CS 512, Spring 2016, Handout 02 Natural Deduction, and Examples of Natural Deduction, in Propositional Logic

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CS 512, Spring 2016, Handout 02 Natural Deduction, and Examples of Natural Deduction, in Propositional Logic"

Transcription

1 CS 512, Spring 2016, Handout 02 Natural Deduction, and Examples of Natural Deduction, in Propositional Logic Assaf Kfoury January 19, 2017 Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 1 of 41

2 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 2 of 41

3 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 3 of 41

4 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 4 of 41

5 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late THEREFORE there were taxis Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 5 of 41

6 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late THEREFORE there were taxis again symbolically: Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 6 of 41

7 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late THEREFORE there were taxis again symbolically: IF P AND (NOT Q) THEN R Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 7 of 41

8 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late THEREFORE there were taxis again symbolically: ( P Q ) R Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 8 of 41

9 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late THEREFORE there were taxis again symbolically: ( P Q ) R R Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 9 of 41

10 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late THEREFORE there were taxis again symbolically: ( P Q ) R R P Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 10 of 41

11 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late THEREFORE there were taxis again symbolically: ( P Q ) R R P THEREFORE Q Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 11 of 41

12 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late THEREFORE there were taxis again symbolically: ( P Q ) R R P Q Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 12 of 41

13 from informal/common reasoning to formal reasoning: IF the train arrives late AND there are NO taxis THEN John is late for the meeting John is NOT late for the meeting the train did arrive late THEREFORE there were taxis again symbolically: ( P Q ) R R P Q more succintly: P Q R, R, P Q Formal Proof of the Sequent Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 13 of 41

14 a sequent (also called a judgment) is an expression of the form: 1,..., n ψ where: 1. 1,..., n, ψ are well-formed formulas (also called wff s) 2. the symbol is pronounced turnstile 3. the wff s 1,..., n to the left of are called the premises (also called antecedents or hypotheses) 4. the wff ψ to the right of is called the conclusion (also called succedent) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 14 of 41

15 a sequent is said to be valid (also deducible or derivable) if there is a formal proof for it a formal proof (also called deduction or derivation) is a sequence of wff s which starts with the premises of the sequent and finishes with the conclusion of the sequent: 1 2. n. ψ premise premise premise conclusion where every wff in the deduction is obtained from the wff s preceding it using a proof rule Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 15 of 41

16 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ i Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 16 of 41

17 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ ψ i e 1 Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 17 of 41

18 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ i e 1 e 2 Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 18 of 41

19 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ i e 1 e 2 i Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 19 of 41

20 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ i ψ e 1 ψ ψ e 2 i e (cannot be used in intuitionistic logic) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 20 of 41

21 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ e (or MP for Modus Ponens) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 21 of 41

22 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ e (or MP for Modus Ponens) ψ ψ MT ( for Modus Tollens) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 22 of 41

23 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ e (or MP for Modus Ponens) ψ ψ MT ( for Modus Tollens). ψ ψ i Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 23 of 41

24 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ e (or MP for Modus Ponens) ψ ψ MT ( for Modus Tollens). ψ ψ i open a box when you introduce an assumption (wff in rule i) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 24 of 41

25 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ e (or MP for Modus Ponens) ψ ψ MT ( for Modus Tollens). ψ ψ i open a box when you introduce an assumption (wff in rule i) close the box when you discharge the assumption Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 25 of 41

26 Examples of Proof Rules ψ ψ e (or MP for Modus Ponens) ψ ψ MT ( for Modus Tollens). ψ ψ i open a box when you introduce an assumption (wff in rule i) close the box when you discharge the assumption you must close every box and discharge every assumption in order to complete a formal proof Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 26 of 41

27 Proof Rules Associated with Only One and with So far, we have an elimination rule and an introduction rule for double negation, namely e and i, but not for single negation. We now compensate for this lack: e ( or LNC for Law of Non-Contradiction) where (a single symbol) stands for contradiction Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 27 of 41

28 Proof Rules Associated with Only One and with So far, we have an elimination rule and an introduction rule for double negation, namely e and i, but not for single negation. We now compensate for this lack: e ( or LNC for Law of Non-Contradiction) where (a single symbol) stands for contradiction. i Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 28 of 41

29 Proof Rules Associated with Only One and with So far, we have an elimination rule and an introduction rule for double negation, namely e and i, but not for single negation. We now compensate for this lack: e ( or LNC for Law of Non-Contradiction) where (a single symbol) stands for contradiction. i e ( if you can prove, you can prove every WFF ) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 29 of 41

30 Two Derived Proof Rules The two following rules are derived rules the first from rules i, i, e, and e (see [LCS, pp 24-25]); the second from rules i, i, e, and e (see [LCS, pp 25-26]):. PBC (for Proof by Contradiction) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 30 of 41

31 Two Derived Proof Rules The two following rules are derived rules the first from rules i, i, e, and e (see [LCS, pp 24-25]); the second from rules i, i, e, and e (see [LCS, pp 25-26]):. PBC (for Proof by Contradiction) LEM (for Law of Excluded Middle) Because e is rejected in intuitionistic logic, so are PBC and LEM Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 31 of 41

