AN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE FIRST EIGENVALUE OF THE p FRACTIONAL LAPLACIAN
|
|
- Karen Gilbert
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FOR THE FIRST EIGENVALUE OF THE p FRACTIONAL LAPLACIAN LEANDRO DEL PEZZO, JULIÁN FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND LUIS LÓPEZ RÍOS Abstract. In this paper we analyze an eigenvalue problem related to the nonlocal p laplace operator plus a potential. After reviewing some elementary properties of the first eigenvalue of these operators (existence, positivity of associated eigenfunctions, simplicity and isolation) we investigate the dependance of the first eigenvalue on the potential function and establish the existence of some optimal potentials in some admissible classes.. Introduction In this paper we study the following non-linear non-local eigenvalue problem { ( p ) s u + V (x) u p u = λ u p u in, (.) u = 0 in R n \, where R n, n, is a smooth bounded domain, 0 < s < < p <, and λ R. The potential V is in L q (), max{, n sp } < q <, and ( p) s is the fractional p-laplacian operator, which for smooth functions with compact support (actually C (R n ) L (R n ) is enough) is given by (.) ( p ) s u(x) := p.v. R n u(x) u(y) p (u(x) u(y)) x y n+sp dy. Observe that, in the case p =, ( ) s = ( ) s is the usual fractional Laplace operator. First, we devoted the paper to the study of problem (.). For this eigenvalue problem we prove the existence of a first eigenvalue and then analyze properties of the associated eigenfunction. Once the existence of this first eigenvalue is established we arrive at the main point of this article, that is the optimization of this first eigenvalue with respect to the potential function V. This type of problems appears naturally in the study of the fractional Shrödinger equation. The eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of (.) are the associated fundamental states of the system. This is of particular interest in the case p =. See [3]. We want to stress that all the results in this paper are new even in the linear case that corresponds to p =. The problem that we want to address is the following. Suppose that we know that the potential V posseses some bound (say V q M), then what can be said about the fundamental state of the system? That is, if we only know the information 00 Mathematics Subject Classification. 35P30, 35J9, 49R05. Key words and phrases. Optimization, Fractional laplacian, Nonlinear eigenvalues.
2 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS of V q for some q >, then what bounds can we have for the first eigenvalue of (.) and what information can we deduce of the associated eigenfunction. In the classical linear setting, that is when p = and when the fractional lapacian is replaced by the standard laplacian operator, this problem was first studied in [3] and then extended to the p laplacian operator in [9]. As far as we know, no investigation was done so far in the fractional setting. Organization of the paper. After this short introduction, we include a section (Section ) where some preliminaries on fractional Sobolev spaces that are used throughout the paper are collected. In Section 3 we analyzed problem (.) and show the existence of a first eigenvalue, together with a nonnegative associated eigenfunction. Moreover, we show the simplicity and isolation of this eigenvalue. In Section 4, we study some properties about the dependence of the principal eigenvalue on the potential function V. Finally, in Section 5, we prove the main results of the paper that is the study of the optimization problem for (.) where V is restricted to belong to some ball in L q.. Preliminaries.. Fractional spaces. Let us recall some well known facts about fractional spaces. Among the many references in this subject, let us mention [, 7, ], which are enough for our purposes. Throughout this section we consider 0 < s < and < p < to be fixed. Given an open set R n, the fractional Sobolev space W s,p () is defined by W s,p () = { u L p (): This space is endowed with the norm where and u s,p; := u W s,p () = } u(x) u(y) x y n p +s Lp ( ). ( u p p; + [u]p s,p,) p, ( u p; := u L p () = u p dx ( [u] s,p; := ) p u(x) u(y) p ) p x y n+sp dxdy is called the Gagliardo seminorm. If = R n, we shall omit the set in the notation: u s,p := u s,p;r n, u p := u p;r n and [u] s,p := [u] s,p;r n. With the above norm, W s,p () is a reflexive Banach space, see [, 7]. The previous fractional space is a good candidate to find weak solutions to problem (.). However, to deal with the boundary condition, we preliminarily restrict ourselves to two special subspaces: (i) W s,p 0 (): the closure in W s,p () of the space Cc ();
3 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM 3 (ii) W s,p (): the space of all u W s,p () such that ũ W s,p (R n ), where ũ is the extension by zero of u, outside of. This space is endowed with the norm u W s,p () := ũ s,p = ũ W s,p (R n ). Remark.. From now on, given u W s,p () we implicitly suppose that it is defined in the whole space R n extending by zero outside of ; moreover, we denote this extension by the same letter u. The next result relate the spaces in (i) and (ii). For the proof we refer the reader to [, Corollary.4.4.5]. Theorem.. Let R n be bounded open set with Lipschitz boundary. If s p, then W s,p 0 () = W s,p (). Furthermore, when 0 < s < p we have W s,p 0 () = W s,p () = W s,p (). The following results are fractional versions of the classical embedding theorems, they can be found in [7, Corollary 4.53 and Theorem 4.54], see also []. Before state them, let us recall the concept of extension domain. Definition.3 (Extension domain). We say that an open set R n is an extension domain for W s,p if there exists a positive constant C = C(n, s, p, ) such that: for every function u W s,p () there exists ũ W s,p (R n ) with ũ(x) = u(x) for all x and ũ s,p C u s,p;. Some important examples of extension domains are the bounded domains with Lipschitz boundary, see [, Section.]. Let us recall also the definition of the fractional Sobolev conjugate of p: np if sp < n, p s = n sp if sp n. Theorem.4. Let R n be an extension domain for W s,p. Then we have: if sp < n, W s,p () is continuously embedded in L q () for any q [p, p s]; if sp = n, W s,p () is continuously embedded in L q () for any q [p, ); If sp > n, W s,p () is continuously embedded in C 0,α () for any α (0, s n p ]. Theorem.5. Let R n be a bounded extension domain for W s,p. Then we have: if sp n, the embedding of W s,p () into L q () is compact for every q [, p s); if sp > n, the embedding of W s,p () into C 0,α () is compact for α (0, s n p ). Remark.6. let R n be a bounded extension domain. Observe that the embedding W s,p () into L p () is compact for all p (, ). Additionally, if max{, n sp } < q < then { pq < p s if sp n, pq if sp > n,
4 4 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS where p is the conjugate exponent of p, p + p =. Thus, by Theorem.5, we have that the embedding of W s,p () into L pq () is compact. In order to work with weak solutions to (.) we need to find the weak formulation of the operator ( p ) s defined in (.). So first we need to extend the definition of ( p ) s to the space W s,p (R n ) with values in the dual (W s,p (R n )) = W s,p (R n ). This computation is rather direct and we include the details for the sake of completeness. Proposition.7. The operator ( p ) s defined in Cc () as (.) can be extended uniquely to W s,p () with values in the dual space ( W s,p ()) = W s,p () by ( p ) s u, v = u(x) u(y) p (u(x) u(y))(v(x) v(y)) x y n+sp dxdy. R n R n Proof. Take u Cc (). Now, for every ε > 0 we define ( p ) s u(x) u(y) p (u(x) u(y)) εu(x) = x y n+sp dy. x y >ε x y >ε Now, ( p ) s εu L p (). In fact, ( p ) s u(x) u(y) p εu(x) x y >ε x y n+sp dy ( ) ( u(x) u(y) p p x y n+sp dy and so where ( p ) s εu p C ε,p,n,s [u] C ε,p,n,s = ( ) nωn p ε s. sp x y >ε p p s,p, ) p dy, x y n+sp Finally, if v Cc (), ( p ) s εu, v = ( p ) s εu(x)v(x) dx R n u(x) u(y) p (u(x) u(y))v(x) = x y n+sp dxdy. R n Analogously, ( p ) s εu, v = Therefore ( p ) s εu, v = R n R n x y >ε x y >ε x y >ε u(x) u(y) p (u(x) u(y))v(y) x y n+sp dxdy. u(x) u(y) p (u(x) u(y))(v(x) v(y)) x y n+sp dxdy. From this last equality, the result follows passing to the limit ε 0.
