In these notes we will outline a proof of Lobachevskiĭ s main equation for the angle of parallelism, namely
|
|
- Arline Daniel
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Mathematics 30 Spring Semester, 003 Notes on the angle of parallelism c W. Taylor, 003 In these notes we will outline a proof of Lobachevskiĭ s main equation for the angle of parallelism, namely ( ) Π(y) () tan e Ky. (See Theorem on page 4 below.) The proof will invoke the following assumptions, which we probably will not have the time to prove.. The function Π is differentiable at zero. Thus Π (0) is a well-defined number, clearly < 0. We define K Π (0); for any given plane, K is a (non-negative) constant for that plane. So for the rest of our deduction, we think of K as a constant. This is the K that appears in Equation ().. There are constants R > 0 and D > 0 such that, if ABC is a right triangle with hypotenuse of length c D, then (a) ABC has defect δ < Rc. (b) BC c sin( A) < Rc. 3. lim y 0 Π(y) π/. (This is the first thing proved in Theorem 3. on page 8. It essentially requires Theorem 3.0 on the previous page.) Geometric derivation of a differential equation. In order to derive a differential equation for the angle of parallelism Π(y), we will evaluate its derivative Π (y) through consideration of a certain construction (which takes place in neutral geometry). Let us be given a directed line m and a point F on m. On the perpendicular to m choose points P and P as indicated, () P α E y γ β P α y m F l l Ω
2 so that F P y, F P y + y. Let directed lines l and l be asymptotic to P and P through P and P, respectively. (The common asymptotic direction of l, l and m is denoted Ω in Diagram ().) Thus (3) Π(y) α and Π(y + y) α. Let E be the foot of P on l. It will be left as an exercise to show that E is interior to P P l, and hence that (4) α + β + γ π, where β and γ are as indicated in the diagram. We also know that (5) α + γ + π/ π δ, where δ is the defect of the right triangle P P E. Subtracting Equation (4) from Equation (5), we easily obtain (6) Π(y + y) Π(y) α α β π/ δ. By the transitivity of the asymptotic relation, l is asymptotic to l at P. Since E is the foot of P on l, β must be the angle of parallelism for the segment P E; thus, by Assumption b, for sufficiently small y, we have (7) β Π( P E ) Π( y sin α + Q( y)), where Q( y) < R y. Since Π is differentiable at zero (Assumption ), we have Π(x) Π(0) + xπ (0) + xe(x) (8) π Kx + xe(x), where E(x) is a quantity that approaches zero with x. Applying (8) to the right-hand side of (7), we have β π K( y sin α + Q( y)) + ( y sin α + Q( y))e( y sin α + Q( y)) (9) π K sin α y + y G( y), where G(x) is a quantity that approaches zero with x. Combining Equations (6) and (9) we obtain and so (0) Π(y + y) Π(y) K sin α y + y G( y) δ, Π(y + y) Π(y) y K sin α + G( y) δ y. We now consider the limit of Equation (0) as y approaches 0. By continuity, α Π(y + y) approaches α, and so sin α approaches sin α. We
3 already know that G( y) approaches 0, and it is immediate from Assumption a that δ/ y approaches 0. Therefore () Π (y) We have thus proved Π(y + y) Π(y) lim y 0 y K sin α. Theorem. For any plane P, the angle-of-parallelism function Π is differentiable, and there is a non-negative constant K such that Π satisfies the differential equation 3 () Π (y) K sin(π(y)). It is now our objective to solve this differential equation. More precisely, we will show that Lobachevskiĭ s formula () yields the unique solution of () that satisfies Π(0) π/. Solution of the differential equation (). The trigonometric identity sin θ sin θ cos θ, with θ Π(y)/, converts Equation () to Π (y) K sin Π(y) ( cos Π(y) K cos Π(y) sin Π(y) cos Π(y) Multiplying both sides of this equation by sec Π(y), we see that ( ) ( ) Π(y) Π(y) (3) sec Π (y) K tan. We now make the substitution u(y) tan(π(y)/). It is not hard to see that the left-hand side of the differential equation (3) is du/dy. Therefore, we may proceed to integrate (3) as follows: (4) ) du dy Ku d dy (eky u) e Ky ( du dy + Ku) 0 e Ky u A u A e Ky ( ) Π(y) tan A e Ky, where A in the third line is a constant of integration. Now the value of A is easily determined by the fact (Assumption 3) that we must have Π(0) π/. If we substitute the initial conditions y 0, Π(y) π/ into.
4 4 Equation (4), we easily obtain tan π/ A e 0 A; hence A. Now Lobachevskiĭ s Equation () is immediate from (4): Theorem. For any plane P, there is a non-negative constant K such that the angle of parallelism Π(y) satisfies Lobachevskiĭ s Equation ( ) Π(y) ( ) tan e Ky. The first mention of Equation () in our textbook is in Equation (6. ) on page 9. It has a proof there, based on a long theory of co-ordinates on horocycles. It is worth noting the general shape of Π(x) that is implied by Theorem. Clearly y 0 corresponds to Π(y)/ an angle of tangent, i.e. Π(y)/ π/4; thus Π(0) π/. Then as y, as long as K > 0, the negative exponential function approaches 0, and so Π(y)/ is an angle whose tangent is approaching 0. In other words, in hyperbolic geometry, Π(y) 0 as y. (This is one of the conclusions of Theorem 3. on page 8.) Corollary 3. (Hyperbolic geometry, i.e. K > 0.) Let l be a directed line and m a line. There exists a directed line l that meets m at right angles and is asymptotic to l. Proof. Let A be a point on m, and let l be the unique directed line through A that is parallel to l. If l is perpendicular to m at A, then we may take l to be l and be done. Otherwise, there is a point Q on m such that AQ makes an acute angle α with l. Now let a be such that e Ka tan(α/), i.e., let a (/K) log tan(α/). It follows from Theorem that α is the angle of parallelism for a. Let B be the point on AQ with AB a, and let l be the line perpendicular to m at B. Since α is the angle of parallelism for a, we must l asymptotic to l through B. By transitivity, l is asymptotic to l, and therefore is as desired. The value of K. The theory does not tell us a value of K. Clearly, if K 0 then Π(y) π/ for every y, and the plane is Euclidean. If K 0, then Π(y) < π/ for all y > 0, and the plane is hyperbolic. In other words, neutral geometry does not imply a value of K. In fact, any value of K 0 leads to a consistent theory. (This was the great discovery of Bolyai, Gauss, Lobachevskiĭ and Beltrami.) In fact, concerning planes in the world where we live, there is no experiment that can distinguish the Euclidean case (with K 0) from the non-euclidean case with very small K 0. If, for instance, K is so small that K ( parsec) is less than e.g..000, then no instrument or measurement can distinguish our geometry from Euclidean geometry.
