Fortin Econ Econometric Review 1. 1 Panel Data Methods Fixed Effects Dummy Variables Regression... 7
|
|
- Francis Daniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 1 Contents 1 Panel Data Methods Fixed Effects Dummy Variables Regression First Differencing Methods Within Estimator Random Effects Dynamic Panel Data Models
2 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 2 1 Panel Data Methods 1.1 Fixed Effects Fixed effects can be seen as a generalization of Differences-in-Differences (DD) in the case of more than two periods (say T periods) and more than 2 groups (say J groups). In the OLS regression, Y it = β 0 + β 1 X it + δ 0 W it + ɛ it (1) c Nicole M. Fortin. Not to be copied, used, or revised without explicit permission from the copyright owner.
3 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 3 where the double subscript it indicate that we have observations for each observation unit i in each time period t. The estimate of δ 0 will be biased if treatment W it is correlated with ɛ it, for example if ɛ it = α i + u it, where α i is the individual fixed effect Consider the estimation of the impact of unions on log wages. If we have panel data on workers: W it = 1 if a worker has a union job and W it = 0 if the worker is non-unionized. If workers self-select into unionized jobs or if employers screen higher ability workers for unionized jobs, we will expect the α i and thus ɛ it will be positively correlated with W it, and thus the OLS estimate of the union effect on wages will be overestimated.
4 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 4 From Wooldridge s example 14.4 which uses Vella and Verbreek (1998) NLSY data on 545 men from 1980 to reg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married Source SS df MS Number of obs = F( 7, 4352) = Model Prob > F = Residual R-squared = Adj R-squared = Total Root MSE = lwage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] union educ exper expersq hisp black
5 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 5 married _cons reg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married, vce(cluster nr) Linear regression Number of obs = 4360 F( 7, 544) = Prob > F = R-squared = Root MSE = (Std. Err. adjusted for 545 clusters in nr) Robust lwage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] union educ exper expersq
6 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 6 hisp black married _cons Also the OLS standard errors underestimate the true standard errors because of serial correlation. By comparison, the clustered standard errors are much larger. Note that the individual effect α i does not change over time. It is said to be fixed (for historical reasons) if it is tought to be correlated with the X s.
7 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 7 On the other hand, if α i can be assumed to be uncorrelated with the X s, α i is said to be a random effect, and we will see later how to estimate the model in this case Dummy Variables Regression One way to solve this problem is to put group dummies and time dummies in the regression: Y it = β 0 + β 1 X i + δ 0 W it + γ i D i + γ t D t + ɛ jt where D i and D t are individual and time dummies respectively The identification then comes from the within group-time variation, that is, group specific changes over time.
8 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 8 In the case of the effect of union on log wages, the identification comes from the relationship between individual changes in union status and wages over time, that is for switchers.. xi: reg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married union i.nr i.year i.nr _Inr_ (naturally coded; _Inr_13 omitted) i.year _Iyear_ (naturally coded; _Iyear_1980 omitted) Source SS df MS Number of obs = F(554, 3805) = Model Prob > F = Residual R-squared = Adj R-squared = Total Root MSE = lwage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] union educ
9 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 9 exper expersq hisp black married Inr_ _Inr_ _Inr_ _Inr_ _Inr_ _Inr_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _cons
10 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 10 Changes common to all groups are captured by the time dummies and thus are not a source of variation that identification of fixed effects. When there are a large number of observations units, such as this example, you may want to use the following command. areg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married yrd*, absorb(nr) Linear regression, absorbing indicators Number of obs = 4360 F( 10, 3805) = Prob > F = R-squared = Adj R-squared = Root MSE = lwage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval]
11 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 11 union educ (dropped) exper expersq hisp (dropped) black (dropped) married yrd1 (dropped) yrd yrd yrd yrd yrd yrd yrd8 (dropped) _cons nr F(544, 3805) = (545 categories)
12 Fortin Econ Econometric Review First Differencing Methods Another way to eliminate the individual effects α i is by first differencing. Since the lagged value of equation (1) is Y it 1 = β 0 + β 1 X it 1 + δ 0 W it 1 + α i + u it 1 (2) Subtracting (2) from (1) (Y it Y it 1 ) = β 1 (X it X it 1 ) + δ 0 (W it W it 1 ) + (u it u it 1 ) or Y it = β 1 X it + δ 0 W it + u it where we now have T 1 time periods for each unit i. The δ F D obtained by first differencing gives us consistent estimates of δ 0
13 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 13 sort nr. by nr:gen dwage=lwage-lwage[_n-1] (545 missing values generated). by nr:gen dexpe=exper-exper[_n-1] (545 missing values generated). by nr:gen dexp2=expersq-expersq[_n-1] (545 missing values generated). by nr:gen dmarr=married-married[_n-1] (545 missing values generated). by nr:gen dunion=union-union[_n-1] (545 missing values generated). tab year, gen(yrd). reg dwage dunion dexpe dexp2 dmarr yrd*, cluster(nr)
14 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 14 Linear regression Number of obs = 3815 F( 9, 544) = 5.46 Prob > F = R-squared = Number of clusters (nr) = 545 Root MSE = Robust dwage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] dunion dexpe (dropped) dexp dmarr yrd1 (dropped) yrd yrd yrd yrd yrd yrd
15 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 15 yrd8 (dropped) _cons But differencing introduces spurious negative correlation across observations since cov( u it 1, u it ) = cov[(u it 1 u it 2 ), (u it u it 1 )] = var(u it 1 ). Sometimes, this problem can be solved by clustering across observations units, that is allowing the error terms for each observation unit to be correlated In our union example, it is best to use longer differences since differencing can make measurement error worse!