32 Two Derived Proof Rules The two following rules are derived rules the first from rules i, i, e, and e (see [LCS, pp 24-25]); the second from rules i, i, e, and e (see [LCS, pp 25-26]):. PBC (for Proof by Contradiction) LEM (for Law of Excluded Middle) Because e is rejected in intuitionistic logic, so are PBC and LEM (a summary of all proof rules and some derived rules in [LCS, p. 27]) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 32 of 41

33 Examples of Natural Deductions formal proof of the sequent P Q (P Q) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 33 of 41

34 Examples of Natural Deductions formal proof of the sequent P Q (P Q) 1 P 2 Q 3 P Q i 1, 2 4 Q (P Q) i Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 34 of 41

35 Examples of Natural Deductions formal proof of the sequent P (Q R) P Q R Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 35 of 41

36 Examples of Natural Deductions formal proof of the sequent P (Q R) P Q R 1 P (Q R) 2 P Q 3 P e Q R e 1, 3 5 Q e R e 4, 5 7 P Q R i Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 36 of 41

37 Examples of Natural Deductions formal proof of the sequent P Q R P (Q R) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 37 of 41

38 Examples of Natural Deductions formal proof of the sequent P Q R P (Q R) 1 P Q R 2 P 3 Q 4 P Q i 2, 3 5 R e 1, 4 6 Q R i 7 P (Q R) i Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 38 of 41

39 Examples of Natural Deductions formal proof of the sequent P (Q R) (P Q) (P R) Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 39 of 41

40 Examples of Natural Deductions formal proof of the sequent P (Q R) (P Q) (P R) 1 P (Q R) 2 P Q 3 P 4 Q e 2, 3 5 Q R e 1, 3 6 R e 5, 4 7 P R i 8 (P Q) (P R) i Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 40 of 41

41 Formal Proof of the Initial Sequent: Initial Sequent 1 P Q R premise 2 R premise 3 P premise 4 Q assume 5 P Q i 3, 4 6 R e 1, 5 7 e 6, 2 8 Q i 9 Q e 8 Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 02 page 41 of 41

Natural Deduction. Formal Methods in Verification of Computer Systems Jeremy Johnson

Natural Deduction. Formal Methods in Verification of Computer Systems Jeremy Johnson Natural Deduction Formal Methods in Verification of Computer Systems Jeremy Johnson Outline 1. An example 1. Validity by truth table 2. Validity by proof 2. What s a proof 1. Proof checker 3. Rules of

More information

03 Propositional Logic II

03 Propositional Logic II Martin Henz February 12, 2014 Generated on Wednesday 12 th February, 2014, 09:49 1 Review: Syntax and Semantics of Propositional Logic 2 3 Propositional Atoms and Propositions Semantics of Formulas Validity,

More information

15414/614 Optional Lecture 1: Propositional Logic

15414/614 Optional Lecture 1: Propositional Logic 15414/614 Optional Lecture 1: Propositional Logic Qinsi Wang Logic is the study of information encoded in the form of logical sentences. We use the language of Logic to state observations, to define concepts,

More information

Warm-Up Problem. Write a Resolution Proof for. Res 1/32

Warm-Up Problem. Write a Resolution Proof for. Res 1/32 Warm-Up Problem Write a Resolution Proof for Res 1/32 A second Rule Sometimes throughout we need to also make simplifications: You can do this in line without explicitly mentioning it (just pretend you

More information

Logic for Computer Science - Week 5 Natural Deduction

Logic for Computer Science - Week 5 Natural Deduction Logic for Computer Science - Week 5 Natural Deduction Ștefan Ciobâcă November 30, 2017 1 An Alternative View of Implication and Double Implication So far, we have understood as a shorthand of However,

More information

Propositional Logic: Deductive Proof & Natural Deduction Part 1

Propositional Logic: Deductive Proof & Natural Deduction Part 1 Propositional Logic: Deductive Proof & Natural Deduction Part 1 CS402, Spring 2016 Shin Yoo Deductive Proof In propositional logic, a valid formula is a tautology. So far, we could show the validity of

More information

Propositional Logic: Part II - Syntax & Proofs 0-0

Propositional Logic: Part II - Syntax & Proofs 0-0 Propositional Logic: Part II - Syntax & Proofs 0-0 Outline Syntax of Propositional Formulas Motivating Proofs Syntactic Entailment and Proofs Proof Rules for Natural Deduction Axioms, theories and theorems

More information

Natural Deduction for Propositional Logic

Natural Deduction for Propositional Logic Natural Deduction for Propositional Logic Bow-Yaw Wang Institute of Information Science Academia Sinica, Taiwan September 10, 2018 Bow-Yaw Wang (Academia Sinica) Natural Deduction for Propositional Logic

More information

Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic.

Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic. Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic. The method consists of using sets of Rules of Inference (valid argument forms)

More information

CSCI.6962/4962 Software Verification Fundamental Proof Methods in Computer Science (Arkoudas and Musser) Chapter p. 1/33

CSCI.6962/4962 Software Verification Fundamental Proof Methods in Computer Science (Arkoudas and Musser) Chapter p. 1/33 CSCI.6962/4962 Software Verification Fundamental Proof Methods in Computer Science (Arkoudas and Musser) Chapter 4.1-4.8 p. 1/33 CSCI.6962/4962 Software Verification Fundamental Proof Methods in Computer

More information

Deductive Systems. Lecture - 3

Deductive Systems. Lecture - 3 Deductive Systems Lecture - 3 Axiomatic System Axiomatic System (AS) for PL AS is based on the set of only three axioms and one rule of deduction. It is minimal in structure but as powerful as the truth

More information

CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 10 Propositional Logic: Conjunctive Normal Forms, Disjunctive Normal Forms, Horn Formulas, and other special forms

CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 10 Propositional Logic: Conjunctive Normal Forms, Disjunctive Normal Forms, Horn Formulas, and other special forms CS 512, Spring 2017, Handout 10 Propositional Logic: Conjunctive Normal Forms, Disjunctive Normal Forms, Horn Formulas, and other special forms Assaf Kfoury 5 February 2017 Assaf Kfoury, CS 512, Spring

More information

2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017 2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary Aaron Tan 21 25 August 2017 1 2. The Logic of Compound Statements 2.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Statements; Compound Statements; Statement Form (Propositional

More information

Section 1.2: Propositional Logic

Section 1.2: Propositional Logic Section 1.2: Propositional Logic January 17, 2017 Abstract Now we re going to use the tools of formal logic to reach logical conclusions ( prove theorems ) based on wffs formed by some given statements.

More information

The Importance of Being Formal. Martin Henz. February 5, Propositional Logic

The Importance of Being Formal. Martin Henz. February 5, Propositional Logic The Importance of Being Formal Martin Henz February 5, 2014 Propositional Logic 1 Motivation In traditional logic, terms represent sets, and therefore, propositions are limited to stating facts on sets

More information

Proof Worksheet 2, Math 187 Fall 2017 (with solutions)

Proof Worksheet 2, Math 187 Fall 2017 (with solutions) Proof Worksheet 2, Math 187 Fall 2017 (with solutions) Dr. Holmes October 17, 2017 The instructions are the same as on the first worksheet, except you can use all the rules in the strategies handout. We

More information

(p == train arrives late) (q == there are taxis) (r == If p and not q, then r. Not r. p. Therefore, q. Propositional Logic

(p == train arrives late) (q == there are taxis) (r == If p and not q, then r. Not r. p. Therefore, q. Propositional Logic Propositional Logic The aim of logic in computer science is to develop languages to model the situations we encounter as computer science professionals Want to do that in such a way that we can reason

More information

Discrete Structures of Computer Science Propositional Logic III Rules of Inference

Discrete Structures of Computer Science Propositional Logic III Rules of Inference Discrete Structures of Computer Science Propositional Logic III Rules of Inference Gazihan Alankuş (Based on original slides by Brahim Hnich) July 30, 2012 1 Previous Lecture 2 Summary of Laws of Logic

More information

Proof Tactics, Strategies and Derived Rules. CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson

Proof Tactics, Strategies and Derived Rules. CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson Proof Tactics, Strategies and Derived Rules CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson Outline 1. Review Rules 2. Positive subformulas and extraction 3. Proof tactics Extraction, Conversion, Inversion,

More information

Propositional Logic: Syntax

Propositional Logic: Syntax 4 Propositional Logic: Syntax Reading: Metalogic Part II, 22-26 Contents 4.1 The System PS: Syntax....................... 49 4.1.1 Axioms and Rules of Inference................ 49 4.1.2 Definitions.................................

More information

CHAPTER 1 - LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS

CHAPTER 1 - LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS CHAPTER 1 - LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS 1.1 - Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Definition. A statement or proposition is a sentence that is either true or false, but not both. ex. 1 + 2 = 3 IS a statement

More information

Manual of Logical Style

Manual of Logical Style Manual of Logical Style Dr. Holmes January 9, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Conjunction 3 2.1 Proving a conjunction...................... 3 2.2 Using a conjunction........................ 3 3 Implication

More information

Today s Lecture 2/25/10. Truth Tables Continued Introduction to Proofs (the implicational rules of inference)

Today s Lecture 2/25/10. Truth Tables Continued Introduction to Proofs (the implicational rules of inference) Today s Lecture 2/25/10 Truth Tables Continued Introduction to Proofs (the implicational rules of inference) Announcements Homework: -- Ex 7.3 pg. 320 Part B (2-20 Even). --Read chapter 8.1 pgs. 345-361.

More information

Overview. I Review of natural deduction. I Soundness and completeness. I Semantics of propositional formulas. I Soundness proof. I Completeness proof.

