Austin Mohr Math 730 Homework. f(x) = y for some x λ Λ

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Austin Mohr Math 730 Homework. f(x) = y for some x λ Λ"

Transcription

1 Austin Mohr Math 730 Homework In the following problems, let Λ be an indexing set and let A and B λ for λ Λ be arbitrary sets. Problem 1B1 ( ) Show A B λ = (A B λ ). λ Λ λ Λ Proof. ( ) x A B λ λ Λ x A and x / B λ λ Λ x A and x / B λ0 for some λ 0 Λ x A B λ0 x (A B λ ) λ Λ Problem 1H1( ) Show f B λ = f B λ. λ Λ λ Λ Proof. y f ( λ Λ B λ ) f(x) = y for some x λ Λ B λ λ 0 Λ such that f(x) = y with x B λ0 y f B λ0 y λ Λ f B λ Extra Problem Show that f : A B is a bijection if and only if it has a two-sided inverse. Proof. ( ) Let f be a bijection. This implies two important facts. Firstly, f bijective f injective for all x 0, x 1 A, x 0 = x 1 whenever f(x 0 ) = f(x 1 ). Secondly, f bijective f surjective for all y A, there is x A such that f(x) = y. Taken together, we have that f bijective for all y B there is a unique x A such that f(x) = y. 1

2 In other words, every element of B is of the form f(x) for some unique x A. Now, define We see that, for all x A, g : B A g(f(x)) = x for all f(x) B (g f)(x) = g(f(x)) = x, so g is a left inverse of f. We also have, for all f(x) B, (f g)(f(x)) = f(g(f(x)) = f(x) (as g(f(x)) = x by definition), and so g is a right inverse of f. Therefore, g is a two-sided inverse. ( ) Let g be a two-sided inverse of f. First, suppose that f is not an injection. There are x 1, x 2 A such that It follows that x 1 x 2 yet f(x 1 ) = f(x 2 ). x 1 = g(f(x 1 )) = g(f(x 2 )) (as f(x 1 ) = f(x 2 )) = x 2 which is a contradiction with the fact that x 1 x 2. Hence, f is an injection. Next, suppose that f is not a surjection. There exists y B such that On the other hand, f(x) y for all x A. f(g(y)) = y. Hence, there exists an element of A whose image under f is y (namely g(y)), which is a contradiction. Hence, f is a surjection. Finally, as f is both an injection and a surjection, we conclude that f is indeed a bijection, as desired. Problem 2B1 (Metrics on C(I)) Let C(I) denote the set of all continuous, real-valued functions on the unit interval I. Show that is a metric on C(I). ρ(f, g) = sup f(x) g(x) x I Proof. We verify each of the three properties of metrics. Claim 1. ρ(f, g) 0 for all f, g C(I) with equality if and only if f = g. Proof. By definition, the ouput of absolute value is always nonnegative, so we have that the supremum of a set of absolute values must also be nonnegative. That is, ρ(f, g) 0 for all f, g C(I). Now, ρ(f, g) = 0 sup f(x) g(x) x I f(x) g(x) = 0 for all x I f(x) = g(x) for all x I f = g on I 2

3 Claim 2. ρ(f, g) = ρ(g, f) for all f, g C(I). Proof. For all f, g C(I), ρ(f, g) = sup f(x) g(x) x I = sup g(x) f(x) x I = ρ(g, f) Claim 3. ρ(f, g) ρ(f, h) + ρ(h, g) for al f, g, h C(I). Proof. For all f, g, h C(I), ρ(f, g) = sup f(x) g(x) x I sup( f(x) h(x) + h(x) g(x) ) (as is a metric on I) x I sup x I f(x) h(x) + sup h(x) g(x) x I = ρ(f, h) + ρ(h, g) Therefore, ρ is a metric on C(I), as desired. 3

4 Lemma 0.1. Let f be a non-negative, continuous function on [0, 1]. If 1 f(x) dx = 0, then f = 0. 0 Proof. We prove the claim above by contrapositive. To that end, choose x 0 [0, 1] such that f(x 0 ) = c > 0. As f is continuous at x 0, there is δ > 0 such that f(x 0 ) f(x) < c for all x B(x 0, δ) f(x) > f(x 0 ) c for all x B(x 0, δ) f(x) > 0 for all x B(x 0, δ). Now, 1 f(x) dx 0 B(x 0,δ) f(x) dx δ min{f(x) x B(x 0, δ)} > 0 thus establishing the contrapositive, as desired. Problem 2B2 (Metrics on C(I)) Let C(I) denote the set of all continuous, real-valued functions on the unit interval I. Show that is a metric on C(I). σ(f, g) = 1 0 f(x) g(x) dx Proof. We verify each of the three properties of metrics. Claim 4. σ(f, g) 0 for all f, g C(I) with equality if and only if f = g. Proof. By definition, the output of absolute value is always nonnegative, so we have that the integral of the nonnegative function f(x) g(x) is itself nonnegative. That is, σ(f, g) 0 for all f, g C(I). Now, the integral of a nonnegative function is zero if and only if the function is identically zero (call this contention ). Hence, we have σ(f, g) = f(x) g(x) dx = 0 f(x) g(x) = 0 for all x I (by ) f(x) = g(x) for all x I f = g on I Claim 5. σ(f, g) = σ(g, f) for all f, g C(I). Proof. For all f, g C(I), σ(f, g) = = = σ(g, f) f(x) g(x) dx g(x) f(x) dx Claim 6. σ(f, g) σ(f, h) + σ(h, g) for al f, g, h C(I). 4

5 Proof. For all f, g, h C(I), σ(f, g) = = f(x) g(x) dx ( f(x) h(x) + h(x) g(x) )dx (as is a metric on I) f(x) h(x) dx = σ(f, h) + σ(h, g) h(x) g(x) dx (by the linearity of the integral) Therefore, σ is a metric on C(I), as desired. 5

6 Problem 2D (Disks are open) Show that, for any subset A of a metric space (M, d) and any ɛ > 0, the set B(A, ɛ) is open. (In particular, B(x, ɛ) is open for each x M.) Proof. Let ɛ > 0 be given. Choose x B(A, ɛ). This means that inf{d(x, y) y A} < ɛ This implies that there is some y 0 A such that d(x, y 0 ) < ɛ. Hence, we can find ɛ such that Claim 7. B(x, ɛ ) B(A, ɛ) Proof. Let x B(x, ɛ ). We see that Hence, x B(A, ɛ), and so B(x, ɛ ) B(A, ɛ). ɛ < ɛ d(x, y 0 ) d(x, A) = inf{d(x, y) y A} d(x, y 0 ) (as y 0 A) d(x, x) + d(x, y 0 ) < ɛ + d(x, y 0 ) < (ɛ d(x, y 0 )) + d(x, y 0 ) = ɛ As B(x, ɛ ) contains x and is contained in B(A, ɛ), we conclude that B(A, ɛ) is indeed open. As a special case, letting A = {x} shows that, for any x M, B(x, ɛ) is open. Problem 2E1 (Bounded metrics) A metric ρ on M is bounded if and only if, for some constant A, ρ(x, y) A for all x and y in M. Show that, if ρ is any metric on M, the distance function is a metric and is also bounded. ρ (x, y) = min{ρ(x, y), 1} Proof. We verify each of the three properties of metrics. Claim 8. ρ (x, y) 0 for all x, y M with equality if and only if x = y. Proof. As ρ is a metric, ρ(x, y) 0 for all x, y M, and hence ρ (x, y) = min{ρ(x, y), 1} 0 for all x, y M. Similarly, ρ(x, y) = 0 if and only if x = y, and so ρ (x, y) min{ρ(x, y), 1} = 0 if and only if x = y. Claim 9. ρ (x, y) = ρ (x, y) for all x, y M. Proof. For all x, y M, ρ (x, y) = min{ρ(x, y), 1} = min{ρ(y, x), 1} = ρ (y, x) 6

7 Claim 10. ρ (x, y) ρ (x, z) + ρ (z, y) for al x, y, z M. Proof. For all x, y, z M, ρ (x, y) = min{ρ(x, y), 1} min{ρ(x, z) + ρ(z, y), 1} (as ρ is a metric) min{ρ(x, z), 1} + min{ρ(z, y), 1} = ρ (x, z) + ρ (z, y) Therefore, ρ is a metric on M, as desired. Furthermore, we see that ρ is bounded by 1. Problem 2E2 (Bounded metrics) A function f is continuous on (M, ρ) if and only if it is continuous on (M, ρ ). Proof. One way to define continuity of f is to say that f (O) is open whenever O is open. Hence, it suffices to show that ρ and ρ generate the same collection of open sets (if this holds, then we will have that f (O) and O are open with respect to ρ if and only if they are open with respect to ρ ). To that end, let A M. Similarly, A is open with respect to ρ for all x A, there is 0 < ɛ < 1 such that B ρ (x, ɛ) A ρ(x, y) < ɛ for all y B ρ (x, ɛ) ρ (x, y) < ɛ for all y B ρ (x, ɛ) (as ɛ < 1) A is open with respect to ρ A is open with respect to ρ for all x A, there is 0 < ɛ such that B ρ (x, ɛ) A ρ (x, y) < ɛ for all y B ρ (x, ɛ) ρ(x, y) < ɛ for all y B ρ (x, ɛ) A is open with respect to ρ Therefore, ρ and ρ generate the same collection of open sets, and so f is continuous on (M, ρ) if and only if it is continuous on (M, ρ ). Proposition 0.2. Let (M, ρ) and (N, σ) be pseudometric spaces. If f : M N is an isometry, then it is continuous. Proof. We aim to establish an alternate phrasing of the notion of continuity, namely that f is continuous at x M if, for all ɛ > 0, there exists δ > 0 such that f B ρ (x, δ) B σ (f(x), ɛ). Given ɛ > 0, take δ = ɛ and let x 0 B ρ (x, ɛ). Observe first that f(x 0 ) f B ρ (x, ɛ) by definition. Now, x 0 B ρ (x, ɛ) ρ(x, x 0 ) < ɛ σ(f(x), f(x 0 )) < ɛ (f is an isometry, so σ(f(x), f(x 0 )) = ρ(x, x 0 )) f(x 0 ) B σ (f(x), ɛ). Thus, we have established that f B ρ (x, ɛ) B σ (f(x), ɛ), and so f is continuous. Proposition 0.3. If is an F -pseudonorm on a vectorspace V, then d(x, y) = x y defines a metric on V. Proof. We verify each of the three properties of metrics. Claim 11. d(x, y) 0 for all x, y V with equality if and only if x = y. 7

8 Proof. For all x, y V, we have that d(x, y) = x y 0 by definition of F -pseudonorm. Furthermore, d(x, y) = 0 x y = 0 x y = 0 (as is an F -pseudonorm) x = y. Claim 12. d(x, y) = d(y, x) for all x, y V. Proof. For all x, y V, d(x, y) = x y = 1(y x) 1 y x = y x = d(y, x). (as is an F -pseudonorm) Similarly, d(y, x) = y x = 1(x y) 1 x y = x y = d(x, y). (as is an F -pseudonorm) Hence, d(x, y) = d(y, x). 8

