arxiv: v4 [math.ap] 4 Jan 2017

Transcription

1 Degeneracy in finite time of 1D quasilinear wave equations II Yuusuke Sugiyama Department of Mathematics, okyo University of Science Kagurazaka 1-3, Shinjuku-ku, okyo , Japan arxiv: v4 [math.ap] 4 Jan 2017 Abstract We consider the large time behavior of solutions to the following nonlinear wave equation: 2 tu = c(u) 2 2 xu + λc(u)c (u)( x u) 2 with the parameter λ [0,2]. If c(u(0, x)) is bounded away from a positive constant, we can construct a local solution for smooth initial data. However, if c( ) has a zero point, then c(u(t,x)) can be going to zero in finite time. When c(u(t,x)) is going to 0 in finite time, the equation degenerates. We give a sufficient condition that the equation with 0 λ < 2 degenerates in finite time. 1 Introduction In this paper, we consider the Cauchy problem of the following quasilinear wave equation: t 2u = c(u)2 x 2u+λc(u)c (u)( x u) 2, (t,x) (0,], u(0,x) = u 0 (x), x, (1.1) t u(0,x) = u 1 (x), x, where u(t,x) is an unknown real valued function, 0 λ 2 c (θ) = dc(θ)/dθ. his parameterized equation has been introduced by Glassey, Hunter Zheng [5]. As is explained later, this equation has different mathematical physical backgrounds depending on λ (see also Chen Shen [3]). hroughout this paper, we assume that c C (( 1, )) C([ 1, )) satisfies that c(θ) > 0 for all θ > 1, (1.2) c( 1) = 0, (1.3) c (θ) > 0 for all θ > 1. (1.4) Furthermore, we assume that there exists a constant c 0 > 0 such that c(u 0 (x)) c 0 (1.5) for all x. A typical example of c(θ) satisfying (1.2)-(1.4) is c(θ) = (1+θ) a with a > 0. he assumptions (1.2) (1.5) enable us to regard the equation in (1.1) as a strictly hyperbolic equation near t = 0. By the stard local existence theorem for strictly sugiyama@ma.kagu.tus.ac.jp telephone number:(+81)

2 hyperbolic equations, the local solution of (1.1) with smooth initial data uniquely exists until the one of the following two phenomena occurs. he first one is the blow-up: tր ( tu(t) L + x u(t) L ) =. he second is the degeneracy of the equation: inf tր (s,x) [0,t] c(u(s,x)) = 0. When the equation degenerates, the stard local well-posedness theorem does not work since the equation loses the strict hyperbolicity. In general, for non-strictly hyperbolic equations, the persistence of the regularity of solutions does not hold (see emark 1.5). he aim of this paper is to give a sufficient condition for the occurrence of the degeneracy of the equation with 0 λ < 2. he main theorem of this paper is the following. heorem 1.1. Let 0 λ < 2, (u 0,u 1 ) H 2 () H 1 () u 1 0. Suppose that the initial data (u 0,u 1 ) c satisfy that (1.2)-(1.5) u 1 (x)±c(u 0 (x)) x u 0 (x) 0 for all x. (1.6) hen there exists > 0 such that a solution of (1.1) exists uniquely satisfies that u C([0, );H 2 ()) C 1 ([0, );H 1 ()) Furthermore, if 0 < λ < 2, then for some x 0. inf tր (s,x) [0,t] c(u(s,x)) = 0. (1.7) tր c(u(t,x 0)) = 0 (1.8) If λ = 2, then the equation in (1.1) is formally equivalent to the following conservation system: ( ( ) U V t ) V x U = 0, 1 c(θ)2 dθ where U(t,x) = u(t,x), V(t,x) = x tu(t,y)dy. his conservation system is called p-system describes several phenomena of the wave propagation in nonlinear media including the electromagnetic wave in a transmission line, shearing-motion in elastic-plastic rods 1 dimensional gas dynamics (see Ames Lohner [1] Zabusky [24]). In addition to the assumptions of heorem 1.1, if u 1(x)dx > 2 0 1c(θ)dθ is assumed, then (1.1) with λ = 2 has a global smooth solution such that the equation does not degenerate (e.g. Johnson [7] Yamaguchi Nishida [23]). On the other h, in [18, 19] (see emark 1.5 in [18] heorem 4.1 in [19]), the author has shown that the degeneracy (1.8) occurs in finite time, if u 1(x)dx < 2 0 1c(θ)dθ. Namely, these resultssaythat c(θ)dθ isathresholdof u 1(x)dx separatingtheglobal existenceof solutions (such that the equation does not degenerate) the degeneracy of the equation 2

