Vacuous and Non-Vacuous Behaviors of the Present Tense
|
|
- Lynne Lester
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Vacuous and Non-Vacuous Behaviors of the Present Tense Laine Stranahan Department of Linguistics, Harvard University 88 th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America January 2, 2014
2 Outline 1. Phenomenon 2. Background 2.1 Tense 2.2 Lifetime Inference 2.3 Presupposition Maximization 3. Analysis 3.1 Distributivity 3.2 Strongest Meaning Hypothesis 3.3 Individuals vs. Intervals 4. Open Issues
3 The Phenomenon Individuals # JFK and Joe Kennedy are tall. # My uncles are blond. # John and Bill are both very handsome. (Mittwoch, 2008) Intervals 2012 and 2016 are leap years. The even-numbered days this week are school days. Every Tuesday this month I fast. (Sauerland, 2002)
4 Semantic Types Individuals: e Truth Values: t (Worlds: w) Intervals: i/t
5 Tense as Presuppositional (Partee, 1973) PRESENT = λt : t t 0.t PAST = λt : t < t 0.t John e T i asleep < i, < e, t >> PRESENT < i, i > t i
6 Tense as Presuppositional (Partee, 1973) PRESENT = λt : t t 0.t PAST = λt : t < t 0.t t John e T i asleep < i, < e, t >> PRESENT < i, i > t i
7 The Present Tense is Vacuous (Sauerland, 2002) Every Tuesday this month I fast. (Sauerland, 2002) 2012 and 2016 are leap years. The even-numbered days this week are school days. PRESENT = λt.t PAST = λt : t < t 0.t
8 The Present Tense is Vacuous (Sauerland,2002) John is asleep t Asleep(John,t)
9 The Present Tense is Vacuous (Sauerland,2002) John is asleep t Asleep(John,t) <PRESENT, PAST > t < t 0 Maxim: Make your contribution presuppose as much as possible.
10 The Present Tense is Vacuous (Sauerland,2002) John is asleep t Asleep(John,t) <PRESENT, PAST > t < t 0 Maxim: Make your contribution presuppose as much as possible. John is asleep = t Alive(John,t) (t < t 0 ) Antipresupposition
11 Non-Vacuous Behavior # JFK and Joe Kennedy are tall. # My uncles are blond. # John and Bill are both very handsome. (Mittwoch, 2008)
12 I-Level and S-Level Predicates (Carlson, 1977; Chierchia, 1995; Kratzer, 1995) I-Level tall blond handsome. S-Level asleep available drunk.
13 I-Level and S-Level Predicates I-Level Properties P: x[ t 1 [P(x, t 1 )] t 2 [Alive(x, t 2 ) P(x, t 2 )]] S-Level Properties P: x[ t 1 [P(x, t 1 )] t 2 [Alive(x, t 2 ) P(x, t 2 )]]
14 Lifetime Inference (Musan, 1997) John was blond. John is no longer alive.
15 Lifetime Inference (Musan, 1997) John was blond. John is no longer alive. 1. Speaker utters John was blond. 2. John is blond would have been more informative/relevant. 3. Speaker is trying to be maximally informative. 4. Speaker must not believe John is still blond. 5. By the semantics of blond, if John were alive, he would be blond. 6. John must not be alive.
16 Inferences About Lifetimes Past Present I-Level John was blond. Lifetime Inference John is no longer alive. John is blond. John is alive. S-Level John was asleep. John was alive. John is asleep. John is alive.
17 Inferences About Lifetimes blond = λt.λx.x is blond at t and x is alive at t asleep = λt.λx.x is asleep at t and x is alive at t
18 Individual Lifetime Parameter John is dead. John = j t t < t 0 Bill is alive. Bill = b t t t 0
19 Individual Lifetime Parameter John is dead. John = j t t < t 0 Bill is alive. Bill = b t t t 0 Mary was a WWII nurse. Mary = m t t
20 Individual Lifetime Parameter John is dead. John = j t t < t 0 Bill is alive. Bill = b t t t 0 Mary was a WWII nurse. Mary = m t t Fred is asleep. Fred = f t t t 0 Sam was blonde. Sam = s t t < t 0
21 Maximize Presupposition (Heim, 1991; Percus, 2006; Sauerland, 2008; Singh, 2011; Schlenker, 2012) The/#a sun was shining. (Hawkins, 1991) Both/#all of John s eyes are blue. (Percus, 2006) John knows/#thinks that Paris is in France. (Singh, 2011)
22 Maximize Presupposition (Heim, 1991; Percus, 2006; Sauerland, 2008; Singh, 2011; Schlenker, 2012) The/#a sun was shining. (Hawkins, 1991) Both/#all of John s eyes are blue. (Percus, 2006) John knows/#thinks that Paris is in France. (Singh, 2011) Maxim: Make your contribution presuppose as much as possible.
23 Local MP (Percus, 2006; Singh, 2011) Everyone with exactly two students assigned the same exercise to both/#all of his students. If John has exactly two students and he assigned the same exercise to both/#all of them, then I m sure he ll be happy. Mary believes that John has exactly two students and that he assigned the same exercise to both/#all of them.
