|
|
- Allison Carr
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 1/29/2010 Page 2 of 65
8 1/29/2010 Page 3 of 65
9 1/29/2010 Page 4 of 65
10 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 5 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Shallow Cells Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Geotechnial Report Reference Letter from Earth Consulting Incorporated Dated December 3, 2008 Vault Geometry Wall - A Length ft - Interior Dimensions Width Cell ft - Interior Dimensions Cell ft - Interior Dimensions Lid Thickness 1.04 ft Soil grade over vault Max ft Wall Height 6.50 ft Min ft Design W.S ft Freeboard 1.00 ft Under Side of Vault Lid ft Soil Cover 1.46 ft - Maximum Top of Vault Lid ft 1.46 ft - Minimum Vault Bottom ft Footing Drain Elevation ft - Footing drain not required. Watertable at 18.5' bgs. Soils well drained Loading Criteria AASHTO Loading H20 [H20, H25, 45 kip] Surcharge 71 psf - Equiv uniform Live Loading Footing Design 260 psf - Wall Design (geotech's standard 2 ft fill for traffic load) Equivalent Loading 70 psf uniform thrust - Wall Design 2.00 ft of additional fill - Wall Design 16 kip - H20 rear axle wheel load. 6 ft. wheel spacing. Geotechnical Design Values 9 Depth - grade to BOV Allowable Soil Bearing ft. load width Native Soil 4,000 psf 1,778 plf - where pressures overlap Struct'l Fill 4,000 psf 71 psf - (Int Wall) w equiv at overlap 142 psf - (Ext Wall) w equiv at overlap EFP active Drained 35 pcf EFP active Saturated 85 pcf EFP passive 250 pcf EFP uniform - seismi 33 psf 8 Seismic load of 8 x wall height / 1.6. Actual seismic load facto EFP uniform - gravity psf Uniform pressure of 0 x wall height. Live load factor = 1.6 Friction Coeff Soil Density 130 pcf Lid Density 84 pcf (84 pcf =HCP, 150 = Concrete) Material Strengths Concrete Walls 3,000 psi Footings 3,000 psi Lid 3,000 psi Reinforcing Steel Rebar 60,000 psi WWM 40,000 psi Muckleshoot - West Vault - shallow 2-span.xls 1 1/29/2010 8:16 AM
11 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 6 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Shallow Cells Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Exterior Walls Wall - A Soil grade over vault 499 ft Wall Thickness 8.00 in Wall Height 6.50 ft Concrete Strength Rebar Grade 3,000 psi 60,000 psi Soil Pressure top 190 psf Wall ht 6.50 ftg lin 400 psf bott to ftg drain 0.50 ft base 443 psf Design Values Service Factored 1.6 Moment 1,609 lb-ft 2,574 lb-ft good number R top 864 lb 1,383 lb R bot 1,117 lb 1,786 lb Reinforcing Horizontal Reinforcing Options: Rho Horiz 12 in o/c rho = in o/c rho = in o/c rho = Crack Control z - limit to 145 k/in Vertical Reinforcing Options: fs [ksi] dc [in] Ac [in2] z [k/in] Design Sol'n 19 in o/c OK 4/3*rho 29 in o/c OK 42 in o/c no good 57 in o/c no good Wall Shear Footing dowel #5 Slab dowel #5 Shear, Vn, at top of wall 1.84 kips/ft Shear, Vn, at base of wall 2.38 kips/ft Wall top: One-way shear, Vc, with dowels 4 inches from inside wall face 5.26 kips/ft Wall Base: One-way shear, Vc, with dowels 2 inches from inside wall face 7.89 kips/ft Check Dtl Footing dowel shear with friction coefficient = 1.0 & #5 dowel kips/bar Wall Top: Place #5 dowels 4 inches from inside wall face. Wall Base: Place #5 dowels 2 inches from inside wall face. Space dowels at 34 o/c max. Space dowels at 39 o/c max Muckleshoot - West Vault - shallow 2-span.xls 2 1/29/2010 8:16 AM
12 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 7 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Shallow Cells Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Exterior Footing - Under Plank Ends Wall - A Soil grade over vault 499 ft Footing Thickness 8.00 in Wall Height 6.50 ft Wall Thickness 8.00 in Tributary Width 12.5 ft Concrete Strength Rebar Grade 3,000 psi 60,000 psi Design Loads Service Service Factored Dead Soil 190 psf 2,496 plf 3,495 plf Lid 88 psf 1,152 plf 1,613 plf Wall 650 plf 910 plf Ftg weight 193 plf 271 plf Soil wedge at heel 780 plf 1,092 plf Live Surchar 142 psf 1,873 plf 3,183 plf 7,144 plf 10,564 plf Width 1.79 ft Use 2.00 ft Forces at top of wall Soil Bearing Service 3,572 psf DL 3,648 plf Factored 5,282 psf LL 1,873 plf - uniform load Moment Mu 1.2 kip-ft Shear Vu 1.8 kips Vn 2.1 kips Vc Shear OK, calculation not required, cone shear failure. Reinforcing Longitudinal Reinforcing Options: 2 # plf < # plf 1 # plf Transverse Reinforcing Options: 34 in o/c 52 in o/c 75 in o/c 102 in o/c Transverse reinforcing not required. Cone shear failure Muckleshoot - West Vault - shallow 2-span.xls 3 1/29/2010 8:16 AM
13 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 8 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Shallow Cells Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Interior Footing Wall - B Soil grade over vault 499 ft Footing Thickness in Wall Height 6.50 ft Wall Thickness 8.00 in Tributary Width 25 ft Concrete Strength Rebar Grade 3,000 psi 60,000 psi Design Loads Service Service Factored Dead Soil 190 psf 4,866 plf 6,812 plf Lid 88 psf 2,246 plf 3,144 plf Wall 650 plf 910 plf Ftg weight 340 plf 476 plf Live Surchar 71 psf 1,825 plf 3,103 plf 9,927 plf 14,445 plf Width 2.48 ft Use 2.50 ft Forces at top of wall Soil Bearing Service 3,971 psf DL 7,112 plf Factored 5,778 psf LL 1,825 plf - uniform load Moment Mu 2.4 kip-ft Wall Compressive Stress at Mid-height Shear Vu 2.6 kip P service 9,262 plf Vn 3.0 kip fa 96 psi Vc 11.3 Shear OK, calculation Fa 180 psi Reinforcing Longitudinal Reinforcing Options: 4 # plf < # plf 2 # plf Transverse Reinforcing Options: 27 in o/c 42 in o/c 60 in o/c 81 in o/c Transverse reinforcing not required. Cone shear failure Muckleshoot - West Vault - shallow 2-span.xls 4 1/29/2010 8:16 AM
14 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 9 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Shallow Cells Buoyancy Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Vault Geometry Length Width Lid Thickness Soil grade over vault Under Side of Vault Lid Vault Bottom Soil Cover Wall Height Allowable Water Table Potential uplift ft - outside dim ft - outside dim ft ft ft ft 1.46 ft - Maximum 6.5 ft ft 183,283 lb - per foot of vault length Walls 214,933 lb perimeter only Lid 42,972 lb Soil Cover 1,117,278 lb Footings 66,142 lb perimeter only Floor 4.5 in thick 331,500 lb 1,772,825 lb Soil Column in proj 515,840 lb Total am'nt of ftg that ext'ds beyond the ext wall face. Accounts for both sides of the vault. Accounts for dry soil above ftg drain only. Ratio Max.footing drain Elev ft < Floor Slab Design Gross Uplift 31.1 psf Slab Weight 56.3 psf Net Uplift psf No net uplift on floor slab Flexure Mu = k-ft/ft d = 2.25 in As (transverse) 24 in MD OR 38 in MD Transverse As (long) 24 in MD Transverse Alternate: 6x6-W2.9XW2.9 WWM (dia = in, area = in2/ft) at MD Slab Shear Vu = -0.5 klf V n = klf Vc = 2.95 klf Shear capacity adequate Muckleshoot - West Vault - shallow 2-span.xls 5 1/29/2010 8:16 AM
