arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 16 Jul 2018

Transcription

1 Jet cross sections at the LHC with NNLOJE arxiv:8.65v [he-h] 6 Jul 8 James Currie, Nigel Glover Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Deartment of Physics, University of Durham, Durham, DH LE, UK james.currie@durham.ac.uk, e.w.n.glover@durham.ac.uk Institute for heoretical Physics, EH, CH-89 Zürich, Switzerland Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 9, CH-85 Zürich, Switzerland gehra@hys.ethz.ch homas Gehrmann Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 9, CH-85 Zürich, Switzerland thomas.gehrmann@uzh.ch Alexander Huss heoretical Physics Deartment, CH- Geneve, Switzerland alexander.huss@cern.ch João Pires Centro de Fisica eorica de Particulas - CFP, Instituto Suerior ecnico IS, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, P-9- Lisboa, Portugal joao.ramalho.ires@tecnico.ulisboa.t We review the status of NNLO calculations for jet cross sections at the LHC. In articular, we describe how erturbative stability and convergence can be used as criteria to select the most aroriate scales in the theoretical descrition of di-jet and single jet inclusive roduction. Loos and Legs in Quantum Field heory (LL8) 9 Aril 8 - May 8 St. Goar, Germany Seaker. c Coyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives. International License (CC BY-NC-ND.). htts://os.sissa.it/

2 Jet cross sections at the LHC with NNLOJE. Introduction Due to their large roduction rate, low-multilicity jet cross sections are among the bestmeasured collider observables. At the LHC, they are measured differentially in the jet kinematics with an accuracy often reaching the ercent level [,,,, 5, 6]. Combined with erturbative QCD redictions of comarable accuracy, these recision data have the otential to determine fundamental arameters of the Standard Model with ercent level errors and to constrain beyond Standard Model hysics searches. hose accurate measurements also rovide an ideal ground for robing the erturbative behaviour of QCD redictions comuted at a given order in the strong couling α s. heoretical redictions for hadron collider observables are built from two main constituents: the arton-level cross sections and the arton distribution functions. hese redictions have two tyes of uncertainties: arametric and erturbative. he arametric uncertainties arise from the ingredients to the redictions that cannot be comuted from first rinciles, but are extracted from data: α s and the arton distributions. hey both deend on auxiliary scales: the renormalization scale (µ R ) and the mass factorization scale (µ F ). he erturbative uncertainty, which is our main concern here, arises from the truncation of the erturbative series and is most often quantified by varying the renormalisation and factorisation scales around some redefined common central value, referred to as central reference scale. his commonly used rocedure rovides an estimation of the theoretical uncertainty related to the unknown missing higher orders terms in the theoretical redictions. he choice of this central scale, although usually hysically motivated, is arbitrary: any suitable choice is a riori equally valid. U to now, jet observables have been comared to data at NLO level only [, 8, 9]. Most recently, di-jet [] and single jet inclusive [] roduction cross sections and related distributions have been comuted to NNLO in QCD, including all artonic channels, but restricting the NNLO corrections to the numerically dominant leading colour and leading N F terms. hese comutations were erformed using the NNLOJE framework, which is a arton-level event generator including all artonic channels relevant at a given order, and which rovides the full kinematical information on all final state articles. he NNLOJE framework is a common infrastructure used to comute NNLO corrections for jet roduction rocesses, emloying the antenna subtraction method [, ] to cature all infrared divergencies from the corresonding matrix elements. A detailed descrition of the NNLOJE framework including the secific rocesses which have been imlemented in this infrastructure u to now, can be found in []. hese NNLO calculations, as they include the knowledge of three orders in the erturbative exansion in α s rovide a unique oortunity to test exectations regarding the erturbative convergence and stability of theoretical redictions when higher order corrections are included in the comutation of these observables. It was furthermore observed that at NNLO, different, but equally motivated choices of the central scale value resulted in substantially different redictions for jet observables yielding a significant erturbative uncertainty and reventing so far the use of jet data in PDF fits, see [5]. It is the urose of this talk to resent detailed studies on the imact of choosing a articular functional form for the central scales in di-jet and single jet inclusive roduction.

