arxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Aug 1993
|
|
- Edward Stewart
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 hep-th/930809, IMA Preprint Series no.53, July 993 QUADRICS ON COMPLEX RIEMANNIAN SPACES OF CONSTANT CURVATURE, SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET arxiv:hep-th/930809v 23 Aug 993 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV*and WILLARD MILLER, Jr. Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Waikato Hamilton, New Zealand Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Amsterdam Plantage Muidergracht TV Amsterdam The Netherlands. School of Mathematics and Institute for Mathematics and its Applications, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. Abstract. We consider integrable systems that are connected with orthogonal separation of variables in complex Riemannian spaces of constant curvature. An isomorphism with the hyperbolic Gaudin magnet, previously pointed out by one of us, extends to coordinates of this type. The complete classification of these separable coordinate systems is provided by means of the corresponding L-matrices for the Gaudin magnet. The limiting procedures (or ǫ calculus) which relate various degenerate orthogonal coordinate systems play a crucial result in the classification of all such systems. PACS: b, m, p, Fd. Classical Integrable Systems on Complex Constant Curvature Spaces and the Complex Gaudin Magnet. Separation of variables in the Hamilton Jacobi equation n (.) H(p,..., p n ; x,..., x n ) = g αβ p α p β = E, α,β= p α = W x α, α =,..., n *This author was supported by the National Dutch Science Organization (NWO) under the Project # Work supported in part by the National Science Foundation under grant DMS
2 2 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. amounts to looking for a solution of the form n (.2) W = W α (x α ; h,..., h n ), h n = E The solution is said to be a complete integral if det( 2 W/ x i h j ) n n 0. The solution then describes that of free motion on the corresponding Riemannian space with contravariant metric g αβ. Indeed, if we require b j = W h j h n tδ nj, j =,..., n for parameters b j, we find that the functions x(b,h), p(b,h) satisfy Hamilton s equations (.3) ẋ α = H p α, ṗ α = H x α In this article we allow the Riemannian space to be complex and we consider variable separation of (.) on the following two classes of spaces. () The n dimensional complex sphere S nc. This is commonly realised by the set of complex vectors x = (x,..., x ) which satisfy x2 α = and have infinitesmal distance dx dx = dx2 α (2) The n dimensional complex Euclidean space E nc. This is the set of complex vectors x = (x,..., x n ) with infinitesmal distance dx dx = n dx2 α. A fundamental problem from the point of view of separation of variables on these manifolds is to find all inequivalent coordinate systems. As yet, this is an unsolved problem, principally because many such coordinate systems are intrinsically nonorthogonal. For orthogonal coordinate systems the problem is completely solved and in this case the constants h i occuring in the complete integral can be chosen to be the values of an involutive set of constants of motion (.4) A j = where n α,β= {F(x α, p β ), G(x α, p β )} = a (j) αβ p αp β, j =,..., n, A n = H, {A j, A k } = 0, n ( F G F G ), p γ x γ x γ p γ γ= α, β =,..., n is the Poisson bracket. These constants of the motion are such that () each of the tensors a (j) αβ is a Killing tensor and satisfies Killing s equations (α a (j) βγ) = 0, [], and (2) the A j can be represented as a sum of quadratic elements of the enveloping algebra of the Lie algebra of symmetries of each of these two considered spaces. The Lie algebras of these spaces have respectively bases of the form () SO(n + ) : M αβ = x α p β x β p α, α, β =,..., n +. Here, {M αβ, M γδ } = δ αγ M δβ + δ αδ M βγ + δ βγ M αδ + δ βδ M γα (2) E(n) : M αβ, P γ = p γ, α, β, γ =,, n, α β. Here, {M αβ, P γ } = δ βγ P α δ αγ P β, {P α, P β } = 0.
3 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 3 In this section the separable coordinate systems classified in [,5,0] are given an algebraic interpretation. This is done using the complex analogue of the isomorphism between all integrable systems connected with all possible separable systems and the m site SO(2, ) Gaudin magnet, [2,4]. The m-site complex Gaudin magnet can be realised as follows. Consider the direct sum of Lie algebras, each of rank, (.5) A = m so α (3,C). The generators s α C 3, α =,, m of A satisfy the Poisson bracket relations (.6) {s i α, sj β } = δ αβǫ ijk s k α. The following metric will be used subsequently when norms and scalar products are calculated: s 2 α = (s α,s α ) = (s α) 2 + (s 2 α) 2 + (s 3 α) 2, (s α,s β ) = s αs β + s 2 αs 2 β + s 3 αs 3 β. If for each α, s 2 α = c2 α then the variables s α lie on the direct product of n complex spheres in C 3. The complex Gaudin magnet is the integrable Hamiltonian system described by the n integrals of motion H α which are in involution with respect to the Poisson bracket, (.7) H α = 2 m (sα,s β ), {H α, H γ } = 0. e α e β β= (We will give a simple proof of this involution property later.) Here the e α are taken to be pairwise distinct. This integrable Hamiltonian system is called an m- site SO(3,C) XXX Gaudin magnet. The H α are all quadratic functions in the generators of the A algebra and the following identities are satisfied: (.8) m H α = 0, m m e α H α = J 2 c 2 α, where we have introduced the variables m (.9) J = s α, J 2 = (J,J), the total sum of the momenta s α. Indeed (.0) {J i, J j } = ǫ ijk J k, {J k, H α } = 0, i, j, k =, 2, 3, α =,, m. The complete set of involutive integrals of motion is provided by H α,j 2 and, for example, J 3. The integrals are generated by the 2 2 L matrix [3,4,6,7,8], (.) L(u) = m ( s 3 α 2 3 s α ) is2 α = ( A B ),
4 4 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. where (.2) det L(u) = (A 2 + BC) = m H α m Furthermore, L(u) satisfies the linear r matrix algebra [2,2] c 2 α ( ) 2. (.3) { L(u), 2 L(v)} = i u v [P, L(u) + 2 L(v)], i = where (.4) P =, L(u) = L(u) I, 2 L(v) = I L(v). The algebra specified by (.3) contains all the necessary Hamiltonian structure of the problem in question. Note that (.3) is equivalent to the easily proved relations (.5) {A(u), A(v)} = {B(u), B(v)} = {C(u), C(v)} = 0, {A(u), B(v)} = {B(u), C(v)} = i i (B(v) B(u)), {A(u), C(v)} = (C(u) C(v)), u v u v 2i (A(v) A(u)). u v From (.5) and the Leibnitz property of the Poisson bracket it is straightforward to deduce that {det L(u), detl(v)} = 0. In his article [4] Kuznetsov has explicitly given the nature of the isomorphism between the XXX Gaudin magnet models and the separation of variables on the n dimensional real sphere S n. The purpose of this article is to extend these ideas to complex orthogonal coordinate systems on the complex n sphere S nc and, of course, as a consequence complex Euclidean space E nc. Following Kuznetsov [4,7] in the case of the sphere, we set c α = 0, α =,, n +. The coordinates on the resulting cones are parametrised by (.6) s α = 4 (p2 α + x2 α ), s2 α = i 4 (p2 α x2 α ), s3 α = i 2 p αx α. It follows from (.6) that {x α, x β } = {p α, p β } = 0, {p α, x β } = δ αβ. Introducing the new variables M αβ = x α p β x β p α which are the generators of rotations we have (s α,s β ) = 8 M2 αβ. These generators satisfy the commutations relations given previously. This equality establishes the simple quadratic connection between the generators s α of A and the
5 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 5 subsequent discussion) transform into the following integrals for the free motion on the n sphere H = h α H α = h α h β Mαβ 2 4 e α e. β For h γ = e γ we obtain the Casimir element of the so(n + ) algebra α<β M2 αβ. The total momentum J takes the form α<β J = 4 (p p + x x), J2 = i 4 (p p x x), J3 = i 2 p x where the scalar product for the vectors x and p in C is Euclidean.The quantities M and J form the direct sum so(n + ) so(3) as a result of the commutation relations {M αβ, J i } = 0, {J i, J j } = ǫ ijk J k. Therefore, in addition to the involutive set of integrals H α we can choose J 2 = α<β M2 αβ and 2(J +ij 2 ) = x x = c, which gives the equation of the n sphere Generic Ellipsoidal Coordinates on S nc and E nc. Critical to the separation of variables on the n sphere S nc is the system of ellipsoidal coordinates graphically pictured by the irreducible block (2.) (S nc e e 2 e. where in general e α e β for α β. The separation variables are defined as zeros of the off diagonal element B(u) of the L matrix, i.e., B(u j ) = 0, j =,..., n. It follows that (2.2) x 2 α = 0 for u = u j and x 2 α u e = c Πn j= (u j e α ) α Π β α (e β e α ). Each vector of momentum s α is associated with a cell e α of the block. Note that x 2 α = 2(s α + is 2 β ). For each u j the conjugate variable v j is defined according to (2.3) v j = ia(u j ) = 2 x α p α u j e α. From (.5) one can show that the u i, v i satisfy the canonical relations [4]: (2.4) {u j, u i } = {v j, v i } = 0, {v j, u i } = δ ij. The change to the new variables v j, u i, c and J 3 is effectively the procedure of variable separation of (.) in ellipsoidal coordinates on the n-sphere. Writing the L matrix in terms of the new variables we obtain L(u) = ( A(u) B(u) ), B(u) = c Π n j= (u u j),
6 6 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. (2.5) A(u) = 2i n c B(u) ij 3 v j Π γ= + (u j e γ ), u u j Π i j (u j u i ) j= where A(u j ) = iv j, j =,, n, and A(u) (/u)j 3 + as u. To obtain C(u) we first notice that equating residues at e α on the right and left hand side of A(u) gives p α = 2x α c ij 3 + n v j Π e j= α u j γ= (u j e γ ). Π i j (u j u i ) This together with the expression (2.2) for x 2 α in terms of u j gives C(u) in the new variables. Three other useful formulae are (2.6) M αβ = 2x αx β c (e α e β ) n j= ˆΠ γ= v (u j e γ ) j Π i j (u j u i ), where the hat in (2.6) means that the product terms with γ = α and γ = β are omitted, (2.7) J 2 = n j= v 2 j Π γ= (u j e γ ) n Π i j (u j u i ) = j= cv 2 j ( x 2 α ), (u j e α ) 2 H α = x2 α c n vj 2 Π u j e α j= γ= (u j e γ ) Π i j (u j u i ). These relations together with (2.2) establish the explicit connection between the two sets of 2n+2 variables p α, x α and u i, v j, c, J 3. The equation for the eigenvalue curve Γ : det(l(u) iλi) = 0 has the form λ 2 A(u) 2 B(u)C(u) = 0. If we put u = u j into this equation then λ = ±v j. Thus variables u j and v j lie on the curve Γ: (2.8) v 2 j + n H α u j e α v 2 j det L(u j ) = 0. Equations (2.8) are the separation equations for each of the n degrees of freedom connected with the values of the integrals H α. For the sphere c α = 0 these have the form H α = M 2 αβ, Hα = 0, eα H α = M 2 αβ = J 2.
