# SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY

Size: px
Start display at page:

Transcription

1 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY MARC LEVINE Contents 0. Introduction 1 1. The category of schemes The spectrum of a commutative ring Ringed spaces Schemes Schemes and morphisms The category Sch k Projective schemes Algebraic cycles, Chow groups and higher Chow groups Algebraic cycles Chow groups Higher Chow groups Grothendieck topologies and the category of sheaves Limits Presheaves Sheaves 69 References Introduction In this note, we give some algebraic geometry background needed for the construction and understanding of the triangulated category of motives and A 1 homotopy theory. All of this material is well-known and excellently discussed in numerous texts; our goal is to collect the main facts to give the reader a convenient first introduction and quick reference. For this reason, many of the proofs will be only sketched or completely omitted. For further details, we suggest the reader take a The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the Humboldt Foundation through the Wolfgang Paul Program, and support of the NSF via grant DMS

2 2 MARC LEVINE look at [4], [18], [29] (for commutative algebra), [14], [19] (for algebraic geometry) [9] (for algebraic cycles) and [1], [2] and [3] (for sheaves and Grothendieck topologies). 1. The category of schemes 1.1. The spectrum of a commutative ring. Let A be a commutative ring. Recall that an ideal p A is a prime ideal if ab p, a p = b p. This property easily extends from elements to ideals: If I and J are ideals of A, we let IJ be the ideal generated by products ab with a I, b J. Then, if p is a prime ideal, we have Since IJ I J, we have as well IJ p, I p = J p. I J p, I p = J p. In addition to product and intersection, we have the operation of sum: if {I α α A} is a set of ideals of A, we let α I α be the smallest ideal of A containing all the ideals I α. One easily sees that I α = { x α x α I α and almost all x α = 0}. α α We let Spec (A) denote the set of proper prime ideals of A: For a subset S of A, we set Spec (A) := {p A p is prime, p A}. V (S) = {p Spec (A) p S}. We note the following properties of the operation V : (1.1.1) (1) Let S be a subset of A, and let (S) A be the ideal generated by S. Then V (S) = V ((S)). (2) Let {I α α A} be a set of ideals of A. Then V ( α I α) = α V (I α ). (3) Let I 1,..., I N be ideals of A. Then V ( N j=1i j ) = N j=1v (I j ). (4) V (0) = Spec (A), V (A) =. Definition The Zariski topology on Spec (A) is the topology for which the closed subsets are exactly the subsets of the form V (I), I an ideal of A. It follows from the properties (1.1.1) that this really does define a topology on the set Spec (A).

3 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 3 Examples (1) Let F be a field. Then (0) is the unique proper ideal in F, and is prime since F is an integral domain (ab = 0, a 0 implies b = 0). Thus Spec (F ) is the one-point space {(0)}. (2) Again, let F be a field, and let A = F [t] be a polynomial ring in one variable t. A is an integral domain, so (0) is a prime ideal. A is a unique factorization domain (UFD), which means that the ideal (f) generated by an irreducible polynomial f is a prime ideal. In fact, each non-zero proper prime ideal in A is of the form (f), f 0, f irreducible. If we take f monic, then different f s give different ideals, so we have Spec (A) = {(0)} {(f) f A a monic irreducible polynomial}. Clearly (0) (f) for all such f; there are no other containment relations as the ideal (f) is maximal (i.e., not contained in any other non-zero ideal) if f is irreducible, f 0. Thus the closure of (0) is all of Spec (A), and the other points (f) Spec (A), f is irreducible, f 0, are closed points. (3) Suppose F is algebraically closed, e.g., F = C. Then an irreducible monic polynomial f F [t] is necessarily linear, hence f = t a for some a F. We thus have a 1-1 correspondence between the closed points of Spec (F [t]) and the set F. For this reason, Spec (F [t]) is called the affine line over F (even if F is not algebraically closed), written A 1 FṪhe operation A Spec (A) actually defines a contravariant functor from the category of commutative rings to topological spaces. In fact, let φ : A B be a homomorphism of commutative rings, and let p B be a proper prime ideal. Then it follows directly from the definition that φ 1 (p) is a prime ideal of A, and is proper, since 1 A φ 1 (p) implies 1 B = φ(1 A ) is in p, which implies p = B. Thus, sending p to φ 1 (p) defines the map of sets ˆφ : Spec (B) Spec (A). In addition, if I is an ideal of A, then φ 1 (p) I for some p Spec (B), if and only if p φ(i). Thus ˆφ 1 (V (I)) = V (φ(i)), hence ˆφ is continuous. The space Spec (A) encodes lots (but not all) of the information regarding the ideals of A. For example, let I A be an ideal. We have the quotient ring A/I and the canonical surjective ring homomorphism φ I : A A/I. If J A/I is an ideal, we have the inverse image ideal J := φ 1 ( J); sending J to J is then a bijection between the ideals of A/I and the ideals J of A with J I. We have

4 4 MARC LEVINE Lemma The map ˆφ I : Spec (A/I) Spec (A) gives a homeomorphism of Spec (A/I) with the closed subspace V (I) of Spec (A). On the other hand, one can have V (I) = V (J) even if I J. For an ideal I, the radical of I is the ideal I := {x A x n I for some integer n 1}. It is not hard to see that I really is an ideal. Clearly, if p is prime, and x n p for some n 1, then x p, so V (I) = V ( I), but it is easy to construct examples of ideals I with I I (e.g. I = (t 2 ) F [t], F a field). In terms of Spec, the quotient map A/I A/ I induces the homeomorphism Spec (A/ I) Spec (A/I). In fact, I I is the largest ideal with this property, since we have the formula (1.1.2) I = p I p. The open subsets of Spec (A) have an algebraic interpretation as well. Let S be a subset of A, closed under multiplication and containing 1. Form the localization of A with respect to S as the ring of fractions a/s with a A, s S, where we identify two fraction a/s, a /s if there is a third s S with s (s a sa ) = 0. We multiply and add the fractions by the usual rules. (If A is an integral domain, the element s is superfluous, but in general it is needed to make sure that the addition of fractions is well-defined). We denote this ring by S 1 A; sending a to a/1 defines the ring homorphism φ S : A S 1 A. If f is an element of A, we may take S = S(f) := {f n n = 0, 1,...}, and write A f for S(f) 1 A. The homomorphism φ S is universal for ring homomorphisms ψ : A B such that B is commutative and ψ(s) consists of units in B. Note that this operation allows one to invert elements one usually doesn t want to invert, for example 0 or non-zero nilpotent elements. In this extreme case, we end up with the 0-ring; in general the ring homomorphism φ S is not injective. However, all is well if we don t invert zero-divisors, i.e., an element a 0 such that there is a b 0 with ab = 0. The most well-know case of localization is of course the formation of the quotient field of an integral domain A, where we take S = A \ {0}. What does localization do to ideals? If p A is prime, there are two possibilities: If p S =, then the image of p in S 1 A generates

5 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 5 a proper prime ideal. In fact, if q S 1 A is the ideal generated by φ S (p), then p = φ 1 S (q). If p S, then clearly the image of p in S 1 A contains invertible elements, hence generates the unit ideal S 1 A. Thus, Lemma Let S A be a multiplicatively closed subset containing 1. Then ˆφ S : Spec (S 1 A) Spec (A) gives a homeomorphism of Spec (S 1 A) with the complement of g S V ((g)) in Spec (A). In general, the subspace ˆφ S (Spec (S 1 A)) is not open, but if S = S(f) for some f A, then the image of ˆφ S is the open complement of V ((f)) Ringed spaces. Let T be a topological space, and let Op(T ) be the category with objects the open subsets of T and morphisms V U corresponding to inclusions V U. Recall that a presheaf S (of abelian groups) on T is a functor S : Op(T ) op Ab. For V U, we often denote the homomorphism S(U) S(V ) by res V,U. A presheaf S is a sheaf if for each open covering U = α U α, the sequence (1.2.1) 0 S(U) α res Uα,U S(U α ) α α,β res Uα U β,uα res Uα U β,u β S(U α U β ) α,β is exact. Replacing Ab with other suitable categories, we have sheaves and presheaves of sets, rings, etc. Let f : T T be a continuous map. If S is a presheaf on T, we have the presheaf f S on T with sections f S(U ) := S(f 1 (U )). The restriction maps are given by the obvious formula, and it is easy to see that f S is a sheaf if S is a sheaf. Definition A ringed space is a pair (X, O X ), where X is a topological space, and O X is a sheaf of rings on X. A morphism of ringed spaces (X, O X ) (Y, O Y ) consists of a pair (f, φ), where f : X Y is a continuous map, and φ : O Y f O X is a homomorphism of sheaves of rings on Y. Explicitly, the condition that φ : O Y f O X is a homomorphism of sheaves of rings means that, for each open V Y, we have a ring

6 6 MARC LEVINE homomorphism φ(v ) : O Y (V ) O X (f 1 (V )), and for V V, the diagram O Y (V ) φ(v ) O X (f 1 (V )) res V,V O Y (V ) O φ(v X (f 1 (V )) ) res f 1 (V ),f 1 (V ) commutes. We want to define a sheaf of rings O X on X = Spec (A) so that our functor A Spec (A) becomes a faithful functor to the category of ringed spaces. For this, note that the open subsets X f := X \ V ((f)) form a basis for the topology of X. Indeed, each open subset U X is of the form U = X \ V (I) for some ideal I. As V (I) = f I V ((f)), we have U = f I X f. Similarly, given p Spec (A), the open subsets X f, f p form a basis of neighborhoods of p in X. Noting that X f X g = X fg, we see that this basis is closed under finite intersection. We start our definition of O X by setting O X (X f ) := A f. Suppose that X g X f. Then p (f) = p (g). Thus, by Lemma 1.1.4, it follows that φ g (f) is contained in no proper prime ideal of A g, hence φ g (f) is a unit in A g. By the universal property of φ f, there is a unique ring homomorphism φ g,f : A f A g making the diagram A φ f A f φ g φ g,f A g By uniqueness, we have (1.2.2) φ h,f = φ h,g φ g,f in case X h X g X f.

