arxiv:nlin/ v1 [nlin.si] 29 Jan 2007

Transcription

1 Exact shock solution of a coupled system of delay differential equations: a car-following model Y Tutiya and M Kanai arxiv:nlin/ v1 [nlin.si] 29 Jan 2007 Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences 1, The University of Tokyo, Komaa 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo , Japan Astract In this paper, we present exact shock solutions of a coupled system of delay differential equations, which was introduced as a traffic-flow model called the car-following model. We use the Hirota method, originally developed in order to solve soliton equations. The relevant delay differential equations have een known to allow exact solutions expressed y elliptic functions with a periodic oundary conditions. In the present work, however, shock solutions are otained with open oundary, representing the stationary propagation of a traffic jam. 1 Introduction Studies of traffic flow including pedestrian flow connect with a wide range of social prolems such as efficient transport, evacuation in case of emergency and city planning. One can regard traffic flows as compressile fluids from a macroscopic viewpoint, or as a many-ody systems of driven particles from a microscopic viewpoint. Accordingly, several different types of models have appeared; some are ased on hydrodynamic equations, some are coupled differential equations, and others are cellular automata. In particular, highway-like traffic is modeled as a one-dimensional system where a numer of particles move in a definite direction interacting with each other asymmetrically. See Fig.1. The x 2 x 1 x 0 x -1 x -2 x -3 Figure 1: An illustration of one-lane traffic. It is prohiited for particles to overtake and collide. one-dimensional flow presents contrasting density patterns, which change quite irregularly as the density of particles increases, and which finally take the form of a stale traffic jam propagating ackwards with constant speed. In earlier work on traffic flow, car-following models were introduced in the form of a coupled system of DDEs: x ẋ n t = F x n t τ n = 1,2,..., 1 where x n t n = 1,2,... denotes the position of the nth car at time t, x n t = x n 1 t x n t is the distance to the next car in front i.e. to the n 1th car, and F is a given function. The car-following model defined y 1 descries a situation where each car determines its velocity ẋ n t in terms of the distance the distance that separates it from its predecessor with a delay τ, i.e., in terms of x n t τ. The delay τ is small ut is never negligile, as the driver needs time to respond to the changing traffic situation, and hence it is one of the essential elements in traffic modeling. The function F, which can e determined from real traffic data, provides the optimal 1 TEL: ,FAX: tutiya@poisson.ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp kanai@ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1

2 velocity for each distance to which the drivers adjust their speed. We call it the optimal velocity OV function hereafter. In this paper, we present exact solutions for the car-following models with OV functions of exponential type the Newell model and tanh type the so-called tanh model. Using the Hirota method, which was originally developed for solving soliton equations, we otain shock solutions representing a traffic jam that propagates ackwards. The Newell and the tanh model have een studied extensively in the past and some exact solutions, typically involving elliptic functions, have een otained. However, all these solutions were otained y assuming a specific traveling wave Ansatz, which reduces the original partial DDE toan ordinarydde. But, asthelattice intervalsoftandnaredifferent inthe originalpartialdde, the reduced ordinary equations inevitaly include two incommensurate lattice intervals, which makes the prolem extraordinarily difficult. To solve this situation, the previous authors always required a strict relation etween the velocity of the traveling wave and the delay it must e equal to 2τ. This requirement then reduces the prolem to a nonlinear ordinary difference equation of second order with a first order differential term, which can e associated with addition theorems for the elliptic functions. It seems that up to now this was the only method availale to tackle such nonlinear delay equations. However, in the present paper, we shall demonstrate that Hirota s method is very well suited to treat such equations. Exactly how this method can e applied for solving 1 will e shown in the susequent sections. The main results of this paper are reported in Section II and III. In Section II, the Newell model will e introduced and its ilinear form and a shock solution will e presented. Section III is dedicated to the tanh model, where as in Section II, a shock solution is otained from the ilinear formalism. Section IV is devoted to conclusions and remarks. 2 The Newell model In the epoch-making work [1], G F Newell proposed a car-following model descried y the DDE [ ẋ n t = V 1 exp γ ] V x nt τ L. 2 We call it the Newell model and 2 the Newell equation hereafter. In [1], particular solutions for 2 in the case τ = 0 were presented. Also, in the susequent work y G B Whitham [2], exact solutions representing solitary waves and periodic waves were found for the case τ 0. The parameters in 2 should e interpreted as follows: V is the maximum allowed velocity of a car, γ the slope of the OV function at x n = L corresponds to the sensitivity of the driver to changes in the traffic situation, and L is the minimum headway. Fig.2 shows the graph of the OV function. The parameters can e determined from empirical data, and in [1] the Newell model, for certain estimated parameter values, was shown to give a reasonale fit of the empirical data. Optimal Velocity V γ L Headway Figure 2: The optimal velocity function for the Newell model. The values of the parameters are as follows: V = 120, γ = 6 and L = 5, where V indicates the maximum allowed velocity, γ is the derivative of F at x n = L, and L is the minimum distance etween cars. 2

