CWV Review London Weather Station Move
|
|
- Arthur Lang
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CWV Review London Weather Station Move 6th November 26 Demand Estimation Sub-Committee
2 Background The current composite weather variables (CWVs) for North Thames (NT), Eastern (EA) and South Eastern (SE) LDZs are based on temperatures and wind speeds from London Weather Centre (LWC). LWC is due to cease operation (probably in the current gas year). Heathrow is the recommended replacement weather station Stable site and has had a weather station for many years. Located on the outskirts of London, reasonably close to the centres of gas demand in the 3 LDZs. The revised CWVs will need to be used in the spring 27 NDM analysis and implemented on 1 st October 27.
3 Backfilling Equations (from July DESC) Used to create Heathrow weather history back to Daily Temperatures: Heathrow = * LWC Daily Wind Speeds: * max(, LWC) Heathrow = * LWC * max(, LWC) At Heathrow, daily temperatures are a lower on average than LWC, especially on cool days and very hot days. At Heathrow, daily wind speeds are slightly higher on average than LWC.
4 Approach used to derive revised CWVs Consistent methodology as for the comprehensive CWV review carried out in 24. Most CWV parameters were derived using aggregate NDM demand data (1 gas years 1996/97 to 25/6). Maximum potential demand (MPD) data prior to 1996/97 was included in the derivation of cold weather parameters. Some suspect / unusual data for particular days or years was excluded from the analysis or corrected. A pseudo seasonal normal effective temperature (SNET) profile was used i.e. a demand adjusted profile with improved shape.
5 Data exclusions example EA graph for 1982/83 (excluded from cold weather parameter analysis) Actual and fitted consumption modelled using current CWV, 1982/83 (MPD low on coldest days), EA LDZ Maximum Potential Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable (CWV) Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted MPD appeared to be too low on coldest days possibly due to interruption estimates not being included.
6 Data exclusions example NT graph for 23/4 (showing 1 day excluded from analysis) Actual and fitted consumption modelled using current CWV, 23/4 (incl. 29/9/4), NT LDZ 5 45 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable CWV Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted Aggregate NDM appeared to be too low on 29/9/4, possibly due to an error in DM demand on that day.
7 Data exclusions example Heathrow data for 25/6 (excluded from pseudo SNET analysis) 3 Effective temperatures for Heathrow in 25/6 (typical threshold of 14º shown) Effective temperature (ET) Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep Effective temperature was consistently high from May to September (need some cooler non-holiday days in this period to derive a profile).
8 EA LDZ - Comparison of pseudo SNET profiles 25 Eastern Seasonal Profiles 2 SNET Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep Date Current (LWC) pseudo SNET Revised (Heathrow) pseudo SNET Values for the revised (Heathrow based) pseudo SNET are lower than the current (LWC based) pseudo SNET.
9 EA LDZ - Comparison of CWV parameters CWV Weather Station l 1 l 2 l 3 V V 1 V 2 Q Current LWC Revised Heathrow The warm weather cut-offs (V 1 and V 2 ) are lower for the revised CWV than the current CWV because of the lower summer temperatures and pseudo SNET values at Heathrow. The cold weather parameters (V and l 3 ) for the revised CWV are the same as for the current CWV. The differences in the other parameters are the result of differences in temperatures, wind speeds and pseudo SNET profiles. CWV values are generally lower for the revised CWV than the current CWV.
10 EA LDZ - Comparison of Seasonal Normal CWV profiles Eastern SNCWV profiles SNCWV Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep Date Current (LWC) SNCWV Revised (Heathrow ) SNCWV SNCWV values based on 17 gas years (1987/88 to 23/4). Values for the revised (Heathrow based) SNCWV are lower than for the current (LWC based) SNCWV.
11 EA LDZ - Comparison of average fit and peaks CWV Weather Station 1 in 2 peak CWV Avg. Mean Abs. % Error Avg. Adj. R-sq. Avg. RMSE (MWh) Avg. % diff. in est. 1 in 2 peak demand Current LWC % 99.15% 6,2 - Revised Heathrow % 99.12% 6, % The average statistics were calculated from Mon-Thu models for 1996/97 to 25/6. The 1 in 2 peak CWV values calculated using1928/29 to 25/6. Estimated 1 in 2 peak aggregate NDM demands were calculated from the demand models and the 1 in 2 peak CWV values. Revised CWV produced a very good fit to aggregate NDM demand. For the revised CWV, the estimated 1 in 2 peak demand was slightly higher than for the current CWV. However, this increase is smaller than the recent drop in annual aggregate NDM demand AQ observed for this LDZ (3.2%).