15 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 10 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Deep Cells Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Geotechnial Report Reference Letter from Earth Consulting Incorporated Dated December 3, 2008 Vault Geometry Wall - C Length ft - Interior Dimensions Width Cell ft - Interior Dimensions Cell ft - Interior Dimensions Lid Thickness 1.04 ft Soil grade over vault Max ft Wall Height ft Min ft Design W.S ft Freeboard 1.00 ft Under Side of Vault Lid ft Soil Cover 1.46 ft - Maximum Top of Vault Lid ft 1.46 ft - Minimum Vault Bottom ft Footing Drain Elevation ft - Footing drain not required. Watertable at 18.5' bgs. Soils well drained Loading Criteria AASHTO Loading H20 [H20, H25, 45 kip] Surcharge 43 psf - Equiv uniform Live Loading Footing Design 260 psf - Wall Design (geotech's standard 2 ft fill for traffic load) Equivalent Loading 70 psf uniform thrust - Wall Design 2.00 ft of additional fill - Wall Design 16 kip - H20 rear axle wheel load. 6 ft. wheel spacing. Geotechnical Design Values Depth - grade to BOV Allowable Soil Bearing ft. load width Native Soil 4,000 psf 1,085 plf - where pressures overlap Struct'l Fill 4,000 psf 43 psf - (Int Wall) w equiv at overlap 87 psf - (Ext Wall) w equiv at overlap EFP active Drained 35 pcf EFP active Saturated 85 pcf EFP passive 250 pcf EFP uniform - seismi 61 psf 8 Seismic load of 8 x wall height / 1.6. Actual seismic load facto EFP uniform - gravity psf Uniform pressure of 0 x wall height. Live load factor = 1.6 Friction Coeff Soil Density 130 pcf Lid Density 84 pcf (84 pcf =HCP, 150 = Concrete) Material Strengths Concrete Walls 3,000 psi Footings 3,000 psi Lid 3,000 psi Reinforcing Steel Rebar 60,000 psi WWM 40,000 psi Muckleshoot - West Vault - deep 2-span.xls 1 1/29/2010 8:18 AM
16 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 11 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Deep Cells Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Exterior Walls Wall - C Soil grade over vault 499 ft Wall Thickness in Wall Height ft Concrete Strength Rebar Grade 3,000 psi 60,000 psi Soil Pressure top 219 psf Wall ht ftg lin 613 psf bott to ftg drain 1.00 ft base 698 psf Design Values Service Factored 1.6 Moment 8,181 lb-ft 13,089 lb-ft good number R top 2,216 lb 3,545 lb R bot 3,115 lb 4,984 lb Reinforcing Horizontal Reinforcing Options: Rho Horiz 10 in o/c rho = in o/c rho = in o/c rho = Crack Control z - limit to 145 k/in Vertical Reinforcing Options: fs [ksi] dc [in] Ac [in2] z [k/in] Design Sol'n 6 in o/c OK rho 10 in o/c OK 14 in o/c OK 19 in o/c OK Wall Shear Footing dowel #5 Slab dowel #5 Shear, Vn, at top of wall 4.73 kips/ft Shear, Vn, at base of wall 6.65 kips/ft Wall top: One-way shear, Vc, with dowels 4 inches from inside wall face 7.89 kips/ft Check Dtl Wall Base: One-way shear, Vc, with dowels 2 inches from inside wall face kips/ft Check Dtl Footing dowel shear with friction coefficient = 1.0 & #5 dowel kips/bar Wall Top: Place #5 dowels 4 inches from inside wall face. Wall Base: Place #5 dowels 2 inches from inside wall face. Space dowels at 20 o/c max. Space dowels at 18 o/c max Muckleshoot - West Vault - deep 2-span.xls 2 1/29/2010 8:18 AM
17 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 12 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Deep Cells Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Exterior Footing - Under Plank Ends Wall - C Soil grade over vault 499 ft Footing Thickness 8.00 in Wall Height ft Wall Thickness in Tributary Width 12.5 ft Concrete Strength Rebar Grade 3,000 psi 60,000 psi Design Loads Service Service Factored Dead Soil 190 psf 2,528 plf 3,539 plf Lid 88 psf 1,167 plf 1,633 plf Wall 1,531 plf 2,144 plf Ftg weight 193 plf 271 plf Soil wedge at heel 1,119 plf 1,566 plf Live Surchar 87 psf 1,157 plf 1,967 plf 7,695 plf 11,120 plf Width 1.92 ft Use 2.00 ft Forces at top of wall Soil Bearing Service 3,847 psf DL 3,694 plf Factored 5,560 psf LL 1,157 plf - uniform load Moment Mu 0.9 kip-ft Shear Vu 1.4 kips Vn 1.6 kips Vc Shear OK, calculation not required, cone shear failure. Reinforcing Longitudinal Reinforcing Options: 2 # plf < # plf 1 # plf Transverse Reinforcing Options: 42 in o/c 65 in o/c 93 in o/c 127 in o/c Transverse reinforcing not required. Cone shear failure Muckleshoot - West Vault - deep 2-span.xls 3 1/29/2010 8:18 AM
18 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 13 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Deep Cells Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Interior Footing Wall - D Soil grade over vault 499 ft Footing Thickness in Wall Height ft Wall Thickness in Tributary Width 25 ft Concrete Strength Rebar Grade 3,000 psi 60,000 psi Design Loads Service Service Factored Dead Soil 190 psf 4,898 plf 6,857 plf Lid 88 psf 2,260 plf 3,165 plf Wall 1,531 plf 2,144 plf Ftg weight 399 plf 558 plf Live Surchar 43 psf 1,121 plf 1,906 plf 10,209 plf 14,629 plf Width 2.55 ft Use 2.75 ft Forces at top of wall Soil Bearing Service 3,712 psf DL 7,158 plf Factored 5,320 psf LL 1,121 plf - uniform load Moment Mu 2.4 kip-ft Wall Compressive Stress at Mid-height Shear Vu 2.4 kip P service 9,045 plf Vn 2.9 kip fa 75 psi Vc 11.3 Shear OK, calculation Fa 180 psi Reinforcing Longitudinal Reinforcing Options: 4 # plf < # plf 2 # plf Transverse Reinforcing Options: 29 in o/c 45 in o/c 65 in o/c 88 in o/c Transverse reinforcing not required. Cone shear failure Muckleshoot - West Vault - deep 2-span.xls 4 1/29/2010 8:18 AM
19 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 14 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn Deep Cells Buoyancy Trevor Stiff ESM Consulting Engineers, Inc st Way South #200 Federal Way, WA (253) Vault Geometry Length Width Lid Thickness Soil grade over vault Under Side of Vault Lid Vault Bottom Soil Cover Wall Height Allowable Water Table Potential uplift ft - outside dim ft - outside dim ft ft ft ft 1.46 ft - Maximum 12.3 ft ft 371,179 lb - per foot of vault length Walls 508,885 lb perimeter only Lid 43,513 lb Soil Cover 1,131,339 lb Footings 66,467 lb perimeter only Floor 4.5 in thick 335,672 lb 2,085,876 lb Soil Column in proj 743,457 lb Total am'nt of ftg that ext'ds beyond the ext wall face. Accounts for both sides of the vault. Accounts for dry soil above ftg drain only. Ratio Max.footing drain Elev ft < Floor Slab Design Gross Uplift 62.2 psf Slab Weight 56.3 psf Net Uplift 6.0 psf << Design floor reinforcing for net uplift >> Flexure Mu = k-ft/ft d = 2.25 in As (transverse) 23 in MD OR 36 in MD Transverse As (long) 24 in MD Transverse Alternate: 6x6-W2.9XW2.9 WWM (dia = in, area = in2/ft) at MD Slab Shear Vu = 0.11 klf V n = 0.12 klf Vc = 2.95 klf Shear capacity adequate Muckleshoot - West Vault - deep 2-span.xls 5 1/29/2010 8:18 AM