16 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 16. reg d2wage d2union d2expe d2exp2 d2marr yrd*, cluster(nr) Linear regression Number of obs = 3270 F( 8, 544) = 9.01 Prob > F = R-squared = Number of clusters (nr) = 545 Root MSE = Robust d2wage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] d2union d2expe (dropped) d2exp d2marr yrd1 (dropped) yrd2 (dropped) yrd3 (dropped) yrd yrd
17 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 17 yrd yrd yrd _cons In applying first differencing, we should difference all variables appearing in the structural equation, including any binary treatment indicator. In the case of 2 time periods, however, it generally does not matter whether the policy variable is differenced, If W i1 = 0 and W i2 = 1, then W it = W i2 and the differenced equation is just Y it = β 1 X it + δ 0 W i2 + u it
18 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 18 This is a direct extension of DD where there are 2 groups that experience different changes in policy over 2 periods Within Estimator There is yet another way to get rid of the individual effects α i. For each individual, let s average equation (1) over time Ȳ i = β 1 X i + δ 0 W i + α i + ū i (3) where Ȳ it = 1/T T i=1 Y it and so on, but where ᾱ i = α i since α i is constant over time. Substracting equation (3) from (1) gives (Y it Ȳ i ) = β 1 (X it X i ) + δ 0 (W it W i ) + (u it ū i ) (4)
19 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 19 Under strict exogeneity assumptions, the within estimator and the dummy variables estimator are equivalent But within estimators easily implemented for unbalanced panels, not just balanced panels If we were to do this estimation by hand, the standard errors would be incorrect, because the software would think that df = NT k, but really is N(T 1) k because we used up dfs calculating means. global v1list lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married. foreach var of varlist $v1list { 2. by nr: egen var bar= mean ( var ) 3. gen var _dev= var - var bar
20 Fortin Econ Econometric Review }. reg lwage_dev union_dev educ_dev exper_dev expersq_dev hisp_dev black_dev married_dev, noconstant Source SS df MS Number of obs = F( 4, 4356) = Model Prob > F = Residual R-squared = Adj R-squared = Total Root MSE = lwage_dev Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] union_dev educ_dev (dropped) exper_dev expersq_dev hisp_dev (dropped) black_dev (dropped)
21 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 21 married_dev xtset nr year panel variable: nr (strongly balanced) time variable: year, 1980 to 1987 delta: 1 unit. xtdescribe nr: 13, 17,..., n = 545 year: 1980, 1981,..., 1987 T = 8 Delta(year) = 1 unit Span(year) = 8 periods (nr*year uniquely identifies each observation) Distribution of T_i: min 5% 25% 50% 75% 95% max
22 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 22 Freq. Percent Cum. Pattern XXXXXXXX. xtreg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married, fe Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 4360 Group variable (i): nr Number of groups = 545 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 8 between = avg = 8.0 overall = max = 8 F(4,3811) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F =
23 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 23 lwage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] union educ (dropped) exper expersq hisp (dropped) black (dropped) married _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(544, 3811) = 7.98 Prob > F = xtsum married Variable Mean Std. Dev. Min Max Observations
24 Fortin Econ Econometric Review married overall N = 4360 between n = 545 within T = 8. xtsum educ Variable Mean Std. Dev. Min Max Observations educ overall N = 4360 between n = 545 within T = 8 If we anticipate unobserved heterogeneity to persist over time for individuals, we can use clustered standard errors.. xtreg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married, fe vce(cluster nr)
25 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 25 Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 4360 Group variable: nr Number of groups = 545 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 8 between = avg = 8.0 overall = max = 8 F(4,544) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = (Std. Err. adjusted for 545 clusters in nr) Robust lwage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] union educ (dropped) exper expersq hisp (dropped) black (dropped)
26 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 26 married _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i). est store fixed_effects Now the dummy variable estimate also includes that time fixed effects, we can add those to the individual fixed effects model. xi: xtreg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married i.year, fe i.year _Iyear_ (naturally coded; _Iyear_1980 omitted) note: educ omitted because of collinearity note: hisp omitted because of collinearity note: black omitted because of collinearity note: _Iyear_1987 omitted because of collinearity
27 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 27 Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 4360 Group variable: nr Number of groups = 545 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 8 between = avg = 8.0 overall = max = 8 F(10,3805) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > F = lwage Coef. Std. Err. t P> t [95% Conf. Interval] union educ 0 (omitted) exper expersq hisp 0 (omitted) black 0 (omitted) married
28 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 28 _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ _Iyear_ (omitted) _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) F test that all u_i=0: F(544, 3805) = 9.16 Prob > F = testparm _Iyear* ( 1) _Iyear_1981 = 0 ( 2) _Iyear_1982 = 0 ( 3) _Iyear_1983 = 0 ( 4) _Iyear_1984 = 0
29 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 29 ( 5) _Iyear_1985 = 0 ( 6) _Iyear_1986 = 0 F( 6, 3805) = 1.96 Prob > F = The Prob > F is > 0.05, so we failed to reject the null that the coefficients for all years are jointly equal to zero, therefore no time fixed effects are needed in this case. The dummy variable estimate δ D =0.080 (0.019) of the union effect is now identical to the fixed effects estimate δ F EF T =0.080 (0.019).
30 Fortin Econ Econometric Review Random Effects Up to now we have assumed that the α i were correlated with the X s, but what if they are not? If Cov(X it, α i ) = 0, t = 1,..., T and if the explanatory variables are strictly exogenous, OLS would be consistent in that case The composite error ɛ it = α i + u it has variance σ ɛ = var(α i + u it ) = (σ 2 α + σ2 u ) For individual i, cov(ɛ it, ɛ is ) = σ 2 α, so the error term is serially correlated : Corr(ɛ it, ɛ is ) = σ 2 α/(σ 2 α + σ 2 u), t s
31 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 31 We will need to transform the model and use feasible GLS to perform the estimation and make correct inferences The idea will be to used quasi-differenced variables using λ = 1 [σ 2 u/(σ 2 u + T σ 2 α)] 1/2 where deriving this transformation requires sophisticated matrix algebra (see, Wooldridge, 1999, chap. 10) The intuition behind the formula is that σ 2 u is the regression error variance from the fixed effects estimator and σ 2 α comes out in the computation of the regression error variance from the between estimator (runned on time averaged observations) (see Adkins and Hill, 2012 on how to do this by hand )
32 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 32 The transformed equation will be (Y it λȳ i ) = β 0 (1 λ)+β 1 (X it λ X i )+δ 0 (W it λ W i )+(u it λū i ) That is, the random effects transformation subtracts a fraction of the unit time average, where the fraction depends on σ 2 u, σ2 α and the number of time periods T. If λ = 1, then this is just the within estimator. If λ = 0, then this is just the OLS estimator. So, the bigger the variance of the unobserved effect, the closer it is to within estimator. The smaller the variance of the unobserved effect, the closer it is to OLS Since it involves quasi-demeaning of the data, a variable without time variation within the individual may be included in the random effects model.