12 EA LDZ - Comparison of seasonal fit CWV Weather Station Dec. to Feb. Mar. to May Jun. To Aug. Sep. to Oct. MPRE MAPE MPRE MAPE MPRE MAPE MPRE MAPE Current LWC -.8% 2.9%.3% 4.36% -.22% 4.9% -.12% 3.89% Revised Heathrow -.2% 2.93%.28% 4.59%.59% 4.98% -.39% 4.2% The average statistics by seasonal quarter were calculated from Monday to Thursday models of aggregate NDM demand (excluding holidays) for 1996/97 to 25/6. Like the current CWV, the revised CWV displayed little seasonal bias (average MPRE close to for all seasonal quarters). The seasonal fit for the revised CWV was very good, almost as good as the current CWV.
13 EA LDZ - Example graphs parameters & statistics Gas Year CWV Weather Station Demand Intercept (GWh) CWV Param. (GWh/º) Mean Abs.% Error Avg. Adj. R-sq. Avg. RMSE (MWh) 1996/97 Current LWC % 98.8% 7, /97 Revised Heathrow % 98.78% 7,29 25/6 Current LWC % 99.44% 6,54 25/6 Revised Heathrow % 99.44% 6,34 Two gas years were chosen as examples (both had winters slightly warmer than the 78 year average): 1996/97 (contained some cold days outside a holiday period) 25/6, the most recent gas year (the coldest days occurred in a holiday period).
14 EA LDZ - Example graph for current CWV (1996/97) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using current CWV,1996/97, EA LDZ 35 3 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted Composite Weather Variable CWV
15 EA LDZ - Example graph for revised CWV (1996/97) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using revised CWV,1996/97, EA LDZ 35 3 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted Composite Weather Variable CWV
16 EA LDZ - Example graph for current CWV (25/6) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using current CWV, 25/6, EA LDZ 35 3 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted Composite Weather Variable CWV
17 EA LDZ - Example graph for revised CWV (25/6) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using revised CWV, 25/6, EA LDZ 35 3 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted Composite Weather Variable CWV
18 NT LDZ - Comparison of pseudo SNET profiles 25 North Thames Seasonal Profiles 2 SNET Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep Date Current (LWC) pseudo SNET Revised (Heathrow) pseudo SNET Values for the revised (Heathrow based) pseudo SNET are lower than the current (LWC based) pseudo SNET.
19 NT LDZ - Comparison of CWV parameters CWV Weather Station l 1 l 2 l 3 V V 1 V 2 Q Current LWC Revised Heathrow The warm weather cut-offs (V 1 and V 2 ) are lower for the revised CWV than the current CWV because of the lower summer temperatures and pseudo SNET values at Heathrow. Zero cold weather parameters (V and l 3 ) for the revised CWV. The differences in the other parameters are the result of differences in temperatures, wind speeds and pseudo SNET profiles. CWV values are generally lower for the revised CWV than the current CWV.
20 NT LDZ - Comparison of Seasonal Normal CWV profiles North Thames SNCWV profiles SNCWV Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr Date 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep Current (LWC) SNCWV Revised (Heathrow) SNCWV SNCWV values based on 17 gas years (1987/88 to 23/4). Values for the revised (Heathrow based) SNCWV are lower than for the current (LWC based) SNCWV.
21 NT LDZ - Comparison of average fit and peaks CWV Weather Station 1 in 2 peak CWV Avg. Mean Abs. % Error Avg. Adj. R-sq. Avg. RMSE (MWh) Avg. % diff. in est. 1 in 2 peak demand Current LWC % 99.28% 7,721 - Revised Heathrow % 99.26% 7,874.86% The average statistics were calculated from Monday to Thursday models of aggregate NDM demand (excluding holidays) for 1996/97 to 25/6. The 1 in 2 peak CWV values were calculated from 78 gas years of weather data (1928/29 to 25/6). Estimated 1 in 2 peak aggregate NDM demands were calculated from the demand models and the 1 in 2 peak CWV values. The revised CWV produced a very good fit to aggregate NDM demand, almost as good as the current CWV. The revised CWV did not significantly alter the estimated 1 in 2 peak aggregate NDM demand.
