ANALYSIS OF A LINEAR FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION PROBLEM. Q. Du. M.D. Gunzburger. L.S. Hou. J. Lee. (Communicated by Jianhong Wu)
|
|
- Joanna Moore
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Volume 9, Number3, May23 pp ANALYSIS OF A LINEAR FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION PROBLEM Q. Du Department of Mathematics Penn State University, State College, PA 1682, USA M.D. Gunzburger School of Computational Science Information Technology Florida State University; Tallahassee FL 3236, USA L.S. Hou Department of Mathematics Iowa State University; Ames, IA 511, USA J. Lee Department of Mathematics Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA (Communicated by Jianhong Wu Abstract. A time-dependent system modeling the interaction between a Stokes fluid an elastic structure is studied. A divergence-free weak formulation is introduced which does not involve the fluid pressure field. The existence uniqueness of a weak solution is proved. Strong energy estimates are derived under additional assumptions on the data. The existence of an L 2 integrable pressure field is established after the verification of an inf-sup condition. 1. Introduction. Fluid-structure interaction problems have been extensively studied in the past continue to be the focus of much attention today. We classify a number of different types of mathematical models for fluid-structure interactions into the following three categories. Elementary fluid. The fluid motion is governed by equations for a potential function, e.g., the Laplace equation or the wave equation. In [25], a coupled system of a potential equation a wave equation was considered. Elementary fluids interacting with a rigid cavity or a moving wall were studied in [15] with an elastic solid in [3]. Inviscid fluid. The fluid motion is governed by inviscid fluid models, e.g., the Euler equations. Interactions between linearized inviscid fluids elastic solids were analyzed in [1, 27]. An algorithm applicable to an inviscid nonlinear fluid coupled with rigid walls was given in [2]. Viscous fluid. The fluid motion is governed by viscous, incompressible or compressible fluid models, e.g., the Stokes or Navier-Stokes equations. There is an extensive literature on linearized viscous fluids coupled with solids. Solids modeled 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 35Q3, 76D7, 73C2, 73K12. Key words phrases. fluid-structure interaction, incompressible fluid, linear elasticity. The work of Q. Du was supported in part by NSF grant DMS ; that of M. Gunzburger was supported in part by NSF grant DMS
2 634 Q. DU, M.D. GUNZBURGER, L.S. HOU, J. LEE by plate equations or shell equations were treated in [11, 12, 14, 23]. The Stokes equations coupled with a beam equation was analyzed in [18]. In [6, 22], interactions between a linearized viscous fluid elastic solids were studied; [4] discussed interactions with rigid walls. There also is a vast literature on fluid-structure interactions for which the fluid is modeled by nonlinear viscous fluid models. Rigid body motions of solids in a nonlinear viscous fluid were studied in [5, 7, 2, 19, 21]. In [13], the Navier-Stokes equations coupled to the plate equations were studied. The work of [5, 8, 1, 28, 29] treated interactions between nonlinear viscous fluids elastic solids. It should be noted that the majority of the references cited use solid models of lower spatial dimensions, e.g., one-dimensional beams interacting with twodimensional fluids or two-dimensional plates interacting with three-dimensional fluids. Rigorous mathematical results are rare for fluid-solid interaction problems in which both the fluid the solid occupy true spatial domains. Eigenmodes of the coupled system (1.1 (1.2 were studied in [29]. In [6], the homogenization of a mathematical model for the Stokes equation coupled to the equations of linear elasticity was considered. Both existence of a solution numerical experiments for a problem in which a nonlinear viscous fluids is coupled to elastic solids in one dimension were discussed in [8]. For a numerical algorithm for solving interaction problems of elastic body motions in a fluid flow, see [1]. In this paper, we consider the interaction of a linear, viscous fluid with elastic body motions in a two or three dimensional bounded domain. The specific fluidstructure interaction model is described as follows. We assume the fluid solid occupy the open, Lipschitz domains Ω 1 R d Ω 2 R d, respectively, where d = 2 or 3 is the space dimensions. We denote by Ω the entire fluid-solid region under consideration, i.e., Ω is the interior of Ω 1 Ω 2. Let Γ = Ω 1 Ω 2 denote the interface between the fluid solid let Γ 1 = Ω 1 \ Γ Γ 2 = Ω 2 \ Γ respectively denote the parts of the fluid solid boundaries excluding the interface Γ. For obvious reasons, we assume that meas(γ 1 Γ 2. In the fluid region Ω 1, we consider the Stokes system ρ 1 v t + p µ 1 ( v + v T =ρ 1 f 1 in (,T Ω 1 v = in (,T Ω 1 (1.1 v = on (,T Γ 1, v t= = v in Ω 1, where v denotes the fluid velocity, p the fluid pressure, f 1 the given body force per unit mass, ρ 1 µ 1 the constant fluid density viscosity, v the given initial velocity, T>the terminal time. In the solid region, we consider the equations of linear elasticity { ρ2 u tt µ 2 ( u + u T λ 2 ( u =ρ 2 f 2 in (,T Ω 2 (1.2 u = on (,T Γ 2, u t= = u in Ω 2, u t t= = u 1 in Ω 2, where u denotes the displacement of the solid, f 2 the given loading force per unit mass, µ 2 λ 2 the Lamé constants, ρ 2 the constant solid density u u 1 the given initial data. Across the fixed interface Γ between the fluid solid, the velocity stress vector are continuous. Thus, we have u t = v on Γ (1.3
3 FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION 635 µ 2 ( u + u T n 2 + λ 2 ( un 2 = pn 1 µ 1 ( v + v T n 1 on Γ, (1.4 where n i is the outward-pointing unit normal vector along Ω i, i =1, 2. Some remarks about the use of a fixed fluid-solid interface Γ are in order. The general motion of a solid body immersed in a fluid involves rigid body motions superimposed with displacements caused by the stresses strains induced in the solid by the loads resulting from the interaction with the fluid motion. Even if the the latter are infinitesimal in size, the rigid motion of the solid by itself would result in a moving fluid-solid interface. Certainly, if the solid motion involves large stress-induced displacements, the fluid-solid interface is not stationary. Thus, the general case is that of a moving fluid-solid interface which, in fact, is generally not known must be found as part of the solution process. At the other extreme is the case for which, first, there is no rigid motion or that motion is purely translational with constant speed one attaches the coordinate system to the solid,, second, the solid undergoes only infinitesimal elastic displacements. Then, since the motion of the fluid-solid interface is wholly determined by the elastic displacement, one may assume that that interface is stationary. Moreover, it is usually the case that the velocity in the solid is also infinitesimal so that that the interface condition v = u t simply reduces to v =, i.e., the classical no-slip condition, the fluid motion decouples from that of the solid. Once the fluid motion is determined, the other interface condition provides an inhomogeneous traction boundary condition which may be used to determine the elastic motion of the solid. In between the two extremes, i.e., between having a moving interface a fixed interface with uncoupled fluid motion, is the case considered here. We begin as in the second case: the motion of the solid is wholly due to infinitesimal displacements. Again, we may then assume that the fluid-solid interface is stationary. However, we operate in the case that although the displacement u is small, the velocity u t is not. Thus, we cannot impose the no-slip condition on the fluid velocity must retain the interface condition v = u t, but the latter may be imposed along a fixed boundary. We note that the case of having O(1 solid velocities even though the solid displacements are of infinitesimal size is of practical interest. For example, this setting arises in the high frequency, small displacement oscillation of elastic structures. Our model may be justified by stard asymptotic analysis techniques (see, e.g., [16] the details are omitted. The plan of the paper is as follows. In Section 2, working in a divergence-free setting, we first introduce some notations define a weak formulation for the model fluid-structure interaction problem. We next formulate an auxiliary, equivalent parabolic type problem, define its Galerkin approximations derive a priori estimates for the Galerkin sequence. By passing to the limit in the Galerkin approximations, we prove the existence uniqueness of a solution for the auxiliary problem. The existence uniqueness of the velocity v displacement u for the fluid-structure interaction problem follows directly from the existence of a unique solution for the auxiliary problem. In Section 3, we prove a regularity result for the weak solution under additional assumptions. We then verify an inf-sup condition establish the existence of an L 2 integrable pressure. In the end of this paper we give some concluding remarks regarding forthcoming work on the model studied in this paper on extensions into more general models.
