arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 9 Sep 2003
|
|
- Ethan Craig
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 arxiv:gr-qc/030905v 9 Sep 2003 Centrifugal (centripetal) and Coriolis velocities and accelerations in spaces with affine connections and metrics as models of space-time Sawa Manoff Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Department of Theoretical Physics Blvd. Tzarigradsko Chaussee Sofia - Bulgaria address: smanov@inrne.bas.bg Abstract The notions of centrifugal (centripetal) and Coriolis velocities and accelerations are introduced and considered in spaces with affine connections and metrics [(L n,g)-spaces] as velocities and accelerations of flows of mass elements (particles) moving in space-time. It is shown that these types of velocities and accelerations are generated by the relative motions between the mass elements. They are closely related to the kinematic characteristics of the relative velocity and relative acceleration. The centrifugal (centripetal) velocity is found to be in connection with the Hubble law. The centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration could be interpreted as gravitational acceleration as it has been done in the Einstein theory of gravitation. This fact could be used as a basis for working out of new gravitational theories in spaces with affine connections and metrics. PACS numbers: Cv; b; e; h; Introduction. The relative velocity and the relative acceleration between particles or mass elements of a flow are important characteristics for describing the evolution and the motion of a dynamic system. On the other side, the kinematic characteristics related to the relative velocity and the relative acceleration (such as deformation velocity and acceleration, shear velocity and acceleration, rotation velocity and acceleration, and expansion velocity and acceleration) characterize specific relative motions of particles and /or mass elements in a flow [] [4]. On the basis of the links between the kinematic characteristics related to the relative
2 velocity and these related to the relative acceleration the evolution of a system of particles or mass elements of a flow could be connected to the geometric properties of the corresponding mathematical model of a space or space-time [5]. Many of the notions of classical mechanics or of classical mechanics of continuous media preserve their physical interpretation in more comprehensive spaces than the Euclidean or Minkowskian spaces, considered as mathematical models of space or space-time [6]. On this background, the generalizations of the notions of Coriolis and centrifugal (centripetal) accelerations [7] from classical mechanics in Euclidean spaces are worth to be investigated in spaces with affine connections and metrics [(L n,g)-spaces] [8] [2]. 2. Usually, the Coriolis and centrifugal (centripetal) accelerations are considered as apparent accelerations, generated by the non-inertial motion of the basic vector fields determining a co-ordinate system or a frame of reference in an Euclidean space. In Einstein s theory of gravitation (ETG) these types of accelerations are considered to be generated by a symmetric affine connection (Riemannian connection) compatible with the corresponding Riemannian metric [5]. In both cases they are considered as corollaries of the non-inertial motion of particles (i.e. of the motion of particles in non-inertial co-ordinate system). 3. In the present paper the notions of Coriolis and centrifugal (centripetal) accelerations are considered with respect to their relations with the geometric characteristics of the corresponding models of space or space-time. It appears that accelerations of these types are closely related to the kinematic characteristics of the relative velocity and of the relative acceleration. The main idea is to be found out how a Coriolis or centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration acts on a mass element of a flow or on a single particle during its motion in space or space-time described by a space of affine connections and metrics. In Section the notions of centrifugal (centripetal) and Coriolis velocities are introduced and considered in (L n,g)-spaces. The relations between the kinematic characteristics of the relative velocity and the introduced notions are established. The centrifugal (centripetal) velocity is found to be in connection with the Hubble law in spaces with affine connections and metrics. In Section 2 the notions of centrifugal (centripetal) and Coriolis accelerations are introduced and their relations to the kinematic characteristics of the relative acceleration are found. In Section 3 the interpretation of the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration as gravitational acceleration is given and illustrated on the basis of the Einstein theory of gravitation and especially on the basis of the Schwarzschild metric in vacuum. 4. The main results in the paper are given in details (even in full details) for these readers who are not familiar with the considered problems. The definitions and abbreviations are identical to those used in [9], [], [2]. The reader is kindly asked to refer to them for more details and explanations of the statements and results only cited in this paper. 2
3 2 Centrifugal (centripetal) and Coriolis velocities Let us now recall some well known facts from kinematics of vector fields over spaces with affine connections and metrics [(L n,g) - spaces], considered as models of space or space-time [] [2].. Every contravariant vector field ξ could be represented by the use of a non-isotropic (non-null) contravariant vector field u and its corresponding contravariant and covariant projective metrics h u and h u in the form where ξ = e g(u,ξ) u+g[h u(ξ)], () h u = g e u u, h u = g g(u) g(u), (2) e g = g ij e i.e j, g ij = g ji, e i.e j = 2 (e i e j +e j e i ), g = g ij e i.e j, g ij = g ji, e i.e j = 2 (ei e j +e j e i ), e = g(u,u) = g kl u k u l = u k u k = u k u k : 0, (3) g(u,ξ) = g ij u i ξ j, e i = i, e j = dx j in a co-ordinate basis. (4) By means of the representation of ξ the notions of relative velocity and relative acceleration are introduced [9], [] in (L n,g) - spaces. By that, the contravariant vector field ξ has been considered as vector field orthogonal to the contravariant vector field u, i.e. g(u,ξ) = 0, ξ = ξ = g[h u (ξ)]. Both the fields are considered as tangent vector fields to the corresponding co-ordinates, i.e. they fulfil the condition [8] ξ u = u ξ = [u,ξ] = 0, where [u,ξ] = u ξ ξ u. Under these preliminary conditions the relative velocity rel v could be found in the form [9], [] relv = g[d(ξ )], (5) where d = σ +ω + n θ h u. (6) The covariant tensor d is the deformation velocity tensor; the covariant symmetric trace-free [g[σ] = g ij σ ij = 0] tensor σ is the shear velocity tensor; the covariant antisymmetric tensor ω is the rotation velocity tensor; the invariant θ is the expansion velocity invariant. The contravariant vector field rel v is interpreted as the relative velocity of two points (mass elements, particles) moving in a space or space-time and having equal proper times [] [4]. The vector field ξ is orthogonal to u and is interpreted as deviation vector connecting the two mass elements (particles) (if considered as an infinitesimal vector field). 3
4 2. Let us now consider the representation of the relative velocity by the use of a non-isotropic (non-null) contravariant vector field ξ (orthogonal to u) and its corresponding projective metrics h ξ = g ξ ξ, (7) h ξ = g g(ξ ) g(ξ ). (8) Then a contravariant vector field v could be represented in the form v = g(v,ξ ) ξ +g[h ξ (v)]. (9) Therefore, the relative velocity rel v as a contravariant vector field could be now written in the form where relv = g( relv,ξ ) ξ +g[h ξ ( rel v)] = v z +v c, (0) v z = g( relv,ξ ) ξ, v c = g[h ξ ( rel v)]. () The vector field v z is collinear to the vector field ξ. If the factor (invariant) before ξ is positive, i.e. if g( rel v,ξ ) > 0 (2) the vectorfield v z is called(relative)centrifugal velocity. Ifthe factor(invariant) before ξ is negative, i.e. if g( rel v,ξ ) < 0 (3) the vector field v z is called (relative) centripetal velocity. The vector field v c is called (relative) Coriolis velocity. Remark. The word (relative) is used here to stress the fact that the centripetal and the Coriolis velocities appear with respect to a trajectory interpreted as the world line of an observer with his sub space T u (M), orthogonal to u at every point of his world line.. 3. We can introduce the (normalized) contravariant unit vectors n and n as n = u, n = ξ, (4) l u l ξ 4
