On behalf of M. Bona, G. Eigen, R. Itoh and E. Kou
|
|
- Steven Robinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 α,φ 2 γ,φ 3 β,φ 1 On behalf of M. Bona, G. Eigen, R. Itoh and E. Kou
2 Chapter Outline Section: Introduction and goals 2p Section: Methodology Subsection: CKMfitter 2p Subsection: UTfit 2p Subsection: Scanning method 2p Section: Experimental Inputs Subsection: B-factories results: β, α (which decays to consider), γ,, 2β+γ, 2, V ub, V cb, Δm d, A d SL, B(B τν τν),radiative penguins (how to use them) 4p Subsection: Non-B-factories results (briefly on their threatment): ε K, Δm s, A s SL, TD B s J/ J/ψφ, ΔΓ s (with order calculation). 2-3p Rather than having subsubsections we indicate in the table which are inputs for the SM fit and inputs i for the BSM fits Section Theoretical Inputs Subsection Derivation of hadronic observables 2p Subsection Lattice QCD inputs 4p Benchmark models 5p Section Results from the global fits Section Global fits beyond the Standard Model 4p Subsection New-physics parameterizations 4p Subsection Operator analysis 2p Section Conclusions 1-2p total: pages 2
3 Motivation The CKM matrix is specified by 4 independent parameters, in the Wolfenstein approximation they are λ, A, ρ, and η % 1! 1 2 "2! 1 8 "4 " A" 3 (#! i$) ( ' * V CKM = '!" + A 2 " 5 ( 1 2! #! i$) 1! 1 2 "2! 1 8 "4! 1 2 A2 " 4 A" 2 * + O(" 6 ) ' * ' A" 3 (1! #! i$ )!A" 2 + A" 4 ( 1 2! #! i$) 1! 1 2 A2 " & 4 * ) Unitarity of the CKM matrix specifies relations among the parameters e.g. V ud V * ub + V cd V * cb + V td V * (ρ, η) tb = 0 α,φ 2 Combine measurements from the R u = V V * ud ub R t = V V * td tb * * V B and K systems to overconstrain cd V V cd V cb cb the triangle test if phase of CKM matrix γ,φ 3 1 β,φ 1 is only source of CP violation $!," 2 = arg # V V * ' td tb * % & V ud V ub ( ) $!," 1 = arg # V V * ' cd cb * % & V td V tb ( ) $!," 3 = arg # V V * ' ud ub * % & V cd V3 cb ( )
4 Motivation In the SM in the absence of errors all measurements of UT properties exactly meet in ρ and η The extraction of ρ, η depends on QCD parameters that have large theory uncertainties We use 3 different fit methods: CKMfitter, UTfit and Scanning method which differ in the treatment of QCD parameters 4
5 CKMfitter Methodology CKMfitter (Rfit)) is a frequentist-based approach to the global fit of CKM matrix Likelihood function: L[y mod ] = L exp [x exp! x th (y mod )] " L th [y QCD ] First term measures agreement between data, x exp, and prediction, x th Second term expresses our present knowledge on QCD parameters y mod are a set of fundamental and free parameters of theory (m( t, etc) Minimize and determine! 2 (y mod ) " #2 ln(l[y mod ])!" 2 (y mod ) = " 2 2 (y mod ) # " min;ymod where χ 2 min;ymod mod is the absolute minimum value of χ 2 function Separate uncertainties of QCD parameters into statistical (σ)( ) and non-statistical (theory) uncertainties (δ)( statistical uncertainties are treated like experimental errors with a Gaussian likelihood 5
6 Rfit Methodology Treatment of theory uncertainties (δ): If fitted parameter a lies within the predicted range x 0 ±δx 0 contribution to χ 2 is zero If fitted parameter a lies outside the predicted range x 0 ±δx 0 the likelihood L th [ y QCD ] drops rapidly to zero, define:!2 ln L th [x 0,",#] = 0, $x 0 % ' x 0 ± #&x ) ( 0 * + x 0! x. 0, - "&x 0 / 0 2 +! #. - 0, " / 2, $x 0 1 ' x 0 ± #&x ( 0 ) * 3 different analysis goals Within SM achieve best estimate of y th Within SM set CL that quantifies agreement between data and theory Within extended theory framework search for specific signs of new physics 6
7 UTfit Methodology UTfit is a Bayesian-based approach to the global fit of CKM matrix For M measurements c j that depend on ρ and η plus other N parameters x i the function f(!, ", x 1,...x N c 1,...c M ) needs to be evaluated by integrating over x i and c j Using Bayes theorem one finds $ f(!, ", x 1,...x N c 1,...c M ) # f j (c j!, ", x 1,..., x N ) f i (x i )f 0 (!, ") j=1,m where f 0 (ρ, η) is the a-priory probability for ρ and η $ i=1,n The output pdf for ρ and η is obtained by integrating over c j and x i 7