5 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM 5.. A minimum principle. Let be bounded extension domain for W s,p, and V L q () with q (, ) ( n sp, ). We say that u W s,p () is a weak supersolution to { ( p ) s u + V (x) u p u = 0 in, (.) if (.) H(u, v) + u = 0 in R n \, V (x) u p uv dx 0 v W s,p (), v 0, where H: W s,p (R n ) W s,p (R n ) R is defined as H(u, v) = u(x) u(y) p (u(x) u(y))(v(x) v(y)) x y n+sp dxdy. R n R n Observe that by virtue of Proposition.7 this is equivalent as saying that u W s,p () is a distributional super-solution to (.). Notice that u, v W s,p () are defined in the whole space, since we consider them to be extended by zero outside of, see Remark.. With this convention in mind, observe that H(u, u) = [u]p s,p for all u W s,p (). Let us now prove a minimum principle for weak super-solutions of (.). To this end, we follow the ideas in [4] and prove first the next logarithmic lemma (see [8, Lemma.3]). Although this is not the more general version of the logarithmic lemma (c.f. with [8, Lemma.3]) it will suffices our purposes and simplifies the presentation. Lemma.8. Let be bounded extension domain for W s,p, and V L q () with q (, ) ( n sp, ). Suppose that u is a nonnegative weak super-solution of (.). Then for any B r = B r (x 0 ) such that B r and 0 < δ < ( ) u(x) + δ p B r B r x y n+sp log dxdy Cr n sp + V ;Br, u(y) + δ where C depends only on n, s, and p. Proof. Let δ > 0 and φ C0 (B 3r ) be such that 0 φ, φ in B r and Dφ < Cr in B 3r Taking v = (u + δ) p φ p as test function in (.) we have that (.3) u p V (x) (u + δ) p φp dx H(u, (u + δ) p φ p ). B 3r B r. In the proof of Lemma.3 in [8], it is showed that ( ) H(u, (u + δ) p φ p ) Cr n sp u(x) + δ p B r B r x y n+sp log dxdy, u(y) + δ where C depends only on n, s, and p. Then, by (.3) and using that 0 u p (u + δ) p φ p in B 3r, the lemma holds.
6 6 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem A. in [4] and using the previous lemma, we get the following minimum principle. Theorem.9. Under the hypothesis of the previous lemma, if u is a nonnegative weak super-solution of (.) and u 0 in all connected components of, then u > 0 a.e in. Proof. We argue by contradiction and we assume that Z = {x : u(x) = 0} has positive measure. Since u 0 in all connected components of, there are a ball B R = B R (x 0 ) and r (0, R /) such that B r Z > 0 and u 0 in B r. For any δ > 0 and x R n, we define ( F δ (x) := log + u(x) ). δ Observe that, if y B r Z then Then F δ (x) p = F δ (x) F δ (y) p (r)n+sp x y n+sp F δ (x) p (r)n+sp Z B r B r x y n+sp ( ) u(x) + δ p log u(y) + δ ( u(x) + δ log u(y) + δ Therefore F δ (x) Br p dx (r)n+sp Z B r B r B r x y n+sp x B r. ) p dy x B r. ( u(x) + δ log u(y) + δ By, Lemma.8, there is a constant C independent of δ such that F δ (x) p dx C rn (r n + r sp V ;Br) B r Z B r Taking δ 0 in the above inequality, we obtain ) p dxdy u 0 in B r which is a contradiction since u 0 in B r. Thus u > 0 in. 3. The first eigenvalue Throughout this section, R n shall be a bounded extension domain boundary and V L q (), q (, ) ( n sp, ). We say that a function u W s,p () is a weak solution of (.) if (3.) H(u, v) + V (x) u p uv dx = λ u p uv dx R n for all v W s,p (). In this context, we say that λ R is an eigenvalue provided there exists a nontrivial weak solution u W s,p () of (.). The function u is a corresponding eigenfunction. Remark 3.. If u is an eigenfunction associated to λ then u 0 in all connected components of. Suppose, by contradiction, that there is Z a connected components of such that u 0 in Z. Taking φ Cc (Z) as a test function in (3.), we get H(u, φ) = 0.
7 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM 7 Therefore \Z (u(x)) p Z φ(y) x y n+sp dydx = 0 φ C c (Z). Then u = 0 in, which is a contradiction since u 0 in. Thus, by Remark 3. and Theorem.9, we have that Lemma 3.. If u is a nonnegative eigenfunction associated to λ then u > 0 in. Now, our goal is to prove that the lowest (first) eigenvalue of (.) is { } (3.) λ(v ) = inf [u]p s,p + V (x) u p dx: u W s,p () and u p =. The next lemma implies that λ(v ) is well defined. Lemma 3.3. Let R n be a bounded extension domain. Then, given ε > 0, there is a constant C ε > 0 such that V (x) u p dx ε[u]p s,p + C ε V q; u p p for all u W s,p (). Proof. The lemma is trivial for V 0, so let us suppose that V 0. Assume by contradiction that there exist ε 0 > 0 and a sequence {u k } k N W s,p () such u k pq = and ε 0 [u k ] p s,p + k V q; u k p p V (x) u k p dx for all k N. Then, by Hölder inequality, ε 0 [u k ] p s,p + k V q; u k p p V q; u k p pq for all k N. Therefore {u k } k N is bounded in W s,p () and (3.3) u k 0 in L p (R n ). Now, as W s,p () is continuously embedded in W s,p (), and this compactly in L pq () (by Theorem.5 and Remark.6), there exist a subsequence (still denoted by {u k } k N ), and some u L pq () such that u k u in L pq (). Then u pq =, which contradicts (3.3) and completes the proofs. Using the previous lemma and standard compactness argument, see [9, Theorem.7], it follows that there is an eigenfunction associated to λ(v ), as the next theorem states. Theorem 3.4. Let R n be a bounded extension domain. u W s,p () such that u p = and λ(v ) = [u]p s,p + V (x) u p dx. Moreover, u is an eigenfunction associated to λ(v ). Then there exists
8 8 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS Remark 3.5. Any eigenfunction u constructed in the previous theorem can be chosen to be positive. Indeed, as u(x) u(y) u(x) u(y) for all x, y R n, then [ u ]p s,p + V (x) u p dx [u]p s,p + V (x) u p dx = λ(v ). This implies that u is an eigenfunction associated to λ(v ). And by Lemma 3., we u > 0. Actually, Theorem 3.7 below shows that all the eigenfunctions associated to λ(v ) have constant sign. A key ingredient in the next sections is the simplicity of the first eigenvalue λ(v ). In order to prove this result we need the following Picone-type identity (see Lemma 6. in []). Lemma 3.6. Let p (, ). For u, v : R such that u 0 and v > 0, we have where L(u, v) 0 in, L(u, v)(x, y) = u(x) u(y) p v(x) v(y) p (v(x) v(y)) The equality holds if and only if u = kv in for some constant k. ( u p ) (x) v p (x) up (y) v p. (y) Theorem 3.7. Let R n be a bounded extension domain. Assume that u is a positive eigenfunction corresponding to λ(v ) (see Remark 3.5). Then if λ > 0 is such that there is a nonnegative eigenfunction v of (.) with eigenvalue λ, then λ = λ(v ) and there is k R such that v = ku a.e. in. Proof. Since λ(v ) is the first eigenvalue we have that λ(v ) λ. On the other hand, by Lemma 3., v > 0 in. Let m N and v m := v + m. We begin by proving that w m := u p /vm p W s,p (). First observe that that w m = 0 in R n \ and w m L p (), due to u L (), see Lemma A.. Now, for all (x, y) R n R n we have u p (x) u p (y) w m (x) w m (y) = vm p up (y) ( vm p (x) vm p (y) ) (x) vm p (x)vm p (y) v p m (x) vm p (y) m p u p (x) u p (y) + u p v p m pm p (u p (x) + u p (y)) u(x) u(y) + (p ) u p v p m v p m (x) + vm p (y) (x)v p m (x)v p m (y) (y) v m(x) v m (y) pm p u p u(x) u(y) ( ) + (p ) u p v m (x)vm p (y) + vm p v(x) v(y) (x)v m (y) C(m, p, u ) ( u(x) u(y) + v(x) v(y) ) As u, v W s,p (), we deduce that w m W s,p () for all m N. Recall that u, v W s,p () are two eigenfunctions of problem (.) with eigenvalue λ(v ) and λ respectively. Then, by using the previous lemma, we deduce
9 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM 9 that 0 L(u, v m )(x, y) x y n+sp dxdy Rn Rn u(x) u(y) p x y n+sp dxdy v(x) v(y) p ( (v(x) v(y)) u p ) (x) R n R x y n+sp n vm p (x) up (y) vm p dxdy (y) λ(v ) u p dx V (x)u p dx λ up dx + V (x)v p up dx. v p v p m v p m Taking m and using Fatou s lemma and the dominated convergence theorem, we infer that L(u, v)(x, y) dxdy = 0 R n R x y n+sp n (recall that λ s,p (V ) λ). Therefore, by the previous lemma, L(u, v)(x, y) = 0 a.e. and u = kv for some constant k > 0. Remark 3.8. As a consequence of the previous theorem, λ(v ) is simple and there is a unique associated positive eigenfunction u W s,p () such that u p =. To conclude this section, we prove that λ(v ) is isolated. To this end, we follow the ideas in [4] and first provide a lower bound for the measure of the nodal sets. Lemma 3.9. Let R n be be a bounded extension domain. If u is an eigenfunction associated to λ > λ(v ), then min A(λ) ( p r ) (, A(λ) q p r ) ±, where r (pq, p s), A(λ) := (C( λ + + V q; )), C is a constant independent of V, λ and u, and ± is the Lebesgue measure of ± = {x R n : u ± (x) 0}. Proof. According to Theorem 3.7, u + and u are not trivial. We shall prove the inequality for +, the proof of the other inequality is similar. Observe that u + W s,p () and u + (x) u + (y) p u(x) u(y) p (u(x) u(y))(u + (x) u + (y)) for all (x, y) R n R n. Let us recall Remark. to keep in mind that u is defined by zero outside of. Then, using Hölder s inequality, we have [u +] p s,p H(u, u + ) = λ u p + dx V (x)u p +dx (3.4) λ u p + dx + V (x)u p +dx λ u + p p + V q; u + p pq ( λ + p r + V q; + q p ) r u + p r.