Overview. I Review of natural deduction. I Soundness and completeness. I Semantics of propositional formulas. I Soundness proof. I Completeness proof. Overview I Review of natural deduction. I Soundness and completeness. I Semantics of propositional formulas. I Soundness proof. I Completeness proof. Propositional formulas Grammar: ::= p j (:) j ( ^ )

More information

Section 1.3: Valid and Invalid Arguments

Section 1.3: Valid and Invalid Arguments Section 1.3: Valid and Invalid Arguments Now we have developed the basic language of logic, we shall start to consider how logic can be used to determine whether or not a given argument is valid. In order

More information

PHIL 50 - Introduction to Logic

PHIL 50 - Introduction to Logic Truth Validity Logical Consequence Equivalence V ψ ψ φ 1, φ 2,, φ k ψ φ ψ PHIL 50 - Introduction to Logic Marcello Di Bello, Stanford University, Spring 2014 Week 2 Friday Class Overview of Key Notions

More information

Logic for Computer Science - Week 4 Natural Deduction

Logic for Computer Science - Week 4 Natural Deduction Logic for Computer Science - Week 4 Natural Deduction 1 Introduction In the previous lecture we have discussed some important notions about the semantics of propositional logic. 1. the truth value of a

More information

Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements. January 7, 2008

Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements. January 7, 2008 Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements January 7, 2008 Outline 1 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence 2 1.2 Conditional Statements 3 1.3 Valid and Invalid Arguments Central notion of deductive

More information

In this chapter, we specify a deductive apparatus for PL.

In this chapter, we specify a deductive apparatus for PL. Handout 5 PL Derivations In this chapter, we specify a deductive apparatus for PL Definition deductive apparatus A deductive apparatus for PL is a set of rules of inference (or derivation rules) that determine

More information

Propositional Logic. CS 3234: Logic and Formal Systems. Martin Henz and Aquinas Hobor. August 26, Generated on Tuesday 31 August, 2010, 16:54

Propositional Logic. CS 3234: Logic and Formal Systems. Martin Henz and Aquinas Hobor. August 26, Generated on Tuesday 31 August, 2010, 16:54 Propositional Logic CS 3234: Logic and Formal Systems Martin Henz and Aquinas Hobor August 26, 2010 Generated on Tuesday 31 August, 2010, 16:54 1 Motivation In traditional logic, terms represent sets,

More information

The Logic of Compound Statements cont.

The Logic of Compound Statements cont. The Logic of Compound Statements cont. CSE 215, Computer Science 1, Fall 2011 Stony Brook University http://www.cs.stonybrook.edu/~cse215 Refresh from last time: Logical Equivalences Commutativity of :

More information

Valid Reasoning. Alice E. Fischer. CSCI 1166 Discrete Mathematics for Computing February, Outline Truth and Validity Valid Reasoning

Valid Reasoning. Alice E. Fischer. CSCI 1166 Discrete Mathematics for Computing February, Outline Truth and Validity Valid Reasoning Alice E. Fischer CSCI 1166 Discrete Mathematics for Computing February, 2018 Alice E. Fischer Reasoning... 1/23 1 Truth is not the same as Validity 2 Alice E. Fischer Reasoning... 2/23 Truth is not the

More information

A Quick Lesson on Negation

A Quick Lesson on Negation A Quick Lesson on Negation Several of the argument forms we have looked at (modus tollens and disjunctive syllogism, for valid forms; denying the antecedent for invalid) involve a type of statement which

More information

Advanced Topics in LP and FP

Advanced Topics in LP and FP Lecture 1: Prolog and Summary of this lecture 1 Introduction to Prolog 2 3 Truth value evaluation 4 Prolog Logic programming language Introduction to Prolog Introduced in the 1970s Program = collection

More information

Notes on Inference and Deduction

Notes on Inference and Deduction Notes on Inference and Deduction Consider the following argument 1 Assumptions: If the races are fixed or the gambling houses are crooked, then the tourist trade will decline. If the tourist trade declines

More information

Arguments and Proofs. 1. A set of sentences (the premises) 2. A sentence (the conclusion)

Arguments and Proofs. 1. A set of sentences (the premises) 2. A sentence (the conclusion) Arguments and Proofs For the next section of this course, we will study PROOFS. A proof can be thought of as the formal representation of a process of reasoning. Proofs are comparable to arguments, since

More information

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017

3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements Summary Aaron Tan 28 31 August 2017 1 3. The Logic of Quantified Statements 3.1 Predicates and Quantified Statements I Predicate; domain; truth set Universal quantifier,

More information

cis32-ai lecture # 18 mon-3-apr-2006

cis32-ai lecture # 18 mon-3-apr-2006 cis32-ai lecture # 18 mon-3-apr-2006 today s topics: propositional logic cis32-spring2006-sklar-lec18 1 Introduction Weak (search-based) problem-solving does not scale to real problems. To succeed, problem

