Survival of Trojan-Type Companions of Neptune During Primordial Planet Migration

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Survival of Trojan-Type Companions of Neptune During Primordial Planet Migration"

Transcription

1 Survival of Trojan-Type Companions of Neptune During Primordial Planet Migration Stephen J. Kortenkamp,, Renu Malhotra, and Tatiana Michtchenko ABSTRACT We investigate the survivability of Trojan-type companions of Neptune during primordial radial migration of the giant planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. We adopt the usual planet migration model in which the migration speed decreases exponentially with a characteristic time scale τ (the e-folding time). We perform a series of numerical simulations, each involving the migrating giant planets plus 1000 test particle Neptune Trojans with initial distributions of orbital eccentricity, inclination, and libration amplitude similar to those of the known jovian Trojans asteroids. We analyze these simulations to measure the survivability of Neptune s Trojans as a function of migration rate. We find that orbital migration with the characteristic time scale τ =10 6 years allows about 35% of pre-existing Neptune Trojans to survive to 5τ, by which time the giant planets have essentially reached their final orbits. In contrast, slower migration with τ =10 7 years yields only a 5% probability of Neptune Trojans surviving to a time of 5τ. Interestingly, we find that the loss of Neptune Trojans during planetary migration is not a random diffusion process. Rather, losses occur almost exclusively during discrete episodes when Trojan particles are swept by secondary resonances associated with mean-motion commensurabilities of Uranus with Neptune. These secondary resonances arise when the circulation frequencies, f, of critical arguments for Uranus-Neptune mean-motion near-resonances (e.g., f UN, f UN 4:7 ) are commensurate with harmonics of the libration frequency of the critical argument for the Neptune-Trojan meanmotion resonance (f NT ). Trojans trapped in the secondary resonances typically have their libration amplitudes amplified until they escape the resonance with Neptune. Trojans with large libration amplitudes are susceptible to loss during sweeping by numerous high order secondary resonances (e.g., f UN 11f NT). However, for the slower migration, with τ =107 years, even tightly bound Neptune Trojans with libration amplitudes below 10 can be lost when they become trapped in 1:3 or secondary resonances between f UN and f NT.Withτ=10 7 years the secondary resonance was responsible for the single greatest episode of loss, ejecting nearly 75% of existing Neptune Trojans. This episode occurred during the late stages of planetary migration when the remnant planetesimal disk would have been largely dissipated. We speculate that if the number of bodies liberated during this event was sufficiently high they could have caused a spike in the impact rate throughout the solar system. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil

2 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 2 I. INTRODUCTION Nearly 1500 asteroids are known to share Jupiter s orbit, locked in mean-motion resonance with the giant planet. These so-called Trojan asteroids form two swarms in the Lagrange equilibrium regions leading (L 4 ) and trailing (L 5 ) Jupiter in its orbit by 60. Only a single nonjovian Trojan-type companion is yet known in the outer solar system, minor planet 2001 QR322 in Neptune s trailing L 5 region (Chiang 2003; Marsden 2003). The lack of saturnian Trojans may be explained by the chaotic effects of resonances with other planets, which disrupt what would otherwise be stable Trojan regions (Holman & Wisdom 1993; de la Barre et al. 1996). Trojans of Uranus may also have been largely depleted by dynamical instabilities over the age of the solar system (Nesvorný & Dones 2002). The paucity of Neptune Trojans, however, is more puzzling. Most investigations into the stability of hypothetical Neptune Trojans (e.g., Weissman & Levison 1997; Nesvorný & Dones 2002) suggest that if a primordial population once existed then some sizable remnant ( 50%) of it should be preserved today. Prior to 2001 there had been no discoveries of Neptune Trojans, neither serendipitously nor in dedicated surveys (Chen et al. 1997). This fact was used to set crude limits on the size distribution of any existing population (Nesvorný & Dones 2002). However, these upper limits are weak, and do not preclude a population of Neptune Trojans that may exceed the population of Jupiter Trojans. Nevertheless, the current apparent scarcity of Neptune Trojans is interesting from a dynamical point of view. This, together with the orbital characteristics of 2001 QR322, may provide important clues to Neptune s origin and the primordial orbital evolution of the giant planets. The early dynamical evolution of the outer solar system is thought to involve significant radial migration of the four giant planets (Fernández & Ip 1984, 1996; Hahn & Malhotra 1999). The cause of this migration is the planets dynamical clearing of the residual planetesimal disk during the late stages of planet formation. Some clues that suggest past planetary migration include the existence of the Oort cloud of comets, orbital characteristics of plutinos and other resonant Kuiper belt objects (KBOs) trapped in mean-motion resonance with Neptune (Malhotra 1993, 1995; Chiang & Jordan 2002), the high inclination classical KBOs (Gomes 2003), and depletion of the outer asteroid belt (Liou & Malhotra 1997). Detailed descriptions of the migration process can be found in Fernández & Ip (1984, 1996) and Hahn & Malhotra (1999). Here we simply re-state the general scenario, highlighting the effects on Neptune s orbit. In the beginning, Neptune is embedded in a planetesimal disk and we will assume it has a mean specific orbital angular momentum roughly equal to that of the planetesimals in its gravitational vicinity. Of those planetesimals encountered by Neptune about equal numbers will be scattered inward and outward, thus initially there is no net change in Neptune s orbital energy or angular momentum, so no migration of Neptune s orbit. Most planetesimals scattered outward eventually return to Neptune s region, with only minor losses from those receiving sufficient stellar perturbations to be boosted into the Oort cloud. These returning planetesimals can again be scattered by Neptune either inward or outward. Thus, most of the energy and angular momentum lost by Neptune to outward scattering can be recaptured upon return of the planetesimal. However, those planetesimals scattered inward by Neptune have the opportunity to encounter Uranus, Saturn, and Jupiter. Jupiter essentially controls the overall dynamics because it is very effective at ejecting planetesimals from the solar system. Planetesimals scattered inward by Neptune and subsequently

3 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 3 ejected by Jupiter cannot return for another encounter with Neptune (or Jupiter). Thus, Neptune retains the energy and angular momentum gained from them. In this scenario Jupiter provides more than the required energy and angular momentum to clear the remnant planetesimal disk, with the extra going toward expansion of Neptune s orbit. Jupiter thus migrates inward, though only slightly owing to its large mass. The early evolution of Saturn and Uranus are somewhat analogous to Neptune s, with each of these planets also migrating outward at Jupiter s expense. Modeling of the cause and effects of planetary migration by planetesimal scattering (e.g., Hahn & Malhotra 1999; Gomes 1997) has yielded approximate semi-major axis migration distances, a, of 0.2, 0.8, 3.0, and 7.0 AU for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, respectively. The present semimajor axes of these planets are about 5.2, 9.5, 19.2, and 30.1 AU. Effective constraints on the early orbital evolution of the giant planets can be found in the orbital eccentricities of Pluto and other Kuiper belt objects trapped in 2:3 mean-motion resonance with Neptune. Using these constraints, Malhotra (1993, 1995) estimated that 5 AU should be considered a minimum migration distance for Neptune. Gomes (1997, 2000) and Malhotra (1998) suggested that a 9 10 AU migration might be necessary to account for the plutino inclinations. Constraints on the timescale of migration have come from the magnitude of a for Neptune (Hahn & Malhotra 1999), from relative populations of the 2:3 and resonant KBOs (Malhotra 1995; Friedland 2000; Chiang & Jordan 2002), and plutino inclinations (Gomes 1997). With the discovery of 2001 QR 322, a new class of small body in resonance with Neptune has become available for study. Our aim with this paper is to begin examining the constraints such bodies may place on the early dynamical evolution of the giant planets. The critical argument for a Trojan-type particle, an object in mean-motion resonance with a planet, is given by φ = λ λ pln,whereλand λ pln are the mean longitudes of the particle and planet. When a particle and planet are not in resonance φ circulates through all angles 0 to 360. For a particle trapped in the planet s leading L 4 or trailing L 5 regions, φ librates about +60 or 60, respectively. The full magnitude of the difference between the extremal values of φ is called the libration amplitude. The time required for one complete libration of φ is the libration period. The effects of a planet s radial migration on the libration amplitude of a Trojan-type companion has been explored for the planar circular restricted three-body problem consisting of the sun, planet, and massless Trojan particle. Fleming and Hamilton (2000) derived the expression A f /A i (a f /a i ) 1/4,whereAis the Trojan libration amplitude, a is the planet s semi-major axis, and the subscripts denote the final and initial values. Inward radial migration increases A while outward migration decreases A. Numerical simulations by Fleming and Hamilton (2000) confirmed the validity of their expression for small initial libration amplitudes (A i < 30 )and slow (adiabatic) migration. This single-planet model of Trojan stability during planetary migration is useful for demonstrating basic principles of the effects of migration. A straight forward application of this expression to our migration distances implies a slight decrease of about 5% in the libration amplitude of Neptune s Trojans. However, we show here that the gravitational perturbations of multiple migrating giant planets, especially at resonance crossings, have a profound effect on Trojan orbits that dwarfs the simple adiabatic response due to a single migrating planet. The effects of radial migration of all four giant planets on pre-existing Neptune Trojans have not received much attention. As far as we are aware, the only published study of the problem is