3 Firstly, eliminating uniform flows for the sake of convenience, we change the dependent variale from x n to y n as x n t = V 0 t L 0 n+y n t, 3 where the velocity V 0 and headway L 0 satisfy the relation [ V 0 = V 1 exp γ ] V L 0 L that is required of a uniform solution. Then, sustituting 3 in 2 and using 4, the Newell model ecomes: [ ẏ n t = V V 0 1 exp γ ] V y nt τ. 5 Considering differences of 5, setting s n t = γ/v{y n 1 t y n t}, one otains the following equation, 1 α 0 ṡ n t = exp s n 1 t τ+exp s n t τ, 6 where α 0 = γ1 V 0 /V = γexp γ/vl 0 L. For instance, 6 is known to have the following elliptic solution [2]: s n t = log 2α 0 snωτcnωτdnωτ Ω1 k 2 sn 2 Ωτsn 2 φ+ωτ1 k 2 sn 2 Ωτsn 2 φ, 7 where φ = Ωt 2τn, snφ = snφ;k, cnφ = cnφ;k, and dnφ = dnφ;k are Jacoi s elliptic functions with modulus k. Ω is determined y a certain transcendental equation. 2.1 A shock solution with parameteric freedom Now we apply the Hirota method [3, 4] to the Newell model. In order to rewrite 6 as a DDE in algeraic form, we first set ψ = exp s n t. Then, 6 transforms into an algeraic relation etween ψ and ψ: 1 ψ n t+τ ψ n t+τ = ψ n 1t ψ n t. 8 α0 Following the examples of soliton equations [3, 4], we set ψ = g/f, where f and g are usually considered to e entire functions. Then, 8 can e written in the following form. 4 1 ġ + f + g + α 0 f + g + f + = gf gf, 9 ff where for simplicity we use the notations, f = fn 1,t and f ± = fn,t±τ to denote n- and t-shifts, respectively. As a result, 9 can e decoupled into the following system: { ġ+ f + g + f + = λgf gf ff = α 0 λ f+ g + 10, where λ is introduced as a coupling constant. This is the so-called ilinear form of 2. Next, we assume that f = 1+expan+2t and g = u+vexpan+2t, where a,, u, and v are constants and the factor 2 in front of is for later convenience. By sustituting f and g into 10, the coefficients of oth exponentials give rise to the constraints on the constants. In this case, the numer of constraints is less than that of the constants and f and g can e determined as follows: f = 1+exp2t τn g = α 0 1 e 2τ {1+exp2[t τn+1]}, 11 where is a free parameter. We thus otain an exact solution of 2: s n t = log α 0sinhτ 3 cosht τn cosh[t τn+1]. 12

4 This is a shock wave with velocity U = 1/τ which presents a traffic jam propagating ackwards; and accordingly open oundary conditions are assumed or equivalently, the period of a wave type solution is assumed to e infinite. It is remarkale that the shock velocity U a macroscopic value should e determined y the driver s response time τ a microscopic value. At the same time, this condition on the velocity means that this solution does not reduce to any previously known solution for which one always had U = 1/2τ. The previous solution 7 is recovered if one takes f = ϑ + 0 φϑ 0φ, g = ϑ ++ 0 φϑ 0 φ, 13 where ϑ 0 φ = ϑ 0 φ;k denotes the elliptic theta function with modulus k. 3 Car-following model with the tanh OV function In [6, 7], two groups of authors independently found that yet another car-following model allows for exact solutions, also descried y elliptic functions. This model is represented y the DDE xn t τ ρ ẋ n t = ξ +ηtanh, 14 2A where ξ, η, ρ and A are parameters. We call the car-following model with the OV function 14 the tanh car-following model or simply, tanh model, hereafter. The tanh OV function the RHS of 14 was extensively investigated in the context of the OV model [8, 9]. In particular, numerical simulation showed that this OV function reproduces the onset and growth of traffic jams faithfully. For convenience and simplicity, we shift the delay from the RHS to the LHS in 14, and introduce the distance variales h n t = x n t ρ/2a instead of the positions x n. Then, the tanh car-following model is represented y the equation: ḣ n t+τ = η 2A [tanhh n 1t tanhh n t]. 15 As for the equation 15, some elliptic solutions are known [6, 7]. Typical examples can e written in the following forms: h n t = a snφ+, snφ+a +c, sn 2 +c, 16 φ+a where φ = Ωt 2τn and Ω can e regarded as a free parameter. a,,c are constants determined y Ω,A,η and τ. 3.1 A shock solution for the tanh model In terms of ψ = tanhh n, 15 takes the form, into an algeraic form ψ + = η { 1 ψ + 2} ψ ψ. 17 2A It should e noted that, if ψ is a solution of 17, ψ is also a solution. As was the case of the Newell model, we set ψ = g/f, and therey successfully separate 17 into a system of ilinear equations: { ġ+ f + g + f + = λgf gf ff = η 2Aλ [f+ 2 g ], where λ is a coupling constant. This is the ilinear form of 15. Sustituting f = 1+exp2t an and g = u+vexp2t an into 18, we find f = 1+exp2t an 2A [1+e g = 1 2τ η1 e 2τ exp2t an ], 4 19