9 Claim 13. d(x, z) d(x, y) + d(y, z) for all x, y, z V. Proof. For all x, y, z V, d(x, z) = x z = x + ( 1 z) x + y + y + ( 1 z) (as is an F -pseudonorm) = x + y + y z x + ( 1 y) + ( 1 y) + y + y z (as is an F -pseudonorm) = x y + y z = d(x, y) + d(y, z). Therefore, d is a metric on V, as desired. Proposition 0.4. (Problem 2C1) Let (M, ρ) be a pseudometric space. The relation defined on M by x y if and only if ρ(x, y) = 0 is an equivalence relation. Proof. We verify each of the three properties of equivalence relations. Claim 14. is reflexive. That is, for all x M, x x. Proof. For all x M, ρ(x, x) = 0, as ρ is a pseudometric. Hence, x x. Claim 15. is symmetric. That is, for all x, y M, x y implies y x. Proof. For all x, y M, x y ρ(x, y) = 0 ρ(y, x) = 0 (ρ is a pseudometric, and so is symmetric) y x. Claim 16. is transitive. That is, for all x, y, z M, x y and y z together imply x z. Proof. For all x, y, z M, x y and y z ρ(x, y) = 0 and ρ(y, z) = 0 ρ(x, z) = 0 (ρ is a pseudometric, so ρ(x, z) ρ(x, y) + ρ(y, z)) x z. Therefore, is an equivalence relation on M, as desired. Proposition 0.5. (Problem 2C2) If M is the set of equivalence classes in M under the equivalence relation and if ρ is defined on M by ρ ([x], [y]) = ρ(x, y), then ρ is a well-defined metric on M. (The metric space (M, ρ ) is called the metric identification of (M, ρ).) 9

10 Proof. Claim 17. ρ is a well-defined function on M. Proof. Let x 0, x 1 [x] M and y 0, y 1 [y] M. As x 0 x 1 and y 0 y 1, we have ρ(x 0, x 1 ) = ρ(y 0, y 1 ) = 0. Now, ρ ([x 0 ], [y 0 ]) = ρ(x 0, y 0 ) ρ(x 0, x 1 ) + ρ(x 1, y 0 ) (ρ is a pseudometric, so we have the triangle inequality) ρ(x 0, x 1 ) + ρ(x 1, y 1 ) + ρ(y 1, y 0 ) (ρ is a pseudometric, so we have the triangle inequality) = ρ(x 0, x 1 ) + ρ(x 1, y 1 ) + ρ(y 0, y 1 ) (ρ is a pseudometric, and so is symmetric) = ρ(x 1, y 1 ) = ρ ([x 1 ], [y 1 ]). Similarly, ρ ([x 1 ], [y 1 ]) = ρ(x 1, y 1 ) ρ(x 1, x 0 ) + ρ(x 0, y 1 ) (ρ is a pseudometric, so we have the triangle inequality) ρ(x 1, x 0 ) + ρ(x 0, y 0 ) + ρ(y 0, y 1 ) (ρ is a pseudometric, so we have the triangle inequality) = ρ(x 0, x 1 ) + ρ(x 0, y 0 ) + ρ(y 0, y 1 ) (ρ is a pseudometric, and so is symmetric) = ρ(x 0, y 0 ) = ρ ([x 0 ], [y 0 ]). Hence, ρ ([x 0 ], [y 0 ]) = ρ ([x 1 ], [y 1 ]), and so ρ is a well-defined function on M. We proceed by verifying each of the three properties of metrics for ρ. Claim 18. ρ ([x], [y]) 0 for all [x], [y] M with equality if and only if [x] = [y]. Proof. As ρ is a metric, it is non-negative, and so ρ is non-negative. Now, for all [x], [y] M, ρ ([x], [y]) = 0 ρ(x, y) = 0 x y [x] = [y] (equivalence classes are either disjoint or they coincide). Claim 19. ρ ([x], [y]) = ρ([y], [x]) for all [x], [y] M. Proof. For all [x], [y] M, ρ ([x], [y]) = ρ(x, y) = ρ(y, x) (ρ is a pseudometric, and so is symmetric) = ρ a st([y], [x]) Claim 20. ρ ([x], [z]) ρ ([x], [y]) + ρ ([y], [z]) for all [x], [y], [z] M. Proof. For all [x], [y], [z] M, ρ ([x], [z]) = ρ(x, z) ρ(x, y) + ρ(y, z) (ρ is a metric, so we have the triangle inequality) = ρ ([x], [y]) + ρ ([y], [z]) 10

11 Therefore, ρ is a well-defined metric on M, as desired. Definition 0.6. A normed linear space is a real linear space X such that a number x, the norm of x, is associated with each x X, satisfying (i) x 0, and x = 0 if and only if x = 0; (ii) αx = a x, for all α R; (iii) x + y x + y. If (i) is replaced by the weaker condition (i ) x 0 and 0 = 0, then X is a pseudonormed linear space. Proposition 0.7. (Problem 2J2) If 1 and 2 are pseudonorms on the same linear space X, they give the same open sets (i.e. are equivalent) if and only if there are constants C and C such that x 1 C x 2 and x 2 C x 1, for all x X. Proof. ( ) For any x X, define B 1 ( 0, r) = {x X x 1 < r} B 2 ( 0, r) = {x X x 2 < r} Now, as B 1 ( 0, r) is open with respect to 1, it is open with respect to 2 by hypothesis. Hence, there is ɛ 2 > 0 such that B 2 ( 0, ɛ 2 ) B 1 ( 0, r). (Simiarly, we can find ɛ 1 > 0 such that B 1 ( 0, ɛ 1 ) B 2 ( 0, r).) (I fail to see the next step. The chosen ɛ i give some open ball contained in the larger ball, but there is no guarantee that any x in, say, B 1 ( 0, r) can be found in B 2 ( 0, ɛ 2 ), so I cannot make any claim about x 2.) ( ) Let U be open with respect to 1. That is, for all x U, there exists ɛ > 0 such that B 1 (x, ɛ) U, where the subscript 1 denotes that distance is computed using. Now, y B 2 (x, ɛ C ) x y 2 < ɛ C x y 1 < C ɛ C x y 1 < ɛ y B 1 (x, ɛ) B 2 (x, ɛ C ) B 1(x, ɛ) (since x y 1 C x y 2 ) Hence, U is open with respect to 2. Similarly, all sets open with respect to 2 are open with respect to 1, and so 1 and 2 are equivalent. 1 Extra Problem 1 Lemma 1.1. Let ˆ be a Čech closure operation. If A B, then  ˆB. Proof. It follows directly from the properties of Čech closure operations that Now,   ˆB = ˆB, and so  ˆB, as desired. A B A B = B  B = ˆB  ˆB = ˆB. 11

12 Proposition 1.2. If we define a set in a Čech closure space (X,ˆ) to be closed if A = Â, then the result is a topology. Proof. Let F denote the collection of subsets of X that are closed with respect to ˆ. By Homework 4, Problem 2, if F satisfies (F-a) the intersection of an arbitrary collection of elements of F belongs to F, (F-b) the union of a finite collection of elements of F belongs to F, and (F-c) the sets and X belong to F, then τ = {F c F F} is a topology on X. We verify that F indeed satisfies each of these three properties. Claim 21. The intersection of an arbitrary collection of elements of F belongs to F. Proof. Let F α F for all α belonging to some indexing set I. As ˆ is a Čech closure operation, F α F α. α I To see the reverse inclusion, observe that F α F α for each α I α I α I F α ˆF α for each α I (by 1.1) α I F α α I α I α I F α α I ˆF α F α Hence, F α = F α (i.e. F α is closed in F). α I α I α I (as each F α is closed). Claim 22. The union of a finite collection of elements of F belongs to F. Proof. Let F i F for 1 i n. We have that n F i = = n ˆF i (since F i = ˆF i for all i) ṋ F i (by induction on i, using the fact that  B =  ˆB for the Čech closure operation ˆ) Claim 23. The sets and X belong to F. Proof. We have that = ˆ by definition of Čech closure operation, so F. Now, X ˆX X (since ˆ is a Čech closure operation) (since ˆ : P(X) P(X)). Hence, X = ˆX, and so X F. Therefore, τ = {F c F F} is a topology on X, as desired. 12

13 2 Problem 3A1 Proposition 2.1. If F is the collection of all closed, bounded subsets of R (in its usual topology), together with R itself, then F is the family of closed sets for a topology on R strictly weaker than the usual topology. Proof. We proceed by verifying properties F-a, F-b, and F-c on the family of sets F. Claim 24. The intersection of an arbitrary collection of elements of F belongs to F. Proof. Let F α F for all α belonging to some indexing set I. In R, the intersection of an arbitrary collection of closed sets is closed. Hence, F α is closed. Furthermore, each F α is bounded, and so F α (which is α I α I contained in F α for every α) is also bounded. Thus, F α is closed and bounded, and so belongs to F. α I Claim 25. The union of a finite collection of elements of F belongs to F. Proof. Let F i F for all 1 in. In R, the union of a finite collection of closed sets is closed. Hence, n F i is closed. Now, each F i is bounded by some B(0, ɛ i ). Take ɛ = max{ɛ i 1 i n}. We see that F i B(0, ɛ) n n for all 1 i n, and so F i B(0, ɛ). Thus, F i is closed and bounded, and so belongs to F. Claim 26. The sets and R belong to F. Proof. We have that R F by definition. Now, is trivially closed and B(0, 1). Hence, is closed and bounded, and so belongs to F. Therefore, F is the family of closed subsets for the topology τ = {F c F F}. To see that τ is weaker than the usual Euclidean topology (call it τ ), observe that B(0, 1) τ (since open balls are open), but B(0, 1) / τ (since B(0, 1) c = R \ B(0, 1) is unbounded). 3 Problem 3E2 Proposition 3.1. Let X be a metrizable space whose topology is generated by a metric ρ. The closure of a set E X is given by Proof. ( ) Let x E. It follows that, E = {y X ρ(e, y) = 0}. x E G E for all open G containing x B(x, ɛ) E for all ɛ > 0 d(e, x) < ɛ for all ɛ > 0 d(e, x) = 0 x {y X ρ(e, y) = 0}. Hence, E {y X ρ(e, y) = 0}. ( ) Let x {y X ρ(e, y) = 0}. It follows that, x {y X ρ(e, y) = 0} ρ(e, x) = 0 B(x, ɛ) E for all ɛ > 0. 13

