ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS WITH HARMONIC SYMBOLS
|
|
- Della Lawson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS WITH HARMONIC SYMOLS OORIM CHOE AND HYUNGWOON KOO ASTRACT. On the ergman space of the unit ball in C n, we solve the zero-product problem for two Toeplitz operators with harmonic symbols that have continuous extensions to the boundary. In the case where symbols have Lipschitz continuous extensions to some part of) the boundary, we solve the zero-product problem for multiple products with the number of factors depending on the dimension n of the underlying space; the number of factors is n + 3. We also prove a local version of this result but with loss of a factor.. INTRODUCTION Let be the unit ball in the complex n-space C n. Let L p = L p ) denote the usual Lebesgue space with respect to the volume measure V on normalized to have total mass. The ergman space A 2 is then the space of all L 2 -holomorphic functions on. Due to the mean value property of holomorphic functions, the space A 2 is a closed subspace of L 2, and thus is a Hilbert space. The ergman projection P is defined to be the Hilbert space orthogonal projection from L 2 onto A 2. For a function u L, the Toeplitz operator T u with symbol u is defined by T u f = P uf) for f A 2. It is clear that T u : A 2 A 2 is a bounded linear operator. The books [] by Douglas and [6] by Zhu are standard sources for one variable theory of Toeplitz operators. In this paper we consider the so-called zero-product problem of characterizing zero products of several Toeplitz operators: The zero-product problem. Suppose that T u T un = 0. Does it then follow that one of u j is identically zero? While we learned about this problem from a recent work of Ahern and Cu cković [2], its history goes back to as early as 960 s. In [7] rown and Halmos studied Toeplitz operators on the Hardy space of the unit disk. We refer to [7] for the definition of Hardy space and their Toeplitz operators. They proved that T u T v = T τ on the Hardy space iff either u or v is holomorphic and τ = uv. From this they easily deduced that if T u T v = 0 then either u or v must be identically zero. This result initiated the zero-product problem on the Hardy space. In the study done so far, the number of factors depends in some essential way on the methods the authors used. So far, the problem has been answered yes for five factors by Guo [4] and for six factors by Gu [3] on the Hardy space of the unit disk. More recently, Ding [0] solved the problem for two factors on the Hardy space of the polydisk. The ball case seems to have not been studied yet Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 4735; Secondary 32A36. Key words and phrases. Zero product, Toeplitz operator, harmonic symbol, ergman space. This research was supported by KOSEFR ).
2 2. CHOE AND H. KOO Returning to the ergman space case, we notice that the study of the zero-product problem has begun only recently. Given that the work of rown-halmos was published long time ago in 964, it is somewhat mysterious to us) that the zero-product problem on the ergman space has not been studied in the literature until very recently Ahern and Cu cković [2] first studied it on the unit disk. In [2] Ahern and Cu cković solved the zeroproduct problem for two Toeplitz operators with harmonic symbols and the problem for arbitrary symbols still remains open. More recently, Ahern [] has given a more general approach that leads to the same zero-product theorem as in [2]. For study of higher dimensional analogues of such a onevariable result, the simplest substitutes for the disk might be the balls or polydisks and the simplest substitutes for harmonic symbols might be pluriharmonic ones. The polydisk case was studied by Choe et al. [9]. They solved the zero-product problem on the polydisks for two Toeplitz operators with pluriharmonic symbols by means of extending the methods of [2]. In the case of the balls it appears to be more subtle to extend the methods of [2] and, in fact, no progress has been made yet even for the simplest case of two factors with pluriharmonic symbols. In this paper we investigate the zero-product problem on the balls by devising a completely new approach to the problem. Roughly speaking, using careful analysis of the the behavior of the operator on test functions which peak near boundary points, we show that one of the symbol functions must vanish on an open subset of the boundary and have radial derivatives which also vanishes and that such a symbol function must vanish identically. Our method has some aspects which we wish to emphasize. Our method allows us not only to cover up to harmonic symbols, but also to deal with multiple products on higher dimensional balls. The price we pay for extending symbols up to harmonic ones seems to be certain amount of boundary regularity. More explicitly, our harmonic symbols are restricted to those that have continuous extensions at least to some part of the boundary. Harmonicity hypothesis, together with such boundary regularity imposed on symbol functions, plays key roles in our arguments of the present paper. It allows us to use a uniqueness theorem Proposition 4.) for harmonic functions. In addition, it provides us quite explicit information on local behavior of symbol functions near a boundary vanishing point Lemma 4.2). We do not know whether either harmonicity or boundary regularity can be removed in the hypotheses of our results to be stated below. In what follows we let h denote the class of all bounded harmonic functions on. Also, a boundary open set refers to a relatively open subset of. Our first result is the next theorem. The disk case is contained in the result of Ahern and Cu cković mentioned earlier. Theorem.. Suppose that functions u, u 2 h are continuous on W for some boundary open set W. If T u T u2 = 0, then either u = 0 or u 2 = 0. In the case where symbols have Lipschitz continuous extensions to the boundary, our method applies to multiple products. Given a subset X C n containing more than one point, recall that the Lipschitz class of order ɛ 0, ], denoted by Lip ɛ X), is the class of all functions f on X such that fz) fw) = O z w ɛ ) for z, w X. For a given point ζ, we let Lip ɛ ζ) = Lip ɛ U ) where the union is taken over all neighborhoods U of ζ.
3 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS 3 Our next result solves the zero-product problem for several Toeplitz operators with harmonic symbols that have Lipschitz continuous extensions to the whole boundary. Unfortunately, our method requires some restriction, depending on the dimension n, on the number of factors, as in the next theorem. Theorem.2. Let u,..., u n+3 Lip ɛ ) h for some ɛ > 0. If T u T un+3 = 0, then u j = 0 for some j. Our proof of Theorem.2 actually works with a local Lipschitz condition but with loss of a factor in the product. Theorem.3. Let u,..., u n+2 Lip ɛ ζ) h for some ɛ > 0 and ζ. If T u T un+2 = 0, then u j = 0 for some j. Note that the identity operator is also a Toeplitz operator with symbol ). Thus, if the zero-product theorem holds for a certain number of factors, it also holds for any smaller number of factors. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we recall and collect some basic facts to be used later. In Section 3 we prove some auxiliary integral identities and integral estimates. In Section 4 we prove Theorem., Theorem.2 and Theorem PRELIMINARIES Throughout the section we let a denote an arbitrary point, unless otherwise specified. Since every point evaluation is a bounded linear functional on A 2, there exists a unique function K a A 2 which has following reproducing property: 2.) fa) = f, K a, f A 2 where the notation, denotes the inner product in L 2. The function K a is the well-known ergman kernel and its explicit formula is given by K a z) =, z. z a) n+ Here and elsewhere, we use the notation z a = n j= z ja j to denote the Hermitian inner product of points z = z,..., z n ) and a = a,..., a n ) in C n. We let k a denote the normalized kernel, namely, 2.2) k a z) = a 2 ) n+)/2, z. z a) n+ y the reproducing property 2.), the ergman projection P can be represented by P ψa) = ψk a dv for functions ψ L 2. For z, w, z 0, define ϕ z w) = z z 2 w z)z z 2 [w z 2 w z)z] w z and ϕ 0 w) = w. The map ϕ a is an automorphism of such that ϕ a ϕ a = id. Its real Jacobian is equal to k a z) 2, so we have the following change of variables formula: h ϕ a z) ) 2.3) k a z) 2 dv z) = hw) dv w),
4 4. CHOE AND H. KOO for every h L. We also have a very useful formula 2.4) and thus, in particular, 2.5) ϕ a z) ϕ a w) = We refer to Chapter 2 of [5] for details. We define a linear operator U a on A 2 by a a) z w) z a) a w) ϕ z w) 2 = z 2 ) w 2 ) z w 2. U a ψ = ψ ϕ a )k a for ψ A 2. It follows from 2.3) that each U a is an isometry on A 2. A straightforward calculation by means of 2.4) yields U a k a = k a ϕ a )k a =. It follows that U a U a = I and thus Ua = U a. Now, being an invertible linear isometry, U a is unitary. It is well known that 2.6) U a T u U a = T u ϕa ; see, for example, [4] or [5] where U a is defined with an extra factor ) on the disk and [8] on the ball. Recall that, given a bounded linear operator L on A 2, its erezin transform is the function L defined by La) = Lk a, k a. We remark in passing that this erezin transform plays the key role in characterizing the compactness of Toeplitz operators: see [5] and [2]. It is not hard to see that L is continuous on. It turns out that L preserves the boundary continuity of symbols as in the next proposition. Proposition 2.. Suppose that functions u,..., u N L are continuous on {ζ} for some ζ. Let L = T un T u. Then L continuously extends to {ζ} and Lζ) = u N u )ζ). Proof. Let a. Note that k a = U a. Also, note that U a LU a = U a T un U a ) U a T u U a ) = T un ϕ a T u ϕ a, because U a U a = I. Since U a = U a = U a, it follows that 2.7) La) = U a LU a, = T un ϕ a T u ϕ a,. Fix ζ. We claim that, as a ζ, we have 2.8) T un ϕ a T u ϕ a u N u )ζ) in L 2 which, together with 2.7), implies the proposition. Now, we prove the claim. Let a ζ. Then, for a given function u continuous on {ζ}, we observe that ϕ a ζ pointwise in fact, uniformly on compact sets) and thus u ϕ a uζ) in L 2 by the dominated convergence theorem. In particular, we have P u ϕ a ) uζ) in L 2. So, we see that the claim holds for N =. We now proceed by
5 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS 5 induction on N. Assume that 2.8) holds for some N and consider the case of N +. Having 2.8) as induction hypothesis and writing p for the L p -norm, we have T un+ ϕ a T un ϕ a T u ϕ a u N+ u N u )ζ) 2 T un+ ϕ a [T un ϕ a T u ϕ a u N u )ζ)] 2 + u N u )ζ) T un+ ϕ a u N+ ζ) 2 u N+ T un ϕ a T u ϕ a u N u )ζ)] u N u )ζ) T un+ ϕ a u N+ ζ) 2 so that 2.8) also holds for N +. This completes the induction and the proof of the proposition. 3. AUXILIARY IDENTITIES AND ESTIMATES The idea of our proofs is to decompose each factor into major and error parts and to employ suitable test functions whose sources are, of course, the ergman kernel functions. In utilizing such decompositions and test functions, we need substantial amount of estimates for major parts and error parts, respectively. For the major parts we need to know precise information on how certain Toeplitz operators act on ergman kernel functions. Also, for the error parts, we need to know the integral behavior of ergman kernel with logarithmic weights. Such integral identities and estimates are very technical and thus collected in this section. Recall the elementary binomial expansion for positive integers k: 3.) x) k = C k,j x j, x < where C k,j = k+j )! k )!j!. Associated with these coefficients are the coefficients a k,p,j = j=0 k p )!k j)! k )!k p j)! defined for positive integers k, p, j with k > p and j k p. The collection of these coefficients will be the source for coefficients of various identities below. The precise values of first two coefficients a k,p, and a k,p,2 are needed in our estimates. We list them here for easier reference later: 3.2) a k,p, = k and a k,p,2 = p ). k k 2 The main significance of the coefficients a k,p,j lies in the following elementary relation. Lemma 3.. Let k, p be positive integers with k > p. Then i=0 Proof. Fix i 0. Note that k p C k,i a k,p,j p + i xi =, x <. x) k j j= C p+,i p + i = C p,i p.
