FOR COSMOLOGY
IMPLICATIONS OF PARTICLE PHYSICS FOR COSMOLOGY Jonathan Feng University of California, Irvine 28-29 July 2005 PiTP, IAS, Princeton 28-29 July 05 Feng 1 Graphic: N. Graf OVERVIEW This Program anticipates
More informationPhysics at the LHC: from Standard Model to new discoveries
Physics at the LHC: from Standard Model to new discoveries Kirill Melnikov University of Hawaii May 2006 Sendai, June 2006 Physics at the LHC: from Standard Model to new discoveries p. 1/22 Outline Standard
More informationFull Mass Determination from M T 2 with Combinatorial Background
Full Mass Determination from M T 2 with Combinatorial Background David Curtin bla arxiv:1004.5350, arxiv:xxxx.xxxx In Collaboration with Maxim Perelstein, Monika Blanke bla Cornell Institute for High Energy
More informationMass measurements at the Large Hadron Collider
Mass measurements at the Large Hadron Collider Priyotosh Bandyopadhyay Helsinki Institute of Physics, Helsinki Seminar Course Lecture-4, Ŝ1/2 min JHEP 0903 (2009) 085, JHEP 1106 (2011) 041 March 30, 2012
More informationICHEP 2008 Philadelphia
ICHEP 2008 Philadelphia LHC CERN Geneva 2008 Sascha Caron Standard SUSY at LHC 2 Almost all LHC sectors are cooled down (2 sectors at this moment at 20-30K) Start at s = 10 TeV in 2008 2008 Luminosity
More informationSearches for new physics at ATLAS
1 Searches for new physics at ATLAS Gökhan Ünel U.C. Irvine On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration ICPP 2011 Istanbul Outline 2 LHC has been giving us data at ever increasing pace. Lint =1 fb reached as
More informationRecent Results on New Phenomena and Higgs Searches at DZERO
Recent Results on New Phenomena and Higgs Searches at DZERO Neeti Parashar Louisiana Tech University Ruston, Louisiana U.S.A. 1 Outline Motivation for DØ Run II Detector at Fermilab The Fermilab Tevatron
More informationBSM physics at the LHC. Akimasa Ishikawa (Kobe University)
BSM physics at the LHC Akimasa Ishikawa (Kobe University) 7 Jan. 2011 If SM Higgs exists Why BSM? To solve the hierarchy and naturalness problems O(1 TeV) Quadratic divergence of Higgs mass If SM Higgs
More informationUniversal Extra-Dimension at LHC
Universal Extra-Dimension at LHC Swarup Kumar Majee National Taiwan University UED@LHC S. K. Majee NCTS-NTHU, 17-May-2011 p.1 Plan Hierarchy problem Extra-dimensions Flat extra-dimension (ADD and UED model)
More informationDPG Sascha Caron (Freiburg)
DPG 2010 Sascha Caron (Freiburg) Outline 2 Reminder: Why is SUSY interesting? SUSY production at LHC LHC, ATLAS and CMS status What can we expect in the next 2 years? Summary SUSY Reminder 3 SUPERSYMMETRY
More informationEarly physics with ATLAS and CMS
PRAMANA c Indian Academy of Sciences Vol. 72, No. 1 journal of January 2009 physics pp. 3 13 Early physics with ATLAS and CMS ALBERT DE ROECK CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland E-mail: deroeck@mail.cern.ch
More informationProbing the Connection Between Supersymmetry and Dark Matter
Probing the Connection Between Supersymmetry and Dark Matter Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Physics Colloquium, OSU, March 30, 2006 March 30, 2006 Probing the Connection Between SUSY and Dark Matter
More informationLHC+LC Synergy: SUSY as a case study
LHC+LC Synergy: SUSY as a case study εργον συν work together Outline: Why LHC/LC studies? Why SUSY as case study? 5 Examples of Synergy Conclusions Klaus Desch University of Hamburg ALCPG meeting - SLAC
More informationCollider Searches for Dark Matter
Collider Searches for Dark Matter AMELIA BRENNAN COEPP-CAASTRO WORKSHOP 1 ST MARCH 2013 Introduction Enough introductions to dark matter (see yesterday) Even though we don t know if DM interacts with SM,
More informationSUSY-Yukawa Sum Rule at the LHC