14 Now, for any open G containing x, there must exist ɛ 0 > 0 such that B(x, ɛ 0 ) G (by definition of openness in a metrizable space). Hence, Hence, {y X ρ(e, y) = 0} E. 4 Problem 3E3 B(x, ɛ) E for all ɛ > 0 G E for all open G containing x x E. Proposition 4.1. Let X be a metrizable space whose topology is generated by a metric ρ. The closed disk U(x, ɛ) = {y X ρ(x, y) ɛ} is closed in X, but may not be the closure of the open disk U(x, ɛ). Proof. We show, equivalently, that U(x, ɛ) c is open. As X is a metrizable space, we need to establish that, for any z U(x, ɛ) c, there exists ɛ > 0 such that B(z, ɛ ) U(x, ɛ) c. To that end, let ɛ = ρ(x, z) ɛ (which, a priori, may or may not be positive). Now, Applying the triangle inequality, we have ρ(x, z) ρ(x, w) + ρ(w, z) B(z, ɛ ) U(x, ɛ) c B(z, ɛ ) {y X ρ(x, y) > ɛ} ρ(x, w) > ɛ for all w B(z, ɛ ). < ρ(x, w) + (ρ(x, z) ɛ) (note now that ρ(x, z) > ɛ, so ρ(x, z) ɛ > 0). Rearranging the terms yeilds that ρ(x, w) > ɛ, as desired. As an example when U(x, ɛ) U(x, ɛ), let X = R and ρ be the discrete metric. Observe that U(0, 1) = R, but U(0, 1) = {K K is closed and contains U(0, 1)} = {K K is closed and contains {0}} = {0} (since {0} itself is closed in a metric space). 5 Extra Problem 1 Proposition 5.1. A set in a pseudometric space is open if and only if it is a union of open disks. Proof. ( ) Let O be an open set in a pseudometric space. To be open means that, for each x O, there is ɛ x > 0 such that B(x, ɛ x ) O. We claim that O = B(x, ɛ x ). x O To see this, choose x 0 O. By definition of openness, x 0 B(x 0, ɛ x0 ), but B(x 0, ɛ x0 ) B(x, ɛ x ), so x 0 B(x, ɛ x ). x O To get the reverse inclusion, choose x 0 x O chosen specifically to ensure that B(x 0, ɛ x0 ) O. Hence, x O. Therefore, O = B(x, ɛ x ). That is, O is the union of open disks. x O x O B(x, ɛ x ). By construction, x 0 B(x 0, ɛ x0 ). Now, ɛ x0 was 14

15 ( ) Let α I B α be an arbitrary union of open disks. x α I B α x B α0 for some α 0 I As open disks are open, we have successfully found an open set contained in α I B α that contains x. Therefore, α I B α is open. 6 Extra Problem 2 Proposition 6.1. Let F be any collection of subsets of a set X. If F satisfies (i) α I F α F if F α F for all α belonging to some indexing set I (ii) n F i F if F i F for all i (iii) F and X F, then τ = {F c F F} is a topology on X and F is the collection of closed sets in this topology. Proof. We show that τ satisfies each of the three properties of topologies on X. Claim 27. Fα c τ if Fα c τ for all α belonging to some indexing set I. α I Proof. By problem 1B1, we have ( ) c Fα c = F α. α I α I By hypothesis, F α is closed, and so its complement is open. Hence, Fα c τ. α I α I Claim 28. n Fi c τ if Fi c τ for all i. Proof. As a corollary of problem 1B1 (take the complement of both sides), we have ( n n ) c Fi c = F i. By hypothesis, n F i is closed, and so its complement is open. Hence, Claim 29. τ and X τ. n Fi c τ. Proof. We have that = X c and X F, so τ. Also, X = c and F, so X τ. Therefore, τ is a topology on X. It remains to show that F is the collection of closed sets in τ. We have immediately that any element F F is closed (since F c τ, and so open). Similarly, if a subset K of X is closed, then K c is open. Thus, K c τ, which implies that K F (τ is precisely the collection of complements of sets from F). Therefore, the collection of closed sets in τ and the collection F conincide. 15

16 7 Problem 2F2 Definition 7.1. Let ρ be a bounded metric on M; that is, for some constant A, ρ(x, y) A for all x, y M. Let F(M) be all nonempty closed subsets of M and for A, B F(M) define d A (B) = sup{ρ(a, x) x B} d(a, B) = max{d A (B), d B (A)}. Lemma 7.2. For all A, B, C F(M), sup{ρ(a, c) c C} sup{ρ(a, b) + ρ(b, c) b B, c C}. Proof. For all A, B, C F(M), sup{ρ(a, c) c C} = sup{inf{ρ(a, c) a A} c C} sup{inf{ρ(a, b) + ρ(b, c) a A, b B} c C} = sup{inf{ρ(a, b) a A, b B} + ρ(b, c) c C} sup{inf{ρ(a, b) a A} + ρ(b, c) b B, c C} = sup{ρ(a, b) + ρ(b, c) b B, c C}. Proposition 7.3. The function d is a metric on F(M) with the property that d({x}, {y}) = ρ(x, y) (called the Hausdorff metric on F(M)). Proof. We show that d satisfies each of the three properties of metrics on F(M). Claim 30. For all A, B F(M), d(a, B) 0 with equality if and only if A = B. Proof. As ρ is a metric on M, Now, ρ(x, y) 0 for all x, y M d A (B) 0 for all A, B F(M) d(a, B) = 0 d A (B) = 0 and d B (A) = 0 d(a, B) 0 for all A, B F(M). sup{ρ(a, b) b B} = 0 and sup{ρ(b, a) a A} = 0 ρ(a, b) = 0 for all b B and ρ(b, a) = 0 for all a A A B and B A (since A and B are closed) A = B. Claim 31. For all A, B F(M), d(a, B) = d(b, A). Proof. For all A, B F(M), d(a, B) = max{d A (B), d B (A)} = max{d B (A), d A (B)} = d(b, A). 16

17 Claim 32. For all A, B, C F(M), d(a, C) d(a, B) + d(b, C). Proof. Let A, B, C F(M). Without loss of generality, assume A and C are such that d(a, C) = max{d A (C), d C (A)} = d A (C). Now, d(a, C) = d A (C) = sup{ρ(a, c) c C} sup{ρ(a, b) + ρ(b, c) b B, c C} (by 7.2) = sup{ρ(a, b) b B} + sup{ρ(b, c) c C} = d A (B) + d B (C) max{d A (B), d B (A)} + max{d B (C), d C (B)} = d(a, B) + d(b, C). Therefore, d is a metric on F(M). Moreover, for all x, y M, d({x}, {y}) = max{d {x} ({y}), d {y} ({x})} = max{sup{ρ({x}, z) z {y}}, sup{ρ({y}, z) z {x}}} = max{sup{ρ(x, y)}, sup{ρ(y, x)}} = max{ρ(x, y), ρ(y, x)} = max{ρ(x, y), ρ(x, y)} = ρ(x, y). 8 Problem 3A2 Proposition 8.1. If A X, then the family τ of all subsets of X which contain A, together with the empty set φ, is a topology on X. Proof. We show that τ satisfies each of the three properties of topologies on X. Claim 33. If O α τ for all α belonging to some indexing set I, then α I O α τ. Proof. Let O α τ for all α I. If this collection consists of only the empty set, then the union is itself empty, and so the union belongs to τ. Otherwise, we may disregard any occurrence of the empty set in the collection (it contributes nothing to the union). Adopting this convention, we have A O α for all α I A α I O α α I O α τ. n Claim 34. If O i τ for all 1 i n, then O i τ. 17

18 Proof. Let O i τ for 1 i n. If O k is the empty set for any k, then the intersection is itself empty, and so the intersection belongs to τ. Otherwise, A O i for 1 i n A n O i n O i τ. Claim 35. The empty set belongs to τ and the set X belongs to τ. Proof. The empty set is included in τ by definition, and it is clear that A X, so X tau. Therefore, τ is a topology on X. Remark 8.2. Recall that the interior of a subset B of X is defined as B = {O O open, O B}. Now, if A B, then the only open subset contained in B is, and so B =. Otherwise, B is itself an open set, and so B = B. Recall that the closure of a subset B of X is defined as Observe that B = {F F closed, B F }. F is closed F c is open A F c A F =. Now, if A B, then the only closed subset containing B is X, and so B = X. Otherwise, B is itself a closed set, and so B = B. Remark 8.3. If A = φ, then every subset of X is open (as every set contains ), so τ is the discrete topology. If A = X, then only X and are open (as X can only be contained in itself and we define to be open), so τ is the indiscrete topology. 9 Problem 3C Proposition 9.1. If A is any subset of a topological space, the largest possible number of sets in the two sequences A, A, A c, A c, A, A c, A c, A c c, (where c denotes complementation and denotes closure) is 14. Furthermore, there is a subset of R that gives

19 Proof. Let A be any subset of a topological space and denote the interior operation by. sequence, we see that In the first A c c c = (A c ) c c = (A c ) c c (since E c = E c for all sets E) = (A c ) c c = (A c ) cc (since E c = E c for all sets E) = A c cc = A c (since E cc = E for all sets E) = (A c ) = (A c ) (since A c is open and G = G for all open sets G) = (A c ) (since E c = E c for all sets E) = A c, which already appears on the list. Hence, we can get at most seven sets in this way (including the original set A). In the second sequence, we have A c c c c = (A c ) c c c = (A c ) c (by the previous argument), which already appears on the list. Hence, we can get at most seven new sets in this way (here, we exclude the original set A, as it has alerady been counted). In total, then, there can be at most 14 distinct sets in these sequences. We exhibit a subset of R that achieves the bound. Let The first sequence gives and the second sequence gives A = [0, 1] (2, 3) {(4, 5) Q} {(6, 8) {7}} {9}. A = [0, 1] [2, 3] [4, 5] [6, 8] {9} A c = (, 0) (1, 2) (3, 4) (5, 6) (8, 9) (9, ) A c = (, 0] [1, 2] [3, 4] [5, 6] [8, ) A c c = (0, 1) (2, 3) (4, 5) (6, 8) A c c = [0, 1] [2, 3] [4, 5] [6, 8] A c c c = (, 0) (1, 2) (3, 4) (5, 6) (8, ), A c = (, 0) (1, 2] [3, 4] {(4, 5) Q} [5, 6] {7} [8, 9) (9, ) A c = (, 0] [1, 2] [3, 6] {7} [8, ) A c c = (0, 1) (2, 3) (6, 7) (7, 8) A c c = [0, 1] [2, 3] [6, 8] A c c c = (, 0) (1, 2) (3, 6) (8, ) A c c c = (, 0] [1, 2] [3, 6] [8, ) A c c c c = (0, 1) (2, 3) (6, 8), giving a total of 14 distinct sets, thus meeting the upper bound. 19