5 where g(u,u) = e = ±l 2 u, g(ξ,ξ ) = l 2 ξ, (5) g(n,n ) = lu 2 g(u,u) = ± l2 u lu 2 = ±, (6) g(n,n ) = lξ 2 = l2 ξ lξ 2 =. (7) Remark. The signs (±) and ( ) are depending on the signatureof the metric g of the space or space-time. If Sgng > 0 then g(u,u) = l 2 u, g(ξ,ξ ) = +l 2 ξ, g(n,n ) =, g(n,n ) = +. If Sgng < 0 then g(u,u) = +l 2 u, g(ξ,ξ ) = l 2 ξ, g(n,n ) = +, g(n,n ) =. By the use of the contravariant unit vectors n and n the (relative) centrifugal (centripetal) velocity v z could be written in the form 2. Centrifugal (centripetal) velocity v z = g( rel v,n ) n. (8) Propertiesof the centrifugal (centripetal) velocity (a)sincev z iscollinear to ξ, it is orthogonal to the vector field u, i.e. g(u,v z ) = 0. (9) (b) The centrifugal (centripetal) velocity v z is orthogonal to the Coriolis velocity v c g(v z,v c ) = 0. (20) (c) The length of the vector v z could be found by means of the relation g(v z,v z ) = v 2 z = l2 v z = g( g( relv,ξ ) ξ, g( relv,ξ ) ξ ) = (2) = [g( relv,ξ )] 2 2 = [g( relv,ξ )] 2 = [g( relv,ξ )] 2 ξ 2 = [g( relv,ξ )] 2 l 2 ξ = l2 ξ [g( rel v,n )] 2 l 2 ξ = [g( rel v,n )] 2. (22) From the last (previous) expression we can conclude that the square of the length of the centrifugal (centripetal) velocity is in general in inverse proportion to the length of the vector field ξ. Special case: M n := E n, n = 3 (3-dimensional Euclidean space): ξ = r, = r 2 = vz 2 = [g( r, rel v )] 2 r 2, l vz = vz 2 = g( r, rel v ) r If the relative velocity rel v is equal to zero then v z = 0.. (23) 5
6 (d) The scalar product between v z and rel v could be found in its explicit form by the use of the explicit form of the relative velocity rel v and the relations relv = g[d(ξ )] = g[σ(ξ )]+g[ω(ξ )]+ n θ ξ, (24) g(ξ, rel v) = g(ξ,g[σ(ξ )])+g(ξ,g[ω(ξ )])+ n θ g(ξ,ξ ), (25) For g(ξ,g[σ(ξ )]) = σ(ξ,ξ ), (26) g(ξ,g[ω(ξ )]) = ω(ξ,ξ ) = 0, (27) g(ξ, rel v) = σ(ξ,ξ )+ n θ g(ξ,ξ ). (28) g(v z, rel v) = g( g(ξ, rel v).ξ, rel v) = g(ξ, rel v) g(ξ, rel v) = = [g(ξ, rel v)] 2 = v 2 z, (29) it follows that g(v z, rel v) = g(v z,v z ) = v 2 z. (30) Remark. g(v z, rel v) = g(v z,v z ) = vz 2 becauseofg(v z,v c ) = 0andg(v z, rel v) = g(v z,v z +v c ) = g(v z,v z )+g(v z,v c ) = g(v z,v z ). On the other side, we can express vz 2 by the use of the kinematic characteristics of the relative velocity σ, ω, and θ vz 2 = [g(ξ, rel v)] 2 = = [σ(ξ,ξ )+ n θ g(ξ,ξ )] 2 = {[σ(ξ,ξ )] 2 + (n ) 2 θ2 [] n θ σ(ξ,ξ ) }, v 2 z = [σ(ξ,ξ )] 2 + (n ) 2 θ2 + 2 n θ σ(ξ,ξ ), (3) vz 2 = l2 v z = lξ 2 [σ(n,n )] 2 (n ) 2 θ2 lξ n θ ξ2 σ(n,n ) = = lξ 2 {[σ(n,n )] 2 + (n ) 2 θ2 2 n θ σ(n,n )} = = l 2 ξ [σ(n,n ) n θ]2, 6
7 lv 2 z = lξ 2 [σ(n,n ) n θ]2 = [ n θ σ(n,n )] 2 lξ 2. (32) Therefore, for l vz we obtain l vz = ±[σ(n,n ) n θ] l ξ = (33) = [ n θ σ(n,n )] l ξ. (34) Special case: θ := 0 (expansion-free relative velocity) v 2 z = [σ(ξ,ξ )] 2 = [σ(ξ,ξ )] 2 ξ 2 = [σ(ξ,ξ )] 2 l 2 ξ, (35) = l 2 ξ, (36) = l 2 ξ if g(u,u) = e = +l 2 u, (37) = +l 2 ξ if g(u,u) = e = l 2 u. (38) Remark. If we introduce as above the unit vector field n, normal to u and normalized, as n := ξ l ξ, = l 2 ξ, ξ = l ξ n, (39) l ξ = /2, g(n,n ) =. (40) then the above expressions for v 2 z with [σ(ξ,ξ )] 2 / could be written in the form: v 2 z = [σ(ξ,ξ )] 2 l 2 ξ = l 2 ξ [σ(n,n )] 2. (4) Special case: σ := 0 (shear-free relative velocity) vz 2 = l2 v z = (n ) 2 θ2 = (n ) 2 θ2 lξ 2, (42) lv 2 z = (n ) 2 θ2 lξ 2. (43) (e) The explicit form of v z could be found as v z = g( relv,ξ ) ξ = [σ(ξ,ξ )+ n θ g(ξ,ξ )] ξ = = [ σ(ξ,ξ ) + n θ] ξ = [ n θ σ(n,n )] ξ, v z = [ n θ + σ(ξ,ξ ) ] ξ = [ n θ σ(n,n )] l ξ n. (44) 7
8 If n θ+ σ(ξ,ξ ) > 0, (45) n θ σ(n,n ) > 0, ξ 2 = g(ξ,ξ ) = lξ 2, (46) we have a centrifugal (relative) velocity. If n θ+ σ(ξ,ξ ) < 0, (47) n θ σ(n,n ) < 0, (48) we have a centripetal (relative) velocity. Special case: θ := 0 (expansion-free relative velocity) v z = σ(ξ,ξ ) ξ = σ(n,n ) l ξ n. (49) Special case: σ := 0 (shear-free relative velocity) v z = n θ ξ = n θ l ξ n. (50) If the expansion invariant θ > 0 we have centrifugal (or expansion) (relative) velocity. If the expansion invariant θ < 0 we have centripetal (or contraction) (relative) velocity. Therefore, in the case of a shear-free relative velocity v z is proportional to the expansion velocity invariant θ. The centrifugal (centripetal) relative velocity v z could be also written in the form v z = g( relv,ξ ) ξ = g( relv,ξ ) l 2 ξ ξ = = g( rel v, ξ l ξ ) ξ l ξ = g( rel v,n ) n. (5) On the other side, on the basis of the relations relv = g[d(ξ )] = g[σ(ξ )]+g[ω(ξ )]+ n θ ξ, g[h u (ξ)] = ξ, g[h u (ξ )] = g[h u (g[h u (ξ)])] = g[h u (ξ)] = ξ, g(g[σ(ξ )],n ) = σ(n,ξ ) = σ(n,l ξ n ) = l ξ σ(n,n ), g(g[ω(ξ )],n ) = ω(n,ξ ) = ω(n,l ξ n ) = l ξ ω(n,n ) = 0, g(ξ,n ) = l ξ g(n,n ) = l ξ, 8
9 it follows for g( rel v,n ) and for v z g( rel v,n ) = [σ(n,n ) n θ] l ξ, (52) v z = g( rel v,n ) n = [ σ(n,n )+ n θ] l ξ n, v z = [ n θ σ(n,n )] l ξ n. (53) Since l ξ > 0, we have three different cases: (a) v z > 0 : σ(n,n )+ n θ > 0 : θ > ±(n ) σ(n,n ), n > 0. (b) (c) v z < 0 : σ(n,n )+ n θ < 0 : θ < ±(n ) σ(n,n ), n > 0. v z = 0 : σ(n,n )+ n θ = 0 : θ = ±(n ) σ(n,n ), n > 0. Special case: σ := 0 (shear-free relative velocity) v z = n θ l ξ n. For v z > 0 : θ > 0 we have an expansion, for v z < 0 : θ < 0 we have a contraction, and for v z = 0 : θ = 0 we have a stationary case. Special case: θ := 0 (expansion-free relative velocity) v z = σ(n,n ) l ξ n. Forv z > 0 : σ(n,n ) > 0wehaveanexpansion,forv z < 0 : σ(n,n ) < 0 we have a contraction, and for v z = 0 : σ(n,n ) = 0 we have a stationary case. In an analogous way we can find the explicit form of v 2 z as vz 2 = { [σ(n,n )] 2 (n ) 2 θ2 + 2 n θ σ(n,n )} lξ 2 = (54) = [σ(n,n ) n θ]2 lξ 2. (55) 9
10 The expression for vz 2 could be now written in the form v 2 z = H2 l 2 ξ = l 2 v z, (56) where Then H 2 = [σ(n,n ) n θ]2. (57) lv 2 z = H 2 lξ 2, l vz = H l ξ, l vz > 0, l ξ > 0, (58) H = [σ(n,n ) θ] = n (59) = n θ σ(n,n ). (60) and v z = ±l vz n = ± H l ξ n = H l ξ n = H ξ. (6) Remark. From the forms of v z = ±l vz n and v z = [ n θ σ(n,n )] l ξ n it follows immediately that ±l vz = H l ξ, v z = H l ξ n. (62) It follows from the last (previously) expression that the centrifugal (centripetal) relative velocity v z = H ξ is collinear to the vector field ξ. The absolutevalue l vz = H l ξ ofv z andtheexpressionforthe centrifugal (centripetal) relative velocity v z = H l ξ n = H ξ represent generalizations of the Hubble law [5], [5]. The function H could be called Hubble function (some authors call it Hubble coefficient [5], [5]). Since H = H(x k (τ)) = H(τ), for a given proper time τ = τ 0 the function H has at the time τ 0 the value H(τ 0 ) = H(τ = τ 0 ) =const. The Hubble function H is usually called Hubble constant. Remark. The Hubble coefficient H has dimension sec. The function H with dimension sec is usually denoted in astrophysics as Hubble s time [5]. The Hubble function H could also be represented in the forms [2] H = n θ σ(n,n ) = = 2 [(n )(h u )( u g u g)(h u )(n )]. (63) In the Einstein theory of gravitation (ETG) the Hubble coefficient is considered under the condition that the centrifugal relative velocity is generated by a shear-free relative velocity in a cosmological model of the type of Robertson- Walker [5], [5], i.e. v z = H l ξ n = H ξ with σ = 0. (64) 0