5 where a is given y e a = A/η +1 e2τ A/η 1+e 2τ. 20 From 19, we finally otain the following exact solution of 14: x n t = ρ+alog 2ηsinhτ cosh t a 2 n A cosh t τ a 1. 2 n This is another shock wave with velocity U = 2/a which represents a traffic jam propagating ackwards. It should e noticed that the velocity of 21 is free, whereas the velocity of the solutions previously reported are all fixed at 1/2τ [6, 7]. The previous solutions 16 are recovered if one assume f and g are the following forms: f + φ = Jϑ 1 φ+kϑ 0 φ, g + φ = Lϑ 1 φ+mϑ 0 φ, 21 which correspond to solutions of the type s n t = a snφ+ and /snφ+a+c, or f + φ = Jϑ 2 1 φ+kϑ2 0 φ, g+ φ = Lϑ 2 1 φ+mϑ2 0 φ, 22 which correspond to solutions of the type /sn 2 φ+a+c. For the solution 21, the constants J, K, L, M are determied y following quadratic relations: ΩAϑ 0 ϑ 1 µ = ητϑ 0 Ωϑ 1 Ω L 2 = 1 µ ϑ2 0 Ω J 2 +µ ϑ2 1 Ω K 2 LM = ϑ µ ϑ 2Ωϑ 3 Ω ϑ 2 ϑ 3 M 2 = µ ϑ2 1Ω ϑ 2 J ϑ 2 0 JK 1 µ ϑ2 0Ω ϑ 2 0 K For the solution 22, the constants are determied y following quartic relations: ΩAϑ 0 ϑ 1 µ = ϑ 2ϑ 3 ητϑ 0 Ωϑ 1 Ωϑ 2 Ωϑ 3 Ω L 2 = 1 µ ϑ4 0Ω ϑ 4 J 2 µ ϑ4 1Ω 0 ϑ 4 K 2 2µ k ϑ 2 0Ωϑ 2 1Ω 0 k 2 ϑ 2 JK 2 ϑ2 3 LM = µ ϑ2 0 Ωϑ2 1 Ω ϑ 4 J 2 +µ ϑ2 0 Ωϑ2 1 Ω 0 ϑ 4 K µ 1+k2 ϑ 2 0 Ωϑ2 1 Ω 0 k 2 ϑ 2 2 ϑ2 3 M 2 = µ ϑ4 1Ω ϑ 4 J µ ϑ4 0Ω ϑ 4 0 K 2 2µ k k 2 ϑ 2 0Ωϑ 2 1Ω ϑ 2 JK 2 ϑ2 3 JK. 24 In aove relations and, ϑ j φ = ϑ j φ;k denotes the elliptic theta function with modulus k and ϑ j denotes ϑ j 0. 4 Summary and Conclusion In this paper, we presented the Hirota ilinear forms of two typical car-following models, and otained exact shock solutions. These are the first solutions that do not assume the velocity of the traveling wave to e equal to 1/2τ. The Hirota method was originally introduced to find special solutions such as soliton solutions for nonlinear partial differential or difference equations. We elieve that the method is effective for solving nonlinear equations in general and delay-differential equations in particular. 5

6 References [1] G.F.Newell, Oper. Res [2] G.B.Whitham, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A [3] R.Hirota, Lecture Notes in Math [4] R.Hirota, in The Direct Method in Soliton Theory, Eds. A.Nagai, J.Nimmo, C.Gilson Camridge Tracts in Mathematics [5] G.B.Whitham, in Linear and Nonlinear Waves John Wiley & Sons, New York, [6] Y.Igarashi, K.Itoh and K.Nakanishi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn [7] K.Hasee, A.Nakayama and Y.Sugiyama, Phys. Lett [8] M.Bando, K.Hasee, A.Nakayama, A.Shiata and Y.Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. E [9] M.Bando, K.Hasee, K.Nakanishi, A.Nakayama, A.Shiata and Y.Sugiyama, J. Phys. I France