10 0 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS On the other hand, by Theorem.4, there is a constant C independent on u such that u + r C u + s,p. Thus, by Hölder inequality, we have u + p r C ( [u + ] p s,p + u + p ) p ( C [u + ] p s,p + u + p r + p ) r This and (3.4) implies that u + p r C ( ( λ + ) + p r + V q; + q p r ) u + p r, that is Therefore ( C ( λ + ) + p r + V Lq () + q p ) r. min A(λ) ( p r ) (, A(λ) q p r ) +. Theorem 3.0. Let R n be a connected bounded extension domain. Then the first eigenvalue λ(v ) is isolated. Proof. By definition λ(v ) is left-isolated. To prove that λ(v ) is right-isolated, we argue by contradiction. We assume that there exists a a sequence of eigenvalues {λ k } k N such that λ k λ(v ) as k. Let u k be an eigenfunction associated to λ k with u k p =. Then, thanks to Lemma 3.3, {u k } k N is bounded in W s,p () and therefore we can extract a subsequence (that we still denoted by {u k } k N ) such that u k u weakly in W s,p (), u k u in L pq (R n ), u k u in L p (R n ). Observe that u p k up in L q (R n ) since u k u in L pq (R n ). Then u p =, and [u]p s,p lim inf k [u k] p s,p = lim λ k u k (x) p dx V (x) u k p dx k R n = λ(v ) u(x) p dx V (x) u p dx. R n Hence, u is an eigenfunction associated to λ(v ). By Theorem 3.7, we can assume that u > 0. On the other hand, by the Egorov s theorem, for any ε > 0 there exists a subset U ε of such that U ε < ε and u k u > 0 uniformly in \ U ε. This contradicts
11 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM the previous lemma. Indeed, 0 < lim min k A(λ ( k) p r ) (, A(λ k ) q p r ) lim {x k Rn : u k < 0}, where r (pq, p s). 4. The functional λ(v ) In this section we shall provide some useful properties of the functional λ: L q () R, max{, n sp } < q <. that associate to every V L q () the positive number λ(v ) given by (3.). From now on, R n denotes a bounded extension domain and V is a function in L q (), with max{, n sp } < q <. Lemma 4.. The functional λ is concave in L q (). Moreover, for any M > 0 there exists a constant C = C(s, p, q, M) such that λ(v ) C for all V L q () such that V q; M. Proof. Given V, W L q (), we have by definition that λ(v ) [u]p s,p + V (x) u p dx, λ(w ) [u]p s,p + W (x) u p dx, for all u W s,p () with u p =. Then, for any t (0, ) and V, W L q (), tλ(v ) + ( t)λ(w ) [u]p s,p + (tv (x) + ( t)w (x)) u p dx for all u W s,p () such that u p =. After recalling the definition of the functional λ, we deduce then that tλ(v ) + ( t)λ(w ) λ(tv + ( t)w ), that is, λ is concave. Let us now prove that λ is locally bounded in L q (). Indeed, given M > 0 and V L q () with V q; M, fix a function φ Cc () W s,p () such that φ p =. Thus, λ(v ) [φ]p s,p + V (x) φ p dx [φ]p s,p + V q; φ p pq [φ]p s,p + M φ p pq. Our next aim is to show that λ is continuous. We ll need the following estimate, related to that in Lemma 3.3. The only difference with Lemma 3.3 is the fact that here we need the constants to be uniform with respect to the potential function V.
12 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS Lemma 4.. Given M > 0, for any ε > 0 there is a constant C ε > 0 such that V (x) u p dx ε[u]p s,p + C ε V q; u p p for all u W s,p () and V L q () such that V L q () M. Proof. Suppose by contradiction that for all k N there exist ε 0 > 0 and a sequence {(u k, V k )} k N W s,p () L q () such that u k pq =, V k q; M and (4.) V k (x) u k p dx ε 0[u k ] p s,p + k V k q; u k p p for all k N. Then, by Hölder s inequality, we have that ε 0 [u k ] p s,p + k V k q; u k p p V k q; u k p pq M, u k p; u k pq ; pq, for all k N. Therefore {(u k, V k )} k N is bounded in W s,p () L q () and (4.) lim k V k q; u k p p = 0. Thus, there exist a subsequence (still denoted by {(u k, V k )} k N ) and some (u, V ) W s,p () L q (), such that (4.3) V k V weakly in L q (), u k u weakly in W s,p (), u k u in L pq (R n ). This implies that u pq =, V q; M and u k p u p in L q (R n ), u k u in L p (R n ). Using (4.), we deduce that V q; u p = 0. As u pq =, then V 0. Therefore V k 0 in L q (). Using this and (4.3) in (4.), we deduce that [u] p s,p lim inf k [u k] p s,p 0, which implies that u 0. This contradiction completes the proof. Lemma 4.3. The functional λ is continuous. Proof. Let V L q () and {V k } k N be a sequence in L q () such that (4.4) V k V in L q (). Let us prove that λ(v k ) λ(v ) as k. Let {u k } k N be a sequence in W s,p () such that u k p = and λ(v k ) = [u k] p s,p + V k (x) u k p dx for all k N. Then, for any k N and u W s,p () such that u L p () =, λ(v k ) [u]p s,p + V k (x) u p dx.
13 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM 3 Thus, using (4.4), we deduce that lim sup λ(v k ) k [u]p s,p + for all u W s,p () with u p =. Hence (4.5) lim sup λ(v k ) λ(v ). k V (x) u p dx Now, let us take a subsequence {V kj } j N of {V k } k N so that (4.6) lim λ(v k j ) = lim inf λ(v k). j k By (4.4), we can assume that for any j N we have that V kj Lq () M for some suitable constant M. Then, by Lemmas 4. and 4., there exist positive constants C and D independent of j such that C λ(v kj ) = [u k j ] p s,p + V kj (x) u kj p dx [u k j ] p s,p 4 [u k j ] p s,p D V kj q; u kj p p. Therefore [u kj ] p s,p 4(C + DM) for all j N. Then, {u kj } j N is bounded in W s,p () and there exist a subsequence (still denoted by {u kj } j N ) and some u W s,p () such that Thus u p = and u kj u weakly in W s,p (), u kj u strongly in L p (R n ), u kj u strongly in L pq (R n ). u p k j u p strongly in L q (R n ), Now, using (4.4) and (4.6), we have that lim inf λ(v k) = lim λ(v k j ) = lim k j [u]p s,p + This and (4.5), imply that and the proof is complete. j [u k j ] p s,p + V kj (x) u kj p dx V (x) u p dx λ(v ). lim λ(v k) = λ(v ); k Remark 4.4. Let V L q (), and {V k } k N be a sequence in L q () such that V k V. Suppose that {u k } k N W s,p (), is the sequence of the positive eigenfunctions
14 4 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS associated to λ(v k ) with u k p =. Then, proceeding as in the proof of the previous lemma, it is possible to extract a subsequence {u kj } j N such that u kj u weakly in W s,p (), u kj u strongly in L p (R n ), u kj u strongly in L pq (R n ). Therefore λ(v ) = lim λ(v k j ) = lim j j [u k j ] p s,p + V kj (x) u kj p dx [u]p s,p + V (x) u p dx λ(v ). Then u is the positive eigenfunction of λ(v ) normalized by u p = ; additionally [u kj ] p s,p [u] p s,p. Thereby u kj u in W s,p (). In fact, proceeding as before, we observe that all subsequence of {u k } k N has a subsequence that converges to u in W s,p (). We conclude that u k u in W s,p (). With the continuity of the functional λ on hand, let us go further and prove a differentiability property. Recall that for V L q () such that V q; = the tangent space of B(0, ) = {V L q (): V q; = } at V is { } T V ( B(0, )) = W L q (): V q V W dx = 0. Given W T V ( B(0, )) and α: (, ) L q () a differentiable curve such that α(t) B(0, ) for all t (, ), α(0) = V and α (0) = W, we define λ: (, ) R by λ(t) := λ(v t ), where V t = α(t). By the previous lemma λ is continuous. Moreover: Lemma 4.5. λ is differentiable at t = 0 and λ (0) = W (x) u p dx, where u is the positive eigenfunction associated to λ(v ) normalized by u p =. Proof. We begin the proof by observing that λ(t) λ(0) = λ(α(t)) λ(v ) (V t (x) V (x)) u p dx then (4.7) lim sup t 0 + lim inf t 0 λ(t) λ(0) W (x) u p dx, t λ(t) λ(0) W (x) u p dx. t
15 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM 5 Let {t k } k N be a sequence in (0, ) such that t k 0 + and λ(t k ) lim λ(0) λ(t) λ(0) = lim inf k t t 0 + t Since λ(t k ) λ(0), by Remark 4.4, we have that u k u in W s,p (), where u k and u are the positive normalized eigenfunctions associated to λ(v tk ) and λ(v ), respectively. Then (4.8) lim inf t 0 + Similarly, we can see that (4.9) lim sup t 0 λ(t) λ(0) λ(t k ) = lim λ(0) t k t (V tk (x) V (x)) lim u tk p dx k t k = W (x) u p dx. λ(t) λ(0) t W (x) u p dx. Putting together (4.7), (4.8) and (4.9), we conclude that λ(t) lim λ(0) = W (x) u p dx. t 0 t 5. The Optimization problems In this section we prove the existence and characterizations of optimal potentials for the first eigenvalue of (.). As in the previous section, R n denotes a bounded extension domain and V is a function in L q (), with q (, ) ( n sp, ). Let us begin with the optimization problem when the potential function V is restricted to a bounded closed convex subset of L q (). Theorem 5.. Let C be a bounded closed convex subset of L q (). Then there exist a unique V C such that λ(v ) = max{λ(v ): V C} and V C (not necessarily unique) such that (5.) λ(v ) = min{λ(v ): V C}. Proof. First we show that there is a unique V C such that Let {V k } k N C be such that λ(v ) = max{λ(v ): V C}. lim λ(v k) = sup{λ(v ): V C}. k Since C is bounded, there exist a subsequence (still denoted by {V k } k N ) and V L q () such that (5.) V k V weakly in L q ().
