Review. p q ~p v q Contrapositive: ~q ~p Inverse: ~p ~q Converse: q p
|
|
|
- Abraham Foster
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ~ v Contraositive: ~ ~ Inverse: ~ ~ Converse: Å Review ( Ú ) Ù ~( Ù ) ~( Ù ) ~ Ú ~ ~( Ú ) ~ Ù ~ is sufficient for is necessary for ~ ~ 1
2 Valid and Invalid Arguments CS 231 Dianna Xu 2
3 Associative Law: (Ù)Ùr Ù(Ùr) (Ú)Úr Ú(Úr) Distributive Law: Review Ù(Úr) (Ù)Ú(Ùr) Ú(Ùr) (Ú)Ù(Úr) Absortion Law: Ú ( Ù ) Ù ( Ú ) 3
4 Definitions An argument is a seuence of statements (statement forms). All statements in an argument excet for the last one, are called remises. (assumtions, hyotheses) The final statement is the conclusion. A valid argument means the conclusion is true if the remises are all true, with all combinations of variable truth values. 4
5 Examles All Greeks are human and all humans are mortal; therefore, all Greeks are mortal. Some men are athletes and some athletes are rich; therefore, some men are rich. Some men are swimmers and some swimmers are fish; therefore, some men are fish. 5
6 Modus Ponens \ 6
7 Modus Ponens examle Assume you are given the following two statements: you are in this class If you are in this class, you are a student Let = you are in this class Let = you are a student \ By Modus Ponens, you can conclude that you are a student. 7
8 Modus Ponens Consider ( Ù ( )) Ù( ) (Ù( )) T T T T T T F F F T F T T F T F F T F T \ 8
9 Modus Tollens Assume that we know: ~ and Recall that ~ ~ Thus, we know ~ and ~ ~ We can conclude ~ ~ ~ 9
10 Modus Tollens examle Assume you are given the following two statements: you are not a student if you are in this class, you are a student Let = you are in this class Let = you are a student ~ ~ By Modus Tollens, you can conclude that you are not in this class 10
11 Generalization & Secialization Generalization: If you know that is true, then Ú will ALWAYS be true \ Ú Secialization: If Ù is true, then will ALWAYS be true \ Ù 11
12 Examle of roof We have the hyotheses: r s t It is not sunny this afternoon and it is colder than yesterday We will go swimming only if it is sunny If we do not go swimming, then we will take a canoe tri If we take a canoe tri, then we will be home by sunset Does this imly that we will be home by sunset? ~ Ù r ~r s s t t 12
13 Examle of roof 1. ~ Ù 1 st hyothesis 2. ~ Secialization using ste 1 3. r 2 nd hyothesis 4. ~r Modus tollens using stes 2 & 3 5. ~r s 3 rd hyothesis 6. s Modus onens using stes 4 & 5 7. s t 4 th hyothesis 8. t Modus onens using stes 6 & 7 ~ Ù \ \ ~ 13
14 More rules of inference Conjunction: if and are true searately, then Ù is true \ Ù Elimination: If Ú is true, and is false, then must be true ~ ~ Transitivity: If is true, and r is true, then r must be true r \ r 14
15 Even more rules of inference Proof by division into cases: if at least one of or is true, then r must be true Contradiction rule: If ~ c is true, we can conclude (via the contra-ositive) Ú r r \ r ~ c Resolution: If Ú is true, and ~Úr is true, then Úr must be true Not in the textbook ~ r r 15
16 Examle of roof Given the hyotheses: If it does not rain or if it is not foggy, then the sailing race will be held and the lifesaving demonstration will go on If the sailing race is held, then the trohy will be awarded The trohy was not awarded Can you conclude: It rained? (~r Ú ~f) (s Ù l) s t ~t r 16
17 Examle of roof 1. ~t 3 rd hyothesis 2. s t 2 nd hyothesis 3. ~s Modus tollens using stes 1 & 2 4. (~rú~f) (sùl) 1 st hyothesis 5. ~(sùl) ~ (~rú~f) Contraositive of ste 4 6. (~sú~l) (rùf) DeMorgan s law and double negation law 7. ~sú~l Generalization using ste 3 8. rùf Modus onens using stes 6 & 7 9. r Secialization using ste 8 \ Ù \ Ú \ ~ ~ 17
18 Fallacy of the converse Modus Badus Fallacy of affirming the conclusion Consider the following: ~ ~ Is this true? \ Ù( ) (Ù( )) T T T T T T F F F T F T T T F F F T F T Not a valid rule! 18
19 Modus Badus examle Assume you are given the following two statements: you are a student If you are in this class, you are a student Let = you are in this class Let = you are a student \ It is clearly wrong to conclude that if you are a student, you must be in this class 19
20 Fallacy of the inverse Modus Badus Fallacy of denying the hyothesis Consider the following: Is this true? ~ ~ ~Ù( )) (~Ù( )) ~ T T T F T T F F F T F T T T F F F T T T Not a valid rule! 20
21 Modus Badus examle Assume you are given the following two statements: you are not in this class if you are in this class, you are a student Let = you are in this class Let = you are a student ~ ~ You CANNOT conclude that you are not a student just because you are not taking Discrete Math 21