SUSY-Yukawa Sum Rule at the LHC David Curtin bla arxiv:1004.5350, arxiv:xxxx.xxxx In Collaboration with Maxim Perelstein, Monika Blanke bla Cornell Institute for High Energy Phenomenology SUSY 2010 Parallel
More informationLHC and Dark Matter 07/23/10. Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University
LHC and Dark atter 7/3/ Bhaskar Dutta Texas A& University Discovery Time We are about to enter into an era of major discovery Dark atter: we need new particles to explain the content of the universe Standard
More informationDark Matter Implications for SUSY
Dark Matter Implications for SUSY Sven Heinemeyer, IFCA (CSIC, Santander) Madrid, /. Introduction and motivation. The main idea 3. Some results 4. Future plans Sven Heinemeyer, First MultiDark workshop,
More informationLHC resonance searches in tt Z final state
LHC resonance searches in tt Z final state Bithika Jain Work in progress with Mihailo Backovic (CP3 Louvain), Thomas Flacke (IBS -CTPU), Seung Lee (Korea University) KIAS Workshop, 2016 1 The name of the
More informationProbing SUSY Contributions to Muon g-2 at LHC and ILC
Probing SUSY Contributions to Muon g-2 at LHC and ILC Motoi Endo (Tokyo) Based on papers in collaborations with ME, Hamaguchi, Iwamoto, Yoshinaga ME, Hamaguchi, Kitahara, Yoshinaga ME, Hamaguchi, Iwamoto,
More informationSearching for Extra Space Dimensions at the LHC. M.A.Parker Cavendish Laboratory Cambridge
Searching for Extra Space Dimensions at the LHC M.A.Parker Cavendish Laboratory Cambridge I shall use ATLAS to illustrate LHC physics, because it is the experiment I know best. Both general purpose detectors
More informationTHE COANNIHILATION CODEX
THE COANNIHILATION CODEX Felix Yu JGU Mainz with Michael Baker, Joachim Brod, Sonia El Hedri, Anna Kaminska, Joachim Kopp, Jia Liu, Andrea Thamm, Maikel de Vries, Xiao-Ping Wang, José Zurita (Johannes
More informationPreparations for SUSY searches at the LHC
Preparations for SUSY searches at the LHC Alex Tapper UK HEP Forum: LHC First Results and Outlook, September 20-21 20. Outline Search strategy Examples with 70 nb -1 Hadronic searches Leptonic searches
More informationSearching for sneutrinos at the bottom of the MSSM spectrum
Searching for sneutrinos at the bottom of the MSSM spectrum Arindam Chatterjee Harish-Chandra Research Insitute, Allahabad In collaboration with Narendra Sahu; Nabarun Chakraborty, Biswarup Mukhopadhyay
More informationFERMION PORTAL DARK MATTER
FERMION PORTAL DARK MATTER Joshua Berger SLAC UC Davis Theory Seminar! w/ Yang Bai: 1308.0612, 1402.6696 March 10, 2014 1 A HOLE IN THE SM Van Albada et. al. Chandra + Hubble What else can we learn about
More informationInterconnection between Particle Physics and Cosmology at the LHC
Interconnection between Particle Physics and Cosmology at the LHC Selections from the Cosmo Secret Cube Catalogue Transformer Cube Standard Model Cube PPC Cube Premiere Props Teruki Kamon Mitchell Institute
More informationThe Physics of Heavy Z-prime Gauge Bosons
The Physics of Heavy Z-prime Gauge Bosons Tevatron LHC LHC LC LC 15fb -1 100fb -1 14TeV 1ab -1 14TeV 0.5TeV 1ab -1 P - =0.8 P + =0.6 0.8TeV 1ab -1 P - =0.8 P + =0.6 χ ψ η LR SSM 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 2σ m Z'
More informationDM & SUSY Direct Search at ILC. Tomohiko Tanabe (U. Tokyo) December 8, 2015 Tokusui Workshop 2015, KEK
& SUSY Direct Search at ILC Tomohiko Tanabe (U. Tokyo) December 8, 2015 Tokusui Workshop 2015, KEK Contents The ILC has access to new physics via: Precision Higgs measurements Precision top measurements
More informationStop NLSPs. David Shih Rutgers University. Based on: Kats & DS ( ) Kats, Meade, Reece & DS ( )
Stop NLSPs David Shih Rutgers University Based on: Kats & DS (06.0030) Kats, Meade, Reece & DS (0.6444) This year, the LHC has performed extremely well. ATLAS and CMS have collected over 5/fb of data each!!