6 6. CHOE AND H. KOO In general we have the recursion relation C q,i p + i = q + i Cq,i = + q p ) C q,i q p + i q p + i for integers q > p. Thus, iterating this recursion relation as many times as needed, we have k p C k,i p + i = a k,p,j C k j,i. j= Now, multiplying both sides by x i and then summing up the resulting equalities, we conclude the lemma by 3.). The proof is complete. In what follows we let λ t z) = tz, z for each 0 t <. The powers of these functions will be our test functions later. Lemma 3.2. Let k > n be an integer. Then for 0 t <. 3.3) k n T w λ k t = tλ k t + ka k+,n+,j+ λ j t j= In the proof below we will use the explicit formula for L 2 -norm of monomials given by w j wjn n 2 dv w) = n!j! j n! n + J)! where j k s are nonnegative integers and J = j + + j n. See Proposition.4.9 of [5] for details. Proof. Let 0 t < and z. y 3.) we have T w λ k w t z) = tw ) k dv w) z w) n+ = C k,i C n+,j w tw ) i z w) j dv w) = = i=0 j=0 C k,j+ C n+,j t j+ j=0 C k,j+ C n+,j t j+ z j j=0 w j+ w z w ) j dv w) w 2j+) dv w)
7 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS 7 where second to the last equality holds by orthogonality of monomials. It follows from 3.3) that T w λ k t z) = = t C k,j+ C n+,j t j+ z j n!j + )! n + j + )! j=0 = tk j=0 j=0 C k,j+ j + n + j + tz ) j C k+,j n + j + tz ) j where the last equality holds, because j + )C k,j+ = kc k+,j. Now, the lemma follows from Lemma 3. and 3.2). The proof is complete. Lemma 3.3. Let k > n + be an integer. Then for 0 t <. T wl 2λk t = k n j= a k,n+,j λ k j t, l = 2,..., n Proof. Let 0 t <, z and let l = 2 without loss of generality. As in the proof of Lemma 3.2, we get by 3.3) and orthogonality of monomials that w 2 2 T w2 2λk t = tw ) k dv w) z w) n+ = C k,i C n+,i t i z i w 2i w 2 2 dv w) i=0 n!i!! = C k,i C n+,i n + i + )! tz ) i i=0 C k,i = n + + i tz ) i. i=0 Now, the lemma follows from Lemma 3.. The proof is complete. We now turn to ceratin integral estimates. Those estimates will take care of error terms in repeated Toeplitz integrals which arise in the course of our proofs. To this end we need to know the volume) integral behavior of the ergman kernel with logarithmic weights. Constants. In the rest of the paper we use the same letter C, often depending on the dimension n, to denote various constants which may change at each occurrence. For nonnegative quantities X and Y, we often write X Y or Y X if X is dominated by Y times some inessential positive constant. Also, we write X Y if X Y X. We begin with a lemma.
8 8. CHOE AND H. KOO Lemma 3.4. Let s 0 and c real be given. Then the following estimates hold: ɛ r +c log ) s ɛ c log ɛ s if c > 0 3.4) dr log ɛ r s+ if c = 0 if c < 0 ɛ r +c log ) s 3.5) dr ɛ c log ɛ s if c < 0 r 0 for 0 < ɛ < 2. The constants suppressed above are independent of ɛ. Proof. The case s = 0 is easily treated. So, assume s > 0. Let 0 < ɛ < 2. We first consider the integral in 3.4), which we denote by I c for simplicity. The estimate for I c with c < 0 is clear, because in that case log r s r c is integrable near r = 0. Meanwhile, for c = 0, we easily deduce that I 0 = s + log ɛ s+. Next, consider the case c > 0. Note that we have 3.6) r +c log r ) s { + s c log r ) } dr = cr c log ) s + C r by elementary calculus. Note that log r s is integrable near. Thus, it follows from the above that cɛ c ) log ɛ s = ɛ r +c log ) { s + s log ) } dr r c r /2 + r +c log ) s dr r I c ɛ and thus we have the estimate for c > 0. Now, let II c denote the integral in 3.5). Note that 3.6) also holds for c < 0. Thus, since c < 0, it follows from 3.6) that c ɛ c ) log ɛ s = ɛ 0 r +c log ) { s + s log ) } dr II c r c r and thus we have the estimate for II c. The proof is complete. The surface integral behavior of the ergman kernel is well known as follows: dsζ) δz c if c > 0 3.7) z ζ + log δ n+c z if c = 0 if c < 0 for z ; see Proposition.4.0 of [5] for details. Here, and in what follows, we use the notation δ z = z, z for simplicity. Also, ds denotes the surface area measure on normalized to have total mass. The volume integral behavior, similar to 3.7), of the ergman kernel with ordinary weights is well known, as is also given in Proposition.4.0 of [5]. However, such
9 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS 9 estimates are not enough and more delicate estimates with logarithmic weights are needed in our arguments later. More explicitly, we need to estimate two types of integrals J c,s and I c,s defined for s 0 and c real as follows : and for z, w where J c,s z) = I c,s z, w) = log δ ξ s dv ξ) z ξ n++c Φ c,s ξ, w) dv ξ) z ξ n+ Φ c,s z, w) = + logδ zδ w ) s z w n++c. In our application the parameter c will be restricted to c n for the integrals I c,s. The estimates for the integrals J c,s are as follows. As is mentioned above, the unweighted case s = 0 is well known. Proposition 3.5. Let s 0 and c real be given. Then δz c + log δ z s ) if c > 0 J c,s z) + log δ z s+ if c = 0 if c < 0 for z. The constants suppressed above are independent of z. Proof. Let z be an arbitrary point of. We may assume δ z < 2. y integration in polar coordinates we have J c,s z) = 2n 0 z dsζ) rz ζ n++c 0 log ) s r 2n dr r and thus the estimate for c is clear. So, assume c >. y 3.7) we have ) s J c,s z) 0 r z ) +c log dr r z ) s + r z ) +c log dr r : = I c + II c. We first consider I c. Note that z r z z 2 for z < r <. It follows that δz I c δz c log ) s dr δz c log δ z s 0 r where the second equivalence holds by Lemma 3.4. Meanwhile, since r r z r 2 for 0 < r < z, it follows that z ) s II c 0 r) +c log dr r δ z r +c log ) s dr. r Now, combining the estimates for I c and II c above, we conclude the lemma by Lemma 3.4. The proof is complete.