[Ch 3, 4] Logic and Proofs (2) 1. Valid and Invalid Arguments ( 2.3, 3.4) 400 lecture note #2. 1) Basics
![[Ch 3, 4] Logic and Proofs (2) 1. Valid and Invalid Arguments ( 2.3, 3.4) 400 lecture note #2. 1) Basics](/thumbs/76/74441698.jpg "[Ch 3, 4] Logic and Proofs (2) 1. Valid and Invalid Arguments ( 2.3, 3.4) 400 lecture note #2. 1) Basics")
400 lecture note #2 [Ch 3, 4] Logic and Proofs (2) 1. Valid and Invalid Arguments ( 2.3, 3.4) 1) Basics An argument is a sequence of statements ( s1, s2,, sn). All statements in an argument, excet for
KS MATEMATIKA DISKRIT (DISCRETE MATHEMATICS ) RULES OF INFERENCE. Discrete Math Team
KS091201 MATEMATIKA DISKRIT (DISCRETE MATHEMATICS ) RULES OF INFERENCE Discrete Math Team 2 -- KS091201 MD W-04 Outline Valid Arguments Modus Ponens Modus Tollens Addition and Simplification More Rules
The Logic of Compound Statements. CSE 2353 Discrete Computational Structures Spring 2018
CSE 2353 Discrete Comutational Structures Sring 2018 The Logic of Comound Statements (Chater 2, E) Note: some course slides adoted from ublisher-rovided material Outline 2.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence
Introduction Logic Inference. Discrete Mathematics Andrei Bulatov
Introduction Logic Inference Discrete Mathematics Andrei Bulatov Discrete Mathematics - Logic Inference 6-2 Previous Lecture Laws of logic Expressions for implication, biconditional, exclusive or Valid
Rules of Inference. Agenda. Rules of Inference Dr Patrick Chan. p r. p q. q r. Rules of Inference for Quantifiers. Hypothetical Syllogism
Discr ete Mathem atic Chater 1: Logic and Proof 1.5 Rules of Inference Dr Patrick Chan School of Comuter Science and Engineering South China University of echnology Recall John is a co. John knows first
Sec$on Summary. Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic. Inference Rules for Quantified Statements. Building Arguments
Section 1.6 Sec$on Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Building Arguments Inference Rules for Quantified Statements Building Arguments 2 Revisi$ng the Socrates Example We have
Discrete Structures of Computer Science Propositional Logic III Rules of Inference
Discrete Structures of Computer Science Propositional Logic III Rules of Inference Gazihan Alankuş (Based on original slides by Brahim Hnich) July 30, 2012 1 Previous Lecture 2 Summary of Laws of Logic
Review. Propositions, propositional operators, truth tables. Logical Equivalences. Tautologies & contradictions
Review Propositions, propositional operators, truth tables Logical Equivalences. Tautologies & contradictions Some common logical equivalences Predicates & quantifiers Some logical equivalences involving
Chapter 1, Logic and Proofs (3) 1.6. Rules of Inference
CSI 2350, Discrete Structures Chapter 1, Logic and Proofs (3) Young-Rae Cho Associate Professor Department of Computer Science Baylor University 1.6. Rules of Inference Basic Terminology Axiom: a statement
Rules Build Arguments Rules Building Arguments
Section 1.6 1 Section Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Using Rules of Inference to Build Arguments Rules of Inference for Quantified Statements Building Arguments for Quantified
Rules of Inference. Arguments and Validity
Arguments and Validity A formal argument in propositional logic is a sequence of propositions, starting with a premise or set of premises, and ending in a conclusion. We say that an argument is valid if
Why Proofs? Proof Techniques. Theorems. Other True Things. Proper Proof Technique. How To Construct A Proof. By Chuck Cusack
Proof Techniques By Chuck Cusack Why Proofs? Writing roofs is not most student s favorite activity. To make matters worse, most students do not understand why it is imortant to rove things. Here are just
Methods of Proof. 1.6 Rules of Inference. Argument and inference 12/8/2015. CSE2023 Discrete Computational Structures
Methods of Proof CSE0 Discrete Computational Structures Lecture 4 When is a mathematical argument correct? What methods can be used to construct mathematical arguments? Important in many computer science
CSCI-2200 FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE
1 CSCI-2200 FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE Spring 2015 February 5, 2015 2 Announcements Homework 1 is due now. Homework 2 will be posted on the web site today. It is due Thursday, Feb. 12 at 10am in class.
