A Novel Double-Notch Passive Hydraulic Mount Design

Transcription

1 Proceedings of 20 th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA August 2010, Sydney, Australia A Novel Double-Notch Passive Hydraulic Mount Design Reza Tikani (1), Saeed Ziaei-Rad (1), Nader Vahdati (2), Somayeh Heidari (2), Mohsen Esfahanian (1) (1) Department of Mechanical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan , Iran (2) School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore , Singapore PACS: TM Vibration isolators, attenuators, and dampers ABSTRACT Passive hydraulic engine mounts are broadly applied in automotive and aerospace applications to isolate cabin from engine noise and vibration. The engine mounts are stationed in between engine and fuselage in aerospace applications. In fixed wing turbofan engine applications, notch frequency of each hydraulic engine mount is adjusted to eir N1 frequency (engine low speed shaft imbalance excitation frequency) or to N2 frequency (engine high speed shaft imbalance excitation frequency) at cruise condition. Since most of today's passive hydraulic engine mount designs have only one notch, isolation is only possible at eir N1 or at N2, but not at both. In this paper, a novel double-notch passive hydraulic engine mount design is proposed. The new design consists of two inertia tracks. One inertia track contains a tuned vibration absorber (TVA) where or one does not. This design exhibits two notch frequencies, and refore provide vibration and noise isolation at two different frequencies. The notch frequencies of new design are easily tunable and notches be placed at N1 and N2 with ease. The new passive hydraulic engine mount design concept and its mamatical model are presented in details and some discussions on simulation results are also included. INTRODUCTION Passive hydraulic engine mounts are widely used in automotive and aerospace applications for control of cabin noise and vibration (Singh, Kim and Ravindra, 1992; Kim and Singh, 1993; 1995; Adigunaa et al., 2003; Vahdati, 2005; Christopherson and Jazar, 2006). The hydraulic mount is placed in between engine and fuselage, or car engine and car frame to reduce and control noise and vibration level of cabin. Aircraft engine mounts have two main functions: 1) to connect engine and airframe toger, and 2) to isolate airframe from engine vibration (Swanson, Wu and Ashrafiuon,1993). Vibratory forces are mainly caused by rotational unbalances of engine, and result in increased stress levels in nacelle, as well as high noise levels in cabin (Swanson, Wu and Ashrafiuon,1993). Through careful design and selection of hydraulic engine mount parameters, it is possible to select dynamic stiffness smaller than static stiffness at a certain frequency. This effect is called "notching'' and is referred to as minimum dynamic stiffness over a small frequency range (Yunhe, Nagi G. and Rao V., 2001). The "notch frequency" is frequency at which dynamic stiffness of hydraulic mount is lowest; refore, greatest cabin noise and vibration reduction are obtained. The design location of notch frequency depends on application, but with most applications, notch frequency is designed to coincide with longest period of constant speed. For example, in case of fixed wing applications, notch frequency may be designed to coincide with aircraft cruise speed rar than take-off and landing speeds. Since most of airplane s flight time is spent at cruise speed, it makes most sense to reduce cabin noise and vibration at cruise speed rar than at take-off or landing speeds (Vahdati, 2005). The problem with exisiting hydraulic engine mount designs is that re is only one notch frequency and cabin noise and vibration reduction is only possible at one frequency. Here in this paper, a new hydraulic engine mount design is proposed that has two notch freauencies; refore, cabin noise and vibration reduction is possible at two distinct frequencies. HYDRAULIC ENGINE MOUNT A single-pumper passive fluid mount, as shown in Fig. 1, consists of two fluid chambers that are connected toger through an inertia track. Source: (Vahdati,1998) Figure 1. A typical single pumper Hydraulic mount The notch frequency location depends on inertia track length, diameter, fluid density and viscosity, and rubber stiffness. Fig. 2 shows a typical dynamic stiffness of a passive fluid mount versus frequency. ICA

