Dynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems
|
|
- Jason Beasley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems ZHANG Sheng *, QIAN Wei-qi (7.6) Computational Aerodynamics Institution, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang, 6, China. * zszhangshengzs@hotmail.com Abstract: A dynamic backstepping method is proposed to design controllers for nonlinear systems in the pure-feedback form, for which the traditional backstepping method suffers from solving the implicit nonlinear algebraic equation. he idea of this method is to augment the (virtual) controls as states during each recursive step. As new dynamics are included in the design, the resulting controller is in the dynamic feedback form. Procedure of deriving the controller is detailed, and one more Lyapunov design is executed in each step compared with the traditional backstepping method. Under appropriate assumptions, the proposed control scheme achieves the uniformly asymptotically stability. he effectiveness of this method is illustrated by the stabilization and tracking numerical examples.. Introduction he backstepping controller design methodology provides an effective tool of designing controllers for a large class of nonlinear systems with a triangular structure. Krstic, Kanellakopoulos, and Kokotovic [] systematically developed this approach, from considering the exact model to encompassing the uncertain bounded nonlinearities and parameterized uncertainties. he basic idea behind backstepping is to break a design problem on the full system down to a sequence of sub-problems on lower order systems, and recursively use some states as virtual controls to obtain the intermediate control laws with the Control Lyapunov Function (CLF). Starting from lower order system and dealing with the interaction after augmentation of new dynamics make the controller design easy. he advantages of backstepping control include the guaranteed global of regional stability, the stress on robustness, and computable transient performance. he backstepping method has received a great deal of interest since its proposition, and has been widely applied to the control problems arising from the aerospace engineering [][][4], mechanical engineering [5][6], etc. Along with these years of studies, this method has been evolved to be fairly systematical and inclusive. For example, techniques like the nonlinear damping [], the variable structure control [7], the neural network adaptive control [8], and the fuzzy adaptive control [9] are synthesized to address various uncertainties, including the matching and un-matching. o resolve the problem of explosion of terms, the dynamics surface control [] and the constrained backstepping control [] are further established. o address the deficiency of state information, the output feedback backstepping
2 control is developed []. For the problem of control saturation, the limiting filters [] and the boundedness propagation [] are employed in the recursive design. Nonetheless, within the extensive researches of backstepping method, the plants studied are usually in the form of strict-feedback. For the more general pure-feedback plants, which have no affine appearance of state variables to be used as virtual controls and the actual control, its usage may be restricted because the intractable implicit algebraic equations are encountered. Kanellakopoulos et al. [] studied the adaptive control of parametric pure-feedback systems in a special form. Ge and Wang [] used the neural networks to approximate the (virtual) controls out of the implicit algebraic equations, and proved that the control error will be ultimately bounded. Wang et al. [4] used the similar strategy and employed the input-to-state stability analysis and small-gain theorem to solve the circularity problem airing from the general pure-feedback problems. For a special class of pure-feedback system, Zou and Hou [5] employed filtered signals to circumvent algebraic loop problems and applied the compensator to counteract the resulting approximation errors. Wang et al. [6] exploited the mean value theorem to deduce the affine form of the pure-feedback plant to design the adaptive backstepping controller. In this paper, we will solve the algebraic loop problem from a different view. A dynamic backstepping method with stativization of (virtual) control is proposed. It circumvents the implicit algebraic equations and is widely applicable to the general pure-feedback nonlinear systems.. Basic backstepping method We first briefly review the basic backstepping controller theory, and show its deficiency in treating pure-feedback plants. In introducing the method, the control objective is to stabilize the states of system towards the origin, which is assumed to be the equilibrium point. For other equilibrium points under the set-point control problems, with coordinate transformation they can be placed at the origin. Moreover, since the controller design procedure is similar for the high cascade model, for the sake of brevity, we only investigate the model of two cascades. For the strict-feedback plant described as x = f ( x ) + g ( x ) x () x = f ( x, x ) + g ( x, x ) u () where x, x are the states, m m m m m m m u is the control, f :, f : are smooth m m m m m m m nonlinear vector fields, and the matrix-valued functions g :, g : are smooth and have inverse. he basic backstepping design procedure is summarised as follows. Step : Consider Eq. (). Regard x as the virtual control in this equation and denote it with x d. he Lyapunov design is carried out as
3 CLF : V = x x Drving V decrease: = ( ) + ( ) ( ) V x f x g x xd Algebraic control equation: f( x) + g( x) xd = κ( x) d = + Explicit virtualcontrol expression: x g ( f κ ( x )) where κ( x ) is the expected dynamics that satisfies the following two conditions: i) it drives V < () when x, and ii) the resulting virtual control solution is continuous and ( ( )) ( ( ) ( )) Usually it may be set that κ( x)= Kx, where K is a positive gain matrix. Step : Consider Eqs. () and () together, and construct a synthetic CLF to obtain ( ) ( ) g f + κ =. CLF: V = x x+ ( x xd) ( x xd) Drving V decrease: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) V = x f x + g x x + x xd x xd = x f x + g x xd + x xd x x d + g x x ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( ) ) Algebraic control equation: f ( x, x ) + g ( x, x ) u= κ ( x, x ) ( ) Explicit control expression: u= g f + γ ( x, x ) κ x x is the expected dynamics that driving V < when x x d, and a common choice is where (, ) (4) that (, ) = ( d) ( ) + d κ x x K x x g x x x, where K is a positive gain matrix. he resulting controller law u achieves the asymptotically stabilization since V < except Now consider the plant in the pure-feedback form like where x, x are the states, the algebraic control equation m m = x x. x = f ( x, x ) (5) x = f ( x, x, u) (6) u is the control. Proceeding accordingly as Step we may obtain
