Boosted hadronic object identification using jet substructure in ATLAS Run-2
|
|
- Jemimah Atkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Boosted hadronic object identification using jet substructure in ATLAS Run-2 Emma Winkels on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration HEPMAD18
2 Outline Jets and jet substructure Top and W tagging H bb tagging Mass-decorrelated taggers Summary 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 1
3 Jets 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 2
4 What is a jet? Jets are objects constructed from the energy deposits left by collimated sprays of particles. Attempt to group inputs from common sources together.
5 What is a jet? Jets are objects constructed from the energy deposits left by collimated sprays of particles. Attempt to group inputs from common sources together. Hard scattering
6 What is a jet? Parton shower Jets are objects constructed from the energy deposits left by collimated sprays of particles. Attempt to group inputs from common sources together. Hard scattering
7 Parton shower What is a jet? Jets are objects constructed from the energy deposits left by collimated sprays of particles. Attempt to group inputs from common sources together. Hard scattering Hadronization
8 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 7
9 Inputs to jets ATLAS uses calorimeter objects and tracks as jet inputs. Calorimeter measures energy of particles. Starts with topological clustering of calorimeter cells. The ATLAS detector Muon Neutrino Proton Neutron Muon spectrometer Seed cells, E > 4σ above noise Hadronic calorimeter Growth cells, E > 2σ above noise Boundary cells Final topoclusters Inner detector Photon Electron Electromagnetic calorimeter LHC beampipe 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 8
10 How to define a jet There is no unique way to define a jet Different jet algorithms to cluster energy constituents into a jet: Anti-k ' : cluster hard (high-p ' ) and close (small R) energy deposits first k ' : cluster soft (low-p ' ) and close Cambridge/Aachen: cluster close 12 constituents = large E = small E R 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 9
11 Boosted jets Different jet radii (R) for different purposes: Small jets for quarks and gluons Large jets for hadronic decays of W, Z, H, top.. θ 2m/pT Increasing pt 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 10
12 Jet substructure Access the inner structure of large jets* Jet substructure variables are some function of Number of constituents Energy of the constituents Angular separation of the constituents ( R) Jet substructure helps us in jet tagging R 12 constituents = large E = small E * We use jet grooming to cut away the soft parts of jets, see /09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 11
13 Jet tagging Identify the particle that produced the jet. Used in broad range of physics analyses. Analyses looking at boosted top/higgs/w: distinguish these large jets from quark/gluon jets Analyses with b-hadrons or c-hadrons in the final state: heavy flavour tagging (b-, c-quark jets) 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 12
14 Top/W tagging ATLAS-CONF /09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 13
15 Commissioning of a tagger ATLAS process from idea to tagger used for physics analyses: Use MC to choose tagger Check data/mc Measure efficiencies in data & MC Calculate uncertainties on efficiencies 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 14
16 Use MC to choose tagger Two-variable tagging Simple cut-based tagging works well: W: m D 7 Top: m τ 97 m 1234 : Combined mass, combines calorimeter clusters with tracks to give more stable mass performance at high-p '. D 7 : Energy correlation ratio, distinguishes between one-prong and two-prong jets. τ 97 : N-subjettiness, distinguishes between two-prong and three-prong jets. 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 15
17 Use MC to choose tagger Two-variable tagging Simple cut-based tagging works well: W: m D 7 Top: m τ 97 m 1234 : Combined mass, combines calorimeter clusters with tracks to give more stable mass performance at high-p '. D 7 : Energy correlation ratio, distinguishes between one-prong and two-prong jets. τ 97 : N-subjettiness, distinguishes between two-prong and three-prong jets. W tagging performance ATLAS-CONF /09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 16
18 Use MC to choose tagger Machine learning taggers - BDT Machine learning techniques allow for the use of multiple variables Boosted decision tree (BDT): sequentially adding variables improves classification over two-variable tagging W tagging Top tagging bkg ) Relative background rejection (1/ rel D 2 comb m p T ATLAS Simulation Preliminary s = 13 TeV, BDT W Tagging Trimmed anti-k t R = 1.0 jets rel sig p true 21 KtDR τ T comb m = 50% = [200,2000] GeV 3 a > 40 GeV, η true < τ P FW R 2 A 2 C 2 τ z cut d 12 3 e bkg ) Relative background rejection (1/ rel τ 32 comb m 23 d ATLAS Simulation Preliminary s = 13 TeV, BDT Top Tagging Trimmed anti-k t R = 1.0 jets rel sig p D 2 true T comb m W Q = 80% = [350,2000] GeV > 40 GeV, η true < 2.0 d τ 3 e 2 τ p T 2 C 1 τ τ 3 ATLAS-CONF /09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 17
19 Use MC to choose tagger Machine learning taggers - DNN ATLAS evaluated TopoDNN* top tagger. Uses deep neural network (DNN) with topocluster jet constituents as inputs. Performance is better with lowlevel inputs than standard machine learning taggers. Background rejection (1 / bkg ) DNN top BDT top Shower Deconstruction 2-var optimised tagger TopoDNN ATLAS-CONF ATLAS Simulation Preliminary s = 13 TeV Trimmed anti-k t R = 1.0 jets η true < 2.0 true p = [1500, 2000] GeV T Top tagging HEPTopTagger v1, m comb > 60 GeV τ 32 TopoDNN: Low level inputs (four momenta) * More details on TopoDNN: DNN: High level inputs (constructed variables) Signal efficiency ( sig ) 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 18