24 Local MP (Percus, 2006; Singh, 2011) Everyone with exactly two students assigned the same exercise to both/#all of his students. If John has exactly two students and he assigned the same exercise to both/#all of them, then I m sure he ll be happy. Mary believes that John has exactly two students and that he assigned the same exercise to both/#all of them. Maximize ( Presupposition )(MP): [S... X...] MP ALT = P([ S... X...]) [ S... X...] P([ S... X...]) Y ALT (X)[ P([ S... Y...])], where: i. ALT(X) = {Y: [ S...Y...] presupposes more than [ S...X...]} ii. P(S) = presupposition(s) of S
25 John is asleep. PRESENT = λt.t, PAST = λt.t t < t 0 ALT (PRESENT) = {PAST} 1. MP {PAST} ([ Asleep ( PRESENT (t))]( John )) 2. MP {PAST} ( t[[[λt.λx.x is asleep at t x is alive at t]([λt.t](t))](j)]) ( ) [[λt.λx.x is asleep at t x is alive at t](t)](j) 3. MP {PAST} t ( ) [λx.x is asleep at t x is alive at t](j) 4. MP {PAST} t ( ) j is asleep at t j is alive at t 5. MP {PAST} t j is asleep at t j is alive at t 6. t Y {PAST}[ P(John be.y asleep)] j is asleep at t j is alive at t 7. t P(John be.past asleep) j is asleep at t j is alive at t 8. t (t < t 0 ) 9. t j is asleep at t j is alive at t (t < t 0 )
26 John is asleep. 1. MP {PAST} ( John is asleep ). ( ) j is asleep at t j is alive at t 5. MP {PAST} t. 9. t j is asleep at t j is alive at t (t < t 0 )
27 Distributivity (Link, 1987; Lasersohn, 1998; i.a.) John and Bill are tall. My uncles are blond. All the dogs are asleep. Distributivity (D): D = λs.λp. x S[P(S)], where S is the set of entities denoted by the plural or conjoined nominal
28 John and Bill are tall. 1. [ D ( John and Bill )]( tall ( PRESENT (t))) 2. [[λs.λp. x S[P(x)]({j, b})]([λt.λx.x is tall at t and x is alive at t](t)) 3. [λp. x {j, b}[p(x)]](λx. t[x is tall at t and x is alive at t]) t 1 [j is tall at t and j is alive at t) 4. t 2 [b is tall at t and b is alive at t)
29 Scope Ambiguity D(MP(... )) ( ) ( ) t1 [j is tall at t and j is alive at t] t2 [b is tall at t and b is alive at t] MP MP MP(D(... )) ( t1 [j is tall at t and j is alive at t] MP t ) 2[b is tall at t and b is alive at t]
30 Scope Ambiguity D(MP(John and Bill... )): 1. x {j, b}[mp[... x...]] 2. MP[... j...] MP[... b...] 3. [... j...] t j < t 0 [... b...] t b < t 0 MP(D(John and Bill... )): 1. MP[ x {j, b}[... x...]] 2. MP[[... j...] [... b...] [... j...] [... b...] 3. (t j < t 0 t b < t 0 )
31 Scope Ambiguity D(MP(John and Bill... )): John Bill t 0 Bill John t 0 John Bill John is alive and Bill is alive. MP(D(John and Bill... )): t 0 John Bill Bill John t 0 John Bill Bill John John and Bill can t both be dead. John Bill John Bill t 0 t 0
32 Scope Ambiguity D(MP(2012 and )): 1. x {2012, 2016}[MP[... x...]] 2. MP[ ] MP[ ] 3. [ ] 2012 < t 0 [ ] 2016 < t 0 MP(D(2012 and )): 1. MP[ x {2012, 2016}[... x...]] 2. MP[[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] 3. (2012 < t < t 0 )
33 Scope Ambiguity D(MP(2012 and )): t is present and 2016 is present. MP(D(2012 and )): t t t t and 2016 can t both be present t
34 Scope Ambiguity D(MP(... )) MP(D(... )) Individual John Bill #John and Bill are tall. t 0 John Bill Bill John John and Bill are tall. t t Interval 0 #2012 and 2016 are leap years and 2016 are leap years. t 0
35 Lifetime Parameter Updates D(MP(... )) MP(D(... )) Individual Interval 0 0 Maxim: Make your contribution presuppose as much as possible.
36 Lifetime Parameter Updates D(MP(... )) MP(D(... )) Individual John Bill t 0 2 John Bill Bill John t 0 John Bill Bill John t 0 John Bill John Bill t 0 Interval 0 0
37 Strongest Meaning Hypothesis Dalrymple, et al. (1998): Reciprocals Winter (2001): Plural predication Chierchia, et al. (2008): Exhaustification
38 Strongest Update Hypothesis If a sentence is ambiguous between two or more interpretations resulting in different numbers of individual lifetime parameter updates, the interpretation resulting in the greatest number of updates is preferred.