10 0. CHOE AND H. KOO In order to estimate the integrals I c,s, we need not only estimates given by Proposition 3.5, but also a localized version for c < 0. We need some notation. For 0 < ɛ <, we let and Q ɛ z) = {ζ : z ζ < ɛ}, z R ɛ z) = {ξ : z ξ < ɛ}, z. Note that Q ɛ z) = R ɛ z) = for δ z ɛ. Also, note that Q ɛ z) Q ɛ+δz η) for z = z η where η. So, we have 3.8) S[Q ɛ z)] ɛ n for z and 0 < ɛ < by Proposition 5..4 of [5]. We begin with a more precise localized version of the estimate 3.7) for c < 0. Lemma 3.6. Let n c 0. Then there is a constant C = Cc) such that { dsζ) ɛ c if c < 0 C Q ɛz) z ζ n+c log + ) ɛ δ z if c = 0 for z and 0 < ɛ <. Proof. Let z and 0 < ɛ <. We may assume δ z < ɛ; otherwise the integral is simply 0. Let I c denote the integral under consideration. Choose a positive integer N such that 2 N ɛ δ z < 2 N+ ɛ. Then we have by 3.8) N dsζ) I c z ζ N N 2 j ɛ) c = ɛ c 2 cj n+c j=0 E j where E j = Q 2 j ɛz) \ Q 2 j ɛz). Note that N log ) ɛ δ z for c = 0. Also, note that the last summation above is a part of a convergent geometric series for c < 0. So, the lemma holds. The following lemma is a localized version of Proposition 3.5 for c < 0. Lemma 3.7. Let s 0 and n c < 0. Then there is a constant C = Cc, s) such that log δ ξ s z ξ dv ξ) n++c Cɛ c log ɛ s R ɛz) for z and 0 < ɛ < 2. Proof. Let z, 0 < ɛ < 2 and assume δ z < ɛ to avoid triviality. Let I c denote the integral under consideration. Note that ξ ɛ for ξ R ɛ z). Thus, by integration in polar coordinates, we have I c ɛ Q ɛrz) j=0 dsζ) rz ζ n++c log j=0 ) s dr. r For c <, we have by Lemma 3.6 and Lemma 3.4 ɛ I c ɛ c log ) s dr ɛ c log ɛ s, r 0
11 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS as desired. Next, for c =, we have by Lemma 3.6 )] I c [log + ɛ log ɛ r z ɛ log ɛ ) log ) s dr 0 r r = ɛ log ) log ) s dr r ɛr ɛ 0 0 ɛ log ɛ s, 0 ) s dr r log ) { log ɛ s + log ) s } dr r r as desired. Finally, for < c < 0, we have by 3.7) and Lemma 3.4 ) s I c ɛ r z ) +c log dr r ɛ r +c log ) s dr r ɛ c log ɛ s, as desired. The proof is complete. We now estimate the integrals I c,s. For z = w, note that the integrals I c,s z, z) reduce to those considered in Proposition 3.5. It is more subtle and complicated to estimate the integrals I c,s in two variables. We have the following estimates for those integrals. In our application s will be an integer. Proposition 3.8. Given s 0 and c n, there exists a constant C = Cc, s) such that { δw c Φ 0,s+ z, w) if c > 0 I c,s z, w) C Φ c,s+ z, w) if c 0 for z, w. Proof. Fix s 0 and c n. Let z, w. Since I n+),s z, w) + log δ w s )J 0,s z), we have the lemma for c = n by Proposition 3.5. So, assume c > n. Put log δ ξ s L c,s z, w) = dv ξ) z ξ n+ w ξ n++c for simplicity. Then, since + logδ ξ δ w ) s + log δ w s + log δ ξ s, we have 3.9) I c,s z, w) + log δ w s )L c,0 z, w) + L c,s z, w) and thus we need to estimate L c,s s. We claim that { δw c Φ 0,s+ z, w) if c > 0 3.0) L c,s z, w) Φ c,s+ z, w) if c 0. Having this estimate, we easily conclude the lemma by 3.9).
12 2. CHOE AND H. KOO It remains to prove 3.0). Decompose into two pieces E and E 2 given by and consider corresponding integrals E = {ξ : 4 w ξ z w }, E 2 = {ξ : 4 w ξ < z w } I j := Ej log δ ξ s dv ξ) z ξ n+ w ξ n++c for j =, 2. For the integral I we have log δ ξ s I z w n++c z ξ dv ξ) + log δ z s+ 3.) n+ z w n++c ; the second equivalence holds by Proposition 3.5. This shows that the integral I satisfies the desired estimates. We now turn to the estimate of the integral I 2. Note that we have z w /2 z ξ /2 + w ξ /2 by Proposition 5..2 of [5]. This gives the estimate and therefore we have 3.2) I 2 z ξ z w, ξ E 2 log δ ξ z w E2 s n+ dv ξ). w ξ n++c Consider the case c 0. It follows from the above that I 2 J c,s w) z w n+, which implies that I 2 also satisfies the desired estimate for c 0 by Proposition 3.5. Next, consider the case c < 0. In this case we have by 3.2) and Lemma 3.7 ) s 4 I 2 z w n++c log + logδ zδ w ) s z w z w n++c where we used 2.5) to get the second inequality. This completes the proof. 4. ZERO PRODUCTS Note that if a function u h is continuous on W and vanishes on W for some boundary open set W, then u is harmonic across W. This is a consequence of the wellknown reflection principle. See, for example, Theorem 4..5 of [3]. The study of harmonic functions has nothing to do with complex structure of C n. So, we introduce real-variable notation. As usual, we identify points z,..., z n ) C n with x, x 2,..., x 2n, x 2n ) R 2n where Rz j = x 2j and Iz j = x 2j for each j. With this convention we let D j =, j =,..., 2n x j and let Ru denote the radial derivative of u. More explicitly, we let Ru = 2n j= x j D j u
13 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS 3 for C -functions u. We will use two elementary facts about the radial derivatives. One is the fact that R commutes with linear transformations on R 2n. More explicitly, 4.) Ru ρ) = Ru) ρ for each linear transformation ρ on R 2n. The other one is the fact that R preserves harmonicity, which is easily seen by a straightforward calculation. Finally, we put for simplicity. e =, 0,..., 0) R 2n = C n Proposition 4.. Suppose that u is a function harmonic on and continuous on W for some boundary open set W. If both u and Ru vanish on W, then u = 0 on. Proof. Suppose that both u and Ru vanish on W. Since u = 0 on W, u extends to an harmonic function across W by the reflection principle, as mentioned above. We claim that 4.2) R 2 u = 0 on W. In order to see this let ζ W, choose a rotation ρ = ρ ζ on R 2n with ρζ) = e, and put ũ = u ρ. Then ũ vanishes on ρw which is a boundary neighborhood of e. Let z = x, z ) where z = x 2,..., x 2n ). Define vz ) = ũ z 2, z ). Then, v vanishes near 0, because ũ vanishes on ρw. Hence, a routine calculation gives 0 = D 2 j v0 ) = D 2 j ũe) D ũe) for j 2. Also, a straightforward calculation yields R 2 ũe) = Rũe) + Dũe). 2 Now, since Rũe) = Ruζ) = 0 by 4.), we have 0 = 2n j=2 D 2 j v0 ) = 2n )D ũe) 2n j=2 = 2n )D ũe) + D 2 ũe) = 2n 2)Rũe) + R 2 ũe) = R 2 ũe). Thus, applying 4.) twice, we have D 2 j ũe) ũe) = 0 ) D ũe) = Rũe) ) 0 = R 2 ũe) = R 2 ũ ρ)ζ) = R 2 ũ ρ)ζ) = R 2 uζ). Now, since ζ W is arbitrary, we have 4.2) as desired. What we have shown so far is the following: u = Ru = 0 on W = R 2 u = 0 on W. Note that Ru is harmonic, because u is. Thus, applying the above with Ru in place of u, we see that R 3 u = 0 on W. Repeating the same argument, we see that R j u = 0 on W for all j 0. Now, let N denote the outward normal differentiation along. Note that R, when restricted to, is the same as N. Thus, we see from 4.) that N commutes with rotations. Also, given any C -function ψ near e, it is not hard to see that D j ψe) can be written as a linear combination of Rψe),..., R j ψe) for each j. So, given j and ζ W,
14 4. CHOE AND H. KOO we see that N j uζ) can be written as a linear combination of Ruζ),..., R j uζ). Consequently, we conclude that N j uζ) = 0 for each j. It follows from real-analyticity that utζ) = 0 for all t sufficiently close to. This shows that the vanishing property of u on W extends to some open set in and therefore u = 0 on the whole. The proof is complete. Remark. It seems worth mentioning that our uniqueness result Proposition 4. has some connection with a local Hopf lemma obtained by aouendi and Rothschild in [6]. Consider a function u harmonic on and continuous on W for some boundary open set W. Then the Local Hopf lemma of aouendi and Rothschild asserts that if u 0 on W and u vanishes of infinite order in the normal direction at some ζ W, then u vanishes near ζ in W and along the radius ending at ζ. Hence, if, in addition, u vanishes of infinite order in arbitrary direction) at ζ, then u must be identically 0. In case u already vanishes in W, Proposition 4. shows that, while the normal derivative of u is assumed to vanish globally) in W, the vanishing order can be weakened from infinity to just. 4.3) We introduce more notation. First, we let σz) = 2 Rz ) n z j 2 for z. Note that σz) = O z ). Next, for 0 t < and z, we let j=2 αt) = t, βz) = β t z) = tz for simplicity. For integers k, m with k m, we use the same notation P m = P m α, β) for either the zero polynomial or any nonzero polynomial in α, β with no term of degree lower than m. Finally, given a positive integer d, let F d denote the class of all functions f on [0, ) such that ft, z) C + log t)δ z d tz n+, 0 t <, z for some constant C depending on f. Note that we have T σ ψ t F 2 for functions ψ t such that ψ t z) = O λ t n+2 ). This follows from the fact σz) = O z ) and thus T σ λ t n+2 F 2 by Proposition 3.8. Now, before turning to the proof of our results, we prove two more lemmas. Lemma 4.2. Suppose that u h C W ) vanishes on W for some boundary neighborhood W of e. Then uz) = D ue) σz) + O z 3/2) 2 for z W near e. Proof. As in the proof of Proposition 4., u is harmonic across W. So, we similarly let z = x, z ) where z = x 2,..., x 2n ) and define vz ) = u z 2, z ). Then, v vanishes near 0, because u vanishes on W. Thus, by a straightforward calculation, we have 0 = D j v0 ) = D j ue) 0 = Dj 2 v0 ) = Dj 2 j = 2,..., 2n, ue) D ue) and 0 = D i D j v0 ) = D i D j ue), i, j = 2,..., 2n, i j.