11 From the explicit form of H, it follows that in this case H = n θ and the Hubble function H depends only on the expansion velocity θ. Special case: U n - or V n -space: u g = 0, u g := 0 (the contravariant vector field u is a Killing vector field in the corresponding space) H = 0. Therefore, in a (pseudo) Riemannian space with or without torsion (U n - or V n - space) the Hubble function H is equal to zero if the velocity vector field u (n = 4) of an observer is a Killing vector field fulfilling the Killing equation u g = 0. This means that the condition u g = 0 is a sufficient condition for the Hubble function H to be equal to zero. Therefore, an observer, moving in space-time with a velocity vector field u obeying the condition υ g = 0, could not detect any centrifugal (centripetal) relative velocity v z. All mass elements (particles) in the surroundings of the observer could only circle around him (without any expansion or contraction, related to the relative centrifugal (centripetal) velocity) and will have stable orbits with respect to this observer. Special case: (L n,g)-space with u g u g := 0 [6]. For this case, the last expression appears as a sufficient condition for the vanishing of the Hubble function H, i.e. H = 0 if u g = u g. This is an analogous case for a (L n,g)-space as the case in U n - and V n -spaces, where no centrifugal (centripetal) velocity could be detected. Special case: (L n,g)-spaces with vanishing centrifugal (centripetal) velocity: v z := 0. v z := 0 : H = 0 : n θ σ(n,n ) = 0, θ = ±(n ) σ(n,n ). Therefore, if a (L n,g)-space allows the existence of an observer, who could not detect any centrifugal (centripetal) relative velocity, the expansion velocity is compensated by the shear velocity in the space on the basis of the relation θ = ±(n ) σ(n,n ). Remark. The Hubble function H is introduced in the above considerations only on a purely kinematic basis related to the notions of relative velocity and centrifugal (centripetal) relative velocity. Its dynamic interpretation in a theory of gravitation depends on the structure of the theory and the relations between the field equations and the Hubble function. 2.2 Coriolis velocity The vector field is called Coriolis velocity. v c = g[h ξ ( rel v)] = g ij (h ξ ) jk relv k i (65)
12 Properties of the Coriolis velocity (a) The Coriolis velocity is orthogonal to the vector field u, interpreted as velocity of a mass element (particle), i.e. g(u,v c ) = 0. (66) Proof: From the definition of the Coriolis velocity, it follows g(u,v c ) = g(u,g[h ξ ( rel v)] = g ij u i g jk (h ξ ) kl relv l = = g ij g jk u i (h ξ ) kl relv l = g k i u i (h ξ ) kl relv l = (67) = (h ξ ) kl u k relv l = (u)(h ξ )( rel v). Since (u)(h ξ ) = (h ξ ) kl u k dx l = (u)(g) (u)[g(ξ )] g(ξ ) = = g(u) g(u,ξ ) g(ξ ) = g(u), (68) g(u,ξ ) = 0, then (u)(h ξ )( rel v) = [g(u)]( rel v) = g(u, rel v) = 0. Because of g(u, rel v) = 0, it follows that g(u,v c ) = 0. (b) The Coriolis velocity v c is orthogonal to the centrifugal (centripetal) velocity v z g(v c,v z ) = 0. (69) (c) The length of the vector v c could be found by the use of the relations: v c = g[h ξ ( rel v)], h ξ ( rel v) = g( rel v) [g(ξ )]( rel v) g(ξ ) = = g( rel v) g(ξ, rel v) g(ξ ) = (70) = g( rel v)±g(n, rel v) g(n ), (7) [g(ξ )]( rel v) = g(ξ, rel v), v c = g[h ξ ( rel v)] = rel v g(ξ, rel v) ξ = (72) = rel v ±g(n, rel v) n = rel v v z, (73) g(v c,v c ) = v 2 c = l 2 v c = g( rel v g(ξ, rel v) ξ, rel v g(ξ, rel v) ξ ) = = g( rel v, rel v) g(ξ, rel v) g(ξ, rel v) g(ξ, rel v) g( relv,ξ )+ + [g(ξ, rel v)] 2, 2
13 g(v c,v c ) = v 2 c = l2 v c = g( rel v, rel v) [g(ξ, rel v)] 2. (74) Ontheotherside,becauseof(u)(h u ) = h u (u) = 0,and rel v = g[h u ( u ξ )], it follows that g(u, rel v) = h u (u, u ξ ) = (u)(h u )( u ξ ), Since g(u, rel v) = (u)(h u )( u ξ ) = 0. (75) g( rel v, rel v) = rel v 2 = l 2 relv = g(g[d(ξ )],g[d(ξ )]) = = g(d(ξ ),d(ξ )), u ξ = 0, (76) we obtain g(d(ξ ),d(ξ )) = g(σ(ξ )+ω(ξ )+ n θ g(ξ ), σ(ξ )+ω(ξ )+ n θ g(ξ )) g( rel v, rel v) = rel v 2 = g(d(ξ ),d(ξ )) = = g(σ(ξ ),σ(ξ ))+g(ω(ξ ),ω(ξ ))+ + (n ) 2 θ g(σ(ξ ),ω(ξ ))+ 2 n θ σ(ξ,ξ ). (77) Special case: σ := 0, θ := 0 (shear-free and expansion-free velocity). Special case: ω := 0 (rotation-free velocity). relv 2 = g(σ(ξ ),σ(ξ ))+ relv 2 = g(ω(ξ ),ω(ξ )). (78) (n ) 2 θ2 + 2 n θ σ(ξ,ξ ). (79) Special case: θ := 0, ω := 0 (expansion-free and rotation-free velocity). relv 2 = g(σ(ξ ),σ(ξ )). (80) Special case: σ := 0, ω := 0 (shear-free and rotation-free velocity). relv 2 = (n ) 2 θ2. (8) 3
14 Special case: θ := 0 (expansion-free velocity). relv 2 = g(σ(ξ ),σ(ξ ))+g(ω(ξ ),ω(ξ ))+2 g(σ(ξ ),ω(ξ )). (82) The squarev 2 c ofv c couldbe foundonthe basisoftherelationv 2 c = relv 2 v 2 z v 2 c = rel v 2 v 2 z = g(σ(ξ ),σ(ξ )) [σ(ξ,ξ )] 2 + +g(ω(ξ ),ω(ξ ))+2 g(σ(ξ ),ω(ξ )). (83) Therefore, the length of v c does not depend on the expansion velocity invariant θ. Special case: σ := 0 (shear-free velocity). Special case: ω := 0 (rotation-free velocity). v 2 c = g(ω(ξ ),ω(ξ )). (84) v 2 c = g(σ(ξ ),σ(ξ )) [σ(ξ,ξ )] 2. (85) It follows from the last(previous) expression that even if the rotation velocity tensor ω is equal to zero (ω = 0), the Coriolis (relative) velocity v c is not equal to zero if σ 0. (d) The scalar product between v c and rel v could be found in its explicit form by the use of the relations: g(v c, rel v) = h ξ ( rel v, rel v) = rel v 2 [g(ξ, rel v)] 2 = rel v 2 v 2 z = v 2 c. (86) (e) The explicit form of v c could be found by the use of the relations v c = g[h ξ ( rel v)] = rel v g(ξ, rel v) ξ = rel v v z, v c = g[σ(ξ )] σ(ξ,ξ ) ξ +g[ω(ξ )]. (87) Therefore, the Coriolis velocity does not depend on the expansion velocity invariant θ. Special case: σ := 0 (shear-free velocity). Special case: ω := 0 (rotation-free velocity). v c = g[ω(ξ )]. (88) v c = g[σ(ξ )] σ(ξ,ξ ) ξ. (89) (f) The Coriolis velocity v c is orthogonal to the deviation vector ξ, i.e. g(v c,ξ ) = 0. Proof: Fromg(v c,ξ ) = g(g[h ξ ( rel v)],ξ ) = h ξ (ξ, rel v) = (ξ )(h ξ )( rel v) and (ξ )(h ξ ) = 0, it follows that g(v c,ξ ) = 0. (90) 4
15 3 Centrifugal (centripetal) and Coriolis accelerations In analogous way as in the case of centrifugal (centripetal) and Coriolis velocities, the corresponding accelerations could be defined by the use of the projections of the relative acceleration rel a = g[h u ( u u ξ )] along or orthogonal to the vector field ξ rela = g(ξ, rel a) ξ +g[h ξ ( rel a)] = a z +a c, (9) where a z = g(ξ, rel a) ξ, (92) If a c = g[h ξ ( rel a)]. (93) g(ξ, rel a) > 0 (94) the vector field a z is called (relative) centrifugal acceleration. If g(ξ, rel a) < 0 (95) the vector field a z is called (relative) centripetal acceleration. The vector field a c is called (relative) Coriolis acceleration. 3. Centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration The centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration has specific properties which will be considered below on the basis of the properties of the relative acceleration rel a. The relative acceleration rel a is orthogonal to the vector field u. Proof: From g(u, rel a) = g(u,g[h u ( u u ξ )]) = (u)(h u )( u u ξ ) and (u)(h u ) = h u (u) = 0, it follows that g(u, rel a) = 0. (96) (a) The centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z is orthogonal to the vector field u, i.e. g(u,a z ) = 0. (97) Proof: From g(u,a z ) = g(u, g(ξ, rel a) ξ ) = g(u,ξ ) = 0, = g(ξ, rel a) g(u,ξ ), (98) 5
16 it follows that g(u,a z ) = 0. (b) The centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z is orthogonal to the Coriolis acceleration a c, i.e. g(a z,a c ) = 0. (99) Proof: From g( g(ξ, rel a) ξ,g[h ξ ( rel a)]) = g(ξ, rel a) g(ξ,g[h ξ ( rel a)]), g(ξ,g[h ξ ( rel a)]) = (ξ )(h ξ )( rel a), (00) (ξ )(h ξ ) = (h ξ )(ξ ) = 0, (0) it follows that g(a z,a c ) = 0. (c) The length of the vector a z could be found on the basis of the relations a 2 z = g(a z,a z ) = l 2 a z = [g(ξ, rel a)] 2. (02) Therefore, in general, the square a 2 z of the length of the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z is reverse proportional to ξ 2 = g(ξ,ξ ). Special case: M n = E n, n = 3 (3-dimensional Euclidean space). ξ := r, = r 2, rela = rel a, a 2 z = [g( r, rel a)] 2 r 2, l az = g( r, rel a) = g(n, rel a), (03) r r n := r, g(n,n ) = g( r, r ) r 2 = n 2 =. (04) The length l az = g(a z,a z ) /2 of the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z is equal to the projection of the relative acceleration rel a at the unit vector field n along the vector field ξ. If l az = g(n, rel a) = 0, i.e. if the relative acceleration rel a is orthogonalto the radius vector r [rel a r ], then az = 0. If the relative acceleration rel a is equal to zero then the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z is also equal to zero. (d) The scalar product g(ξ, rel a) could be found in its explicit form by the use of the explicit form of rel a [9] rela = g[a(ξ )] = g[ s D(ξ )]+g[w(ξ )]+ n U ξ. (05) 6