More informationDay2: Physics at TESLA
Day2: Physics at TESLA Origin of Electroweak Symmetry Breaking as one great Motivation for a Linear Collider The TESLA project Higgs Precision Physics at TESLA Leaving the Standard Model Behind Precision
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 17 Apr 2000
SEARCH FOR NEW PHYSICS WITH ATLAS AT THE LHC arxiv:hep-ph/0004161v1 17 Apr 2000 V.A. MITSOU CERN, EP Division, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland and University of Athens, Physics Department, Nuclear and Particle
More informationSUSY-Yukawa Sum Rule at the LHC
SUSY-Yukawa Sum Rule at the LHC David Curtin bla arxiv:1004.5350, arxiv:xxxx.xxxx In Collaboration with Maxim Perelstein, Monika Blanke bla Cornell Institute for High Energy Phenomenology Phenomenology
More informationPAMELA from Dark Matter Annihilations to Vector Leptons
PAMELA from Dark Matter Annihilations to Vector Leptons phalendj@umich.edu With Aaron Pierce and Neal Weiner University of Michigan LHC and Dark Matter Workshop 2009 University of Michigan Outline PAMELA
More informationDark Matter Experiments and Searches
Dark Matter Experiments and Searches R.J.Cashmore Principal Brasenose College,Oxford and Dept of Physics,Oxford R.Cashmore Dark Matter 3 1 Dark Matter at LHC R.Cashmore Dark Matter 3 2 Satellite view of
More informationZ' Bosons On-peak, Off-peak, and Way Off-peak
Z' Bosons On-peak, Off-peak, and Way Off-peak Seth Quackenbush University of Wisconsin-Madison arxiv:0801.4389 [hep ph] (F. Petriello, SQ) WIP (Y. Li, F. Petriello, SQ) Outline What is a Z'? How do we
More informationSupersymmetry IV. Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) PiTP 05, IAS
Supersymmetry IV Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley) PiTP 05, IAS Plan Mon: Non-technical Overview what SUSY is supposed to give us Tue: From formalism to the MSSM Global SUSY formalism, Feynman rules, soft SUSY
More informationBeyond the SM: SUSY. Marina Cobal University of Udine
Beyond the SM: SUSY Marina Cobal University of Udine Why the SM is not enough The gauge hierarchy problem Characteristic energy of the SM: M W ~100 GeV Characteristic energy scale of gravity: M P ~ 10
More informationHiggs Searches and Properties Measurement with ATLAS. Haijun Yang (on behalf of the ATLAS) Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Higgs Searches and Properties Measurement with ATLAS Haijun Yang (on behalf of the ATLAS) Shanghai Jiao Tong University LHEP, Hainan, China, January 11-14, 2013 Outline Introduction of SM Higgs Searches
More informationPreparations for SUSY searches at the LHC
Preparations for SUSY searches at the LHC Alex Tapper UK HEP Forum: LHC First Results and Outlook, September 20-21 20. Outline Search strategy Examples with 70 nb Hadronic searches Leptonic searches (single
More informationLecture 03. The Standard Model of Particle Physics. Part III Extensions of the Standard Model
Lecture 03 The Standard Model of Particle Physics Part III Extensions of the Standard Model Where the SM Works Excellent description of 3 of the 4 fundamental forces Explains nuclear structure, quark confinement,
More informationPhysics at the Tevatron. Lecture IV
Physics at the Tevatron Lecture IV Beate Heinemann University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN, Academic Training Lectures, November 2007 1 Outline Lecture I: The Tevatron,
More informationSUSY searches at the LHC * and Dark Matter
SUSY searches at the LHC * and Dark Matter Elisabetta Barberio ATL-PHYS-SLIDE-2009-025 26 February 2009 School of Physics The University of Melbourne/Australia Dark 2009: Seventh International Heidelberg
More informationThe HL-LHC physics program
2013/12/16 Workshop on Future High Energy Circular Collider 1 The HL-LHC physics program Takanori Kono (KEK/Ochanomizu University) for the ATLAS & CMS Collaborations Workshop on Future High Energy Circular
More informationLHC Capability for Dark Matter
LHC Capability for Dark atter 5// Bhaskar Dutta Texas A& University Discovery Time We are about to enter into an era of major discovery Dark atter: we need new particles to explain the content of the universe
More informationEXOTICA AT LHC. Philippe Miné LPNHE-Ecole Polytechnique, IN2P3-CNRS, France CMS collaboration.
EXOTICA AT LHC Philippe Miné LPNHE-Ecole Polytechnique, IN2P3-CNRS, France CMS collaboration pmine@poly.in2p3.fr Chia, Sardinia, Italy October 24-27 2001 1 EXOTICA AT LHC Beyond the Standard Model, Supersymmetry
More informationDiscovery potential of toppartners in a realistic composite Higgs model with early LHC data
Discovery potential of toppartners in a realistic composite Higgs model with early LHC data Günther Dissertori, Elisabetta Furlan, Filip Moortgat, JHEP09(20)019 Kick-off Meeting Of The LHCPhenoNet Initial
More informationDiscovery potential for SUGRA/SUSY at CMS
Discovery potential for SUGRA/SUSY at CMS Stefano Villa, Université de Lausanne, April 14, 2003 (Based on talk given at SUGRA20, Boston, March 17-21, 2003) Many thanks to: Massimiliano Chiorboli, Filip
More informationMass Reconstruction Techniques for Resonances in W ± W ± Scattering
Mass Reconstruction Techniques for Resonances in W ± W ± Scattering Stefanie Todt (stefanie.todt@tu-dresden.de) Institut fuer Kern- und Teilchenphysik, TU Dresden DPG Wuppertal March 11, 2015 bluu Vector
More informationSupersymmetric Origin of Matter (both the bright and the dark)
Supersymmetric Origin of Matter (both the bright and the dark) C.E.M. Wagner Argonne National Laboratory EFI, University of Chicago Based on following recent works: C. Balazs,, M. Carena and C.W.; Phys.
More informationOutline: Introduction Search for new Physics Model driven Signature based General searches. Search for new Physics at CDF
PE SU Outline: Introduction Search for new Physics Model driven Signature based General searches R Search for new Physics at CDF SUperSYmmetry Standard Model is theoretically incomplete SUSY: spin-based
More information