Adaptive Jacobian Tracking Control of Robots With Uncertainties in Kinematic, Dynamic and Actuator Models
|
|
- Cuthbert Walters
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 104 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 51, NO. 6, JUNE 006 Adaptive Jacobian Tracking Control of Robots With Uncertainties in Kinematic, Dynamic and Actuator Models C. C. Cheah, C. Liu, and J. J. E. Slotine Abstract Most research so far on robot trajectory control has assumed that the kinematics of the robot is known exactly. However, when a robot picks up tools of uncertain lengths, orientations, or gripping points, the overall kinematics becomes uncertain and changes according to different tasks. Recently, we derived a new adaptive Jacobian tracking controller for robots with uncertain kinematics and dynamics. This note extends the results to include redundant robots and adaptation to actuator parameters. Experimental results are presented to illustrate the performance of the proposed controller. Index Terms Actuator model, adaptive control, dynamics, robot kinematics, tracking control, uncertainty. I. INTRODUCTION Robot manipulators are required to handle various tools and, hence, the dynamic parameters of the robots vary during operation and are difficult to be predicted in advance. By exploring physical properties of the robot system, Takegaki and Arimoto [1] and Arimoto [] showed using Lyapunov s method that simple controllers such as the proportional-derivative (PD) and proportional integral-derivative (PID) feedback are effective for setpoint control despite the nonlinearity and uncertainty of the robot dynamics. To deal with trajectory tracking control, several adaptive robot control laws have been proposed and much progress has been obtained in respect to understanding how the robot can track a desired trajectory in the presence of uncertain dynamic parameters [3] [17]. However, most research on robot control has assumed that the exact kinematics and Jacobian matrix of the manipulator from joint space to Cartesian space are known. This assumption leads us to several open problems in the development of robot control laws today. In free motion [18], this implies that the exact lengths of the links, joint offsets and the object which the robot is holding, must be known. Unfortunately, no physical parameters can be derived exactly. Moreover, when the robot picks up objects or tools of different lengths, unknown orientations and gripping points, the overall kinematics are changing and, therefore, difficult to derive exactly. Therefore, the robot is not able to manipulate the tool to a desired position if the length or gripping point of the tool is uncertain. When the control problem is extended to the control of multifingered robot hands [19], such assumption also limits its potential applications because the kinematics is uncertain in many applications of robot hands. For example, the contact points of the robot fingers are uncertain and changing during manipulation. Similarly, in hybrid position force control [0], the assumption of exact kinematics also leads us to an open problem on how to control the robot if the kinematics and constraint are uncertain. To overcome the problem of uncertain kinematics, several approximate Jacobian setpoint controllers [1] [3] were proposed recently. The proposed controllers do not require the exact knowledge of kinematics and Jacobian matrix that is assumed in the literature of robot control. Using the approximate Jacobian control approach, other open problems such as force control with uncertainties [4] and control of robot fingers with uncertain contact points [5] can be resolved in a unified formulation. However, the results in [1] [3] are focusing on setpoint control of robot. In some applications, it is necessary to specify the motion in much more details than simply stating the desired final position. Thus, a desired trajectory should be specified. Recently, an adaptive Jacobian controller was proposed for trajectory tracking control of robot manipulators [6], [7]. The controller does not require the exact knowledge of kinematics and Jacobian matrix that is assumed in the literature of tracking control. However, it is assumed in [6] and [7] that the actuator model is known exactly. Since the actuator model may be uncertain in practice, calibration is necessary to identify the exact parameters of the actuator in implementing the robot controllers. In addition, the actuator parameters could change as temperature varies due to overheating of motor or changes in ambient temperature. Hence, in the presence of the modeling uncertainty or calibration error, the convergence of the tracking error may not be guaranteed. This note extends the algorithm of [6] to include redundant robots and adaptation to actuator parameters. A new adaptive Jacobian controller is proposed for trajectory tracking of robot with uncertain kinematics, dynamics and actuator model. Experimental results are presented to illustrate the performance of the proposed controller. II. ROBOT DYNAMICS AND KINEMATICS If a direct current (dc) motor driven by an amplifier is used as actuator at each joint of the robot, the dynamics of the robot with n degree of degrees of freedom can be expressed as [], [8] M (q)q + B + 1 M _ (q) +S(q; _q) _q + g(q) =Ku (1) where M (q) R nn is the inertia matrix, B R nn is a matrix of damping coefficients, u R n is either a voltage or current inputs to the amplifiers, K R nn is a diagonal transmission matrix that relates the actuator input u to the control torque S(q; _q)_q = 1 _M (q)_q _qt M (q)_q and g(q) R n is the gravitational force. Several important properties of the dynamic equation described by (1) are given as follows [], [4], [8], [9]. Property 1: The inertia matrix M (q) is symmetric and uniformly positive definite for all q R n. Property : The matrix S(q; _q) is skew-symmetric so that T S(q; _q) =0for all R n. Property 3: The dynamic model as described by (1) is linear in a set of physical parameters d =( d1 ; 111; dp ) T as T Manuscript received October 1, 004; revised July 5, 005 and November 30, 005. Recommended by Associate Editor F. Bullo. C. C. Cheah and C. Liu are with School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore , Republic of Singapore ( ECCCheah@ntu.edu.sg). J. J. E. Slotine is with Nonlinear Systems Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 0139 USA ( jjs@mit.edu). M (q)q + B + 1 M _ (q) +S(q; _q) _q + g(q) =Y d (q; _q; _q; q) d where Y d (1) R np is called the dynamic regressor matrix. } In most applications of robot manipulators, a desired path for the end-effector is specified in task space or operation space such as Carte /$ IEEE
2 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 51, NO. 6, JUNE sian space or visual space [], [1], [30]. Let x R m be a task space vector defined by x = h(q) where m n, h(1) R m is a transformation describing the relation between the joint space and task space. The task-space velocity _x is related to joint-space velocity _q as _x = J(q)_q () where J(q) R mn is the Jacobian matrix from joint space to task space. If cameras are used to monitor the position of the end-effector, the task space is defined as image space in pixels. Let r represent the position of the end-effector in Cartesian coordinates and x represent the vector of image feature parameters [3]. The image velocity vector _x is related to the joint velocity vector _q as [3] _x = J I (r)je(q)_q where J I (r) is the image Jacobian matrix [3] and J e (q) is the manipulator Jacobian matrix of the mapping from joint space to Cartesian space. In the presence of uncertainties in the camera parameters, the exact image Jacobian matrix and the manipulator Jacobian matrix cannot be obtained. If a position sensor is used to monitor the position of the end-effector, the task space is defined as Cartesian space and, hence, J(q) =J e (q) where J e (q) is the manipulator Jacobian. A property of the kinematic equation described by () is stated as