3 Jet cross sections at the LHC with NNLOJE NNLOJE ALAS ev, anti-k jets, R=.,. < y* < LO NLO NNLO NNLOJE ALAS ev, anti-k jets, R=.,.5 < y* <. LO NLO NNLO ratio to data.5 µ=m jj ratio to data.5 µ=m jj ratio to data.5 µ= ratio to data.5 µ= 5 5 (GeV) m jj 5 5 (GeV) m jj Figure : Ratio of theory redictions to data for. < y < (left) and.5 < y <. (right) for the scale choices µ = m j j (to) and µ = (bottom) at LO (green), NLO (blue) and NNLO (red). Scale bands reresent variation of the cross section by varying the scales indeendently by factors of and.. he di-jet roduction cross section Di-jet observables are defined through the two jets with the largest transverse momentum in the event. In [] we have resented the NNLO calculation of di-jet roduction doubly differential in the invariant mass m j j and half of the absolute raidity difference of the two leading jets, ( y = y j y j / ) and comared it to the available ALAS data [] at ev. his comarison was erformed using the following central scale choices: the invariant mass m j j and the average transverse momentum of the two leading jets,. At NLO, it was reviously noted that the redictions obtained with these two central scale choices are substantially different. his observation raised doubts on the reliability of the erturbative descrition of di-jet roduction, and the corresonding data were often not included in global determinations of arton distributions. Including the NNLO corrections, this sread in the redictions is reduced substantially, as can be seen in Fig.. he sread is raidity deendent, and some imact of the central scale choice is still observed in the raidity region.5 < y <., while being largely absent at low raidity searation. While the sread is reduced considerably at NNLO, yielding mutually comatible redictions, the two central scale choices dislay a considerably different erturbative convergence and residual scale uncertainty. his leads us to conclude that the scale choice µ = m j j aears to be the most aroriate in the theoretical descrition of the di-jet cross section. With this choice as reference central scale, when comaring our NNLO redictions for the double differential cross section with the ALAS data at ev [], we found that those redictions yield a good agreement in shae and normalization with the data for all the kinematical range in invariant mass and raidity. he inclusion of NNLO corrections leads to a significant imrovement in the descrition of the data even for the low invariant mass and raidity range where the NLO rediction deviated from it. It is also found that the residual scale uncertainty at NNLO is smaller than the exerimental uncertainty for this observable. hese findings regarding the scale sensitivity in the di-jet observables cannot be transferred straightforwardly to the single jet inclusive roduction cross section, as we will see below.

4 Jet cross sections at the LHC with NNLOJE. he single jet inclusive roduction cross section he single jet inclusive roduction cross section is obtained by summing over all reconstructed jets in an event. By ordering the jets in transverse momentum, this cross section can be exressed as the sum of the jet cross sections for the first (leading), second, third (an so on) jets in the event. It has been studied extensively by the ALAS and CMS collaborations [,,,, 5, 6] as a function of the transverse momentum and raidity y at various center-of-mass energies ranging from s = ev to s = ev. Beyond the requirement of observing at least one jet, no further constraints on the final state articles are imosed on this observable. As a consequence, an event can contain multile jets and all jets that ass the jet fiducial cuts contribute individually to the cross section. Unlike in di-jet roduction where in a given distribution each event is counted once in a given kinematical bin, for the single jet inclusive roduction cross section, a single event can have multile entries in the binned histogram. he henomenological analysis of single jet inclusive rocesses thus turns out to be much more involved than in the di-jet roduction case. he fact that the contributions to inclusive distributions come from individual jets rather than events introduces more ossibilities for the choice of the central scale in the theoretical redictions. We investigated this in detail in [6], considering the following otions (and multiles thereof): the individual jet transverse momentum the leading-jet transverse momentum, the scalar sum of the transverse momenta of all artons Ĥ We can distinguish two generic categories classifying these functional forms: jet-based ( ) or event-based (,, Ĥ ). In the first case, in a given event, the scale used for the individual jet contributions is different for each jet while for an event-based scale rediction, a common scale is used for all jets in the event. For a given fixed value of the central scale, the theoretical redictions for single jet inclusive observables, deend on the kinematics of the reconstructed jets, in articular on the jet cuts and the radius of the jet cone size R used in the jet algorithm. he main difference between redictions obtained with different scale choices arise from events which are not in the Born back-toback kinematical configuration. In this back-to-back kinematical situation, which is also reached at high, those scales (,,,Ĥ ), or multiles of these, are equivalent and using any of them yields the same redictions. Away from these back-to-back configurations, the scales differ and besides the dominant leading jet contribution, the effect of the sub-leading jet contributions become sizeable. As a consequence, the imact of changing the scales becomes more and more imortant as the size of the jet cone R decreases, where the imortance of the sub-leading jet contributions is enhanced. o demonstrate this effect, we focus on two cone sizes R =. and R =., as used by the LHC exerimental collaborations. U to now, the most commonly used scale choices in describing single jet inclusive observables were and,. In [], we showed that the NNLO redictions for these two scale choices

