PARETO OPTIMAL SENSITIVITY BOUNDS
|
|
- Kerry Butler
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ARETO OTIMA SENSITIVITY OUNDS FOR A STRONGY INTERACTING -OO RAZING TEMERATURE CONTRO SYSTEM Eduard Eitelberg ORT raude College, Karmiel, Israel & University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa Eitelberg@braude.ac.il Alan de Freitas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, elo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, razil alandefreitas@gmail.com Abstract: In the industry, feedback loops are designed, or tuned, individually whereby a loop design/tuning depends on the characteristics and closure of the other loops. In this paper, the nature of areto optimal sensitivity bounds is investigated for a -loop brazing temperature control system. It is found that there are a few attractive small ranges of sensitivity pairings on the areto optimality bound some of which sacrifice performance in one loop for significant improvement in the other loop. Keywords: ristol gain, relative gain, multi-loop feedback. Introduction For many good reasons, industrial plants are controlled by multiple singleinput-single-output (SISO) feedback loops. The design, or tuning, of these SISO loops is carried out sequentially both in practice and in such theoretical methods as the Quantitative Feedback Theory (QFT) of the late Isaac Horowitz (993). In case of plant interaction, an individual loop design/tuning depends on the closure of the other loops the loop designs interact too. Close to 50 years ago, Edgar H. ristol of Foxboro Company asked: How is the measured transfer function between a given manipulated variable [u j ] and a given controlled variable [y i ] affected by the complete control of all other controlled variables in a general square multivariable system? [ristol, 966] He observed that industry has often found it desirable to control the multivariable process as if it were made up of isolated single variable processes. This is still the practically well motivated case and will be followed presently. The essential components of interest of a multivariable regulation structure are shown in Figure.. Figure.: Multi-loop regulation: multivariable regulation with diagonal controller G. The plant is square. File: aretorazinginteraction.doc Dr. Ed. Eitelberg
2 ARETO OTIMA SENSITIVITY OUNDS There are n feedback loops around the plant (s) through the n scalar regulators G i (s). In the context of loop design, in isolation from tracking or regulating requirements, the sensor and actuator transfer functions may be allocated to or to G, whichever is more convenient. The scalar regulators are the diagonal elements of G(s), with all off-diagonal elements of G being zero. It is convenient to define the n loop transfer functions through the diagonal elements of the plant as G, i, n (.) i i ii, For any i, this is the loop transfer function when all other loops are open. Such is the case in sequential loop closure when loop number i is the first one to be tuned. Generally however, when any number (or all) of the other loops are closed, then the loop i (s) through the regulator G i (s) is different from i. ristol suggested that this loop modification, or interaction, should be measured by the ratio of two gains representing first the process gain in an isolated loop and, second, the apparent process gain in that same loop when all other control loops are closed. [ristol, 966] Nevertheless, he did not strictly follow his eminently reasonable suggestion. Instead, he assumed that all the other loops are ideal in the sense that all the corresponding regulated variables y j (j i) are independent of u i. This ideal situation requires infinite loop gains with infinite bandwidth. In the QFT notation, the above apparent process gain is denoted by Qi (s). Following the suggestion of McAvoy (983), Eitelberg (006) uses the expression ristol gain i (s) to denote this ideal ratio i (s)/ Qi (s) and defines relative gain i (s) as the real ratio i (s)/ i (s) with the as designed loop transfer functions i (s) and i (s). Note that the ristol gains are properties of the plant and do not depend on the controllers, while relative gains generally do [see for example Eitelberg (006)]. Hence, there is a significant difference between the plant and loop interactions. Relative gains in systems. After output-input, or control authority, allocation, the two ristol gains are identical: The relative gains, however, are not necessarily equal: (.) ; ; with with Q Q (.) (s) leads automatically to (s) (s) independently of the design of (s) or (s) in eq. (.). ( jω) << is of little interest in feedback design as it should lead to swapping of the output-input allocation and the corresponding s jω >> jω changes ( ). Design problems are encountered when ( ) or when ( ) phase angle within the design bandwidth. ( jω) 0, in any relevant frequency range, indicates a strict load sharing system configuration see Eitelberg (999a). Generally, in systems i i when when Qj Qj j j > < and and j j > < (.3) That means the relative gains of a simply regulated system are independent of the other loop design particulars, except between and around the gain File: aretorazinginteraction.doc Dr. Ed. Eitelberg
