MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE


 Alannah McCarthy
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES STEFAN GILLE 1
2 2 STEFAN GILLE 1. Rings We recall first the definition of a group Definition. Let G be a non empty set. The set G is called a group if there is a map called multiplication G G G, (g, h) g h subject to the following axioms: (Associative law) g (h l) = (g h) l for all g, h, l G. (Existence of a left neutral element) There exists e G, such that e g = g for all g G. (Existence of a left inverse) For all g G there exists h G, such that If moreover (Commutative law) h g = e. g h = h g for all g, h G then the group G is called abelian or commutative. In this case we write the multiplication in G additively and call it addition, i.e. we write g + h instead of g h Examples. (a) The integers, rational, real, and complex numbers (denoted Z, Q, R, and C, respectively) with the usual addition are an abelian group. (b) The general linear group GL n (R), i.e. the set of invertible n nmatrices over R, with the usual matrix multiplication is a group, which is for n 2 not commutative. (c) If X is set then Aut(X), the set of bijective, i.e. onetoone and onto, mappings from X into itself is a group with composition of maps as multiplication. The neutral element is the identity mapping id X : X X, x x, and as left inverse of a map the usual inverse of the map. (d) A vector space over the real or complex numbers with the addition as operation is an abelian group Some consequences of the axioms. Let G be a group. (1) If h g = e, where e is a left neutral element, then also g h = e. In fact, it follows from h g that h g h = h. Multiplying this equation on the left by an left inverse k of h gives k (h g h) = k h = e and so e = k (h g h) = (k h) g h = g h as claimed. It follows also form this that g is a left inverse of its left inverse h. (2) If e g = g then also g e = g, i.e. a left neutral element is also right neutral. In fact, let h be a left and so by (1) also right inverse of g. Then g = e g = (g h) g = g (h g) = g e.
3 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 3 (3) There is only one element e G, such that e g = g for all g G. This element is called the neutral element of G and is also denoted by 1 and called the one of G, or if G is abelian and the multiplication is written additively denoted by 0 and called the zero of G. Proof of claim: Assume that ẽ is another left neutral element. Since by (2) the left neutral element e is also right neutral this gives ẽ = ẽ e = e. (4) Every g G has a unique left inverse, called the inverse of g and denoted by g 1, or if G is abelian and the multiplication is written additively by g. In fact, if h g = e = h g then multiplying this equation on the right by a right inverse of g gives h = h Definition. A homomorphism of groups is a map α : G H between groups, such that α(g 1 g 2 ) = α(g 1 ) α(g 2 ) for all g 1, g 2 G. Denote by e G and e H the neutral elements of G and H, respectively. Then α(e G ) = e H and α(g 1 ) = (α(g)) 1. In fact, we have α(e G ) = α(e G e G ) = α(e G ) α(e G ) multiplying on the left by (α(e G )) 1 gives e H = α(e G ). Therefore we have e H = α(e G ) = α(g 1 g) = α(g 1 ) α(g) and so the uniqueness of the inverse implies α(g 1 ) = (α(g)) Examples. (a) Let V, W be a vector spaces considered as abelian groups as in 1.2 (d). Then a linear map α : V W is a homomorphism of groups. (b) Let r Z be an integer. Then Z, Z, n r n is a homomorphism of the abelian group Z into itself. (c) The positive real numbers R >0 := { r R r > 0 } with the usual multiplication are an abelian group. The exponential function exp : R R >0, t exp(t) is a homomorphism of groups from the additive group of real numbers into this group since exp(s + t) = exp(s) exp(t). We come now to the definition of a ring Definition. A ring is a non empty set R equipped with two operations called addition, and R R R, (r, s) r + s R R R, (r, s) r s called multiplication, which are subject to the following axioms: The set R with the operation + is an abelian group. The neutral element of this operation will be denoted by 0, or 0 R to indicate the ring R, and called the zero of R.
4 4 STEFAN GILLE (Associative law for the multiplication) r (s t) = (r s) t for all r, s, t R. (Existence of a neutral element for the multiplication) There exits an element in R called one and denoted by 1, or 1 R to indicate the ring R, which is 0, such that 1 r = r = r 1 for all r R. (Distributive laws) r (s + t) = r s + r t and (r + s) t = r t + s t for all r, s, t R. If moreover the elements of R satisfy the (commutative law) r s = s r for all r, s R then R is called a commutative ring. Note the following consequences of these axioms: (i) 0 r = 0 = r 0 for all r R, since 0 r = (0 + 0) r = 0 r + 0 r, and subtraction from both sides of this equation the inverse of 0 r gives then 0 = 0 r. Analogous, one shows r 0 = 0. (ii) The one is unique: If 1 is another element satisfying 1 r = r = r 1 for all r R then 1 = 1 1 = Examples. (a) The integers Z with the usual addition and multiplication are a ring. (b) The rational, real, and complex numbers with the usual addition and multiplication are rings. We denote them by Q, R, and C, respectively. (c) The n nmatrices over R or C with the usual matrix addition and multiplication are a ring. We denote this ring by M n (R) respectively by M n (C). (d) Let V be a vector space over the real numbers. Then End R (V ) the set of all Rlinear maps from V into itself is ring with addition (f + g)(x) := f(x) + g(x) and multiplication the composition of maps f g. (e) Let X be set and Maps(X, R) the set of maps X R (or more general Maps(X, R) the set of maps X R, where R is a ring). This is a ring with addition (f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x) and multiplication (f g)(x) = f(x) g(x). The neutral elements for the addition and multiplication are the constant functions x 0, respectively x 1 for all x X Definition. Let R be a ring. A subring of R is a subset S R, such that 0 and 1 are in S, and given s, t S then (a) s t = s + ( t) S, and
5 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 5 (b) s t S. This implies that S is also a ring, in other words, one can define a subring of a ring R also as subset of R, which contains 0 and 1, and is a ring with respect to the addition and multiplication of R. Note that if T is a subring of S and S is a subring of R then T is also a subring of R Examples. (a) Z is a subring of Q, which in turn is a subring of R. (b) The set of real valued diagonal matrices is a subring of M n (R). (c) The set of continuous functions and the set of differentiable functions are subrings of Maps(R, R) Definition. Let R be a ring. An element r R is called a unit, or an invertible element of R if there exists an element s R, such that r s = 1 = s r. The element s with this property is unique. In fact, if s is another such element, i.e. r s = s r = 1 then s = s 1 = s (r s) = (s r) s = 1 s = s. We call this unique element an inverse of r and denote it by r 1. Lemma. Let R be a ring. The set R of all units in R is a group with the ring multiplication as multiplication. It is abelian if R is commutative. Proof. To show that R is a group we observe first that if r, s R then (r s) (s 1 r 1 ) = r (s s 1 ) r 1 = r 1 r 1 = 1 and similar (s 1 r 1 ) (r s) = 1, i.e. r s is also a unit (and so in R ) with inverse s 1 r 1. Hence the multiplication in R defines an operation on the set R : R R R, (r, s) r s. This operation is associative, has 1 as neutral element, and r 1 as inverse of r R. Hence R is a group with this multiplication, which is clearly commutative, i.e. abelian, if R is a commutative ring. The group R is called the multiplicative group of the ring R Examples. (a) The 1 and 1 are all units of Z, i.e. Z = { 1, 1}. (b) In Q, R, and C all non zero elements are units. (c) The general linear group GL n (R) of invertible matrices is the group of units in M n (R) Definition. A ring R, such that every non zero element is a unit, i.e. R = R \ {0}, is called a skewfield. If R is moreover commutative we say that R is a field. The rational, real, and complex numbers are fields. An example of a skewfield is the quaternion algebra over the real numbers R.