8 UTfit Methodology Measurement inputs and all theory parameters are described by pdfs Errors are typically treated with a Gaussian model, only for B k, ξ and f B B B a flat distribution representing the theory uncertainty is convolved with a Gaussian representing the statistical uncertainty So if available, experimental inputs are represented by likelihoods The method does not make any distinction between measurement and theory parameters The allowed regions are well defined in terms of probability allowed regions at 95% probability means that you expect the true value in this range with 95% probability By changing the integration variables any pdf can be extracted this yields an indirect determination of any interesting quantity 8
9 The Scanning Method The basis is the original approach by M.H. Schune & S. Plaszczynski used for the BABAR physics book The fit method was extended to include over 250 single measurements The four QCD parameters B k, f B, B B, ξ and V ub, V cb, have significant theory uncertainties, thus they are scanned in the following way We express each parameter in terms of x 0 ± σ x ±δ x, where σ is a statistical uncertainty and δ x is the theory uncertainty We select a specific value x * [x 0 - δ x, x 0 + δ x ] as a model We consider all models inside the [x 0 - δ x, x 0 + δ x ] interval In each model the uncertainty σ q is treated in a statistical way The uncertainties in the QCD parameters η cc, η ct, η tt, and η B and the quark masses m c (m c ) and m b (m b ) are treated like statistical uncertainties, since these uncertainties are relatively small however, if necessary, we can scan over any of these parameters 9
10 The Scanning Method We perform maximum likelihood fits using a frequentist approach A model is considered consistent with data if P(χ 2 M ) min > 5% For consistent models we determine the best estimate and plot a 95% CL (ρ, η) contour we overlay contours of consistent models however, though only one of the contours is the correct one, we do not know which and thus show a representative numebr of them For accepted fits we also study the correlations among the theoretical parameters extending their range far beyond the range specified by the theorists We can input α, φ 2 and γ, φ 3 via a likelihood function or directly using individual B ππb ππ, ρπ, ρρ,, a 1 π,, b 1 π measurements and GLW, ADS and Dalitz plot measurements in B D (*) K (*) & sin(2β+γ), respectively We can further determine PP, PV VV amplitudes and strong phases using Gronau and Rosner parameterizations in powers of λ Work is in progress to include cos 2β, β s, A q SL, ΔΓ s and τ s add contours of sin 2α, γ and sin (2β+γ) and improve on display 10
11 Differences among the 3 Methods Fit methodologies differ: 2 frequentist approaches vs 1 Bayesian approach Theory uncertainties are treated differently in the global fits Presently, measurement input values differ plus some assumptions differ For V ub and V cb there is an issue how to combine inclusive and exclusive results Inclusive/exclusive averages individual results Resulting errors QCD parameters inputs differ, eg f Bs, B Bs, f Bs f Bd, B Bd, ξ f Bd B Bd, ξ Bs /f Bd Bd, B Bs Bs /B Bd We need to standardize measurement inputs, QCD parameters (at least numerical values should agree) and assumptions 11
12 Input Measurements from B Factories V ub and V cb measured in exclusive and inclusive semileptonic B decays Δm d from B d B d oscillations CP asymmetries a cp (ψk S ) from B cck s decays angle β α from B ππ, B ρρ, & B ρπ CP measurements, add B a 1 π, B b 1 π γ β r u Δm d sin2α GLW, ADS and GGSZ analyses in B D (*) K (*) 12
13 Input Measurements from B Factories sin(2β+γ) measurement from B D (*) π(ρ) cos 2 β from B J/ψK * and B D 0 π 0 B τν branching fraction sin(2α+ γ) cosβ B(B τν τν) 13
14 Other Input Measurements ε K from CP violation in K decays ε K Δm d /Δm s from B d B d and B s B s oscillations β s - ΔΓ s from B s measurements at the Tevatron Δm d /Δm s CKM elements V ud, V us, V cd, V cs, V tb 14
15 Measurement Inputs Observable V us V ub V cb ub [10-3 sin 2β2 α[ ππ, ρπ, ρρ] γ [GGSZ, GLW, ADS] cos 2β 2β+γ -3 ] cb [ ] B(B τν τν) ) [10-4 Δm [ps-1-1 Bd ] Δm [ps-1-1 Bs ] ε K [10-3 ] -4 ] CKMfitter ± ±0.09±0.41* 40.59±0.37±0.58* 1.73± ± ± ± ± CL(α) 1-CL(γ) J/ψK* D (*) (*) π(ρ) UTfit ± (inc) 3.38±0.36 (exc) 41.54±0.73 (inc) 38.6±1.1 (exc( exc) 1.51± ± ± ± ± Δln ln(l) -2Δln ln(l) J/ψK*, D 0 π 0 Scanning M ± ±0.16±0.29 (ex 40.9±1.0±1.6 (exc( exc) 1.79± ± ± ± ±0.025 B, S, C for ππ & ρρ GGSZ, GLW, ADS To be done -2Δln ln(l) D (*) π(ρ) * use average values 15
16 Parameter f Bs [f Bd f Bs /f B K α s /f Bd Bd ] B [B Bs Bd ] B Bs /B [ξ] Bd B K [2 GeV] m c (m c ) [GeV[ GeV] Mean Lattice QCD Inputs CKMfitter σ stat δ theo 228 ±3 ± ±0.008 ± ±0.03 ± ±0.02 ± ± ± ±0.005 ± ±0.013 ± ± UTfit Mean σ 245 ± ± ± ± ± ± ±0.03 Scanning Mean σ stat [216 ±10 ± 20] δ theo [1.29 ±.05 ±.08] [1.2 ±.028 ±.05] 0.79 ±0.04 ± ±0.11 m t (m t ) [GeV[ GeV] ±1.16 ± ± ±2.1 η cc Calculated from m c (m c ) & α s 1.38 ± ±0.22 η ct 0.47± ± ±0.04 η tt ± ± ± η B (MS) 0.551± ± ±