4 636 Q. DU, M.D. GUNZBURGER, L.S. HOU, J. LEE 2. The existence of a weak solution Notations. Throughout this paper, C denotes a positive constant, depending on the domains Ω, Ω 1 Ω 2, whose meaning value changes with context. H s (D, s R, denotes the stard Sobolev space of order s with respect to the set D equipped with the stard norm s,d. Vector-valued Sobolev spaces are denoted by H s (D, with norms still denoted by s,d. H 1 (D denotes the space of functions belonging to H 1 (D that vanish on the boundary D of D; H 1 (D denotes the vector-valued counterpart. We will use the following L 2 inner product notations on scalar vector-valued L 2 spaces: [p, q] D = pq dd p, q L 2 (D, [u, v] D = u v dd u, v L 2 (D, D where the spatial set D is Ω or Γ or Ω i,fori =1, 2. We introduce the function spaces X i =[H 1 (Ω] Ωi with the norm Xi = 1,Ωi, i =1, 2, V 1 = {v H 1 (Ω 1 : div v =} with the norm V1 = 1,Ω1, Ψ = {η H 1 (Ω : div η =inω 1 } with the norm 1,Ω, Φ = the closure of Ψ for the norm induced by the inner product [[, ]], where [[, ]] denotes the weighted L 2 inner product [[ξ, η]] = [ρ 1 ξ, η] Ω1 +[ρ 2 ξ, η] Ω2 ξ, η L 2 (Ω. (2.1 Clearly, the induced norm on Φ is equivalent to,ω Φ preserves the divergence-free property in Ω 1. We denote by, the duality pairing between Ψ Ψ that is generated from the weighted L 2 inner product [[, ]]. The norm on the dual space Ψ is defined in the conventional manner: g Ψ = sup g, η η Ψ, η 1,Ω 1 g Ψ. We define the bilinear forms a 1 [u, v] = 1 µ 1 ( u + u T :( v + v T dω u, v X 1, 2 Ω 1 b[v,q]= q v dω Ω 1 v X 1, q L 2 (Ω 1 { µ2 } a 2 [u, v] = Ω 2 2 ( u + ut :( v + v T +λ 2 ( u( v dω u, v X 2. It is evident that the forms a 1 [, ], a 2 [, ] b[, ] are continuous, i.e., there exist positive constants K 1, K 2 K b such that a 1 [u, v] K 1 u 1,Ω1 v 1,Ω1 u, v X 1, a 2 [u, v] K 2 u 1,Ω2 v 1,Ω2 u, v X 2, b[v,q] K b v 1,Ω1 q,ω1 v X 1, q L 2 (Ω 1. D
5 FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION 637 Also, it can be verified with the help of Korn s inequalities [26, p.31, p.12] that for i =1, 2, a i [η, η] k i η 2 1,Ω i η X i, if meas(γ i (2.2 [η, η] Ωi + a i [η, η] k i η 2 1,Ω i η X i, if meas(γ i =. ( A divergence-free weak formulation. We are now prepared to introduce a weak formulation for (1.1-(1.4. We assume that the fluid force f 1, the elastic force f 2 the initial data v, u u 1 satisfy { f1 L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω 1, f 2 L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω 2, u X 2, (2.4 v X 1, div v =inω 1, u 1 X 2, v Γ = u 1 Γ. A desired weak formulation for (1.1 (1.2 can be derived by multiplying the Stokes elasticity equations by an η H 1 (Ω performing integration by parts; this yields ρ 1 [v t, η] Ω1 + b[η,p]+a 1 [v, η]+ρ 2 [u tt, η] Ω2 + a 2 [u, η] (2.5 = ρ 1 [f 1, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [f 2, η] Ω2 η H 1 (Ω, a.e. t [,T]. The choice of a global test function η H 1 (Ω instead of two independent test functions on the two subdomains allows us to incorporate the stress interface condition (1.4 into the weak formulation. The weak form (2.5 requires v t L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω 1, u t L 2 (,T; X 2, u tt L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω 2, p L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω 1. In general, such regularity conditions are too strong to assume for a weak solution. Analogous to the stard practice [3] of defining a weak formulation for the Stokes equation with respect to divergence-free function spaces, we introduce the following divergence-free weak formulation for (1.1-(1.4: seek a pair (v, u L 2 (,T; X 1 L 2 (,T; X 2 satisfying div v =inω 1, d (ρ 1 [v, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [ t u, η] Ω2 + a 1 [v, η]+a 2 [u, η] dt (2.6 = ρ 1 [f 1, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [f 2, η] Ω2 η Ψ, v t= = v, u t= = u, u t t= = u 1 (2.7 v(s Γ ds = u(t Γ u Γ a.e. t, (2.8 where (2.6 holds in the sense of distributions on (,T (see [3]. Equations (2.6 (2.8 will be the primary weak formulation we study in this paper. Note that the pressure does not appear in (2.6 (2.8. A weak formulation involving the pressure will be considered in Section 3.2. The natural interface condition (1.4 is built into the weak form (2.5 (2.6. In the divergence-free weak formulation, we enforce the essential interface condition (1.3 in the weak sense (2.8.
6 638 Q. DU, M.D. GUNZBURGER, L.S. HOU, J. LEE 2.3. An auxiliary weak formulation its Galerkin approximations. Introducing auxiliary functions { { v in Ω1 v in Ω 1 ξ = ξ = (2.9 u t in Ω 2 u 1 in Ω 2, we see that (2.6 (2.8 is equivalent to the auxiliary problem t ξ, η + a 1 [ξ, η]+a 2 [ ξ(s ds, η] (2.1 = ρ 1 [f 1, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [f 2, η] Ω2 a 2 [u, η] η Ψ, a.e. t [,T], ξ( = ξ in Ψ (2.11 ( ( Γ Γ ξ(s Ω1 ds = ξ(s Ω2 ds a.e. t. (2.12 Here we recall that the space Ψ introduced in Section 2.1 is divergence-free in Ω 1 so that the term b[η,p] vanishes. Under assumption (2.4, ξ defined by (2.9 obviously satisfies ξ Ψ. The initial condition (2.11 is equivalent to ξ(, η =[[ξ, η]] η Ψ. The precise meaning of the initial condition requires certain continuity of ξ in t will be made clear in subsequent discussions. To prove the existence of a solution for (2.1 (2.12, we employ adapt the widely-used Galerkin approach (see, e.g., [9] [24]. Let {ψ j } j=1 be a basis for the space Ψ. In particular, we choose {ψ j } j=1 to be the complete set of eigenfunctions for the eigenvalue problem ψ Ψ, [ ψ, η] Ω = λ[[ψ, η]] η Ψ, (2.13 where the weighted L 2 (Ω inner product [[, ]] is defined by (2.1. Moreover, we assume that {ψ j } j=1 is orthonormalized with respect to the H1 (Ω-inner product [, ] Ω. Then, from equation (2.13 we also have that {ψ j } j=1 is orthogonal with respect to the weighted L 2 (Ω inner product [[, ]]. Let Ψ m = span {ψ 1,...,ψ m }. A Galerkin approximation ξ m C 1 ([,T]; Ψ m of the form ξ m = m j=1 g (m j (tψ j (x (2.14 is defined as the solution of ρ 1 [ t ξ m (t, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [ t ξ m (t, η] Ω2 + a 1 [ξ m (t, η]+a 2 [ ξ m(s ds, η] (2.15 =[[f(t, η]] a 2 [u, η]+a 1 [ξ m ( v, η] η Ψ m,t [,T] [[ξ m (, η]] = [[ξ, η]] η Ψ m, (2.16 where f L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω is defined by { f1 in Ω 1 f = f 2 in Ω 2. Note that ξ m defined as in (2.14 trivially satisfies (ξ m (s Ω1 Γ ds = (ξ m (s Ω2 Γ ds t [,T]. (2.17
7 FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION 639 Remark: Comparing (2.15 (2.1, the term a 1 [ξ m ( v, η] appears to be redundant. Indeed, it will be shown in Lemma 2.2 that ξ m ( ξ 1,Ω sothat a 1 [ξ m ( v, η] asm.theterma 1 [ξ m ( v, η] is added into (2.15 for technical reasons connected with the derivation of strong a priori estimates in Section 3.1. We can write (2.15 (2.16 as an equivalent system of first-order, linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs for {g (m j } m j=1 : m ( [[ψ j, ψ i ]] d dt g(m j (t+a 1 [ψ j, ψ i ] g (m j (t+a 2 [ψ j, ψ i ] j=1 =[[f(t, ψ i ]] a 2 [u, ψ i ]+a 1 [ξ m ( v, ψ i ] g (m j (s ds i =1,...,m, t [,T] (2.18 m [[ψ j, ψ i ]] g (m j ( = [[ξ, ψ i ]] i =1,...,m. (2.19 j=1 The following theorem states the existence of a solution for (2.18 (2.19, or equivalently, (2.15 (2.16. Theorem 2.1. Assume that f 1, v, f 2, u u 1 satisfy (2.4. Then, for each integer m>, there exists a unique set of functions {g (m j } m j=1 C1 [,T] which satisfy (2.18 (2.19. Proof: Setting h (m j (t = g(m j (s ds for j =1,...,m, we see that (2.18 (2.19 is equivalent to the following ODE initial value problem: m [[ψ j, ψ i ]] d m dt g(m (t+ j=1 dt h(m i j j=1 a 1 [ψ j, ψ i ] g (m j (t+ m j=1 = c i (t i =1,...,m, d (t =g (m i (t i =1,...,m, m [[ψ j, ψ i ]] g (m j ( = [[ξ, ψ i ]] i =1,...,m, j=1 h (m i ( =, i =1,...,m, j=1 a 2 [ψ j, ψ i ] h (m j (t where m c i (t =ρ 1 [f 1 (t, ψ i ] Ω1 +ρ 2 [f 2 (t, ψ i ] Ω2 a 2 [u, ψ i ]+ g (m j (a 1 [ψ j, ψ i ] a 1 [v, ψ i ]. The matrix {[[ψ i, ψ j ]]} m i,j=1 is positive definite as the function set {ψ 1,...,ψ m } is linearly independent. Thus, using stard theories for (constant coefficient systems of linear, first-order ODEs we see that the above ODE system has a unique C 1 solution (g (m 1,...,g m (m,h (m 1,...,h (m m on[,t]. Upon eliminating h (m j in the system, we arrive at the assertion of the theorem. Theorem 2.1 immediately yields the existence of the Galerkin approximate solutions {ξ m } satisfying (2.15 (2.16. We proceed to derive a priori estimates for {ξ m }.