follows [6]. Property 4: The right hand side of () is linear in a set of kinematic parameters k =( k1 ; 111; kq ) T, such as link lengths and joint offsets. Hence, () can be expressed as _x = J(q)_q = Y k (q; _q) k (3) where Y k (q; _q) R mq is called the kinematic regressor matrix. } Remark 1: In the presence of kinematic uncertainty, inverse kinematics cannot be used to derive the desired trajectory in joint space. In addition, when the dynamics equation is expressed in task space by using () and its derivative, we have where l 1 and l are the link lengths, l 0 and q 0 are the length and grasping angle of the object, respectively, s 1 = sin(q 1 ), s 1 = sin(q 1 + q ), s 1o = sin(q 1 + q + q o ), c 1 = cos(q 1 ), c 1 = cos(q 1 + q ), and c 1o = cos(q1 + q + q o). In presence of kinematic uncertainty, the parameters l 1, l, l o, and q 0 are unknown. The inverse Jacobian matrix J 01 (q) can be obtained as J 01 1 (q) = l 1 l s + l 1 l o s o l c 1 + l oc 1o l s 1 + l os 1o 0(l 1 c 1 + l c 1 + l o c 1o ) 0(l 1 s 1 + l s 1 + l o s 1o ) which is nonlinear in the unknown parameters l 1, l, l o, and q 0. Therefore, the standard adaptive controller by Slotine and Li [4] cannot be applied directly to overcome the uncertainty in both kinematics and dynamics. Hence, in the presence of kinematic uncertainty, the adaptive method [4] results in tracking error or even unstable response in the end-effector s motion. The nonlinearity and uncertainty of the robot kinematics pose a difficult and challenging adaptive tracking control problem which remains unsolved for almost two decades. III. ADAPTIVE JACOBIAN TRACKING CONTROL In this section, we present an adaptive Jacobian tracking controller for robot with uncertain kinematics, dynamics, and actuator model. The main idea of the derivation is to introduce an adaptive sliding vector based on estimated task-space velocity, so that kinematic, dynamic, and actuator adaptation can be performed concurrently. In the presence of kinematic uncertainty, the parameters of the Jacobian matrix is uncertain and, hence, (3) can be expressed as ^_x = ^J(q; ^ k )_q = Y k (q; _q)^ k (4) where ^_x R m denotes an estimated task-space velocity, ^J(q; ^ k ) R mn is an approximate Jacobian matrix, and ^ k R q denotes a set of estimated kinematic parameters. Let us define a vector _x r R m as _x r = _x d 0 (x 0 x d ) (5) where x d R m is a desired trajectory, _x d = dx d =dt R m is the desired velocity specified in task space, and is a positive constant. Differentiating (5) with respect to time, we have M (q)j 01 (q)x + 0M (q)j 01 (q) J(q)+B _ + 1 M _ (q)+s(q; _q) x r =xd 0 (_x 0 _x d ) (6) J 01 (q)_x+g(q) =Ku: The aforementioned equation cannot be expressed in a form as in Property 3 because J 01 (q) is not linear in the unknown kinematic parameters. In addition, the mapping between force and torque using Jacobian transpose is also uncertain due to the unknown kinematic parameters. For example, for a two link nonredundant robot holding an object, the Jacobian matrix J(q) from joint space to Cartesian space can be derived as 0(l 1s 1 + l s 1 + l o s 1o ) 0(l s 1 + l o s 1o ) J(q) = l 1 c 1 + l c 1 + l o c 1o l c 1 + l o c 1o where x d = d _x d =dt R m is the desired acceleration in task space. Next, define an adaptive task-space sliding vector using (4) as ^s x = ^_x 0 _xr = ^J(q; ^ k )_q 0 _x r (7) where ^J(q; ^ k )_q = Y k (q; _q)^ k as indicated in (4). The above vector is adaptive in the sense that the parameters of the approximate Jacobian matrix is updated by a parameter update law (18). Differentiating (7) with respect to time, we have _^s x = ^x 0 x r = ^J(q; ^ k )q + _^J(q; ^ k )_q 0 x r (8)
3 106 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 51, NO. 6, JUNE 006 where ^x denotes the derivative of ^_x. In the redundant case, the null space of the approximate Jacobian matrix can be used to minimize a performance index [13], [31]. Next, let where 1x = x 0 x d, 1_x = _x 0 _x d, and K v R mm and K p R mm are symmetric positive definite gain matrices, ii) a dynamic adaptation law _q r = ^J + (q; ^ k )_x r + I n 0 ^J + (q; ^ k ) ^J(q; ^ k ) (9) where ^J + (q; ^ k )= ^J T (q; ^ k )( ^J(q; ^ k ) ^J T (q; ^ k )) 01 is the generalized inverse of the approximate Jacobian matrix, and R n is minus the gradient of the convex function to be optimized. In this note, we assume that the robot is operating in a finite task space such that the approximate Jacobian matrix is of full rank. From (9), we have iii) a kinematic adaptation law _^ d = 0L d Y T d (q; _q; _q r; q r)s (17) _^ k = L k Y T k (q; _q)(k v1_x + K p1x) (18) and iv) an actuator adaptation law q r = ^J + (q; ^ k )x r + _^J + (q; ^ k )_x r + I n 0 ^J + (q; ^ k ) ^J(q; ^ k ) _ 0 _^J + (q; ^ k ) ^J(q; ^ k ) 0 ^J + (q; ^ k ) _^J(q; ^k ) : (10) and Hence, we have an adaptive sliding vector in joint space as From (9) and (11), we note that s = _q 0 _q r (11) _s =q 0 q r: (1) ^J(q; ^ k )s =(^_x 0 _x d )+(x 0 x d )=^s x: (13) Substituting (11) and (1) into (1), the equations of motion can be expressed as M (q)_s + B + 1 M _ (q)+s(q; _q) s + M (q)q r + B + 1 _M (q)+s(q; _q) _q r + g(q) =Ku: (14) From Property 3, the last five terms of (14) are linear in a set of dynamics parameters d and, hence, can be expressed as _ ^ a = 0L a Y a ( o )s (19) where L k R qq and L d R pp are symmetric positive definite matrices, L a R nn is a positive definite and diagonal matrix, Y a ( o )=diagf0 o1 ; 0 o ;...; 0 on g, and oi denotes the ith element of the vector o which is defined as o = ^J T (q; ^ k )(K v 1_x + K p 1x) 0 Y d (q; _q; _q r ; q r )^ d : (0) In the adaptive control law (16), a constant ^K01 is used to transform the control torque to an approximate actuator input. The first term is an approximate Jacobian transpose feedback law of the task-space velocity and position errors; the second term is an estimated dynamic compensation term; and the last term is used to compensate for the uncertainty introduced by the constant estimated transmission matrix ^K. The estimated dynamic parameters ^ d is updated using (17), and the estimated kinematic parameters ^ k of the approximate Jacobian matrix ^J(q; ^ k ) is updated using (18). The linear parameterization of the kinematic parameters is obtained from (3). The key novelties are that the algorithm is now augmented by a kinematic adaptation law (18) and an actuator adaptation law (19) and that a specific choice of _q r is exploited throughout. In the proposed controller, x is measured from a position sensor. Many commercial sensors are available for measurement of x, such as vision systems, electromagnetic measurement systems, position sensitive detectors, or laser trackers. The closed-loop dynamics is obtained by substituting (16) into (15) to give M (q)_s + B + 1 M _ (q)+s(q; _q) s + Y d (q; _q; _q r; q r)1 d M (q)q r + B+ 1 _M (q)+s(q; _q) so the dynamic (14) can be written as _q r + g(q)=y d (q; _q; _q r; q r) d M (q)_s + B + 1 M _ (q)+s(q; _q) s + Y d (q; _q; _q r ; q r ) d = Ku: (15) The algorithm we will now derive is composed of i) a control law based on an approximate transmission matrix ^K R nn as u = 0 ^K 01 ^JT (q; ^k )(K v 1_x + K p 1x) + ^K 01 Y d (q; _q; _q r; q r)^ d + ^K 01 Y a( o)^ a (16) + ^J T (q; ^ k )(K v1_x + K p1x) +(K ^K 01 0 I) o 0 K ^K 01 Y a ( o )^ a =0 (1) where o is defined in (0) and 1 d = d 0 ^ d. The estimated kinematic parameters ^ k of the approximate Jacobian matrix ^J(q; ^ k ) is updated by the parameter update (18) and then used in the inverse approximate Jacobian matrix ^J + (q; ^ k ), _q r, and q r in the dynamic regressor matrix. Note that ^ k (like q and _q) is just part of the states of the adaptive control system and, hence, can be used in the control variables even if it is nonlinear in the variables (provided that a linear parameterization can be found elsewhere in the system model i.e., (3)). Since ^J(q; ^ k ) and its inverse ^J + (q; ^ k ) are updated by q and ^ k, _^J(q; ^k ) and _^J + (q; ^ k ) are functions of q, _q, ^ k, 1x, and 1_x because _^k is described by (18).