3 under the assumption (1.6). If (1.6) is not satisfied, then solutions can blow up in finite time (e.g. Klainerman Majda [9], Manfrin [13] Zabusky [24]). he main theorem of this paper implies that the degeneracy in finite time of the equation in (1.1) can occurs regardless of u 1(x)dx, when 0 λ < 2. When λ = 1, the equation in (1.1) is called variational wave equation. As its name suggests, the equation with λ = 1 has a variational structure. he variational wave equation has some physical backgrounds including nematic liquid crystal long waves on a dipole chain in the continuum it (see [5]). In [4, 5], Glassey, Hunter Zheng have shown that solutions can blow up in finite time, if (1.6) is not satisfied (see also emark 1.4). here are a lot of papers devoted to the global existence of weak solutions to variational wave equations (e.g. Bressan Zheng [2] Zhang Zheng [25, 26, 27]). When λ = 0, the equation in (1.1) describes the wave of entropy in superfluids (e.g. Lau Lifshitz [11]). his equation is the one dimensional version of 2 tu = c(u) 2 u, (t,x) (0,] 3, which has been studied in Lindbald [15]. In [15], Lindblad has shown that solutions exists globally in time with small initial data. In [8, 17], Kato the author have shown that the equation in (1.1) with c(θ) = 1+θ λ = 0,1 degenerates in finite time, if initial data are smooth, compactly supported satisfy (1.5) (1.6). he main theorem of this paper removes the compactness condition on initial data extends the result in [8, 17] to (1.1) with more general c(θ) 0 λ < 2. In [17, 18], the generalization on λ has already been pointed out without a proof. In fact, applying the method in [17, 18] to the equation in (1.1), we can generalize the result in [17, 18] to (1.1) with 0 λ < 2 c(θ) = 1+θ. However the compactness condition plays a crucial role in [8, 17], since we use the following estimates for bounded solutions under the assumption that initial data are compactly supported: C(1+t) u(t, x)dx (1.9) C(1+t) (2 λ) t s 0 0 c(u)c (u)( x u(τ,x)) 2 dxdτds. (1.10) (1.9) is formally shown by the finiteness of the propagation speed the boundedness of solutions. (1.10) is shown by the equation in (1.1), (1.9) the integration by parts. Furthermore, taking c(u) = 1+u, we use the following estimate in [17, 18]: ( )1 u(t,x)dx C(1+t) (1+t) (1+u)( x u(τ,x)) 2 2 dx, (1.11) which is shown by the fundamental theorem of calculus the finiteness of the propagation speed. We can not obtain the above estimates directly, if initial data are not compactly supported. he first idea of the proof of heorem 1.1 is the use of iemann invariant, whichisamajortoolforthestudyof2 2conservationsystems. Whenweusetheiemann invariant in the reduction from (1.1) to a first order system, x c(u)c (u)( x u(t,x)) 2 dx appears as a force term in the first order system (see (3.1) (3.2)). he second idea for 3