8 64 Q. DU, M.D. GUNZBURGER, L.S. HOU, J. LEE Lemma 2.2. Let P m denote the weighted L 2 (Ω projection from L 2 (Ω onto Ψ m, i.e., for every η L 2 (Ω, [[P m η, z]] = [[η, z]] z Ψ m. (2.2 Then, P m η,ω η,ω η L 2 (Ω, (2.21 P m η 1,Ω η 1,Ω η Ψ, (2.22 P m η η 1,Ω as m η Ψ (2.23 P m η η,ω as m η Φ. (2.24 Proof: Setting z = P m η in (2.2 applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality we easily obtain (2.21. Next, we prove (2.22 (2.23. Let η Ψ be given. Since {ψ i } i=1 forms a basis for Ψ, we can write η = i=1 α iψ i ; moreover, we have that m 1,Ω m α i ψ i η 1,Ω α i ψ i η asm. (2.25 1,Ω i=1 i=1 Using the orthogonality of {ψ i } with respect to the [[, ]] inner product we find P m η = m i=1 α iψ i. Hence, (2.22 (2.23 follows from (2.25. It remains to prove (2.24. Let η Φ be given. Using the triangle inequality (2.21 we have P m η η,ω η η ɛ,ω + η ɛ P m η,ω + P m (η ɛ η,ω ( η η ɛ,ω + η ɛ P m η,ω η ɛ Ψ. From relations (2.23 (2.26 as well as the denseness of Ψ in Φ for the L 2 (Ω norm we obtain (2.24. Theorem 2.3. Assume that f 1, v, f 2, u u 1 satisfy (2.4. Then, for each integer m >, there exists a function ξ m C 1 ([,T]; Ψ m of the form (2.14 which satisfies (2.15 (2.17. Moreover, ξ m (t 2,Ω + ξ m 2 L 2 (,T ;H 1 (Ω + 1 ξ m(s ds 2 H 1 (Ω 2 Ce CT( (2.27 f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + v 2 1,Ω 2 + u 2 1,Ω 1 for all t [,T], ξ m 2 L 2 (,T ;Ψ Ce CT( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + v 2 1,Ω 2 + u 2 1,Ω 1, (2.28 t [ξ m Ω1 ] 2 L 2 (,T ;V 1 Ce CT( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + v 2 1,Ω 2 + u 2 1,Ω 1, t [ξ m Ω2 ] 2 L 2 (,T ;H 1 (Ω 2 Ce CT( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + v 2 1,Ω 2 + u 2 1,Ω 1. (2.29 (2.3
9 FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION 641 Proof: The existence of ξ m follows directly from Theorem 2.1 so we only need to prove the a priori estimates (2.27 (2.3. Setting η = ξ m (t in (2.15 using the weighted L 2 (Ω inner product notation, we have [[ξ m(t, ξ m (t]] + a 1 [ξ m (t, ξ m (t] + a 2 [ ξ m(s ds, ξ m (t] =[[f(t, ξ m (t]] a 2 [u, ξ m (t] + a 1 [ξ m ( v, ξ m (t] which can be rewritten as 1 d 2 dt [[ξ m(t, ξ m (t]] + a 1 [ξ m (t, ξ m (t] + 1 d 2 dt a 2[ ξ m(s ds, ξ m(s ds] =[[f(t, ξ m (t]] a 2 [u, ξ m (t] + a 1 [ξ m ( v, ξ m (t] C( f(t 2,Ω + ξ m ( v 2 1,Ω ξ m(t 2,Ω a 2 [u, ξ m (t] a 1[ξ m (t, ξ m (t]. Integrating the last relation in t noting that (Lemma 2.2 we are led to ξ m ( 2 1,Ω = P m ξ 2 1,Ω ξ 2 1,Ω = v 2 1,Ω 1 [[ξ m (t, ξ m (t]] + a 1 [ξ m (s, ξ m (s] ds + a 2 [ ξ m(s ds, ξ m(s ds] C ( ξ m ( 2,Ω + f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 1,Ω2 + T ξ m ( v 2 1,Ω1 + ξ m (s 2,Ω ds a 2 [u, ξ m(s ds] C ( ξ m ( 2,Ω + f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 1,Ω2 + T v 2 1,Ω1 + T u 1 2 1,Ω2 so that + ξ m (t 2,Ω + ξ m (s 2,Ω ds a 2[ ξ m(s ds, ξ m(s ds] a 1 [ξ m (s, ξ m (s] ds + a 2 [ ξ m(s ds, ξ m(s ds] ξ m (s 2,Ω ds +C ( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + T v 2 1,Ω1 + u 2 1,Ω2 + T u 1 2 1,Ω2. (2.31 Dropping the second third terms on the left side of (2.31 then applying the following version of Gronwall s inequality: we deduce if h(t C 1 + C 2 h(s ds, then h(t C 1 C 2 e C2t, (2.32 ξ m (t 2,Ω Ce CT( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + v 2 1,Ω 1 + u 2 1,Ω 2. (2.33
10 642 Q. DU, M.D. GUNZBURGER, L.S. HOU, J. LEE The estimates (2.33 (2.31 yield: for all t [,T], ξ m (s 2,Ω 1 ds + a 1 [ξ m (s, ξ m (s] ds Ce CT( (2.34 f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + v 2 1,Ω 1 + u 2 1,Ω 2 ξ m(s ds 2,Ω 2 + a 2 [ ξ m(s ds, ξ m(s ds] Ce CT( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + v 2 1,Ω 1 + u 2 1,Ω 2. (2.35 Combining (2.33 (2.35 utilizing the coercivity conditions (2.2 or (2.3 we arrive at the desired energy estimate (2.27. We next prove (2.28. For each given η Ψ with η 1,Ω 1, we write η as η = P m η +(η P m η where P m is defined by (2.2. Since ξ m(t Ψ m,wehave [[ξ m(t, η]] = [[ξ m(t,p m η]] + [[ξ m(t, η P m η]] = [[ξ m(t,p m η]]. From the last equation (2.15 we obtain [[ξ m(t, η]] = [[ξ m(t,p m η]] =[[f(t,p m η]] a 1 [ξ m (t,p m η] a 2 [u,p m η] a 2 [ ξ m(s ds, P m η]+a 1 [ξ m ( v,p m η] ( C f(t,ω + ξ m (t 1,Ω1 + ξ m(s ds 1,Ω2 ( u 1,Ω2 + u 1 1,Ω2 + v 1,Ω1 P m η 1,Ω. Thus, (2.28 follows from (2.36, (2.27 the fact that P m η 1,Ω η 1,Ω 1 (see Lemma 2.2. To prove (2.29, we arbitrarily choose a v V 1 with v 1,Ω1 1. We then define an η Ψ by η Ω1 = v η Ω2 =. Evidently we have that η 1,Ω = v 1,Ω1 1 [ξ m(t, v] Ω1 =[ξ m(t, η] Ω C ξ m(t Ψ. The last estimate together with (2.28 implies (2.29. We may prove (2.3 analogously Existence uniqueness of a weak solution. By passing to the limit in the Galerkin approximations, we may prove the existence of a solution ξ for the auxiliary problem (2.1 (2.11 which in turn directly yields the existence uniqueness of a solution to the fluid-structure interaction problem. Note that as in the Galerkin approximations, we consider in this subsection the existence of an auxiliary weak solution on the space Ψ so that the weak formulation does not contain the pressure term. Theorem 2.4. Assume that f 1, v, f 2, u u 1 satisfy (2.4. Then, there exists auniqueξ L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω H 1 (,T; Ψ which satisfies ξ Ω1 L 2 (,T; X 1, div ξ Ω1 =, ξ(s Ω2 ds L (,T; X 2 (2.37
11 FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION 643 (2.1 (2.12. Moreover, ξ(t 2,Ω + ξ 2 L 2 (,T ;H 1 (Ω + 1 ξ(s ds 2 H 1 (Ω 2 Ce CT( (2.38 f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 1,Ω 2 + v 2 1,Ω 1 for all t [,T], ξ 2 L 2 (,T ;Ψ Ce CT( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 1,Ω 2 + v 2 1,Ω 1, (2.39 t [ξ Ω1 ] 2 L 2 (,T ;V 1 Ce CT( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 1,Ω 2 + v 2 1,Ω 1, t [ξ Ω2 ] 2 L 2 (,T ;H 1 (Ω 2 Ce CT( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 1,Ω 2 + v 2 1,Ω 1. (2.4 (2.41 Proof: Letξ m of the form (2.14 be a solution of (2.15 (2.16. Using the initial condition the energy estimates (2.27 (2.28 we may extract subsequence of {ξ m }, still denoted by {ξ m }, such that ξ m ξ in L (,T; L 2 (Ω, ξ m ξ in L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω, ξ m Ω1 ξ Ω1 in L 2 (,T; H 1 (Ω 1, [ξ m (s] Ω2 ds [ξ(s] Ω2 ds in L (,T; H 1 (Ω 2 t ξ m t ξ in L 2 (,T; Ψ for some ξ L (,T; L 2 (Ω H 1 (,T; Ψ satisfying (2.37. These weak limits also imply [ξ m (s Ω1 ] Γ ds [ξ(s Ω1 ] Γ ds in L 2 (,T; H 1/2 (Γ [ξ m (s Ω2 ] Γ ds [ξ(s Ω2 ] Γ ds in L 2 (,T; H 1/2 (Γ. Passing to the limit in (2.17, we obtain (2.12. Also, passing to the limit in (2.27 (2.3 yields (2.38 (2.41. To prove ξ satisfies (2.1, we proceed as follows. We fix an integer N choose a function η C 1 ([,T]; Ψ havingtheform N η = d j (tψ j. (2.42 For each m>n, we integrate (2.15 with respect to t to obtain ρ 1 [ t ξ m, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [ t ξ m, η] Ω2 + a 1 [ξ m, η]+a 2 [ t ξ m(s ds, η] dt = ρ 1 [f 1, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [f 2, η] Ω2 a 2 [u, η]+a 1 [ξ m ( v, η] dt. j=1 (2.43