3 ARETO OTIMA SENSITIVITY OUNDS cross-over frequencies of the other loop in the form of j and Qj. This is precisely the frequency range where not only the plant but also the loop designs interact. As a practical consideration, this loop design interaction is most difficult to deal with when both loop bandwidth ranges are overlapping. If however, one of the loops is, or can be made, significantly slower than the other then the following observations are apposite when the design is carried out in a single pass sequence. et and be the slow and fast loop respectively. The slow loop design (within its bandwidth) is independent of the design as long as bandwidth is sufficiently high. However the slow loop tuning does depend on whether the fast loop is closed or open the difference is characterised by the ristol gain. In case of high gain (jω) within the slow loop bandwidth, the slow loop should (generally but not necessarily always) be tuned first. This is a practical recommendation discovered in the context of load sharing control (Eitelberg, 999a). The fast loop design is independent of the slow loop or its closure near the Nyquist point, because and beyond the slow loop gain cross-over frequency. In the same higher frequency range, uncertainty comes only from and it is independent of any uncertainty in, and. It does not follow, that stability of the closed fast loop is necessarily independent of the slow loop closure. This question does not arise when the slow loop is closed before the tuning of the fast loop as recommended above and remains operational (out of limits) during all operating conditions and disturbances. Tuning the fast loop first, may lead to higher bandwidth and improved small signal regulation. However such regulated process is often inoperable during start-up, shutdown and under other large signal conditions, when the (conditionally stable) fast loop saturates, temporarily or permanently. Some more insight is gained from eq. (.) directly. Without restriction of generality, the controller G in loop number is being tuned. The loop transfer function is G + Q (.4) + The poles of this loop number are those of the controller G, the diagonal plant element, and some or all of the zeros of the first loop characteristic equation when the second loop is open. If, for example, is stable and an unconditionally stable closed loop system is desirable then + should have no right half-plane zeros. Furthermore, if the plant must remain stable when is (temporarily) saturated then + must have no right half-plane zeros. The zeros of this loop number are those of the controller G, the diagonal plant element, and some or all of the zeros of the ideal first loop characteristic equation when the second loop is open. If, for example, one wishes to have no additional bandwidth limitations beyond those of then + Q should have no right half-plane zeros. Within the first loop bandwidth, those zeros are (approximately) equal to zeros of. 3 I control for sensitivity minimisation. To paraphrase ristol s wording, after all those years, industry is still finding it desirable and satisfactory to control its plants with I or ID controllers. The ID controller adds to the loop transfer function some phase lead while the simpler I controller cannot do so. Not all loop designs benefit sufficiently from the additional phase lead and most industrial control loops use I control only. A I controller is characterised by the proportional gain k and the integral time T i in the following structure ( ω /T i ) ci File: aretorazinginteraction.doc 3 Dr. Ed. Eitelberg
4 G ARETO OTIMA SENSITIVITY OUNDS ω I + Tis s (3.) ( ) ( ) + ci s G s k k The sensitivity function for a closed-loop feedback system around a plant (s) is defined as S, + G (3.) The task of feedback design is to minimise the sensitivity in some (usually low) frequency range with a given upper bound M (usually somewhere around 3 to 6 d, near the gain and phase cross-over frequencies): ( jω) M, ω S (3.3) 4 Two-loop sensitivity minimization for a brazing furnace. A certain industrial brazing furnace temperature control structure was shown to be inoperable in Eitelberg (999b). The reason advanced at the time was the large steady state ristol gain of 6. A solution to the problem was designed and successfully implemented then without understanding or using the dynamic ristol or relative gains. It is appropriate to revisit this problem presently with the new understanding. The non-linear plant could be approximated by 8. T s 5.9 d Td s e e + T s + T s (4.) 7.6 Td s 5.9 Td s e e + T s + T s All Tij are about 0 minutes and both loop delays Tdj are assumed here equal to 0.5 min. All loops have bandwidth limitations, usually due to a right half-plane zero at or dead-time T d. The gain cross-over frequency is bound by β ω gc <, ωgc < (4.) T d These limitations are due to plant and not often modified by controller design. In specific situations, they can be modified (see the above possibility of designing the faster loop first), however there are good engineering reasons to advise against such designs. Here both loop bandwidths are limited by ω < 0.5 rad/min rad/min. gc If not only unconditional stability, but also unconditional stability margins are required, the low frequency loop magnitude slope should be approximately 30 d/dec. Accordingly, a well-designed sensitivity at, say two decades below gain crossover, should be about 60 d. A simple I control structure does not permit achievement of the best theoretical performance. Hence one should not expect 60 d sensitivity at 0.0 rad/min, perhaps more realistically at around 0.0 rad/min. The inverse of the ristol gain is here ( + Ts )( + Ts) ( + T s)( + T s) (4.3) This example indicates why highly interacting plants ( 6 at low frequency) are likely to have non-minimum phase-lag problems too. T and T only need to be a few per cent greater than T and T to push one or both zeros of transmission zeros of into the right half-plane. All parameters of this plant vary much more than a few per cent when furnace loading and other operating conditions change. For the purposes of the present investigation, it is assumed that T T File: aretorazinginteraction.doc 4 Dr. Ed. Eitelberg