4 the proof is to divide the situation into the two cases that t 0 c(u)c (u)( x u(s,x)) 2 dxds is bounded or not. If t 0 c(u)c (u)( x u(s,x)) 2 dxds is bounded, then (1.10) holds (1.9) can be shown by the use of the iemann invariant. Hence we can use a variation of the method in [8, 17]. he key for the generalization on c( ) is the use of G(u) = u 1 c(θ)c (θ)dθ. We use G(u) in order to generalize the estimate (1.11). If t 0 c(u)c (u)( x u(s,x)) 2 dxds is not bounded, we can use the method in [18]. In the case that u 1(x)dx L 1 (), the iemann invariant can not be defined in general. heorem 1.1 with u 1 L 1 () can be shown by applying the same argument as in [18]. emark 1.2. Addition to the assumptions of heorem 1.1, if initial data are compactly suppurated, then (1.8) holdsfor (1.1) with 0 λ < 2, which can beshownby the finiteness of the propagation speed (see [8, 17]). Our method does not work for the case that λ = 0 (see emark 3.2). emark 1.3. Under the assumptions (1.2)-(1.5), there is still no global existence result of (1.1) for 0 λ < 2. In stead of the assumptions, we assume that c C () satisfies that c 1 c(θ) c 2 for all θ, c (θ) 0 for all θ for some positive constants c 1 c 2. Under these assumptions (1.6), Zhang Zheng [25] have shown that (1.1) has global smooth solutions with λ = 1. his global existence result has been extended to 0 λ 2 in the author s paper [17]. emark 1.4. Here we collect some open questions for (1.1). When λ = 1 2, it is known that blow-up solutions exist, if (1.6) is not satisfied. From the first the second equations in (2.4), we can expect that blow-up solutions exist for 0 < λ 2, if (1.6) is not satisfied, since the right h sides of the first the second equations in (2.4) contain λ 2 λs 2 respectively, which seems to derive the singularity formation. However, the existence of the blow-up solution is still open, since the proofs of the blow-up theorems for λ = 1 2 rely on structures of the equation. When λ = 0, if c( ) is uniformly positive, then it seems possible that (1.1) has global smooth solution for any smooth initial data, although a complete proof or a counterexample for this problem is also open. emark 1.5. Itisknownthat alossof theregularity appearsforsolutions tothefollowing non-strictly hyperbolic equation: 2 tu t 2l 2 xu ht l 1 x u = 0, (t,x) (0, ), where h is a constant l N. Namely, in general, (u, t u) does not belong to C 1 ([0, ),H s ()) C([0, ),H s 1 ()) with (u(0,x), t u(0,x)) H s () H s 1 () (see aniguchi ozaki [20], Yagdjian [22] Qi [16]). From this fact, we can expect that solutions of (1.1) have a singularity when the equation degenerates. his paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we recall the local well-posedness some properties of solutions of (1.1). In Sections 3 4, we show heorem 1.1 in the cases that u 1 L 1 () u 1 L 1 () respectively. Notation 4

5 We denote Lebesgue space for 1 p L 2 Sobolev space with the order m N on by L p () H m (). For a Banach space X, C j ([0,];X) denotes the set of functions f : [0,] X such that f(t) its k times derivatives for k = 1,2,...,j are continuous. Various positive constants are simply denoted by C. 2 Preinary We recall the local well-posedness of (1.1) some properties of solutions of (1.1). By applying the well-known local well-posedness heorem (e.g Hughes, Kato Marsden [6], Majda [12] or aylor [21]), we can obtain the following theorem. heorem 2.1. Let λ. Suppose that (u 0,u 1 ) H 2 () H 1 () that (1.2) (1.5) hold. hen there exist > 0 a unique solution u of (1.1) with u C j ([0,];H 2 j ()) (2.1) j=0,1,2 c(u(t,x)) δ() for (t,x) [0,], (2.2) where δ() is a positive monotone decreasing function of [0, ). Furthermore, if (1.1) does not have a global solution u satisfying (2.1) (2.2), then the solution u satisfies or for some > 0. tր ( tu(t) L + x u(t) L ) = tր inf c(u(s,x)) = 0 (s,x) [0,t] We denote the maximal existence time of the solution u of(1.1) constructed in heorem 2.1 by, that is, =sup{ > 0 sup{ t u(t) L + x u(t) L } <, [0,] inf c(u(t,x)) > 0 }. [0,] We set (t,x) S(t,x) as follows { = t u+c(u) x u, S = t u c(u) x u. (2.3) he functions S have been used in Glassey, Hunter Zheng [4, 5] Zhang Zheng [25]. We recall some properties of S proved in [17]. By (1.1), S are solutions to the system of the following first order equations: t c(u) x = c (u) 2c(u) (S S2 )+λ c (u) 4c(u) ( S)2, x u = 1 2c(u) ( S), (2.4) t S +c(u) x S = c (u) 2c(u) (S 2 )+λ c (u) 4c(u) (S )2. 5

