REMARKS ON A CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE GINIBRE ENSEMBLE
|
|
- Geraldine Lee
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REMARKS ON A CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE GINIBRE ENSEMBLE SCOTT N. ARMSTRONG, SYLVIA SERFATY, AND OFER ZEITOUNI Abstract. We study the limiting distribution of the eigenvalues of the Ginibre ensemble conditioned on the event that a certain proportion lie in a given region of the complex plane. Using an equivalent formulation as an obstacle problem, we describe the optimal distribution and some of its monotonicity properties.. Introduction and statement of results With high probability, a square N-by-N matrix with complex independent, standard Gaussian entries i.e., the Ginibre ensemble) has eigenvalues evenly spread in the ball of radius N. More precisely, after multiplying the matrix by N / and letting N, one finds that the spectral measure converges weakly in the sense of measures) to the suitably normalized) uniform measure on the unit disk D C: N N δ zi µ 0 where the z i s are the eigenvalues of the matrix, δ z denotes the Dirac mass at z C and i=.) dµ 0 := π D dx. This statement is called the circular law and goes back to Ginibre [0]. Hiai and Petz [7] proved, in addition, that the law of spectral measure of the eigenvalues obeys a large deviations principle with speed N and rate function.) I[µ] := log x y dµx) dµy) + x dµx). C C See Ben Arous and Zeitouni [4] for the case of real Gaussian entries.) Roughly, this means that if A PC), then [ ] N ) P δ zi A exp N min N I min I). A PC) i= Of course, the unique minimizer of I over the set PC) of probability measures on C is the circular law µ 0. In view of this result, in order to understand the likely arrangement of eigenvalues after conditioning on a certain rare event e.g., having a hole in D without a significant number of eigenvalues) it suffices to find the minimizer of I on the event. Related random matrix models are the Gaussian unitary ensemble GUE) and Gaussian orthogonal ensemble GOE), in which the matrices are constrained to be Hermitian and real symmetric, C Date: April, 03. Revised October, Mathematics Subject Classification. 3A35, 49K0, 60B0. Key words and phrases. Obstacle problem, Ginibre ensemble, large deviations.
2 S. N. ARMSTRONG, S. SERFATY, AND O. ZEITOUNI respectively, and thus have real eigenvalues. The analogue of the circular law is Wigner s semicircle law: N δ xi ν 0 := N x 4 x dx. i= Here ν 0 minimizes I over the set PR) of probability measures on the real line. The corresponding large deviations principle in this setting was proved in the seminal paper by Ben Arous and Guionnet [3]. In this context, Majumdar, Nadal, Scardicchio and Vivo [4, 5] examined the rare event that a given proportion p [0, ] of the eigenvalues must lie on interval [a, ). Determining the likely configuration of the eigenvalues as N, conditioned on this rare event, is equivalent to minimizing I over probability measures on R) under the constraint that µ[a, )) p. Explicit formulas are given in [5] for the optimal distribution µ. A nontrivial situation occurs when p > ν 0 [a, )), in which case they find that µ has an L density ϕx) which tends to infinity as x a+ and vanishes in an interval [a ε, a) for some ε > 0. In this paper we examine the analogue of this question for the Ginibre ensemble. We consider an open subset U C with C, boundary such that the boundary of U D is locally Lipschitz, and we study the unlikely event in which the random matrix has too many eigenvalues in U. To avoid trivial situations we assume that D \ U is nonempty, fix µ 0 U) < p and minimize I subject to the constraint that.3) µ U ) p. The minimization is not over an empty set, as a convex combination of an appropriate multiple of the uniform measure on U and of µ 0 satisfies.3) and has finite I. Due to the convexity of the constraint, the compactness of the level sets of I, and the strict convexity of the functional I, there is a unique minimizer of I over C := {µ PC) :.3) holds}, which we denote by µ. Note that if p =, then C is the set of probability measures with a hole in C \ U. In contrast to the results for the one dimensional model studied in [5], our analysis typically does not lead to explicit formulas. Rather, we study certain qualitative properties of the minimizing measure µ. An exception is the case where p = and the set U is a half-space parallel to the imaginary axis; see Section 3 for that setup.) Here is the statement of the main results. See Figure for an illustration of the results.) Theorem. Assume that U C is open, U is locally C, and U D) is locally Lipschitz. Then the measure µ can be decomposed as where V C is bounded and open and d µ = π V dx + d µ S, d µ S = g dh U, where H denotes the one-dimensional Hausdorff measure and g 0 belongs to L U). Moreover,.4) U D supp µ S,.5) V \ U ) U =,.6) V \ U D, and moreover, if U D then V \ U D
3 A CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE GINIBRE ENSEMBLE 3 U Figure. An illustration of Theorem in the case p is slightly larger than µ 0 U) and U D. The dashed line is the unit ball and the shaded area is the support of the measure µ. The thick part of the boundary of U represents the support of µ S. and finally.7) U D V supp µ S. The fact that, at least in the case that U D, the singular part of µ is nonzero is in contrast to the one-dimensional model [5] which has a minimizing measure absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure on R. On the other hand, the qualitative picture portrayed by.6) and.7) an expansion of the support of the measure in U, the contraction of it in the complement of U and the appearance of a gap on the outside of U along the support of µ S is the same as that of [5]. The proof of Theorem is based on interpreting the minimization problem as an obstacle problem. This connection is folklore and was mentioned briefly in [8, Ch. ]; it was also employed in a context related to this paper in [, ]. For more detail and the case of general potentials and dimensions, see the forthcoming lecture notes [0].) The advantage of writing the problem this way is that it allows us to use the classical free-boundary regularity theory of Caffarelli [5] combined with some maximal principle arguments such as Hopf s Lemma. Acknowledgements. We thank Gilles Wainrib and Amir Dembo for bringing this problem to our attention, and Satya Majumdar for enlighting discussions and a reference to [5]. SS was supported by a EURYI award. OZ was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-030, the Israel Science Foundation and the Herman P. Taubman chair of Mathematics at the Weizmann Institute.. Proof of Theorem The proof of Theorem is based on identifying the minimization problem as an obstacle problem for the Newtonian potential of µ. This is the content of subsection.. The actual proof of Theorem is taken up in subsection., and proceeds by first establishing regularity properties
4 4 S. N. ARMSTRONG, S. SERFATY, AND O. ZEITOUNI of H µ and then applying Hopf s lemma together with Caffarelli s regularity theory for solutions of free boundary problems... Formulation as an obstacle problem. We first characterize the measure µ in terms of an obstacle problem. The solution of the obstacle problem turns out to be the Newtonian potential generated by µ, which we denote by.) H µ x) := log x y d µy). R We henceforth identify R with C.) We show in this subsection that H µ satisfies the variational inequality.) v K, H µ y) v H µ) y) dy 0, R where K := {v Hloc R ) : v H µ has bounded support in R and v ψ q.e. in R } and the obstacle is the function ψ given by {.3) ψx) := c x ) x U c x ) x U, where c > c are constants determined below. Note that.) is equivalent to the statement that, for every R > 0, H µ is the unique solution of the following minimization problem: {.4) min vy) } dy : v H B R ) such that v H µ H0 B R ) and v ψ in B R. B R Solutions of the variational inequality.) are said to be solutions of the obstacle problem { }.5) min H µ, H µ ψ = 0 in R. That is, the precise interpretation of.5) is that H µ is a solution of.). The reader can check by an integration by parts that this notion is consistent with the classical interpretation of.5) in the case that H µ is smooth. For general references on the obstacle problem, see [5, 3]. To prove.5), we observe that H µ = π µ 0 and in particular H µ is superharmonic and harmonic in the complement of the support of µ. It remains to show that H µ ψ in R and H µ = ψ on the support of µ. This is the statement of Lemma. below. In Lemma.3, we prove that H µ satisfies.). In what follows, q.e. is short for quasi-everywhere which means except possibly in of a set of capacity zero. A set K is of capacity zero if there does not exist a probability measure ν with support in a compact subset of K such that log x y dνx) dνy) is finite c.f. [8]). In particular, a set of capacity zero has zero Lebesgue measure and we note that a measure µ satisfying I[µ] < + does not charge sets of zero capacity. We first observe that µu) = p. If, on the contrary, µu) > p, then for small enough t > 0, we have t) µ + tµ 0 C. The strict convexity of I then contradicts the minimality of µ: I[ t) µ + tµ 0 ] < t)i[ µ] + ti[µ 0 ] I[ µ]. Lemma.. There exist c > c with c = if p =, such that.6) H µ x) + x c q.e. in U and H µ x) + x = c q.e. in supp µ) U and.7) H µ x) + x c q.e. in C \ U and H µ x) + x = c q.e. in supp µ) \ U.