6 6 STEFAN GILLE The quaternion algebra. Let H be a 4dimensional real vector space with basis 1, i, j, k, i.e. every z H can be written z = a 1 + b i + c j + d k with unique real numbers a, b, c, d. Define a multiplication on H by setting letting 1 acts as 1, i.e. 1 h = h 1 = h for all h H, and set i i = 1, j j = 1, and i j = j i = k. This implies i k = j, k i = j, j k = i, k j = i, and k 2 = 1. One extends this linearly to a multiplication on H as follows: (a 1 + b i + c j + d k) (e 1 + f i + g j + h k) := (ae bf cg dh) 1 + (af + be + ch dg) i +(ag bh + ce + df) j + (ah + bg cf + de) k. With the vector addition and this multiplication H is a ring with the zero vector as 0 and 1 as one. To see that it is a skewfield consider the linear map x x which is defined by 1 = 1, ī = i, jh = j, and A straightforward computation shows that kh = k. (a 1 + b i + c j + d k) (a 1 + b i + c j + d k) = a 2 + b 2 + c 2 + d 2, which is a positive real number except if a = b = c = d = 0. In particular, for all x 0. Let x 0. Then N(x) := x x 0 (N(x) 1 x) x = 1 = x (N(x) 1 x), and so every non zero x in H is a unit with inverse x 1 = N(x) 1 x. Since H is not commutative (e.g. i j j i), it is a skewfield called the quaternion algebra. Another way to define H is as follows. Let M 2 (C) be the set of complex 2 2 matrices. This is a 4dimensional complex vector space, and by restricting the scalars to the real numbers also a real vector space (of dimension 8). Consider in M 2 (C) the matrices ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 i = 0, j =, and k = 1 1 0, 1 0 where 1 C denotes a square root of 1. Then H can be identified( with the ) dimensional Rvector space of M 2 (C) generated by the identity matrix 0 1 and the matrices i, j, and k The group ring. Let G be a group and R a ring. The group ring of G over R is the set of formal sums r g g with r g R, and all but finitely many r g = 0. The addition is defined by g G g G r g g + g G s g g := g G (r g + s g ) g,
7 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 7 and the multiplication is defined by r g g g G g G s g g := g G ( h k=g r h s k ) g. This is a ring with 1 e + 0 g as one, where e is the neutral element of G, and g e 0 g as zero. g G
8 8 STEFAN GILLE 2. Commutative rings and polynomial rings Convention. In the following sections all rings are understood unless otherwise said to be commutative Notation. In the following the in a product will be often suppressed, i.e. rs instead of r s. Let R be a ring. For an integer n and r R one defines n r as follows: n = 0: 0 r := 0; n > 0: 1 r := r, 2 r := r + r, 3 r := r + r + r, and so on, i.e. inductively n r := (n 1) r + r. n < 0: n r := [( n) r]. Then (m + n) r = m r + n r and n r = (n 1 R ) r for all n, m Z. The definition of r n is for n 0 is analogous: r 0 := 1, r 1 := r, and for n 2 inductively by r n := r n 1 r. If r is a unit and so also r m for all integers m 0 as one proves by induction, r n is also defined for negative n by r n := (r n ) 1. Then r m+n = r m r n for all integers m, n 0, and if r is a unit also for all integers m, n Definition. Let R and S be rings. A homomorphism of rings, or (shorter) morphism of rings is a map α : R S, such that α(1 R ) = 1 S. α(r 1 + r 2 ) = α(r 1 ) + α(r 2 ); α(r 1 r 2 ) = α(r 1 ) α(r 2 ); and These axioms imply: (1) α(0 R ) = 0 S since α(0 R ) = α(0 R + 0 R ) = α(0 R ) + α(0 R ). (2) α( r) = α(r) since by (1) one has 0 S = α(0 R ) = α(r + ( r)) = α(r) + α( r), i.e. α( r) is the additive inverse of α(r). (3) Analogous, if r is a unit in R then α(r 1 ) = α(r) 1 since 1 S = α(1 R ) = α(r r 1 ) = α(r) α(r 1 ), i.e. α(r 1 ) is the multiplicative inverse of α(r) Example. For every ring R there is a unique homomorphism of rings π R : Z R, which is given by π R := n 1 R. It follows from the formulas in 2.1 that this is a homomorphism of rings. Since every homomorphism Z R has to map 1 onto 1 R it follows that every such homomorphism maps the integer n onto n 1 R and so π R is the unique homomorphism from Z to R Definition. The kernel, denoted Ker α, of a homomorphism of rings α : R S is the set of all r R. such that α(r) = 0 S. This set has the following properties: 0 R Ker α, if r 1, r 2 Ker α then also r 1 r 2 Ker α, and for all r Ker α and t R the product t r is also in Ker α. (Proof: If r 1, r 2 are in the kernel of α then α(r 1 r 2 ) = α(r 1 ) α(r 2 ) = 0; and if r Ker α and t R then α(t r) = α(t) α(r) = α(t) 0 S = 0 S.) In other words, Ker α is an example of an ideal Definition. Let R be a ring. An ideal of the ring R is a subset I R, such that
9 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 9 0 R I; r 1 r 2 I for all r 1, r 2 I; and t r I for all t R and r I. Note that an ideal is in general not a subring of R since usually the one 1 R is not contained in the ideal. Every ring has at least two ideals, the zero ideal {0} which is denoted by (0) and the full ring are ideals. These are also called the trivial ideals. An ideal I in the ring R is called finitely generated if there are x 1,..., x n I, such that n I = R x i := { n } r i x i r1,..., r n R. The elements x 1,..., x n are called generators of I. If I is generated by one element then I is called a principal ideal, i.e. I is of the form I = R x { r x r R } for some x R. Note that for all x, x 1,..., x n in the ring R the sets R x and n R x i are ideals Lemma. Let R be a ring. (i) An element x R is a unit if and only if R x = R. (ii) The ring R is a field if and only if (0) and R are the only ideals of R. (iii) If R is an integral domain and R x = R y then there exists a unit u R, such that x = u y. Proof. (i): If x is a unit then r = (r x 1 ) x and so all r R are in R x, i.e. R = R x. On the other hand, if R x = R then there exists y R, such that y x = 1 R, i.e. x is a unit. (ii): If R is a field and I (0) an ideal in R then there is 0 x in I. This x is a unit and so by part (i) R x = R. Since R x I this implies I = R. The reverse direction follows also from part (i): Since for x 0 in R the ideal R x is not the zero ideal, and so has to be the full ring R, which by (i) implies that x is a unit. (iii): If R x = R y then y R x and x R y. Hence there are u, v R, such that y = v x and x = u y. Inserting the second into the first of these equations gives y = v (u y) = (v u) y, which is equivalent by the distributive law to (1 v u) y = 0. Since R is an integral domain it follows 1 = v u, i.e. u is a unit Example. All ideals of the integers Z are given by { Z n := r n } r Z for an integer n 0. In fact, if I is an ideal of Z, which is not the zero ideal then there exists an integer s 0 in I. Since I is an ideal also s I. Hence there exists a positive integer in I. Let n be the smallest positive integer in I. Then since I is an ideal Z n = {t n t Z} I. To show the reverse inclusion I Z n, let m 0 be an element of I. By the Euclidean algorithm one can write m = t n + r with integers r, t, such that 0 r < n. Since I is an ideal also r = m t n I. This implies r = 0 as n is the smallest positive integer in I, and therefore m = t n Z n as claimed.
10 10 STEFAN GILLE Hence all ideals of Z are principal ideals, and since Z has also no zero divisors the ring Z is an example of a principal ideal domain Definition. Let R be a ring. A zero divisor in R is a non zero element r, such that there exists an element s 0 with r s = 0. The ring R is called an integral domain if there are no zero divisors in R. If all ideals in an integral domain R are principal then R is called a principal ideal domain. Examples of integral domains are fields (note that a unit can not be a zero divisor), or the integers Z, which is in fact as seen above a principal ideal domain. An element r R is called nilpotent if there exists an integer n 1, such that r n = Lemma. Let R be a ring. Then the set of nilpotent elements in R is an ideal. Proof. Let r, s be nilpotent, say r m = 0 and s n = 0, and t R be arbitrary. Since R is commutative (t r) m = t m r m = 0 and so also t r is nilpotent. To show that also r s is nilpotent one uses the binomial formula: m+n ( ) m + n (r s) m+n = ( 1) m+n i r i s m+n i. i If 0 i m 1 the sum m + n i is bigger or equal n and so s m+n i = 0, and if i m then r i = 0. Hence (r s) m+n = 0 and so also r s is nilpotent. Therefore the set of nilpotent elements in R is an ideal. This ideal is called the prime radical of R and is denoted by R The characteristic of a ring. Let R be a ring and π R : Z R be the unique homomorphism from the integers into R, see Example 2.3. The kernel of π R is equal an ideal Z n, n 0. This integer n is called the characteristic of R, denoted char R. In other words, the characteristic of a ring R is either 0, if n 1 R 0 R for all 0 n Z, or the smallest positive integer n, such that n 1 R = 0. Lemma. If R is an integral domain then either char R = 0 or char R is a prime number. Proof. Let n := char R. If n = 0 there is nothing to prove. So assume n 0. To show that n is prime number consider a factorization n = a b with 1 a, b n. Then 0 R = n 1 R = (a b) 1 R = (a 1 R ) (b 1 R ), and so since R is an integral domain a 1 R = 0 or b 1 R = 0. But 1 a, b n and so since n is the smallest positive integer, such that n 1 R = 0, this implies a = n or b = n. Therefore n is a prime number Definition. A homomorphism of rings α : R S is called an isomorphism if it is onetoone and onto. The inverse map α 1 : S R of an isomorphism of ring α : R S is also a homomorphism of rings: Obviously α 1 (1 S ) = 1 R as 1 R is the only element mapped to 1 S by α. To show that α 1 (s 1 + s 2 ) = α 1 (s 1 ) + α 1 (s 2 ) let r i R be
11 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 11 elements, such that α(r i ) = s i and so α 1 (s i ) = r i for i = 1, 2 (these exists since α is onto). Then: α 1 (s 1 + s 2 ) = α 1 (α(r 1 ) + α(r 2 )) = α 1 (α(r 1 + r 2 )) α is a homomorphism = r 1 + r 2 α 1 α = id R = α 1 (s 1 ) + α 1 (s 2 ). The equation α 1 (s 1 s 2 ) = α 1 (s 1 ) α 1 (s 2 ) follows analogous Operations on ideals. Let R be a ring and I i, i K, ideals in R, where K is an index set. The intersection i K is also an ideal (exercise), but the union in general not. However if for all i, j K there exists k K, such that I i I j I k then J := is an ideal. In fact, 0 R is in all I i s and so also in J. If r 1, r 2 J then there exists indices i, j, such that r 1 I i and r 2 I j. Let k K, such that I i I j I k. Then r 1, r 2 I k and so also r 1 r 2 I k J since I k is an ideal. Finally, t r J for all r J and t R: The element r is in I i for some i K and so since I i is an ideal also t r I i J. Let now s j, j K, where K is an index set, elements in the ring R. Then the smallest ideal containing the set S := {s j j K} is called the ideal generated by this set. It exists, since there is at least one ideal which contains this set (the ring R), and certainly it has to be contained in all ideals which contain S, i.e. it is equal the intersection of all ideals which contain S. Equivalently, it is the set of all finite sums m r ji s ji, I i i K where r j1,..., r jm R and j 1,..., j m are indices in K. Let now I 1,..., I l be finitely many ideals in R. The set l { l } I i = I I l := a i ai I i, for all 1 i l is an ideal in R called the sum of the ideals I 1,..., I l. For instance if r 1,..., r l R then the ideal generated by these elements is the sum of the ideals R r 1,..., R r l. The product of the ideals I 1,..., I l, which is denoted by I i l I l = I 1... I l, is the ideal generated by all products l r i with r i I i for all 1 i l.