20 1/29/2010 Page 15 of 65
21 1/29/2010 Page 16 of 65
22 1/29/2010 Page 17 of 65
23 1/29/2010 Page 18 of 65
24 1/29/2010 Page 19 of 65
25 1/29/2010 Page 20 of 65
26 1/29/2010 Page 21 of 65
27 1/29/2010 Page 22 of 65
28 1/29/2010 Page 23 of 65
29 1/29/2010 Page 24 of 65
30 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM ADAPT-RC Version 4.01 Date: 1/29/2010 Time: 8:50:04 AM File: CB-1 V 1- PROJECT TITLE MIT Vault #2 - CB DESIGN STRIP CB-1 shear 2 - MEMBER ELEVATION [ft] MIT West Vault - Permit Submittal 1/29/2010 Page 25 of TOP REBAR 3.1 User selected 3.2 User selected 3.3 ADAPT selected 3.4 ADAPT selected 5 - BOTTOM REBAR 5.1 User selected 5.2 User selected 5.3 ADAPT selected 2 3#5X18'0" 5.4 ADAPT selected 1 4#5X19'0" 6 - REQUIRED & PROVIDED BARS 6.1 Top Bars [ in 2 ] required provided max Bottom Bars max SHEAR STIRRUPS 7.1 ADAPT selected. Bar Size #4 Legs: 2 Spacing [in] User-selected Bar Size # Legs: 7.3 Required area [in 2 /ft] 8 - LEGEND DESIGN PARAMETERS 9.1 Code: ACI f'c = 3 ksi fy = 60 ksi (longitudinal) fy = 60 ksi (shear) 9.2 Rebar Cover: Top = 1 in Bottom = 1 in Rebar Table: ASTM - US Customary bars (Non-redistributed Moments) 10 - DESIGNER'S NOTES
31 1/29/2010 Page 26 of 65 ADAPT CORPORATION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, California ADAPT-RC FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM/SLAB DESIGN Version 4.01 AMERICAN (ACI /UBC-1997) ADAPT CORPORATION - Structural Concrete Software System 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, California Phone: (650) , Fax: (650) Support@AdaptSoft.com, Web site: DATE AND TIME OF PROGRAM EXECUTION: Jan 29,2010 At Time: 8:50 PROJECT FILE: CB-1 V P R O J E C T T I T L E: MIT Vault #2 - CB-1 CB-1 shear 1 - G E N E R A L D E S I G N P A R A M E T E R S CONCRETE: STRENGTH at 28 days, for BEAMS/SLABS... MODULUS OF ELASTICITY for BEAMS/SLABS psi ksi CREEP factor for deflections for BEAMS/SLABS CONCRETE WEIGHT... SELF WEIGHT... REINFORCEMENT: YIELD Strength... Minimum Cover at TOP... Minimum Cover at BOTTOM... ANALYSIS OPTIONS USED: Structural system... Moment of Inertia over support is... Effective flange width consideration... NORMAL pcf ksi 1.00 in 1.00 in BEAM NOT INCREASED NO 2 - I N P U T G E O M E T R Y Page 2 ( CB-1 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI
32 1/29/2010 Page 27 of PRINCIPAL SPAN DATA OF UNIFORM SPANS S F TOP BOTTOM/MIDDLE P O FLANGE FLANGE REF MULTIPLIER A R LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH width thick. width thick. HEIGHT left right N M ft in in in in in in in LEGEND: 1 - SPAN 3 - FORM C = Cantilever 1 = Rectangular section 2 = T or Inverted L section 3 = I section 4 = Extended T or L section 7 = Joist 8 = Waffle 11 - Top surface to reference line S U P P O R T W I D T H A N D C O L U M N D A T A SUPPORT < LOWER COLUMN > < UPPER COLUMN > WIDTH LENGTH B(DIA) D CBC* LENGTH B(DIA) D CBC* JOINT in ft in in ft in in (1) (1) (1) (1) *THE COLUMN BOUNDARY CONDITION CODES (CBC) Fixed at both ends...(standard)... = 1 Hinged at near end, fixed at far end... = 2 Fixed at near end, hinged at far end... = 3 Fixed at near end, roller with rotational fixity at far end.. = I N P U T A P P L I E D L O A D I N G <---CLASS---> < TYPE > D = DEAD LOAD U = UNIFORM P = PARTIAL UNIFORM Page 3 ( CB-1 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI L = LIVE LOAD C = CONCENTRATED M = APPLIED MOMENT
33 1/29/2010 Page 28 of 65 Li= LINE LOAD Intensity ( From... To ) ( M or C...At) Total on Trib SPAN CLASS TYPE k/ft^2 ( ft ft ) (k-ft or k...ft) k/ft L C L C D P D P SW U NOTE: LIVE LOADING is SKIPPED with a skip factor of LOADING AS APPEARS IN USER`S INPUT SCREEN PRIOR TO PROCESSING UNIFORM (k/ft^2), ( CON. or PART. ) ( M O M E N T ) SPAN CLASS TYPE LINE(k/ft) ( k@ft or ft-ft ) ( ft ) L C L C D P D P NOTE: SELFWEIGHT INCLUSION REQUIRED LIVE LOADING is SKIPPED with a skip factor of C A L C U L A T E D S E C T I O N P R O P E R T I E S 4.1 For Uniform Spans and Cantilevers only SPAN AREA I Yb Yt in^2 in^4 in in E Note: Page 4 ( CB-1 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI --- = Span/Cantilever is Nonuniform, see block 4.2
34 1/29/2010 Page 29 of D E A D L O A D M O M E N T S, S H E A R S & R E A C T I O N S < 5.1 S P A N M O M E N T S (k-ft) > < 5.2 SPAN SHEARS (k) > SPAN M(l)* midspan M(r)* SH(l) SH(r) Note: * = Centerline moments JOINT < 5.3 REACTIONS (k) > <- 5.4 COLUMN MOMENTS (k-ft) -> Lower columns----upper columns L I V E L O A D M O M E N T S, S H E A R S & R E A C T I O N S < L I V E L O A D SPAN MOMENTS (k-ft) and SHEAR FORCES (k) --> <----- left* -----> <--- midspan ---> <---- right* -----> <--SHEAR FORCE--> SPAN max min max min max min left right Note: * = Centerline moments <- 6.2 REACTIONS (k) -> < COLUMN MOMENTS (k-ft) > <--- LOWER COLUMN ---> <--- UPPER COLUMN ---> JOINT max min max min max min Page 5 ( CB-1 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI 10 - F A C T O R E D M O M E N T S & R E A C T I O N S Calculated as ( 1.40D L) 10.1 FACTORED DESIGN MOMENTS (k-ft)
35 1/29/2010 Page 30 of 65 <----- left* > <---- midspan ----> <----- right* -----> SPAN max min max min max min Note: * = face of support 10.2 FACTORED REACTIONS 10.3 FACTORED COLUMN MOMENTS (k-ft) (k) <-- LOWER column --> <-- UPPER column --> JOINT max min max min max min M I L D S T E E L Top bar extension beyond where required in Bottom bar extension beyond where required in M I L D S T E E L - T O T A L S T R I P TOP STEEL SELECTION AT MID-SPAN BOTTOM STEEL AT MID-SPAN (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> SPAN ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH (.00.00) ( ) 7 # 5 x 19'-0" TOP STEEL SELECTION AT SUPPORTS BOTTOM STEEL AT SUPPORTS Page 6 ( CB-1 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> JOINT ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH (.00.00) (.00.00) 2 (.00.00) (.00.00) TOTAL WEIGHT OF REBAR = lb AVERAGE = 7.5 psf
36 1/29/2010 Page 31 of 65 Note: Min* = Minimum rebar listed under column 3 and 8 is calculated based on either "rho min = 200/fy" or "1.33*Area of reinforcement for strength (listed under column 2 and 7)" Number of bars listed under column 4 is based on either area of bar under column 2 or column 3, whichever is larger. Number of bars listed under column 9 is based on either area of bar under column 7 or column 8, whichever is larger S E L E C T I O N O F R E B A R STEEL PROVIDED SPAN ID LOCATION NUM BAR LENGTH [ft] AREA [in^2] B 4 # 5 x 19'0" B 3 # 5 x 18'0" Notes: Bar location - T = Top, B = Bottom. NUM - Number of bars. Refer to steel disposition tables and PTsum graphical display for positioning of bars STEEL DISPOSITION - TOP BARS TOP STEEL SPAN ID LOCATION NUM BAR LENGTH [ft] STEEL DISPOSITION - BOTTOM BARS Page 7 ( CB-1 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI BOTTOM STEEL SPAN ID LOCATION NUM BAR LENGTH [ft] RIGHT 4 # 5 x 18'9" 1 2 RIGHT 3 # 5 x 17'10" S H E A R D E S I G N FOR BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLAB SYSTEMS