7 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 7 Lemma Let f be in A and let {g α } be a set of elements of A such that X f = α X fgα. Then the sequence is exact. φfgα,f 0 A f Proof. See [29] or [4] α A fgα φfgαgβ,fgα φ fgαg β,fg β α,β A fgαg β We thus have the partially defined sheaf O X (X f ) = A f, satisfying the sheaf axiom for covers consisting of the basic open subsets. Let now U X be an arbitrary open subset. Let I(U) be the ideal I(U) := p U p, so U = X \ V (I(U)). Write U as a union of basic open subsets: U = f I(U) X f, and define O X (U) as the kernel of the map O X (X f ) φ fg,f φ fg,g f I(U) f,g I(U) O X (X fg ). If we have V U, then I(V ) I(U), and so we have the projections π V,U : O X (X f ) O X (X f ) π V,U : f I(U) f,g I(U) These in turn induce the map O X (X fg ) f I(V ) f,g I(V ) res V,U : O X (U) O X (V ) O X (X fg ) satisfying res W,V res V,U = res W,U for W V U. We now have two defintions of O X (U) in case U = X f, but by Lemma 1.2.2, these two agree. It remains to check the sheaf axiom for an arbitrary cover of an arbitrary open U X, but this follows formally from Lemma Thus, we have the sheaf of rings O X on X. Let ψ : A B be a homomorphism of commutative rings, giving us the continuous map ˆψ : Y := Spec (B) X := Spec (A). Take f B, g A, and suppose that ˆψ(Y f ) X g. This says that, if p is a prime idea in B with f p, then ψ(g) p. This implies that φ f (ψ(g)) is in no prime ideal of B f, hence φ f (ψ(g)) is a unit in B f.

8 8 MARC LEVINE By the universal property of φ g : A A g, there is a unique ring homomorphism ψ f,g : A g B f making the diagram φ g A ψ B A g ψ f,g B f commute. One easily checks that the ψ f,g fit together to define the map of sheaves ψ : O X ˆψ O Y, giving the map of ringed spaces The functoriality φ f ( ˆψ, ψ) : (X, O X ) (Y, O X ). ( ψ 1 ψ 2, ψ 1 ψ 2 ) = ( ˆψ 2, ψ 2 ) ( ˆψ 1, ψ 1 ) is also easy to check. Thus, we have the contravariant functor Spec from commutative rings to ringed spaces. Since O X (X) = A if X = Spec A, Spec is clearly a faithful embedding Local rings and stalks. Recall that a commutative ring O is called a local ring if O has a unique maximal ideal m. The field k := O/m is the residue field of O. A homomorphism f : O O of local rings is called a local homomorphism if f(m) m. Example Let A be a commutative ring, p A a proper prime ideal. Let S = A \ p; S is then a multiplicatively closed subset of A containing 1. We set A p := S 1 A, and write pa p for the ideal generated by φ S (p). We claim that A p is a local ring with maximal ideal pa p. Indeed, each proper prime ideal of A p is the ideal generated by φ S (q), for q some prime ideal of A with q S =. As this is equivalent to q p, we find that pa p is indeed the unique maximal ideal of A p. Definition Let F be a sheaf (of sets, abelian, rings, etc.) on a topological space X. The stalk of F at x, written F x, is the direct limit F x := lim x U F(U).

9 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 9 Note that, if (f, φ) : (Y, O Y ) (X, O X ) is a morphism of ringed spaces, and we take y Y, then φ : O X f O Y induces the homomorphism of stalks φ y : O X,f(y) O Y,y. Lemma Let A be a commutative ring, (X, O X ) = Spec (A). Then for p Spec (A), we have O X,p = A p. Proof. We may use the principal open subsets X f, f p, to define the stalk O X,p : O X,p = lim f p O X (X f ) = lim f p A f = (A \ p) 1 A = A p. Thus, the ringed spaces of the form (X, O X ) = Spec (A) are special, in that the stalks of the sheaf O X are all local rings. The morphisms ( ˆψ, ψ) coming from ring homomorphisms ψ : A B are also special: Lemma Let (X, O X ) = Spec A, (Y, O Y ) = Spec B, and let ψ : A B be a ring homomorphism. Take y Y. Then is a local homomorphism. ψ y : O X, ˆψ(y) O Y,y Proof. In fact, if y is the prime ideal p B, then ˆψ(y) is the prime ideal q := ψ 1 (p), and ψ y is just the ring homomorphism ψ p : A q B p induced by ψ, using the universal property of localization. Since ψ(ψ 1 (p)) p, ψ p is a local homomorphism.

10 10 MARC LEVINE 1.3. Schemes. We can now define our main object: Definition A scheme is a ringed space (X, O X ) which is locally Spec of a ring, i.e., for each point x X, there is an open neighborhood U of x and a commutative ring A such that (U, O U ) is isomorphic to Spec A, where O U denotes the restriction of O X to a sheaf of rings on U. A morphism of schemes f : (X, O X ) (Y, O Y ) is a morphism of ringed spaces which is locally of the form ( ˆψ, ψ) for some homomorphism of commutative rings ψ : A B, that is, for each x X, there are neighborhoods U of x and V of f(x) such that f restricts to a map f U : (U, O U ) (V, O V ), a homomorphism of commutative rings ψ : A B and isomorphisms of ringed spaces making the diagram (U, O U ) g Spec B; (V, O V ) h Spec A (U, O U ) f U (V, O V ) commute. g Spec B ( ˆψ, ψ) h Spec A Note that, as the functor Spec is a faithful embedding, the isomorphism (U, O U ) Spec A required in the first part of Definition is unique up to unique isomorphism of rings A A. Thus, the data is the second part of the definition are uniquely determined (up to unique isomorphism) once one fixes the open neighborhoods U and V. Definition A scheme (X, O X ) isomorphic to Spec (A) for some commutative ring A is called an affine scheme. An open subset U X such that (U, O U ) is an affine scheme is called an affine open subset of X. If U X is an affine open subset, then (U, O U ) = Spec A, where A = O X (U). Let Sch denote the category of schemes, and Aff Sch the full subcategory of affine schemes. Sending A to Spec A thus defines the functor Spec : Rings op Aff Lemma Spec is an equivalence of categories; in particular Hom Rings (A, B) = Hom Sch (Spec B, Spec A).

11 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 11 Proof. We have already seen that Spec is a faithful embedding, so it remains to see that Spec is full, i.e., a morphism of affine schemes f : Spec B Spec A arises from a homomorphism of rings. For this, write Spec A = (X, O X ), Spec B = (Y, O Y ). f gives us the ring homomorphism f (Y, X) : O X (X) O Y (Y ), i.e., a ring homomorphism ψ : A B, so we need to see that f = ( ˆψ, ψ). Take y Y and let x = f(y). Then as f locally of the form ( ˆφ, φ), the homomorphism fy : O Y,y O X,x is local and (fy ) 1 (m x ) = m y, where m x and m y are the respective maximal ideals. Suppose x is the prime ideal p A and y is the prime ideal q B. We thus have O Y,y = B q, O X,x = A p, and the diagram A ψ B φ p A p f y B q φ q commutes. Since f y is local, it follows that ψ 1 (q) p; as φ p induces a bijection between the prime ideals of A contained in p and the prime ideals of A p, it follows that p = ψ 1 (q). Thus, as maps of topological spaces, f and ˆψ agree. We note that the map ψ p,q : A p A q is the unique local homomorphism ρ making the diagram A ψ B φ p A p ρ B q commute. Thus f y = ψ p,q. Now, for U X open, the map φ q O X (U) x U O X,x is injective, and similarly for open subsets V of Y. Thus f = ψ, completing the proof. Remark It follows from the proof of Lemma that one can replace the condition in Definition defining a morphism of schemes with the following:

12 12 MARC LEVINE If (X, O X ) and (Y, O Y ) are schemes, a morphism of ringed spaces (f, φ) : (X, O X ) (Y, O Y ) is a morphism of schemes if for each x X, the map φ x : O Y,f(x) O X,x is a local homomorphism. Remark Let (X, O X ), and (Y, O Y ) be arbitrary schemes. We have the rings A := O X (X) and B := O Y (Y ), and each map of schemes f : (Y, O Y ) (X, O X ) induces the ring homomorphism f (X) : A B, giving us the functor Γ : Sch Rings op. We have seen above that Γ Spec = id Rings, and that the restriction of Γ to Aff is the inverse to Spec. More generally, suppose that X is affine, (X, O X ) = Spec A. Then Γ : Hom Sch (Y, X) Hom Rings (A, B) is an isomorphism. This is not the case in general for non-affine X Local/global principal. There is an analogy between topological manifolds and schemes, in that a scheme is a locally affine ringed space, while a topological manifold is a locally Euclidean topological space. As for manifolds, one can construct a scheme by gluing affine schemes: Let U α be a collection of schemes, together with open subschemes U α,β U α, and isomorphisms satisfying the cocycle condition g β,α : U α,β U β,α g 1 β,α (U β,α U β,γ ) = U α,β U α,γ g γ,α = g γ,β g β,α on U α,β U α,γ. This allows one to define the underlying topological space of the glued scheme X by gluing the underlying spaces of the schemes U α, and the structure sheaf O X is constructed by gluing the structure sheaves O Uα. If the U α and the open subschemes U α,β are all affine, the entire structure is defined via commutative rings and ring homomorphisms. Remark Throughout the text, we will define various properties along these lines by requiring certain conditions hold on some affine open cover of X. It is usually the case that these defining conditions then hold on every affine open subscheme (see below) of X, and we will use this fact without further explicit mention.

13 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY Open and closed subschemes. Let (X, O X ) be a scheme. An open subscheme of X is a scheme of the form (U, O U ), where U X is an open subspace. A morphism of schemes j : (V, O V ) (X, O X ) which gives rise to an isomorphism (V, O V ) = (U, O U ) for some open subscheme (U, O U ) of (X, O X ) is called an open immersion. Closed subschemes are a little less straightforward. We first define the notion of a sheaf of ideals. Let (X, O X ) be a ringed space. We have the category of O X -modules: an O X -module is a sheaf of abelian groups M on X, together with a map of sheaves O X M M which is associative and unital (in the obvious sense). Morphisms are maps of sheaves respecting the multiplication. Now suppose that (X, O X ) = Spec A is an affine scheme, and I A is an ideal. For each f A, we have the ideal I f A f, being the ideal generated by φ f (I). These patch together to form an O X -submodule of O X, called the ideal sheaf generated by I, and denoted Ĩ. In general, if X is a scheme, we call an O X -submodule I of O X an ideal sheaf if I is locally of the form Ĩ for some ideal I O X (U), U X affine. Let I be an ideal sheaf. We may form the sheaf of rings O X /I on X. The support of O X /I is the (closed) subset of X consisting of those x with (O X /I) x 0. Letting i : Z X be the inclusion of the support of O X /I, we have the ringed space (Z, O X /I) and the morphism of ringed spaces (i, π) : (Z, O X /I) (X, O X ), where π is given by the surjection O X i O X /I. If we take an affine open subscheme U = Spec A of X and an ideal I A for which I U = Ĩ, then one has Z U = V (I). We call (Z, O X /I) a closed subscheme of (X, O X ). More generally, let i : (W, O W ) (X, O X ) a morphism of schemes such that (1) i : W X gives a homeomorphism of W with a closed subset Z of X. (2) i : O X i O W is surjective, with kernel an ideal sheaf. Then we call i a closed embedding. If I O X is the ideal sheaf associated to a closed subscheme (Z, O Z ), we call I the ideal sheaf of (Z, O Z ), and write I = I Z. Example Let (X, O X ) = Spec A, and I A an ideal, giving us the ideal sheaf Ĩ O X, and the closed subscheme i : (Z, O Z ) (X, O X ). Then (Z, O Z ) is affine, (Z, O Z ) = Spec A/I, and i = (ˆπ, π), where π : A A/I is the canonical surjection. Conversely, if (Z, O Z )

14 14 MARC LEVINE is a closed subscheme of Spec A with ideal sheaf I Z, then (Z, O Z ) is affine, (Z, O Z ) = Spec A/I (as closed subscheme), where I = I Z (X) Fiber products. An important property of the category Sch is the existence of a (categorical) fiber product Y X Z for each pair of morphisms f : Y X, g : Z X. We sketch the construction. First consider the case of affine X = Spec A, Y = Spec B and Z = Spec C. We thus have ring homomorphisms f : A B, g : A C with f = ( f ˆ, f ) and similarly for g. The maps B B A C, C B A C defined by b b 1, c 1 c give us the commutative diagram of rings B A C B C g It is not hard to see that this exhibits B A C as the categorical coproduct of B and C over A (in Rings), and thus applying Spec yields the fiber product diagram Spec (B A C) Z in Aff = Rings op. By Remark 1.3.5, this diagram is a fiber product diagram in Sch as well. Now suppose that X, Y and Z are arbitrary schemes. We can cover X, Y and Z by affine open subschemes X α, Y α, Z α such that the maps f and g restrict to f α : Y α X α, g α : Z α X α (we may have X α = X β for α β). We thus have the fiber products Y α Xα Z α for each α. The universal property of fiber products together with the gluing data for the individual covers {X α }, {Y α }, {Z α } defines gluing data for the pieces Y α Xα Z α, which forms the desired categorical fiber product Y X Z. Example (The fibers of a morphism). Let X be a scheme, x X a point, k(x) the residue field of the local ring O X,x. The inclusion x X together with the residue map O X,x k(x) defines the morphism of schemes i x : Spec k(x) X. If f : Y X is a morphism, we set g A. f Y X f 1 (x) := Spec k(x) X Y. Via the first projection, f 1 (x) is a scheme over k(x), called the fiber of f over x. f

15 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY Sheaves of O X -modules. Let (X, O X ) be a ringed space. As we noted in our discussion of closed subschemes, a sheaf of abelian groups M equipped with a multiplication map O X M M, satisfying the usual associate and unit properties, is an O X -module. Morphisms of O X -modules are morphisms of sheaves of abelian groups respecting the multiplication, giving us the category Mod OX of O X - modules. If (f, ψ) : (Y, O Y ) (X, O X ) is a morphism of ringed spaces, we have the map ˆψ : f O X O Y adjoint to ψ : O X f O Y. If M is an O X -module, then f M is an f O X -module, and the tensor product O Y f O X f M is an O Y -module, denoted (f, ψ) (M). Thus, we have the pull-back functor (f, ψ) : Mod OX Mod OY and a natural isomorphism ((f, ψ) (g, φ)) = (g, φ) (f, ψ). In particular, for a map of schemes f : Y X, we have the pullback morphism f : Mod OX Mod OY. As we noted in the case of ideal sheaves, the full category Mod OX is not of central importance; we should rather consider those O X -modules which are locally given by modules over a ring. To explain this, let A be a commutative ring and M an A-module. If S A is a multiplicatively closed subset containing 1, we have the localization S 1 A and the S 1 A-module S 1 M. Exactly the same considerations which lead to the construction of the sheaf O X on X := Spec A give us the sheaf of O X -modules M on Spec A, satisfying M(X f ) = S(f) 1 M for all f A. The ideal sheaf Ĩ considered in (1.3.8) is a special case of this construction. Definition Let X be a scheme. An O X -module M is called quasi-coherent if there is an affine open cover X = α U α := Spec A α and A α -modules M α and isomorphisms of O Uα -modules M Uα = Mα. If X is noetherian and each M α is a finitely generated A α -module, then M is called a coherent O X -module. If each of the M α is a free A α -module of rank n, then M is called a locally free O X -module of rank n. A rank 1 locally free O X -module is called an invertible sheaf. We thus have the category Q. Coh X of quasi-coherent O X -modules as a full subcategory of Mod OX and, for X noetherian, the full subcategory Coh X of coherent O X -modules. We have as well the full subcategory

16 16 MARC LEVINE P X of locally free sheaves of finite rank. Given a morphism f : Y X, the pull-back f : Mod OX Mod OY restricts to f : Q. Coh X Q. Coh Y f : Coh X Coh Y f : P X P Y The categories Mod OX, Q. Coh X and Coh X (for X noetherian) are all abelian categories, in fact abelian subcategories of the category of sheaves of abelian groups on X Schemes and morphisms. In practice, one restricts attention to various special types of schemes and morphisms. In this section, we describe the most important of these. For a scheme X, we write X for the underlying topological space of X, and O X for the structure sheaf of rings on X. For a morphism f : Y X of schemes, we usually write f : Y X for the map of underlying spaces (sometimes f if necessary) and f : O X f O Y for the map of sheaves of rings Noetherian schemes. Recall that a commutative ring A is noetherian if the following equivalent conditions are satisfied: (1) Every increasing sequences of ideals in A I 0 I 1... I n... is eventually constant. (2) Let M be a finitely generated A-module (i.e., there exist elements m 1,..., m n M such that each element of M is of the form n i=1 a im i with the a i A). Then every increasing sequence of submodules of M N 0 N 1... N n... is eventually constant. (3) Let M be a finitely generated A-module, N M a submodule. Then N is finitely generated as an A-module. (4) Let I be an ideal in A. Then I is a finitely generated ideal. A topological space X is called noetherian if every sequence of closed subsets X X 1 X 2... X n... is eventually constant. Clearly, if A is noetherian, then the topological space Spec A is a noetherian topological space (but not conversely). We call a scheme X noetherian if X is noetherian, and X admits an affine cover, X = α Spec A α with each A α a noetherian ring. We