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary. Aaron Tan August 2017
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary Aaron Tan 21 25 August 2017 1 2. The Logic of Compound Statements 2.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Statements; Compound Statements; Statement Form (Propositional
CHAPTER 1 - LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS
CHAPTER 1 - LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS 1.1 - Logical Form and Logical Equivalence Definition. A statement or proposition is a sentence that is either true or false, but not both. ex. 1 + 2 = 3 IS a statement
CS 2740 Knowledge Representation. Lecture 4. Propositional logic. CS 2740 Knowledge Representation. Administration
Lecture 4 Propositional logic Milos Hauskrecht milos@cs.pitt.edu 5329 Sennott Square dministration Homework assignment 1 is out Due next week on Wednesday, September 17 Problems: LISP programming a PL
CS 2336 Discrete Mathematics
CS 2336 Discrete Mathematics Lecture 3 Logic: Rules of Inference 1 Outline Mathematical Argument Rules of Inference 2 Argument In mathematics, an argument is a sequence of propositions (called premises)
Sec$on Summary. Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic. Inference Rules for Quantified Statements. Building Arguments
Section 1.6 Sec$on Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for Propositional Logic Building Arguments Inference Rules for Quantified Statements Building Arguments 2 Revisi$ng the Socrates Example We have
CS0441 Discrete Structures Recitation 3. Xiang Xiao
CS0441 Discrete Structures Recitation 3 Xiang Xiao Section 1.5 Q10 Let F(x, y) be the statement x can fool y, where the domain consists of all people in the world. Use quantifiers to express each of these
Review: Potential stumbling blocks
Review: Potential stumbling blocks Whether the negation sign is on the inside or the outside of a quantified statement makes a big difference! Example: Let T(x) x is tall. Consider the following: x T(x)
DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 6
DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 6 DR. DANIEL FREEMAN 1) a. Does 3 = {3}? b. Is 3 {3}? c. Is 3 {3}? d. Does {3} = {3, 3, 3, 3}? e. Is {x Z x > 0} {x R x > 0}? 1. Chapter 1 review 2) a. When does (a, b) = (c, d)?
Propositional Logic. Argument Forms. Ioan Despi. University of New England. July 19, 2013
Propositional Logic Argument Forms Ioan Despi despi@turing.une.edu.au University of New England July 19, 2013 Outline Ioan Despi Discrete Mathematics 2 of 1 Order of Precedence Ioan Despi Discrete Mathematics
3 Rules of Inferential Logic
24 FUNDAMENTALS OF MATHEMATICAL LOGIC 3 Rules of Inferential Logic The main concern of logic is how the truth of some roositions is connected with the truth of another. Thus, we will usually consider a
Discrete Mathematics Logics and Proofs. Liangfeng Zhang School of Information Science and Technology ShanghaiTech University
Discrete Mathematics Logics and Proofs Liangfeng Zhang School of Information Science and Technology ShanghaiTech University Resolution Theorem: p q p r (q r) p q p r q r p q r p q p p r q r T T T T F T
Resolution (7A) Young Won Lim 4/21/18
(7A) Coyright (c) 215 218 Young W. Lim. Permission is granted to coy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version ublished
The Logic of Compound Statements cont.