5 A CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE GINIBRE ENSEMBLE 5 Proof. We argue by the standard method of variations one could also proceed by computing the convex dual of the optimization problem). Select ν C such that I[ν] < + and observe that, for every t [0, ],.8) I [ t) µ + tν] I[ µ]. Expanding in powers of t and letting t 0, we discover that.9) H µ x) + x ) dν µ)x) 0 for every ν C for which I[ν] <. We claim that.0) H µ x) + x p C U H µ x) + x ) d µx) =: c q.e. in U. If.0) is false, then there exists a compact set E U of positive capacity on which the opposite inequality holds. By the characterization of positive capacity, there exists a measure ν E of mass p supported in E with log x y dν E x) dν E y) <. We obtain a contradiction to.9) by taking ν to be the sum of ν E and the restriction of µ to C \ U. This establishes.0), and integrating it against µ which does not charge sets of zero capacity since it has finite energy) yields.6). If p = we stop the reasoning here and all the claims are true since.7) holds with c =. If p <, we obtain.7) by a similar argument as above, applying.9) to a measure ν which coincides with µ in U and has mass p in C \ U, resulting with c := p C\U H µ x) + x ) d µx). It remains to prove that c > c. By strict convexity of I and the fact that I[ µ] > I[µ 0 ], we have d dt I [ t) µ + tµ 0 ] < 0. t=0 This says, by the same computation as above, that H µ x) + x ) dµ 0 µ)x) < 0. Using.6) and.7), we obtain C c µ 0 U) + c µ 0 C \ U) < pc + p)c. Since p > µ 0 U) by assumption, we deduce that c > c. In the special case p =, which is considered in Section 3, the result in Lemma. is actually a characterization. Lemma.. Assume p = and that µ C satisfies.) H µ x) + x c q.e. in U and H µ x) + x = c q.e. in suppµ) U, for some c R. Then, µ = µ. Proof. Assume not, and set, for t 0, ), µ t := tµ + t) µ.
6 6 S. N. ARMSTRONG, S. SERFATY, AND O. ZEITOUNI We have I [µ t ] = t = t.) t H µ x) + x ) dµ t x) + t) H µ x) + x ) dµ t x) H µ x) + x t) ) dµ t x) + H µ x) + x )dµ t x) + ) ) x t) dµx) + c + x d µx), c + x dµ t x) where.6) and.) were used in the inequality. On the other hand, integrating.6) and.) with respect to µ and µ gives I[µ] = ) c + x dµx) and I[ µ] = ) c + x d µx). Substituting in.) then gives I[µ t ] ti[µ] + t)i[ µ], which contradicts the strict convexity of I unless µ = µ. Lemma.3. The function H µ is the unique element of K which satisfies.). Proof. First, we show that H µ is in L loc R ; R ). To see this first note that if ρ is a compactly supported Radon measure on R with dρ = 0 satisfying log x y dρx) + dρy) + < +, log x y dρ x) dρ y) < + and H ρ is the potential generated by ρ, defined as usual by H ρ x) := log x y dρy), then we have.3) log x y dρx) dρy) = H ρ x) dx. R R π R See the proof of [8, Lemma.8] where, more precisely, it is shown that log x y dρx) dρy) = ) R R π R R x y dρy) dx. Then.3) follows, since R x y)dρy) x y = H µ x) in the distributional sense. Next, consider µ 0 defined in.)) and its associated potential H µ 0, which belongs to C R ) by direct computation. The measure ρ := µ µ 0 is a compactly supported Radon measure with dρ = 0. In addition, since I[ µ] < and I[µ 0 ] <, it satisfies the desired assumptions. Thus.3) holds, which proves that H µ H µ 0 is in L R ; R ). Since H µ 0 is in L loc R ; R ), it follows that H µ L loc R ; R ), as claimed. We next turn to the proof that H µ satisfies.). Pick v K and set ϕ := v H µ. Observe that, in the case that ϕ is smooth and compactly supported, we have.4) H µ ϕ = π ϕ d µ 0. R R The last inequality of.4) is true because ϕ = v H µ 0 q.e. in supp µ) due to the fact that H µ = ψ q.e. in supp µ) and v ψ q.e. in R. The conclusion.4) follows since µ does not charge sets of capacity zero, and this proves that.) is satisfied under the additional assumption that ϕ is smooth and compactly supported. To obtain.) for general v K, we just need to show that the subset of K consisting of v for which v H µ is smooth is dense in K with respect to the topology of H. To see this, we fix v K and select R > so large that v H µ is supported in B R/. Then we define v ε,δ := H µ + v H µ ) η ε + δχ R,
7 A CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE GINIBRE ENSEMBLE 7 where ε, δ > 0, η ε is the standard mollifier and χ R is a smooth function supported in B R with 0 χ R and χ in B R. It is clear that v ε,δ H µ is smooth. If ε > 0 is sufficiently small relative to δ, then v ε,δ > ψ and hence v ε,δ K. Finally, we note that if ε > 0 is small enough relative to δ, then v ε,δ v H < Cδ. This concludes the proof of.). The uniqueness of the solution to.) is standard: if v is another solution, then first.) holds, and second, testing.) this time holding for v) with H µ yields R v H µ v) 0, Adding the two relations yields R H µ v) v H µ ) 0 which immediately implies that H µ v = 0 in H R )... Proof of Theorem. We now present the proof of the main result. It is divided to several steps, with the first four steps devoted to deriving regularity results for H µ and the last two steps analyzing properties of the minimizer µ by means of Hopf s lemma. Proof of Theorem. Step : Local regularity of H µ. In this step, we show that for some α > 0,.5) H µ C 0,α loc R ). The variational characterization provided by Lemma.3 asserts that H µ is a solution of the obstacle problem with obstacle ψ with ψ defined in.3)) and allows us to use the classical regularity theory for the obstacle problem. In particular, we see that, away from U, H µ is locally C, since ψ is smooth there. This optimal regularity for the obstacle problem is an old result of Frehse [7]; for a proof, see also [5, Theorem ]. In neighborhoods of U, in which ψ has a jump discontinuity, we cannot expect H µ to be so regular, in general. However, a result of Frehse and Mosco [8, Theorem 3.] implies that H µ is in fact Hölder continuous in a neighborhood of U. To verify that this result applies, we have to check that ψ verifies the unilateral Hölder condition summarized in lines 3.6) and 3.7) of [8], which in our case comes down to a smoothness condition on U. Indeed, it is easy to check that all we need for the obstacle ψ in.3) to satisfy this condition is that U satisfies an exterior cone condition, so our assumption that U is C, certainly suffices. We conclude that H µ C 0,α loc R ) for some α > 0. In particular, H µ is continuous. Step : Consequences of continuity and existence of a gap between U and V \ U. Since H µ is continuous and µ does not charge sets of capacity zero, we may upgrade Lemma. by removing the q.e. qualifier from.6) and.7). We have:.6) H µ x) + x c in U and H µ x) + x = c in supp µ) U, and.7) H µ x) + x c in R \ U and H µ x) + x = c in supp µ) \ U. We next claim that.8) µ is compactly supported. Indeed, I[ µ] < implies that x d µx) < and then x log x y d µy) x log x + y ) d µy) x log x + ) log y + )d µy) x. Together with the equalities in.6) and.7), this implies.8).