7 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 7 The Hamilton Jacobi equation (.) when parametrised by these variables has the form (2.9) 4 Mαβ 2 = J 2 = α<β n ( W 2Π γ= ) (u j e γ ) u j Π i j (u j u i ) = E, j= v j = W u j, which can be solved by the separation of variables ansatz (2.0) W = n W j (u j, H,..., H n ) = j= n j= v j du j. It will be convenient to employ an alternative form of the L matrix. If we use the vector (2.) L(u) = where s = we see that L satisfies s α, L(u) = (s,l(u)), det L(u) = L(u) L(u) ( ) 0, s 2 = 0 ( ) ( ) 0 i, s 3 0 =, i 0 0 (2.2) {L i (u), L j (v)} = ǫ ijk ( L k (u) L k (v) ). u v At this point we must consider a crucial difference between the real sphere and its complex counterpart. In the case of the complex sphere the generic ellipsoidal coordinates can admit multiply degenerate forms: the restriction e α e β, for α β can be lifted. The resulting coordinates can be denoted by the block form (S nc e λ eλ 2 2 eλ q q, λ + + λ q = n +, where the λ α denote the multiplicities of the e α. To understand how the previous analysis applies to these types of coordinates we first illustrate with an example corresponding to the coordinates with diagram In this case we write (S nc e 2 e 3 e. (2.3) L(u) = a s + a 2s 2 s α +. u e u e 2 Putting α=3 (2.4) x 2 x + ǫx 2, x x, p 2 p + ǫp 2, p p,
8 2 2 8 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. then in the limit as ǫ 0 we find where L(u) = z (u e ) + z u e α=3 z =< 4 (p 2 + x 2 i ), 4 (p 2 x 2 i ), 2 p x > z α z 2 =< 2 (p p 2 + x x 2 ), i 2 (p p 2 x x 2 ), i 2 (p x 2 + p 2 x ) > (2.5) z α = s α, α = 3,, n +. The components of z,z 2 satisfy the E(3,C) algebra relations {z i, zj } = 0, {zi, zj 2 } = ǫ ijkz k, {zi 2, zj 2 } = ǫ ijkz k 2 where the Poisson bracket (expressed in the primed coordinates) is {F, G} = j,k= B jk ( F p j G x k F x j G ) p k and B = (B jk ) = It can easily be verified from these relations that relations (2.2) are again satisfied. Thus, {L L(u),L L(v)} = 0 so the coefficients of the various powers (u e j ) k in the expansion of L L(u) form an involutive set of integrals of motion. We obtain L L = (u e ) 4z z + + α 3 2 (u e ) 3z z 2 + 2z 2 z α (u e )( ) + α,β 3, α β α=3 (u e ) 2z 2 z 2 + α 3 ( )(u e β ) (z α,z β ) (2.6) = 4(u e ) 2(p x 2 p 2x ) 2 + [ 4(u e ) 2 ( ) (p x α p αx ) 2 + 2(u e )( ) (p x α p α x )(p 2 x α p α x 2 )] n + 8( )(u e β ) (p β x α p α x β )2. α,β=3,α β In particular, 2z z α (u e ) 2 ( )
9 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 9 z α z 2 = (p x α p α x )(p 2 x α p α x 2 )/4. To relate this to the projective coordinates on the complex n sphere we recall that under the transformation (2.4) the fundamental quadratic forms X = a x 2 +a 2x α=3 x2 α, P = a p 2 + a 2p p2 α transform to X = 2x x 2 + α=3 x 2 α, P = 2p p 2 +. Therefore if we take the coordinates α=3 p 2 α x = 2 (X + ix 2 ), x 2 = 2 (X ix 2 ), x α = X α, α = 3,, n + p = 2 (P + ip 2 ), p 2 = 2 (P ip 2 ), p α = P α, α = 3,, n + we then can write p x α p αx = 2 (M α + im 2α ), p 2x α p αx 2 = 2 (M α im 2α ), p x 2 p 2 x = i 2M 2, X = Xj 2, P = Pj 2, where M jk = X j P k X k P j. The integrals of motion H α, Z in this case have, using partial fractions, the form L L = + j= j= (u e ) [ 2 4 (p x 2 p 2 x )2 + 4(e e α ) (p x α p α x )2 ] α=3 α=3 [ 4(e e α ) 2(p x α p α x )2 2(e e α ) (p x α p α x )(p 2 x α p α x 2 ) + (p α x β p β x α )2 ] + [ (p 4(e α e β ) (u e ) 4(e β α=3 e α ) x α p αx ) (e e α ) (p x α p α x )(p 2 x α p α x 2 )] = α=3 H α + Z (u e ) + Y 2 u e where Y = α=3 H α. The analysis presented so far could have been deduced from Kuznetsov [4] where the double root is essentially contained in the s systems of type C on the real hyperboloid. Furthermore, the threefold root is contained in Kuznetsov s type D systems. The question we now answer is how to use these techniques on the case of ellipsoidal coordinates corresponding to multiply degenerate roots. For this we use the limiting procedures developed by Kalnins, Miller and Reid [5]. We recall that the process of using these limiting procedures amounts to altering the elementary divisors of the two quadratic forms x 2 α = 0, x 2 α = c2.