16 6 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS In fact, since C is closed convex subset of L q () it follows that C is weakly closed and so V C. Then (5.3) λ(v ) sup{λ(v ): V C}. On the other hand, for any ε > 0 there exists u W s,p () such that λ(v ) + ε [u]p s,p + V (x) u p dx. Then, using that u p L q () (since q > n sp ) and (5.), we deduce that λ(v ) + ε [u]p s,p + V (x) u p dx = [u]p s,p + lim V k (x) u p dx k Therefore, The previous equation and (5.3) imply lim k λ(v k) = sup{λ(v ): V C}. λ(v ) sup{λ(v ): V C}. λ(v ) = max{λ(v ): V C}. Suppose now that there exist V, V C such that (5.4) λ(v ) = λ(v ) = max{λ(v ): V C}. Since C is convex, we have that V 3 = V + V C. Moreover, since λ is concave and (5.4), λ(v 3 ) λ(v ) + λ(v ) = max{λ(v ): V C} Then ( ) V + V (5.5) λ = λ(v ) = λ(v ) = max{λ(v ): V C}. On the other hand, by Remark 3.8, there exist u, u, u 3 W s,p () such that u i is the unique positive eigenfunction associated to λ(v i ) normalized by u i p =, i =,, 3. We claim that u = u = u 3. Suppose by contradiction that u u 3 or u u 3. Then λ(v 3 ) = [u 3 ] p V (x) + V (x) s,p + u 3 p dx = ( [u 3] p s,p + > λ(v ) + λ(v ) = max{λ(v ): V C}, which contradicts (5.5). V (x) u 3 p dx + [u 3] p s,p + ) V (x) u 3 p dx
17 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM 7 Therefore, H(u, v) + V (x) u p u v dx = H(u, v) + V (x) u p u v dx for all v W s,p (), that is (V (x) V (x)) u p u v dx = 0 for all v W s,p (). Then V = V. Finally we show that there is V C such that Let {V k } k N C be such that λ(v ) = min{λ(v ): V C}. lim λ(v k) = inf{λ(v ): V C}. k As before, we have that there exist a subsequence (still denoted by {V k } k N ) and V C such that (5.6) V k V weakly in L q (). Then (5.7) λ(v ) inf{λ(v ): V C}. Let {u k } k N W s,p () be such that u k p = and λ(v k ) = [u k] p s,p + V k (x) u k p dx. Then, by (5.7) and Lemma 4., there exist positive constants C and D independent of k such that C λ(v k ) = [u k] p s,p + V k (x) u k p dx Therefore [u k] p s,p 4 [u k] p s,p D V k q; u k p p. [u k ] p s,p 4(C + D sup{ V q; : V C}) for all k N. Then, {u k } k N is bounded in W s,p () and there exist a subsequence (still denoted by {u k } k N ) and u W s,p () such that u k u weakly in W s,p (), u k u strongly in L p (R n ), u k u strongly in L pq (R n ). Then, u p = and, using (5.6), we have that λ(v ) inf{λ(v ): V C} = lim λ(v k) = lim k [u]p s,p + V (x) u p dx λ(v ). k [u k] p s,p + V k (x) u k p dx The next result is a characterization of the minimal potential V.
18 8 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS Lemma 5.. Let u be the positive eigenfunction associated to λ(v ) such that u p =. Then V is the unique minimizer of linear operator L(V ) := V (x) u p dx relative to V C. Proof. We first prove that V is a minimizer. By (5.), we have that [u ] p s,p + V (x) u p dx = λ(v ) λ(v ) [u ] p s,p + V (x) u p dx for all V C. Therefore V (x) u p dx V (x) u p dx for all V C. To prove the uniqueness, let W C such that W (x) u p dx = min {L(V ): V C} = Then λ(v ) = [u ] p s,p + V (x) u p dx. V (x) u p dx = [u ] p s,p + W (x) u p dx λ(w ). Thus, by (5.), λ(v ) = λ(w ) and therefore u is an eigenfunction associated to λ(w ). Then (V (x) W (x)) u p u v dx = 0 for all v W s,p (). Since u > 0 in, we conclude that V = W a.e. in. 5.. Optimization problems in a closed ball. Let us now consider the case C = B(0, ) := {V L q (): V q; }, the unit closed ball in L q (). In this setting further characterizations of the extremal potentials can be provided. Indeed, by Theorem 5., there exists a unique V B(0, ) such that max{λ(v ): V B(0, )} = λ(v ) [u]p s,p + V (x) u p dx [u]p s,p + V (x) V q; u p dx for all u W s,p (). Then ( max{λ(v ): V B(0, V )} = λ(v ) ) λ V. q; V Since V q; B(0, ), then, by Theorem 5., V is nonnegative and V B(0, ). Moreover, by Lemma 4.5, we have that W (x) u dx = 0 for all W T V ( B(0, )), where u is the positive eigenfunction of λ(v ) normalized by u p =. This procedure proves the validity of the following result.
19 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM 9 Theorem 5.3. Let V B(0, ) be the unique potential that satisfies λ(v ) = max{λ(v ): V B(0, )}, according to Theorem 5.. Then V is nonnegative, V B(0, ) and W (x) u dx = 0 for all W T V ( B(0, )), where u is the positive eigenfunction of λ(v ) normalized by u p =. Similarly, we have that Theorem 5.4. There exists V B(0, ) such that λ(v ) = min{λ(v ): V B(0, )}. Moreover, V is nonpositive, V q; = and W (x) u dx = 0 for all W T V ( B(0, )), where u is the positive eigenfunction of λ(v ) normalized by u p =. Corollary 5.5. In the notation of Theorem 5.3 and 5.4, we have = supp(v ) = supp(v ) and there exist two constants C and C such that for a.e. x. u (x) p = C V (x) q, u (x) p = C V (x) q, Proof. See the proofs of Proposition 3.0 and Theorem 3. in [9]. 5.. Optimization problems in the class of rearrangements of a given potential. Let V 0 L q () and R(V 0 ) be the set of rearrangements of V 0, that is V R(V 0 ) iff V : R is a measurable function and for any t R. {x : V (x) t} = {x : V 0 (x) t} Remark 5.6. If V R(V 0 ) then V L q () and V q; = V 0 q;. See, for instance, [6, Lemma.]. Let R(V 0 ) be the the weak closure of R(V 0 ). In [6, Theorem 6], the author proves that R(V 0 ) is convex, see also [5, 5]. Hence R(V 0 ) is strongly closed. Then, by Remark 5.6, we have that R(V 0 ) is a bounded closed convex subset of L q (). Thus, by Theorems 5., we have that There exists a unique V R(V 0 ) so that There exists V R(V 0 ) so that λ(v ) = max{λ(v ): V R(V 0 )}; λ(v ) = min{λ(v ): V R(V 0 )}.