4 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 4 that of Gomes (1998). Gomes used both linear and exponential migration and found significant survival of Neptune Trojans in N-body simulations which had all four giant planets migrating. Gomes included 100 initial Trojan-type test particles and generally migrated the planets using the conventional a values given above. In linear migration models with a 10 6 year time scale Gomes found 82 particles survived as Neptune Trojans after migration. For a time scale of 10 7 years 53 Trojan particles survived. Using exponential migration, Gomes found that 30 Neptune Trojans survived for years in a model with characteristic time scale τ = years (τ is the e- folding time for migration) and that 49 survived years with τ = years, suggesting an increase in Trojan survivability with longer migration time scales. However, that trend was reversed in a model with τ =10 7 years, where Gomes found only 30 Neptune Trojans surviving for years. The relatively small number of initial test particles used by Gomes (1998) and the inconsistent results for different migration rates prevent a clear assessment of the general survivability of Neptune Trojans during primordial radial migration of the four giant planets. In addition, Gomes did not seek to identify the mechanism by which Neptune Trojans are destabilized during planetary migration. In the present paper we have re-evaluated the problem using more than an order of magnitude more particles. Our simulations use only exponential radial migration as this seems more realistic than linear migration (Fernández & Ip 1984, 1996; Hahn & Malhotra 1999). We find that there is a clear trend of decreasing Trojan survivability with increasing migration time scale. We also describe in detail the primary mechanism responsible for destabilization and loss of Neptune Trojans during migration. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section II we describe our initial conditions, the numerical model, and results from a series of simulations. In Section III we conclude by discussing some implications of our results in the context of our current understanding of planet migration and earlier work on Neptune Trojan stability. II. METHOD AND RESULTS IIa. Initial Conditions and Numerical Model Unless otherwise noted, each of our simulations included the four giant planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The radial migration of these planets followed a smooth time variation of their semi-major axes, a. A time scale τ was used to characterize the migration, where a(t) = a(0)+ a[1 exp( t/τ)] and a is the desired amount of total migration at time t =. Following Malhotra (1995), we adopt a = 0.2, 0.8, 3.0, and 7.0 AU, respectively for Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Table 1 lists the masses and initial configuration of these planets for our simulations. The masses of the terrestrial planets were added to the mass of the sun. Tab. 1 Orbital evolution was followed using the Wisdom-Holman (1991) symplectic integration technique with radial migration modifications included as non-gravitational forces (see Cordeiro et al. 1997). The mutual gravitational perturbations of the planets were included self-consistently even as their orbital spacing was expanding. The numerical simulation code is similar to that used in earlier work (Malhotra 1995). For all simulations we used a time step of 6 months, roughly 1/25 the orbital period of the innermost planet (Jupiter). This time step is sufficiently small to reliably integrate the orbits of the four giant planets and the test particles over the time scales we studied

5 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 5 (Wisdom & Holman 1992). The initial conditions for the Neptune Trojans (modeled as massless test particles) were obtained as follows. We started with the population of Jupiter s current Trojan companions as of January 2002, a total of 1171 asteroids, having downloaded their orbital elements from the Minor Planet Center database (cfa- These asteroids are roughly evenly divided between Jupiter s leading L 4 (57%) and trailing L 5 (43%) Lagrange equilibrium regions. The orbital elements of these asteroids were then assigned to test particles at Neptune s initial orbit at 23 AU, with appropriate transformations of semi-major axes, arguments of pericenter, and longitudes of ascending node. Eccentricities and inclinations were not changed. This transformation was successful in placing most of the original population in mean-motion resonance with Neptune. To verify this, during the first 25,000 years of each simulation we monitored the critical argument of each Neptune-Trojan pair, φ NT = λ λ Nep. All particles that maintained 0 < φ NT < 180 for the first 25,000 years were considered members of the initial resonant population. This initial 25,000 years is about four times the libration period of φ NT for Neptune s initial orbit at 23 AU. Because of differences in the parameter τ, the number of particles in these initial populations at 25,000 years varied slightly in different simulations, but was always greater than During the remainder of each simulation φ NT for each particle was calculated every 100 time steps (50 years) and the extremal values of φ NT were updated every 104 years. Our initial populations of Trojan particles (at T o = 25,000 years) had a spread in semimajor axis a 0.3 AU, eccentricity e 0.2, inclinations i 40, and libration amplitudes A 150. The range in (a, e, i) space for these initial populations covers roughly the same volume as the populations used by Nesvorný and Dones (2002) for their study of long term stability of Neptune Trojans subject to planetary perturbations in the present configuration of the solar system. They found that roughly 50% of the Neptune Trojan population survived after years. A direct application of their stability results to our initial population is not possible because we used a different tighter planetary configuration. However, qualitatively their results suggest that our initial conditions more than adequately cover the most stable regions of the phase space for Neptune Trojans. To increase run-time efficiency we removed particles from the simulations if their libration amplitude exceeded 180. Thus, Neptune could not regain Trojans after they had been lost. A limited number of simulations were carried out that tracked all particles for the full duration of the simulation. In these simulations a small number of particles on large tadpole orbits around either the leading L 4 or trailing L 5 were found to be capable of transitioning to and from resonant horseshoe orbits as the planets migrated. However, recapture of lost Trojans by this process was a short-term effect. The counts of surviving Trojans in the primary runs typically differed only by one or two particles compared to the runs that followed all particles for the full duration of the simulation.

6 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 6 IIb. Migration Simulations Figure 1 shows the evolution of the semi-major axes of the four giant planets as a function of time expressed in units of the characteristic migration time scale τ up to a time of 8τ. With this exponential migration model, radial migration of all planets is 99.33% complete after a time of 5τ. By this time orbital evolution of the planets (and of their Trojan companions) is dominated by gravitational perturbations from the planets in their near-final orbits rather than the effects of migration. Because the final configuration in each of our simulations cannot exactly match the current configuration of the solar system, we confine our study of Trojan survival to times less than or equal to 5τ. For stability analysis of Neptune Trojans beyond 5τ we defer to gigayear simulations that use the precise present orbital configuration of the solar system (Weissman & Levison 1997; Nesvorný & Dones 2002). These studies have shown that if a post-migration population of Neptune Trojans existed then some significant remnant ( 50%) should have survived on a 4 billion year time scale. Figure 2 shows results from a relatively rapid migration simulation with τ =10 6 years. At the initial time T o =25,000 years there were 1031 particles trapped in Neptune s leading L 4 and trailing L 5 regions. The top panel of Fig. 2 shows a histogram of the extremal values of φ NT for this initial population. The five lower panels of Fig. 2 show similar histograms of the Trojan population surviving after integer increments of the characteristic migration time scale τ. After a time of 5τ about 38% of the initial Trojan population remained in resonance with Neptune. This result is reasonably consistent with that of Gomes (1998), who found a Neptune Trojan survival probability of 30-50% for τ =1.5and years. Figure 3 shows results from a simulation where the migration rate was an order of magnitude slower than that of Fig. 2, with τ =10 7 years. The initial population at 25,000 years was nearly identical to the previous case, with 1025 test particles trapped in the leading and trailing Lagrange regions. However, after a time of 5τ most of the Trojans had been lost, with only 1.5% of the initial population surviving. The simulations shown in Figs. 2 and 3 represent examples of our key result: survivability of Neptune Trojans depends on the characteristic migration time scale. Although the simulation with τ =10 7 years ran for 10 times longer than that with τ =10 6 years, the greater losses in Fig. 3 cannot be explained simply by the longer duration of the simulation. In neither case were the losses the result of a gradual random diffusive process. Because of the inherent chaotic nature of N-body simulations, identical initial conditions modeled on different computers (different processors and/or compilers) produced results that were generally in agreement but differed in some details. For example, some Trojans lost after 5τ in a τ =10 7 year simulation on a Sun Sparc Ultra 5 were survivors when the simulation was run on an Intel Xeon CPU, and vice versa. We ran simulations for each value of τ on four different types of processors the Sparc, two Xeons (1.7 and 2.4 GHz), and a Digital Alpha EV6. Figure 4 shows a composite histogram of the survivability of Neptune Trojans from runs on these four types of processors for simulations with τ =10 6, , ,and10 7 years. These four runs for each value of τ effectively quadruple the number of initial test particles in each case, resulting in over 4000 initial Trojan test particles for each value of τ. Figure 4 displays an obvious trend: Neptune loses Trojans during migration and it loses more Trojans for longer migration time scales. Com- Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4

7 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 7 paring the survival statistics in Fig. 4 at equal durations in time (e.g., at years for different values of τ ) reveals that these losses cannot be explained by a constant diffusion with time. In all simulations shown in Fig. 4 Neptune is migrating from just exterior to the 3:5 meanmotion resonance with Uranus to approximately its present orbit just interior to the meanmotion resonance with Uranus (see Fig. 1). Between the 3:5 and, Neptune and its Trojans cross numerous other higher order uranian resonances, such as the 4:7 and 5:9. All of these resonances play a role in destabilizing Neptune Trojans during migration. Simple confirmation of this was found by repeating some simulations without Uranus (see Fig. 5). In these simulations nearly all initial Neptune Trojan particles survived to a time of 5τ. Fig. 5 The importance of Uranus in this problem should not be entirely unexpected. In an ideal case Uranus is the planet that comes the closest to, and strays the farthest from, Neptune s Trojans. For a Trojan initially trapped exactly at Neptune s L 4 or L 5 point (zero libration amplitude), Uranus passes within 7 AU at conjunction and is as distant as 39 AU at opposition. Neptune, on the other hand, remains at a distance of 23 AU. Accounting for the difference in planetary mass, the gravitational force from Uranus acting on the particle varies, from about nine times stronger than the force from Neptune at conjunction to about one third weaker at opposition. These uranian perturbations will repeat with the synodic period of Uranus and Neptune. For a Trojan particle with non-zero libration amplitude, its position will vary somewhat at each conjunction with Uranus. Thus, the uranian perturbations, while roughly of the same magnitude, will at times accelerate and others decelerate the particle s motion with respect to Neptune. The net effect over many libration periods amounts to destructive interference which does not destabilize the Trojan particle s resonant configuration with Neptune. However, if the Uranus-Neptune-Trojan orbital orientation becomes periodic in time (a three-body resonance) then the uranian perturbations could buildup constructively, driving the Trojan particle to larger or smaller libration amplitude. Note that for the initial conditions in Tab. 1 the gravitational forces acting on Neptune s Trojans from Saturn and Jupiter are always larger than the force from Neptune. Saturnian perturbations range from about 13 to 3 times those from Neptune, at conjunction and opposition with the Trojan particle, respectively. Jovian perturbations are stronger still, 30 times neptunian at conjunction and 12 times at opposition. The high retention of Trojans in simulations that did not include Uranus (Fig. 5) demonstrate that the direct saturnian and jovian perturbations do not dominate the stability of Neptune Trojans during planetary migration. Jupiter and Saturn have short synodic periods with respect to Neptune (about 14 and 34 years). Considering the 10 4 year libration period of Neptune s Trojans, the high frequency low amplitude perturbations from Saturn and Jupiter can be considered in an orbit-averaged sense, as if the mass of these two distant planets were distributed in a ring about their orbits. Results shown in Fig. 5 and the simple schematic described above do not preclude destabilizing roles for Jupiter and Saturn acting indirectly through perturbations on Uranus (Michtchenko et al. 2001). Close scrutiny of the orbital evolution of some of the Trojans lost in our simulations strengthens the case against Uranus acting alone. Figure 6 provides an example of the evolution of Trojan libration amplitudes in a simulation with τ = years. In this simulation about 95% of the initial population of Neptune Trojans was lost by a time of 5τ. Nearly all Trojans that were lost Fig. 6