33 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 33 Note that STATA calls the individual fixed effect u i and the unobserved effect e it (I use the same terminology as Wooldridge) and the coefficient rho = σ 2 u /(σ2 u + σ2 e ) corresponds to Corr(ɛ it, ɛ is ) above.. xtreg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married, re Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 4360 Group variable (i): nr Number of groups = 545 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 8 between = avg = 8.0 overall = max = 8 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(7) = corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = lwage Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] union
34 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 34 educ exper expersq hisp black married _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) Prob > chi2 = The following LM test helps you decide between a random effects regression and a simple OLS regression. The Breusch-Pagan test statistic consider the null H 0 : σ 2 u = 0 [aka σ 2 a = 0] that variances across entities is zero.
35 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 35. xttest0 Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects lwage[nr,t] = Xb + u[nr] + e[nr,t] Estimated results: Var sd = sqrt(var) lwage e u Test: Var(u) = 0 chi2(1) = Prob > chi2 = Rejecting the null leads us to conclude that random effects are present.
36 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 36 We might consider RE as an appropriate model when applied to a random sample of individuals, such as a sample of workers, or the unemployed, or those who have completed a job training program. In the case of union, it make more sense to think of fixed effects, since we think that the problem comes from something unobserved (such as ability) that is correlated with the Xs But we can perform a Hausman asking whether the random effects coefficients are statistically different from the allegedly consistent fixed effects, which should go first in the test. quietly xtreg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married, fe. estimates store fixed
37 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 37. quietly xtreg lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married, re. estimates store random. hausman fixed random ---- Coefficients ---- (b) (B) (b-b) sqrt(diag(v_b-v_b)) fixed random Difference S.E union exper expersq married b = consistent under Ho and Ha; obtained from xtreg B = inconsistent under Ha, efficient under Ho; obtained from xtreg Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic
38 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 38 chi2(4) = (b-b) [(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B) = Prob>chi2 = Thus we reject the hypothesis of equality of the coefficients estimates, suggesting that the random effects estimator is inconsistent Another testing approach asks if there is a systematic relation between α i [u i ] and the X s. It adds time averages to the other explanatory variables which should not be significant if there is no systematic relationship, which we expect to find here.. xtreg lwage union exper experbar expersq expersqbar married marriedbar, re vce(cluster nr)
39 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 39 Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 4360 Group variable: nr Number of groups = 545 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 8 between = avg = 8.0 overall = max = 8 Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(8) = corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = (Std. Err. adjusted for 545 clusters in nr) Robust lwage Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] union exper experbar expersq expersqbar married
40 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 40 marriedbar _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i). test experbar expersqbar marriedbar ( 1) experbar = 0 ( 2) expersqbar = 0 ( 3) marriedbar = 0 chi2( 3) = Prob > chi2 = Sometimes it may be helpful to use a procedure that allow for the error term u it to be correlated over i: u it = ρ i u it 1 + ε it
41 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 41 The Prais-Winsten procedure is one such GLS procedure (with ρ i = ρ) that is correctly implemented in STATA in the case of panel data with the command xtpcse It uses quasi-differenced data Y it ρy it 1, X it ρx it 1 instead or Y it and X it and a special correction ( 1 ρ 2 ) for the first observation (see Wooldridge, chap. 12 or Hill et al. chap. 12). xtpcse lwage union educ exper expersq hisp black married, correlation(ar1) hetonly (note: estimates of rho outside [-1,1] bounded to be in the range [-1,1]) Prais-Winsten regression, heteroskedastic panels corrected standard errors Group variable: nr Number of obs = 4360 Time variable: year Number of groups = 545 Panels: heteroskedastic (balanced) Obs per group: min = 8
42 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 42 Autocorrelation: common AR(1) avg = 8 max = 8 Estimated covariances = 545 R-squared = Estimated autocorrelations = 1 Wald chi2(7) = Estimated coefficients = 8 Prob > chi2 = Het-corrected lwage Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] union educ exper expersq hisp black married _cons rho
43 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 43 So which estimates of union effects should we trust? Here all specialized estimates are much closer to each other than to the OLS, δ OLS =0.180 (0.017). Whereas δ LSDV =δ F EF T = (0.019) (least squares dummy variables, fixed effects fixed time ) and δ F E =0.082 (0.019) (fixed effects, within estimator), even δ RE = (0.018) (random effects) and δ P rais W insten = 0.099(0.018) (random effects, Prais-Winsten correction) We think that the OLS estimates of the union effect indeed overestimate the impact of unions on wages! Another idea would be to control for occupations!
44 Fortin Econ Econometric Review Dynamic Panel Data Models Another serious difficulty, distinct from the autocorrelation of the error term, arises with the fixed effects model in the context of a dynamic panel data (DPD) model: one containing a lagged dependent variable (and possibly other regressors). In the simplest setup of a pure AR(1) model without additional regressors: Y it = β 0 + ρy it 1 + α i + u it (5) (Y it Ȳ i ) = ρ(y it 1 Ȳ i, 1 ) + α i + (u it ū i ) (6) where Ȳ it = 1/T T i=1 Y it and so on,
45 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 45 Because u it enters every value of Y it by assumption, the lagged dependent variable cannot be independent of the composite error process The demeaning process which subtracts the individual s mean value of Y and each X from the respective variable creates a correlation between regressor and error. If ρ > 0, the bias is invariably negative, so that the persistence of Y will be underestimated. If the regressors are correlated with the lagged dependent variable to some degree, their coefficients may be seriously biased as well. A solution to this problem involves taking first differences of the original model.