12 644 Q. DU, M.D. GUNZBURGER, L.S. HOU, J. LEE By passing to the limit as m, we find t ξ, η + a 1 [ξ, η+a 2 [ t ξ(s ds, η] dt = ρ 1 [f 1, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [f 2, η] Ω2 a 2 [u, η] dt. (2.44 Here we have used the fact that (see Lemma 2.2 ξ m ( v 1,Ω1 = P m ξ ξ 1,Ω1 P m ξ ξ 1,Ω as m Equality (2.44 then holds for all η L 2 (,T; Ψ, since functions of the form (2.42 are dense in L 2 (,T; Ψ. In particular, (2.44 implies (2.1. To verify the initial condition (2.11, we first note that the regularity ξ L 2 (,T; Ψ t ξ L 2 (,T; Ψ implies that ξ C([,T]; Ψ. On the one h, by choosing an η C 1 ([,T]; Ψ in (2.44 integrating by parts we have ξ, t η + a 1 [ξ, η]+a 2 [ t ξ m(s ds, η] dt (2.45 = [[f, η]] a 2 [u, η] dt + ξ(, η(. On the other h, from (2.43 we deduce ρ 1 [ξ m, t η] Ω1 ρ 2 [ξ m, t η] Ω2 + a 1 [ξ m, η]+a 2 [ t ξ m(s ds, η] dt = [[f, η]] a 2 [u, η]+a 1 [ξ m ( v, η] dt +[[ξ m (, η(]]. Passing to the limit in (2.46 yields ξ, t η + a 1 [ξ, η]+a 2 [ t ξ(s ds, η] dt = ρ 1 [f 1, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [f 2, η] Ω2 a 2 [u, η] dt +[[ξ, η(]]. (2.46 (2.47 Comparing (2.45 (2.47 we obtain ξ( ξ, η( = η( Ψ, (2.48 which is precisely (2.11 as η( Ψ is arbitrary. It remains to prove the uniqueness. The following proof is adapted from [9, pp ]. Assume ξ ξ are two solutions of (2.1 (2.11. Setting θ = ξ ξ we have that θ L 2 (,T; Φ, θ L 2 (,T; Ψ, θ, η + a 1 [θ, η]+a 2 [ θ(s ds, η] = η Ψ, a.e. t, (2.49 θ( =. (2.5 We define ζ = θ(s ds. Then ζ L 2 (,T; Ψ, ζ L 2 (,T; Φ, ζ L 2 (,T; Ψ, ζ, η + a 1 [ζ, η]+a 2 [ζ, η] = η Ψ, a.e. t, (2.51 ζ( = ζ ( =, (2.52 where ( ( denotes the first second time derivatives, respectively. We note that from the regularity ζ L 2 (,T; Ψ H 1 (,T; Ψ [3, p.176, Lemma
13 FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ] we deduce that ζ C([,T]; Φ; indeed, the spaces Ψ, Φ Ψ satisfy that Ψ Φ Ψ that the duality pairing between Ψ Ψ is generated from the weighted L 2 inner product on Φ. We arbitrarily fix a t (,T] define { t ζ(τ dτ, η(t = t t [, t], t [ t, T ]. Then η(t Ψ for every t [,T] equation (2.51 yields t ( ζ, η + a 1 [ζ, η]+a 2 [ζ, η] dt =. Since ζ ( = η( t =, we obtain after integrating by parts in the first two terms that t ( [[ζ, η ]] a 1 [ζ, η ] a 2 [η, η] dt =. Noting that η (t = ζ(t fort [, t] weareledto t 1 d ( t [[ζ, ζ]] a 2 [η, η] dt = a 1 [ζ, ζ] dt 2 dt so that 1 2 [[ζ( t, ζ( t]] + 1 t 2 a 2[η(, η(] = a 1 [ζ, ζ] dt. This implies that ζ( t =. As t is arbitrary, we deduce that ζ = in [,T] Ω. Hence, ξ ξ = ζ = in [,T] Ω. Remark: In the proof for uniqueness, it is not known whether ξ(t ξ(t belong to Ψ for almost every t. Thus we cannot simply set η = θ(t in (2.49. If ξ is the solution of (2.1 (2.12 that is guaranteed to exist by Theorem 2.4, then by setting v = ξ Ω1 u = u + ξ(s Ω 2 ds we immediately obtain the existence of a weak solution (v, u for the divergence-free formulation of the fluidstructure interaction problem. Theorem 2.5. Assume that f 1, v, f 2, u u 1 satisfy (2.4. Then, there exists auniquepair(v, u L 2 (,T; X 1 L 2 (,T; X 2 which satisfies (2.6 (2.8, where (2.6 holds in the sense of distributions on (,T. Moreover, v(t 2,Ω + u t(t 2,Ω + v 2 L 2 (,T ;H 1 (Ω + 1 u(t 2 H 1 (Ω 2 Ce CT( (2.53 f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 1,Ω 2 + v 2 1,Ω 1 for all t [,T] v t 2 L 2 (,T ;V 1 + u tt 2 L 2 (,T ;H 1 (Ω 2 Ce CT ( f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 1,Ω 2 + v 2 1,Ω 1. (2.54
14 646 Q. DU, M.D. GUNZBURGER, L.S. HOU, J. LEE 3. The existence of a strong solution an L 2 pressure. Under additional regularity compatibility assumptions on the data, we may prove stronger energy estimates for the Galerkin solutions {ξ m }. Such a priori estimates will allow us to derive regularity results for the solution of (2.1 (2.11 to show the existence of a corresponding pressure field Strong energy estimates. Theorem 3.1. Assume that f 1, v, f 2, u u 1 satisfy (2.4 t f i L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω i, i=1, 2, (3.1 v H 2 (Ω 1, u 1 H 2 (Ω 2, u H 2 (Ω 2. Assume further that there exists a p H 1 (Ω 1 such that ( p n 1 µ 1 ( v + v T Γ n 1 (3.2 = (µ 2 ( u + u T Γ n 2 +(λ 2 + µ 2 (div u n 2 where n i denotes the outward-pointing normal along Ω i. Then, for each integer m>, the solution ξ m of (2.15 (2.16 satisfies the estimate ξ m(t 2,Ω + ξ m 2 L 2 (,T ;H 1 (Ω + 1 ξ m(s ds 2 H 1 (Ω 2 Ce CT( (3.3 f 2 H 1 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 2,Ω 2 + v 2 2,Ω 1 + p 2 1,Ω 1 for all t [,T]. Proof: Defining ζ m = t ξ m differentiating (2.15 we obtain that for each t [,T], ρ 1 [ t ζ m, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [ t ζ m, η] Ω2 + a 1 [ζ m, η]+a 2 [ ζ m(s ds, η] (3.4 = ρ 1 [ t f 1, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [ t f 2, η] Ω2 a 2 [ξ m (, η] η Ψ m. Setting η = ζ m (t in (2.15 repeating the steps for the derivation of (2.31 we have ζ m (t 2,Ω + a 1 [ζ m (t, ζ m (t] dt + a 2 [ ζ m(s ds, ζ m(s ds] (3.5 C ( ζ m ( 2,Ω + t f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + ξ m( 2 1,Ω2 so that using Gronwall s inequality (2.32 (2.16 we deduce ζ m (t 2,Ω Ce CT( ξ m( 2,Ω 1 + t f 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + v 2 1,Ω 1 + u 1 2 1,Ω 2. (3.6 The term ξ m( 2,Ω 1 can be estimated as follows. Evaluating (2.15 at t = then setting η = ξ m( using (2.16 the divergence-free property of Ψ m,we deduce [[ξ m(, ξ m(]] = [[f(, ξ m(]] a 2 [u, ξ m(] a 1 [v, ξ m(] b[ξ m(,p ] =[[f(, ξ m(]] + [ u + (div u, ξ m(] Ω2 +[ v p, ξ m(] Ω1 ( + µ 2 ( u + u T n 2 (λ 2 + µ 2 (div u n 2 Γ +p n 1 ( v + v T n 1 ξ m( dγ
15 FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION 647 so that upon substituting (3.2 into the last estimate we have ( [[ξ m(, ξ m(]] C f( 2 L 2 (Ω + v 2 2,Ω+ p 2 1,Ω 1 + u 2 2,Ω [[ξ m(, ξ m(]]. This last relation the estimate f( 2 L 2 (Ω ( f C 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + tf 2 L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω lead us to ( [[ξ m(, ξ m(]] C v 2 2,Ω + p 2 1,Ω 1 + u 2 2,Ω + f 2 H 1 (,T ;L 2 (Ω. From (3.5, (3.6 the last inequality we obtain (3.3. Remark: The term a 1 [ξ m ( v, η] is added to the Galerkin approximation (2.15 to provide the cancellation of a 1 [ξ m (, η] in the estimation of [[ξ m(, ξ m(]]. This extra term vanishes in the limit as m thus does not affect the continuous weak form. As an immediate consequence of Theorems we obtain the following strong a priori estimates for the solution to (2.6 (2.8. Theorem 3.2. Assume the hypotheses of Theorem 3.1 hold. Then, the solution (v, u to (2.6 (2.8 satisfies the estimate t v(t 2,Ω 1 + tt u(t 2,Ω 2 + t v 2 L 2 (,T ;X 1 + tu(t 2 1,Ω 2 Ce CT( f 2 H 1 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 2,Ω 2 + v 2 2,Ω 1 + p 2 1,Ω 1. ( The existence of a pressure. With the existence of a strong solution guaranteed by Theorem 3.2, it is now possible for us to establish the existence of an L 2 integrable pressure. To find a pressure that satisfies (2.5, we need to show the existence of a p L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω 1 such that b[η,p]= ρ 1 [v t, η] Ω1 a 1 [v, η] ρ 2 [u tt, η] Ω2 a 2 [u, η] (3.8 +ρ 1 [f 1, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [f 2, η] Ω2 η H 1 (Ω, a.e. t. Using the auxiliary formulation (2.1, we see that this is equivalent to showing there exists a p L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω 1 which satisfies ρ 1 [ξ t, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [ξ t, η] Ω2 + b[η,p]+a 1 [ξ, η]+a 2 [ ξ(s ds, η] (3.9 = ρ 1 [f 1, η] Ω1 + ρ 2 [f 2, η] Ω2 a 2 [u, η] η H 1 (Ω, a.e. t. By virtue of [17, p.58, Lemma 4.1], the proof of the existence of a pressure p for (3.9 is reduced to showing the following inf-sup condition for the pair of function spaces {H 1 (Ω,Q 1 }, where Q 1 = L 2 (Ω 1 : inf sup q Q 1 η H 1 (Ω b[η,q] η 1,Ω q,ω1 C. (3.1 The proof of this inf-sup condition follows exactly that of [1, Lemma 3.1], though the inf-sup condition established in that Lemma is for a slightly different pair of function spaces. Theorem 3.3. The inf-sup condition (3.1 holds.