4 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 51, NO. 6, JUNE Since K, ^K, and Y a( o) are diagonal matrices, the last two terms of (1) can be expressed as (K ^K 01 0 I) o 0 K ^K 01 Y a ( o )^ a = Y a ( o )( a 0 K ^K 01 ^ a ) () where ai =10 (k i=^k i) and k i and ^k i are the ith diagonal elements of K and ^K, respectively. Substituting () into (1), we have M (q)_s + B + 1 _M (q)+s(q; _q) s + Y d (q; _q; _q r; q r)1 d + ^J T (q; ^ k )(K v1_x + K p1x) +Y a( o)1 a =0 (3) Proof: Since M (q) is uniformally positive definite, V in (4) is positive definite in s, 1x, 1 k, 1 d, and 1 a. Since V _ 0, V is also bounded, and, therefore, s, 1x, 1 k, 1 d, and 1 a are bounded vectors. This implies that ^ k, ^ d, and ^ a are bounded, x is bounded if x d is bounded, and ^s x = ^J(q; ^ k )s is bounded. Since 1x is bounded, _x r in (5) is also bounded if _x d is bounded. Therefore, _q r in (9) is also bounded if the approximate Jacobian matrix is of full rank. From (11), _q is bounded and the boundedness of _q means that _x is bounded since the Jacobian matrix is bounded. Hence, 1_x is bounded and x r in (6) is also bounded if x d is bounded. From (18), _^ k is, therefore, bounded since 1x, 1_x, and _q are bounded and Y k (1) is a trigonometric function of q. Therefore, q r in (10) is bounded. From the closed-loop (3), we can conclude that _s is bounded. The boundedness of _s imply the boundedness of q as seen from (1). From (8), _^s x is, therefore, bounded. Finally, differentiating (6) with respect to time and rearranging yields where 1 a = a 0 K ^K 01 ^ a and, hence, 1 _ a = 0K ^K 01 _^ a. Let us define a Lyapunov-like function candidate as V = 1 M (q)s st + 1 1T d L 01 1 d d + 1 1T k L 01 1 k k 1x + 1_x = _^s x + _ Y k (q; _q; q)1 k 0 Y k (q; _q) _^ k which means that 1x =x 0 x d is also bounded. To apply Barbalat s lemma, let us check the uniform continuity of _V. Differentiating (8) with respect to time gives T a L 01 a ^KK 01 1 a + 1 1xT (K p + K v)1x (4) where 1 k = k 0 ^ k. Differentiating with respect to time and using Property 1, wehave _V = s T M (q)_s + 1 M _ (q)s 0 1 T st d L 01 _^ d d 0 1 T k L 01 _^ k k V = 0s T B _s 0 1 _x T K v1x 0 1x T K p1_x: This shows that V is bounded since 1x, 1_x, and 1x are all bounded. Hence, _ V is uniformly continuous. Using Barbalat s lemma, we have 1x = x 0 x d! 0, 1_x = _x 0 _x d! 0, and s! 0 as t!1.444 Remark : If the kinematic parameter update (18) is modified as 01 T a L 01 a _^ a +1x T (K p + K v )1 _x: Substituting M (q)_s from (3), _^ k from (18), _^ d from (17), and _^ a from (19) into the aforementioned, using Property and (13), yields _V = 0s T Bs 0 ^s T x (K v1_x + K p1x) +1x T (K p + K v)1 _x 01 T k Y T k (q; _q)(k v 1_x + K p 1x): (5) From (7), (3), and (5), we have _^ k = 0PY T k (q; _q)p (^_x 0 _x) +L k Y T k (q; _q)(k v 1_x + K p 1x) where P is a symmetric positive definite matrix, this adds to V _ minus the P square norm of Y k (q; _q)1 k. Hence, Y k (q; _q)1 k also converges to zero. In addition, if the persistent excitation condition is satisfied, the convergence of ^ k to k can be achieved. Remark 3: From (6), the adaptive sliding vector can be expressed as where ^s x =1_x + 1x 0 Y k (q; _q)1 k (6) Y k (q; _q)1 k = J(q)_q 0 ^J(q; ^ k )_q = _x 0 ^_x: (7) Substituting (6) into (5) yields _V = 0s T Bs 0 1_x T K v 1_x 0 1x T K p 1x 0: (8) We are now in a position to state the following theorem. Theorem: The adaptive Jacobian tracking control law (16) and the parameter update laws(17) (19) guarantee the stability and result in the convergence of position and velocity tracking errors of the adaptive control system, that is x 0 x d! 0 and _x 0 _x d! 0 as t!1. ^s x =1_x + 1x + Y k (q; _q)^ k 0 Y k (q; _q) k : (9) Hence, the signs of the parameter update laws in (18) and (17) are different because the last term in (16) is positive, while the last term in the aforementioned is negative. Remark 4: As seen from (11) and (9), if Y k (q; _q)1 k also converges to zero, the convergence of 1x and 1_x to zero implies that _q converges to _q r (even if B =0). Remark 5: In this note, we assume that the robot is operating in a finite task space such that the approximate Jacobian matrix is of full rank. Note from (9) that ^J + (q; ^ k ) is used only in the definition of control variable _q r. Therefore, we should be able to control this by bounding the variable or using a singularity-robust inverse of the approximate Jacobian matrix [31]. A projection algorithm can be used to ensure that ^ k remains bounded in an appropriate region [3]. Hence, singularities only depend on q, not ^ k. It may also be possible to avoid boundary singularities by originally overestimating the size of the robot.
