Does anemia contribute to end-organ dysfunction in ICU patients Statistical Analysis

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Does anemia contribute to end-organ dysfunction in ICU patients Statistical Analysis"

Transcription

1 Does anemia contribute to end-organ dysfunction in ICU patients Statistical Analysis Xue Han, MPH and Matt Shotwell, PhD Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University School of Medicine November 7, 2014 Contents 1 Analysis 1: Transitional Model to model next day s effect Outcome1: Daily Delirium Descriptive Statistics Multinomial logistic regression with Normal as the reference level for outcome variable Delirium Outcome2: Daily troponin (greater than 0.1) as an index of cardiac dysfunction Descriptive Statistics Outcome3: Daily renal SOFA score Descriptive Statistics Logistic regression, Daily renal SOFA 2(Y/N) Proportional odds logistic regression regression, Ordinal response (0-4) Outcome4: Daily resp SOFA score ( 2) Descriptive Statistics Logistic regression, Daily RESP SOFA 2(Y/N) Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4) Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),without three way interaction Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Sensitivity Analysis Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Sensitivity Analysis2, without three way interaction Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Marginal Model Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Marginal Model with hgb.icu and resp.sofa interaction Tomorrow resp.sofa Tomorrow resp.sofa Tomorrow resp.sofa Outcome5: Daily Ventilator (Y/N) as a measure of success of extubation Descriptive Statistics Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Marginal Model Logistic regression (Daily Ventilation (Y/N)) Analysis2: Hb during ICU stay and predicted outcomes Outcome1: ICU mortality Descriptive Statistics Logistic regression for ICU.mortality (Y/N) Time dependent covariate survival analysis for Time to ICU.mortality

2 2.2 Outcome2: Cardiac dysfunction(tropnin greater than 0.1) Correlated time dependent covariate survival analysis for Time to Tropnin greater than Outcome3: Renal dysfunction Outcome: Time to renal dysfunction Survival analysis with correlated time dependent covariate Outcome4: Time to resolution of delirium Outcome5: Time to successful extubation

3 1 Analysis 1: Transitional Model to model next day s effect 1.1 Outcome1: Daily Delirium Descriptive Statistics Table 1: Descriptive by Icu.status 3 N Normal Discharged Delirious Comatose Deceased Combined Test Statistic N = 1976 N = 697 N = 1994 N = 1917 N = 127 N = 6711 icu.status.today 6711 χ 2 8 = 4326, P < Normal 73% (1451) 66% ( 462) 11% ( 217) 5% ( 88) 9% ( 11) 33% (2229) Delirious 21% ( 410) 28% ( 193) 61% (1210) 20% ( 380) 22% ( 28) 33% (2221) Comatose 6% ( 115) 6% ( 42) 28% ( 567) 76% (1449) 69% ( 88) 34% (2261) Age at enrollment F 4,6706 = 18, P < ICU type 6711 Surgical 28% ( 552) 35% ( 242) 42% ( 844) 38% ( 736) 19% ( 24) 36% (2398) χ 2 4 = 112, P < APACHE APS at enrollment F 4,6706 = 43, P < Charlson score F 4,6706 = 8, P < Framingham stroke risk score F 4,6706 = 24, P < Lowest mean arterial pressure, current 24h F 4,6699 = 51, P < Was patient in ICU today? ICU 100% (1976) 100% ( 697) 100% (1994) 100% (1917) 100% ( 127) 100% (6711) Study day F 4,6706 = 35, P < Septic in the current 24h? 6703 Septic today 60% (1182) 49% ( 344) 67% (1330) 70% (1337) 73% ( 91) 64% (4284) χ 2 4 = 117, P < sevsepsis.l Severely septic today 47% ( 926) 34% ( 240) 65% (1302) 69% (1323) 71% ( 89) 58% (3880) χ 2 4 = 406, P < Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h F 4,5832 = 4.4, P = a b c represent the lower quartile a, the median b, and the upper quartile c for continuous variables. N is the number of non missing values. Numbers after percents are frequencies. Tests used: 1 Pearson test; 2 Kruskal-Wallis test

4 1.1.2 Multinomial logistic regression with Normal as the reference level for outcome variable Delirium 4 Level Discharged vs. Level Normal betahat se pval RRR RRR.lo RRR.up icu.status.todaynormal icu.status.todaydelirious icu.status.todaycomatose age.enroll icu.typesurgical apache.aps charlson.score stroke.risk map.low.icu study.day sepsis.l24septic today hgb.icu study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:age.enroll icu.status.todaycomatose:age.enroll icu.status.todaydelirious:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaycomatose:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaydelirious:apache.aps icu.status.todaycomatose:apache.aps icu.status.todaydelirious:charlson.score icu.status.todaycomatose:charlson.score icu.status.todaydelirious:stroke.risk icu.status.todaycomatose:stroke.risk icu.status.todaydelirious:map.low.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:map.low.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day icu.status.todaydelirious:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaycomatose:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaydelirious:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day:hgb.icu

5 5 Level Delirious vs. Level Normal betahat se pval RRR RRR.lo RRR.up icu.status.todaynormal icu.status.todaydelirious icu.status.todaycomatose age.enroll icu.typesurgical apache.aps charlson.score stroke.risk map.low.icu study.day sepsis.l24septic today hgb.icu study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:age.enroll icu.status.todaycomatose:age.enroll icu.status.todaydelirious:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaycomatose:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaydelirious:apache.aps icu.status.todaycomatose:apache.aps icu.status.todaydelirious:charlson.score icu.status.todaycomatose:charlson.score icu.status.todaydelirious:stroke.risk icu.status.todaycomatose:stroke.risk icu.status.todaydelirious:map.low.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:map.low.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day icu.status.todaydelirious:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaycomatose:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaydelirious:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day:hgb.icu Level Comatose vs. Level Normal betahat se pval RRR RRR.lo RRR.up

6 6 icu.status.todaynormal icu.status.todaydelirious icu.status.todaycomatose age.enroll icu.typesurgical apache.aps charlson.score stroke.risk map.low.icu study.day sepsis.l24septic today hgb.icu study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:age.enroll icu.status.todaycomatose:age.enroll icu.status.todaydelirious:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaycomatose:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaydelirious:apache.aps icu.status.todaycomatose:apache.aps icu.status.todaydelirious:charlson.score icu.status.todaycomatose:charlson.score icu.status.todaydelirious:stroke.risk icu.status.todaycomatose:stroke.risk icu.status.todaydelirious:map.low.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:map.low.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day icu.status.todaydelirious:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaycomatose:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaydelirious:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day:hgb.icu Level Deceased vs. Level Normal betahat se pval RRR RRR.lo RRR.up icu.status.todaynormal icu.status.todaydelirious icu.status.todaycomatose

7 7 age.enroll icu.typesurgical apache.aps charlson.score stroke.risk map.low.icu study.day sepsis.l24septic today hgb.icu study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:age.enroll icu.status.todaycomatose:age.enroll icu.status.todaydelirious:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaycomatose:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaydelirious:apache.aps icu.status.todaycomatose:apache.aps icu.status.todaydelirious:charlson.score icu.status.todaycomatose:charlson.score icu.status.todaydelirious:stroke.risk icu.status.todaycomatose:stroke.risk icu.status.todaydelirious:map.low.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:map.low.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day icu.status.todaydelirious:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaycomatose:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaydelirious:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day:hgb.icu Level Withdrawn vs. Level Normal betahat se pval RRR RRR.lo RRR.up icu.status.todaynormal icu.status.todaydelirious icu.status.todaycomatose age.enroll icu.typesurgical apache.aps

8 8 charlson.score stroke.risk map.low.icu study.day sepsis.l24septic today hgb.icu study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:age.enroll icu.status.todaycomatose:age.enroll icu.status.todaydelirious:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaycomatose:icu.typesurgical icu.status.todaydelirious:apache.aps icu.status.todaycomatose:apache.aps icu.status.todaydelirious:charlson.score icu.status.todaycomatose:charlson.score icu.status.todaydelirious:stroke.risk icu.status.todaycomatose:stroke.risk icu.status.todaydelirious:map.low.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:map.low.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day icu.status.todaydelirious:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaycomatose:sepsis.l24septic today icu.status.todaydelirious:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:hgb.icu icu.status.todaydelirious:study.day:hgb.icu icu.status.todaycomatose:study.day:hgb.icu

