Hard and Soft X-ray Mirror System Design Status

Transcription

1 Hard and Soft X-ray Mirror System Design Status From FEL Gas Attenuator & Diagnostics HOMS/SOMS Mirror System To Experiment Stations This work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.

2 Mirror system testing & final design drawings are nearly complete CDR PDR FDR Prototype tests focused on two high technical risk areas: - Measuring & maintaining HOMS tangential figure - Measuring & maintaining HOMS pointing stability Requirements have been demonstrated for both these areas

3 HOMS and SOMS share a common design approach: HOMS requires a few additional features Chamber & mirror Mirror & Mount Pointing & centering Installation alignment plates Support Pedestal Tunable bending force Si Mirror HOMS bender for real time figure control Invar mount Chin guard

4 Figure errors predicted by analysis have been verified in prototype tests Figure budget limits power imparted upon reflection Remotely controlled spring force Force element Manual Force Adjustment Finite element analysis guided design optimization Mirror figure stability after 150 nm bend: +/- 1 Cº room air

5 SOMS mirror #1 tangential (horizontal) figure has been measured (transmission flat correction not yet applied) SOMS #1 mirror figure and slope Fabrication budget Uncorrected Fabrication budget

6 We recently calibrated our interferometer transmission flat Zygo does not calibrate the horizontal axis of large transmission flats (TF) - requires rotating a TF about the horizontal, which could break glass/epoxy bond - by design, 12 TF mounting cell design precludes this rotation Our horizontal calibration was done using two TF s & the un-silvered side of an RF - a reflection flat (RF) mounting cell allows all three rotations (no glass/epoxy bond) Vertical Calibration Horizontal Calibration LLNL data LLNL data Zygo data Random Error +/-2 nm (3σ) vib. + turb. RF Rotation Error

7 Algorithm for calibrating the horizontal axis of large flats Interferometer coordinates Flat coordinates File1(x) = T1(x) + T2(x) File2(x) = T1(x) + R(x) File3(x) = T2(-x) + R (-x) T2 T1 R T1 T2 +y +x Flat spacing Interferometer coordinates R Convert File3(x) File3(-x) and solve for T1(x), T2(x), R(x): T1(x) = ½[F1(x)+F2(x)-F3(-x)] T2(x) = ½[F1(x)-F2(x)+F3(-x)] R(x) = ½[-F1(x)+F2(x)+F3(-x)] The systematic error from RF weight reversal can be evaluated File4(x) = T1(x) + [R(-x)+Error(-x)] File 5(x) = T2(-x) + [R(x)+Error(x)] R T1 +y +x Interferometer coordinates R T2 Check Error(x) = F4(-x)-T1(-x)-R(x) and double check Error(x) = F5(x)-T2(-x)-R(x)

8 Effect of ground motion amplification on pointing stability has been addressed Pointing jitter was noticed on our first HOMS prototype Cap. sensor scope traces Rotation mechanism Translation stage Strut plates Motion amplification was measured with accelerometers - rms amplification relates to mean square acceleration S(f) by: xtop rms xground = rms S top ( f ) / S ( f ) ground 150 at 20 Hz The final design corrects this problem S(f), g 2 /Hz 10 dia wall Horizontal ground spectral density

9 The final design fundamental frequency is over 80 Hz Modes calculated by a finite element model PDR design PDR design FDR design Adjustable plates for installation alignment Z rotation X,Z Tip/tilt & Y FDR design 10 dia wall 14 dia. 0.5 wall Amplitude scaling for mode f n x rms πf ns( fn) ζ = 2k 1/ 2 damping stiffness x z

10 Temperature induced pointing error has been measured and controlled (1) Beam pointing drift < 10% of diameter required during experiments: - dθ = 90 nrad for HOMS - dθ = 900 nrad for SOMS (2) Temperature dependence of mirror pointing has been measured: (next page) - dθ/dt 300 nrad/0.1 C Temperature stability < 0.03 C required for HOMS (3) The challenge: to demonstrate closed loop stability < 0.03 C/week C demonstrated in an insulated enclosure around our prototype

11 Pointing error θ/ T was measured with our prototype Rotation assembly: 70 nr/0.1ºc Chiller control +/- 0.1 C Strut assembly Uncorrelated drift was the basis for replacing struts with adjustable plates Translation stage: 300 nr/0.1ºc Day no

12 Pointing stability has been demonstrated in a thermal enclosure Heat balance: q dq fan ( t) = q fan wall ( t) c + q wall dt floor out c ( t) wall [ T in ( t) T out ( t)] + c floor [ T in ( t 1 hr) T floor ( t)] Control parameters: T set = q max o C Watts Insulated Enclosure c wall 1 W o / C T in < ±.03ºC (t) T out q wall T in (t) T in ( t 1 hr) 40 kg θ T set Eurotherm controller q( t) = V ( t) fan 2 R 400 kg insulated pedestal T out Thermistor ± 0.01ºC q floor T floor (t) (slowly varies ) c floor 7 W o / C

13 Summary of a mirror system traveler LLNL clean rooms LLNL B141 assembly area Ship FEE Optics shop Measure figure Assemble components on pedestal Ship assembled pedestal Install, align, & grout pedestal Coating facility Coating facility Coat mirrors Mount mirrors Connect cables Set limit switches Operate motors Mount chamber on pedestal Ship mirror Inside chamber Install & precision align chamber Install bellows & connecting beam tubes Optics shop Figure adjustment Operational acceptance test Remote operation acceptance test Coating facility Install mirrors into chamber Mirror survey inspection Mirror to mirror alignment Install thermal enclosures Align to exp. stations

14 Tasks remaining this FY: Complete ESD, fabrication drawings, & final review August - calculate survey installation coordinates Measure & coat SOMS mirrors in August Bid and award fabrication drawings Sept. (1) chamber (2) pedestal & slide plate assembly (3) mirror mount & chin guard assembly (4) cam assembly