17 Inputs: V ud, V us V cb, V ub B(B τν) ε K us ub Global Fit Results Δm Bd, Δm Bs sin 2β, 2, 1-CL(α), 1-CL(γ) 2008 inputs Note scales are not the same! 17
18 Tension from B(B τν) B(B τν) is proportional to Vub 2 and f2bd from global fit B(B τν)=( ) WA: B(B τν)=(1.73±0.35) σ discrepancy direct measurement If B(B τν) or sin 2β are removed χ2min in global fit drops by 2.4 Vub, Vcb remain unaffected allowed region by fit 18
19 Constraints in the m H -tanβ Plane From BABAR/Belle average we extract r H = 1.67 ± 0.34 exp ± 0.36 fb,v ub % r H = ' 1! & ' 2 m ( B 2 (1 + " 0 # tan $) tan2 $ * ) * m H + 95% C.L. exclusions 2 H + We can use the 95% CL to present exclusions at 95% CL in the m H+ -tanβ plane m H Dark matter 1.2< 10 9 Δa <4.6 µ r H 95%CL B X s γ B τν K µν µν Tevatron tan β/m H ATLAS 5σ 5 discovery curve LEP tan β 19
20 Model-Independent Analysis of UT Assume that new physics only affects short-distance part of ΔB=2 We use model-independent parameterization for B d and B s B 0 full q H!B =2 B 0 SM q H!B =2 where H full = H SM + H NP B q 0 B q 0 =! NP q =! NP NP q exp { 2i" q } Several observables are modified by the magnitude or phase of Δ NP q In B d system we compare R u & γ with sin 2β, 2, sin2α and Δm d that may be modified by NP parameters (Δ d, φ d ) In B s system we compare R u & γ with Δm s, β s, and ΔΓ s that may be modified by NP parameters (Δ( d, φ d ) 20
21 Model-Independent Analysis of UT for Δ d - φ d Inputs: Δm d, Δm s, sin 2β, 2 α, ΔΓ d, A Bd SL, A Bs SL, w/o B(B τν) Dominant constraints come from β and Δm d Semileptonic asymmetries A SL exclude symmetric solution with η<0 Δ d =1 (SM) is disfavored by 2.1σ (discrepancy B(B τν) ) and sin 2β) 2 φ NP d =( % CL ( discrepancy( is 0.6σ w/o B(B τν) ) ) +9-6 Δ d 21
22 Model-Independent Analysis of UT for Δ s - φ s Inputs: φ s, Δm d, Δm s, A Bd SL, A Bs SL, ΔΓ s, τ s, B(B τν) Δ s Dominant constraints come from direct measurements of φ s, ΔΓ s in B J/ B J/ψφ and Δm s from the Tevatron φ s is 2.2σ away from the SM prediction Δ s =1 is disfavored at 1.9σ level independent of B(B τν) 22
23 Final Remarks Among the 3 global CKM fitting methods we need to standardize All measurement inputs What QCD parameters to use, their central values, their statistical errors and their theory errors The notation for quantities in the text, on plots and in equations We need to specify which input parameters are used in the fits and standardize on the assumptions This is important for comparing results We will present results in form of plots with values listed in tables we accompany the results with a few remarks in particular in cases of discrepancies we need to discuss them Most of the writing probably has to be done by the co-conveners 23
24 More Recent Publications CKMfitter publications J. Charles et al., Eur. Phys. J. C41, 1-135, UTfit publications: M. Bona et al., JHEP 0610:081, M. Bona et al., Phys.Rev.D76:014015, M. Bona et al., Phys.Rev.Lett Lett.97:151803, M Bona et al., Phys.Lett Lett.B687:61-69, Scanning method G. Eigen et al., Eur.Phys.J.C33:S644-S646,2004. G.P. Dubois-Felsmann et al., hep-ph/
Motivation Fit Method Inputs Results Conclusion
Motivation Fit Method Inputs Results Conclusion MOTIVATION In the hunt for New Physics (Supersymmetry) the Standard Model (SM) has to be scrutinized in various areas Two very promising areas are CP violation
More informationStatus of the CKM Matrix and a simple New Physics scenario
Status of the CKM Matrix and a simple New Physics scenario J. Charles, on behalf of the CKMfitter group a a Centre de Physique Théorique, Luminy Case 907 3288 Marseille Cedex 9, France We present a short
More informationStatus of the CKM Matrix and a simple New Physics scenario
Status of the CKM Matrix and a simple New Physics scenario J. Charles, on behalf of the CKMfitter group a a Centre de Physique Théorique, Luminy Case 97 3288 Marseille Cedex 9, France We present a short
More informationStandard Model updates and new physics analysis with the Unitarity Triangle fit
Standard Model updates and new physics analysis with the Unitarity Triangle fit Marcella Bona A. Bevan, M. Bona, M. Ciuchini, D. Derkach, E. Franco, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, F. Parodi, M. Pierini, C.
More informationMoriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, Flavour physics in the LHC era. An introduction. Clara Matteuzzi. INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca
Moriond QCD La Thuile, March 14 21, 2009 Flavour physics in the LHC era An introduction Clara Matteuzzi INFN and Universita Milano-Bicocca 1 Contents 1. The flavor structure of the Standard Model 2. Tests
More informationCKMfitter A Mathematica based Version
CKMfitter A Mathematica based Version Andreas Jantsch IKTP Institutsseminar, TU Dresden November 9, 2006 Content 1) CKM matrix & Unitarity Triangle 2) The CKMfitter package Original Fortran based version
More informationB Factories. Alan Watson University of Birmingham, UK
Towards (φ ) and γ (φ ) at the 2 3 B Factories Alan Watson University of Birmingham, UK The Unitarity Triangle Source of CP in the Standard Model 1 λ 2 /2 λ Aλ 3 (ρ iη) V CKM λ 1 λ 2 /2 Aλ 2 Αλ 3 (1 ρ
More informationUpdates from UTfit within and beyond the Standard Model
Updates from UTfit within and beyond the Standard Model Marcella Bona Queen Mary, University of London SUSY 2013 26 August 2013 Trieste, Italy unitarity Triangle analysis in the SM SM UT analysis: provide
More informationCKM phase and CP Violation in B Decays
CKM phase and CP Violation in B Decays David Brown Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BaBar Collaboration August 14, 2007 Daegu, Korea Talk Outline Review of CPV in the B system Results on the CKM unitarity
More informationVI Charmless B Decays
Assessing the Impact of the Asymmetric B Factories http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/ckmfitter The whole paper: (Submitted to Eur.Phys.J.C) I The CKM matrix and the UT triangle V Constraints on 2β + γ
More informationAdvances in Open Charm Physics at CLEO-c
Advances in Open Charm Physics at CLEO-c Paras Naik CLEO-c 2230104-002 Solenoid Coil Barrel Calorimeter Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detector Drift Chamber Inner Drift Chamber / Beampipe SC Quadrupole Pylon
More informationRecent results on CKM/CPV from Belle
Recent results on CKM/CPV from Belle Alexander Leopold for the Belle Collaboration Insitute of High Energy Physics Austrian Academy of Sciences HEPMAD 15, September 21 st 2015 A. Leopold (HEPHY) Belle
More informationBABAR Status & Physics Reach in Coming Years
BABAR Status & Physics Reach in Coming Years Gautier Hamel de Monchenault CEA-Saclay DAPNIA/SPP on behalf of the BABAR Collaboration CERN, 14 February 2006 Status of PEP-2 and BABAR PEP-2 and BABAR at
More informationCP violation in the quark sector: What have we learned?
CP violation in the quark sector: What have we learned? Patricia Burchat, Stanford University World Summit on Physics Beyond the Standard Model Galapagos Islands, June 22-25, 2006 1 Notes for Printed Version
More informationLecture III. Measurement of sin 2 in B K 0 S. Measurement of sin 2 in B + -, B + - Measurement of in B DK. Direct CP Violation
Lecture III Measurement of sin 2 in BK S Measurement of sin 2 in BK S Measurement of sin 2 in B + -, B + - Measurement of in BDK Direct CP Violation Model-independent Test for New Physics Prospects Strategy
More informationCP Violation Beyond the Standard Model
CP Violation Beyond the Standard Model 5th Recontres du Vietnam Hanoi August 7, 2004 Yossi Nir (Weizmann Institute of Science) Thanks to: Sandrine Laplace, Zoltan Ligeti CPV BSM 1/21 Motivation Why do
More informationHeavy Quarks and τ. CVC test Michel parameters. Charm Mixing f D s
Heavy Quarks and τ University of Illinois CVC test Michel parameters Charm Mixing f D s B f B Two mysteries: N c and η K CKM: ππ, Kπ, V cb, V ub Lifetime and mixing CP search Belle and Babar* A very brief
More informationCP violation in B 0 π + π decays in the BABAR experiment. Muriel Pivk, CERN. 22 March 2004, Lausanne
CP violation in B π + π decays in the BABAR experiment, 22 March 24, The BABAR experiment at SLAC 2 Phenomenology 3 The h + h analysis 4 A new tool: s Plots 5 Results 6 Interpretation of the results 7
More informationThe Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix
The Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix Charge-raising current J µ W = ( ν e ν µ ν τ )γ µ (1 γ 5 ) V = A u L Ad L e µ τ + (ū c t)γ µ (1 γ 5 )V Mismatch between weak and quark masses, and between A u,d
More informationStandard Model of Particle Physics
Standard Model of Particle Physics Chris Sachrajda School of Physics and Astronomy University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ UK SUSSP61, St Andrews August 8th 23rd 2006 Contents 1. Spontaneous Symmetry
More informationA.Mordá. INFN - Padova. 7 th July on behalf of the Belle2 Collaboration. CP Violation sensitivity at the Belle II Experiment
A. Mordá CP Violation sensitivity at the Belle II Experiment 7 th July 7 / CP Violation sensitivity at the Belle II Experiment A.Mordá on behalf of the Belle Collaboration INFN - Padova 7 th July 7 Introduction
More informationElectroweak Theory: 5
Electroweak Theory: 5 Introduction QED The Fermi theory The standard model Precision tests CP violation; K and B systems Higgs physics Prospectus STIAS (January, 2011) Paul Langacker (IAS) 162 References
More informationRecent CP violation measurements. Advanced topics in Particle Physics: LHC physics, 2011 Jeroen van Tilburg 1/38
Recent CP violation measurements Advanced topics in Particle Physics: LHC physics, 2011 Jeroen van Tilburg 1/38 Recap of last week What we have learned last week: Indirect searches (CP violation and rare