The Logic of Compound Statements cont. CSE 215, Computer Science 1, Fall 2011 Stony Brook University http://www.cs.stonybrook.edu/~cse215 Refresh from last time: Logical Equivalences Commutativity of :
Boolean Algebra and Proof. Notes. Proving Propositions. Propositional Equivalences. Notes. Notes. Notes. Notes. March 5, 2012
March 5, 2012 Webwork Homework. The handout on Logic is Chapter 4 from Mary Attenborough s book Mathematics for Electrical Engineering and Computing. Proving Propositions We combine basic propositions
software design & management Gachon University Chulyun Kim
Gachon University Chulyun Kim 2 Outline Propositional Logic Propositional Equivalences Predicates and Quantifiers Nested Quantifiers Rules of Inference Introduction to Proofs 3 1.1 Propositional Logic
3/29/2017. Logic. Propositions and logical operations. Main concepts: propositions truth values propositional variables logical operations
Logic Propositions and logical operations Main concepts: propositions truth values propositional variables logical operations 1 Propositions and logical operations A proposition is the most basic element
THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS
THE LOGIC OF COMPOUND STATEMENTS All dogs have four legs. All tables have four legs. Therefore, all dogs are tables LOGIC Logic is a science of the necessary laws of thought, without which no employment
Knowledge Representation. Propositional logic
CS 2710 Foundations of AI Lecture 10 Knowledge Representation. Propositional logic Milos Hauskrecht milos@cs.pitt.edu 5329 Sennott Square Knowledge-based agent Knowledge base Inference engine Knowledge
What is the decimal (base 10) representation of the binary number ? Show your work and place your final answer in the box.
Question 1. [10 marks] Part (a) [2 marks] What is the decimal (base 10) representation of the binary number 110101? Show your work and place your final answer in the box. 2 0 + 2 2 + 2 4 + 2 5 = 1 + 4
Intro to Logic and Proofs
Intro to Logic and Proofs Propositions A proposition is a declarative sentence (that is, a sentence that declares a fact) that is either true or false, but not both. Examples: It is raining today. Washington
Knowledge Representation. Propositional logic.
CS 1571 Introduction to AI Lecture 10 Knowledge Representation. Propositional logic. Milos Hauskrecht milos@cs.pitt.edu 5329 Sennott Square Announcements Homework assignment 3 due today Homework assignment
DISCRETE MATH: FINAL REVIEW
DISCRETE MATH: FINAL REVIEW DR. DANIEL FREEMAN 1) a. Does 3 = {3}? b. Is 3 {3}? c. Is 3 {3}? c. Is {3} {3}? c. Is {3} {3}? d. Does {3} = {3, 3, 3, 3}? e. Is {x Z x > 0} {x R x > 0}? 1. Chapter 1 review
A Quick Lesson on Negation
A Quick Lesson on Negation Several of the argument forms we have looked at (modus tollens and disjunctive syllogism, for valid forms; denying the antecedent for invalid) involve a type of statement which
DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 3
DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 3 DR. DANIEL FREEMAN 1. Chapter 2.2 Conditional Statements If p and q are statement variables, the conditional of q by p is If p then q or p implies q and is denoted p q. It is false
PSU MATH RELAYS LOGIC & SET THEORY 2017
PSU MATH RELAYS LOGIC & SET THEORY 2017 MULTIPLE CHOICE. There are 40 questions. Select the letter of the most appropriate answer and SHADE in the corresponding region of the answer sheet. If the correct
CS100: DISCRETE STRUCTURES. Lecture 5: Logic (Ch1)
CS100: DISCREE SRUCURES Lecture 5: Logic (Ch1) Lecture Overview 2 Statement Logical Connectives Conjunction Disjunction Propositions Conditional Bio-conditional Converse Inverse Contrapositive Laws of
Analyzing Arguments with Truth Tables
Analyzing Arguments with Truth Tables MATH 100 Survey of Mathematical Ideas J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Fall 2014 Introduction Euler diagrams are useful for checking the validity of simple
10/5/2012. Logic? What is logic? Propositional Logic. Propositional Logic (Rosen, Chapter ) Logic is a truth-preserving system of inference
Logic? Propositional Logic (Rosen, Chapter 1.1 1.3) TOPICS Propositional Logic Truth Tables Implication Logical Proofs 10/1/12 CS160 Fall Semester 2012 2 What is logic? Logic is a truth-preserving system
CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Winter
CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH Winter 2017 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/wi17/cse20-ab/ Today's learning goals Distinguish between a theorem, an axiom, lemma, a corollary, and a conjecture. Recognize direct proofs
Discrete Mathematics Recitation Course 張玟翔
Discrete Mathematics Recitation Course 1 2013.03.07 張玟翔 Acknowledge 鄭安哲 TA 2012 About Myself English Name : Zak Chinese Name : 張玟翔 Mail:o0000032@yahoo.com.tw Lab: ED612 1-1 Propositional Logic 1-1 Ex.2
A. Propositional Logic
CmSc 175 Discrete Mathematics A. Propositional Logic 1. Statements (Propositions ): Statements are sentences that claim certain things. Can be either true or false, but not both. Propositional logic deals
Mathacle. PSet ---- Algebra, Logic. Level Number Name: Date: I. BASICS OF PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC
I. BASICS OF PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC George Boole (1815-1864) developed logic as an abstract mathematical system consisting of propositions, operations (conjunction, disjunction, and negation), and rules for
MACM 101 Discrete Mathematics I. Exercises on Propositional Logic. Due: Tuesday, September 29th (at the beginning of the class)
MACM 101 Discrete Mathematics I Exercises on Propositional Logic. Due: Tuesday, September 29th (at the beginning of the class) SOLUTIONS 1. Construct a truth table for the following compound proposition:
Section 1.3: Valid and Invalid Arguments
Section 1.3: Valid and Invalid Arguments Now we have developed the basic language of logic, we shall start to consider how logic can be used to determine whether or not a given argument is valid. In order
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs. Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs Summary Valid Arguments and Rules of Inference Proof Methods Proof Strategies Rules of Inference Section 1.6 Section Summary Valid Arguments
Why Learning Logic? Logic. Propositional Logic. Compound Propositions
Logic Objectives Propositions and compound propositions Negation, conjunction, disjunction, and exclusive or Implication and biconditional Logic equivalence and satisfiability Application of propositional
Proposition logic and argument. CISC2100, Spring 2017 X.Zhang
Proposition logic and argument CISC2100, Spring 2017 X.Zhang 1 Where are my glasses? I know the following statements are true. 1. If I was reading the newspaper in the kitchen, then my glasses are on the
Where are my glasses?
Proposition logic and argument CISC2100, Spring 2017 X.Zhang 1 Where are my glasses? I know the following statements are true. 1. If I was reading the newspaper in the kitchen, then my glasses are on the
Math.3336: Discrete Mathematics. Nested Quantifiers/Rules of Inference
Math.3336: Discrete Mathematics Nested Quantifiers/Rules of Inference Instructor: Dr. Blerina Xhabli Department of Mathematics, University of Houston https://www.math.uh.edu/ blerina Email: blerina@math.uh.edu
Proofs. Example of an axiom in this system: Given two distinct points, there is exactly one line that contains them.
Proofs A mathematical system consists of axioms, definitions and undefined terms. An axiom is assumed true. Definitions are used to create new concepts in terms of existing ones. Undefined terms are only
Propositional Logic. Jason Filippou UMCP. ason Filippou UMCP) Propositional Logic / 38
Propositional Logic Jason Filippou CMSC250 @ UMCP 05-31-2016 ason Filippou (CMSC250 @ UMCP) Propositional Logic 05-31-2016 1 / 38 Outline 1 Syntax 2 Semantics Truth Tables Simplifying expressions 3 Inference
With Question/Answer Animations. Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs
With Question/Answer Animations Chapter 1, Part III: Proofs Summary Valid Arguments and Rules of Inference Proof Methods Proof Strategies Section 1.6 Section Summary Valid Arguments Inference Rules for
Discrete Mathematics
Discrete Mathematics Chih-Wei Yi Dept. of Computer Science National Chiao Tung University March 9, 2009 Overview of ( 1.5-1.7, ~2 hours) Methods of mathematical argument (i.e., proof methods) can be formalized
n logical not (negation) n logical or (disjunction) n logical and (conjunction) n logical exclusive or n logical implication (conditional)
Discrete Math Review Discrete Math Review (Rosen, Chapter 1.1 1.6) TOPICS Propositional Logic Logical Operators Truth Tables Implication Logical Equivalence Inference Rules What you should know about propositional
Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic.