10 0 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. Theorem. Let u i be the generic ellipsoidal coordinates coordinates on the n sphere viz. (2.8) a α x 2 α = c2 Π n j= (u j e α ) Π β α (e β e α ), α =,, n + with corresponding infinitesmal distance ds 2 = 4 n (du i ) 2 Π j i (u i u j ) Π j= (u i e j ) i= and coordinate curves (2.9) a α x 2 α u e j = 0, a α x 2 α = c2. Then the degenerate ellipsoidal coordinates having the infinitesimal distance (2.20) ds 2 = 4 n (du i ) 2 [Π j i (u i u j )] Π p j= (u i e j ) N j i= can be obtained from generic ellipsoidal coordinates via the transformations (2.2) e J j ej +J ǫ j, j =,, N J, J =,, p N J p J j pj + i=2 N J x J j xj + i=2 J ǫ i j+ i pj i J ǫ i j+ i xj i where J ǫ i j+ i = Πi l=2 (J ǫ j J ǫ l 2 ), aj j = /[Π k j( J ǫ j J ǫ k )], k =,, N J and N + + N p = n +. (We require J ǫ i 0 = 0 and take the limit as the J ǫ h 0 for h =,, N J.) In particular, (2.22) L(u) = where p N J J= j= z J j (u e J ) N J j+ z J j =< (p J i 4 pj j+ i +xj i xj j+ i ), i (p J i 4 pj j+ i xj i xj j+ i ), i p J i 2 xj j+ i >. i i i
11 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET (2.24) {(z J j ) l, (z J k ) m } = δ JJ (z J j+k N J ) s ǫ lms and we also have (2.25) L L(u) = 4 (x J j p L k xl k pj j )(xj m pl n xl n pj m ) (u e J ) p (u e L ) q where p N J, q N L, j, m N J, k, n N L, subject to j +m = N J +2 p, k +n = N L +2 q and the summation extends over the indices J, L, p, q, j, m, k, n subject to these restrictions. From expressions (2.24) we can verify that relations (2.2) are satisfied, so that {L L(u),L L(v)} = 0. The constants of the motion can be read off from the partial fraction decomposition of (2.25). This clearly illustrates the compactness of the r matrix formulation for the operators describing the integrable systems examined so far. In dealing with the case of Euclidean space E nc the most transparent way to proceed is as follows. The generic ellipsoidal coordinates in n dimensional complex Euclidean space are given by [,9] (2.26) x 2 α = Πn j= (u j e α ) Π β α (e β e α ), j, α, β =,, n with coordinate curves n x 2 α (2.27) ( ) =, u = u j, j =,, n. Proceeding in analogy with (2.2)-(2.0) we can obtain the r matrix algebra. The corresponding L(u) operator is n s α (2.28) L(u) = +. u e α 4 0 (Indeed the equation L (u) + il 2 (u) = 0 is just (2.27). Moreover it is obvious, due to the fact that expressions (2.) satisfy (2.2), that expressions (2.28) also satisfy (2.2).) The conjugate variables v j are defined by v j = il 3 (u j ) and they must satisfy the canonical relations (2.4). The integrals of motion H α are determined from n (2.29) L 2 H α (u) = where H α = 2 n (sα,s β ) e α e β 2 (s α + s2 α ) = n 4 ( β= β= M 2 αβ e α e β p 2 α ) with α H α = p 2 /4. The separation equations are of the form v 2 j + L2 (u j ) = 0, j =,, n,
12 2 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. 3. Cyclidic Coordinates. Associated with the separation of variables problem for the Hamilton Jacobi equation (.) with E 0 is the corresponding E = 0 problem. In this case the equation is (3.) n α,β= g αβ p α p β = 0, p = W x α, α =,, n and we consider only complex Euclidean space. While it is true that all the coordinate systems discussed for E nc with E 0 will provide a separation of variables of this equation, there are coordinates that provide an additive separation of variables only when E = 0. This is related to the fact that the E = 0 equation admits a conformal symmetry algebra [,,3]. The most convenient way to proceed is to introduce hyperspherical coordinates {x,, x n+2 }, n n x = t 2 ( zj 2 ), x 2 = it 2 ( zj 2 + ), x k+2 = 2z k t 2, k =,, n, j= j= related to the usual Cartesian coordinates {z,, z n } according to z k = x k+2 /( x ix 2 ), k =,, n n+2 x 2 j = 0. j= We consider the system of in n + 2 dimensions, where J = 0 and the c α = 0. The general (separable) cyclidic coordinates are specified by Ω = Furthermore, n+2 j= x 2 n+2 j = 0, Φ = λ e i j= x 2 j = 0, λ = u,, u n, e k e j. σx 2 α = Πn j= (u n+2 j e α ) Π β α (e β e α ), σ = [ e j x 2 j]. The Hamilton Jacobi equation is given by n ( W (3.2) J 2 = σ 2 u j j= j= ) 2 Π n+2 γ= (u j e γ ) Π i j (u j u i ) = 0. The quadratic forms Ω and Φ have elementary divisors [ ], see [5,]. It is known that the geometry of these fourth order coordinate curves is unchanged under birational transformations of the form e k αe k + β γe k + δ, u j αu j + β γu j + δ, λ αλ + β γλ + δ,
13 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 3 Now we can mimic the exposition given for the Gaudin magnet integrable systems using the hyperspherical coordinates and the Poisson bracket n+2 (3.3) {F(x i, p j ), G(x i, p j )} h = ( F G F G ), p k x k x k p k k= the x i, p j now being regarded as independent. The analysis then proceeds much as in the construction (2.2)-(2.2), but with n replaced by ; indeed the coordinates are defined as zeros of the off diagonal element B(u) = n+2 x 2 α subject to the restriction Φ = 0. The crucial difference is that J = 0. The expressions for p α and M αβ are altered by a factor σ: p α = 2σx α [ n j= v j Π n γ=(u j e γ ) e α u j Π i j (u j u i ) ] which together with x 2 α in terms of u j gives C(u) in the new variables. Another useful formula is n ˆΠn+2 γ= M αβ = 2σx α x β (e α e β ) v (u j e γ ) j Π i j (u j u i ). In fact the Poisson bracket {, } h can be identified with the Poisson bracket {, } for functions defined in the n dimensional space spanned by z,, z n. This can readily be seen by noting that F(z,, z n, p z,..., p zn ) = F( x 3 /(x + ix 2 ),, x n+2 /(x +ix 2 ), (x +ix 2 )p x3 +x 3 (p x +ip x2 ),, (x +ix 2 )p xn+2 + x n+2 (p x +ip x2 )) from which the equality of the Poisson brackets follows identically. The infinitesmal distance for general cyclidic coordinates is ( (3.4) ds 2 = n ) 4 (x + ix 2 ) 2 (du i ) 2 Π j i (u i u j ) Π n+2 j= (u. i e j ) i= j= We denote the coordinates defined by this graph as [E nc, E = 0 e... e n+2. Other coordinates of this type are those corresponding to the graphs (S pc e... e p+ (S qc f... f q+ where p + q = n + 2. These coordinates are given by (3.5) σx 2 k = Πp j= (u j e α ) Π β α (e β e α ), α, β =,, p +, k =,, p σx 2 k = Πq j= (v j f α ), α, β =,, q +, k = p +,, p + q + 2 Π β α (f β f α ) p+ q+ σ = [ ei x 2 i + fj x 2 j ].
14 4 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. We note here that the e i the f j are pairwise distinct, for if they were not then for any of these quantities which occured with multiplicity more than a birational transformation could transform it to and hence to a graph corresponding to E nc. It can happen just as in the case of generic ellipsoidal integrable systems on the sphere that some of the e i in (3.5) are equal to some of the f j also. In this case the rules for obtaining the corresponding L matrix are summarised in the following theorem. Theorem 2. Denote the generic ellipsoidal coordinates by the graph [E nc e... e n ], e i e j and generic cyclidic coordinates by the graph {CE nc e... e n+2 }, e i e j. Separable coordinates for the Hamilton Jacobi equation (3.) corresponding to generic graphs with multiplicities [E nc e n en p p ], n + + n p = n, {CE nc e n en q q }, n + + n q = n + 2, [5] can be obtained via the transformations of Theorem applied to the quadratic forms m a i x 2 m i Ω = = 0, Φ = a i x 2 i λ e = 0 i i= where m = n for generic ellipsoidal coordinates in E nc and m = n + 2 for the corresponding cyclidic coordinates. For coordinates corresponding to the direct sum of two spheres viz. (3.5) we can merely apply the result of the previous theorem for spherical coordinates to each of the pairs of quadratic forms i= p+ Ω = a α x 2 α, Φ u e = p+ a α x 2 α α n+2 Ω 2 = α=p+2 a α x 2 n+2 α, Φ 2 u e = α α=p+2 a α x 2 α. Indeed the freedom to subject the coordinates u j and the e i to birational transformations in the expressions for generic cyclidic coordinates allows us to let e. (In this particular case the resulting coordinates can be identified with generic elliptical coordinates on the n sphere.) The process described in Theorem enables one to pass from the elementary divisors [...] to [N, N 2,..., N p ], N i, i =,..., p, see [5,]. It is then possible (via Theorem 2) to take e in which case [ N, N 2,..., N p ] corresponds to the various generic coordinate systems in Euclidean
15 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 5 consider the quadratic forms ˆΩ, ˆΦ corresponding to elementary divisors [2 ] viz. ˆΩ = x 2 (λ e ) 2 + 2x x 2 λ e + + x2 n+2 λ e n+2 = 0, ˆΦ = 2x x 2 + x x2 n+2 = 0. Putting λ /λ, e i /e i we find (with the use of ˆΦ = 0) or, in the limit as e, ˆΩ = λ 2 e 2 [ x2 n+2 (e λ) 2 + x 2 n+2 k=3 k=3 (e e k ) (e λ) x 2 k λ e k = 0. x 2 k (e k λ) ], Now if we perform the limiting procedure (2.3) - (2.5) on L(u) (in n + 2 dimensions), let u /u, e i /e i, let e and then evaluate at p = 0, x = we find (up to a common factor u) L(u) = n+2 α=3 s α Here, we have made use of the fact that J = 0. This agrees with (2.28) and with the L(u) operator given by Kuznetsov [4], and corresponds to elementary divisors [ 2,,, ]. This process can be generalised for quadratic forms corresponding to elementary divisors [ N,, ], N >. We have that. ˆΩ = u N 2 x 2 +un 3 2x x 2 + i x i x N i n+2 k=n+ x 2 k u e k, ˆΦ = N x i x N+ i + i= n+2 k=n+ x 2 k. The corresponding L(u) operator is where L(u) = n+2 α=n+ s α u e k + s s = 4 [ˆΩ(0, p 2,..., p n+2 ) ˆΩ(, x 2,..., x n+2 )], s 2 = 4 [ˆΩ(0, p 2,..., p n+2 ) + ˆΩ(, x 2,..., x n+2 )], s 3 = 2 [S (0, p 2,..., p n+2 ;, x 2,..., x n+2 )], S = N j=2 u N j l+m=j x l p m.