12 12 STEFAN GILLE Here are some properties of the addition and multiplication of ideals. These follow all form the analogous properties of the addition and multiplication in the ring R. To state them let I, J, and K be ideals in R, and a, b R elements. Then: I (J K) = (I J) K and I J = J I; (R a) (R b) = R (ab); I J I J (since for x I and y J the product x y = y x is in I as well as in J); and I (J + K) = I J + I K Prime ideals. Let R be a ring. An ideal P of R is called a prime ideal if P R and if a b P a or b are in P for all a, b R. Examples. (a) If R is an integral domain the (0) is a prime ideal, since a b = 0 in R if and only if a = 0 or b = 0. (b) By (a) the zero ideal is a prime ideal in Z. The other prime ideals are given by Z p, where p is a prime number. Further examples of prime ideals are the so called maximal ideals Definition. Let R be a ring. An ideal m of R is called a maximal ideal, if (1) m R, and (2) if I R is an ideal with I m then I = m. In other words, a maximal ideal is an ideal R, such that there is except for R no ideal I m with I m Lemma. Let R be a ring. Then: (i) Maximal ideals in R are prime ideals. (The converse is not true, e.g. (0) is a prime ideal in Z but not a maximal ideal.) (ii) Let P be a prime ideal of R and x R an element, such that x n P for some n 1. Then x P. Proof. (i): Let m be a maximal ideal and a, b R with a b m. If a m then m + R a is an ideal which contains m and is bigger than m. Hence R = m + R a. Then there exists r R and x m, such that 1 R = x + r a. This implies b = b 1 R = b x + r (a b) m. (ii): Assume x P. Let 1 l < n be maximal, such that x l P. Then the element x l+1 = x l x is in P, and so since P is a prime ideal x P or x l P, a contradiction. To show that every ring has at least on maximal and so also one prime ideal Zorn s lemma is used Zorn s lemma. A partial ordering on a set K is a relation x y defined between some (not always all) elements of K, satisfying x x; x y and y x implies x = y; and x y and y z implies x z for all x, y, z K. For instance, the set of all subsets of a set T are ordered by inclusion, i.e. U V if and only if U V.
13 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 13 The set K with its partial ordering is called totally ordered if x y or y x for all x, y K. For instance, the real numbers with are totally ordered. Let T be a subset of K. An upper bound for T is an element x K, such that t x for all t T. A maximal element of K is an element x K, such that x y implies y = x, i.e. there is not element bigger than x in K. Note that x a maximal element of K does not imply that y x for all y K as there may be elements y, such that neither y x nor x y. In particular a maximal element has not to be an upper bound. The partially ordered set K is called inductive partially ordered if every totally ordered subset of K has an upper bound. Zorn s lemma asserts: Every non empty inductive partially ordered set has a maximal element. This assertion is equivalent to the axiom of choice and will therefore be taken as an axiom. Note that the maximal element is not unique Theorem. Let R be a ring and I 0 R an ideal in R which is R. Then there exists a maximal ideal m I 0. In particular, since (0) is an ideal the ring R has a maximal ideal. Proof. Let K := { J } J I0 and J is an ideal R. This set is partially ordered by inclusion, non empty as I 0 K. To show that it is also inductive partially ordered let T be a totally ordered subset of K. Then J = I is an ideal of R, see 2.12, with I J for all I T. As I R for all I K I T and so also for all I T the element 1 R is not in I for all I T, and so 1 R J. In particular J R and so J is in K and an upper bound for T. It follows that K is inductively ordered, and so has a maximal element m by Zorn s lemma. This ideal m contains I and is R. Moreover it is clearly maximal since if H m is an ideal R then H is in K and has therefore to be equal m as m is maximal in K. The following result is another application of Zorn s lemma Theorem. Let R be a ring. Then R = P. P prime ideal Proof. If x is nilpotent then there exists n 0, such that x n = 0 P for all prime ideals P, and so by Lemma 2.15 x P for all prime ideals P. To show the reverse inclusion R P it is enough to show that P prime ideal given an element x R which is not nilpotent then there exists a prime ideal P, such that x P. Let x R be not nilpotent. Consider the set S = { x n n N }. Let further { L := I } I is an ideal in R with I S =.
14 14 STEFAN GILLE The set L is not empty since the ideal (0) is in L, and partially ordered by inclusion. If T L is a totally ordered subset then J := I is an upper bound for T. It is I T an ideal, see 2.12, and ( ) J S = I S = (I S) =, I T and so J is also in L. Hence L is inductive partially ordered and so by Zorn s lemma there is a maximal element P in L. This is a prime ideal. In fact, if a, b P then the ideals P + R a and P + R b are both bigger than P and so not in L. Hence there are integers m, n 1, such that x m P + R a and x n P + R b. Then x n+m (P + R a) (P + R b) = P 2 + (R a) P + P (R b) + R ab I T P + R (ab). Since P is maximal with the property that S P = this implies that P + R (ab) is strictly bigger than P and so a b P. Hence P is a prime ideal with x P Definition. Let R be a ring. (i) The Jacobson radical of the ring R is the intersection of all maximal ideals of R. As intersection of ideals this is an ideal, which is denoted by Jac(R). (ii) The ring R is called local if it has only one maximal ideal m, or equivalently if Jac(R) is a maximal ideal. There is the following characterization of local rings Lemma. A ring R is local if and only if the set of non units is an ideal (which is then the only maximal ideal of R). Proof. Let R be a local ring with maximal ideal m. If x m then R x m, and so R x R. Therefore x is not a unit in R by Lemma 2.6. It follows that m R\R. On the other hand if x is not a unit then by Lemma 2.6 again R x R and so there exists a maximal ideal J with J R x by Theorem Since m is the only maximal ideal it follows J = m and so x m. Hence if R is local m = R \ R and so in particular the set of non units is an ideal. For the other direction, the set of non units is then an ideal by assumption and R since 1 R is a unit. If I R is an ideal then R x R for all x I and so x R for all x I by Lemma 2.6. It follows I R \ R for all ideals I R. Therefore the set of non units R \ R is a maximal ideal Definition. A ring R is called noetherian if all non zero ideals of R are finitely generated. For instance principal ideal domains are noetherian (every ideal is generated by a single element), and also fields are noetherian Theorem. The following is equivalent for a ring R: (a) R is noetherian. (b) R satisfies the ascending chain condition for ideals, i.e. there is no infinite strictly ascending chain of ideals I 0 I 1 I 2 I 3... in R, or equivalently, if I 0 I 1 I 2... is an ascending chain of ideals then there is an integer k 1, such that I m = I k for all m k.
15 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 15 (c) Every non empty subset of ideals in R has a maximal element. (Note that this is not a consequence of Zorn s lemma. Such a subset is partially ordered by inclusion but this partial ordering is in general not inductive.) Proof. (a) = (b): Let I 0 I 1, I 2... be an infinite chain of ideals. Let I := I i be their union. As seen in 2.12 this is an ideal and so since R is noetherian i 0 it is finitely generated, say by r 1,..., r m. Then r j I ij for some integer i j. Let k := max { i j 1 i m }. Then the generators r 1,..., r m are in I k and so I = I k. Hence the ascending chain of ideals becomes stable at k, i.e. I k = I k+1 = I k+2 =.... (b) = (c): Let K be a subset of ideals in R. If there is no maximal element one can construct inductively an infinite strictly ascending chain of ideals in K, contradicting the assumption that such a chain of ideals does not exists: Start with any ideal I 0 K; it is not maximal and so there exists a strictly bigger I 1 in K; and if I 0 I 1... I n in K are chosen, I n is also not maximal in K and so there is an ideal I n+1 K which strictly contains I n, giving the strictly ascending chain I 0 I 1... I n I n+1. Continuing in this way one gets an infinite strictly ascending chain of ideals. (c) = (a): Let I (0) be an ideal in R and K the subset of finitely generated ideals J with J I. This set is not empty. In fact, since I (0) there is 0 x I. The ideal R x lies then in K. Let J be a maximal element of K. Then J is a finitely generated ideal I. Showing I = J finishes the proof. In fact, if x I then J + R x is a finitely generated ideal contained in I, and so since J is maximal in K this implies J + R x = J. It follows x J, and therefore I = J. Replacing ascending by descending gives the notion of an artinian ring Definition. A ring R is a called artinian if it satisfies the descending chain condition for ideals, i.e. there is no infinite strictly descending chain of ideals I 0 I 1 I 2 I 3... in R, or equivalently, it J 0 J 1 J 2... is a descending chain of ideals then there is an integer k 1, such that I m = I k for all m k. As for ascending one shows that the descending chain condition for ideals in R is equivalent to the assertion that every non empty subset K of ideals in R has a minimal element, i.e. there is J K, such that if I K and I J then I = J Polynomial rings in one variable. Let R be a ring. The polynomial ring R[T ] in the variable T over R is the set of all formal finite sums, the polynomials over R, m F (T ) = r i T i, with r 0,..., r m R. This is a ring with addition m r i T i + n s i T j := j=0 max(m,n) k=0 (r k + s k ) T k, where r k = 0 if k > m and s k = 0 if k > n is understood, and multiplication m r i T i n s i T j := j=0 m+n k=0 ( k r i s k i ) T k.