5 108 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 51, NO. 6, JUNE 006 Fig. 1. Path and position errors of first experiment. Fig.. Path and position errors of second experiment. Remark 6: Following [13], a simplification of the computation of (10) can be written as q r = ^J + (q; ^ k ) x r 0 _^J(q; ^ k )_q r +(I n 0 ^J + (q; ^ k ) ^J(q; ^ k ) effector. The task-space velocities are obtained from differentiation of the measured position. The robot is required to hold an object with uncertain length and grasping angle and follow a circular trajectory specified in Cartesian space as _ + _^J T (q; ^ k ) ^J +T (q; ^ k )( _q r 0 ) X d =0:33 + 0:1 sin(0:54 + 3t); Y d =0:41 + 0:1 cos(0:54 + 3t): where the derivative of the generalized inverse is not required. IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS To illustrate the performance of the adaptive Jacobian tracking controller, we implemented the proposed controller on a two-link direct drive robot [6], using a personal computer (PC) with Pentium II processor. The controller is running in Microsoft Windows NT together with VenturCom s RTX, a hard real-time extension. The sampling period is set as 3 ms. A position sensitive detector (PSD) camera manufactured by Hamamatsu is used to measure the position of the robot end The relationship between the velocities in task space and the velocities of the joints is given by _x = J(q)_q 0s1 _q1 0s1(_q1 + _q) 0c1(_q1 + _q) = c 1 _q 1 c 1(_q 1 + _q ) 0s 1(_q 1 + _q ) l 1 l + l o c o l o s o (30)
6 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 51, NO. 6, JUNE where l 1 and l are the link lengths, l 0 and q 0 are the length and grasping angle of the object, respectively, c 1 =cosq 1, s 1 =sinq 1, c 1 = cos(q 1 + q ), s 1 = sin(q 1 + q ), c 1o = cos(q 1 + q + q o ), s 1o = sin(q 1 + q + qo), co = cos qo, and so = sin qo,. The proposed controller in the Theorem was implemented on the robot holding an object with uncertain length and grasping angle. The length of the object was approximately set as 0.06 m and the grasping angle was approximately set as 45. The object length and grasping angle were estimated as ^l o (0) = 0:1 m and ^qo(0) = 0, respectively, and the link lengths were set as ^l1 (0) = 0:5 mand ^l (0) = 0:7 m. The initial position of the robot end effector was specified as (X(0); Y(0)) = (0:8; 0:5). The actuator model is estimated as ^K = [:45; 0:95]. Experimental results with L a =diagf0:15; 0:10g, L k = diagf0:13; 0:15; 0:015g, L d = diagf0:01; 0:00; 0:00; 0:00; 0:015; 0:01; 0:01g, K v = diagf; g, Kp = diagf40; 380g, and = 1: are presented in Fig. 1. As seen from the results, the tracking errors converge with updating of the estimated actuator, kinematic, and dynamic parameters. In the second experiment, we varied the actual length and grasping angle of the object. The length of the object was approximately set as 0.1 m and the grasping angle was approximately set as 60. The experiment results are shown in Fig.. V. CONCLUSION We have proposed an adaptive Jacobian controller for the tracking control of robot with uncertain kinematics, dynamics, and actuator model. Novel parameter update laws are proposed to update uncertain kinematics, dynamics, and actuator parameters. We have shown that the robot end effector is able to track a desired trajectory with the uncertain parameters being updated online by the proposed parameter update laws. Experimental results illustrate the performance of the proposed controller. REFERENCES [1] M. Takegaki and S. Arimoto, A new feedback method for dynamic control of manipulators, ASME J. Dynam. Syst., Meas. Control, vol. 10, pp , [] S. Arimoto, Control Theory of Nonlinear Mechanical Systems A Passivity-Based and Circuit-Theoretic Approach. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press, [3] J. J. Craig, P. Hsu, and S. S. Sastry, Adaptive control of mechanical manipulators, Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 6, no., pp. 16 8, [4] J. J. E. Slotine and W. Li, On the adaptive control of robot manipulators, Int. J. Robot. Res., no. 6, pp , [5], Adaptive manipulator control: a case study, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 33, no. 11, pp , Nov [6] R. H. Middleton and G. C. Goodwin, Adaptive computed torque control for rigid link manipulators, Syst. Control Lett., vol. 10, pp. 9 16, [7] D. E. Koditschek, Adaptive techniques for mechanical systems, in Proc. 5th Yale Workshop Applications of Adaptive Systems Theory, New Haven, CT, 1987, pp [8] J. T. Wen and D. Bayard, New class of control laws for robotic manipulators Part. Adaptive case, Int. J. Control, vol. 47, no. 5, pp , [9] B. Paden and R. Panja, A globally asymptotically stable PD+ controller for robot manipulator, Int. J. Control, vol. 47, no. 6, pp , [10] R. Kelly, R. Carelli, and R. Ortega, Adaptive motion control design of robot manipulators. An input-output approach, Int. J. Control, vol. 50, no. 6, pp , [11] R. Ortega and M. W. Spong, Adaptive motion control of rigid robots: a tutorial, Automatica, vol. 5, no. 6, pp , [1] N. Sadegh and R. Horowitz, Stability and robustness analysis of a class of adaptive controllers for robotic manipulators, Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 74 9, [13] G. Niemeyer and J. J. E. Slotine, Performance in adaptive manipulator control, Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 10, no., pp , [14] H. Berghuis, R. Ortega, and H. Nijmeijer, A robust adaptive robot controller, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 9, no. 6, pp , Dec [15] L. L. Whitcomb, A. Rizzi, and D. E. Koditschek, Comparative experiments with a new adaptive controller for robot arms, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 9, no. 1, pp , Feb [16] K. W. Lee and H. Khalil, Adaptive output feedback control of robot manipulators using high gain observer, Int. J. Control, vol. 67, no. 6, pp , [17] P. Tomei, Robust adaptive friction compensation for tracking control of robot manipulators, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 45, no. 11, pp , Nov [18] S. Arimoto, Robotics research toward explication of everyday physics, Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 18, no. 11, pp , [19] A. Bicchi, Hands for dexterous manipulation and robust grasping: a difficult road toward simplicity, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 16, no. 6, pp , Dec [0] T. Yoshikawa, Force control of robot manipulators, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, 000, pp. 0 6, Invited session on robot control. [1] C. C. Cheah, S. Kawamura, and S. Arimoto, Feedback control for robotic manipulators with an uncertain Jacobian matrix, J. Robot. Syst., vol. 1, no., pp , [] C. C. Cheah, M. Hirano, S. Kawamura, and S. Arimoto, Approximate Jacobian control for robots with uncertain kinematics and dynamics, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 19, no. 4, pp , Aug [3] W. E. Dixon, Adaptive regulation of amplitude limited robot manipulators with uncertain kinematics and dynamics, in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., Boston, MA, 004, pp [4] C. C. Cheah, S. Kawamura, and S. Arimoto, Stability of hybrid position and force control for robotic manipulator with uncertain kinematics and dynamics, Automatica, vol. 39, no. 5, pp , 003. [5] C. C. Cheah, H. Han, S. Kawamura, and S. Arimoto, Grasping and position control of multi-fingered robot hands with uncertain jacobian matrices, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automation, Leuven, Belgium, 1998, pp [6] C. C. Cheah, C. Liu, and J. J. E. Slotine, Approximate jacobian adaptive control for robot manipulators, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automation, New Orleans, LA, 004, pp [7], Adaptive Jacobian tracking control of robots based on visual task-space information, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics Automation, 005, pp [8] F. L. Lewis, C. T. Abdallah, and D. M. Dawson, Control of Robot Manipulators. New York: Macmillan, [9] J. J. E. Slotine and W. Li, Applied Nonlinear Control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, [30] O. Khatib, A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: the operation space formulation, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 3, no. 1, pp , Feb [31] Y. Nakamura, Advanced Robotics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesleyn, [3] G. H. S. Hutchinson and P. Corke, A tutorial on visual servo control, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 1, no. 5, pp , Oct
Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationAdaptive Tracking Control for Robots with Unknown Kinematic and Dynamic Properties
1 Adaptive Tracking Control for Robots with Unknown Kinematic and Dynamic Properties C. C. Cheah, C. Liu and J.J.E. Slotine C.C. Cheah and C. Liu are with School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,
More informationObserver Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators
1 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications Part of 1 IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control Yokohama, Japan, September 8-1, 1 Observer Based Output Feedback Tracking Control of Robot
More information458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 3, MAY 2008
458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL 16, NO 3, MAY 2008 Brief Papers Adaptive Control for Nonlinearly Parameterized Uncertainties in Robot Manipulators N V Q Hung, Member, IEEE, H D
More informationADAPTIVE FORCE AND MOTION CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS IN CONSTRAINED MOTION WITH DISTURBANCES
ADAPTIVE FORCE AND MOTION CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS IN CONSTRAINED MOTION WITH DISTURBANCES By YUNG-SHENG CHANG A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
More informationA composite adaptive output feedback tracking controller for robotic manipulators* E. Zergeroglu, W. Dixon, D. Haste, and D.