8 8 S. N. ARMSTRONG, S. SERFATY, AND O. ZEITOUNI Define V to be the interior of the support of µ, which is bounded by.8). According to.),.6).7) and the fact that H µ is C, loc = W, loc in both U and R \ U, we find that.9) µ = π H µ = π V in U R \ U). Let µ reg denote the Lebesgue measure on V multiplied by /π and set µ S := µ µ reg. It is clear by.9) that µ S is supported on U. Since H µ is continuous and above the obstacle function ψ = c x ) in U, it must be strictly larger than c x ) = ψ in a neighborhood of U. In other words, there is a gap between U and V \ U. Step 3: Further local regularity of H µ. In this step, we show that H µ L loc R ; R ), and that H µ has Neumann trace on each side of U. We first argue that H µ C 0, loc R ), which amounts to proving that H µ is Lipschitz continuous in a neighborhood of U. To show this, we introduce a modification ψ of ψ which is locally Lipschitz continuous in R and such that H µ satisfies.) with ψ in place of ψ. The Lipschitz continuity of H µ then follows from [5, Theorem a)]. It is clear from.) or.4) that any ψ will do, provided that we modify ψ only in the region in which {H µ > ψ} and in such a way that H µ ψ in R. We define ψy) := { hy) if y U δ \ U, ψy) if y U R \ U δ ), where U δ := {z R : distz, U) < δ}, δ > 0 is small enough that U δ is smooth and H µ > ψ in U δ \ U, and h is the unique harmonic function in U δ \ U which is equal to ψ on U δ \ U). In view of the fact that H µ is superharmonic in R, it is clear that ψ H µ in R and so ψ has the desired properties. We deduce that H µ is locally Lipschitz. In particular, we have H µ L loc R ; R ) by Rademacher s theorem c.f. [6, Chapter 3]). We next show that H µ has a Neumann trace on each side of U. We mean that ν F exists and belongs to L loc U), where F is either the restriction of H µ to U or to R \ U, and ν denotes the outer unit normal to U. We only prove the claim in the case that F = H µ U, since the other case is even easier due to the gap,.5)). We first give the argument in the case that U is bounded. We write H µ U = H µ +H µ in U, where H µ is harmonic in U with H µ = H µ on U, and H µ := H µ H µ. Note that H µ W, U) since H µ is Lipschitz. Next, we recall that the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map also called the Poincaré-Steklov operator) with respect to the Laplacian is a continuous linear operator from H Ω) to L Ω), for any bounded C, domain Ω c.f. [6, Theorem 4.]). It follows that ν H µ L U). By standard elliptic regularity c.f. [9, Theorem 9.5]), we have that H µ W,p U) W,p 0 U) for all < p <. Since W,p U) C,α U) for 0 < α < /p by Sobolev embedding c.f. [, Theorem 5.4, Part II]), we deduce that ν H µ Cα U) for all 0 < α <. The claim that ν H µ ) U L U) follows. For the general case in which U may be unbounded, we fix R > 0 and select a C, domain ŨR such that U B R ŨR and apply the above argument to ζ R H µ, where ζ R is a smooth cutoff function satisfying 0 ζ R, ζ R on B R, and ζ R 0 in R d \ B R. Step 4: Regularity of µ S. We show next that µ S is absolutely continuous with respect to the one-dimensional Hausdorff measure restricted to U, with a density belonging to L U). Fix a compactly supported smooth function ζ C R d ). Using that H µ L loc R ) and the fact proved in the previous paragraph that H µ has a Neumann trace in L U) from both sides of U,
9 A CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE GINIBRE ENSEMBLE 9 we may integrate by parts to find H µ x) ζx) dx = H µ x) ζx) dx + H µ x) ζx) dx R U R \U ) = ζx) H µ x) dx + ζx) ν H µ U x) dh x) U U ) ζx) H µ x) dx ζx) ν H µ R \U x) dh x). R \U It follows from this and.9) that µ S is equal to the one-dimensional Hausdorff measure, restricted to U, multiplied by L loc U) function g := π ν H µ ) U ν H µ )) R \U. Therefore, g is nonnegative and cannot have mass greater than one. On the other hand, µ is of compact support due to.8), so in fact g L U). Step 5: Potential and comparisons. Having established a-priori regularity for H µ, µ and its components, we turn to comparisons of H µ and H µ 0. These comparisons culminate in the relations.3).5). Let H µ 0 be the potential generated by the measure µ 0 given in.). It is also the solution of the variational inequality.) with ψ replaced by c 3 x ) for some c 3 R. The reason is that µ 0 is the minimizer of I over all probability measures without constraint) and hence the arguments of Lemmas. and.3 apply. Observe that { }.0) H µ = c x ) = V U and We show next that U { } H µ = c x ) = V \ U)..) H µ 0 c 3 c ) H µ H µ 0 c 3 c ). We prove only the second inequality, since the first is obtained via a similar argument. The function G := H µ 0 c 3 c ) is larger than c x ) hence larger than ψ, and thus larger than H µ in {H µ = ψ}. Moreover, G is superharmonic in R and H µ is harmonic in the complement of {H µ = ψ}, and thus H µ G is subharmonic in R \ {H µ = ψ} and nonpositive on {H µ = ψ}. It follows from their definitions that H µ G is bounded in R. We deduce that H µ G in R, as desired. Consider the difference of the two potentials, w := H µ 0 H µ c 3 c ), which satisfies.) w 0 in R \ V and w 0 in R \ D and 0 w c c ). We claim that:.3) {w = 0} = D U,.4) either {w = c c )} = D V \ U) and or else {w = c c )} = D V \ U)) R \ D).5) U D implies that {w = c c )} = D V \ U). In order to prove these, we first observe that, by the monotonicity.) of the obstacle problem,.6) D U V U and V \ U D \ U.