8 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 8 between a time of τ and 5τ evolved out of resonance during a discrete number of prolonged episodes. The top panel of Fig. 6 shows these events, with numerous particles cascading out of resonance together. Figure 6 also shows selected examples of some lost Trojans (middle panel) and others that survive these events (bottom panel). In general, the cascading episodes that occur earlier affect only those Trojans with relatively large libration amplitudes, with more tightly bound particles affected by each subsequent episode. This suggests that the cause of these events is gaining strength with time. Note also that during any given single cascading episode smaller libration amplitude (higher lib. freq.) particles are affected first and larger libration amplitude (lower lib. freq.) particles are picked up as the episode progresses. Also, the time between episodes, from the beginning of one to the beginning of the next, increases systematically by about a factor of two. These timedependent features suggest that the cause has a characteristic frequency that is slowing appreciably during the course of each episode and from one episode to the next. Finally, those Trojans that survive the episodes (bottom panel, Fig. 6) experience sharp changes in libration amplitude at times coincident with other particles of similar libration amplitude being swept up in an event. Figure 6 is an example from a simulation with τ = years but the general characteristics of the cascading episodes were similar for all values of τ. The primary difference was that the number of particles lost during each event increased as τ increased. Many of these features are similar to the effects of sweeping secondary resonances studied in the tidal evolution of the uranian satellite system (Tittermore & Wisdom 1990; Malhotra & Dermott 1990; Malhotra 1998a). In particular, the anomalously large orbital inclination of Miranda is naturally explained as a consequence of secondary resonance sweeping due to tidal evolution within a 3:1 inclination-type mean-motion resonance with Umbriel. This resonance increased Miranda s inclination from an initially small value, but the resonance was temporary. As Miranda s inclination approached its current value, the satellites were captured in a secondary resonance which amplified their primary resonance libration amplitude; this eventually caused the satellites to escape from the 3:1 mean-motion resonance, leaving Miranda with an inclination that is preserved to the present. The secondary resonance implicated in this case was due to a 1:3 commensurability between the libration frequency of the mean-motion resonance angle and the secular frequency of precession of the relative lines of nodes of the two satellites. The exact secondary resonance can be identified because each one is associated with a specific value of the final inclination of Miranda. The essential elements of the Uranian satellite dynamics relevant to the present work are that (i) secondary resonances appear at the center of the primary resonance, initially at small libration amplitude, and sweep across the entire libration region of the primary resonance; (ii) capture into a secondary resonance is a probabilistic phenomenon, with low-integer secondary resonances having generally higher probabilities of capture; (iii) capture in a secondary resonance causes an amplification of the libration amplitude until the system escapes the mean-motion resonance; (iv) particles not captured experience a small perturbation, mainly in their libration amplitude; they may later be captured by another secondary resonance sweeping by. This analogy suggests that the cascading episodes of Neptune s Trojans found in our models (Fig. 6) are caused by one or more secondary resonances sweeping across the phase space occupied by the Trojan particles. Some Trojan particles can be trapped in these secondary resonances and forced out of Neptune s Lagrange regions. Others only experience a momentary perturbation as a secondary resonance

9 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 9 crosses their location in phase space. During the cascading episodes shown in Fig. 6 the strongest resonance in the vicinity of Neptune and its Trojan particles is the mean-motion with Uranus. While Uranus and Neptune are not locked in resonance with each other, they are close. One critical argument for the Uranus- Neptune near-resonance is φ UN =2λ Nep λ Ura ω Ura,where ω Ura is the longitude of pericenter for Uranus. During migration φ UN circulates through all angles 0 to 360 while the Neptune-Trojan critical argument, φ NT, librates about ±60. The libration frequency of φ NT,givenasf NT,is 10 4 yr 1 and decreases only slightly as Neptune migrates outward ( a 3/2 Nep ). The circulation frequency of φ UN NT, is initially more rapid than f but decreases dramatically as the migrating,givenasfun Uranus and Neptune converge upon resonance. As f UN can become trapped in secondary resonances that occur when f UN harmonics of f NT,wheref UN (j/k)f NT NT converges toward f Trojan particles becomes commensurate with, j and k are integers, and j k. Figure 7 shows an example from a τ =10 7 year simulation where a Trojan particle was lost while trapped in a 1:4 commensurability between f UN and f NT. A fast Fourier filter (FFT) was used to obtain power spectra of φ NT (middle panel) and φun (bottom panel). Spectra were taken every 0.1 τ (10 6 years) from 1.4 to 2.8τ. Each FFT used 4096 points sampled every 100 years, giving an FFT interval of about 0.041τ. In the first interval, starting at 1.4τ, f UN is higher than the 6th harmonic of f NT. As Uranus and Neptune converge upon the resonance f UN slows and passes the 6 th harmonic of f NT at about 1.55τ. The libration amplitude of the Trojan particle experiences a perturbation at this time. Passage of f UN by the 5 th harmonic of f NT at 1.85τ results in a more significant change in libration amplitude. At about 2.23τ the 4 th harmonic is reached, where f UN 4f NT. After 2.23τ, as Uranus and Neptune migrate closer to resonance the particle is captured in this 1:4 secondary resonance between f UN and f NT ; as a consequence it is gradually forced to larger libration amplitude. Increasing libration amplitude results in a slower libration frequency. Thus, the 4 th harmonic of the slowing f NT UN keeps pace with the slowing f. The particle is trapped and the 1:4 secondary resonance is maintained. Trapped particles forced to libration amplitudes of 110 to 130 were quickly lost from Neptune s Lagrange regions. Fig. 7 Initially, f UN is more than a factor of 10 faster than f NT. After a time of 5τ Uranus and Neptune have reached nearly their final orbits and f UN is less than twice as fast as f NT for a typical unaffected Trojan particle. As f UN slows it passes numerous higher harmonics of f NT.The occurrences of commensurabilities between f UN NT and harmonics of f correspond precisely to the cascading episodes shown in Fig. 6. In the middle panel of Fig. 6 the last particle lost (near 4.8τ) was initially tightly bound to Neptune s L 4 or L 5 with a libration amplitude below 10. This particle became trapped in a secondary resonance, f UN 2f NT, and was lost in about years. The first particle lost in the examples of Fig. 6 (near 1.5τ) was likely trapped in the 1 secondary resonance. The 1:9 and 0 commensurabilities are not represented in the examples showninfig.6. In all simulations significant loss of Neptune Trojans occurred in the first multiple of τ, before the first bars on the histogram of Fig. 4. An example of Trojan evolution during this early period is shown in Fig. 8 for a simulation with τ =10 7 years. The format is similar to Fig. 6, with a cross-section of particles shown at the top, examples of lost Trojans in the middle panel, and two Figs. 8,9

10 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 10 typical survivors at the bottom. As in Fig. 6, loss of Trojans is confined to a few discrete episodes, primarily from τ and τ. Because these losses occur so early in the migration process the 3:5 and 4:7 Uranus-Neptune mean-motion resonances are likely culprits. Figure 9 shows a detailed analysis of one Trojan particle lost at 0.44τ. Spectra of φ NT (middle panel) are shown in comparison with spectra (bottom panel) of a critical argument of the Uranus-Neptune 4:7 mean-motion near-resonance, φ UN 4:7 =7λ Nep 4λ Ura 3 ω Ura. Initially, as Uranus and Neptune approach 4:7 resonance the circulation frequency of the critical argument, f UN 4:7, slows and converges upon f NT UN. Abrupt changes in the Trojan libration amplitude record passage of f by the 4:7 3rd,2 nd, and 1 st harmonics of f NT. This particular Trojan survives these events but Fig. 8 illustrates that many particles are lost in events leading up to the commensurability between f UN 4:7 and f NT. At about 0.27τ all of the power in the spectrum of φ UN 4:7 falls near zero frequency. This indicates that circulation of φ UN 4:7 planets withdraw from the 4:7 resonance circulation of φ UN 4:7 diverging from f NT has ceased, with Uranus and Neptune crossing their 4:7 resonance. As the UN resumes and speeds up, with f now 4:7 UN NT. Divergent passages of f4:7 by harmonics of f result in abrupt changes to the particle s libration amplitude. The particle is finally lost following passage of f UN 4:7 by the 8 th harmonic of f NT. The effects of secondary resonances demonstrated by Figs. 7 and 9 can be used to associate gross features seen in Figs. 6 and 8 with their respective causes. In Fig. 8 the initial loss of Trojans between 0 and 0.06τ corresponds to withdrawal of Uranus and Neptune from the location of their 3:5 mean-motion resonance. Between 0.12 and 0.24τ the planets are approaching their 4:7 resonance. The lull from 0.24 to 0.3τ corresponds to a calm period when the planets actually cross the location of their 4:7 resonance. Withdrawal from the 4:7 leads to more lost Trojan particles between 0.3 and 0.44τ. Structure from 0.44 to 0.58τ is from approach to the 5:9, with withdrawal from 5:9 between 0.6 and 0.8τ. We can also see structure associated with approach to and withdrawal from the 6:11 resonance, between 0.8 and 1.1τ (more evident in Fig. 6). The two survivors shown as examples in the bottom panel of Fig. 8 show sudden changes in libration amplitude probably caused by secondary resonances associated with the 6:11 resonance. Loss of Neptune Trojans during secondary resonances with Uranus and Neptune occurred for all values of τ. However, the fraction lost during passages of each secondary resonance increased as τ increased. Figure 4 essentially gives the results for loss during approach to the Uranus-Neptune mean-motion resonance. With τ =10 6 years about 50% of the Trojan particles still present are lost through secondary resonances associated with the. With τ =10 7 years about 85% of existing Trojans are lost during these same events. For times less than τ Fig. 4 provides bulk survival statistics for events associated with higher order Uranus-Neptune resonances such as the 3:5, 4:7, and 5:9. These include withdrawal from the 3:5 as well as approach and withdrawal from both the 4:7 and 5:9. With τ =10 6 years about 20% of Trojan particles are lost through secondary resonances associated with all these events. In contrast, with τ =10 7 years nearly 65% of Trojan particles are lost during the same events. Most of the Trojans lost in our simulations were destabilized by perturbations from Uranus. The primary episodes of loss can be directly linked to the secondary resonances described above. The nearest saturnian and jovian mean-motion resonances to Neptune are the saturnian 1:6 and jovian 3 and 4. Direct perturbations of Jupiter and Saturn on Neptune Trojans appear to