17 Then g(ξ, rel a) = s D(ξ,ξ )+ n U g(ξ,ξ ), (06) a 2 z = [g(ξ, rel a)] 2 = = [ sd(ξ,ξ )+ n U g(ξ,ξ )] 2 = = [ sd(ξ,ξ )] 2 + (n ) 2 U n U sd(ξ,ξ ). (07) Special case: s D := 0 (shear-free acceleration). a 2 z = (n ) 2 U2. (08) Special case: U := 0 (expansion-free acceleration). a 2 z = [ sd(ξ,ξ )] 2. (09) (e) The explicit form of a z could be found in the form If a z = g(ξ, rel a) ξ = s D(ξ,ξ ) ξ + n U ξ = = [ n U + s D(ξ,ξ ) ] ξ = (0) = [ n U ± sd(n,n )] ξ. () a z is a centrifugal (relative) acceleration. If n U + s D(ξ,ξ ) > 0 (2) n U + s D(ξ,ξ ) < 0 (3) a z is a centripetal (relative) acceleration. The (relative) centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z could be written also in the form a z = q ξ, (4) where q = n U ± sd(n,n ). (5) 7
18 The invariant function q could be denoted as acceleration function or acceleration parameter. Its explicit form depends on the explicit forms of the expansion acceleration invariant U and on the shear acceleration tensor s D [9], []. The centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z has an analogous form to the centrifugal (centripetal) velocity v z a z = q l ξ n = ±l az n, (6) v z = H l ξ n = ±l vz n. (7) Since ±l vz = H l ξ and ±l az = q l ξ, we can express l ξ from the one of these expressions l ξ = ± l v z H = ±l a z q (8) and put it into the other relation. As a result we could find the relation between the absolute values of a z and v z l az = q H l v z. (9) Therefore, the absolute value l az of the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z could be related to the absolute value l vz of the centrifugal (centripetal) velocity v z by means of the Hubble s function H and the acceleration parameter q. Then a z = ± q H l v z n = q H v z, (20) q = H la z l vz = ± l a z l ξ. (2) Remark. In Einstein s theory of gravitation, on the basis of cosmological models with Robertson-Walker metrics, the acceleration parameter is introduced as [5] q H la z l vz, where l az = K, H = K/K, l vz = K, l ξ = K. A comparison with the expression for q shows that q q H 2, and q q/h 2. It should be stressed that the acceleration parameter q is introduced on a pure kinematic basis and is not depending on a special type ofgravitationaltheory in a (L n,g)-space(einstein s theory of gravitation could be considered as a gravitational theory in a special type of a (L n,g)-space with n = 4 and (L n,g) V 4 ). In a theory of gravitation the centripetal (relative) acceleration could be interpreted as gravitational acceleration. Special case: s D := 0 (shear-free relative acceleration). a z = n U ξ. (22) 8
19 If the expansion acceleration invariant U > 0 the acceleration a z is a centrifugal (or expansion) acceleration. If U < 0 the acceleration a z is a centripetal (or contraction) acceleration. Therefore, in the case of a shear-free relative acceleration the centrifugal or the centripetal acceleration is proportional to the expansion acceleration invariant U. 3.2 Coriolis acceleration The vector field a c, defined as a c = g[h ξ ( rel a)], is called Coriolis (relative) acceleration. On the basis of its definition, the Coriolis acceleration has well defined properties. (a) The Coriolis acceleration is orthogonal to the vector field u, i.e. and Proof: From it follows that g(u,a c ) = 0. (23) g(u,a c ) = g(u,g[h ξ ( rel a)]) = (u)(h ξ )( rel a) = h ξ (u, rel a) (u)(h ξ ) = (h ξ )(u) = g(u), g(u, rel a) = 0, (24) g(u,a c ) = [g(u)]( rel a) = g(u, rel a) = 0. (b) The Coriolis acceleration a c is orthogonal to the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z, i.e. g(a c,a z ) = 0. (25) (c) The Coriolis acceleration a c is orthogonal to the deviation vector ξ, i.e. g(ξ,a c ) = 0. (26) (d) The length a 2 c = g(a c,a c ) of a c could be found by the use of the relations a c = g[h ξ ( rel a)], [g(ξ )]( rel a) = g(ξ, rel a), (27) h ξ ( rel a) = g( rel a) g(ξ, rel a) g(ξ ), (28) a c = g[h ξ ( rel a)] = rel a a z = (29) = rel a g(ξ, rel a) ξ. (30) 9
20 For a 2 c we obtain a 2 c = g(a c,a c ) = g( rel a a z, rel a a z ) = = g( rel a, rel a)+g(a z,a z ) 2 g(a z, rel a). (3) Since g(a z,a z ) = g(a z, rel a) = [g(ξ ), rel a)] 2, (32) a 2 c = g( rela, rel a) g(a z,a z ) = rel a 2 a 2 z, (33) g( rel a, rel a) = rel a 2 = g(g[a(ξ )],g[a(ξ )]) = = g(a(ξ ),A(ξ )), A = s D +W + n U h u, A(ξ ) = s D(ξ )+W(ξ )+ n U g(ξ ), h u (ξ ) = g(ξ ), it follows for rel a 2 g( s D(ξ ),h u (ξ )) = s D(ξ,ξ ), (34) g(w(ξ ),h u (ξ )) = W(ξ,ξ ) = 0, (35) g(h u (ξ ),h u (ξ )) = h u (ξ,ξ ) = g (ξ,ξ ), (36) rela 2 = g( rel a, rel a) = g( s D(ξ ), s D(ξ ))+g(w(ξ ),W(ξ ))+ +2 g( s D(ξ ),W(ξ ))+ + 2 n U sd(ξ,ξ )+ (n ) 2 U2 g (ξ,ξ ). (37) On the other side, a 2 z = [ sd(ξ,ξ )] 2 Therefore, + a 2 c = rela 2 a 2 z = (n ) 2 U2 + 2 n U sd(ξ,ξ ). = g( s D(ξ ), s D(ξ )) [ sd(ξ,ξ )] 2 + +g(w(ξ ),W(ξ ))+2 g( s D(ξ ),W(ξ )). (38) Special case: s D := 0 (shear-free acceleration). a 2 c = g(w(ξ ),W(ξ )). (39) 20
21 Special case: W := 0 (rotation-free acceleration). a 2 c = g( sd(ξ ), s D(ξ )) [ sd(ξ,ξ )] 2 The explicit form of a c could be found by the use of the relations: a c = g[h ξ ( rel a)] = rel a g(ξ, rel a) ξ = rel a a z =. (40) = g[ s D(ξ )] s D(ξ,ξ ) ξ +g[w(ξ )] = (4) = g[ s D(ξ )] s D(n,n ) ξ +g[w(ξ )]. (42) Therefore, the Coriolis acceleration a c does not depend on the expansion acceleration invariant U. Special case: s D := 0 (shear-free acceleration). Special case: W := 0 (rotation-free acceleration). a c = g[w(ξ )]. (43) a c = g[ s D(ξ )] s D(ξ,ξ ) ξ = (44) = g[ s D(ξ )] s D(n,n ) ξ. (45) The Coriolis acceleration depends on the shear acceleration s D and on the rotation acceleration W. These types of accelerations generate a Coriolis acceleration between particles or mass elements in a flow. 4 Centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration as gravitational acceleration. The main idea of the Einstein theory of gravitation(etg) is the identification of the centripetal acceleration with the gravitational acceleration. The weak equivalence principle stays that a gravitational acceleration could be identified with a centripetal acceleration and vice versa. From this point of view, it is worth to be investigated the relation between the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration and the Einstein theory of gravitation as well as the possibility for describing the gravitational interaction as result of the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration generated by the motion of mass elements (particles). The structure of the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration could be considered on the basis of its explicit form expressed by means of the kinematic characteristics of the relative acceleration and the relative velocity. The centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration is written as a z = [ n U + s D(ξ,ξ ) ] ξ. 2
22 The vector field ξ is directed outside of the trajectory of a mass element (particle). If the mass element generates a gravitational field the acceleration a z should be in the direction to the mass element. If the mass element moves in an external gravitational field caused by an other gravitational source then the acceleration a z should be directed to the source. The expansion (contraction) invariant U could be expressed by means of the kinematic characteristics of the relative acceleration or of the relative velocity in the forms [3], [9] U = U 0 +I = F U 0 T U 0 +I, U 0 = F U 0 T U 0, (46) where F U 0 is the torsion-free and curvature-free expansion acceleration, T U 0 is the expansion acceleration induced by the torsion and I is the expansion acceleration induced by the curvature, U 0 is the curvature-free expansion acceleration FU 0 = g[b] e g(u, ua), (47) FU 0 = a k ;k e g kl uk a l ;m u m, (48) U 0 = g[b] g[ s P(g)σ] g[q(g)ω] θ n θ θ e [g(u,t(a,u))+g(u, ua)], (49) I = R ij u i u j, g[b] = g ij b ij = g ij a i ;n g nj = a n ;n. (50) 2. In the ETG only the term I is used on the basis of the Einstein equations. The invariant I represents an invariant generalization of Newton s gravitational law [3]. In a V n -space (n = 4) of the ETG, a free moving spinless test particle with a = 0 will have an expansion (contraction) acceleration U = I (U 0 = 0) if R ij 0 and U = I = 0 if R ij = 0. At the same time, in a V n -space (the bars over the indices should be omitted) sd = s M, sd 0 = 0, M = h u (K s )h u, (5) M ij = h ik Ks kl h lj = 2 h ik (Kkl s +Ks lk ) h lj = = 2 h ik (Rk mnr u m u n g rl +R l mnr u m u n g rk ) h lj = = 2 um u n (h ik R k mnr g rl h lj +h ik R l mnr g rk h lj ) = = 2 um u n [h ik R k mnr g rl (g lj e u l u j)+ +h lj R k mnr g rk (g ki e u k u i). (52) Since h ik R k mnr g rl (g lj e u l u j) = 22