16 x 2 = (u e )(u 2 e ) (ū 3 f 4 )(ū 4 f 4 ). 6 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. 4. Branching Rules for the Construction of Orthogonal Non Generic Complex Integrable Systems on S nc and E nc. To deal with the non generic separable coordinate systems in E nc and S nc we must combine coordinate systems for both manifolds [5]. (See [3,4] for tabulations of all cases for small values of n.) The branching laws for graphs on these manifolds are summarised below () (S nc e i S pi C (2) (3) (S nc e λ i i, λ i > E pi C (E nc e i S pi C (4) (E nc e λ i i, λ i >. E pi C As an example consider the coordinate system given by the graph on S 4C, (S 2C e 2 e 5 [E 2C f 3 f 4 The coordinates for this graph can be obtained from those of the generic graph via the limiting transformations (S 4C e 2 e 3 e 4 e 5 e j = e + ǫ + ǫ 2 f j, j = 3, 4, f 3 f 4 u j = e + ǫ + ǫ 2 ū j, j = 3, 4 where ǫ 0. The corresponding coordinates are then given implicitly by x 2 = (u e )(u 2 e ), x 2 5 e 5 e = (u e 5 )(u 2 e 5 ) (e e 5 ) 2 2x x 2 = (u e ) (u 2 e ) + (u e )(u 2 e ) e 5 e e 5 e (e 5 e ) 2 (u e )(u 2 e ) e 5 e (f 3 + f 4 ū 3 ū 4 ) x 2 3 = (u e )(u 2 e ) (e 5 e ). (ū 3 f 3 )(ū 4 f 3 ), (f 3 f 4 )
17 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 7 Using the nomenclature given previously we have that L(u) has the two different forms z L (u) = (u e ) + z 2 + z 3 + z 4 + z 5, u = u 2, u 2 u e u e u e 5 L 2 (u) = z + z 3 u f 3 + z 4 u f 4, u = ū 3, ū 4. As usual, the separation variables are the zeros of the equation L λ (u)+il2 λ (u) = 0 with u = u, u 2 when λ = and u = ū 3, ū 4 when λ = 2. Each of the L λ separately satisfy (2.2) for λ =, 2. In addition we have {L L (u),l 2 L 2 (v)} = 0. This example illustrates how to derive the substitutions that enable the various branching laws to be obtained from a generic form. For the sphere S nc and generic coordinates (S nc... e λ+q s 0 e e s q > s, λ >, if we make the substitutions e k = e 0 + ǫ q s+ + ǫ λ+q s f k, k = s, u j = e 0 + ǫ q s+ + ǫ λ+q s ū j, j = q where ǫ 0, then the graph illustrated transforms into (S nc e λ 0. [E qc f f s The remaining branching rule is obtained from a graph of the type By means of the substitutions e j = e 0 + ǫ(f 0 f j ), j =,, p + (S nc... e 0 e... e s. u k = e 0 + ǫ(ū k f 0 ), k =,, p we obtain the coordinate system coming from the graph (S nc e 0. (S pc f 0 f p The corresponding substitutions for the analogous Euclidean space branching rules are essentially identical. To completely specify the coordinate systems on these manifolds we need a few more substitution rules. Firstly consider the graph [E pc h... h p + [E qc f... f q. This graph can be obtained from the generic graph for E (p+q)c via the substitutions u i = K ǫ + ū i, e i = K ǫ + h i, i =,, p u i = K 2 ǫ + ū i, e i = K 2 ǫ + f i p, i = p +,, p + q, K K 2. The graph [E qc h... h q, q < n can be obtained from [E nc h... h n via the substitutions u i = e + ǫ q n + ǫ q n ū i, i =,, n e j = e + ǫ q n + ǫ q n h j, j =,, q e k = h k, k = q +,, n. Given these substitution rules all the corresponding graphs for E nc and S nc can
18 8 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. 5. Quantum Integrable Systems on Complex Constant Curvature Spaces and the Quantum Gaudin Magnet. To deal with the quantum version of this description of separation of variables we consider the Schrödinger or Helmholtz equation [3]. (5.) HΨ = [ g g αβ g y α ]Ψ = EΨ, y β where E 0 for the moment. Separation of variables means (roughly) the solution of this equation of the form (5.2) Ψ = Π n ψ α(y α ; h,, h n ) where the quantum numbers h j are the eigenvalues of mutually commuting operators n A i = a (j) 2 n (5.3) αβ + b β, j =,, n y α y β y β α,β= β= [A i, A j ] =0, i, j =,, n, A n = H, A j Ψ = h j Ψ. Furthermore these operators can be represented as symmetric quadratic elements in the enveloping algebra of the symmetry algebra of the equation (5.) in the case of S nc and E nc. The standardised representations of these symmetry algebras are (5.4) (5.5) SO(n + ) : M αβ = ˆx αˆp β ˆx β ˆp α, ˆp α =, α, β =,, n +. x α [M αβ, M γδ ] = δ αγ M δβ + δ αδ M βγ + δ βγ M αδ + δ βδ M γα E(n) : M αβ, P γ = x γ [M αβ, P γ ] = δ βγ P α δ αγ P β, [P α, P β ] = 0 where [, ] is the commutator bracket. Much of the analysis goes through as it did in the classical case with, of course, some critical differences. For the quantum Gaudin magnet one considers the sum of rank Lie algebras A = m so α (3) where the generators of the algebra satisfy the commutation relations (.6) and the inner product is defined as in. The Casimir elements of A have the form (5.6) (s α,s α ) = k α (k α + ) where k α is a constant when the generators of so α (3) determine an irreducible representation,[2]. The quantum Gaudin magnet is the quantum integrable Hamiltonian system on A given by m commuting integrals of motion : H α = 2 m (sα,s β ), [H α, H β ] = 0. e α e β β= This is the m site SO(3, C)-XXX quantum Gaudin magnet, [3]. These integrals (operators) satisfy (5.7) m Hα = 0, m eα H α = J 2 m kα (k α + )
19 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 9 where J = m s α is the total momentum operator. The complete set of commuting operators consists of H α,j 2 and J 3. The integrals are generated by the 2 2 operator L(u) given by (.) understood in the operator sense. The quantum determinant is (5.8) q-detl(u) = A(u) 2 2 {B(u), C(u)} = m with L-operator satisfying the r matrix algebra H α (5.9) [ L(u), 2 L(v)] = i u v [P, L(u) + 2 L(v)], i =, (compare with (.3)). The total momentum J has components m k α (k α + ) ( ) 2 (5.0) J = 4 (ˆp ˆp + ˆx ˆx), J 2 = i 4 (ˆp ˆp ˆx ˆx), J 3 = i (ˆp ˆx + ˆx ˆp) 4 The Lie symmetries M αβ and J form the direct sum so(m) so(3) with commutation relations (5.) [M αβ, J i ] = 0, [J i, J j ] = iǫ jkl J l, subject to the constraints (5.2) J 2 = 4 α<β M 2 αβ + 6 m(m 4), 2(J + ij 2 ) = ˆx ˆx. Considering again separation of variables using the coordinates of the irreducible block (2.), the separation variables are defined, as before, as the zeros of the off diagonal elements B(u) of the L matrix. The q-determinant is the generating function of the commuting integrals of motion (5.3) [q-detl(u), q-detl(v)] = 0. On the n sphere the algebra A is realised by taking the canonical operators (5.4) s α = 4 (ˆp2 α + ˆx2 α ), s2 α = i 4 (ˆp2 α ˆx2 α ), s3 α = i 4 {ˆp α, ˆx α }, α =,, n + where (s α,s α ) = 3 6. Furthermore (5.5) (s α,s β ) = 8 (M2 αβ + 2 ) and this establishes the relationship between the s α of A and the M αβ of so(). The integrals transform into the family of integrals (5.6) H = hα H α = h α h β (M 2 αβ + )
20 20 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. and the coordinates are given by B(u j ) = 0 : x 2 α = 0. For each u j variable there is defined the conjugate variable (operator) (5.7) v j = ia(u j ) = 4 u j e α {ˆp α, ˆx α }. Separation of variables is then the process of changing to the new variables v j, u i, c and J 3. In fact we have that (5.8) 4 {ˆp α, ˆx α } = ˆx2 α c [ ij 3 n j= e α u j D j v j ], D j = Π (u j e α ) Π i j (u j u i ). The separation equations can be obtained by substituting u = u j into the q-detl(u), making the choice (5.9) v j = i( + ), u j 4 u j e α and looking for the solutions of the spectral problem H α Ψ = h α Ψ. The separation equations are then (5.20) d 2 du 2 j ψ j + 2 ( n ) d h α ψ j = ψ j u j e α du j u j e α where Ψ = Π j= ψ j(u j ), h α = h α +. 8 e α e β β α These are the separation equations for the Helmholtz equation in generic ellipsoidal coordinates. Note that for this choice of v j we have taken (s α,s α ) = 3/6. The L operator is given in direct analogy with the classical case, (5.2) L(u) = s α. The treatment of generic ellipsoidal coordinates on E nc follows similar lines, with the L operator given in this case by (5.22) L(u) = n s α The limiting procedures described in the classical case work also in the quantum.