20 Measurements in data Use MC to choose tagger Check data/mc Events / 5 GeV ATLAS Preliminary Data s = 13 TeV, 36.1 fb tt (top) Trimmed anti-k tt (W ) t R=1.0 jets tt (other) 8000 R(large-R jet, b-jet) > 1.0 Single Top (W ) p > 200 GeV T Single Top (other) W + jets 6000 VV, Z + jets, multijet Total uncert. Stat. uncert. tt modelling uncert W enriched sample Events / 5 GeV 2500 Data tt (top) tt (W ) tt (other) 2000 Single Top (W ) Single Top (other) W + jets 1500 VV, Z + jets, multijet Total uncert. Stat. uncert. tt modelling uncert Top enriched sample ATLAS Preliminary -1 s = 13 TeV, 36.1 fb Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets R(large-R jet, b-jet) < 1.0 p > 350 GeV T Data/Pred Data/Pred comb Leading large-r jet m [GeV] ATLAS-CONF comb Leading large-r jet m [GeV] 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 19
21 Use MC to choose tagger Check data/mc Measure efficiencies in data & MC Calculate uncertainties on efficiencies W/top tagging efficiency Need to measure efficiency in data and get uncertainty on this efficiency*. Full ATLAS dataset of fb CD Measure top/w tagging efficiency in tt lepton+jets samples. Measure multijet rejection in dijet and γ +jets samples. * Also done in V+jets: ATLAS-CONF /09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 20
22 Use MC to choose tagger Check data/mc Measure efficiencies in data & MC Calculate uncertainties on efficiencies W/top tagging efficiency vs. pile-up Pile-up is the resulting signal in the detector from other interactions besides the hard scatter we want to look at. Expressed as the mean number of interactions per bunch crossing. 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 21
23 Use MC to choose tagger Check data/mc Measure efficiencies in data & MC Calculate uncertainties on efficiencies W/top tagging efficiency vs. pile-up pre-fit ϵ IJ = SQOOTU L MNOPQR SQOOTU L VLMNOPQR MNOPQR PWS SQOOTU ϵ XYZY = SQOOTU L [NSSTU MNOPQR SQOOTU PWS SQOOTU L [NSSTU MNOPQR VL [NSSTU MNOPQR post-fit Signal efficiency ( sig ) Data/MC 0.6 ATLAS Preliminary -1 Data s = 13 TeV, 36.1 fb lepton+jets selection Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets W tagger ( = 50%): m comb sig + D 2 p > 200 GeV T W tagger PowhegPythia6 Total uncert Mean number of interactions per bunch crossing µ ATLAS-CONF /09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 22 Signal efficiency ( sig ) Data/MC ATLAS Preliminary s = 13 TeV, 36.1 fb lepton+jets selection Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets Top tagger ( sig = 80%): TopoDNN p > 450 GeV T TopoDNN tagger -1 Data PowhegPythia6 Total uncert Mean number of interactions per bunch crossing µ
24 Use MC to choose tagger Check data/mc Measure efficiencies in data & MC Calculate uncertainties on efficiencies Multijet rejection vs. pile-up Background rejection (1/ bkg ) W tagger ATLAS Preliminary -1 s = 13 TeV, 36.7 fb Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets Multijet Selection W tagger ( sig = 50%): comb m + D 2 Data Pythia8 Herwig++ Stat. uncert. Total uncert. Background rejection (1/ bkg ) TopoDNN tagger ATLAS Preliminary Data s = 13 TeV, 36.7 fb Pythia8 Trimmed anti-k Herwig++ t R=1.0 jets Stat. uncert. Multijet Selection Total uncert. Top tagger ( sig = 80%): TopoDNN Data/Pred Mean number of interactions per bunch crossing µ Data/Pred. ATLAS-CONF Mean number of interactions per bunch crossing µ 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 23
25 H bb tagging ATL-PHYS-PUB /09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 24
26 Overview b H BOOST b b] H BOOST b] b H b] Current nominal tagger identifies b-jets with multivariate algorithm on anti-k ' R=0.2 track-jets. Loses efficiency at high-p ' due to b- jets merging. 3 new subjet reconstruction techniques to mitigate this loss. 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 25
27 1 Variable radius track jets Subjets with dynamic radius parameter: ATL-PHYS-PUB R^ p ' = ` a b with low (R cde ) and high (R cfg ) cutoff. Scans performed over ρ, R cde, R cfg to find optimal values 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 26
28 2 Exclusive-k ' Recluster trimmed large-r jet calorimeter constituents with k ' algorithm and stop when 2 jets are obtained. Splits the large-r jet into two parts, each of which is expected to contain one b-hadron. 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 27
29 3 Centre-of-mass Boost jet calorimeter clusters to the centre-of-mass frame of the large-r jet (jet rest frame) and reconstruct subjets. Tracks for b-tagging are also boosted to the centre-of-mass frame. 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 28
30 Results New methods show large improvement over nominal tagger for p ' > 1000 GeV. New methods Nominal ATL-PHYS-PUB /09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 29
31 Mass decorrelation ATL-PHYS-PUB /09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 30
32 Mass decorrelated taggers Jet substructure variables are correlated with jet mass. When you put many of them into a multivariate analysis the correlation gets very strong. Sculpting of the multijet background -> resembles the resonance jet mass distribution Depopulates side-band regions Aim to decorrelate jet substructure classifiers from jet mass ATL-PHYS-PUB /09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 31
33 Designed decorrelated taggers (DDT) τ 7D variable distinguishes 1-prong from 2-prong jets Has a linear relationship to jet scaling variable ρ kkl for masses > 80 GeV ATL-PHYS-PUB /09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 32
34 Designed decorrelated taggers (DDT) τ 7D variable distinguishes 1-prong from 2-prong jets Has a linear relationship to jet scaling variable ρ kkl for masses > 80 GeV ATL-PHYS-PUB τ 7D after DDT transformation Standard τ 7D 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 33