22 NT LDZ - Comparison of seasonal fit CWV Weather Station Dec. to Feb. Mar. to May Jun. To Aug. Sep. to Oct. MPRE MAPE MPRE MAPE MPRE MAPE MPRE MAPE Current LWC.6% 2.39%.8% 4.13% -.31% 4.62% -.1% 3.54% Revised Heathrow.1% 2.45%.16% 4.26%.7% 4.52% -.33% 3.61% The average statistics by seasonal quarter were calculated from Monday to Thursday models of aggregate NDM demand (excluding holidays) for 1996/97 to 25/6. MPRE = Mean Percentage Residual Error for seasonal quarter = 1 * (avg. actual demand avg. fitted demand) avg. actual demand MAPE = Mean Absolute Percentage Error for seasonal quarter. Like the current CWV, the revised CWV displayed very little seasonal bias (average MPRE close to for all seasonal quarters). The seasonal fit for the revised CWV was very good, almost as good as the current CWV.
23 NT LDZ - Example graphs parameters & statistics Gas Year CWV Weather Station Demand Intercept (GWh) CWV Param. (GWh/º) Mean Abs.% Error Avg. Adj. R-sq. Avg. RMSE (MWh) 1996/97 Current LWC % 98.66% 1, /97 Revised Heathrow % 98.71% 1,64 25/6 Current LWC % 99.58% 6,93 25/6 Revised Heathrow % 99.55% 7,176 Two gas years were chosen as examples (both had winters slightly warmer than the 78 year average): 1996/97 (contained some cold days outside a holiday period) 25/6, the most recent gas year (the coldest days occurred in a holiday period).
24 NT LDZ - Example graph for current CWV (1996/97) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using current CWV, 1996/97, NT LDZ 5 45 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable CWV Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted
25 NT LDZ - Example graph for revised CWV (1996/97) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using revised CWV, 1996/97, NT LDZ 5 45 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable CWV Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted
26 NT LDZ - Example graph for current CWV (25/6) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using current CWV, 25/6, NT LDZ 5 45 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable CWV Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted
27 NT LDZ - Example graph for revised CWV (25/6) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using revised CWV, 25/6, NT LDZ 5 45 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable CWV Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted
28 SE LDZ - Comparison of pseudo SNET profiles 25 South Eastern Seasonal Profiles 2 SNET Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep Date Current (LWC) pseudo SNET Revised (Heathrow) pseudo SNET Values for the revised (Heathrow based) pseudo SNET are lower than the current (LWC based) pseudo SNET.
29 SE LDZ - Comparison of CWV parameters CWV Weather Station l 1 l 2 l 3 V V 1 V 2 Q Current LWC Revised Heathrow The warm weather cut-offs (V 1 and V 2 ) are lower for the revised CWV than the current CWV because of the lower summer temperatures and pseudo SNET values at Heathrow. Smaller cold weather upturn parameter (l 3 ) for the revised CWV. The differences in the other parameters are the result of differences in temperatures, wind speeds and pseudo SNET profiles. CWV values are generally lower for the revised CWV than the current CWV.
30 SE LDZ - Comparison of Seasonal Normal CWV profiles South Eastern SNCWV profiles SNCWV Oct 1-Nov 1-Dec 1-Jan 1-Feb 1-Mar 1-Apr 1-May 1-Jun 1-Jul 1-Aug 1-Sep Date Current (LWC) SNCWV Revised (Heathrow ) SNCWV SNCWV values based on 17 gas years (1987/88 to 23/4). Values for the revised (Heathrow based) SNCWV are lower than for the current (LWC based) SNCWV.