5 Jet cross sections at the LHC with NNLOJE NNLOJE s= ev anti-k t jets R=. (µ =µ =P ) NNLOJE s= ev anti-k t jets R=. (µ =µ =P ) dσ NLO /d dσ NLO /d jet fraction dσ NNLO /d NNLOJE 6 s= ev anti-k t jets R=. (µ =µ =P ) (GeV) jet fraction dσ NNLO /d NNLOJE 6 s= ev anti-k t jets R=. (µ =µ =P ) (GeV) jet fraction 6 (GeV) jet fraction 6 (GeV) Figure : Breakdown of the single jet inclusive cross section integrated over raidity into contributions from first, second, third and fourth jet at NLO (uer lots) NNLO (lower lots) evaluated for µ = for the jet cone sizes (left) R =. and (right) R =.. differ substantially. While at high, a clear trend showing a stabilisation and agreement of the redictions is manifest, at low, significant differences between the redictions ersist and are even more ronounced at NNLO. his unexected behaviour motivated the further study resented in [6], where the different ingredients to single jet inclusive distributions were analysed according to their behaviour at higher orders in the erturbative exansion. It is worth mentioning that when decomosing the inclusive jet cross section in leading and sub-leading jet contributions, the individual jet distributions are well-defined and infrared safe only if they are inclusive in the jet raidity. his is related to the fact that the raidity assignment is not well-defined for the leading order kinematics where the transverse momentum of first and second jets are identical. When higher orders corrections are included, this can result in situations where the role of leading and sub-leading jet is interchanged between event and counter-event, thereby hamering their cancellation in infrared limits. In the inclusive jet transverse momentum distribution, this roblem does not haen as all jets are summed over. In order to be able to select the most aroriate scales for the theoretical descrition of the single jet inclusive roduction rocess, we define a list of desired roerties, that a central scale choice should satisfy in order to roduce reliable redictions for single jet inclusive observables. A detailed analysis of the leading and sub-leading jet distributions (in the context of a thorough comarison of and,, see [6]) showed that some central scale choices lead to infrared sensitive redictions with athological behaviours regarding erturbative convergence and stability. It was found that the second jet distribution is articularly sensitive to the scale choice, sometimes even