21 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 2 In the case of cyclidic coordinates we can adopt the same strategy as in 3: we impose the conditions J = 0 and proceed as before. The natural setting in this case is again to use hyperspherical coordinates. The total momentum has components as in (5.0). If ˆp α, ˆx α are now vectors in hyperspherical coordinates then we can derive the standard quantum r matrix algebra as above with the same formulas valid. The constraints are now 2(J + ij 2 ) = ˆx ˆx = 0, J 2 = 8 n(n 4). Coordinates u j and their conjugate operators v j can be chosen as before. In particular if we make the choice (5.23) v j = + n+2 u j 4 u j e α and look for solutions of HΨ = 0 of the form Ψ = σ (n 2)/2 Π n i= ψ i(u i ), then we obtain the separation equations which coincide with the the equations given by Bocher,[], viz. d 2 du 2 ψ j + n+2 j 2 u j e α d du j ψ j = 6 (n2 4)u n j 6 (2n n2 )( n+2 e α)u n j + n 2 β=0 λ βu β j Π n+2 γ= (u ψ j j e γ ) for suitable γ β. Note that the solutions Ψ are not strictly separable in this case but are what is termed R separable, i.e., separable to within a non separable factor σ (n 2)/2, []. We conclude this work by pointing out that one can obtain a complete set of constants of the motion associated with an orthogonal separable coordinate system {u, u n } for the Schrödinger equation (5.) directly from (5.) itself, [5, 6]. It is well known that all orthogonal separable coordinate systems for the Schrödinger equation on a Riemannian space are obtainable via the Stäckel construction, e.g., [7, 8]. Thus if {u} is a separable orthogonal coordinate system for (5.) there exists an n n nonsingular matrix S = (S γ,β (u α )) such that uγ S αβ = 0 if γ α, and such that the nonzero components of the contravariant metric tensor in the coordinates {u} are g αα (u) = T nα (u), α =,, n, where T is the inverse matrix to S, (5.24) n T αβ (u)s βγ (u β ) = δγ α. β= The constants of the motion are n (5.25) A β = T βα (u) ( u 2 ) α + f α (u α ) uα, An = H. Here, f α (u α ) = uα ln( gg αα ). (The fact that αα
22 22 E.G. KALNINS, V.B. KUZNETSOV AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. follows for any space of constant curvature by noting that it is equivalent to the statement that the off diagonal elements of the Ricci tensor must vanish for an orthogonal coordinate system: R αβ = 0, α β, [7].) One can show that [A α, A β ] = 0, [7, 8]. Furthermore, if Ψ = Π n ψ α (y α ; h,, h n ) satisfies the separation equations (5.26) 2 u α Ψ + f α (u α ) uα Ψ = then n S αβ (u α )h β Ψ, α =,, n β= (5.27) A β Ψ = h β Ψ, β =,, n. Now fix γ, γ n, and denote by y the coordinate choice y = (u,, u γ, τ, u γ+,, u n ) where τ is a parameter. We see from (5.26) that if Ψ satisfies the separation equations then (5.28) ψ γ ( 2 uγ ψ γ + f α (u γ ) uγ ψ γ ) uγ =τψ(u) = On the other hand, from (5.) we have where ψ γ ( 2 uγ ψ γ + f α (u γ ) uγ ψ γ ) uγ =τψ(u) = H γ (y) = g(y) This suggests the operator identity (5.29) α γ g γγ (y) (H(u) Hγ (y)) = n S γβ (τ)a β Ψ(u). β= g γγ (y) (H(u) Hγ (y))ψ(u) uα ( g(y)g αα (y) uα ). n S γβ (τ)a β, i.e., that the left-hand side of (5.29) is a one-parameter family of constants of the motion and that as τ runs over a range of values and γ =,, n the full space of constants of the motion associated with this separable system is spanned, [5, 6]. Now (5.29) is equivalent to the conditions T nα (u) T nγ (y) T nα (y) T nγ (y) ( δα γ ) = β= n S γβ (τ)t βα (u), β= and these conditions are easily seen to follow from (5.24) and from n β=,β γ T nβ (y)s βξ (u β ) + T nγ (y)s γξ (τ) = δ n ξ. Similarly, for the classical case an expression for the Hamiltonian analogous to
23 SEPARATION OF VARIABLES AND THE GAUDIN MAGNET 23 References. E.G. Kalnins, Separation of Variables for Riemannian Spaces of Constant Curvature, Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics 28, Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, England, M. Gaudin, La fonction d onde de Bethe, Masson, Paris, V.B. Kuznetsov, Equivalence of two graphical calculi, J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 25 (992), V.B. Kuznetsov, Quadrics on real Riemannian spaces of constant curvature. Separation of variables and connection with Gaudin magnet, J. Math. Phys. 33 (992), E.G. Kalnins, W. Miller Jr. and G.J. Reid, Separation of variables for complex Riemannian spaces of constant curvature. Orthogonal separable coordinates for S nc and E nc, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A394 (984), I.V. Komarov and V.B. Kuznetsov, Quantum Euler-Manakov top on the 3-sphere S 3, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 24 (99), L E.K. Sklyanin, Separation of variables in the Gaudin model, J. Soviet Math. 47 (989), I.V. Komarov and V.B. Kuznetsov, Kowalewski s top on the Lie algebras o(4), e(3), and o(3,), J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 23 (990), W.D. Niven, VI. On ellipsoidal harmonics, Phil.Trans. CLXXXII (89), E.G. Kalnins and W.Miller Jr., Separation of variables on n-dimensional Riemannian manifolds.. The n-sphere S n and Euclidean n-space R n, J. Math. Phys. 27 (986), 72.. M. Bôcher, Die Reihentwickelungen der Potentialtheorie, B.G. Teubner, Leipzig, N.J.Vilenkin, Special Functions and the Theory of Group Representations, Translations of Mathematical Monographs Vol22 American Math.Society, Providence, Rhode Island, E.G. Kalnins and W. Miller Jr., The wave equation and separation of variables on the complex sphere S 4, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 83 (98), E.G. Kalnins and W. Miller Jr., Lie theory and the wave equation in space time. 2. The group O(4, C), SIAM J. Math. Anal. 9 (978), N.M.J. Woodhouse, Killing tensors and the separation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equations, Commun. math. Phys. 44 (975), W. Dietz, Separable coordinate systems for the Hamilton-Jacobi, Klein-Gordon and wave equations in curved spaces, J. Phys. A(GB) 9 (976), L.P. Eisenhart, Separable systems of Stäckel, Ann. Math. 35 (934), W. Miller Jr., Mechanisms for variable separation in partial differential equations and their relationship to group theory, Proceedings of School on Symmetry and Nonlinear Phenomena, Paipa, Colombia, February 22-26, 988 in Symmetries and Nonlinear Phenomena, D. Levi and P. Winternitz eds., World Scientific, London (989). 9. E.G. Kalnins and W. Miller, Jr., The theory of orthogonal R-separation for Helmholtz equations, Advances in Mathematics 5 (984), E.G. Kalnins and W. Miller, Jr., Intrinsic characterization of orthogonal separation of one coordinate in the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 5 (982), L.D. Faddeev and L.A. Takhtajan, Hamiltonian methods in the theory of solitons, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 986.