31 SE LDZ - Comparison of average fit and peaks CWV Weather Station 1 in 2 peak CWV Avg. Mean Abs. % Error Avg. Adj. R-sq. Avg. RMSE (MWh) Avg. % diff. in est. 1 in 2 peak demand Current LWC % 99.2% 8,64 - Revised Heathrow % 99.17% 8,258.81% The average statistics were calculated from Monday to Thursday models of aggregate NDM demand (excluding holidays) for 1996/97 to 25/6. The 1 in 2 peak CWV values were calculated from 78 gas years of weather data (1928/29 to 25/6). Estimated 1 in 2 peak aggregate NDM demands were calculated from the demand models and the 1 in 2 peak CWV values. The revised CWV produced a very good fit to aggregate NDM demand, almost as good as the current CWV. The revised CWV did not significantly alter the estimated 1 in 2 peak aggregate NDM demand.
32 SE LDZ - Comparison of seasonal fit CWV Weather Station Dec. to Feb. Mar. to May Jun. To Aug. Sep. to Oct. MPRE MAPE MPRE MAPE MPRE MAPE MPRE MAPE Current LWC -.5% 2.71%.4% 4.67% -.32% 5.64% -.26% 3.97% Revised Heathrow -.2% 2.81%. 32% 4.71%.55% 5.67% -.44% 4.7% The average statistics by seasonal quarter were calculated from Monday to Thursday models of aggregate NDM demand (excluding holidays) for 1996/97 to 25/6. MPRE = Mean Percentage Residual Error for seasonal quarter = 1 * (avg. actual demand avg. fitted demand) avg. actual demand MAPE = Mean Absolute Percentage Error for seasonal quarter. Like the current CWV, the revised CWV displayed very little seasonal bias (average MPRE close to for all seasonal quarters). The seasonal fit for the revised CWV was very good, almost as good as the current CWV.
33 SE LDZ - Example graphs parameters & statistics Gas Year CWV Weather Station Demand Intercept (GWh) CWV Param. (GWh/º) Mean Abs.% Error Avg. Adj. R-sq. Avg. RMSE (MWh) 1996/97 Current LWC % 98.74% 1, /97 Revised Heathrow % 98.75% 1,83 25/6 Current LWC % 99.46% 7,939 25/6 Revised Heathrow % 99.44% 8,68 Two gas years were chosen as examples (both had winters slightly warmer than the 78 year average): 1996/97 (contained some cold days outside a holiday period) 25/6, the most recent gas year (the coldest days occurred in a holiday period).
34 SE LDZ - Example graph for current CWV (1996/97) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using current CWV, 1996/97, SE LDZ 5 45 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable CWV Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted
35 SE LDZ - Example graph for revised CWV (1996/97) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using revised CWV, 1996/97, SE LDZ 5 45 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable CWV Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted
36 SE LDZ - Example graph for current CWV (25/6) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using current CWV, 25/6, SE LDZ 5 45 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable CWV Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted
37 SE LDZ - Example graph for revised CWV (25/6) Actual and fitted consumption, Monday to Thursday (excl. holidays), modelled using revised CWV, 25/6, SE LDZ 5 45 LDZ NDM Demand (GWh) Composite Weather Variable CWV Demand Dec-Feb Mar-May Jun-Aug Sep-Nov Fitted
38 Summary Revised CWVs based on Heathrow data have been derived for 3 LDZs. To be used in the spring 27 NDM analysis and implemented on 1 st October 27. Produce a very good fit to aggregate NDM demand, almost as good as the current CWVs in all 3 LDZs. NT and SE LDZs did not significantly alter the estimated 1 in 2 peak aggregate NDM demand. Little seasonal bias & a good seasonal fit to demand in all 3 LDZs. For EA LDZ, the increase (1.8%) in estimated 1 in 2 peak NDM demand for the revised CWV is smaller than the recent drop in AQ observed for this LDZ (3.2%). The very small reduction in fit for the revised CWVs may indicate that at Heathrow the weather is slightly less representative of the conditions experienced by the main centres of demand in the 3 LDZs.