16 648 Q. DU, M.D. GUNZBURGER, L.S. HOU, J. LEE Proof: Obviously, it suffices to show that q Q 1, an η Ψ such that div η Ω1 = q η 1,Ω C q,ω1. (3.11 Let q Q 1 be given. We define q L 2 (Ω = {s L 2 (Ω Ω sdω=} by q Ω 1 = q q Ω2 = (1/ Ω 2 Ω 1 qdx. By virtue of [17, p.24, Corollary 2.4], there exists a unique η H 1 (Ω such that div η = q, η 1,Ω C q,ω C q,ω1. This proves (3.11, which in turn implies (3.1. From [17, p.58, Lemma 4.1] Theorems 2.5, we readily deduce the following result. Theorem 3.4. Assume the hypotheses of Theorem 3.1 hold. Then, there exists a unique triplet (v,p,u which possesses the regularity v L (,T; L 2 (Ω 1 L 2 (,T; X 1, u L (,T; X 2, p L 2 (,T; L 2 (Ω 1 v t L (,T; L 2 (Ω 1 L 2 (,T; X 1, u t L (,T; X 2, u tt L (,T; L 2 (Ω 2 satisfies equations (2.5, (2.7, (2.8 b[v,q]= q L 2 (Ω 1, a.e. t. Moreover, the estimates (2.53, (3.7 hold. p L 2 (,T ;L 2 (Ω 1 Ce CT( f 2 H 1 (,T ;L 2 (Ω + u 2 2,Ω 2 + v 2 2,Ω 1 + p 2 1,Ω 1 For a strong solution in the sense of Theorem 3.4, the velocity interface condition holds in the strong sense v Γ = u t Γ in L 2 (,T; H 1/2 (Γ v Γ = u t Γ in H 1/2 (Γ, a.e. t. Also,itcanbeinferredthat v C([,T]; X 1, u C([,T]; X 2 t u C([,T]; L 2 (Ω 2 so that the initial conditions (2.7 hold in the respective strong senses. Remark. The inf-sup condition (3.1 is equivalent to the following inf-sup condition for the space pair {X 1,Q 1 }: b[v,q] inf sup C. (3.12 q Q 1 v X 1 v 1,Ω1 q,ω1 To see this, let the extension operator E : X 1 H 1 (Ω be defined as follows: for every z X 1,(Ez Ω1 = z (Ez Ω2 = z where z X 2 is the solution of [ z, w] Ω = w H 1 (Ω 2, z Γ2 =, z Γ = z Γ. (3.13 (For each given z X 1, the definition of X 1 ensures that there exists an η H 1 (Ω such that η Γ = z Γ so that (3.13 possesses a unique solution z X 2. Stard elliptic estimates (e.g., [17, p.12] yields Ez 1,Ω C (Ez Ω1 1,Ω1 + (Ez Ω2 1,Ω2 C( z 1,Ω1 + z 1/2,Γ C z 1,Ω1
17 FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION 649 for all z X 1. Then, for every q Q 1 we have sup η H 1 (Ω b[η,q] sup q,ω1 η 1,Ω z X 1 b[ez,q] C sup z X 1 b[ez,q] q,ω1 Ez 1,Ω b[z,q] = C sup q,ω1 z 1,Ω1 z X 1 q,ω1 z 1,Ω1 b[η,q] b[η,q] b[z,q] sup sup sup ; η H 1 (Ω q,ω1 η 1,Ω η H 1 (Ω q,ω1 η 1,Ω1 z X 1 q,ω1 z 1,Ω1 in other words, (3.1 (3.12 are indeed equivalent. The inf-sup condition (3.12 is useful for recovering the pressure field from the fluid equations. As a side remark, we point out that this inf-sup condition is also useful for analyzing the Stokes problems with mixed velocity/stress boundary conditions. 4. Concluding remarks. We have demonstrated the existence uniqueness of weak (fluid velocity solid displacement solutions of a fluid-structure interaction problem involving a linear, viscous, incompressible fluid an elastic solid. We have considered the particular case of a solid that undergoes only infinitesimal elastic displacements but whose velocity is large enough so that the fluid structure remain fully coupled. Under additional smoothness assumptions on the data, we have also demonstrated the existence of an L 2 integrable fluid pressure. In forthcoming work, we will consider finite element approximations of our model fluid-structure interaction problem, in future work, we will consider the extension of our results to nonlinear fluid models such as the Navier-Stokes equations to optimization control problems involving the interactions between fluids structures. REFERENCES [1] A. Bermúdez, R. Durán R. Rodríguez (1998, Finite element analysis of compressible incompressible fluid-solid systems. Math. Comp., 67, pp [2] F. Blom (1998, A monolithical fluid-structure interaction algorithm applied to the piston problem. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 167, pp [3] J. Boujot (1987, Mathematical formulation of fluid-structure interaction problems. RAIRO Modél. Math. Anal. Numér., 21, pp [4] C. Conca M. Durán (1995, A numerical study of a spectral problem in solid-fluid type structures. Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations, 11, pp [5] C.Conca,J.Martín J. Tucsnak (1999, Motion of a rigid body in a viscous fluid. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 328, pp [6] S. Dasser (1995, A Penalization method for the homogenization of a mixed fluid-structure problem. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 32, pp [7] B. Desjardins M. Esteban (2, On weak solutions for fluid-rigid structure interaction: compressible incompressible models. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 25, pp [8] D. Errate, M. Esteban Y. Maday (1994, Couplage fluid-structure. Un modéle simplifié en dimension 1, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 318, pp [9] L. Evans (1998, Partial Differential Equations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Isl. [1] C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne P. LeTallec (1998, Load motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: momentum energy conservation, optimal discretization application to aeroelasticity. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 157, pp [11] F. Flori P. Orenga (2, Fluid-structure interaction: analysis of a 3-D compressible model. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire, 17, pp
18 65 Q. DU, M.D. GUNZBURGER, L.S. HOU, J. LEE [12] F. Flori P. Orenga (1998, On a fluid-structure interaction problem. Trends in Applications of Mathematics to Mechanics (Nice, pp [13] F. Flori P. Orenga (1999, Analysis of a nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem in velocity-displacement formulation. Nonlinear Anal., 35, pp [14] F. Flori P. Orenga (1999, On a nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem defined on a domain depending on time. Nonlinear Anal. 38, pp [15] L. Gastaldi (1996, Mixed finite element methods in fluid structure system. Numer. Math., 74, pp [16] J.-F. Gerbeau B. Perthame (21, Derivation of viscous Saint-Venant system for laminar shallow water: numerical validation. Discrete Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series B, 1, pp [17] V. Girault P. Raviart (1986, Finite Element Methods for Navier-Stokes Equations, Springer, Berlin. [18] C. Grmont (1998, Existence uniqueness for a two-dimensional steady-state fluidstructure interaction problem. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 326, pp [19] C. Grmont Y. Maday (1998, Existence of solutions for a two-dimensional unsteady fluid-structure interaction problem. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 326, pp [2] C. Grmont Y. Maday (2, Existence for an unsteady fluid-structure interaction problem. M 2 ANMath.Model.Numer.Anal., 34, pp [21] M. Gunzburger, H.-C. Lee G. Seregin (2, Global existence of weak solutions for incompressible viscous flow around a moving rigid body in three dimensions; J. Math. Fluid Mech., 2, pp [22] G. Hsiao, R. Kleinman G. Roach (2, Weak solutions of fluid-solid interaction problems. Math. Nachr., 218, pp [23] P. LeTallec S. Mani (2, Numerical analysis of a linearized fluid-structure interaction problem. Numer. Math., 87, pp [24] C. Liu J. Shen (21, On liquid crystal flows with free-slip boundary conditions. Discrete Continuous Dynamical Systems, 7, pp [25] S. Micu E. Zuazua (1998, Asymptotics for the spectrum of a fluid/structure hybrid system arising in the control of noise. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 29, pp [26] P. Panagiotopoulos (1985, Inequality Problems in Mechanics Applications, Birkháuser, Boston. [27] R. Rodríguez J. Solomin (1996, The order of convergence of eigenfrequences in finite element approximations of fluid-structure interaction problems. Math. Comp., 65, pp [28] M. Rumpf (1998, On equilibria in the interaction of fluids elastic solids. Theory of the Navier-Stokes equations, Ser. Adv. Math. Appl. Sci., 47, pp [29] R. Schulkes (1992, Interactions of an elastic solid with a viscous fluid: eigenmode analysis. J. Comput. Phys., 1, pp [3] R. Temam (21, Navier-Stokes Equations, AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, Rhode Isl. Received March 22; revised July 22; final version December 22. address: qdu@math.psu.edu address: gunzburg@csit.fsu.edu address: hou@math.iastate.edu address: jeehyunl@rew.cmu.edu
PSEUDO-COMPRESSIBILITY METHODS FOR THE UNSTEADY INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS
PSEUDO-COMPRESSIBILITY METHODS FOR THE UNSTEADY INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS Jie Shen Department of Mathematics, Penn State University University Par, PA 1680, USA Abstract. We present in this
More informationON LIQUID CRYSTAL FLOWS WITH FREE-SLIP BOUNDARY CONDITIONS. Chun Liu and Jie Shen
DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS Website: http://aimsciences.org DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS Volume 7, Number2, April2001 pp. 307 318 ON LIQUID CRYSTAL FLOWS WITH FREE-SLIP BOUNDARY CONDITIONS Chun Liu and Jie Shen Department
More informationEXISTENCE AND REGULARITY OF SOLUTIONS FOR STOKES SYSTEMS WITH NON-SMOOTH BOUNDARY DATA IN A POLYHEDRON
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2017 (2017), No. 147, pp. 1 10. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu EXISTENCE AND REGULARITY OF SOLUTIONS FOR
More informationOn Pressure Stabilization Method and Projection Method for Unsteady Navier-Stokes Equations 1
On Pressure Stabilization Method and Projection Method for Unsteady Navier-Stokes Equations 1 Jie Shen Department of Mathematics, Penn State University University Park, PA 1682 Abstract. We present some
More informationLecture Note III: Least-Squares Method
Lecture Note III: Least-Squares Method Zhiqiang Cai October 4, 004 In this chapter, we shall present least-squares methods for second-order scalar partial differential equations, elastic equations of solids,
More informationA NOTE ON THE LADYŽENSKAJA-BABUŠKA-BREZZI CONDITION