11 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 11 play a very minor role, as indicated by results from the simulation run without Uranus. Indirect perturbations of Jupiter and Saturn, acting through Uranus, may have a greater influence. One important mean-motion resonance in the region of Uranus is the jovian 1:7. The pair cross their 1:7 mean-motion resonance between 3.25τ and 3.5τ (see Fig. 1). Figure 6 shows that some Trojan particles trapped in the 1:3 secondary resonance (f UN 3f NT ) are lost in this time interval. Spectral analysis of some of these trapped particles indicates that they can escape the secondary resonance during passage of the Jupiter-Uranus 1:7 mean-motion resonance. It is possible then that some of the Trojan particles forced to high libration amplitudes while trapped in the 1:3 secondary resonance could ultimately have been lost as a result of the Jupiter-Uranus 1:7 mean-motion resonance. III. DISCUSSION The post-formation orbital evolution of the giant planets in our solar system is constrained by observed characteristics of small body populations. Studies of the interaction of the giant planets with these populations have led to a detailed understanding of the early dynamical evolution of the outer solar system. Discovery of the first Trojan companion of Neptune, 2001 QR 322, reveals yet another class of minor solar system body. As more of these objects are discovered, statistical comparisons of their orbits with results from numerical modeling such as ours will provide further constraints on the early history of the solar system. With only a single known Neptune Trojan, such a comparison may not carry much weight but is still interesting. Figure 10 shows the initial and final distributions of eccentricity, inclination, and libration amplitude for surviving Trojans from the τ =10 7 year simulation. The initial and final distributions of inclination and libration amplitude show no strong differences. The eccentricity distributions are markedly different though. Figure 11 shows the mean eccentricity of surviving Trojan particles as a function of time for all values of τ. The initial eccentricities of the particles (at T o =25,000 years) were about equal to those of Jupiter s real Trojan asteroids, with a mean of and standard deviation of about ±0.03. The secondary resonances primarily removed higher eccentricity particles and longer migration time scales led to erosion of lower eccentricity particles. With τ =10 7 years the surviving population at 5τ has a mean eccentricity of 0.04 ± Figs. 10,11 The (a, e, i) space occupied by the surviving Neptune Trojans in our τ =10 7 years simulation overlaps remarkably well with the large stable region found by Nesvorný and Dones (2002). In their study, using the present configuration of the planets as starting conditions, nearly all Trojan particles within ±0.1 AU of the libration center and with e 0.07, i 25, A survived for years. The agreement is probably not coincidental considering the importance we found for the mean-motion near-resonance between Uranus and Neptune. Nesvorný and Dones found that this same near-resonance shapes the stability of Neptune s Trojan regions in the present planetary configuration. The similarity between our final conditions for τ =10 7 years and the initial conditions of Nesvorný and Dones suggests that 30 to 50% of Neptune s post-migration Trojan population could survive for the age of the solar system. This indicates that Neptune s current Trojan population may be just 1-2% of its primordial size. Depending on initial conditions it may be possible to either mitigate or enhance Trojan losses during planetary migration. From the characteristics of Pluto s orbit, Malhotra (1995) shows that 5 AU should be considered a minimum migration distance for Neptune. This smaller distance could

12 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 12 allow Neptune Trojans to avoid destabilizing secondary resonances associated with withdrawal from the 3:5 with Uranus and some of those associated with approach to the 4:7. On the other hand, Gomes (1997) suggests that Neptune may have migrated as much as 9 10 AU rather than the nominal value of 7 AU assumed in our simulations. The extra 2 AU would put Neptune initially interior to the location of the 3:5 mean-motion resonance with Uranus. Neptune Trojans would then be subject to additional losses through secondary resonances associated with approach to the 3:5. Convergence of Uranus and Neptune toward mean-motion resonance seems unavoidable based on our current understanding of planetary migration. Therefore, regardless of the extent of Neptune s migration (be it 5, 7, or 9 AU), it is the migration rate on final approach to its present orbit that determined the fate of most of its Trojans. Previous work (Malhotra 1998b) suggests that planetary migration with τ =10 7 years is favored to allow Kuiper belt objects trapped in 2:3 mean-motion resonance with Neptune to evolve to the high orbital inclinations observed for some of the plutinos. If Neptune had an abundant primordial population of Trojan companions then migration with τ 10 7 years would have dramatically depleted that population. The loss rate would not have been a smooth function of time. Instead, the losses would have been episodic, with an especially dramatic loss between 4 and 5τ as Uranus and Neptune closed upon their present near-resonant configuration. Our simulations show that this final loss episode involved a nearly 75% reduction in Neptune s Trojan population (see Fig. 4). These liberated bodies, heretofore dynamically sequestered by Neptune, would be injected into the largely eroded planetesimal disk. We speculate that if their numbers were sufficiently high they could have temporarily enhanced the impact rate throughout the solar system. Traces of this event, while probably not preserved in Triton s relatively fresh surface, may be preserved in the impact records on other more ancient surfaces. IV. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Bill Hartmann and Stu Weidenschilling for valuable comments on an early draft of this paper. This material is based upon work supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant Nos. NAG and NAG issued through the Office of Space Science and by the Research Foundation of São Paulo State (FAPESP) under Grant No. 01/ V. REFERENCES Chen, J., D. Jewitt, C. Trujillo, and J. Luu Mauna Kea Trojan survey and statistical studies of L 4 Trojans. Bull. Amer. Astron. Soc. 29, DPS abstract # Chiang, E.I., and A.B. Jordan On the plutinos and twotinos of the Kuiper belt. Astron. J. 124, Chiang, E.I QR 322. IAU Circulars Cordeiro, R.R., R.S. Gomes, and R.V. Martins A mapping for nonconservative systems. Celes. Mech. Dynamic. Astron. 65, de la Barre, C.M., W.M. Kaula, and F. Varadi triangular Lagrangian points. Icarus 121, A study of orbits near Saturn s

13 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 13 Fernandez, J.A., and W.H. Ip Some dynamical aspects of the accretion of Uranus and Neptune: The exchange of orbital angular momentum with planetesimals. Icarus 58, Fernandez, J.A., and W.H. Ip Orbital expansion and resonant trapping during the late accretion stages of the outer planets. Plan. Spa. Sci. 44, Fleming, H.J., and D.P. Hamilton On the origin of the Trojan asteroids: Effects of Jupiter s mass accretion and radial migration. Icarus 148, Friedland, L Migration timescale thresholds for resonant capture in the plutino problem. Astrophys. J. Lett. 547, Gomes, R.S., Orbital evolution in resonance lock I. The restricted 3-body problem. Astron. J. 114, Gomes, R.S., Dynamical effects of planetary migration on primordial Trojan-type asteroids. Astron. J. 116, Gomes, R.S., Planetary migration and plutino orbital inclinations. Astron. J. 120, Gomes, R.S The origin of the Kuiper belt high-inclination population. Icarus 161, Hahn, J.M., and R. Malhotra Orbital evolution of planets embedded in a planetesimal disk. Astron. J. 117, Holman, M.J., and J. Wisdom Dynamical stability in the outer solar system and the delivery of short period comets. Astron. J. 105, Liou, J.C., and R. Malhotra Depletion of the outer asteroid belt. Science 275, Malhotra, R., The origin of Pluto s peculiar orbit. Nature 365, Malhotra, R., The origin of Pluto s orbit: Implications for the solar system beyond Neptune. Astron. J. 110, Malhotra, R., 1998a. Orbital resonances and chaos in the solar system, In Solar System Formation and Evolution, (D. Lazzaro, R. Vieira Martins, S. Ferraz-Mello, J. Fernández, and C. Beaugé, Eds.), ASP Conference Series 149, pp Malhotra, R., 1998b. Pluto s inclination excitation by resonance sweeping. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 29, abstract # 1476 on CD-ROM. Malhotra, R., and S.F. Dermott The role of secondary resonances in the orbital history of Miranda. Icarus 85, Malhotra, R., M. Duncan, and H. Levison Dynamics of the Kuiper belt. In Protostars and Planets IV, (V. Mannings, A.P. Boss, and S.S. Russell, Eds.) pp Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson. Marsden, B.G QR 322. Minor Planet Ele. Circulars 2003-A55.