Robotica (1999) volume 17, pp. 591 600. Printed in the United Kingdom 1999 Cambridge University Press A composite adaptive output feedback tracking controller for robotic manipulators* E. Zergeroglu, W.
More informationTracking Control of Robot Manipulators with Bounded Torque Inputs* W.E. Dixon, M.S. de Queiroz, F. Zhang and D.M. Dawson
Robotica (1999) volume 17, pp. 121 129. Printed in the United Kingdom 1999 Cambridge University Press Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators with Bounded Torque Inputs* W.E. Dixon, M.S. de Queiroz, F.
More informationExponential Controller for Robot Manipulators
Exponential Controller for Robot Manipulators Fernando Reyes Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla Grupo de Robótica de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Electrónica Apartado Postal 542, Puebla 7200, México
More informationRobot Manipulator Control. Hesheng Wang Dept. of Automation
Robot Manipulator Control Hesheng Wang Dept. of Automation Introduction Industrial robots work based on the teaching/playback scheme Operators teach the task procedure to a robot he robot plays back eecute
More informationA SIMPLE ITERATIVE SCHEME FOR LEARNING GRAVITY COMPENSATION IN ROBOT ARMS
A SIMPLE ITERATIVE SCHEME FOR LEARNING GRAVITY COMPENSATION IN ROBOT ARMS A. DE LUCA, S. PANZIERI Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza ABSTRACT The set-point
More informationNonlinear PD Controllers with Gravity Compensation for Robot Manipulators
BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES Volume 4, No Sofia 04 Print ISSN: 3-970; Online ISSN: 34-408 DOI: 0.478/cait-04-00 Nonlinear PD Controllers with Gravity Compensation
More informationForce/Position Regulation for Robot Manipulators with. Unmeasurable Velocities and Uncertain Gravity. Antonio Loria and Romeo Ortega
Force/Position Regulation for Robot Manipulators with Unmeasurable Velocities and Uncertain Gravity Antonio Loria and Romeo Ortega Universite de Tecnologie de Compiegne URA CNRS 87, HEUDIASYC, BP 69 6000,
More informationOVER THE past 20 years, the control of mobile robots has
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 18, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2010 1199 A Simple Adaptive Control Approach for Trajectory Tracking of Electrically Driven Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Bong Seok
More informationRobust Control of Cooperative Underactuated Manipulators
Robust Control of Cooperative Underactuated Manipulators Marcel Bergerman * Yangsheng Xu +,** Yun-Hui Liu ** * Automation Institute Informatics Technology Center Campinas SP Brazil + The Robotics Institute
More informationAdaptive set point control of robotic manipulators with amplitude limited control inputs* E. Zergeroglu, W. Dixon, A. Behal and D.
Robotica (2) volume 18, pp. 171 181. Printed in the United Kingdom 2 Cambridge University Press Adaptive set point control of robotic manipulators with amplitude limited control inputs* E. Zergeroglu,
More informationCase Study: The Pelican Prototype Robot
5 Case Study: The Pelican Prototype Robot The purpose of this chapter is twofold: first, to present in detail the model of the experimental robot arm of the Robotics lab. from the CICESE Research Center,
More informationControl of a Handwriting Robot with DOF-Redundancy based on Feedback in Task-Coordinates
Control of a Handwriting Robot with DOF-Redundancy based on Feedback in Task-Coordinates Hiroe HASHIGUCHI, Suguru ARIMOTO, and Ryuta OZAWA Dept. of Robotics, Ritsumeikan Univ., Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8577,
More informationRobust Control of Robot Manipulator by Model Based Disturbance Attenuation
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 511-513, Nov./Dec. 2003 obust Control of obot Manipulator by Model Based Disturbance Attenuation Keywords : obot manipulators, MBDA, position control,
More informationCONTROL OF ROBOT CAMERA SYSTEM WITH ACTUATOR S DYNAMICS TO TRACK MOVING OBJECT
Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, V.31, N.3 (2015), 255 265 DOI: 10.15625/1813-9663/31/3/6127 CONTROL OF ROBOT CAMERA SYSTEM WITH ACTUATOR S DYNAMICS TO TRACK MOVING OBJECT NGUYEN TIEN KIEM
More informationA new large projection operator for the redundancy framework
21 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Anchorage Convention District May 3-8, 21, Anchorage, Alaska, USA A new large projection operator for the redundancy framework Mohammed Marey
More informationA Sliding Mode Controller Using Neural Networks for Robot Manipulator
ESANN'4 proceedings - European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks Bruges (Belgium), 8-3 April 4, d-side publi., ISBN -9337-4-8, pp. 93-98 A Sliding Mode Controller Using Neural Networks for Robot
More informationPERIODIC signals are commonly experienced in industrial
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 15, NO. 2, MARCH 2007 369 Repetitive Learning Control of Nonlinear Continuous-Time Systems Using Quasi-Sliding Mode Xiao-Dong Li, Tommy W. S. Chow,
More information538 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL. 32, NO. 4, AUGUST 2002
538 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL. 3, NO. 4, AUGUST 00 Correspondence Repetitive Learning Control: A Lyapunov-Based Approach W. E. Dixon, E. Zergeroglu, D.
