PUBLICATION. Consolidated EIR design baseline: Milestone M3.6

Transcription

1 CERN-ACC Future Circular Collider PUBLICATION Consolidated EIR design baseline: Milestone M3.6 Tomas Garcia, Rogelio (CERN) et al. 01 November 2018 The European Circular Energy-Frontier Collider Study (EuroCirCol) project has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant No The information herein only reflects the views of its authors and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information. The research leading to this document is part of the Future Circular Collider Study The electronic version of this FCC Publication is available on the CERN Document Server at the following URL : < CERN-ACC

2 Grant Agreement No: EuroCirCol European Circular Energy-Frontier Collider Study Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Framework Programme, Research and Innovation Action MILESTONE REPORT CONSOLIDATED EIR DESIGN BASELINE Document identifier: Due date: End of Month 41 (November 1, 2018) Report release date: 01/11/2018 Work package: Lead beneficiary: Document status: WP3 (Experimental Interaction Region) CERN RELEASED (V1.0) Abstract: Report on the collider Experimental Insertion Region design and its key elements considering the cumulative findings of all studies carried out so far, usable as input for the preparation of the Conceptual Design Report. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 1 / 17

3 Copyright notice: Copyright EuroCirCol Consortium, 2015 For more information on EuroCirCol, its partners and contributors please see The European Circular Energy-Frontier Collider Study (EuroCirCol) project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant No EuroCirCol began in June 2015 and will run for 4 years. The information herein only reflects the views of its authors and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information. Delivery Slip Name Partner Date Authored by Edited by Reviewed by Rogelio Tomas Roman Martin Julie Hadre Johannes Gutleber Michael Benedikt Daniel Schulte CERN 15/10/18 CERN 24/10/18 CERN 29/10/18 Approved by EuroCirCol Coordination Committee 31/10/18 Grant Agreement PUBLIC 2 / 17

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW KEY ISSUES MDI CONSIDERATIONS SYSTEM LAYOUT AND OPTICS FINAL FOCUS TRIPLET BEAM-BEAM EFFECTS AND CROSSING ANGLE DYNAMIC APERTURE WITH TRIPLET ERRORS CRAB CAVITIES LOW LUMINOSITY INTERACTION REGION CONCLUSION REFERENCES ANNEX GLOSSARY Grant Agreement PUBLIC 3 / 17

5 1. OVERVIEW Much like the LHC, FCC-hh features two high luminosity interaction regions (IRs), situated in the Points A and G as well as two low luminosity interaction regions in the points B and L. Table 1 shows the two parameter sets, Baseline and Ultimate, for the high luminosity IRs and compares them with the respective parameters of LHC and HL-LHC. The most notable difference between Baseline and Ultimate are the goals for the β functions at the interaction point β. Table 1: Key parameters of FCC-hh compared to LHC and HL-LHC. LHC HL-LHC FCC-hh Baseline Center-of-mass energy [TeV] Injection energy [TeV] Ring circumference [km] Arc dipole field [T] Number of IPs Number of bunches per beam n b Beam current [A] Ultimate Peak luminosity/ip [10 34 cm 2 s 1 ] Events/crossing Stored beam energy [GJ] Synchrotron power per beam [MW] Arc synchrotron radiation [W/m/beam] IP beta function β* [m] Bunch spacing [ns] Initial norm. rms emittance [µm] Initial bunch population Nb[10 11 ] Transv. emittance damping time [h] RMS bunch length [cm] RMS IP beam size [µm] Full crossing angle [µrad] KEY ISSUES Early in the design phase of the interaction regions, the radiation load from collision debris has been identified as a key issue of the final focus system. Unifying adequate protection of the triplet magnets with a high luminosity performance has been the driving factor of the interaction region layout. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 4 / 17