5 5 In Equation () (with K > 0) we encounter a feature that plays no role in Euclidean geometry, namely the dependence of K on the unit of length. This dependence is inherent in the simple fact that one can change the unit of length without changing any angles. (Axiomatically, this means that if all distance are multiplied by a fixed factor, and angles are left alone, the axioms will still hold.) Thus the left-hand side of Equation () which involves only the angle α Π(y) is invariant under any change of unit length. Since () is an equation, the quantity Ka appearing on the righthand side must also be invariant under such a change. A change in unit length will of course change a, and this change must obviously result in an inversely proportional change in K. If one likes, one can think of K as implying a new unit of length, which we might (temporarily) call the Lob after Lobachevskiĭ K Lobs equal one ordinary unit of length. Now, if L is the length in Lobs of segment P F of diagram, then its length a in ordinary units is a L/K; thus tan α e Ka e L, and K is not apparent in the relationship between L and α. For the rest of these notes, we assume that we are working in a particular plane, and hence that K can be considered fixed. Most of our conclusions will involve the constant K. A slight generalization of Lobachevskiĭ s Equation. Theorem was the special case of Theorem 4 (just below) that has ψ π/. Here we give the easy derivation for the general case. A φ (5) a B Q ψ n l m Ω Theorem 4. Let l and m be asymptotic directed lines, A a point on l and B a point on m. Let ψ be the measure of BA m, let φ be the measure of AB l, and let a be the length of segment AB (as diagrammed by the solid
6 6 lines in (5)). Then a, φ and ψ are related by (6) tan φ tan ψ e Ka. Proof. The Euclidean version is easily proved (e.g. using co-ordinate geometry), and so we will present only the hyperbolic version. Let Q denote a point on AB, and n the directed line perpendicular to AB at Q and directed to the same side of AB as are l and m. By Corollary 3, we may choose Q so that n is asymptotic to l and m. There are now three cases: (i) Q between A and B, (ii) A between B and Q, and (iii) B between A and Q. We prove only case (i), leaving the other two to the reader. (In fact cases (ii) and (iii) have similar proofs, so the reader need only check case (ii).) In diagram (5), one may make two applications of Theorem : tan φ e K AQ ; tan ψ e K QB. Multiplying these equations together yields tan φ tan ψ e K( AQ + QB ) e Ka, where the last equation used the fact that Q is between A and B. A development of hyperbolic trigonometry from Lobachevskiĭ s Equation. Consider a right triangle ABC, with right angle at C, angles of measure α and β at A and B, respectively, and side-lengths a, b and c, as indicated in Diagram (7) below. (7) B a C β c b α A We shall prove that the various quantities in this right triangle satisfy four laws: the hyperbolic counterpart to the cosine as a ratio: (8) tanh Ka cos β tanh Kc, the hyperbolic counterpart of the law of sines, (9) sin α sinh Ka sinh Kc,
7 7 the hyperbolic counterpart of the law of Pythagoras, (0) cosh Kc cosh Ka cosh Kb, and and a new law which has no serious counterpart in Euclidean geometry: () tan α tan β cosh Kc. In Equations (8 ) cosh x and sinh x are the hyperbolic functions cosh x ex + e x ; sinh x ex e x. In fact, we prove (8 ) in reverse order, so we begin with (). The law tan α tan β / cosh Kc. As depicted in Diagram () just below, let us augment our picture of ABC with an auxiliary directed line l that is asymptotic to the ray CA through B; we let θ be the measure of the angle BA l. B β θ l () a c C b α π α A Applying Equation (6) to the right side of this diagram, we immediately have which is easily transformed to tan θ tan π α e Kc, (3) tan θ e Kc tan α. For a second equation involving θ and α, we augment the previous picture by reflecting segments AC and AB in the vertical line BC, as indicated in
8 8 the following diagram: B (4) c β β θ l A α C A An application of Equation (6) to Diagram (4) yields tan α ( tan β + θ ) e Kc, which immediately leads to ( tan β + θ ) (5) e Kc tan(α/). At this point the reader is asked to recall the addition formula for the tangent function: tan u + tan v tan(u + v) tan u tan v. It will be used twice in the next calculation. We eliminate θ from Equations (3) and (5) with the following calculation: tan(β + θ/) tan(θ/) tan β + tan(θ/) tan(β + θ/) e Kc tan(α/) e Kc tan(α/) + e Kc e Kc [tan(α/)] tan(α/) + e Kc e Kc tan (α/) + e Kc tan(α/) cosh Kc tan α. We now immediately obtain ( ) tan α tan β cosh Kc.
9 The law of Pythagoras, hyperbolic version. Let F denote the foot of C on AB. We know (e.g. by the Exterior Angle Theorem) that F is between A and B, as in the following diagram. 9 B a C β F c δ γ α b A Thus the angle measures denoted γ and δ in the diagram add to a right angle. Therefore, by well-known properties of the tangent function, (6) tan γ tan δ. Three applications of () and one application of (6) yield (0 ) cosh Ka cosh Kb tan β tan δ tan β tan α cosh Kc. tan γ tan α Note that (0) is derived in our textbook as (6.3-6) on page 97. Connections with the original theorem of Pythagoras. The power series for the hyperbolic cosine is cosh x + x + 4 x4 + + (n)! xn +. To see what (0) says in the Euclidean case, we apply this power series to each instance of the cosh that appears in (0), thereby obtaining + K c + ( + K a + ) ( + K b + ) + K a + K b +, where the dots represent terms that have fourth and higher powers of K. Thus c a + b +, where the dots now represent terms that are quadratic or higher in K. Thus the ordinary law of Pythagoras, c a + b, may be seen as a limiting form of (0) as K 0 (the Euclidean case).
10 0 Review of some ordinary trigonometry: (7) sin λ tan λ + tan λ ; (8) (9) cos λ tan λ + tan λ ; tan λ tan λ tan λ. Notice now, for instance, that Lobachevskiĭ s Equation for the angle of parallelism can now be presented as tan Π(a) tan Π(a)/ tan Π(a)/ (30) e Ka e Ka e Ka e Ka sinh Ka. Hyperbolic version of the law of sines (9). In Diagram (), we note that β + θ is the angle of parallelism for the length a. Thus by (30), we have (3) tan(β + θ) sinh Ka. From (3) and (9) we immediately obtain (3) tan θ tan(θ/) tan (θ/) e Kc tan(α/) e Kc tan (α/). Now comes a long calculation; to simplify, in this calculation we will abbreviate tan(α/) by t and e Kc by f. Our strategy is this: in (3) we already have one calculation of tan(β+θ). Thus we will make a second calculation of tan(β +θ) using () and (3), and then equate the two values of tan(β +θ).