16 16 STEFAN GILLE The zero of this ring is the zero polynomial 0 = T + 0 T , and the one is the polynomial T + 0 T The degree deg f(t ) of the polynomial f(t ) = m r i T i R[T ] is the biggest integer j m, such that r j 0. By definition the zero polynomial has degree 1. A polynomial of degree 0 is called constant. The set of constant polynomials are a subring of R[T ], which is isomorphic to R via the onetoone homomorphism ι R : R R[T ], a a T 0. We identify this subring with R and denote the polynomial a T 0 also by a only. Note that deg ( f(t )+g(t ) ) = max { deg f(t ), deg g(t ) }, and if R is an integral domain deg ( f(t ) g(t ) ) = deg f(t ) + deg g(t ). The latter equation implies: Lemma. If R is an integral domain then also R[T ] is an integral domain. If f(t ) = n a i T i is a polynomial of degree n then a n is called the leading coefficient of f(t ). If the leading coefficient of f(t ) is 1 the polynomial is called monic. Notations. Polynomials of degree 1 are called linear, of degree 2 quadratic, and of degree 3 cubic The substitution principle. Let γ : R S be a homomorphism of rings and s S. Consider the following map of rings Γ s : R[T ] S, m a i T i m γ(a i )s i. A straightforward computation shows that this is a homomorphism of rings. It is the only homomorphism of rings R[T ] S, such that the composition with ι R is equal γ, and which maps T onto s S. In words, Γ s substitutes for the coefficients of a polynomial the images of them under the homomorphism γ and for the variable T the element s in S. If f = id R : R R the image Γ s (f(t )) of f(t ) is also denoted by f(s). The following lemma will be used to show that the polynomial ring over a field is a principal ideal domain Lemma. Let R be a ring and f(t ) a non constant polynomial in R[T ] whose leading coefficient is a unit in R. Then given g(t ) R[T ] there exist polynomials h(t ) and r(t ) with deg r(t ) < deg f(t ), such that g(t ) = h(t ) f(t ) + r(t ). Proof. Let f(t ) = m a i T i be a polynomial of degree m and g(t ) = one of degree n. The lemma is proven by induction on n = deg g(t ). n j=0 b j T j
17 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 17 If n < m = deg f(t ) set r(t ) = g(t ) and h(t ) = 0. So let n m 0 and consider k(t ) := g(t ) (b n a 1 m T n m ) f(t ) = b n T n (a 1 m b n T n m ) a m T m + n 1 b j T j m 1 = n 1 j=0 b j T j m 1 (a 1 m b n a i )T n m+i. j=0 (a 1 m b n a i )T n m+i Hence deg k(t ) n 1 and so by induction there exists polynomials l(t ) and r(t ) with deg r(t ) < m = deg f(t ), such that Inserting this in (1) gives k(t ) = l(t ) f(t ) + r(t ). g(t ) = k(t ) + (b n a 1 m )T n m f(t ) = l(t ) f(t ) + r(t ) + (b n a 1 m )T n m f(t ) = (l(t ) + b n a 1 m T n m ) f(t ) + r(t ), and so h(t ) = l(t ) + b n a 1 m T n m together with r(t ) do the job Roots of polynomials. Let R be a ring and f(t ) = n a i T i R[T ]. An element x R is called a root or zero of the polynomial f(t ) if n 0 = f(x) = a i x i. Let x be a root of f(t ). Consider the polynomial T x of degree 1. By the lemma above there are polynomials h(t ) and r(t ) in R[T ] with deg r(t ) < deg(t x) = 1, such that f(t ) = h(t ) (T x) + r(t ). Then 0 = f(x) = h(x) (x x) + r(x) = r(x). Hence x is a root of the constant polynomial r(t ). But this implies that r(t ) is the zero polynomial and so f(t ) = h(t ) (T x) for some polynomial h(t ). Hence: Lemma. Let f(t ) be a non zero polynomial in R[T ]. Then x R is a root of f(t ) if and only if there exists h(t ) R[T ], such that f(t ) = h(t ) (T x) Theorem. Let F be a field. Then the polynomial ring in one variable F [T ] over F is a principal ideal domain. Proof. (Compare the arguments below with the proof that Z is an integral domain in Example 2.7.) As F is an integral domain also F [T ] is an integral domain, and so one has only to show that given an ideal (0) J F [T ] then there exists a polynomial 0 f(t ), such that { J = F [T ] f(t ) = h(t ) f(t ) } h(t ) F [T ]. (1)
18 18 STEFAN GILLE By the assumption J (0) there exist a polynomial of degree 0 in J. Let f(t ) 0 be a polynomial of minimal degree 0 in J. Then F [T ] f(t ) J. To show J F [T ] f(t ) let g(t ) J. By Lemma 2.26 above there exists polynomials h(t ) and r(t ) with deg r(t ) < deg f(t ), such that g(t ) = h(t ) f(t ) + r(t ). Then r(t ) = g(t ) h(t ) f(t ) is also in J. Since f(t ) has minimal positive degree in J it follows that deg r(t ) = 1, i.e. r(t ) = 0. Therefore g(t ) = h(t ) f(t ) F [T ] f(t ) Polynomial rings in several variables. The polynomial ring R[T 1,..., T n ] in the n variables T 1,..., T n over the ring R is defined inductively as R[T 1,..., T n ] = ( R[T 1,..., T n 1 ] ) [T n ]. A element in this ring is called a polynomial the n variables T 1,..., T n, denoted f(t 1,..., T n ). It can be uniquely written as d f(t 1,..., T n ) = g i (T 1,..., T n 1 ) Tn i, where g i (T 1,..., T n 1 ) R[T 1,..., T n 1 ] for all 0 i n 1. Writing the g i (T 1,..., T n 1 ) s as polynomials over R[T 1,..., T n 2 ] and so on one sees that f(t 1,..., T n ) = µ a µ T µ, where the sum is over all multiindices µ = (µ 1,..., µ n ), the a µ s are elements of the ring R with all but finitely many zero, and n T µ := for µ = (µ 1,..., µ n ). The expression n is called a monomial in the n variables T 1,..., T n. The sum n j=1 T µj j j=1 T µj j µ i is called the degree of the monomial. With this notation the sum of two polynomials in n variables is given by a µ T µ + b µ T µ := (a µ + b µ ) T µ, µ µ µ and the product by a µ T µ b µ T µ := µ µ ϕ µ+ν=ϕ a µ b ν T ϕ, where (µ 1,..., µ n ) + (ν 1,..., ν n ) = (µ 1 + ν 1,..., µ n + ν n ). The degree of the polynomial a µ T µ is the maximum of the degrees of the monomials T µ whose coef µ ficient a µ is not zero. A polynomial f(t 1,..., T n ) = µ a µ T µ is called homogeneous of degree m if it is sum of monomials of degree m Examples.