37 1/29/2010 Page 32 of 65 LEGEND : Concrete = NORMAL weight (full shear allowed for) d... = distance of compression fiber to centroid of tension rebar #3@... = spacings of two-legged #3 stirrups, (fy= psi) ***** means no stirrups are required Mu, Vu.. = factored moments and shears CASES.. Vc = 1 ACI eqn 11-6 governs 2 min permissible value of 2(fc)^1/2 governs (ACI eqn 11-3) 3 max permissible value of 3.5(fc)^1/2 governs Av = 1 no reinforcement required 2 min reinforcement required (ACI eqn 11-14), for beams only 3 stirrup required by analysis (ACI eqn 11-15) SPAN = 1 LENGTH = ft (Net span from.00 to ft ) X d Vu Mu RATIO Av # 4@ CASES X/L ft in k k-ft Vu/íVc in^2/ft in Vc Av REMARKS (2 3) (1 3) (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY ***** (2 1) Page 8 ( CB-1 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI ***** (2 1) ***** (2 1) ***** (2 1) (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 3) (2 3)
38 1/29/2010 Page 33 of 65 Page 9 ( CB-1 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI 13 - MAXIMUM S P A N D E F L E C T I O N S Concrete`s modulus of elasticity... Ec = ksi Creep factor... K = 2.00 Values in parentheses are (span/max deflection) ratios <...DEFLECTION ARE ALL IN inches, DOWNWARD POSITIVE...> SPAN DL DL+CREEP LL DL+LL+CREEP ( 1583).26( 866).40( 560)
39 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM ADAPT-RC Version 4.01 Date: 1/29/2010 Time: 8:52:58 AM File: CB-1 M 1- PROJECT TITLE MIT Vault #2 - CB DESIGN STRIP CB-1 flexure 2 - MEMBER ELEVATION [ft] MIT West Vault - Permit Submittal 1/29/2010 Page 34 of TOP REBAR 3.1 User selected 3.2 User selected 3.3 ADAPT selected 3.4 ADAPT selected 5 - BOTTOM REBAR 5.1 User selected 5.2 User selected 5.3 ADAPT selected 5.4 ADAPT selected 1 4#5X19'0" 2 4#5X16'0" 6 - REQUIRED & PROVIDED BARS 6.1 Top Bars [ in 2 ] required provided max Bottom Bars max SHEAR STIRRUPS 7.1 ADAPT selected. Bar Size #4 Legs: 2 Spacing [in] User-selected Bar Size # Legs: 7.3 Required area [in 2 /ft] 8 - LEGEND DESIGN PARAMETERS 9.1 Code: ACI f'c = 3 ksi fy = 60 ksi (longitudinal) fy = 60 ksi (shear) 9.2 Rebar Cover: Top = 1 in Bottom = 1 in Rebar Table: ASTM - US Customary bars (Non-redistributed Moments) 10 - DESIGNER'S NOTES
40 1/29/2010 Page 35 of 65 ADAPT CORPORATION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, California ADAPT-RC FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM/SLAB DESIGN Version 4.01 AMERICAN (ACI /UBC-1997) ADAPT CORPORATION - Structural Concrete Software System 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, California Phone: (650) , Fax: (650) Support@AdaptSoft.com, Web site: DATE AND TIME OF PROGRAM EXECUTION: Jan 29,2010 At Time: 8:52 PROJECT FILE: CB-1 M P R O J E C T T I T L E: MIT Vault #2 - CB-1 CB-1 flexure 1 - G E N E R A L D E S I G N P A R A M E T E R S CONCRETE: STRENGTH at 28 days, for BEAMS/SLABS... MODULUS OF ELASTICITY for BEAMS/SLABS psi ksi CREEP factor for deflections for BEAMS/SLABS CONCRETE WEIGHT... SELF WEIGHT... REINFORCEMENT: YIELD Strength... Minimum Cover at TOP... Minimum Cover at BOTTOM... ANALYSIS OPTIONS USED: Structural system... Moment of Inertia over support is... Effective flange width consideration... NORMAL pcf ksi 1.00 in 1.00 in BEAM NOT INCREASED NO 2 - I N P U T G E O M E T R Y PRINCIPAL SPAN DATA OF UNIFORM SPANS S F TOP BOTTOM/MIDDLE
41 1/29/2010 Page 36 of 65 Page 2 ( CB-1 M) ADAPT-RC V ACI P O FLANGE FLANGE REF MULTIPLIER A R LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH width thick. width thick. HEIGHT left right N M ft in in in in in in in LEGEND: 1 - SPAN 3 - FORM C = Cantilever 1 = Rectangular section 2 = T or Inverted L section 3 = I section 4 = Extended T or L section 7 = Joist 8 = Waffle 11 - Top surface to reference line S U P P O R T W I D T H A N D C O L U M N D A T A SUPPORT < LOWER COLUMN > < UPPER COLUMN > WIDTH LENGTH B(DIA) D CBC* LENGTH B(DIA) D CBC* JOINT in ft in in ft in in (1) (1) (1) (1) *THE COLUMN BOUNDARY CONDITION CODES (CBC) Fixed at both ends...(standard)... = 1 Hinged at near end, fixed at far end... = 2 Fixed at near end, hinged at far end... = 3 Fixed at near end, roller with rotational fixity at far end.. = I N P U T A P P L I E D L O A D I N G <---CLASS---> < TYPE > D = DEAD LOAD U = UNIFORM P = PARTIAL UNIFORM L = LIVE LOAD C = CONCENTRATED M = APPLIED MOMENT Li= LINE LOAD Intensity ( From... To ) ( M or C...At) Total on Trib SPAN CLASS TYPE k/ft^2 ( ft ft ) (k-ft or k...ft) k/ft
42 1/29/2010 Page 37 of 65 Page 3 ( CB-1 M) ADAPT-RC V ACI 1 L C L C D P D P SW U NOTE: LIVE LOADING is SKIPPED with a skip factor of LOADING AS APPEARS IN USER`S INPUT SCREEN PRIOR TO PROCESSING UNIFORM (k/ft^2), ( CON. or PART. ) ( M O M E N T ) SPAN CLASS TYPE LINE(k/ft) ( k@ft or ft-ft ) ( ft ) L C L C D P D P NOTE: SELFWEIGHT INCLUSION REQUIRED LIVE LOADING is SKIPPED with a skip factor of C A L C U L A T E D S E C T I O N P R O P E R T I E S 4.1 For Uniform Spans and Cantilevers only SPAN AREA I Yb Yt in^2 in^4 in in E Note: --- = Span/Cantilever is Nonuniform, see block D E A D L O A D M O M E N T S, S H E A R S & R E A C T I O N S
43 1/29/2010 Page 38 of 65 Page 4 ( CB-1 M) ADAPT-RC V ACI < 5.1 S P A N M O M E N T S (k-ft) > < 5.2 SPAN SHEARS (k) > SPAN M(l)* midspan M(r)* SH(l) SH(r) Note: * = Centerline moments JOINT < 5.3 REACTIONS (k) > <- 5.4 COLUMN MOMENTS (k-ft) -> Lower columns----upper columns L I V E L O A D M O M E N T S, S H E A R S & R E A C T I O N S < L I V E L O A D SPAN MOMENTS (k-ft) and SHEAR FORCES (k) --> <----- left* -----> <--- midspan ---> <---- right* -----> <--SHEAR FORCE--> SPAN max min max min max min left right Note: * = Centerline moments <- 6.2 REACTIONS (k) -> < COLUMN MOMENTS (k-ft) > <--- LOWER COLUMN ---> <--- UPPER COLUMN ---> JOINT max min max min max min F A C T O R E D M O M E N T S & R E A C T I O N S Calculated as ( 1.20D L) 10.1 FACTORED DESIGN MOMENTS (k-ft) <----- left* > <---- midspan ----> <----- right* -----> SPAN max min max min max min