15 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS 5 It follows that uz) = D ue) 2 + σz) + D2 ue) 2 2n j=2 x ) 2 + D2 2ue) x D D j ue) x )x j + O e z 3) 2 for z = x,..., x 2n ) near e. Note that x 2 z and x j = O x ) /2) for each j 3. It follows that e z = O x ) /2) and we conclude the lemma. The proof is complete. Lemma 4.3. Let k, d be positive integers with k > n + d. Then there exist a polynomial P d+ and a function f d F d such that 4.4) T d σ λ k t = b k,d λ k d t + λ k t P d+ + O λ t n+2 ) + f d t, ) for 2 < t < where b k,d = k ) k d). Proof. Let 2 < t <. Consider k > n for a moment. y Lemma 3.2 and 3.2) we have T w λ k t = tλ k t + t nb k, )λ k t = tλ k t + nb k, )λ k t + λ k t P + λ k t P. Put η = 2 z z and γ = z. Note that α +γ = αγ +β. Thus, a little manipulation yields 4.5) T η λ k t = α + γ)λ k t nb k, )λ k t = nb k, λ k t + αγλ k t + λ k t P 2. + λ k t P Note that γ = β α)/t. Also, note that α tz. So, it is clear that αγλ k t = O λ t n+2 ) for k n + 4. Meanwhile, for k > n + 4, we have k n 5 αγλ k t = αβ α)λ k t α j + αk n 4 t Therefore we see from 4.5) that Meanwhile, we have T σ η λ k t = j=0 = λ k t P 2 + α k n 3 β α)λ k t t = λ k t P 2 + O λ t n+2 ). T η λ k t = nb k, λ k t + λ k t P 2 + O λ t n+2 ), k > n. n j=2 T wj 2λk t = n)b k, λ k t + λ k t P 2, k > n + by Lemma 3.3 and 3.2). Combining these two estimates, we have 4.6) T σ λ k t = b k, λ k t + λ k t P 2 + O λ t n+2 ), k > n + and thus the lemma holds for d =. We now proceed by induction on d. So, assume that d and the lemma holds for d with k > n + d. So, we have 4.4). Now, assume k > n + d + and consider the case
16 6. CHOE AND H. KOO d +. Apply T σ to both sides of 4.4) once more. For the first term in the right side of 4.4), we have by 4.6) b k,d T σ λ k d t = b k,d+ λ k d t + λ k d t P 2 + O λ t n+2 ) = b k,d+ λ k d+) t + λ k t P d+)+ + O λ t n+2 ), which is of desired form. Also, T σ takes the last two terms in the right side of 4.4) into F d+ by Proposition 3.8. For the second term in the right side of 4.4), note that λ k t P d+ is a linear combination of terms of the type α i λ k j t, i + j d +. We only need to consider terms with k j > n + 2; otherwise terms are of O λ t n+2 ). For such a term we have T σ [α i λ k j t ] = b k j, α i λ k j t + α i λ k j t P 2 + O λ t n+2 ) = λ k t P +i+j + O λ t n+2 ) = λ k t P d+)+ + O λ t n+2 ) by 4.6). This shows that 4.4) also holds for d + and the induction is complete. The proof is complete. We are now ready for the proofs of Theorem., Theorem.2 and Theorem.3. First, we prove Theorem.. Proof of Theorem.. Assume T u T u2 = 0. Then, since u and u 2 are both continuous on W by assumption, we have 0 = T u T u2 ) = u u 2 on W by Proposition 2.. There are two cases to consider: i) oth u and u 2 vanish everywhere on W and ii) Either u or u 2 does not vanish on some boundary open subset of W. In case of i) we have u, u 2 Lip ζ) for some ζ W by Lemma 4.2. Thus, the case i) is contained in Theorem.3 to be proved below. So, we may assume ii). Note that we may further assume that u does not vanish on some boundary open set, still denoted by W, because otherwise we can use the adjoint operator T u T u2 ) = T u2 T u. We now have u 2 = 0 on W. Assume e W without loss of generality. y Proposition 4. we may further assume that Ru 2 vanishes nowhere on W. This will lead us to a contradiction. Let c = u e) 0 and c 2 = Du2e) 2 0. Let e = u c and e 2 = u 2 c 2 σ where σ is the function introduced in 4.3). Then we have and thus 4.7) 0 = T u T u2 = T c+e T c2σ+e 2 = c c 2 T σ + c 2 T e T σ + T u T e2 c c 2 T σ = c 2 T e T σ + T u T e2. Now we apply each sides of the above to the same test functions λ k t with an integer k > n + 2 and derive a contradiction. First, we have by 4.6) T σ λ k t z) = k λk t z) { + O tz )}, t so that 4.8) T σ λ k t te) = k λk t te) { + O t )} t) k
17 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS 7 as t. Next, note that e 2 z) = O z 3/2 ) by Lemma 4.2. Also, note that k 3 2 > n +. Thus an application of Proposition 3.8 gives T e2 λ k dv ξ) t z) tξ k 3/2 z ξ Φ 0, z, te) n+ t) k 3/2 n and thus an application of Proposition 3.5 gives 4.9) T u T e2 λ k t te) J n+, te) log t) t) k 3/2 n t) = o) k 3/2 t) k as t. Finally we estimate T e T σ λ k t. Write T σ λ k t = f + g where f = k λk t and g = T σ λ k t f. First, consider T e f. Given ɛ > 0 sufficiently small, let ωɛ) = sup{ u ξ) u e) : ξ W, e ξ < ɛ} be the modulus of continuity of u at e. y continuity we have ωɛ) 0 as ɛ 0. Note that, since e ξ 2 ξ 2 + ξ 2 4 ξ, we have In particular, we have tξ ξ t) e ξ 2 4 t). tξ ɛ2 4 t) for e ξ ɛ. Accordingly, with ɛ > 0 independent of t) fixed, we have by Proposition 3.5. e ξ) T e fte) dv ξ) tξ k +n+ e ξ) 4.0) = + dv ξ) tξ k+n e ξ <ɛ e ξ ɛ ωɛ) t) k + [ɛ 2 /4 t)] k+n for all t such that ɛ 2 /4 < t <. Next, consider T e g. y 4.6) we have g λ t k 2. Thus we get by Proposition 3.5 recall k 2 > n > 0) that 4.) T e gte) t) k 2 = o) t) k as t. Now, setting M = c c 2 T σ and R = c 2 T e T σ + T u T e2, we obtain from 4.7), 4.8), 4.9), 4.0) and 4.) that { = Mλk t te) Rλ k t te) t) k } o) + ωɛ) + [ɛ 2 /4 t)] k+n as t. So, first taking the limit t with ɛ > 0 fixed and then taking the limit ɛ 0, we have ωɛ), which is a contradiction. The proof is complete. Next, we prove Theorem.2.