39 Lifetime Parameter Updates D(MP(... )) MP(D(... )) Individual # JFK and Joe Kennedy are tall. # My uncles are blond. # John and Bill are both very handsome. (Mittwoch, 2008) 0 Interval and 2016 are leap years. The even-numbered days this week are school days. Every Tuesday this month I fast. (Sauerland, 2002)
40 Summary Systematic difference between contexts in which present is vacuous and those in which it is non-vacuous Traditional theory & Sauerland s (2002) vacuous present fail to account for both Apparent irreconcilability can be resolved by: Admitting a formal realization of the distinction between individuals and intervals Assuming a covert operator analysis of distributivity and presupposition maximization with scope ambiguity Positing disambiguation based on a preferential interpretation principle sensitive to the difference
41 Questions MP as mobile grammatical operator vs. utterance-level maxim Intervals > Events > Individuals 2012 and 2016 are leap years.? The 87 th and 88 th Annual Meetings are in snowy climates. # JFK and Joe Kennedy are tall. Covert aspectual operators? (Thomas, 2012; i.a.) Futurate ( The Red Sox play the Yankees tomorrow. ) Habitual ( Every Christmas I go to California. ) [Calendrical? ( Next Friday is a holiday. ; 2016 is a leap year. )]
42 Thank you! Uli Sauerland Isabelle Charnavel Chrissy Zlogar
43 References Carlson, G. N. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. Dissertation, UMass Amherst. Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2008). The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. Unpublished manuscript. Dalrymple, M., Kanazawa, M., Kim, Y., Mchombo, S., & Peters, S. (1998). Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21(2), Hawkins, J. A. (1991). On (in) definite articles: implicatures and (un) grammaticality prediction. Journal of linguistics, 27(2), Heim, I. (1991). Artikel und definitheit. Semantik: ein internationales Handbuch der Zeitgen ossischen forschung, Mittwoch, A. (2008). Tenses for the living and the dead: Lifetime inferences reconsidered. Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect, Musan, R. (1997). Tense, predicates, and lifetime effects. Natural Language Semantics, 5(3), Percus, O. (2006). Antipresuppositions. Theoretical and empirical studies of reference and anaphora: Toward the establishment of generative grammar as an empirical science, 52, 73. Sauerland, U. (2002). The present tense is vacuous. Snippets, 6, Schlenker, P. (2012). Maximize presupposition and Gricean reasoning. Manuscript, UCLA and Institute Jean-Nicod. Singh, R. (2011). Maximize Presupposition! and local contexts. Natural Language Semantics, 19(2), Thomas, Guillaume. (2012). Temporal implicatures. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Winter, Yoad. (2001). Plural predication and the strongest meaning hypothesis. Journal of Semantics 18.4:
Basics of conversational implicatures
Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 12 Yimei Xiang November 19, 2018 1. Implication relations Basics of conversational implicatures Implication relations are inferential relations between sentences. A
More informationHomogeneity and Plurals: From the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis to Supervaluations
Homogeneity and Plurals: From the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis to Supervaluations Benjamin Spector IJN, Paris (CNRS-EHESS-ENS) Sinn und Bedeutung 18 Sept 11 13, 2013 1 / 40 The problem (1) Peter solved
More informationAn Alternative Semantics for English Aspectual Particles
Aspectual Particles 1 of 27 An Alternative Semantics for English Aspectual Particles Alexander Klapheke Harvard University SNEWS November 15, 2014 Aspectual Particles Overview 2 of 27 Overview Previous
More informationPresuppositions (introductory comments)
1 Presuppositions (introductory comments) Some examples (1) a. The person who broke the typewriter was Sam. b. It was Sam who broke the typewriter. c. John screwed up again. d. John likes Mary, too. e.
More informationA New Account for too and either 1
A New Account for too and either 1, Harvard University dorothyahn@fas.harvard.edu PLC 39 March 20-22, 2015 1 Introduction: additive either There are at least three different uses of either: (1) a. Disjunctive:
More informationEconomy and Embedded Exhaustification Danny Fox and Benjamin Spector
1 Cornell University May 2009 Economy and Embedded Exhaustification Danny Fox and Benjamin Spector Background: Putative cracks in the Neo-Gricean Framework (mostly reviewed in Cheirchia, Fox and Spector,
More informationFocus in complex noun phrases
Focus in complex noun phrases Summary In this paper I investigate the semantics of association with focus in complex noun phrases in the framework of Alternative Semantics (Rooth 1985, 1992). For the first
More informationTwo sets of alternatives for numerals
ECO5 @ Harvard April 11, 2015 Teodora Mihoc, tmihoc@fas.harvard.edu Alexander Klapheke, klapheke@fas.harvard.edu Two sets of alternatives for numerals Contents 1 Preliminaries 1 2 Horn-style alternatives:
More informationGlobal Approach to Scalar Implicatures in DRT*
Article Global Approach to Scalar Implicatures in DRT* Jae-Il Yeom Hongik University Language and Linguistics 16(1) 3 42 The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalspermissions.nav
More informationLing 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 5)
Yimei Xiang yxiang@fas.harvard.edu 15 October 2013 1 Review Negation in propositional logic, oppositions, term logic of Aristotle Presuppositions Projection and accommodation Three-valued logic External/internal
More informationProseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2015 Ling 720 Adnominal Tenses Redux: Thomas (2014) Nominal Tense and Temporal Implicatures
Adnominal Tenses Redux: Thomas (2014) Nominal Tense and Temporal Implicatures 1. Tense and Nominal Tense in Mbya: A Challenge for Tonhauser (2007) Mbya is a Guarani language of Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay.