5 ARETO OTIMA SENSITIVITY OUNDS T 0 min and T is varied. When also T 0 min then 6. Otherwise is frequency-dependent: ( + Ts ) ( + 0s) ( 0.938T ) ( + 0s) s Its interaction related zero is at (4.4) 0.06 β i (4.5) 0.938T 0 It is in the right half-plane for T >.33. If the ristol number, then there is no loop design interaction and the two sensitivities are completely independent they are minimised independently. If, however,, then loop designs interact. Accordingly, the achievable minimum value of, say, S depends on the chosen design of. It stands to reason that there are many loop designs that jω + jω jω + jω lead to areto optimal sensitivity pairs ( ) ( ) and ( ) ( ) S S meaning that one cannot reduce S without increasing S and vice versa. Here, a qualitative analysis is developed for what can be expected under some realistic conditions. There are two distinct mechanisms whereby interaction will reduce the achievable performance of about 60 d at ωs 0. 0rad/min one is due to the interaction magnitude and the other is due to the interaction induced right halfplane zeros β i. If ω S << ωgc of Q and does not introduce any right half-plane zeros β i, then S ( jωs ) will be increased by ( j S ) d ω. Such is the case with T 0. et ω S 0. 0 then the low-frequency sensitivity increases at most by a factor of 6 4 d because the loop gain is reduced by this amount. esser change is obtained in a loop if the other loop s bandwidth is near or below the test frequency at ω 0.0. S If however, introduces a right half-plane zero β i < ω gc of Q then β i becomes the new bandwidth limitation for. If ω S << β i then ωs S ( jωs ) d > 30log0. To this one needs to add up to 4 d from the ristol gain β i magnitude. For T.4 we get from eq. (4.5) β i and for T 3 we get β i The corresponding loop bandwidths are limited to ω gci < 0. 4 and to ω gci < 0.0 respectively. The approximate lower bounds for sensitivity at ω S are 30log 0 48 d and 30log 0 9 d respectively. Due to the limited complexity of the used I controllers, more realistic numbers would be something like 4 d and 3 d respectively. To the first number one should add up to 4 d depending on the other loop bandwidth. The test frequency ω S 0. 0 is so close to the gain cross-over frequency in the second case (T 3), that the sensitivity should not be expected to change much from the 3 d above. This qualitative analysis is confirmed in Figure 4. that displays the areto lower bounds of S ( j0.0 ) d and S ( j0.0 ) d for the indicated three choices of T. The best performance of 60 d in either loop is achieved when the other loop is open (the corresponding S 0 d) this is independent of the T -value. When the other loop is gradually closed and its performance improves from 0 d to about 0 d, the excellent performance worsens from 60 d to about 40 d. It is not wholly the above predicted 4 d increase but close. This is clearly visible for T 0 min and.4 min. The case of T.4 differs from that of T 0 by the introduction of β i Hence, when the other loop s bandwidth is sufficiently high, the first loop s performance degrades to about 7 d. This confirms the above calculated expectation of 4 d + 4 d 8 d. The case of T 3 is dominated by the File: aretorazinginteraction.doc 5 Dr. Ed. Eitelberg
6 ARETO OTIMA SENSITIVITY OUNDS introduction of the interaction zero at β i Therefore, neither loop performs better than about 4 d, except when both loops have similar bandwidths and performances up to about d. S ( ) d and ( ) d In the case of T 0 min, the best performance is around j S j simultaneously. It is assumed that noone wants one of the two loops to be open! 0 S d -0 T3-0 T T S d Figure 4.: areto optimality bounds for T 0 min, T.4 min, and T 3 min. File: aretorazinginteraction.doc 6 Dr. Ed. Eitelberg
7 ARETO OTIMA SENSITIVITY OUNDS 3.5 k/ti 3.5 T0.5 T T k/ti Figure 4.: areto optimal low-frequency controller gains (k/ti) for T 0 min, T.4 min, and T 3 min. In the case of T.4 min however, there are two obvious choices of best S j0.0 40, S ( j0.0) 7d and the performance. The one is around ( ) d other is around S ( j0.0) 7d, S ( j0.0) 39d solution around S ( j0.0) 46d, S ( j0.0) 6d open loop number.. One could argue about the, but this means an almost If one wants any significant performance at ω 0. 0, in the case of T 3 S j0.0 j min, the best performance is around S ( ) 48d, ( j0.0) 3d around S ( j0.0) 4d, ( ) d S or S. If comparatively moderate performance is acceptable and it is required in both loops simultaneously then it will be about d. Figures 4. and 4. were generated as follows. First, million random combinations of k, ω ci, k, and ω ci were generated in a hyper-cube [0, 5] 4. This choice of parameter sub-space is reasonable because any k-values close to and above 5 lead to unstable closed-loop system and any Ti-values below /5 lead to instability. Every single combination of the four controller parameters defines the feedback system fully. Second, every one of the million systems from above was checked for stability and only those combinations of k, ω ci, k, and ω ci that resulted in a stable system, were admitted. The rest were rejected. Third, for every one of the above admitted combinations of k, ω ci, k, and ω ci, the pair of frequency responses S ( jω), S( jω) was calculated. Only those combinations of k, ω ci, k, and ω ci for which both S( jω) and S( jω) satisfied the sensitivity bound in eq. (3.3) with M 6 d, were admitted. The rest were rejected. File: aretorazinginteraction.doc 7 Dr. Ed. Eitelberg