9 1.2 Outcome2: Daily troponin (greater than 0.1) as an index of cardiac dysfunction Descriptive Statistics Table 2: Descriptive by Troponin (greater than 0.1) 9 N No Yes Combined Test Statistic N = 5710 N = 137 N = 5847 tro.imp.cat 6704 χ 2 1 = 369, P < Yes 5% ( 271) 43% ( 59) 6% ( 330) Highest troponin, current 24h (missing = <0.1) F 1,5840 = 80, P < trop.tomo F 1,5845 = 431, P < Age at enrollment F 1,5845 = 3.6, P = ICU type 6711 Surgical 36% (2067) 36% ( 49) 36% (2116) χ 2 1 = 0.01, P = APACHE APS at enrollment F 1,5845 = 3.5, P = Charlson score F 1,5845 = 4.8, P = Framingham stroke risk score F 1,5845 = 8.1, P = Lowest mean arterial pressure, current 24h F 1,5840 = 18, P < Was patient in ICU today? ICU 100% (5710) 100% ( 137) 100% (5847) Septic in the current 24h? 6703 Septic today 65% (3732) 65% ( 89) 65% (3821) χ 2 1 = 0.01, P = sevsepsis.l Severely septic today 60% (3443) 60% ( 82) 60% (3525) χ 2 1 = 0.01, P = Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h F 1,5157 = 2.1, P = a b c represent the lower quartile a, the median b, and the upper quartile c for continuous variables. N is the number of non missing values. Numbers after percents are frequencies. Tests used: 1 Pearson test; 2 Wilcoxon test Table 3: Outcome:Tropnin ( 0.1).. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. tro.imp.cat=yes ( 6.862, ) age.enroll ( 0.980, 1.027) icu.type=surgical ( 0.607, 1.641) apache.aps ( 0.986, 1.046) charlson.score ( 0.953, 1.177) stroke.risk ( 1.011, 1.117) map.low.icu ( 0.965, 1.002) study.day ( 0.839, 1.443) sepsis.l24=septic today ( 0.584, 1.565) hgb.icu ( 0.850, 1.345) study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.957, 1.014) tro.imp.cat=yes * age.enroll ( 0.944, 1.023) tro.imp.cat=yes * icu.type=surgical ( 0.999, 5.229) tro.imp.cat=yes * apache.aps ( 0.933, 1.030) 0.439

10 Table 3: (continued) tro.imp.cat=yes * charlson.score ( 0.768, 1.105) tro.imp.cat=yes * stroke.risk ( 0.836, 0.995) tro.imp.cat=yes * map.low.icu ( 0.957, 1.021) tro.imp.cat=yes * study.day ( 0.248, 0.908) tro.imp.cat=yes * sepsis.l24=septic today ( 0.738, 3.859) tro.imp.cat=yes * hgb.icu ( 0.617, 1.229) tro.imp.cat=yes * study.day * hgb.icu ( 1.017, 1.163) Outcome3: Daily renal SOFA score Descriptive Statistics Table 4: Descriptive by next day s Renal SOFA score 2 10 N No Yes Combined Test Statistic N = 4319 N = 1528 N = 5847 sofa.renal.cat 6704 χ 2 1 = 4270, P < Yes 4% ( 185) 90% (1380) 27% (1565) SOFA renal component score % (2971) 1% ( 11) 51% (2982) χ 2 4 = 4375, P < % (1161) 9% ( 134) 22% (1295) 2 4% ( 172) 48% ( 726) 15% ( 898) 3 0% ( 6) 21% ( 317) 6% ( 323) 4 0% ( 7) 22% ( 337) 6% ( 344) renal.tomo % (3061) 0% ( 0) 52% (3061) χ 2 4 = 5847, P < % (1258) 0% ( 0) 22% (1258) 2 0% ( 0) 58% ( 886) 15% ( 886) 3 0% ( 0) 20% ( 303) 5% ( 303) 4 0% ( 0) 22% ( 339) 6% ( 339) Age at enrollment F 1,5845 = 22, P < ICU type 6711 Surgical 39% (1668) 29% ( 448) 36% (2116) χ 2 1 = 42, P < APACHE APS at enrollment F 1,5845 = 158, P < Charlson score F 1,5845 = 307, P < Framingham stroke risk score F 1,5845 = 20, P < Lowest mean arterial pressure, current 24h F 1,5840 = 213, P < Was patient in ICU today? ICU 100% (4319) 100% (1528) 100% (5847) Septic in the current 24h? 6703 Septic today 65% (2823) 65% ( 998) 65% (3821) χ 2 1 = 0, P = sevsepsis.l Severely septic today 59% (2533) 65% ( 992) 60% (3525) χ 2 1 = 19, P < Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h F 1,5157 = 34, P < a b c represent the lower quartile a, the median b, and the upper quartile c for continuous variables. N is the number of non missing values. Numbers after percents are frequencies. Tests used: 1 Pearson test; 2 Wilcoxon test

11 Table 5: Descriptive by next day s Renal SOFA score (0-4) 11 N Combined Test Statistic N = 3061 N = 1258 N = 886 N = 303 N = 339 N = 5847 sofa.renal.cat 6704 χ 2 4 = 4379, P < Yes 0% ( 12) 14% ( 173) 85% ( 756) 98% ( 295) 97% ( 329) 27% (1565) SOFA renal component score % (2820) 12% ( 151) 1% ( 7) 1% ( 2) 1% ( 2) 51% (2982) χ 2 16 = 11626, P < % ( 227) 74% ( 934) 14% ( 122) 2% ( 5) 2% ( 7) 22% (1295) 2 0% ( 7) 13% ( 165) 73% ( 642) 22% ( 66) 5% ( 18) 15% ( 898) 3 0% ( 2) 0% ( 4) 10% ( 88) 59% ( 179) 15% ( 50) 6% ( 323) 4 0% ( 3) 0% ( 4) 3% ( 26) 17% ( 50) 77% ( 261) 6% ( 344) Age at enrollment F 4,5842 = 22, P < ICU type 6711 Surgical 40% (1215) 36% ( 453) 35% ( 310) 22% ( 68) 21% ( 70) 36% (2116) χ 2 4 = 77, P < APACHE APS at enrollment F 4,5842 = 52, P < Charlson score F 4,5842 = 93, P < Framingham stroke risk score F 4,5842 = 19, P < Lowest mean arterial pressure, current 24h F 4,5837 = 84, P < Was patient in ICU today? ICU 100% (3061) 100% (1258) 100% ( 886) 100% ( 303) 100% ( 339) 100% (5847) Septic in the current 24h? 6703 Septic today 66% (2032) 63% ( 791) 67% ( 589) 61% ( 184) 67% ( 225) 65% (3821) χ 2 4 = 8.4, P = sevsepsis.l Severely septic today 58% (1781) 60% ( 752) 66% ( 583) 61% ( 184) 67% ( 225) 60% (3525) χ 2 4 = 23, P < Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h F 4,5154 = 11, P < a b c represent the lower quartile a, the median b, and the upper quartile c for continuous variables. N is the number of non missing values. Numbers after percents are frequencies. Tests used: 1 Pearson test; 2 Kruskal-Wallis test

12 1.3.2 Logistic regression, Daily renal SOFA 2(Y/N) Table 6: Outcome:Daily renal SOFA =2.. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. 12 sofa.renal.cat=yes 3e ( 1.184, ) age.enroll 9e ( 0.992, 1.026) icu.type=surgical -3e ( 0.509, 1.073) apache.aps 2e ( 1.001, 1.047) charlson.score 1e ( 1.019, 1.189) stroke.risk -3e ( 0.930, 1.010) map.low.icu -4e ( 0.950, 0.977) <0.001 study.day 1e ( 0.848, 1.202) sepsis.l24=septic today 1e ( 0.694, 1.471) hgb.icu -4e ( 0.806, 1.153) study.day * hgb.icu -1e ( 0.981, 1.017) sofa.renal.cat=yes * age.enroll 7e ( 0.978, 1.024) sofa.renal.cat=yes * icu.type=surgical 5e ( 0.634, 1.741) sofa.renal.cat=yes * apache.aps -1e ( 0.957, 1.015) sofa.renal.cat=yes * charlson.score 1e ( 0.905, 1.130) sofa.renal.cat=yes * stroke.risk 4e ( 0.985, 1.097) sofa.renal.cat=yes * map.low.icu 4e ( 1.020, 1.059) <0.001 sofa.renal.cat=yes * study.day -9e ( 0.717, 1.159) sofa.renal.cat=yes * sepsis.l24=septic today 3e ( 0.820, 2.254) sofa.renal.cat=yes * hgb.icu -7e ( 0.738, 1.185) sofa.renal.cat=yes * study.day * hgb.icu 1e ( 0.987, 1.038) Proportional odds logistic regression regression, Ordinal response (0-4) Table 7: Outcome:Daily renal SOFA (0-4).. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. sofa.renal (11.321, ) <0.001 age.enroll ( 0.999, 1.020) icu.type=surgical ( 0.676, 1.079) apache.aps ( 1.008, 1.037) charlson.score ( 1.009, 1.119) stroke.risk ( 0.964, 1.014) map.low.icu ( 0.965, 0.983) <0.001 study.day ( 0.872, 1.086) sepsis.l24=septic today ( 0.823, 1.319) hgb.icu ( 0.879, 1.093) study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.991, 1.014) 0.722