14 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 14 Michtchenko, T.A., C. Beaugé, and F. Roig Planetary migration and the effects of mean motion resonances on Jupiter s Trojan asteroids. Astron. J. 122, Nesvorný, D., and L. Dones How long-lived are the hypothetical Trojan populations of Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune? Icarus 160, Tittemore, W.C., and J. Wisdom Tidal evolution of the uranian satellites III. Evolution through the Miranda-Umbriel 3:1, Miranda-Ariel 5:3, and Ariel-Umbriel 2:1 mean-motion commensurabilities. Icarus 85, Weissman, P.R., and H.F. Levison The population of the trans-neptunian region: The Pluto-Charon environment. In Pluto and Charon, (S.A. Stern and D.J. Tholen, Eds.), pp Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson. Wisdom, J., and M. Holman Symplectic maps for the N-body problem. Astron. J. 102, Wisdom, J., and M. Holman Symplectic maps for the N-body problem: Stability analysis. Astron. J. 104,

15 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 15 Table 1 Initial Heliocentric Planetary Configuration b Planet Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Mass Semi-Major Axis Eccentricity Inclination Long. Ascend. Node Arg. Pericenter Mean Anomoly E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E+00 b Solar masses, AUs, radians referred to invariable plane and mean equinox, Epoch

16 Kortenkamp et al.: Planetary Migration and Neptune Trojans 16 Figure Captions Figure 1: Four panels showing examples of the evolution with time of the semi-major axes of the four giant planets in a migration simulation. The planets were subject to mutual gravitational perturbations and a drag force which caused their orbits to migrate Jupiter inward; Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune outward. Table 1 gives the initial orbital parameters for the planets. Time is expressed in units of τ, the characteristic migration time scale. After a time of 5τ migration is 99.33% complete and subsequent orbital evolution is dominated by mutual planetary gravitational perturbations rather than the migration force. Dashed lines indicate the ideal locations (for zero eccentricity) of the 3:5 and mean-motion resonances with Uranus and the 1:7 mean-motion resonance with Jupiter. Figure 2: Survival of Neptune Trojans in a simulation with the four giant planets migrating with a characteristic time scale of τ =10 6 years. The six panels show minimum and maximum limits on libration of the critical argument, φ NT = λ λ Nep. The dashed lines at ±60 indicate the ideal locations of the leading L 4 and trailing L 5 Lagrange equilibrium points (for zero eccentricity). Each histogram gives the number of surviving Trojans in each bin as a fraction of the total population across all bins at the initial time T o =25,000 years. The top panel shows the initial distribution at time T o. Each of the subsequent lower panels lists the output time in units of τ and the number of particles trapped in the L 4 and L 5 regions. Figure 3: Similar to Fig. 2 but from a simulation with characteristic time scale 10 times slower, τ =10 7 years. All other initial conditions were identical to the simulations shown in Fig. 2. In this slow migration simulation nearly 99% of Neptune s initial Trojan companions are lost after 5τ. Figure 4: Histogram of the surviving fraction of Neptune Trojans as a function of time for four different characteristic migration time scales, τ, ranging from 10 6 to 10 7 years. In each case, time is expressed as integer multiples of τ up to 5τ. Solid and open bars indicate surviving fractions of Trojans in Neptune s leading L 4 and trailing L 5 regions, respectively. For each value of τ, simulations with identical initial conditions were run on four different types of processors, two Intel Xeons (1.7 and 2.4 GHz), a Digital Alpha EV6, and a Sun Sparc Ultra 5. The results shown in the histogram are a composite from all four simulations. Figure 5: Similar to Fig. 2 (τ =10 7 ) but from a simulation that included Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune, but not Uranus. Removing Uranus resulted in nearly full retention of Neptune Trojans up to atimeof5τ. Figure 6: The libration amplitude of Neptune Trojans as a function of time expressed in units of τ for a simulation with τ = years. Evolution of the general population is shown in the top panel. To avoid saturation only every fifth particle is plotted and libration amplitudes greater than 180 are not connected. After a time of τ, loss of Trojans is generally marked by cascading of particles out of resonance during a discrete number of prolonged events.

Forming the Kuiper Belt by the Outward Transport of Objects During Neptune s Migration

Forming the Kuiper Belt by the Outward Transport of Objects During Neptune s Migration Forming the Kuiper Belt by the Outward Transport of Objects During Neptune s Migration Harold F. Levison and Alessandro Morbidelli Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, USA Observatoire de la

More information

The Mars 1:2 Resonant Population. Tabaré Gallardo.

The Mars 1:2 Resonant Population. Tabaré Gallardo. 1 The Mars 1:2 Resonant Population Tabaré Gallardo Departamento de Astronomía, Facultad de Ciencias, Iguá 4225, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay gallardo@fisica.edu.uy Icarus, in press May 2007 2 Abstract An

More information

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 14 Jan 1999

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 14 Jan 1999 DYNAMICS OF THE KUIPER BELT RENU MALHOTRA Lunar and Planetary Institute arxiv:astro-ph/9901155v2 14 Jan 1999 MARTIN DUNCAN Queen s University and HAROLD LEVISON Southwest Research Institute ABSTRACT Our

More information

DYNAMICS OF THE KUIPER BELT

DYNAMICS OF THE KUIPER BELT To appear in Protostars and Planets IV Preprint (Jan 1999): http://www.lpi.usra.edu/science/renu/home.html DYNAMICS OF THE KUIPER BELT Renu Malhotra (1), Martin Duncan (2), and Harold Levison (3) (1) Lunar

More information

A SYMPLECTIC MAPPING MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF 2:3 RESONANT TRANS-NEPTUNIAN MOTION

A SYMPLECTIC MAPPING MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF 2:3 RESONANT TRANS-NEPTUNIAN MOTION 3 A SYMPLECTIC MAPPING MODEL FOR THE STUDY OF 2:3 RESONANT TRANS-NEPTUNIAN MOTION K.G. HADJIFOTINOU and JOHN D. HADJIDEMETRIOU Department of Physics, University of Thessaloniki, 540 06 Thessaloniki, Greece

More information

Kuiper Belt Dynamics and Interactions

Kuiper Belt Dynamics and Interactions Kuiper Belt Dynamics and Interactions Minor Planet Center Ruth Murray-Clay Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Kuiper belt µm ejected by radiation pressure larger grains migrate in via PR drag

More information

Dynamical behaviour of the primitive asteroid belt

Dynamical behaviour of the primitive asteroid belt Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 293, 405 410 (1998) Dynamical behaviour of the primitive asteroid belt Adrián Brunini Observatorio Astronómico de La Plata, Profoeg, Paseo del Bosque, (1900) La Plata, Argentina

More information

Planetary migration and the Late Heavy Bombardment (better late than never)

Planetary migration and the Late Heavy Bombardment (better late than never) Planetary migration and the Late Heavy Bombardment (better late than never) S. Goldman April 2007 The early history of the Solar System, though still shrouded in mystery, is slowly being pieced together

More information

Planetary Perturbations on the 2 : 3 Mean Motion Resonance with Neptune

Planetary Perturbations on the 2 : 3 Mean Motion Resonance with Neptune PASJ: Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 54, 493 499, 2002 June 25 c 2002. Astronomical Society of Japan. Planetary Perturbations on the 2 : 3 Mean Motion Resonance with Neptune Tetsuharu FUSE Subaru Telescope,

More information

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 1 Feb 2010

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 1 Feb 2010 Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Where are the Uranus Trojans? R. Dvorak Á. Bazsó L.-Y. Zhou arxiv:911.2366v2 [astro-ph.ep] 1 Feb 21 Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract The area

More information

The primordial excitation and clearing of the asteroid belt Revisited

The primordial excitation and clearing of the asteroid belt Revisited Icarus 191 (2007) 434 452 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus The primordial excitation and clearing of the asteroid belt Revisited David P. O Brien a,b,, Alessandro Morbidelli a, William F. Bottke c a Observatoire

More information

Orbital Structure and Dynamical Evolution of. TNOs. Patryk Sofia Lykawka ( )

Orbital Structure and Dynamical Evolution of. TNOs. Patryk Sofia Lykawka ( ) Orbital Structure and Dynamical Evolution of TNOs Patryk Sofia Lykawka ( ) patryksan@gmail.com Outline I: Introduction and motivation II: III: IV: Dynamical stability and planet migration Stable TNO populations

More information

The dynamics of Plutinos

The dynamics of Plutinos The dynamics of Plutinos Qingjuan Yu and Scott Tremaine Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-1001, USA ABSTRACT Plutinos are Kuiper-belt objects that share the 3:2 Neptune

More information

The Collisional Evolution of Small Bodies in the Solar System

The Collisional Evolution of Small Bodies in the Solar System The Collisional Evolution of Small Bodies in the Solar System David P. O'Brien* Planetary Science Institute Tucson, AZ Invited Review CD '07 Alicante, Spain * with Don Davis, Scott Kenyon and Benjamin

More information

THE PLANE OF THE KUIPER BELT

THE PLANE OF THE KUIPER BELT The Astronomical Journal, 127:2418 2423, 2004 April # 2004. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. THE PLANE OF THE KUIPER BELT Michael E. Brown Division of Geological

More information

The orbit evolution of 32 plutinos over 100 million year

The orbit evolution of 32 plutinos over 100 million year A&A 368, 700 705 (2001) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010056 c ESO 2001 Astronomy & Astrophysics The orbit evolution of 32 plutinos over 100 million year X.-S. Wan 1 and T.-Y. Huang 1,2 1 Astronomy Department,

More information

A REGION VOID OF IRREGULAR SATELLITES AROUND JUPITER

A REGION VOID OF IRREGULAR SATELLITES AROUND JUPITER The Astronomical Journal, 136:909 918, 2008 September c 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/3/909 A REGION VOID OF IRREGULAR SATELLITES

More information

The MATROS project: Stability of Uranus and Neptune Trojans. The case of 2001 QR322

The MATROS project: Stability of Uranus and Neptune Trojans. The case of 2001 QR322 A&A 41, 725 734 (23) DOI: 1.151/4-6361:231275 c ESO 23 Astronomy & Astrophysics The MATROS project: Stability of Uranus and Neptune Trojans. The case of 21 QR322 F. Marzari 1, P. Tricarico 1, and H. Scholl

More information

Resonance Capture. Alice Quillen. University of Rochester. Isaac Newton Institute Dec 2009

Resonance Capture. Alice Quillen. University of Rochester. Isaac Newton Institute Dec 2009 Resonance Capture Alice Quillen University of Rochester Isaac Newton Institute Dec 2009 This Talk Resonance Capture extension to nonadiabatic regime Astrophysical settings: Dust spiraling inward via radiation