20 0 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS By [6, Theorems and 4], there is W R(V 0 ) so that L(W ) = min{l(v ): V R(V 0 )}. Then, by Lemma 5., we have that V = W a.e in. Hence V R(V 0 ). Moreover, by Lemma 5. and Theorem 5 in [6], there is a decreasing function ϕ: R R so that V = ϕ u p. Therefore we prove the next result. Theorem 5.7. Let V 0 L q (). There is a rearrangement V of V 0 in such that λ(v ) = min{λ(v ): V R(V 0 )}. Moreover there exists a decreasing function ϕ: R R so that V = ϕ u p, where u is the positive eigenfunction associated to λ(v ) such that u p =. Appendix A. Regularity of fractional p-eigenfunctions We begin by proving that the eigenfunctions are bounded. Lemma A.. Let R n be a bounded extension domain and V L q () with q (, ) ( n sp, ). If u is an eigenfunction associated to λ then u L (R n ). Proof. In this proof we follow ideas from [0]. If ps > n, by Theorem.5, then the assertion holds. Then let us suppose that sp n. We will show that if u + pq δ then u + is bounded, where δ > 0 must be determined. For k N 0 we define the function u k by u k := (u + k ) +. Observe that, u 0 = u + and for any k N 0 we have that u k W s,p (), (A.) Now, since u k+ u k a.e. R n, u < ( k+ )u k in {u k+ > 0}, {u k+ > 0} {u k > (k+) }. v + (x) v + (y) p v(x) v(y) p (v(x) v(y))(v + (x) v + (y)) x, y R n, for any function v : R n R, we have that [u k+] p s,p H(u, u k+ ) = λ u p w k+ dx λ u p w k+ dx + V (x)u p u k+ dx V (x)u p u k+ dx, for all k N 0. Then, by (A.) and Hölder inequality, we have that [u k+] p s,p λ u p w k+ dx + V (x)u p u k+ dx ) (A.) ( k+ ) ( λ u p k p p + V (x)u p k dx ( ) ( k+ ) p λ q + V q; u k p pq
21 OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM for all k N 0. On the other hand, in the case sp < n, using Hölder s inequality, Theorem.4, (A.), and Chebyshev s inequality, for any k N 0 we have that (A.3) u k+ p pq u k+ p p s {u k+ > 0} q p p s C[u k+ ] p sp s,p {u k+ > 0} n q C[u k+ ] p s,p {u k > (k+) sp } n q ( ) q C[u k+ ] p s,p (k+)p u k p ( sp n q ) pq, where C is a constant independent of k. Then, by (A.) and (A.3), for any k N 0 we have that (A.4) u k+ p pq C ( (k+)p u k p pq ) +α, where C is a constant independent of k and α = q ( sp n q ) > 0. Similarly, in the case sp = n, taking r > pq and proceeding as in the previous case sp < n (with r in place of p s), we have that (A.4) holds with α = pq r > 0. Therefore if sp n then there exist α > 0 and a constant C > such that u k+ p pq Ck ( u k p pq ) +α, for any k N 0. Hence, if u 0 p pq = u + p pq C α =: δ p then u k 0 in L pq (). On the oher hand u k (u ) + a.e in R n, then (u ) + 0 in R n. Therefore u + is bounded. Finally, taking u in place of u we have that u is bounded if u pq < δ. Therefore u is bounded. Finally we show a regularity result. Theorem A.. Let R n be a bounded extension domain, and V L (). If u is an eigenfunction associated to λ then there is α (0, ) such that u C α (). Proof. By Lemma A., we have that u L (). Then (λ V (x)) u p u L (). Therefore, by [, Theorem.], there is α (0, ) such that u C α (). Acknowledgements This paper was partially supported by Universidad de Buenos Aires under grant UBACyT BA and by ANPCyT under grant PICT J. Fernández Bonder and Leandro M. Del Pezzo are members of CONICET. References [] Robert A. Adams, Sobolev spaces, Academic Press [A subsidiary of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York-London, 975, Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 65. MR (56 #947) [] S. Amghibech, On the discrete version of Picone s identity, Discrete Appl. Math. 56 (008), no., 0. MR (008m:35090) [3] Mark S. Ashbaugh and Evans M. Harrell, II, Maximal and minimal eigenvalues and their associated nonlinear equations, J. Math. Phys. 8 (987), no. 8, MR (88g:3549)
22 L. DEL PEZZO, J. FERNÁNDEZ BONDER AND L. LÓPEZ RÍOS [4] Lorenzo Brasco and Giovanni Franzina, Convexity properties of Dirichlet integrals and Picone-type inequalities, Kodai Math. J. 37 (04), no. 3, MR [5] James R. Brown, Approximation theorems for Markov operators, Pacific J. Math. 6 (966), 3 3. MR 0955 (33 #777) [6] G. R. Burton, Rearrangements of functions, maximization of convex functionals, and vortex rings, Math. Ann. 76 (987), no., MR (88d:4900) [7] Françoise Demengel and Gilbert Demengel, Functional spaces for the theory of elliptic partial differential equations, Universitext, Springer, London, 0, Translated from the 007 French original by Reinie Erné. MR [8] Agnese Di Castro, Tuomo Kuusi, and Giampiero Palatucci, Local behavior of fractional p- minimizers, Preprint (04), 5. [9] Julián Fernández Bonder and Leandro M. Del Pezzo, An optimization problem for the first eigenvalue of the p-laplacian plus a potential, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 5 (006), no. 4, MR 4600 (007g:35050) [0] Giovanni Franzina and Giampiero Palatucci, Fractional p-eigenvalues, Riv. Math. Univ. Parma (N.S.) 5 (04), no., [] P. Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains, Monographs and Studies in Mathematics, vol. 4, Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA, 985. MR (86m:35044) [] A. Iannizzotto, S. Mosconi, and M. Squassina, Global hölder regularity for the fractional p-laplacian, ArXiv e-prints (04). [3] Nick Laskin, Fractional Schrödinger equation, Phys. Rev. E (3) 66 (00), no. 5, 05608, 7. MR (003k:8043) [4] Erik Lindgren and Peter Lindqvist, Fractional eigenvalues, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 49 (04), no. -, MR [5] John V. Ryff, Majorized functions and measures, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 7 = Indag. Math. 30 (968), MR (38 #580) Departamento de Matemática FCEN - Universidad de Buenos Aires and IMAS - CON- ICET. Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón I (C48EGA) Av. Cantilo 60. Buenos Aires, Argentina. address, J. Fernandez Bonder: jfbonder@dm.uba.ar URL: address, L. Del Pezzo: ldpezzo@dm.uba.ar URL: address, L. López Ríos: llopez@dm.uba.ar
FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV SPACES WITH VARIABLE EXPONENTS AND FRACTIONAL P (X)-LAPLACIANS. 1. Introduction
FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV SPACES WITH VARIABLE EXPONENTS AND FRACTIONAL P (X-LAPLACIANS URIEL KAUFMANN, JULIO D. ROSSI AND RAUL VIDAL Abstract. In this article we extend the Sobolev spaces with variable exponents
More informationFractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents and fractional p(x)-laplacians
Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations 217, No. 76, 1 1; https://doi.org/1.14232/ejqtde.217.1.76 www.math.u-szeged.hu/ejqtde/ Fractional Sobolev spaces with variable exponents
More informationTRACES FOR FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV SPACES WITH VARIABLE EXPONENTS
Adv. Oper. Theory 2 (2017), no. 4, 435 446 http://doi.org/10.22034/aot.1704-1152 ISSN: 2538-225X (electronic) http://aot-math.org TRACES FOR FRACTIONAL SOBOLEV SPACES WITH VARIABLE EXPONENTS LEANDRO M.
More informationSOME NONLOCAL OPTIMAL DESIGN PROBLEMS. 1. Introduction. u(x) u(y) p. 2 x y n+sp dx dy
SOME NONLOCL OPTIML DESIGN PROBLEMS JULIÁN FERNÁNDEZ BONDER ND JUN F. SPEDLETTI bstract. In this paper we study two optimal design problems associated to fractional Sobolev spaces W s,p (). Then we find
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 15 Sep 2016
A HOPF S LEMMA AND A STRONG MINIMUM PRINCIPLE FOR THE FRACTIONAL p-laplacian arxiv:1609.04725v1 [math.ap] 15 Sep 2016 LEANDRO M. DEL PEZZO AND ALEXANDER QUAAS Abstract. Our propose here is to provide a
More informationSobolev Spaces. Chapter Hölder spaces
Chapter 2 Sobolev Spaces Sobolev spaces turn out often to be the proper setting in which to apply ideas of functional analysis to get information concerning partial differential equations. Here, we collect
More informationSYMMETRY IN REARRANGEMENT OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2009(2009), No. 149, pp. 1 10. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu SYMMETRY IN REARRANGEMENT
More informationSHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES. 1. Introduction
SHARP BOUNDARY TRACE INEQUALITIES GILES AUCHMUTY Abstract. This paper describes sharp inequalities for the trace of Sobolev functions on the boundary of a bounded region R N. The inequalities bound (semi-)norms
More informationNONLINEAR FREDHOLM ALTERNATIVE FOR THE p-laplacian UNDER NONHOMOGENEOUS NEUMANN BOUNDARY CONDITION
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2016 (2016), No. 210, pp. 1 7. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu NONLINEAR FREDHOLM ALTERNATIVE FOR THE p-laplacian
More informationFIRST CURVE OF FUČIK SPECTRUM FOR THE p-fractional LAPLACIAN OPERATOR WITH NONLOCAL NORMAL BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 208 (208), No. 74, pp. 2. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu FIRST CURVE OF FUČIK SPECTRUM FOR THE p-fractional
More informationMaximax rearrangement optimization related to a homogeneous Dirichlet problem
DOI 10.1007/s40065-013-0083-0 M. Zivari-Rezapour Maximax rearrangement optimization related to a homogeneous Dirichlet problem Received: 26 June 2012 / Accepted: 1 July 2013 The Author(s) 2013. This article
More informationMAXIMIZATION AND MINIMIZATION PROBLEMS RELATED TO A p-laplacian EQUATION ON A MULTIPLY CONNECTED DOMAIN. N. Amiri and M.