13 Table 7: (continued) sofa.renal * age.enroll ( 0.991, 1.003) sofa.renal * icu.type=surgical ( 0.860, 1.149) sofa.renal * apache.aps ( 0.981, 0.997) sofa.renal * charlson.score ( 0.960, 1.019) sofa.renal * stroke.risk ( 0.990, 1.019) sofa.renal * map.low.icu ( 1.004, 1.015) <0.001 sofa.renal * study.day ( 0.924, 1.047) sofa.renal * sepsis.l24=septic today ( 0.866, 1.146) sofa.renal * hgb.icu ( 0.932, 1.059) sofa.renal * study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.996, 1.009) Outcome4: Daily resp SOFA score ( 2) Descriptive Statistics Table 8: Descriptive by next day s RESP SOFA score ( 2) 13 N No Yes Combined Test Statistic N = 276 N = 5571 N = 5847 sofa.resp.cat 6704 χ 2 1 = 2576, P < Yes 39% ( 107) 99% (5510) 96% (5617) SOFA respiratory component score % ( 0) 0% ( 9) 0% ( 9) χ 2 4 = 2717, P < % ( 169) 1% ( 47) 4% ( 216) 2 34% ( 95) 51% (2852) 50% (2947) 3 4% ( 12) 45% (2505) 43% (2517) 4 0% ( 0) 3% ( 153) 3% ( 153) resp.tomo % ( 8) 0% ( 0) 0% ( 8) χ 2 4 = 5847, P < % ( 268) 0% ( 0) 5% ( 268) 2 0% ( 0) 57% (3152) 54% (3152) 3 0% ( 0) 41% (2285) 39% (2285) 4 0% ( 0) 2% ( 134) 2% ( 134) Age at enrollment F 1,5845 = 0.13, P = ICU type 6711 Surgical 23% ( 64) 37% (2052) 36% (2116) χ 2 1 = 21, P < APACHE APS at enrollment F 1,5845 = 33, P < Charlson score F 1,5845 = 0.71, P = Framingham stroke risk score F 1,5845 = 2.4, P = Lowest mean arterial pressure, current 24h F 1,5840 = 9.6, P = Was patient in ICU today? ICU 100% ( 276) 100% (5571) 100% (5847) Septic in the current 24h? 6703 a b c represent the lower quartile a, the median b, and the upper quartile c for continuous variables. χ 2 1 = 157, P < N is the number of non missing values. Numbers after percents are frequencies. Tests used: 1 Pearson test; 2 Wilcoxon test

14 Table 8: (continued) N No Yes Combined Test Statistic N = 276 N = 5571 N = 5847 Septic today 30% ( 84) 67% (3737) 65% (3821) sevsepsis.l Severely septic today 22% ( 61) 62% (3464) 60% (3525) χ 2 1 = 177, P < Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h F 1,5157 = 38, P < a b c represent the lower quartile a, the median b, and the upper quartile c for continuous variables. N is the number of non missing values. Numbers after percents are frequencies. Tests used: 1 Pearson test; 2 Wilcoxon test Table 9: Descriptive by next day s RESP SOFA score (0-4) 14 N Combined Test Statistic N = 8 N = 268 N = 3152 N = 2285 N = 134 N = 5847 sofa.resp.cat 6704 χ 2 4 = 2633, P < Yes 88% ( 7) 37% ( 100) 99% (3102) 100% (2275) 99% ( 133) 96% (5617) SOFA respiratory component score % ( 0) 0% ( 0) 0% ( 7) 0% ( 2) 0% ( 0) 0% ( 9) χ 2 16 = 5156, P < % ( 1) 63% ( 168) 1% ( 40) 0% ( 6) 1% ( 1) 4% ( 216) 2 38% ( 3) 34% ( 92) 76% (2404) 19% ( 435) 10% ( 13) 50% (2947) 3 50% ( 4) 3% ( 8) 22% ( 685) 76% (1744) 57% ( 76) 43% (2517) 4 0% ( 0) 0% ( 0) 0% ( 13) 4% ( 96) 33% ( 44) 3% ( 153) renal.tomo % ( 6) 44% ( 119) 55% (1718) 51% (1158) 45% ( 60) 52% (3061) χ 2 16 = 101, P < % ( 0) 16% ( 44) 20% ( 644) 23% ( 534) 27% ( 36) 22% (1258) 2 25% ( 2) 15% ( 40) 14% ( 441) 17% ( 380) 17% ( 23) 15% ( 886) 3 0% ( 0) 7% ( 19) 6% ( 182) 4% ( 95) 5% ( 7) 5% ( 303) 4 0% ( 0) 17% ( 46) 5% ( 167) 5% ( 118) 6% ( 8) 6% ( 339) Age at enrollment F 4,5842 = 11, P < ICU type 6711 Surgical 75% ( 6) 22% ( 58) 37% (1177) 37% ( 841) 25% ( 34) 36% (2116) χ 2 4 = 39, P < APACHE APS at enrollment F 4,5842 = 11, P < Charlson score F 4,5842 = 6.4, P < Framingham stroke risk score F 4,5842 = 11, P < Lowest mean arterial pressure, current 24h F 4,5837 = 8.9, P < Was patient in ICU today? ICU 100% ( 8) 100% ( 268) 100% (3152) 100% (2285) 100% ( 134) 100% (5847) Septic in the current 24h? 6703 Septic today 75% ( 6) 29% ( 78) 64% (2024) 71% (1611) 76% ( 102) 65% (3821) χ 2 4 = 192, P < sevsepsis.l Severely septic today 62% ( 5) 21% ( 56) 60% (1876) 66% (1505) 62% ( 83) 60% (3525) χ 2 4 = 205, P < Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h F 4,5154 = 12, P < a b c represent the lower quartile a, the median b, and the upper quartile c for continuous variables. N is the number of non missing values. Numbers after percents are frequencies. Tests used: 1 Pearson test; 2 Kruskal-Wallis test Logistic regression, Daily RESP SOFA 2(Y/N)

15 Table 10: Outcome:Daily resp SOFA =2.P-values less than 0.05 are in red. 15 sofa.resp.catyes ( , ) <0.001 age.enroll ( 0.955, 1.041) icu.typesurgical ( 1.022, 6.859) apache.aps ( 0.991, 1.088) charlson.score ( 0.801, 1.107) stroke.risk ( 0.952, 1.130) map.low.icu ( 0.956, 1.004) study.day ( 0.482, 1.373) sepsis.l24septic today ( 0.826, 4.261) hgb.icu ( 0.554, 1.329) study.day:hgb.icu ( 0.963, 1.068) sofa.resp.catyes:age.enroll ( 0.954, 1.050) sofa.resp.catyes:icu.typesurgical ( 0.150, 1.233) sofa.resp.catyes:apache ( 0.930, 1.035) sofa.resp.catyes:charlson.score ( 0.801, 1.155) sofa.resp.catyes:stroke.risk ( 0.893, 1.085) sofa.resp.catyes:map.low.icu ( 0.975, 1.034) sofa.resp.catyes:study.day ( 0.730, 2.243) sofa.resp.catyes:sepsis.l24septic today ( 0.611, 3.908) sofa.resp.catyes:hgb.icu ( 0.632, 1.624) sofa.resp.catyes:study.day:hgb.icu ( 0.928, 1.036) Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4) Table 11: Outcome:Daily resp SOFA (0-4).. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. sofa.resp ( 2.842, ) <0.001 age.enroll ( 0.964, 1.013) icu.type=surgical ( 3.157, 9.969) <0.001 apache.aps ( 1.000, 1.064) charlson.score ( 0.852, 1.091) stroke.risk ( 1.042, 1.173) <0.001 map.low.icu ( 0.958, 0.998) study.day ( 0.753, 1.283) sepsis.l24=septic today ( 2.562, 8.005) <0.001 hgb.icu ( 0.557, 0.949) study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.970, 1.024) sofa.resp * age.enroll ( 0.995, 1.014) sofa.resp * icu.type=surgical ( 0.408, 0.635) <0.001 sofa.resp * apache.aps ( 0.974, 0.997) sofa.resp * charlson.score ( 0.942, 1.039) 0.662

16 Table 11: (continued) sofa.resp * stroke.risk ( 0.940, 0.983) <0.001 sofa.resp * map.low.icu ( 0.998, 1.013) sofa.resp * study.day ( 0.894, 1.099) sofa.resp * sepsis.l24=septic today ( 0.499, 0.775) <0.001 sofa.resp * hgb.icu ( 1.000, 1.218) sofa.resp * study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.992, 1.013) Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),without three way interaction Table 12: Outcome:Daily resp SOFA (0-4).. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. 16 sofa.resp ( 3.029, ) <0.001 age.enroll ( 0.964, 1.013) icu.type=surgical ( 3.148, 9.935) <0.001 apache.aps ( 1.000, 1.064) charlson.score ( 0.852, 1.091) stroke.risk ( 1.043, 1.174) <0.001 map.low.icu ( 0.958, 0.998) study.day ( 0.854, 0.994) sepsis.l24=septic today ( 2.561, 8.000) <0.001 hgb.icu ( 0.573, 0.840) <0.001 sofa.resp * age.enroll ( 0.996, 1.014) sofa.resp * icu.type=surgical ( 0.409, 0.636) <0.001 sofa.resp * apache.aps ( 0.974, 0.997) sofa.resp * charlson.score ( 0.942, 1.039) sofa.resp * stroke.risk ( 0.939, 0.983) <0.001 sofa.resp * map.low.icu ( 0.998, 1.013) sofa.resp * study.day ( 1.001, 1.033) sofa.resp * sepsis.l24=septic today ( 0.499, 0.775) <0.001 sofa.resp * hgb.icu ( 1.051, 1.202) <0.001 study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.997, 1.010) Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Sensitivity Analysis