8 ARETO OTIMA SENSITIVITY OUNDS Fourth, for the remaining admitted combinations of k, ω ci, k, and ω ci the S j.0, S 0.0, were recorded. Then a simple 0 j low frequency sensitivity pairs, ( ) ( ) areto dominance relation (A dominates if A is better than for all objectives) as implemented in [7] was applied to the low-frequency sensitivities to obtain the fronts. 3 Conclusion. There are two distinct mechanisms whereby interaction will reduce the achievable performance of two-loop feedback systems. The one is due to the interaction magnitude and the other is due to the interaction induced right halfplane zeros β. i In the shown example of brazing temperature control, a lack of interaction induced right half-plane zeros permits achievement of similar performance in both loops. If however, the interaction introduces a significant right half-plane zero, then it becomes attractive to sacrifice performance in one loop for the sake of performance in the other loop. References.. ristol, Edgar, H. (966): On a New Measure of Interaction for Multivariable rocess Control. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC (966), pp Eitelberg, Ed. (999a): oad Sharing Control. NOY ress, Durban. 3. Eitelberg, Ed. (999b): oad sharing in a multivariable temperature control system. Control Engineering ractice, Vol. 7, No., pp Eitelberg, Ed. (006): On multi-loop interaction and relative and ristol gains. ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control. Dec. 006, Vol. 8, pp Horowitz, Isaac (993): Quantitative Feedback Design Theory (QFT). oulder, QFT ublications. 6. McAvoy, J. Thomas (983): Interaction Analysis: rinciples and Applications. Instrument Society of America, Research Triangle ark File: aretorazinginteraction.doc 8 Dr. Ed. Eitelberg
Dynamic Modeling, Simulation and Control of MIMO Systems
Dynamic Modeling, Simulation and Control of MIMO Systems M.Bharathi, C.Selvakumar HOD, Department of Electronics And Instrumentation, Bharath University Chennai 600073, India Prof & Head, St.Joseph s College
More informationThe loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)
Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2). Loop shaping 2. Performance limitations The loop shaping paradigm. Estimate performance and robustness of the feedback system from the loop transfer L(jω)
More informationQFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
45-E-PSS-75 QFT Framework for Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Seyyed Mohammad Mahdi Alavi, Roozbeh Izadi-Zamanabadi Department of Control Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark Correspondence
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 Open-Loop Process The study of dynamics was limited to open-loop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More information6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson
Bode Obstacle Course is one technique for doing compensation, or designing a feedback system to make the closed-loop behavior what we want it to be. To review: - G c (s) G(s) H(s) you are here! plant For
More informationToday (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
More informationChapter 2. Classical Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 2 Classical Control System Design Overview Ch. 2. 2. Classical control system design Introduction Introduction Steady-state Steady-state errors errors Type Type k k systems systems Integral Integral
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-059-00 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationFREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequency-response methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationControl Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
More informationSolutions for Tutorial 10 Stability Analysis
Solutions for Tutorial 1 Stability Analysis 1.1 In this question, you will analyze the series of three isothermal CSTR s show in Figure 1.1. The model for each reactor is the same at presented in Textbook
More informationStability of CL System
Stability of CL System Consider an open loop stable system that becomes unstable with large gain: At the point of instability, K( j) G( j) = 1 0dB K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) =± 180 o 180 o Closed
More informationIterative Controller Tuning Using Bode s Integrals
Iterative Controller Tuning Using Bode s Integrals A. Karimi, D. Garcia and R. Longchamp Laboratoire d automatique, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 05 Lausanne, Switzerland. email: alireza.karimi@epfl.ch
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationRobust and Optimal Control, Spring A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization
Robust and Optimal Control, Spring 2015 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) A: SISO Feedback Control A.1 Internal Stability and Youla Parameterization A.2 Sensitivity and Feedback Performance A.3