35 Summary 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 34
36 Summary Top/W tagging: Machine learning taggers perform better than 2-variable taggers Machine learning tagger with low-level inputs (TopoDNN) performs the best for top tagging Signal efficiency & background rejection in data are well modelled by MC H bb tagging: 3 new subjet reconstruction techniques to overcome loss of efficiency at high p ' due to b-jet merging Large improvement over nominal tagger for p ' > 1000 GeV Mass decorrelated taggers: Various approaches studied with promising results 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 35
37 Fin. 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 36
38 Back-up 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 37
39 The ATLAS coordinate system η = ln tan θ 2 R = η 7 + φ 7 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 38
40 Granularity of ATLAS calorimeter The hadronic calorimeter is coarser than the EM calorimeter. If we want to use all calorimeter layers we are limited by coarsest layer (R cde ~0.2). But we can also ignore coarse layers and use only very fine layers. EM granularity: η φ π/128 Hadronic granularity: η φ 0.1 π/32 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 39
41 Jet trimming 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 40
42 Combined mass Track-assisted mass: m lx = m ZyY1z { }QRW { S~Q} ATLAS-CONF in which m ZyY1z and p l ZyY1z are the invariant mass and pt calculated from tracks associated with the large-r trimmed calorimeter jet and p l 1Y 2 is the pt of the original trimmed large-r jet. Calorimeter mass: m fƒ = E d d 7 p d d 7 m 1234 = a m 1Y 2 + b m lx with a = ˆ}QRW Š ˆ}QRW Š Vˆ and b = ˆ Š Š ˆ}QRW Š Š Vˆ where σ 1Y 2 and σ lx are the calorimeter-based jet mass resolution function and the track-assisted mass resolution function respectively. 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 41
43 JSS variables Energy correlation ratio: D 7 = Œ (Œ Š ) where e 7 and e 9 are the 2- and 3-prong energy correlation functions which are sensitive to the 2- and 3-prong structure in a jet. N-subjettiness: τ 97 = τ 9 /τ 7 where τ L = 1 p d l,z min ( R Dz, R 7z,, R Lz ), d = p lz R z R is radius parameter of the jet, p lz is transverse momentum of constituent k, and δr z is the distance between the subjet i and the constituent k. The N-subjettiness variable τ L expresses how well a jet can be described as containing N subjets. Jet mass calculated from constituents: m 7 = E d d 7 p 7 d d z 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 42
44 W tagging with ML methods Background rejection (1 / bkg ) DNN W BDT W 2-var optimised tagger, m comb D 2 [60, 100] GeV Low pt ATLAS Simulation Preliminary s = 13 TeV Trimmed anti-k t R = 1.0 jets η true < 2.0 true p = [200, 500] GeV T W tagging Background rejection (1 / bkg ) DNN W BDT W 2-var optimised tagger, m comb D 2 [60, 100] GeV High pt ATLAS Simulation Preliminary s = 13 TeV Trimmed anti-k t R = 1.0 jets η true < 2.0 true p = [1000, 1500] GeV T W tagging Signal efficiency ( sig ) Signal efficiency ( sig ) 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 43
45 TopoDNN Uses p l, η, φ of 10 leading topoclusters in trimmed large-r jet. Normalized units ATLAS Simulation Preliminary s = 13 TeV Pythia 8 Pythia 8 Multijet Z Cluster 0 Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets Light Quark Jet Sample : p > 450 GeV T Top Quark Jet Sample: p > 150 GeV T fraction of cluster 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 44 p T
46 Top/W tagging in data 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 45
47 W/top tagging efficiency Need to measure efficiency in data and get uncertainty on this efficiency. Measure signal-like events in data to fit large-r jet mass for events passing/failing a tagger Passing tag Failing tag Events / 10 GeV 1200 ATLAS Preliminary -1 Data s = 13 TeV, 36.1 fb tt signal 1000 non-tt background tt background lepton+jets selection Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets Top tagger ( = 80%): m comb sig + τ 32 Tag pass 350 GeV < p < 400 GeV T Events / 10 GeV ATLAS Preliminary s = 13 TeV, 36.1 fb -1 Data tt signal non-tt background tt background lepton+jets selection Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets Top tagger ( = 80%): m comb sig + τ 32 Tag fail 350 GeV < p < 400 GeV T Data/MC m comb [GeV] Data/MC m comb [GeV] 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 46
48 W/top tagging efficiency vs. jet pt pre-fit ϵ IJ = SQOOTU L MNOPQR SQOOTU L VLMNOPQR MNOPQR PWS SQOOTU ϵ XYZY = SQOOTU L [NSSTU MNOPQR SQOOTU PWS SQOOTU L [NSSTU MNOPQR VL [NSSTU MNOPQR post-fit Signal efficiency ( sig ) Data/MC 0.6 ATLAS Preliminary -1 Data W tagger s = 13 TeV, 36.1 fb lepton+jets selection Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets W tagger ( = 50%): m comb sig + D 2 PowhegPythia6 Total uncert Leading large-r jet p [GeV] T Signal efficiency ( sig ) Data/MC ATLAS Preliminary TopoDNN tagger s = 13 TeV, 36.1 fb lepton+jets selection Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets Top tagger ( sig = 80%): TopoDNN -1 Data PowhegPythia6 Total uncert Leading large-r jet p [GeV] T 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 47
49 Multijet rejection vs. jet pt Background rejection (1/ bkg ) W tagger ATLAS Preliminary -1 s = 13 TeV, 36.7 fb Trimmed anti-k t R=1.0 jets Multijet Selection W tagger ( sig = 50%): comb m + D 2 Data Pythia8 Herwig++ Stat. uncert. Total uncert. Background rejection (1/ bkg ) TopoDNN tagger ATLAS Preliminary Data s = 13 TeV, 36.7 fb Pythia8 Trimmed anti-k Herwig++ t R=1.0 jets Stat. uncert. Multijet Selection Total uncert. Top tagger ( sig = 80%): TopoDNN 20 5 Data/Pred Data/Pred Leading large-r Jet p T [GeV] Leading large-r Jet p T [GeV] 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 48