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 243-252, February 2015 DOI: 10.11650/tjm.19.2015.3873 This paper is available online at http://journal.taiwanmathsoc.org.tw MAXIMIZATION AND MINIMIZATION
More informationON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM
ON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM OLEG ZUBELEVICH DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS THE BUDGET AND TREASURY ACADEMY OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 7, ZLATOUSTINSKY MALIY PER.,
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS FOR A RESONANT PROBLEM UNDER LANDESMAN-LAZER CONDITIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2008(2008), No. 98, pp. 1 10. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) EXISTENCE
More informationMULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR THE p-laplace EQUATION WITH NONLINEAR BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2006(2006), No. 37, pp. 1 7. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) MULTIPLE
More informationEXISTENCE RESULTS FOR QUASILINEAR HEMIVARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES AT RESONANCE. Leszek Gasiński
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: www.aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS SUPPLEMENT 2007 pp. 409 418 EXISTENCE RESULTS FOR QUASILINEAR HEMIVARIATIONAL INEQUALITIES AT RESONANCE Leszek Gasiński Jagiellonian
More informationEIGENVALUE PROBLEMS INVOLVING THE FRACTIONAL p(x)-laplacian OPERATOR
Adv. Oper. Theory https://doi.org/0.5352/aot.809-420 ISSN: 2538-225X (electronic) https://projecteuclid.org/aot EIGENVALUE PROBLEMS INVOLVING THE FRACTIONAL p(x)-laplacian OPERATOR E. AZROUL, A. BENKIRANE,
More informationSobolev Spaces. Chapter 10
Chapter 1 Sobolev Spaces We now define spaces H 1,p (R n ), known as Sobolev spaces. For u to belong to H 1,p (R n ), we require that u L p (R n ) and that u have weak derivatives of first order in L p
More informationSYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 21, 2003, 211 226 SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S.
More informationThe Dirichlet s P rinciple. In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation:
Oct. 1 The Dirichlet s P rinciple In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation: 1. Dirichlet s Principle. u = in, u = g on. ( 1 ) If we multiply
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS FOR KIRCHHOFF TYPE EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUNDED POTENTIAL. 1. Introduction In this article, we consider the Kirchhoff type problem
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 207 (207), No. 84, pp. 2. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS FOR KIRCHHOFF TYPE EQUATIONS
More informationNonhomogeneous Neumann problem for the Poisson equation in domains with an external cusp
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 31 (5) 397 411 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Nonhomogeneous Neumann problem for the Poisson equation in domains with an external cusp Gabriel Acosta a,1, María G. Armentano b,,, Ricardo
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ca] 15 Dec 2016
L p MAPPING PROPERTIES FOR NONLOCAL SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS WITH CERTAIN POTENTIAL arxiv:62.0744v [math.ca] 5 Dec 206 WOOCHEOL CHOI AND YONG-CHEOL KIM Abstract. In this paper, we consider nonlocal Schrödinger
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 16 Jan 2015
Three positive solutions of a nonlinear Dirichlet problem with competing power nonlinearities Vladimir Lubyshev January 19, 2015 arxiv:1501.03870v1 [math.ap] 16 Jan 2015 Abstract This paper studies a nonlinear
More informationMULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR AN INDEFINITE KIRCHHOFF-TYPE EQUATION WITH SIGN-CHANGING POTENTIAL
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2015 (2015), o. 274, pp. 1 9. ISS: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu MULTIPLE SOLUTIOS
More informationON THE EXISTENCE OF THREE SOLUTIONS FOR QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC PROBLEM. Paweł Goncerz
Opuscula Mathematica Vol. 32 No. 3 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/opmath.2012.32.3.473 ON THE EXISTENCE OF THREE SOLUTIONS FOR QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC PROBLEM Paweł Goncerz Abstract. We consider a quasilinear
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO ASYMPTOTICALLY PERIODIC SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 017 (017), No. 15, pp. 1 7. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO ASYMPTOTICALLY PERIODIC
More informationTHE HARDY LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTION OF A SOBOLEV FUNCTION. Juha Kinnunen. 1 f(y) dy, B(x, r) B(x,r)
Appeared in Israel J. Math. 00 (997), 7 24 THE HARDY LITTLEWOOD MAXIMAL FUNCTION OF A SOBOLEV FUNCTION Juha Kinnunen Abstract. We prove that the Hardy Littlewood maximal operator is bounded in the Sobolev
More informationNehari manifold for non-local elliptic operator with concave convex nonlinearities and sign-changing weight functions
Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) Vol. 125, No. 4, November 2015, pp. 545 558. c Indian Academy of Sciences Nehari manifold for non-local elliptic operator with concave convex nonlinearities and sign-changing
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.oc] 12 Nov 2018
EXTERNAL OPTIMAL CONTROL OF NONLOCAL PDES HARBIR ANTIL, RATNA KHATRI, AND MAHAMADI WARMA arxiv:1811.04515v1 [math.oc] 12 Nov 2018 Abstract. Very recently Warma [35] has shown that for nonlocal PDEs associated
More informationNonlinear elliptic systems with exponential nonlinearities
22-Fez conference on Partial Differential Equations, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 9, 22, pp 139 147. http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu
More informationON BOUNDEDNESS OF MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS IN SOBOLEV SPACES
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 29, 2004, 167 176 ON BOUNDEDNESS OF MAXIMAL FUNCTIONS IN SOBOLEV SPACES Piotr Haj lasz and Jani Onninen Warsaw University, Institute of Mathematics
More informationEIGENVALUE QUESTIONS ON SOME QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS. lim u(x) = 0, (1.2)
Proceedings of Equadiff-11 2005, pp. 455 458 Home Page Page 1 of 7 EIGENVALUE QUESTIONS ON SOME QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS M. N. POULOU AND N. M. STAVRAKAKIS Abstract. We present resent results on some
More informationPositive eigenfunctions for the p-laplace operator revisited
Positive eigenfunctions for the p-laplace operator revisited B. Kawohl & P. Lindqvist Sept. 2006 Abstract: We give a short proof that positive eigenfunctions for the p-laplacian are necessarily associated
More informationPERTURBATION THEORY FOR NONLINEAR DIRICHLET PROBLEMS
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 28, 2003, 207 222 PERTURBATION THEORY FOR NONLINEAR DIRICHLET PROBLEMS Fumi-Yuki Maeda and Takayori Ono Hiroshima Institute of Technology, Miyake,
More informationTHE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n
THE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n BAISHENG YAN Abstract. We present an elementary L 2 -Hodge theory on whole R n based on the minimization principle of the calculus of variations and some
More informationELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH MEASURE DATA IN ORLICZ SPACES
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2008(2008), No. 76, pp. 1 10. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) ELLIPTIC
More informationLimit problems for a Fractional p-laplacian as p
Limit problems for a Fractional p-laplacian as p Raúl Ferreira and Mayte Pérez-Llanos Abstract. The purpose of this work is the analysis of the solutions to the following problems related to the fractional
More informationNONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS TO INTEGRAL AND DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Fixed Point Theory, Volume 9, No. 1, 28, 3-16 http://www.math.ubbcluj.ro/ nodeacj/sfptcj.html NONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS TO INTEGRAL AND DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS GIOVANNI ANELLO Department of Mathematics University
More informationFractional Cahn-Hilliard equation
Fractional Cahn-Hilliard equation Goro Akagi Mathematical Institute, Tohoku University Abstract In this note, we review a recent joint work with G. Schimperna and A. Segatti (University of Pavia, Italy)
More informationEQUAZIONI A DERIVATE PARZIALI. STEKLOV EIGENVALUES FOR THE -LAPLACIAN
EQUAZIONI A DERIVATE PARZIALI. STEKLOV EIGENVALUES FOR THE -LAPLACIAN J. GARCIA-AZORERO, J. J. MANFREDI, I. PERAL AND J. D. ROSSI Abstract. We study the Steklov eigenvalue problem for the - laplacian.