Models for the 3D singular isotropic oscillator quadratic algebra
Models for the 3D singular isotropic oscillator quadratic algebra E. G. Kalnins, 1 W. Miller, Jr., and S. Post 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. School of Mathematics,
More informationModels of quadratic quantum algebras and their relation to classical superintegrable systems
Models of quadratic quantum algebras and their relation to classical superintegrable systems E. G, Kalnins, 1 W. Miller, Jr., 2 and S. Post 2 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Waikato, Hamilton,
More informationVariable separation and second order superintegrability
Variable separation and second order superintegrability Willard Miller (Joint with E.G.Kalnins) miller@ima.umn.edu University of Minnesota IMA Talk p.1/59 Abstract In this talk we shall first describe
More informationSuperintegrability in a non-conformally-at space
(Joint work with Ernie Kalnins and Willard Miller) School of Mathematics and Statistics University of New South Wales ANU, September 2011 Outline Background What is a superintegrable system Extending the
More informationEquivalence of superintegrable systems in two dimensions
Equivalence of superintegrable systems in two dimensions J. M. Kress 1, 1 School of Mathematics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 058, Australia. In two dimensions, all nondegenerate superintegrable
More informationTwo-variable Wilson polynomials and the generic superintegrable system on the 3-sphere
Two-variable Wilson polynomials and the generic superintegrable system on the 3-sphere Willard Miller, [Joint with E.G. Kalnins (Waikato) and Sarah Post (CRM)] University of Minnesota Special Functions
More informationNondegenerate three-dimensional complex Euclidean superintegrable systems and algebraic varieties
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS 48, 113518 2007 Nondegenerate three-dimensional complex Euclidean superintegrable systems and algebraic varieties E. G. Kalnins Department of Mathematics, University of
More informationCanonical Forms for BiHamiltonian Systems
Canonical Forms for BiHamiltonian Systems Peter J. Olver Dedicated to the Memory of Jean-Louis Verdier BiHamiltonian systems were first defined in the fundamental paper of Magri, [5], which deduced the
More informationStructure relations for the symmetry algebras of classical and quantum superintegrable systems
UNAM talk p. 1/4 Structure relations for the symmetry algebras of classical and quantum superintegrable systems Willard Miller miller@ima.umn.edu University of Minnesota UNAM talk p. 2/4 Abstract 1 A quantum
More informationarxiv: v1 [math-ph] 31 Jan 2015
Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA? (00?), 00?,?? pages Structure relations and Darboux contractions for D nd order superintegrable systems R. Heinonen, E. G. Kalnins,
More informationSEPARABLE COORDINATES FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL COMPLEX RIEMANNIAN SPACES
J. DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 14 (1979) 221-236 SEPARABLE COORDINATES FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL COMPLEX RIEMANNIAN SPACES E. G. KALNINS & WILLARD MILLER, JR. 1. Introduction In this paper we study the problem of
More informationSuperintegrability and exactly solvable problems in classical and quantum mechanics
Superintegrability and exactly solvable problems in classical and quantum mechanics Willard Miller Jr. University of Minnesota W. Miller (University of Minnesota) Superintegrability Penn State Talk 1 /
More informationSuperintegrable 3D systems in a magnetic field and Cartesian separation of variables
Superintegrable 3D systems in a magnetic field and Cartesian separation of variables in collaboration with L. Šnobl Czech Technical University in Prague GSD 2017, June 5-10, S. Marinella (Roma), Italy
More informationNondegenerate 2D complex Euclidean superintegrable systems and algebraic varieties
Nondegenerate 2D complex Euclidean superintegrable systems and algebraic varieties E. G. Kalnins Department of Mathematics, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. J. M. Kress School of Mathematics,
More informationNondegenerate 3D complex Euclidean superintegrable systems and algebraic varieties
Nondegenerate 3D complex Euclidean superintegrable systems and algebraic varieties E. G. Kalnins Department of Mathematics, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. J. M. Kress School of Mathematics,
More informationSymmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1.
Symmetries, Fields and Particles. Examples 1. 1. O(n) consists of n n real matrices M satisfying M T M = I. Check that O(n) is a group. U(n) consists of n n complex matrices U satisfying U U = I. Check
More informationClifford Algebras and Spin Groups
Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups Math G4344, Spring 2012 We ll now turn from the general theory to examine a specific class class of groups: the orthogonal groups. Recall that O(n, R) is the group of
More informationComplete sets of invariants for dynamical systems that admit a separation of variables
Complete sets of invariants for dynamical systems that admit a separation of variables. G. Kalnins and J.. Kress Department of athematics, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, e.kalnins@waikato.ac.nz
More informationOn the quantum theory of rotating electrons
Zur Quantentheorie des rotierenden Elektrons Zeit. f. Phys. 8 (98) 85-867. On the quantum theory of rotating electrons By Friedrich Möglich in Berlin-Lichterfelde. (Received on April 98.) Translated by
More informationLECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C)
LECTURE 3: REPRESENTATION THEORY OF SL 2 (C) AND sl 2 (C) IVAN LOSEV Introduction We proceed to studying the representation theory of algebraic groups and Lie algebras. Algebraic groups are the groups
More informationUnimodularity and preservation of measures in nonholonomic mechanics
Unimodularity and preservation of measures in nonholonomic mechanics Luis García-Naranjo (joint with Y. Fedorov and J.C. Marrero) Mathematics Department ITAM, Mexico City, MEXICO ẋ = f (x), x M n, f smooth
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 21 Mar 2000
arxiv:hep-th/0003189v1 21 Mar 2000 - X-Sun-Data-Type: default X-Sun-Data-Description: default X-Sun-Data-Name: qgroups1 Sun-Charset: us-ascii X-Sun-Content-Lines: 527 UCLA/99/TEP/47 February 2000 QUANTUM
More informationIntroduction to Group Theory
Chapter 10 Introduction to Group Theory Since symmetries described by groups play such an important role in modern physics, we will take a little time to introduce the basic structure (as seen by a physicist)
More informationGeneral tensors. Three definitions of the term V V. q times. A j 1...j p. k 1...k q
General tensors Three definitions of the term Definition 1: A tensor of order (p,q) [hence of rank p+q] is a multilinear function A:V V }{{ V V R. }}{{} p times q times (Multilinear means linear in each
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF NON-ABELIAN CHERN-SIMONS VORTICES
CLASSIFICATION OF NON-ABELIAN CHERN-SIMONS VORTICES arxiv:hep-th/9310182v1 27 Oct 1993 Gerald V. Dunne Department of Physics University of Connecticut 2152 Hillside Road Storrs, CT 06269 USA dunne@hep.phys.uconn.edu
More informationTwo-Step Nilpotent Lie Algebras Attached to Graphs
International Mathematical Forum, 4, 2009, no. 43, 2143-2148 Two-Step Nilpotent Lie Algebras Attached to Graphs Hamid-Reza Fanaï Department of Mathematical Sciences Sharif University of Technology P.O.