Summary of Seasonal Normal Review Investigations CWV Review
Summary of Seasonal Normal Review Investigations CWV Review DESC 31 st March 2009 1 Contents Stage 1: The Composite Weather Variable (CWV) An Introduction / background Understanding of calculation Stage
More informationDESC Technical Workgroup. CWV Optimisation Production Phase Results. 17 th November 2014
DESC Technical Workgroup CWV Optimisation Production Phase Results 17 th November 2014 1 2 Contents CWV Optimisation Background Trial Phase Production Phase Explanation of Results Production Phase Results
More informationCWV Optimisation. TWG 12 th February 2014
CWV Optimisation TWG 12 th February 2014 1 2 Contents Background / Introduction Approach to CWV Optimisation Next Steps 3 CWV Optimisation Background 4 Background UNC Section H 1.4.2 requires DESC to review
More informationDemand Estimation Sub-Committee. Seasonal Normal Review - Updated. 17 th December 2014
Demand Estimation Sub-Committee Seasonal Normal Review - Updated 17 th December 2014 1 2 Introduction Seasonal Normal is the gas industry benchmark of what constitutes "typical" weather conditions, and
More informationEVALUATION OF ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE 2012/13 GAS YEAR SCALING FACTOR AND WEATHER CORRECTION FACTOR
EVALUATION OF ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE /3 GAS YEAR SCALING FACTOR AND WEATHER CORRECTION FACTOR. Background The annual gas year algorithm performance evaluation normally considers three sources of information
More informationSummary of Seasonal Normal Review Investigations. DESC 31 st March 2009
Summary of Seasonal Normal Review Investigations DESC 31 st March 9 1 Introduction to the Seasonal Normal Review The relationship between weather and NDM demand is key to a number of critical processes
More informationSYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY
SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY * ANNUAL MaxTemp NEL (MWH) Hr Ending Hr Ending LOAD (PEAK HOURS 7:00 AM TO 10:00 PM MON-SAT) ENERGY (MWH) INCREMENTAL COST DAY DATE Civic TOTAL MAXIMUM @Max MINIMUM @Min FACTOR
More informationSYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY
SYSTEM BRIEF DAILY SUMMARY * ANNUAL MaxTemp NEL (MWH) Hr Ending Hr Ending LOAD (PEAK HOURS 7:00 AM TO 10:00 PM MON-SAT) ENERGY (MWH) INCREMENTAL COST DAY DATE Civic TOTAL MAXIMUM @Max MINIMUM @Min FACTOR
More informationGAMINGRE 8/1/ of 7
FYE 09/30/92 JULY 92 0.00 254,550.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 254,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 254,550.00 AUG 10,616,710.31 5,299.95 845,656.83 84,565.68 61,084.86 23,480.82 339,734.73 135,893.89 67,946.95
More informationChampaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary
Champaign-Urbana 2001 Annual Weather Summary ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY 2204 Griffith Dr. Champaign, IL 61820 wxobsrvr@sws.uiuc.edu Maria Peters, Weather Observer January: After a cold and snowy December,
More informationChampaign-Urbana 2000 Annual Weather Summary
Champaign-Urbana 2000 Annual Weather Summary ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY 2204 Griffith Dr. Champaign, IL 61820 wxobsrvr@sws.uiuc.edu Maria Peters, Weather Observer January: January started on a mild note,
More informationTILT, DAYLIGHT AND SEASONS WORKSHEET
TILT, DAYLIGHT AND SEASONS WORKSHEET Activity Description: Students will use a data table to make a graph for the length of day and average high temperature in Utah. They will then answer questions based
More informationWHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities
WHEN IS IT EVER GOING TO RAIN? Table of Average Annual Rainfall and 2001-2002 Rainfall For Selected Arizona Cities Phoenix Tucson Flagstaff Avg. 2001-2002 Avg. 2001-2002 Avg. 2001-2002 October 0.7 0.0
More informationDetermine the trend for time series data
Extra Online Questions Determine the trend for time series data Covers AS 90641 (Statistics and Modelling 3.1) Scholarship Statistics and Modelling Chapter 1 Essent ial exam notes Time series 1. The value
More informationChampaign-Urbana 1999 Annual Weather Summary
Champaign-Urbana 1999 Annual Weather Summary ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY 2204 Griffith Dr. Champaign, IL 61820 wxobsrvr@sws.uiuc.edu Maria Peters, Weather Observer A major snowstorm kicked off the new
More informationThe Effects of Weather on Urban Trail Use: A National Study
The Effects of Weather on Urban Trail Use: A National Study Alireza Ermagun, Tracy Haden-Loh, Greg Lindsey May 3, 2016 Rails to Trails Conservancy Trail Modeling and Assessment Platform Objectives Monitor