More informationA Simple PID Control Design for Systems with Time Delay
Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation CODEN:LUTEDX/(TEIE-7266)/1-16/(2017) A Simple PID Control Design for Systems with Time Delay Mats Lilja Division of Industrial Electrical Engineering and
More informationLecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
More information9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design
9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design In some feedback schemes we have additional degrees-offreedom outside the feedback path. For example, feed forwarding known disturbance signals or reference signals. In
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #11 Wednesday, January 28, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Relative Stability: Stability
More informationRELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS. Ryszard Gessing
RELAY CONTROL WITH PARALLEL COMPENSATOR FOR NONMINIMUM PHASE PLANTS Ryszard Gessing Politechnika Śl aska Instytut Automatyki, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland, fax: +4832 372127, email: gessing@ia.gliwice.edu.pl
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationDesign and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes
Design and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes Emmanuel Edet Technology and Innovation Centre University of Strathclyde 99 George Street Glasgow, United Kingdom emmanuel.edet@strath.ac.uk
More informationStructured Uncertainty and Robust Performance
Structured Uncertainty and Robust Performance ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Devron Profile Control Solutions Outline Structured uncertainty: motivating example. Structured
More informationIMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration
Computers and Chemical Engineering 28 (2004) 281 290 IMC based automatic tuning method for PID controllers in a Smith predictor configuration Ibrahim Kaya Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
More informationWind Turbine Control
Wind Turbine Control W. E. Leithead University of Strathclyde, Glasgow Supergen Student Workshop 1 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Control Basics 3. General Control Objectives 4. Constant Speed Pitch Regulated
More informationMulti-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
Multi-Input Multi-output (MIMO) Processes CBE495 LECTURE III CONTROL OF MULTI INPUT MULTI OUTPUT PROCESSES Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University
More informationECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design
ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design A Brief Tutorial on Control Design Instructor: Professor John T. Wen TA: Ben Potsaid http://www.cat.rpi.edu/~wen/ecse4962s04/ Don t Wait Until The Last Minute! You got
More informationFrequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability
Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods
More informationControl of Electromechanical Systems
Control of Electromechanical Systems November 3, 27 Exercise Consider the feedback control scheme of the motor speed ω in Fig., where the torque actuation includes a time constant τ A =. s and a disturbance
More informationFall 線性系統 Linear Systems. Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian. NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08
Fall 2007 線性系統 Linear Systems Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08 Materials used in these lecture notes are adopted from Linear System Theory & Design, 3rd.
More informationControl Lab. Thermal Plant. Chriss Grimholt
Control Lab Thermal Plant Chriss Grimholt Process System Engineering Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology October 3, 23 C. Grimholt (NTNU) Thermal Plant October
More informationCONTROL OF MULTIVARIABLE PROCESSES
Process plants ( or complex experiments) have many variables that must be controlled. The engineer must. Provide the needed sensors 2. Provide adequate manipulated variables 3. Decide how the CVs and MVs
More informationAnalysis of Discrete-Time Systems
TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 1 Analysis of Discrete-Time Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin Discrete-Time
More informationRobust Control. 2nd class. Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room
Robust Control Spring, 2018 Instructor: Prof. Masayuki Fujita (S5-303B) 2nd class Tue., 17th April, 2018, 10:45~12:15, S423 Lecture Room 2. Nominal Performance 2.1 Weighted Sensitivity [SP05, Sec. 2.8,
More informationUncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems
Uncertainty and Robustness for SISO Systems ELEC 571L Robust Multivariable Control prepared by: Greg Stewart Outline Nature of uncertainty (models and signals). Physical sources of model uncertainty. Mathematical
More informationReturn Difference Function and Closed-Loop Roots Single-Input/Single-Output Control Systems
Spectral Properties of Linear- Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 2018! Stability margins of single-input/singleoutput (SISO) systems! Characterizations
More informationInput-output Controllability Analysis
Input-output Controllability Analysis Idea: Find out how well the process can be controlled - without having to design a specific controller Note: Some processes are impossible to control Reference: S.