19 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 19 (a) f(s, T ) = S 2 + ST + 3T 2 ST 7 S 17 T is a polynomial of degree 19 in the two variables S, T over Z. One can consider this as polynomial in the one variable T over Z[S]: f(x, T ) = ( S) T 7 + ( S ) T 2 + S T + (S 2 + 5). (b) The polynomial f(s, T, U) = U 3 6 ST U + ST T U 2 is a homogeneous polynomial of degree 3 over R Hilbert basis Theorem. If R is a noetherian ring then also the polynomial ring in n variables R[T 1,..., T n ] is noetherian. Proof. As R[T 1,..., T n ] = (R[T 1,..., T n 1 ])[T n ] it is by induction enough to show this for n = 1, i.e. to show that S = R[T ] is noetherian. Let J S be a non zero ideal and I i the set of leading coefficients of polynomials of degree i 1 in J together with 0. These are ideals in R. In fact, if a, b are the leading coefficients of polynomials f(t ) and g(t ), respectively, of degree i in J then either a b is 0 or the leading coefficient of f(t ) g(t ), which is also a polynomial of degree i in J. And if r R then r a is 0 or the leading coefficient of the polynomial r f(t ) of degree i, which is also in J. The ideals I i, i 1, constitute an ascending chain I 1 I 0 I 1 I In fact, if a I i is the leading coefficient of a polynomial f J of degree i then a is also the leading coefficient of the polynomial T f(t ) of degree i + 1, which is also in J as J is an ideal. Hence a I i+1 and so I i I i+1. Since R is noetherian there is k 1, such that I m = I k for all m k and also all ideals I i are finitely generated. Let a 1,i, a 2,i,..., a ni,i be generators of I i for 0 i k. Denote by f s,t (T ) J a polynomial of degree s in J with leading coefficient a rs. Claim: The polynomials f s,t (T ), 0 t k, 1 s n t, generated the ideal J, i.e. J is finitely generated. To show this, let f(t ) J be a non zero polynomial with leading coefficient a R. It is shown by induction on the degree d of f that f is in the ideal generated by the f s,t s. If d = 0 then f(t ) = at 0 is constant, and a I 0. The ideal I 0 is generated by a 1,0,..., a n0,0 and so f(t ) = n0 r i f i,0 (T ). Let now d 1. If d k then a I d = I k, which is generated by a 1,k,..., a nk,k. Hence n k a = r j,k a j,k for some r j,i R, and so j=0 n k g(t ) := f(t ) r j,k (T d k f j,k (T )) j=0
20 20 STEFAN GILLE is a polynomial of degree d 1. It is also in J since f(t ) and all f j,k (T ) are in J. Hence by induction k n 1 g(t ) = h r,i (T ) f r,i (T ) r=1 for some polynomials h r,i (T ) R[T ]. Therefore k n 1 n k f(t ) = h r,i (T ) f r,i (T ) + r j,k (T d k f j,k (T )) r=1 j=0 is in the ideal generated by the polynomials f i,j (T ). If d < k then a I d and so a = n d r j,d a j,d for some r j,d R, and so j=0 n d l(t ) := f(t ) r j,d f j,k (T ) is a polynomial of degree d 1. It is also in J since f(t ) and all f j,k (T ) are in J. Hence by induction l(t ) = k n 1 h r,i (T ) f r,i (T ) for some polynomials j=0 r=1 h r,i (T ) R[T ]. Therefore k n 1 n d f(t ) = h r,i (T ) f r,i (T ) + r j,d f j,k (T ) r=1 j=0 is in this case also in the ideal generated by the polynomials f i,j (T ).
21 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES Principal ideal and unique factorization domains 3.1. Definition. Let R be a ring. One says that an element b of R divides a R if there exists c R, such that a = b c. Notation: b a. Note that b divides a if and only if R a R b. If R is an integral domain and a b as well as b a for some non zero elements a, b R then a = b u for a unit u. In fact, by the assumptions one has a v = b and b u = a for some u, v R, and therefore a (v u) = a, or equivalently a (vu 1) = 0. Hence since a is not 0 and R an integral domain this implies v u = 1, i.e. u, v R. Elements a and b in a ring R are called associates if a = u b for some unit u. Note that a is associate to b is an equivalence relation. Clearly, if a and b are associates then R a = R b. The converse holds, i.e. R a = R b implies a and b are associates, in an integral domain, see Lemma Irreducible elements. Let a be a non zero element in a ring R. A factorization of a is an expression a = b c with b, c R. Such a factorization is called trivial if b or c is a unit, otherwise it is called non trivial, or proper. A non zero element a R is called irreducible if it is not a unit and has only trivial factorizations. If R is an integral domain and a = b c is a proper factorization of a R \ {0} then the ideal R a is a proper subset of the ideals R b and R c. Therefore a non zero element a in the integral domain R is irreducible if and only if there is no principal ideal R b R which properly contains R a Lemma. Let R be a noetherian integral domain. Then every non unit a R \ {0} can be written n a = with b 1,..., b n irreducible elements in R. Proof. Assume the contrary. Let A R be the set of non units in R, which can not be written as product of irreducible elements. By assumption this set is not empty and R a R for all a A. Set b i K := { R a a A }. Since R is noetherian there exists a maximal element R a 0 in K. The element a 0 A can not be irreducible since then a 0 = a 0 would be a factorization into irreducible elements. Hence there are b, c R \R, such that a 0 = b c. But then R b and R c properly contain R a 0, and so these ideals are not in K. Therefore c, b A, and so b and c have a factorization into irreducible elements: b = d 1... d l and c = e 1... e m for some m, l 1 and irreducible elements d 1,..., d l, e 1,..., e m. But then a 0 = d 1... d l e 1... e m, a contradiction Prime elements. A prime element of the ring R is an element p 0 in R, which is not a unit, such that if p divides a product a b in R then p divides a or b. In an integral domain prime elements are irreducible: If p = a b then p divides one
22 22 STEFAN GILLE of a or b, say a = p c. Then (as above) one gets c b = 1 and so b is a unit, i.e. the factorization p = a b is trivial Lemma. Let R be a ring and p a prime element in R. If p divides a product a 1... a n 1 a n then p divides on of the factors a i. Proof. By induction on n. If n = 2 this is the definition of prime element, so let n 3. The prime element p divides (a 1... a n 1 ) a n. Hence p divides a 1... a n 1 or a n. In the latter case p divides the factor a n of the product, and in the former it divides one of the elements a 1,..., a n 1 by induction Greatest common divisor. Let R be an integral domain. An element d R is called a greatest common divisor (short: gcd) of the non zero elements r 1,..., r l R if (and only if) d divides r i for all 1 i l, and if t is another element in R which divides all r i s then t divides d Lemma. Let R be a principal ideal domain. Then d R is a greatest common divisor of the non zero r 1,..., r l if and only if R d = l R r i. In particular, if d and e are greatest common divisors of r 1,..., r l then there exists a unit u R, such that d = u e. Proof. Assume that d is a gcd of r 1,..., r l. Then d divides all r i, say r i = a i d for some a i R, i = 1,..., l. One has then: l s i r i = for all s 1,..., s l R, and so I := l ( l ) s i (a i d) = s i a i d l R r i R d. On the other hand since R is a principal ideal domain there is t R, such that I = R t. Then t divides all r i s since these are in I, and so t divides the greatest common divisor d. But this implies R d R t and so i.e. R d = I as claimed. R d R t = I R d, For the other direction, assume R d = I = l R r i. Then d divides all r i s since r i I = R d for all 1 i l, and if t R also divides all r i s then (by the arguments above) I = R d R t and so t divides d, i.e. d is a gcd of r 1,..., r l. For the last assertion, if d and e are greatest common divisors of r 1,..., r l then Z d = Z e and so by Lemma 2.6 (iii) d = u e for some unit u in R. In other words, a greatest common divisor of the elements r 1,..., r l can be also defined as a generator of the ideal generated by the r i s. This implies the following corollary.
23 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES Corollary. Let R be a principal ideal domain and r 1,..., r n R \ {0}. Then an element d R, which divides all r 1,..., r n, is a gcd of r 1,..., r n R if and only if there are s 1,..., s n R, such that d = n s i r i Remark. In Z the only units are ±1. Hence if e and d are greatest common divisors of some integers then e = ±d. Therefore one can force the gcd to be unique by requiring that it is positive. Another consequence of Lemma 3.7 is the fact that in a principal ideal domain irreducible elements and prime elements are the same Theorem. Let R be a principal ideal domain. Then: (i) x R is irreducible if and only if it is a prime element. (ii) The ideal R x (0) is a prime ideal if and only if x is a prime element. (iii) Every prime ideal (0) is a maximal ideal. Proof. (i): As seen above, a prime element is irreducible. For the converse, let x R be irreducible. Assume that x divides the product a b and not a. To show that then x divides b let d be the gcd of x and a. Since x is irreducible and does not divide a the gcd d has to be 1. By the corollary above there exists then r, s R, such that 1 = ra + sx.multiplying this equation by b gives b = rab + sbx and so since x ab that x divides b as claimed. (ii): The ideal R x is prime if and only if a b implies a R x or b R x. But y R x if and only if x divides y, and so x being a prime element is equivalent to R x be a prime ideal. (iii): Let R x be a prime ideal and I R x another ideal. Then x is a prime element by (ii) and I = R y for some y R since R is a principal ideal domain. Hence y divides x and so since x is irreducible either y is a unit and so I = R, or x and y are associates and so I = R y = R x. Hence R x is a maximal ideal Definition. An integral domain R is called a unique factorization domain if every non unit 0 x R can be written as a product x = p 1... p m with p 1,..., p n irreducible, and this factorization is unique, i.e. if x = q 1... q n another factorization with q 1,..., q n irreducible then m = n and there exists a onetoone and onto map σ of {1,..., n} into itself (a permutation), such that q i and p σ(i) are associates for all 1 i n. The relation p is associate of q is an equivalence relation on the set of irreducible elements. One can therefore choose a representative for every irreducible element of a ring R, i.e. there exists a set P R of elements, such that (1) if q R is irreducible then q is associate of exactly one p P, and (2) if p 1 p 2 in P then p 1 and p 2 are not associates. Such a set P will be called a set of representatives of the irreducible elements of R. If now R is a unique factorization domain, and 0 r R is a non unit then r = l j=1 q j for some irreducible q j, 1 j l. There is then p j P,