50 Variable radius track jets 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 49
51 Results H->bb tagging techniques 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 50
52 H->bb tagging results 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 51
53 Designed decorrelated taggers Linear fit on the relationship between τ 7D and rho. Transformation is: τ 7D ' = τ 7D a ρ ' 1.5 a is the slope of the fit in the plot. DDT transformation removes the linear correlation of τ 7D with ρ. Since ρ has info on kinematics of the jet (m and pt), the DDT transform yields a JSS discriminant which is decorrelated from the jet mass. 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels ewinkels@cern.ch HEPMAD18 52
54 Mass decorrelation 11/09/2018 Emma Winkels HEPMAD18 53
bb and TopTagging in ATLAS
X bb and TopTagging in ATLAS Mike Nelson, University of Oxford michael.nelson@physics.ox.ac.uk Focus of the discussion I want to try and achieve two things: Introduce the basic tools employed in ATLAS
More informationATLAS jet and missing energy reconstruction, calibration and performance in LHC Run-2
Prepared for submission to JINS International Conference on Instrumentation for Colliding Beam Physics 7 February - March, 7 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia ALAS jet and missing
More informationATLAS Jet Reconstruction, Calibration, and Tagging
ALAS Jet Reconstruction, Calibration, and agging Steven Schramm On behalf of the ALAS Collaboration ICNFP 7 Crete, Greece August, 7 Steven Schramm (Université de Genève) Jet reconstruction, calibration,
More informationMeasurement of Jet Energy Scale and Resolution at ATLAS and CMS at s = 8 TeV
Measurement of Jet Energy Scale and Resolution at ATLAS and CMS at s = 8 TeV EDSBlois 2015 02.07.2015 Dominik Haitz on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations INSTITUT FÜR EXPERIMENTELLE KERNPHYSIK
More informationJet substructure, top tagging & b-tagging at high pt Pierre-Antoine Delsart and Jeremy Andrea
Jet substructure, top tagging & b-tagging at high pt Pierre-Antoine Delsart and Jeremy Andrea Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et Corpusculaire CNRS/IN2P3 1 Motivations Now exploring very high pt regions
More informationLarge R jets and boosted. object tagging in ATLAS. Freiburg, 15/06/2016. #BoostAndNeverLookBack. Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg
Large R jets and boosted object tagging in ATLAS Christoph Anders Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg #BoostAndNeverLookBack Freiburg, 15/06/2016 ??? Cambridge-Aachen 2 arxiv:1506.00962 Higgs
More informationTHE ATLAS TRIGGER SYSTEM UPGRADE AND PERFORMANCE IN RUN 2
THE ATLAS TRIGGER SYSTEM UPGRADE AND PERFORMANCE IN RUN 2 S. Shaw a on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration University of Manchester E-mail: a savanna.marie.shaw@cern.ch The ATLAS trigger has been used very
More informationTop tagging at CMS. Torben Dreyer on behalf of the CMS Collaboration. BOOST 2017, Buffalo
Torben Dreyer on behalf of the CMS Collaboration BOOST 2017, Buffalo Motivation LHC at s = 13 TeV More top quarks with high momentum (Standard Model and new physics) Top tagging more important than ever
More informationImproving Jet Substructure Performance in ATLAS with Unified Tracking and Calorimeter Inputs Connecting The Dots 2018
Improving Jet Substructure Performance in ATLAS with Unified Tracking and Calorimeter Inputs Connecting The Dots 2018 Roland Jansky, University of Geneva 21st March 2018 Jets at the Energy Frontier event
More informationEvidence for tth production at ATLAS
Evidence for tth production at ATLAS Rohin T Narayan on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration Nov-6-2017, Higgs couplings Heidelberg Motivation Fermion masses are generated through Yukawa interaction Heaviest
More informationATLAS Jet Reconstruction, Calibration, and Tagging of Lorentzboosted
ALAS Jet Reconstruction, Calibration, and agging of Lorentzboosted Objects Steven Schramm, on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Université de Genève (CH) Abstract. Jet reconstruction in the ALAS detector
More informationQCD Jets at the LHC. Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago. on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations
QCD Jets at the LHC Leonard Apanasevich University of Illinois at Chicago on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations Outline Physics at the LHC Jet Reconstruction and Performance Clustering Algorithms
More informationPerformance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS
ATL-PHYS-PROC-22-3 22/2/22 Performance of muon and tau identification at ATLAS On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration University of Oregon E-mail: mansoora.shamim@cern.ch Charged leptons play an important
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 28 Aug 2017
Proceedings of the Fifth Annual LHCP AL-PHYS-PROC-7-99 November 9, 8 Boosted top production in ALAS and arxiv:78.864v [hep-ex] 8 Aug 7 Marino Romano On behalf of the ALAS and Collaborations, INFN, Sezione
More informationTagging Boosted Top Quarks and Higgs Bosons in ATLAS
agging Boosted op Quarks and Higgs Bosons in ALAS BOOS 05, University of Chicago Matt LeBlanc, on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration 0 th -4 th August 05 Overview Run-I op agging: ALAS-CONF-05-36 agging
More informationHard And Soft QCD Physics In ATLAS
Hard And Soft QCD Physics In ALAS Stefanie Adomeit on behalf of the ALAS collaboration International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - Crete, June -6, QCD Measurements in ALAS at LHC every kind
More informationResolved Top Tagger in CMS