6 Lemma 2.2. Let 0 λ 2. Supposethat the assumptions of heorem (1.1) are satisfied. hen we have (t,x), S(t,x) 0 for (t,x) [0, ), (2.5) where S arethefunctionsin(2.3) forthesolution u of (1.1) constructed by heorem 2.1. Lemma 2.3. Let p max{2, 2 λ }. Suppose that the assumptions of heorem (1.1) are satisfied. hen we have for 0 < λ 2 (t) p L p + S(t) p L p (0) p L p + S(0) p L p, for t [0, ), (2.6) where S arethefunctionsin(2.3) forthesolution u of (1.1) constructed by heorem 2.1. Furthermore (t) L S(t) L are uniformly bounded with t [0. ) for 0 λ 2. Lemmas have been shown in the author s paper [17]. he proofs are essentially the same as in the case that λ = 1, which are proved in Zhang Zheng [25]. In [17, 18], it is assumed only p 2/λ for the inequality (2.6). But the proof in [17] is not collect for p < 2. In fact, in [17], the proof of (2.6) is based on the following inequality: 1 d pdt p + S p dx ( 1 2 λ 4 ) c (u) c(u) S( S)(( ) p 2 ( S) p 2 )dx, where = S = S. If p < 2, the right h side of this inequality is not negative except for λ = 2. However, in [17], we only use (2.6) for p 2. If λ = 2, (2.6) holds for all p 1. We note that (2.5) implies that t u(t,x) 0 for all (t,x) [0, ). 3 Proof of heorem 1.1 with u 1 L 1 () We show heorem 1.1 in the case that u 1 L 1 (). First, we show (1.7) by the contradiction argument. From heorem 2.1 Lemma 2.3, it is enough to show that <. We set G(u) = u 1c(θ)dθ for u 1 µ = 2 λ define the iemann invariants (w 1 (t,x),w 2 (t,x)) (v 1 (t,x),v 2 (t,x)) as follows: w 1 = w 2 = x x t udx+g(u), t udx G(u) v 1 = v 2 = x x t udx G(u), t udx+g(u). 6

7 From (1.1), (w 1 (t,x),w 2 (t,x)) (v 1 (t,x),v 2 (t,x)) satisfy that the following systems: { t w 1 c(u) x w 1 = µ ẽ(t,y)dy, x t w 2 +c(u) x w 2 = µ ẽ(t,y)dy x (3.1) { t v 1 c(u) x v 1 = µ x ẽ(t,y)dy, t v 2 +c(u) x v 2 = µ x ẽ(t,y)dy, (3.2) where ẽ(t,y) = c (u)c(u)( x u) 2 (t,y). Let x ± (t) be characteristic curves on the first third equations of (3.1) respectively. hat is, x ± (t) are solutions to the following differential equations: (3.1) (3.2) imply that d dt x ±(t) = ±c(u(t,x ± (t))). (3.3) w 1 (t,x (t)) = w 1 (t 0,x (t 0 )) µ t x (s) t 0 ẽ(s, y)dyds (3.4) w 2 (t,x + (t)) = w 2 (t 0,x + (t 0 )) µ t x+ (s) t 0 ẽ(s, y)dyds. (3.5) Case that t 0 ẽ(s,y)dyds is bounded. Bythecontradictionargument, weshowthat isfiniteinthecasethat t 0 is bounded on [0, ). We suppose that =. (3.4) (3.5) imply that ẽ(s,y)dyds w 1 (t,x (t)) w 1 (0,x (0)) µ x (s) 0 ẽ(s, y)dyds (3.6) w 2 (t,x + (t)) w 2 (0,x + (0)) µ x+ (s) 0 ẽ(s, y)dyds. (3.7) We fix an arbitrary number ε > 0. Since x u 0 (x) = 0, u 1 L 1 () x w j (0,x) 0 for j = 1,2, there exists a constant M 0 > 0 such that G(0) ε w 1 (0,x) G(0) G(0) ε w 2 (0,x) G(0) for any x M 0. Noting x ± (t) goes to as x ± (0) for all t 0, since 0 ẽ(s,y)dyds is bounded, we have by the Lebesgue convergence theorem x ± (0) 0 x± (s) 7 ẽ(s,y)dyds = 0.