More informationLoop shaping exercise
Loop shaping exercise Excerpt 1 from Controlli Automatici - Esercizi di Sintesi, L. Lanari, G. Oriolo, EUROMA - La Goliardica, 1997. It s a generic book with some typical problems in control, not a collection
More informationCYBER EXPLORATION LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
CYBER EXPLORATION LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS 1 2 Cyber Exploration oratory Experiments Chapter 2 Experiment 1 Objectives To learn to use MATLAB to: (1) generate polynomial, (2) manipulate polynomials, (3)
More informationLecture 6. Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems. Eugenio Schuster.
Lecture 6 Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 6 p. 1/73 6.1 General
More informationHere represents the impulse (or delta) function. is an diagonal matrix of intensities, and is an diagonal matrix of intensities.
19 KALMAN FILTER 19.1 Introduction In the previous section, we derived the linear quadratic regulator as an optimal solution for the fullstate feedback control problem. The inherent assumption was that
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 3, Part 2: Introduction to Affine Parametrisation School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 3, Part 2: Affine Parametrisation p. 1/29 Outline
More informationInternal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems
Internal Model Control of A Class of Continuous Linear Underactuated Systems Asma Mezzi Tunis El Manar University, Automatic Control Research Laboratory, LA.R.A, National Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT),
More informationReview: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic: basic properties and benefits of feedback control
Plan of the Lecture Review: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic: basic properties and benefits of feedback control Goal: understand the difference between open-loop and closed-loop (feedback)
More informationHomework 7 - Solutions
Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationCascade Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR)
Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 213, 1 (4): 16-23, ISSN: 2328-4595 (PRINT), ISSN: 2328-469 (ONLINE) Research Article Cascade Control of a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) 16 A. O. Ahmed
More informationLinear Control Systems
Linear Control Systems Project session 3: Design in state-space 6 th October 2017 Kathleen Coutisse kathleen.coutisse@student.ulg.ac.be 1 Content 1. Closed loop system 2. State feedback 3. Observer 4.
More informationPlan of the Lecture. Review: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic: basic properties and benefits of feedback control
Plan of the Lecture Review: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic: basic properties and benefits of feedback control Plan of the Lecture Review: stability; Routh Hurwitz criterion Today s topic:
More informationCHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER
114 CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER 5.1 INTRODUCTION Robust control is a branch of control theory that explicitly deals with uncertainty in its approach to controller design. It also refers
More informationDesign of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process
Design of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process D.Angeline Vijula #, Dr.N.Devarajan * # Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering Sri Ramakrishna
More informationPerformance of an Adaptive Algorithm for Sinusoidal Disturbance Rejection in High Noise
Performance of an Adaptive Algorithm for Sinusoidal Disturbance Rejection in High Noise MarcBodson Department of Electrical Engineering University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 842, U.S.A. (8) 58 859 bodson@ee.utah.edu
More informationDESIGN OF AN ON-LINE TITRATOR FOR NONLINEAR ph CONTROL
DESIGN OF AN ON-LINE TITRATOR FOR NONLINEAR CONTROL Alex D. Kalafatis Liuping Wang William R. Cluett AspenTech, Toronto, Canada School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne,
More informationCompensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus
1 Compensator Design to Improve Transient Performance Using Root Locus Prof. Guy Beale Electrical and Computer Engineering Department George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Correspondence concerning
More informationAnalysis of Discrete-Time Systems
TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems TU Berlin Discrete-Time Control Systems 2 Stability Definitions We define stability first with respect to changes in the initial conditions Analysis of Discrete-Time
More informationObserver Based Friction Cancellation in Mechanical Systems
2014 14th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2014) Oct. 22 25, 2014 in KINTEX, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Observer Based Friction Cancellation in Mechanical Systems Caner Odabaş
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 15, 2017 Control Systems I (151-0591-00L) Prof Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 44 Number of Points: 52 Permitted aids: Important:
More informationLaboratory 2: Motion in One Dimension: Velocity
Phys 131L Fall 010 Laboratory : Motion in One Dimension: One of the goals of classical mechanics is to determine the position of an object as time passes. A useful quantity in this context is the object
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #15 Friday, February 6, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL-229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca (3) Cohen-Coon Reaction Curve Method
More informationFEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS
271 FEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON H ANALYSIS Eduardo J. Adam * and Jacinto L. Marchetti Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (Universidad Nacional del Litoral - CONICET)
More informationCONTROL MODE SETTINGS. The quality of control obtained from a particular system depends largely on the adj ustments made to the various mode
Instrumentation & Control - Course 136 CONTROL MODE SETTINGS The quality of control obtained from a particular system depends largely on the adj ustments made to the various mode settings. Many control
More informationLet the plant and controller be described as:-
Summary of Fundamental Limitations in Feedback Design (LTI SISO Systems) From Chapter 6 of A FIRST GRADUATE COURSE IN FEEDBACK CONTROL By J. S. Freudenberg (Winter 2008) Prepared by: Hammad Munawar (Institute
More information(Continued on next page)
(Continued on next page) 18.2 Roots of Stability Nyquist Criterion 87 e(s) 1 S(s) = =, r(s) 1 + P (s)c(s) where P (s) represents the plant transfer function, and C(s) the compensator. The closedloop characteristic
More informationCHAPTER 3 TUNING METHODS OF CONTROLLER
57 CHAPTER 3 TUNING METHODS OF CONTROLLER 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter deals with a simple method of designing PI and PID controllers for first order plus time delay with integrator systems (FOPTDI).
More informationCBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using State-space Methods. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CBE507 LECTURE III Controller Design Using State-space Methods Professor Dae Ryook Yang Fall 2013 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering Korea University Korea University III -1 Overview States What
More informationGoodwin, Graebe, Salgado, Prentice Hall Chapter 11. Chapter 11. Dealing with Constraints
Chapter 11 Dealing with Constraints Topics to be covered An ubiquitous problem in control is that all real actuators have limited authority. This implies that they are constrained in amplitude and/or rate
More informationCHBE320 LECTURE XI CONTROLLER DESIGN AND PID CONTOLLER TUNING. Professor Dae Ryook Yang
CHBE320 LECTURE XI CONTROLLER DESIGN AND PID CONTOLLER TUNING Professor Dae Ryook Yang Spring 2018 Dept. of Chemical and Biological Engineering 11-1 Road Map of the Lecture XI Controller Design and PID
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationActive Control? Contact : Website : Teaching
Active Control? Contact : bmokrani@ulb.ac.be Website : http://scmero.ulb.ac.be Teaching Active Control? Disturbances System Measurement Control Controler. Regulator.,,, Aims of an Active Control Disturbances
More informationImprove Performance of Multivariable Robust Control in Boiler System
Canadian Journal on Automation, Control & Intelligent Systems Vol. No. 4, June Improve Performance of Multivariable Robust Control in Boiler System Mehdi Parsa, Ali Vahidian Kamyad and M. Bagher Naghibi
More information1 Loop Control. 1.1 Open-loop. ISS0065 Control Instrumentation
Lecture 4 ISS0065 Control Instrumentation 1 Loop Control System has a continuous signal (analog) basic notions: open-loop control, close-loop control. 1.1 Open-loop Open-loop / avatud süsteem / открытая
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 5: Uncertainty and Robustness in SISO Systems [Ch.7-(8)] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 5:Uncertainty and Robustness () FEL3210 MIMO
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #19 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Stengel Chapter 6 Question: how well do the large gain and phase margins discussed for LQR map over to DOFB using LQR and LQE (called LQG)? Fall 2010 16.30/31 19
More informationTask 1 (24%): PID-control, the SIMC method
Final Exam Course SCE1106 Control theory with implementation (theory part) Wednesday December 18, 2014 kl. 9.00-12.00 SKIP THIS PAGE AND REPLACE WITH STANDARD EXAM FRONT PAGE IN WORD FILE December 16,
More informationEECE 460. Decentralized Control of MIMO Systems. Guy A. Dumont. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia
EECE 460 Decentralized Control of MIMO Systems Guy A. Dumont Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia January 2011 Guy A. Dumont (UBC EECE) EECE 460 - Decentralized
More informationDesign of Measurement Noise Filters for PID Control
Preprints of the 9th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control Design of Measurement Noise Filters for D Control Vanessa R. Segovia Tore Hägglund Karl J. Åström Department of Automatic
More informationPositioning Servo Design Example
Positioning Servo Design Example 1 Goal. The goal in this design example is to design a control system that will be used in a pick-and-place robot to move the link of a robot between two positions. Usually
More informationSynthesis of Controllers for Non-minimum Phase and Unstable Systems Using Non-sequential MIMO Quantitative Feedback Theory
Synthesis of Controllers for Non-minimum Phase and Unstable Systems Using Non-sequential MIMO Quantitative Feedback Theory Chen-yang Lan Murray L Kerr Suhada Jayasuriya * Graduate Student Graduate Student
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method. Readings: Jacopo Tani. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 7: Feedback and the Root Locus method Readings: Jacopo Tani Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 2, 2018 J. Tani, E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 7:
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationRobust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization
Robust fixed-order H Controller Design for Spectral Models by Convex Optimization Alireza Karimi, Gorka Galdos and Roland Longchamp Abstract A new approach for robust fixed-order H controller design by
More informationRobust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Using Coefficient Diagram Method