Natural Deduction is a method for deriving the conclusion of valid arguments expressed in the symbolism of propositional logic. The method consists of using sets of Rules of Inference (valid argument forms)
Proving Things. Why prove things? Proof by Substitution, within Logic. Rules of Inference: applying Logic. Using Assumptions.
1 Proving Things Why prove things? Proof by Substitution, within Logic Rules of Inference: applying Logic Using Assumptions Proof Strategies 2 Why Proofs? Knowledge is power. Where do we get it? direct
1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs
1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs 1.1 Propositional Logic Propositions( ) a declarative sentence that is either true or false, but not both nor neither letters denoting propostions p, q, r, s, T: true
Agenda. Introduction to Proofs Dr Patrick Chan School of Computer Science and Engineering South China University of Technology
Discrete Mathematic Chapter 1: Logic and Proof 1.5 Rules of Inference 1.6 Introduction to Proofs Dr Patrick Chan School of Computer Science and Engineering South China University of echnology Agenda Rules
Simplification by Truth Table and without Truth Table
SUBJECT NAME SUBJECT CODE : MA 6566 MATERIAL NAME REGULATION : Discrete Mathematics : University Questions : R2013 UPDATED ON : April-May 2018 BOOK FOR REFERENCE To buy the book visit : Sri Hariganesh
Sample Problems for all sections of CMSC250, Midterm 1 Fall 2014
Sample Problems for all sections of CMSC250, Midterm 1 Fall 2014 1. Translate each of the following English sentences into formal statements using the logical operators (,,,,, and ). You may also use mathematical
Outline. Rules of Inferences Discrete Mathematics I MATH/COSC 1056E. Example: Existence of Superman. Outline
Outline s Discrete Mathematics I MATH/COSC 1056E Julien Dompierre Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Laurentian University Sudbury, August 6, 2008 Using to Build Arguments and Quantifiers Outline
Anna University, Chennai, November/December 2012
B.E./B.Tech. DEGREE EXAMINATION, NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2012 Fifth Semester Computer Science and Engineering MA2265 DISCRETE MATHEMATICS (Regulation 2008) Part - A 1. Define Tautology with an example. A Statement
CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH. Fall
CSE 20 DISCRETE MATH Fall 2017 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/classes/fa17/cse20-ab/ Today's learning goals Distinguish between a theorem, an axiom, lemma, a corollary, and a conjecture. Recognize direct proofs
Valid Reasoning. Alice E. Fischer. CSCI 1166 Discrete Mathematics for Computing February, Outline Truth and Validity Valid Reasoning
Alice E. Fischer CSCI 1166 Discrete Mathematics for Computing February, 2018 Alice E. Fischer Reasoning... 1/23 1 Truth is not the same as Validity 2 Alice E. Fischer Reasoning... 2/23 Truth is not the
Deductive and Inductive Logic
Deductive Logic Overview (1) Distinguishing Deductive and Inductive Logic (2) Validity and Soundness (3) A Few Practice Deductive Arguments (4) Testing for Invalidity (5) Practice Exercises Deductive and
Tutorial Obtain the principal disjunctive normal form and principal conjunction form of the statement
Tutorial - 1 1. Obtain the principal disjunctive normal form and principal conjunction form of the statement Let S P P Q Q R P P Q Q R A: P Q Q R P Q R P Q Q R Q Q R A S Minterm Maxterm T T T F F T T T
Proof Tactics, Strategies and Derived Rules. CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson
Proof Tactics, Strategies and Derived Rules CS 270 Math Foundations of CS Jeremy Johnson Outline 1. Review Rules 2. Positive subformulas and extraction 3. Proof tactics Extraction, Conversion, Inversion,
Today s Lecture 2/25/10. Truth Tables Continued Introduction to Proofs (the implicational rules of inference)
Today s Lecture 2/25/10 Truth Tables Continued Introduction to Proofs (the implicational rules of inference) Announcements Homework: -- Ex 7.3 pg. 320 Part B (2-20 Even). --Read chapter 8.1 pgs. 345-361.