18 8. CHOE AND H. KOO Proof of Theorem.2. Assume T u T un+3 = 0. Then, since each u j has a continuous extension to the whole boundary by assumption, we have T u T un+3 ) = u u n+3 = 0 on by Proposition 2.. Since u u n+3 is continuous and vanishes everywhere on the boundary, there exists a boundary open set W such that either u j ζ) 0, ζ W, or u j = 0 on W holds for each j. If u 0, there is nothing to prove. So, we may assume that u vanishes nowhere on W. Suppose that there is a boundary open set W j W such that 4.2) u j = Ru j = 0 on W j that for some j. Since u j C) is harmonic by assumption, Proposition 4. and 4.2) will lead us to conclude u j = 0 on, which completes the proof. Now, we assume that 4.2) dose not hold for all j and derive a contradiction. Since 4.2) does not hold, we may shrink if necessary) the set W to get a smaller boundary open set, still denoted by W, such that 4.3) either i) u j ζ) 0, ζ W, or ii) u j ζ) = 0, Ru j ζ) 0, ζ W holds for each j =, 2,..., n + 3. We may further assume that e W ; this causes no loss of generality by 4.). Note that Ru j e) = D u j e). We introduce more notation. In the rest of the proof we let 0 t < and z represent arbitrary points. Recall that D u j e) 0 by 4.3), in case u j e) = 0. Let d j = if u j e) = 0 and d j = 0 otherwise. Note that d = 0. Now, define the major part of u j by { u j e) if d j = 0 m j := Duje) 2 σ if d j = and put e j = u j m j for each j. Note that e z = O z /2). Thus, by Lemma 4.2 and the Lipschitz continuity hypothesis, there is some ɛ 0 0, 2 ) such that 4.4) e j z) = O z dj+ɛ0) for each j. In connection with this estimate we notice that m j = O ) z dj and thus 4.5) u j z) = O z ) dj for each j. We introduce further notation. Put M = T m T mn+3 and R = T u T un+3 M for notational convenience. Then an inductive argument yields where n+3 R = j= R j R j = T u T uj T ej T mj+ T mn+3
19 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS 9 for each j. Note that R = M, because T u T un+3 = 0 by assumption. We will estimate the same expression Mλ k t = Rλ k t along the radius ending at e in two different ways and reach a contradiction. efore proceeding, we recall a consequence provided by Lemma 4.3. Note that t tz. Therefore, given positive integers k and m with k > n + m, we have by Lemma ) Tσ m λ k t z) = b k,m λ k m t z) { + O tz + Et, z) )} where Et, z) = tz log t)δ z m. Now, put d = d + + d n+3 and p j = d + + d j, q j = d j + + d n+3 for each j =,..., n + 3. Note that we have d, because u u n )e) = 0. Choose a positive integer k sufficiently large so that k > n + d +. We first estimate Mλ k t. Let c j = u j e) if u j e) 0 and c j = Duje) 2 if u j e) = 0. Then we have M = ctσ d where c = c c n+3. It thus follows from 4.6) that so that 4.7) Mλ k t te) = cb k,d { + o)}, c 0 t) k d Mλ k t te) t) k d. Next, we estimate Rλ k t. So, fix j and consider R j. Note that So, we have T mj+ T mn+3 = c j+ c n+3 T qj+ σ. T mj+ T mn+3 λ k t λ k qj+ t by 4.6). It follows from 4.4) and Proposition 3.8 that T ej T mj+ T mn+3 λ k dv ξ) t z) tξ k qj ɛ0 z ξ 4.8) n+ t) Φ 0,z, te); k n qj ɛ0 note that k n q j ɛ 0 d + q j ɛ 0 > 0 by the choice of k. Now, going one step further, we get by 4.5) and Proposition 3.8 that for j 2. Note that 4.9) T uj T ej T mj+ T mn+3 λ k t z) Φ d j,2z, te) t) k n qj ɛ0 p j j 2 n +, j = 2,..., n + 3, because d = 0; it is this step which requires the restriction on the number of factors in the product. Hence, by the same argument repeatedly using 4.9) and Proposition 3.5, we eventually obtain R j λ k t z) Φ p j,jz, te) t) k n qj ɛ0
20 20. CHOE AND H. KOO for each j 2. This also holds for j = by 4.8) if we set p 0 = 0. So, evaluating at z = te, we therefore have R j λ k t te) This holds for arbitrary j. Accordingly, we have 4.20) + log t) j + log t) n+3. t) k d ɛ0 t) k d ɛ0 Rλ k t te) Now, we have by 4.7) and 4.20) + log t) n+3 t) k d ɛ0. = Mλk t te) Rλ k t te) t) ɛ0 + log t) n+3 ) as t, which is a contradiction. The proof is complete. Finally, we prove Theorem.3. The proof is exactly the same as that of Theorem.2 except at only one spot. We only indicate such a difference. Proof of Theorem.3. y a similar argument using Proposition 2., it is not hard to see that there is still a boundary open set W where u u 2 u n+2 vanishes and 4.3) holds. In addition, the local Lipschitz hypothesis allows us to assume e W and u j Lip ɛ e) for each j =, 2,..., n + 2. In the proof of Theorem.2 we were able to assume d = 0 under the global Lipschitz hypothesis, because the location of the boundary set W is of no significance. However, we cannot do the same under the present local Lipschitz hypothesis. That is, d = may well happen, which causes loss of a factor. So, the inequality 4.9) is no longer true and what we have now is p j j n + for 2 j n + 2. The rest of the proof is exactly the same. REFERENCES [] P. Ahern, On the range of the erezin transform, J. Funct. Anal ), [2] P. Ahern and Z. Cu cković, A theorem of rown-halmos type for ergman space Toeplitz operators, J. Funct. Anal ), [3] S. Axler, P. ourdon and W. Ramey, Harmonic function theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 992. [4] S. Axler and Z. Cu cković, Commuting Toeplitz operators with harmonic symbols, Integral Equations Operator Theory 499),. [5] S. Axler and D. Zheng, Compact operators via the erezin transform, Indiana Univ. Math. J ), [6] M. S. aouendi and L. P. Rothschild, A local Hopf lemma and unique continuation for harmonic functions, International Mathematics Research Notices, 993, No. 8, [7] A. rown and P. Halmos, Algebraic properties of Toeplitz operators, J. Reine Angew. Math ), [8]. Choe and Y. J. Lee, Pluriharmonic symbols of commuting Toeplitz operators, Illinois J. Math ), [9]. Choe, Y. J. Lee, K. Nam and D. Zheng, Products of ergman space Toeplitz operators on the polydisk, preprint. [0] X. Ding, Products of Toeplitz operators on the polydisk, Integral Equations Operator Theory ), [] R. G. Douglas, anach algebra techniques in operator theory, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 998. [2] M. Englis, Compact Toeplitz operators via the erezin transform on bounded symmetric domains, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory ), [3] C. Gu, Products of several Toeplitz operators, J. Funct. Anal ), [4] K. Guo, A problem on products of Toeplitz operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc ), [5] W. Rudin, Function theory in the unit ball of C n, Springer-Verlag, New York, 980. [6] K. Zhu, Operator theory in function spaces, Marcel Dekker, New York, 990.
21 ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS 2 DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, KOREA UNIVERSITY, SEOUL 36-70, KOREA address: cbr@korea.ac.kr DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, KOREA UNIVERSITY, SEOUL 36-70, KOREA address: koohw@korea.ac.kr
Zero products of Toeplitz operators with harmonic symbols
Journal of Functional Analysis 233 2006) 307 334 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa Zero products of Toeplitz operators with harmonic symbols Boorim Choe, Hyungwoon Koo Department of Mathematics, Korea University,
More informationZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS
ZERO PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS WITH n-harmonic SYMBOLS BOO RIM CHOE, HYUNGWOON KOO, AND YOUNG JOO LEE ABSTRACT. On the Bergman space of the unit polydisk in the complex n-space, we solve the zero-product
More informationDerivatives of Harmonic Bergman and Bloch Functions on the Ball
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 26, 1 123 (21) doi:1.16/jmaa.2.7438, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Derivatives of Harmonic ergman and loch Functions on the all oo
More informationDIAGONAL TOEPLITZ OPERATORS ON WEIGHTED BERGMAN SPACES
DIAGONAL TOEPLITZ OPERATORS ON WEIGHTED BERGMAN SPACES TRIEU LE Abstract. In this paper we discuss some algebraic properties of diagonal Toeplitz operators on weighted Bergman spaces of the unit ball in
More informationFractional Derivatives of Bloch Functions, Growth Rate, and Interpolation. Boo Rim Choe and Kyung Soo Rim
Fractional Derivatives of loch Functions, Growth Rate, and Interpolation oo Rim Choe and Kyung Soo Rim Abstract. loch functions on the ball are usually described by means of a restriction on the growth
More informationPRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS ON THE FOCK SPACE
PRODUCTS OF TOEPLITZ OPERATORS ON THE FOCK SPACE HONG RAE CHO, JONG-DO PARK, AND KEHE ZHU ABSTRACT. Let f and g be functions, not identically zero, in the Fock space F 2 α of. We show that the product
More informationCOMPOSITION OPERATORS ON HARDY-SOBOLEV SPACES
Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 46(3): 55-67, June 015 c Indian National Science Academy DOI: 10.1007/s136-015-0115-x COMPOSITION OPERATORS ON HARDY-SOBOLEV SPACES Li He, Guang Fu Cao 1 and Zhong Hua He Department
More informationON A CLASS OF IDEALS OF THE TOEPLITZ ALGEBRA ON THE BERGMAN SPACE
ON A CLASS OF IDEALS OF THE TOEPLITZ ALGEBRA ON THE BERGMAN SPACE TRIEU LE Abstract Let T denote the full Toeplitz algebra on the Bergman space of the unit ball B n For each subset G of L, let CI(G) denote
More informationHermitian Weighted Composition Operators on the Fock-type Space F 2 α(c N )
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 9, 2015, no. 61, 3037-3043 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2015.136 Hermitian Weighted Composition Operators on the Fock-type Space F 2 (C
More informationTRANSLATION INVARIANCE OF FOCK SPACES
TRANSLATION INVARIANCE OF FOCK SPACES KEHE ZHU ABSTRACT. We show that there is only one Hilbert space of entire functions that is invariant under the action of naturally defined weighted translations.