20 10 Problem 4A3 Definition The Sorgenfrey line, denoted E, is the real line with the topology in which basic neighborhoods of x are the sets [x, z) for z > x. Proposition The closure in E of Q is R. Proposition The closure in E of { 1 n n N} is itself together with {0}. Proposition The closure in E of { 1 n n N} is itself. Proposition The closure in E of the integers is itself. 11 Problem 4B1 Definition Let Γ denote the closed upper half-plane {(x, y) y 0} in R 2. For each point in the open upper half-plane, basic neighborhoods will be the usual open disks (with the restriction, of course, that they be taken small enough to lie in Γ). At the points z on the x-axis, the basic neighborhoods will be the sets {z} A, where A is an open disk in the upper half-plane, tangent to the x-axis at z. This collection of basic neighborhoods is known as the Moore plane. Proposition The Moore plane gives a topology on Γ. Proof. Recall that, if a collection B x of subsets of X is assigned to each x X so as to satisfy V-a) if V B x, then x V, V-b) if V 1, V 2 B x, then there is some V 3 B x such that V 3 V 1 V 2, V-c) if V B x, there is some V 0 B x such that, for any y V 0, there is some W B y with W V, and if we define a set G to be open if and only if it contains a basic neighborhood of each of its points, then the result is a topology on X in which B x is a neighborhood base at x, for each x X. Let B x denote the neighborhood base of a point x Γ given by the Moore plane. We proceed by verifying that B x satisfies each of the above properties for each x Γ. Claim 36. If V B x, then x V. Proof. Let V B x. Either V is an open ball centered at x, or V is an open ball tangent to x together with x itself. In either case, we see that x V, as desired. Claim 37. If V 1, V 2 B x, then there is some V 3 b x such that V 3 V 1 V 2. Proof. Let V 1 and V 2 belong to B x. We consider two cases. Case x lies on the real line As x lies on the real line, it must be that V 1 and V 2 are both tangent to x. Furthermore, we have that one is contained in the other. Without loss of generality, let V 1 V 2. Choosing V 3 to be V 1, we have V 3 = V 1 B x and V 3 = V 1 V 1 V 2, as desired. Case x lies strictly in the upper half-plane As x lies strictly in the upper half-plane, it must be that V 1 and V 2 are both open balls centered at x. Furthermore, we have that one is contained in the other. Without loss of generality, let V 1 V 2. Choosing V 3 to be V 1, we have V 3 = V 1 B x and V 3 = V 1 V 1 V 2, as desired. Claim 38. If V B x, there is some V 0 b x such that, for any y V 0, there is some W b y with W V. 20

21 Proof. Let V B x. We consider two cases. Case x lies on the real line As x lies on the real line, it must be that V is tangent to x. Choose V 0 to be V. If y is chosen to be x, then taking W = V suffices. Otherwise, y lies strictly inside the open ball V {x}, and so there will always be a smaller open ball centered at y and contained in V (which we will take to be W ). Case x lies strictly in the upper half-plane As x lies strictly in the upper half-plane, it must be that V is an open ball centered at x. Choose V 0 to be V. As V is open, for any y V 0 = V, there is a smaller open ball centered at y and contained in V (which we will take to be W ). Therefore, the Moore plane gives a topology on Γ. 12 Extra Problem 1 Proposition Let (X, τ) and (Y, σ) be topological spaces, and let B be a base for τ. The function f : Y X is continuous if and only if f B σ for all B B. Proof. ( ) Suppose f is continuous. It follows that f is continuous f U is open for every open set U X f B is open for every B B (as each B B is itself an open set) f B σ for every B B ( ) Suppose f B σ for all B B. Let U be any open subset of X. Our goal is to show that f U is open in Y, thus establishing the continuity of f. Since B is a base for τ, there exists a collection C B such that U = {B C}. Now, f U = f ( {B C} ) = B C f B. By hypothesis, each f B belongs to σ. In other words, each f B is open in Y, and so the union of these sets is open in Y, as well. Thus, we have shown that f U is open in Y for any open U X. Therefore, f is continuous. 13 Problem 6A1 Proposition Let BA denote the slotted plane. Any straight line in the plane has the discrete topology as a subspace of BA. Proof. Let τ be the relative topology on any line L R 2 as a subspace of BA. Observe first that we can find basic neighborhoods in BA which intersect trivially with L, and so we can construct. Now, for any point x L, consider any basic neighborhood {x} A in BA where we require that one of the lines removed from the open disk A coincides with L. Under this constraint, ({x} A) L = {x}. Since we can construct any isolated point by intersecting L with some basic neighborhood in BA, we can take unions to construct any subset of L. Therefore, any subset of L is open in τ, and so τ is the discrete topology. Proposition Let BA denote the slotted plane. The topology on any circle in the plane as a subspace of BA coincides with its usual topology. Proof. Let C be any circle in R 2. Denote the usual topology of C by σ and the relative topology as a subspace of BA by τ. We show that σ = τ. ( ) Let O be a basic open set in σ. That is, O an open interval lying on C. Furthermore, O = G C, where G is an open Euclidean ball in R 2. As G is an open ball with finitely-many (i.e. zero) lines removed, G BA. Therefore, O = G C τ. 21

22 ( ) Let O be a basic open set in τ. That is, O = C A for some A BA. If A =, then C = σ. If A = R 2, then C R 2 = C σ. Otherwise, C A is the finite union of disjoint open intervals lying on C (the open disk of A selects some open interval of C, while the finite number of removed lines subdivides this into a finite number of open subintervals). In this case, we still have C A σ, as desired. 14 Problem 6A2 Proposition Let BB denote the radial plane. The relative topology induced on any straight line as a subspace of BB is its usual topology. Proof. Let L be any line in the plane. Denote the topology of L inherited from the usual topology on the plane by σ and the relative topology of L as a subspace of BB by τ. We show that σ = τ. ( ) Let O be a basic open set of σ. That is, O = (x ɛ, x + ɛ) = L (x ɛ, x + ɛ) = L B(x, ɛ). Hence, O is an element of τ. ( ) Let O be a basic open set of τ. That is, O is the union of a collection of open line segments centered around some point x R 2. If O intersects trivially with L, then L O = σ. If x lies on L, O contains an open line segment centered at x coinciding with an open interval of L. Hence, L O is an open interval lying on L, and so L O σ. Proposition Let BB denote the radial plane. The relative topology on any circle in the plane as a subspace of BB is the discrete topology. Proof. Let C be any circle in the plane. Denote the relative topology of C as a subspace of BB by τ. For x / C, we can always find an open ball about x of small enough radius that intersects trivially with C. Hence, τ. Now, for any x C, we wish to find an open set O BB such that C O = {x}. We require that O possess an open line segment about x in each direction. We claim that O = B(x, ɛ) \ C suffices, where ɛ is the radius of C. To see this, consider the line passing through x in a given direction. If the line is tangent to x, we have an open neighborhood of x of length 2ɛ. Otherwise, the line is a chord of C, and so intersects C at some point y. In this direction, we have any open neighborhood of length ɛ + d(x, y). Hence, O is radially open about x and is constructed in such a way that C O = {x}. By taking unions, we see that any subset of C is open in the relative topology τ, and so τ is the discrete topology. 15 Problem 6C Proposition If M is metrizable and N M, then the subspace N is metrizable with the topology generated by the restriction of any metric which generates the topology on M. Proof. Let τ be the topology on M generated by a metric ρ. Let σ be the relative topology on N and let ρ N be the restriction of ρ to N. We show that σ is generated by ρ N. Let O σ. It must be that O = N G for some G τ. Since M is generated by ρ, we know that G = B ρ (x, ɛ x ), where ɛ x > 0 may depend on x. Now, x G O = N G = N x G B ρ (x, ɛ x ) = N B ρ (x, ɛ x ) x G = x N G B ρn (x, ɛ x ). 22

23 Hence, O is the union of open balls with respect to the metric ρ N. Therefore, σ is generated by the ρ N, as desired. 16 Extra Problem Proposition Let X and Y be topological spaces and f : X Y a bijection. equivalent: a.) The function f is a homeomorphism. b.) For any G X, f G is open in Y if and only if G is open in X. c.) For any F X, f F is closed in Y if and only if F is closed in X. d.) For any E X, f E = f E. Proof. (We have shown a b c in class.) The following are ((a and b) d) Let f be a homeomorphism (and so also possesses the property that, for any G X, f G is open in Y if and only if G is open in X). We show first that f E f E. To that end, let b f E and consider any open O containing b. By the continuity of f, f O is open. Furthermore, there is an element a of f O such that f(a) = b. Now, since a E, any open set containing a intersects nontrivially with E. In particular, the open set f O intersects nontrivially with E, and so f (f O) intersects nontrivially with f E. As f is a bijection, f (f O) = O, and so we see that O intersects nontrivially with f E. In other words, b f E, as desired. Next we show that f E f E. To that end, let b f E and suppose, for the purpose of contradiction, that b / f E. In other words, b = f(a) for a / E (such an a must exist, since f is a bijection). Hence, we can find an open ball O containing a such that O intersects trivially with E, which implies that f O is an open set containing b that intersects trivially with f E. In other words, b / f E, which is a contradiction. Therefore, f E f E. (d c) Let f be such that, for any E X, f E = f E. We show first that, for any F X, f F is closed in Y implies that F is closed in X. For that, observe f F is closed in Y f F = f F f F = f F F = F F is closed in X. (since f is a bijection) We show next that, for any F X, F is closed in X implies that f F is closed in Y. For that, observe F is closed in X F = F f F = f F f F = f F f F is closed in Y. Therefore, for any F X, f F is closed in Y if and only if F is closed in X. 17 Problem 7A Definition The characteristic function of a subset A of a set X (denoted χ A ) is the function from X to R which is 1 at points of A and 0 at other points of X. Proposition The characteristic function of A is continuous if and only if A is both open and closed in X. 23

24 Proof. ( ) Let χ A be continuous. Observe χ A : X {0, 1} is indeed a function between topological spaces when each subset of R is taken together with its relative topology. Now, f ({1}) = A. As {1} is closed in {0, 1}, A is closed in X (by the continuity of χ A ). Similarly, we have f ({0}) = A c. As {0} is closed in {0, 1}, A c is closed in X (by the continuity of χ A ), and so A is open in X. ( ) Let A be both open and closed in X and consider an arbitrary open subset O of R. We show that f (B O) is open for all subsets B of {0, 1}. Therefore, χ A is continuous. f ( ) =, which is open f ({0}) = A c, which is open, since A is closed f ({1}) = A, which is open f ({0, 1}) = X, which is open Proposition The topological space X has the discrete topology if and only if f : X Y is continuous whenever (Y, τ) is a topological space. Proof. ( ) Let X have the discrete topology. That is, every subset A of X is open. In particular, f (O) is open in X for any open subset O of Y. Therefore, f is continuous. ( ) Let f : X Y be continuous whenever (Y, τ) is a topological space. In particular, let Y = X, τ be the discrete topology, and f be the identity on X. Now, for any subset A of the codomain, we have that A is open (since the codomain has the discrete topology). Hence, by the continuity of f, f (A) is open. At the same time, by the definition of f, f (A) = A. Therefore, every subset A of the domain is open, and so X has the discrete topology. Proposition The topological space X has the trivial topology if and only if f : Y X is continuous whenever (Y, τ) is a topological space. Proof. ( ) Let X have the trivial topology. To establish the continuity of f, we show that the preimage of any open set in X is open in Y. As X has the trivial topology, it suffices to observe that f ( ) = which is open in Y f (X) = Y which is open in Y. Therefore, f is continuous. ( ) Let f : Y X be continuous whenever (Y, τ) is a topological space. In particular, let Y = X, τ be the trivial topology, and f be the identity on X. Now, consider any open set A in X. Since f is continuous, f (A) is open in Y. As the domain has the trivial topology, it must be that f (A) is either the empty set or all of X. At the same time, since f is the identity on X, we see that A is either the empty set or all of X. Therefore, the only open sets in the codomain are the empty set or X, and so the codomain has the trivial topology. 18 Problem 6B3 Proposition An open subset of a separable space is separable. Proof. Let O be an open subset of the separable space X, and let D be the countable, dense set in X. Consider any open neighborhood G of a point x O with the constraint that G be contained in O (since O is open, this can always be done). Since D is dense in X, G D. Hence, any open neighborhood of a point in O contains an element of D. In other words, D is dense in O. 24