More information

Propositional Logics and their Algebraic Equivalents

Propositional Logics and their Algebraic Equivalents Propositional Logics and their Algebraic Equivalents Kyle Brooks April 18, 2012 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Formal Logic Systems 1 2.1 Consequence Relations......................... 2 3 Propositional Logic

More information

Answers to the Exercises -- Chapter 1

Answers to the Exercises -- Chapter 1 Answers to the Exercises -- Chapter 1 SECTION 1 1. a Sentence, official notation ~~~P ~~P ~P P Sentence, informal notation ~Q ~R /\ ~Q ~R Q R c d e Not a sentence; it is impossile to construct "~ " Not

More information

Propositional Logic Arguments (5A) Young W. Lim 10/11/16

Propositional Logic Arguments (5A) Young W. Lim 10/11/16 Propositional Logic (5A) Young W. Lim Copyright (c) 2016 Young W. Lim. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version

More information

DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 3

DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 3 DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 3 DR. DANIEL FREEMAN 1. Chapter 2.2 Conditional Statements If p and q are statement variables, the conditional of q by p is If p then q or p implies q and is denoted p q. It is false

More information

Introduction Logic Inference. Discrete Mathematics Andrei Bulatov

Introduction Logic Inference. Discrete Mathematics Andrei Bulatov Introduction Logic Inference Discrete Mathematics Andrei Bulatov Discrete Mathematics - Logic Inference 6-2 Previous Lecture Laws of logic Expressions for implication, biconditional, exclusive or Valid

More information

Manual of Logical Style (fresh version 2018)

Manual of Logical Style (fresh version 2018) Manual of Logical Style (fresh version 2018) Randall Holmes 9/5/2018 1 Introduction This is a fresh version of a document I have been working on with my classes at various levels for years. The idea that

More information

CHAPTER 11. Introduction to Intuitionistic Logic

CHAPTER 11. Introduction to Intuitionistic Logic CHAPTER 11 Introduction to Intuitionistic Logic Intuitionistic logic has developed as a result of certain philosophical views on the foundation of mathematics, known as intuitionism. Intuitionism was originated

More information

Proof strategies, or, a manual of logical style

Proof strategies, or, a manual of logical style Proof strategies, or, a manual of logical style Dr Holmes September 27, 2017 This is yet another version of the manual of logical style I have been working on for many years This semester, instead of posting

More information

The proposition p is called the hypothesis or antecedent. The proposition q is called the conclusion or consequence.

The proposition p is called the hypothesis or antecedent. The proposition q is called the conclusion or consequence. The Conditional (IMPLIES) Operator The conditional operation is written p q. The proposition p is called the hypothesis or antecedent. The proposition q is called the conclusion or consequence. The Conditional

More information

Phil Introductory Formal Logic

Phil Introductory Formal Logic Phil 134 - Introductory Formal Logic Lecture 7: Deduction At last, it is time to learn about proof formal proof as a model of reasoning demonstrating validity metatheory natural deduction systems what

More information

Implementing Proof Systems for the Intuitionistic Propositional Logic

Implementing Proof Systems for the Intuitionistic Propositional Logic Implementing Proof Systems for the Intuitionistic Propositional Logic Veronica Zammit Supervisor: Dr. Adrian Francalanza Faculty of ICT University of Malta May 27, 2011 Submitted in partial fulfillment

More information

Language of Propositional Logic

Language of Propositional Logic Logic A logic has: 1. An alphabet that contains all the symbols of the language of the logic. 2. A syntax giving the rules that define the well formed expressions of the language of the logic (often called

More information

Proving Things. Why prove things? Proof by Substitution, within Logic. Rules of Inference: applying Logic. Using Assumptions.

Proving Things. Why prove things? Proof by Substitution, within Logic. Rules of Inference: applying Logic. Using Assumptions. 1 Proving Things Why prove things? Proof by Substitution, within Logic Rules of Inference: applying Logic Using Assumptions Proof Strategies 2 Why Proofs? Knowledge is power. Where do we get it? direct

More information

A SIMPLE AXIOMATIZATION OF LUKASIEWICZ S MODAL LOGIC

A SIMPLE AXIOMATIZATION OF LUKASIEWICZ S MODAL LOGIC Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 41:3/4 (2012), pp. 149 153 Zdzis law Dywan A SIMPLE AXIOMATIZATION OF LUKASIEWICZ S MODAL LOGIC Abstract We will propose a new axiomatization of four-valued Lukasiewicz

More information

PHI Propositional Logic Lecture 2. Truth Tables

PHI Propositional Logic Lecture 2. Truth Tables PHI 103 - Propositional Logic Lecture 2 ruth ables ruth ables Part 1 - ruth unctions for Logical Operators ruth unction - the truth-value of any compound proposition determined solely by the truth-value

More information

Proofs. Example of an axiom in this system: Given two distinct points, there is exactly one line that contains them.