4 f( x, x d ) = κ( x) (7) However, different from the strict-feedback system that has a affine structure, for the pure-feedback system, it may be not possible to get the explicit expression of x d due to the implicit nonlinear form of Eq. (7), and this confines the application of the traditional backstepping method.. Dynamic backstepping method o gain a systematic solution for the controller design problems on pure-feedback systems, a dynamic backstepping method is proposed. We first present the stabilizing control law and then expound the procedure to help understanding.. Main results Assumptions that make the results rigorous are first presented. Assumption : he exact solution for the implicit nonlinear algebraic control equation exists, such as the existence of x d that rigorously nullifying Eq. (7). f Assumption : For the controlled domain D that contains the origin, the Jacobi matrixes x, f x f u are invertible. Assumption : For the controlled domain D that contains the origin, f( x, a) f( x, b ) when a b. Assumption guarantees the theoretic existence of controller law that stabilizes the closed-loop system under the frame of backstepping design. Assumption is related to Assumption with the implicit function theorem [7]. Also note that x d is a augmented state in the proposed method, and invertible when x d is close to x, which is described in the assumed domaind. Assumption is used to deduce a general result for the controlled plant in this section, and it may be removed under certain situations, which will be shown in Sec. 4. d f x d and is heorem : Consider the pure-feedback cascade plant of the form x = f ( x, x ) (8) x = f ( x, x, u) (9) 4
5 where x, x are the states, m m u is the control, and f (i,) are smooth vector fields. If Assumption holds, then the following dynamic feedback control law stabilizes the plant in the domain D, where Assumptions and hold. i = h h h f ( x, x ) + f ( x, x, u) + x t u= K h u = u where x d is a augmented state and its dynamics is d h h x x x d v d, t t= u u (, ) f x x + ( (, ) (, d ) ) f x x f x x x t h h h xd = K v h f( x, xd) + x d t, xd = x t= d xd xd x u and x d are the initial values for the augmented states. he other relevant quantities are () () h ( x, x ) = f ( x, x ) κ ( x ) () d d h ( x, x, u, x ) = f ( x, x, u) κ ( x, x, x ) () d d κ( x ) may be arbitrary function that satisfies: i) d = x κ ( x ) < when x x C ( x ) implicitly determined by Eq. () is continuous and C ( )=., and ii) the mapping f( x, x) h f( x, x) f( x, xd) f( x, xd) (,, d) = (,, d) + ( ) + (, ) d x x x x xd κ x x x Γ x x x x h f x x x (4) Γ( x, x, x ) may be arbitrary function that satisfies ( ) f( x, x) f( x, x) f( x, xd) Γ( x, x, xd) < x and d when x x d.. Proof of heorem Construct a CLF as V = x x+ h h+ ( f( x, x) f( x, xd) ) ( f( x, x) f( x, xd) ) + h h (5) where h and h are given by Eqs. () and () respectively. Differentiating Eq. (5) renders V = x x + h h x + h x + f x x f x x f x x f x x ( (, ) (, )) ( (, ) (, )) d d d x xd h h h h + h x + x + x d + u x x xd u with certain treatment to deal with the interactions, there is (6) 5
6 ( ) V = x x + h x + f x x f x x x κ( ) (, ) (, d ) h h h (, d) d ( (, ) (, d) ) x xd x + h f x x + x + f x x f x x h f( x, x) f( x, xd ) + ( f( x, x) f( x, xd )) f( x, x) x x ( ) + f ( x, x ) f ( x, x f ( x, x ) d d) κ( x, x, xd) x d x xd f( x, x) d x ( (, ) (, )) + h f x x f x x h h h h + h f( x, x) + f( x, x, u) + x d + u x x xd u Substituting the differential form of Eq. (), i.e. f ( x, x ) (7) we obtain f( x, xd) f( x, xd) h d = v (, d) + xd xd x x K h f x x x (8) f( x, xd) f( x, xd) ( ) v xd xd V = x κ x h K h h + ( f( x, x) f( x, x )) d x+ h x f( x, x) f( x, xd ) + ( f( x, x) f( x, xd )) f( x, x) x x ( f ( x, x ) f ( x, x )) + d f ( x, x ) x f( x, x) d x d κ( x, x, xd) x d xd ( (, ) (, )) + h f x x f x x h h h h + h f( x, x) + f( x, x, u) + x d + u x x xd u Substituting Eq. (4) and the differential form of Eq. (), i.e. we may further obtain that f ( x, x ) h h h f ( x, x ) + f ( x, x, u) + x d h h x x x d v u u (, ) f x x + ( (, ) (, d )) f x x f x x x u = K h () (9) 6
7 f( x, xd) f( x, xd) x κ( x) h Kv h xd xd (, ) V f x x = ( f( x, x) f( x, xd) ) Γ ( x, x, xd) () x f( x, x, u) f( x, x, u) h Kv h u u Since V < for D /{ }, this proves that the control law given by Eq. () will asymptotically stabilize the plant described by Eqs. (8) and (9).. Design procedure Readers may be enlightened by the proof about the controller design, yet to facilitate understanding how the control law are constructed, the concrete procedure will be presented. Step : Consider Eq. (8) only. In this equation regard x as the virtual control and denote it with x d, a CLF is constructed to obtain the algebraic control equation V = x x V = x f( x, xd ) () f ( x, x ) = κ ( x ) d where κ( x ) satisfies the conditions in heorem, and generally it may be set to be κ ( x )= K x, where K is a positive gain matrix. Since we may not be able to obtain the analytic expression of xd * = C( x ) that rigorously satisfy f ( x, x d *) κ ( x ), we circumvent such problem by considering the dynamics of the virtual control x d, in the hope that x d will satisfy the implicit algebraic equation in a asymptotical way. o realize this, again a CLF is constructed as V = V + h h () where h is given by Eq. (). Differentiating V and driving V, we have 7
8 V h h = x f( x, xd) + h x + x d x xd h h = x κ( x) + h x+ x + x d x xd h h h d = v (, xd ) + x xd xd x x K h f x hus we have the virtual control x d that achieves lim h = and lim x =. For the applicability of the t equivalent integral form given by Eq. (), we use Assumptions and to guarantee that x d * exists and the initial value d f xd t C x t where x x is close to *( ) = ( ( )) d t h, i.e., x d exists. Step : Consider Eqs. (8) and (9) together, and construct a CLF which aims to track x d in virtue of Assumption V ( ) = V + f( x, x) f( x, xd) ( f( x, x) f( x, x d) ) (5) Proceeding similarly through differentiating V and driving V gives ( ) V = + x f( x, xd) f( x, x) f( x, xd) x h h h + h f( x, xd) + x d + ( f( x, x) f( x, xd) ) h x xd x f( x, x) f( x, xd ) + ( f( x, x) f( x, xd )) f( x, x) x x + ( f( x, x) f( x, x ) f( x, x) f( x, xd ) d) x x d x xd (6) f ( x, x, u) = κ ( x, x, x ) d where κ( x, x, x d ) is given by Eq. (4), and a feasible form of Γ ( x, x, x d ) may be f( x, x) d = d x ( ) Γ ( x, x, x ) K f ( x, x ) f ( x, x ) (7) where K is a positive gain matrix. Analogously, we consider the dynamics of the control u to avoid the difficulty in searching its analytic solution. he CLF for the whole plant is constructed as (4) 8
