Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Time-Independent Perturbation Theory"

Transcription

1 4 Phys46.nb Time-Independent Perturbation Theory.. Overview... General question Assuming that we have a Hamiltonian, H = H + λ H (.) where λ is a very small real number. The eigenstates of the Hamiltonian should not be very different from the eigenstates of H. If we already know all eigenstates of H, can we get eigenstates of H approximately? Bottom line: we are studying an approximate method.... Why perturbation theory? Why we need to study this approximation methods? (considering the fact that numerical methods can compute the eigenstates very efficiently and accurately for any Hamiltonian that we consider in this course) Reason number I: It is part of the history (QM was born before electronic computer becomes a powerful tool in scientific research). Reason number II: It reveals to us universal principles, which are very important and cannot be obtained from just numerical simulations Reason number III: The idea of perturbation theory has very deep and broad impact in many branches of physics. Perturbation theories is in many cases the only theoretical technique that we have to handle various complex systems (quantum and classical). Examples: in quantum field theory (which is in fact a nonlinear generalization of QM), most of the efforts is to develop new ways to do perturbation theory (Loop expansions, /N expansions, 4-ϵ expansions)...3. Assumptions Assumption #: we know all eigenstates of H, as well as their corresponding eigenenergies H ψ n = E n ψ n (.) Assumption #: we know the perturbation H '. What do we mean by knowing H '? Here, we mean that we can write down H ' using the complete basis of ψ n, i.e., we know the value of ψ n H' ψ m for any m and n. Assumption #3: we only consider quantum states with discrete eigenenergies In general, the energy spectrum of a quantum system (i.e. all eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian) falls into one of the following three general possibilities A discrete spectrum: eigenenergies can only take certain discredited values (example: infinite deep potential wells, e.g. harmonic potential E n = (n + /) ħω)

2 Phys46.nb 5 A continuous spectrum: eigenenergies can take any (real) values in certain allowed range (example: a constant potential. Here, any E V is an eigenenergy) A mixed spectrum: some parts of the spectrum are continuous, while other parts has discrete eigenenergies. (example: a finite potential well. Here, we may have some discrete states inside the well. But for E above the top of the potential well, we have a continuous spectrum). Q: Consider the energy spectrum of an attractive Coulomb (/r) potential. Is it discrete, continuous or mixed? A: It is mixed. When we consider the an attractive Coulomb potential, we mostly focus on the negative energy states (E < ). This part of the spectrum is discrete, as we all know very well from the study of a hydrogen atom. But if we look at states with positive energies, there is a continuous spectrum for E >. For E >, the system is NOT a bound state, i.e. the proton and the electron doesn t form an atom. In other words, we have a high probability found the proton and the electron to be separated far from each other. There, the attractive potential is very small and negligible, so we have two free particles and only need to consider their kinetic energies. For free particles, we know that any positive energy is an allowed eigenenergy (i.e. we have a continuum spectrum for E > ). Bottom line: in this chapter, our perturbation theory only consider discrete spectrum or the discrete part of a mixed spectrum. Another version of assumption #3: we only consider confined states. (In QM, in most cases, confined states=discrete energy and unconfined states=continuous energy). Comment: In QM, we only study discrete states in a perturbation theory. But this is NOT true for other branches of physics. For example, in quantum field theory, perturbation theory is applied to continuous spectral... Non-degenerate Perturbation Theory... Assumptions Key assumption: we consider a specific state ψ n. Here, we assume that E n - E m is much larger than λ H for any other eigenstate ψ m... Preparation # wavefunctions Since the eigenstates of H form a compete basis, we can write down any quantum state as a linear superposition of ψ m ψ = m a m ψ m (.3) Now, if we consider an eigenstate of H, ψ n, it can also be written in a similar fashion ψ n = m a m ψ m (.4) As discussion above, if λ is small, an eigenstate of H would be similar to an eigenstate of H. Here, we assume that ψ n is very close to ψ n. This means that a n and for other values of m n, a m ~, To highlight this, we separate the term for ψ n out from the sum ψ n = a n ψ n + m n a m ψ m (.5) It turns out that it is usually more convenient to use unnormalized eigenstates. Now, let us define unnormalized eigenstates of H ψ n = a n ψ n = ψ n + m n a m a n ψ m (.6) For simplicity, we will now call a m /a n = c m ψ n = ψ n + m n c n ψ m (.7) Because a m ~ and a n ~, we know that c m ~ for small λ. Comment #: This state is NOT normalized ψ n ψ n = + m n c m (.8)