More information

The stability of planets in the Alpha Centauri system

The stability of planets in the Alpha Centauri system The stability of planets in the Alpha Centauri system Paul A. Wiegert 1, Matt Holman 2 1 Department of Astronomy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 2 Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics,

More information

FROM THE SCATTERED DISK TO THE OORT CLOUD The Extended Scattered Disk

FROM THE SCATTERED DISK TO THE OORT CLOUD The Extended Scattered Disk FROM THE SCATTERED DISK TO THE OORT CLOUD The Extended Scattered Disk Julio A. Fernández Departamento de Astronomía, Facultad de Ciencias, Montevideo, URUGUAY Adrián Brunini, Tabaré Gallardo, Rodney Gomes

More information

Planetary system dynamics. Planetary migration Kozai resonance Apsidal resonance and secular theories Mean motion resonances Gravitational scattering

Planetary system dynamics. Planetary migration Kozai resonance Apsidal resonance and secular theories Mean motion resonances Gravitational scattering Planetary system dynamics Planetary migration Kozai resonance Apsidal resonance and secular theories Mean motion resonances Gravitational scattering How should the planets of a typical planetary system

More information

Dynamical properties of the Solar System. Second Kepler s Law. Dynamics of planetary orbits. ν: true anomaly

Dynamical properties of the Solar System. Second Kepler s Law. Dynamics of planetary orbits. ν: true anomaly First Kepler s Law The secondary body moves in an elliptical orbit, with the primary body at the focus Valid for bound orbits with E < 0 The conservation of the total energy E yields a constant semi-major

More information

Theory of mean motion resonances.

Theory of mean motion resonances. Theory of mean motion resonances. Mean motion resonances are ubiquitous in space. They can be found between planets and asteroids, planets and rings in gaseous disks or satellites and planetary rings.

More information

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 27 Sep 1995

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 27 Sep 1995 THE PHASE SPACE STRUCTURE NEAR NEPTUNE RESONANCES IN THE KUIPER BELT arxiv:astro-ph/9509141v1 27 Sep 1995 RENU MALHOTRA Lunar and Planetary Institute, 3600 Bay Area Blvd., Houston, TX 77058. Electronic

More information

Planetary System Stability and Evolution. N. Jeremy Kasdin Princeton University

Planetary System Stability and Evolution. N. Jeremy Kasdin Princeton University Planetary System Stability and Evolution N. Jeremy Kasdin Princeton University (Lots of help from Eric Ford, Florida and Robert Vanderbei, Princeton) KISS Exoplanet Workshop 10 November 2009 Motivation

More information

F. Marzari, Dept. Physics, Padova Univ. Planetary migration

F. Marzari, Dept. Physics, Padova Univ. Planetary migration F. Marzari, Dept. Physics, Padova Univ. Planetary migration Standard model of planet formation based on Solar system exploration Small semimajor axes Large eccentricities The standard model Protostar +Disk

More information

as the orbits of distant planetoids are expected to be randomized over billions of year by the gravity of the four giant planets.

as the orbits of distant planetoids are expected to be randomized over billions of year by the gravity of the four giant planets. Dynamics of Extreme Outer Solar System Objects Principle investigators/supervisors: Denis Gaidashev (Matematiska Institution); Erik Zackrisson (Institutionen fo r fysik och astronomi) 1. Purpose and aims

More information

A few points on the dynamical evolution of the young solar system. Renu Malhotra The University of Arizona

A few points on the dynamical evolution of the young solar system. Renu Malhotra The University of Arizona A few points on the dynamical evolution of the young solar system Renu Malhotra The University of Arizona A few points on the dynamical evolution of the young solar system Renu Malhotra The University

More information

Kozai-Lidov oscillations

Kozai-Lidov oscillations Kozai-Lidov oscillations Kozai (1962 - asteroids); Lidov (1962 - artificial satellites) arise most simply in restricted three-body problem (two massive bodies on a Kepler orbit + a test particle) e.g.,

More information

AST111, Lecture 1b. Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements

AST111, Lecture 1b. Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements AST111, Lecture 1b Measurements of bodies in the solar system (overview continued) Orbital elements Planetary properties (continued): Measuring Mass The orbital period of a moon about a planet depends

More information

THE CURIOUSLY WARPED MEAN PLANE OF THE KUIPER BELT

THE CURIOUSLY WARPED MEAN PLANE OF THE KUIPER BELT Draft version September 17, 217 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX61 THE CURIOUSLY WARPED MEAN PLANE OF THE KUIPER BELT Kathryn Volk 1 and Renu Malhotra 1 1 Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, The

More information

The Dynamics of Known Centaurs 1

The Dynamics of Known Centaurs 1 The Dynamics of Known Centaurs 1 Matthew S. Tiscareno, Renu Malhotra Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; matthewt@lpl.arizona.edu, renu@lpl.arizona.edu ABSTRACT We

More information

Planetary Embryos Never Formed in the Kuiper Belt

Planetary Embryos Never Formed in the Kuiper Belt Icarus 157, 241 248 (2002) doi:10.1006/icar.2002.6832, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Planetary Embryos Never Formed in the Kuiper Belt A. Morbidelli and C. Jacob Observatoire de la

More information

Solar System evolution and the diversity of planetary systems

Solar System evolution and the diversity of planetary systems Solar System evolution and the diversity of planetary systems Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA, Nice) Work in collaboration with: R. Brasser, A. Crida, R. Gomes, H. Levison, F. Masset, D. O brien, S. Raymond,

More information

Formation and Dynamical Evolution of the Neptune Trojans the Influence of the Initial Solar System Architecture

Formation and Dynamical Evolution of the Neptune Trojans the Influence of the Initial Solar System Architecture Formation and Dynamical Evolution of the Neptune Trojans the Influence of the Initial Solar System Architecture P. S. Lykawka, 1* J. Horner, 2 B. W. Jones 3 and T. Mukai 4 1 International Center for Human

More information

Resonancias orbitales

Resonancias orbitales www.fisica.edu.uy/ gallardo Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de la República Uruguay Curso Dinámica Orbital 2018 Orbital motion Oscillating planetary orbits Orbital Resonances Commensurability between

More information

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 15. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc.

Lecture Outlines. Chapter 15. Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outlines Chapter 15 Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan Chapter 15 The Formation of Planetary Systems Units of Chapter 15 15.1 Modeling Planet Formation 15.2 Terrestrial and Jovian Planets

More information

WILLIAM I. NEWMAN, UCLA PHILIP W. SHARP, U. OF AUCKLAND BRUCE G. BILLS, JPL

WILLIAM I. NEWMAN, UCLA PHILIP W. SHARP, U. OF AUCKLAND BRUCE G. BILLS, JPL CATASTROPHIC METEORITE 1 IMPACTS ON EARTH WILLIAM I. NEWMAN, UCLA PHILIP W. SHARP, U. OF AUCKLAND BRUCE G. BILLS, JPL Solar system with different scales for distance and for size: presents role of giant

More information

ASTEROIDS, COMETS, AND TRANS-NEPTUNIAN OBJECTS:

ASTEROIDS, COMETS, AND TRANS-NEPTUNIAN OBJECTS: ASTEROIDS, COMETS, AND TRANS-NEPTUNIAN OBJECTS: SMALL BODIES IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM Rosemary E. Pike ASIAA TIARA Summer School 2018 On the Origins of the Solar System SMALL BODIES IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM Formation

More information

Formation and dynamical evolution of the Neptune Trojans the influence of the initial Solar system architecture

Formation and dynamical evolution of the Neptune Trojans the influence of the initial Solar system architecture Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 44, 1272 128 (21) doi:1.1111/j.1365-2966.21.16381.x Formation and dynamical evolution of the Neptune Trojans the influence of the initial Solar system architecture P. S. Lykawka,

More information

On the Origin of the Trojan Asteroids: Effects of Jupiter s Mass Accretion and Radial Migration

On the Origin of the Trojan Asteroids: Effects of Jupiter s Mass Accretion and Radial Migration Icarus 148, 479 493 2000) doi:10.1006/icar.2000.6523, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on On the Origin of the Trojan Asteroids: Effects of Jupiter s Mass Accretion and Radial Migration Heather

More information

Minimum Mass Solar Nebulae, Nice model, & Planetary Migration.

Minimum Mass Solar Nebulae, Nice model, & Planetary Migration. Minimum Mass Solar Nebulae, Nice model, & Planetary Migration. Aurélien CRIDA 1) MMSN : definition, recipe Minimum Mass Solar Nebula Little reminder : It is not a nebula, but a protoplanetary disc. Solar

More information

The Secular Evolution of the Primordial Kuiper Belt

The Secular Evolution of the Primordial Kuiper Belt The Secular Evolution of the Primordial Kuiper Belt Joseph M. Hahn (LPI) March 20, 2003 What Happened to the Kuiper Belt? KBO orbits indicate that some process stirred up the KB Neptune s outward migration

More information

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Mar 2007

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 21 Mar 2007 THE DYNAMICAL STRUCTURE OF THE KUIPER BELT AND ITS PRIMORDIAL ORIGIN Alessandro Morbidelli Observatoire de la Côte d Azur arxiv:astro-ph/0703558v1 21 Mar 2007 1. Introduction Harold F. Levison Southwest

More information

On the origin of the Trojan asteroids: Effects of Jupiter s mass accretion and radial migration

On the origin of the Trojan asteroids: Effects of Jupiter s mass accretion and radial migration On the origin of the Trojan asteroids: Effects of Jupiter s mass accretion and radial migration Heather J. Fleming and Douglas P. Hamilton Astronomy Department, University of Maryland arxiv:astro-ph/0007296v1

More information

ON THE ORIGIN OF THE HIGH-PERIHELION SCATTERED DISK: THE ROLE OF THE KOZAI MECHANISM AND MEAN MOTION RESONANCES

ON THE ORIGIN OF THE HIGH-PERIHELION SCATTERED DISK: THE ROLE OF THE KOZAI MECHANISM AND MEAN MOTION RESONANCES ON THE ORIGIN OF THE HIGH-PERIHELION SCATTERED DISK: THE ROLE OF THE KOZAI MECHANISM AND MEAN MOTION RESONANCES RODNEY S. GOMES 1, TABARE GALLARDO 2, JULIO A. FERNA NDEZ 2 AND ADRIA N BRUNINI 3 1 GEA/OV/UFRJ