10 0 S. N. ARMSTRONG, S. SERFATY, AND O. ZEITOUNI Due to.0),.6), the fact that H µ 0 c 3 x ) and c < c, we have.7) V {w = 0} V D U = D U {w = 0} and.8) D { w = c c ) } D V \ U) = V \ U) { w = c c ) }. Here comes the argument for.3). In view of.7), it suffices to show that {w = 0} V. Suppose on the contrary that there exists x / V with wx) = 0. Then, by.) and the strong maximum principle, we have w 0 in R \ V. By.8), continuity of H µ and c c, we deduce that V U. In particular, H µ is harmonic in R \ U and w 0 in R \ U, which implies that H µ 0 is harmonic in R \ U. This contradicts the assumption that D \ U is nonempty, verifying.3). We continue with the proofs of.4) and.5). In light of.8), if {w = c c )} = D V \ U), then there exists x / D such that wx) = c c ). This implies that w c c ) in R \ D by the maximum principle and.). This confirms.4). Moreover, in this case H µ is harmonic outside of D since H µ 0 is), which implies that V D. Also, in view of.8) and the continuity of w, we deduce that U D, which completes the proof of.5). Step 6: Completion of the proof of Theorem - Hopf s lemma and free boundary regularity. We have prepared all estimates needed for the conclusion of the proof. The main technical point is that we want to use Hopf s lemma in order to identify the regions where w vanishes. For that, regularity of the free boundary is important, and is provided by Caffarelli s theory. Turning to the proof, we note first that.5) follows from the combination of.3),.5) and.6). We still need to prove.4),.6) and.7). Each of these follows from a variation of an argument based on Hopf s lemma. We first prove.4), arguing by contradiction. Because of.6), if.4) fails then there exists x V U D \ supp µ S. Since x µ S, w is continuous at x. In fact, we have wx) = 0 since w vanishes on U D by.7). Due to.) and Hopf s lemma, we deduce that w vanishes identically in the connected component of R \ V containing x. Since H µ is harmonic in R \ V and H µ 0 is harmonic nowhere in D, we conclude that the intersection of D and the connected component of R \ V containing x is empty. This contradicts x D, completing the argument for.4). Next we prove.6). We need only verify the second claim, since the first claim was obtained above already in.6). In the case U D, in view of.6), it suffices to prove that V \ U) D is empty. Suppose on the contrary that there exists x V \ U) D. We have already demonstrated a gap between V \ U) and U and thus x U. In particular, w C, in a neighborhood of x. By.4), w c c ) in D V \ U) and thus wx) = 0. In view of Hopf s lemma and the fact that w is subharmonic in R \ D by.), the second alternative must hold in.4). This contradicts.5) to finish the proof of.6). We conclude with the argument for.7), which is a bit more involved due to the fact that we need the best regularity for the boundary of the contact set in Caffarelli s theory, which is C,α except for singular points, see [5, Theorem 6]. We proceed again by contradiction and suppose there exists x U D \ V supp µ S ). Since x D \ supp µ S, x U by.4) and so w is C, in a neighborhood of x. Thus wx) = 0 and wx) = 0. Notice that x V and thus it is a point on the boundary of the contact set. In view of.3) we have w > 0 in R \ V. Since w 0 in R \ V by.), an application of Hopf s lemma gives us a contradiction, completing the proof. However, before we may apply Hopf s lemma, we must check that V is sufficiently smooth in a
11 A CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE GINIBRE ENSEMBLE neighborhood of x. Indeed, Hopf s lemma holds for C,α boundaries for any α > 0) but not for domains with boundaries which are merely C, see Safonov [9]. Fortunately, the free boundary regularity theory of Caffarelli gives us just what we need: V is C,α near x, for every 0 < α <. The reason is that x cannot be a singular point as defined in [5]) of the free boundary, due to the fact that U D) is Lipschitz and U D V, which rules out the possibility that V is contained in a thin strip near x. See [5, Theorem 6], which asserts that the boundary of V is C,α near x unless V B r x) is contained between two parallel planes separated by a distance of or) as r 0. It follows that V is regular enough in a neighborhood of x to invoke Hopf s lemma. This completes the proof. 3. An example: real part constraint We conclude with an explicit example, in which the constraint set U is a half-space and p =. We show that there is a critical point at which the minimizing measure becomes entirely concentrated and equal to the semicircle law) on the boundary line. For each a R, we set U a := {z C : Rez) < a}, and set C a := {µ PC) : µu a ) = }. We denote by L a = U a the boundary line, by µ a the minimizing measure of I ) on C a, and by µ S,a its singular component as in Theorem. Note that µ S,a L a ) is the total mass of µ S,a. Also denote the semicircle law on R by y σdy) = π { y < } dy. The following result asserts that µ a = µ S,a if and only if a, in which case µ S,a is the semicircle law on L a. Proposition 3.. For every a <, we have µ S,a L a ) <. µ S,a L a ) = and, with z = x + iy, µ S,a dz) = δ a dx) σdy) =: σ a dz). Conversely, if a, then Before giving the proof of Proposition 3., we recall some preliminaries on the semicircle law. Denote H σ z) := log z iy σdy). R By a direct computation, we have { H σ x) + x = 0, x 3.) + log )/) 0, x, x R, [, Ex..6.4]). 3.) S σ z) := x z σdx) = z z ), z C +, [, pg. 46,.4.7)]). We recognize S σ z) as the Stieltjes transform of σ.) Proof of Proposition 3.. Note first that if µ S,a U a ) = then µ S,a L a ) = by Theorem and therefore, using that for z = a + iy one has z = a + y, it follows from 3.) that necessarily in such a situation µ S,a a + idy) = σdy) and 3.3) H µ S,a a + iy) + a + iy) = a + + log. Applying Lemma., we conclude that a necessary and sufficient condition for µ S,a L a ) = is that 3.4) H σa b + iy) + b + iy) a + + log for all b > a.
12 S. N. ARMSTRONG, S. SERFATY, AND O. ZEITOUNI Suppose a <. Differentiate the left side of 3.4) with respect to b to obtain, with θ R, H σ a b + iy) + b + iy) i ) = b IS σ y + ib a)) b = b + Iz z ) =: F a, b, y), where z = y + ib a) and 3.) was used in the equalities. Noting that lim F a, b, 0) = a, b a we conclude that if a < the necessary condition for µ S,a L a ) = is not satisfied. This proves the first statement of the proposition. For the second statement, we introduce the function Gy, a, b) = y + b + H σ y + ib a)) a log. Since Gy, a, a) 0 by 3.), it is enough due to Lemma. to verify that Gy, a, b) 0 when b > a. By symmetry and convexity, for fixed a < b, one has Gy, a, b) G0, a, b) =: Ga, b). Note that Ga, b) b { = b a b a) ), 0 b a <, > 0, b a, where again we used 3.). It is straightforward to check that the right side is nonnegative provided that b a and a. Since Ga, a) 0, this implies that Ga, b) 0 for b > a. This completes the proof. References [] R. A. Adams. Sobolev spaces. Academic Press [A subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 975. Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 65. [] G. W. Anderson, A. Guionnet, and O. Zeitouni. An introduction to random matrices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 00. [3] G. Ben Arous and A. Guionnet. Large deviations for Wigner s law and Voiculescu s non-commutative entropy. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 084):57 54, 997. [4] G. Ben Arous and O. Zeitouni. Large deviations from the circular law. ESAIM Probab. Statist., :3 34 electronic), 998. [5] L. A. Caffarelli. The obstacle problem revisited. J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 44-5):383 40, 998. [6] L. C. Evans and R. F. Gariepy. Measure theory and fine properties of functions. Studies in Advanced Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 99. [7] J. Frehse. On the regularity of the solution of a second order variational inequality. Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. 4), 6:3 35, 97. [8] J. Frehse and U. Mosco. Irregular obstacles and quasivariational inequalities of stochastic impulse control. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 4), 9):05 57, 98. [9] D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger. Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 00. Reprint of the 998 edition. [0] J. Ginibre. Statistical ensembles of complex, quaternion, and real matrices. J. Mathematical Phys., 6: , 965. [] H. Hedenmalm and N. Makarov. Quantum Hele-Shaw flow. arxiv:math/04437, 004. [] H. Hedenmalm and N. Makarov. Coulomb gas ensembles and Laplacian growth. Proc. London Math. Soc., 06: , 03. [3] D. Kinderlehrer and G. Stampacchia. An introduction to variational inequalities and their applications, volume 88 of Pure and Applied Mathematics. Academic Press Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers], New York, 980. [4] S. N. Majumdar, C. Nadal, A. Scardicchio, and P. Vivo. The index distribution of gaussian random matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett., 03:0603, 009. [5] S. N. Majumdar, C. Nadal, A. Scardicchio, and P. Vivo. How many eigenvalues of a Gaussian random matrix are positive? Phys. Rev. E, 83:0405, Apr 0. [6] W. McLean. Strongly elliptic systems and boundary integral equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 000.