2 23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australiaa Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010 chamber is connected to bottom fluid chamber via two inertia tracks. In first inertia track, re is a mass and two springs. The fluid, flowing through 1st inertia track, flow in between masss and inertia track walls and dynamically move mass up and down. In bottom fluid chamber a soft rubber diaphragm provides volumetric stiffness and contains fluid. This volumetric stiffnesss also varied by pressuring air behind it, as shown in Fig. 3. The bond graph model of Fig. 3 is shown in Fig. 4. Source: (Vahdati,1998) Figure 2. Dynamic stiffness of a typical hydraulic mount But, at cruise speed, re are many enginee imbalance (disturbance) excitation frequencies and ideally one wants to isolate cabin from all enginee imbalance excitation fremount tech- quencies. However, with current hydraulic nology, hydraulic mount notch frequency only be tuned to one and only one frequency. For example, in most turbofan engines largest imbalance excitation amplitudes normally occur at N1 (engine low-speed shaft imbalance excitation frequency) and at N2 frequencies (engine high- cur- speed shaft imbalance excitation frequency). Since rent hydraulic mount design technology only offers isolation at one frequency, a hydraulic mount designer has no choice but to choose isolation at N1 or at N2 (Vahdati, 2005). Literature and patent review show that only Vahdati (Vahdati, 2005)) has worked on hydraulic engine mounts that provide vibration and noise isolation at two distinct fre- two fluid quencies. In his design, instead of conventional chambers, three fluid chambers and two fluid inertia tracks were used to create a double notch fluid mount. But here, in this paper, a new single-pumper hydraulic mount design will be described, which offer cabin noise and vibration isolation at two frequencies without a need for an additional fluid chamber. The new design concept and its mamatical model, and simulation results will be presented in following sections. DOUBLE-NOTCH PASSIVE HYDRAULIC MOUNT DESIGN Here, in this section, a double-notch passive hydraulic engine mount design concept is described, that filter out two imbalance disturbance inputs from cabin. Fig. 3 shows new double-notch hydraulic engine mount design con- two cept. In this new design, re are two fluid chambers, inertia tracks, and a mass and two springs inside one of inertia tracks. Before deriving state space equations from bond graph model of Fig. 3, it is necessary to obtain flow loss and pressure drop in inertia tracks and especially in gap between mass and 1 st inertia track housing. The inertia track flow resistance, for circular part of 1 st inertia track, is given by (Shaughnessy, Katz and Schaffer 2005) Where μ is fluid viscosity ( Ns/m 2 ), is in- ner diameter of inertia track and L is length of inertia track that is circular. For annular section of inertia track, a different flow resistancee equation needs to be used. The velocity profile between cylindrical mass and inertia track housing could be written as Figure 3. Bond graph model of Figure 3. γ γ (1) (2) Figure 4. Mass in inertia track Where A and B are constants and be obtained by apply- ing appropriate boundary conditions. In this problem, one define boundary conditions 0 (3) Figure 3. Double-notch passive hydraulic mount The top fluid chamber, a costumed designed rubber compocomponent) nent (shown in Fig. 3 as a cone-shaped rubber acts like a spring in axial direction, acts like a piston pumping fluid, and acts like a volumetric spring in volumetric or bulge direction, containing fluid. The top fluid By considering P γh P, constants A and B L will be as follows: b a A 4Lln b P µ a ln b a x (4)

3 B a lnb b lna 4µLln a b P lna ln a x b By using Q 2πrudr, flow in gap will be derived based on pressure gradient and mass velocity. The flow loss in gap depends on fluid flow and mass velocity and be written as, P R 21i QR 21ii x (5) On or hand, force applied to mass by fluid is important in simulations. The shear stress on mass surface is given by τ µ du dr Where must be calculated at r a. By Differentiating u with respect to r, shear stress will be obtained. Where C and C are (6) τ F C 3 P C 4 x (7) A surf b a C 4Lbln b a b 2L µ C bln b a The fluid force acting on mass be written as a function of flow and mass velocity by plugging Eq.(5) into Eq.(7). (8) FC.R.A.QC.R C A.x (9) Now, by considering obtained equations, state space equations, from bond graph model, be derived as q q V (10) q A V P I (11) P q C R P I q C (12) P I A (13) q A q q A C C R C (14) R q (15) q C R q C R (16) q A (17) q C R q C (18) q C R q C (19) q (20) The input force or effort on bond 1, is given by F q C R V A q C (21) In above state space equations, q, q, q, q, q and q are generalized displacement variables, P,,, and are momentum variables. To simulate model of Fig. 4, MATLAB Program and above state space equations with following baseline parameters were used. velocity across mount, m/s effective area of top metal, m2 effective area of mass in inertia track, 2.162e-4 m2 diameter of inertia track, m fluid inertia in upper and below parts of inertia track, same as I and, Ns2/m5 inertia track flow resistance, same as R and R, Ns/m5 inertia of piston, same as, kg loss of inertia around mass, same as, flow loss in gap, Ns/ m5 axial stiffness of rubber in upper chamber (C 1 K ), 2.05e6 N/m damping component of rubber in upper chamber (R B ), 145 Ns/m top chamber volumetric or bulge stiffness (C 1 K ), 1.1e11 N/m5 bottom chamber volumetric or bulge stiffness (C 1 K ) 2.1e9 N/m5 stiffness of springs in inertia track, (C 1 K ), 2*1000 N/m flow loss around piston(r C.R C A ), Ns/m flow loss around piston(r C.R.A ), Ns/m fluid inertia in 2nd inertia track, Ns2/m5 2nd inertia track flow resistance, Ns/m5 The fluid inertia is given by (22) Where ρ is fluid density (1765 kg/m 3 ) and L is length of upper and lower parts of inertia track ( m). Also, be calculated in same manner ( height of piston in inertia track is 25.4e-3 m). The length of second inertia track is m and its diameter is m. ICA