More informationSemantic Restrictions
2 From Semantic Restrictions to Reciprocal Meanings Sivan Sabato and Yoad Winter Abstract This paper proposes a new approach to the interpretation of reciprocal expressions using the Strongest Meaning
More informationThe Blindness Hypothesis and Individual Level Predicates
The Blindness Hypothesis and Individual Level Predicates Giorgio Magri Massachusetts Institute of Technology Predicates such as to be tall, to be related to Chomsky or to know Latin, which intuitively
More informationBreaking de Morgan s law in counterfactual antecedents
Breaking de Morgan s law in counterfactual antecedents Lucas Champollion New York University champollion@nyu.edu Ivano Ciardelli University of Amsterdam i.a.ciardelli@uva.nl Linmin Zhang New York University
More informationlist readings of conjoined singular which -phrases
list readings of conjoined singular which -phrases Andreea C. Nicolae 1 Patrick D. Elliott 2 Yasutada Sudo 2 NELS 46 at Concordia University October 18, 2015 1 Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
More informationBoolean AND and the Semantic Correlates of Gradable Adjectives
Boolean AND and the Semantic Correlates of Gradable Adjectives Alan Bale (alanbale@mit.edu) September 13 th, 2007 1 Introduction General Issues: 1. What are the semantic properties correlated with being
More informationExhaustive interpretations: what to say and what not to say
Benjamin SPECTOR Laboratoire de linguistique formelle, Paris 7/Ecole Normale Supérieure benjamin.spector@ens.fr Exhaustive interpretations: what to say and what not to say LSA Institute, workshop on Context
More informationParasitic Scope (Barker 2007) Semantics Seminar 11/10/08
Parasitic Scope (Barker 2007) Semantics Seminar 11/10/08 1. Overview Attempts to provide a compositional, fully semantic account of same. Elements other than NPs in particular, adjectives can be scope-taking
More informationSpring 2018 Ling 620 Introduction to Semantics of Questions: Questions as Sets of Propositions (Hamblin 1973, Karttunen 1977)
Introduction to Semantics of Questions: Questions as Sets of Propositions (Hamblin 1973, Karttunen 1977) 1. Question Meanings and Sets of Propositions (1) The Semantics of Declarative Sentence Dave smokes
More informationBar-Hillel and the Division of Labor in Language
Bar-Hillel and the Division of Labor in Language On the interaction of grammar, logic, and pragmatics Luka Crnič November 2, 2015 Language, Logic and Cognition Center http://scholars.huji.ac.il/llcc Luka
More informationCounterfactuality in non-standard subjunctive conditionals * 1. On standard and non-standard subjunctive conditionals: The data
Counterfactuality in non-standard subjunctive conditionals * María Biezma 1, Andrew Carnie 2, Daniel Siddiqi 1 1 Carleton University, 2 University of Arizona 1. On standard and non-standard subjunctive
More informationTense and Mood in conditional sentences. Katrin Schulz ILLC/University of Amsterdam
Tense and Mood in conditional sentences Katrin Schulz ILLC/University of Amsterdam K.Schulz@uva.nl 1 1. Introduction 2 1. Introduction Aim of the research: 3 1. Introduction Aim of the research: A compositional
More informationSimilarity: towards a unified account of scalar implicatures, free choice permission and presupposition projection
Similarity: towards a unified account of scalar implicatures, free choice permission and presupposition projection Emmanuel Chemla Abstract I propose a new theory of scalar implicatures: the speaker should
More information(6) Some students who drank beer or wine were allowed to drive.
Global Approach to Scalar Implicatures in Dynamic Semantics Jae-Il Yeom Hongik University English Language and Literature 94 Wausan-ro, Sangsu-dong, Mapo-gu Seoul 121-791 KOREA jiyeom@hongik.ac.kr Abstract
More informationThe Semantics of Reciprocal Expressions in Natural Language
The Semantics of Reciprocal Expressions in Natural Language Sivan Sabato The Semantics of Reciprocal Expressions in Natural Language Research Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationApproaching the Logic of Conversational Implicatures
Approaching the Logic of Conversational Implicatures Robert van Rooy & Katrin Schulz ILLC/University of Amsterdam R.A.M.vanRooij/K.Schulz@uva.nl 1. Introduction 1.1 Aim of the Research Describe the logic
More informationIntroduction to Semantics. Pronouns and Variable Assignments. We ve seen that implicatures are crucially related to context.
Pronouns and Variable Assignments 1. Putting this Unit in Context (1) What We ve Done So Far This Unit Expanded our semantic theory so that it includes (the beginnings of) a theory of how the presuppositions
More informationScalar Implicatures: Are There Any?