24 24 STEFAN GILLE such that q j = u j p j for some unit u j R for all 1 j l. Then r = l l (u j p j ) = u p j, j=1 j=1 where u := l j=1 u j. Hence if one chooses in a unique factorization domain R a set P of representatives for the irreducible elements then one has a factorization r = u p np(r), p P where u R is a unit and n p (r) 0 are integers which are 0 except for finitely many p s in P. This factorization is unique, i.e. if u l j=1 p mj j = v l j=1 p nj j, (2) where {p 1,..., p l } is a set of (different) elements in P, u, v units in R, and n j, m j integers 0, then u = v and m j = n j for all 1 j l. This is proven by induction on l 0. If l = 0 then u = v and nothing is to prove, so let l 1. Assume m 1 n 1. Then by (2) one has ( 0 = p m1 1 u l j=2 p mj j p n1 m1 1 v l j=2 p nj j ), and so since R is an integral domain u l j=2 p mj j = v p n1 m1 1 l j=2 p nj j. If now n 1 m 1 > 0 then by the uniqueness of the factorization into irreducible elements in a unique factorization domain this equation would imply that p 1 is associate of l l one of the p 2,..., p l, a contraction. Hence n 1 = m 1 and u p mj j = v p nj j. The claim follows now by induction Lemma. Let R be a unique factorization domain. Then: (i) A element p R is irreducible if and only if it is prime. (ii) For all non zero elements r 1,..., r n R the gcd exists. Proof. (i): That prime elements are irreducible has been shown above. For the other direction, let p be an irreducible element which divides a product a b, say ab = p c. One can write a = p 1... p l and b = q 1... q m for some irreducible p 1,..., p l, q 1,..., q m. Factoring also c into irreducible factors: c = o 1... o n gives p o 1,... o n = p 1... p l q 1... q m. Since the factorization into irreducible elements is unique this implies that p is associate of one of the elements p 1,..., p l, q 1,..., q m and hence p divides either a or b. It follows that p is a prime element. j=2 j=2
25 MATH 326: RINGS AND MODULES 25 For (ii), since R is a unique factorization domain one can choose, as shown above, different irreducible (and so by (i) prime) elements p 1,..., p l, such that r i = u i for some integers n ij 0 and units u i in R. Set m j := min { n ij 1 i n }. Then l j=1 p nij j is a gcd of r 1,..., r n. d := l j=1 p mj j Theorem. Let R be a noetherian integral domain. Then R is a unique factorization domain if and only if every irreducible element in R is a prime element. Proof. One direction is part (i) of the lemma above. So assume that every irreducible element in the noetherian integral domain R is prime. Since R is noetherian it follows from Lemma 3.3 that every element of R can be written as a product of irreducible elements. Therefore to show that R is a unique factorization domain one has only to prove that this factorization is unique, i.e. if m n 0 x = p i = for some irreducible elements p 1,..., p m, q 1,..., q n then m = n and there exists a permutation σ of {1,..., m}, such that p i and q σ(i) are associates. This is proven by induction on m 1. If m = 1 it is clear since then x = p 1 is irreducible, so let m 2. Let x = n q j be another factorization with q j irreducible for 1 j n. j=1 As x is not irreducible n 2. By assumption the irreducible elements p 1,..., p m and q 1,..., q n are prime, and so by Lemma 3.5 the prime element p 1 divides one of the q j s. After renumbering one can assume p 1 divides q 1. Then q 1 = u p 1 for some unit u as both are prime elements. In particular, p 1 and q 1 are associated. Dividing now the equation m p i = n q i by p 1 gives the equation i=2 j=1 m n p i = u q i. By induction one gets m = n, and p i and q σ(i) are associates, where σ is a permutation of {2,..., n} Corollary. A principal ideal domain is a unique factorization domain. i=2 q j Proof. This follows from the theorem above and Theorem 3.10 (i). This implies in particular that a polynomial ring over a field is a unique factorization domains since it is a principal ideal domain by Theorem A prime element in a polynomial ring over a field is also called an irreducible polynomial.
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra
Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................
More informationMath 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille
Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille 1 2 0. Group Operations 0.1. Definition. Let G be a group and X a set. A (left) operation of G on X is
More information(Rgs) Rings Math 683L (Summer 2003)
(Rgs) Rings Math 683L (Summer 2003) We will first summarise the general results that we will need from the theory of rings. A unital ring, R, is a set equipped with two binary operations + and such that
More informationRings and groups. Ya. Sysak
Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak 1 Noetherian rings Let R be a ring. A (right) R module M is called noetherian if it satisfies the maximum condition for its submodules. In other words, if M 1... M i M i+1...
More informationStructure of rings. Chapter Algebras
Chapter 5 Structure of rings 5.1 Algebras It is time to introduce the notion of an algebra over a commutative ring. So let R be a commutative ring. An Ralgebra is a ring A (unital as always) together
More information2. Prime and Maximal Ideals
18 Andreas Gathmann 2. Prime and Maximal Ideals There are two special kinds of ideals that are of particular importance, both algebraically and geometrically: the socalled prime and maximal ideals. Let
More informationALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.
ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ. ANDREW SALCH 1. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz. The last lecture left off with the claim that, if J k[x 1,..., x n ] is an ideal, then
More informationLecture 2. (1) Every P L A (M) has a maximal element, (2) Every ascending chain of submodules stabilizes (ACC).
Lecture 2 1. Noetherian and Artinian rings and modules Let A be a commutative ring with identity, A M a module, and φ : M N an Alinear map. Then ker φ = {m M : φ(m) = 0} is a submodule of M and im φ is
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime
More informationCHAPTER I. Rings. Definition A ring R is a set with two binary operations, addition + and
CHAPTER I Rings 1.1 Definitions and Examples Definition 1.1.1. A ring R is a set with two binary operations, addition + and multiplication satisfying the following conditions for all a, b, c in R : (i)
More informationAlgebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010
Algebra Homework, Edition 2 9 September 2010 Problem 6. (1) Let I and J be ideals of a commutative ring R with I + J = R. Prove that IJ = I J. (2) Let I, J, and K be ideals of a principal ideal domain.
More information8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions
70 Andreas Gathmann 8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions 13 When it comes to actual computations, Euclidean domains (or more generally principal ideal domains) are probably the nicest rings
More informationFormal power series rings, inverse limits, and Iadic completions of rings
Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and Iadic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely
More informationMATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12
MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f
More information(1) A frac = b : a, b A, b 0. We can define addition and multiplication of fractions as we normally would. a b + c d
The Algebraic Method 0.1. Integral Domains. Emmy Noether and others quickly realized that the classical algebraic number theory of Dedekind could be abstracted completely. In particular, rings of integers
More information4.4 Noetherian Rings
4.4 Noetherian Rings Recall that a ring A is Noetherian if it satisfies the following three equivalent conditions: (1) Every nonempty set of ideals of A has a maximal element (the maximal condition); (2)
More informationSchool of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5836 Galois Theory. Handout 0: Course Information
MRQ 2017 School of Mathematics and Statistics MT5836 Galois Theory Handout 0: Course Information Lecturer: Martyn Quick, Room 326. Prerequisite: MT3505 (or MT4517) Rings & Fields Lectures: Tutorials: Mon
More informationMath 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes
Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes 1 Affine Schemes Let R be a commutative ring with 1. Definition 1.1. The prime spectrum of R, denoted Spec(R), is the set of prime ideals of the ring R. Spec(R) = {P R
More informationCommutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry. Robert Friedman
Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry Robert Friedman August 1, 2006 2 Disclaimer: These are rough notes for a course on commutative algebra and algebraic geometry. I would appreciate all suggestions
More informationFILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.
FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0
More informationIntegral Extensions. Chapter Integral Elements Definitions and Comments Lemma
Chapter 2 Integral Extensions 2.1 Integral Elements 2.1.1 Definitions and Comments Let R be a subring of the ring S, and let α S. We say that α is integral over R if α isarootofamonic polynomial with coefficients
More informationg(x) = 1 1 x = 1 + x + x2 + x 3 + is not a polynomial, since it doesn t have finite degree. g(x) is an example of a power series.
6 Polynomial Rings We introduce a class of rings called the polynomial rings, describing computation, factorization and divisibility in such rings For the case where the coefficients come from an integral
More informationALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes!
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes! 1. Some algebraic geometry The subject of algebraic groups depends on the interaction between algebraic geometry and group theory.
More informationYuriy Drozd. Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry. Kaiserslautern 1998/99
Yuriy Drozd Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry Kaiserslautern 1998/99 CHAPTER 1 Affine Varieties 1.1. Ideals and varieties. Hilbert s Basis Theorem Let K be an algebraically closed field. We denote by
More informationRINGS: SUMMARY OF MATERIAL
RINGS: SUMMARY OF MATERIAL BRIAN OSSERMAN This is a summary of terms used and main results proved in the subject of rings, from Chapters 1113 of Artin. Definitions not included here may be considered
More informationHonors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 3 Due Friday, February 5 at 08:35
Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 3 Due Friday, February 5 at 08:35 1. Let R 0 be a commutative ring with 1 and let S R be the subset of nonzero elements which are not zero divisors. (a)
More informationFactorization in Polynomial Rings
Factorization in Polynomial Rings Throughout these notes, F denotes a field. 1 Long division with remainder We begin with some basic definitions. Definition 1.1. Let f, g F [x]. We say that f divides g,
More informationALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL
ALGEBRA EXERCISES, PhD EXAMINATION LEVEL 1. Suppose that G is a finite group. (a) Prove that if G is nilpotent, and H is any proper subgroup, then H is a proper subgroup of its normalizer. (b) Use (a)
More information4.2 Chain Conditions
4.2 Chain Conditions Imposing chain conditions on the or on the poset of submodules of a module, poset of ideals of a ring, makes a module or ring more tractable and facilitates the proofs of deep theorems.