25 19 Problem 7B Recall that the Cantor-Bernstein theorem states that if A and B are sets and if one-to-one functions f : A B and g : B A exist, then a one-to-one function of A onto B exists. The analog for topological spaces would be as follows: Whenever X can be embedded in Y and Y can be embedded in X, then X and Y are homeomorphic. Proposition The aforementioned analog of the Cantor-Bernstein theorem for topological spaces is false. Proof. Define R 1 to be the set {x R x 1}. Claim 39. The function is an embedding of [0, 1] into R 1. f : [0, 1] R 1 f(x) = x + 1 Proof. The function f is one-to-one and continuous. The inverse of f, given by f 1 (x) = x 1, is also continuous. Claim 40. The function g : R 1 [0, 1] is an embedding of R 1 into [0, 1]. g(x) = 1 x Proof. The function g is one-to-one and continuous. continuous. The inverse of g, given by g 1 (x) = x, is also Now, the property that every continuous, real-valued function on some set achieves its maximum is a topology property. As [0, 1] is a compact set, it possesses this property. The property does not hold, however, for R 1 (the identity function on R 1 serves as a counterexample). Therefore, while there exists an embedding of [0, 1] into R 1 and vice versa, the two spaces are not homeomorphic, and so the proposed analog of the Cantor-Bernstein theorem is not true in general. 20 Problem 8D Let X and Y be topological spaces containing subsets A and B, respectively. Proposition In the product space X Y, (A B) = A B. Proof. It follows directly that (x, y) (A B) (x, y) G for some open set G A B (x, y) G 1 G 2 for some open sets G 1 A and G 2 B x G 1 and y G 2 for some open sets G 1 A and G 2 B x A and y B (x, y) A B. 25

26 Proposition In the product space X Y, A B = A B. Proof. To see that A B A B, observe that (x, y) A B (x, y) F for all closed sets F A B (x, y) F 1 F 2 for all closed sets F 1 A and F 2 B x F 1 and y F 2 for all closed sets F 1 A and F 2 B x A and y B (x, y) A B. To see that A B A B, observe that (x, y) A B x A and y B for all basic open O x containing x, O x A, and for all basic open O y containing y, O y B for all basic open O containing (x, y), O (A B) (x, y) A B. 21 Problem 8D3 Proposition Let X α be topological spaces containing subsets A α, respectively, for α Γ. product space α Γ X α, we have A α = A α. α Γ α Γ Proof. Recall that, for any set subset E of a topological space X, In the E = {x X each basic neighborhood of x meets E}. It follows that, { A α = x X α each basic neighborhood of x meets } A α α Γ α Γ α Γ { = x } X α for all α Γ, each basic neighborhood of x α meets A α α Γ { = x } X α for all α Γ, each basic neighborhood of x α A α α Γ = A α. α Γ Remark The proposition above is not true in general for the interior operation. For a counterexample, let A α = (0, 1) for α Γ and consider them as subspaces of R ω with the usual topology. We have ( ) (0, 1) = { G G is open, G } (0, 1) α Γ α Γ =. 26

27 To see why this is the case, recall that the open sets in this product topology must equal R at all but finitely-many coordinates. Hence, the only open set contained in α Γ A α is the empty set. On the other hand, we have 1) α Γ(0, = (0, 1) α Γ. 22 Problem 8H1 Proposition Let X have the weak topology induced by a collection of maps f α : X X α for α Γ. If each X α has the weak topology given by a collection of maps g αλ : X α Y αλ, for λ Λ α, then X has the weak topology given by the maps g αλ f α : X Y αλ, for α Γ and λ Λ α. Proof. We first verify that the open sets in X are indeed sufficient to make the functions g αλ f α continuous for all α Γ and λ Λ. To that end, choose an open set O αλ Y αλ. It follows that (g αλ f α ) 1 (O αλ ) = fα 1 (g 1 αλ (O αλ)). Since g αλ is continuous, g 1 αλ (O αλ) is open. Since f α is continous, the preimage of this open set is itself open. Hence, g αλ f α is continous. Evidently, the open sets in X are also necessary to make the functions g αλ f α continuous for all α Γ and λ Λ (i.e. they form the weak topology on X induced by g αλ f α ). To that end, let O X. Since the f α induce the weak topology on X, there exists some O α such that f 1 (O α ) = O. Furthermore, since the g αλ induce the weak topology on X α, there exists some O αλ such that g 1 αλ (O αλ) = O α. Hence, (g αλ f α ) 1 (O αλ ) = fα 1 (g 1 αλ (O αλ)) = fα 1 (O α ) = O. As the open sets in X are both necessary and sufficient to make the functions g αλ f α continuous for all α Γ and λ Λ, we conclude that X indeed has the weak topology induced by g αλ f α. 23 Problem 9B1 Definition Let X be a topological space. A decomposition D of X is a collection of disjoint subsets of X whose union is X. If a decomposition D is endowed with the topology in which F D is open if and only if {F F F} is open in X, then D is referred to as a decomposition space of X. Proposition The process given above for forming the topology on a decomposition space does indeed define a topology. Proof. Let τ be the proposed topology on D. We verify that τ satisfies each of the properties of a topology. Claim 41. If F α belongs to τ for all α Γ, then so does α Γ F α. Proof. By definition, each F α is itself a union of sets that are open in X. Denote of consituent open sets of F α by F αβ with β Γ. It follows that F α = α Γ α Γ = F αβ. α Γ, β Γ β Γ F αβ Since each of the F αβ is open in X, their union is also open in X. Therefore, α Γ F α belongs to τ. 27

28 Claim 42. If F i belongs to τ for all 1 i n, then so does n F i. Proof. By definition, each F i is itself a union of sets that are open in X. Denote of consituent open sets of F i by F iα with α Γ. It follows that n F i = n F iα. α Γ Since each of the F iα is open in X, their union is also open in X. Since the finite intersetion of open sets is again open, we have that n F i belongs to τ, as desired. Claim 43. The sets and D belong to τ. Proof. We have that {F : F } = =, which is open in X. Hence, belongs to τ. We also have that {F : F D} = X, as D is a decomposition of X. Since X is open in X, we have that D belongs to τ. Therefore, τ is a topology on D. 24 Problem 9B2 Let D denote the decomposition space of a topological space X and let P be the natural map from X onto D. Lemma For any subset F of D, P (F) = {F F F}. Proof. x P (F) P (x) = F, some F F x F, some F F x {F F F} Proposition The topology on D is the quotient topology induced by P. Proof. Let τ denote the topology on the decomposition space D and let τ P induced by the natural map. It follows that denote the quotient topology O τ O = {F α F α X, α Γ} with α Γ F α open in X P (O) open in X (as P (O) = α Γ F α by 24.1) O τ P. Therefore, τ = τ P. 28

29 25 Problem 9C2 Proposition A closed, continuous, onto map need not be open. Proof. Consider the function f mapping the interval [ π, 3π] to the unit circle C by f(x) = (cos x, sin y). It is easily seen that f is closed (the image of a closed subinterval of [ π, 3π] is a closed arc of C), continuous (the preimage of an open arc in C is an open subinterval of [ π, 3π]), and onto (f [0, 2π] = C). (I cannot work out how to make use of this counterexample suggested by Willard. It seems that, for any open subinterval O, f (O) is an open arc of C. Hence, a general open set in [ π, 3π] will simply be the union of open sets in C, which is again open. By the way, I chose [ π, 3π] as the domain, since any bijection is necessarily both open and closed. Hence, I was hoping to exploit the fact that my choice of domain causes f to fail to be injective to create my counterexample.) 26 Problem 9H1 Definition Suppose X α is a topological space and f α is a map of X α to a set Y for each α A. The strong topology coinduced by the maps f α on Y consists of all sets U in Y such that fα 1 (U) is open in X α for each α A. Proposition The strong topology is indeed a topology. Moreover, it is the largest topology making each f α continuous. Proof. Let τ be the proposed topology on Y. We verify that τ satisfies each of the properties of a topology. Claim 44. If O β belongs to τ for all β Γ, then so does β Γ O β. Proof. It follows immediately that O β τ for all β Γ fα 1 (O β ) is open in X α for all α A and β Γ fα 1 (O β ) is open in X α for all α A β Γ f 1 α O β is open in X α for all α A β Γ (as f 1 α β Γ O β = β Γ f 1 α (O β )) β Γ O β τ. Claim 45. If O i belongs to τ for all 1 i n, then so does n O i. Proof. (I am stumped here. The best I can claim is that, for all α A, ( n ) n fα 1 O i fα 1 (O i ) We have that the righthand side is open in X α, since each element of the finite intersection is open by hypothesis. I do not see that this forces the lefthand side to be open, as well.) Claim 46. The sets and Y belong to τ. Proof. For all α A, which is open in X α. Hence, τ. f 1 α ( ) =, 29

30 For all α A, f 1 α (Y ) = X α, which is open in X α. Hence, Y τ. Therefore, τ is indeed a topology on Y. To see that this is the largest topology making each f α continuous, consider any other topology σ making each f α continuous. Given any open set O belonging to σ, we have that fα 1 (O) is open for all α A (as each f α is continuous). By definition of openness in τ, we have that O τ. Hence, σ τ, and so τ is indeed the largest topology making each f α continuous. 27 Problem 13B1 Proposition Any subspace of a T 0 -space is T 0. Proof. Let X be a T 0 -space and let A be a subspace of X. For any distinct x, y A X, there is a set G that is open in X such that x G and y / G, or x / G and y G, since X is a T 0 -space. Now, consider the set G A, which is open in A. It follows that Therefore, A is a T 0 -space. x G and y / G, or x / G and y G, Proposition Any subspace of a T 1 -space is T 1. Proof. Let X be a T 1 -space and let A be a subspace of X. For any distinct x, y A X, there is a set G that is open in X such that x G and y / G, since X is a T 1 -space. Now, consider the set G A, which is open in A. It follows that Therefore, A is a T 1 -space. x G A and y / G A. 30