44 1/29/2010 Page 39 of 65 Page 5 ( CB-1 M) ADAPT-RC V ACI Note: * = face of support 10.2 FACTORED REACTIONS 10.3 FACTORED COLUMN MOMENTS (k-ft) (k) <-- LOWER column --> <-- UPPER column --> JOINT max min max min max min M I L D S T E E L Top bar extension beyond where required in Bottom bar extension beyond where required in M I L D S T E E L - T O T A L S T R I P TOP STEEL SELECTION AT MID-SPAN BOTTOM STEEL AT MID-SPAN (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> SPAN ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH (.00.00) ( ) 8 # 5 x 19'-0" TOP STEEL SELECTION AT SUPPORTS BOTTOM STEEL AT SUPPORTS (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> JOINT ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH (.00.00) (.00.00) 2 (.00.00) (.00.00) TOTAL WEIGHT OF REBAR = lb AVERAGE = 8.5 psf Note: Min* = Minimum rebar listed under column 3 and 8 is calculated based on either "rho min = 200/fy" or "1.33*Area of reinforcement for strength (listed under column 2 and 7)" Number of bars listed under column 4 is based on either area of bar under
45 1/29/2010 Page 40 of 65 Page 6 ( CB-1 M) ADAPT-RC V ACI column 2 or column 3, whichever is larger. Number of bars listed under column 9 is based on either area of bar under column 7 or column 8, whichever is larger S E L E C T I O N O F R E B A R STEEL PROVIDED SPAN ID LOCATION NUM BAR LENGTH [ft] AREA [in^2] B 4 # 5 x 19'0" B 4 # 5 x 16'0" Notes: Bar location - T = Top, B = Bottom. NUM - Number of bars. Refer to steel disposition tables and PTsum graphical display for positioning of bars STEEL DISPOSITION - TOP BARS TOP STEEL SPAN ID LOCATION NUM BAR LENGTH [ft] STEEL DISPOSITION - BOTTOM BARS BOTTOM STEEL SPAN ID LOCATION NUM BAR LENGTH [ft] RIGHT 4 # 5 x 18'9" 1 2 RIGHT 4 # 5 x 15'11" S H E A R D E S I G N FOR BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLAB SYSTEMS LEGEND : Concrete = NORMAL weight (full shear allowed for) d... = distance of compression fiber to centroid of
46 1/29/2010 Page 41 of 65 Page 7 ( CB-1 M) ADAPT-RC V ACI tension rebar #3@... = spacings of two-legged #3 stirrups, (fy= psi) ***** means no stirrups are required Mu, Vu.. = factored moments and shears CASES.. Vc = 1 ACI eqn 11-6 governs 2 min permissible value of 2(fc)^1/2 governs (ACI eqn 11-3) 3 max permissible value of 3.5(fc)^1/2 governs Av = 1 no reinforcement required 2 min reinforcement required (ACI eqn 11-14), for beams only 3 stirrup required by analysis (ACI eqn 11-15) SPAN = 1 LENGTH = ft (Net span from.00 to ft ) X d Vu Mu RATIO Av # 4@ CASES X/L ft in k k-ft Vu/íVc in^2/ft in Vc Av REMARKS (2 3) (2 3) (1 3) (1 3) (2 3) (2 3) (2 3) (2 3) (2 3) ***** (2 1) ***** (2 1) ***** (2 1) ***** (2 1) ***** (2 1) ***** (2 1) (1 3) (1 3) (1 3) (1 3) (2 3) (2 3)
47 1/29/2010 Page 42 of 65 Page 8 ( CB-1 M) ADAPT-RC V ACI 13 - MAXIMUM S P A N D E F L E C T I O N S Concrete`s modulus of elasticity... Ec = ksi Creep factor... K = 2.00 Values in parentheses are (span/max deflection) ratios <...DEFLECTION ARE ALL IN inches, DOWNWARD POSITIVE...> SPAN DL DL+CREEP LL DL+LL+CREEP ( 1583).35( 642).49( 457)
48 1/29/2010 Page 43 of 65
49 1/29/2010 Page 44 of 65 Footing Design Footing at wall end Dead Load (DL): 40,000 lbs. L Live Load (LL): 30,000 lbs. O Snow Load (SL): 0 lbs. A D Total Load = TL = DL+LL+SL = 70,000 lbs. S Ultimate Load = U = 1.2DL + 1.6LL = 96,000 lbs. or U = 1.2DL + 1.0LL + 1.6SL = 78,000 lbs. Assumed Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure, P a = 4,000 psf S O Required Bearing Area = TL/P a = sq.ft. I Provide footing with side length, L 1 = 4.50 feet Long side L side length, L 2 = 4.50 feet Short side S Actual Soil Bearing, w = TL/(L 1 *L 2 ) = 3,457 psf Ultimate Soil Bearing, wu = U/L^2 = 4,741 psf Concrete Strength, f c ' = 3,000 psi C Depth of Footing, h = 12 inches O Depth to Reinforcement, d = 8.5 inches N Base Plate Dimensions: d1 = 12 inches C d2 = 16 inches R E Beam Shear, V u = 22.2 kips - demand T Punching Shear, V u = 79.5 kips - demand E Capacity Demand Beam Shear Strength, Φ V n = 37.7 kips > 22.2 kips - ok D Punching Shear Strength, Φ V n = kips > 79.5 kips - ok E S Maximum Footing Moment, L 1 span, M u = 54.0 kip-feet I F = Ld^2/12000 = 0.3 G K u = M u/f = N p(req) = A s(req) = pa c = 1.55 sq.in. Maximum Footing Moment, L 2 span, M u = 54.0 kip-feet F = Ld^2/12000 = 0.3 K u = M u /F = p(req) = A s(req) = pa c = 1.55 sq.in. Provide: 4.5 foot by 4.5 foot by 12 inch thick footing with: Options: Long Dirct'n Short Dirct'n Weight # lbs # Use #5 bars # #
50 ADAPT - STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM ADAPT-RC Version 4.01 Date: 1/29/2010 Time: 10:22:31 AM File: CB-2 V 1- PROJECT TITLE MIT Vault #2 - CB DESIGN STRIP Case 2 - Shear 2 - MEMBER ELEVATION [ft] MIT West Vault - Permit Submittal 1/29/2010 Page 45 of TOP REBAR 3.1 User selected 3.2 User selected 3.3 ADAPT selected 3.4 ADAPT selected 5 - BOTTOM REBAR 5.1 User selected 5.2 User selected 5.3 ADAPT selected 2 4#5X12'6" 5.4 ADAPT selected 1 5#5X13'0" 6 - REQUIRED & PROVIDED BARS 6.1 Top Bars [ in 2 ] required provided max Bottom Bars max SHEAR STIRRUPS 7.1 ADAPT selected. Bar Size #4 Legs: 2 Spacing [in] User-selected Bar Size # Legs: 7.3 Required area [in 2 /ft] 8 - LEGEND DESIGN PARAMETERS 9.1 Code: ACI f'c = 3 ksi fy = 60 ksi (longitudinal) fy = 60 ksi (shear) 9.2 Rebar Cover: Top = 1 in Bottom = 1 in Rebar Table: ASTM - US Customary bars (Non-redistributed Moments) 10 - DESIGNER'S NOTES
51 1/29/2010 Page 46 of 65 ADAPT CORPORATION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, California ADAPT-RC FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM/SLAB DESIGN Version 4.01 AMERICAN (ACI /UBC-1997) ADAPT CORPORATION - Structural Concrete Software System 1733 Woodside Road, Suite 220, Redwood City, California Phone: (650) , Fax: (650) Support@AdaptSoft.com, Web site: DATE AND TIME OF PROGRAM EXECUTION: Jan 29,2010 At Time: 10:22 PROJECT FILE: CB-2 V P R O J E C T T I T L E: MIT Vault #2 - CB-2 Case 2 - Shear 1 - G E N E R A L D E S I G N P A R A M E T E R S CONCRETE: STRENGTH at 28 days, for BEAMS/SLABS... MODULUS OF ELASTICITY for BEAMS/SLABS psi ksi CREEP factor for deflections for BEAMS/SLABS CONCRETE WEIGHT... SELF WEIGHT... REINFORCEMENT: YIELD Strength... Minimum Cover at TOP... Minimum Cover at BOTTOM... ANALYSIS OPTIONS USED: Structural system... Moment of Inertia over support is... Effective flange width consideration... NORMAL pcf ksi 1.00 in 1.00 in BEAM NOT INCREASED NO 2 - I N P U T G E O M E T R Y PRINCIPAL SPAN DATA OF UNIFORM SPANS S F TOP BOTTOM/MIDDLE