11 Here goes: tan(β + θ) tan β + tan θ tan β tan θ cosh Kc tan α + ft f t ft cosh Kc tan α f t f t + f t + f t + f t ft f t ft f t f( t )( f t ) + ft ( + f ) t( + f )( f t ) f( t )t f f t f t + f t + t + f t 4 + f t f f 4 t ( + t )( + f t ) ( f )( + f t ) f t + t f (33) + t t f f sin α sinh Kc (where the last line used (7)). Equating (3) and (33), we then have (9 ) sinh Ka sin α sin α sinh Ka sinh Kc. sinh Kc Hyperbolic version of the ratio for the cosine (8). immediate from (9) that tan sin α α sin α sinh Ka sinh Kc sinh Ka. From this equation and Equation (), we calculate tan β tan α cosh Kc sinh Kc sinh Ka sinh Ka It is almost cosh Kc
12 Therefore sec β tan β + sinh Kc sinh Ka + sinh Ka cosh Kc sinh Ka cosh Kc sinh Kc sinh Ka + sinh Ka ( + sinh Kc) sinh Ka cosh Kc (sinh Ka + ) sinh Kc sinh Ka cosh Kc cosh KA sinh Kc sinh Ka cosh Kc tanh Kc tanh Ka. From here it follows almost immediately that (8 ) cos β tanh Ka tanh Kc. Comment on Equations (8) and (9). Since sinh(x) and tanh(x) have power series that begin sinh(x) x + 6 x3 + tanh(x) x 3 x3 +, it follows immediately from Equations (8) and (9) that for small K, (8-Euclid) cos β Kb Kc b c ; (9-Euclid) sin α Ka Kc a c. Thus in the Euclidean limit, our formulas yield the well known expression for the trigonometric functions as the appropriate side-ratios in a right triangle. Moreover, from (9) we may derive a formula that is more traditionally known as the law of sines. Suppose that we have an arbitrary triangle ABC, as diagrammed in (34): (34) B β F a h α C b A
13 Let F be the foot of the perpendicular from C to AB, and let h be the length of segment CF, as noted in Diagram (34). Applying (9) to the two small triangles in Diagram (34), we see that sin α sinh Ka sinh Kh sin β sinh Kb. The same pattern applies also to c and γ as one might check in detail and so in general, for any triangle, we have (35) sin α sinh Ka sin β sinh Kb sin γ sinh Kc. Equation (35) is known as the general law of sines. In our textbook, Equations (8) and (9) appear as Equations (6.3 4b) and (6.3 4a), respectively, on page 96. The general law of sines (35) may be seen on page Side-Angle-Side reconsidered. As we easily recall, the SAS axiom states, for triangles A B C and A B C, that if segments A B and B C are congruent, respectively, to A B and B C, and if A B C is congruent to A B C, then all six corresponding parts (three segments and three angles) of the two triangles are congruent. In stating this axiom, it is implicitly understood that we are speaking of triangles A B C and A B C that lie in the same plane P. This is because, in fact, the axioms refer to what happens within a single plane. This is a point that we almost always ignore mostly because for much of our work the issue does not arise, but also because (historically) we were stuck in the idea that geometry is merely a description of the one and only space in which we live. In discussing hyperbolic geometry, however, we are forced to consider the possibility that more than one sort of plane might make sense. If we, however cautiously, entertain the idea that hyperbolic geometry is consistent (something we shall later prove), then we are tacitly assuming that there are at least two planes possible, a Euclidean one and a non-euclidean one. Now, faced with the existence of more than one plane, we might ask, Does SAS hold between planes? More precisely, suppose that A B C and A B C satisfy the aforementioned hypotheses of SAS, but with the points taken from two different planes P and P A, B, C P and A, B, C P ; can we then conclude that the two triangles are congruent? In fact, we already know enough about geometry to give an easy answer of No! to this question. If P is Euclidean and P is hyperbolic, then no triangle of P is congruent to any triangle of P. The simplest reason here is simply that all triangles in P have defect zero, and all triangles in P have non-zero defect. With slightly more work, we may also see that the answer is no if P and P are hyperbolic planes with distinct values of the constant K. Suppose for instance that K is the value of K for P, and K is the value of K for
14 4 P, with K K. Suppose we had congruent right triangles A B C and A B C (right angles at C and C ), lying in the two planes P and P. From Equation () it is immediate that cosh K c tan α tan β cosh K c, where c is the common length of segments A B and A B, α is the common measure of the angles at A and A, and β is the common measure of the angles at B and B. The absurdity of this equation for K K shows that no right triangle of P can be congruent to a triangle of P. The result for general triangles is a short step away; we omit the details. With that background, we now state and prove Theorem 5. (SAS for triangles in planes of the same K). Suppose that P and P are hyperbolic planes with the same value K valid in both. If A B C P and A B C P satisfy the hypotheses of SAS, namely that A B and B C are congruent, respectively, to A B and B C, and that A B C is congruent to A B C, then the two triangles are congruent. Proof. Suppose without loss of generality that A B B C. Let F be the foot of the perpendicular from C to A B, and perform a similar construction of F in P. Clearly F lies between A and B and ray C F is interior to the angle at C. We first prove that F B C F B C. Applying Equation (8) to F B C and F B C, and using the given congruences, yields tanh K B F cos( A B C ) tanh K B C cos( A B C ) tanh K B C tanh K B F. Since the tanh function is one-one, we now have (36) B F B F. A similar calculation using (9) yields (37) C F C F. To complete the congruence of F B C and F B C, we apply (9) to yield sin( B C F ) sinh K B F sinh K B C sinh K B F sinh K B C sin( B C F ). Since the sine function is one-one on the interval [0, π], we now have (38) B C F B C F.