6 Jet cross sections at the LHC with NNLOJE [fb/gev] 9 NNLOJE 8 s= ev anti-k jets R=. (µ =µ = LO NLO NNLO R F ) [fb/gev] 9 NNLOJE 8 s= ev anti-k jets R=. (µ =µ = LO NLO NNLO R F ) 6 6 dσ/d dσ/d ratio to LO.5 ratio to LO.5 6 (GeV) 6 (GeV) Figure : Perturbative corrections to the transverse momentum distribution of the second jet at ev (CMS cuts, y <., R =. (left) and R =. (right)), integrated over raidity and normalised to the LO rediction for the central scale choice µ =. Shaded bands reresent the theory uncertainty due to the variation of the factorization and renormalization scales. exhibiting an unhysical behaviour in redicting negative cross sections. We therefore identify a set of requirements that a central scale choice should fulfil, rior to any comarison with exerimental data. hese are: (a) erturbative convergence, (b) scale uncertainty as error estimate, (c) erturbative convergence of the individual jet sectra, (d) stability of the second jet distribution. While the first two criteria are rather standard requirements, and have been used to select m j j as best choice for the central reference scale in di-jet roduction, the latter two criteria are secific to the single jet inclusive roduction and in articular to the single jet inclusive transverse momentum distribution. Using our selection rocedure on the transverse momentum distributions integrated over raidity and emloying the CMS kinematical set-u [6] to define the final state jets, we were able to identify µ = and µ = Ĥ as the two theoretically best-motivated scale choices for single jet inclusive roduction. Note that the former belongs to the class of jet-based scales, the latter is an event-based scale and that the two scales coincide in Born kinematics. In what follows, we resent the most comelling features leading to this selection outcome for one of the selected central scale choices: µ =. We start by resenting the breakdown of the single jet inclusive transverse momentum distribution into leading and sub-leading jet fractions. In Fig., we see that over most of the range at NNLO, the leading jet contribution dominates, while the second jet fraction is sizeable and the third and fourth jet fractions are comletely negligible for both cone sizes. At NLO, the second jet contribution becomes less and less imortant as decreases. Going to NNLO, we observe a substantial increase in the second jet fraction comared to the NLO case secially at low, the largest difference being observed for the smaller cone size R =.. Given the otentially larger imact on the inclusive jet cross section of the second jet distribution at NNLO, as comared to NLO, we analysed its erturbative stability in further detail [6]. In Fig., we observe that for µ =, this distribution exhibits stable higher order corrections 5

7 Jet cross sections at the LHC with NNLOJE.5 CMS ev anti-k jets R=. (µ =µ =P ) NNLOJE. < y < NLO NNLO.5 CMS ev anti-k jets R=. (µ =µ =P ) NNLOJE. < y < NLO NNLO.5 < y <. (GeV).5 < y <. (GeV).5. < y <.5 (GeV).5. < y <.5 (GeV).5.5 < y <..5.5 < y <. (GeV).5. < y <.5.5. < y <.5 (GeV).5.5 < y <..5.5 < y <. (GeV).5. < y <..5. < y <. (GeV) 6 (GeV) 6 (GeV) Figure : Double-differential single jet inclusive cross sections measurement by CMS [6] and NNLO erturbative QCD redictions as a function of the jet in slices of raidity, for anti-k jets with R =. (left) and R =. (right) normalised to the NLO result µ =, he shaded bands reresent the scale uncertainty. and small residual NNLO uncertainties while being ositive over the whole range for both cone sizes. For most of the other central scale choices considered, these secific distributions yielded unhysical negative redictions. In [6], the otimal scale choices µ = and µ = Ĥ, have been validated further by studying the distributions of the single jet cross section differential in transverse momentum and also in raidity. Furthermore, for these scale choices, a direct comarison for the double-differential single jet inclusive cross-sections to the CMS available data [6] at s = ev has been erformed. As seen in Fig. for µ =, we observe small ositive NNLO corrections across all raidity slices, that imrove the agreement with the CMS data, as comared to the NLO rediction for both cone sizes. In addition, across the entire range, a clear reduction of the scale uncertainty is manifest when going from NLO to NNLO.. Conclusions and outlook In this talk, we have highlighted the main outcomes of recent studies regarding the choice of a reference central scale for the factorisation and renormalisation scales in observables related to the di-jet and single jet inclusive roduction rocesses [, 6]. We have emhasized the substantial 6