Resolved Top Tagger in CMS An MVA-based tool used for tagging low to moderately boosted hadronic tops Stanislava Sevova, Northwestern University on behalf of CMS Collaboration 1 Overview Motivation Resolved
More informationNikos Varelas. University of Illinois at Chicago. CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 20, Nikos Varelas. CTEQ Meeting Nov 20, 2009
QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern November 0, 009 1 QCD Physics at CMS University of Illinois at Chicago CTEQ Collaboration Meeting Northwestern
More informationHighlights of top quark measurements in hadronic final states at ATLAS
Highlights of top quark measurements in hadronic final states at ATLAS Serena Palazzo 1,2,, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 1 Università della Calabria 2 INFN Cosenza Abstract. Measurements of inclusive
More informationMeasurement of the jet production properties at the LHC with the ATLAS Detector
Measurement of the jet production properties at the LHC with the ALAS Detector Stanislav okar Comenius University, Bratislava On behalf of the ALAS collaboration Different features of the jet production
More informationPhysics with Tau Lepton Final States in ATLAS. Felix Friedrich on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
Physics with Tau Lepton Final States in ATLAS on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration HEP 2012, Valparaiso (Chile), 06.01.2012 The Tau Lepton m τ = 1.8 GeV, heaviest lepton cτ = 87 μm, short lifetime hadronic
More informationBoosted Top Resonance Searches at CMS
Boosted Top Resonance Searches at CMS Justin Pilot, UC Davis on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Northwest Terascale Workshop, Using Jet Substructure University of Oregon 5 April 013 Introduction Many new
More informationBoosted Top Tagging with Neural Networks
Boosted Top Tagging with Neural Networks Maxim Perelstein Cornell CMS Group Physics Retreat, March 5 2015 Based on work with Leo Almeida, Mihailo Backovic, Mathieu Cliche, Seung Lee [arxiv:1501.05968 +
More informationEffects of Jet Substructure Selection in
Effects of Jet Substructure Selection in tt WbWb µνbqqb Ziggy Zacks Wesleyan University July 31, 2012 1 / 29 Optimization Optimize data selection from the semi-leptonic boosted tops analysis. Specifically
More informationTop production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC
Top production measurements using the ATLAS detector at the LHC INFN, Sezione di Bologna and University of Bologna E-mail: romano@bo.infn.it This paper is an overview of recent results on top-quark production
More informationUpgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential
IL NUOVO CIMENTO 4 C (27) 8 DOI.393/ncc/i27-78-7 Colloquia: IFAE 26 Upgrade of ATLAS and CMS for High Luminosity LHC: Detector performance and Physics potential M. Testa LNF-INFN - Frascati (RM), Italy
More informationSearch for heavy BSM particles coupling to third generation quarks at CMS
Search for heavy BSM particles coupling to third generation quarks at on behalf of the Collaboration University of Hamburg E-mail: mareike.meyer@desy.de Many models of physics beyond the Standard Model
More informationPhysics potential of ATLAS upgrades at HL-LHC
M.Testa on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration INFN LNF, Italy E-mail: marianna.testa@lnf.infn.it ATL-PHYS-PROC-207-50 22 September 207 The High Luminosity-Large Hadron Collider (HL-LHC) is expected to start
More informationTop quarks objects definition and performance at ATLAS
5th International Workshop on op Quark Physics (OP) doi:.88/74-6596/45// op quarks objects definition and performance at ALAS V. Boisvert on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Royal Holloway University of
More informationJet physics in ATLAS. Paolo Francavilla. IFAE-Barcelona. Summer Institute LNF , QCD, Heavy Flavours and Higgs physics
Jet physics in ATLAS IFAE-Barcelona Summer Institute LNF-2012-2, QCD, Heavy Flavours and Higgs physics Frascati National Laboratories 27 June 2012 Jets in the LHC era At the Large Hadron Collider (LHC),
More informationTop Quark Production at the LHC. Masato Aoki (Nagoya University, Japan) For the ATLAS, CMS Collaborations
Top Quark Production at the LHC Masato Aoki (Nagoya University, Japan) For the ATLAS, CMS Collaborations Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 091503, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 054018, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 054028, Comput.
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 7 Jan 2019
Top quarks and exotics at ATLAS and CMS Leonid Serkin on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations 1 arxiv:1901.01765v1 [hep-ex] 7 Jan 2019 INFN Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Sezione di Trieste, Udine and
More informationMeasurement of t-channel single top quark production in pp collisions
Measurement of t-channel single top quark production in pp collisions (on behalf of the CMS collaboration) INFN-Napoli & Università della Basilicata E-mail: Francesco.Fabozzi@cern.ch Measurements of t-channel
More informationPre-Processing and Re-Weighting Jet Images with Different Substructure Variables
Pre-Processing and Re-Weighting Jet Images with Different Substructure Variables Lynn Huynh University of California, Davis Department of Mechanical Engineering CERN Work Project Report CERN, ATLAS, Jet
More informationPhysics at Hadron Colliders
Physics at Hadron Colliders Part 2 Standard Model Physics Test of Quantum Chromodynamics - Jet production - W/Z production - Production of Top quarks Precision measurements -W mass - Top-quark mass QCD
More informationReconstructing low mass boosted A bb at LHCb
Summer student report - CERN 2014 Summer student: Petar Bokan Supervisor: Victor Coco Reconstructing low mass boosted A bb at LHCb ABSTRACT: LHCb has the ability to trigger low mass objects with high efficiency.