31 28 Problem 13B2 Proposition Any nonempty product space is T 1 if and only if each factor space is T 1. Proof. ( ) Let α Γ X α be T 1 and let x and y be distinct points in some particular X β. Consider elements x, y α Γ X α which are equal to x and y (respectively) in the β th coordinate and have x α = y α for all α β. As α Γ X α is T 1, it follows that there is an open set α Γ G α such that x α Γ G α and y / α Γ G α. Hence, x α G α for all α Γ, so, in particular, x G β. Now, it must be that y / G β, as y α = x α G α for all α β. Hence, the set G β is an open set in X β with x G β and y / G β. That is, X β is T 1. As β was chosen arbitrarily, it follows that each factor space is T 1. ( ) Let X α be T 1 for all α Γ and let x, y be distinct points in α Γ X α. Since each factor space is T 1, we can find, for all α Γ, G α X α such that x α G α and y α / G α. It follows that x α Γ G α and y / α Γ G α. Therefore, α Γ X α is T Problem 13D1 For a polynomial P in n real variables, let Z(P ) = {(x 1,..., x n ) R n P (x 1,..., x n ) = 0}. Let P be the collection of all such polynomials. Proposition {Z(P ) P P} is a base for the closed sets of a topology (the Zariski topology) on R n. Proof. We show that P P Z(P ) = and that, for any P 1, P 2 P, Z(P 1 ) Z(P 2 ) is equal to the intersection of some subfamily of {Z(P ) P P}, thereby establishing that {Z(P ) P P} is a base for the closed sets of a topology on R n. Let P 0 P denote the polynomial in n variables whose output is 1 for any input. As P 0 has no roots, it must be that Z(P 0 ) =. Hence, P P Z(P ) =. Let P 1, P 2 P. We claim that Z(P 1 ) Z(P 2 ) = Z(P 1 P 2 ), which belongs to {Z(P ) P P}. To see this, observe that (x 1,..., x n ) Z(P 1 ) Z(P 2 ) P 1 (x 1,..., x n ) = 0 or P 2 (x 1,..., x n ) = 0 P 1 (x 1,..., x n ) P 2 (x 1,..., x n ) = 0 (x 1,..., x n ) Z(P 1 P 2 ). Hence, Z(P 1 ) Z(P 2 ) is the intersection of a subfamily of {Z(P ) P P} (namely, {Z(P 1 P 2 )} itself). 30 Problem 13D3 For a polynomial P in n real variables, let Z(P ) = {(x 1,..., x n ) R n P (x 1,..., x n ) = 0}. Let P be the collection of all such polynomials. Definition The Zariski topology on R n is the one having the set {Z(P ) P P} as a base for its closed sets. Proposition On R, the Zariski topology coincides with the cofinite topology. Proof. Let F Z denote the closed sets in the Zariski topology and let F co denote the closed sets in the cofinite topology. We show that F Z = F co. Let F F Z. Observe that F = Z(P α ) for some subfamily {P α } P. If the subfamily is merely the zero polynomial, then every real number is a root, and so F = R, which belongs to F co. Otherwise, the number of roots of each polynomial is finite, and so the intersection of these sets of roots is finite. Hence, F is finite, and so F F co. Let F F co. If F = R, then F corresponds to the set of roots the zero polynomial. If F =, then F corresponds to the set of roots of a nonzero, constant polynomial. Otherwise, construct the polynomial P (x) = a F (x a) (since F is finite, this is indeed a polynomial). We see that F corresponds to the set of roots of the polynomial P. In any case, we conclude that F F Z. 31

Austin Mohr Math 730 Homework 2

Austin Mohr Math 730 Homework 2 Austin Mohr Math 73 Homework 2 Extra Problem Show that f : A B is a bijection if and only if it has a two-sided inverse. Proof. ( ) Let f be a bijection. This implies two important facts. Firstly, f bijective

More information

Math 730 Homework 6. Austin Mohr. October 14, 2009

Math 730 Homework 6. Austin Mohr. October 14, 2009 Math 730 Homework 6 Austin Mohr October 14, 2009 1 Problem 3A2 Proposition 1.1. If A X, then the family τ of all subsets of X which contain A, together with the empty set φ, is a topology on X. Proof.

More information

Topology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA address:

Topology. Xiaolong Han. Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA  address: Topology Xiaolong Han Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA E-mail address: Xiaolong.Han@csun.edu Remark. You are entitled to a reward of 1 point toward a homework

More information

Chapter 2 Metric Spaces

Chapter 2 Metric Spaces Chapter 2 Metric Spaces The purpose of this chapter is to present a summary of some basic properties of metric and topological spaces that play an important role in the main body of the book. 2.1 Metrics

More information

4 Countability axioms

4 Countability axioms 4 COUNTABILITY AXIOMS 4 Countability axioms Definition 4.1. Let X be a topological space X is said to be first countable if for any x X, there is a countable basis for the neighborhoods of x. X is said

More information

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3

1 Topology Definition of a topology Basis (Base) of a topology The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3 Index Page 1 Topology 2 1.1 Definition of a topology 2 1.2 Basis (Base) of a topology 2 1.3 The subspace topology & the product topology on X Y 3 1.4 Basic topology concepts: limit points, closed sets,

More information

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 6 Solutions

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 6 Solutions Math 535 - General Topology Fall 202 Homework 6 Solutions Problem. Let F be the field R or C of real or complex numbers. Let n and denote by F[x, x 2,..., x n ] the set of all polynomials in n variables

More information

Introduction to Topology

Introduction to Topology Introduction to Topology Randall R. Holmes Auburn University Typeset by AMS-TEX Chapter 1. Metric Spaces 1. Definition and Examples. As the course progresses we will need to review some basic notions about

More information

Maths 212: Homework Solutions

Maths 212: Homework Solutions Maths 212: Homework Solutions 1. The definition of A ensures that x π for all x A, so π is an upper bound of A. To show it is the least upper bound, suppose x < π and consider two cases. If x < 1, then

More information

Topology, Math 581, Fall 2017 last updated: November 24, Topology 1, Math 581, Fall 2017: Notes and homework Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski

Topology, Math 581, Fall 2017 last updated: November 24, Topology 1, Math 581, Fall 2017: Notes and homework Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski Topology, Math 581, Fall 2017 last updated: November 24, 2017 1 Topology 1, Math 581, Fall 2017: Notes and homework Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski Class of August 17: Course and syllabus overview. Topology

More information

MA651 Topology. Lecture 10. Metric Spaces.

MA651 Topology. Lecture 10. Metric Spaces. MA65 Topology. Lecture 0. Metric Spaces. This text is based on the following books: Topology by James Dugundgji Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Linear Algebra and Analysis by Marc Zamansky

More information

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces

Course 212: Academic Year Section 1: Metric Spaces Course 212: Academic Year 1991-2 Section 1: Metric Spaces D. R. Wilkins Contents 1 Metric Spaces 3 1.1 Distance Functions and Metric Spaces............. 3 1.2 Convergence and Continuity in Metric Spaces.........

More information

7 Complete metric spaces and function spaces

7 Complete metric spaces and function spaces 7 Complete metric spaces and function spaces 7.1 Completeness Let (X, d) be a metric space. Definition 7.1. A sequence (x n ) n N in X is a Cauchy sequence if for any ɛ > 0, there is N N such that n, m

More information

AN EXPLORATION OF THE METRIZABILITY OF TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

AN EXPLORATION OF THE METRIZABILITY OF TOPOLOGICAL SPACES AN EXPLORATION OF THE METRIZABILITY OF TOPOLOGICAL SPACES DUSTIN HEDMARK Abstract. A study of the conditions under which a topological space is metrizable, concluding with a proof of the Nagata Smirnov

More information

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 8 Solutions

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 8 Solutions Math 535 - General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 8 Solutions Problem 1. (Willard Exercise 19B.1) Show that the one-point compactification of R n is homeomorphic to the n-dimensional sphere S n. Note that

More information

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X. Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2

More information

Problem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016

Problem Set 2: Solutions Math 201A: Fall 2016 Problem Set 2: s Math 201A: Fall 2016 Problem 1. (a) Prove that a closed subset of a complete metric space is complete. (b) Prove that a closed subset of a compact metric space is compact. (c) Prove that

More information

Math 201 Topology I. Lecture notes of Prof. Hicham Gebran

Math 201 Topology I. Lecture notes of Prof. Hicham Gebran Math 201 Topology I Lecture notes of Prof. Hicham Gebran hicham.gebran@yahoo.com Lebanese University, Fanar, Fall 2015-2016 http://fs2.ul.edu.lb/math http://hichamgebran.wordpress.com 2 Introduction and

More information

Topological properties

Topological properties CHAPTER 4 Topological properties 1. Connectedness Definitions and examples Basic properties Connected components Connected versus path connected, again 2. Compactness Definition and first examples Topological

More information

Math 3T03 - Topology

Math 3T03 - Topology Math 3T03 - Topology Sang Woo Park April 5, 2018 Contents 1 Introduction to topology 2 1.1 What is topology?.......................... 2 1.2 Set theory............................... 3 2 Functions 4 3

More information

Math 320-2: Midterm 2 Practice Solutions Northwestern University, Winter 2015

Math 320-2: Midterm 2 Practice Solutions Northwestern University, Winter 2015 Math 30-: Midterm Practice Solutions Northwestern University, Winter 015 1. Give an example of each of the following. No justification is needed. (a) A metric on R with respect to which R is bounded. (b)

More information

MH 7500 THEOREMS. (iii) A = A; (iv) A B = A B. Theorem 5. If {A α : α Λ} is any collection of subsets of a space X, then

MH 7500 THEOREMS. (iii) A = A; (iv) A B = A B. Theorem 5. If {A α : α Λ} is any collection of subsets of a space X, then MH 7500 THEOREMS Definition. A topological space is an ordered pair (X, T ), where X is a set and T is a collection of subsets of X such that (i) T and X T ; (ii) U V T whenever U, V T ; (iii) U T whenever

More information

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 1 Solutions

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 1 Solutions Math 535 - General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 1 Solutions Definition. Let V be a (real or complex) vector space. A norm on V is a function : V R satisfying: 1. Positivity: x 0 for all x V and moreover

More information

Real Analysis Math 131AH Rudin, Chapter #1. Dominique Abdi

Real Analysis Math 131AH Rudin, Chapter #1. Dominique Abdi Real Analysis Math 3AH Rudin, Chapter # Dominique Abdi.. If r is rational (r 0) and x is irrational, prove that r + x and rx are irrational. Solution. Assume the contrary, that r+x and rx are rational.

More information

Metric Spaces and Topology

Metric Spaces and Topology Chapter 2 Metric Spaces and Topology From an engineering perspective, the most important way to construct a topology on a set is to define the topology in terms of a metric on the set. This approach underlies

More information

NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination. Answer Key

NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination. Answer Key NAME: Mathematics 205A, Fall 2008, Final Examination Answer Key 1 1. [25 points] Let X be a set with 2 or more elements. Show that there are topologies U and V on X such that the identity map J : (X, U)

More information

MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9

MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES. Contents. 1. Sets Functions Countability Axiom of choice Equivalence relations 9 MAT 570 REAL ANALYSIS LECTURE NOTES PROFESSOR: JOHN QUIGG SEMESTER: FALL 204 Contents. Sets 2 2. Functions 5 3. Countability 7 4. Axiom of choice 8 5. Equivalence relations 9 6. Real numbers 9 7. Extended

More information

Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University

Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University February 7, 2007 2 Contents 1 Metric Spaces 1 1.1 Basic definitions...........................

More information

MATH 54 - TOPOLOGY SUMMER 2015 FINAL EXAMINATION. Problem 1

MATH 54 - TOPOLOGY SUMMER 2015 FINAL EXAMINATION. Problem 1 MATH 54 - TOPOLOGY SUMMER 2015 FINAL EXAMINATION ELEMENTS OF SOLUTION Problem 1 1. Let X be a Hausdorff space and K 1, K 2 disjoint compact subsets of X. Prove that there exist disjoint open sets U 1 and

More information

Math 426 Homework 4 Due 3 November 2017

Math 426 Homework 4 Due 3 November 2017 Math 46 Homework 4 Due 3 November 017 1. Given a metric space X,d) and two subsets A,B, we define the distance between them, dista,b), as the infimum inf a A, b B da,b). a) Prove that if A is compact and

More information

Solutions to Tutorial 8 (Week 9)

Solutions to Tutorial 8 (Week 9) The University of Sydney School of Mathematics and Statistics Solutions to Tutorial 8 (Week 9) MATH3961: Metric Spaces (Advanced) Semester 1, 2018 Web Page: http://www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/ug/sm/math3961/

More information

3 COUNTABILITY AND CONNECTEDNESS AXIOMS

3 COUNTABILITY AND CONNECTEDNESS AXIOMS 3 COUNTABILITY AND CONNECTEDNESS AXIOMS Definition 3.1 Let X be a topological space. A subset D of X is dense in X iff D = X. X is separable iff it contains a countable dense subset. X satisfies the first

More information

Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions. HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y)

Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions. HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y) Metric Space Topology (Spring 2016) Selected Homework Solutions HW1 Q1.2. Suppose that d is a metric on a set X. Prove that the inequality d(x, y) d(z, w) d(x, z) + d(y, w) holds for all w, x, y, z X.