More informationSkew Polynomial Rings
Skew Polynomial Rings NIU November 14, 2018 Bibliography Beachy, Introductory Lectures on Rings and Modules, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999 Goodearl and Warfield, An Introduction to Noncommutative Noetherian
More informationA finite universal SAGBI basis for the kernel of a derivation. Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(4) P.759P.792
Title Author(s) A finite universal SAGBI basis for the kernel of a derivation Kuroda, Shigeru Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 4(4) P.759P.792 Issue Date 20042 Text Version publisher URL https://doi.org/0.890/838
More informationPlaces of Number Fields and Function Fields MATH 681, Spring 2018
Places of Number Fields and Function Fields MATH 681, Spring 2018 From now on we will denote the field Z/pZ for a prime p more compactly by F p. More generally, for q a power of a prime p, F q will denote
More informationADVANCED COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PROBLEM SETS
ADVANCED COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA: PROBLEM SETS UZI VISHNE The 11 problem sets below were composed by Michael Schein, according to his course. Take into account that we are covering slightly different material.
More informationIn Theorem 2.2.4, we generalized a result about field extensions to rings. Here is another variation.
Chapter 3 Valuation Rings The results of this chapter come into play when analyzing the behavior of a rational function defined in the neighborhood of a point on an algebraic curve. 3.1 Extension Theorems
More information11. Finitelygenerated modules
11. Finitelygenerated modules 11.1 Free modules 11.2 Finitelygenerated modules over domains 11.3 PIDs are UFDs 11.4 Structure theorem, again 11.5 Recovering the earlier structure theorem 11.6 Submodules
More informationbe any ring homomorphism and let s S be any element of S. Then there is a unique ring homomorphism
21. Polynomial rings Let us now turn out attention to determining the prime elements of a polynomial ring, where the coefficient ring is a field. We already know that such a polynomial ring is a UFD. Therefore
More informationChapter 3. Rings. The basic commutative rings in mathematics are the integers Z, the. Examples
Chapter 3 Rings Rings are additive abelian groups with a second operation called multiplication. The connection between the two operations is provided by the distributive law. Assuming the results of Chapter
More informationSolutions to Homework 1. All rings are commutative with identity!
Solutions to Homework 1. All rings are commutative with identity! (1) [4pts] Let R be a finite ring. Show that R = NZD(R). Proof. Let a NZD(R) and t a : R R the map defined by t a (r) = ar for all r R.
More informationAlgebra Qualifying Exam August 2001 Do all 5 problems. 1. Let G be afinite group of order 504 = 23 32 7. a. Show that G cannot be isomorphic to a subgroup of the alternating group Alt 7. (5 points) b.
More informationφ(xy) = (xy) n = x n y n = φ(x)φ(y)
Groups 1. (Algebra Comp S03) Let A, B and C be normal subgroups of a group G with A B. If A C = B C and AC = BC then prove that A = B. Let b B. Since b = b1 BC = AC, there are a A and c C such that b =
More informationRings. Chapter Homomorphisms and ideals
Chapter 2 Rings This chapter should be at least in part a review of stuff you ve seen before. Roughly it is covered in Rotman chapter 3 and sections 6.1 and 6.2. You should *know* well all the material
More informationSUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUISPHILIPPE THIBAULT
SUMMARY ALGEBRA I LOUISPHILIPPE THIBAULT Contents 1. Group Theory 1 1.1. Basic Notions 1 1.2. Isomorphism Theorems 2 1.3. Jordan Holder Theorem 2 1.4. Symmetric Group 3 1.5. Group action on Sets 3 1.6.
More informationPolynomial Rings. i=0. i=0. n+m. i=0. k=0
Polynomial Rings 1. Definitions and Basic Properties For convenience, the ring will always be a commutative ring with identity. Basic Properties The polynomial ring R[x] in the indeterminate x with coefficients
More informationMath 4400, Spring 08, Sample problems Final Exam.
Math 4400, Spring 08, Sample problems Final Exam. 1. Groups (1) (a) Let a be an element of a group G. Define the notions of exponent of a and period of a. (b) Suppose a has a finite period. Prove that
More information0 Sets and Induction. Sets
0 Sets and Induction Sets A set is an unordered collection of objects, called elements or members of the set. A set is said to contain its elements. We write a A to denote that a is an element of the set
More informationSolutions to oddnumbered exercises Peter J. Cameron, Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 2
Solutions to oddnumbered exercises Peter J Cameron, Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 1 The answers are a No; b No; c Yes; d Yes; e No; f Yes; g Yes; h No; i Yes; j No a No: The inverse law for addition
More informationAlgebraic Varieties. Chapter Algebraic Varieties
Chapter 12 Algebraic Varieties 12.1 Algebraic Varieties Let K be a field, n 1 a natural number, and let f 1,..., f m K[X 1,..., X n ] be polynomials with coefficients in K. Then V = {(a 1,..., a n ) :
More informationFormal Groups. Niki Myrto Mavraki
Formal Groups Niki Myrto Mavraki Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Some preliminaries 2 3. Formal Groups (1 dimensional) 2 4. Groups associated to formal groups 9 5. The Invariant Differential 11 6. The Formal
More informationFactorization in Integral Domains II
Factorization in Integral Domains II 1 Statement of the main theorem Throughout these notes, unless otherwise specified, R is a UFD with field of quotients F. The main examples will be R = Z, F = Q, and
More informationMT5836 Galois Theory MRQ
MT5836 Galois Theory MRQ May 3, 2017 Contents Introduction 3 Structure of the lecture course............................... 4 Recommended texts..................................... 4 1 Rings, Fields and
More informationAlgebras. Chapter Definition
Chapter 4 Algebras 4.1 Definition It is time to introduce the notion of an algebra over a commutative ring. So let R be a commutative ring. An Ralgebra is a ring A (unital as always) that is an Rmodule
More informationRing Theory Problems. A σ
Ring Theory Problems 1. Given the commutative diagram α A σ B β A σ B show that α: ker σ ker σ and that β : coker σ coker σ. Here coker σ = B/σ(A). 2. Let K be a field, let V be an infinite dimensional
More informationReid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed.
Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed. Answer: Note that the first generator factors as (y
More informationReview of Linear Algebra
Review of Linear Algebra Throughout these notes, F denotes a field (often called the scalars in this context). 1 Definition of a vector space Definition 1.1. A F vector space or simply a vector space
More information1.5 The Nil and Jacobson Radicals
1.5 The Nil and Jacobson Radicals The idea of a radical of a ring A is an ideal I comprising some nasty piece of A such that A/I is wellbehaved or tractable. Two types considered here are the nil and
More informationMath 120 HW 9 Solutions
Math 120 HW 9 Solutions June 8, 2018 Question 1 Write down a ring homomorphism (no proof required) f from R = Z[ 11] = {a + b 11 a, b Z} to S = Z/35Z. The main difficulty is to find an element x Z/35Z
More information4. Noether normalisation
4. Noether normalisation We shall say that a ring R is an affine ring (or affine kalgebra) if R is isomorphic to a polynomial ring over a field k with finitely many indeterminates modulo an ideal, i.e.,
More informationExtended Index. 89f depth (of a prime ideal) 121f ArtinRees Lemma. 107f descending chain condition 74f Artinian module
Extended Index cokernel 19f for Atiyah and MacDonald's Introduction to Commutative Algebra colon operator 8f Key: comaximal ideals 7f  listings ending in f give the page where the term is defined commutative
More informationPrime Rational Functions and Integral Polynomials. Jesse Larone, Bachelor of Science. Mathematics and Statistics
Prime Rational Functions and Integral Polynomials Jesse Larone, Bachelor of Science Mathematics and Statistics Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Faculty
More informationALGEBRA HW 4. M 0 is an exact sequence of Rmodules, then M is Noetherian if and only if M and M are.
ALGEBRA HW 4 CLAY SHONKWILER (a): Show that if 0 M f M g M 0 is an exact sequence of Rmodules, then M is Noetherian if and only if M and M are. Proof. ( ) Suppose M is Noetherian. Then M injects into
More informationALGEBRA HANDOUT 2.3: FACTORIZATION IN INTEGRAL DOMAINS. In this handout we wish to describe some aspects of the theory of factorization.
ALGEBRA HANDOUT 2.3: FACTORIZATION IN INTEGRAL DOMAINS PETE L. CLARK In this handout we wish to describe some aspects of the theory of factorization. The first goal is to state what it means for an arbitrary
More informationExercises on chapter 1
Exercises on chapter 1 1. Let G be a group and H and K be subgroups. Let HK = {hk h H, k K}. (i) Prove that HK is a subgroup of G if and only if HK = KH. (ii) If either H or K is a normal subgroup of G
More informationRings and Fields Theorems
Rings and Fields Theorems Rajesh Kumar PMATH 334 Intro to Rings and Fields Fall 2009 October 25, 2009 12 Rings and Fields 12.1 Definition Groups and Abelian Groups Let R be a nonempty set. Let + and (multiplication)
More informationALGEBRA II: RINGS AND MODULES OVER LITTLE RINGS.