A NOTE ON THE LADYŽENSKAJA-BABUŠKA-BREZZI CONDITION JOHNNY GUZMÁN, ABNER J. SALGADO, AND FRANCISCO-JAVIER SAYAS Abstract. The analysis of finite-element-like Galerkin discretization techniques for the
More informationA Least-Squares Finite Element Approximation for the Compressible Stokes Equations
A Least-Squares Finite Element Approximation for the Compressible Stokes Equations Zhiqiang Cai, 1 Xiu Ye 1 Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, 1395 Mathematical Science Building, West Lafayette,
More informationKonstantinos Chrysafinos 1 and L. Steven Hou Introduction
Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis Modélisation Mathématique et Analyse Numérique Will be set by the publisher ANALYSIS AND APPROXIMATIONS OF THE EVOLUTIONARY STOKES EQUATIONS WITH INHOMOGENEOUS
More informationERROR ESTIMATES FOR SEMI-DISCRETE GAUGE METHODS FOR THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS : FIRST-ORDER SCHEMES
MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION Volume, Number, Pages S 5-578XX- ERROR ESTIMATES FOR SEMI-DISCRETE GAUGE METHODS FOR THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS : FIRST-ORDER SCHEMES RICARDO H. NOCHETTO AND JAE-HONG PYO Abstract.
More informationOn a Suitable Weak Solution of the Navier Stokes Equation with the Generalized Impermeability Boundary Conditions
Proceedings of the 3rd IASME/WSEAS Int. Conf. on FLUID DYNAMICS & AERODYNAMICS, Corfu, Greece, August -, 5 pp36-41 On a Suitable Weak Solution of the Navier Stokes Equation with the Generalized Impermeability
More informationAuthor(s) Huang, Feimin; Matsumura, Akitaka; Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(1)
Title On the stability of contact Navier-Stokes equations with discont free b Authors Huang, Feimin; Matsumura, Akitaka; Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 4 Issue 4-3 Date Text Version publisher URL
More informationExistence of minimizers for the pure displacement problem in nonlinear elasticity
Existence of minimizers for the pure displacement problem in nonlinear elasticity Cristinel Mardare Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, Paris, F-75005 France Abstract
More informationSECOND-ORDER FULLY DISCRETIZED PROJECTION METHOD FOR INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS
Tenth MSU Conference on Differential Equations and Computational Simulations. Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 3 (06), pp. 9 0. ISSN: 07-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or
More informationENERGY NORM A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR MIXED FINITE ELEMENT METHODS
ENERGY NORM A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR MIXED FINITE ELEMENT METHODS CARLO LOVADINA AND ROLF STENBERG Abstract The paper deals with the a-posteriori error analysis of mixed finite element methods
More informationNew Discretizations of Turbulent Flow Problems
New Discretizations of Turbulent Flow Problems Carolina Cardoso Manica and Songul Kaya Merdan Abstract A suitable discretization for the Zeroth Order Model in Large Eddy Simulation of turbulent flows is
More informationAMS subject classifications. Primary, 65N15, 65N30, 76D07; Secondary, 35B45, 35J50
A SIMPLE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR THE STOKES EQUATIONS LIN MU AND XIU YE Abstract. The goal of this paper is to introduce a simple finite element method to solve the Stokes equations. This method is in
More informationThe Navier-Stokes Equations with Time Delay. Werner Varnhorn. Faculty of Mathematics University of Kassel, Germany
The Navier-Stokes Equations with Time Delay Werner Varnhorn Faculty of Mathematics University of Kassel, Germany AMS: 35 (A 35, D 5, K 55, Q 1), 65 M 1, 76 D 5 Abstract In the present paper we use a time
More informationYongdeok Kim and Seki Kim
J. Korean Math. Soc. 39 (00), No. 3, pp. 363 376 STABLE LOW ORDER NONCONFORMING QUADRILATERAL FINITE ELEMENTS FOR THE STOKES PROBLEM Yongdeok Kim and Seki Kim Abstract. Stability result is obtained for
More informationOn Friedrichs inequality, Helmholtz decomposition, vector potentials, and the div-curl lemma. Ben Schweizer 1
On Friedrichs inequality, Helmholtz decomposition, vector potentials, and the div-curl lemma Ben Schweizer 1 January 16, 2017 Abstract: We study connections between four different types of results that
More informationELLIPTIC RECONSTRUCTION AND A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS
ELLIPTIC RECONSTRUCTION AND A POSTERIORI ERROR ESTIMATES FOR PARABOLIC PROBLEMS CHARALAMBOS MAKRIDAKIS AND RICARDO H. NOCHETTO Abstract. It is known that the energy technique for a posteriori error analysis
More informationPREPRINT 2010:23. A nonconforming rotated Q 1 approximation on tetrahedra PETER HANSBO
PREPRINT 2010:23 A nonconforming rotated Q 1 approximation on tetrahedra PETER HANSBO Department of Mathematical Sciences Division of Mathematics CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG
More informationUniversität des Saarlandes. Fachrichtung 6.1 Mathematik
Universität des Saarlandes U N I V E R S I T A S S A R A V I E N I S S Fachrichtung 6.1 Mathematik Preprint Nr. 155 A posteriori error estimates for stationary slow flows of power-law fluids Michael Bildhauer,
More informationNONSTANDARD NONCONFORMING APPROXIMATION OF THE STOKES PROBLEM, I: PERIODIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
NONSTANDARD NONCONFORMING APPROXIMATION OF THE STOKES PROBLEM, I: PERIODIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS J.-L. GUERMOND 1, Abstract. This paper analyzes a nonstandard form of the Stokes problem where the mass conservation
More informationA Mixed Nonconforming Finite Element for Linear Elasticity
A Mixed Nonconforming Finite Element for Linear Elasticity Zhiqiang Cai, 1 Xiu Ye 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-1395 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics,
More informationOn the local existence for an active scalar equation in critical regularity setting
On the local existence for an active scalar equation in critical regularity setting Walter Rusin Department of Mathematics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 7478 Fei Wang Department of Mathematics,
More informationA Finite Element Method Using Singular Functions for Poisson Equations: Mixed Boundary Conditions
A Finite Element Method Using Singular Functions for Poisson Equations: Mixed Boundary Conditions Zhiqiang Cai Seokchan Kim Sangdong Kim Sooryun Kong Abstract In [7], we proposed a new finite element method
More informationON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM
ON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM OLEG ZUBELEVICH DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS THE BUDGET AND TREASURY ACADEMY OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 7, ZLATOUSTINSKY MALIY PER.,
More informationLocal null controllability of the N-dimensional Navier-Stokes system with N-1 scalar controls in an arbitrary control domain
Local null controllability of the N-dimensional Navier-Stokes system with N-1 scalar controls in an arbitrary control domain Nicolás Carreño Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 UMR 7598 Laboratoire
More informationLECTURE # 0 BASIC NOTATIONS AND CONCEPTS IN THE THEORY OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS (PDES)
LECTURE # 0 BASIC NOTATIONS AND CONCEPTS IN THE THEORY OF PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS (PDES) RAYTCHO LAZAROV 1 Notations and Basic Functional Spaces Scalar function in R d, d 1 will be denoted by u,
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL AND STRANGE TERM FOR A STOKES PROBLEM IN PERFORATED DOMAINS
PORTUGALIAE MATHEMATICA Vol. 59 Fasc. 2 2002 Nova Série OPTIMAL CONTROL AND STRANGE TERM FOR A STOKES PROBLEM IN PERFORATED DOMAINS J. Saint Jean Paulin and H. Zoubairi Abstract: We study a problem of
More informationSTOKES PROBLEM WITH SEVERAL TYPES OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN AN EXTERIOR DOMAIN
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2013 2013, No. 196, pp. 1 28. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu STOKES PROBLEM
More informationGENERIC SOLVABILITY FOR THE 3-D NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS WITH NONREGULAR FORCE
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2(2), No. 78, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 172-6691. UR: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) GENERIC SOVABIITY
More informationStability of an abstract wave equation with delay and a Kelvin Voigt damping
Stability of an abstract wave equation with delay and a Kelvin Voigt damping University of Monastir/UPSAY/LMV-UVSQ Joint work with Serge Nicaise and Cristina Pignotti Outline 1 Problem The idea Stability
More informationA Remark on the Regularity of Solutions of Maxwell s Equations on Lipschitz Domains
A Remark on the Regularity of Solutions of Maxwell s Equations on Lipschitz Domains Martin Costabel Abstract Let u be a vector field on a bounded Lipschitz domain in R 3, and let u together with its divergence
More informationLECTURE 1: SOURCES OF ERRORS MATHEMATICAL TOOLS A PRIORI ERROR ESTIMATES. Sergey Korotov,
LECTURE 1: SOURCES OF ERRORS MATHEMATICAL TOOLS A PRIORI ERROR ESTIMATES Sergey Korotov, Institute of Mathematics Helsinki University of Technology, Finland Academy of Finland 1 Main Problem in Mathematical
More information1 Introduction. J.-L. GUERMOND and L. QUARTAPELLE 1 On incremental projection methods
J.-L. GUERMOND and L. QUARTAPELLE 1 On incremental projection methods 1 Introduction Achieving high order time-accuracy in the approximation of the incompressible Navier Stokes equations by means of fractional-step
More informationA LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE. 1.
A LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE THOMAS CHEN AND NATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We prove a Beale-Kato-Majda criterion
More informationCONNECTIONS BETWEEN A CONJECTURE OF SCHIFFER S AND INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID MECHANICS
CONNECTIONS BETWEEN A CONJECTURE OF SCHIFFER S AND INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID MECHANICS JAMES P. KELLIHER Abstract. We demonstrate connections that exists between a conjecture of Schiffer s (which is equivalent
More informationON THE UNIQUENESS IN THE 3D NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS
ON THE UNIQUENESS IN THE 3D NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS Abdelhafid Younsi To cite this version: Abdelhafid Younsi. ON THE UNIQUENESS IN THE 3D NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS. 4 pages. 212. HAL Id:
More informationA Multigrid Method for Two Dimensional Maxwell Interface Problems
A Multigrid Method for Two Dimensional Maxwell Interface Problems Susanne C. Brenner Department of Mathematics and Center for Computation & Technology Louisiana State University USA JSA 2013 Outline A
More informationA Two-Grid Stabilization Method for Solving the Steady-State Navier-Stokes Equations
A Two-Grid Stabilization Method for Solving the Steady-State Navier-Stokes Equations Songul Kaya and Béatrice Rivière Abstract We formulate a subgrid eddy viscosity method for solving the steady-state
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO THE CAHN-HILLIARD/ALLEN-CAHN EQUATION WITH DEGENERATE MOBILITY
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 216 216), No. 329, pp. 1 22. ISSN: 172-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO THE CAHN-HILLIARD/ALLEN-CAHN
More informationSYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 21, 2003, 211 226 SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S.
More informationExistence and uniqueness of the weak solution for a contact problem
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 9 (216), 186 199 Research Article Existence and uniqueness of the weak solution for a contact problem Amar Megrous a, Ammar Derbazi b, Mohamed
More informationModels. A.Dunca and Y.Epshteyn
On the Adams-Stolz Deconvolution LES Models A.Dunca and Y.Epshteyn Abstract We consider a family of LES models with arbitrarily high consistency error O(δ 2N+2 ) for N = 1, 2, 3.. that are based on the
More informationNon-Conforming Finite Element Methods for Nonmatching Grids in Three Dimensions
Non-Conforming Finite Element Methods for Nonmatching Grids in Three Dimensions Wayne McGee and Padmanabhan Seshaiyer Texas Tech University, Mathematics and Statistics (padhu@math.ttu.edu) Summary. In
More informationA generalised Ladyzhenskaya inequality and a coupled parabolic-elliptic problem
A generalised Ladyzhenskaya inequality and a coupled parabolic-elliptic problem Dave McCormick joint work with James Robinson and José Rodrigo Mathematics and Statistics Centre for Doctoral Training University
More informationAsymptotic Behavior of a Hyperbolic-parabolic Coupled System Arising in Fluid-structure Interaction
International Series of Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 154, 445 455 c 2006 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland Asymptotic Behavior of a Hyperbolic-parabolic Coupled System Arising in Fluid-structure Interaction
More informationLOCAL WELL-POSEDNESS FOR AN ERICKSEN-LESLIE S PARABOLIC-HYPERBOLIC COMPRESSIBLE NON-ISOTHERMAL MODEL FOR LIQUID CRYSTALS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 017 (017), No. 3, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu LOCAL WELL-POSEDNESS FOR AN ERICKSEN-LESLIE S
More informationAn optimal control problem governed by implicit evolution quasi-variational inequalities
Annals of the University of Bucharest (mathematical series) 4 (LXII) (213), 157 166 An optimal control problem governed by implicit evolution quasi-variational inequalities Anca Capatina and Claudia Timofte
More informationb i (x) u + c(x)u = f in Ω,
SIAM J. NUMER. ANAL. Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 1938 1953 c 2002 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics SUBOPTIMAL AND OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE IN MIXED FINITE ELEMENT METHODS ALAN DEMLOW Abstract. An elliptic
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.na] 29 Feb 2016
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WEAK GALERKIN FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR THE BIHARMONIC EQUATION LIN MU, JUNPING WANG, AND XIU YE Abstract. arxiv:1602.08817v1 [math.na] 29 Feb 2016 The weak Galerkin (WG)
More informationPERIODIC PROBLEMS WITH φ-laplacian INVOLVING NON-ORDERED LOWER AND UPPER FUNCTIONS
Fixed Point Theory, Volume 6, No. 1, 25, 99-112 http://www.math.ubbcluj.ro/ nodeacj/sfptcj.htm PERIODIC PROBLEMS WITH φ-laplacian INVOLVING NON-ORDERED LOWER AND UPPER FUNCTIONS IRENA RACHŮNKOVÁ1 AND MILAN
More informationON SOME ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS IN UNBOUNDED DOMAINS
Chin. Ann. Math.??B(?), 200?, 1 20 DOI: 10.1007/s11401-007-0001-x ON SOME ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS IN UNBOUNDED DOMAINS Michel CHIPOT Abstract We present a method allowing to obtain existence of a solution for
More informationFourth Order Convergence of Compact Finite Difference Solver for 2D Incompressible Flow
Fourth Order Convergence of Compact Finite Difference Solver for D Incompressible Flow Cheng Wang 1 Institute for Scientific Computing and Applied Mathematics and Department of Mathematics, Indiana University,
More informationCONVERGENCE OF FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR THE GENERALIZED SOLUTIONS OF SOBOLEV EQUATIONS
J. Korean Math. Soc. 34 (1997), No. 3, pp. 515 531 CONVERGENCE OF FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR THE GENERALIZED SOLUTIONS OF SOBOLEV EQUATIONS S. K. CHUNG, A.K.PANI AND M. G. PARK ABSTRACT. In this paper,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 21 Dec 2016
arxiv:1612.07051v1 [math.ap] 21 Dec 2016 On the extension to slip boundary conditions of a Bae and Choe regularity criterion for the Navier-Stokes equations. The half-space case. H. Beirão da Veiga, Department
More informationObstacle problems and isotonicity
Obstacle problems and isotonicity Thomas I. Seidman Revised version for NA-TMA: NA-D-06-00007R1+ [June 6, 2006] Abstract For variational inequalities of an abstract obstacle type, a comparison principle
More informationA Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations
A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations Michael Röckner Reference: C. Prevot, M. Röckner: Springer LN in Math. 1905, Berlin (2007) And see the references therein for the original
More informationLIFE SPAN OF BLOW-UP SOLUTIONS FOR HIGHER-ORDER SEMILINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 21(21), No. 17, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 172-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu LIFE SPAN OF BLOW-UP
More informationGlowinski Pironneau method for the 3D ω-ψ equations
280 GUERMOND AND QUARTAPELLE Glowinski Pironneau method for the 3D ω-ψ equations Jean-Luc Guermond and Luigi Quartapelle 1 LIMSI CNRS, Orsay, France, and Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano,
More informationINCOMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS IN THIN DOMAINS WITH NAVIER FRICTION BOUNDARY CONDITIONS (II) Luan Thach Hoang. IMA Preprint Series #2406.
INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUIDS IN THIN DOMAINS WITH NAVIER FRICTION BOUNDARY CONDITIONS II By Luan Thach Hoang IMA Preprint Series #2406 August 2012 INSTITUTE FOR MATHEMATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS UNIVERSITY OF
More informationAppendix A Functional Analysis
Appendix A Functional Analysis A.1 Metric Spaces, Banach Spaces, and Hilbert Spaces Definition A.1. Metric space. Let X be a set. A map d : X X R is called metric on X if for all x,y,z X it is i) d(x,y)
More informationREMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID
REMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID DRAGOŞ IFTIMIE AND JAMES P. KELLIHER Abstract. In [Math. Ann. 336 (2006), 449-489] the authors consider the two dimensional
More informationAnalysis of a non-isothermal model for nematic liquid crystals
Analysis of a non-isothermal model for nematic liquid crystals E. Rocca Università degli Studi di Milano 25th IFIP TC 7 Conference 2011 - System Modeling and Optimization Berlin, September 12-16, 2011
More informationVANISHING VISCOSITY LIMIT FOR THE 3D NONHOMOGENEOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATION WITH SPECIAL SLIP BOUNDARY CONDITION
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2017 (2017), No. 169, pp. 1 13. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu VANISHING VISCOSITY LIMIT FOR THE 3D NONHOMOGENEOUS
More informationStrong Stabilization of the System of Linear Elasticity by a Dirichlet Boundary Feedback
To appear in IMA J. Appl. Math. Strong Stabilization of the System of Linear Elasticity by a Dirichlet Boundary Feedback Wei-Jiu Liu and Miroslav Krstić Department of AMES University of California at San
More informationSolvability of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations on a Moving Domain with Surface Tension. 1. Introduction
Solvability of the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations on a Moving Domain with Surface Tension Hantaek Bae Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University 251 Mercer Street, New York,
More informationScientific Computing WS 2018/2019. Lecture 15. Jürgen Fuhrmann Lecture 15 Slide 1
Scientific Computing WS 2018/2019 Lecture 15 Jürgen Fuhrmann juergen.fuhrmann@wias-berlin.de Lecture 15 Slide 1 Lecture 15 Slide 2 Problems with strong formulation Writing the PDE with divergence and gradient
More informationFundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Elementary Viscous Flow
Fundamentals of Fluid Dynamics: Elementary Viscous Flow Introductory Course on Multiphysics Modelling TOMASZ G. ZIELIŃSKI bluebox.ippt.pan.pl/ tzielins/ Institute of Fundamental Technological Research
More information1 The Stokes System. ρ + (ρv) = ρ g(x), and the conservation of momentum has the form. ρ v (λ 1 + µ 1 ) ( v) µ 1 v + p = ρ f(x) in Ω.
1 The Stokes System The motion of a (possibly compressible) homogeneous fluid is described by its density ρ(x, t), pressure p(x, t) and velocity v(x, t). Assume that the fluid is barotropic, i.e., the
More informationGlobal well-posedness of the primitive equations of oceanic and atmospheric dynamics
Global well-posedness of the primitive equations of oceanic and atmospheric dynamics Jinkai Li Department of Mathematics The Chinese University of Hong Kong Dynamics of Small Scales in Fluids ICERM, Feb
More informationRemarks on the blow-up criterion of the 3D Euler equations
Remarks on the blow-up criterion of the 3D Euler equations Dongho Chae Department of Mathematics Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 44-746, Korea e-mail : chae@skku.edu Abstract In this note we prove that the
More informationVANISHING VISCOSITY IN THE PLANE FOR VORTICITY IN BORDERLINE SPACES OF BESOV TYPE
VANISHING VISCOSITY IN THE PLANE FOR VORTICITY IN BORDERLINE SPACES OF BESOV TYPE ELAINE COZZI AND JAMES P. KELLIHER Abstract. The existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Euler equations for initial
More informationINTRODUCTION TO PDEs
INTRODUCTION TO PDEs In this course we are interested in the numerical approximation of PDEs using finite difference methods (FDM). We will use some simple prototype boundary value problems (BVP) and initial
More informationand finally, any second order divergence form elliptic operator
Supporting Information: Mathematical proofs Preliminaries Let be an arbitrary bounded open set in R n and let L be any elliptic differential operator associated to a symmetric positive bilinear form B
More informationTHE ELLIPTICITY PRINCIPLE FOR SELF-SIMILAR POTENTIAL FLOWS
Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations Vol., No. 4 005 909 917 c World Scientific Publishing Company THE ELLIPTICITY PRINCIPLE FOR SELF-SIMILAR POTENTIAL FLOWS VOLKER ELLING, and TAI-PING LIU, Dept.
More informationDecay rate of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosity coefficients
South Asian Journal of Mathematics 2012, Vol. 2 2): 148 153 www.sajm-online.com ISSN 2251-1512 RESEARCH ARTICLE Decay rate of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosity coefficients
More informationPiecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation
Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation Alberto Bressan and Tianyou Zhang Department of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pa 68, USA e-mails: bressan@mathpsuedu, zhang
More informationExistence and Uniqueness of the Weak Solution for a Contact Problem
Available online at www.tjnsa.com J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. x (215), 1 15 Research Article Existence and Uniqueness of the Weak Solution for a Contact Problem Amar Megrous a, Ammar Derbazi b, Mohamed Dalah
More informationFrom Boltzmann Equations to Gas Dynamics: From DiPerna-Lions to Leray
From Boltzmann Equations to Gas Dynamics: From DiPerna-Lions to Leray C. David Levermore Department of Mathematics and Institute for Physical Science and Technology University of Maryland, College Park
More information1. Introduction. The Stokes problem seeks unknown functions u and p satisfying
A DISCRETE DIVERGENCE FREE WEAK GALERKIN FINITE ELEMENT METHOD FOR THE STOKES EQUATIONS LIN MU, JUNPING WANG, AND XIU YE Abstract. A discrete divergence free weak Galerkin finite element method is developed
More informationBIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES
BIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES SEBASTIAN HERR, TOBIAS LAMM, AND ROLAND SCHNAUBELT Abstract. A global weak solution of the biharmonic wave map equation in the energy space for spherical targets is constructed.
More informationOn an Approximation Result for Piecewise Polynomial Functions. O. Karakashian
BULLETIN OF THE GREE MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 57, 010 (1 7) On an Approximation Result for Piecewise Polynomial Functions O. arakashian Abstract We provide a new approach for proving approximation results
More informationDetermination of thin elastic inclusions from boundary measurements.
Determination of thin elastic inclusions from boundary measurements. Elena Beretta in collaboration with E. Francini, S. Vessella, E. Kim and J. Lee September 7, 2010 E. Beretta (Università di Roma La
More informationGlobal well-posedness and decay for the viscous surface wave problem without surface tension
Global well-posedness and decay for the viscous surface wave problem without surface tension Ian Tice (joint work with Yan Guo) Université Paris-Est Créteil Laboratoire d Analyse et de Mathématiques Appliquées
More informationSecond Order Elliptic PDE
Second Order Elliptic PDE T. Muthukumar tmk@iitk.ac.in December 16, 2014 Contents 1 A Quick Introduction to PDE 1 2 Classification of Second Order PDE 3 3 Linear Second Order Elliptic Operators 4 4 Periodic
More informationPARTITION OF UNITY FOR THE STOKES PROBLEM ON NONMATCHING GRIDS
PARTITION OF UNITY FOR THE STOES PROBLEM ON NONMATCHING GRIDS CONSTANTIN BACUTA AND JINCHAO XU Abstract. We consider the Stokes Problem on a plane polygonal domain Ω R 2. We propose a finite element method
More informationMixed exterior Laplace s problem
Mixed exterior Laplace s problem Chérif Amrouche, Florian Bonzom Laboratoire de mathématiques appliquées, CNRS UMR 5142, Université de Pau et des Pays de l Adour, IPRA, Avenue de l Université, 64000 Pau
More informationOPTIMAL CONVERGENCE RATES FOR THE COMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS WITH POTENTIAL FORCES
OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE RATES FOR THE COMPRESSIBLE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS WITH POTENTIAL FORCES RENJUN DUAN Department of Mathematics, City University of Hong Kong 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.na] 15 Nov 2017
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) An HDG method with orthogonal projections in facet integrals Issei Oikawa arxiv:1711.05396v1 [math.na] 15 Nov 2017 Received: date / Accepted: date
More informationInequalities of Babuška-Aziz and Friedrichs-Velte for differential forms
Inequalities of Babuška-Aziz and Friedrichs-Velte for differential forms Martin Costabel Abstract. For sufficiently smooth bounded plane domains, the equivalence between the inequalities of Babuška Aziz
More information7 The Navier-Stokes Equations
18.354/12.27 Spring 214 7 The Navier-Stokes Equations In the previous section, we have seen how one can deduce the general structure of hydrodynamic equations from purely macroscopic considerations and
More informationStrong stabilization of the system of linear elasticity by a Dirichlet boundary feedback
IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics (2000) 65, 109 121 Strong stabilization of the system of linear elasticity by a Dirichlet boundary feedback WEI-JIU LIU AND MIROSLAV KRSTIĆ Department of AMES, University
More informationChapter 2. General concepts. 2.1 The Navier-Stokes equations
Chapter 2 General concepts 2.1 The Navier-Stokes equations The Navier-Stokes equations model the fluid mechanics. This set of differential equations describes the motion of a fluid. In the present work
More informationThe incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in vacuum
The incompressible, Université Paris-Est Créteil Piotr Bogus law Mucha, Warsaw University Journées Jeunes EDPistes 218, Institut Elie Cartan, Université de Lorraine March 23th, 218 Incompressible Navier-Stokes
More informationDivorcing pressure from viscosity in incompressible Navier-Stokes dynamics
Divorcing pressure from viscosity in incompressible Navier-Stokes dynamics Jian-Guo Liu 1, Jie Liu 2, and Robert L. Pego 3 February 18, 2005 Abstract We show that in bounded domains with no-slip boundary
More informationON THE SOLVABILITY OF A NONLINEAR PSEUDOPARABOLIC PROBLEM
Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 44(3): 343-354, June 2013 c Indian National Science Academy ON THE SOLVABILITY OF A NONLINEAR PSEUDOPARABOLIC PROBLEM S. Mesloub and T. Hayat Mathematics Department, College
More informationDownloaded 08/20/14 to Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see
SIAM J. MATH. ANAL. Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 89 92 c 26 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Downloaded 8/2/4 to 28..64.244. Redistribution subject to SIAM license or copyright; see http://www.siam.org/journals/ojsa.php
More information1. Introduction Since the pioneering work by Leray [3] in 1934, there have been several studies on solutions of Navier-Stokes equations
Math. Res. Lett. 13 (6, no. 3, 455 461 c International Press 6 NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS IN ARBITRARY DOMAINS : THE FUJITA-KATO SCHEME Sylvie Monniaux Abstract. Navier-Stokes equations are investigated in
More information