46 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 46 Consider a model containing a lagged dependent variable and a single regressor X: Y it = β 0 + ρy it 1 + β 1 X it + α i + u it (7) The first difference transformation removes both the constant term and the individual effect: Y it = ρ Y it 1 + β 1 X it + u it (8) There is still correlation between the differenced lagged dependent variable and the error process: the former contains Y it 1 and the latter contains u it 1. But we can instrument the lagged dependent variable with the second and third lags of Y it, either in the form of differences or lagged levels.
47 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 47 This approach first proposed by Anderson and Hsiao (1982) provides consistent estimates; it is implemented in STATA by xtivreg, fd. The example below uses the Arellano and Bond (1991) panel dataset, which is based on a sample of 140 UK firms surveyed annually from 1976 to 1984, and considers the determinants of firm s employment adjustment. The panel is unbalanced, with some firms having more observations than others. Because hiring and firing workers is costly, we expect employment to adjust with delay to changes in factors such as firms capital stock, wages, and demand for the firms output.
48 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 48 The variables names are as follows: n is firm employment, w is the firms wage level, k is the firms gross capital, and ys is the aggregate output in the firms sector, as a proxy for demand; all variables are in logarithms. Variable names beginning with D indicate differenced variables. Variable names ending in L1 or L2 indicate lagged copies. For example D.nL1 = n it 1. In their model, Arellano and Bond include the current and first lags of wages, the first two lags of employment, the current and first two lags of capital and sector-level output, and a set of time dummies.
49 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 49. webuse abdata. xtivreg n (nl1=nl2) w wl1 k kl1 kl2 ys ysl1 ysl2 yr*, fd note: yr1984 omitted because of collinearity First-differenced IV regression Group variable: id Number of obs = 611 Time variable: year Number of groups = 140 R-sq: within = Obs per group: min = 4 between = avg = 4.4 overall = max = 6 Wald chi2(14) = corr(u_i, Xb) = Prob > chi2 = D.n Coef. Std. Err. z P> z [95% Conf. Interval] nl1
50 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 50 D w D wl1 D k D kl1 D kl2 D ys D ysl1
51 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 51 D ysl2 D yr1979 D yr1980 D yr1981 D yr1982 D yr1983 D
52 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 52 yr1984 D1. 0 (omitted) _cons sigma_u sigma_e rho (fraction of variance due to u_i) Instrumented: nl1 Instruments: w wl1 k kl1 kl2 ys ysl1 ysl2 yr1978 yr1979 yr1980 yr1981 yr1982 yr1983 nl2 Arellano and Bond (1991) actually proposed an alternative GMM approach based on the notion that the instrumental variables approach above does not exploit all of the information available in the sample.
53 Fortin Econ Econometric Review 53 Their original version xtabond was superseeded by xtabond2, which offers a much more flexible syntax and allows different specification of instrument sets, including differences of lagged dependent variables and correction for standard errors of the two-step estimates.
Please discuss each of the 3 problems on a separate sheet of paper, not just on a separate page!
Econometrics - Exam May 11, 2011 1 Exam Please discuss each of the 3 problems on a separate sheet of paper, not just on a separate page! Problem 1: (15 points) A researcher has data for the year 2000 from
More informationProblem Set 10: Panel Data
Problem Set 10: Panel Data 1. Read in the data set, e11panel1.dta from the course website. This contains data on a sample or 1252 men and women who were asked about their hourly wage in two years, 2005
More informationSimultaneous Equations with Error Components. Mike Bronner Marko Ledic Anja Breitwieser
Simultaneous Equations with Error Components Mike Bronner Marko Ledic Anja Breitwieser PRESENTATION OUTLINE Part I: - Simultaneous equation models: overview - Empirical example Part II: - Hausman and Taylor
More informationEmpirical Application of Panel Data Regression
Empirical Application of Panel Data Regression 1. We use Fatality data, and we are interested in whether rising beer tax rate can help lower traffic death. So the dependent variable is traffic death, while
More information4 Instrumental Variables Single endogenous variable One continuous instrument. 2
Econ 495 - Econometric Review 1 Contents 4 Instrumental Variables 2 4.1 Single endogenous variable One continuous instrument. 2 4.2 Single endogenous variable more than one continuous instrument..........................
More informationFixed and Random Effects Models: Vartanian, SW 683
: Vartanian, SW 683 Fixed and random effects models See: http://teaching.sociology.ul.ie/dcw/confront/node45.html When you have repeated observations per individual this is a problem and an advantage:
More informationDynamic Panel Data Models
June 23, 2010 Contents Motivation 1 Motivation 2 Basic set-up Problem Solution 3 4 5 Literature Motivation Many economic issues are dynamic by nature and use the panel data structure to understand adjustment.
More information4 Instrumental Variables Single endogenous variable One continuous instrument. 2
Econ 495 - Econometric Review 1 Contents 4 Instrumental Variables 2 4.1 Single endogenous variable One continuous instrument. 2 4.2 Single endogenous variable more than one continuous instrument..........................
More informationCRE METHODS FOR UNBALANCED PANELS Correlated Random Effects Panel Data Models IZA Summer School in Labor Economics May 13-19, 2013 Jeffrey M.