More informationpeak half-hourly New South Wales
Forecasting long-term peak half-hourly electricity demand for New South Wales Dr Shu Fan B.S., M.S., Ph.D. Professor Rob J Hyndman B.Sc. (Hons), Ph.D., A.Stat. Business & Economic Forecasting Unit Report
More informationDAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR
DAILY QUESTIONS 28 TH JUNE 18 REASONING - CALENDAR LEAP AND NON-LEAP YEAR *A non-leap year has 365 days whereas a leap year has 366 days. (as February has 29 days). *Every year which is divisible by 4
More informationLocal Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois
SWS Miscellaneous Publication 98-5 STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES Local Ctimatotogical Data Summary White Hall, Illinois 1901-1990 by Audrey A. Bryan and Wayne Armstrong Illinois
More informationpeak half-hourly Tasmania
Forecasting long-term peak half-hourly electricity demand for Tasmania Dr Shu Fan B.S., M.S., Ph.D. Professor Rob J Hyndman B.Sc. (Hons), Ph.D., A.Stat. Business & Economic Forecasting Unit Report for
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: AK 5 NWS Call Sign: ANC Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 90 Number of s (3) Jan 22.2 9.3 15.8
More informationTime Series Analysis
Time Series Analysis A time series is a sequence of observations made: 1) over a continuous time interval, 2) of successive measurements across that interval, 3) using equal spacing between consecutive
More information2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead
2003 Water Year Wrap-Up and Look Ahead Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center Prepared by Odie Bliss http://ccc.atmos.colostate.edu Colorado Average Annual Precipitation Map South Platte Average Precipitation
More informationChapter 3. Regression-Based Models for Developing Commercial Demand Characteristics Investigation
Chapter Regression-Based Models for Developing Commercial Demand Characteristics Investigation. Introduction Commercial area is another important area in terms of consume high electric energy in Japan.
More informationVariability and trends in daily minimum and maximum temperatures and in diurnal temperature range in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia
Variability and trends in daily minimum and maximum temperatures and in diurnal temperature range in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia Jaak Jaagus Dept. of Geography, University of Tartu Agrita Briede Dept.
More informationOVERVIEW OF IMPROVED USE OF RS INDICATORS AT INAM. Domingos Mosquito Patricio
OVERVIEW OF IMPROVED USE OF RS INDICATORS AT INAM Domingos Mosquito Patricio domingos.mosquito@gmail.com Introduction to Mozambique /INAM Introduction to AGRICAB/SPIRITS Objectives Material & Methods Results
More informationJackson County 2013 Weather Data
Jackson County 2013 Weather Data 61 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center Doug Mayo Jackson County Extension Director 1952-2008 Rainfall Data
More informationLesson Adaptation Activity: Analyzing and Interpreting Data
Lesson Adaptation Activity: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Related MA STE Framework Standard: 3-ESS2-1. Use graphs and tables of local weather data to describe and predict typical weather during a particular
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 63.9 39.3 51.6 86 1976 16 56.6 1986 20 1976 2 47.5 1973
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Temperature ( F) Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 32.8 21.7 27.3 62 1918 1 35.8 1983-24 1950 29 10.5 1979
More informationCLIMATE OVERVIEW. Thunder Bay Climate Overview Page 1 of 5
CLIMATE OVERVIEW The climate in the Thunder Bay area is typical of a mid-latitude inland location with a Great Lake Moderating influence. The moderating effect of Lake Superior results in cooler summer
More informationNASA Products to Enhance Energy Utility Load Forecasting
NASA Products to Enhance Energy Utility Load Forecasting Erica Zell, Battelle zelle@battelle.org, Arlington, VA ESIP 2010 Summer Meeting, Knoxville, TN, July 20-23 Project Overview Funded by the NASA Applied
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 55.6 39.3 47.5 77
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 1 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 57.9 38.9 48.4 85
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 5 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 56.6 36.5 46.6 81