15 We shall now prove that the right triangles A F C and A F C are congruent. We have congruence for the leg C F in Equation (37). Congruence for the leg A F may be found by subtracting (36) from the given congruence A B A B to yield (39) A F A F. The parts of A F C for which we still need to prove a congruence are the hypotenuse C A and the two acute angles F A C and F C A. For the hypotenuse, we apply (0) to the right triangles A F C and A F C, using (37) and (39), to yield cosh K C A cosh K C F cosh K F A cosh K C F cosh K F A cosh K C A. Since cosh x is one-to-one for positive x, we have (40) C A C A. Now that we have all the corresponding sides of A F C and A F C congruent, their two acute angle can be handled with Equation (9), much as we did in proving (37); we skip the details. Finally, since we began with F interior to the angle at C (and correspondingly in the plane P ), we have (4) and (4) B A B F + F A B F + F A B A C rad B C F rad + F C A rad B C F rad + F C A rad C rad. Now the congruence of F B C and F B C is contained in Equations (40), (4) and (4). One should especially notice that although we made use of the important Equations (8), (9) and (0), the exact form of these equations was immaterial to the argument. In this context, the significant feature of these equations is simply that there is some definite formulas of this type (i.e. relating various angles and sides) are true generally in the geometry, not depending on which particular plane is under consideration. Another way to say it is this: on page 5 our text defines a function φ(a, b, γ) which tells the length of the third side of a triangle, given sides a and b and the angle γ between those sides. It is pointed out there that the SAS axiom guarantees the existence of a φ(a, b, γ) that is valid for all triangles. Theorem 5 says that, moreover, one φ(a, b, γ) is valid for all triangles in all planes that have a fixed K-value. 5
16 6 The isomorphism of two hyperbolic planes. Suppose that H and H are hyperbolic planes that share one value of K. We will use Theorem 5 to prove that H and H are isomorphic. A function F :H H is called an isomorphism of planes if (i) F is a bijection. (ii) F preserves distances; i.e. if A, B H, then AB F (A)F (B). (iii) F preserves angles; i.e. if A, B and C are non-collinear points of H, then ABC rad F (A)F (B)F (C) rad It can be proved that under these hypotheses, we also have (iv) F preserves halfplanes. (v) F preserves rays. (vi) F preserves segments. (vii) F preserves asymptotically parallel rays. If there exists an isomorphism F : H H, then H and H are said to be isomorphic. Remarks like those prior to Theorem 5 make it clear that hyperbolic planes with different K-values are not isomorphic. In the remaining cases, we do have isomorphism: Theorem 6. (N. I. Lobachevskiĭ) Any two hyperbolic planes with the same value of K are isomorphic. Proof. Let H and H be such planes. We proceed to construct the desired F. Let S be a half-plane of H, let r be a ray in H that lies in the edge of S, and let A be the vertex of r. Similarly let S be a half-plane of H, let r be a ray in H that lies in the edge of S, and let A be the vertex of r. To begin the definition of F, we let F (A ) A. Now suppose X A ; we will define F (X) using a sort of polar coordinate system like those that are found in our textbook. Consider the ray A X. Case A X lies in the half-plane S. By Axiom 5, there is a unique ray s emanating from A in the half-plane S such that angles r A X and r s have the same measure. There is a unique point Y on s such that A Y A X. We then define F (X) to be this Y. Case A X lies in the half-plane opposite to S. Similar to Case, except that we must locate s in the half-plane opposite to S. Case 3 A X lies in the edge of S. (I.e. A X is either the ray r or its opposite ray.) We leave it to the reader to see how F (X) should be
17 defined in this case. We may now consider that F (X) has been defined for every X. We leave the proof that F is a bijection as an exercise. It remains to prove that F preserves both distances and angles. We first observe that F preserves angles at A ; this is almost immediate from the definition, and we omit the details. Next, it is not hard to see that F preserves distances along any line that passes through A ; we omit the details. We next prove that F preserves all distances, i.e. that B C B C whenever B, C H and B, C are defined as B F (B ) and C F (C ). By the previous paragraph, we need only prove this in the case that A, B and C are non-collinear, i.e. that they form the vertices of a triangle. It is now obvious that A B C and A B C satisfy the hypotheses of SAS: A B A B and A C A C because F preserves distances along lines through A. Moreover, as we said before, angles at A are preserved by F, and so for these triangles, A A. Therefore by Theorem 5, we have B C B C. Thus all distances are preserved. The proof that all angles are preserved will be left as an exercise for the reader. Here I should like to point out and acknowledge that Theorem 6 illustrates a trend in twentieth-century mathematics, that of classifying mathematical objects. Here the (potentially wild) collection of all planes is tamed by being classified according to a single real parameter, namely K. It s like classifying shoes up to size, but much more thorough. Shoes of the same size may still have interesting differences between them. But planes of the same K are the same according to all geometrically interesting properties. In fact the classification can be made even simpler, as follows. In fact, if K is the relevant constant for a hyperbolic plane P, then P can be changed to a plane with constant K, simply by changing all lengths by a factor K /K. Therefore, in fact, all hyperbolic planes are isomorphic to one another if we are allowed to re-scale lengths. Now here is where the real mystery or challenge begins. If there is really only one hyperbolic plane H, then anything we discover (such as any equation in this report) can be viewed as part of a description of H. If our description is sufficiently complete, we might expect to be able to actually describe H to the point of saying what H is. Slowly this realization dawned on the early workers in the field. It turns out for a full construction of H it is more efficient to start over in a slightly different way, but these facts will not be forgotten. 7
Mathematics 3210 Spring Semester, 2005 Homework notes, part 8 April 15, 2005
Mathematics 3210 Spring Semester, 2005 Homework notes, part 8 April 15, 2005 The underlying assumption for all problems is that all points, lines, etc., are taken within the Poincaré plane (or Poincaré
More informationPlease note that, as always, these notes are really not complete without diagrams. I have included a few, but the others are up to you.
Mathematics 3210 Spring Semester, 2005 Homework notes, part 6 March 18, 2005 lease note that, as always, these notes are really not complete without diagrams. I have included a few, but the others are
More informationMORE EXERCISES FOR SECTIONS II.1 AND II.2. There are drawings on the next two pages to accompany the starred ( ) exercises.
Math 133 Winter 2013 MORE EXERCISES FOR SECTIONS II.1 AND II.2 There are drawings on the next two pages to accompany the starred ( ) exercises. B1. Let L be a line in R 3, and let x be a point which does
More informationNeutral Geometry. October 25, c 2009 Charles Delman
Neutral Geometry October 25, 2009 c 2009 Charles Delman Taking Stock: where we have been; where we are going Set Theory & Logic Terms of Geometry: points, lines, incidence, betweenness, congruence. Incidence
More information13 Spherical geometry
13 Spherical geometry Let ABC be a triangle in the Euclidean plane. From now on, we indicate the interior angles A = CAB, B = ABC, C = BCA at the vertices merely by A, B, C. The sides of length a = BC
More information2 Recollection of elementary functions. II
Recollection of elementary functions. II Last updated: October 5, 08. In this section we continue recollection of elementary functions. In particular, we consider exponential, trigonometric and hyperbolic
More information8. Hyperbolic triangles
8. Hyperbolic triangles Note: This year, I m not doing this material, apart from Pythagoras theorem, in the lectures (and, as such, the remainder isn t examinable). I ve left the material as Lecture 8
More informationHyperbolic Geometry Solutions
Hyperbolic Geometry Solutions LAMC November 11, 2018 Problem 1.3. b) By Power of a Point (Problem 1.1) we have ON OM = OA 2 = r 2, so each orthogonal circle is fixed under inversion. c) Lines through O,
More information4.3 TRIGONOMETRY EXTENDED: THE CIRCULAR FUNCTIONS
4.3 TRIGONOMETRY EXTENDED: THE CIRCULAR FUNCTIONS MR. FORTIER 1. Trig Functions of Any Angle We now extend the definitions of the six basic trig functions beyond triangles so that we do not have to restrict
More informationChapter 3. Betweenness (ordering) A system satisfying the incidence and betweenness axioms is an ordered incidence plane (p. 118).