6 3. MDI CONSIDERATIONS Early studies of the final focus system layout concluded that the main contributor to the minimum β is the overall length of the triplet, while the L plays a minor role. This led to a clear strategy to minimize β with significant amounts of shielding reducing the free aperture of the final focus magnets: to choose the smallest L that does not restrict the detector design and to increase triplet length until dynamic aperture or chromaticity become obstacles. In this strategy the machine-detector interface plays a key role as it defines L. A sketch of the detector region layout is shown in Error! Reference source not found.. While the detector has a total length of about 50 m, extending to 25 m on either side of the IP, the opening scenario requires a total cavern length of 66 m. During operation, the gap between detector and cavern wall will be occupied by the forward shielding that protects the detector from secondaries back-scattered from the TAS. The aperture in the 2 m thick wall between cavern and tunnel is equipped with a cast iron absorber to complete the forward shielding. The TAS, a 3 m long copper absorber that protects the final focus magnets from collision debris is located 35 m from the IP. With an additional space of 2 m reserved for vacuum equipment and for the end of the magnet cryostat, first quadrupole of the final focus triplet starts at L = 40 m. The beam pipe at the IP is made of 0.8 mm thick beryllium and has an inner radius of 20 mm. This pipe extends to ± 8 m to either side of the IP and is followed by a beryllium cone with an opening angle of 2.5 mrad corresponding to η = 6. From 16 m from the IP on, the inner radius of the aluminium beam pipe is constant at 40 mm, this is necessary for the opening of the detector. Figure 1: Detector and interaction region layout leading to the L* = 40 m lattice. The IP is located at (0,0). Grant Agreement PUBLIC 5 / 17

7 4. SYSTEM LAYOUT AND OPTICS Figure 2: Layout of the high luminosity interaction region. The layout is antisymmetric around the IP at (0,0). The interaction region layout of FCC-hh follows the same principles as the LHC and HL-LHC interaction regions. The layout is shown in Figure 2Error! Reference source not found.. Starting at the Interaction Point (IP), the strongly focused and highly divergent beams pass a drift space with the length L chosen to accommodate the detector. Following this drift space, a final focus system comprised of three large aperture quadrupoles (hence called the triplet) focuses the beams in both the horizontal and vertical plane. The triplet consists of single aperture magnets that host both beams. The triplets on both sides of the IP are powered antisymmetrically. This has the advantage that the triplet region is optically identical for both beams. Behind the triplet, a shared aperture dipole D1 separates the two beams. After a drift, the double bore dipole D2 bends the separated beams onto parallel orbits again. The resulting reference orbits are shown in Figure 3. Also depicted are orbit excursions that let the two beams collide with a crossing angle in order to avoid parasitic collisions outside the detector area. Figure 3: Reference orbits (solid lines) and closed orbits with crossing angles (dashed lines) in the inter Grant Agreement PUBLIC 6 / 17

8 Four more quadrupoles Q4-Q7 make up the following matching section that occupies the rest of the straight section. The straight section is connected to the arcs by a two cell dispersion suppressor. To provide enough degrees of freedom to match all required beam parameters from the IP to the arcs, the four matching section quadrupoles, the three individually powered quadrupoles of the dispersion suppressor Q8-Q10 and well as three tuning quadrupoles in the first arc cell QT11-QT13 are used for the matching procedure FINAL FOCUS TRIPLET The final focus design strategy calls for a long triplet in order to achieve small β values. In practice, not only chromaticity and dynamic aperture were limiting factors for the triplet length, but also the total length of the straight section that determines the arc side focal length of the final focus system, as well as the strength of the Q7 quadrupole. Furthermore the lengths of individual magnets must be equal or below 14.3 m in order to be compatible with a cryostat length of 15 m. The relative lengths of Q1, Q2 and Q3 were adopted from HL-LHC. As suggested in [1], Q1 was chosen to have a smaller aperture and higher gradient than Q2 and Q3 in order to minimize β. The specification for the triplet quadrupoles are listed in Table 2 and the layout of the final focus triplet shown in Figure 4Error! Reference source not found.. Q1 and Q3 are made up of two submagnets each with length of 14.3 m. For the interconnects a drift space of 2 m is reserved between the submagnets. Magnet Coil aperture diameter [mm] Table 2: Parameters of triplet of the high luminosity EIRs. Gradient [T/m] Length [m] Number per IP Q Q Q The drift between Q1 and Q2 as well as Q2 and Q3 is longer at 7 m and must house orbit correctors, BPMs and vacuum equipment. Q2 consists of four 12.5 m long submagnets. This not only allows for a similar length ratio as in the HL-LHC but also to place orbit correctors in the cryostat of the outermost Q2 magnets. Behind Q3, 18.8 m of space are reserved for higher order multipole correctors to compensate triplet field errors. Figure 4: Layout of the final focus triplet. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 7 / 17