23 = (g ik e u i u k ) R k mnr g rl g lj e (g ik e u i u k ) R k mnr g rl u l u j, R k mnr g rl u l = R k mnr u r, u k R k mnr = g ks u s R k mnr, we have h ik R k mnr g rl h lj = g ik R k mnr g rl g lj e u i g ks u s R k mnr g rl g lj e g ik Rk mnr g rl g ls u s u j + (53) + e 2 u i g ks u s R k mnr g rl g lq u q u j. Special case: V n -space: S := C. M ij = R imnj u m u n. (54) sd ij = s M ij = M ij n I h ij = = R imnj u m u n n R mn u m u n h ij, sd ij = (R imnj n R mn h ij ) u m u n = s M ij, (55) U = I = R ij u i u j. In a V n -space the components a i z of the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a z have the form a i z = ( n U + s D jk ξ j ξk g rs ξ r ) ξ ξs i = (56) = [ n R mn u m u n + + g rs ξ r (R jmnk ξs n R mn h jk ) u m u n ξ j ξk ] ξ i. 3. If the Einstein equations in vacuum without cosmological term (λ 0 = 0) are valid, i.e. if R ij = 0, λ 0 = const. = 0, n = 4, (57) 23
24 are fulfilled then a i z = g rs ξ r R jmnk u m u n ξ j ξs ξk ξi = (58) = R jmnk u m u n n j n k ξ i = g ξ i, (59) where n j = ξ j grs ξ r ξs, (60) g =R jmnk u m u n n j n k. (6) If a z is a centripetal acceleration interpreted as gravitational acceleration for a free spinless test particles moving in an external gravitational field (R ij = 0) then the condition g < 0 should be valid if the centripetal acceleration is directed to the particle. If the centripetal acceleration is directed to the gravitational source (in the direction ξ ) then g > 0. From a more general point of view as that in the ETG, a gravitational theory could be worked out in a (L n,g)-space where a z could also be interpreted as gravitational acceleration of mass elements or particles generating a gravitational field by themselves and caused by their motions in space-time. 4. If we consider a frame of reference in which a mass element (particle) is at rest then u i = g 4 u4 i and ξ i = gi a ξa := gi ξ. The centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration a i z could be written in the form a i z = R 44 u 4 u 4 n n ξ i = R 44 (u 4 ) 2 (n ) 2 ξ i. (62) For the Schwarzschild metric ds 2 = dr2 rg r +r 2 (dθ 2 +sin 2 θ dϕ 2 ) ( r g r ) (dx4 ) 2, (63) r g = 2 k M 0 c 2, (64) the component R 44 = g R 44 of the curvature tensor has the form [5] R 44 = g (Γ 44, Γ 4,4+Γ Γ 44+Γ 4 Γ 4 44 Γ 4 Γ 4 Γ 44 Γ 4 4). (65) After introducing in the last expression the explicit form of the metric and of the Christoffel symbols Γ i jk, it follows for R 44 Then R 44 = r g r 3. (66) a i z = r g r 3 (u4 ) 2 (n ) 2 ξ i. (67) 24
25 If the co-ordinate time t = x 4 /c is chosen as equal to the proper time τ of the particle, i.e. if t = τ then u 4 = dx4 dτ = c dτ dτ = c, n =, ξ i = g i ξ, (68) a i z = r g r 3 c2 g i ξ r g, r 3 c2 > 0. (69) For the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration we obtain a z = 2 k M 0 r 3 ξ, (70) which is exactly the relative gravitational acceleration between two mass elements (particles) with co-ordinates x c = r and x c2 = r +ξ [4]. Therefore, the centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration could be used for working out of a theory of gravitation in a space with affine connections and metrics as this has been done in the Einstein theory of gravitation. 5 Conclusions In the present paper the notions of (relative) centrifugal (centripetal) and (relative) Coriolis velocities and accelerations are introduced and considered in spaces with affine connections and metrics as velocities and accelerations of flows of mass elements (particles) moving in space-time. It is shown that these types of velocities and accelerations are generated by the relative motions between the mass elements. The centrifugal (centripetal) velocity is found to be in connection with the Hubble law in spaces with affine connections and metrics. [The relations between null vector fields and the Hubble and the Doppler effects will be considered elsewhere [7].] The accelerations are closely related to the kinematic characteristics of the relative velocity and relative acceleration. The centrifugal (centripetal) acceleration could be interpreted as gravitational acceleration as it has been done in the Einstein theory of gravitation. This fact could be used as a basis for working out of new gravitational theories in spaces with affine connections and metrics. References [] S. Manoff: Mechanics of continuous media in (L n,g)-spaces.. Introduction and mathematical tools (Preprint gr-qc /020306), [2] S. Manoff: Mechanics of continuous media in (L n,g)-spaces. 2. Relative velocity and deformations (Preprint gr-qc /020307), [3] S. Manoff: Mechanics of continuous media in (L n,g)-spaces. 3. Relative accelerations (Preprint gr-qc / ),
26 [4] S. Manoff: Mechanics of continuous media in (L n,g)-spaces. 4. Stress (tension) tensor. (Preprint gr-qc / ), [5] H. Stephani: Allgemeine Relativitaetstheorie. VEB Deutscher Verlag d. Wissenschaften, Berlin, 977, pp [6] J. Ehlers: Beitraege zur relativistischen Mechanik kontinuierlicher Medien. Abhandlungen d. Mainzer Akademie d. Wissenschaften, Math.- Naturwiss. Kl. Nr. (96), [7] Cl. Laemmerzahl: A Characterisation of the Weylian structure of Space- Time by Means of Low Velocity Tests (Preprint gr-qc /003047), 200. [8] R. L. Bishop, S. I. Goldberg. Tensor Analysis on Manifolds. The Macmillan Company, New York, 968. [9] S. Manoff: Kinematics of vector fields. Complex Structures and Vector Fields ed St Dimiev and K Sekigawa. World Scientific, Singapore, 995, pp 6-3. [0] S. Manoff: Spaces with contravariant and covariant affine connections and metrics. Phys. Part. Nuclei 30 (999) 5, (Russian edn: 30 (999) 5, 2-69). [] S. Manoff: Geometry and Mechanics in Different Models of Space-Time: Geometry and Kinematics. Nova Science Publishers, New York, [2] S. Manoff: Geometry and Mechanics in Different Models of Space-Time: Dynamics and Applications. Nova Science Publishers, New York, [3] S. Manoff: Einstein s theory of gravitation as a Lagrangian theory for tensor fields. Intern. J. Mod. Phys. A 3 (998) 2, [4] S. Manoff: About the motion of test particles in an external gravitational field. Exp. Technik der Physik 24 (976) 5, (in German). [5] Ch. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, J. A. Wheeler: Gravitation. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 973.(Russian translation 977 Mir, Moscow, Vol, Vol. 2, Vol. 3). [6] S. Manoff: Flows and particles with shear-free and expansion-free velocities in (L n,g)- and Weyl s spaces. Class. Quantum Grav. 9 (2002 ) 6, (Preprint gr-qc/ ). [7] S. Manoff: Centrifugal (centripetal), Coriolis velocities, accelerations and Hubble s law in spaces with affine connections and metrics (Preprint gr-qc/022038),
arxiv:gr-qc/ v2 4 Feb 2003
arxiv:gr-qc/022038v2 4 Feb 2003 Centrifugal (centripetal), Coriolis velocities, accelerations and Hubble s law in spaces with affine connections and metrics Sawa Manoff Institute for Nuclear Research and
More informationLagrangian fluid mechanics
Lagrangian fluid mechanics S. Manoff Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Department of Theoretical Physics Blvd. Tzarigradsko Chaussee 72 1784 - Sofia, Bulgaria
More informationTensor Calculus, Relativity, and Cosmology
Tensor Calculus, Relativity, and Cosmology A First Course by M. Dalarsson Ericsson Research and Development Stockholm, Sweden and N. Dalarsson Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden ELSEVIER ACADEMIC
More informationCurved spacetime and general covariance
Chapter 7 Curved spacetime and general covariance In this chapter we generalize the discussion of preceding chapters to extend covariance to more general curved spacetimes. 219 220 CHAPTER 7. CURVED SPACETIME
More informationClassical Oscilators in General Relativity
Classical Oscilators in General Relativity arxiv:gr-qc/9709020v2 22 Oct 2000 Ion I. Cotăescu and Dumitru N. Vulcanov The West University of Timişoara, V. Pârvan Ave. 4, RO-1900 Timişoara, Romania Abstract
More informationSyllabus. May 3, Special relativity 1. 2 Differential geometry 3
Syllabus May 3, 2017 Contents 1 Special relativity 1 2 Differential geometry 3 3 General Relativity 13 3.1 Physical Principles.......................................... 13 3.2 Einstein s Equation..........................................