9 V = V + h h (8) where h is given by Eq. (). V is just the CLF constructed in the proof of heorem. hen the controller that guarantee V decreases is V h h f ( x, x ) + h f ( x, x, u) + x d h h x x x d v u u (, ) f x x + ( (, ) (, d )) f x x f x x x h u = K h Also by Assumption, the existence of obtained with a reasonable u. u (9) is guaranteed. hus, the equivalent integral form is hrough the design procedure, it is shown that there are two Lypunov designs during each step. his operation along with the augmentation of the dynamics of the (virtual) control is used to solve the implicit nonlinear algebraic control equations, i.e., h( x, xd ) = and h( x, x, xd, u) =. With the dynamic feedback control law, the states and the implicit nonlinear algebraic equations are both driven to be zero. 4. Further discussion 4. Simplification of controller form he controller design presented last section aims at the general situation, and the resulting controller is complex in its form. Simplification of the controller is possible upon some conditions on the control gains, and this is helpful to alleviate the problem of explosion of terms. In the second Lyapunov design of Step, presume that κ ( x )= K x, then with the condition that K v satisfies Kv > K + ( ) + K d d h h h h h h x x x x x x the virtual control, i.e., x d, may be set as () h d = v xd x K h () and it also guarantees the stability of the subsystem. his may be verified by substituting Eq. () into V to be 9
10 h h V = x f( x, xd) + h x + xd x xd h h h h = x Kx+ h ( m m K) x+ h h h Kv h x x xd xd where m mis m m dimensional identity matrix. With the Young s inequality that h h h h ( m m K) x x Kx+ h ( m m K) K ( m m K) h x 4 x x h h h h = x K x+ h + ( ) + ( ) 4 K K h x x x x h h h + x x x h h h K h h K h (4) we may get V h h h h h h = h K + ( ) + K Kv h 4 4 x x 4 x x xd xd (5) with the gain condition given by Eq. (), there is V <. In the first Lyapunov design of Step to derive κ ( x, x, x d ), if the plant satisfies the Lipschitz condition [8] f( x, x) f( x, xd) L x x d (6) where L is the Lipschitz constant, then with the condition on K that ( max ( eig( )) max(eig( ))) L K > K + M m m (7) 4 h h h h where M = ( ) Kv, and eig() represents the operator that solves the x xd xd x eigenvalue of matrix, the derived κ( x, x, x d ) that guarantee the stability may be simplified as κ( x, x, xd) = K( x xd) + x d (8) In this way Assumption is also removed in deriving the controller. o verify it, construct the CLF () () Its derivative is V ( x x ) ( x x ) (9) = V + d d
11 V = x x + h h + ( x xd) ( x x d) h h = x κ( x) + h x+ h f( x, xd) + x d x xd h + ( f( x, x) f( x, xd) ) ( ) h + x+ ( x xd) ( x x d) x Presuming κ( x)= Kx and x d is given by Eq. (4), then (4) h h = x Kx h Kv h xd xd V h + ( f( x, x) f( x, xd) ) ( ) h + x+ ( x xd) ( x x d) x According to the Young s inequality, we have f x x f x xd x x Kx f x x f x xd K f x x f x x d (4) 4 ( ) (, ) (, ) + ( (, ) (, )) ( (, ) (, )) h h h d v x xd xd ( (, ) (, )) f x x f x x h h K h (4) + ( f( x, x) f( x, xd) ) M( f( x, x) f( x, xd) ) 4 Further with the Lipschitz condition (6) and the gain condition (7), it will be found that V <. In addition, we may also use the first-order approximation of f( x, x) f( x, x d ) in Eq. (4) to derive h h ( x, x, xd) = K( x xd) ( ) h+ x+ xd xd x κ (44) which is more complex but may require a smaller K. In general, the larger the control gains are, the simpler the form of the controller might be. With these simplifications during the design, the form of final control law may be simplified. 4. System containing strict-feedback dynamics We have considered the problem where analytic expressions of all the (virtual) controls are not available, yet the design method proposed is also applicable to include the situation where some explicit expression of the (virtual) control may be obtained. Variation of such case may be abundant, but the key is to employ the dynamic backstepping whenever it is necessary. For example, consider plant of the form (4) x = f ( x, x ) (45) x = f ( x, x ) + g ( x, x ) u (46)
12 his plant contains a strict-feedback dynamics where the actual control u may be directly derived. In the design procedure, Step is same as that in Sec.., and it contains two Lyapunov designs. In Step, the CLF is same as Eq. (5) and through the algebraic control equation f( x, x) + g( x, x) u= κ( x, x, x d ) (47) we may directly get the control law ( (, ) (,, ) ) d u= g f x x + κ x x x (48) where κ( x, x, x d ) is same to that in Eq (4). In this step, only one Lypunov design is required. he proof for the closed-loop stability is similar to that in Sec.., by nullifying the term regarding the implicit algebraic control equation arising from the second step. 4. One treatable singularity case Before giving heorem, we presented Assumption as a precondition. For one special case where Assumption fails, the method is also applicable. Consider a scalar illustrative example x = x ( x + u+ u ) (49) where x is the state and u is the control. he algebraic control equation may be in the following form as ( ) h= x x + u+ u + K x (5) where K is a scalar positive control gain. Apparently, Assumption is not satisfied at the origin and there are infinite solutions of u when x =. However, for such case, a continuous mapping u* = C( x ) determined by Eq. (5) maybe exist. Actually this problem is solvable, by transforming the former algebraic control equation to h = h= ( x+ u+ u ) + K (5) x then a definite control under the dynamic backstepping frame may be determined. Now we consider a general case of the i -th level dynamics of the cascade pure-feedback system x = f ( x,..., x, x ) (5) i i i i+ For the right-hand function, if the virtual control x i+ may take arbitrary value that the following equation holds f i(,...,, x i+ ) = (5) then to avoid singularity, the algebraic control equation may be formulate as h = R( x,..., x ) h = (54) i i i
13 which satisfies that h i x ( i+ ) d at the controlled domain D and where h = f ( x,..., x, x ) κ ( x,..., x, x,..., x ) is the original implicit equation, and R( x,..., x i ) is a i i i ( i+ ) d i i d id matrix-valued function. Note that for the virtual control x ( ) ( i+ ) d = i i d id i+ d, it should be guaranteed that the mapping x C ( x,..., x, x,..., x ) implicitly determined by Eq. (54) is continuous and satisfies Ci (,..., ) = through setting κi( x,..., xi, xd,..., x id). he modification will be employed in the Lyapunov design to deduce the control law as Vi = Vi+ h i h i (55) and V(i + ) = V i + ( f i ( x,..., x i, x i + ) f i ( x,..., x i, x( i + ) d )) ( f i ( x,..., x i, x i + ) f i ( x,..., x i, x( i + ) d )) (56) where the modified term f i( x,..., xi, xi+ ) = R( x,..., xi) fi( x,..., xi, xi+ ) aims to guarantee the validity of Assumption, i.e., f i( x,..., xi, a) f i( x,..., xi, b) when a b. 4.4 racking problem In the preceding we focused on the stabilization problem, and the proposed approach is also applicable to the tracking problem. For the pure-feedback cascade plant given by Eqs. (8) and (9), presume that the reference signal is r and the output function is y = x (57) with extra consideration about the effect of reference signal, the design procedure that achieves asymptotically tracking is similar to the stability controller design. he CLF constructed during the design procedure is V = ( x r ) ( x r ) (58) and the resulting (virtual) control, i.e., x d and u, are similar to the stabilization controller but includes the dynamics of r. Similarly, lim( y r ) = are guaranteed through the Lyapunov principle. t 5. Illustrative examples 5. Example : Stabilization of pure-feedback system A nonlinear system in the pure-feedback form from Refs. [4] and [5] is considered