8 Jet cross sections at the LHC with NNLOJE differences between the erturbative behaviour of their differential cross sections. While in the di-jet case, the knowledge of the NNLO corrections was sufficient to establish m j j as the referred choice based on standard erturbative convergence and stability criteria, we saw that in the case of the sectrum in single jet inclusive roduction a more elaborated list of requirements is needed to identify µ = and µ = Ĥ as the most aroriate from a list of a riori equally valid and reasonable scale choices. We saw in articular that µ = fulfils the selection criteria associated to the second jet contribution, whose imact in the single jet inclusive cross section is articularly sensitive to the instabilities. Using these theoretically well-motivated scale choices, the NNLO redictions for di-jet invariant mass and single jet distribution are in good agreement with the data resenting a significant reduction of the scale uncertainty over most of the allowed kinematical range in m j j and resectively. We exect that these results will enable recision henomenology with jet data, such as the NNLO determination of the arton distributions functions and of fundamental QCD arameters. Acknowledgments he authors thank Xuan Chen, Juan Cruz-Martinez, Rhorry Gauld, Marius Höfer, Imre Majer, om Morgan, Jan Niehues, Duncan Walker and James Whitehead for useful discussions and their many contributions to the NNLOJE code. his research was suorted in art by the UK Science and echnology Facilities Council, by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) under contracts and -8, and CRSII-68, by the Research Executive Agency (REA) of the Euroean Union through the ERC Advanced Grant MC@NNLO (98) and by the Fundação ara a Ciência e ecnologia (FC-Portugal), roject UID/FIS//. References [] G. Aad et al. [ALAS Collaboration], Measurement of dijet cross sections in collisions at ev centre-of-mass energy using the ALAS detector, JHEP 5 () 59 [arxiv:.5 [he-ex]]. [] S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], Measurements of differential jet cross sections in roton-roton collisions at s = ev with the CMS detector, Phys. Rev. D 8 () [arxiv:.666 [he-ex]]. [] M. Aaboud et al. [ALAS Collaboration], Measurement of the inclusive jet cross-sections in roton-roton collisions at s = 8 ev with the ALAS detector, JHEP 9 () [arxiv:6.9 [he-ex]]. [] V. Khachatryan et al. [CMS Collaboration], Measurement and QCD analysis of double-differential inclusive jet cross sections in collisions at s = 8 ev and cross section ratios to.6 and ev, JHEP () 56 [arxiv:69.5 [he-ex]]. [5] M. Aaboud et al. [ALAS Collaboration], Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet cross-sections in roton-roton collisions at s = ev with the ALAS detector JHEP 85 (8) 95 [arxiv:.69 [he-ex]]. [6] V. Khachatryan et al. [CMS Collaboration], Measurement of the double-differential inclusive jet cross section in roton-roton collisions at s = ev, Eur. Phys. J. C 6, no. 8, 5 (6) [arxiv:65.6 [he-ex]].

9 Jet cross sections at the LHC with NNLOJE [] S. D. Ellis, Z. Kunszt and D. E. Soer, wo jet roduction in hadron collisions at O(α s ) in Hadron Collisions Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (99) [8] W.. Giele, E. W. N. Glover and D. A. Kosower, he wo-jet Differential Cross Section at O(α s ) in Hadron Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett., 9 (99) [he-h/9]. [9] Z. Nagy, hree jet cross-sections in hadron hadron collisions at next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, () [he-h/5]. [] J. Currie, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder,. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss and J. Pires, Precise redictions for dijet roduction at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, no. 5, 5 () [arxiv:5. [he-h]]. [] J. Currie, E. W. N. Glover and J. Pires, Next-to-Next-to Leading Order QCD Predictions for Single Jet Inclusive Production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, no., () [arxiv:6.6 [he-h]]. [] A. Gehrmann-De Ridder,. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Antenna subtraction at NNLO, JHEP 59 (5) 56 [he-h/55]. [] J. Currie, E. W. N. Glover and S. Wells, Infrared Structure at NNLO Using Antenna Subtraction, JHEP () 66 [arxiv:.69 [he-h]]. []. Gehrmann et al., Jet cross sections and transverse momentum distributions with NNLOJE, PoS RADCOR, (8) [arxiv:8.65 [he-h]]. [5] L. A. Harland-Lang, A. D. Martin and R. S. horne, he Imact of LHC Jet Data on the MMH PDF Fit at NNLO Eur. Phys. J. C 8, no., 8 (8) [arxiv:.55 [he-h]]. [6] J. Currie, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder,. Gehrmann, E. W. N. Glover, A. Huss and J. Pires, Infrared sensitivity of single jet inclusive roduction at hadron colliders, [arxiv:8.69 [he-h]]. [] J. Currie, E. W. N. Glover,. Gehrmann, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, A. Huss and J. Pires, Single Jet Inclusive Production for the Individual Jet Scale Choice at the LHC, Acta Phys. Polon. B 8, 955 () [arxiv:.9 [he-h]]. 8