Chapter 3 Betweenness (ordering) Point B is between point A and point C is a fundamental, undefined concept. It is abbreviated A B C. A system satisfying the incidence and betweenness axioms is an ordered
More informationEUCLIDEAN AND HYPERBOLIC CONDITIONS
EUCLIDEAN AND HYPERBOLIC CONDITIONS MATH 410. SPRING 2007. INSTRUCTOR: PROFESSOR AITKEN The first goal of this handout is to show that, in Neutral Geometry, Euclid s Fifth Postulate is equivalent to the
More informationHyperbolic Analytic Geometry
Chapter 6 Hyperbolic Analytic Geometry 6.1 Saccheri Quadrilaterals Recall the results on Saccheri quadrilaterals from Chapter 4. Let S be a convex quadrilateral in which two adjacent angles are right angles.
More informationDefinitions, Axioms, Postulates, Propositions, and Theorems from Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries by Marvin Jay Greenberg
Definitions, Axioms, Postulates, Propositions, and Theorems from Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries by Marvin Jay Greenberg Undefined Terms: Point, Line, Incident, Between, Congruent. Incidence Axioms:
More informationDefinitions, Axioms, Postulates, Propositions, and Theorems from Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries by Marvin Jay Greenberg ( )
Definitions, Axioms, Postulates, Propositions, and Theorems from Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries by Marvin Jay Greenberg (2005-02-16) Logic Rules (Greenberg): Logic Rule 1 Allowable justifications.
More informationDefinitions, Axioms, Postulates, Propositions, and Theorems from Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries by Marvin Jay Greenberg ( )
Definitions, Axioms, Postulates, Propositions, and Theorems from Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries by Marvin Jay Greenberg (2009-03-26) Logic Rule 0 No unstated assumptions may be used in a proof.
More informationMonday, 6 th October 2008
MA211 Lecture 9: 2nd order differential eqns Monday, 6 th October 2008 MA211 Lecture 9: 2nd order differential eqns 1/19 Class test next week... MA211 Lecture 9: 2nd order differential eqns 2/19 This morning
More informationAnswer Key. 7.1 Tangent Ratio. Chapter 7 Trigonometry. CK-12 Geometry Honors Concepts 1. Answers
7.1 Tangent Ratio 1. Right triangles with 40 angles have two pairs of congruent angles and therefore are similar. This means that the ratio of the opposite leg to adjacent leg is constant for all 40 right
More informationEUCLIDEAN, SPHERICAL AND HYPERBOLIC TRIGONOMETRY
EUCLIDEAN, SPHERICAL AND HYPERBOLIC TRIGONOMETRY SVANTE JANSON Abstract. This is a collection of some standard formulae from Euclidean, spherical and hyperbolic trigonometry, including some standard models
More informationVectors. A vector is usually denoted in bold, like vector a, or sometimes it is denoted a, or many other deviations exist in various text books.
Vectors A Vector has Two properties Magnitude and Direction. That s a weirder concept than you think. A Vector does not necessarily start at a given point, but can float about, but still be the SAME vector.
More informationTrigonometric ratios:
0 Trigonometric ratios: The six trigonometric ratios of A are: Sine Cosine Tangent sin A = opposite leg hypotenuse adjacent leg cos A = hypotenuse tan A = opposite adjacent leg leg and their inverses:
More informationThe Integers. Math 3040: Spring Contents 1. The Basic Construction 1 2. Adding integers 4 3. Ordering integers Multiplying integers 12
Math 3040: Spring 2011 The Integers Contents 1. The Basic Construction 1 2. Adding integers 4 3. Ordering integers 11 4. Multiplying integers 12 Before we begin the mathematics of this section, it is worth
More informationExercises for Unit V (Introduction to non Euclidean geometry)
Exercises for Unit V (Introduction to non Euclidean geometry) V.1 : Facts from spherical geometry Ryan : pp. 84 123 [ Note : Hints for the first two exercises are given in math133f07update08.pdf. ] 1.
More informationThe Integers. Peter J. Kahn
Math 3040: Spring 2009 The Integers Peter J. Kahn Contents 1. The Basic Construction 1 2. Adding integers 6 3. Ordering integers 16 4. Multiplying integers 18 Before we begin the mathematics of this section,
More informationFoundations of Neutral Geometry
C H A P T E R 12 Foundations of Neutral Geometry The play is independent of the pages on which it is printed, and pure geometries are independent of lecture rooms, or of any other detail of the physical
More informationMAT1035 Analytic Geometry
MAT1035 Analytic Geometry Lecture Notes R.A. Sabri Kaan Gürbüzer Dokuz Eylül University 2016 2 Contents 1 Review of Trigonometry 5 2 Polar Coordinates 7 3 Vectors in R n 9 3.1 Located Vectors..............................................
More information7.5 Partial Fractions and Integration
650 CHPTER 7. DVNCED INTEGRTION TECHNIQUES 7.5 Partial Fractions and Integration In this section we are interested in techniques for computing integrals of the form P(x) dx, (7.49) Q(x) where P(x) and
More informationMath 1230, Notes 2. Aug. 28, Math 1230, Notes 2 Aug. 28, / 17
Math 1230, Notes 2 Aug. 28, 2014 Math 1230, Notes 2 Aug. 28, 2014 1 / 17 This fills in some material between pages 10 and 11 of notes 1. We first discuss the relation between geometry and the quadratic
More information2 Trigonometric functions
Theodore Voronov. Mathematics 1G1. Autumn 014 Trigonometric functions Trigonometry provides methods to relate angles and lengths but the functions we define have many other applications in mathematics..1
More informationMathematics 308 Geometry. Chapter 2. Elementary coordinate geometry
Mathematics 308 Geometry Chapter 2. Elementary coordinate geometry Using a computer to produce pictures requires translating geometry to numbers, which is carried out through a coordinate system. Through
More informationAlgebra 1B. Unit 9. Algebraic Roots and Radicals. Student Reading Guide. and. Practice Problems
Name: Date: Period: Algebra 1B Unit 9 Algebraic Roots and Radicals Student Reading Guide and Practice Problems Contents Page Number Lesson 1: Simplifying Non-Perfect Square Radicands 2 Lesson 2: Radical
More informationCHAPTER 1. DIFFERENTIATION 18. As x 1, f(x). At last! We are now in a position to sketch the curve; see Figure 1.4.