More informationRELG - General Relativity
Coordinating unit: Teaching unit: Academic year: Degree: ECTS credits: 2017 230 - ETSETB - Barcelona School of Telecommunications Engineering 749 - MAT - Department of Mathematics 748 - FIS - Department
More informationTensor Analysis in Euclidean Space
Tensor Analysis in Euclidean Space James Emery Edited: 8/5/2016 Contents 1 Classical Tensor Notation 2 2 Multilinear Functionals 4 3 Operations With Tensors 5 4 The Directional Derivative 5 5 Curvilinear
More informationChapter 7 Curved Spacetime and General Covariance
Chapter 7 Curved Spacetime and General Covariance In this chapter we generalize the discussion of preceding chapters to extend covariance to more general curved spacetimes. 145 146 CHAPTER 7. CURVED SPACETIME
More informationMetrics and Curvature
Metrics and Curvature How to measure curvature? Metrics Euclidian/Minkowski Curved spaces General 4 dimensional space Cosmological principle Homogeneity and isotropy: evidence Robertson-Walker metrics
More informationCurved Spacetime III Einstein's field equations
Curved Spacetime III Einstein's field equations Dr. Naylor Note that in this lecture we will work in SI units: namely c 1 Last Week s class: Curved spacetime II Riemann curvature tensor: This is a tensor
More informationÜbungen zu RT2 SS (4) Show that (any) contraction of a (p, q) - tensor results in a (p 1, q 1) - tensor.
Übungen zu RT2 SS 2010 (1) Show that the tensor field g µν (x) = η µν is invariant under Poincaré transformations, i.e. x µ x µ = L µ νx ν + c µ, where L µ ν is a constant matrix subject to L µ ρl ν ση
More informationGeneral Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam
Physikalisches Institut Mock Exam Universität Bonn 29. June 2011 Theoretische Physik SS 2011 General Relativity and Cosmology Mock exam Priv. Doz. Dr. S. Förste Exercise 1: Overview Give short answers
More informationA brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström
A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity Hans Ringström May 5, 2015 2 Contents 1 Scalar product spaces 1 1.1 Scalar products...................................... 1 1.2 Orthonormal
More informationINTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RELATIVITY
INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RELATIVITY RONALD ADLER Instito de Fisica Universidade Federal de Pemambuco Recife, Brazil MAURICE BAZIN Department of Physics Rutgers University MENAHEM SCHIFFER Department of
More informationProblem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic
Problem 1, Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic fields We have that where, F µν = F µ ν = L µ µ Lν ν F µν, 0 B 3 B 2 ie 1 B 3 0 B 1 ie 2 B 2 B 1 0 ie 3 ie 2 ie 2 ie 3 0. Note that we use the
More informationA5682: Introduction to Cosmology Course Notes. 2. General Relativity
2. General Relativity Reading: Chapter 3 (sections 3.1 and 3.2) Special Relativity Postulates of theory: 1. There is no state of absolute rest. 2. The speed of light in vacuum is constant, independent
More informationCurved Spacetime I. Dr. Naylor
Curved Spacetime I Dr. Naylor Last Week Einstein's principle of equivalence We discussed how in the frame of reference of a freely falling object we can construct a locally inertial frame (LIF) Space tells
More informationGTR is founded on a Conceptual Mistake And hence Null and Void
GTR is founded on a Conceptual Mistake And hence Null and Void A critical review of the fundamental basis of General Theory of Relativity shows that a conceptual mistake has been made in the basic postulate
More informationUNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN
UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN TRINITY COLLEGE JS & SS Mathematics SS Theoretical Physics SS TSM Mathematics Faculty of Engineering, Mathematics and Science school of mathematics Trinity Term 2015 Module MA3429
More informationChoice of Riemannian Metrics for Rigid Body Kinematics
Choice of Riemannian Metrics for Rigid Body Kinematics Miloš Žefran1, Vijay Kumar 1 and Christopher Croke 2 1 General Robotics and Active Sensory Perception (GRASP) Laboratory 2 Department of Mathematics
More informationBianchi Type-III Inflationary Universe with Constant Deceleration Parameter in General Relativity
Bulg. J. Phys. 38 2011 139 1 Bianchi Type-III Inflationary Universe with Constant Deceleration Parameter in General Relativity S.D. Katore Department of Mathematics, S.G.B. Amravati University, Amravati
More informationarxiv: v2 [gr-qc] 27 Apr 2013
Free of centrifugal acceleration spacetime - Geodesics arxiv:1303.7376v2 [gr-qc] 27 Apr 2013 Hristu Culetu Ovidius University, Dept.of Physics and Electronics, B-dul Mamaia 124, 900527 Constanta, Romania
More informationChapter 2 Lorentz Connections and Inertia
Chapter 2 Lorentz Connections and Inertia In Special Relativity, Lorentz connections represent inertial effects present in non-inertial frames. In these frames, any relativistic equation acquires a manifestly
More informationAn exact solution for 2+1 dimensional critical collapse
An exact solution for + dimensional critical collapse David Garfinkle Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan 839 We find an exact solution in closed form for the critical collapse
More informationThe Definition of Density in General Relativity
The Definition of Density in General Relativity Ernst Fischer Auf der Hoehe 82, D-52223 Stolberg, Germany e.fischer.stolberg@t-online.de August 14, 2014 1 Abstract According to general relativity the geometry
More informationIrreducible Killing Tensors from Conformal Killing Vectors
Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine 2004, Vol. 50, Part 2, 708 714 Irreducible Killing Tensors from Conformal Killing Vectors S. Brian EDGAR, Rafaelle RANI and Alan BARNES Department
More information4.7 The Levi-Civita connection and parallel transport
Classnotes: Geometry & Control of Dynamical Systems, M. Kawski. April 21, 2009 138 4.7 The Levi-Civita connection and parallel transport In the earlier investigation, characterizing the shortest curves
More informationVectors, metric and the connection
Vectors, metric and the connection 1 Contravariant and covariant vectors 1.1 Contravariant vectors Imagine a particle moving along some path in the 2-dimensional flat x y plane. Let its trajectory be given
More informationPH5011 General Relativity
PH5011 General Relativity Martinmas 2012/2013 Dr HongSheng Zhao shortened/expanded from notes of MD hz4@st-andrews.ac.uk 0 General issues 0.1 Summation convention dimension of coordinate space pairwise
More informationNewman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions
Newman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions V. Pravda various parts in collaboration with: A. Coley, R. Milson, M. Ortaggio and A. Pravdová Introduction - algebraic classification in four dimensions
More informationProblem Set #4: 4.1, 4.3, 4.5 (Due Monday Nov. 18th) f = m i a (4.1) f = m g Φ (4.2) a = Φ. (4.4)
Chapter 4 Gravitation Problem Set #4: 4.1, 4.3, 4.5 (Due Monday Nov. 18th) 4.1 Equivalence Principle The Newton s second law states that f = m i a (4.1) where m i is the inertial mass. The Newton s law
More informationTutorial I General Relativity
Tutorial I General Relativity 1 Exercise I: The Metric Tensor To describe distances in a given space for a particular coordinate system, we need a distance recepy. The metric tensor is the translation
More informationCharacterization of the Lovelock gravity
PRAMANA c Indian Academy of Sciences Vol. 74, No. 6 journal of June 2010 physics pp. 875 882 Characterization of the Lovelock gravity by Bianchi derivative NARESH DADHICH Inter-University Centre for Astronomy
More informationFrom An Apple To Black Holes Gravity in General Relativity
From An Apple To Black Holes Gravity in General Relativity Gravity as Geometry Central Idea of General Relativity Gravitational field vs magnetic field Uniqueness of trajectory in space and time Uniqueness
More informationBy drawing Mohr s circle, the stress transformation in 2-D can be done graphically. + σ x σ y. cos 2θ + τ xy sin 2θ, (1) sin 2θ + τ xy cos 2θ.