International Journal of Electrical Engineering. ISSN 0974-2158 Volume 7, Number 2 (2014), pp. 257-270 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
More informationRobust QFT-based PI controller for a feedforward control scheme
Integral-Derivative Control, Ghent, Belgium, May 9-11, 218 ThAT4.4 Robust QFT-based PI controller for a feedforward control scheme Ángeles Hoyo José Carlos Moreno José Luis Guzmán Tore Hägglund Dep. of
More informationChapter 9: Controller design
Chapter 9. Controller Design 9.1. Introduction 9.2. Effect of negative feedback on the network transfer functions 9.2.1. Feedback reduces the transfer function from disturbances to the output 9.2.2. Feedback
More informationStability of Feedback Control Systems: Absolute and Relative
Stability of Feedback Control Systems: Absolute and Relative Dr. Kevin Craig Greenheck Chair in Engineering Design & Professor of Mechanical Engineering Marquette University Stability: Absolute and Relative
More informationGAIN SCHEDULING CONTROL WITH MULTI-LOOP PID FOR 2- DOF ARM ROBOT TRAJECTORY CONTROL
GAIN SCHEDULING CONTROL WITH MULTI-LOOP PID FOR 2- DOF ARM ROBOT TRAJECTORY CONTROL 1 KHALED M. HELAL, 2 MOSTAFA R.A. ATIA, 3 MOHAMED I. ABU EL-SEBAH 1, 2 Mechanical Engineering Department ARAB ACADEMY
More informationLecture 12. Upcoming labs: Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30
289 Upcoming labs: Lecture 12 Lab 20: Internal model control (finish up) Lab 22: Force or Torque control experiments [Integrative] (2-3 sessions) Final Exam on 12/21/2015 (Monday)10:30-12:30 Today: Recap
More informationExam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time
Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (5-59-L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages
More informationProblem Set 4 Solution 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 4 Solution Problem 4. For the SISO feedback
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch. 2-3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationClosed-loop system 2/1/2016. Generally MIMO case. Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure. (2 DOF structure) The closed loop equations become
Closed-loop system enerally MIMO case Two-degrees-of-freedom (2 DOF) control structure (2 DOF structure) 2 The closed loop equations become solving for z gives where is the closed loop transfer function
More informationAndrea Zanchettin Automatic Control AUTOMATIC CONTROL. Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, Linear systems (frequency domain)
1 AUTOMATIC CONTROL Andrea M. Zanchettin, PhD Spring Semester, 2018 Linear systems (frequency domain) 2 Motivations Consider an LTI system Thanks to the Lagrange s formula we can compute the motion of
More informationControl Systems. EC / EE / IN. For
Control Systems For EC / EE / IN By www.thegateacademy.com Syllabus Syllabus for Control Systems Basic Control System Components; Block Diagrammatic Description, Reduction of Block Diagrams. Open Loop
More informationH CONTROL AND SLIDING MODE CONTROL OF MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM
333 Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 333-340, September 2002 H CONTROL AND SLIDING MODE CONTROL OF MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEM Jing-Chung Shen ABSTRACT In this paper, H disturbance attenuation
More informationCONTROL SYSTEMS, ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION - Vol. VIII - Design Techniques in the Frequency Domain - Edmunds, J.M. and Munro, N.
DESIGN TECHNIQUES IN THE FREQUENCY DOMAIN Edmunds, Control Systems Center, UMIST, UK Keywords: Multivariable control, frequency response design, Nyquist, scaling, diagonal dominance Contents 1. Frequency
More informationImproved Identification and Control of 2-by-2 MIMO System using Relay Feedback
CEAI, Vol.17, No.4 pp. 23-32, 2015 Printed in Romania Improved Identification and Control of 2-by-2 MIMO System using Relay Feedback D.Kalpana, T.Thyagarajan, R.Thenral Department of Instrumentation Engineering,
More informationLecture 5 Classical Control Overview III. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore
Lecture 5 Classical Control Overview III Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore A Fundamental Problem in Control Systems Poles of open
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY
Open-Loop controller An Open-Loop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, non-linear dynamics and parameter
More information