17 Table 13: Outcome:Daily resp SOFA (0-4).. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. 17 sofa.resp ( 3.508, ) <0.001 age.enroll ( 0.966, 1.019) icu.type=surgical ( 3.240, ) <0.001 apache.aps ( 0.994, 1.060) charlson.score ( 0.898, 1.169) stroke.risk ( 1.020, 1.156) map.low.icu ( 0.956, 0.997) study.day ( 0.696, 1.353) sepsis.l24=septic today ( 2.624, 8.658) <0.001 hgb.icu ( 0.587, 1.095) study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.966, 1.032) sofa.resp * age.enroll ( 0.993, 1.013) sofa.resp * icu.type=surgical ( 0.396, 0.632) <0.001 sofa.resp * apache.aps ( 0.975, 1.000) sofa.resp * charlson.score ( 0.920, 1.022) sofa.resp * stroke.risk ( 0.945, 0.991) sofa.resp * map.low.icu ( 0.998, 1.014) sofa.resp * study.day ( 0.878, 1.141) sofa.resp * sepsis.l24=septic today ( 0.487, 0.773) <0.001 sofa.resp * hgb.icu ( 0.947, 1.195) sofa.resp * study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.989, 1.015) Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Sensitivity Analysis2, without three way interaction Table 14: Outcome:Daily resp SOFA (0-4).. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. sofa.resp ( 4.315, ) <0.001 age.enroll ( 0.966, 1.018) icu.type=surgical ( 3.237, ) <0.001 apache.aps ( 0.993, 1.060) charlson.score ( 0.898, 1.169) stroke.risk ( 1.021, 1.156) map.low.icu ( 0.956, 0.997) study.day ( 0.852, 1.024) sepsis.l24=septic today ( 2.617, 8.625) <0.001 hgb.icu ( 0.624, 0.980) sofa.resp * age.enroll ( 0.993, 1.013) sofa.resp * icu.type=surgical ( 0.397, 0.633) <0.001 sofa.resp * apache.aps ( 0.975, 1.000) 0.056

18 Table 14: (continued) sofa.resp * charlson.score ( 0.920, 1.022) sofa.resp * stroke.risk ( 0.945, 0.990) sofa.resp * map.low.icu ( 0.998, 1.014) sofa.resp * study.day ( 1.000, 1.034) sofa.resp * sepsis.l24=septic today ( 0.488, 0.774) <0.001 sofa.resp * hgb.icu ( 0.993, 1.164) study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.994, 1.011) Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Marginal Model Table 15: Outcome:Daily resp SOFA (0-4).. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. 18 sofa.resp= ( , ) <0.001 sofa.resp= ( , ) <0.001 sofa.resp= ( , ) <0.001 age.enroll ( 0.994, 1.006) icu.type=surgical ( 0.875, 1.141) apache.aps ( 0.987, 1.003) charlson.score ( 0.913, 0.972) <0.001 stroke.risk ( 0.983, 1.012) map.low.icu ( 0.986, 0.996) <0.001 study.day ( 0.917, 1.037) sepsis.l24=septic today ( 1.207, 1.589) <0.001 hgb.icu ( 0.898, 1.015) study.day * hgb.icu ( 0.996, 1.008) Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Marginal Model with hgb.icu and resp.sofa interaction Table 16: Outcome:Daily resp SOFA (0-4).. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. sofa.resp= ( , ) <0.001 sofa.resp= ( , ) <0.001 sofa.resp= ( , ) <0.001 hgb.icu ( 0.728, 1.118) age.enroll ( 0.995, 1.007) 0.866

19 Table 16: (continued) icu.type=surgical ( 0.871, 1.135) apache.aps ( 0.986, 1.002) charlson.score ( 0.909, 0.968) <0.001 stroke.risk ( 0.984, 1.012) map.low.icu ( 0.987, 0.997) study.day ( 0.898, 1.017) sepsis.l24=septic today ( 1.209, 1.593) <0.001 sofa.resp=2 * hgb.icu ( 0.762, 1.181) sofa.resp=3 * hgb.icu ( 0.880, 1.354) sofa.resp=4 * hgb.icu ( 0.997, 1.831) hgb.icu * study.day ( 0.998, 1.011)

20 20

21 1.4.9 Tomorrow resp.sofa 2 Today level 34 Today level P(y>=2) 0.6 Today level 1 1 Today level 2 2 Today level 3 3 Today level Today level Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h ted to:age.enroll=61.76 icu.type=medical apache.aps=22 charlson.score=2 stroke.risk=10 map.low.icu=62 study.day=6 sepsis.l24=septic today

22 22

23 Tomorrow resp.sofa 3 Today level Today level P(y>=3) Today level 1 1 Today level 2 2 Today level 3 3 Today level Today level 2 Today level Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h ted to:age.enroll=61.76 icu.type=medical apache.aps=22 charlson.score=2 stroke.risk=10 map.low.icu=62 study.day=6 sepsis.l24=septic today

24 24

25 Tomorrow resp.sofa Today level 1 1 Today level 2 2 Today level 3 3 Today level P(y>=4) 0.4 Today level Today level 3 Today level Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h ted to:age.enroll=61.76 icu.type=medical apache.aps=22 charlson.score=2 stroke.risk=10 map.low.icu=62 study.day=6 sepsis.l24=septic today

26 1.5 Outcome5: Daily Ventilator (Y/N) as a measure of success of extubation Descriptive Statistics Proportional odds logistic regression, Ordinal response (0-4),Marginal Model Table 17: Descriptive by ventilator (Y/N) 26 N No Yes Combined Test Statistic N = 1580 N = 4269 N = 5849 on.vent.l χ 2 1 = 3661, P < Yes 25% ( 399) 98% (4198) 79% (4597) Age at enrollment F 1,5847 = 8.7, P = ICU type 6711 Surgical 32% ( 500) 38% (1616) 36% (2116) χ 2 1 = 19, P < APACHE APS at enrollment F 1,5847 = 110, P < Charlson score F 1,5847 = 16, P < Framingham stroke risk score F 1,5847 = 0.06, P = Lowest mean arterial pressure, current 24h F 1,5842 = 83, P < Was patient in ICU today? ICU 100% (1580) 100% (4269) 100% (5849) Septic in the current 24h? 6703 Septic today 54% ( 858) 69% (2963) 65% (3821) χ 2 1 = 116, P < sevsepsis.l Severely septic today 37% ( 587) 69% (2938) 60% (3525) χ 2 1 = 483, P < Lowest hemoglobin, current 24h F 1,5157 = 29, P < a b c represent the lower quartile a, the median b, and the upper quartile c for continuous variables. N is the number of non missing values. Numbers after percents are frequencies. Tests used: 1 Pearson test; 2 Wilcoxon test Logistic regression (Daily Ventilation (Y/N)) Table 18: Outcome:Daily ventilation (Y/N).. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. on.vent.l24=yes 9e e+04 ( , ) <0.001 age.enroll 4e e+00 ( 0.977, 1.031) icu.type=surgical 7e e+00 ( 1.123, 3.430) apache.aps 1e e+00 ( 0.978, 1.043) charlson.score 2e e+00 ( 0.906, 1.154) stroke.risk -7e e+00 ( 0.938, 1.052) map.low.icu -3e e+00 ( 0.979, 1.016) study.day 2e e+00 ( 0.939, 1.579) sepsis.l24=septic today 6e e+00 ( 1.016, 3.119) hgb.icu 3e e+00 ( 0.989, 1.703) study.day * hgb.icu -2e e+00 ( 0.952, 1.004) 0.093

27 Table 18: (continued) on.vent.l24=yes * age.enroll 4e e+00 ( 0.975, 1.033) on.vent.l24=yes * icu.type=surgical -9e e-01 ( 0.224, 0.750) on.vent.l24=yes * apache.aps 2e e+00 ( 0.966, 1.036) on.vent.l24=yes * charlson.score -8e e-01 ( 0.812, 1.054) on.vent.l24=yes * stroke.risk -1e e+00 ( 0.926, 1.049) on.vent.l24=yes * map.low.icu -3e e+00 ( 0.953, 0.993) on.vent.l24=yes * study.day -6e e-01 ( 0.709, 1.262) on.vent.l24=yes * sepsis.l24=septic today -2e e-01 ( 0.452, 1.520) on.vent.l24=yes * hgb.icu -2e e-01 ( 0.584, 1.045) on.vent.l24=yes * study.day * hgb.icu 1e e+00 ( 0.982, 1.042)