9 A 35 mm thick inner shielding of INERMET180 protects the triplet magnets from collision debris. Furthermore the free aperture is reduced a gap for the liquid helium for cooling (1.5 mm), the Kapton insulator (0.5 mm), a beam screen (2.05 mm), a gab for the insulation of the beam screen (2.0 mm) as well as the cold bore that scaled with 2.72 % of the coil aperture diameter, all of which have been modelled as simple layers. Figure 5: Optics of the main interaction region with β* = 0.3 m. Despite this significant reduction of the free aperture, the triplet can accommodate a beam with lower than ultimate β. Figure 5 shows the β functions and horizontal dispersion in the EIR and Figure 6 the corresponding aperture usage. Although aperture and alignment tolerances are not included in Figure 5, the beam stay clear depicted in Figure 6 clearly shows that the ultimate optics have a significant margin in terms of aperture. In fact, optics with almost β = 0.2 m can be achieved, although the chromaticity correction will not suffice with the current arc layout. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 8 / 17

10 Figure 6: Overall layout of the insertion region between the IP and Q7. For each beam, the closed orbit, the 2 σ envelope and the 15.5 σ envelope for the ultimate β* of 0.3 m are shown. The beam sizes include a beta beating of 10 % and a closed orbit uncertainty of 2 mm. Magnet apertures and the detector region beam pipe are illustrated with light gray while absorbers are shown in dark gray. The large aperture triplet magnets leave significant aperture margins. Figure 7: Beam stay clear of the high luminosity EIR for horizontal crossing and ultimate as well as beyond ultimate optics. For β = 0.2 m the beam stay clear is just below the minimum of 15.5 σ in the left Q1, suggesting a slightly larger β can be accommodated. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 9 / 17

11 4.2. BEAM-BEAM EFFECTS AND CROSSING ANGLE Dynamic aperture has been studied for the full FCC optics together with beam-beam effects. The results are shown in Figure 8. For these studies only two main EIRs have been taken into account. Assuming an alternating horizontal and vertical crossing scheme to profit from the passive compensation of the long-range tune and chromaticity shifts, it was found that a DA of 6 σ even at high chromaticity operational scenarios requires a minimum crossing angle of θ = 200 µrad at ultimate optics with β = 0.3 m. The corresponding orbit excursion is shown in Figure 9. Figure 8: Dynamic aperture as a function of the crossing angle θ. Figure 9: Orbit bump for a 200 µrad horizontal crossing angle required at β* = 0.3 m. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 10 / 17

12 4.3. DYNAMIC APERTURE WITH TRIPLET ERRORS The large β functions in the final focus triplet make the beam susceptible to field errors in these magnets. In order to assess the impact on the dynamic aperture (DA), tracking studies were performed using field errors derived from the HL-LHC final focus quadrupoles. Initial tracking showed a very low dynamic aperture, however, the phase between the two main IPs, as well as nonlinear corrector packages close to the triplets have shown to increase the DA to acceptable levels of more than 10 σ 12 σ. These values are expected to leave a DA of 6 σ when beam-beam effects and octupoles are added. The results of the tracking studies are shown in Figure 10. The baseline optics with β = 1.1 m show no issue with the DA. For the ultimate β = 0.3 m the phase optimization leads to a DA slightly above of 10 σ. This is just enough, however the non-linear correctors increase the DA significantly, offering a safety margin, and are therefore recommended. Beyond ultimate parameters make non-linear correctors mandatory. Figure 10: Dynamic aperture as a function of β*. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 11 / 17

13 4.4. CRAB CAVITIES In the long shared aperture section around the IP, the two counterrotating beams must be separated by an orbit bump in order to avoid parasitic crossings. The two beams only cross each other at the IP with a crossing angle θ. The crossing angle determines the separation of the beam in the shared aperture and thus the long range beam-beam effect. The minimum crossing angle was determined by beambeam studies to be 200 µrad for the ultimate β of 0.3 m and then scaled for other optics to provide the same normalized separation of 17 σ. Table 3 lists the crossing angle for a set of collision optics together with the luminosity reduction factor caused by the reduced geometric overlap of the bunches at the IP due to the crossing angle. For ultimate optics and beyond, FCC-hh is not able to provide even half of the luminosity head-on collisions would provide. It is clear that the luminosity reduction in the high luminosity EIRs must be compensated by crab cavities. Table 3: Crossing angle and luminosity reduction due to crossing angle for different collision optics. Optics version β [m] Full crossing angle [µrad] Luminosity reduction factor baseline ultimate beyond ultimate Initial studies with crab cavities show that a crab voltage of 13.4 MV per beam on either side of each high luminosity IP is needed to provide full crabbing in ultimate optics, corresponding to MV in total. Half of this voltage must be horizontally deflecting in one EIR, the other half vertically deflecting in the other EIR. For optics beyond ultimate parameters, the crab voltage increases up to MV. Orbit leakage of the crab orbit into the arcs varied strongly during the evolution of the lattice. In the latest lattice version it appears to be small, causing only small orbit aberrations in the other IPs. More detailed studies should be performed to get a better control of the orbit leakage in the future. The crab orbits and orbit leakage into the other high luminosity EIR are shown in Figure 11 for ultimate optics. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 12 / 17