CRE METHODS FOR UNBALANCED PANELS Correlated Random Effects Panel Data Models IZA Summer School in Labor Economics May 13-19, 2013 Jeffrey M. Wooldridge Michigan State University 1. Introduction 2. Linear
More informationJeffrey M. Wooldridge Michigan State University
Fractional Response Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables and Heterogeneity Jeffrey M. Wooldridge Michigan State University 1. Introduction 2. Fractional Probit with Heteroskedasticity 3. Fractional
More informationEC327: Advanced Econometrics, Spring 2007
EC327: Advanced Econometrics, Spring 2007 Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics (3rd ed, 2006) Chapter 14: Advanced panel data methods Fixed effects estimators We discussed the first difference (FD) model
More informationApplied Econometrics. Lecture 3: Introduction to Linear Panel Data Models
Applied Econometrics Lecture 3: Introduction to Linear Panel Data Models Måns Söderbom 4 September 2009 Department of Economics, Universy of Gothenburg. Email: mans.soderbom@economics.gu.se. Web: www.economics.gu.se/soderbom,
More informationxtdpdqml: Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of linear dynamic short-t panel data models
xtdpdqml: Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of linear dynamic short-t panel data models Sebastian Kripfganz University of Exeter Business School, Department of Economics, Exeter, UK UK Stata Users Group
More informationQuantitative Methods Final Exam (2017/1)
Quantitative Methods Final Exam (2017/1) 1. Please write down your name and student ID number. 2. Calculator is allowed during the exam, but DO NOT use a smartphone. 3. List your answers (together with
More informationpoint estimates, standard errors, testing, and inference for nonlinear combinations
Title xtreg postestimation Postestimation tools for xtreg Description The following postestimation commands are of special interest after xtreg: command description xttest0 Breusch and Pagan LM test for
More information1 The basics of panel data
Introductory Applied Econometrics EEP/IAS 118 Spring 2015 Related materials: Steven Buck Notes to accompany fixed effects material 4-16-14 ˆ Wooldridge 5e, Ch. 1.3: The Structure of Economic Data ˆ Wooldridge
More informationExam ECON3150/4150: Introductory Econometrics. 18 May 2016; 09:00h-12.00h.
Exam ECON3150/4150: Introductory Econometrics. 18 May 2016; 09:00h-12.00h. This is an open book examination where all printed and written resources, in addition to a calculator, are allowed. If you are
More informationLongitudinal Data Analysis Using Stata Paul D. Allison, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: May 18-19, 2017, Chicago, Illinois
Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Stata Paul D. Allison, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: May 18-19, 217, Chicago, Illinois Outline 1. Opportunities and challenges of panel data. a. Data requirements b. Control
More informationDynamic Panel Data estimators
Dynamic Panel Data estimators Christopher F Baum EC 823: Applied Econometrics Boston College, Spring 2014 Christopher F Baum (BC / DIW) Dynamic Panel Data estimators Boston College, Spring 2014 1 / 50
More informationEconometrics. 8) Instrumental variables
30C00200 Econometrics 8) Instrumental variables Timo Kuosmanen Professor, Ph.D. http://nomepre.net/index.php/timokuosmanen Today s topics Thery of IV regression Overidentification Two-stage least squates
More informationDynamic Panels. Chapter Introduction Autoregressive Model
Chapter 11 Dynamic Panels This chapter covers the econometrics methods to estimate dynamic panel data models, and presents examples in Stata to illustrate the use of these procedures. The topics in this
More informationWarwick Economics Summer School Topics in Microeconometrics Instrumental Variables Estimation
Warwick Economics Summer School Topics in Microeconometrics Instrumental Variables Estimation Michele Aquaro University of Warwick This version: July 21, 2016 1 / 31 Reading material Textbook: Introductory
More informationCapital humain, développement et migrations: approche macroéconomique (Empirical Analysis - Static Part)
Séminaire d Analyse Economique III (LECON2486) Capital humain, développement et migrations: approche macroéconomique (Empirical Analysis - Static Part) Frédéric Docquier & Sara Salomone IRES UClouvain
More informationMicroeconometrics (PhD) Problem set 2: Dynamic Panel Data Solutions
Microeconometrics (PhD) Problem set 2: Dynamic Panel Data Solutions QUESTION 1 Data for this exercise can be prepared by running the do-file called preparedo posted on my webpage This do-file collects
More informationRecent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using Micro-Level Data
Recent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using Micro-Level Data July 2012 Bangkok, Thailand Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 Content a) Classical regression model b)
More information7 Introduction to Time Series Time Series vs. Cross-Sectional Data Detrending Time Series... 15
Econ 495 - Econometric Review 1 Contents 7 Introduction to Time Series 3 7.1 Time Series vs. Cross-Sectional Data............ 3 7.2 Detrending Time Series................... 15 7.3 Types of Stochastic
More informationExercices for Applied Econometrics A
QEM F. Gardes-C. Starzec-M.A. Diaye Exercices for Applied Econometrics A I. Exercice: The panel of households expenditures in Poland, for years 1997 to 2000, gives the following statistics for the whole
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 6 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 6 1 / 36 Outline 1 The First-Difference (FD) estimator 2 Dynamic panel data models 3 The Anderson and Hsiao
More informationLecture 9: Panel Data Model (Chapter 14, Wooldridge Textbook)
Lecture 9: Panel Data Model (Chapter 14, Wooldridge Textbook) 1 2 Panel Data Panel data is obtained by observing the same person, firm, county, etc over several periods. Unlike the pooled cross sections,
More informationECON2228 Notes 10. Christopher F Baum. Boston College Economics. cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes / 48
ECON2228 Notes 10 Christopher F Baum Boston College Economics 2014 2015 cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes 10 2014 2015 1 / 48 Serial correlation and heteroskedasticity in time series regressions Chapter 12:
More informationGraduate Econometrics Lecture 4: Heteroskedasticity
Graduate Econometrics Lecture 4: Heteroskedasticity Department of Economics University of Gothenburg November 30, 2014 1/43 and Autocorrelation Consequences for OLS Estimator Begin from the linear model
More informationProblem Set 5 ANSWERS
Economics 20 Problem Set 5 ANSWERS Prof. Patricia M. Anderson 1, 2 and 3 Suppose that Vermont has passed a law requiring employers to provide 6 months of paid maternity leave. You are concerned that women
More information****Lab 4, Feb 4: EDA and OLS and WLS
****Lab 4, Feb 4: EDA and OLS and WLS ------- log: C:\Documents and Settings\Default\Desktop\LDA\Data\cows_Lab4.log log type: text opened on: 4 Feb 2004, 09:26:19. use use "Z:\LDA\DataLDA\cowsP.dta", clear.
