The Launch of Gorizont 45 on the First Proton K /Breeze M

Transcription

1 The Launch of Gorizont 45 on the First Proton K / Fred D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Space Control Conference 3 April 2001 FDR This work is sponsored by the Air Force under Air Force Contract F C-0002 "Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the United States Air Force."

2 Outline Introduction Launch Scenarios and Pre-Launch Planning Mission Events Summary FDR -01 2

3 Introduction On 6 June 2000 Russia launched Gorizont 45 using the newly developed upper stage First non-historic deep space Russian launch in many years However, International Launch Services published detailed description of the booster capabilities and launch scenarios Pre-mission planning led to successful coverage of the rocket body and payload up to synchronous injection FDR -01 3

4 Outline Introduction Launch Scenarios and Pre-Launch Planning Mission Events Summary FDR -01 4

5 with Auxiliary Propulsion Tank The is comprised of a central cylinder and a jettisonable external propellant tank. Propellant carried is dependent on the specific mission requirements and is varied to maximize FDR performance for the mission. Ref: ILSLaunch.com

6 Rocket Body and Surrounding External Fuel Tank FDR The will be replacing the Block DM More lift capability Flexible launch profile 3 rd stage not left in parking orbit

7 Outline Introduction Launch Scenarios and Pre-Launch Planning Mission Events Summary FDR -01 7

8 Typical Flight Profile to Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit For typical Proton M/ missions, the first three stages inject the elements above the third stage into a suborbital ballistic trajectory. Approximately 2 minutes after separation, the fourth stage performs a main engine burn to reach a low earth "support" orbit inclined 51.6 degrees to the equator. The second burn of the engine occurs approximately 55 minutes after lift-off as the vehicle crosses the first ascending node, and lasts nearly 12 minutes. After one revolution in an intermediate transfer orbit, a third burn occurs to complete the raising of apogee to geosynchronous altitude. The fourth burn, which places the spacecraft into its final orbit, occurs approximately 5.5 hours later at geosynchronous altitude, and lasts ten minutes. Total launch mission duration is approximately 10 hours. FDR -01 8

9 Typical Launch Scenario Using the Block DM Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit (GTO) I=48.8º Parking Orbit I=51.6 Synchronous Orbit I= 1.5 FDR -01 9

10 Gorizont 45 Launch Scenario Parking Orbit 200 km x 51.6 Synchronous Orbit 35,800 km x 1.5 FDR

11 Gorizont 45 Launch Scenario Orbit #2 300 km x 5,000 km x 50.2 Parking Orbit 200 km x 51.6 Synchronous Orbit 35,800 km x 1.5 FDR

12 Gorizont 45 Launch Scenario Orbit #3 400 km x 35,800 km x 48.8 Orbit #2 300 km x 5,000 km x 50.2 Parking Orbit 200 km x 51.6 Synchronous Orbit 35,800 km x 1.5 FDR

13 Scenario to Geo-Synchronous Orbit Parking Orbit 200 km x 51.6 Synchronous Orbit 35,800 km x 0.8 FDR scenario uses multiple transfer orbits lower thrust 4th stage cannot insert directly into GTO Inclination changes selected to minimize velocity requirement velocity same as for Proton/Block DM scenario Intermediate transfer orbit apogee height dependent upon payload mass

14 Scenario to Geo-Synchronous Orbit Parking Orbit 200 km x 51.6 Intermediate Orbit 300 km x 5,000 km x 50.2 Synchronous Orbit 35,800 km x 0.8 FDR scenario uses multiple transfer orbits lower thrust 4th stage cannot insert directly into GTO Inclination changes selected to minimize velocity requirement velocity same as for Proton/Block DM scenario Intermediate transfer orbit apogee height dependent upon payload mass

15 Scenario to Geo-Synchronous Orbit Parking Orbit 200 km x 51.6 Intermediate Orbit 300 km x 5,000 km x 50.2 Transfer Orbit 400 km x 35,800 km x 48.8 Synchronous Orbit 35,800 km x 0.8 FDR scenario uses multiple transfer orbits lower thrust 4th stage cannot insert directly into GTO Inclination changes selected to minimize velocity requirement velocity same as for Proton/Block DM scenario Intermediate transfer orbit apogee height dependent upon payload mass

16 Apogee Height Inclination Relationship Inclination (deg) Intermediate Orbit Intermediate transfer orbit GTO 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 A two-dimensional apogee heightinclination search of the intermediate transfer orbit would be very stressing However we can use a simple impulse burn model to limit the search to one-dimension Apogee Height (km) 4 FDR

17 Apogee Height Inclination Relationship Inclination (deg) ,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 Apogee Height (km) FDR Intermediate Orbit Intermediate transfer orbit GTO This model has been tested against the Block DM scenario, as well as for the high-energy transfer orbit scenario published in the ILS Proton Manual. A two-dimensional apogee heightinclination search of the intermediate transfer orbit would be very stressing However we can use a simple impulse burn model to limit the search to one-dimension Inclination (deg High-energy transfer orbit Curve is from the ILS Proton Manual Symbols are model calculations P 2 3 Inclination 0 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 Orbit #4 Perigee Height (km) 4 F

18 Outline Introduction Launch Scenarios and Pre-Launch Planning Mission Events Summary FDR

19 Gorizont 45 Launch Scenario Parking Orbit 220 km x 51.6 Orbit #2 265 km x 5,000 km x 50.2 GTO 380 km x 35,000 km x 48.8 Synchronous Orbit 35,500 km x 1.5 FDR

20 FDR Gorizont 45 Chronology Parking Orbit 220 km X 51.6º 02:59 Launch Task ed Gorizont folder by SCC 03:36 ALTAIR elset piece count of 1 Ascension acquisition/elset? Intermediate Transfer Orbit 265 X 5,000 km X 50.2º 04:11 Ascending node injection into transfer orbit 04:45 Fylingsdale elset (acquisition from???) 05:17 ALTAIR elset 95101; acquisition from FYL elset 06:00 Faxed launch memo and briefing to SCC Geo Transfer Orbit 380 X 35,000 km X 48.8º 06:37 Perigee, ascending node injection into GTO Fylingsdale track to SCC 09:09 SCC elset from Fylingdale data GEO drift orbit 56º drifting 10º/day toward 145º 11:48 Apogee, descending node injection into GEO drift orbit 17:04 ALTAIR elset on tank in GTO 17:32 MHR elset on tank in GTO ALTAIR acquired payload based upon postulated drift elset

21 Outline Introduction Launch Scenarios and Pre-Launch Planning Mission Events Summary FDR

22 Summary Successful coverage of non-historic launch Public information on the Web Pre-mission planning at Millstone SSN coordination through the SCC Excellent sensor performance, particularly Fylingsdale Future success depends upon Same attributes that lead to previous success Use of optical and passive sensors if possible FDR