More informationMORE NOTES FOR MATH 823, FALL 2007
MORE NOTES FOR MATH 83, FALL 007 Prop 1.1 Prop 1. Lemma 1.3 1. The Siegel upper half space 1.1. The Siegel upper half space and its Bergman kernel. The Siegel upper half space is the domain { U n+1 z C
More informationLINEAR FRACTIONAL COMPOSITION OPERATORS ON H 2
J Integral Equations and Operator Theory (988, 5 60 LINEAR FRACTIONAL COMPOSITION OPERATORS ON H 2 CARL C COWEN Abstract If ϕ is an analytic function mapping the unit disk D into itself, the composition
More informationESSENTIALLY COMMUTING HANKEL AND TOEPLITZ OPERATORS
ESSENTIALLY COMMUTING HANKEL AND TOEPLITZ OPERATORS KUNYU GUO AND DECHAO ZHENG Abstract. We characterize when a Hankel operator a Toeplitz operator have a compact commutator. Let dσ(w) be the normalized
More informationAlgebraic Properties of Dual Toeplitz Operators on Harmonic Hardy Space over Polydisc
Journal of Mathematical Research with Applications Nov., 2016, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 703 710 DOI:10.3770/j.issn:2095-2651.2016.06.009 Http://jmre.dlut.edu.cn Algebraic Properties of Dual Toeplitz Operators
More informationON THE SIMILARITY OF CENTERED OPERATORS TO CONTRACTIONS. Srdjan Petrović
ON THE SIMILARITY OF CENTERED OPERATORS TO CONTRACTIONS Srdjan Petrović Abstract. In this paper we show that every power bounded operator weighted shift with commuting normal weights is similar to a contraction.
More informationMathematische Annalen
Math. Ann. (2007) 337:295 316 DOI 10.1007/s00208-006-0034-6 Mathematische Annalen Products of Bergman space Toeplitz operators on the polydisk Boo Rim Choe Young Joo Lee Kyesook Nam Dechao Zheng Received:
More informationHarmonic Polynomials and Dirichlet-Type Problems. 1. Derivatives of x 2 n
Harmonic Polynomials and Dirichlet-Type Problems Sheldon Axler and Wade Ramey 30 May 1995 Abstract. We take a new approach to harmonic polynomials via differentiation. Surprisingly powerful results about
More informationLOCAL DIRICHLET SPACES AS DE BRANGES-ROVNYAK SPACES
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 125, Number 7, July 1997, Pages 2133 2139 S 0002-9939(97)03896-3 LOCAL DIRICHLET SPACES AS DE BRANGES-ROVNYAK SPACES DONALD SARASON (Communicated
More informationCOMPOSITION OPERATORS INDUCED BY SYMBOLS DEFINED ON A POLYDISK
COMPOSITION OPERATORS INDUCED BY SYMBOLS DEFINED ON A POLYDISK MICHAEL STESSIN AND KEHE ZHU* ABSTRACT. Suppose ϕ is a holomorphic mapping from the polydisk D m into the polydisk D n, or from the polydisk
More informationREPRESENTATION THEOREM FOR HARMONIC BERGMAN AND BLOCH FUNCTIONS
Tanaka, K. Osaka J. Math. 50 (2013), 947 961 REPRESENTATION THEOREM FOR HARMONIC BERGMAN AND BLOCH FUNCTIONS KIYOKI TANAKA (Received March 6, 2012) Abstract In this paper, we give the representation theorem
More informationWEIERSTRASS THEOREMS AND RINGS OF HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS
WEIERSTRASS THEOREMS AND RINGS OF HOLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS YIFEI ZHAO Contents. The Weierstrass factorization theorem 2. The Weierstrass preparation theorem 6 3. The Weierstrass division theorem 8 References
More informationCOMPACT DIFFERENCE OF WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS ON N p -SPACES IN THE BALL
COMPACT DIFFERENCE OF WEIGHTED COMPOSITION OPERATORS ON N p -SPACES IN THE BALL HU BINGYANG and LE HAI KHOI Communicated by Mihai Putinar We obtain necessary and sucient conditions for the compactness
More informationComplex Analysis Homework 9: Solutions
Complex Analysis Fall 2007 Homework 9: Solutions 3..4 (a) Let z C \ {ni : n Z}. Then /(n 2 + z 2 ) n /n 2 n 2 n n 2 + z 2. According to the it comparison test from calculus, the series n 2 + z 2 converges
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.cv] 11 Mar 2016 BEYAZ BAŞAK KOCA AND NAZIM SADIK
INVARIANT SUBSPACES GENERATED BY A SINGLE FUNCTION IN THE POLYDISC arxiv:1603.01988v2 [math.cv] 11 Mar 2016 BEYAZ BAŞAK KOCA AND NAZIM SADIK Abstract. In this study, we partially answer the question left
More informationON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTEGRABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS
1 2 3 ON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTERABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS HONYU HE Abstract. In this paper, we study matrix valued positive definite functions on a unimodular group. We generalize two important
More informationINTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY
INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY KRZYSZTOF KURDYKA 1. Analytic functions in several variables 1.1. Summable families. Let (E, ) be a normed space over the field R or C, dim E
More informationMeans of unitaries, conjugations, and the Friedrichs operator
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 335 (2007) 941 947 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Means of unitaries, conjugations, and the Friedrichs operator Stephan Ramon Garcia Department of Mathematics, Pomona College, Claremont,
More informationSOME PROPERTIES OF THE CANONICAL DIVISOR IN THE BERGMAN SPACE
SOME PROPERTIES OF THE CANONICAL DIVISOR IN THE BERGMAN SPACE Cyrus Luciano 1, Lothar Narins 2, Alexander Schuster 3 1 Department of Mathematics, SFSU, San Francisco, CA 94132,USA e-mail: lucianca@sfsu.edu
More informationHartogs Theorem: separate analyticity implies joint Paul Garrett garrett/
(February 9, 25) Hartogs Theorem: separate analyticity implies joint Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ (The present proof of this old result roughly follows the proof
More informationComposition Operators on the Fock Space
Composition Operators on the Fock Space Brent Carswell Barbara D. MacCluer Alex Schuster Abstract We determine the holomorphic mappings of C n that induce bounded composition operators on the Fock space
More informationDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley. GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2016
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley YOUR 1 OR 2 DIGIT EXAM NUMBER GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2016 1. Please write your 1- or 2-digit exam number on
More informationLecture 11 Hyperbolicity.