CHAPTER. DIFFERENTIATION 8 and similarly for x, As x +, fx), As x, fx). At last! We are now in a position to sketch the curve; see Figure.4. Figure.4: A sketch of the function y = fx) =/x ). Observe the
More informationHonors 213 / Math 300. Second Hour Exam. Name
Honors 213 / Math 300 Second Hour Exam Name Monday, March 6, 2006 95 points (will be adjusted to 100 pts in the gradebook) Page 1 I. Some definitions (5 points each). Give formal definitions of the following:
More information15 x. Substitute. Multiply. Add. Find the positive square root.
hapter Review.1 The Pythagorean Theorem (pp. 3 70) Dynamic Solutions available at igideasmath.com Find the value of. Then tell whether the side lengths form a Pythagorean triple. c 2 = a 2 + b 2 Pythagorean
More informationMidterm 1 Review. Distance = (x 1 x 0 ) 2 + (y 1 y 0 ) 2.
Midterm 1 Review Comments about the midterm The midterm will consist of five questions and will test on material from the first seven lectures the material given below. No calculus either single variable
More informationGiven an arc of length s on a circle of radius r, the radian measure of the central angle subtended by the arc is given by θ = s r :
Given an arc of length s on a circle of radius r, the radian measure of the central angle subtended by the arc is given by θ = s r : To convert from radians (rad) to degrees ( ) and vice versa, use the
More informationMATH 109 TOPIC 3 RIGHT TRIANGLE TRIGONOMETRY. 3a. Right Triangle Definitions of the Trigonometric Functions
Math 09 Ta-Right Triangle Trigonometry Review Page MTH 09 TOPIC RIGHT TRINGLE TRIGONOMETRY a. Right Triangle Definitions of the Trigonometric Functions a. Practice Problems b. 5 5 90 and 0 60 90 Triangles
More informationMAT 3271: Selected solutions to problem set 7
MT 3271: Selected solutions to problem set 7 Chapter 3, Exercises: 16. Consider the Real ffine Plane (that is what the text means by the usual Euclidean model ), which is a model of incidence geometry.
More informationGiven an arc of length s on a circle of radius r, the radian measure of the central angle subtended by the arc is given by θ = s r :
Given an arc of length s on a circle of radius r, the radian measure of the central angle subtended by the arc is given by θ = s r : To convert from radians (rad) to degrees ( ) and vice versa, use the
More information1.1 Line Reflections and Point Reflections
1.1 Line Reflections and Point Reflections Since this is a book on Transformation Geometry, we shall start by defining transformations of the Euclidean plane and giving basic examples. Definition 1. A
More informationMath F15 Rahman
Math - 9 F5 Rahman Week3 7.3 Hyperbolic Functions Hyperbolic functions are similar to trigonometric functions, and have the following definitions: sinh x = (ex e x ) cosh x = (ex + e x ) tanh x = sinh
More informationChapter 06: Analytic Trigonometry
Chapter 06: Analytic Trigonometry 6.1: Inverse Trigonometric Functions The Problem As you recall from our earlier work, a function can only have an inverse function if it is oneto-one. Are any of our trigonometric
More information14.4. Lengths of Curves and Surfaces of Revolution. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
Lengths of Curves and Surfaces of Revolution 4.4 Introduction Integration can be used to find the length of a curve and the area of the surface generated when a curve is rotated around an axis. In this
More information6.2. The Hyperbolic Functions. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
The Hyperbolic Functions 6. Introduction The hyperbolic functions cosh x, sinh x, tanh x etc are certain combinations of the exponential functions e x and e x. The notation implies a close relationship
More informationENGINEERING MATH 1 Fall 2009 VECTOR SPACES
ENGINEERING MATH 1 Fall 2009 VECTOR SPACES A vector space, more specifically, a real vector space (as opposed to a complex one or some even stranger ones) is any set that is closed under an operation of
More informationMath 200 University of Connecticut
RELATIVISTIC ADDITION AND REAL ADDITION KEITH CONRAD Math 200 University of Connecticut Date: Aug. 31, 2005. RELATIVISTIC ADDITION AND REAL ADDITION 1 1. Introduction For three particles P, Q, R travelling
More informationMathematics Revision Questions for the University of Bristol School of Physics
Mathematics Revision Questions for the University of Bristol School of Physics You will not be surprised to find you have to use a lot of maths in your stu of physics at university! You need to be completely
More information7.1. Calculus of inverse functions. Text Section 7.1 Exercise:
Contents 7. Inverse functions 1 7.1. Calculus of inverse functions 2 7.2. Derivatives of exponential function 4 7.3. Logarithmic function 6 7.4. Derivatives of logarithmic functions 7 7.5. Exponential
More informationCongruence Axioms. Data Required for Solving Oblique Triangles
Math 335 Trigonometry Sec 7.1: Oblique Triangles and the Law of Sines In section 2.4, we solved right triangles. We now extend the concept to all triangles. Congruence Axioms Side-Angle-Side SAS Angle-Side-Angle
More informationTest #1 Geometry MAT 4263
Test #1 Geometry MAT 4263 I. Consider some of the differences and similarities among the three geometries we looked at with respect to each of the following: 1) geodesics (line segments) 2) triangles (appearance,
More informationChennai Mathematical Institute B.Sc Physics Mathematical methods Lecture 1: Introduction to complex algebra
Chennai Mathematical Institute B.Sc Physics Mathematical methods Lecture 1: Introduction to complex algebra A Thyagaraja January, 2009 AT p.1/12 1. Real numbers The set of all real numbers (hereafter denoted
More informationUNDETERMINED COEFFICIENTS SUPERPOSITION APPROACH *
4.4 UNDETERMINED COEFFICIENTS SUPERPOSITION APPROACH 19 Discussion Problems 59. Two roots of a cubic auxiliary equation with real coeffi cients are m 1 1 and m i. What is the corresponding homogeneous
More informationLecture 9. = 1+z + 2! + z3. 1 = 0, it follows that the radius of convergence of (1) is.