14 where x, x x = x+ x + 5 (59) u x = xx + u+ 7 x are the states and u is the control. he control objective is to stabilize the states to the origin. According to the dynamic backstepping controller design procedure in Sec.., the implicit nonlinear algebraic control equations are he control gains (in scalar form) K, h xd d K h = x + x + + x (6) 5 u = xx + u+ + K( +.6x )(( x +.x ) ( xd +.xd )) 7 (6) + ( K K ) x+ ( + K) h+ Kv(.6xd ) h + +.6x K, K v and K v are all set to be. he initial states of the system x are arbitrarily set to be.5 x =, and the initial conditions for the augmented dynamics are x d t t= = and u = t = =. he simulation results about the states are plotted in Fig.. It is shown that the stats are stabilized to the origin as expected. he virtual control x d and control u, which are augmented states in the controller, are plotted in Fig.. he profiles about the implicit algebraic control equations, i.e., h and h, are presented in Fig., showing that they approaches zero rapidly..5 State x State x x, x Fig. he states profiles in Example 4
15 .5 Virtual control x d Control u x d, u Fig. he virtual control and control profiles in Example 5 4 Implicit algebraic control equation h Implicit algebraic control equation h h, h Fig. he implicit algebraic control equation profiles in Example 5. Example : Stabilization of system containing strict-feedback dynamics A simplified Jet engine model from Ref. [], which includes the strict-feedback dynamics, are considered. he dynamic equations are R = σr σr( φ+ φ ) φ = φ φ Rφ R ψ (6) ψ = u where R, φ, ψ are the states and u is the control. For this plant, the dynamics regarding R is in the pure-feedback form and the dynamics regarding φ and ψ are in the strict-feedback form. hus within the proposed controller design scheme, it requires three steps and the first step includes two Lyapunov designs. 5
16 In Ref. [], the controller is artfully designed by using the input-to-state stability of dynamics regarding R. Here it is addressed under a unified frame. However, this work does not aim to show the superiority in performance of the proposed method. It is just used to indicate its capacity to deal with a model including the pure-feedback dynamics. Especially in designing the controller, κ ( R) is set to be κ ( R) = K R for the requirement that the augmented state φ d continuously approaches zero when R approaches zero. Also, the treatable singularity is avoided by employing a modified implicit algebraic control equation as h = h = σr σ( φ+ φ ) + KR (6) R he scalar control gains K, K, K and K v are all set to be. he initial states of the system are arbitrarily set to be R φ 5 =, and the initial condition for the augmented dynamics is φ d t = =. 5 ψ t = Figure 4 gives the profiles of the states, and all of them are stabilized to the origin. he profiles regarding virtual control φ d (a augmented state) and ψ d (function of R, φ, and φ d ), and control u ( function of R, φ, ψ, and φ d ) are presented in Fig. 5. At the initial time, the values of ψ d and u are large while φ d increases fast from zero, the initial condition prescribed. For the implicit nonlinear equation h, its profile is given in Fig. 6 and it approaches zero as expected. R, φ, ψ State R State φ State ψ R, φ, ψ Fig. 4 he states profiles in Example 6
17 φ d Virtual control φ d ψ d, u Virtual control ψ d Control u Fig. 5 he virtual control and control profiles in Example 4 Implicit algebraic cont rol equat ion ~ h ~ h 5. Example : Signal tracking Fig.6 he implicit algebraic control equation profile in Example Again consider the pure-feedback model given in Example. he tracking problem is defined in Refs. [4] and [5], with the famous van der Pol oscillator taken as the reference model. d r r t r = r+ r r d.( ) r his model yields a limit cycle trajectory for any initial states except = r. he output of the controlled system is x, and the control objective is to make x follow the reference signal r. he (64) 7
18 dynamic backstepping controller is designed similarly as Example, along with extra consideration on the reference signal. Now the implicit nonlinear algebraic control equations are he control gains K, h xd d h = x+ x + + K ( x r) r (65) 5 u = xx + u+ + K( +.6x )(( x+.x ) ( xd +.xd )) 7 (66) + ( K K ) x+ ( + K) h+ Kv( +.6xd ) h r Kr r +.6x K, K v and K v are all again set to be. he initial conditions for the reference model and the controlled system are r.5 = r t= and x.5 = x t=, respectively. he initial conditions for the augmented dynamics are also x d = and u t= t = =. Figure 7 plots the output trajectory in the tracking and the tracking error, showing that the nearly exact tracking performance is achieved. he periodical virtual control x d and control u are presented in Fig. 8. Figure 9 gives the profiles of h and h. hey also approaches zero quickly. x, r 4 State x Reference signal r x -r racking error Fig. 7 he tracking results to the reference signal in Example 8
19 Virtual control x d x d Control u u Fig. 8 he virtual control and control profiles in Example h, h Implicit algebraic control equation h Implicit algebraic control equation h Fig.9 he implicit algebraic control equation profiles in Example 6. Conclusion A general backstepping controller design frame is developed for the pure-feedback system. he idea is to introduce new dynamics to describe the (virtual) control and it solves the implicit nonlinear algebraic equation in an asymptotically way, from a control-based view. Situations where controller may be simplified are discussed, which will alleviate the problem of explosion of terms. his paper provides the solution for the general pure-feedback system controller design problem with exact model, and it may be extended to address the problems with uncertainties, as the adaptive backstepping method studied on the strict-feedback systems. Moreover, consideration on the control saturation and time delay may also be investigated. hese problems will be studied in the future to further complete this method. 9
20 References [] Krstic M, Kanellakopoulos I, and Kokotovic P. Nonlinear and adaptive control design. New York: Wiley, 995. [] Lee, and Kim Y. Nonlinear adaptive flight control using backstepping and neural networks controller. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics,, 4(4): [] Farrell J, Sharma M, and Polycarpou M. Backstepping based flight control with adaptive function approximation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 5, 8(6): 89-. [4] Sonneveldt L, Chu Q P, and Mulder J A. Nonlinear flight control design using constrained adaptive backstepping. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 7, (): -6. [5] Bridges M M, Dawson D M, and Abdallah C. Control of rigid-link, flexible-joint robots: a survey of backstepping approaches. Journal of Robotic Systems, 995, (): [6] Melhem K, and Wang W. Global output tracking control of flexible joint robots via factorization of the manipulator mass matrix. IEEE ransactions on Robotics, 9, 5(): [7] Won M C, and Hedrick J K. Multiple surface sliding control of a class of uncertain nonlinear systems. International Journal of Control, 996, 64(4): [8] Zhang, Ge S S, and Hang C C. Adaptive neural network control for strict-feedback nonlinear systems using backstepping design. Automatia,, 6(): [9] Yang Y, and Zhou C. Adaptive fuzzy H stabilization for strict-feedback canonical nonlinear systems via backstepping and small-gain approach. IEEE ransaction on Fuzzy System, 5, (): 4-4. [] Swaroop D, Hedrick J K, Yip P P, and Gerdes J C. Dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear systems. IEEE ransactions on Automatic Control,, 45(): [] Freeman R, and Praly L. Integrator backstepping for bounded controls and control rates. IEEE ransactions on Automatic Control, 998, 4(): [] Kanellakopoulos I, Kokotovic P V, and Morse A S. Systematic design of adaptive controller for feedback linearizable systems. IEEE ransactions on Automatic Control, 99, 6(): 4-5. [] Ge S S, and Wang C. Adaptive NN control of uncertain nonlinear pure-feedback systems. Automatica,, 8(4): [4] Wang C, Hill D J, Ge S S, and Chen G. An ISS-modular approach for adaptive neural control of purefeedback systems. Automatica, 6, 4(5): 7-7. [5] Zou A M, and Hou Z G. Adaptive control of a class of nonlinear pure-feedback systems using fuzzy backstepping. IEEE ransactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8, 6(4): [6] Wang M, Ge S S, and Hong K S. Approximation-based adaptive tracking control of pure-feedback nonlinear systems with multiple unknown time-varying delays. IEEE ransactions on Neural Networks,, (): [7] Wang H, Luo J S, and Zhu J M. Advanced mathematics. China, Changsha: National University of Defense echnology Press.. [8] Khalil H K. Nonlinear systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, rd edn,.
UDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances
16 American Control Conference ACC) Boston Marriott Copley Place July 6-8, 16. Boston, MA, USA UDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances Jiguo Dai, Beibei
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationApproximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control
Preprints of the 8th IFAC World Congress Milano Italy August 28 - September 2 2 Approximation-Free Prescribed Performance Control Charalampos P. Bechlioulis and George A. Rovithakis Department of Electrical
More informationContraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 WeB4.5 Contraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems B. B. Sharma and I. N. Kar, Member IEEE Abstract
More informationAdaptive Robust Control for Servo Mechanisms With Partially Unknown States via Dynamic Surface Control Approach
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 18, NO. 3, MAY 2010 723 Adaptive Robust Control for Servo Mechanisms With Partially Unknown States via Dynamic Surface Control Approach Guozhu Zhang,
More informationOVER THE past 20 years, the control of mobile robots has
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 18, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2010 1199 A Simple Adaptive Control Approach for Trajectory Tracking of Electrically Driven Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Bong Seok
More informationNEURAL NETWORKS (NNs) play an important role in
1630 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 34, NO 4, AUGUST 2004 Adaptive Neural Network Control for a Class of MIMO Nonlinear Systems With Disturbances in Discrete-Time
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationGlobal stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization
Global stabilization of feedforward systems with exponentially unstable Jacobian linearization F Grognard, R Sepulchre, G Bastin Center for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics Université catholique
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationEML5311 Lyapunov Stability & Robust Control Design
EML5311 Lyapunov Stability & Robust Control Design 1 Lyapunov Stability criterion In Robust control design of nonlinear uncertain systems, stability theory plays an important role in engineering systems.
More informationUDE-based Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation
UDEbased Robust Control for Nonlinear Systems with Mismatched Uncertainties and Input Saturation DAI Jiguo, REN Beibei, ZHONG QingChang. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock,
More informationIN recent years, controller design for systems having complex
818 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 29, NO 6, DECEMBER 1999 Adaptive Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Systems by State and Output Feedback S S Ge, Member,
More informationEN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015
EN530.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 10: Lyapunov Redesign and Robust Backstepping April 6, 2015 Prof: Marin Kobilarov 1 Uncertainty and Lyapunov Redesign Consider the system [1]
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial. Miroslav Krstić
Adaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial Miroslav Krstić University of California, San Diego Backstepping Tuning Functions Design Modular Design Output Feedback Extensions A Stochastic Example Applications
More informationUNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEM CONTROL VIA ADAPTIVE NEURAL DESIGN
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol., No. 5 (00) 097 09 c World Scientific Publishing Company UNCERTAIN CHAOTIC SYSTEM CONTROL VIA ADAPTIVE NEURAL DESIGN S. S. GE and C. WANG Department
More informationObserver-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Observer-based quantized output feedback control of nonlinear systems Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory,
More informationNONLINEAR SAMPLED DATA CONTROLLER REDESIGN VIA LYAPUNOV FUNCTIONS 1
NONLINEAR SAMPLED DAA CONROLLER REDESIGN VIA LYAPUNOV FUNCIONS 1 Lars Grüne Dragan Nešić Mathematical Institute, University of Bayreuth, 9544 Bayreuth, Germany, lars.gruene@uni-bayreuth.de Department of
More informationSLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED PERFORMANCE. Jicheng Gao, Qikun Shen, Pengfei Yang and Jianye Gong
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 27 ISSN 349-498 Volume 3, Number 2, April 27 pp. 687 694 SLIDING MODE FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL WITH PRESCRIBED
More informationAdaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems
Adaptive backstepping for trajectory tracking of nonlinearly parameterized class of nonlinear systems Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio Mora-Camino To cite this version: Hakim Bouadi, Felix Antonio Claudio
More informationAS A POPULAR approach for compensating external
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 1, JANUARY 2008 137 A Novel Robust Nonlinear Motion Controller With Disturbance Observer Zi-Jiang Yang, Hiroshi Tsubakihara, Shunshoku Kanae,
More informationFUZZY STABILIZATION OF A COUPLED LORENZ-ROSSLER CHAOTIC SYSTEM
Part-I: Natural and Applied Sciences FUZZY STABILIZATION OF A COUPLED LORENZ-ROSSLER CHAOTIC SYSTEM Edwin A. Umoh Department of Electrical Engineering Technology, Federal Polytechnic, Kaura Namoda, NIGERIA.