52 1/29/2010 Page 47 of 65 Page 2 ( CB-2 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI P O FLANGE FLANGE REF MULTIPLIER A R LENGTH WIDTH DEPTH width thick. width thick. HEIGHT left right N M ft in in in in in in in LEGEND: 1 - SPAN 3 - FORM C = Cantilever 1 = Rectangular section 2 = T or Inverted L section 3 = I section 4 = Extended T or L section 7 = Joist 8 = Waffle 11 - Top surface to reference line S U P P O R T W I D T H A N D C O L U M N D A T A SUPPORT < LOWER COLUMN > < UPPER COLUMN > WIDTH LENGTH B(DIA) D CBC* LENGTH B(DIA) D CBC* JOINT in ft in in ft in in (1) (1) (1) (1) *THE COLUMN BOUNDARY CONDITION CODES (CBC) Fixed at both ends...(standard)... = 1 Hinged at near end, fixed at far end... = 2 Fixed at near end, hinged at far end... = 3 Fixed at near end, roller with rotational fixity at far end.. = I N P U T A P P L I E D L O A D I N G <---CLASS---> < TYPE > D = DEAD LOAD U = UNIFORM P = PARTIAL UNIFORM L = LIVE LOAD C = CONCENTRATED M = APPLIED MOMENT Li= LINE LOAD Intensity ( From... To ) ( M or C...At) Total on Trib SPAN CLASS TYPE k/ft^2 ( ft ft ) (k-ft or k...ft) k/ft
53 1/29/2010 Page 48 of 65 Page 3 ( CB-2 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI 1 L C L C L C D C D P D P D P D P SW U NOTE: LIVE LOADING is SKIPPED with a skip factor of LOADING AS APPEARS IN USER`S INPUT SCREEN PRIOR TO PROCESSING UNIFORM (k/ft^2), ( CON. or PART. ) ( M O M E N T ) SPAN CLASS TYPE LINE(k/ft) ( k@ft or ft-ft ) ( ft ) L C L C L C D C D P D P D P D P NOTE: SELFWEIGHT INCLUSION REQUIRED LIVE LOADING is SKIPPED with a skip factor of C A L C U L A T E D S E C T I O N P R O P E R T I E S 4.1 For Uniform Spans and Cantilevers only SPAN AREA I Yb Yt in^2 in^4 in in E Note: --- = Span/Cantilever is Nonuniform, see block 4.2
54 1/29/2010 Page 49 of 65 Page 4 ( CB-2 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI 5 - D E A D L O A D M O M E N T S, S H E A R S & R E A C T I O N S < 5.1 S P A N M O M E N T S (k-ft) > < 5.2 SPAN SHEARS (k) > SPAN M(l)* midspan M(r)* SH(l) SH(r) Note: * = Centerline moments JOINT < 5.3 REACTIONS (k) > <- 5.4 COLUMN MOMENTS (k-ft) -> Lower columns----upper columns L I V E L O A D M O M E N T S, S H E A R S & R E A C T I O N S < L I V E L O A D SPAN MOMENTS (k-ft) and SHEAR FORCES (k) --> <----- left* -----> <--- midspan ---> <---- right* -----> <--SHEAR FORCE--> SPAN max min max min max min left right Note: * = Centerline moments <- 6.2 REACTIONS (k) -> < COLUMN MOMENTS (k-ft) > <--- LOWER COLUMN ---> <--- UPPER COLUMN ---> JOINT max min max min max min F A C T O R E D M O M E N T S & R E A C T I O N S
55 1/29/2010 Page 50 of 65 Page 5 ( CB-2 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI Calculated as ( 1.40D L) 10.1 FACTORED DESIGN MOMENTS (k-ft) <----- left* > <---- midspan ----> <----- right* -----> SPAN max min max min max min Note: * = face of support 10.2 FACTORED REACTIONS 10.3 FACTORED COLUMN MOMENTS (k-ft) (k) <-- LOWER column --> <-- UPPER column --> JOINT max min max min max min M I L D S T E E L Top bar extension beyond where required in Bottom bar extension beyond where required in M I L D S T E E L - T O T A L S T R I P TOP STEEL SELECTION AT MID-SPAN BOTTOM STEEL AT MID-SPAN (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> SPAN ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH (.00.00) ( ) 9 # 5 x 12'-0" TOP STEEL SELECTION AT SUPPORTS BOTTOM STEEL AT SUPPORTS (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> (in^2) <-- SELECTION --> JOINT ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH ( ULT MIN*) NO SIZE LENGTH (.00.00) (.00.00) 2 (.00.00) (.00.00)
56 1/29/2010 Page 51 of 65 Page 6 ( CB-2 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI TOTAL WEIGHT OF REBAR = lb AVERAGE = 9.4 psf Note: Min* = Minimum rebar listed under column 3 and 8 is calculated based on either "rho min = 200/fy" or "1.33*Area of reinforcement for strength (listed under column 2 and 7)" Number of bars listed under column 4 is based on either area of bar under column 2 or column 3, whichever is larger. Number of bars listed under column 9 is based on either area of bar under column 7 or column 8, whichever is larger S E L E C T I O N O F R E B A R STEEL PROVIDED SPAN ID LOCATION NUM BAR LENGTH [ft] AREA [in^2] B 5 # 5 x 13'0" B 4 # 5 x 12'6" Notes: Bar location - T = Top, B = Bottom. NUM - Number of bars. Refer to steel disposition tables and PTsum graphical display for positioning of bars STEEL DISPOSITION - TOP BARS TOP STEEL SPAN ID LOCATION NUM BAR LENGTH [ft] STEEL DISPOSITION - BOTTOM BARS BOTTOM STEEL SPAN ID LOCATION NUM BAR LENGTH [ft] RIGHT 5 # 5 x 12'10" 1 2 RIGHT 4 # 5 x 12'2"
57 1/29/2010 Page 52 of 65 Page 7 ( CB-2 V) ADAPT-RC V ACI 12 - S H E A R D E S I G N FOR BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLAB SYSTEMS LEGEND : Concrete = NORMAL weight (full shear allowed for) d... = distance of compression fiber to centroid of tension rebar #3@... = spacings of two-legged #3 stirrups, (fy= psi) ***** means no stirrups are required Mu, Vu.. = factored moments and shears CASES.. Vc = 1 ACI eqn 11-6 governs 2 min permissible value of 2(fc)^1/2 governs (ACI eqn 11-3) 3 max permissible value of 3.5(fc)^1/2 governs Av = 1 no reinforcement required 2 min reinforcement required (ACI eqn 11-14), for beams only 3 stirrup required by analysis (ACI eqn 11-15) SPAN = 1 LENGTH = ft (Net span from.00 to ft ) X d Vu Mu RATIO Av # 4@ CASES X/L ft in k k-ft Vu/íVc in^2/ft in Vc Av REMARKS (2 3) (2 3) (1 3) (1 3) (1 3) (1 3) (2 3) (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (2 2) BEAMS ONLY ***** (2 1) ***** (2 1) (2 2) BEAMS ONLY (1 3) (1 3) (1 3) (1 3) (1 3) (1 3) (2 3) (2 3)
PROPOSED SATSANG HALL TECHNICAL REPORT
PROPOSED SATSANG HALL - VERTICAL STRIP V1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADAPT CORPORATION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM 1733 Woodside Road, Suite
More informationPUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT
Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified
More informationServiceability Deflection calculation
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning
More informationRETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)
QuickWall 8.0 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ================================================================================ Job ID : Job Description : Designed By : ================================================================================
More informationDesign of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge
Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder
More informationCase Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.
ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular Beams Diagonal Tension
More information3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties
CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties Description his application calculates gross section moment of inertia neglecting reinforcement, moment of inertia
More informationLecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion
Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of
More informationChapter 2. Design for Shear. 2.1 Introduction. Neutral axis. Neutral axis. Fig. 4.1 Reinforced concrete beam in bending. By Richard W.