8 Hence, from (3.6) (3.7), there exists a constant M 1 > 0 such that if x ± (0) max{m 0,M 1 }, then for all t 0 G(0) ε w 1 (t,x (t)) G(0) G(0) ε w 2 (t,x + (t)) G(0). We note the positive constant M 1 can be chosen independently of t. Hence the equality 2G(u(t,x)) = w 1 (t,x) w 2 (t,x) yields that G(0) ε G(u(t,x)) G(0)+ε, if x x (t), where x (0) max{m 0,M 1 }. Since G is invertible G 1 is continuous, this inequality implies that u(t, x) Cε (3.8) with x x (t), where x (0) max{m 0,M 1 }. From the above estimates of w 1 G(u), we have Since d dt x (t) Cε u(t,x) u 0 (x)dx = x (t) x (t) t u(t,y)dy 0. t u(t,x)dx if x (0) max{m 0,M 1 }, then we have from (3.8) x (t) (u(t,x (t)) u 0 (x (t)))c(u(t,x (t))), u(t,y) u 0 (x)dy Cεt. (3.9) By using (3.2), we have in the same way as in the derivation of (3.9) x + (t) u(t,y) u 0 (x)dy Cεt, (3.10) if x + (0) M 2 for sufficiently large M 2 > 0. We set F(t) = u(t,x) u 0(x)dx take M max{m 0,M 1,M 2 }. From the integration by parts (1.1), it follows that F (t) = µ ẽ(t,x)dx 0. Integrating this equality twice on [0,t] dividing by t, we have By (3.23) (3.10), we have F (0) F(t) t = 1 t Cε 1 t F(t) t ( x (t) + x+ (t) x (t) F (0). x+ (t) x (t) ) + u(t,x) u 0 (x)dx x + (t) u(t,x) u 0 (x)dx. (3.11) 8

9 Now we estimate the second term of the right h side of (3.11). We set G(u) = u 1 c(θ)c (θ)dθ. he Schwarz inequality implies that G(u) 2 u 1 u u c (θ)dθ c(θ)dθ = c(u) c(θ)dθ. 1 1 Hence G(u) can be defined for u 1. From (1.2) (1.3), we have that G (u) = c(u)c (u) > 0, from which G( ) is invertible on [0, ) G 1 ( ) is continuous. he fundamental theorem of calculus yields that G(u(t,x)) = G(u(t,x (t)))+ x x (t) c(u)c (u) y u(t,y)dy. (3.12) Applying (3.8) to the first term of the right h side of (3.12) the Schwarz inequality to the second term, we have G(u(t,x)) G(0) Cε x + (t) x (t) ẽ(t, y)dy for x [x (t),x + (t)]. Since G 1 is a monotone increasing function, we have ) u(t,x) ( G(0) Cε G 1 x + (t) x (t) ẽ(t, y)dy. From (3.3) (3.8), we have x + (t) x (t) C M +C t, where C M > 0 depends on M j for j = 1,2,3 C > 0 can be chosen independently of the three constants. Integrating the both sides of this inequality on [x (t),x + (t)], we have x+ (t) x (t) While the Schwarz inequality implies that x+ (t) x (t) u(t,x)dx (C M +C t) G 1 ( G(0) Cε (C M +C t) u 0 (x) dx C C M +C t u 0 L 2. From this inequality, (3.11) (3.13), we have F (0) C C M +C t u 0 L 2 t +Cε ẽ(t, y)dy ). (3.13) C M +C t G ( G(0) Cε 1 (C M +C t t) ẽ(t, y)dy. (3.14) Since we assume that 0 ẽ(s,y)dyds <, there exists a monotone increasing sequence {t j } j N such that j t j = (C M +C t j ) ẽ(t j,y)dy = 0. j 9 )