More informationStochastic Nonlinear Stabilization Part II: Inverse Optimality Hua Deng and Miroslav Krstic Department of Mechanical Engineering h
Stochastic Nonlinear Stabilization Part II: Inverse Optimality Hua Deng and Miroslav Krstic Department of Mechanical Engineering denghua@eng.umd.edu http://www.engr.umd.edu/~denghua/ University of Maryland
More informationLyapunov Based Control
Lyapunov Based Control Control Lyapunov Functions Consider the system: x = f(x, u), x R n f(0,0) = 0 Idea: Construct a stabilizing controller in steps: 1. Choose a differentiable function V: R n R, such
More informationAdaptive Control of Nonlinearly Parameterized Systems: The Smooth Feedback Case
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 47, NO 8, AUGUST 2002 1249 Adaptive Control of Nonlinearly Parameterized Systems: The Smooth Feedback Case Wei Lin, Senior Member, IEEE, and Chunjiang Qian,
More informationOutput-feedback Dynamic Surface Control for a Class of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Systems
96 IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 3, NO., JANUARY 06 Output-feedback Dynamic Surface Control for a Class of Nonlinear Non-minimum Phase Systems Shanwei Su Abstract In this paper, an output-feedback
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationAn LMI Approach to Robust Controller Designs of Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy Systems with Parametric Uncertainties
An LMI Approach to Robust Controller Designs of akagi-sugeno fuzzy Systems with Parametric Uncertainties Li Qi and Jun-You Yang School of Electrical Engineering Shenyang University of echnolog Shenyang,
More information1 Introduction Hydraulic systems have been used in industry in a wide number of applications by virtue of their small size-to-power ratios and the abi
NONLINEAR ADAPTIVE ROBUST CONTROL OF ONE-DOF ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC SERVO SYSTEMS Λ Bin Yao George T. C. Chiu John T. Reedy School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907 Abstract
More informationSINCE the 1959 publication of Otto J. M. Smith s Smith
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL 287 Input Delay Compensation for Forward Complete and Strict-Feedforward Nonlinear Systems Miroslav Krstic, Fellow, IEEE Abstract We present an approach for compensating
More informationRobust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers
28 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June 11-13, 28 WeC15.1 Robust Stabilization of Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Using Extended High Gain Observers Shahid
More informationBackstepping Control of Linear Time-Varying Systems With Known and Unknown Parameters
1908 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 48, NO 11, NOVEMBER 2003 Backstepping Control of Linear Time-Varying Systems With Known and Unknown Parameters Youping Zhang, Member, IEEE, Barış Fidan,
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 50, NO. 5, MAY Bo Yang, Student Member, IEEE, and Wei Lin, Senior Member, IEEE (1.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 50, NO 5, MAY 2005 619 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems With Uncontrollable and Unobservable Linearization Bo Yang, Student
More informationSmall Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability
Small Gain Theorems on Input-to-Output Stability Zhong-Ping Jiang Yuan Wang. Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY 11201, U.S.A. zjiang@control.poly.edu Dept. of
More informationEvent-sampled direct adaptive neural network control of uncertain strict-feedback system with application to quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle
Scholars' Mine Masters Theses Student Research & Creative Works Fall 2016 Event-sampled direct adaptive neural network control of uncertain strict-feedback system with application to quadrotor unmanned
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationFINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES. Danlei Chu, Tongwen Chen, Horacio J. Marquez
FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES Danlei Chu Tongwen Chen Horacio J Marquez Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton
More informationADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 12, No. 7 (2002) 1599 1604 c World Scientific Publishing Company ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT KEVIN BARONE and SAHJENDRA
More informationOutput Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form
Output Feedback Stabilization with Prescribed Performance for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems in Canonical Form Charalampos P. Bechlioulis, Achilles Theodorakopoulos 2 and George A. Rovithakis 2 Abstract The
More informationTracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique
International Journal of Automation and Computing (3), June 24, 38-32 DOI: 7/s633-4-793-6 Tracking Control of a Class of Differential Inclusion Systems via Sliding Mode Technique Lei-Po Liu Zhu-Mu Fu Xiao-Na
More informationOptimal Control of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Cancun, Mexico, Dec. 9-11, 28 Optimal Control of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems using RISE Feedback K.Dupree,P.M.Patre,Z.D.Wilcox,andW.E.Dixon
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More informationIntegrator Backstepping using Barrier Functions for Systems with Multiple State Constraints
Integrator Backstepping using Barrier Functions for Systems with Multiple State Constraints Khoi Ngo Dep. Engineering, Australian National University, Australia Robert Mahony Dep. Engineering, Australian
More informationInput Constraints Sliding Mode Control Based on RBF Network Compensation Mengya Hou 1,a, Huanqiang Chen 2,b
International Conference on Information Sciences, Machinery, Materials and Energy (ICISMME 5) Input Constraints Sliding Mode Control Based on RBF Network Compensation Mengya Hou,a, Huanqiang Chen,b Jiangxi
More information1030 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 56, NO. 5, MAY 2011
1030 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 56, NO 5, MAY 2011 L L 2 Low-Gain Feedback: Their Properties, Characterizations Applications in Constrained Control Bin Zhou, Member, IEEE, Zongli Lin,
More informationFurther Results on Model Structure Validation for Closed Loop System Identification
Advances in Wireless Communications and etworks 7; 3(5: 57-66 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/awcn doi:.648/j.awcn.735. Further esults on Model Structure Validation for Closed Loop System Identification
More informationPerturbed Feedback Linearization of Attitude Dynamics
008 American Control Conference Westin Seattle Hotel, Seattle, Washington, USA June -3, 008 FrC6.5 Perturbed Feedback Linearization of Attitude Dynamics Abdulrahman H. Bajodah* Abstract The paper introduces
More informationA Sliding Mode Control based on Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for the Mobile Manipulator
International Core Journal of Engineering Vol.3 No.6 7 ISSN: 44-895 A Sliding Mode Control based on Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for the Mobile Manipulator Yanna Si Information Engineering College Henan
More informationUnifying Behavior-Based Control Design and Hybrid Stability Theory