Chapter 2 Design for Shear By Richard W. Furlong 2.1 Introduction Shear is the term assigned to forces that act perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of structural elements. Shear forces on beams are
More informationMoment Redistribution
TIME SAVING DESIGN AID Page 1 of 23 A 3-span continuous beam has center-to-center span lengths of 30 ft-0 in. The beam is 20 in. by 28 in. and all columns are 20 in. by 20 in. In this example, the beam
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear
Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular
More informationDesign of a Multi-Storied RC Building
Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23
More informationPreferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:
GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of semi-integral abutments. For general requirements and guidelines on
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More information3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection
CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection Description his application calculates the spacing for shear reinforcement of a concrete beam supporting a uniformly
More informationTwo Way Beam Supported Slab
Two Way Beam Supported Slab Part 2 The following example was done by Mr. Naim Hassan, 3 rd Year 2 nd Semester Student of CE Dept., AUST 16 The following Example was done by Md. Mahmudun Nobe, ID -.01.03.078,
More informationTwo-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design
Two-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design Version: Aug-10-017 Two-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design The concrete floor slab system shown below is for an intermediate
More informationDesign of RC Retaining Walls
Lecture - 09 Design of RC Retaining Walls By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Retaining Walls Terms Related to Retaining Walls Types of Retaining
More informationA q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e
A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e H a t o R e y, P u e r t o R i c o G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Building Facts: 7-story parking structure + luxury apartments 900,000
More informationFigure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.
Example (8.1): Using the ACI Code approximate structural analysis, design for a warehouse, a continuous one-way solid slab supported on beams 4.0 m apart as shown in Figure 1. Assume that the beam webs
More informationLecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
More informationGeneral Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth
More informationLecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement
Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections
More informationThis procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.
327 Sample Problems Problem 16.1 The moment of inertia about the neutral axis for the T-beam shown is most nearly (A) 36 in 4 (C) 236 in 4 (B) 136 in 4 (D) 736 in 4 This procedure covers the determination
More informationDEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy)
DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy) The deflection of a uniformly loaded flat plate, flat slab, or two-way slab supported by beams on column lines can be calculated by an equivalent method that
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction
More informationLecture 7 Two-Way Slabs
Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs Two-way slabs have tension reinforcing spanning in BOTH directions, and may take the general form of one of the following: Types of Two-Way Slab Systems Lecture 7 Page 1 of 13 The
More informationSPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5
As = 736624/(0.5*413.69) = 3562 mm 2 (ADAPT 3569 mm 2, B29, C6) Data Block 27 - Compressive Stresses The initial compressive strength, f ci, is the strength entered in the Material/Concrete input screen.
More informationAppendix K Design Examples
Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.
More informationRoadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.
Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab
More informationAppendix J. Example of Proposed Changes
Appendix J Example of Proposed Changes J.1 Introduction The proposed changes are illustrated with reference to a 200-ft, single span, Washington DOT WF bridge girder with debonded strands and no skew.
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationChapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures
Chapter 4 Seismic Design Requirements for Building Structures where: F a = 1.0 for rock sites which may be assumed if there is 10 feet of soil between the rock surface and the bottom of spread footings
More informationFlexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections
4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
More informationA.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications
A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications A.2.1 INTRODUCTION A.2.2 DESIGN PARAMETERS 1'-5.0" Detailed example showing sample calculations for design of typical Interior AASHTO Type IV prestressed concrete
More informationAISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System
Model: Verification11_3 Typical Floor Beam #10 W21x44 (10,3,10) AISC 360-05 LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Floor Loads: Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal
More informationB U I L D I N G D E S I G N
B U I L D I N G D E S I G N 10.1 DESIGN OF SLAB P R I O D E E P C H O W D H U R Y C E @ K 8. 0 1 7 6 9 4 4 1 8 3 DESIGN BY COEFFICIENT METHOD Loads: DL = 150 pc LL = 85 pc Material Properties: c = 3000
More informationThis Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced concrete columns when the ACI code is selected.
COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 2001 CONCRETE FRAME DESIGN ACI-318-99 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced
More informationtwenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete
More informationLecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)
1 / 8 Geometry beam span L 40 ft Steel Wide Flange Beam: beam spacing s beam 10 ft F y 50 ksi construction live load LL construc 20 psf row 148 live load LL 150 psf unit weight of concrete UW conc 145
More informationUNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION
Introduction UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION A foundation is a integral part of the structure which transfer the load of the superstructure to the soil. A foundation is that member which provides support for
More informationBeam Design - FLOOR JOIST
Beam Design - FLOOR JOIST 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Douglas Fir-Larch Grade: DF No.2 Size: 2 x 10 Design Span (L): 11.83 ft. Clear
More information5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?
1 of 5 Continuing Education Course #274 What Every Engineer Should Know About Structures Part D - Bending Strength Of Materials NOTE: The following question was revised on 15 August 2018 1. The moment
More informationChapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension
Chapter 8. and Diagonal Tension 8.1. READING ASSIGNMENT Text Chapter 4; Sections 4.1-4.5 Code Chapter 11; Sections 11.1.1, 11.3, 11.5.1, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.5.5.1, and 11.5.6 8.2. INTRODUCTION OF SHEAR
More informationDESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
More informationspslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb
X Z Y spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: 00000-0000000-4-2D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A23.3 - Kt Revised.slb Project: CSA A23.3 - Kt Torsional Stiffness Illustration Frame: Engineer:
More informationDesign 1 Calculations
Design 1 Calculations The following calculations are based on the method employed by Java Module A and are consistent with ACI318-99. The values in Fig. 1 below were taken from the Design 1 Example found
More informationAnnex - R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).
More informationBeam Design and Deflections
Beam Design and Deflections tation: a = name for width dimension A = name for area Areq d-adj = area required at allowable stress when shear is adjusted to include self weight Aweb = area of the web of
More informationSeismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department
More informationTABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).
TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 2-1. Wind loads calculation 2-2. Seismic loads 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). 4-1.
More information4.3 Moment Magnification
CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column
More informationBeam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S
Beam Design - Shed Roof Back Wall Beam-S 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 2.5 x 6 Design Span (L):
More informationABS Consulting Project No
SUPPORTING STRUCTURE DESIGN FOR BLAST RESISTANT WINDOWS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER MOODY AFB, GA ABS Consulting Project No. 898 PREPARED FOR: ATLANTIC ENGINEERING SERVICE 6 ARLINGTON EXPRESSWAY BLDG. B,
More informationCurved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003
Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Guide Specifications (1993-2002) 2.3 LOADS 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS
More informationChapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations
Chapter (6) Geometric Design of Shallow Foundations Introduction As we stated in Chapter 3, foundations are considered to be shallow if if [D (3 4)B]. Shallow foundations have several advantages: minimum
More informationLecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I)
Lecture-09 Introduction to Earthquake Resistant Analysis & Design of RC Structures (Part I) By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Introduction Earthquake
More informationStructural Calculations For:
Structural Calculations For: Project: Address: Job No. Revision: Date: 1400 N. Vasco Rd. Livermore, CA 94551 D031014 Delta 1 - Plan Check May 8, 2015 Client: Ferreri & Blau MEMBER REPORT Roof, Typical
More informationDIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.
ICC ES Report ICC ES () 7 () www.icc es.org Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 1 Reissued /1 This report is subject to renewal /. DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: 1 STEEL ING REPORT
More informationERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted
Errata posted 8-16-2017 Revisions are shown in red. Question 521, p. 47: Question 521 should read as follows: 521. The W10 22 steel eam (Fy = 50 ksi) shown in the figure is only raced at the center of
More informationColumn Design. Columns Axial Load and Bending
Column Design MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VI Dr. Jason E. Charalambides = = Columns Axial Load and Bending We tend to have this image of columns that we envision
More informationCE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
More informationLoad Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges
Presentation at 2003 TRB Meeting, Washington, D.C. UNIVERSITY Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges F. N. Catbas, A. E. Aktan, K. Ciloglu, O. Hasancebi, J. S. Popovics Drexel
More informationLecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads
Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.