Proofs. Example of an axiom in this system: Given two distinct points, there is exactly one line that contains them. Proofs A mathematical system consists of axioms, definitions and undefined terms. An axiom is assumed true. Definitions are used to create new concepts in terms of existing ones. Undefined terms are only

More information

Marie Duží

Marie Duží Marie Duží marie.duzi@vsb.cz 1 Formal systems, Proof calculi A proof calculus (of a theory) is given by: 1. a language 2. a set of axioms 3. a set of deduction rules ad 1. The definition of a language

More information

Proposition logic and argument. CISC2100, Spring 2017 X.Zhang

Proposition logic and argument. CISC2100, Spring 2017 X.Zhang Proposition logic and argument CISC2100, Spring 2017 X.Zhang 1 Where are my glasses? I know the following statements are true. 1. If I was reading the newspaper in the kitchen, then my glasses are on the

More information

Where are my glasses?

Where are my glasses? Proposition logic and argument CISC2100, Spring 2017 X.Zhang 1 Where are my glasses? I know the following statements are true. 1. If I was reading the newspaper in the kitchen, then my glasses are on the

More information

Part Two: The Basic Components of the SOFL Specification Language

Part Two: The Basic Components of the SOFL Specification Language Part Two: The Basic Components of the SOFL Specification Language SOFL logic Module Condition Data Flow Diagrams Process specification Function definition and specification Process decomposition Other

More information

Sample Problems for all sections of CMSC250, Midterm 1 Fall 2014

Sample Problems for all sections of CMSC250, Midterm 1 Fall 2014 Sample Problems for all sections of CMSC250, Midterm 1 Fall 2014 1. Translate each of the following English sentences into formal statements using the logical operators (,,,,, and ). You may also use mathematical

More information

Display calculi in non-classical logics

Display calculi in non-classical logics Display calculi in non-classical logics Revantha Ramanayake Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien) Prague seminar of substructural logics March 28 29, 2014 Revantha Ramanayake (TU Wien) Display calculi

More information

FORMAL PROOFS DONU ARAPURA

FORMAL PROOFS DONU ARAPURA FORMAL PROOFS DONU ARAPURA This is a supplement for M385 on formal proofs in propositional logic. Rather than following the presentation of Rubin, I want to use a slightly different set of rules which

More information

Propositional Logic. Argument Forms. Ioan Despi. University of New England. July 19, 2013

Propositional Logic. Argument Forms. Ioan Despi. University of New England. July 19, 2013 Propositional Logic Argument Forms Ioan Despi despi@turing.une.edu.au University of New England July 19, 2013 Outline Ioan Despi Discrete Mathematics 2 of 1 Order of Precedence Ioan Despi Discrete Mathematics

More information

Propositional Logic Arguments (5A) Young W. Lim 11/8/16

Propositional Logic Arguments (5A) Young W. Lim 11/8/16 Propositional Logic (5A) Young W. Lim Copyright (c) 2016 Young W. Lim. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version

More information

Chapter 4, Logic using Propositional Calculus Handout

Chapter 4, Logic using Propositional Calculus Handout ECS 20 Chapter 4, Logic using Propositional Calculus Handout 0. Introduction to Discrete Mathematics. 0.1. Discrete = Individually separate and distinct as opposed to continuous and capable of infinitesimal

More information

MCS-236: Graph Theory Handout #A4 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Sep 15, Methods of Proof

MCS-236: Graph Theory Handout #A4 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Sep 15, Methods of Proof MCS-36: Graph Theory Handout #A4 San Skulrattanakulchai Gustavus Adolphus College Sep 15, 010 Methods of Proof Consider a set of mathematical objects having a certain number of operations and relations

More information

Chapter 3: Propositional Calculus: Deductive Systems. September 19, 2008

Chapter 3: Propositional Calculus: Deductive Systems. September 19, 2008 Chapter 3: Propositional Calculus: Deductive Systems September 19, 2008 Outline 1 3.1 Deductive (Proof) System 2 3.2 Gentzen System G 3 3.3 Hilbert System H 4 3.4 Soundness and Completeness; Consistency

More information

02 Propositional Logic

02 Propositional Logic SE 2F03 Fall 2005 02 Propositional Logic Instructor: W. M. Farmer Revised: 25 September 2005 1 What is Propositional Logic? Propositional logic is the study of the truth or falsehood of propositions or

More information

Inference in Propositional Logic

Inference in Propositional Logic Inference in Propositional Logic Deepak Kumar November 2017 Propositional Logic A language for symbolic reasoning Proposition a statement that is either True or False. E.g. Bryn Mawr College is located

More information

CSC Discrete Math I, Spring Propositional Logic

CSC Discrete Math I, Spring Propositional Logic CSC 125 - Discrete Math I, Spring 2017 Propositional Logic Propositions A proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true or false Propositional Variables A propositional variable (p, q, r, s,...)