28 2 Analysis2: Hb during ICU stay and predicted outcomes 2.1 Outcome1: ICU mortality Descriptive Statistics Table 19: Descriptive by Mortality (Y/N) unique subject) N No Yes Combined Test Statistic N = 685 N = 128 N = 813 Age at enrollment F 1,811 = 4.3, P = ICU type 813 Surgical 35% (238) 19% ( 24) 32% (262) χ 2 1 = 13, P < APACHE APS at enrollment F 1,811 = 22, P < Charlson score F 1,811 = 6.5, P = Framingham stroke risk score F 1,811 = 1.9, P = lowest.hgb.icu F 1,801 = 4.8, P = auc.hgb.icu F 1,811 = 0.57, P = mean.sofa F 1,811 = 134, P < duration.sepsis F 1,811 = 12, P < max.sofa.renal % (285) 15% ( 19) 37% (304) χ 2 4 = 44, P < % (163) 23% ( 30) 24% (193) 2 19% (132) 37% ( 47) 22% (179) 3 6% ( 39) 12% ( 16) 7% ( 55) 4 10% ( 66) 12% ( 16) 10% ( 82) a b c represent the lower quartile a, the median b, and the upper quartile c for continuous variables. N is the number of non missing values. Numbers after percents are frequencies. Tests used: 1 Wilcoxon test; 2 Pearson test Logistic regression for ICU.mortality (Y/N) Two different functional forms of hemoglobin during ICU was considered in the below analysis (two different models) Table 20: Outcome:Mortality.. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. lowest.hgb.icu (0.857, 1.157) age.enroll (1.019, 1.065) <0.001 icu.type=surgical (0.217, 0.633) <0.001 apache.aps (0.964, 1.024) charlson.score (0.892, 1.090) stroke.risk (0.907, 1.000) mean.sofa (1.401, 1.670) <0.001 duration.sepsis (0.982, 1.063) Table 21: Outcome:Mortality.. P-values less than 0.05 are in red. auc.hgb.icu (0.991, 1.004) age.enroll (1.020, 1.065) <0.001 icu.type=surgical (0.223, 0.655) <0.001 apache.aps (0.964, 1.024) charlson.score (0.897, 1.094) stroke.risk (0.905, 0.998) mean.sofa (1.407, 1.674) <0.001 duration.sepsis (0.978, 1.114)

29 2.1.3 Time dependent covariate survival analysis for Time to ICU.mortality Variable hgb.icu, daily.sofa, severe sepsis were time variang covariates. charlson.score,stroke.risk did not change over time. Age.enroll, icu.type, apache.aps, Call: coxph(formula = Surv(time1, time2, mortality.censor) ~ hgb.icu + age.enroll + icu.type + apache.aps + charlson.score + stroke.risk + daily.sofa + sevsepsis.l24 + cluster(id), data = brain.dailyobs) coef exp(coef) se(coef) robust se z p hgb.icu e-01 age.enroll e-02 icu.typesurgical e-03 apache.aps e-01 charlson.score e-02 stroke.risk e-02 daily.sofa e-11 sevsepsis.l24severely septic today e-01 Likelihood ratio test=78.3 on 8 df, p=1.05e-13 n= 5848, number of events= 84 (876 observations deleted due to missingness) For every unit increase of hgb.icu, the hazard of mortality in ICU increased by 6.4%. Given the p value equals to 0.4, no evidence to conclude hgb.icu has statistically significant effect on ICU.mortality after controlling for all other covariates. The robust standard error is used due to repeated measurement of hgb.icu on each subject. 29

30 2.2 Outcome2: Cardiac dysfunction(tropnin greater than 0.1) Correlated time dependent covariate survival analysis for Time to Tropnin greater than 0.1 Variable hgb.icu, daily.sofa, severe sepsis were time variang covariates. charlson.score,stroke.risk did not change over time. Call: coxph(formula = Surv(time1, time2, tropnin.censor) ~ hgb.icu + age.enroll + icu.type + apache.aps + charlson.score + stroke.risk + daily.sofa + sevsepsis.l24 + cluster(id), data = brain.dailyobs) Age.enroll, icu.type, apache.aps, coef exp(coef) se(coef) robust se z p hgb.icu age.enroll icu.typesurgical apache.aps charlson.score stroke.risk daily.sofa sevsepsis.l24severely septic today Likelihood ratio test=33.4 on 8 df, p= n= 5848, number of events= 129 (876 observations deleted due to missingness) 30

31 2.3 Outcome3: Renal dysfunction Outcome: Time to renal dysfunction Survival analysis with correlated time dependent covariate Variable hgb.icu, daily.sofa, severe sepsis were time variang covariates. charlson.score,stroke.risk did not change over time. Call: coxph(formula = Surv(time1, time2, renal.censor) ~ hgb.icu + age.enroll + icu.type + apache.aps + charlson.score + stroke.risk + daily.sofa + sevsepsis.l24 + cluster(id), data = brain.dailyobs) Age.enroll, icu.type, apache.aps, coef exp(coef) se(coef) robust se z p hgb.icu age.enroll icu.typesurgical apache.aps charlson.score stroke.risk daily.sofa sevsepsis.l24severely septic today Likelihood ratio test=508 on 8 df, p=0 n= 5848, number of events= 557 (876 observations deleted due to missingness) 2.4 Outcome4: Time to resolution of delirium To be continue 2.5 Outcome5: Time to successful extubation To be continue 31

Lecture 12. Multivariate Survival Data Statistics Survival Analysis. Presented March 8, 2016

Lecture 12. Multivariate Survival Data Statistics Survival Analysis. Presented March 8, 2016 Statistics 255 - Survival Analysis Presented March 8, 2016 Dan Gillen Department of Statistics University of California, Irvine 12.1 Examples Clustered or correlated survival times Disease onset in family

More information

The coxvc_1-1-1 package

The coxvc_1-1-1 package Appendix A The coxvc_1-1-1 package A.1 Introduction The coxvc_1-1-1 package is a set of functions for survival analysis that run under R2.1.1 [81]. This package contains a set of routines to fit Cox models

More information

Turning a research question into a statistical question.

Turning a research question into a statistical question. Turning a research question into a statistical question. IGINAL QUESTION: Concept Concept Concept ABOUT ONE CONCEPT ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CONCEPTS TYPE OF QUESTION: DESCRIBE what s going on? DECIDE

More information

Relative-risk regression and model diagnostics. 16 November, 2015

Relative-risk regression and model diagnostics. 16 November, 2015 Relative-risk regression and model diagnostics 16 November, 2015 Relative risk regression More general multiplicative intensity model: Intensity for individual i at time t is i(t) =Y i (t)r(x i, ; t) 0

More information

Lecture 7 Time-dependent Covariates in Cox Regression

Lecture 7 Time-dependent Covariates in Cox Regression Lecture 7 Time-dependent Covariates in Cox Regression So far, we ve been considering the following Cox PH model: λ(t Z) = λ 0 (t) exp(β Z) = λ 0 (t) exp( β j Z j ) where β j is the parameter for the the

More information

Survival analysis in R

Survival analysis in R Survival analysis in R Niels Richard Hansen This note describes a few elementary aspects of practical analysis of survival data in R. For further information we refer to the book Introductory Statistics

More information

Lecture 8 Stat D. Gillen

Lecture 8 Stat D. Gillen Statistics 255 - Survival Analysis Presented February 23, 2016 Dan Gillen Department of Statistics University of California, Irvine 8.1 Example of two ways to stratify Suppose a confounder C has 3 levels

More information

β j = coefficient of x j in the model; β = ( β1, β2,

β j = coefficient of x j in the model; β = ( β1, β2, Regression Modeling of Survival Time Data Why regression models? Groups similar except for the treatment under study use the nonparametric methods discussed earlier. Groups differ in variables (covariates)

More information

Matched Pair Data. Stat 557 Heike Hofmann

Matched Pair Data. Stat 557 Heike Hofmann Matched Pair Data Stat 557 Heike Hofmann Outline Marginal Homogeneity - review Binary Response with covariates Ordinal response Symmetric Models Subject-specific vs Marginal Model conditional logistic

More information

Introduction to Statistical Analysis

Introduction to Statistical Analysis Introduction to Statistical Analysis Changyu Shen Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Objectives Descriptive

More information

Survival analysis in R

Survival analysis in R Survival analysis in R Niels Richard Hansen This note describes a few elementary aspects of practical analysis of survival data in R. For further information we refer to the book Introductory Statistics

More information

CDA Chapter 3 part II

CDA Chapter 3 part II CDA Chapter 3 part II Two-way tables with ordered classfications Let u 1 u 2... u I denote scores for the row variable X, and let ν 1 ν 2... ν J denote column Y scores. Consider the hypothesis H 0 : X

More information

MAS3301 / MAS8311 Biostatistics Part II: Survival

MAS3301 / MAS8311 Biostatistics Part II: Survival MAS3301 / MAS8311 Biostatistics Part II: Survival M. Farrow School of Mathematics and Statistics Newcastle University Semester 2, 2009-10 1 13 The Cox proportional hazards model 13.1 Introduction In the

More information

Nemours Biomedical Research Statistics Course. Li Xie Nemours Biostatistics Core October 14, 2014

Nemours Biomedical Research Statistics Course. Li Xie Nemours Biostatistics Core October 14, 2014 Nemours Biomedical Research Statistics Course Li Xie Nemours Biostatistics Core October 14, 2014 Outline Recap Introduction to Logistic Regression Recap Descriptive statistics Variable type Example of

More information

Stat 642, Lecture notes for 04/12/05 96

Stat 642, Lecture notes for 04/12/05 96 Stat 642, Lecture notes for 04/12/05 96 Hosmer-Lemeshow Statistic The Hosmer-Lemeshow Statistic is another measure of lack of fit. Hosmer and Lemeshow recommend partitioning the observations into 10 equal

More information

Multistate models and recurrent event models

Multistate models and recurrent event models Multistate models Multistate models and recurrent event models Patrick Breheny December 10 Patrick Breheny Survival Data Analysis (BIOS 7210) 1/22 Introduction Multistate models In this final lecture,

More information

In contrast, parametric techniques (fitting exponential or Weibull, for example) are more focussed, can handle general covariates, but require

In contrast, parametric techniques (fitting exponential or Weibull, for example) are more focussed, can handle general covariates, but require Chapter 5 modelling Semi parametric We have considered parametric and nonparametric techniques for comparing survival distributions between different treatment groups. Nonparametric techniques, such as

More information

Hypothesis testing, part 2. With some material from Howard Seltman, Blase Ur, Bilge Mutlu, Vibha Sazawal

Hypothesis testing, part 2. With some material from Howard Seltman, Blase Ur, Bilge Mutlu, Vibha Sazawal Hypothesis testing, part 2 With some material from Howard Seltman, Blase Ur, Bilge Mutlu, Vibha Sazawal 1 CATEGORICAL IV, NUMERIC DV 2 Independent samples, one IV # Conditions Normal/Parametric Non-parametric

More information

Introduction and Descriptive Statistics p. 1 Introduction to Statistics p. 3 Statistics, Science, and Observations p. 5 Populations and Samples p.