Scalar Implicatures: Are There Any? Angelika Kratzer University of Massachusetts at Amherst Workshop on Polarity, Scalar Phenomena, and Implicatures. University of Milan-Bicocca June 18, 2003 1 The cast
More informationQUANTIFICATIONAL READINGS OF INDEFINITES
QUANTIFICATIONAL READINGS OF INDEFINITES WITH FOCUSED CREATION VERBS * Tamina Stephenson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology tamina@mit.edu Abstract This paper looks at sentences with quantificational
More informationIntroduction to Pragmatics
Introduction to Pragmatics Summer 2016 Tuesdays 2:30--4:00pm @ 2321.HS 3H INSTRUCTOR Todor Koev (Todor.Koev@uni-duesseldorf.de) Presupposition projection Presupposition is a prevalent type of inference
More informationPast-as-Past in Japanese Counterfactuals
Past-as-Past in Japanese Counterfactuals Teruyuki Mizuno Stefan Kaufmann University of Connecticut CLS 54, April 2018 1 / 27 Outline 1 Introduction English: basic observations Japanese: some examples 2
More informationProseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2010 Ling 720. The Basics of Plurals: Part 2 Distributivity and Indefinite Plurals
1. Our Current Picture of Plurals The Basics of Plurals: Part 2 Distributivity and Indefinite Plurals At the conclusion of Part 1, we had built a semantics for plural NPs and DPs that had the following
More informationSemantics and Generative Grammar. The Semantics of Adjectival Modification 1. (1) Our Current Assumptions Regarding Adjectives and Common Ns
The Semantics of Adjectival Modification 1 (1) Our Current Assumptions Regarding Adjectives and Common Ns a. Both adjectives and common nouns denote functions of type (i) [[ male ]] = [ λx : x D
More informationabout conditionals. It is a good example of what might be called systematic ordinary
Wheeler: Lycan s Real Conditionals page 1 William Lycan s Real Conditionals (Oxford University Press 2001; isbn 0-19-924207-0; 223 pp.) Real Conditionals is the result of a couple of decades of William
More information1 Classical scalar implicature
Linguistics 661, Issues in Semantics Alexander Williams, 3 April 2007 Chierchia on Scalar implicature 1 Classical scalar implicature When a speaker says that w, we often take him to mean that he believes
More informationAt most at last. Doris Penka Universität Konstanz
Sinn und Bedeutung 2014 Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 15.9.2014 At most at last Doris Penka Universität Konstanz doris.penka@uni-konstanz.de 1. Superlative modifiers and ignorance inferences The
More informationSemantics 2 Part 1: Relative Clauses and Variables
Semantics 2 Part 1: Relative Clauses and Variables Sam Alxatib EVELIN 2012 January 17, 2012 Reviewing Adjectives Adjectives are treated as predicates of individuals, i.e. as functions from individuals
More informationIntroduction to Semantics. The Formalization of Meaning 1
The Formalization of Meaning 1 1. Obtaining a System That Derives Truth Conditions (1) The Goal of Our Enterprise To develop a system that, for every sentence S of English, derives the truth-conditions
More informationProseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2010 Ling 720. Remko Scha (1981/1984): Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification
1. Introduction Remko Scha (1981/1984): Distributive, Collective and Cumulative Quantification (1) The Importance of Scha (1981/1984) The first modern work on plurals (Landman 2000) There are many ideas
More informationMonads as a Solution for Generalized Opacity
Monads as a Solution for Generalized Opacity Gianluca Giorgolo & Ash Asudeh April 27, 2014 - TTNLS 2014 Denotations vs. senses 1 + 1 = 2 The two sides of the equality have the same denotation But they
More informationLecture 7. Logic. Section1: Statement Logic.
Ling 726: Mathematical Linguistics, Logic, Section : Statement Logic V. Borschev and B. Partee, October 5, 26 p. Lecture 7. Logic. Section: Statement Logic.. Statement Logic..... Goals..... Syntax of Statement
More informationSingleton Indefinites (re. Schwarzschild 2000)
MIT Syntax-Semantics Reading Group November 15, 2000 Kai von Fintel Singleton Indefinites (re. Schwarzschild 2000) 1. If a (particular) friend of mine from Texas had died in the fire, I would have inherited
More informationKarttunen Semantics. Last week. LING 147. Semantics of Questions Week 4 Yimei Xiang September 22, I. Intensionality
LING 147. Semantics of Questions Week 4 Yimei Xiang September 22, 2016 Last week I. Intensionality Karttunen Semantics The intension of an expression X is a function which applies to a possible world and
More informationSemantics and Generative Grammar. Quantificational DPs, Part 2: Quantificational DPs in Non-Subject Position and Pronominal Binding 1
Quantificational DPs, Part 2: Quantificational DPs in Non-Subject Position and Pronominal Binding 1 1. Introduction (1) Our Current System a. The Ds no, some, and every are type (Quantificational
More informationExpressing ignorance or indifference
Expressing ignorance or indifference Modal implicatures in Bi-directional OT Maria Aloni ILLC/University of Amsterdam M.D.Aloni@uva.nl Abstract. The article presents a formal analysis in the framework
More informationSemantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, Predicate logic