The Exponential Function Lecture 9 The exponential function 1 plays a central role in analysis, more so in the case of complex analysis and is going to be our first example using the power series method.
More informationDifferential and Integral Calculus
School of science an engineering El Akhawayn University Monay, March 31 st, 2008 Outline 1 Definition of hyperbolic functions: The hyperbolic cosine an the hyperbolic sine of the real number x are enote
More information7.1 Projections and Components
7. Projections and Components As we have seen, the dot product of two vectors tells us the cosine of the angle between them. So far, we have only used this to find the angle between two vectors, but cosines
More informationAs we know, the three basic trigonometric functions are as follows: Figure 1
Trigonometry Basic Functions As we know, the three basic trigonometric functions are as follows: sin θ = cos θ = opposite hypotenuse adjacent hypotenuse tan θ = opposite adjacent Where θ represents an
More information5.7 Justifying the Laws
SECONDARY MATH III // MODULE 5 The Pythagorean theorem makes a claim about the relationship between the areas of the three squares drawn on the sides of a right triangle: the sum of the area of the squares
More information(1) Recap of Differential Calculus and Integral Calculus (2) Preview of Calculus in three dimensional space (3) Tools for Calculus 3
Math 127 Introduction and Review (1) Recap of Differential Calculus and Integral Calculus (2) Preview of Calculus in three dimensional space (3) Tools for Calculus 3 MATH 127 Introduction to Calculus III
More informationCalculus: Early Transcendental Functions Lecture Notes for Calculus 101. Feras Awad Mahmoud
Calculus: Early Transcendental Functions Lecture Notes for Calculus 101 Feras Awad Mahmoud Last Updated: August 2, 2012 1 2 Feras Awad Mahmoud Department of Basic Sciences Philadelphia University JORDAN
More informationOlympiad Correspondence Problems. Set 3
(solutions follow) 1998-1999 Olympiad Correspondence Problems Set 3 13. The following construction and proof was proposed for trisecting a given angle with ruler and Criticizecompasses the arguments. Construction.
More informationPYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES KEITH CONRAD
PYTHAGOREAN TRIPLES KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction A Pythagorean triple is a triple of positive integers (a, b, c) where a + b = c. Examples include (3, 4, 5), (5, 1, 13), and (8, 15, 17). Below is an ancient
More informationHigher Geometry Problems
Higher Geometry Problems (1) Look up Eucidean Geometry on Wikipedia, and write down the English translation given of each of the first four postulates of Euclid. Rewrite each postulate as a clear statement
More informationTRIGONOMETRY OUTCOMES
TRIGONOMETRY OUTCOMES C10. Solve problems involving limits of trigonometric functions. C11. Apply derivatives of trigonometric functions. C12. Solve problems involving inverse trigonometric functions.
More informationACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER / Functions
ACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER 1 2017/2018 DR. ANTHONY BROWN 4. Functions 4.1. What is a Function: Domain, Codomain and Rule. In the course so far, we
More information8-2 Trigonometric Ratios
8-2 Trigonometric Ratios Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz Geometry Warm Up Write each fraction as a decimal rounded to the nearest hundredth. 1. 2. 0.67 0.29 Solve each equation. 3. 4. x = 7.25
More informationPart IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1
Part IB GEOMETRY (Lent 2016): Example Sheet 1 (a.g.kovalev@dpmms.cam.ac.uk) 1. Suppose that H is a hyperplane in Euclidean n-space R n defined by u x = c for some unit vector u and constant c. The reflection
More informationA Surprising Application of Non-Euclidean Geometry
A Surprising Application of Non-Euclidean Geometry Nicholas Reichert June 4, 2004 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Geometry 2 2.1 Arclength... 3 2.2 Central Projection.......................... 3 2.3 SidesofaTriangle...
More information5.4 Continuity: Preliminary Notions
5.4. CONTINUITY: PRELIMINARY NOTIONS 181 5.4 Continuity: Preliminary Notions 5.4.1 Definitions The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language defines continuity as an uninterrupted succession,
More informationLecture 6 SPHERICAL GEOMETRY
1 Lecture 6 SPHERICAL GEOMETRY So far we have studied finite and discrete geometries, i.e., geometries in which the main transformation group is either finite or discrete. In this lecture, we begin our
More information(, ) : R n R n R. 1. It is bilinear, meaning it s linear in each argument: that is
17 Inner products Up until now, we have only examined the properties of vectors and matrices in R n. But normally, when we think of R n, we re really thinking of n-dimensional Euclidean space - that is,
More informationELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA
ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA K. R. MATTHEWS DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND Second Online Version, December 1998 Comments to the author at krm@maths.uq.edu.au Contents 1 LINEAR EQUATIONS
More informationCHAPTER 4. APPLICATIONS AND REVIEW IN TRIGONOMETRY
CHAPTER 4. APPLICATIONS AND REVIEW IN TRIGONOMETRY In the present chapter we apply the vector algebra and the basic properties of the dot product described in the last chapter to planar geometry and trigonometry.
More informationA Stronger Triangle Inequality for Neutral Geometry
Forum Geometricorum Volume 7 (007) 5 9. FORUM GEOM ISSN 1534-1178 A Stronger Triangle Inequality for Neutral Geometry Melissa Baker and Robert C. Powers Abstract. Bailey and Bannister [College Math. Journal,
More informationThings you should have learned in Calculus II
Things you should have learned in Calculus II 1 Vectors Given vectors v = v 1, v 2, v 3, u = u 1, u 2, u 3 1.1 Common Operations Operations Notation How is it calculated Other Notation Dot Product v u
More informationComments about Chapters 4 and 5 of the Math 5335 (Geometry I) text Joel Roberts November 5, 2003; revised October 18, 2004 and October 2005
Comments about Chapters 4 and 5 of the Math 5335 (Geometry I) text Joel Roberts November 5, 2003; revised October 8, 2004 and October 2005 Contents: Heron's formula (Theorem 9 in 4.5). 4.4: Another proof
More informationY. D. Chai and Young Soo Lee
Honam Mathematical J. 34 (01), No. 1, pp. 103 111 http://dx.doi.org/10.5831/hmj.01.34.1.103 LOWER BOUND OF LENGTH OF TRIANGLE INSCRIBED IN A CIRCLE ON NON-EUCLIDEAN SPACES Y. D. Chai and Young Soo Lee
More informationPoincaré Models of Hyperbolic Geometry
Chapter 9 Poincaré Models of Hyperbolic Geometry 9.1 The Poincaré Upper Half Plane Model The next model of the hyperbolic plane that we will consider is also due to Henri Poincaré. We will be using the
More informationTopic Learning Outcomes Suggested Teaching Activities Resources On-Line Resources
UNIT 3 Trigonometry and Vectors (P1) Recommended Prior Knowledge. Students will need an understanding and proficiency in the algebraic techniques from either O Level Mathematics or IGCSE Mathematics. Context.