4 MATLAB program, with above baseline parameters, was used to simulate state space Eqs. (10) (21). Fig. 6 shows new hydraulic mount dynamic stiffness (defined as ) versus frequency. The figure clearly shows that indeed that are two notches and two peaks. From figure, one see that first and second notch frequencies occur at and Hz, and peak frequencies at and Hz, respectively. Of course, one place notch and peak frequencies to any desired location by altering hydraulic mount parameters. The first notch location be varied by a change in second inertia track parameters and second notch location by a change in first inertia track parameters and also mass and springs. Fig. 9 shows that if one varies piston material (lead), one alter location of notch and peak frequencies. Figure 9. Dynamic stiffness as piston material changes In this novel design, re is an opportunity to vanish one notch by fixing mass in inertia track. In or words, by using magnets, one change a double notch fluid mount design to a fluid mount design with only one notch. Fig. 10 shows notch location in this situation. Figure 6. Dynamic stiffness of double-notch hydraulic engine mount (MATLAB simulation) For example, Fig. 7 shows that if one varies second inertia track parameters, one alter location of first notch frequency and first and second peak frequencies. In this simulation diameter of second inertia track was altered from m to m. Figure 7. Dynamic stiffness as diameter of second inertia track changes Fig. 8 shows variation in location of notches and peaks as stiffness of springs in inertia track is varied. In this case second notch frequency will vary from Hz to Hz. Figure 10. Dynamic stiffness with and without magnets Often, it is necessary to alter location of notch frequencies after hydraulic mount is manufactured. Also, if notch frequency or frequencies need to be retuned, ideally it be done without a need for any fluid mount redesign. Similar to approach in (Vahdati, 2005), in this new hydraulic engine mount design, volumetric stiffness ; be easily varied if gas pressure behind rubber diaphragm is increased or decreased. This tunability be very useful both to original equipment manufacturer and to customer. The two notch frequencies be fine tuned with help of ; without need for any hydraulic mount redesign. If it is needed to fine tune fluid mount notches in field, one do so by changing gas pressure. Fine tuning notch frequencies in field provide better cabin noise and vibration isolation than tuning fluid mount notches at OEM s manufacturing site. Figs. 11 and 12 show that as volume stiffness is varied, first and second notch frequencies be relocated. Figure 8. Dynamic stiffness as stiffness of springs change Figure 11. First notch frequency as bottom volume stiffness, ; is varied 4 ICA 2010

5 9. Vahdati, N. (2005). "Double-Notch Single-Pumper Fluid Mounts." Journal of Sound and Vibration 285: Yunhe, Y. a., N. a. Nagi G. and D. Rao V. (2001). "A literature review of automotive vehicle engine mounting systems." Mechanism and Machine Theory 36: Figure 12. Second notch frequency as bottom volume stiffness, ; is varied CONCLUSIONS For fixed wing applications, current commercially available passive hydraulic engine mount designs have only one notch frequency; refore, cabin noise and vibration isolation is only possible at N1 or at N2, but not both. Here, in this paper, a new passive hydraulic engine mount design has been presented, which has two notch frequencies. The new design was described and its mamatical model was presented. It was shown that indeed this new design provide vibration and noise isolation at two frequencies and one easily tune notch and peak frequencies by changing gas pressure and appropriate mount parameters. REFERENCES 1. Adigunaa, H., M. Tiwaria, R. Singh, H. E. Tsengb and D. Hrovat (2003). "Transient Response of a Hydraulic Engine Mount." Journal of Sound and Vibration 268: Christopherson, J. and G. N. Jazar (2006). "Dynamic Behavior Comparison of Passive Hydraulic Engine Mounts. Part 1: Mamatical Analysis." Journal of Sound and Vibration 290: Kim, G. and R. Singh (1993). "Nonlinear Analysis of Automotive Hydraulic Engine Mount." Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control 115: Kim, G. and R. Singh (1995). "A Study Of Passive And Adaptive Hydraulic Engine Mount Systems With Emphasis On Non-Linear Characteristics." Journal of Sound and Vibration 179(3): Shaughnessy, E. J., I. M. Katz and J. P. Schaffer (2005). Introduction to fluid mechanics. New York, Oxford University Press. 6. Singh, R., G. Kim and P. V. Ravindra (1992). "Linear Analysis of Automotive Hydro-Mechanical Mount With Emphasis on Decoupler Characteristics." Journal of Sound and Vibration 158(2): Swanson, D. A., H. T. Wu and H. Ashrafiuon (1993). "Optimization of Aircraft Engine Suspension Systems." Journal of Aircraft 30(6): Vahdati, N. (1998). "A Detailed Mechanical Model of a Double Pumper Fluid Mount." Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 120 (2). ICA