17 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 17 can take the cover to have finitely many elements. If X is a noetherian scheme, so is each open or closed subscheme of X. Examples A field k is clearly a noetherian ring. More generally, if A is a principal ideal domain, then A is noetherian, in particular, Z is noetherian. The Hilbert basis theorem states that, if A is noetherian, so is the polynomial ring A[X]. Thus, the polynomial rings k[x 1,..., X n ] and Z[X 1,..., X n ] are noetherian. If A is noetherian, so is A/I for each ideal I, thus, every quotient of A[X 1,..., X n ] (that is, every A-algebra that is finitely generated as an A-algebra) is noetherian. This applies to, e.g., a ring of integers in a number field, or rings of the form k[x 1,..., X n ]/I. The scheme Spec A[X 1,..., X n ] is called the affine n-space over A, written A n A Irreducible schemes, reduced schemes and generic points. Let X be a topological space. X is called irreducible if X is not the union of two proper closed subsets; equivalently, each non-empty open subspace of X is dense. It is easy to see that a noetherian topological space X is uniquely a finite union of irreducible closed subspaces X = X 0... X N where no X i contains X j for i j. We call a scheme X irreducible if X is an irreducible topological space. Example Let A be an integral domain. Then Spec A is irreducible. Indeed, since A is a domain, (0) is a prime ideal, and as every prime ideal contains (0), Spec A is the closure of the singleton set {(0)}, hence irreducible. The point x gen Spec A corresponding to the prime ideal (0) is called the generic point of Spec A. An element x in a ring A is called nilpotent if x n = 0 for some n; the set of nilpotent elements in a commutative ring A form an ideal, nil(a), called the nil-radical of A. A ring A is reduced if nil(a) = {0}; clearly A red := A/nil(A) is the maximal reduced quotient of A. As one clearly has nil(a) p for every prime ideal p of A, the quotient map A A red induces a homeomorphism Spec A red Spec A. A scheme X is called reduced if for each open subset U X, the ring O X (U) contains no non-zero nilpotent elements. A reduced, irreducible scheme is called integral. If X = Spec A is affine, then X is an integral scheme if and only if A is a domain. For a scheme X, we have the presheaf nil X with nil X (U) the set of nilpotent elements of O X (U); we let nil X O X be the associated

18 18 MARC LEVINE sheaf. nil X is a sheaf of ideals; we let X red be the closed subscheme of X with structure sheaf O X /nil X. For X = Spec A, nil X (X) = p Spec A (i.e. nil X (X) = (0)), so X red X is a homeomorphism. Thus each scheme X has a canonical reduced closed subscheme X red homeomorphic to X. More generally, if Z X is a closed subset, there is a unique sheaf of ideals I Z such that the closed subscheme W of X defined by I Z has underlying topological space Z, and W is reduced. We usually write Z for this closed subscheme, and say that we give Z the reduced subscheme structure. Lemma Let X be a non-empty irreducible scheme. Then X has a unique point x gen with X the closure of x gen. x gen is called the generic point of X. Proof. Replacing X with X red, we may assume that X is integral. If U X is an affine open subscheme, then U is dense in X and U is integral, so U = Spec A with A a domain. We have already seen that U satisfies the lemma. If u U is the generic point, the the closure of u in X is X ; uniqueness of x gen follows from the uniqueness of u gen and denseness of U. If X is noetherian, then X has finitely many irreducible components: X = N i=1 X i, without containment relations among the X i. The X i (with the reduced subscheme structure) are called the irreducible components of X, and the generic points x 1,..., x N of the components X i are called the generic points of X. Definition Let X be a noetherian scheme with generic points x 1,..., x N. The ring of rational functions on X is the ring N k(x) := O X,xi. If X is integral, then k(x) is a field, called the field of rational functions on X. i= Separated schemes and morphisms. One easily sees that, except for trivial cases, the topological space X underlying a scheme X is not Hausdorff. So, to replace the usual separation axioms, we have the following condition: a morphism of schemes f : X Y is called separated if the diagonal inclusion X X Y X has image a closed subset (with respect to the underlying topological spaces). Noting that every scheme has a unique morphism to Spec Z, we call X a separated scheme if X is separated over Spec Z, i.e., the diagonal X in X Spec Z X is closed.

19 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 19 Separation has the following basic properties (proof left to the reader): Proposition Let X f Y g Z be morphisms of schemes. (1) If gf is separated, then f is separated. (2) If f is separated and g is separated, the gf is separated. (3) if f is separated and h : W Y is an arbitrary morphism, then the projection X Y W W is separated. In addition: Proposition Every affine scheme is separated. Proof. Let X = Spec A. The diagonal inclusion δ : X X Spec Z X arises from the dual diagram of rings A µ id id A Z A A i 1 i 2 A where i 1 (a) = a 1, i 2 (a) = 1 a, and the maps Z A are the canonical ones. Thus µ is the multiplication map, hence surjective. Letting I A Z A be the kernel of µ (in fact I is the ideal generated by elements a 1 1 a), we see that δ is a closed embedding with image Spec A Z A/I. The point of using separated schemes is that this forces the condition that two morphisms f, g : X Y be the same to be a closed subscheme of X. Indeed, the equalizer of f and g is the pull-back of the diagonal δ Y Y Y via the map (f, g) : X Y Y, so this equalizer is closed if δ Y is closed in Y Y. Another nice consequence is Proposition Let X be a separated scheme, U and V affine open subschemes. Then U V is also affine. Proof. We have the fiber product diagram U V i U V X δ δ X U V iu i V X X identifying U V with (U V ) X X X. If U = Spec A and V = Spec B, then U V = Spec A B is affine; since δ X is a closed embedding, Z

20 20 MARC LEVINE so is δ. Thus U V is isomorphic to a closed subscheme of the affine scheme Spec A B, hence for some ideal I. U V = Spec A B/I Finite type morphisms. Let A be a noetherian commutative ring. A commutative A-algebra A B is of finite type if B is isomorphic to quotient of a polynomial ring over A in finitely many variables: B = A[X 1,..., X m ]/I. This globalizes in the evident manner: Let X be a noetherian scheme. A morphism f : Y X is of finite type if X and Y admit finite affine covers X = i U i = Spec A i, Y = i V i = Spec B i with f(v i ) U i and f : A i B i making B i a finite-type A i -algebra for each i. In case X = Spec A for some noetherian ring A, we say that Y is of finite type over A. We let Sch A denote the full subcategory of all schemes with objects the A-scheme of finite type which are separated over Spec A. Clearly the property of f : Y X being of finite type is preserved under fiber product with an arbitrary morphism Z X (with Z noetherian). By the Hilbert basis theorem, if f : Y X is a finite type morphism, then Y is noetherian (X is assumed noetherian as part of the definition) Proper, finite and quasi-finite morphisms. In topology, a proper morphism is one for which the inverse image of a compact set is compact. As above, the lack of good separation for the Zariski topology means one needs to use a somewhat different notion. Definition A morphism f : Y X is closed if for each closed subset C of Y, f(c) is closed in X. A morphism f : Y X is proper if (1) f is separated. (2) f is universally closed: for each morphism Z X, the projection Z X Y Z is closed. Since the closed subsets in the Zariski topology are essentially locii defined by polynomial equations, the condition that a morphism f : Y X is proper implies the principle of elimination theory : Let C be a closed algebraic locus in Z X Y. Then the set of z Z for which there exist a z C Z X Y is a closed subset. We will see below in the section on projective spaces how to construct examples of proper morphisms.

21 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 21 Definition Let f : Y X be a morphism of noetherian schemes. f is called affine if for each affine open subscheme U X, f 1 (U) is an affine open subscheme of Y. An affine morphism is called finite if for U = Spec A X with f 1 (U) = Spec B, the homomorphism f : A B makes B into a finitely generated A- module. Definition Let f : Y X be a morphism of noetherian schemes. f is called quasi-finite if for each x X, f 1 (x) is a finite set. The property of a morphism f : Y X being proper, affine, finite or quasi-finite morphisms is preserved under fiber product with an arbitrary morphism Z X, and the composition of two proper (resp. affine, finite, quasi-finite) morphisms is proper (resp. affine, finite, quasi-finite). Also Proposition Let X f Y g Z be morphisms of noetherian schemes. If gf is proper (resp. finite, quasi-finite) then f is proper (resp. finite, quasi-finite). A much deeper result is Proposition Let f : Y X be a finite type morphism. Then f is finite if and only if f is proper and quasi-finite Flat morphisms. The condition of flatness comes from homological algebra, but has geometric content as well. Recall that for a commutative ring A and an A-module M, the operation of tensor product A M is right exact: N N N 0 exact = N A M N A M N A M 0 exact. M is a flat A-module if A M is exact, i.e., left-exact: 0 N N exact = 0 N A M N A M exact. A ring homomorphism A B is called flat if B is flat as an A-module. Definition Let f : Y X be a morphism of schemes. f is flat if for each y Y, the homomorphism f y : O X,f(x) O Y,y is flat. It follows from the cancellation formula (N A B) B C = N A C that a composition of flat morphisms is flat.