More informationOptimizing Selection and Sensitivity Results for VV->lvqq, 6.5 pb -1, 13 TeV Data
1 Optimizing Selection and Sensitivity Results for VV->lvqq, 6.5 pb, 13 TeV Supervisor: Dr. Kalliopi Iordanidou 215 Columbia University REU Home Institution: High Point University 2 Summary Introduction
More informationJet tagging with ATLAS for discoveries in Run II
Jet tagging with ATLAS for discoveries in Run II Ayana Arce (Duke University) November 5 th 2014 The Large Hadron Collider 2008-2013: E CM : 7.0 8.0 TeV m H = 125.4 +/- 0.4 (ATLAS) m H = 125.0 +/- 0.3
More informationMeasurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ATLAS
Measurement of multijets and the internal structure of jets at ALAS Bilge M. Demirköz, on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Institut de Fisica d Altes Energies, Barcelona, SPAIN also at Middle East echnical
More informationMeasurement of the Z ττ cross-section in the semileptonic channel in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector
Measurement of the Z ττ cross-section in the semileptonic channel in pp collisions at s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector Sofia Consonni Università di Milano & INFN XCVII Congresso Nazionale della Società
More informationJet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS
Jet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS Ariel Schwartzman 3 rd Top Workshop: from the Tevatron to ATLAS Grenoble, 23-Oct-2008 1 Outline ATLAS Calorimeters Calorimeter signal reconstruction:
More informationTop-tagging at high jet multiplicity
Top-tagging at high jet multiplicity Sebastian Schätzel Universität Heidelberg, Germany Using Jet Substructure Workshop University of Oregon, Eugene, USA 23-26 April 2013 HEPTopTagger fat jet quantities
More informationDistinguishing quark and gluon jets at the LHC
Distinguishing quark and jets at the LHC Giorgia Rauco (on behalf of the ALAS and CMS Collaborations) Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland Abstract: Studies focused on discriminating between jets originating
More informationMeasurements of the tt Cross Section and Top Mass at CDF
Measurements of the tt Cross Section and Top Mass at University of Chicago / LBNL For the Collaboration HCP 2004, 06/15/04, p. 1 Studying the tt Cross Section Main question: is top quark adequately described
More informationHighlights of top-quark measurements in hadronic nal states at ATLAS
Highlights of top-quark measurements in hadronic nal states at ATLAS Serena Palazzo on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration XLVII International Symposium on Multiparticle Dynamics Tlaxcala, Mexico September
More informationPhysics object reconstruction in the ATLAS experiment
Physics object reconstruction in the ALAS experiment, on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University Blegdamsvej 7, Denmark E-mail: xella@nbi.dk his document presents a
More informationJet Substructure. Adam Davison. University College London
Jet Substructure Adam Davison University College London 1 Outline Jets at the LHC Machine and ATLAS detector What is a jet? Jet substructure What is it? What can it do for us? Some ATLAS/Higgs bias here
More informationParticle Identification at LHCb. IML Workshop. April 10, 2018
Particle Identification at LHCb Miriam Lucio, on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration IML Workshop April 10, 2018 M. Lucio Particle Identification at LHCb April 10, 2018 1 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Neutral
More informationJet Physics. Yazid Delenda. 1st Jijel Meeting on Theoretical Physics. Jijel, October 29-31, University Batna 1
Jet Physics Yazid Delenda University Batna 1 1st Jijel Meeting on Theoretical Physics Quantum Mechanics, Gravitation and Particle Physics Jijel, October 29-31, 2018 977 1 ⵜ ⴰ ⵙ ⴷⴰ ⵡⵉ ⵜ ⵏ ⵜ ⴱⴰ ⵜ ⴻ ⵏ ⵜ U
More informationBoosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks
Boosted Top Tagging with Deep Neural Networks Jannicke Pearkes University of British Columbia, Engineering Physics Wojtek Fedorko, Alison Lister, Colin Gay Inter-Experimental Machine Learning Workshop
More informationThe Heavy Quark Search at the LHC
The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC The Heavy Quark Search at the LHC Backgrounds: estimating and suppressing tt, multijets,... jet mass technique NLO effects matrix elements for extra jets initial state
More informationJET FRAGMENTATION DENNIS WEISER
JET FRAGMENTATION DENNIS WEISER OUTLINE Physics introduction Introduction to jet physics Jets in heavy-ion-collisions Jet reconstruction Paper discussion The CMS experiment Data selection and track/jet
More informationRisultati dell esperimento ATLAS dopo il run 1 di LHC. C. Gemme (INFN Genova), F. Parodi (INFN/University Genova) Genova, 28 Maggio 2013
Risultati dell esperimento ATLAS dopo il run 1 di LHC C. Gemme (INFN Genova), F. Parodi (INFN/University Genova) Genova, 28 Maggio 2013 1 LHC physics Standard Model is a gauge theory based on the following
More informationRecent QCD results from ATLAS
Recent QCD results from ATLAS PASCOS 2013 Vojtech Pleskot Charles University in Prague 21.11.2013 Introduction / Outline Soft QCD: Underlying event in jet events @7TeV (2010 data) Hard double parton interactions
More informationSearch for a SM-like Higgs boson. Zijun Xu Peking University ISHP, Beijing Aug 15, 2013
l n W H W Search for a SM-like Higgs boson decaying into WW lνq q in CMS Zijun Xu Peking University ISHP, Beijing Aug 15, 2013 Outline Introduction H WW Lep + MET + 2 jets [1] : 160-600 GeV H WW Lep +
More informationSearch for the Higgs boson in the t th production mode using the ATLAS detector
Search for the Higgs boson in the t th production mode using the ATLAS detector Rustem Ospanov (University of Pennsylvania) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration Large Hadron Collider Physics Conference,
More informationHow to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad
How to Measure Top Quark Mass with CMS Detector??? Ijaz Ahmed Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad Outlines o o o o o o o High Pt top basic idea Methods for jets selection Top quark mass
More informationSubstructure at CMS:
Substructure at CMS: Experimental Perspective (SUNY Buffalo) Terajets 2013: Using Jet Substructure 1 Introduction Use one example analysis (Z tt all hadronic) to bring up some experimental discussion topics
More information2 ATLAS operations and data taking
The ATLAS experiment: status report and recent results Ludovico Pontecorvo INFN - Roma and CERN on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 1 Introduction The ATLAS experiment was designed to explore a broad
More informationResults on QCD jet production at the LHC (incl. Heavy flavours)
Results on QCD jet production at the LHC (incl. Heavy flavours) R. Seuster (TRIUMF) On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations Recontres du Vietnam August 11th 17th, 2013 Windows on the Universe Outline
More informationb hadron properties and decays (ATLAS)
b hadron properties and decays (ATLAS) Milind V. Purohit Univ. of South Carolina, USA for the ATLAS collaboration M. V. Purohit SM@LHC 2012 1 Outline Detector, Di muon trigger, Performance: Mass, vertex
More informationtt production in the forward region at LHCb
tt production in the forward region at LHCb María Vieites Díaz, On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Universidade de Santiago de Compostela image from https://www.trada.co.uk/case-studies/the-globe-at-cern-geneva/
More informationDark matter searches and prospects at the ATLAS experiment
Dark matter searches and prospects at the ATLAS experiment Wendy Taylor (York University) for the ATLAS Collaboration TeVPA 2017 Columbus, Ohio, USA August 7-11, 2017 Dark Matter at ATLAS Use 13 TeV proton-proton
More informationHiggs Searches with taus in the final state in ATLAS
Higgs Searches with taus in the final state in ATLAS (University of Washington) Terascale Workshop: Interpreting emerging Higgs data @ Uni of Oregon With many thanks to Anna Goussiou, J. Keller, M. Beckingham,
More informationChristian Wiel. Reconstruction and Identification of Semi-Leptonic Di-Tau Decays in Boosted Topologies at ATLAS
22.3.8 / 6 Reconstruction and Identification of Semi-Leptonic Di-Tau Decays in Boosted Topologies at ATLAS 22.3.8 2 / 6 Tau Lepton Properties 8% 7% other 6% 4% 35% leptonic % 9% 65% hadronic 9% 25% 22.3.8
More informationJet reconstruction. What are jets? How can we relate the measured jets to the underlying physics process? Calibration of jets Tagging of jets
Jet reconstruction What are jets? How can we relate the measured jets to the underlying physics process? Calibration of jets Tagging of jets 1 What are jets? Jets for non- particle physicists Jets for
More informationMeasurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC. Michele Cascella
Measurement of the associated production of direct photons and jets with the Atlas experiment at LHC Michele Cascella Graduate Course in Physics University of Pisa The School of Graduate Studies in Basic
More informationDemystifying Multivariate Searches
Demystifying Multivariate Searches and the Matthew Schwartz Harvard University Work down with Jason Gallicchio, PRL, 105:022001,2010 and with Gallicchio, Tweedie, Huth, Kagan and Black in preparation Johns
More informationMeasurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the ATLAS detector
Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 00 (07) 6 Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings Measurement of photon production cross sections also in association with jets with the detector Sebastien Prince
More informationQCD Multijet Background and Systematic Uncertainties in Top Physics
QCD Multijet Background and Systematic Uncertainties in Top Physics Jin Wang On behalf of ATLAS, CMS, CDF and D0 Collaborations IHEP, China 2013-09-15, Top2013 1 Outline Introduction of QCD Multijet Background
More informationFeasibility of a cross-section measurement for J/ψ->ee with the ATLAS detector
Feasibility of a cross-section measurement for J/ψ->ee with the ATLAS detector ATLAS Geneva physics meeting Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Outline Motivation Theoretical background for J/ψ hadroproduction
More informationFlavour Tagging at ATLAS
Flavour agging at ALAS Hannah Arnold Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Heavy Flavour Production at the LHC, IPPP Durham - April 6 H. Arnold (Universität Freiburg) Flavour agging at ALAS - April 6 / 3
More informationPreparations for SUSY searches at the LHC
Preparations for SUSY searches at the LHC Alex Tapper UK HEP Forum: LHC First Results and Outlook, September 20-21 20. Outline Search strategy Examples with 70 nb Hadronic searches Leptonic searches (single
More informationStatistical Tools in Collider Experiments. Multivariate analysis in high energy physics
Statistical Tools in Collider Experiments Multivariate analysis in high energy physics Pauli Lectures - 06/0/01 Nicolas Chanon - ETH Zürich 1 Main goals of these lessons - Have an understanding of what
More informationA Measurement Of WZ/ZZ ll+jj Cross Section. Rahmi Unalan Michigan State University Thesis Defense
A Measurement Of WZ/ZZ ll+jj Cross Section Rahmi Unalan Michigan State University Thesis Defense 1 Overview Physics Motivation DØ Detector Standard Model Triple Gauge Coupling Object Definitions WZ/ZZ
More informationBoosted searches for WW/WZ resonances in
Boosted searches for WW/WZ resonances in the lνj final state BILLIE LUBIS COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY REU 2016 CERN Founded in 1954 by 12 Western European countries Now 22 member countries Aims to conduct cutting-edge
More informationSearch for W' tb in the hadronic final state at ATLAS
Search for W' tb in the hadronic final state at ATLAS Ho Ling Li The University of Chicago January 5, 2015 1 Introduction What is W'? A charged, heavy, Standard-Model-like W gauge boson Analysis channels
More informationTop Quark Mass Reconstruction from High Pt Jets at LHC
Top Quark Mass Reconstruction from High Pt Jets at LHC IJAZ AHMED National Centre for Physics Islamabad, Pakistan Signaling the Arrival of the LHC Era, ICTP, Italy Outlines o o o o o o o o o o Motivations
More informationHow to find a Higgs boson. Jonathan Hays QMUL 12 th October 2012
How to find a Higgs boson Jonathan Hays QMUL 12 th October 2012 Outline Introducing the scalar boson Experimental overview Where and how to search Higgs properties Prospects and summary 12/10/2012 2 The