13 A CONSTRAINED OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE GINIBRE ENSEMBLE 3 [7] D. Petz and F. Hiai. Logarithmic energy as an entropy functional. In Advances in differential equations and mathematical physics Atlanta, GA, 997), volume 7 of Contemp. Math., pages 05. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 998. [8] E. B. Saff and V. Totik. Logarithmic potentials with external fields, volume 36 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 997. Appendix B by Thomas Bloom. [9] M. V. Safonov. Boundary estimates for positive solutions to second order elliptic equations, 008. unpublished preprint, arxiv: [0] S. Serfaty. Coulomb Gases and Ginzburg-Landau Vortices, 03. To appear, Zurich Lecture Notes in Mathematics. CEREMADE UMR CNRS 7534), Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France address: armstrong@ceremade.dauphine.fr Laboratoire Jacques Louis Lions, UPMC Paris 6, France and The Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, USA, address: serfaty@ann.jussieu.fr Faculty of Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7600, Israel and School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, MN 55455, USA address: zeitouni@math.umn.edu
REMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID
REMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID DRAGOŞ IFTIMIE AND JAMES P. KELLIHER Abstract. In [Math. Ann. 336 (2006), 449-489] the authors consider the two dimensional
More informationRegularity of local minimizers of the interaction energy via obstacle problems
Regularity of local minimizers of the interaction energy via obstacle problems J. A. Carrillo, M. G. Delgadino, A. Mellet September 22, 2014 Abstract The repulsion strength at the origin for repulsive/attractive
More informationA Perron-type theorem on the principal eigenvalue of nonsymmetric elliptic operators
A Perron-type theorem on the principal eigenvalue of nonsymmetric elliptic operators Lei Ni And I cherish more than anything else the Analogies, my most trustworthy masters. They know all the secrets of
More informationand finally, any second order divergence form elliptic operator
Supporting Information: Mathematical proofs Preliminaries Let be an arbitrary bounded open set in R n and let L be any elliptic differential operator associated to a symmetric positive bilinear form B
More informationGIOVANNI COMI AND MONICA TORRES
ONE-SIDED APPROXIMATION OF SETS OF FINITE PERIMETER GIOVANNI COMI AND MONICA TORRES Abstract. In this note we present a new proof of a one-sided approximation of sets of finite perimeter introduced in
More informationSHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction
SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES GILES AUCHMUTY Abstract. This paper describes sharp inequalities for the trace of Sobolev functions on the boundary of a bounded region R N. The inequalities bound (semi-)norms
More informationBrunn-Minkowski inequality for the 1-Riesz capacity and level set convexity for the 1/2-Laplacian
Brunn-Minkowski inequality for the 1-Riesz capacity and level set convexity for the 1/2-Laplacian M. Novaga, B. Ruffini Abstract We prove that that the 1-Riesz capacity satisfies a Brunn-Minkowski inequality,
More informationC 1 regularity of solutions of the Monge-Ampère equation for optimal transport in dimension two
C 1 regularity of solutions of the Monge-Ampère equation for optimal transport in dimension two Alessio Figalli, Grégoire Loeper Abstract We prove C 1 regularity of c-convex weak Alexandrov solutions of
More informationOPTIMAL DISTRIBUTION OF OPPOSITELY CHARGED PHASES: PERFECT SCREENING AND OTHER PROPERTIES
OPTIMAL DISTRIBUTION OF OPPOSITELY CHARGED PHASES: PERFECT SCREENING AND OTHER PROPERTIES MARCO BONACINI, HANS KNÜPFER, AND MATTHIAS RÖGER Abstract. We study the minimum energy configuration of a uniform
More informationSYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 21, 2003, 211 226 SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S.
More informationSYMMETRY IN REARRANGEMENT OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2009(2009), No. 149, pp. 1 10. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu SYMMETRY IN REARRANGEMENT
More informationMATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction
1 INTRODUCTION MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, 2014 1 Introduction Definition. If A, B are sets and there exists a bijection A B, they have the same cardinality, which we write as A, #A. If there exists
More informationA Dirichlet problem in the strip
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 1996(1996), No. 10, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp (login: ftp) 147.26.103.110 or 129.120.3.113
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationRecall that if X is a compact metric space, C(X), the space of continuous (real-valued) functions on X, is a Banach space with the norm
Chapter 13 Radon Measures Recall that if X is a compact metric space, C(X), the space of continuous (real-valued) functions on X, is a Banach space with the norm (13.1) f = sup x X f(x). We want to identify
More informationPARTIAL REGULARITY OF BRENIER SOLUTIONS OF THE MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATION
PARTIAL REGULARITY OF BRENIER SOLUTIONS OF THE MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATION ALESSIO FIGALLI AND YOUNG-HEON KIM Abstract. Given Ω, Λ R n two bounded open sets, and f and g two probability densities concentrated
More informationNONLINEAR FREDHOLM ALTERNATIVE FOR THE p-laplacian UNDER NONHOMOGENEOUS NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONDITION
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2016 (2016), No. 210, pp. 1 7. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu NONLINEAR FREDHOLM ALTERNATIVE FOR THE p-laplacian
More informationSobolev spaces. May 18
Sobolev spaces May 18 2015 1 Weak derivatives The purpose of these notes is to give a very basic introduction to Sobolev spaces. More extensive treatments can e.g. be found in the classical references
More informationSELF-ADJOINTNESS OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS WITH SINGULAR POTENTIALS ON MANIFOLDS OF BOUNDED GEOMETRY
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2003(2003), No.??, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) SELF-ADJOINTNESS
More informationLocal semiconvexity of Kantorovich potentials on non-compact manifolds
Local semiconvexity of Kantorovich potentials on non-compact manifolds Alessio Figalli, Nicola Gigli Abstract We prove that any Kantorovich potential for the cost function c = d / on a Riemannian manifold
More informationNECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES
NECESSARY CONDITIONS FOR WEIGHTED POINTWISE HARDY INEQUALITIES JUHA LEHRBÄCK Abstract. We establish necessary conditions for domains Ω R n which admit the pointwise (p, β)-hardy inequality u(x) Cd Ω(x)
More informationu( x) = g( y) ds y ( 1 ) U solves u = 0 in U; u = 0 on U. ( 3)
M ath 5 2 7 Fall 2 0 0 9 L ecture 4 ( S ep. 6, 2 0 0 9 ) Properties and Estimates of Laplace s and Poisson s Equations In our last lecture we derived the formulas for the solutions of Poisson s equation
More informationRobustness for a Liouville type theorem in exterior domains
Robustness for a Liouville type theorem in exterior domains Juliette Bouhours 1 arxiv:1207.0329v3 [math.ap] 24 Oct 2014 1 UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7598, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, F-75005, Paris,
More informationThe Dirichlet s P rinciple. In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation:
Oct. 1 The Dirichlet s P rinciple In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation: 1. Dirichlet s Principle. u = in, u = g on. ( 1 ) If we multiply
More informationON SOME ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS IN UNBOUNDED DOMAINS