Semantics I, Rutgers University Week 3-1 Yimei Xiang September 17, 2018 Predicate logic 1. Why propositional logic is not enough? Discussion: (i) Does (1a) contradict (1b)? [Two sentences are contradictory
More informationSensitivity to false answers in interpreting questions under attitudes. Yimei Xiang
Sensitivity to false answers in interpreting questions under attitudes Yimei Xiang November 10, 2017 Harvard University yxiang@fas.harvard.edu PhLing Workshop, Northwestern University Exhaustivity and
More informationIntensional semantics: worlds, modals, conditionals
Intensional semantics: worlds, modals, conditionals 1 Limitations of the actual world Recall some assumptions we have followed in this class: Sentences are conditional truth values ( 1 iff truth condition]
More informationThe Semantics of Questions Introductory remarks
MIT, September-October 2012 1 1. Goals for this class The Semantics of Questions Introductory remarks (1) a. Which boy (among John, Bill and Fred) read the book? Uniqueness presupposition (UP): exactly
More informationSemantics and Pragmatics of NLP. SPNLP: Dynamic Semantics and Drawbacks
Semantics and Pragmatics of NLP Dynamic Semantics and Drawbacks School of Informatics University of Edinburgh Outline Some Quick Revision 1 Some Quick Revision 2 A quick overview of how DRSs are interpreted
More informationExhaustively as Cell Identification
Danny Fox Page 1 UMass Linguistics Colloquium Exhaustively as Cell Identification Dayal s (1996) approach to question presupposition: a. Accounts for existence and uniqueness presuppositions. b. Accounts
More informationExceptional Wide Scope as Anaphora to Quantificational Dependencies
Exceptional Wide Scope as Anaphora to Quantificational Dependencies Adrian Brasoveanu* *Stanford University Donka F. Farkas** **University of California at Santa Cruz Abstract The paper proposes a novel
More informationGradable Adjectives, Compounded Scales, Conjunction and Structured Meanings
Gradable Adjectives, Compounded Scales, Conjunction and Structured Meanings Alan Bale (alanbale@mit.edu) Winter, 2007 1 Introduction General Issues: 1. What are the semantic properties correlated with
More informationLogic for Computer Science - Week 2 The Syntax of Propositional Logic
Logic for Computer Science - Week 2 The Syntax of Propositional Logic Ștefan Ciobâcă November 30, 2017 1 An Introduction to Logical Formulae In the previous lecture, we have seen what makes an argument
More informationScales and comparison classes
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Scales and comparison classes Alan Clinton Bale the date of receipt and acceptance should be inserted later Abstract This paper evaluates three accounts
More information(1) You re allowed to draw at most three cards.
A surface-scope analysis of authoritative readings of modified numerals 1 Brian Buccola The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Andreas Haida The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Abstract. A sentence like You
More informationA Review of the Essentials of Extensional Semantics 1
A Review of the Essentials of Extensional Semantics 1 1. The Big Picture (1) Our Ultimate Goal A precise, formal theory of a particular sub-component the human language faculty: the ability to productively
More informationSemantics and Generative Grammar. Pronouns and Variable Assignments 1. We ve seen that implicatures are crucially related to context.
Pronouns and Variable Assignments 1 1. Putting this Unit in Context (1) What We ve Done So Far This Unit Expanded our semantic theory so that it includes (the beginnings of) a theory of how the presuppositions
More informationMathematics for linguists
Mathematics for linguists WS 2009/2010 University of Tübingen December 8, 2009 Gerhard Jäger Mathematics for linguists p. 1 Sentences and statements (1) You again! (2) Has the lecture already started?
More informationAgainst generalized quantifiers (and what to replace them with)
Against generalized quantifiers (and what to replace them with) Udo Klein SFB 732 Stuttgart, 06.11.08 Generalized quantifier theory the basic idea The sentence Exactly three students smoke. is true if
More informationA S P E C T S O F H O M O G E N E I T Y I N T H E S E M A N T I C S O F N AT U R A L L A N G U A G E. manuel križ. Ph. D. Thesis University of Vienna
A S P E C T S O F H O M O G E N E I T Y I N T H E S E M A N T I C S O F N AT U R A L L A N G U A G E manuel križ Ph. D. Thesis University of Vienna Manuel Križ: Aspects of Homogeneity in the Semantics
More informationPunctual Until as a Scalar NPI
1 Punctual Until as a Scalar NPI Cleo Condoravdi Final version: December 2002 1 Introduction It is well-known that until-phrases behave differently with telic and atelic event descriptions. 1 When construed
More informationDeriving Distributivity from Discourse. Grant Xiaoguang Li Marlboro College
Deriving Distributivity from Discourse Grant Xiaoguang Li Marlboro College This paper discusses the structure that incorporates information from discourse to derive distributivity. Following a proposal
More informationSeminar in Semantics: Gradation & Modality Winter 2014