Lecture 11 Hyperbolicity. 1 C 0 linearization near a hyperbolic point 2 invariant manifolds Hyperbolic linear maps. Let E be a Banach space. A linear map A : E E is called hyperbolic if we can find closed
More informationSARASON S COMPOSITION OPERATOR OVER THE HALF-PLANE
SARASON S COMPOSITION OPERATOR OVER THE HALF-PLANE BOO RIM CHOE, HYUNGWOON KOO, AND WAYNE SMITH In memory of Donald Sarason Abstract. Let H = {z C : Im z > 0} be the upper half plane, and denote by L p
More informationTOEPLITZ OPERATORS. Toeplitz studied infinite matrices with NW-SE diagonals constant. f e C :
TOEPLITZ OPERATORS EFTON PARK 1. Introduction to Toeplitz Operators Otto Toeplitz lived from 1881-1940 in Goettingen, and it was pretty rough there, so he eventually went to Palestine and eventually contracted
More informationStrictly positive definite functions on a real inner product space
Advances in Computational Mathematics 20: 263 271, 2004. 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Strictly positive definite functions on a real inner product space Allan Pinkus Department
More informationSPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS
SPECTRAL THEOREM FOR COMPACT SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS G. RAMESH Contents Introduction 1 1. Bounded Operators 1 1.3. Examples 3 2. Compact Operators 5 2.1. Properties 6 3. The Spectral Theorem 9 3.3. Self-adjoint
More informationWeighted composition operators on weighted Bergman spaces of bounded symmetric domains
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) Vol. 117, No. 2, May 2007, pp. 185 196. Printed in India Weighted composition operators on weighted Bergman spaces of bounded symmetric domains SANJAY KUMAR and KANWAR
More informationON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM
ON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM OLEG ZUBELEVICH DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS THE BUDGET AND TREASURY ACADEMY OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 7, ZLATOUSTINSKY MALIY PER.,
More informationCARLESON MEASURES AND DOUGLAS QUESTION ON THE BERGMAN SPACE. Department of Mathematics, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH ANTHONY VASATURO
CARLESON MEASURES AN OUGLAS QUESTION ON THE BERGMAN SPACE ŽELJKO ČUČKOVIĆ epartment of Mathematics, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606 ANTHONY VASATURO epartment of Mathematics, University of Toledo,
More informationA linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra
A linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra Andrés E. Caicedo May 18, 2010 Abstract We present a recent proof due to Harm Derksen, that any linear operator in a complex finite dimensional
More informationNumerical Range in C*-Algebras
Journal of Mathematical Extension Vol. 6, No. 2, (2012), 91-98 Numerical Range in C*-Algebras M. T. Heydari Yasouj University Abstract. Let A be a C*-algebra with unit 1 and let S be the state space of
More informationA linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra
A linear algebra proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra Andrés E. Caicedo May 18, 2010 Abstract We present a recent proof due to Harm Derksen, that any linear operator in a complex finite dimensional
More informationMath 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative
Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative This chapter is another review of standard material in complex analysis. See for instance
More informationA TALE OF TWO CONFORMALLY INVARIANT METRICS
A TALE OF TWO CONFORMALLY INVARIANT METRICS H. S. BEAR AND WAYNE SMITH Abstract. The Harnack metric is a conformally invariant metric defined in quite general domains that coincides with the hyperbolic
More informationExistence and Uniqueness
Chapter 3 Existence and Uniqueness An intellect which at a certain moment would know all forces that set nature in motion, and all positions of all items of which nature is composed, if this intellect
More informationStrictly Positive Definite Functions on a Real Inner Product Space
Strictly Positive Definite Functions on a Real Inner Product Space Allan Pinkus Abstract. If ft) = a kt k converges for all t IR with all coefficients a k 0, then the function f< x, y >) is positive definite
More informationdominant positive-normal. In view of (1), it is very natural to study the properties of positivenormal
Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 39 (2002), No. 1, pp. 33 41 ON POSITIVE-NORMAL OPERATORS In Ho Jeon, Se Hee Kim, Eungil Ko, and Ji Eun Park Abstract. In this paper we study the properties of positive-normal operators
More informationSAMPLING SEQUENCES FOR BERGMAN SPACES FOR p < 1. Alexander P. Schuster and Dror Varolin
SAMPLING SEQUENCES FOR BERGMAN SPACES FOR p < Alexander P. Schuster and ror Varolin Abstract. We provide a proof of the sufficiency direction of Seip s characterization of sampling sequences for Bergman
More informationCommutants of Finite Blaschke Product. Multiplication Operators on Hilbert Spaces of Analytic Functions
Commutants of Finite Blaschke Product Multiplication Operators on Hilbert Spaces of Analytic Functions Carl C. Cowen IUPUI (Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis) Universidad de Zaragoza, 5
More informationGlobal holomorphic functions in several non-commuting variables II
arxiv:706.09973v [math.fa] 29 Jun 207 Global holomorphic functions in several non-commuting variables II Jim Agler U.C. San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093 July 3, 207 John E. McCarthy Washington University St.
More informationBanach Journal of Mathematical Analysis ISSN: (electronic)
Banach J. Math. Anal. 6 (2012), no. 1, 139 146 Banach Journal of Mathematical Analysis ISSN: 1735-8787 (electronic) www.emis.de/journals/bjma/ AN EXTENSION OF KY FAN S DOMINANCE THEOREM RAHIM ALIZADEH
More informationStanford Mathematics Department Math 205A Lecture Supplement #4 Borel Regular & Radon Measures
2 1 Borel Regular Measures We now state and prove an important regularity property of Borel regular outer measures: Stanford Mathematics Department Math 205A Lecture Supplement #4 Borel Regular & Radon
More informationInvertible Composition Operators: The product of a composition operator with the adjoint of a composition operator.
Invertible Composition Operators: The product of a composition operator with the adjoint of a composition operator. John H. Clifford, Trieu Le and Alan Wiggins Abstract. In this paper, we study the product
More informationTHE ZERO-DISTRIBUTION AND THE ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF A FOURIER INTEGRAL. Haseo Ki and Young One Kim
THE ZERO-DISTRIBUTION AND THE ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF A FOURIER INTEGRAL Haseo Ki Young One Kim Abstract. The zero-distribution of the Fourier integral Q(u)eP (u)+izu du, where P is a polynomial with leading
More informationSpanning and Independence Properties of Finite Frames
Chapter 1 Spanning and Independence Properties of Finite Frames Peter G. Casazza and Darrin Speegle Abstract The fundamental notion of frame theory is redundancy. It is this property which makes frames
More informationHarmonic Bergman Spaces
Holomorphic paces MRI Publications Volume 33, 998 Harmonic ergman paces KAREL TROETHOFF Abstract. We present a simple derivation of the explicit formula for the harmonic ergman reproducing kernel on the
More information1 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations
March 3, 203 6-6. Systems of Linear Equations Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations An m n matrix is an array A = a ij of the form a a n a 2 a 2n... a m a mn where each a ij is a real or complex number.
More informationAn Introduction to Complex Analysis and Geometry John P. D Angelo, Pure and Applied Undergraduate Texts Volume 12, American Mathematical Society, 2010
An Introduction to Complex Analysis and Geometry John P. D Angelo, Pure and Applied Undergraduate Texts Volume 12, American Mathematical Society, 2010 John P. D Angelo, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana IL 61801.
More informationMath 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative
Math 259: Introduction to Analytic Number Theory Functions of finite order: product formula and logarithmic derivative This chapter is another review of standard material in complex analysis. See for instance
More informationBLOCH FUNCTIONS ON THE UNIT BALL OF AN INFINITE DIMENSIONAL HILBERT SPACE
BLOCH FUNCTIONS ON THE UNIT BALL OF AN INFINITE DIMENSIONAL HILBERT SPACE OSCAR BLASCO, PABLO GALINDO, AND ALEJANDRO MIRALLES Abstract. The Bloch space has been studied on the open unit disk of C and some
More informationTOEPLITZ OPERATORS ON BERGMAN SPACES OF POLYANALYTIC FUNCTIONS
TOEPLITZ OPERATORS ON BERGMAN SPACES OF POLYANALYTIC FUNCTIONS ŽELJKO ČUČKOVIĆ AN TRIEU LE Abstract. We study algebraic properties of Toeplitz operators on Bergman spaces of polyanalytic functions on the
More informationBALANCING GAUSSIAN VECTORS. 1. Introduction
BALANCING GAUSSIAN VECTORS KEVIN P. COSTELLO Abstract. Let x 1,... x n be independent normally distributed vectors on R d. We determine the distribution function of the minimum norm of the 2 n vectors
More informationMetric Spaces and Topology
Chapter 2 Metric Spaces and Topology From an engineering perspective, the most important way to construct a topology on a set is to define the topology in terms of a metric on the set. This approach underlies
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.fa] 13 Jul 2007
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) Vol. 117, No. 2, May 2003, pp. 185 195. Printed in India Weighted composition operators on weighted Bergman spaces of bounded symmetric domains arxiv:0707.1964v1 [math.fa]
More informationDaniel M. Oberlin Department of Mathematics, Florida State University. January 2005
PACKING SPHERES AND FRACTAL STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES IN R d FOR d 3 Daniel M. Oberlin Department of Mathematics, Florida State University January 005 Fix a dimension d and for x R d and r > 0, let Sx, r) stand
More informationare Banach algebras. f(x)g(x) max Example 7.4. Similarly, A = L and A = l with the pointwise multiplication
7. Banach algebras Definition 7.1. A is called a Banach algebra (with unit) if: (1) A is a Banach space; (2) There is a multiplication A A A that has the following properties: (xy)z = x(yz), (x + y)z =
More information1 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations. a 1n a 2n
March 31, 2013 16-1 16. Systems of Linear Equations 1 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations An m n matrix is an array A = (a ij ) of the form a 11 a 21 a m1 a 1n a 2n... a mn where each a ij is a real
More informationSOLUTION TO RUBEL S QUESTION ABOUT DIFFERENTIALLY ALGEBRAIC DEPENDENCE ON INITIAL VALUES GUY KATRIEL PREPRINT NO /4
SOLUTION TO RUBEL S QUESTION ABOUT DIFFERENTIALLY ALGEBRAIC DEPENDENCE ON INITIAL VALUES GUY KATRIEL PREPRINT NO. 2 2003/4 1 SOLUTION TO RUBEL S QUESTION ABOUT DIFFERENTIALLY ALGEBRAIC DEPENDENCE ON INITIAL
More informationLecture 4: Numerical solution of ordinary differential equations
Lecture 4: Numerical solution of ordinary differential equations Department of Mathematics, ETH Zürich General explicit one-step method: Consistency; Stability; Convergence. High-order methods: Taylor
More informationTHE BERGMAN KERNEL FUNCTION. 1. Introduction
THE BERGMAN KERNEL FUNCTION GAAHAR MISRA Abstract. In this note, we point out that a large family of n n matrix valued kernel functions defined on the unit disc C, which were constructed recently in [9],
More informationMATHEMATICS 217 NOTES
MATHEMATICS 27 NOTES PART I THE JORDAN CANONICAL FORM The characteristic polynomial of an n n matrix A is the polynomial χ A (λ) = det(λi A), a monic polynomial of degree n; a monic polynomial in the variable
More informationMATH 426, TOPOLOGY. p 1.