Chin. Ann. Math.??B(?), 200?, 1 20 DOI: 10.1007/s11401-007-0001-x ON SOME ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS IN UNBOUNDED DOMAINS Michel CHIPOT Abstract We present a method allowing to obtain existence of a solution for
More informationMicroscopic behavior for β-ensembles: an energy approach
Microscopic behavior for β-ensembles: an energy approach Thomas Leblé (joint with/under the supervision of) Sylvia Serfaty Université Paris 6 BIRS workshop, 14 April 2016 Thomas Leblé (Université Paris
More informationBrunn-Minkowski inequality for the 1-Riesz capacity and level set convexity for the 1/2-Laplacian
Brunn-Minkowski inequality for the 1-Riesz capacity and level set convexity for the 1/2-Laplacian M. Novaga, B. Ruffini January 13, 2014 Abstract We prove that that the 1-Riesz capacity satisfies a Brunn-Minkowski
More informationObstacle problems and isotonicity
Obstacle problems and isotonicity Thomas I. Seidman Revised version for NA-TMA: NA-D-06-00007R1+ [June 6, 2006] Abstract For variational inequalities of an abstract obstacle type, a comparison principle
More informationEXISTENCE RESULTS FOR QUASILINEAR HEMIVARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES AT RESONANCE. Leszek Gasiński
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: www.aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS SUPPLEMENT 2007 pp. 409 418 EXISTENCE RESULTS FOR QUASILINEAR HEMIVARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES AT RESONANCE Leszek Gasiński Jagiellonian
More informationON THE REGULARITY OF SAMPLE PATHS OF SUB-ELLIPTIC DIFFUSIONS ON MANIFOLDS
Bendikov, A. and Saloff-Coste, L. Osaka J. Math. 4 (5), 677 7 ON THE REGULARITY OF SAMPLE PATHS OF SUB-ELLIPTIC DIFFUSIONS ON MANIFOLDS ALEXANDER BENDIKOV and LAURENT SALOFF-COSTE (Received March 4, 4)
More informationHOMEOMORPHISMS OF BOUNDED VARIATION
HOMEOMORPHISMS OF BOUNDED VARIATION STANISLAV HENCL, PEKKA KOSKELA AND JANI ONNINEN Abstract. We show that the inverse of a planar homeomorphism of bounded variation is also of bounded variation. In higher
More informationON BOUNDEDNESS OF MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS IN SOBOLEV SPACES
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 29, 2004, 167 176 ON BOUNDEDNESS OF MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS IN SOBOLEV SPACES Piotr Haj lasz and Jani Onninen Warsaw University, Institute of Mathematics
More informationNONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH MEASURES REVISITED
NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH MEASURES REVISITED Haïm Brezis (1),(2), Moshe Marcus (3) and Augusto C. Ponce (4) Abstract. We study the existence of solutions of the nonlinear problem (P) ( u + g(u)
More informationEverywhere differentiability of infinity harmonic functions
Everywhere differentiability of infinity harmonic functions Lawrence C. Evans and Charles K. Smart Department of Mathematics University of California, Berkeley Abstract We show that an infinity harmonic
More informationOPTIMAL POTENTIALS FOR SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS. 1. Introduction In this paper we consider optimization problems of the form. min F (V ) : V V, (1.
OPTIMAL POTENTIALS FOR SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS G. BUTTAZZO, A. GEROLIN, B. RUFFINI, AND B. VELICHKOV Abstract. We consider the Schrödinger operator + V (x) on H 0 (), where is a given domain of R d. Our
More informationThe Skorokhod reflection problem for functions with discontinuities (contractive case)
The Skorokhod reflection problem for functions with discontinuities (contractive case) TAKIS KONSTANTOPOULOS Univ. of Texas at Austin Revised March 1999 Abstract Basic properties of the Skorokhod reflection
More informationMATH6081A Homework 8. In addition, when 1 < p 2 the above inequality can be refined using Lorentz spaces: f
MATH68A Homework 8. Prove the Hausdorff-Young inequality, namely f f L L p p for all f L p (R n and all p 2. In addition, when < p 2 the above inequality can be refined using Lorentz spaces: f L p,p f
More informationA TALE OF TWO CONFORMALLY INVARIANT METRICS
A TALE OF TWO CONFORMALLY INVARIANT METRICS H. S. BEAR AND WAYNE SMITH Abstract. The Harnack metric is a conformally invariant metric defined in quite general domains that coincides with the hyperbolic
More informationON MAPS WHOSE DISTRIBUTIONAL JACOBIAN IS A MEASURE
[version: December 15, 2007] Real Analysis Exchange Summer Symposium 2007, pp. 153-162 Giovanni Alberti, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pisa, largo Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy. Email address:
More informationTHE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS
THE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS OGNJEN MILATOVIC Abstract. We consider H V = M +V, where (M, g) is a Riemannian manifold (not necessarily
More informationOn a weighted total variation minimization problem
On a weighted total variation minimization problem Guillaume Carlier CEREMADE Université Paris Dauphine carlier@ceremade.dauphine.fr Myriam Comte Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, Université Pierre et Marie
More informationOn m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry
On m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry Ognjen Milatovic Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of North Florida Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA. Abstract
More informationRichard F. Bass Krzysztof Burdzy University of Washington
ON DOMAIN MONOTONICITY OF THE NEUMANN HEAT KERNEL Richard F. Bass Krzysztof Burdzy University of Washington Abstract. Some examples are given of convex domains for which domain monotonicity of the Neumann
More informationMixed exterior Laplace s problem
Mixed exterior Laplace s problem Chérif Amrouche, Florian Bonzom Laboratoire de mathématiques appliquées, CNRS UMR 5142, Université de Pau et des Pays de l Adour, IPRA, Avenue de l Université, 64000 Pau
More informationThe small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results)
The small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results) Ehrhard Behrends Abstract A metric space (M, d) is said to have the small ball property (sbp) if for every ε 0 > 0 there exists a sequence
More informationMULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR CRITICAL ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS WITH FRACTIONAL LAPLACIAN
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 016 (016), No. 97, pp. 1 11. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu MULTIPLE SOLUTIONS
More informationIntegral Jensen inequality
Integral Jensen inequality Let us consider a convex set R d, and a convex function f : (, + ]. For any x,..., x n and λ,..., λ n with n λ i =, we have () f( n λ ix i ) n λ if(x i ). For a R d, let δ a
More informationREGULARITY OF MONOTONE TRANSPORT MAPS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED DOMAINS
REGULARITY OF MONOTONE TRANSPORT MAPS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED DOMAINS DARIO CORDERO-ERAUSQUIN AND ALESSIO FIGALLI A Luis A. Caffarelli en su 70 años, con amistad y admiración Abstract. The regularity of monotone
More informationSELF-ADJOINTNESS OF DIRAC OPERATORS VIA HARDY-DIRAC INEQUALITIES
SELF-ADJOINTNESS OF DIRAC OPERATORS VIA HARDY-DIRAC INEQUALITIES MARIA J. ESTEBAN 1 AND MICHAEL LOSS Abstract. Distinguished selfadjoint extension of Dirac operators are constructed for a class of potentials
More informationA GENERALIZATION OF THE FLAT CONE CONDITION FOR REGULARITY OF SOLUTIONS OF ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 100, Number 2. June 1987 A GENERALIZATION OF THE FLAT CONE CONDITION FOR REGULARITY OF SOLUTIONS OF ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS GARY M. LIEBERMAN ABSTRACT.