More informationHamilton s principle and Symmetries
Hamilton s principle and Symmetries Sourendu Gupta TIFR, Mumbai, India Classical Mechanics 2011 August 18, 2011 The Hamiltonian The change in the Lagrangian due to a virtual change of coordinates is dl
More informationKonstantin E. Osetrin. Tomsk State Pedagogical University
Space-time models with dust and cosmological constant, that allow integrating the Hamilton-Jacobi test particle equation by separation of variables method. Konstantin E. Osetrin Tomsk State Pedagogical
More informationHolonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland. October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012
Holonomy groups Thomas Leistner Mathematics Colloquium School of Mathematics and Physics The University of Queensland October 31, 2011 May 28, 2012 1/17 The notion of holonomy groups is based on Parallel
More informationLecture 10: A (Brief) Introduction to Group Theory (See Chapter 3.13 in Boas, 3rd Edition)
Lecture 0: A (Brief) Introduction to Group heory (See Chapter 3.3 in Boas, 3rd Edition) Having gained some new experience with matrices, which provide us with representations of groups, and because symmetries
More informationThe groups SO(3) and SU(2) and their representations
CHAPTER VI The groups SO(3) and SU() and their representations Two continuous groups of transformations that play an important role in physics are the special orthogonal group of order 3, SO(3), and the
More informationarxiv: v2 [nlin.si] 27 Jun 2015
On auto and hetero Bäcklund transformations for the Hénon-Heiles systems A. V. Tsiganov St.Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg, Russia e mail: andrey.tsiganov@gmail.com arxiv:1501.06695v2 [nlin.si]
More informationA Note on Poisson Symmetric Spaces
1 1 A Note on Poisson Symmetric Spaces Rui L. Fernandes Abstract We introduce the notion of a Poisson symmetric space and the associated infinitesimal object, a symmetric Lie bialgebra. They generalize
More informationE.G. KALNINS AND WILLARD MILLER, JR. The notation used for -series and -integrals in this paper follows that of Gasper and Rahman [3].. A generalizati
A NOTE ON TENSOR PRODUCTS OF -ALGEBRA REPRESENTATIONS AND ORTHOGONAL POLYNOMIALS E.G. KALNINSy AND WILLARD MILLER, Jr.z Abstract. We work out examples of tensor products of distinct generalized s`) algebras
More informationCanonical Quantization
Canonical Quantization March 6, 06 Canonical quantization of a particle. The Heisenberg picture One of the most direct ways to quantize a classical system is the method of canonical quantization introduced
More informationMetrics and Holonomy
Metrics and Holonomy Jonathan Herman The goal of this paper is to understand the following definitions of Kähler and Calabi-Yau manifolds: Definition. A Riemannian manifold is Kähler if and only if it
More informationParallel and Killing Spinors on Spin c Manifolds. 1 Introduction. Andrei Moroianu 1
Parallel and Killing Spinors on Spin c Manifolds Andrei Moroianu Institut für reine Mathematik, Ziegelstr. 3a, 0099 Berlin, Germany E-mail: moroianu@mathematik.hu-berlin.de Abstract: We describe all simply
More informationChanging sign solutions for the CR-Yamabe equation
Changing sign solutions for the CR-Yamabe equation Ali Maalaoui (1) & Vittorio Martino (2) Abstract In this paper we prove that the CR-Yamabe equation on the Heisenberg group has infinitely many changing
More informationThe following definition is fundamental.
1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic
More informationFaculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science School of Mathematics
Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science School of Mathematics JS & SS Mathematics SS Theoretical Physics SS TSM Mathematics Module MA3429: Differential Geometry I Trinity Term 2018???, May??? SPORTS
More informationCanonicity of Bäcklund transformation: r-matrix approach. I. arxiv:solv-int/ v1 25 Mar 1999
LPENSL-Th 05/99 solv-int/990306 Canonicity of Bäcklund transformation: r-matrix approach. I. arxiv:solv-int/990306v 25 Mar 999 E K Sklyanin Laboratoire de Physique 2, Groupe de Physique Théorique, ENS
More informationSEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS
SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS BRIAN COLLIER 1. Outiline The goal is to talk about semisimple Lie groups, mainly noncompact real semisimple Lie groups. This is a very broad subject so we will do our best to be
More informationDuality, Dual Variational Principles
Duality, Dual Variational Principles April 5, 2013 Contents 1 Duality 1 1.1 Legendre and Young-Fenchel transforms.............. 1 1.2 Second conjugate and convexification................ 4 1.3 Hamiltonian
More informationmsqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197
msqm 2011/8/14 21:35 page 189 #197 Bibliography Dirac, P. A. M., The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th Edition, (Oxford University Press, London, 1958). Feynman, R. P. and A. P. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics
More informationThe 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation
Chapter 6 The 3 dimensional Schrödinger Equation 6.1 Angular Momentum To study how angular momentum is represented in quantum mechanics we start by reviewing the classical vector of orbital angular momentum
More informationMP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS
MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS Introduction Quantum theory of angular momentum Quantum theory of a particle in a central potential - Hydrogen atom - Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator (a model of
More informationCALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =
CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = a M T am, called the tangent bundle, is itself a smooth manifold, dim T M = 2n. Example 1.
More informationTHE GEOMETRY OF B-FIELDS. Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Odense November 26th 2009
THE GEOMETRY OF B-FIELDS Nigel Hitchin (Oxford) Odense November 26th 2009 THE B-FIELD IN PHYSICS B = i,j B ij dx i dx j flux: db = H a closed three-form Born-Infeld action: det(g ij + B ij ) complexified
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 6 Mar 2000
Consistent Batalin Fradkin quantization of Infinitely Reducible First Class Constraints Stefano Bellucci and Anton Galajinsky INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, C.P. 3, 00044 Frascati, Italia arxiv:hep-th/990990v
More informationAs always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing).
An Interlude on Curvature and Hermitian Yang Mills As always, the story begins with Riemann surfaces or just (real) surfaces. (As we have already noted, these are nearly the same thing). Suppose we wanted
More informationSYMMETRIES OF SECOND-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS AND DECOUPLING
SYMMETRIES OF SECOND-ORDER DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS AND DECOUPLING W. Sarlet and E. Martínez Instituut voor Theoretische Mechanica, Universiteit Gent Krijgslaan 281, B-9000 Gent, Belgium Departamento de
More informationOn local normal forms of completely integrable systems
On local normal forms of completely integrable systems ENCUENTRO DE Răzvan M. Tudoran West University of Timişoara, România Supported by CNCS-UEFISCDI project PN-II-RU-TE-2011-3-0103 GEOMETRÍA DIFERENCIAL,
More informationAPPENDIX A. Background Mathematics. A.1 Linear Algebra. Vector algebra. Let x denote the n-dimensional column vector with components x 1 x 2.
APPENDIX A Background Mathematics A. Linear Algebra A.. Vector algebra Let x denote the n-dimensional column vector with components 0 x x 2 B C @. A x n Definition 6 (scalar product). The scalar product
More informationGEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION
GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION 1. The basic idea The setting of the Hamiltonian version of classical (Newtonian) mechanics is the phase space (position and momentum), which is a symplectic manifold. The typical
More informationCOULOMB SYSTEMS WITH CALOGERO INTERACTION
PROCEEDINGS OF THE YEREVAN STATE UNIVERSITY Physical and Mathematical Sciences 016, 3, p. 15 19 COULOMB SYSTEMS WITH CALOGERO INTERACTION P h y s i c s T. S. HAKOBYAN, A. P. NERSESSIAN Academician G. Sahakyan
More information(super)algebras and its applications
for Lie (super)algebras and its applications Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, 119 992 Moscow, Russia The International School Advanced Methods of Modern Theoretical Physics: Integrable
More informationMeromorphic open-string vertex algebras and Riemannian manifolds
Meromorphic open-string vertex algebras and Riemannian manifolds Yi-Zhi Huang Abstract Let M be a Riemannian manifold. For p M, the tensor algebra of the negative part of the (complex) affinization of
More informationClassification of Quadratic Surfaces
Classification of Quadratic Surfaces Pauline Rüegg-Reymond June 4, 202 Part I Classification of Quadratic Surfaces Context We are studying the surface formed by unshearable inextensible helices at equilibrium
More informationMetrisability of Painleve equations and Hamiltonian systems of hydrodynamic type
Metrisability of Painleve equations and Hamiltonian systems of hydrodynamic type Felipe Contatto Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics University of Cambridge felipe.contatto@damtp.cam.ac.uk
More informationCONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP
CONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP TOSHIHIRO SHODA Abstract. In this paper, we study a compact minimal surface in a 4-dimensional flat
More informationOn the Killing Tensor Fields on a Compact Riemannian Manifold
On the Killing Tensor Fields on a Compact Riemannian Manifold Grigorios Tsagas Abstract Let (M, g) be a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension n The aim of the present paper is to study the dimension
More information2. Lie groups as manifolds. SU(2) and the three-sphere. * version 1.4 *
. Lie groups as manifolds. SU() and the three-sphere. * version 1.4 * Matthew Foster September 1, 017 Contents.1 The Haar measure 1. The group manifold for SU(): S 3 3.3 Left- and right- group translations
More informationSpinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
Chapter Spinor Formulation of Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. The Lorentz Transformation of the Dirac Bispinor We will provide in the following a new formulation of the Dirac equation in the chiral representation
More informationTheorem 2. Let n 0 3 be a given integer. is rigid in the sense of Guillemin, so are all the spaces ḠR n,n, with n n 0.
This monograph is motivated by a fundamental rigidity problem in Riemannian geometry: determine whether the metric of a given Riemannian symmetric space of compact type can be characterized by means of
More informationIntroduction to Integrability
Introduction to Integrability Problem Sets ETH Zurich, HS16 Prof. N. Beisert, A. Garus c 2016 Niklas Beisert, ETH Zurich This document as well as its parts is protected by copyright. This work is licensed
More informationThe Fueter Theorem and Dirac symmetries
The Fueter Theorem and Dirac symmetries David Eelbode Departement of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Antwerp (partially joint work with V. Souček and P. Van Lancker) General overview of
More informationTensors, and differential forms - Lecture 2
Tensors, and differential forms - Lecture 2 1 Introduction The concept of a tensor is derived from considering the properties of a function under a transformation of the coordinate system. A description
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 1 Mar 2000
February 2000 IUT-Phys/00-02 arxiv:hep-th/0003010v1 1 Mar 2000 Classification of constraints using chain by chain method 1 F. Loran, 2 A. Shirzad, 3 Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences P.O.