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront St. Louis MO USA June - 9 ThC.6 Unifying Behavior-Based Control Design and Hybrid Stability Theory Vladimir Djapic 3 Jay Farrell 3 and Wenjie Dong
More informationChaos Suppression in Forced Van Der Pol Oscillator
International Journal of Computer Applications (975 8887) Volume 68 No., April Chaos Suppression in Forced Van Der Pol Oscillator Mchiri Mohamed Syscom laboratory, National School of Engineering of unis
More informationOutput Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems
International Journal of Automation and Computing 3 2006 25-22 Output Feedback Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems Keylan Alimhan, Hiroshi Inaba Department of Information Sciences, Tokyo Denki University,
More informationDynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2 Dynamic Integral Sliding Mode Control of Nonlinear SISO Systems with States Dependent Matched and Mismatched Uncertainties Qudrat Khan*, Aamer Iqbal Bhatti,* Qadeer
More informationA New Robust Decentralized Control Method for Interconnected Nonlinear Systems Based on State Extension and Adaptive Tracking
7 3rd International Conference on Computational Systems and Communications (ICCSC 7) A New Robust Decentralized Control Method for Interconnected Nonlinear Systems Based on State Etension and Adaptive
More informationStability of Hybrid Control Systems Based on Time-State Control Forms
Stability of Hybrid Control Systems Based on Time-State Control Forms Yoshikatsu HOSHI, Mitsuji SAMPEI, Shigeki NAKAURA Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering Tokyo Institute of Technology 2
More informationAFAULT diagnosis procedure is typically divided into three
576 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 47, NO. 4, APRIL 2002 A Robust Detection and Isolation Scheme for Abrupt and Incipient Faults in Nonlinear Systems Xiaodong Zhang, Marios M. Polycarpou,
More informationAsignificant problem that arises in adaptive control of
742 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 44, NO. 4, APRIL 1999 A Switching Adaptive Controller for Feedback Linearizable Systems Elias B. Kosmatopoulos Petros A. Ioannou, Fellow, IEEE Abstract
More informationAdaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationNavigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop
Navigation and Obstacle Avoidance via Backstepping for Mechanical Systems with Drift in the Closed Loop Jan Maximilian Montenbruck, Mathias Bürger, Frank Allgöwer Abstract We study backstepping controllers
More informationTHE nonholonomic systems, that is Lagrange systems
Finite-Time Control Design for Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Subject to Spatial Constraint Yanling Shang, Jiacai Huang, Hongsheng Li and Xiulan Wen Abstract This paper studies the problem of finite-time stabilizing
More informationA Backstepping control strategy for constrained tendon driven robotic finger
A Backstepping control strategy for constrained tendon driven robotic finger Kunal Sanjay Narkhede 1, Aashay Anil Bhise 2, IA Sainul 3, Sankha Deb 4 1,2,4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, 3 Advanced
More informationOutput Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System
Vol. 0, No. 05, 00, 60-608 Output Regulation of the Arneodo Chaotic System Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan R & D Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi-Alamathi Road, Avadi, Chennai-600
More informationSimultaneous State and Fault Estimation for Descriptor Systems using an Augmented PD Observer
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Simultaneous State and Fault Estimation for Descriptor Systems using an Augmented PD Observer Fengming Shi*, Ron J.
More informationRobust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States
obust Stabilization of Jet Engine Compressor in the Presence of Noise and Unmeasured States John A Akpobi, Member, IAENG and Aloagbaye I Momodu Abstract Compressors for jet engines in operation experience
More informationSwitching H 2/H Control of Singular Perturbation Systems
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(4): 443-45, 009 ISSN 1991-8178 Switching H /H Control of Singular Perturbation Systems Ahmad Fakharian, Fatemeh Jamshidi, Mohammad aghi Hamidi Beheshti
More informationAnti-synchronization of a new hyperchaotic system via small-gain theorem
Anti-synchronization of a new hyperchaotic system via small-gain theorem Xiao Jian( ) College of Mathematics and Statistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China (Received 8 February 2010; revised
More informationRBF Neural Network Adaptive Control for Space Robots without Speed Feedback Signal
Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci. Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 37 3, 3 RBF Neural Network Adaptive Control for Space Robots without Speed Feedback Signal By Wenhui ZHANG, Xiaoping YE and Xiaoming JI Institute
More informationAdaptive Control for Nonlinear Uncertain Systems with Actuator Amplitude and Rate Saturation Constraints
Adaptive Control for Nonlinear Uncertain Systems with Actuator Amplitude and Rate Saturation Constraints Alexander Leonessa Dep. of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering University of Central
More information458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 3, MAY 2008
458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL 16, NO 3, MAY 2008 Brief Papers Adaptive Control for Nonlinearly Parameterized Uncertainties in Robot Manipulators N V Q Hung, Member, IEEE, H D
More informationConverse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability
Converse Lyapunov theorem and Input-to-State Stability April 6, 2014 1 Converse Lyapunov theorem In the previous lecture, we have discussed few examples of nonlinear control systems and stability concepts
More informationOutput Regulation of the Tigan System
Output Regulation of the Tigan System Dr. V. Sundarapandian Professor (Systems & Control Eng.), Research and Development Centre Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-6 6, Tamil Nadu,
More informationIndirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme
Indirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme Itamiya, K. *1, Sawada, M. 2 1 Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Eng.,
More informationAdaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Disturbance
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering 2018, 8(2): 31-35 DOI: 10.5923/j.control.20180802.01 Adaptive Predictive Observer Design for Class of Saeed Kashefi *, Majid Hajatipor Faculty of
More informationRobust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form
Robust Semiglobal Nonlinear Output Regulation The case of systems in triangular form Andrea Serrani Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Collaborative Center for Control Sciences The Ohio
More informationKINETIC ENERGY SHAPING IN THE INVERTED PENDULUM
KINETIC ENERGY SHAPING IN THE INVERTED PENDULUM J. Aracil J.A. Acosta F. Gordillo Escuela Superior de Ingenieros Universidad de Sevilla Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n 49 - Sevilla, Spain email:{aracil,
More informationMulti-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures
Preprints of the 19th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Multi-Model Adaptive Regulation for a Family of Systems Containing Different Zero Structures Eric Peterson Harry G.