More information1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016
1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 W2016 1.1 Homework 1. Due Wednesday, October 7, 2015 Notation 1.1 Let U be any set, g be a positive function on U, Y be a normed space. For any f : U Y let
More informationOn John type ellipsoids
On John type ellipsoids B. Klartag Tel Aviv University Abstract Given an arbitrary convex symmetric body K R n, we construct a natural and non-trivial continuous map u K which associates ellipsoids to
More informationSpectral law of the sum of random matrices
Spectral law of the sum of random matrices Florent Benaych-Georges benaych@dma.ens.fr May 5, 2005 Abstract The spectral distribution of a matrix is the uniform distribution on its spectrum with multiplicity.
More informationON THE EXISTENCE OF THREE SOLUTIONS FOR QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC PROBLEM. Paweł Goncerz
Opuscula Mathematica Vol. 32 No. 3 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/opmath.2012.32.3.473 ON THE EXISTENCE OF THREE SOLUTIONS FOR QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC PROBLEM Paweł Goncerz Abstract. We consider a quasilinear
More informationOn a Class of Multidimensional Optimal Transportation Problems
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 10 (2003), No. 2, 517 529 On a Class of Multidimensional Optimal Transportation Problems G. Carlier Université Bordeaux 1, MAB, UMR CNRS 5466, France and Université Bordeaux
More informationMath The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution
Math. 209 The Laplacian Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution Let be a bounded open set in R n, n 2, with smooth boundary. The fact that the boundary is smooth means that at each point x the external
More informationDEGREE AND SOBOLEV SPACES. Haïm Brezis Yanyan Li Petru Mironescu Louis Nirenberg. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 13, 1999, 181 190 DEGREE AND SOBOLEV SPACES Haïm Brezis Yanyan Li Petru Mironescu Louis Nirenberg Dedicated to Jürgen
More informationFailure of the Raikov Theorem for Free Random Variables
Failure of the Raikov Theorem for Free Random Variables Florent Benaych-Georges DMA, École Normale Supérieure, 45 rue d Ulm, 75230 Paris Cedex 05 e-mail: benaych@dma.ens.fr http://www.dma.ens.fr/ benaych
More informationFrequency functions, monotonicity formulas, and the thin obstacle problem
Frequency functions, monotonicity formulas, and the thin obstacle problem IMA - University of Minnesota March 4, 2013 Thank you for the invitation! In this talk we will present an overview of the parabolic
More informationNonlinear Energy Forms and Lipschitz Spaces on the Koch Curve
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 9 (2002), No. 1, 245 257 Nonlinear Energy Forms and Lipschitz Spaces on the Koch Curve Raffaela Capitanelli Dipartimento di Metodi e Modelli Matematici per le Scienze
More informationPERTURBATION THEORY FOR NONLINEAR DIRICHLET PROBLEMS
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 28, 2003, 207 222 PERTURBATION THEORY FOR NONLINEAR DIRICHLET PROBLEMS Fumi-Yuki Maeda and Takayori Ono Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Miyake,
More informationA LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION
A LOCALIZATION PROPERTY AT THE BOUNDARY FOR MONGE-AMPERE EQUATION O. SAVIN. Introduction In this paper we study the geometry of the sections for solutions to the Monge- Ampere equation det D 2 u = f, u
More informationOn the uniform Poincaré inequality
On the uniform Poincaré inequality Abdesslam oulkhemair, Abdelkrim Chakib To cite this version: Abdesslam oulkhemair, Abdelkrim Chakib. On the uniform Poincaré inequality. Communications in Partial Differential
More informationPHASE TRANSITIONS: REGULARITY OF FLAT LEVEL SETS
PHASE TRANSITIONS: REGULARITY OF FLAT LEVEL SETS OVIDIU SAVIN Abstract. We consider local minimizers of the Ginzburg-Landau energy functional 2 u 2 + 4 ( u2 ) 2 dx and prove that, if the level set is included
More informationRegularity of flat level sets in phase transitions
Annals of Mathematics, 69 (2009), 4 78 Regularity of flat level sets in phase transitions By Ovidiu Savin Abstract We consider local minimizers of the Ginzburg-Landau energy functional 2 u 2 + 4 ( u2 )
More informationEXISTENCE AND REGULARITY RESULTS FOR SOME NONLINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
EXISTECE AD REGULARITY RESULTS FOR SOME OLIEAR PARABOLIC EUATIOS Lucio BOCCARDO 1 Andrea DALL AGLIO 2 Thierry GALLOUËT3 Luigi ORSIA 1 Abstract We prove summability results for the solutions of nonlinear
More informationNew York Journal of Mathematics. A Refinement of Ball s Theorem on Young Measures
New York Journal of Mathematics New York J. Math. 3 (1997) 48 53. A Refinement of Ball s Theorem on Young Measures Norbert Hungerbühler Abstract. For a sequence u j : R n R m generating the Young measure
More informationREGULARITY RESULTS FOR THE EQUATION u 11 u 22 = Introduction
REGULARITY RESULTS FOR THE EQUATION u 11 u 22 = 1 CONNOR MOONEY AND OVIDIU SAVIN Abstract. We study the equation u 11 u 22 = 1 in R 2. Our results include an interior C 2 estimate, classical solvability
More informationENTIRE FUNCTIONS AND COMPLETENESS PROBLEMS. Lecture 3
ENTIRE FUNCTIONS AND COMPLETENESS PROBLEMS A. POLTORATSKI Lecture 3 A version of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle formulated in terms of Harmonic Analysis claims that a non-zero measure (distribution)
More informationBLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED
BLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED TAOUFIK HMIDI AND SAHBI KERAANI Abstract. In this note we prove a refined version of compactness lemma adapted to the blowup analysis
More information08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms
(February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops
More informationChapter 1. Measure Spaces. 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets Notation and preliminaries
Chapter 1 Measure Spaces 1.1 Algebras and σ algebras of sets 1.1.1 Notation and preliminaries We shall denote by X a nonempty set, by P(X) the set of all parts (i.e., subsets) of X, and by the empty set.