More informationDL CMU wall = 51.0 (lb/ft 2 ) 0.7 (ft) DL beam = 2.5 (lb/ft 2 ) 18.0 (ft) 5
SUJECT: HEADER EAM SELECTION SHEET 108 of 131 INTERIOR HEADER EAM SELECTION - ay length = 36 ft. (stairwell) INTERIOR HEADER EAM Header eam 1 2 Total ay Length = 36 (ft) Total ay Width = 10 (ft) 20.5 Fill
More informationBeam Design - Trotin Project
Beam Design - Trotin Project 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Glulam Species: Western Species Grade: 24F-V4 1.8E DF/DF Size: 3.125 x 13.5 Design Span (L): 14.98
More information1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6
Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L
More informationChapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams
Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Introduction One of the earliest studies concerned with the strength and deflection of beams was conducted by Galileo Galilei. Galileo was the first to discuss
More informationSERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS
CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil
More informationProblem 7.1 Determine the soil pressure distribution under the footing. Elevation. Plan. M 180 e 1.5 ft P 120. (a) B= L= 8 ft L e 1.5 ft 1.
Problem 7.1 Determine the soil pressure distribution under the footing. Elevation Plan M 180 e 1.5 ft P 10 (a) B= L= 8 ft L e 1.5 ft 1.33 ft 6 1 q q P 6 (P e) 180 6 (180) 4.9 kip/ft B L B L 8(8) 8 3 P
More informationCHAPTER 5. T a = 0.03 (180) 0.75 = 1.47 sec 5.12 Steel moment frame. h n = = 260 ft. T a = (260) 0.80 = 2.39 sec. Question No.
CHAPTER 5 Question Brief Explanation No. 5.1 From Fig. IBC 1613.5(3) and (4) enlarged region 1 (ASCE 7 Fig. -3 and -4) S S = 1.5g, and S 1 = 0.6g. The g term is already factored in the equations, thus
More informationSERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
More informationDesign Beam Flexural Reinforcement
COPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEBER 2001 CONCRETE FRAE DESIGN ACI-318-99 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how this program completes beam design when the ACI 318-99
More informationA Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages
A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages P L/2 L PL/4 MOMNT F b < 1 lastic F b = 2 lastic F b = 3 lastoplastic 4 F b = Plastic hinge Plastic Dr. M.. Haque, P.. (LRFD:
More informationExample Stayed beam with two pylons
Example Stayed beam with two pylons A roof structure is a stayed beam. The roof span is 300 ft. Stay vertical run is 20 ft. The deck is weighs 12 PSF. Beams have a transverse spacing equal to 40 feet.
More informationNAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:
NME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: EXM 3 PST PROBLEMS (LESSONS 21 TO 28) 100 points Thursday, November 16, 2017, 7pm to 9:30, Room 200 You are allowed to use a calculator and drawing equipment, only.
More informationBeam Design - Pine Tree
- Pine Tree 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Southern Pine Grade: SP DSS Size: 2 x 8 Design Span (L): 11.83 ft. Clear Span: 11.67 ft. Total
More informationTECHNICAL CORRECTION July Process Industry Practices Structural. PIP STE03360 Heat Exchanger and Horizontal Vessel Foundation Design Guide
TECHNICAL CORRECTION July 2007 Structural Heat Exchanger and Horizontal Vessel Foundation Design Guide PURPOSE AND USE OF PROCESS INDUSTRY PRACTICES In an effort to minimize the cost of process industry
More informationSHEET PILE WALLS. Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University
SHEET PILE WALLS Mehdi Mokhberi Islamic Azad University Lateral Support In geotechnical engineering, it is often necessary to prevent lateral soil movements. Tie rod Anchor Sheet pile Cantilever retaining
More informationDr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection
Example: Continuous beam deflection Analyze the short-term and ultimate long-term deflections of end-span of multi-span beam shown below. Ignore comp steel Beam spacing = 3000 mm b eff = 9000/4 = 2250
More informationDIVISION: METALS SECTION: STEEL DECKING SECTION: STEEL ROOF DECKING REPORT HOLDER: NEW MILLENNIUM BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC
0 Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ICC ES Report ICC ES 000 (800) 423 6587 (562) 699 0543 www.icc es.org ESR 2657 Reissued 05/2017 This report is subject to renewal 03/2018. DIVISION: 05 00 00 METALS SECTION:
More information= 50 ksi. The maximum beam deflection Δ max is not = R B. = 30 kips. Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 200
Notes for Strength of Materials, ET 00 Steel Six Easy Steps Steel beam design is about selecting the lightest steel beam that will support the load without exceeding the bending strength or shear strength
More informationBeam Design - Awning
Beam Design - Awning 1. Beam Data Load Type: Uniform Dist. Load Support: Simple Beam Beam Type: Sawn Lumber Species: Douglas Fir-Larch Grade: DF No.2 Size: 4 x 12 Design Span (L): 21.50 ft. Clear Span:
More informationDISTRIBUTION OF STRESS IN GROUND-SUPPORTED SLABS
Structural Concrete Software System TN207_sog_stresses_10 122005 DISTRIBUTION OF STRESS IN GROUND-SUPPORTED SLABS Bijan O Aalami 1 This Technical Note describes the distribution of stress in ground-supported
More informationMAXIMUM SUPERIMPOSED UNIFORM ASD LOADS, psf SINGLE SPAN DOUBLE SPAN TRIPLE SPAN GAGE
F-DEK ROOF (ASD) 1-1/2" high x 6" pitch x 36" wide SECTION PROPERTIES GAGE Wd 22 1.63 20 1.98 18 2.62 16 3.30 I D (DEFLECTION) 0.142 0.173 0.228 fy = 40 ksi Sp Sn 0.122 0.135 708 815 905 1211 1329 2365
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationTORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES)
Page1 TORSION INCLUDING WARPING OF OPEN SECTIONS (I, C, Z, T AND L SHAPES) Restrained warping for the torsion of thin-wall open sections is not included in most commonly used frame analysis programs. Almost
More informationInteraction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements
Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Interaction Diagram - Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Investigate the capacity for the irregular
More informationNonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using wframe to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability.
DESCRIPTION Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using wframe to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability. Moment hinges are based on Caltrans material
More informationALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE HEADWALLS AASHTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN
ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS AASTO LRFD BASIS OF DESIGN LANE ENTERPRISES, INC. www.lane-enterprises.com Required Backfill and Load Cases: ALUMINUM STRUCTURAL PLATE EADWALLS BASIS OF DESIGN Backfill
More informationAPRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:
APRIL 2015 DR. Z s CORNER Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications Topics covered in this month s column: PE Exam Specifications (Geotechnical) Transportation (Horizontal Curves)
More informationAccordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.
C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional
More informationJob No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
More information*Refer to IBC Section , applicable when fall protection is required. Glass stresses are designed for a safety factor of of 4.0 (IBC ).
Architectural Railing Division C.R.Laurence Co., Inc. 2503 E Vernon Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90058 (T) 800.421.6144 (F) 800.587.7501 www.crlaurence.com 12 JAN 2011 SUBJ: TAPER-LOC SYSTEM DRY-GLAZE LAMINATED
More informationDetails of Check for Boundary Element Requirements
COMUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 2001 SHEAR WALL DESIGN UCB 97 Technical te Wall ier Bondary Elements This Technical te describes how the program considers the bondary element
More informationAB Engineering Manual
AB Engineering Manual Allan Block Retaining Walls Excerptfrom theabengineeringmanualforretainingwals CHAPTER FIVE Seismic Analysis Introduction In seismic design we take a dynamic force and analyze it
More informationNICE-PACK ALCOHOL PREP ROOM PLATFORM CALCULATIONS
DESIGN STATEMENT THIS GALVANISED STEEL PLATFORM IS ANALYSED USING THE ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN METHOD TO DETERMINE MATERIAL STRENGTH. MEMBER SIZES AND FASTENERS ARE CHOSEN NOT SO MUCH FOR THEIR STRENGTH
More informationSteel Cross Sections. Structural Steel Design
Steel Cross Sections Structural Steel Design PROPERTIES OF SECTIONS Perhaps the most important properties of a beam are the depth and shape of its cross section. There are many to choose from, and there
More informationSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction
CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Introduction The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the whole part of a structure and to identify
More information