More information

Real Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller

Real Analysis Notes. Thomas Goller Real Analysis Notes Thomas Goller September 4, 2011 Contents 1 Abstract Measure Spaces 2 1.1 Basic Definitions........................... 2 1.2 Measurable Functions........................ 2 1.3 Integration..............................

More information

Real Analysis Chapter 4 Solutions Jonathan Conder

Real Analysis Chapter 4 Solutions Jonathan Conder 2. Let x, y X and suppose that x y. Then {x} c is open in the cofinite topology and contains y but not x. The cofinite topology on X is therefore T 1. Since X is infinite it contains two distinct points

More information

INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY, MATH 141, PRACTICE PROBLEMS

INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY, MATH 141, PRACTICE PROBLEMS INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY, MATH 141, PRACTICE PROBLEMS Problem 1. Give an example of a non-metrizable topological space. Explain. Problem 2. Introduce a topology on N by declaring that open sets are, N,

More information

CHAPTER 7. Connectedness

CHAPTER 7. Connectedness CHAPTER 7 Connectedness 7.1. Connected topological spaces Definition 7.1. A topological space (X, T X ) is said to be connected if there is no continuous surjection f : X {0, 1} where the two point set

More information

Problems - Section 17-2, 4, 6c, 9, 10, 13, 14; Section 18-1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10; Section 19-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9;

Problems - Section 17-2, 4, 6c, 9, 10, 13, 14; Section 18-1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10; Section 19-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9; Math 553 - Topology Todd Riggs Assignment 2 Sept 17, 2014 Problems - Section 17-2, 4, 6c, 9, 10, 13, 14; Section 18-1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10; Section 19-1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9; 17.2) Show that if A is closed in Y and

More information

Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem

Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem 56 Chapter 7 Locally convex spaces, the hyperplane separation theorem, and the Krein-Milman theorem Recall that C(X) is not a normed linear space when X is not compact. On the other hand we could use semi

More information

Immerse Metric Space Homework

Immerse Metric Space Homework Immerse Metric Space Homework (Exercises -2). In R n, define d(x, y) = x y +... + x n y n. Show that d is a metric that induces the usual topology. Sketch the basis elements when n = 2. Solution: Steps

More information

1. Simplify the following. Solution: = {0} Hint: glossary: there is for all : such that & and

1. Simplify the following. Solution: = {0} Hint: glossary: there is for all : such that & and Topology MT434P Problems/Homework Recommended Reading: Munkres, J.R. Topology Hatcher, A. Algebraic Topology, http://www.math.cornell.edu/ hatcher/at/atpage.html For those who have a lot of outstanding

More information

Set, functions and Euclidean space. Seungjin Han

Set, functions and Euclidean space. Seungjin Han Set, functions and Euclidean space Seungjin Han September, 2018 1 Some Basics LOGIC A is necessary for B : If B holds, then A holds. B A A B is the contraposition of B A. A is sufficient for B: If A holds,

More information

MATH 51H Section 4. October 16, Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous:

MATH 51H Section 4. October 16, Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous: MATH 51H Section 4 October 16, 2015 1 Continuity Recall what it means for a function between metric spaces to be continuous: Definition. Let (X, d X ), (Y, d Y ) be metric spaces. A function f : X Y is

More information

Axioms of separation

Axioms of separation Axioms of separation These notes discuss the same topic as Sections 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, and also 7, 10 of Munkres book. Some notions (hereditarily normal, perfectly normal, collectionwise normal, monotonically

More information

Theorems. Theorem 1.11: Greatest-Lower-Bound Property. Theorem 1.20: The Archimedean property of. Theorem 1.21: -th Root of Real Numbers

Theorems. Theorem 1.11: Greatest-Lower-Bound Property. Theorem 1.20: The Archimedean property of. Theorem 1.21: -th Root of Real Numbers Page 1 Theorems Wednesday, May 9, 2018 12:53 AM Theorem 1.11: Greatest-Lower-Bound Property Suppose is an ordered set with the least-upper-bound property Suppose, and is bounded below be the set of lower

More information

REVIEW FOR THIRD 3200 MIDTERM

REVIEW FOR THIRD 3200 MIDTERM REVIEW FOR THIRD 3200 MIDTERM PETE L. CLARK 1) Show that for all integers n 2 we have 1 3 +... + (n 1) 3 < 1 n < 1 3 +... + n 3. Solution: We go by induction on n. Base Case (n = 2): We have (2 1) 3 =

More information

Economics 204 Fall 2011 Problem Set 1 Suggested Solutions

Economics 204 Fall 2011 Problem Set 1 Suggested Solutions Economics 204 Fall 2011 Problem Set 1 Suggested Solutions 1. Suppose k is a positive integer. Use induction to prove the following two statements. (a) For all n N 0, the inequality (k 2 + n)! k 2n holds.

More information

Chapter 1 : The language of mathematics.

Chapter 1 : The language of mathematics. MAT 200, Logic, Language and Proof, Fall 2015 Summary Chapter 1 : The language of mathematics. Definition. A proposition is a sentence which is either true or false. Truth table for the connective or :

More information

Analysis III. Exam 1

Analysis III. Exam 1 Analysis III Math 414 Spring 27 Professor Ben Richert Exam 1 Solutions Problem 1 Let X be the set of all continuous real valued functions on [, 1], and let ρ : X X R be the function ρ(f, g) = sup f g (1)

More information

Connectedness. Proposition 2.2. The following are equivalent for a topological space (X, T ).

Connectedness. Proposition 2.2. The following are equivalent for a topological space (X, T ). Connectedness 1 Motivation Connectedness is the sort of topological property that students love. Its definition is intuitive and easy to understand, and it is a powerful tool in proofs of well-known results.

More information

Real Analysis. Joe Patten August 12, 2018

Real Analysis. Joe Patten August 12, 2018 Real Analysis Joe Patten August 12, 2018 1 Relations and Functions 1.1 Relations A (binary) relation, R, from set A to set B is a subset of A B. Since R is a subset of A B, it is a set of ordered pairs.

More information

REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS

REAL AND COMPLEX ANALYSIS REAL AND COMPLE ANALYSIS Third Edition Walter Rudin Professor of Mathematics University of Wisconsin, Madison Version 1.1 No rights reserved. Any part of this work can be reproduced or transmitted in any

More information

Thus, X is connected by Problem 4. Case 3: X = (a, b]. This case is analogous to Case 2. Case 4: X = (a, b). Choose ε < b a

Thus, X is connected by Problem 4. Case 3: X = (a, b]. This case is analogous to Case 2. Case 4: X = (a, b). Choose ε < b a Solutions to Homework #6 1. Complete the proof of the backwards direction of Theorem 12.2 from class (which asserts the any interval in R is connected). Solution: Let X R be a closed interval. Case 1:

More information

MATH 202B - Problem Set 5

MATH 202B - Problem Set 5 MATH 202B - Problem Set 5 Walid Krichene (23265217) March 6, 2013 (5.1) Show that there exists a continuous function F : [0, 1] R which is monotonic on no interval of positive length. proof We know there

More information

Mathematics for Economists

Mathematics for Economists Mathematics for Economists Victor Filipe Sao Paulo School of Economics FGV Metric Spaces: Basic Definitions Victor Filipe (EESP/FGV) Mathematics for Economists Jan.-Feb. 2017 1 / 34 Definitions and Examples

More information

Metric spaces and metrizability

Metric spaces and metrizability 1 Motivation Metric spaces and metrizability By this point in the course, this section should not need much in the way of motivation. From the very beginning, we have talked about R n usual and how relatively

More information

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 1. I. Foundational material

SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR. MATHEMATICS 205A Part 1. I. Foundational material SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES FOR MATHEMATICS 205A Part 1 Fall 2014 I. Foundational material I.1 : Basic set theory Problems from Munkres, 9, p. 64 2. (a (c For each of the first three parts, choose a 1 1 correspondence

More information

Solve EACH of the exercises 1-3

Solve EACH of the exercises 1-3 Topology Ph.D. Entrance Exam, August 2011 Write a solution of each exercise on a separate page. Solve EACH of the exercises 1-3 Ex. 1. Let X and Y be Hausdorff topological spaces and let f: X Y be continuous.

More information

2 Metric Spaces Definitions Exotic Examples... 3

2 Metric Spaces Definitions Exotic Examples... 3 Contents 1 Vector Spaces and Norms 1 2 Metric Spaces 2 2.1 Definitions.......................................... 2 2.2 Exotic Examples...................................... 3 3 Topologies 4 3.1 Open Sets..........................................

More information

MATH 426, TOPOLOGY. p 1.

MATH 426, TOPOLOGY. p 1. MATH 426, TOPOLOGY THE p-norms In this document we assume an extended real line, where is an element greater than all real numbers; the interval notation [1, ] will be used to mean [1, ) { }. 1. THE p

More information

TOPOLOGY HW 2. x x ± y

TOPOLOGY HW 2. x x ± y TOPOLOGY HW 2 CLAY SHONKWILER 20.9 Show that the euclidean metric d on R n is a metric, as follows: If x, y R n and c R, define x + y = (x 1 + y 1,..., x n + y n ), cx = (cx 1,..., cx n ), x y = x 1 y

More information

Math 54: Topology. Syllabus, problems and solutions. Pierre Clare. Dartmouth College, Summer 2015

Math 54: Topology. Syllabus, problems and solutions. Pierre Clare. Dartmouth College, Summer 2015 Math 54: Topology Syllabus, problems and solutions Pierre Clare Dartmouth College, Summer 2015 1 [M] Topology (2 nd ed.), by J. Munkres. Textbook O. Introduction - 4 lectures O.1 Elementary set theory

More information

Math 190: Fall 2014 Homework 4 Solutions Due 5:00pm on Friday 11/7/2014

Math 190: Fall 2014 Homework 4 Solutions Due 5:00pm on Friday 11/7/2014 Math 90: Fall 04 Homework 4 Solutions Due 5:00pm on Friday /7/04 Problem : Recall that S n denotes the n-dimensional unit sphere: S n = {(x 0, x,..., x n ) R n+ : x 0 + x + + x n = }. Let N S n denote

More information

Topology Part of the Qualify Exams of Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University Prepared by Zhang, Zecheng

Topology Part of the Qualify Exams of Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University Prepared by Zhang, Zecheng Topology Part of the Qualify Exams of Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University Prepared by Zhang, Zecheng Remark 0.1. This is a solution Manuel to the topology questions of the Topology Geometry

More information

MATH 220 (all sections) Homework #12 not to be turned in posted Friday, November 24, 2017

MATH 220 (all sections) Homework #12 not to be turned in posted Friday, November 24, 2017 MATH 220 (all sections) Homework #12 not to be turned in posted Friday, November 24, 2017 Definition: A set A is finite if there exists a nonnegative integer c such that there exists a bijection from A

More information

COUNTABLE PRODUCTS ELENA GUREVICH

COUNTABLE PRODUCTS ELENA GUREVICH COUNTABLE PRODUCTS ELENA GUREVICH Abstract. In this paper, we extend our study to countably infinite products of topological spaces.. The Cantor Set Let us constract a very curios (but usefull) set known

More information

B. Appendix B. Topological vector spaces

B. Appendix B. Topological vector spaces B.1 B. Appendix B. Topological vector spaces B.1. Fréchet spaces. In this appendix we go through the definition of Fréchet spaces and their inductive limits, such as they are used for definitions of function

More information

Metric Spaces Lecture 17

Metric Spaces Lecture 17 Metric Spaces Lecture 17 Homeomorphisms At the end of last lecture an example was given of a bijective continuous function f such that f 1 is not continuous. For another example, consider the sets T =

More information

Analysis III Theorems, Propositions & Lemmas... Oh My!