Introduction and Descriptive Statistics p. 1 Introduction to Statistics p. 3 Statistics, Science, and Observations p. 5 Populations and Samples p. Preface p. xi Introduction and Descriptive Statistics p. 1 Introduction to Statistics p. 3 Statistics, Science, and Observations p. 5 Populations and Samples p. 6 The Scientific Method and the Design of

More information

DETAILED CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS. 1. Introduction to Statistics

DETAILED CONTENTS PART I INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS. 1. Introduction to Statistics DETAILED CONTENTS About the Author Preface to the Instructor To the Student How to Use SPSS With This Book PART I INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS 1. Introduction to Statistics 1.1 Descriptive and

More information

Statistics in medicine

Statistics in medicine Statistics in medicine Lecture 4: and multivariable regression Fatma Shebl, MD, MS, MPH, PhD Assistant Professor Chronic Disease Epidemiology Department Yale School of Public Health Fatma.shebl@yale.edu

More information

Beyond GLM and likelihood

Beyond GLM and likelihood Stat 6620: Applied Linear Models Department of Statistics Western Michigan University Statistics curriculum Core knowledge (modeling and estimation) Math stat 1 (probability, distributions, convergence

More information

Marginal versus conditional effects: does it make a difference? Mireille Schnitzer, PhD Université de Montréal

Marginal versus conditional effects: does it make a difference? Mireille Schnitzer, PhD Université de Montréal Marginal versus conditional effects: does it make a difference? Mireille Schnitzer, PhD Université de Montréal Overview In observational and experimental studies, the goal may be to estimate the effect

More information

Survival Regression Models

Survival Regression Models Survival Regression Models David M. Rocke May 18, 2017 David M. Rocke Survival Regression Models May 18, 2017 1 / 32 Background on the Proportional Hazards Model The exponential distribution has constant

More information

Multistate models and recurrent event models

Multistate models and recurrent event models and recurrent event models Patrick Breheny December 6 Patrick Breheny University of Iowa Survival Data Analysis (BIOS:7210) 1 / 22 Introduction In this final lecture, we will briefly look at two other

More information

SSUI: Presentation Hints 2 My Perspective Software Examples Reliability Areas that need work

SSUI: Presentation Hints 2 My Perspective Software Examples Reliability Areas that need work SSUI: Presentation Hints 1 Comparing Marginal and Random Eects (Frailty) Models Terry M. Therneau Mayo Clinic April 1998 SSUI: Presentation Hints 2 My Perspective Software Examples Reliability Areas that

More information

Foundations of Probability and Statistics

Foundations of Probability and Statistics Foundations of Probability and Statistics William C. Rinaman Le Moyne College Syracuse, New York Saunders College Publishing Harcourt Brace College Publishers Fort Worth Philadelphia San Diego New York

More information

Part [1.0] Measures of Classification Accuracy for the Prediction of Survival Times

Part [1.0] Measures of Classification Accuracy for the Prediction of Survival Times Part [1.0] Measures of Classification Accuracy for the Prediction of Survival Times Patrick J. Heagerty PhD Department of Biostatistics University of Washington 1 Biomarkers Review: Cox Regression Model

More information

Lecture 12: Effect modification, and confounding in logistic regression

Lecture 12: Effect modification, and confounding in logistic regression Lecture 12: Effect modification, and confounding in logistic regression Ani Manichaikul amanicha@jhsph.edu 4 May 2007 Today Categorical predictor create dummy variables just like for linear regression

More information

Section IX. Introduction to Logistic Regression for binary outcomes. Poisson regression

Section IX. Introduction to Logistic Regression for binary outcomes. Poisson regression Section IX Introduction to Logistic Regression for binary outcomes Poisson regression 0 Sec 9 - Logistic regression In linear regression, we studied models where Y is a continuous variable. What about

More information

Lecture 7. Proportional Hazards Model - Handling Ties and Survival Estimation Statistics Survival Analysis. Presented February 4, 2016

Lecture 7. Proportional Hazards Model - Handling Ties and Survival Estimation Statistics Survival Analysis. Presented February 4, 2016 Proportional Hazards Model - Handling Ties and Survival Estimation Statistics 255 - Survival Analysis Presented February 4, 2016 likelihood - Discrete Dan Gillen Department of Statistics University of

More information

REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR TIME-TO-EVENT DATA THE PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS (COX) MODEL ST520

REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR TIME-TO-EVENT DATA THE PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS (COX) MODEL ST520 REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR TIME-TO-EVENT DATA THE PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS (COX) MODEL ST520 Department of Statistics North Carolina State University Presented by: Butch Tsiatis, Department of Statistics, NCSU

More information

Sample Size/Power Calculation by Software/Online Calculators

Sample Size/Power Calculation by Software/Online Calculators Sample Size/Power Calculation by Software/Online Calculators May 24, 2018 Li Zhang, Ph.D. li.zhang@ucsf.edu Associate Professor Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Division of Hematology and Oncology

More information

ECLT 5810 Linear Regression and Logistic Regression for Classification. Prof. Wai Lam

ECLT 5810 Linear Regression and Logistic Regression for Classification. Prof. Wai Lam ECLT 5810 Linear Regression and Logistic Regression for Classification Prof. Wai Lam Linear Regression Models Least Squares Input vectors is an attribute / feature / predictor (independent variable) The

More information

Nonparametric Statistics

Nonparametric Statistics Nonparametric Statistics Nonparametric or Distribution-free statistics: used when data are ordinal (i.e., rankings) used when ratio/interval data are not normally distributed (data are converted to ranks)

More information

Outline. Frailty modelling of Multivariate Survival Data. Clustered survival data. Clustered survival data

Outline. Frailty modelling of Multivariate Survival Data. Clustered survival data. Clustered survival data Outline Frailty modelling of Multivariate Survival Data Thomas Scheike ts@biostat.ku.dk Department of Biostatistics University of Copenhagen Marginal versus Frailty models. Two-stage frailty models: copula

More information

Statistics 262: Intermediate Biostatistics Model selection

Statistics 262: Intermediate Biostatistics Model selection Statistics 262: Intermediate Biostatistics Model selection Jonathan Taylor & Kristin Cobb Statistics 262: Intermediate Biostatistics p.1/?? Today s class Model selection. Strategies for model selection.

More information

Analysis of Categorical Data. Nick Jackson University of Southern California Department of Psychology 10/11/2013

Analysis of Categorical Data. Nick Jackson University of Southern California Department of Psychology 10/11/2013 Analysis of Categorical Data Nick Jackson University of Southern California Department of Psychology 10/11/2013 1 Overview Data Types Contingency Tables Logit Models Binomial Ordinal Nominal 2 Things not

More information

On a connection between the Bradley-Terry model and the Cox proportional hazards model

On a connection between the Bradley-Terry model and the Cox proportional hazards model On a connection between the Bradley-Terry model and the Cox proportional hazards model Yuhua Su and Mai Zhou Department of Statistics University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0027, U.S.A. SUMMARY This

More information

Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Midterm Exam

Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Midterm Exam Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Midterm Exam List of Figures in this document by page: List of Figures 1 Packages................................ 2 2 Hospital infection risk data (some).................