More informationECON2228 Notes 10. Christopher F Baum. Boston College Economics. cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes / 54
ECON2228 Notes 10 Christopher F Baum Boston College Economics 2014 2015 cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes 10 2014 2015 1 / 54 erial correlation and heteroskedasticity in time series regressions Chapter 12:
More informationINTRODUCTION TO BASIC LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL
INTRODUCTION TO BASIC LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL 13 September 2011 Yogyakarta, Indonesia Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 LINEAR REGRESSION MODEL In general, regression models estimate the effect
More informationLecture 8: Instrumental Variables Estimation
Lecture Notes on Advanced Econometrics Lecture 8: Instrumental Variables Estimation Endogenous Variables Consider a population model: y α y + β + β x + β x +... + β x + u i i i i k ik i Takashi Yamano
More informationEconometrics. Week 4. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague
Econometrics Week 4 Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague Fall 2012 1 / 23 Recommended Reading For the today Serial correlation and heteroskedasticity in
More informationDynamic Panel Data Models
Models Amjad Naveed, Nora Prean, Alexander Rabas 15th June 2011 Motivation Many economic issues are dynamic by nature. These dynamic relationships are characterized by the presence of a lagged dependent
More informationCourse Econometrics I
Course Econometrics I 4. Heteroskedasticity Martin Halla Johannes Kepler University of Linz Department of Economics Last update: May 6, 2014 Martin Halla CS Econometrics I 4 1/31 Our agenda for today Consequences
More information(a) Briefly discuss the advantage of using panel data in this situation rather than pure crosssections
Answer Key Fixed Effect and First Difference Models 1. See discussion in class.. David Neumark and William Wascher published a study in 199 of the effect of minimum wages on teenage employment using a
More informationApplied Microeconometrics (L5): Panel Data-Basics
Applied Microeconometrics (L5): Panel Data-Basics Nicholas Giannakopoulos University of Patras Department of Economics ngias@upatras.gr November 10, 2015 Nicholas Giannakopoulos (UPatras) MSc Applied Economics
More informationPanel Data: Very Brief Overview Richard Williams, University of Notre Dame, https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/ Last revised April 6, 2015
Panel Data: Very Brief Overview Richard Williams, University of Notre Dame, https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/ Last revised April 6, 2015 These notes borrow very heavily, often verbatim, from Paul Allison
More informationAnswer all questions from part I. Answer two question from part II.a, and one question from part II.b.
B203: Quantitative Methods Answer all questions from part I. Answer two question from part II.a, and one question from part II.b. Part I: Compulsory Questions. Answer all questions. Each question carries
More informationNew Developments in Econometrics Lecture 11: Difference-in-Differences Estimation
New Developments in Econometrics Lecture 11: Difference-in-Differences Estimation Jeff Wooldridge Cemmap Lectures, UCL, June 2009 1. The Basic Methodology 2. How Should We View Uncertainty in DD Settings?
More informationEconometrics. Week 8. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague
Econometrics Week 8 Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague Fall 2012 1 / 25 Recommended Reading For the today Instrumental Variables Estimation and Two Stage
More informationApplied Quantitative Methods II
Applied Quantitative Methods II Lecture 10: Panel Data Klára Kaĺıšková Klára Kaĺıšková AQM II - Lecture 10 VŠE, SS 2016/17 1 / 38 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Pooled OLS 3 First differences 4 Fixed effects
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 1 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 1 1 / 31 Outline 1 Course outline 2 Panel data Advantages of Panel Data Limitations of Panel Data 3 Pooled
More informationECON 4551 Econometrics II Memorial University of Newfoundland. Panel Data Models. Adapted from Vera Tabakova s notes
ECON 4551 Econometrics II Memorial University of Newfoundland Panel Data Models Adapted from Vera Tabakova s notes 15.1 Grunfeld s Investment Data 15.2 Sets of Regression Equations 15.3 Seemingly Unrelated
More informationEconometrics I KS. Module 2: Multivariate Linear Regression. Alexander Ahammer. This version: April 16, 2018
Econometrics I KS Module 2: Multivariate Linear Regression Alexander Ahammer Department of Economics Johannes Kepler University of Linz This version: April 16, 2018 Alexander Ahammer (JKU) Module 2: Multivariate
More informationApplied Economics. Panel Data. Department of Economics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Applied Economics Panel Data Department of Economics Universidad Carlos III de Madrid See also Wooldridge (chapter 13), and Stock and Watson (chapter 10) 1 / 38 Panel Data vs Repeated Cross-sections In
More informationLinear Panel Data Models
Linear Panel Data Models Michael R. Roberts Department of Finance The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania October 5, 2009 Michael R. Roberts Linear Panel Data Models 1/56 Example First Difference
More informationLecture 3 Linear random intercept models
Lecture 3 Linear random intercept models Example: Weight of Guinea Pigs Body weights of 48 pigs in 9 successive weeks of follow-up (Table 3.1 DLZ) The response is measures at n different times, or under
More informationEconometrics. Week 6. Fall Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague
Econometrics Week 6 Institute of Economic Studies Faculty of Social Sciences Charles University in Prague Fall 2012 1 / 21 Recommended Reading For the today Advanced Panel Data Methods. Chapter 14 (pp.
More informationUniversity of California at Berkeley Fall Introductory Applied Econometrics Final examination. Scores add up to 125 points
EEP 118 / IAS 118 Elisabeth Sadoulet and Kelly Jones University of California at Berkeley Fall 2008 Introductory Applied Econometrics Final examination Scores add up to 125 points Your name: SID: 1 1.