Mohr s Circle By drawing Mohr s circle, the stress transformation in -D can be done graphically. σ = σ x + σ y τ = σ x σ y + σ x σ y cos θ + τ xy sin θ, 1 sin θ + τ xy cos θ. Note that the angle of rotation,
More informationAn introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem
An introduction to General Relativity and the positive mass theorem National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Mathematics Division March 2 nd, 2007 Wen-ling Huang Department of Mathematics University of
More informationGauge Theory of Gravitation: Electro-Gravity Mixing
Gauge Theory of Gravitation: Electro-Gravity Mixing E. Sánchez-Sastre 1,2, V. Aldaya 1,3 1 Instituto de Astrofisica de Andalucía, Granada, Spain 2 Email: sastre@iaa.es, es-sastre@hotmail.com 3 Email: valdaya@iaa.es
More informationStationarity of non-radiating spacetimes
University of Warwick April 4th, 2016 Motivation Theorem Motivation Newtonian gravity: Periodic solutions for two-body system. Einstein gravity: Periodic solutions? At first Post-Newtonian order, Yes!
More information2.1 Basics of the Relativistic Cosmology: Global Geometry and the Dynamics of the Universe Part I
1 2.1 Basics of the Relativistic Cosmology: Global Geometry and the Dynamics of the Universe Part I 2 Special Relativity (1905) A fundamental change in viewing the physical space and time, now unified
More informationNonsingular big-bounce cosmology from spin and torsion
Nonsingular big-bounce cosmology from spin and torsion Nikodem J. Popławski Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 22 nd Midwest Relativity Meeting University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
More information2 General Relativity. 2.1 Curved 2D and 3D space
22 2 General Relativity The general theory of relativity (Einstein 1915) is the theory of gravity. General relativity ( Einstein s theory ) replaced the previous theory of gravity, Newton s theory. The
More informationLecture: Lorentz Invariant Dynamics
Chapter 5 Lecture: Lorentz Invariant Dynamics In the preceding chapter we introduced the Minkowski metric and covariance with respect to Lorentz transformations between inertial systems. This was shown
More informationNon-gravitating waves
Non-gravitating waves D C Robinson Mathematics Department King s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS United Kingdom email: david.c.robinson@kcl.ac.uk October 6, 2005 Abstract: It is pointed out that
More informationThird Year: General Relativity and Cosmology. 1 Problem Sheet 1 - Newtonian Gravity and the Equivalence Principle
Third Year: General Relativity and Cosmology 2011/2012 Problem Sheets (Version 2) Prof. Pedro Ferreira: p.ferreira1@physics.ox.ac.uk 1 Problem Sheet 1 - Newtonian Gravity and the Equivalence Principle
More informationPhysics 209 Fall 2002 Notes 5 Thomas Precession
Physics 209 Fall 2002 Notes 5 Thomas Precession Jackson s discussion of Thomas precession is based on Thomas s original treatment, and on the later paper by Bargmann, Michel, and Telegdi. The alternative
More informationPHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH
PHYS 4390: GENERAL RELATIVITY NON-COORDINATE BASIS APPROACH 1. Differential Forms To start our discussion, we will define a special class of type (0,r) tensors: Definition 1.1. A differential form of order
More informationOutline. 1 Relativistic field theory with variable space-time. 3 Extended Hamiltonians in field theory. 4 Extended canonical transformations
Outline General Relativity from Basic Principles General Relativity as an Extended Canonical Gauge Theory Jürgen Struckmeier GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany j.struckmeier@gsi.de,
More informationThe Equivalence Principle and the bending of light
The Equivalence Principle and the bending of light Rafael Ferraro Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, Casilla de Correo 67, Sucursal 28, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina Departamento de Física, Facultad
More informationarxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 18 Dec 2007
Static plane symmetric relativistic fluids and empty repelling singular boundaries arxiv:0712.2831v1 [gr-qc] 18 Dec 2007 Ricardo E. Gamboa Saraví Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad
More informationImperial College 4th Year Physics UG, General Relativity Revision lecture. Toby Wiseman; Huxley 507,
Imperial College 4th Year Physics UG, 2012-13 General Relativity Revision lecture Toby Wiseman; Huxley 507, email: t.wiseman@imperial.ac.uk 1 1 Exam This is 2 hours. There is one compulsory question (
More informationg ij = diag[(1 r 0 r ) 1, r 2, r 2 sin 2 θ] (1)
Units of a metric tensor and physical interpretation of the gravitational constant. Boris Hikin E-mail: blhikin@gmail.com Tel: 30-922-4752, or 30-826-0209, USA It is shown that writing the metric tensor
More informationChapter 3 Stress, Strain, Virtual Power and Conservation Principles
Chapter 3 Stress, Strain, irtual Power and Conservation Principles 1 Introduction Stress and strain are key concepts in the analytical characterization of the mechanical state of a solid body. While stress
More informationLevel sets of the lapse function in static GR
Level sets of the lapse function in static GR Carla Cederbaum Mathematisches Institut Universität Tübingen Auf der Morgenstelle 10 72076 Tübingen, Germany September 4, 2014 Abstract We present a novel
More informationIntroduction to General Relativity
Introduction to General Relativity 1 Recall Newtonian gravitation: Clearly not Lorentz invariant, since Laplacian appears rather than d'alembertian. No attempt to find Lorentz invariant equations that
More informationSpace-Times Admitting Isolated Horizons
Space-Times Admitting Isolated Horizons Jerzy Lewandowski Instytut Fizyki Teoretycznej, Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Hoża 69, 00-681 Warszawa, Poland, lewand@fuw.edu.pl Abstract We characterize a general
More informationEditorial Manager(tm) for International Journal of Theoretical Physics Manuscript Draft
Editorial Managertm) for International Journal of Theoretical Physics Manuscript Draft Manuscript Number: IJTP1962 Title: Concerning Radii in Einstein's Gravitational Field Article Type: Original research
More informationHigher dimensional Kerr-Schild spacetimes 1
Higher dimensional Kerr-Schild spacetimes 1 Marcello Ortaggio Institute of Mathematics Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Bremen August 2008 1 Joint work with V. Pravda and A. Pravdová, arxiv:0808.2165
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v2 13 Mar 1997
UTPT-97-06 Stochastic Gravity and Self-Organized Critical Cosmology J. W. Moffat Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A7, Canada arxiv:gr-qc/9703032v2 13 Mar 1997 (October
More informationA rotating charged black hole solution in f (R) gravity
PRAMANA c Indian Academy of Sciences Vol. 78, No. 5 journal of May 01 physics pp. 697 703 A rotating charged black hole solution in f R) gravity ALEXIS LARRAÑAGA National Astronomical Observatory, National
More informationKonstantin E. Osetrin. Tomsk State Pedagogical University
Space-time models with dust and cosmological constant, that allow integrating the Hamilton-Jacobi test particle equation by separation of variables method. Konstantin E. Osetrin Tomsk State Pedagogical
More informationhas a lot of good notes on GR and links to other pages. General Relativity Philosophy of general relativity.