More information[#1] R 3 bracket for the spherical pendulum
.. Holm Tuesday 11 January 2011 Solutions to MSc Enhanced Coursework for MA16 1 M3/4A16 MSc Enhanced Coursework arryl Holm Solutions Tuesday 11 January 2011 [#1] R 3 bracket for the spherical pendulum
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Mar 1995
Straight-line string with curvature L.D.Soloviev Institute for High Energy Physics, 142284, Protvino, Moscow region, Russia arxiv:hep-th/9503156v1 23 Mar 1995 Abstract Classical and quantum solutions for
More informationON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES
ON THE FOLIATION OF SPACE-TIME BY CONSTANT MEAN CURVATURE HYPERSURFACES CLAUS GERHARDT Abstract. We prove that the mean curvature τ of the slices given by a constant mean curvature foliation can be used
More informationON SOME GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF QUASI-SUM PRODUCTION MODELS. 1. Introduction
ON SOME GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF QUASI-SUM PRODUCTION MODELS BANG-YEN CHEN Abstract. A production function f is called quasi-sum if there are continuous strict monotone functions F, h 1,..., h n with F
More informationGeneralization of the Hamilton-Jacobi approach for higher order singular systems
1 arxiv:hep-th/9704088v1 10 Apr 1997 Generalization of the Hamilton-Jacobi approach for higher order singular systems B. M. Pimentel and R. G. Teixeira Instituto de Física Teórica Universidade Estadual
More informationLecture 2 Some Sources of Lie Algebras
18.745 Introduction to Lie Algebras September 14, 2010 Lecture 2 Some Sources of Lie Algebras Prof. Victor Kac Scribe: Michael Donovan From Associative Algebras We saw in the previous lecture that we can
More informationCost-extended control systems on SO(3)
Cost-extended control systems on SO(3) Ross M. Adams Mathematics Seminar April 16, 2014 R.M. Adams (RU) Cost-extended control systems on SO(3) RU Maths Seminar 1 / 34 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Control systems
More informationUNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN
UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN TRINITY COLLEGE JS & SS Mathematics SS Theoretical Physics SS TSM Mathematics Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science school of mathematics Trinity Term 2015 Module MA3429
More informationEXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) (2) Prove that a lattice L is integral if and only if its Gram matrix has integer coefficients.
EXERCISES IN MODULAR FORMS I (MATH 726) EYAL GOREN, MCGILL UNIVERSITY, FALL 2007 (1) We define a (full) lattice L in R n to be a discrete subgroup of R n that contains a basis for R n. Prove that L is
More informationVariable-separation theory for the null Hamilton Jacobi equation
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS 46, 042901 2005 Variable-separation theory for the null Hamilton Jacobi equation S. Benenti, C. Chanu, and G. Rastelli Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Torino,
More informationGeneralized Korn s inequality and conformal Killing vectors
Generalized Korn s inequality and conformal Killing vectors arxiv:gr-qc/0505022v1 4 May 2005 Sergio Dain Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik Am Mühlenberg 1 14476 Golm Germany February 4, 2008 Abstract
More informationA PERIODICITY PROBLEM FOR THE KORTEWEG DE VRIES AND STURM LIOUVILLE EQUATIONS. THEIR CONNECTION WITH ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY
A PERIODICITY PROBLEM FOR THE KORTEWEG DE VRIES AND STURM LIOUVILLE EQUATIONS. THEIR CONNECTION WITH ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY B. A. DUBROVIN AND S. P. NOVIKOV 1. As was shown in the remarkable communication
More informationMathematical Methods wk 2: Linear Operators
John Magorrian, magog@thphysoxacuk These are work-in-progress notes for the second-year course on mathematical methods The most up-to-date version is available from http://www-thphysphysicsoxacuk/people/johnmagorrian/mm
More informationThe symmetry structures of ASD manifolds
The symmetry structures of ASD manifolds 1 1 School of Mathematics University of the Witatersrand, Johannesburg South Africa African Institute of Mathematics Outline 1 Introduction 2 3 The dispersionless
More informationCurves in the configuration space Q or in the velocity phase space Ω satisfying the Euler-Lagrange (EL) equations,
Physics 6010, Fall 2010 Hamiltonian Formalism: Hamilton s equations. Conservation laws. Reduction. Poisson Brackets. Relevant Sections in Text: 8.1 8.3, 9.5 The Hamiltonian Formalism We now return to formal
More informationEvolutionary Hirota Type (2+1)-Dimensional Equations: Lax Pairs, Recursion Operators and Bi-Hamiltonian Structures
Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications Evolutionary Hirota Type +-Dimensional Equations: Lax Pairs, Recursion Operators and Bi-Hamiltonian Structures Mikhail B. SHEFTEL and Devrim
More informationA non-strictly hyperbolic system for the Einstein equations with arbitrary lapse and shift
IFP-UNC-518 TAR-UNC-054 gr-qc/9607006 A non-strictly hyperbolic system for the Einstein equations with arbitrary lapse and shift Andrew Abrahams, Arlen Anderson, Yvonne Choquet-Bruhat[*] and James W. York,
More information1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle
1 1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle The main reference for this section is [8]. In the following, we consider (M, g) an n-dimensional smooth manifold endowed with a Riemannian metric g. 1.1. Notations
More informationPHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH
PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH 1. Differential Forms To start our discussion, we will define a special class of type (0,r) tensors: Definition 1.1. A differential form of order
More information(Ref: Schensted Part II) If we have an arbitrary tensor with k indices W i 1,,i k. we can act on it 1 2 k with a permutation P = = w ia,i b,,i l
Chapter S k and Tensor Representations Ref: Schensted art II) If we have an arbitrary tensor with k indices W i,,i k ) we can act on it k with a permutation = so a b l w) i,i,,i k = w ia,i b,,i l. Consider
More informationWilliam P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds
William P. Thurston The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds Electronic version 1.1 - March 00 http://www.msri.org/publications/books/gt3m/ This is an electronic edition of the 1980 notes distributed
More informationExercises Symmetries in Particle Physics
Exercises Symmetries in Particle Physics 1. A particle is moving in an external field. Which components of the momentum p and the angular momentum L are conserved? a) Field of an infinite homogeneous plane.
More informationHolonomy groups. Thomas Leistner. School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, /15
Holonomy groups Thomas Leistner School of Mathematical Sciences Colloquium University of Adelaide, May 7, 2010 1/15 The notion of holonomy groups is based on Parallel translation Let γ : [0, 1] R 2 be
More information1.13 The Levi-Civita Tensor and Hodge Dualisation
ν + + ν ν + + ν H + H S ( S ) dφ + ( dφ) 2π + 2π 4π. (.225) S ( S ) Here, we have split the volume integral over S 2 into the sum over the two hemispheres, and in each case we have replaced the volume-form
More informationHYPERSURFACES OF EUCLIDEAN SPACE AS GRADIENT RICCI SOLITONS *
ANALELE ŞTIINŢIFICE ALE UNIVERSITĂŢII AL.I. CUZA DIN IAŞI (S.N.) MATEMATICĂ, Tomul LXI, 2015, f.2 HYPERSURFACES OF EUCLIDEAN SPACE AS GRADIENT RICCI SOLITONS * BY HANA AL-SODAIS, HAILA ALODAN and SHARIEF
More information1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.
1. Riemannian symmetric spaces Definition 1.1. A (globally, Riemannian) symmetric space is a Riemannian manifold (X, g) such that for all x X, there exists an isometry s x Iso(X, g) such that s x (x) =
More informationLecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems
Lecture I: Constrained Hamiltonian systems (Courses in canonical gravity) Yaser Tavakoli December 15, 2014 1 Introduction In canonical formulation of general relativity, geometry of space-time is given
More informationSymmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws
Chapter Symmetries, Groups, and Conservation Laws The dynamical properties and interactions of a system of particles and fields are derived from the principle of least action, where the action is a 4-dimensional
More informationReview and Notation (Special relativity)
Review and Notation (Special relativity) December 30, 2016 7:35 PM Special Relativity: i) The principle of special relativity: The laws of physics must be the same in any inertial reference frame. In particular,
More information1 Mathematical preliminaries
1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical
More informationAn Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem
An Exactly Solvable 3 Body Problem The most famous n-body problem is one where particles interact by an inverse square-law force. However, there is a class of exactly solvable n-body problems in which
More information