Simplification by Truth Table and without Truth Table
SUBJECT NAME SUBJECT CODE : MA 6566 MATERIAL NAME REGULATION : Discrete Mathematics : University Questions : R2013 UPDATED ON : June 2017 (Scan the above Q.R code for the direct download of this material)
1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs
1 The Foundation: Logic and Proofs 1.1 Propositional Logic Propositions( 명제 ) a declarative sentence that is either true or false, but not both nor neither letters denoting propositions p, q, r, s, T:
PHI Propositional Logic Lecture 2. Truth Tables
PHI 103 - Propositional Logic Lecture 2 ruth ables ruth ables Part 1 - ruth unctions for Logical Operators ruth unction - the truth-value of any compound proposition determined solely by the truth-value
(Refer Slide Time: 02:20)
Discrete Mathematical Structures Dr. Kamala Krithivasan Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture - 5 Logical Inference In the last class we saw about
Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements. January 7, 2008
Chapter 1: The Logic of Compound Statements January 7, 2008 Outline 1 1.1 Logical Form and Logical Equivalence 2 1.2 Conditional Statements 3 1.3 Valid and Invalid Arguments Central notion of deductive
CSC 125 :: Final Exam December 14, 2011
1-5. Complete the truth tables below: CSC 125 :: Final Exam December 14, 2011 p q p q p q p q p q p q T T F F T F T F (6 9) Let p be: Log rolling is fun. q be: The sawmill is closed. Express these as English
PROPOSITIONAL CALCULUS
PROPOSITIONAL CALCULUS A proposition is a complete declarative sentence that is either TRUE (truth value T or 1) or FALSE (truth value F or 0), but not both. These are not propositions! Connectives and
Argument. whenever all the assumptions are true, then the conclusion is true. If today is Wednesday, then yesterday is Tuesday. Today is Wednesday.
Logic and Proof Argument An argument is a sequence of statements. All statements but the first one are called assumptions or hypothesis. The final statement is called the conclusion. An argument is valid
Logic. Definition [1] A logic is a formal language that comes with rules for deducing the truth of one proposition from the truth of another.
![Logic. Definition [1] A logic is a formal language that comes with rules for deducing the truth of one proposition from the truth of another.](/thumbs/87/97228443.jpg "Logic. Definition [1] A logic is a formal language that comes with rules for deducing the truth of one proposition from the truth of another.")
Math 0413 Appendix A.0 Logic Definition [1] A logic is a formal language that comes with rules for deducing the truth of one proposition from the truth of another. This type of logic is called propositional.
Propositional Logic. Fall () Propositional Logic Fall / 30
Propositional Logic Fall 2013 () Propositional Logic Fall 2013 1 / 30 1 Introduction Learning Outcomes for this Presentation 2 Definitions Statements Logical connectives Interpretations, contexts,... Logically
Predicate Logic & Quantification
Predicate Logic & Quantification Things you should do Homework 1 due today at 3pm Via gradescope. Directions posted on the website. Group homework 1 posted, due Tuesday. Groups of 1-3. We suggest 3. In
CSC 125 :: Final Exam May 3 & 5, 2010
CSC 125 :: Final Exam May 3 & 5, 2010 Name KEY (1 5) Complete the truth tables below: p Q p q p q p q p q p q T T T T F T T T F F T T F F F T F T T T F F F F F F T T 6-15. Match the following logical equivalences
Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology:
Test 1 Solutions(COT3100) Sitharam (1) Prove that the following Absorption Law is correct. I.e, prove this is a tautology: ( q (p q) (r p)) r Solution. This is Modus Tollens applied twice, with transitivity
Readings: Conjecture. Theorem. Rosen Section 1.5
Readings: Conjecture Theorem Lemma Lemma Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 : Step n-1 Step n a rule of inference an axiom a rule of inference Rosen Section 1.5 Provide justification of the steps used to show that a