More information

PROPOSITIONAL CALCULUS

PROPOSITIONAL CALCULUS PROPOSITIONAL CALCULUS A proposition is a complete declarative sentence that is either TRUE (truth value T or 1) or FALSE (truth value F or 0), but not both. These are not propositions! Connectives and

More information

Propositional logic. Programming and Modal Logic

Propositional logic. Programming and Modal Logic Propositional logic Programming and Modal Logic 2006-2007 4 Contents Syntax of propositional logic Semantics of propositional logic Semantic entailment Natural deduction proof system Soundness and completeness

More information

cse371/mat371 LOGIC Professor Anita Wasilewska Fall 2018

cse371/mat371 LOGIC Professor Anita Wasilewska Fall 2018 cse371/mat371 LOGIC Professor Anita Wasilewska Fall 2018 Chapter 7 Introduction to Intuitionistic and Modal Logics CHAPTER 7 SLIDES Slides Set 1 Chapter 7 Introduction to Intuitionistic and Modal Logics

More information

Propositional logic (revision) & semantic entailment. p. 1/34

Propositional logic (revision) & semantic entailment. p. 1/34 Propositional logic (revision) & semantic entailment p. 1/34 Reading The background reading for propositional logic is Chapter 1 of Huth/Ryan. (This will cover approximately the first three lectures.)

More information

Completeness for FOL

Completeness for FOL Completeness for FOL Completeness Theorem for F Theorem. Let T be a set of sentences of a firstorder language L and let S be a sentence of the same language. If S is a first-order consequence of T, then

More information

PHIL012. SYMBOLIC LOGIC PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC DERIVATIONS

PHIL012. SYMBOLIC LOGIC PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC DERIVATIONS HIL012 SYMBOLIC LOGIC ROOSITIONL LOGIC DERIVTIONS When we argue, what we want are (i) clearly specifiable rules, (ii) that apply to any particular subject matter, and (iii) that legitimate transitions

More information

AI Principles, Semester 2, Week 2, Lecture 5 Propositional Logic and Predicate Logic

AI Principles, Semester 2, Week 2, Lecture 5 Propositional Logic and Predicate Logic AI Principles, Semester 2, Week 2, Lecture 5 Propositional Logic and Predicate Logic Propositional logic Logical connectives Rules for wffs Truth tables for the connectives Using Truth Tables to evaluate

More information

Introduction to Intuitionistic Logic

Introduction to Intuitionistic Logic Introduction to Intuitionistic Logic August 31, 2016 We deal exclusively with propositional intuitionistic logic. The language is defined as follows. φ := p φ ψ φ ψ φ ψ φ := φ and φ ψ := (φ ψ) (ψ φ). A

More information

Artificial Intelligence. Propositional logic

Artificial Intelligence. Propositional logic Artificial Intelligence Propositional logic Propositional Logic: Syntax Syntax of propositional logic defines allowable sentences Atomic sentences consists of a single proposition symbol Each symbol stands

More information

CSE Discrete Structures

CSE Discrete Structures CSE 2315 - Discrete Structures Homework 2- Fall 2010 Due Date: Oct. 7 2010, 3:30 pm Proofs using Predicate Logic For all your predicate logic proofs you can use only the rules given in the following tables.

More information

CITS2211 Discrete Structures Proofs

CITS2211 Discrete Structures Proofs CITS2211 Discrete Structures Proofs Unit coordinator: Rachel Cardell-Oliver August 13, 2017 Highlights 1 Arguments vs Proofs. 2 Proof strategies 3 Famous proofs Reading Chapter 1: What is a proof? Mathematics

More information

Review of Propositional Calculus

Review of Propositional Calculus CS 1813 Discrete Mathematics Review of Propositional Calculus 1 Truth Tables for Logical Operators P Q P Q P Q P Q P Q P Q P 2 Semantic Reasoning with Truth Tables Proposition (WFF): ((P Q) (( P) Q)) P

More information

Logic and Inferences

Logic and Inferences Artificial Intelligence Logic and Inferences Readings: Chapter 7 of Russell & Norvig. Artificial Intelligence p.1/34 Components of Propositional Logic Logic constants: True (1), and False (0) Propositional

More information

CSE 20: Discrete Mathematics

CSE 20: Discrete Mathematics Spring 2018 Summary Last time: Today: Logical connectives: not, and, or, implies Using Turth Tables to define logical connectives Logical equivalences, tautologies Some applications Proofs in propositional

More information

COMP 182 Algorithmic Thinking. Proofs. Luay Nakhleh Computer Science Rice University

COMP 182 Algorithmic Thinking. Proofs. Luay Nakhleh Computer Science Rice University COMP 182 Algorithmic Thinking Proofs Luay Nakhleh Computer Science Rice University 1 Reading Material Chapter 1, Section 3, 6, 7, 8 Propositional Equivalences The compound propositions p and q are called

More information

COMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 19: Logic for KR

COMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 19: Logic for KR COMP219: Artificial Intelligence Lecture 19: Logic for KR 1 Overview Last time Expert Systems and Ontologies Today Logic as a knowledge representation scheme Propositional Logic Syntax Semantics Proof