More informationAn Adaptive Full-State Feedback Controller for Bilateral Telerobotic Systems
21 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront Baltimore MD USA June 3-July 2 21 FrB16.3 An Adaptive Full-State Feedback Controller for Bilateral Telerobotic Systems Ufuk Ozbay Erkan Zergeroglu and
More informationIntegrated Design and PD Control of High-Speed Closed-loop Mechanisms
F. X. Wu Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada W. J. Zhang* Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9,
More informationNeural Network Control of Robot Manipulators and Nonlinear Systems
Neural Network Control of Robot Manipulators and Nonlinear Systems F.L. LEWIS Automation and Robotics Research Institute The University of Texas at Arlington S. JAG ANNATHAN Systems and Controls Research
More informationAdaptive Visual Tracking for Robotic Systems Without Image-Space Velocity Measurement
Adaptive Visual Tracking for Robotic Systems Without Image-Space Velocity Measurement Hanlei Wang 1 arxiv:1401.6904v3 [cs.ro] 27 Apr 2015 Abstract In this paper, we investigate the visual tracking problem
More informationTask-space Adaptive Setpoint Control for Robots with Uncertain Kinematics and Actuator Model
Task-space Adaptive Setpoint Control for Robots with Uncertain Kinematics and Actuator Model Chao Liu Chien Chern Cheah School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Nanyang Technological University,
More informationControl of Robotic Manipulators with Input/Output Delays
2009 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 10-12, 2009 WeC20.5 Control of Robotic Manipulators with Input/Output Delays Nikhil Chopra Abstract Input/output delays
More informationWE PROPOSE a new approach to robust control of robot
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL. 14, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1998 69 An Optimal Control Approach to Robust Control of Robot Manipulators Feng Lin and Robert D. Brandt Abstract We present a new
More informationControl of industrial robots. Centralized control
Control of industrial robots Centralized control Prof. Paolo Rocco (paolo.rocco@polimi.it) Politecnico di Milano ipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria Introduction Centralized control
More informationAdaptive Position and Orientation Regulation for the Camera-in-Hand Problem
Adaptive Position and Orientation Regulation for the Camera-in-Hand Problem Aman Behal* Electrical and Computer Engineering Clarkson University Potsdam, New York 13699-5720 e-mail: abehal@clarkson.edu
More informationTHE robot is one of the choices for improving productivity
320 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 52, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2005 Multiple Neuro-Adaptive Control of Robot Manipulators Using Visual Cues Choon-Young Lee and Ju-Jang Lee, Senior Member, IEEE
More informationq 1 F m d p q 2 Figure 1: An automated crane with the relevant kinematic and dynamic definitions.
Robotics II March 7, 018 Exercise 1 An automated crane can be seen as a mechanical system with two degrees of freedom that moves along a horizontal rail subject to the actuation force F, and that transports
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationVideo 8.1 Vijay Kumar. Property of University of Pennsylvania, Vijay Kumar
Video 8.1 Vijay Kumar 1 Definitions State State equations Equilibrium 2 Stability Stable Unstable Neutrally (Critically) Stable 3 Stability Translate the origin to x e x(t) =0 is stable (Lyapunov stable)
More informationModel Reference Adaptive Control for Robot Tracking Problem: Design & Performance Analysis
International Journal of Control Science and Engineering 07, 7(): 8-3 DOI: 0.593/j.control.07070.03 Model Reference Adaptive Control for Robot racking Problem: Design & Performance Analysis ahere Pourseif,
More informationTrigonometric Saturated Controller for Robot Manipulators
Trigonometric Saturated Controller for Robot Manipulators FERNANDO REYES, JORGE BARAHONA AND EDUARDO ESPINOSA Grupo de Robótica de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Electrónica Benemérita Universidad Autónoma
More informationMCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II
MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 12: Multivariable Control of Robotic Manipulators Part II Reading: SHV Ch.8 Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE647 p.1/14 Robust vs. Adaptive
More informationDelay-Independent Stabilization for Teleoperation with Time Varying Delay
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 FrC9.3 Delay-Independent Stabilization for Teleoperation with Time Varying Delay Hiroyuki Fujita and Toru Namerikawa
More informationNeural Network-Based Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulator: Application to a Three Links Cylindrical Robot
Vol.3 No., 27 مجلد 3 العدد 27 Neural Network-Based Adaptive Control of Robotic Manipulator: Application to a Three Links Cylindrical Robot Abdul-Basset A. AL-Hussein Electrical Engineering Department Basrah
More informationVirtual Passive Controller for Robot Systems Using Joint Torque Sensors
NASA Technical Memorandum 110316 Virtual Passive Controller for Robot Systems Using Joint Torque Sensors Hal A. Aldridge and Jer-Nan Juang Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia January 1997 National
More informationAn Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for Robot Manipulator in Task Space
INT J COMPUT COMMUN, ISSN 84-9836 Vol.7 (22), No. 3 (September), pp. 58-529 An Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for Robot Manipulator in Task Space T. Ngo, Y. Wang, T.L. Mai, J. Ge, M.H. Nguyen, S.N.