10 Putting t = t j in (3.14) taking j, since G is continuous, we obtain F (0) Cε C G 1 ( G(0) Cε ) Cε, which contradicts to the assumption that u 1 0, if ε is sufficiently small. herefore we obtain < in the case that t 0 ẽ(s,y)dyds is bounded. emark 3.1. he strictly positivity of c is only used in the estimate of G. It is enough to assume that c (θ) 0 for θ > 0 in the case that t 0 ẽ(s,y)dyds is unbounded. In this case, we use the method in [18, 19]. In [18, 19], instead of (1.4), it is assumed that c (θ) 0 for the occurrence of the degeneracy of the equation in (1.1) with λ = 2. Case that t 0 ẽ(s,y)dyds is unbounded. We suppose that =. In this case, from the identity t u(t,x)dx = u 1 (x)dx+µ t 0 ẽ(s, x)dxds, there exists a positive number such that t u(,x)dx > 2G(0). (3.15) From (3.6) (3.7), iftheplusminuscharacteristic curvescrossat somepoint (t 0,x 0 ) with t 0, then we have by the definitions of w 1 w 2 t0 2G(u(t 0,x 0 )) =w 1 (,x ()) w 2 (,x + ()) µ = x () x + () t0 x (s) µ x (s) x + (s) ẽ(s, y)dyds t u(,x)dx+g(u(,x + ()))+G(u(,x ())) x + (s) ẽ(s, y)dyds. (3.16) By (3.15) the facts that x u(,x) = 0 that t u(, ) L 1 (), there exists a number M > 0 such that M M t u(,x)dx+g(u(, M))+G(u(,M))) < 0. (3.17) We set F(t) = u(t,x) u(,x)dx. We derive a estimate of F(t) which contradicts to (3.17). Suppose that the plus minus characteristic curves x ± (t) defined in (3.3) pass through (, M) respectively. he characteristics x ± (t) are drawn on the (x,t) plane as follows: 10

11 Figure 1: the two characteristic curves on the (x,t) plane x = x + (t) t x = x (t) M 0 M t = x From (3.16) (3.17), these characteristic curves x + (t) x (t) do not cross for all t. Hence it follows that And F can be divided as follows: ( x+ (t) F(t) = + c(u(t,x ±(t))) = 0. (3.18) t x (t) x + (t) Now we estimate x + (t) u(t,x) u(,x)dx. From (3.3), we have d dt x+ (t) u(t,x) u(,x)dx = x+ (t) ) + u(t, x) u(, x)dx. (3.19) x (t) t u(t,x)dx +(u(t,x + (t)) u(,x + (t)))c(u(t,x + (t))). (3.20) From (3.5) the definition of w 2, the first term of the right h side of (3.20) can be estimated as follows: x+ (t) t u(t,x)dx =G(u(t,x + (t)))+w 2 (, M) µ w 2 (, M) µ t x+ (s) t x+ (s) ẽ(s, x)dxds. ẽ(s, x)dxds From the boundedness of u, the second term of the right h side of (3.20) can be estimated as Hence we have from (3.20) x+ (t) (u(t,x + (t)) u(,x + (t)))c(u(t,x + (t))) Cc(u(t,x + (t))). u(t,x) u(,x)dx (t )w 2 (, M) C µ t s x+ (τ) t c(u(s,x + (s)))ds ẽ(τ, x)dxdτ ds. (3.21) 11