More informationHow well do we know the Unitarity Triangle? An experimental review
SLAC-PUB-1281 hep-ex/78.3238 September 27 How well do we know the Unitarity Triangle? An experimental review Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Physics, Room 26-443, 77 Massachusetts
More informationCP Violation: A New Era
CP Violation: A New Era Ringberg Phenomenology Workshop on Heavy Flavors 2/5/23 Yossi Nir (Weizmann Institute of Science) Collaborations with: Yuval Grossman, Zoltan Ligeti, Helen Quinn Sandrine Laplace,
More informationBounds on New Physics from the Unitarity Triangle fit: Summer'06 update
Bounds on New Physics from the Unitarity Triangle fit: Summer'06 update University of Wisconsin, Madison on behalf of UTfit Collaboration http://www.utfit.org M. Bona, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, V. Lubicz,
More informationub + V cd V tb = 0, (1) cb + V td V
REVIEW OF β, α AND γ MEASUREMENTS K. TRABELSI KEK (High Energy Accelerator Research Organization) Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki-ken, 35-81, Japan Precision measurements
More informationWeak Decays, CKM, Anders Ryd Cornell University
Weak Decays, CKM, CP Violation Anders Ryd Cornell University Presented at the International Conference on Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Delphi, Greece, June 6-11, 2005 Page: 1 Flavor Physics The study
More informationSTATUS OF CKM ANGLE MEASUREMENTS, A REPORT FROM BABAR AND BELLE
SLAC-R-950 STATUS OF CKM ANGLE MEASUREMENTS, A REPORT FROM BABAR AND BELLE Owen Long Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside CA 92521, USA I will review the latest developments
More informationCP Violation at the LHC - workshop 2017
CP Violation at the LHC - SM@LHC workshop 217 Sarah Karodia on behalf of the LHCb collaboration, including results from ATLAS, CMS and LHCb University of Glasgow May 2, 217 Sarah Karodia (UoG) SM@LHC 217
More informationThe Future of V ub. Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1
The Future of V ub Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) 2010 2006 BMN 2006 BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep 13-14 2006 Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Motivation Fundamental parameter in SM L SM =...+ gw µ
More informationNew Physics & Future B Physics Programs CP violation Rare Decays
Andrey Golutvin ARGUS & ITEP/Moscow New Physics & Future B Physics Programs CP violation Rare Decays 1 Experimental Facilities LHCb forward spectrometer (running in pp collider mode) Data taking starts
More informationSearch for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories
Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model at B Factories Gautier Hamel de Monchenault CEA-Saclay DAPNIA/SPP on behalf of the BABAR & BELLE Collaborations Moskow, 29 July 2006 New Physics in Flavor Sector
More informationLHCb results relevant to SUSY and BSM physics
LHCb results relevant to SUSY and BSM physics SUSY 2013, 31 st August 2013 Mitesh Patel (Imperial College London) On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Introduction The interest in B physics : Virtual contributions
More informationMeasurements of CP violating phases in B decays at LHCb
Measurements of CP violating phases in B decays at Sevda Esen [Heidelberg University] on behalf of the collaboration Les Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d Aoste, 1-7 March 215 CP Violation in the SM
More informationRecent CP violation measurements
Recent CP violation measurements 1/38 Recap of last week What we have learned last week: Indirect searches (CP violation and rare decays) are good places to search for effects from new, unknown particles.
More informationMeasurements of the phase φ s at LHCb
Measurements of the phase φ s at LHCb V. Batozskaya 1 on behalf of LHCb collaboration 1 National Centre for Nuclear Research, Warsaw, Poland XXIII Cracow Epiphany Conference 9-12 January 2017 V. Batozskaya
More informationThe weak interaction Part II
The weak interaction Part II Marie-Hélène Schune Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay IN2P3/CNRS Weak Interaction, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine 1 The K -K system The CKM mechanism Measurements
More informationLessons for New Physics from CKM studies
Lessons for New Physics from CKM studies Indiana University Flavor Physics and CP violation, 010 Università di Torino, May 5-8, 010 Outline Flavor violation in the Standard Model Inputs to the unitarity
More informationResults on Searches for New Physics at B Factories
SLAC-PUB-14826 Results on Searches for New Physics at B Factories Gerald Eigen, representing the BABAR collaboration University of Bergen - Dept of Physics Allegaten 55, Bergen, Norway We summarize recent
More informationHints of New Physics in b s transitions
( B K * γ ) Hints of New Physics in b s transitions (or) Looking for New Physics in Flavour Physics in quark sector Achille Stocchi LAL Orsay Université Paris Sud/IN2P3-CNRS 24 September 2008 DESY-Zeuthen
More informationPerspectives in B Physics: Results from LHCb
Pheno 2017 Symposium Pittsburgh, May 8 th, 2017 Perspectives in B Physics: Results from LHCb Ulrich Uwer Heidelberg University on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Outline: b s Introduction Unitarity Triangle
More informationLecture 14 Mixing and CP Violation