More informationRobust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft
Robust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft AER1503 Spacecraft Dynamics and Controls II April 24, 2015 Christopher Au Agenda Introduction Model Formulation Controller Designs Simulation Results 2
More informationA Cascaded-Based Hybrid Position-Force Control for Robot Manipulators with Nonnegligible Dynamics
21 American Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July 2, 21 FrA16.4 A Cascaded-Based Hybrid Position-Force for Robot Manipulators with Nonnegligible Dynamics Antonio C. Leite, Fernando
More informationTracking Control for Robot Manipulators with Kinematic and Dynamic Uncertainty
Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, and the European Control Conference 2005 Seille, Spain, December 2-5, 2005 WeB3.3 Tracking Control for Robot Manipulators with Kinematic
More informationDesign and Control of Variable Stiffness Actuation Systems
Design and Control of Variable Stiffness Actuation Systems Gianluca Palli, Claudio Melchiorri, Giovanni Berselli and Gabriele Vassura DEIS - DIEM - Università di Bologna LAR - Laboratory of Automation
More informationGAIN SCHEDULING CONTROL WITH MULTI-LOOP PID FOR 2- DOF ARM ROBOT TRAJECTORY CONTROL
GAIN SCHEDULING CONTROL WITH MULTI-LOOP PID FOR 2- DOF ARM ROBOT TRAJECTORY CONTROL 1 KHALED M. HELAL, 2 MOSTAFA R.A. ATIA, 3 MOHAMED I. ABU EL-SEBAH 1, 2 Mechanical Engineering Department ARAB ACADEMY
More informationMulti-Priority Cartesian Impedance Control
Multi-Priority Cartesian Impedance Control Robert Platt Jr. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology rplatt@csail.mit.edu Muhammad Abdallah, Charles
More informationRBF Neural Network Adaptive Control for Space Robots without Speed Feedback Signal
Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci. Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 37 3, 3 RBF Neural Network Adaptive Control for Space Robots without Speed Feedback Signal By Wenhui ZHANG, Xiaoping YE and Xiaoming JI Institute
More informationNONLINEAR PATH CONTROL FOR A DIFFERENTIAL DRIVE MOBILE ROBOT
NONLINEAR PATH CONTROL FOR A DIFFERENTIAL DRIVE MOBILE ROBOT Plamen PETROV Lubomir DIMITROV Technical University of Sofia Bulgaria Abstract. A nonlinear feedback path controller for a differential drive
More information1348 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL. 34, NO. 3, JUNE 2004
1348 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 34, NO 3, JUNE 2004 Direct Adaptive Iterative Learning Control of Nonlinear Systems Using an Output-Recurrent Fuzzy Neural
More informationNatural and artificial constraints
FORCE CONTROL Manipulator interaction with environment Compliance control Impedance control Force control Constrained motion Natural and artificial constraints Hybrid force/motion control MANIPULATOR INTERACTION
More informationSTABILITY OF SECOND-ORDER ASYMMETRIC LINEAR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATION TO ROBOT GRASPING
STABILITY OF SECOND-ORDER ASYMMETRIC LINEAR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATION TO ROBOT GRASPING Amir Shapiro Department of Mechanical Engineering Ben Gurion University of the Negev P.O.B. 653 Beer Sheva
More informationCombined NN/RISE-based Asymptotic Tracking Control of a 3 DOF Robot Manipulator
JIAS Journal of Intelligent Automation Systems Published online: 15 January 214 Combined NN/RISE-based Asymptotic Tracking Control of a 3 DOF Robot Manipulator Sara Yazdanzad a, Alireza Khosravi b,*, Abolfazl
More informationRobotics 2 Robot Interaction with the Environment
Robotics 2 Robot Interaction with the Environment Prof. Alessandro De Luca Robot-environment interaction a robot (end-effector) may interact with the environment! modifying the state of the environment
More informationReal-time Motion Control of a Nonholonomic Mobile Robot with Unknown Dynamics
Real-time Motion Control of a Nonholonomic Mobile Robot with Unknown Dynamics TIEMIN HU and SIMON X. YANG ARIS (Advanced Robotics & Intelligent Systems) Lab School of Engineering, University of Guelph
More informationDesign and Stability Analysis of Single-Input Fuzzy Logic Controller
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL. 30, NO. 2, APRIL 2000 303 Design and Stability Analysis of Single-Input Fuzzy Logic Controller Byung-Jae Choi, Seong-Woo Kwak,
More informationGlobal robust output feedback tracking control of robot manipulators* W. E. Dixon, E. Zergeroglu and D. M. Dawson
Robotica 004) volume, pp. 35 357. 004 Cambridge University Press DOI: 0.07/S06357470400089 Printed in the United Kingdom Global robust output feedback tracking control of robot manipulators* W. E. Dixon,
More informationStable Limit Cycle Generation for Underactuated Mechanical Systems, Application: Inertia Wheel Inverted Pendulum
Stable Limit Cycle Generation for Underactuated Mechanical Systems, Application: Inertia Wheel Inverted Pendulum Sébastien Andary Ahmed Chemori Sébastien Krut LIRMM, Univ. Montpellier - CNRS, 6, rue Ada
More informationInverse differential kinematics Statics and force transformations
Robotics 1 Inverse differential kinematics Statics and force transformations Prof Alessandro De Luca Robotics 1 1 Inversion of differential kinematics! find the joint velocity vector that realizes a desired
More informationA Unified Quadratic-Programming-Based Dynamical System Approach to Joint Torque Optimization of Physically Constrained Redundant Manipulators
16 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL. 34, NO. 5, OCTOBER 004 A Unified Quadratic-Programg-Based Dynamical System Approach to Joint Torque Optimization of Physically
More informationLecture Schedule Week Date Lecture (M: 2:05p-3:50, 50-N202)
J = x θ τ = J T F 2018 School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering at the University of Queensland Lecture Schedule Week Date Lecture (M: 2:05p-3:50, 50-N202) 1 23-Jul Introduction + Representing
More informationDynamic Tracking Control of Uncertain Nonholonomic Mobile Robots
Dynamic Tracking Control of Uncertain Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Central Florida Orlando FL 3816 USA Abstract We consider
More informationAdaptive servo visual robot control
Robotics and Autonomous Systems 43 (2003) 51 78 Adaptive servo visual robot control Oscar Nasisi, Ricardo Carelli Instituto de Automática, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, Av. San Martín (Oeste) 1109,
More informationRobust Adaptive Control of Nonholonomic Mobile Robot With Parameter and Nonparameter Uncertainties
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS, VOL. 1, NO., APRIL 005 61 [4] P. Coelho and U. Nunes, Lie algebra application to mobile robot control: A tutorial, Robotica, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 483 493, 003. [5] P. Coelho,
More informationForce Tracking Impedance Control with Variable Target Stiffness
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Force Tracking Impedance Control with Variable Target Stiffness K. Lee and M. Buss Institute of Automatic Control
More informationTHE control of systems with uncertain nonlinear dynamics
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 2, MARCH 2008 373 Asymptotic Tracking for Systems With Structured and Unstructured Uncertainties P. M. Patre, Student Member, IEEE, W. MacKunis,
More informationAdaptive Vision and Force Tracking Control for Robots With Constraint Uncertainty
Adaptive Vision and Force Tracking Control for Robots With Constraint Uncertainty The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters.