22 22 MARC LEVINE Valuative criteria. In the study of metric spaces, sequences and limits play a central role. In algebraic geometry, this is replaced by using the spectrum of discrete valuation rings. Recall that a noetherian local domain (O, m) is a discrete valuation ring (DVR for short) if m is a principal ideal, m = (t). Let O have quotient field F and residue field k. It is not hard to see that Spec O consists of two points: the generic point η : Spec F Spec O and the single closed point Spec k Spec O. In terms of our sequence/limit analogy, Spec F is the sequence and Spec k is the limit. This should motivate the follow result which characterizes separated and proper morphisms. Proposition Let f : Y X be a morphism of finite type. (1) f is separated if and only if, for each DVR O (with quotient field F ) and each commutative diagram Spec F η Spec O there exists at most one lifting Spec O Y. (2) f is proper if and only if, for each DVR O (with quotient field F ) and each commutative diagram Spec F η Spec O Y X Y X there exists a unique lifting Spec O Y The category Sch k. In this section we fix a field k. The schemes of most interest to us in many applications are the separated k-schemes of finite type; in this section we examine a number of concepts which one can describe quite concretely for such schemes R-valued points. The use of R-valued points allows one to recover the classical notion of solutions of a system of equations within the theory of schemes. Definition Let X be a scheme, R a ring. The set of R-valued points X(R) is by definition the Hom-set Hom Sch (Spec R, X). If we fix a base-ring A, and X is a scheme over A and R is an A-algebra, we set X A (R) := Hom SchA (Spec R, X). f f

23 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 23 We often leave off the subscript A if the context makes the meaning clear. Example Let X = Spec k[x 1,..., X n ]/(f 1,..., f r ), and let F/k be an extension field of k. Then X k (F ) is the set of maps Spec F Spec k[x 1,..., X n ]/(f 1,..., f r ) over k, i.e., the set of k-algebra homomorphisms ψ : k[x 1,..., X n ]/(f 1,..., f r ) F. Clearly ψ is determined by the values ψ(x i ), i = 1,..., n; conversely, given elements x 1,..., x n F, we have the unique k-algebra homomorphism ψ : k[x 1..., X n ] F sending X i to x i. As ψ(f j ) = f j (x 1,..., x n ), ψ descends to an F -valued point ψ of X if and only if f j (x 1,..., x n ) = 0 for all j. Thus, we have identified the F -valued points of X with the set of solutions in F of the polynomial equations f 1 =..., f r = 0. This example explains the connection of the machinery of schemes with the basic problem of understanding the solutions of polynomial equations. As a special case, take X = A n k. Then X k(f ) = F n for all F Group-schemes and bundles. Just as in topology, we have the notion of a locally trivial bundle E B with base B, fiber F and group G. The group G is an algebraic group-scheme over k, which is just a group-object in Sch k. Concretely, we have a multiplication µ : G k G G, inverse ι : G G and unit e : Spec k G, satisfying the usual identities, interpreted as identities of morphisms. Example Let M n = Spec k[{x ij 1 i, j n}] = A n2 formula for matrix multiplication k. The µ (X ij ) = k X ik X kj defines the ring homomorphism hence the morphism µ : k[... X ij...] k[... X ij...] k k[... X ij...], µ : M n k M n M n. Let GL n be the open subset (M n ) det, where det is the determinant of the n n matrix (X ij ), i.e. GL n := Spec k[... X ij..., 1 det ].

24 24 MARC LEVINE Then µ restricts to µ : GL n k GL n GL n, and the usual formula for matrix inverse defines the inverse morphism ι : GL n GL n. The unit is given by e (X ij ) = δ ij. If G is an algebraic group-scheme over k, and F a finite type k- scheme, an action of G on F is just a morphism ρ : G k F F, satisfying the usual associativity and unit conditions, again as identities of morphisms in Sch k. Now we can just mimic the usual definition of a fiber-bundle with fiber F and group G: p : E B is required to have local trivializations, B = i U i, with the U i open subschemes, and there are isomorphisms over U i, ψ i : p 1 (U i ) U i k F. In addition, for each i, j, there is a morphism g ij : U i U j G such that the isomorphism ψ i ψ 1 j is given by the composition : (U i U j ) k F (U i U j ) k F (p 1,g ij p 1,p 2 ) (U i U j ) k k GF id ρ (U i U j ) k F. An isomorphism of bundles f : (E B) (E B) is given by a B-morphism f : E E such that, with respect to a common local trivialization, f is locally of the form U k F (p 1,g p 1,p 2 ) U k k GF id ρ U k F for some morphism g : U G. For example, using G = GL n, F = A n k, ρ : GL n k A n k An k the map with ρ (Y i ) = X ij Y j, j we have the notion of an algebraic vector bundle of rank n Dimension. Let A be a commutative ring. The Krull dimension of A is the maximal length n of a chain of distinct prime ideals in A: p 0 p 1... p n Let F be a finitely generated field extension of k. A set of elements of F are transcendentally independent if they satisfy no non-trivial polynomial identity with coefficients in k. A transcendence basis of F over k is a transcendentally independent set {x α F } of elements of F such

25 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 25 that F is algebraic over the subfield k({x α }) generated by the x α, i.e., each element x F satisfies some non-trivial polynomial identity with coefficients in k({x α }). One shows that each F admits a transcendence basis over k and that each two transcendence bases of F over k have the same cardinality, which is called the transcendence dimension of F over k, tr. dim k F. Clearly if F is finitely generated over k, then tr. dim k F is finite. In particular, if X is an integral k-scheme of finite type over k, then the function field k(x) has finite transcendence dimension over k. Definition Let X be an irreducible separated k-scheme of finite type. The dimension of X over k is defined by dim k X := tr. dim k k(x red ). In general, if X is a separated k-scheme of finite type with reduced irreducible components X 1,..., X n, we write dim k X d if dim k X i d for all i. We say that X is equi-dimenisonal over k of dimension d if dim k X i = d for all i. Remark We can make the notion of dimension have a local character as follows: Let X be a separated finite type k-scheme and x X a point. We say dim k (X, x) d if there is some neighborhood U of x in X with dim k U d. We similarly say that X is equi-dimensional over k of dimension d at x if there is a U with dim k U = d. We say X is locally equi-dimensional over k if X is equi-dimensional over k at x for each x X. If X is locally equi-dimensional over k, then the local dimension function dim k (X, x) is constant on connected components of X. Thus, if W X is an integral closed subscheme, then the local dimension function dim k (X, w) is constant over W. We set codim X W = dim k (X, w) dim k W. If w is the generic point of W and codim X W = d, we call w a codimension d point of X. We thus have two possible definitions of the dimension of Spec A for A a domain which is a finitely generated k-algebra, dim k Spec A and the Krull dimension of A. Fortunately, these are the same: Theorem (Krull). Let A be a domain which is a finitely generated k-algebra. Then dim k Spec A equals the Krull dimension of A. This result follows from the principal ideal theorem of Krull :

26 26 MARC LEVINE Theorem (Krull). Let A be a a domain which is a finitely generated k-algebra, let f be a non-zero element of A and p (f) a minimal prime ideal containing (f). Then dim k Spec A = dim k Spec A/p+1. the Hilbert Nullstellensatz: Theorem Let A be a finitely generated k-algebra which is a field. Then k A is a finite field extension. and induction. There is a relation of flatness to dimension: Let f : Y X be a finite type morphism of noetherian schemes. Then for each x X, f 1 (x) is a scheme of finite type over the field k(x), so one can ask if f 1 (x) is equi-dimensional over k(x) and if so, what is the dimension. If X and Y are irreducible and f is flat, then there is an integer d 0 such that for each x X, either f 1 (x) is empty or f 1 (x) is an equi-dimensional k(x)-scheme of dimension d over k(x). If f : Y X is a flat morphism in Sch k, with X and Y equi-dimensional over k, then each non-empty fiber f 1 (x) is equi-dimensional over k(x), and dim k Y = dim k X + dim k(x) f 1 (x) Hilbert s Nullstellensatz. Having introduced Hilbert s Nullstellensatz (Theorem ) above, we take this opportunity to mention some important consequences: Corollary Let X be a scheme of finite type over k, x X a closed point. Then k(x) is a finite field extension of k. Corollary Suppose k is algebraically closed. Let m be a maximal ideal in k[x 1,..., X n ]. Then m = (X 1 a 1,..., X n a n ) for (a unique) (a 1,..., a n ) k n. Proof. Take X = Spec k[x 1,..., X n ] and x = m X in Corollary Since k is algebraically closed the inclusion k k(x) is an isomorphism, so we have the exact sequence 0 m k[x 1,..., X n ] π k(x) = k 0. If π(x i ) = a i, then m is generated by the elements X i a i.. Finally, the Nullstellensatz allows one to relate the commutative algebra encoded in Spec to the more concrete notion of solutions of polynomial equations, at least if k is algebraically closed. For this, let I k[x 1,..., X n ] be an ideal, and let V k (I) k n be the set of