More information

Probabilistic Index Models

Probabilistic Index Models Probabilistic Index Models Jan De Neve Department of Data Analysis Ghent University M3 Storrs, Conneticut, USA May 23, 2017 Jan.DeNeve@UGent.be 1 / 37 Introduction 2 / 37 Introduction to Probabilistic

More information

Small n, σ known or unknown, underlying nongaussian

Small n, σ known or unknown, underlying nongaussian READY GUIDE Summary Tables SUMMARY-1: Methods to compute some confidence intervals Parameter of Interest Conditions 95% CI Proportion (π) Large n, p 0 and p 1 Equation 12.11 Small n, any p Figure 12-4

More information

Logistic Regressions. Stat 430

Logistic Regressions. Stat 430 Logistic Regressions Stat 430 Final Project Final Project is, again, team based You will decide on a project - only constraint is: you are supposed to use techniques for a solution that are related to

More information

Textbook Examples of. SPSS Procedure

Textbook Examples of. SPSS Procedure Textbook s of IBM SPSS Procedures Each SPSS procedure listed below has its own section in the textbook. These sections include a purpose statement that describes the statistical test, identification of

More information

TABLES AND FORMULAS FOR MOORE Basic Practice of Statistics

TABLES AND FORMULAS FOR MOORE Basic Practice of Statistics TABLES AND FORMULAS FOR MOORE Basic Practice of Statistics Exploring Data: Distributions Look for overall pattern (shape, center, spread) and deviations (outliers). Mean (use a calculator): x = x 1 + x

More information

Master s Written Examination - Solution

Master s Written Examination - Solution Master s Written Examination - Solution Spring 204 Problem Stat 40 Suppose X and X 2 have the joint pdf f X,X 2 (x, x 2 ) = 2e (x +x 2 ), 0 < x < x 2

More information

Logistic Regression. Continued Psy 524 Ainsworth

Logistic Regression. Continued Psy 524 Ainsworth Logistic Regression Continued Psy 524 Ainsworth Equations Regression Equation Y e = 1 + A+ B X + B X + B X 1 1 2 2 3 3 i A+ B X + B X + B X e 1 1 2 2 3 3 Equations The linear part of the logistic regression

More information

Modeling Prediction of the Nosocomial Pneumonia with a Multistate model

Modeling Prediction of the Nosocomial Pneumonia with a Multistate model Modeling Prediction of the Nosocomial Pneumonia with a Multistate model M.Nguile Makao 1 PHD student Director: J.F. Timsit 2 Co-Directors: B Liquet 3 & J.F. Coeurjolly 4 1 Team 11 Inserm U823-Joseph Fourier

More information

ESP 178 Applied Research Methods. 2/23: Quantitative Analysis

ESP 178 Applied Research Methods. 2/23: Quantitative Analysis ESP 178 Applied Research Methods 2/23: Quantitative Analysis Data Preparation Data coding create codebook that defines each variable, its response scale, how it was coded Data entry for mail surveys and

More information

3 Joint Distributions 71

3 Joint Distributions 71 2.2.3 The Normal Distribution 54 2.2.4 The Beta Density 58 2.3 Functions of a Random Variable 58 2.4 Concluding Remarks 64 2.5 Problems 64 3 Joint Distributions 71 3.1 Introduction 71 3.2 Discrete Random

More information

APPENDIX B Sample-Size Calculation Methods: Classical Design

APPENDIX B Sample-Size Calculation Methods: Classical Design APPENDIX B Sample-Size Calculation Methods: Classical Design One/Paired - Sample Hypothesis Test for the Mean Sign test for median difference for a paired sample Wilcoxon signed - rank test for one or

More information

Multivariable Fractional Polynomials

Multivariable Fractional Polynomials Multivariable Fractional Polynomials Axel Benner September 7, 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Inventory of functions 1 3 Usage in R 2 3.1 Model selection........................................ 3 4 Example

More information

Testing Independence

Testing Independence Testing Independence Dipankar Bandyopadhyay Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University BIOS 625: Categorical Data & GLM 1/50 Testing Independence Previously, we looked at RR = OR = 1

More information

Statistics Handbook. All statistical tables were computed by the author.

Statistics Handbook. All statistical tables were computed by the author. Statistics Handbook Contents Page Wilcoxon rank-sum test (Mann-Whitney equivalent) Wilcoxon matched-pairs test 3 Normal Distribution 4 Z-test Related samples t-test 5 Unrelated samples t-test 6 Variance

More information

Online supplement. Absolute Value of Lung Function (FEV 1 or FVC) Explains the Sex Difference in. Breathlessness in the General Population

Online supplement. Absolute Value of Lung Function (FEV 1 or FVC) Explains the Sex Difference in. Breathlessness in the General Population Online supplement Absolute Value of Lung Function (FEV 1 or FVC) Explains the Sex Difference in Breathlessness in the General Population Table S1. Comparison between patients who were excluded or included

More information

ECLT 5810 Linear Regression and Logistic Regression for Classification. Prof. Wai Lam

ECLT 5810 Linear Regression and Logistic Regression for Classification. Prof. Wai Lam ECLT 5810 Linear Regression and Logistic Regression for Classification Prof. Wai Lam Linear Regression Models Least Squares Input vectors is an attribute / feature / predictor (independent variable) The

More information

BIOL 51A - Biostatistics 1 1. Lecture 1: Intro to Biostatistics. Smoking: hazardous? FEV (l) Smoke

BIOL 51A - Biostatistics 1 1. Lecture 1: Intro to Biostatistics. Smoking: hazardous? FEV (l) Smoke BIOL 51A - Biostatistics 1 1 Lecture 1: Intro to Biostatistics Smoking: hazardous? FEV (l) 1 2 3 4 5 No Yes Smoke BIOL 51A - Biostatistics 1 2 Box Plot a.k.a box-and-whisker diagram or candlestick chart

More information

Hypothesis Testing, Power, Sample Size and Confidence Intervals (Part 2)

Hypothesis Testing, Power, Sample Size and Confidence Intervals (Part 2) Hypothesis Testing, Power, Sample Size and Confidence Intervals (Part 2) B.H. Robbins Scholars Series June 23, 2010 1 / 29 Outline Z-test χ 2 -test Confidence Interval Sample size and power Relative effect

More information

Wheel for assessing spinal block study

Wheel for assessing spinal block study Wheel for assessing spinal block study Xue Han, xue.han@vanderbilt.edu Matt Shotwell, matt.shotwell@vanderbilt.edu Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University December 13, 2012 Contents 1 Preliminary

More information

Missing Covariate Data in Matched Case-Control Studies

Missing Covariate Data in Matched Case-Control Studies Missing Covariate Data in Matched Case-Control Studies Department of Statistics North Carolina State University Paul Rathouz Dept. of Health Studies U. of Chicago prathouz@health.bsd.uchicago.edu with

More information

Basic Medical Statistics Course

Basic Medical Statistics Course Basic Medical Statistics Course S7 Logistic Regression November 2015 Wilma Heemsbergen w.heemsbergen@nki.nl Logistic Regression The concept of a relationship between the distribution of a dependent variable

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 COMBINATORIAL PROBABILITY 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 COMBINATORIAL PROBABILITY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 COMBINATORIAL PROBABILITY 1 1.1 The Probability Model...1 1.2 Finite Discrete Models with Equally Likely Outcomes...5 1.2.1 Tree Diagrams...6 1.2.2 The Multiplication Principle...8

More information

Homework Solutions Applied Logistic Regression

Homework Solutions Applied Logistic Regression Homework Solutions Applied Logistic Regression WEEK 6 Exercise 1 From the ICU data, use as the outcome variable vital status (STA) and CPR prior to ICU admission (CPR) as a covariate. (a) Demonstrate that

More information

How to Present Results of Regression Models to Clinicians

How to Present Results of Regression Models to Clinicians How to Present Results of Regression Models to Clinicians Frank E Harrell Jr Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University School of Medicine f.harrell@vanderbilt.edu biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/fhhandouts

More information

Comparison of Hazard, Odds and Risk Ratio in the Two-Sample Survival Problem

Comparison of Hazard, Odds and Risk Ratio in the Two-Sample Survival Problem Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 8-2014 Comparison of Hazard, Odds and Risk Ratio in the Two-Sample Survival Problem Benedict P. Dormitorio Western Michigan

More information

Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Midterm Exam

Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Midterm Exam Booklet of Code and Output for STAD29/STA 1007 Midterm Exam List of Figures in this document by page: List of Figures 1 NBA attendance data........................ 2 2 Regression model for NBA attendances...............

More information

Instrumental variables estimation in the Cox Proportional Hazard regression model

Instrumental variables estimation in the Cox Proportional Hazard regression model Instrumental variables estimation in the Cox Proportional Hazard regression model James O Malley, Ph.D. Department of Biomedical Data Science The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice

More information

Multi-level Models: Idea

Multi-level Models: Idea Review of 140.656 Review Introduction to multi-level models The two-stage normal-normal model Two-stage linear models with random effects Three-stage linear models Two-stage logistic regression with random

More information

Outline. Frailty modelling of Multivariate Survival Data. Clustered survival data. Clustered survival data

Outline. Frailty modelling of Multivariate Survival Data. Clustered survival data. Clustered survival data Outline Frailty modelling of Multivariate Survival Data Thomas Scheike ts@biostat.ku.dk Department of Biostatistics University of Copenhagen Marginal versus Frailty models. Two-stage frailty models: copula

More information

Instantaneous geometric rates via generalized linear models

Instantaneous geometric rates via generalized linear models Instantaneous geometric rates via generalized linear models Andrea Discacciati Matteo Bottai Unit of Biostatistics Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden andrea.discacciati@ki.se 1 September 2017 Outline

More information

Case-control studies

Case-control studies Matched and nested case-control studies Bendix Carstensen Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark b@bxc.dk http://bendixcarstensen.com Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, 8 November

More information

Fitting Cox Regression Models

Fitting Cox Regression Models Department of Psychology and Human Development Vanderbilt University GCM, 2010 1 Introduction 2 3 4 Introduction The Partial Likelihood Method Implications and Consequences of the Cox Approach 5 Introduction

More information

Lecture 9. Statistics Survival Analysis. Presented February 23, Dan Gillen Department of Statistics University of California, Irvine