More informationIntroduction to Jets. Hsiang nan Li ( 李湘楠 ) Academia Sinica, Taipei. July. 11, 2014
Introduction to Jets Hsiang nan Li ( 李湘楠 ) Academia Sinica, Taipei at CTEQ School, Beijing July. 11, 2014 1 Outlines Introduction e+e annihilation and jets Jets in experiment Jets in theory Summary 2 Introduction
More informationPoS(ICHEP2012)311. Identification of b-quark jets in the CMS experiment. Sudhir Malik 1
Identification of b-quark jets in the CMS experiment 1 University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588 E-mail: malik@fnal.gov The identification of jets arising from the production of b-quarks is an essential
More informationPreparations for SUSY searches at the LHC
Preparations for SUSY searches at the LHC Alex Tapper UK HEP Forum: LHC First Results and Outlook, September 20-21 20. Outline Search strategy Examples with 70 nb -1 Hadronic searches Leptonic searches
More informationOptimization of selection and data-driven background estimation for the boosted di-higgs to 4b final state search
Optimization of selection and data-driven background estimation for the boosted di-higgs to 4b final state search Alison Marsh Advisor: Dr. Emily Thompson August 1, 2014 Abstract This paper presents the
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 16 Jan 2019
CMS-CR-28/262 January 7, 29 Measurement of the single top quark and antiquark production cross sections in the t channel and their ratio at TeV arxiv:9.5247v [hep-ex] 6 Jan 29 Denise Müller on behalf of
More informationCharged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV
Charged Particle Multiplicity in pp Collisions at s = 13 TeV Khadeejah ALGhadeer PhD in Engineering, Physics The Workshop of the APS Topical Group on Hadronic Physics Charged Particle Multiplicity IN PP
More informationCDF top quark " $ )(! # % & '
$% CDF quark 7 3 5 ( "#! Tevatron Run II Started Spring 1. proton-antiproton collider with (Run I :. antiproton recycler commissioning electron cooling operational by Summer 5. increase in luminosity.
More informationQCD and Top physics studies in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV centre-of-mass energy with the ATLAS detector
Journal of Physics: Conference Series QCD and Top physics studies in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV centre-of-mass energy with the ATLAS detector To cite this article: Marcello Barisonzi 2012 J. Phys.:
More informationMono-X, Associate Production, and Dijet searches at the LHC
Mono-X, Associate Production, and Dijet searches at the LHC Emily (Millie) McDonald, The University of Melbourne CAASTRO-CoEPP Joint Workshop Melbourne, Australia Jan. 30 - Feb. 1 2017 M. McDonald, University
More informationMeasurement of the top pair invariant mass distribution and search for New Physics using the CMS experiment
Measurement of the top pair invariant mass distribution and search for New Physics using the CMS experiment On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Interuniversity Institute for High Energies (ULB-VUB) Vrije
More informationFactorization for Jet Substructure. Andrew Larkoski Reed College
Factorization for Jet Substructure Andrew Larkoski Reed College SCET 017, March 14, 017 Goal: Precision Calculations on Isolated Jets at the LHC 3 Perturbative Radiation Perturbative Radiation Underlying
More informationProbing electroweak symmetry breaking! with Higgs pair production at the LHC
Probing electroweak symmetry breaking! with Higgs pair production at the LHC Behr, Bortoletto, Frost, Issever, Hartland, JR, arxiv:1512.08928 Juan Rojo! STFC Rutherford Fellow! Rudolf Peierls Center for
More informationQCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets
QCD at the Tevatron: The Production of Jets & Photons plus Jets Mike Strauss The University of Oklahoma The Oklahoma Center for High Energy Physics for the CDF and DØD Collaborations APS 2009 Denver, Colorado
More informationTau Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS. Tau 2016 Conference, Beijing, 21st September 2016
Tau Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS Tau 2016 Conference, Beijing, 21st September 2016 Cristina Galea Nikhef/RU Nijmegen presented by: Daniele Zanzi University of Melbourne Tau lepton properties Mass = 1.78
More informationPhysics at Hadron Colliders Part II
Physics at Hadron Colliders Part II Marina Cobal Università di Udine 1 The structure of an event One incoming parton from each of the protons enters the hard process, where then a number of outgoing particles
More informationSearch for single production of vector-like quarks decaying into a W-boson and a b-quark at 13 TeV
SNSN-33-63 November 0 06 Search for single production of vector-like quarks decaying into a W-boson and a b-quark at 3 TeV Dustin Biedermann on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Institut für Physik Humboldt-Universität
More informationQCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector
QCD Studies at LHC with the Atlas detector Introduction Sebastian Eckweiler - University of Mainz (on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration) Examples of QCD studies Minimum bias & underlying event Jet-physics
More informationTop production at the Tevatron
Top production at the Tevatron Bob Hirosky University of Virginia for the CDF and D0 Collaborations Moriond Moriond QCD 2017 1 Top production at the Tevatron Top mass from differential cross section Polarization
More informationThesis. Wei Tang. 1 Abstract 3. 3 Experiment Background The Large Hadron Collider The ATLAS Detector... 4
Thesis Wei Tang Contents 1 Abstract 3 2 Introduction 3 3 Experiment Background 4 3.1 The Large Hadron Collider........................... 4 3.2 The ATLAS Detector.............................. 4 4 Search
More informationNew physics searches with top quarks at ATLAS
New physics searches with top quarks at ATLAS Marcel Vos (IFIC, CSIC/UV, Valencia, Spain) New phenomena discussion session IMFP2012, Benasque, Spain Top as a signature for new physics? Wishful thinking?:
More informationTop properties and ttv LHC
Top properties and ttv results @ LHC Emmanuel MONNIER CPPM/IN2P3 Aix-Marseille Université (Marseille, FRANCE) On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations 15 March 2016 Moriond EW@La Thuile a Many top
More information