27 SUMMER COURSE IN MOTIVIC HOMOTOPY THEORY 27 a := (a 1,..., a n ) k n such that f(a) = 0 for all f I. Similarly, if S is a subset of k n, we let I(S) = {f k[x 1,..., X n ] f(a) = 0 for all a S}. The subsets of k n of the form V k (I) for an ideal I are called the algebraic subsets of k n. Clearly V k (I) = V k ( I) for each ideal I, so the algebraic subsets do not distinguish between I and I. Corollary Let k be and algebraically closed field. k[x 1,..., X n ] be an ideal. Then I(V k (I)) = I. Proof. Clearly I I(V k (I)). Take f I(V k (I)), let A = k[x 1,..., X n ]/ I Let I and let f be the image of f in A. If f is not in I, then f is not nilpotent. Thus A f is not the zero-ring, and hence has a maximal ideal m. Also, we have the isomorphism A f = k[x1,..., X n, X n+1 ]/( I, fx n+1 1), so m lifts to a maximal ideal M := (X 1 a 1,..., X n a n, X n+1 a n+1 ) in k[x 1,..., X n, X n+1 ]. But then (a 1,..., a n ) is in V k (I), hence f(a 1,..., a n ) = 0, contradicting the relation a n+1 f(a 1,..., a n ) 1 = 0. Thus, we have a 1-1 correspondence between radical ideals in the ring k[x 1,..., X n ] (i.e reduced closed subschemes of A n k ) and algebraic subsets of k n, assuming k algebraically closed. This allows one to base the entire theory of reduced schemes of finite type over k on algebraic subsets of A n k rather than on affine schemes; for a first approach to algebraic geometry, this pre-grothendieck simplification gives a good approximation to the entire theory, at least if one works over an algebraically closed base-field Smooth morphisms and étale morphisms. Let φ : A B be a ring homomorphism, and M a B-module. Recall that a derivation of B into M over A is an A-module homomorphism : B M satisfying the Leibniz rule (bb ) = b (b ) + b (b). Note that the condition of A-linearity is equivalent to (φ(a)) = 0 for a A.

28 28 MARC LEVINE The module of Kähler differentials, Ω B/A, is a B-module equipped with a universal derivation over A, d : B Ω B/A, i.e., for each derivation : B M as above, there is a unique B-module homomorphism ψ : Ω B/A M with (b) = ψ(db). It is easy to construct Ω B/A : take the quotient of the free B-module on symbols db, b B, by the B-submodule generated by elements of the form d(φ(a)) for a A d(b + b ) db db for b, b B d(bb ) bdb b db for b, b B. Let B = B/I for some ideal I. sequence: (1.5.1) I/I 2 Ω B/A B B Ω B/A 0, where the first map is induced by the map f df. We have the fundamental exact Example Let k be a field, B := k[x 1,..., X n ] the polynomial ring over k. Then Ω B/k is the free B-module on dx 1,..., dx n. If B = k[x 1,..., X n ]/I then the fundamental sequence shows that Ω B/k is the quotient of n i=1 B dx i by the submodule generated by df = f i X i dx i for f I. Definition Let f : Y X be a morphism of finite type. f is smooth if (1) f is separated. (2) f is flat (3) Each non-empty fiber f 1 is locally equi-dimensional over k(x). (4) Let y be in Y, let x = f(y), let d y = dim k(x) (f 1 (x), y) and let B y = O f 1 (x),y. Then Ω By/k(x) is a free B y -module of rank d y. The map f is étale if f is smooth and d y = 0 for all y. Remarks (1) If X and Y are integral schemes, or if X and Y are in Sch k and are both locally equi-dimensional over k, then the flatness of f implies the condition (3). (2) Smooth (resp. étale) morphisms are stable under base-change: if f : Y X is smooth (resp. étale) and Z X is an arbitrary morphism, then the projection Z X Y Z is smooth (resp. étale). There is a converse: A morphism g : Z X is faithfully flat if g is flat and g : Z X is surjective. A morphism f : Y X is smooth (resp. étale) if and only if the projection Z X Y Z is smooth (resp. étale) for some faithfully flat Z X.

### Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties

Algebraic varieties and schemes over any scheme. Non singular varieties Trang June 16, 2010 1 Lecture 1 Let k be a field and k[x 1,..., x n ] the polynomial ring with coefficients in k. Then we have two

### Smooth morphisms. Peter Bruin 21 February 2007

Smooth morphisms Peter Bruin 21 February 2007 Introduction The goal of this talk is to define smooth morphisms of schemes, which are one of the main ingredients in Néron s fundamental theorem [BLR, 1.3,

### HARTSHORNE EXERCISES

HARTSHORNE EXERCISES J. WARNER Hartshorne, Exercise I.5.6. Blowing Up Curve Singularities (a) Let Y be the cusp x 3 = y 2 + x 4 + y 4 or the node xy = x 6 + y 6. Show that the curve Ỹ obtained by blowing

### 1. Algebraic vector bundles. Affine Varieties

0. Brief overview Cycles and bundles are intrinsic invariants of algebraic varieties Close connections going back to Grothendieck Work with quasi-projective varieties over a field k Affine Varieties 1.

### NOTES ON FLAT MORPHISMS AND THE FPQC TOPOLOGY

NOTES ON FLAT MORPHISMS AND THE FPQC TOPOLOGY RUNE HAUGSENG The aim of these notes is to define flat and faithfully flat morphisms and review some of their important properties, and to define the fpqc

### CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES

CHAPTER 1. AFFINE ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES During this first part of the course, we will establish a correspondence between various geometric notions and algebraic ones. Some references for this part of the

### Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo. Alex Massarenti

Exercises of the Algebraic Geometry course held by Prof. Ugo Bruzzo Alex Massarenti SISSA, VIA BONOMEA 265, 34136 TRIESTE, ITALY E-mail address: alex.massarenti@sissa.it These notes collect a series of

### Lecture 3: Flat Morphisms

Lecture 3: Flat Morphisms September 29, 2014 1 A crash course on Properties of Schemes For more details on these properties, see [Hartshorne, II, 1-5]. 1.1 Open and Closed Subschemes If (X, O X ) is a

### SCHEMES. David Harari. Tsinghua, February-March 2005

SCHEMES David Harari Tsinghua, February-March 2005 Contents 1. Basic notions on schemes 2 1.1. First definitions and examples.................. 2 1.2. Morphisms of schemes : first properties.............

### 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions

24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice

### MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 12

MATH 8253 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEEK 2 CİHAN BAHRAN 3.2.. Let Y be a Noetherian scheme. Show that any Y -scheme X of finite type is Noetherian. Moreover, if Y is of finite dimension, then so is X. Write f

### AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES

AN INTRODUCTION TO AFFINE SCHEMES BROOKE ULLERY Abstract. This paper gives a basic introduction to modern algebraic geometry. The goal of this paper is to present the basic concepts of algebraic geometry,

### ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ANDREW SALCH 1. Affine schemes. About notation: I am in the habit of writing f (U) instead of f 1 (U) for the preimage of a subset

### ALGEBRAIC GROUPS. Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes!

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS Disclaimer: There are millions of errors in these notes! 1. Some algebraic geometry The subject of algebraic groups depends on the interaction between algebraic geometry and group theory.

### SMA. Grothendieck topologies and schemes

SMA Grothendieck topologies and schemes Rafael GUGLIELMETTI Semester project Supervised by Prof. Eva BAYER FLUCKIGER Assistant: Valéry MAHÉ April 27, 2012 2 CONTENTS 3 Contents 1 Prerequisites 5 1.1 Fibred

### which is a group homomorphism, such that if W V U, then

4. Sheaves Definition 4.1. Let X be a topological space. A presheaf of groups F on X is a a function which assigns to every open set U X a group F(U) and to every inclusion V U a restriction map, ρ UV

### ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY: GLOSSARY AND EXAMPLES HONGHAO GAO FEBRUARY 7, 2014 Quasi-coherent and coherent sheaves Let X Spec k be a scheme. A presheaf over X is a contravariant functor from the category of open

### MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS.

MATH 233B, FLATNESS AND SMOOTHNESS. The discussion of smooth morphisms is one place were Hartshorne doesn t do a very good job. Here s a summary of this week s material. I ll also insert some (optional)

### 0.1 Spec of a monoid

These notes were prepared to accompany the first lecture in a seminar on logarithmic geometry. As we shall see in later lectures, logarithmic geometry offers a natural approach to study semistable schemes.