1 Subject matter Seminar in Semantics: Gradation & Modality Winter 2014 Dan Lassiter 1/8/14 Handout: Basic Modal Logic and Kratzer (1977) [M]odality is the linguistic phenomenon whereby grammar allows
More informationExhaustive interpretation of complex sentences
Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences Robert van Rooij and Katrin Schulz Abstract. In terms of Groenendijk & Stokhof s (1984) formalization of exhaustive interpretation, many conversational implicatures
More informationPlural Superlatives and Distributivity
Plural Superlatives and Distributivity Natalia Fitzgibbons, Yael Sharvit and Jon Gajewski University of Connecticut 1. The Distributivity Problem and the Cut-off Problem In this paper we propose a unified
More informationDegree pluralities : distributive, cumulative and collective readings of comparatives
Degree pluralities : distributive, cumulative and collective readings of comparatives Jakub Dotlačil (Groningen) & Rick Nouwen (Utrecht) February 14, 2014, Paris 1 John lifted the box. 1 John lifted the
More informationTwo kinds of long-distance indefinites Bernhard Schwarz The University of Texas at Austin
Amsterdam Colloquium 2001, December 17-19, 2001 Two kinds of long-distance indefinites Bernhard Schwarz The University of Texas at Austin 1. Introduction Indefinites can often be interpreted as if they
More informationSpring 2017 Ling 620. An Introduction to the Semantics of Tense 1
1. Introducing Evaluation Times An Introduction to the Semantics of Tense 1 (1) Obvious, Fundamental Fact about Sentences of English The truth of some sentences (of English) depends upon the time they
More informationQuantifiers in than-clauses
Semantics & Pragmatics Volume 3, Article 1: 1 72, 2010 doi: 10.3765/sp.3.1 Quantifiers in than-clauses Sigrid Beck University of Tübingen Received 2009-01-13 / First Decision 2009-03-17 / Revised 2009-06-17
More informationAssociation with traces & the copy theory of movement 1
Association with traces & copy ory of movement 1 mitcho (Michael Yoshitaka ERLEWINE), MIT, Sinn und Bedeutung 18, 13 September 2013 1 Introduction Today I will discuss Association with Focus: (1) a John
More informationGeneralized Quantifiers Logical and Linguistic Aspects
Generalized Quantifiers Logical and Linguistic Aspects Lecture 1: Formal Semantics and Generalized Quantifiers Dag Westerståhl University of Gothenburg SELLC 2010 Institute for Logic and Cognition, Sun
More informationa. Rachel is {taller / more intelligent} than Stephanie (is). a. Rachel is the {tallest / most intelligent} (student in my class).
Degree semantics1 1 Gradability Certain predicates allow us to specify to what extent the predicate holds; we call them gradable. There are many constructions which only apply to gradable predicates. (1)
More informationSpring 2018 Ling 620 The Basics of Intensional Semantics, Part 1: The Motivation for Intensions and How to Formalize Them 1
The Basics of Intensional Semantics, Part 1: The Motivation for Intensions and How to Formalize Them 1 1. The Inadequacies of a Purely Extensional Semantics (1) Extensional Semantics a. The interpretation
More informationBerlin, May 16 / 2003
Berlin, May 16 / 2003 1 The challenge of free choice permission The basic puzzle epistemic variants wide disjunction FC permission and quantification Conjunctive permission 2 The basic puzzle (1) a. You
More informationFREE CHOICE AND EXHAUSTIFICATION: AN ACCOUNT OF
FREE CHOICE AND EXHAUSTIFICATION: AN ACCOUNT OF SUBTRIGGING EFFECTS Maria Aloni, University of Amsterdam M.D.Aloni@uva.nl 1 Introduction Universal Free Choice (FC) items like Italian qualsiasi/qualunque
More informationEmbedded interrogatives: the role of false answers
1 Introduction Embedded interrogatives: the role of false answers Floris Roelofsen Nadine Theiler Maria Aloni Questions in Discourse workshop, Göttingen, September 18, 2014 Consider the following sentence:
More informationA Time-relational Approach to Aspect in Mandarin Chinese and English
A Time-relational Approach to Aspect in Mandarin Chinese and English Mingya Liu University of Tübingen mingya.liu@uni-tuebingen.de July 22, 2008 Mingya Liu (Tübingen) Aspect in Chinese and English July
More informationHamblin Semantics & Focus
LING 147. emantics of Questions Week 3 Yimei Xiang eptember 15, 2016 Last week I. Generalized quantifiers Hamblin emantics & Focus quantificational DPs are generalized quantifiers, which denote sets of
More informationPredicates, Quantifiers and Nested Quantifiers
Predicates, Quantifiers and Nested Quantifiers Predicates Recall the example of a non-proposition in our first presentation: 2x=1. Let us call this expression P(x). P(x) is not a proposition because x
More informationHedging Your Ifs and Vice Versa
Hedging Your Ifs and Vice Versa Kai von Fintel and Anthony S. Gillies MIT and Rutgers November 21 University of Latvia Ramsey s Test If two people are arguing If p will q? and are both in doubt as to p,
More informationTopic #3 Predicate Logic. Predicate Logic
Predicate Logic Predicate Logic Predicate logic is an extension of propositional logic that permits concisely reasoning about whole classes of entities. Propositional logic treats simple propositions (sentences)
More informationChapter 2: The Logic of Quantified Statements. January 22, 2010