More informationSYMMETRY OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS OF SOME NONLINEAR EQUATIONS. M. Grossi S. Kesavan F. Pacella M. Ramaswamy. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 12, 1998, 47 59 SYMMETRY OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS OF SOME NONLINEAR EQUATIONS M. Grossi S. Kesavan F. Pacella M. Ramaswamy
More information1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability
Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability Let E R N, let f : E R and let x 0 E. Given a direction v R N, let L be the line through x 0 in the direction v, that is, L :=
More informationTHE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n
THE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n BAISHENG YAN Abstract. We present an elementary L 2 -Hodge theory on whole R n based on the minimization principle of the calculus of variations and some
More informationA note on the convex infimum convolution inequality
A note on the convex infimum convolution inequality Naomi Feldheim, Arnaud Marsiglietti, Piotr Nayar, Jing Wang Abstract We characterize the symmetric measures which satisfy the one dimensional convex
More informationOperators with numerical range in a closed halfplane
Operators with numerical range in a closed halfplane Wai-Shun Cheung 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, P. R. China. wshun@graduate.hku.hk Chi-Kwong Li 2 Department of Mathematics,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 28 Mar 2014
GROUNDSTATES OF NONLINEAR CHOQUARD EQUATIONS: HARDY-LITTLEWOOD-SOBOLEV CRITICAL EXPONENT VITALY MOROZ AND JEAN VAN SCHAFTINGEN arxiv:1403.7414v1 [math.ap] 28 Mar 2014 Abstract. We consider nonlinear Choquard
More informationPartial regularity for fully nonlinear PDE
Partial regularity for fully nonlinear PDE Luis Silvestre University of Chicago Joint work with Scott Armstrong and Charles Smart Outline Introduction Intro Review of fully nonlinear elliptic PDE Our result
More information(somewhat) expanded version of the note in C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 340, (2005). A (ONE-DIMENSIONAL) FREE BRUNN-MINKOWSKI INEQUALITY
(somewhat expanded version of the note in C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 340, 30 304 (2005. A (ONE-DIMENSIONAL FREE BRUNN-MINKOWSKI INEQUALITY M. Ledoux University of Toulouse, France Abstract. We present a one-dimensional
More informationBIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES
BIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES SEBASTIAN HERR, TOBIAS LAMM, AND ROLAND SCHNAUBELT Abstract. A global weak solution of the biharmonic wave map equation in the energy space for spherical targets is constructed.
More informationON THE HÖLDER CONTINUITY OF MATRIX FUNCTIONS FOR NORMAL MATRICES
Volume 10 (2009), Issue 4, Article 91, 5 pp. ON THE HÖLDER CONTINUITY O MATRIX UNCTIONS OR NORMAL MATRICES THOMAS P. WIHLER MATHEMATICS INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY O BERN SIDLERSTRASSE 5, CH-3012 BERN SWITZERLAND.
More informationA NOTE ON WEAK CONVERGENCE OF SINGULAR INTEGRALS IN METRIC SPACES
A NOTE ON WEAK CONVERGENCE OF SINGULAR INTEGRALS IN METRIC SPACES VASILIS CHOUSIONIS AND MARIUSZ URBAŃSKI Abstract. We prove that in any metric space (X, d) the singular integral operators Tµ,ε(f)(x) k
More informationSTOKES PROBLEM WITH SEVERAL TYPES OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN AN EXTERIOR DOMAIN
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2013 2013, No. 196, pp. 1 28. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu STOKES PROBLEM
More informationESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC HOMOGENIZATION PROBLEMS IN NONSMOOTH DOMAINS. Zhongwei Shen
W,p ESTIMATES FOR ELLIPTIC HOMOGENIZATION PROBLEMS IN NONSMOOTH DOMAINS Zhongwei Shen Abstract. Let L = div`a` x, > be a family of second order elliptic operators with real, symmetric coefficients on a
More informationNONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS TO INTEGRAL AND DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Fixed Point Theory, Volume 9, No. 1, 28, 3-16 http://www.math.ubbcluj.ro/ nodeacj/sfptcj.html NONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS TO INTEGRAL AND DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS GIOVANNI ANELLO Department of Mathematics University
More informationWavelets and modular inequalities in variable L p spaces
Wavelets and modular inequalities in variable L p spaces Mitsuo Izuki July 14, 2007 Abstract The aim of this paper is to characterize variable L p spaces L p( ) (R n ) using wavelets with proper smoothness
More informationSome lecture notes for Math 6050E: PDEs, Fall 2016
Some lecture notes for Math 65E: PDEs, Fall 216 Tianling Jin December 1, 216 1 Variational methods We discuss an example of the use of variational methods in obtaining existence of solutions. Theorem 1.1.
More informationThe Caratheodory Construction of Measures
Chapter 5 The Caratheodory Construction of Measures Recall how our construction of Lebesgue measure in Chapter 2 proceeded from an initial notion of the size of a very restricted class of subsets of R,
More informationThe optimal partial transport problem
The optimal partial transport problem Alessio Figalli Abstract Given two densities f and g, we consider the problem of transporting a fraction m [0, min{ f L 1, g L 1}] of the mass of f onto g minimizing
More informationThe Hopf argument. Yves Coudene. IRMAR, Université Rennes 1, campus beaulieu, bat Rennes cedex, France
The Hopf argument Yves Coudene IRMAR, Université Rennes, campus beaulieu, bat.23 35042 Rennes cedex, France yves.coudene@univ-rennes.fr slightly updated from the published version in Journal of Modern
More informationA LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE. 1.
A LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE THOMAS CHEN AND NATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We prove a Beale-Kato-Majda criterion
More informationPositive eigenfunctions for the p-laplace operator revisited
Positive eigenfunctions for the p-laplace operator revisited B. Kawohl & P. Lindqvist Sept. 2006 Abstract: We give a short proof that positive eigenfunctions for the p-laplacian are necessarily associated
More informationSome Properties of the Augmented Lagrangian in Cone Constrained Optimization
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH Vol. 29, No. 3, August 2004, pp. 479 491 issn 0364-765X eissn 1526-5471 04 2903 0479 informs doi 10.1287/moor.1040.0103 2004 INFORMS Some Properties of the Augmented
More information+ 2x sin x. f(b i ) f(a i ) < ɛ. i=1. i=1
Appendix To understand weak derivatives and distributional derivatives in the simplest context of functions of a single variable, we describe without proof some results from real analysis (see [7] and
More informationThe longest shortest piercing.
The longest shortest piercing. B. Kawohl & V. Kurta. December 8, 21 Abstract: We generalize an old problem and its partial solution of Pólya [7] to the n-dimensional setting. Given a plane domain Ω R 2,
More information2 Lebesgue integration
2 Lebesgue integration 1. Let (, A, µ) be a measure space. We will always assume that µ is complete, otherwise we first take its completion. The example to have in mind is the Lebesgue measure on R n,
More information1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer 11(2) (1989),
Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 April 26, 2005 1 Real Analysis 2, Math 651, Spring 2005 Krzysztof Chris Ciesielski 1/12/05: sec 3.1 and my article: How good is the Lebesgue measure?, Math. Intelligencer
More informationWiener Measure and Brownian Motion
Chapter 16 Wiener Measure and Brownian Motion Diffusion of particles is a product of their apparently random motion. The density u(t, x) of diffusing particles satisfies the diffusion equation (16.1) u
More informationSpectral Gap and Concentration for Some Spherically Symmetric Probability Measures
Spectral Gap and Concentration for Some Spherically Symmetric Probability Measures S.G. Bobkov School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, 127 Vincent Hall, 26 Church St. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455,
More information