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 5 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 44.8 25.4 35.1 72
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 49.4 37.5 43.5 73
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 69.4 46.6 58.0 92
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) Jan 58.5 38.8 48.7 79 1962
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) Jan 67.5 42. 54.8 92 1971
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 1 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) Jan 57.8 39.5 48.7 85 1962
More informationDrought in Southeast Colorado
Drought in Southeast Colorado Nolan Doesken and Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center Prepared by Tara Green and Odie Bliss http://climate.atmos.colostate.edu 1 Historical Perspective on Drought Tourism
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: ND 8 NWS Call Sign: BIS Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 21.1 -.6 10.2
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: TN 1 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 47.6 24.9 36.3 81
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 5 NWS Call Sign: FAT Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) Jan 53.6 38.4 46. 78
More informationHighlights of the 2006 Water Year in Colorado
Highlights of the 2006 Water Year in Colorado Nolan Doesken, State Climatologist Atmospheric Science Department Colorado State University http://ccc.atmos.colostate.edu Presented to 61 st Annual Meeting
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: 1L2 N Lon: 118 3W Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) Jan 63.7
More informationENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS
ENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS The engine number was also the serial number of the car. Engines were numbered when they were completed, and for the most part went into a chassis within a day or so. However, some
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 5 NWS Call Sign: BFL Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) Jan 56.3 39.3 47.8
More informationMultivariate Regression Model Results
Updated: August, 0 Page of Multivariate Regression Model Results 4 5 6 7 8 This exhibit provides the results of the load model forecast discussed in Schedule. Included is the forecast of short term system
More informationIn this activity, students will compare weather data from to determine if there is a warming trend in their community.
Overview: In this activity, students will compare weather data from 1910-2000 to determine if there is a warming trend in their community. Objectives: The student will: use the Internet to locate scientific
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: TN 3 NWS Call Sign: BNA Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 45.6 27.9 36.8
More informationConstructing a typical meteorological year -TMY for Voinesti fruit trees region and the effects of global warming on the orchard ecosystem
Constructing a typical meteorological year -TMY for Voinesti fruit trees region and the effects of global warming on the orchard ecosystem ARMEANU ILEANA*, STĂNICĂ FLORIN**, PETREHUS VIOREL*** *University
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 5 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: 6 Feet Lat: 37 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3)
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: 2 Feet Lat: 37 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3)
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: 13 Feet Lat: 36 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 5 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: 1,14 Feet Lat: 36 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of
More informationOntario Demand Forecast
Ontario Demand Forecast DECEMBER 12, 2017 December 12, 2017 Public Page i Executive Summary The IESO is responsible for forecasting electricity demand in Ontario and for assessing whether transmission
More informationChampaign-Urbana 1998 Annual Weather Summary
Champaign-Urbana 1998 Annual Weather Summary ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY Audrey Bryan, Weather Observer 2204 Griffith Dr. Champaign, IL 61820 wxobsrvr@sparc.sws.uiuc.edu The development of the El Nìno
More informationTechnical note on seasonal adjustment for M0
Technical note on seasonal adjustment for M0 July 1, 2013 Contents 1 M0 2 2 Steps in the seasonal adjustment procedure 3 2.1 Pre-adjustment analysis............................... 3 2.2 Seasonal adjustment.................................