Chapter 2: The Logic of Quantified Statements January 22, 2010 Outline 1 2.1- Introduction to Predicates and Quantified Statements I 2 2.2 - Introduction to Predicates and Quantified Statements II 3 2.3
More informationProseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2010 Ling 720 The Basics of Plurals: Part 1 1 The Meaning of Plural NPs and the Nature of Predication Over Plurals
The Basics of Plurals: Part 1 1 The Meaning of Plural NPs and the Nature of Predication Over Plurals 1. Introductory Questions and Guesses (1) Blindingly Obvious Fact about Natural Language There is number
More informationIntroduction to Intensional Logic. Ling 406/802 Read Meaning and Grammar, Ch
Introduction to Intensional Logic Ling 406/802 Read Meaning and Grammar, Ch 51-52 1 Towards Intensional Semantics Extensional semantics that models the meaning of sentences based on the extensions of linguistic
More informationAlternations of logical functions: Mandarin particle dou as a pre-exhaustification exhaustifier 1
Alternations of logical functions: Mandarin particle dou as a pre-exhaustification exhaustifier 1 Yimei Xiang, Harvard University yxiang@fas.harvard.edu School of English Studies, Beijing Language and
More informationToo Many Alternatives: Density, Symmetry and Other Predicaments
Too Many Alternatives: Density, Symmetry and Other Predicaments Danny Fox Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1. Goal In a recent paper, Martin Hackl and I identified a variety of circumstances where
More informationThe semantics of yuè V yuè A in Mandarin Chinese: Coercion and the necessarily temporal reading
Proceedings of CLS 51 (2015), 381-395 c Chicago Linguistic Society 2016. All rights reserved. 381 The semantics of yuè V yuè A in Mandarin Chinese: Coercion and the necessarily temporal reading Xiao Li
More informationScalar additives and their interaction with focus
2 Restrictions on the position of focus 1 Introduction Scalar additives and their interaction with focus Maziar Toosarvandani University of California, Berkeley California Universities Semantics and Pragmatics
More informationConditional antecedents provide no evidence for a grammatical theory of scalar implicature
Conditional antecedents provide no evidence for a grammatical theory of scalar implicature Daniel Lassiter Stanford University Draft of 11/19/13. Comments welcome: danlassiter@stanford.edu. 1 Overview
More informationAn inquisitive approach to occasion-sensitivity
An inquisitive approach to occasion-sensitivity Tamara Dobler ILLC November 6, 2017 Tamara Dobler (ILLC) An inquisitive approach to occasion-sensitivity November 6, 2017 1 / 37 Outline 1 Introduction 2
More informationPeter Hallman, University of Vienna
All and Every as Quantity Superlatives Peter Hallman, University of Vienna peter.hallman@univie.ac.at Summary An analysis is proposed that captures similarities between most and all in English bytreatingall
More informationLIN1032 Formal Foundations for Linguistics
LIN1032 Formal Foundations for Lecture 5 Albert Gatt In this lecture We conclude our discussion of the logical connectives We begin our foray into predicate logic much more expressive than propositional
More informationIndefinites, Review of Basics: the birth of DRT
1 G. Chierchia 6/25/2018 The Plan WCO may be described as a syntactic configuration in which pronouns cannot be interpreted as coconstrued with certain kinds of displaced or quantified antecedents. If
More informationA unified account of distributive NPs, for-adverbials, and measure constructions
A unified account of distributive NPs, for-adverbials, and measure constructions Lucas Champollion University of Pennsylvania / Palo Alto Research Center Sinn und Bedeutung 14 September 29, 2009 Lucas
More informationAdverbial Quantifiers, Maximal Situations, and Weak E-type Pronouns * Toshiyuki Ogihara University of Washington
Adverbial Quantifiers, Maximal Situations, and Weak E-type Pronouns * Toshiyuki Ogihara University of Washington Abstract This paper argues with von Fintel (1994) and others that adverbs of quantification
More informationTopics in Lexical-Functional Grammar. Ronald M. Kaplan and Mary Dalrymple. Xerox PARC. August 1995
Projections and Semantic Interpretation Topics in Lexical-Functional Grammar Ronald M. Kaplan and Mary Dalrymple Xerox PARC August 199 Kaplan and Dalrymple, ESSLLI 9, Barcelona 1 Constituent structure
More informationPredicate Calculus lecture 1
Predicate Calculus lecture 1 Section 1.3 Limitation of Propositional Logic Consider the following reasoning All cats have tails Gouchi is a cat Therefore, Gouchi has tail. MSU/CSE 260 Fall 2009 1 MSU/CSE
More informationConditional Questions
James Isaacs (isaacs@ucsc.edu) Kyle Rawlins (krawlins@ucsc.edu) University of California Santa Cruz Language Under Uncertainty, Kyoto University January 22, 2005 1 Introduction Claim: conditional questions
More informationON THE LOGIC OF VERBAL MODIFICATION DAVID BEAVER AND CLEO CONDORAVDI
ON THE LOGIC OF VERBAL ODIFICATION DAVID BEAVER AND CLEO CONDORAVDI Department of Linguistics University of Texas at Austin dib@mail.utexas.edu PARC and Department of Linguistics Stanford University condorav@csli.stanford.edu
More information