More information7 Introduction to Time Series
Econ 495 - Econometric Review 1 7 Introduction to Time Series 7.1 Time Series vs. Cross-Sectional Data Time series data has a temporal ordering, unlike cross-section data, we will need to changes some
More informationEconometrics Homework 4 Solutions
Econometrics Homework 4 Solutions Computer Question (Optional, no need to hand in) (a) c i may capture some state-specific factor that contributes to higher or low rate of accident or fatality. For example,
More informationEconometrics. 9) Heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation
30C00200 Econometrics 9) Heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation Timo Kuosmanen Professor, Ph.D. http://nomepre.net/index.php/timokuosmanen Today s topics Heteroscedasticity Possible causes Testing for
More informationProblem set - Selection and Diff-in-Diff
Problem set - Selection and Diff-in-Diff 1. You want to model the wage equation for women You consider estimating the model: ln wage = α + β 1 educ + β 2 exper + β 3 exper 2 + ɛ (1) Read the data into
More informationECON Introductory Econometrics. Lecture 13: Internal and external validity
ECON4150 - Introductory Econometrics Lecture 13: Internal and external validity Monique de Haan (moniqued@econ.uio.no) Stock and Watson Chapter 9 Lecture outline 2 Definitions of internal and external
More informationPractice 2SLS with Artificial Data Part 1
Practice 2SLS with Artificial Data Part 1 Yona Rubinstein July 2016 Yona Rubinstein (LSE) Practice 2SLS with Artificial Data Part 1 07/16 1 / 16 Practice with Artificial Data In this note we use artificial
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 2 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 2 1 / 26 Outline 1 Fixed effects model The Least Squares Dummy Variable Estimator The Fixed Effect (Within
More informationAuto correlation 2. Note: In general we can have AR(p) errors which implies p lagged terms in the error structure, i.e.,
1 Motivation Auto correlation 2 Autocorrelation occurs when what happens today has an impact on what happens tomorrow, and perhaps further into the future This is a phenomena mainly found in time-series
More informationBasic Regressions and Panel Data in Stata
Developing Trade Consultants Policy Research Capacity Building Basic Regressions and Panel Data in Stata Ben Shepherd Principal, Developing Trade Consultants 1 Basic regressions } Stata s regress command
More informationBinary Dependent Variables
Binary Dependent Variables In some cases the outcome of interest rather than one of the right hand side variables - is discrete rather than continuous Binary Dependent Variables In some cases the outcome
More informationWooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 15: Instrumental variables and two stage least squares
Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 15: Instrumental variables and two stage least squares Many economic models involve endogeneity: that is, a theoretical relationship does not fit
More informationAutocorrelation. Think of autocorrelation as signifying a systematic relationship between the residuals measured at different points in time
Autocorrelation Given the model Y t = b 0 + b 1 X t + u t Think of autocorrelation as signifying a systematic relationship between the residuals measured at different points in time This could be caused
More informationLab 10 - Binary Variables
Lab 10 - Binary Variables Spring 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 SLR on a Dummy 2 3 MLR with binary independent variables 3 3.1 MLR with a Dummy: different intercepts, same slope................. 4 3.2
More informationMeasurement Error. Often a data set will contain imperfect measures of the data we would ideally like.
Measurement Error Often a data set will contain imperfect measures of the data we would ideally like. Aggregate Data: (GDP, Consumption, Investment are only best guesses of theoretical counterparts and
More informationControl Function and Related Methods: Nonlinear Models
Control Function and Related Methods: Nonlinear Models Jeff Wooldridge Michigan State University Programme Evaluation for Policy Analysis Institute for Fiscal Studies June 2012 1. General Approach 2. Nonlinear
More informationECON Introductory Econometrics. Lecture 16: Instrumental variables
ECON4150 - Introductory Econometrics Lecture 16: Instrumental variables Monique de Haan (moniqued@econ.uio.no) Stock and Watson Chapter 12 Lecture outline 2 OLS assumptions and when they are violated Instrumental
More information1 Linear Regression Analysis The Mincer Wage Equation Data Econometric Model Estimation... 11
Econ 495 - Econometric Review 1 Contents 1 Linear Regression Analysis 4 1.1 The Mincer Wage Equation................. 4 1.2 Data............................. 6 1.3 Econometric Model.....................
More informationECON2228 Notes 7. Christopher F Baum. Boston College Economics. cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes / 41
ECON2228 Notes 7 Christopher F Baum Boston College Economics 2014 2015 cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes 6 2014 2015 1 / 41 Chapter 8: Heteroskedasticity In laying out the standard regression model, we made
More informationSTATA Commands for Unobserved Effects Panel Data
STATA Commands for Unobserved Effects Panel Data John C Frain 21st February 2005 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Estimation usingxtreg 9 3 Testing afterxtreg 13 4 Prediction after xtreg 15 5 Faster estimation
More informationPanel Data Models. Chapter 5. Financial Econometrics. Michael Hauser WS17/18 1 / 63
1 / 63 Panel Data Models Chapter 5 Financial Econometrics Michael Hauser WS17/18 2 / 63 Content Data structures: Times series, cross sectional, panel data, pooled data Static linear panel data models:
More informationPanel Data. March 2, () Applied Economoetrics: Topic 6 March 2, / 43
Panel Data March 2, 212 () Applied Economoetrics: Topic March 2, 212 1 / 43 Overview Many economic applications involve panel data. Panel data has both cross-sectional and time series aspects. Regression
More informationDynamic Panel Data Ch 1. Reminder on Linear Non Dynamic Models
Dynamic Panel Data Ch 1. Reminder on Linear Non Dynamic Models Pr. Philippe Polomé, Université Lumière Lyon M EcoFi 016 017 Overview of Ch. 1 Data Panel Data Models Within Estimator First-Differences Estimator
More informationHandout 11: Measurement Error