More informationExistence of Multiple Positive Solutions of Quasilinear Elliptic Problems in R N
Advances in Dynamical Systems and Applications. ISSN 0973-5321 Volume 2 Number 1 (2007), pp. 1 11 c Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/adsa.htm Existence of Multiple Positive Solutions
More informationExistence of Solutions for a Class of p(x)-biharmonic Problems without (A-R) Type Conditions
International Journal of Mathematical Analysis Vol. 2, 208, no., 505-55 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/0.2988/ijma.208.886 Existence of Solutions for a Class of p(x)-biharmonic Problems without
More informationKrein-Rutman Theorem and the Principal Eigenvalue
Chapter 1 Krein-Rutman Theorem and the Principal Eigenvalue The Krein-Rutman theorem plays a very important role in nonlinear partial differential equations, as it provides the abstract basis for the proof
More informationNonlinear Analysis 72 (2010) Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. Nonlinear Analysis. journal homepage:
Nonlinear Analysis 72 (2010) 4298 4303 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Nonlinear Analysis journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/na Local C 1 ()-minimizers versus local W 1,p ()-minimizers
More informationFunctional Analysis. Franck Sueur Metric spaces Definitions Completeness Compactness Separability...
Functional Analysis Franck Sueur 2018-2019 Contents 1 Metric spaces 1 1.1 Definitions........................................ 1 1.2 Completeness...................................... 3 1.3 Compactness......................................
More informationAn introduction to some aspects of functional analysis
An introduction to some aspects of functional analysis Stephen Semmes Rice University Abstract These informal notes deal with some very basic objects in functional analysis, including norms and seminorms
More informationOPTIMAL POTENTIALS FOR SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS. 1. Introduction In this paper we consider optimization problems of the form. min F (V ) : V V, (1.
OPTIMAL POTENTIALS FOR SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS G. BUTTAZZO, A. GEROLIN, B. RUFFINI, AND B. VELICHKOV Abstract. We consider the Schrödinger operator + V (x) on H 0 (), where is a given domain of R d. Our
More informationA Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequality with variable exponent and applications to PDE s
A Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type ineuality with variable exponent and applications to PDE s Mihai Mihăilescu a,b Vicenţiu Rădulescu a,c Denisa Stancu-Dumitru a a Department of Mathematics, University of
More informationXiyou Cheng Zhitao Zhang. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 34, 2009, 267 277 EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS TO SYSTEMS OF NONLINEAR INTEGRAL OR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Xiyou
More informationMULTIPLE SOLUTIONS FOR CRITICAL ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS WITH FRACTIONAL LAPLACIAN
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 016 (016), No. 97, pp. 1 11. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu MULTIPLE SOLUTIONS
More informationVariational eigenvalues of degenerate eigenvalue problems for the weighted p-laplacian
Variational eigenvalues of degenerate eigenvalue problems for the weighted p-laplacian An Lê Mathematics Sciences Research Institute, 17 Gauss Way, Berkeley, California 94720 e-mail: anle@msri.org Klaus
More informationSome lecture notes for Math 6050E: PDEs, Fall 2016
Some lecture notes for Math 65E: PDEs, Fall 216 Tianling Jin December 1, 216 1 Variational methods We discuss an example of the use of variational methods in obtaining existence of solutions. Theorem 1.1.
More informationEXISTENCE RESULTS FOR OPERATOR EQUATIONS INVOLVING DUALITY MAPPINGS VIA THE MOUNTAIN PASS THEOREM
EXISTENCE RESULTS FOR OPERATOR EQUATIONS INVOLVING DUALITY MAPPINGS VIA THE MOUNTAIN PASS THEOREM JENICĂ CRÎNGANU We derive existence results for operator equations having the form J ϕu = N f u, by using
More informationCOMBINED EFFECTS FOR A STATIONARY PROBLEM WITH INDEFINITE NONLINEARITIES AND LACK OF COMPACTNESS
Dynamic Systems and Applications 22 (203) 37-384 COMBINED EFFECTS FOR A STATIONARY PROBLEM WITH INDEFINITE NONLINEARITIES AND LACK OF COMPACTNESS VICENŢIU D. RĂDULESCU Simion Stoilow Mathematics Institute
More informationMINIMAL GRAPHS PART I: EXISTENCE OF LIPSCHITZ WEAK SOLUTIONS TO THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH C 2 BOUNDARY DATA
MINIMAL GRAPHS PART I: EXISTENCE OF LIPSCHITZ WEAK SOLUTIONS TO THE DIRICHLET PROBLEM WITH C 2 BOUNDARY DATA SPENCER HUGHES In these notes we prove that for any given smooth function on the boundary of
More informationi=1 α i. Given an m-times continuously
1 Fundamentals 1.1 Classification and characteristics Let Ω R d, d N, d 2, be an open set and α = (α 1,, α d ) T N d 0, N 0 := N {0}, a multiindex with α := d i=1 α i. Given an m-times continuously differentiable
More informationExistence of Minimizers for Fractional Variational Problems Containing Caputo Derivatives
Advances in Dynamical Systems and Applications ISSN 0973-5321, Volume 8, Number 1, pp. 3 12 (2013) http://campus.mst.edu/adsa Existence of Minimizers for Fractional Variational Problems Containing Caputo
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ap] 20 Jun 2016
FRACTIONAL EIGENVALUE PROBLEMS THAT APPROXIMATE STEKLOV EIGENVALUES arxiv:60.05290v2 [math.ap] 20 Jun 206 LEANDRO M. DEL PEZZO, JULIO D. ROSSI, ARIEL M. SALORT Abstract. In this aer we analyze ossible
More informationNONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS FOR SUPERQUADRATIC NONAUTONOMOUS PERIODIC SYSTEMS. Shouchuan Hu Nikolas S. Papageorgiou. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 34, 29, 327 338 NONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS FOR SUPERQUADRATIC NONAUTONOMOUS PERIODIC SYSTEMS Shouchuan Hu Nikolas S. Papageorgiou
More informationOn m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry
On m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry Ognjen Milatovic Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of North Florida Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA. Abstract
More informationNONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS INVOLVING EXPONENTIAL CRITICAL GROWTH IN R Introduction
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 014 (014), No. 59, pp. 1 1. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER
More informationATTRACTORS FOR SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS WITH DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN VARYING DOMAINS. Emerson A. M. de Abreu Alexandre N.