Analysis III Theorems, Propositions & Lemmas... Oh My! Analysis III Theorems, Propositions & Lemmas... Oh My! Rob Gibson October 25, 2010 Proposition 1. If x = (x 1, x 2,...), y = (y 1, y 2,...), then is a distance. ( d(x, y) = x k y k p Proposition 2. In

More information

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 13 Solutions

Math General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 13 Solutions Math 535 - General Topology Fall 2012 Homework 13 Solutions Note: In this problem set, function spaces are endowed with the compact-open topology unless otherwise noted. Problem 1. Let X be a compact topological

More information

Some Background Material

Some Background Material Chapter 1 Some Background Material In the first chapter, we present a quick review of elementary - but important - material as a way of dipping our toes in the water. This chapter also introduces important

More information

CHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM

CHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM CHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM We begin our study by identifying certain special kinds of linear functionals on certain special vector spaces of functions. We describe these linear functionals

More information

Based on the Appendix to B. Hasselblatt and A. Katok, A First Course in Dynamics, Cambridge University press,

Based on the Appendix to B. Hasselblatt and A. Katok, A First Course in Dynamics, Cambridge University press, NOTE ON ABSTRACT RIEMANN INTEGRAL Based on the Appendix to B. Hasselblatt and A. Katok, A First Course in Dynamics, Cambridge University press, 2003. a. Definitions. 1. Metric spaces DEFINITION 1.1. If

More information

Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces

Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces The Stone-Čech compactification of Tychonoff spaces Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto June 27, 2014 1 Completely regular spaces and Tychonoff spaces A topological

More information

Lecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352

Lecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352 Lecture Notes 1 Basic Concepts of Mathematics MATH 352 Ivan Avramidi New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM 87801 June 3, 2004 Author: Ivan Avramidi; File: absmath.tex; Date: June 11,

More information

REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS

REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS REVIEW OF ESSENTIAL MATH 346 TOPICS 1. AXIOMATIC STRUCTURE OF R Doğan Çömez The real number system is a complete ordered field, i.e., it is a set R which is endowed with addition and multiplication operations

More information

After taking the square and expanding, we get x + y 2 = (x + y) (x + y) = x 2 + 2x y + y 2, inequality in analysis, we obtain.

After taking the square and expanding, we get x + y 2 = (x + y) (x + y) = x 2 + 2x y + y 2, inequality in analysis, we obtain. Lecture 1: August 25 Introduction. Topology grew out of certain questions in geometry and analysis about 100 years ago. As Wikipedia puts it, the motivating insight behind topology is that some geometric

More information

PROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space

PROBLEMS. (b) (Polarization Identity) Show that in any inner product space 1 Professor Carl Cowen Math 54600 Fall 09 PROBLEMS 1. (Geometry in Inner Product Spaces) (a) (Parallelogram Law) Show that in any inner product space x + y 2 + x y 2 = 2( x 2 + y 2 ). (b) (Polarization

More information

Chapter 2. Metric Spaces. 2.1 Metric Spaces

Chapter 2. Metric Spaces. 2.1 Metric Spaces Chapter 2 Metric Spaces ddddddddddddddddddddddddd ddddddd dd ddd A metric space is a mathematical object in which the distance between two points is meaningful. Metric spaces constitute an important class

More information

Continuity. Matt Rosenzweig

Continuity. Matt Rosenzweig Continuity Matt Rosenzweig Contents 1 Continuity 1 1.1 Rudin Chapter 4 Exercises........................................ 1 1.1.1 Exercise 1............................................. 1 1.1.2 Exercise

More information

Part A. Metric and Topological Spaces

Part A. Metric and Topological Spaces Part A Metric and Topological Spaces 1 Lecture A1 Introduction to the Course This course is an introduction to the basic ideas of topology and metric space theory for first-year graduate students. Topology

More information

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t

Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall F(x) = 1 x. f(t)dt. t 1 2. tf 2 (t)dt. and g(t, x) = 2 t. 2 t Analysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall 2. Let f L 2 (, ) be given. (a) Prove that ( x 2 f(t) dt) 2 x x t f(t) 2 dt. (b) Given part (a), prove that F L 2 (, ) 2 f L 2 (, ), where F(x) = x (a) Using

More information

Class Notes for MATH 255.

Class Notes for MATH 255. Class Notes for MATH 255. by S. W. Drury Copyright c 2006, by S. W. Drury. Contents 0 LimSup and LimInf Metric Spaces and Analysis in Several Variables 6. Metric Spaces........................... 6.2 Normed

More information

Functional Analysis I

Functional Analysis I Functional Analysis I Course Notes by Stefan Richter Transcribed and Annotated by Gregory Zitelli Polar Decomposition Definition. An operator W B(H) is called a partial isometry if W x = X for all x (ker

More information

MATH 4200 HW: PROBLEM SET FOUR: METRIC SPACES

MATH 4200 HW: PROBLEM SET FOUR: METRIC SPACES MATH 4200 HW: PROBLEM SET FOUR: METRIC SPACES PETE L. CLARK 4. Metric Spaces (no more lulz) Directions: This week, please solve any seven problems. Next week, please solve seven more. Starred parts of

More information

Banach-Alaoglu theorems

Banach-Alaoglu theorems Banach-Alaoglu theorems László Erdős Jan 23, 2007 1 Compactness revisited In a topological space a fundamental property is the compactness (Kompaktheit). We recall the definition: Definition 1.1 A subset

More information

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS

INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS INVERSE LIMITS AND PROFINITE GROUPS BRIAN OSSERMAN We discuss the inverse limit construction, and consider the special case of inverse limits of finite groups, which should best be considered as topological

More information

g 2 (x) (1/3)M 1 = (1/3)(2/3)M.

g 2 (x) (1/3)M 1 = (1/3)(2/3)M. COMPACTNESS If C R n is closed and bounded, then by B-W it is sequentially compact: any sequence of points in C has a subsequence converging to a point in C Conversely, any sequentially compact C R n is

More information

Assignment #10 Morgan Schreffler 1 of 7

Assignment #10 Morgan Schreffler 1 of 7 Assignment #10 Morgan Schreffler 1 of 7 Lee, Chapter 4 Exercise 10 Let S be the square I I with the order topology generated by the dictionary topology. (a) Show that S has the least uppper bound property.

More information

Lebesgue Measure on R n

Lebesgue Measure on R n CHAPTER 2 Lebesgue Measure on R n Our goal is to construct a notion of the volume, or Lebesgue measure, of rather general subsets of R n that reduces to the usual volume of elementary geometrical sets

More information

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f)) 1. Basic algebra of vector fields Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over R. Recall that V = {L : V R} is defined to be the set of all linear maps to R. V is isomorphic to V, but there is no canonical

More information

Analysis Finite and Infinite Sets The Real Numbers The Cantor Set

Analysis Finite and Infinite Sets The Real Numbers The Cantor Set Analysis Finite and Infinite Sets Definition. An initial segment is {n N n n 0 }. Definition. A finite set can be put into one-to-one correspondence with an initial segment. The empty set is also considered

More information

Chapter 1: Banach Spaces

Chapter 1: Banach Spaces 321 2008 09 Chapter 1: Banach Spaces The main motivation for functional analysis was probably the desire to understand solutions of differential equations. As with other contexts (such as linear algebra

More information

CHAPTER 9. Embedding theorems

CHAPTER 9. Embedding theorems CHAPTER 9 Embedding theorems In this chapter we will describe a general method for attacking embedding problems. We will establish several results but, as the main final result, we state here the following:

More information

Sanjay Mishra. Topology. Dr. Sanjay Mishra. A Profound Subtitle

Sanjay Mishra. Topology. Dr. Sanjay Mishra. A Profound Subtitle Topology A Profound Subtitle Dr. Copyright c 2017 Contents I General Topology 1 Compactness of Topological Space............................ 7 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 Compact Space 7 1.2.1 Compact Space.................................................

More information

General Topology. Summer Term Michael Kunzinger

General Topology. Summer Term Michael Kunzinger General Topology Summer Term 2016 Michael Kunzinger michael.kunzinger@univie.ac.at Universität Wien Fakultät für Mathematik Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1 A-1090 Wien Preface These are lecture notes for a

More information

Economics 204 Fall 2011 Problem Set 2 Suggested Solutions

Economics 204 Fall 2011 Problem Set 2 Suggested Solutions Economics 24 Fall 211 Problem Set 2 Suggested Solutions 1. Determine whether the following sets are open, closed, both or neither under the topology induced by the usual metric. (Hint: think about limit

More information

MATH 722, COMPLEX ANALYSIS, SPRING 2009 PART 5

MATH 722, COMPLEX ANALYSIS, SPRING 2009 PART 5 MATH 722, COMPLEX ANALYSIS, SPRING 2009 PART 5.. The Arzela-Ascoli Theorem.. The Riemann mapping theorem Let X be a metric space, and let F be a family of continuous complex-valued functions on X. We have

More information

Def. A topological space X is disconnected if it admits a non-trivial splitting: (We ll abbreviate disjoint union of two subsets A and B meaning A B =

Def. A topological space X is disconnected if it admits a non-trivial splitting: (We ll abbreviate disjoint union of two subsets A and B meaning A B = CONNECTEDNESS-Notes Def. A topological space X is disconnected if it admits a non-trivial splitting: X = A B, A B =, A, B open in X, and non-empty. (We ll abbreviate disjoint union of two subsets A and

More information

CONTENTS. 4 Hausdorff Measure Introduction The Cantor Set Rectifiable Curves Cantor Set-Like Objects...

CONTENTS. 4 Hausdorff Measure Introduction The Cantor Set Rectifiable Curves Cantor Set-Like Objects... Contents 1 Functional Analysis 1 1.1 Hilbert Spaces................................... 1 1.1.1 Spectral Theorem............................. 4 1.2 Normed Vector Spaces.............................. 7 1.2.1

More information