Handout 11: Measurement Error In which you learn to recognise the consequences for OLS estimation whenever some of the variables you use are not measured as accurately as you might expect. A (potential)
More informationmultilevel modeling: concepts, applications and interpretations
multilevel modeling: concepts, applications and interpretations lynne c. messer 27 october 2010 warning social and reproductive / perinatal epidemiologist concepts why context matters multilevel models
More informationTopic 10: Panel Data Analysis
Topic 10: Panel Data Analysis Advanced Econometrics (I) Dong Chen School of Economics, Peking University 1 Introduction Panel data combine the features of cross section data time series. Usually a panel
More informationMonday 7 th Febraury 2005
Monday 7 th Febraury 2 Analysis of Pigs data Data: Body weights of 48 pigs at 9 successive follow-up visits. This is an equally spaced data. It is always a good habit to reshape the data, so we can easily
More informationDifference-in-Differences Estimation
Difference-in-Differences Estimation Jeff Wooldridge Michigan State University Programme Evaluation for Policy Analysis Institute for Fiscal Studies June 2012 1. The Basic Methodology 2. How Should We
More informationLab 07 Introduction to Econometrics
Lab 07 Introduction to Econometrics Learning outcomes for this lab: Introduce the different typologies of data and the econometric models that can be used Understand the rationale behind econometrics Understand
More information1
i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Foreign Liabilities/ Dependen Variabel Rasio Foreign Liabilities Total Debt (1) (2) Konstanta 0.216*** 0.219*** Ekspor/Total Sales -0.064-0.055
More informationApplied Statistics and Econometrics
Applied Statistics and Econometrics Lecture 6 Saul Lach September 2017 Saul Lach () Applied Statistics and Econometrics September 2017 1 / 53 Outline of Lecture 6 1 Omitted variable bias (SW 6.1) 2 Multiple
More information10 Panel Data. Andrius Buteikis,
10 Panel Data Andrius Buteikis, andrius.buteikis@mif.vu.lt http://web.vu.lt/mif/a.buteikis/ Introduction Panel data combines cross-sectional and time series data: the same individuals (persons, firms,
More informationInstrumental Variables, Simultaneous and Systems of Equations
Chapter 6 Instrumental Variables, Simultaneous and Systems of Equations 61 Instrumental variables In the linear regression model y i = x iβ + ε i (61) we have been assuming that bf x i and ε i are uncorrelated
More informationLecture 4: Linear panel models
Lecture 4: Linear panel models Luc Behaghel PSE February 2009 Luc Behaghel (PSE) Lecture 4 February 2009 1 / 47 Introduction Panel = repeated observations of the same individuals (e.g., rms, workers, countries)
More informationEmpirical Application of Simple Regression (Chapter 2)
Empirical Application of Simple Regression (Chapter 2) 1. The data file is House Data, which can be downloaded from my webpage. 2. Use stata menu File Import Excel Spreadsheet to read the data. Don t forget
More informationLecture 8 Panel Data
Lecture 8 Panel Data Economics 8379 George Washington University Instructor: Prof. Ben Williams Introduction This lecture will discuss some common panel data methods and problems. Random effects vs. fixed
More informationECON Introductory Econometrics. Lecture 5: OLS with One Regressor: Hypothesis Tests
ECON4150 - Introductory Econometrics Lecture 5: OLS with One Regressor: Hypothesis Tests Monique de Haan (moniqued@econ.uio.no) Stock and Watson Chapter 5 Lecture outline 2 Testing Hypotheses about one
More informationNinth ARTNeT Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research "Trade Flows and Trade Policy Analysis"
Ninth ARTNeT Capacity Building Workshop for Trade Research "Trade Flows and Trade Policy Analysis" June 2013 Bangkok, Thailand Cosimo Beverelli and Rainer Lanz (World Trade Organization) 1 Selected econometric
More informationPanel Data III. Stefan Dahlberg
Panel Data III Stefan Dahlberg Overview of Part #3 VII. Spatial Panel Data & Unit Heterogeneity VIII. Panel Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) IX. Fixed and Random Effects X. Hausman Test XI. The Hybrid
More informationPanel data methods for policy analysis
IAPRI Quantitative Analysis Capacity Building Series Panel data methods for policy analysis Part I: Linear panel data models Outline 1. Independently pooled cross sectional data vs. panel/longitudinal
More informationECO220Y Simple Regression: Testing the Slope
ECO220Y Simple Regression: Testing the Slope Readings: Chapter 18 (Sections 18.3-18.5) Winter 2012 Lecture 19 (Winter 2012) Simple Regression Lecture 19 1 / 32 Simple Regression Model y i = β 0 + β 1 x
More information1. You have data on years of work experience, EXPER, its square, EXPER2, years of education, EDUC, and the log of hourly wages, LWAGE
1. You have data on years of work experience, EXPER, its square, EXPER, years of education, EDUC, and the log of hourly wages, LWAGE You estimate the following regressions: (1) LWAGE =.00 + 0.05*EDUC +
More informationFixed Effects Models for Panel Data. December 1, 2014
Fixed Effects Models for Panel Data December 1, 2014 Notation Use the same setup as before, with the linear model Y it = X it β + c i + ɛ it (1) where X it is a 1 K + 1 vector of independent variables.
More informationHeteroskedasticity Example
ECON 761: Heteroskedasticity Example L Magee November, 2007 This example uses the fertility data set from assignment 2 The observations are based on the responses of 4361 women in Botswana s 1988 Demographic
More informationMediation Analysis: OLS vs. SUR vs. 3SLS Note by Hubert Gatignon July 7, 2013, updated November 15, 2013
Mediation Analysis: OLS vs. SUR vs. 3SLS Note by Hubert Gatignon July 7, 2013, updated November 15, 2013 In Chap. 11 of Statistical Analysis of Management Data (Gatignon, 2014), tests of mediation are
More informationECON2228 Notes 2. Christopher F Baum. Boston College Economics. cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes / 47
ECON2228 Notes 2 Christopher F Baum Boston College Economics 2014 2015 cfb (BC Econ) ECON2228 Notes 2 2014 2015 1 / 47 Chapter 2: The simple regression model Most of this course will be concerned with
More informationProblem Set #5-Key Sonoma State University Dr. Cuellar Economics 317- Introduction to Econometrics
Problem Set #5-Key Sonoma State University Dr. Cuellar Economics 317- Introduction to Econometrics C1.1 Use the data set Wage1.dta to answer the following questions. Estimate regression equation wage =
More information