12 Using v 1 instead of w 2, in the same way as in the derivation of (3.21), we get x (t) u(t,x) u(,x)dx (t )v 1 (, M) C µ t s x (τ) he boundedness of u(t,x) x + (t) x (t) yields that x (t) x + (t) t c(u(s,x (s)))ds ẽ(τ, x)dxdτ ds. (3.22) u(t,x) u(,x)dx C x (t) x + (t) C. (3.23) While, in the same way as in the computation of F, we have t s F(t) = (t ) F ()+µ ẽ(τ, x)dxdτ ds. (3.24) By (3.19), (3.21), (3.22) (3.23), we have F(t) C (t )(w 2 (, M)+v 1 (,M)) +C +µ t t s c(u(s,x + (s)))+c(u(s,x (s)))ds ( x+ (τ) ) + ẽ(τ, x)dxdτ ds. (3.25) x + (τ) From the definitions of w 2 v 1, the second term of the right h side of (3.25) can be written as follows: ( M ) w 2 (, M)+v 1 (,M) = + t u(,x)dx from which, (3.24) (3.25) yield that M t u(,x)dx µ M (t ) M (G(u(,M)) +G(u(, M))), t s x (τ) x + (τ) G(u(,M))+G(u(, M)) + C t t ẽ(τ, x)dxdτ ds c(u(s,x + (s)))+c(u(s,x (s)))ds G(u(,M))+G(u(, M)) + C t t c(u(s,x + (s)))+c(u(s,x (s)))ds. From (3.18), the second term of the right h side of the above inequality tends to 0 as t. Hence, taking t in the above inequality, we have M M t u(,x)dx G(u(,M))+G(u(, M)), 12

13 which contradicts to (3.17). Hence we have that < in the case t 0 ẽ(s,y)dyds is unbounded. From the above argument of the two cases, we have < (1.7). Next we give an outline of the proof of (1.8) for 0 < λ < 2. he proof is the same as in [8, 17, 18]. Since u(t,x) is a monotone decreasing function with t for all x, we can define ũ(x) = tր u(t,x). While, (2.6) in Lemma 2.3 implies that c(u) x u(t) L p is uniformly bounded with t [0, ) p = max{2,2/λ}. Hence, by the stard argument on the Sobolev space, it follows that G(ũ) G(0),c(ũ) x ũ L p () that G(ũ( )) is a continuous function. hereforewe have x ր G(ũ) G(0) = 0, fromwhich, the continuity of G(ũ( )) implies that G(ũ(x 0 )) = 0 for some x 0. While, from the monotonicity of G(u(t,x)) with t, we have inf tր (s,x) [0,t] G(u(s,x)) = inf x tր G(u(t,x)) = inf G(ũ(x)). x Hence, by the continuity of G 1, we have tր u(t,x 0 ) = 1, which implies (1.8). emark 3.2. In the case that λ = 0, since the boundednessof c(ũ) x ũ(t) L p is unknown for p, the above argument does not work. Hence the case that λ = 0 is excluded in (1.8). 4 Proof of heorem 1.1 with u 1 L 1 () By using the same argument as in [18], we can show heorem 1.1 with u 1 L 1 (). We show that the degeneracy (1.7) occurs in finite time for the reader s convenience. (1.8) can be shown by same way as in the case that u 1 L 1 (). In the same argument as in Section 3, we can say that then (1.7) occurs at, if <. Hence it is enough to show that is finite. We define a cut-off function ψ C0 () as { 1 for x 1, ψ(x) = 0 for x 2 0 ψ(x) 1. We set ψ ε (x) = ψ(εx) F ε (t) = ψ ε(x)u(t,x)dx. From (1.1) the integration by parts, we have F ε (t) = ε2 ψ (εx)g 2 (u)dx+µ ψ ε (x)c(u)c (u)( x u) 2 dx ε 2 ψ (εx)g 2 (u)dx, where G 2 (u) = u 1 c(θ)2 dθ. Since 1 u(t,x) u(0,x) C, it follows that Namely we have F ε (t) Cε. F ε (t) F ε (0)+tF ε(0) Cεt 2. he boundedness of u(t,x) with (t,x) [0, ) yields that F ε (t) ψ ε (x) u(t,x) dx C ε. 13