MATH 426, TOPOLOGY THE p-norms In this document we assume an extended real line, where is an element greater than all real numbers; the interval notation [1, ] will be used to mean [1, ) { }. 1. THE p
More informationTHE BERGMAN KERNEL FUNCTION 1. Gadadhar Misra
Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 41(1): 189-197, February 2010 c Indian National Science Academy THE BERGMAN KERNEL FUNCTION 1 Gadadhar Misra Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
More informationA PRIMER ON SESQUILINEAR FORMS
A PRIMER ON SESQUILINEAR FORMS BRIAN OSSERMAN This is an alternative presentation of most of the material from 8., 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5 and 8.8 of Artin s book. Any terminology (such as sesquilinear form
More informationClassification of root systems
Classification of root systems September 8, 2017 1 Introduction These notes are an approximate outline of some of the material to be covered on Thursday, April 9; Tuesday, April 14; and Thursday, April
More informationFredholmness of Some Toeplitz Operators
Fredholmness of Some Toeplitz Operators Beyaz Başak Koca Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey IWOTA, 2017 Preliminaries Definition (Fredholm operator) Let H be a Hilbert space and let T B(H). T is said
More informationREAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS
REAL AND COMPLE ANALYSIS Third Edition Walter Rudin Professor of Mathematics University of Wisconsin, Madison Version 1.1 No rights reserved. Any part of this work can be reproduced or transmitted in any
More informationBoundedly complete weak-cauchy basic sequences in Banach spaces with the PCP
Journal of Functional Analysis 253 (2007) 772 781 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa Note Boundedly complete weak-cauchy basic sequences in Banach spaces with the PCP Haskell Rosenthal Department of Mathematics,
More information2 A Model, Harmonic Map, Problem
ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS JOHN E. HUTCHINSON Department of Mathematics School of Mathematical Sciences, A.N.U. 1 Introduction Elliptic equations model the behaviour of scalar quantities u, such as temperature or
More informationPOINTWISE MULTIPLIERS FROM WEIGHTED BERGMAN SPACES AND HARDY SPACES TO WEIGHTED BERGMAN SPACES
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 29, 24, 139 15 POINTWISE MULTIPLIERS FROM WEIGHTE BERGMAN SPACES AN HARY SPACES TO WEIGHTE BERGMAN SPACES Ruhan Zhao University of Toledo, epartment
More informationVector Fields on the Space of Functions Univalent Inside the Unit Disk via Faber Polynomials
Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 5 (2009), 032, pages Vector Fields on the Space of Functions Univalent Inside the Unit Disk via Faber Polynomials Helene AIRAULT LAMFA
More informationTHE GROUP OF UNITS OF SOME FINITE LOCAL RINGS I
J Korean Math Soc 46 (009), No, pp 95 311 THE GROUP OF UNITS OF SOME FINITE LOCAL RINGS I Sung Sik Woo Abstract The purpose of this paper is to identify the group of units of finite local rings of the
More informationCOMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 2014
COMPLEX ANALYSIS Spring 204 Cauchy and Runge Under the Same Roof. These notes can be used as an alternative to Section 5.5 of Chapter 2 in the textbook. They assume the theorem on winding numbers of the
More informationNovember 18, 2013 ANALYTIC FUNCTIONAL CALCULUS
November 8, 203 ANALYTIC FUNCTIONAL CALCULUS RODICA D. COSTIN Contents. The spectral projection theorem. Functional calculus 2.. The spectral projection theorem for self-adjoint matrices 2.2. The spectral
More informationBoolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices
Boolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices Stan Gudder Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver CO 80208 Frédéric Latrémolière Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver
More informationTHE BOUNDEDNESS BELOW OF 2 2 UPPER TRIANGULAR OPERATOR MATRICES. In Sung Hwang and Woo Young Lee 1
THE BOUNDEDNESS BELOW OF 2 2 UPPER TRIANGULAR OPERATOR MATRICES In Sung Hwang and Woo Young Lee 1 When A LH and B LK are given we denote by M C an operator acting on the Hilbert space H K of the form M
More informationREVERSALS ON SFT S. 1. Introduction and preliminaries
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume 7, Number 2, December, 2004, Pages 119 125 REVERSALS ON SFT S JUNGSEOB LEE Abstract. Reversals of topological dynamical systems
More informationAn introduction to some aspects of functional analysis
An introduction to some aspects of functional analysis Stephen Semmes Rice University Abstract These informal notes deal with some very basic objects in functional analysis, including norms and seminorms
More informationDERIVATIVE-FREE CHARACTERIZATIONS OF Q K SPACES
ERIVATIVE-FREE CHARACTERIZATIONS OF Q K SPACES HASI WULAN AN KEHE ZHU ABSTRACT. We give two characterizations of the Möbius invariant Q K spaces, one in terms of a double integral and the other in terms
More informationMATH 581D FINAL EXAM Autumn December 12, 2016
MATH 58D FINAL EXAM Autumn 206 December 2, 206 NAME: SIGNATURE: Instructions: there are 6 problems on the final. Aim for solving 4 problems, but do as much as you can. Partial credit will be given on all
More informationALGEBRAIC PROPERTIES OF OPERATOR ROOTS OF POLYNOMIALS
ALGEBRAIC PROPERTIES OF OPERATOR ROOTS OF POLYNOMIALS TRIEU LE Abstract. Properties of m-selfadjoint and m-isometric operators have been investigated by several researchers. Particularly interesting to
More informationConvergence in shape of Steiner symmetrized line segments. Arthur Korneychuk
Convergence in shape of Steiner symmetrized line segments by Arthur Korneychuk A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Graduate Department of Mathematics
More informationAN INTERPOLATION THEOREM FOR HOLOMORPHIC AUTOMORPHISMS OF C n. Gregery T. Buzzard and Franc Forstneric*
AN INTERPOLATION THEOREM FOR HOLOMORPHIC AUTOMORPHISMS OF C n Gregery T. Buzzard and Franc Forstneric* Department of Mathematics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA Department of Mathematics,
More informationCompression on the digital unit sphere
16th Conference on Applied Mathematics, Univ. of Central Oklahoma, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conf. 07, 001, pp. 1 4. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
More informationDeviation Measures and Normals of Convex Bodies
Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie Contributions to Algebra Geometry Volume 45 (2004), No. 1, 155-167. Deviation Measures Normals of Convex Bodies Dedicated to Professor August Florian on the occasion
More informationProblem List MATH 5143 Fall, 2013
Problem List MATH 5143 Fall, 2013 On any problem you may use the result of any previous problem (even if you were not able to do it) and any information given in class up to the moment the problem was
More informationDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley. GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2014
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley YOUR 1 OR 2 DIGIT EXAM NUMBER GRADUATE PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION, Part A Fall Semester 2014 1. Please write your 1- or 2-digit exam number on
More informationLIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society Submitted Paper Paper 14 June 2011 LIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM MICHAEL C. CRABB AND PEDRO L. Q. PERGHER Institute of Mathematics,
More informationFinite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product
Chapter 4 Hilbert Spaces 4.1 Inner Product Spaces Inner Product Space. A complex vector space E is called an inner product space (or a pre-hilbert space, or a unitary space) if there is a mapping (, )
More informationTRIANGLE CENTERS DEFINED BY QUADRATIC POLYNOMIALS
Math. J. Okayama Univ. 53 (2011), 185 216 TRIANGLE CENTERS DEFINED BY QUADRATIC POLYNOMIALS Yoshio Agaoka Abstract. We consider a family of triangle centers whose barycentric coordinates are given by quadratic
More information