Lecture 9. Statistics Survival Analysis. Presented February 23, Dan Gillen Department of Statistics University of California, Irvine Statistics 255 - Survival Analysis Presented February 23, 2016 Dan Gillen Department of Statistics University of California, Irvine 9.1 Survival analysis involves subjects moving through time Hazard may

More information

BMI 541/699 Lecture 22

BMI 541/699 Lecture 22 BMI 541/699 Lecture 22 Where we are: 1. Introduction and Experimental Design 2. Exploratory Data Analysis 3. Probability 4. T-based methods for continous variables 5. Power and sample size for t-based

More information

STAT 7030: Categorical Data Analysis

STAT 7030: Categorical Data Analysis STAT 7030: Categorical Data Analysis 5. Logistic Regression Peng Zeng Department of Mathematics and Statistics Auburn University Fall 2012 Peng Zeng (Auburn University) STAT 7030 Lecture Notes Fall 2012

More information

A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R 2nd Edition. Brian S. Everitt and Torsten Hothorn

A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R 2nd Edition. Brian S. Everitt and Torsten Hothorn A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R 2nd Edition Brian S. Everitt and Torsten Hothorn CHAPTER 7 Logistic Regression and Generalised Linear Models: Blood Screening, Women s Role in Society, Colonic

More information

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE EXAMINATION. ST3241 Categorical Data Analysis. (Semester II: ) April/May, 2011 Time Allowed : 2 Hours

NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE EXAMINATION. ST3241 Categorical Data Analysis. (Semester II: ) April/May, 2011 Time Allowed : 2 Hours NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE EXAMINATION Categorical Data Analysis (Semester II: 2010 2011) April/May, 2011 Time Allowed : 2 Hours Matriculation No: Seat No: Grade Table Question 1 2 3 4 5 6 Full marks

More information

Statistical. Psychology

Statistical. Psychology SEVENTH у *i km m it* & П SB Й EDITION Statistical M e t h o d s for Psychology D a v i d C. Howell University of Vermont ; \ WADSWORTH f% CENGAGE Learning* Australia Biaall apan Korea Меяко Singapore

More information

Comparison of Two Samples

Comparison of Two Samples 2 Comparison of Two Samples 2.1 Introduction Problems of comparing two samples arise frequently in medicine, sociology, agriculture, engineering, and marketing. The data may have been generated by observation

More information

Unit 9: Inferences for Proportions and Count Data

Unit 9: Inferences for Proportions and Count Data Unit 9: Inferences for Proportions and Count Data Statistics 571: Statistical Methods Ramón V. León 1/15/008 Unit 9 - Stat 571 - Ramón V. León 1 Large Sample Confidence Interval for Proportion ( pˆ p)

More information

Functional Regression Methods for Densely-Sampled. Biomarkers in the ICU. Jonathan E. Gellar

Functional Regression Methods for Densely-Sampled. Biomarkers in the ICU. Jonathan E. Gellar Functional Regression Methods for Densely-Sampled Biomarkers in the ICU by Jonathan E. Gellar A dissertation submitted to The Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree

More information

Glossary for the Triola Statistics Series

Glossary for the Triola Statistics Series Glossary for the Triola Statistics Series Absolute deviation The measure of variation equal to the sum of the deviations of each value from the mean, divided by the number of values Acceptance sampling

More information

Chapter 4 Regression Models

Chapter 4 Regression Models 23.August 2010 Chapter 4 Regression Models The target variable T denotes failure time We let x = (x (1),..., x (m) ) represent a vector of available covariates. Also called regression variables, regressors,

More information

Lecture 1. Introduction Statistics Statistical Methods II. Presented January 8, 2018

Lecture 1. Introduction Statistics Statistical Methods II. Presented January 8, 2018 Introduction Statistics 211 - Statistical Methods II Presented January 8, 2018 linear models Dan Gillen Department of Statistics University of California, Irvine 1.1 Logistics and Contact Information Lectures:

More information

Nonparametric Methods

Nonparametric Methods Nonparametric Methods Marc H. Mehlman marcmehlman@yahoo.com University of New Haven Nonparametric Methods, or Distribution Free Methods is for testing from a population without knowing anything about the

More information

Lecture 01: Introduction

Lecture 01: Introduction Lecture 01: Introduction Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Ph.D. BMTRY 711: Analysis of Categorical Data Spring 2011 Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Medical University of South Carolina Lecture 01: Introduction

More information

Data are sometimes not compatible with the assumptions of parametric statistical tests (i.e. t-test, regression, ANOVA)

Data are sometimes not compatible with the assumptions of parametric statistical tests (i.e. t-test, regression, ANOVA) BSTT523 Pagano & Gauvreau Chapter 13 1 Nonparametric Statistics Data are sometimes not compatible with the assumptions of parametric statistical tests (i.e. t-test, regression, ANOVA) In particular, data

More information

You can specify the response in the form of a single variable or in the form of a ratio of two variables denoted events/trials.

You can specify the response in the form of a single variable or in the form of a ratio of two variables denoted events/trials. The GENMOD Procedure MODEL Statement MODEL response = < effects > < /options > ; MODEL events/trials = < effects > < /options > ; You can specify the response in the form of a single variable or in the

More information

Residuals and regression diagnostics: focusing on logistic regression

Residuals and regression diagnostics: focusing on logistic regression Big-data Clinical Trial Column Page of 8 Residuals and regression diagnostics: focusing on logistic regression Zhongheng Zhang Department of Critical Care Medicine, Jinhua Municipal Central Hospital, Jinhua

More information

ANALYSING BINARY DATA IN A REPEATED MEASUREMENTS SETTING USING SAS

ANALYSING BINARY DATA IN A REPEATED MEASUREMENTS SETTING USING SAS Libraries 1997-9th Annual Conference Proceedings ANALYSING BINARY DATA IN A REPEATED MEASUREMENTS SETTING USING SAS Eleanor F. Allan Follow this and additional works at: http://newprairiepress.org/agstatconference

More information

Class: Dean Foster. September 30, Read sections: Examples chapter (chapter 3) Question today: Do prices go up faster than they go down?

Class: Dean Foster. September 30, Read sections: Examples chapter (chapter 3) Question today: Do prices go up faster than they go down? Class: Dean Foster September 30, 2013 Administrivia Read sections: Examples chapter (chapter 3) Gas prices Question today: Do prices go up faster than they go down? Idea is that sellers watch spot price

More information

Binomial Model. Lecture 10: Introduction to Logistic Regression. Logistic Regression. Binomial Distribution. n independent trials

Binomial Model. Lecture 10: Introduction to Logistic Regression. Logistic Regression. Binomial Distribution. n independent trials Lecture : Introduction to Logistic Regression Ani Manichaikul amanicha@jhsph.edu 2 May 27 Binomial Model n independent trials (e.g., coin tosses) p = probability of success on each trial (e.g., p =! =

More information

TMA 4275 Lifetime Analysis June 2004 Solution

TMA 4275 Lifetime Analysis June 2004 Solution TMA 4275 Lifetime Analysis June 2004 Solution Problem 1 a) Observation of the outcome is censored, if the time of the outcome is not known exactly and only the last time when it was observed being intact,

More information

Test of Association between Two Ordinal Variables while Adjusting for Covariates

Test of Association between Two Ordinal Variables while Adjusting for Covariates Test of Association between Two Ordinal Variables while Adjusting for Covariates Chun Li, Bryan Shepherd Department of Biostatistics Vanderbilt University May 13, 2009 Examples Amblyopia http://www.medindia.net/

More information

Question. Hypothesis testing. Example. Answer: hypothesis. Test: true or not? Question. Average is not the mean! μ average. Random deviation or not?

Question. Hypothesis testing. Example. Answer: hypothesis. Test: true or not? Question. Average is not the mean! μ average. Random deviation or not? Hypothesis testing Question Very frequently: what is the possible value of μ? Sample: we know only the average! μ average. Random deviation or not? Standard error: the measure of the random deviation.

More information

Lecture 10: Introduction to Logistic Regression

Lecture 10: Introduction to Logistic Regression Lecture 10: Introduction to Logistic Regression Ani Manichaikul amanicha@jhsph.edu 2 May 2007 Logistic Regression Regression for a response variable that follows a binomial distribution Recall the binomial

More information

On a connection between the Bradley Terry model and the Cox proportional hazards model

On a connection between the Bradley Terry model and the Cox proportional hazards model Statistics & Probability Letters 76 (2006) 698 702 www.elsevier.com/locate/stapro On a connection between the Bradley Terry model and the Cox proportional hazards model Yuhua Su, Mai Zhou Department of

More information

Goodness-Of-Fit for Cox s Regression Model. Extensions of Cox s Regression Model. Survival Analysis Fall 2004, Copenhagen

Goodness-Of-Fit for Cox s Regression Model. Extensions of Cox s Regression Model. Survival Analysis Fall 2004, Copenhagen Outline Cox s proportional hazards model. Goodness-of-fit tools More flexible models R-package timereg Forthcoming book, Martinussen and Scheike. 2/38 University of Copenhagen http://www.biostat.ku.dk

More information

Analysis of repeated measurements (KLMED8008)

Analysis of repeated measurements (KLMED8008) Analysis of repeated measurements (KLMED8008) Eirik Skogvoll, MD PhD Professor and Consultant Institute of Circulation and Medical Imaging Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Emergency Medicine 1 Day 2 Practical

More information