http://preposterousuniverse.com/grnotes/ has a lot of good notes on GR and links to other pages. General Relativity Philosophy of general relativity. As with any major theory in physics, GR has been framed
More informationRelativistic Mechanics
Physics 411 Lecture 9 Relativistic Mechanics Lecture 9 Physics 411 Classical Mechanics II September 17th, 2007 We have developed some tensor language to describe familiar physics we reviewed orbital motion
More informationClassical differential geometry of two-dimensional surfaces
Classical differential geometry of two-dimensional surfaces 1 Basic definitions This section gives an overview of the basic notions of differential geometry for twodimensional surfaces. It follows mainly
More informationGeneral Relativity and Cosmology. The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang
General Relativity and Cosmology The End of Absolute Space Cosmological Principle Black Holes CBMR and Big Bang The End of Absolute Space (AS) Special Relativity (SR) abolished AS only for the special
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 14 Oct 1997
T-duality and HKT manifolds arxiv:hep-th/9709048v2 14 Oct 1997 A. Opfermann Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EW, UK February
More informationRelativity Discussion
Relativity Discussion 4/19/2007 Jim Emery Einstein and his assistants, Peter Bergmann, and Valentin Bargmann, on there daily walk to the Institute for advanced Study at Princeton. Special Relativity The
More informationProperties of Traversable Wormholes in Spacetime
Properties of Traversable Wormholes in Spacetime Vincent Hui Department of Physics, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691, USA. (Dated: May 16, 2018) In this project, the Morris-Thorne metric of
More informationBrane Gravity from Bulk Vector Field
Brane Gravity from Bulk Vector Field Merab Gogberashvili Andronikashvili Institute of Physics, 6 Tamarashvili Str., Tbilisi 380077, Georgia E-mail: gogber@hotmail.com September 7, 00 Abstract It is shown
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v4 23 Feb 1999
gr-qc/9802042 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 3 (998) 49-425 Mass of perfect fluid black shells Konstantin G. Zloshchastiev arxiv:gr-qc/9802042v4 23 Feb 999 Department of Theoretical Physics, Dnepropetrovsk State University,
More informationC. C. Briggs Center for Academic Computing, Penn State University, University Park, PA Tuesday, August 18, 1998
SOME POSSIBLE FEATURES OF GENERAL EXPRESSIONS FOR LOVELOCK TENSORS AND FOR THE COEFFICIENTS OF LOVELOCK LAGRANGIANS UP TO THE 15 th ORDER IN CURVATURE (AND BEYOND) C. C. Briggs Center for Academic Computing,
More informationFundamental Cosmology: 4.General Relativistic Cosmology
Fundamental Cosmology: 4.General Relativistic Cosmology Matter tells space how to curve. Space tells matter how to move. John Archibald Wheeler 1 4.1: Introduction to General Relativity Introduce the Tools
More informationPHY 475/375. Lecture 5. (April 9, 2012)
PHY 475/375 Lecture 5 (April 9, 2012) Describing Curvature (contd.) So far, we have studied homogenous and isotropic surfaces in 2-dimensions. The results can be extended easily to three dimensions. As
More informationBlack Holes and Thermodynamics I: Classical Black Holes
Black Holes and Thermodynamics I: Classical Black Holes Robert M. Wald General references: R.M. Wald General Relativity University of Chicago Press (Chicago, 1984); R.M. Wald Living Rev. Rel. 4, 6 (2001).
More informationHOMEWORK 10. Applications: special relativity, Newtonian limit, gravitational waves, gravitational lensing, cosmology, 1 black holes
General Relativity 8.96 (Petters, spring 003) HOMEWORK 10. Applications: special relativity, Newtonian limit, gravitational waves, gravitational lensing, cosmology, 1 black holes 1. Special Relativity
More informationExact Solutions of the Einstein Equations
Notes from phz 6607, Special and General Relativity University of Florida, Fall 2004, Detweiler Exact Solutions of the Einstein Equations These notes are not a substitute in any manner for class lectures.
More informationElectromagnetic and Gravitational Waves: the Third Dimension
Electromagnetic and Gravitational Waves: the Third Dimension Gerald E. Marsh Argonne National Laboratory (Ret) 5433 East View Park Chicago, IL 60615 E-mail: gemarsh@uchicago.edu Abstract. Plane electromagnetic
More informationTensors, and differential forms - Lecture 2
Tensors, and differential forms - Lecture 2 1 Introduction The concept of a tensor is derived from considering the properties of a function under a transformation of the coordinate system. A description
More informationApproaching the Event Horizon of a Black Hole
Adv. Studies Theor. Phys., Vol. 6, 2012, no. 23, 1147-1152 Approaching the Event Horizon of a Black Hole A. Y. Shiekh Department of Physics Colorado Mesa University Grand Junction, CO, USA ashiekh@coloradomesa.edu
More informationMathematical Relativity, Spring 2017/18 Instituto Superior Técnico
Mathematical Relativity, Spring 2017/18 Instituto Superior Técnico 1. Starting from R αβµν Z ν = 2 [α β] Z µ, deduce the components of the Riemann curvature tensor in terms of the Christoffel symbols.
More informationSpecial and General Relativity based on the Physical Meaning of the Spacetime Interval
Special and General Relativity based on the Physical Meaning of the Spacetime Interval Alan Macdonald Department of Mathematics Luther College macdonal@luther.edu http://faculty.luther.edu/ macdonal Abstract
More informationBibliography. Introduction to General Relativity and Cosmology Downloaded from
Bibliography Abbott, B. P. et al. (2016). Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102. Ade, P. A. R. et al. (2015). Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological
More informationChapter 3. Forces, Momentum & Stress. 3.1 Newtonian mechanics: a very brief résumé
Chapter 3 Forces, Momentum & Stress 3.1 Newtonian mechanics: a very brief résumé In classical Newtonian particle mechanics, particles (lumps of matter) only experience acceleration when acted on by external
More informationBianchi Type-VI Inflationary Universe in General Relativity
March 01 Vol. 3 Issue 5 pp. 7-79 Katore S. D. & Chopade B. B. Bianchi Type-VI Inflationary Universe in General Relativity Bianchi Type-VI Inflationary Universe in General Relativity 7 Article Shivdas.
More information2. Geometrical Preliminaries
2. Geometrical Preliminaries The description of the geometry is essential for the definition of a shell structure. Our objective in this chapter is to survey the main geometrical concepts, to introduce
More informationGeneralized Korn s inequality and conformal Killing vectors
Generalized Korn s inequality and conformal Killing vectors arxiv:gr-qc/0505022v1 4 May 2005 Sergio Dain Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik Am Mühlenberg 1 14476 Golm Germany February 4, 2008 Abstract
More informationAsk class: what is the Minkowski spacetime in spherical coordinates? ds 2 = dt 2 +dr 2 +r 2 (dθ 2 +sin 2 θdφ 2 ). (1)
1 Tensor manipulations One final thing to learn about tensor manipulation is that the metric tensor is what allows you to raise and lower indices. That is, for example, v α = g αβ v β, where again we use
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v2 26 Jan 1998
PERFECT FLUID AND TEST PARTICLE WITH SPIN AND DILATONIC CHARGE IN A WEYL CARTAN SPACE O. V. Babourova and B. N. Frolov arxiv:gr-qc/9708009v2 26 Jan 1998 Department of Mathematics, Moscow State Pedagogical
More informationPAPER 309 GENERAL RELATIVITY
MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III Monday, 30 May, 2016 9:00 am to 12:00 pm PAPER 309 GENERAL RELATIVITY Attempt no more than THREE questions. There are FOUR questions in total. The questions carry equal weight.
More informationLecture XIV: Global structure, acceleration, and the initial singularity
Lecture XIV: Global structure, acceleration, and the initial singularity Christopher M. Hirata Caltech M/C 350-17, Pasadena CA 91125, USA (Dated: December 5, 2012) I. OVERVIEW In this lecture, we will
More informationA GENERALLY COVARIANT FIELD EQUATION FOR GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM. Institute for Advanced Study Alpha Foundation
A GENERALLY COVARIANT FIELD EQUATION FOR GRAVITATION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM Myron W. Evans Institute for Advanced Study Alpha Foundation E-mail: emyrone@aol.com Received 17 April 2003; revised 1 May 2003
More information1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle
1 1. Geometry of the unit tangent bundle The main reference for this section is [8]. In the following, we consider (M, g) an n-dimensional smooth manifold endowed with a Riemannian metric g. 1.1. Notations
More informationarxiv:gr-qc/ v1 4 Apr 2006
arxiv:gr-qc/0604008v1 4 Apr 2006 A NEW KIND OF UNIFORMLY ACCELERATED REFERENCE FRAMES Chao-Guang HUANG Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences P.O. Box 918-4, Beijing 100049, P. R.
More informationA A + B. ra + A + 1. We now want to solve the Einstein equations in the following cases:
Lecture 29: Cosmology Cosmology Reading: Weinberg, Ch A metric tensor appropriate to infalling matter In general (see, eg, Weinberg, Ch ) we may write a spherically symmetric, time-dependent metric in
More informationThe Divergence Myth in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity. William O. Straub Pasadena, California November 11, 2016
The Divergence Myth in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity William O. Straub Pasadena, California 91104 November 11, 2016 Abstract In Riemannian geometry there is a unique combination of the Riemann-Christoffel curvature
More informationAccelerated Observers
Accelerated Observers In the last few lectures, we ve been discussing the implications that the postulates of special relativity have on the physics of our universe. We ve seen how to compute proper times
More informationarxiv: v1 [gr-qc] 17 May 2008
Gravitation equations, and space-time relativity arxiv:0805.2688v1 [gr-qc] 17 May 2008 L. V. VEROZUB Kharkov National University Kharkov, 61103 Ukraine Abstract In contrast to electrodynamics, Einstein
More informationOn a new class of infinitesimal group actions on pseudo-riemannian manifolds
On a new class of infinitesimal group actions on pseudo-riemannian manifolds Sigbjørn Hervik arxiv:1805.09402v1 [math-ph] 23 May 2018 Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, N-4036
More informationPurely magnetic vacuum solutions
Purely magnetic vacuum solutions Norbert Van den Bergh Faculty of Applied Sciences TW16, Gent University, Galglaan, 9000 Gent, Belgium 1. Introduction Using a +1 formalism based on a timelike congruence
More informationOn the existence of isoperimetric extremals of rotation and the fundamental equations of rotary diffeomorphisms
XV II th International Conference of Geometry, Integrability and Quantization Sveti Konstantin i Elena 2016 On the existence of isoperimetric extremals of rotation and the fundamental equations of rotary
More information