14 Hence we have Putting ε = 1/(1+t), we have 2C(t+1) t C ε +Cεt2 tf ε(0). ( ) x ψ u 1 (x)dx. t+1 Sinceu 1 L 1 (), therighthsideisgoingtoinfinityast, whichisacontradiction. herefore we have <. eferences [1] W. F. Ames,. J. Lohner, Group properties of u tt = [f(u)u x ] x, Int. J. Non-linear Mech. 16 (1981) [2] A. Bressan Y. Zheng, Conservative solutions to a nonlinear variational wave equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 266 (2006) [3] G. Chen Y. Shen, Existence regularity of solutions in nonlinear wave equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35 (2015) [4].. Glassey, J. K. Hunter Y. Zheng, Singularities of a variational wave equation, J. Differential Equations 129 (1996) [5].. Glassey, J. K. Hunter Y. Zheng, Singularities oscillations in a nonlinear wave variational wave equation, Singularities oscillations, he IMA Volumes in Mathematics its applications, 91 (1997) pp [6]. J.. Hughes,. Kato J. E. Marsden, Well-posed quasi-linear second-order hyperbolic systems with applications to nonlinear elastodynamics general relativity, Arch. ation. Mech. Anal. 63 (1977) [7] J. L. Johnson, Global continuous solutions of hyperbolic systems of quasilinear equations Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967) [8] K. Kato Y. Sugiyama, Blow up of solutions to second sound equation in one space dimension, Kyushu J. Math. 67 (2013) [9] S. Klainerman A. Majda, Formation of singularities for wave equations including the nonlinear vibrating string, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 33 (1980) [10] P. D. Lax, Development of Singularities of solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equations, J. Math. Phys. 5 (1964) [11] L. D. Lau E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid mechanics, volume 6 of course of theoretical physics, Pergamon, [12] A. Majda, Compressible fluid flow systems of conservation laws in several space variables, Springer, Appl. Math. Sci.,

15 [13]. Manfrin, A note on the formation of singularities for quasi-linear hyperbolic systems, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 32 (2000) [14]. C. MacCamy, V. J. Mizel, Existence nonexistence in the large of solutions of quasilinear wave equations, Arch. ation. Mech. Anal. 25 (1967) [15] H. Lindblad, Global solutions of quasilinear wave equations, Amer. J. Math. 130 (2008) [16] M.-Y. Qi, On the Cauchy problem for a class of hyperbolic equations with initial data on the parabolic degenerating line, Acta Math. Sinica, 8 (1958) [17] Y. Sugiyama, Global existence of solutions to some quasilinear wave equation in one space dimension, Differential Integral Equations 6 (2013) [18] Y. Sugiyama, Degeneracy in finite time of 1D quasilinear wave equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 3 (2016) [19] Y. Sugiyama, Large time behavior of solutions to 1D quasilinear wave equations, to appear in IMS Kôkyûroku Bessatsu. [20] K. aniguchi Y. ozaki, A hyperbolic equation with double characteristics which has a solution with branching singularities, Math, Japonica 25 (1980) [21] M. E. aylor, Pseudodifferential operators nonlinear PDE, Birkhauser, Boston, [22] M. K. Yagdjian, he Cauchy problem for hyperbolic operators. Multiple characteristics, micro-local approach, Akademie Verlag, [23] M. Yamaguchi. Nishida, On some global solution for quasilinear hyperbolic equations, Funkcial. Ekvac. 11 (1968) [24] N. J. Zabusky, Exact solution for the vibrations of a nonlinear continuous model string, J. Math. Phys. 3 (1962) [25] P. Zhang Y. Zheng, arefactive solutions to a nonlinear variational wave equation of liquid crystals, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 26 (2001) [26] P. Zhang Y. Zheng, Singular rarefactive solutions to a nonlinear variational wave equation, Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B 22 (2001) [27] P. Zhang Y. Zheng, Weak solutions to a nonlinear variational wave equation, Arch. ation. Mech. Anal. 166 (2003)