14 Figure 11: Crab orbits for β* = 0.3 m and orbit leakage into the other high luminosity EIR. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 13 / 17

15 5. LOW LUMINOSITY INTERACTION REGION In the current FCC-hh design the low luminosity interaction regions in the points B and L have to share the 1400 m long straight section with the injection. This significantly limits the available space, as shown in Figure 12, and consequently the reachable performance. To save space the separation and recombination dipoles are superconducting with fields of 12 T and 10 T respectively. The parameters of the triplet quadrupoles are listed in Table 4. With these parameters, a β of 3.0 m can be achieved at an L of 25 m. This offers a luminosity in the order of cm 2 s 1. To avoid perturbances of the high luminosity experiments due to long range beam-beam effects, a crossing angle of 180 µrad is applied. Due to the lower luminosity a copper mask is sufficient to protect the triplet magnets from collision debris. Together with the 10 mm shielding inside the triplet aperture, the magnet lifetime is in the order of 0.5 ab 1. Magnet Length [m] Maximum Gradient [T/m] Table 4: Triplet parameters of the low luminosity EIRs Inner coil diameter [mm] Number Q Q Q Shielding thickness [mm] Figure 12: Layout of the combined injection and experimental insertion at point B. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 14 / 17

16 6. CONCLUSION In summary the WP3 group has produced a robust lattice that meets the performance expectations. The design of the high luminosity experimental insertion region is capable of running with the ultimate parameter set and has the potential to even exceed the goals. It is fully compatible with the detector design and opening scenarios as well as the overall FCC-hh design. The crossing angle was chosen to offer operational margins. The required strength of the crab cavities is compatible with current assumptions for HL-LHC. Studies of collision debris indicate that the thick shielding inside final focus triplet can protect the magnets sufficiently, requiring only a single magnet replacement to reach the integrated luminosity goal even under conservative assumptions. The dynamic aperture studies are encouraging, but further work will be needed to evaluate the interplay of beam-beam effects, Landau octupoles and field errors. Additionally, future studies should aim to provide an optimized squeezing scheme, making best use of the evolution of emittance and bunch charge. Grant Agreement PUBLIC 15 / 17

17 7. REFERENCES [1] R. d. Maria, "Layout design for final focus systems and applications for the LHC interaction region upgrade, LHC- PROJECT-Report-1051," [2] E. Cruz-Alaniz, Dynamic Aperture studies of FCC-hh at collision, Presented at the 4th EuroCirCol meeting, [3] E. Cruz-Alaniz, "Methods to Increase the Dynamic Aperture of the FCC-hh Lattice," in IPAC, Vancouver, BC, Canada, [4] A. Seryi and a. et, "Overview of Design Development of FCC-hh Experimental Interaction Regions," in IPAC, Copenhagen, Denmark, [5] T. Pieloni, Beam-Beam Studies for FCC-HH, Presented at FCC week [6] M. Hofer, Optics Design for the Low Luminosity Experiments in the FCC-hh, Thesis, Grant Agreement PUBLIC 16 / 17

18 8. ANNEX GLOSSARY SI units and formatting according to standard ISO on quantities and units are used throughout this document where applicable. ATS BPM c.m. DA DIS ESS FCC FCC-ee FCC-hh FODO H1 H2 HL-LHC IP IR LHC LLIR LAR LSS MBA MIR Nb3Sn Nb-Ti RF RMS σ SAR SR SSC TSS Achromatic Telescopic Squeezing Beam Position Monitor Centre of Mass Dynamic Aperture Dispersion suppressor Extended Straight Section Future Circular Collider Electron-positron Collider within the Future Circular Collider study Hadron Collider within the Future Circular Collider study Focusing and defocusing quadrupole lenses in alternating order Beam running in the clockwise direction in the collider ring Beam running in the anti-clockwise direction in the collider ring High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider Interaction Point Interaction Region Large Hadron Collider Low Luminosity Interaction Region Long arc Long Straight Section Multi-Bend Achromat Main Interaction Region Niobium-tin, a metallic chemical compound, superconductor Niobium-titanium, a superconducting alloy Radio Frequency Root Mean Square RMS size Short arc Synchrotron Radiation Superconducting Super Collider Technical Straight Section Grant Agreement PUBLIC 17 / 17