Lecture 4 Mixing and CP Violation Mixing of neutral K mesons CP violation in K decays T violation and CPT conservation Observation of charm mixing d and s mixing CP violation in decays Mixing of Neutral
More informationarxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 10 Aug 2011
The Physics Potential of SuperB F. F. Wilson 1 on behalf of the SuperB Collaboration STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK arxiv:1108.2178v1 [hep-ex] 10 Aug 2011 SuperB
More informationRecent developments on CKM angles
Recent developments on CKM angles Wei Wang Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik, Bonn Flavor Physics & CP Violation, Buzios, Rio, 19-24 May 2013 (FPCP 2013) Wei Wang (HISKP) CKM angles Buzios,
More informationLa Fisica dei Sapori Pesanti
La Fisica dei Sapori Pesanti Lina Barbaro Galtieri Simposio in onore di Romano Bizzarri Roma, La Sapienza, 10 Febbraio 2004 Lina Galtieri Simposio in onore di Romano Bizzarri, Roma 10 Febbraio 2004 1 Heavy
More informationNeville Harnew University of Oxford
Review of Unitarity Triangle and Spectroscopy Measurements with LHCb Neville Harnew University of Oxford On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration September 5 th 2017 1 Outline General introduction The LHCb
More informationMeasurement of CP violation in B J/ψK 0 S. decays. Frank Meier TU Dortmund. XXIX Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d Aoste March 1 7, 2015
Measurement of CP violation in B J/ψK S decays at LHCb Frank Meier TU Dortmund on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration XXIX Rencontres de Physique de la Vallée d Aoste March 1 7, 215 CP violation in the SM
More informationCP Violation in B Decays and the CKM Matrix. Emmanuel Olaiya Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton,Didcot,Oxon,OX11 0QX,UK
XXIV Physics in Collision - Boston, June 27-29, 24 CP Violation in B Decays and the CKM Matrix Emmanuel Olaiya Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Chilton,Didcot,Oxon,OX11 QX,UK ABSTRACT Results by the BaBar
More informationLecture 2: CPV in B system
1/39 Lecture 2: CPV in B system CTEQ Summer School Rhodes, Greece - July 2006 Franco Bedeschi, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa, Italy 2/39 Outline Reminder CKM matrix Basic theory CP violation
More informationMeasuring the Unitarity Triangle Angle α with BaBar. Adrian Bevan KEK, 15 th September 2006
(C) Peter Ginter (2002). Measuring the Unitarity Triangle Angle α with BaBar Adrian Bevan KEK, 15 th September 2006 (α, β, γ) (φ 1, φ 2, φ 3 ) 15 th September 2006 Adrian Bevan 1 Overview Motivation PEP-II
More informationMikihiko Nakao (KEK) June 16th, 2006, SUSY06, Newport Beach, CA.
at BELLE and BABAR. Mikihiko Nakao (KEK) June 16th, 26, SUSY6, Newport Beach, CA mikihiko.nakao@kek.jp. Huge number of coherent / energy-asymmetric BB production at Y(4S) slow π e / µ K B or B (flavor
More informationCKM : Status and Prospects
Anirban Kundu University of Calcutta February 20, 2014 IIT Guwahati, EWSB2014 Plan The CKM matrix V ud, V cd, V cs, V us V tb, V cb, V ub Combinations UT angles: α, β, γ, β s BSM hints? Summary: No spectacular
More informationShahram Rahatlou University of Rome
Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Matrix and CP Violation in Standard Model Shahram Rahatlou University of Rome Lecture 1 Lezioni di Fisica delle Particelle Elementari Many thanks to Vivek Sharma (UCSD) And Achille
More informationAdrian Bevan Department of Physics Liverpool University Liverpool, United Kingdom (from the BABAR Collaboration.)
BABAR-PROC-04/138 SLAC-PUB-10874 Measurements of sin 2α/φ 2 from B ππ, ρπ and ρρ modes. Adrian Bevan Department of Physics Liverpool University Liverpool, United Kingdom (from the BABAR Collaboration.)
More informationProbing beyond the Standard Model with B Decays
Probing beyond the Standard Model with B Decays J. Chauveau LPNHE Univ. Paris 6-7 On behalf of the BABAR Collaboration ICHEP 2004, Aug. 16 th 22 nd, 2004 Beijing, China ICHEP'04 Aug. 16-22 J. Chauveau
More informationHiroyuki Sagawa KEK OHO 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
Hiroyuki Sagawa KEK OHO 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan In the neutral B meson system, it is possible to measure the CKM angle α using the decay mode b uud in the presence of penguin pollution. Here the recent
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v4 18 Nov 1999
February 8, 018 arxiv:hep-ph/990998v4 18 Nov 1999 OITS-678 CLEO measurement of B π + π and determination of weak phase α 1 K. Agashe and N.G. Deshpande 3 Institute of Theoretical Science University of
More information12 Best Reasons to Like CP Violation
12 Best Reasons to Like CP Violation SSI 2012 The Electroweak Scale: Unraveling the Mysteries at the LHC SLAC, California 27 July 2012 Yossi Nir (Weizmann Institute of Science) SSI40 1/35 CP Violation
More informationParticle Physics II CP violation. Lecture 3. N. Tuning. (also known as Physics of Anti-matter ) Niels Tuning (1)
Particle Physics II CP violation (also known as Physics of Anti-matter ) Lecture 3 N. Tuning Niels Tuning (1) Plan 1) Mon 5 Feb: Anti-matter + SM 2) Wed 7 Feb: CKM matrix + Unitarity Triangle 3) Mon 26
More informationSearches for Leptonic Decays of the B-meson at BaBar
Searches for Leptonic Decays of the B-meson at BaBar Stephen Jacob Sekula (MIT) on behalf of the BaBar collaboration Presented at Frontiers in Contemporary Physics III Vanderbilt University May 22-28,