More informationA Backstepping control strategy for constrained tendon driven robotic finger
A Backstepping control strategy for constrained tendon driven robotic finger Kunal Sanjay Narkhede 1, Aashay Anil Bhise 2, IA Sainul 3, Sankha Deb 4 1,2,4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, 3 Advanced
More informationForce/Impedance Control for Robotic Manipulators
16 Force/Impedance Control for Robotic Manipulators Siddharth P Nagarkatti MKS Instruments, Wilmington, MA Darren M Dawson Clemson University 161 Introduction 162 Dynamic Model Joint-Space Model Task-Space
More informationVehicle Dynamics of Redundant Mobile Robots with Powered Caster Wheels
Vehicle Dynamics of Redundant Mobile Robots with Powered Caster Wheels Yuan Ping Li * and Teresa Zielinska and Marcelo H. Ang Jr.* and Wei Lin * National University of Singapore, Faculty of Engineering,
More informationBACKSTEPPING-BASED HYBRID ADAPTIVE CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS INCORPORATING ACTUATOR DYNAMICS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 11, 141 153 (1997) BACKSTEPPING-BASED HYBRID ADAPTIVE CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS INCORPORATING ACTUATOR DYNAMICS CHUN-YI SU* AND
More informationq HYBRID CONTROL FOR BALANCE 0.5 Position: q (radian) q Time: t (seconds) q1 err (radian)
Hybrid Control for the Pendubot Mingjun Zhang and Tzyh-Jong Tarn Department of Systems Science and Mathematics Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA mjz@zach.wustl.edu and tarn@wurobot.wustl.edu
More informationUnit Quaternion-Based Output Feedback for the Attitude Tracking Problem
56 IEEE RANSACIONS ON AUOMAIC CONROL, VOL. 53, NO. 6, JULY 008 Unit Quaternion-Based Output Feedback for the Attitude racking Problem Abdelhamid ayebi, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract In this note, we propose
More informationH State-Feedback Controller Design for Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems Using Fuzzy Weighting-Dependent Lyapunov Functions
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL 11, NO 2, APRIL 2003 271 H State-Feedback Controller Design for Discrete-Time Fuzzy Systems Using Fuzzy Weighting-Dependent Lyapunov Functions Doo Jin Choi and PooGyeon
More informationLinköping University Electronic Press
Linköping University Electronic Press Report Simulation Model of a 2 Degrees of Freedom Industrial Manipulator Patrik Axelsson Series: LiTH-ISY-R, ISSN 400-3902, No. 3020 ISRN: LiTH-ISY-R-3020 Available
More informationTrajectory Tracking Control of a Very Flexible Robot Using a Feedback Linearization Controller and a Nonlinear Observer
Trajectory Tracking Control of a Very Flexible Robot Using a Feedback Linearization Controller and a Nonlinear Observer Fatemeh Ansarieshlaghi and Peter Eberhard Institute of Engineering and Computational
More informationSTABILITY OF HYBRID POSITION/FORCE CONTROL APPLIED TO MANIPULATORS WITH FLEXIBLE JOINTS
International Journal of Robotics and Automation, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1999 STABILITY OF HYBRID POSITION/FORCE CONTROL APPLIED TO MANIPULATORS WITH FLEXIBLE JOINTS P.B. Goldsmith, B.A. Francis, and A.A. Goldenberg
More informationIN recent years, controller design for systems having complex
818 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 29, NO 6, DECEMBER 1999 Adaptive Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Systems by State and Output Feedback S S Ge, Member,
More information(W: 12:05-1:50, 50-N202)
2016 School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering at the University of Queensland Schedule of Events Week Date Lecture (W: 12:05-1:50, 50-N202) 1 27-Jul Introduction 2 Representing Position
More informationDesign Artificial Nonlinear Controller Based on Computed Torque like Controller with Tunable Gain
World Applied Sciences Journal 14 (9): 1306-1312, 2011 ISSN 1818-4952 IDOSI Publications, 2011 Design Artificial Nonlinear Controller Based on Computed Torque like Controller with Tunable Gain Samira Soltani
More informationFINITE TIME CONTROL FOR ROBOT MANIPULATORS 1. Yiguang Hong Λ Yangsheng Xu ΛΛ Jie Huang ΛΛ
Copyright IFAC 5th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain FINITE TIME CONTROL FOR ROBOT MANIPULATORS Yiguang Hong Λ Yangsheng Xu ΛΛ Jie Huang ΛΛ Λ Institute of Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
More informationLecture «Robot Dynamics»: Dynamics 2
Lecture «Robot Dynamics»: Dynamics 2 151-0851-00 V lecture: CAB G11 Tuesday 10:15 12:00, every week exercise: HG E1.2 Wednesday 8:15 10:00, according to schedule (about every 2nd week) office hour: LEE
More informationAnalytic Nonlinear Inverse-Optimal Control for Euler Lagrange System
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL. 16, NO. 6, DECEMBER 847 Analytic Nonlinear Inverse-Optimal Control for Euler Lagrange System Jonghoon Park and Wan Kyun Chung, Member, IEEE Abstract Recent
More informationLecture «Robot Dynamics»: Dynamics and Control
Lecture «Robot Dynamics»: Dynamics and Control 151-0851-00 V lecture: CAB G11 Tuesday 10:15 12:00, every week exercise: HG E1.2 Wednesday 8:15 10:00, according to schedule (about every 2nd week) Marco
More informationAdaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinearly Parameterized Fuzzy Approximators
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL. 9, NO. 2, APRIL 2001 315 Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinearly Parameterized Fuzzy Approximators Hugang Han, Chun-Yi Su, Yury Stepanenko
More informationThe Rationale for Second Level Adaptation
The Rationale for Second Level Adaptation Kumpati S. Narendra, Yu Wang and Wei Chen Center for Systems Science, Yale University arxiv:1510.04989v1 [cs.sy] 16 Oct 2015 Abstract Recently, a new approach
More informationStability Analysis and Robust PID Control of Cable-Driven Robots Considering Elasticity in Cables
Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic) Amirkabir International Jounrnal of Science & Research Electrical & Electronics Engineering (AIJ-EEE) Vol. 48, No. 2, Fall 2016, pp. 113-125 Stability
More informationMCE493/593 and EEC492/592 Prosthesis Design and Control
MCE493/593 and EEC492/592 Prosthesis Design and Control Control Systems Part 3 Hanz Richter Department of Mechanical Engineering 2014 1 / 25 Electrical Impedance Electrical impedance: generalization of
More informationAdaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 48, NO. 0, OCTOBER 003 87 Adaptive and Robust Controls of Uncertain Systems With Nonlinear Parameterization Zhihua Qu Abstract Two classes of partially known
More informationA Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for Robotic Manipulators
932 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 47, NO. 4, AUGUST 2000 A Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for Robotic Manipulators Wen-Hua Chen, Member, IEEE, Donald J. Ballance, Member, IEEE, Peter
More informationGain Scheduling Control with Multi-loop PID for 2-DOF Arm Robot Trajectory Control
Gain Scheduling Control with Multi-loop PID for 2-DOF Arm Robot Trajectory Control Khaled M. Helal, 2 Mostafa R.A. Atia, 3 Mohamed I. Abu El-Sebah, 2 Mechanical Engineering Department ARAB ACADEMY FOR
More informationControl of Mobile Robots
Control of Mobile Robots Regulation and trajectory tracking Prof. Luca Bascetta (luca.bascetta@polimi.it) Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria Organization and
More informationNEURAL NETWORKS (NNs) play an important role in
1630 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 34, NO 4, AUGUST 2004 Adaptive Neural Network Control for a Class of MIMO Nonlinear Systems With Disturbances in Discrete-Time
More informationRobot Dynamics II: Trajectories & Motion
Robot Dynamics II: Trajectories & Motion Are We There Yet? METR 4202: Advanced Control & Robotics Dr Surya Singh Lecture # 5 August 23, 2013 metr4202@itee.uq.edu.au http://itee.uq.edu.au/~metr4202/ 2013
More informationTODAY, the developments in technology and the requirements
542 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 12, NO. 4, JULY 2004 Mutual Synchronization of Robots via Estimated State Feedback: A Cooperative Approach Alejandro Rodriguez-Angeles and Henk
More informationOperational Space Control of Constrained and Underactuated Systems
Robotics: Science and Systems 2 Los Angeles, CA, USA, June 27-3, 2 Operational Space Control of Constrained and Underactuated Systems Michael Mistry Disney Research Pittsburgh 472 Forbes Ave., Suite Pittsburgh,
More informationPassivity-based Control of Euler-Lagrange Systems
Romeo Ortega, Antonio Loria, Per Johan Nicklasson and Hebertt Sira-Ramfrez Passivity-based Control of Euler-Lagrange Systems Mechanical, Electrical and Electromechanical Applications Springer Contents
More information