More information

The Scattered Disk: Origins, Dynamics and End States

The Scattered Disk: Origins, Dynamics and End States The Scattered Disk: Origins, Dynamics and End States Rodney S. Gomes Observatório Nacional, Rua General José Cristino 77, CEP 2921-, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil Julio A. Fernández, Tabaré Gallardo Departamento

More information

ABSTACT KUIPER BINARY OBJECT FORMATION

ABSTACT KUIPER BINARY OBJECT FORMATION KUIPER BINARY OBJECT FORMATION R. C. Nazzario, K Orr, C. Covington, D. Kagan, and T. W. Hyde Center for Astrophysics, Space Physics and Engineering Research, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798-7310, USA,

More information

Prospects for unseen planets beyond Neptune

Prospects for unseen planets beyond Neptune Prospects for unseen planets beyond Neptune Renu Malhotra The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA; renu@lpl.arizona.edu Abstract. Several anomalous features in the orbital distribution of distant

More information

Frequency map analysis of the 3/1 resonance between planets b and c in the 55 Cancri system ABSTRACT

Frequency map analysis of the 3/1 resonance between planets b and c in the 55 Cancri system ABSTRACT A&A 442, 359 364 (2005) DOI: 151/0004-6361:20053164 c ESO 2005 Astronomy & Astrophysics Frequency map analysis of the 3/1 resonance between planets b and c in the 55 Cancri system F. Marzari 1,H.Scholl

More information

Origin of the Structure of the Kuiper Belt during a Dynamical Instability in the Orbits of Uranus and Neptune

Origin of the Structure of the Kuiper Belt during a Dynamical Instability in the Orbits of Uranus and Neptune Origin of the Structure of the Kuiper Belt during a Dynamical Instability in the Orbits of Uranus and Neptune Harold F. Levison Southwest Research Institute, USA Alessandro Morbidelli Observatoire de la

More information

Mars Growth Stunted by an Early Orbital Instability between the Giant Planets

Mars Growth Stunted by an Early Orbital Instability between the Giant Planets Mars Growth Stunted by an Early Orbital Instability between the Giant Planets M.S. Clement University of Oklahoma Advisor: Professor N.A. Kaib Collaborators: S.N. Raymond, K.J. Walsh 19 September 2017

More information

Dynamical evolution of asteroid fragments originating near the ν 6 resonance

Dynamical evolution of asteroid fragments originating near the ν 6 resonance Dynamical evolution of asteroid fragments originating near the ν 6 resonance Takashi Ito and Renu Malhotra Lunar & Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 0092, USA Correspondence

More information

Origin of high orbital eccentricity and inclination of asteroids

Origin of high orbital eccentricity and inclination of asteroids Earth Planets Space, 53, 85 9, 2 Origin of high orbital eccentricity and inclination of asteroids Makiko Nagasawa, Shigeru Ida, and Hidekazu Tanaka Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo Institute

More information

Inclination Mixing in the Classical Kuiper Belt

Inclination Mixing in the Classical Kuiper Belt Submitted to ApJ; preprint: Jan 11, 211. Inclination Mixing in the Classical Kuiper Belt Kathryn Volk and Renu Malhotra Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. kvolk@lpl.arizona.edu

More information

Tides and Lagrange Points

Tides and Lagrange Points Ast111, Lecture 3a Tides and Lagrange Points Arial view of Tidal surge in Alaska (S. Sharnoff) Tides Tidal disruption Lagrange Points Tadpole Orbits and Trojans Tidal Bulges Tides Tidal Force The force

More information

Dynamical Evolution of Ecliptic Comets

Dynamical Evolution of Ecliptic Comets Duncan et al.: Dynamical Evolution of Ecliptic Comets 193 Dynamical Evolution of Ecliptic Comets Martin Duncan Queen s University Harold Levison and Luke Dones Southwest Research Institute Ecliptic comets

More information

Formation and evolution of the two 4/3 resonant giants planets in HD

Formation and evolution of the two 4/3 resonant giants planets in HD DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424820 c ESO 2014 Astronomy & Astrophysics Formation and evolution of the two 4/3 resonant giants planets in HD 200964 M. Tadeu dos Santos, J. A. Correa-Otto, T. A. Michtchenko,

More information

On the Plutinos and Twotinos of the Kuiper Belt

On the Plutinos and Twotinos of the Kuiper Belt On the Plutinos and Twotinos of the Kuiper Belt E. I. Chiang & A. B. Jordan Center for Integrative Planetary Sciences Astronomy Department University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720, USA ABSTRACT

More information

CIRCUMSTELLAR DISKS AND OUTER PLANET FORMATION

CIRCUMSTELLAR DISKS AND OUTER PLANET FORMATION CIRCUMSTELLAR DISKS AND OUTER PLANET FORMATION A. LECAVELIER DES ETANGS Institut d Astrophysique de Paris 98 Bld Arago, F-75014 Paris, France Abstract. The dust disk around β Pictoris must be produced

More information

Pluto Data: Numbers. 14b. Pluto, Kuiper Belt & Oort Cloud. Pluto Data (Table 14-5)

Pluto Data: Numbers. 14b. Pluto, Kuiper Belt & Oort Cloud. Pluto Data (Table 14-5) 14b. Pluto, Kuiper Belt & Oort Cloud Pluto Pluto s moons The Kuiper Belt Resonant Kuiper Belt objects Classical Kuiper Belt objects Pluto Data: Numbers Diameter: 2,290.km 0.18. Earth Mass: 1.0. 10 22 kg

More information

The Solar System - I. Alexei Gilchrist. [The Story of the Solar System]

The Solar System - I. Alexei Gilchrist. [The Story of the Solar System] The Solar System - I Alexei Gilchrist [The Story of the Solar System] Some resources Section 13.3 of Voyages (references and links at end) References noted in these slides The Story of the Solar System,

More information

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 6 Mar 2018

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ep] 6 Mar 2018 On the Early In Situ Formation of Pluto s Small Satellites Man Yin Woo 1 and Man Hoi Lee 1,2 ABSTRACT arxiv:1803.02005v1 [astro-ph.ep] 6 Mar 2018 The formation of Pluto s small satellites Styx, Nix, Keberos

More information

Dynamically Unstable Planetary Systems Emerging Out of Gas Disks

Dynamically Unstable Planetary Systems Emerging Out of Gas Disks EXTREME SOLAR SYSTEMS ASP Conference Series, Vol. 398, 2008 D. Fischer, F. A. Rasio, S. E. Thorsett, and A. Wolszczan Dynamically Unstable Planetary Systems Emerging Out of Gas Disks Soko Matsumura, Edward

More information

What Have We Found? 1978 planets in 1488 systems as of 11/15/15 (http://exoplanet.eu/ ) 1642 planets candidates (http://exoplanets.

What Have We Found? 1978 planets in 1488 systems as of 11/15/15 (http://exoplanet.eu/ ) 1642 planets candidates (http://exoplanets. Exoplanets. II What Have We Found? 1978 planets in 1488 systems as of 11/15/15 (http://exoplanet.eu/ ) 1642 planets + 3787 candidates (http://exoplanets.org) Detected by radial velocity/astrometry: 621

More information

Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM

Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM Astronomy 405 Solar System and ISM Lecture 17 Planetary System Formation and Evolution February 22, 2013 grav collapse opposed by turbulence, B field, thermal Cartoon of Star Formation isolated, quasi-static,

More information

planet migration driven by a planetesimal disk Solar System & extra solar planets: evidence for/against planet migration?

planet migration driven by a planetesimal disk Solar System & extra solar planets: evidence for/against planet migration? 2 planet migration driven by a gas disk: type I & type II planet migration driven by a planetesimal disk Solar System & extra solar planets: evidence for/against planet migration? 3 Type I migration: follow

More information

Importance of the study of extrasolar planets. Exoplanets Introduction. Importance of the study of extrasolar planets

Importance of the study of extrasolar planets. Exoplanets Introduction. Importance of the study of extrasolar planets Importance of the study of extrasolar planets Exoplanets Introduction Planets and Astrobiology (2017-2018) G. Vladilo Technological and scientific spin-offs Exoplanet observations are driving huge technological

More information

The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems

The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems The Long-Term Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Systems Melvyn B. Davies Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics Lund University Co-authors: Fred Adams, Philip Armitage, John Chambers, Eric Ford,

More information

Pluto, the Kuiper Belt, and Trans- Neptunian Objects

Pluto, the Kuiper Belt, and Trans- Neptunian Objects Pluto, the Kuiper Belt, and Trans- Neptunian Objects 1 What about Pluto? Pluto used to be considered a planet Pluto is one of a large number of Trans-Neptunian Objects, not even the largest one! Discovery

More information

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 20 Dec 1999

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 20 Dec 1999 POPULATION OF THE SCATTERED KUIPER BELT 1 Chadwick A. Trujillo Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822 arxiv:astro-ph/9912428v1 20 Dec 1999 chad@ifa.hawaii.edu David C. Jewitt

More information

Asteroid 2014 YX 49 : a large transient Trojan of Uranus

Asteroid 2014 YX 49 : a large transient Trojan of Uranus Preprint 6 February 2017 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Asteroid 2014 YX 49 : a large transient Trojan of Uranus C. de la Fuente Marcos and R. de la Fuente Marcos Universidad Complutense de

More information

Investigation of evolution of orbits similar to that of (4179) Toutatis

Investigation of evolution of orbits similar to that of (4179) Toutatis Investigation of evolution of orbits similar to that of (4179) Toutatis Wm. Robert Johnston May 1994 Abstract This project compared the orbital evolution of asteroid (4179) Toutatis to that of several

More information

1. INTRODUCTION. THE ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 121:1730È1735, 2001 March ( The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.