More informationREPETITIVE LEARNING OF BACKSTEPPING CONTROLLED NONLINEAR ELECTROHYDRAULIC MATERIAL TESTING SYSTEM 1. Seunghyeokk James Lee 2, Tsu-Chin Tsao
REPETITIVE LEARNING OF BACKSTEPPING CONTROLLED NONLINEAR ELECTROHYDRAULIC MATERIAL TESTING SYSTEM Seunghyeokk James Lee, Tsu-Chin Tsao Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department University of California
More informationDesign and Stability Analysis of Single-Input Fuzzy Logic Controller
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL. 30, NO. 2, APRIL 2000 303 Design and Stability Analysis of Single-Input Fuzzy Logic Controller Byung-Jae Choi, Seong-Woo Kwak,
More informationINTEGRAL BACKSTEPPING SLIDING MODE CONTROL OF CHAOTIC FORCED VAN DER POL OSCILLATOR
INTEGRAL BACKSTEPPING SLIDING MODE CONTROL OF CHAOTIC FORCED VAN DER POL OSCILLATOR Ismaila Adeniyi Kamil and Samuel Oyelekan Oladipo Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering,University of Ibadan,
More informationOUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM
OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE SIMPLIFIED LORENZ CHAOTIC SYSTEM Sundarapandian Vaidyanathan Research and Development Centre, Vel Tech Dr. RR & Dr. SR Technical University Avadi, Chennai-600 06, Tamil Nadu, INDIA
More informationCONTROLLING CHAOTIC DYNAMICS USING BACKSTEPPING DESIGN WITH APPLICATION TO THE LORENZ SYSTEM AND CHUA S CIRCUIT
Letters International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 9, No. 7 (1999) 1425 1434 c World Scientific Publishing Company CONTROLLING CHAOTIC DYNAMICS USING BACKSTEPPING DESIGN WITH APPLICATION TO THE
More informationSynchronization of identical new chaotic flows via sliding mode controller and linear control
Synchronization of identical new chaotic flows via sliding mode controller and linear control Atefeh Saedian, Hassan Zarabadipour Department of Electrical Engineering IKI University Iran a.saedian@gmail.com,
More informationRiccati difference equations to non linear extended Kalman filter constraints
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 3, Issue 12, December-2012 1 Riccati difference equations to non linear extended Kalman filter constraints Abstract Elizabeth.S 1 & Jothilakshmi.R
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL AND ESTIMATION
OPTIMAL CONTROL AND ESTIMATION Robert F. Stengel Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey DOVER PUBLICATIONS, INC. New York CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationGeneralized projective synchronization of a class of chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems with uncertain parameters
Vol 16 No 5, May 2007 c 2007 Chin. Phys. Soc. 1009-1963/2007/16(05)/1246-06 Chinese Physics and IOP Publishing Ltd Generalized projective synchronization of a class of chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems with
More informationPERIODIC signals are commonly experienced in industrial
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 15, NO. 2, MARCH 2007 369 Repetitive Learning Control of Nonlinear Continuous-Time Systems Using Quasi-Sliding Mode Xiao-Dong Li, Tommy W. S. Chow,
More informationRobust Tracking Control of Uncertain MIMO Nonlinear Systems with Application to UAVs
IEEE/CAA JOURNAL OF AUTOMATICA SINICA, VOL. 2, NO. 1, JANUARY 2015 25 Robust Tracking Control of Uncertain MIMO Nonlinear Systems with Application to UAVs Yanlong Zhou, Mou Chen, and Changsheng Jiang Abstract
More informationA Model-Free Control System Based on the Sliding Mode Control Method with Applications to Multi-Input-Multi-Output Systems
Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference of Control, Dynamic Systems, and Robotics (CDSR'17) Toronto, Canada August 21 23, 2017 Paper No. 119 DOI: 10.11159/cdsr17.119 A Model-Free Control System
More informationPrediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate
www.scichina.com info.scichina.com www.springerlin.com Prediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate WEI Chen & CHEN ZongJi School of Automation
More informationNonlinear Controller Design of the Inverted Pendulum System based on Extended State Observer Limin Du, Fucheng Cao
International Conference on Automation, Mechanical Control and Computational Engineering (AMCCE 015) Nonlinear Controller Design of the Inverted Pendulum System based on Extended State Observer Limin Du,
More informationAn Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems
,,, 323 E-mail: mxsun@zjut.edu.cn :, Lyapunov( ),,.,,,.,,. :,,, An Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems Mingxuan Sun, Chaonan Jiang, Yanwei Li College of Information Engineering,
More informationSeveral Extensions in Methods for Adaptive Output Feedback Control
Several Extensions in Methods for Adaptive Output Feedback Control Nakwan Kim Postdoctoral Fellow School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA 333 5 Anthony J. Calise Professor
More informationTRACKING CONTROL VIA ROBUST DYNAMIC SURFACE CONTROL FOR HYPERSONIC VEHICLES WITH INPUT SATURATION AND MISMATCHED UNCERTAINTIES
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 017 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 13, Number 6, December 017 pp. 067 087 TRACKING CONTROL VIA ROBUST DYNAMIC SURFACE
More information28TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES
8 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF O THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES AUTOPILOT DESIGN FOR AN AGILE MISSILE USING L ADAPTIVE BACKSTEPPING CONTROL Chang-Hun Lee*, Min-Jea Tahk* **, and Byung-Eul Jun*** *KAIST, **KAIST,
More informationPassivity-based Control of Euler-Lagrange Systems
Romeo Ortega, Antonio Loria, Per Johan Nicklasson and Hebertt Sira-Ramfrez Passivity-based Control of Euler-Lagrange Systems Mechanical, Electrical and Electromechanical Applications Springer Contents
More informationMCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II
MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II Reading: SHV Ch.8 Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE647 p.1/14 Robust vs. Adaptive
More informationTrajectory tracking & Path-following control
Cooperative Control of Multiple Robotic Vehicles: Theory and Practice Trajectory tracking & Path-following control EECI Graduate School on Control Supélec, Feb. 21-25, 2011 A word about T Tracking and
More informationNeural Network-Based Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulator: Application to a Three Links Cylindrical Robot
Vol.3 No., 27 مجلد 3 العدد 27 Neural Network-Based Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulator: Application to a Three Links Cylindrical Robot Abdul-Basset A. AL-Hussein Electrical Engineering Department Basrah
More informationADAPTIVE FORCE AND MOTION CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS IN CONSTRAINED MOTION WITH DISTURBANCES
ADAPTIVE FORCE AND MOTION CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS IN CONSTRAINED MOTION WITH DISTURBANCES By YUNG-SHENG CHANG A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
More informationDesign of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone
International Journal of Automation and Computing 8), May, -8 DOI:.7/s633--574-4 Design of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone Xue-Li
More informationSDRE BASED LEADER-FOLLOWER FORMATION CONTROL OF MULTIPLE MOBILE ROBOTS
SDRE BASED EADER-FOOWER FORMAION CONRO OF MUIPE MOBIE ROBOS Caio Igor Gonçalves Chinelato, uiz S. Martins-Filho Universidade Federal do ABC - UFABC Av. dos Estados, 5001, Bangu, 09210-971, Santo André,
More information