More informationUWM Field Station meteorological data
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Field Station Bulletins UWM Field Station Spring 992 UWM Field Station meteorological data James W. Popp University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Follow
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: LAX Elevation: 1 Feet Lat: 33 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: TOA Elevation: 11 Feet Lat: 33 2W Temperature ( F) Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number
More informationClimatography of the United States No
No. 2 1971-2 Asheville, North Carolina 2881 COOP ID: 46646 Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: 8W Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp
More informationClimatography of the United States No
No. 2 1971-2 Asheville, North Carolina 2881 COOP ID: 4792 Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65
More informationThe Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 5 High Plateau
105 E55 Unbound issue i". 9 13oes not circulate CZe Special Report 917 May 1993 The Climate of Oregon Climate Zone 5 Property of OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY Library Serials Corvallis, OR 97331-4503 Agricultural
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 42.6 24.2 33.4 79 1950 25 44.2 1974-16 1994 19 18.8 1977 977
More informationClimatography of the United States No
No. 2 1971-2 Asheville, North Carolina 2881 COOP ID: 43417 Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: N Lon: 121 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1)
More informationThree main areas of work:
Task 2: Climate Information 1 Task 2: Climate Information Three main areas of work: Collect historical and projected weather and climate data Conduct storm surge and wave modeling, sea-level rise (SLR)
More informationClimatography of the United States No
No. 2 1971-2 Asheville, North Carolina 2881 COOP ID: 4795 Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: SBA Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp
More informationAnnual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017
Annual Average NYMEX Strip Comparison 7/03/2017 To Year to Year Oil Price Deck ($/bbl) change Year change 7/3/2017 6/1/2017 5/1/2017 4/3/2017 3/1/2017 2/1/2017-2.7% 2017 Average -10.4% 47.52 48.84 49.58
More informationForecasting the electricity consumption by aggregating specialized experts
Forecasting the electricity consumption by aggregating specialized experts Pierre Gaillard (EDF R&D, ENS Paris) with Yannig Goude (EDF R&D) Gilles Stoltz (CNRS, ENS Paris, HEC Paris) June 2013 WIPFOR Goal
More informationpeak half-hourly South Australia
Forecasting long-term peak half-hourly electricity demand for South Australia Dr Shu Fan B.S., M.S., Ph.D. Professor Rob J Hyndman B.Sc. (Hons), Ph.D., A.Stat. Business & Economic Forecasting Unit Report
More informationWhat Does It Take to Get Out of Drought?
What Does It Take to Get Out of Drought? Nolan J. Doesken Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University http://ccc.atmos.colostate.edu Presented at the Insects, Diseases and Drought Workshop, May 19,
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 54.3 40.1 47.2 75 1998 17 53.0 1995 18 1949 11 41.7 1972
More informationMinnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date
Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture Kenny Blumenfeld, State Climatology Office Crop Insurance Conference, Sep 13, 2017 Today 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date
More informationColorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook
Colorado s 2003 Moisture Outlook Nolan Doesken and Roger Pielke, Sr. Colorado Climate Center Prepared by Tara Green and Odie Bliss http://climate.atmos.colostate.edu How we got into this drought! Fort
More informationClimatography of the United States No
No. 2 1971-2 Asheville, North Carolina 2881 COOP ID: 46175 Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: 3L3 Elevation: 1 Feet Lat: 33 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1)
More informationClimatography of the United States No
No. 2 1971-2 Asheville, North Carolina 2881 COOP ID: 42713 Climate Division: CA 7 NWS Call Sign: Elevation: -3 Feet Lat: 32 Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1)
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 5 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 59.3 31.5 45.4 80 1976
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 7 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 44.5 29.3 36.9 69 1951
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 2 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 53.3 37.1 45.2 77 1962
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 2 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 53.3 31.8 42.6 74+ 1975
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 2 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 53.7 32.7 43.2 79 1962
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 68.5 45.7 57.1 90 1971
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 7 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 56.0 35.7 45.9 83 1975
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 7 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) 64.8 45.4 55.1 85 1971
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 7 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) 65.5 38.7 52.1 87 1962
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 7 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 58.8 34.3 46.6 81+ 1948
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 7 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) 70.4 44.2 57.3 95 1971
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 51.5 35.0 43.3 80
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 1 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 52.4 35.4 43.9 69
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 61.9 42.0 52.0 89
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 2 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 55.6 38.8 47.2 81
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 2 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 53.5 37.6 45.6 78
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 6 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 66.1 38.3 52.2 91
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 1 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 1 Number of s (3) Jan 56.2 4.7 48.5 79 1962
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 1 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 50.2 31.2 40.7 65+
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 4 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 61.4 33.1 47.3 82+
More informationClimatography of the United States No
Climate Division: CA 7 NWS Call Sign: Month (1) Min (2) Month(1) Extremes Lowest (2) Temperature ( F) Lowest Month(1) Degree s (1) Base Temp 65 Heating Cooling 100 Number of s (3) Jan 54.4 36.9 45.7 77+
More information