1. INTRODUCTION. THE ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 121:1730È1735, 2001 March ( The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. THE ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 121:1730È1735, 2001 March ( 2001. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. ON THE SIZE DEPENDENCE OF THE INCLINATION DISTRIBUTION OF THE MAIN

More information

THE STRUCTURE OF THE DISTANT KUIPER BELT IN A NICE MODEL SCENARIO

THE STRUCTURE OF THE DISTANT KUIPER BELT IN A NICE MODEL SCENARIO Accepted to the Astronomical Journal: January 21, 2017 Preprint typeset using L A TEX style AASTeX6 v. 1.0 THE STRUCTURE OF THE DISTANT KUIPER BELT IN A NICE MODEL SCENARIO R. E. Pike 1,2, S. Lawler 3,

More information

The Planet Pluto. & Kuiper Belt. The Search for PLANET X Pluto Discovered. Note how Pluto Moved in 6 days. Pluto (Hades): King of the Underworld

The Planet Pluto. & Kuiper Belt. The Search for PLANET X Pluto Discovered. Note how Pluto Moved in 6 days. Pluto (Hades): King of the Underworld X The Planet Pluto & Kuiper Belt Updated May 9, 2016 The Search for PLANET X Recall Neptune was predicted from observed changes in orbit of Uranus Lowell & Pickering suggest small changes in Neptune s

More information

Dynamic Exoplanets. Alexander James Mustill

Dynamic Exoplanets. Alexander James Mustill Dynamic Exoplanets Alexander James Mustill Exoplanets: not (all) like the Solar System Exoplanets: not (all) like the Solar System Solar System Lissauer et al 14 Key questions to bear in mind What is role

More information

Capturing Trojans and Irregular Satellites - the key required to unlock planetary migration

Capturing Trojans and Irregular Satellites - the key required to unlock planetary migration Capturing Trojans and Irregular Satellites - the key required to unlock planetary migration Jonathan Horner 1, F. Elliott Koch 1, and Patryk Sofia Lykawka 2 1 Department of Astrophysics and Optics, School

More information

EVOLUTIONS OF SMALL BODIES IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM

EVOLUTIONS OF SMALL BODIES IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM EVOLUTIONS OF SMALL BODIES IN OUR SOLAR SYSTEM Dynamics and collisional processes Dr. Patrick MICHEL Côte d'azur Observatory Cassiopée Laboratory, CNRS Nice, France 1 Plan Chapter I: A few concepts on

More information

Earth, Uranus, Neptune & Pluto

Earth, Uranus, Neptune & Pluto 14a. Uranus, Neptune & Pluto The discovery of Uranus & Neptune Uranus is oddly tilted & nearly featureless Neptune is cold & blue Uranus & Neptune are like yet dislike Jupiter The magnetic fields of Uranus

More information

PLANETARY FORMATION 5) THE SOLAR SYSTEM : GRAND TAK & NICE MODEL. Aurélien CRIDA

PLANETARY FORMATION 5) THE SOLAR SYSTEM : GRAND TAK & NICE MODEL. Aurélien CRIDA PLANETARY FORMATION 5) THE SOLAR SYSTEM : GRAND TAK & NICE MODEL Aurélien CRIDA Has the Solar System always been as now? So far, you know that Mercury ia at 0,4 AU from the Sun Venus at 0,7 the Earth at

More information

ORBITAL RESONANCES IN PLANETARY SYSTEMS

ORBITAL RESONANCES IN PLANETARY SYSTEMS ORBITAL RESONANCES IN PLANETARY SYSTEMS Renu Malhotra Lunar & Planetary Laboratory, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Keywords: planets, orbits, solar system, Hamiltonian, action-angle variables,

More information

Transneptunian objects. Minor bodies in the outer Solar System. Transneptunian objects

Transneptunian objects. Minor bodies in the outer Solar System. Transneptunian objects Transneptunian objects Minor bodies in the outer Solar System Planets and Astrobiology (2016-2017) G. Vladilo Around 1980 it was proposed that the hypothetical disk of small bodies beyond Neptune (called

More information

Planetary system dynamics Part III Mathematics / Part III Astrophysics

Planetary system dynamics Part III Mathematics / Part III Astrophysics Planetary system dynamics Part III Mathematics / Part III Astrophysics Lecturer: Prof. Mark Wyatt (Dr. Amy Bonsor on 9,11 Oct) Schedule: Michaelmas 2017 Mon, Wed, Fri at 10am MR11, 24 lectures, start Fri

More information

SBAG GOALS Origin of the Solar System Theme

SBAG GOALS Origin of the Solar System Theme SBAG GOALS Origin of the Solar System Theme Objective 1.2. Study small bodies to understand the origin of the Solar System Objective 1.1.2 Find and characterize new samples from small bodies Presented

More information

The dynamical evolution of the asteroid belt in the pebble accretion scenario

The dynamical evolution of the asteroid belt in the pebble accretion scenario The dynamical evolution of the asteroid belt in the pebble accretion scenario S. Pirani 1, A. Johansen 1, B. Bitsch 1, A. J. Mustill 1 and D. Turrini 2,3 1 Lund Observatory, Department of Astronomy and

More information

Chapter 15 The Formation of Planetary Systems

Chapter 15 The Formation of Planetary Systems Chapter 15 The Formation of Planetary Systems Units of Chapter 15 15.1 Modeling Planet Formation 15.2 Formation of the Solar System 15.3 Terrestrial and Jovian Planets 15.4 Interplanetary Debris 15.5 Solar

More information

On the observability of resonant structures in planetesimal disks due to planetary migration. R. Reche, H. Beust, J.-C. Augereau, and O.

On the observability of resonant structures in planetesimal disks due to planetary migration. R. Reche, H. Beust, J.-C. Augereau, and O. A&A 480, 551 561 (2008) DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077934 c ESO 2008 Astronomy & Astrophysics On the observability of resonant structures in planetesimal disks due to planetary migration R. Reche, H. Beust,

More information

Which of the following statements best describes the general pattern of composition among the four jovian

Which of the following statements best describes the general pattern of composition among the four jovian Part A Which of the following statements best describes the general pattern of composition among the four jovian planets? Hint A.1 Major categories of ingredients in planetary composition The following

More information

Lecture 13. Gravity in the Solar System

Lecture 13. Gravity in the Solar System Lecture 13 Gravity in the Solar System Guiding Questions 1. How was the heliocentric model established? What are monumental steps in the history of the heliocentric model? 2. How do Kepler s three laws

More information

on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the Universe to do. Galileo Galilei

on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the Universe to do. Galileo Galilei The Sun, with all the planets revolving around it, and depending on it, can still ripen a bunch of grapes as though it had nothing else in the Universe to do. Galileo Galilei What We Will Learn Today Where

More information

Resonance and chaos ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS. II. Exterior resonances and asymmetric libration

Resonance and chaos ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS. II. Exterior resonances and asymmetric libration Astron. Astrophys. 328, 399 48 (1997) ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS Resonance and chaos II. Exterior resonances and asymmetric libration O.C. Winter 1,2 and C.D. Murray 2 1 Grupo de Dinâmica Orbital e Planetologia,

More information

AST 105. Overview of the Solar System

AST 105. Overview of the Solar System AST 105 Overview of the Solar System Scale of the Solar System Earth Voyager 1, 1991, distance = 4 billion miles Recap: The Solar System in Scale If the Solar System were the size of a football

More information

A Survey of the Trans-Neptunian Region

A Survey of the Trans-Neptunian Region Next Generation Space Telescope Ad-Hoc Science Working Group Design Reference Mission Proposal Program contacts: Philip D. Nicholson, Brett J. Gladman Scientific category: SOLAR SYSTEM Instruments: OPT/CAM,

More information

Dynamics of two planets in the 3/2 mean-motion resonance: application to the planetary system of the pulsar PSR B

Dynamics of two planets in the 3/2 mean-motion resonance: application to the planetary system of the pulsar PSR B Celestial Mech Dyn Astr (2006) 94:381 397 DOI 10.1007/s10569-006-9002-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Dynamics of two planets in the 3/2 mean-motion resonance: application to the planetary system of the pulsar PSR

More information

Planets: Name Distance from Sun Satellites Year Day Mercury 0.4AU yr 60 days Venus yr 243 days* Earth 1 1 yr 1 day Mars 1.

Planets: Name Distance from Sun Satellites Year Day Mercury 0.4AU yr 60 days Venus yr 243 days* Earth 1 1 yr 1 day Mars 1. The Solar System (Ch. 6 in text) We will skip from Ch. 6 to Ch. 15, only a survey of the solar system, the discovery of extrasolar planets (in more detail than the textbook), and the formation of planetary

More information

INVESTIGATION OF ORBITAL EVOLUTION OF INTERPLANETARY DUST PARTICLES ORIGINATING FROM KUIPER BELT AND ASTEROID BELT OBJECTS

INVESTIGATION OF ORBITAL EVOLUTION OF INTERPLANETARY DUST PARTICLES ORIGINATING FROM KUIPER BELT AND ASTEROID BELT OBJECTS INVESTIGATION OF ORBITAL EVOLUTION OF INTERPLANETARY DUST PARTICLES ORIGINATING FROM KUIPER BELT AND ASTEROID BELT OBJECTS 1 PALAK DHARSANDIA, 2 DR. JAYESH PABARI, 3 DR. CHARMY PATEL 1 Research Scholar,

More information

Exoplanets: a dynamic field

Exoplanets: a dynamic field Exoplanets: a dynamic field Alexander James Mustill Amy Bonsor, Melvyn B. Davies, Boris Gänsicke, Anders Johansen, Dimitri Veras, Eva Villaver The (transiting) exoplanet population Solar System Hot Jupiters:

More information

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 13 May 2012

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ep] 13 May 2012 Trailing (L5) Neptune Trojans: 2004 KV18 and 2008 LC18 Pu Guan, Li-Yong Zhou, Jian Li Astronomy Department, Nanjing University, Key Laboratory of Modern Astronomy and Astrophysics in MOE, Nanjing 210093,

More information