ATTRACTORS FOR SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS WITH DIRICHLET BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN VARYING DOMAINS Emerson A. M. de Abreu Alexandre N. Carvalho Abstract Under fairly general conditions one can prove that
More informationCRITICAL POINT METHODS IN DEGENERATE ANISOTROPIC PROBLEMS WITH VARIABLE EXPONENT. We are interested in discussing the problem:
STUDIA UNIV. BABEŞ BOLYAI, MATHEMATICA, Volume LV, Number 4, December 2010 CRITICAL POINT METHODS IN DEGENERATE ANISOTROPIC PROBLEMS WITH VARIABLE EXPONENT MARIA-MAGDALENA BOUREANU Abstract. We work on
More informationFractional superharmonic functions and the Perron method for nonlinear integro-differential equations
Fractional superharmonic functions and the Perron method for nonlinear integro-differential equations Janne Korvenpää Tuomo Kuusi Giampiero Palatucci Abstract We deal with a class of equations driven by
More informationAn introduction to semilinear elliptic equations
An introduction to semilinear elliptic equations Thierry Cazenave Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions UMR CNRS 7598 B.C. 187 Université Pierre et Marie Curie 4, place Jussieu 75252 Paris Cedex 05 France E-mail
More informationTD M1 EDP 2018 no 2 Elliptic equations: regularity, maximum principle
TD M EDP 08 no Elliptic equations: regularity, maximum principle Estimates in the sup-norm I Let be an open bounded subset of R d of class C. Let A = (a ij ) be a symmetric matrix of functions of class
More informationAn introduction to semilinear elliptic equations
An introduction to semilinear elliptic equations Thierry Cazenave Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions UMR CNRS 7598 B.C. 187 Université Pierre et Marie Curie 4, place Jussieu 75252 Paris Cedex 05 France E-mail
More informationExistence of minimizers for the pure displacement problem in nonlinear elasticity
Existence of minimizers for the pure displacement problem in nonlinear elasticity Cristinel Mardare Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, Paris, F-75005 France Abstract
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 28 Mar 2014
GROUNDSTATES OF NONLINEAR CHOQUARD EQUATIONS: HARDY-LITTLEWOOD-SOBOLEV CRITICAL EXPONENT VITALY MOROZ AND JEAN VAN SCHAFTINGEN arxiv:1403.7414v1 [math.ap] 28 Mar 2014 Abstract. We consider nonlinear Choquard
More informationA Perron-type theorem on the principal eigenvalue of nonsymmetric elliptic operators
A Perron-type theorem on the principal eigenvalue of nonsymmetric elliptic operators Lei Ni And I cherish more than anything else the Analogies, my most trustworthy masters. They know all the secrets of
More information2. Function spaces and approximation
2.1 2. Function spaces and approximation 2.1. The space of test functions. Notation and prerequisites are collected in Appendix A. Let Ω be an open subset of R n. The space C0 (Ω), consisting of the C
More informationThe Brézis-Nirenberg Result for the Fractional Elliptic Problem with Singular Potential
arxiv:1705.08387v1 [math.ap] 23 May 2017 The Brézis-Nirenberg Result for the Fractional Elliptic Problem with Singular Potential Lingyu Jin, Lang Li and Shaomei Fang Department of Mathematics, South China
More informationON NONHOMOGENEOUS BIHARMONIC EQUATIONS INVOLVING CRITICAL SOBOLEV EXPONENT
PORTUGALIAE MATHEMATICA Vol. 56 Fasc. 3 1999 ON NONHOMOGENEOUS BIHARMONIC EQUATIONS INVOLVING CRITICAL SOBOLEV EXPONENT M. Guedda Abstract: In this paper we consider the problem u = λ u u + f in, u = u
More informationOn the spectrum of a nontypical eigenvalue problem
Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations 18, No. 87, 1 1; https://doi.org/1.143/ejqtde.18.1.87 www.math.u-szeged.hu/ejqtde/ On the spectrum of a nontypical eigenvalue problem
More informationPROPERTIES OF CAPACITIES IN VARIABLE EXPONENT SOBOLEV SPACES
PROPERTIES OF CAPACITIES IN VARIABLE EXPONENT SOBOLEV SPACES PETTERI HARJULEHTO, PETER HÄSTÖ, AND MIKA KOSKENOJA Abstract. In this paper we introduce two new capacities in the variable exponent setting:
More informationTools from Lebesgue integration
Tools from Lebesgue integration E.P. van den Ban Fall 2005 Introduction In these notes we describe some of the basic tools from the theory of Lebesgue integration. Definitions and results will be given
More informationOn critical systems involving fractional Laplacian
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 446 017 681 706 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa On critical systems involving fractional Laplacian
More informationSEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH DEPENDENCE ON THE GRADIENT
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2012 (2012), No. 139, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC
More informationEXISTENCE OF NONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS FOR A QUASILINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS WITH SIGN-CHANGING POTENTIAL
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2014 (2014), No. 05, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu EXISTENCE OF NONTRIVIAL
More informationBoundedness and Regularizing Effects of O Hara s Knot Energies
March, 2 2:24 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE OHarasEnergies Boundedness and Regularizing Effects of O Hara s Knot Energies Simon Blatt Departement Mathematik ETH Zürich Rämistrasse CH-84 Zürich Switzerland simon.blatt@math.ethz.ch
More informationT. Godoy - E. Lami Dozo - S. Paczka ON THE ANTIMAXIMUM PRINCIPLE FOR PARABOLIC PERIODIC PROBLEMS WITH WEIGHT
Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Pol. Torino Vol. 1, 60 2002 T. Godoy - E. Lami Dozo - S. Paczka ON THE ANTIMAXIMUM PRINCIPLE FOR PARABOLIC PERIODIC PROBLEMS WITH WEIGHT Abstract. We prove that an antimaximum principle
More informationA NOTE ON THE EXISTENCE OF TWO NONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS OF A RESONANCE PROBLEM
PORTUGALIAE MATHEMATICA Vol. 51 Fasc. 4 1994 A NOTE ON THE EXISTENCE OF TWO NONTRIVIAL SOLUTIONS OF A RESONANCE PROBLEM To Fu Ma* Abstract: We study the existence of two nontrivial solutions for an elliptic
More informationBlow-up for a Nonlocal Nonlinear Diffusion Equation with Source
Revista Colombiana de Matemáticas Volumen 46(2121, páginas 1-13 Blow-up for a Nonlocal Nonlinear Diffusion Equation with Source Explosión para una ecuación no lineal de difusión no local con fuente Mauricio
More informationThe oblique derivative problem for general elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains
M. MITREA The oblique derivative problem for general elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains Let M be a smooth, oriented, connected, compact, boundaryless manifold of real dimension m, and let T M and T
More informationBANACH SPACES IN WHICH EVERY p-weakly SUMMABLE SEQUENCE LIES IN THE RANGE OF A VECTOR MEASURE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 124, Number 7, July 1996 BANACH SPACES IN WHICH EVERY p-weakly SUMMABLE SEQUENCE LIES IN THE RANGE OF A VECTOR MEASURE C. PIÑEIRO (Communicated by
More informationBrunn-Minkowski inequality for the 1-Riesz capacity and level set convexity for the 1/2-Laplacian
Brunn-Minkowski inequality for the 1-Riesz capacity and level set convexity for the 1/2-Laplacian M. Novaga, B. Ruffini January 13, 2014 Abstract We prove that that the 1-Riesz capacity satisfies a Brunn-Minkowski
More informationEXISTENCE OF WEAK SOLUTIONS FOR A NONUNIFORMLY ELLIPTIC NONLINEAR SYSTEM IN R N. 1. Introduction We study the nonuniformly elliptic, nonlinear system
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 20082008), No. 119, pp. 1 10. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu login: ftp) EXISTENCE
More informationTitle: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on
Title: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on manifolds. Author: Ognjen Milatovic Department Address: Department
More informationSELF-ADJOINTNESS OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS WITH SINGULAR POTENTIALS ON MANIFOLDS OF BOUNDED GEOMETRY
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2003(2003), No.??, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) SELF-ADJOINTNESS
More informationCOINCIDENCE SETS IN THE OBSTACLE PROBLEM FOR THE p-harmonic OPERATOR
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 95, Number 3, November 1985 COINCIDENCE SETS IN THE OBSTACLE PROBLEM FOR THE p-harmonic OPERATOR SHIGERU SAKAGUCHI Abstract. We consider the obstacle
More informationLERAY LIONS DEGENERATED PROBLEM WITH GENERAL GROWTH CONDITION
2005-Oujda International Conference on Nonlinear Analysis. Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 14, 2006, pp. 73 81. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu
More informationIGNACIO GARCIA, URSULA MOLTER, AND ROBERTO SCOTTO. (Communicated by Michael T. Lacey)
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 135, Number 10, October 2007, Pages 3151 3161 S 0002-9939(0709019-3 Article electronically published on June 21, 2007 DIMENSION FUNCTIONS OF CANTOR
More informationA DUALITY APPROXIMATION OF SOME NONLINEAR PDE s
ISSN 2066-6594 Ann. Acad. Rom. Sci. Ser. Math. Appl. Vol. 8, No. /206 A DUALITY APPROXIMATION OF SOME NONLINEAR PDE s Dan Tiba Abstract We discuss a discretization approach for the p - Laplacian equation
More informationLecture 4 Lebesgue spaces and inequalities
Lecture 4: Lebesgue spaces and inequalities 1 of 10 Course: Theory of Probability I Term: Fall 2013 Instructor: Gordan Zitkovic Lecture 4 Lebesgue spaces and inequalities Lebesgue spaces We have seen how
More informationOn a weighted total variation minimization problem
On a weighted total variation minimization problem Guillaume Carlier CEREMADE Université Paris Dauphine carlier@ceremade.dauphine.fr Myriam Comte Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, Université Pierre et Marie
More informationSobolevology. 1. Definitions and Notation. When α = 1 this seminorm is the same as the Lipschitz constant of the function f. 2.
Sobolevology 1. Definitions and Notation 1.1. The domain. is an open subset of R n. 1.2. Hölder seminorm. For α (, 1] the Hölder seminorm of exponent α of a function is given by f(x) f(y) [f] α = sup x
More informationPseudo-monotonicity and degenerate elliptic operators of second order
2002-Fez conference on Partial Differential Equations, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 09, 2002, pp 9 24. http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu
More informationPartial Differential Equations, 2nd Edition, L.C.Evans Chapter 5 Sobolev Spaces
Partial Differential Equations, nd Edition, L.C.Evans Chapter 5 Sobolev Spaces Shih-Hsin Chen, Yung-Hsiang Huang 7.8.3 Abstract In these exercises always denote an open set of with smooth boundary. As
More informationNotes on Sobolev Spaces A. Visintin a.a
Notes on Sobolev Spaces A. Visintin a.a. 2017-18 Contents: 1. Hölder spaces. 2. Regularity of Euclidean domains. 3. Sobolev spaces of positive integer order. 4. Sobolev spaces of real integer order. 5.
More information