More informationr=1 Our discussion will not apply to negative values of r, since we make frequent use of the fact that for all non-negative numbers x and t
Chapter 2 Some Area Calculations 2.1 The Area Under a Power Function Let a be a positive number, let r be a positive number, and let S r a be the set of points (x, y) in R 2 such that 0 x a and 0 y x r.
More information5 t + t2 4. (ii) f(x) = ln(x 2 1). (iii) f(x) = e 2x 2e x + 3 4
Study Guide for Final Exam 1. You are supposed to be able to determine the domain of a function, looking at the conditions for its expression to be well-defined. Some examples of the conditions are: What
More informationEUCLID S AXIOMS A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 CN-1 CN-2 CN-3 CN-4 CN-5
EUCLID S AXIOMS In addition to the great practical value of Euclidean Geometry, the ancient Greeks also found great aesthetic value in the study of geometry. Much as children assemble a few kinds blocks
More informationMAT100 OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS AND SAMPLE PROBLEMS
MAT100 OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS AND SAMPLE PROBLEMS MAT100 is a fast-paced and thorough tour of precalculus mathematics, where the choice of topics is primarily motivated by the conceptual and technical knowledge
More information7.3 Hyperbolic Functions Hyperbolic functions are similar to trigonometric functions, and have the following
Math 2-08 Rahman Week3 7.3 Hyperbolic Functions Hyperbolic functions are similar to trigonometric functions, and have the following definitions: sinh x = 2 (ex e x ) cosh x = 2 (ex + e x ) tanh x = sinh
More informationThe Complex Numbers c ). (1.1)
The Complex Numbers In this chapter, we will study the basic properties of the field of complex numbers. We will begin with a brief historic sketch of how the study of complex numbers came to be and then
More informationHyperbolic Transformations
C H A P T E R 17 Hyperbolic Transformations Though the text of your article on Crystal Symmetry and Its Generalizations is much too learned for a simple, selfmade pattern man like me, some of the text-illustrations
More informationPythagoras Theorem. What it is: When to use: What to watch out for:
Pythagoras Theorem a + b = c Where c is the length of the hypotenuse and a and b are the lengths of the other two sides. Note: Only valid for right-angled triangles! When you know the lengths of any two
More informationDot Products. K. Behrend. April 3, Abstract A short review of some basic facts on the dot product. Projections. The spectral theorem.
Dot Products K. Behrend April 3, 008 Abstract A short review of some basic facts on the dot product. Projections. The spectral theorem. Contents The dot product 3. Length of a vector........................
More informationSum and Difference Identities
Sum and Difference Identities By: OpenStaxCollege Mount McKinley, in Denali National Park, Alaska, rises 20,237 feet (6,168 m) above sea level. It is the highest peak in North America. (credit: Daniel
More informationMA 460 Supplement: Analytic geometry
M 460 Supplement: nalytic geometry Donu rapura In the 1600 s Descartes introduced cartesian coordinates which changed the way we now do geometry. This also paved for subsequent developments such as calculus.
More informationTRIGONOMETRY REVIEW (PART 1)
TRIGONOMETRY REVIEW (PART ) MATH 52, SECTION 55 (VIPUL NAIK) Difficulty level: Easy to moderate, given that you are already familiar with trigonometry. Covered in class?: Probably not (for the most part).
More informationChapter 13: Trigonometry Unit 1
Chapter 13: Trigonometry Unit 1 Lesson 1: Radian Measure Lesson 2: Coterminal Angles Lesson 3: Reference Angles Lesson 4: The Unit Circle Lesson 5: Trig Exact Values Lesson 6: Trig Exact Values, Radian
More informationHigher Geometry Problems
Higher Geometry Problems (1 Look up Eucidean Geometry on Wikipedia, and write down the English translation given of each of the first four postulates of Euclid. Rewrite each postulate as a clear statement
More informationQF101: Quantitative Finance August 22, Week 1: Functions. Facilitator: Christopher Ting AY 2017/2018
QF101: Quantitative Finance August 22, 2017 Week 1: Functions Facilitator: Christopher Ting AY 2017/2018 The chief function of the body is to carry the brain around. Thomas A. Edison 1.1 What is a function?
More informationMAS153/MAS159. MAS153/MAS159 1 Turn Over SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS hours. Mathematics (Materials) Mathematics For Chemists
Data provided: Formula sheet MAS53/MAS59 SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS Mathematics (Materials Mathematics For Chemists Spring Semester 203 204 3 hours All questions are compulsory. The marks awarded
More information4 Arithmetic of Segments Hilbert s Road from Geometry
4 Arithmetic of Segments Hilbert s Road from Geometry to Algebra In this section, we explain Hilbert s procedure to construct an arithmetic of segments, also called Streckenrechnung. Hilbert constructs
More information5.2 Proving Trigonometric Identities
SECTION 5. Proving Trigonometric Identities 43 What you ll learn about A Proof Strategy Proving Identities Disproving Non-Identities Identities in Calculus... and why Proving identities gives you excellent
More informationA matrix over a field F is a rectangular array of elements from F. The symbol
Chapter MATRICES Matrix arithmetic A matrix over a field F is a rectangular array of elements from F The symbol M m n (F ) denotes the collection of all m n matrices over F Matrices will usually be denoted
More informationCHAPTER 4 VECTORS. Before we go any further, we must talk about vectors. They are such a useful tool for
CHAPTER 4 VECTORS Before we go any further, we must talk about vectors. They are such a useful tool for the things to come. The concept of a vector is deeply rooted in the understanding of physical mechanics
More informationAssignment 1 and 2: Complete practice worksheet: Simplifying Radicals and check your answers
Geometry 0-03 Summary Notes Right Triangles and Trigonometry These notes are intended to be a guide and a help as you work through Chapter 8. These are not the only thing you need to read, however. Rely
More informationChapter 8B - Trigonometric Functions (the first part)
Fry Texas A&M University! Spring 2016! Math 150 Notes! Section 8B-I! Page 79 Chapter 8B - Trigonometric Functions (the first part) Recall from geometry that if 2 corresponding triangles have 2 angles of
More information3.C. Further comments on axioms for geometry
3.C. Further comments on axioms for geometry One important feature of the Elements is that it develops geometry from a very short list of assumptions. Although axiom systems like Hilbert s (or G. D. Birkhoff
More information