ALGEBRA II: RINGS AND MODULES OVER LITTLE RINGS. KEVIN MCGERTY. 1. RINGS The central characters of this course are algebraic objects known as rings. A ring is any mathematical structure where you can add
More informationInstitutionen för matematik, KTH.
Institutionen för matematik, KTH. Contents 7 Affine Varieties 1 7.1 The polynomial ring....................... 1 7.2 Hypersurfaces........................... 1 7.3 Ideals...............................
More informationAugust 2015 Qualifying Examination Solutions
August 2015 Qualifying Examination Solutions If you have any difficulty with the wording of the following problems please contact the supervisor immediately. All persons responsible for these problems,
More informationIntroduction Nonuniqueness of factorization in A[x]... 66
Abstract In this work, we study the factorization in A[x], where A is an Artinian local principal ideal ring (briefly SPIR), whose maximal ideal, (t), has nilpotency h: this is not a Unique Factorization
More informationHARTSHORNE EXERCISES
HARTSHORNE EXERCISES J. WARNER Hartshorne, Exercise I.5.6. Blowing Up Curve Singularities (a) Let Y be the cusp x 3 = y 2 + x 4 + y 4 or the node xy = x 6 + y 6. Show that the curve Ỹ obtained by blowing
More informationMath 547, Exam 2 Information.
Math 547, Exam 2 Information. 3/19/10, LC 303B, 10:1011:00. Exam 2 will be based on: Homework and textbook sections covered by lectures 2/33/5. (see http://www.math.sc.edu/ boylan/sccourses/547sp10/547.html)
More informationTROPICAL SCHEME THEORY
TROPICAL SCHEME THEORY 5. Commutative algebra over idempotent semirings II Quotients of semirings When we work with rings, a quotient object is specified by an ideal. When dealing with semirings (and lattices),
More informationTheorem 5.3. Let E/F, E = F (u), be a simple field extension. Then u is algebraic if and only if E/F is finite. In this case, [E : F ] = deg f u.
5. Fields 5.1. Field extensions. Let F E be a subfield of the field E. We also describe this situation by saying that E is an extension field of F, and we write E/F to express this fact. If E/F is a field
More informationWritten Homework # 4 Solution
Math 516 Fall 2006 Radford Written Homework # 4 Solution 12/10/06 You may use results form the book in Chapters 1 6 of the text, from notes found on our course web page, and results of the previous homework.
More informationNOTES FOR COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA M5P55
NOTES FOR COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA M5P55 AMBRUS PÁL 1. Rings and ideals Definition 1.1. A quintuple (A, +,, 0, 1) is a commutative ring with identity, if A is a set, equipped with two binary operations; addition
More informationCOURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER : MODERN ALGEBRA
COURSE SUMMARY FOR MATH 504, FALL QUARTER 20178: MODERN ALGEBRA JAROD ALPER Week 1, Sept 27, 29: Introduction to Groups Lecture 1: Introduction to groups. Defined a group and discussed basic properties
More informationExample: This theorem is the easiest way to test an ideal (or an element) is prime. Z[x] (x)
Math 4010/5530 Factorization Theory January 2016 Let R be an integral domain. Recall that s, t R are called associates if they differ by a unit (i.e. there is some c R such that s = ct). Let R be a commutative
More informationThe most important result in this section is undoubtedly the following theorem.
28 COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 6.4. Examples of Noetherian rings. So far the only rings we can easily prove are Noetherian are principal ideal domains, like Z and k[x], or finite. Our goal now is to develop theorems
More informationMath 145. Codimension
Math 145. Codimension 1. Main result and some interesting examples In class we have seen that the dimension theory of an affine variety (irreducible!) is linked to the structure of the function field in
More informationMath 762 Spring h Y (Z 1 ) (1) h X (Z 2 ) h X (Z 1 ) Φ Z 1. h Y (Z 2 )
Math 762 Spring 2016 Homework 3 Drew Armstrong Problem 1. Yoneda s Lemma. We have seen that the bifunctor Hom C (, ) : C C Set is analogous to a bilinear form on a Kvector space, : V V K. Recall that
More informationDefinitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations
Page 1 Definitions Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:23 AM Notations " " means "equals, by definition" the set of all real numbers the set of integers Denote a function from a set to a set by Denote the image of
More informationA COURSE ON INTEGRAL DOMAINS
A COURSE ON INTEGRAL DOMAINS ALGEBRA II  SPRING 2004 Updated  March 3, 2004 1. The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic My son who is in the 4 th grade is learning about prime numbers and cancelling prime
More informationON THE REPRESENTABILITY OF Hilb n k[x] (x) Roy Mikael Skjelnes
ON THE REPRESENTABILITY OF Hilb n k[x] (x) Roy Mikael Skjelnes Abstract. Let k[x] (x) be the polynomial ring k[x] localized in the maximal ideal (x) k[x]. We study the Hilbert functor parameterizing ideals
More informationLinear Algebra. Paul Yiu. Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University. Fall 2011
Linear Algebra Paul Yiu Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University Fall 2011 Linear Algebra Paul Yiu Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University Fall 2011 1A: Vector spaces Fields
More informationDMATH Algebra I HS18 Prof. Rahul Pandharipande. Solution 6. Unique Factorization Domains
DMATH Algebra I HS18 Prof. Rahul Pandharipande Solution 6 Unique Factorization Domains 1. Let R be a UFD. Let that a, b R be coprime elements (that is, gcd(a, b) R ) and c R. Suppose that a c and b c.
More informationMATH32062 Notes. 1 Affine algebraic varieties. 1.1 Definition of affine algebraic varieties
MATH32062 Notes 1 Affine algebraic varieties 1.1 Definition of affine algebraic varieties We want to define an algebraic variety as the solution set of a collection of polynomial equations, or equivalently,
More informationPolynomials, Ideals, and Gröbner Bases
Polynomials, Ideals, and Gröbner Bases Notes by Bernd Sturmfels for the lecture on April 10, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra We fix a field K. Some examples of fields
More informationRings If R is a commutative ring, a zero divisor is a nonzero element x such that xy = 0 for some nonzero element y R.
Rings 10262008 A ring is an abelian group R with binary operation + ( addition ), together with a second binary operation ( multiplication ). Multiplication must be associative, and must distribute over
More informationCHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES
CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the
More informationCommutative Algebra. Andreas Gathmann. Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2013/14
Commutative Algebra Andreas Gathmann Class Notes TU Kaiserslautern 2013/14 Contents 0. Introduction......................... 3 1. Ideals........................... 9 2. Prime and Maximal Ideals.....................
More information1. Group Theory Permutations.
1.1. Permutations. 1. Group Theory Problem 1.1. Let G be a subgroup of S n of index 2. Show that G = A n. Problem 1.2. Find two elements of S 7 that have the same order but are not conjugate. Let π S 7
More informationChapter 4. Matrices and Matrix Rings
Chapter 4 Matrices and Matrix Rings We first consider matrices in full generality, i.e., over an arbitrary ring R. However, after the first few pages, it will be assumed that R is commutative. The topics,
More informationMATH 3030, Abstract Algebra Winter 2012 Toby Kenney Sample Midterm Examination Model Solutions
MATH 3030, Abstract Algebra Winter 2012 Toby Kenney Sample Midterm Examination Model Solutions Basic Questions 1. Give an example of a prime ideal which is not maximal. In the ring Z Z, the ideal {(0,
More informationALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012
ALGEBRA QUALIFYING EXAM SPRING 2012 Work all of the problems. Justify the statements in your solutions by reference to specific results, as appropriate. Partial credit is awarded for partial solutions.
More informationLecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman
Lecture Notes Math 371: Algebra (Fall 2006) by Nathanael Leedom Ackerman October 17, 2006 TALK SLOWLY AND WRITE NEATLY!! 1 0.1 Factorization 0.1.1 Factorization of Integers and Polynomials Now we are going
More informationDMATH Algebra I HS 2013 Prof. Brent Doran. Solution 3. Modular arithmetic, quotients, product groups
DMATH Algebra I HS 2013 Prof. Brent Doran Solution 3 Modular arithmetic, quotients, product groups 1. Show that the functions f = 1/x, g = (x 1)/x generate a group of functions, the law of composition
More informationTHE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY DICTIONARY FOR BEGINNERS. Contents
THE ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY DICTIONARY FOR BEGINNERS ALICE MARK Abstract. This paper is a simple summary of the first most basic definitions in Algebraic Geometry as they are presented in Dummit and Foote ([1]),
More information1 First Theme: Sums of Squares
I will try to organize the work of this semester around several classical questions. The first is, When is a prime p the sum of two squares? The question was raised by Fermat who gave the correct answer
More informationSPRING 2006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS
SPRING 006 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION SOLUTIONS 1A. Let G be the subgroup of the free abelian group Z 4 consisting of all integer vectors (x, y, z, w) such that x + 3y + 5z + 7w = 0. (a) Determine a linearly
More information2. Intersection Multiplicities
2. Intersection Multiplicities 11 2. Intersection Multiplicities Let us start our study of curves by introducing the concept of intersection multiplicity, which will be central throughout these notes.
More informationMath Introduction to Modern Algebra
Math 343  Introduction to Modern Algebra Notes Field Theory Basics Let R be a ring. M is called a maximal ideal of R if M is a proper ideal of R and there is no proper ideal of R that properly contains
More information