More informationIntroduction to Dalitz-plot
Introduction to Dalitz-plot Gagan Mohanty Student Seminar @ TIFR January 7, 01 Few Diversions Hierarchical expansion of CKM (1983) + O( 4) magnitudes d s b phases d s b u c t u c t 3 A triangle at the
More informationB the Tevatron
B Physics @ the Tevatron Stephanie Hansmann-Menzemer Physikalisches Institut, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg DESY, 9 th of November 7 xxx p.1/1 Tevatron p p collisions at s = 1.96 TeV observed by
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 17 Oct 2003
LMU 25/03 October 2003 Model Independent Bound on the Unitarity Triangle from CP Violation in B π + π and B ψk S arxiv:hep-ph/0310218v1 17 Oct 2003 Gerhard Buchalla and A. Salim Safir Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität
More informationCKM fits and charm decays
CKM fits and charm decays Sébastien Descotes-Genon Laboratoire de Physique Théorique CNRS & Université Paris-Sud 11, 91405 Orsay, France Beijing - 22 Oct 2010 Sébastien Descotes-Genon (LPT-Orsay) CKM fits
More informationLatest time-dependent CP-violation results from BaBar
Latest time-dependent CP-violation results from BaBar Owen Long, UC Santa Barbara TM All results are preliminary XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond QCD and Hadronic Interactions March 17, 2002 The CKM matrix
More informationRecent V ub results from CLEO
Recent V ub results from CLEO Marina Artuso Representing the CLEO Collaboration Beauty 2005, Assisi, June 20-25, 2005 1 Quark Mixing Weak interaction couples weak eigenstates, not mass eigenstates: CKM
More informationFlavour Physics at hadron machines
Flavour Physics at hadron machines KIAS Phenomenology Workshop Seoul, Korea, 17-19 November 2011 T. Nakada EPFL-LPHE Lausanne, Switzerland B physics, started with hadron machine First discovery of b-quark
More informationCP Violation in B Decays at BABAR
CP Violation in B Decays at BABAR October 19-, 11 October 19-, 11 CP Violation in B Decays at BABAR (page 1 B Meson Factories BABAR at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, California, USA Another B-factory
More informationCP Violation in the B(s) meson system at LHCb Julian Wishahi on behalf of the LHCb collaboration
CP Violation in the B(s) meson system at Julian Wishahi on behalf of the collaboration 5th Rencontres de Moriond, Electroweak Session, 2th of March 215 CPV in Interference of Mixing/Decay interference
More informationThe other window on New Physics: CP violation at the B factories
The other window on New Physics: CP violation at the B factories Gabriella Sciolla M.I.T. Outline: The physics of CP violation What is CP and why is it interesting? CPV in the B system CPV in the Standard
More informationCP violation and rare decays Tim Gershon University of Warwick. 4 June 2015
CP violation and rare decays University of Warwick Blois2015: 27th Rencontres de Blois on "Particle Physics and Cosmology" th 4 June 2015 Quark flavour mixing a.k.a. CKM phenomenology V CKM 3 A i 1 2 1
More informationCracking the Unitarity Triangle
Cracking the Unitarity Triangle Latest Results from BABAR Masahiro Morii Harvard University NEPPSR 2004, Craigville, MA Unitarity Triangle Already seen it a few times this week VV + VV + VV = 0 ud ub cd
More informationLHCb Physics and prospects. Stefano Perazzini On behalf of LHCb Collabora4on MENU nd June 2010
LHCb Physics and 2010-11 prospects Stefano Perazzini On behalf of LHCb Collabora4on MENU2010 2 nd June 2010 Physics: OUTLINE Flavor physics and CPV in the quark sector Search for New Physics The LHCb Experiment
More informationB Physics: Theoretical Aspects Anirban Kundu
B Physics: Theoretical Aspects Anirban Kundu Calcutta University, Kolkata, India Why B Physics? CP violation. That s why we are here Test the CP violation mechanism of the SM Investigation of the third
More informationRencontres de Moriond - EW Interactions and Unified Theories La Thuile, March 14-21, 2015
Rencontres de Moriond - EW Interactions and Unified Theories La Thuile, March 14-21, 2015 Eli Ben-Haïm LPNHE-IN2P3- Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris) On behalf of the BELLE and BABAR collaborations
More informationExperimental aspects of the CP violation.
Experimental aspects of the CP violation. S. Monteil, LPC Université Blaise Pascal in2p3. [LHCb experiment and CKMfitter group] Some authoritative literature about the lecture : BaBar physics book: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacreports/slac-r-504.html
More informationUnitary Triangle Analysis: Past, Present, Future
Unitarity Triangle Analysis: Past, Present, Future INTRODUCTION: quark masses, weak couplings and CP in the Standard Model Unitary Triangle Analysis: PAST PRESENT FUTURE Dipartimento di Fisica di Roma
More informationProbing the New Physics scale with the Unitarity Triangle fit
Probing the New Physics scale with the Unitarity Triangle fit Denis Derkach University of Oxford On behalf of UTfit group Adrian Bevan, Marcella Bona, Marco Ciuchini, Denis Derkach, Enrico Franco, Vittorio
More informationPhysics at the Tevatron. Lecture III
Physics at the Tevatron Lecture III Beate Heinemann University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN Academic Training Lectures, November 2007 1 Outline Lecture I: The Tevatron,
More informationSearching for New Physics in Heavy Flavours
Searching for New Physics in Heavy Flavours Luca Silvestrini INFN, Rome Introduction Status of flavour physics in the SM UT beyond the SM and constraints on NP CP violation in Charm Physics Conclusions