### Lecture 2 Sheaves and Functors

Lecture 2 Sheaves and Functors In this lecture we will introduce the basic concept of sheaf and we also will recall some of category theory. 1 Sheaves and locally ringed spaces The definition of sheaf

### Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar

Summer Algebraic Geometry Seminar Lectures by Bart Snapp About This Document These lectures are based on Chapters 1 and 2 of An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry by Karen Smith et al. 1 Affine Varieties

### FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 24 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Vector bundles and locally free sheaves 1 2. Toward quasicoherent sheaves: the distinguished affine base 5 Quasicoherent and coherent sheaves

### Introduction and preliminaries Wouter Zomervrucht, Februari 26, 2014

Introduction and preliminaries Wouter Zomervrucht, Februari 26, 204. Introduction Theorem. Serre duality). Let k be a field, X a smooth projective scheme over k of relative dimension n, and F a locally

### 3. Lecture 3. Y Z[1/p]Hom (Sch/k) (Y, X).

3. Lecture 3 3.1. Freely generate qfh-sheaves. We recall that if F is a homotopy invariant presheaf with transfers in the sense of the last lecture, then we have a well defined pairing F(X) H 0 (X/S) F(S)

### ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES

ABSTRACT NONSINGULAR CURVES Affine Varieties Notation. Let k be a field, such as the rational numbers Q or the complex numbers C. We call affine n-space the collection A n k of points P = a 1, a,..., a

### 14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces

14 Lecture 14: Basic generallities on adic spaces 14.1 Introduction The aim of this lecture and the next two is to address general adic spaces and their connection to rigid geometry. 14.2 Two open questions

### Yuriy Drozd. Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry. Kaiserslautern 1998/99

Yuriy Drozd Intriduction to Algebraic Geometry Kaiserslautern 1998/99 CHAPTER 1 Affine Varieties 1.1. Ideals and varieties. Hilbert s Basis Theorem Let K be an algebraically closed field. We denote by

### Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4. Proposition (4.1.6). The canonical homomorphism ( ) is surjective [(3.2.4)].

Synopsis of material from EGA Chapter II, 4 4.1. Definition of projective bundles. 4. Projective bundles. Ample sheaves Definition (4.1.1). Let S(E) be the symmetric algebra of a quasi-coherent O Y -module.

### Algebraic varieties. Chapter A ne varieties

Chapter 4 Algebraic varieties 4.1 A ne varieties Let k be a field. A ne n-space A n = A n k = kn. It s coordinate ring is simply the ring R = k[x 1,...,x n ]. Any polynomial can be evaluated at a point

### where Σ is a finite discrete Gal(K sep /K)-set unramified along U and F s is a finite Gal(k(s) sep /k(s))-subset

Classification of quasi-finite étale separated schemes As we saw in lecture, Zariski s Main Theorem provides a very visual picture of quasi-finite étale separated schemes X over a henselian local ring

### 1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results

An introduction to algebraic fundamental groups 1 Notations and Statement of the Main Results Throughout the talk, all schemes are locally Noetherian. All maps are of locally finite type. There two main

### A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander

A GLIMPSE OF ALGEBRAIC K-THEORY: Eric M. Friedlander During the first three days of September, 1997, I had the privilege of giving a series of five lectures at the beginning of the School on Algebraic

### Preliminary Exam Topics Sarah Mayes

Preliminary Exam Topics Sarah Mayes 1. Sheaves Definition of a sheaf Definition of stalks of a sheaf Definition and universal property of sheaf associated to a presheaf [Hartshorne, II.1.2] Definition

### Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35

Honors Algebra 4, MATH 371 Winter 2010 Assignment 4 Due Wednesday, February 17 at 08:35 1. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 0. (a) Prove that the nilradical of R is equal to the intersection of the prime

### Direct Limits. Mathematics 683, Fall 2013

Direct Limits Mathematics 683, Fall 2013 In this note we define direct limits and prove their basic properties. This notion is important in various places in algebra. In particular, in algebraic geometry

### FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS.

FILTERED RINGS AND MODULES. GRADINGS AND COMPLETIONS. Let A be a ring, for simplicity assumed commutative. A filtering, or filtration, of an A module M means a descending sequence of submodules M = M 0

### HYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA

HYPERSURFACES IN PROJECTIVE SCHEMES AND A MOVING LEMMA OFER GABBER, QING LIU, AND DINO LORENZINI Abstract. Let X/S be a quasi-projective morphism over an affine base. We develop in this article a technique

### APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS

APPENDIX 3: AN OVERVIEW OF CHOW GROUPS We review in this appendix some basic definitions and results that we need about Chow groups. For details and proofs we refer to [Ful98]. In particular, we discuss

### Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry

Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry 2 Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry Travis Dirle December 4, 2016 2 Contents 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 Affine Varieties.......................... 1 1.2 Projective Varieties........................

### Algebraic v.s. Analytic Point of View

Algebraic v.s. Analytic Point of View Ziwen Zhu September 19, 2015 In this talk, we will compare 3 different yet similar objects of interest in algebraic and complex geometry, namely algebraic variety,

### Modules over a Ringed Space

Modules over a Ringed Space Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In these notes we collect some useful facts about sheaves of modules on a ringed space that are either left as exercises in [Har77] or omitted

### Modules over a Scheme

Modules over a Scheme Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In these notes we collect various facts about quasi-coherent sheaves on a scheme. Nearly all of the material is trivial or can be found in [Gro60]. These

### ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY ARDA H. DEMIRHAN Abstract. We examine the conditions for uniqueness of differentials in the abstract setting of differential geometry. Then we ll come up

### Math 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology

Math 248B. Applications of base change for coherent cohomology 1. Motivation Recall the following fundamental general theorem, the so-called cohomology and base change theorem: Theorem 1.1 (Grothendieck).

### 214A HOMEWORK KIM, SUNGJIN

214A HOMEWORK KIM, SUNGJIN 1.1 Let A = k[[t ]] be the ring of formal power series with coefficients in a field k. Determine SpecA. Proof. We begin with a claim that A = { a i T i A : a i k, and a 0 k }.

### CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES

CHEVALLEY S THEOREM AND COMPLETE VARIETIES BRIAN OSSERMAN In this note, we introduce the concept which plays the role of compactness for varieties completeness. We prove that completeness can be characterized

### Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

### AFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES

AFFINE PUSHFORWARD AND SMOOTH PULLBACK FOR PERVERSE SHEAVES YEHAO ZHOU Conventions In this lecture note, a variety means a separated algebraic variety over complex numbers, and sheaves are C-linear. 1.

### Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed.

Reid 5.2. Describe the irreducible components of V (J) for J = (y 2 x 4, x 2 2x 3 x 2 y + 2xy + y 2 y) in k[x, y, z]. Here k is algebraically closed. Answer: Note that the first generator factors as (y

### A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped with a Grothendieck topology T. A Grothendieck topology T consists of a collection of subfunctors

Contents 5 Grothendieck topologies 1 6 Exactness properties 10 7 Geometric morphisms 17 8 Points and Boolean localization 22 5 Grothendieck topologies A Grothendieck site is a small category C equipped

### h M (T ). The natural isomorphism η : M h M determines an element U = η 1

MODULI PROBLEMS AND GEOMETRIC INVARIANT THEORY 7 2.3. Fine moduli spaces. The ideal situation is when there is a scheme that represents our given moduli functor. Definition 2.15. Let M : Sch Set be a moduli

### Lectures on algebraic stacks

Rend. Mat. Appl. (7). Volume 38, (2017), 1 169 RENDICONTI DI MATEMATICA E DELLE SUE APPLICAZIONI Lectures on algebraic stacks Alberto Canonaco Abstract. These lectures give a detailed and almost self-contained

### Algebraic Varieties. Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra

Algebraic Varieties Notes by Mateusz Micha lek for the lecture on April 17, 2018, in the IMPRS Ringvorlesung Introduction to Nonlinear Algebra Algebraic varieties represent solutions of a system of polynomial

### Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

### Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry

Exploring the Exotic Setting for Algebraic Geometry Victor I. Piercey University of Arizona Integration Workshop Project August 6-10, 2010 1 Introduction In this project, we will describe the basic topology

### 1 Existence of the Néron model

Néron models Setting: S a Dedekind domain, K its field of fractions, A/K an abelian variety. A model of A/S is a flat, separable S-scheme of finite type X with X K = A. The nicest possible model over S

### MATH 8254 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY HOMEWORK 1

MATH 8254 ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY HOMEWORK 1 CİHAN BAHRAN I discussed several of the problems here with Cheuk Yu Mak and Chen Wan. 4.1.12. Let X be a normal and proper algebraic variety over a field k. Show

### Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem

Boolean Algebras, Boolean Rings and Stone s Representation Theorem Hongtaek Jung December 27, 2017 Abstract This is a part of a supplementary note for a Logic and Set Theory course. The main goal is to

### MASTER S THESIS MAT CHOW VARIETIES

MASTER S THESIS MAT-2003-06 CHOW VARIETIES David Rydh DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN Chow Varieties June, 2003 David Rydh Master s Thesis Department

### MATH 221 NOTES BRENT HO. Date: January 3, 2009.

MATH 22 NOTES BRENT HO Date: January 3, 2009. 0 Table of Contents. Localizations......................................................................... 2 2. Zariski Topology......................................................................