More information

SE 212: Logic and Computation. se212 Nancy Day

SE 212: Logic and Computation.   se212 Nancy Day E 212, Fall 2018, University of Waterloo, Module 2, Page 1 SE 212: Logic and Computation Module 2: Propositional Logic http://www.student.cs.uwaterloo.ca/ se212 se212@uwaterloo.ca Nancy Day E 212, Fall

More information

Lecture Notes on Cut Elimination

Lecture Notes on Cut Elimination Lecture Notes on Cut Elimination 15-317: Constructive Logic Frank Pfenning Lecture 10 October 5, 2017 1 Introduction The entity rule of the sequent calculus exhibits one connection between the judgments

More information

Logic. Propositional Logic: Syntax

Logic. Propositional Logic: Syntax Logic Propositional Logic: Syntax Logic is a tool for formalizing reasoning. There are lots of different logics: probabilistic logic: for reasoning about probability temporal logic: for reasoning about

More information

COMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 19: Logic for KR

COMP219: Artificial Intelligence. Lecture 19: Logic for KR COMP219: Artificial Intelligence Lecture 19: Logic for KR 1 Overview Last time Expert Systems and Ontologies Today Logic as a knowledge representation scheme Propositional Logic Syntax Semantics Proof

More information

LING 501, Fall 2004: Laws of logic and the definitions of the connectives

LING 501, Fall 2004: Laws of logic and the definitions of the connectives LING 501, Fall 2004: Laws of logic and the definitions of the connectives Modified October 24, adding a test yourself section at the end. Modified October 21, correcting errors noted in class on October

More information

Collins' notes on Lemmon's Logic

Collins' notes on Lemmon's Logic Collins' notes on Lemmon's Logic (i) Rule of ssumption () Insert any formula at any stage into a proof. The assumed formula rests upon the assumption of itself. (ii) Double Negation (DN) a. b. ( Two negations

More information

4 Derivations in the Propositional Calculus

4 Derivations in the Propositional Calculus 4 Derivations in the Propositional Calculus 1. Arguments Expressed in the Propositional Calculus We have seen that we can symbolize a wide variety of statement forms using formulas of the propositional

More information

Formal (natural) deduction in propositional logic

Formal (natural) deduction in propositional logic Formal (natural) deduction in propositional logic Lila Kari University of Waterloo Formal (natural) deduction in propositional logic CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 67 I know what you re thinking about,

More information

The semantics of propositional logic

The semantics of propositional logic The semantics of propositional logic Readings: Sections 1.3 and 1.4 of Huth and Ryan. In this module, we will nail down the formal definition of a logical formula, and describe the semantics of propositional

More information

CS0441 Discrete Structures Recitation 3. Xiang Xiao

CS0441 Discrete Structures Recitation 3. Xiang Xiao CS0441 Discrete Structures Recitation 3 Xiang Xiao Section 1.5 Q10 Let F(x, y) be the statement x can fool y, where the domain consists of all people in the world. Use quantifiers to express each of these

More information

Propositions and Proofs

Propositions and Proofs Chapter 2 Propositions and Proofs The goal of this chapter is to develop the two principal notions of logic, namely propositions and proofs There is no universal agreement about the proper foundations

More information

Logic for Computer Science Handout Week 8 DERIVED RULE MODUS TOLLENS DERIVED RULE RAA DERIVED RULE TND

Logic for Computer Science Handout Week 8 DERIVED RULE MODUS TOLLENS DERIVED RULE RAA DERIVED RULE TND Logic for Computer Science Handout Week 8 DERIVED RULE MODUS TOLLENS We have last week completed the introduction of a calculus, which is sound and complete. That is, we can syntactically establish the

More information

Discrete Mathematics. Instructor: Sourav Chakraborty. Lecture 4: Propositional Logic and Predicate Lo

Discrete Mathematics. Instructor: Sourav Chakraborty. Lecture 4: Propositional Logic and Predicate Lo gic Instructor: Sourav Chakraborty Propositional logic and Predicate Logic Propositional logic and Predicate Logic Every statement (or proposition) is either TRUE or FALSE. Propositional logic and Predicate

More information

For a horseshoe statement, having the matching p (left side) gives you the q (right side) by itself. It does NOT work with matching q s.

For a horseshoe statement, having the matching p (left side) gives you the q (right side) by itself. It does NOT work with matching q s. 7.1 The start of Proofs From now on the arguments we are working with are all VALID. There are 18 Rules of Inference (see the last 2 pages in Course Packet, or front of txt book). Each of these rules is

More information

MACM 101 Discrete Mathematics I. Exercises on Propositional Logic. Due: Tuesday, September 29th (at the beginning of the class)

MACM 101 Discrete Mathematics I. Exercises on Propositional Logic. Due: Tuesday, September 29th (at the beginning of the class) MACM 101 Discrete Mathematics I Exercises on Propositional Logic. Due: Tuesday, September 29th (at the beginning of the class) SOLUTIONS 1. Construct a truth table for the following compound proposition:

More information