More informationCP Violation in the B system
CP Violation in the B system Outline: Mixing induced CPV and B s mixing phase s Search for CPV in B s mixing Direct CPV in B DK and CKM phase Direct CPV in charmless B decays new Ulrich Uwer Heidelberg
More informationPrecision measurement of
Precision of Francesca Dordei University of Heidelberg, Physikalisches Institut b 3rd IMPRS-PTFS Seminar, Heidelberg - 24 th April 2012 (Heidelberg University) 24-04-2012 1 / 24 and the LHCb detector CP
More informationCKM Matrix and CP Violation in Standard Model
CKM Matrix and CP Violation in Standard Model CP&Viola,on&in&Standard&Model&& Lecture&15& Shahram&Rahatlou& Fisica&delle&Par,celle&Elementari,&Anno&Accademico&2014815& http://www.roma1.infn.it/people/rahatlou/particelle/
More informationFlavor physics. Yuval Grossman. Cornell. Y. Grossman Flavor physics APS2009, Denver, 5/2/2009 p. 1
Flavor physics Yuval Grossman Cornell Y. Grossman Flavor physics APS2009, Denver, 5/2/2009 p. 1 Flavor at a junction Every end is a new beginning End: The Nobel to KM is a formal declaration that the CKM
More informationMeasurement of ϕ 2 /α using
Measurement of ϕ 2 /α using Decays at elle and aar lexander Somov CKM 6, Nagoya 26 Introduction (CP violation in decays Measurements in φ 2 constraint from an Isospin analysis CP Violation in decays Tree
More informationExperimental prospects for B physics and discrete symmetries at LHC and future projects
Experimental prospects for B physics and discrete symmetries at LHC and future projects University of Warwick DISCRETE 2010 Symposium on Prospects in the Physics of Discrete Symmetries 6th December 2010
More informationBs studies at a SuperB: physics case and experimental potentialities
Bs studies at a SuperB: physics case and experimental potentialities 1 2 3 4 5 6 E.Baracchini1,2, M.Bona3, F.Ferroni1,2, G.Isidori2,4, G.Martinelli1,2, M.Pierini5, G.Piredda1,2, F.Renga1,2, A.Stocchi6
More informationSummary of WG5. Gianluca Cavoto. INFN Roma La Sapienza. On behalf of WG5 conveners Robert Fleischer Karim Trabelsi Jure Zupan
Summary of WG5 Gianluca Cavoto INFN Roma La Sapienza On behalf of WG5 conveners Robert Fleischer Karim Trabelsi Jure Zupan CKM Workshop 2006 in Nagoya 1 Overview The charge The main goal is the measurements
More informationCKM OVERVIEW. Luca Silvestrini. TU-München & INFN Rome
CKM OVERVIEW TU-München & INFN Rome Member of the Collaboration: M. Bona, M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, F. Parodi, M. Pierini, P. Roudeau, C. Schiavi, L. S., A. Stocchi, V. Vagnoni
More informationUnitarity Triangle Analysis (UTA)
Unitarity Triangle Analysis (UTA) Weak eigenstates d' s' b' V CKM Mass eigenstates d s b The CKM Matrix 3x3 unitary matrix 4 parameters: 3 angles and 1 phase The phase is responsible of CP-violation (With
More informationG. Eigen U Bergen NFR Meeting Bergen October 19, 2005
G. Eigen U Bergen NFR Meeting Bergen October 19, 2005 Introduction The BABAR experiment was designed to measure sin 2 2 with high precision in the mode B J/ K 0 S For sin 2 2 no high precision results
More informationLa Belle Epoque. K.Trabelsi kek.jp Lausanne, 22 Jan, 2009
La Belle Epoque K.Trabelsi karim.trabelsi @ kek.jp Lausanne, Jan, 9 Belle Epoque : was a period in European social history that began during th the late 19 and lasted until World War I... considered as
More informationSuperb prospects: Physics at Belle II/SuperKEKB
PANIC July 28, 2011 Superb prospects: Physics at Belle II/SuperKEKB cf G. Varner, talk 3H-1 SuperKEKB & Belle II projects 2 Primary goal: establish unitarity & complex phase of CKM matrix Kobayashi & Maskawa
More informationMeasurement of γ from B DK and related modes at LHCb
Measurement of γ from B DK and related modes at LHCb Till Moritz Karbach CERN moritz.karbach@cern.ch Outline I. LHCb measurements two-body GLW/ADS four-body ADS GGSZ B Dh, followed by: GLW: ADS: GGSZ:
More informationLattice QCD and flavour physics
Lattice QCD and flavour physics Vittorio Lubicz Workshop on Indirect Searches for New Physics at the time of LHC 15/02/2010-26/03/2010 OUTLINE: The accuracy of LQCD in the flavour sector the past (the
More informationPoS(CKM2016)113. Measurement of γ from B meson decay to D ( ) K ( )
LAL, Université Paris-Sud, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France. E-mail: frederic.machefert@in2p3.fr The LHCb experiment has measured the angle γ of the unitarity triangle using B D ( ) K ( ) decays and with an integrated
More informationFlavor Physics Today. Hassan Jawahery University of Maryland December 12, 2014
Flavor Physics Today Hassan Jawahery University of Maryland December 12, 2014 1# According to famous theorists: Relevance of Flavor Physics today rests on New Physics reach of FCNC processes & its exclusive
More informationDetermination of Unitarity Triangle parameters
Determination of Unitarity Triangle parameters Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Phenomenology Workshop on Heavy Flavours Ringberg Schloss 8 April May 003 -Introuction (Unitarity Triangle) -The measurements/theoretical
More informationFLAVOR PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL
SFB Colloquium DESY Hamburg, July 3rd, 2008 FLAVOR PHYSICS BEYOND THE STANDARD MODEL Gudrun Hiller, Dortmund University of Technology Standard Model of Particle Physics renormalizable quantum field theory
More information