Discrete Structures & Algorithms. Propositional Logic EECE 320 // UBC
Discrete Structures & Algorithms Propositional Logic EECE 320 // UBC 1 Review of last lecture Pancake sorting A problem with many applications Bracketing (bounding a function) Proving bounds for pancake
Propositional Logic. Spring Propositional Logic Spring / 32
Propositional Logic Spring 2016 Propositional Logic Spring 2016 1 / 32 Introduction Learning Outcomes for this Presentation Learning Outcomes... At the conclusion of this session, we will Define the elements
Boolean Logic. CS 231 Dianna Xu
Boolean Logic CS 231 Dianna Xu 1 Proposition/Statement A proposition is either true or false but not both The sky is blue Lisa is a Math major x == y Not propositions: Are you Bob? x := 7 2 Boolean variables
Inference in Propositional Logic
Inference in Propositional Logic Deepak Kumar November 2017 Propositional Logic A language for symbolic reasoning Proposition a statement that is either True or False. E.g. Bryn Mawr College is located
DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE Chapter 3.3 Statements with Multiple Quantifiers If you want to establish the truth of a statement of the form
DISCRETE MATH: LECTURE 5 DR. DANIEL FREEMAN 1. Chapter 3.3 Statements with Multiple Quantifiers If you want to establish the truth of a statement of the form x D, y E such that P (x, y) your challenge
1) Let h = John is healthy, w = John is wealthy and s = John is wise Write the following statement is symbolic form
Math 378 Exam 1 Spring 2009 Show all Work Name 1) Let h = John is healthy, w = John is wealthy and s = John is wise Write the following statement is symbolic form a) In order for John to be wealthy it
(ÀB Ä (A Â C)) (A Ä ÀC) Á B. This is our sample argument. Formal Proofs
(ÀB Ä (A Â C)) (A Ä ÀC) Á B This is our sample argument. Formal Proofs From now on, formal proofs will be our main way to test arguments. We ll begin with easier proofs. Our initial strategy for constructing
Solutions to Exercises (Sections )
s to Exercises (Sections 1.11-1.12) Section 1.11 Exercise 1.11.1 (a) p q q r r p 1. q r Hypothesis 2. p q Hypothesis 3. p r Hypothetical syllogism, 1, 2 4. r Hypothesis 5. p Modus tollens, 3, 4. (b) p
At least one of us is a knave. What are A and B?
1. This is a puzzle about an island in which everyone is either a knight or a knave. Knights always tell the truth and knaves always lie. This problem is about two people A and B, each of whom is either
ECOM Discrete Mathematics
ECOM 2311- Discrete Mathematics Chapter # 1 : The Foundations: Logic and Proofs Fall, 2013/2014 ECOM 2311- Discrete Mathematics - Ch.1 Dr. Musbah Shaat 1 / 85 Outline 1 Propositional Logic 2 Propositional
Collins' notes on Lemmon's Logic
Collins' notes on Lemmon's Logic (i) Rule of ssumption () Insert any formula at any stage into a proof. The assumed formula rests upon the assumption of itself. (ii) Double Negation (DN) a. b. ( Two negations
CPSC 121: Models of Computation
CPSC 121: Models of Computation Unit 4 Propositional Logic Proofs Based on slides by Patrice Belleville and Steve Wolfman Coming Up Pre-class quiz #5 is due Wednesday October 4th at 21:00 Assigned reading
SRI VENKATESWARA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MA DISCRETE MATHEMATICS
1 MA6566 - DISCRETE MATHEMATICS UNIT I - LOGIC AND PROOFS Propositional Logic Propositional equivalences-predicates and quantifiers-nested Quantifiers- Rules of inference-introduction to Proofs-Proof Methods
STUDY PROBLEMS FOR EXAM I CMSC 203 DISCRETE STRUCTURES. n (n +1)(2n +1), 6. j 2 = 1(1+1)(2 1+1) 6. k (k +1)(2k +1) 6
STUDY PROBLEMS FOR EXAM I CMSC 203 DISCRETE STRUCTURES DR. LOMONACO 1. Use the principle of mathematical induction to prove that P (n) : n (n +1)(2n +1), for all integers n 1. Answer: Proof (by weak induction):