### Lectures on Galois Theory. Some steps of generalizations

= Introduction Lectures on Galois Theory. Some steps of generalizations Journée Galois UNICAMP 2011bis, ter Ubatuba?=== Content: Introduction I want to present you Galois theory in the more general frame

### Tunisian Journal of Mathematics an international publication organized by the Tunisian Mathematical Society

unisian Journal of Mathematics an international publication organized by the unisian Mathematical Society Ramification groups of coverings and valuations akeshi Saito 2019 vol. 1 no. 3 msp msp UNISIAN

### Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak

Rings and groups. Ya. Sysak 1 Noetherian rings Let R be a ring. A (right) R -module M is called noetherian if it satisfies the maximum condition for its submodules. In other words, if M 1... M i M i+1...

### COHOMOLOGY AND DIFFERENTIAL SCHEMES. 1. Schemes

COHOMOLOG AND DIFFERENTIAL SCHEMES RAMOND HOOBLER Dedicated to the memory of Jerrold Kovacic Abstract. Replace this text with your own abstract. 1. Schemes This section assembles basic results on schemes

### Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes

Math 418 Algebraic Geometry Notes 1 Affine Schemes Let R be a commutative ring with 1. Definition 1.1. The prime spectrum of R, denoted Spec(R), is the set of prime ideals of the ring R. Spec(R) = {P R

### 12. Linear systems Theorem Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an A-morphism then L = φ O P n

12. Linear systems Theorem 12.1. Let X be a scheme over a ring A. (1) If φ: X P n A is an A-morphism then L = φ O P n A (1) is an invertible sheaf on X, which is generated by the global sections s 0, s

### ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ.

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 2: HILBERT S NULLSTELLENSATZ. ANDREW SALCH 1. Hilbert s Nullstellensatz. The last lecture left off with the claim that, if J k[x 1,..., x n ] is an ideal, then

### Extended Index. 89f depth (of a prime ideal) 121f Artin-Rees Lemma. 107f descending chain condition 74f Artinian module

Extended Index cokernel 19f for Atiyah and MacDonald's Introduction to Commutative Algebra colon operator 8f Key: comaximal ideals 7f - listings ending in f give the page where the term is defined commutative

### 10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann

82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It

### Section Blowing Up

Section 2.7.1 - Blowing Up Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 Now we come to the generalised notion of blowing up. In (I, 4) we defined the blowing up of a variety with respect to a point. Now we will define

### Lecture 9 - Faithfully Flat Descent

Lecture 9 - Faithfully Flat Descent October 15, 2014 1 Descent of morphisms In this lecture we study the concept of faithfully flat descent, which is the notion that to obtain an object on a scheme X,

### IndCoh Seminar: Ind-coherent sheaves I

IndCoh Seminar: Ind-coherent sheaves I Justin Campbell March 11, 2016 1 Finiteness conditions 1.1 Fix a cocomplete category C (as usual category means -category ). This section contains a discussion of

### PROBLEMS, MATH 214A. Affine and quasi-affine varieties

PROBLEMS, MATH 214A k is an algebraically closed field Basic notions Affine and quasi-affine varieties 1. Let X A 2 be defined by x 2 + y 2 = 1 and x = 1. Find the ideal I(X). 2. Prove that the subset

### CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL. Paul Vojta. University of California, Berkeley. 18 February 1998

CHAPTER 0 PRELIMINARY MATERIAL Paul Vojta University of California, Berkeley 18 February 1998 This chapter gives some preliminary material on number theory and algebraic geometry. Section 1 gives basic

### Motivic integration on Artin n-stacks

Motivic integration on Artin n-stacks Chetan Balwe Nov 13,2009 1 / 48 Prestacks (This treatment of stacks is due to B. Toën and G. Vezzosi.) Let S be a fixed base scheme. Let (Aff /S) be the category of

### 6. Lecture cdh and Nisnevich topologies. These are Grothendieck topologies which play an important role in Suslin-Voevodsky s approach to not

6. Lecture 6 6.1. cdh and Nisnevich topologies. These are Grothendieck topologies which play an important role in Suslin-Voevodsky s approach to not only motivic cohomology, but also to Morel-Voevodsky

### BEZOUT S THEOREM CHRISTIAN KLEVDAL

BEZOUT S THEOREM CHRISTIAN KLEVDAL A weaker version of Bézout s theorem states that if C, D are projective plane curves of degrees c and d that intersect transversally, then C D = cd. The goal of this

### Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013

18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #18 11/07/2013 As usual, all the rings we consider are commutative rings with an identity element. 18.1 Regular local rings Consider a local

### Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

### Section Higher Direct Images of Sheaves

Section 3.8 - Higher Direct Images of Sheaves Daniel Murfet October 5, 2006 In this note we study the higher direct image functors R i f ( ) and the higher coinverse image functors R i f! ( ) which will

### Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory

Elementary (ha-ha) Aspects of Topos Theory Matt Booth June 3, 2016 Contents 1 Sheaves on topological spaces 1 1.1 Presheaves on spaces......................... 1 1.2 Digression on pointless topology..................

### Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7)

Homology and Cohomology of Stacks (Lecture 7) February 19, 2014 In this course, we will need to discuss the l-adic homology and cohomology of algebro-geometric objects of a more general nature than algebraic

### n P say, then (X A Y ) P

COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA 35 7.2. The Picard group of a ring. Definition. A line bundle over a ring A is a finitely generated projective A-module such that the rank function Spec A N is constant with value 1.

### π X : X Y X and π Y : X Y Y

Math 6130 Notes. Fall 2002. 6. Hausdorffness and Compactness. We would like to be able to say that all quasi-projective varieties are Hausdorff and that projective varieties are the only compact varieties.

### APPENDIX 2: AN INTRODUCTION TO ÉTALE COHOMOLOGY AND THE BRAUER GROUP

APPENDIX 2: AN INTRODUCTION TO ÉTALE COHOMOLOGY AND THE BRAUER GROUP In this appendix we review some basic facts about étale cohomology, give the definition of the (cohomological) Brauer group, and discuss

### 11. Dimension. 96 Andreas Gathmann

96 Andreas Gathmann 11. Dimension We have already met several situations in this course in which it seemed to be desirable to have a notion of dimension (of a variety, or more generally of a ring): for

### Basic results on Grothendieck Duality

Basic results on Grothendieck Duality Joseph Lipman 1 Purdue University Department of Mathematics lipman@math.purdue.edu http://www.math.purdue.edu/ lipman November 2007 1 Supported in part by NSA Grant

### Université Paris Sud XI Orsay THE LOCAL FLATTENING THEOREM. Master 2 Memoire by Christopher M. Evans. Advisor: Prof. Joël Merker

Université Paris Sud XI Orsay THE LOCAL FLATTENING THEOREM Master 2 Memoire by Christopher M. Evans Advisor: Prof. Joël Merker August 2013 Table of Contents Introduction iii Chapter 1 Complex Spaces 1

### Adic Spaces. Torsten Wedhorn. June 19, 2012

Adic Spaces Torsten Wedhorn June 19, 2012 This script is highly preliminary and unfinished. It is online only to give the audience of our lecture easy access to it. Therefore usage is at your own risk.

### CHAPTER 1. Étale cohomology

CHAPTER 1 Étale cohomology This chapter summarizes the theory of the étale topology on schemes, culminating in the results on l-adic cohomology that are needed in the construction of Galois representations

### Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra

Course 311: Michaelmas Term 2005 Part III: Topics in Commutative Algebra D. R. Wilkins Contents 3 Topics in Commutative Algebra 2 3.1 Rings and Fields......................... 2 3.2 Ideals...............................

### Notes on p-divisible Groups

Notes on p-divisible Groups March 24, 2006 This is a note for the talk in STAGE in MIT. The content is basically following the paper [T]. 1 Preliminaries and Notations Notation 1.1. Let R be a complete

### Chern classes à la Grothendieck

Chern classes à la Grothendieck Theo Raedschelders October 16, 2014 Abstract In this note we introduce Chern classes based on Grothendieck s 1958 paper [4]. His approach is completely formal and he deduces

### Some remarks on Frobenius and Lefschetz in étale cohomology

Some remarks on obenius and Lefschetz in étale cohomology Gabriel Chênevert January 5, 2004 In this lecture I will discuss some more or less related issues revolving around the main idea relating (étale)

### GLUING SCHEMES AND A SCHEME WITHOUT CLOSED POINTS

GLUING SCHEMES AND A SCHEME WITHOUT CLOSED POINTS KARL SCHWEDE Abstract. We first construct and give basic properties of the fibered coproduct in the category of ringed spaces. We then look at some special

### PART II.1. IND-COHERENT SHEAVES ON SCHEMES

PART II.1. IND-COHERENT SHEAVES ON SCHEMES Contents Introduction 1 1. Ind-coherent sheaves on a scheme 2 1.1. Definition of the category 2 1.2. t-structure 3 2. The direct image functor 4 2.1. Direct image

### Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings

Formal power series rings, inverse limits, and I-adic completions of rings Formal semigroup rings and formal power series rings We next want to explore the notion of a (formal) power series ring in finitely

### ALGEBRAIC GROUPS JEROEN SIJSLING

ALGEBRAIC GROUPS JEROEN SIJSLING The goal of these notes is to introduce and motivate some notions from the theory of group schemes. For the sake of simplicity, we restrict to algebraic groups (as defined