3 6 Phys46.nb But we can easily normalized it, if we want to ψ n = ψ n + m n c m (.9) Comment #: (almost) any quantum states can be written in the form of Eq. (.3). This is because ψ m forms a complete basis. Q: what does the word almost mean here? A: If a state is orthogonal to ψ n, we cannot write the state the form of Eq. (.3). But we don t need to worry about it here, because we are doing perturbation theory and we know that the eigenstates of H is close to eigenstates of H. So it can not be orthogonal to ψ n. Bottom line: we are not making any assumptions or approximations here. It is just a new way to write down eigenstates of H. Comment #3: c m s are functions of λ, i.e. c m (λ). For small λ, we can use the Taylor series: c m = c () m λ + c () m λ + c (3) m λ 3 + (.) Here, the Taylor series doesn t contain the th order term of λ (i.e. the constant term). This is because when λ =, ψ n = c m (λ) = at λ =. ψ n, and thus As a result, ψ n = ψ n + m n c m (λ) ψ m = ψ n + m n k= cm (k) λ k ψ m = ψ n + k= λ k m n c m (k) ψ m (.) If we define we get ψ n k = m n c m (k) ψ m (.) ψ n = ψ n + λ ψ n + λ ψ n + (.3) This is Eq. [6.5] in the textbook. Important: ψ n, ψ n doesn t contain ψ n. In other words, all corrections are orthogonal to ψ n...3. Preparation # eigenenergies Eigenenergies of H are also functions of λ, and for small λ, we can use the Taylor series: E n (λ) = E n + λ E n + λ E n + (.4) This is Eq. [6.6] in the textbook...4. Schrodinger Equation in the perturbation theory H ψ n = E n ψ n (.5) (H + λ H ') ψ n + λ ψ n + λ ψ n + = E n + λ E n + λ E n + ψ n + λ ψ n + λ ψ n + (.6) H ψ n + λh ψ n + H ' ψ n + λ H ψ n + H ' ψ n + = E n ψ n + λe n ψ n + E n ψ n + λ E n ψ n + E n ψ n + E n ψ n + (.7) In the perturbation theory, we need to compute two sets of quantities () energy corrections at each order E n, E n,... and () wavefunction corrections at each order, ψ n, ψ n, ψ 3 n. It turns out that these two set of quantities are entangled together and we need to compute both of them. At each order, we will first compute energy corrections, and then the wavefunction corrections...5. Zeroth order The leading order terms in the equation is λ = constant H ψ n = E n ψ n (.8)

4 Phys46.nb 7 This is identical to the case of λ =, i.e. the unperturbed system...6. First order To the order of λ, we have H ψ n + H ' ψ n = E n ψ n + E n ψ n (.9) Here, we first compute the energy correction E n. This is done by multiplying on both sides ψ n ψ n H ψ n + ψ n H ' ψ n = ψ n E n ψ n + ψ n E n ψ n (.) For the first term on the l.h.s., we use the fact that ψ n H = ψ n E n (.) For the last term on the r.h.s., we use the fact that E n is a number (not a quantum operator), and thus ψ n E n ψ n = E n ψ n ψ n = E n ψ n E n ψ n + ψ n H ' ψ n = ψ n E n ψ n + E n ψ n H ' ψ n = E n (.) (.3) The first order correction in energy is the expectation value of H '. E n = E n + λ ψ n H ' ψ n + Oλ = ψ n H ψ n + ψ n λ H ' ψ n + Oλ = ψ n H + λ H ' ψ n + Oλ = ψ n H ψ n + Oλ (.4) Bottom line: to the first order (or say up to corrections at the order of λ ), we can use the old wavefunction (the zeroth order wavefunction). Then we compute the first order correction for the wavefunction ψ n. To do that, we multiply both sides of the equation with ψ m where m n ψ m H ψ n + ψ m H ' ψ n = ψ m E n ψ n + ψ m E n ψ n (.5) For the first term on the l.h.s., we use the fact that ψ m H = ψ m E m (.6) For the two terms on the r.h.s., we use the fact that E n and E n are both numbers (not quantum operators), so ψ m E n ψ n = E n ψ m ψ n and ψ m E n ψ n = E n ψ m ψ n =. Here, we used the fact that when m n, the two quantum states are orthogonal and thus ψ m ψ n =. E m ψ m ψ n + ψ m H ' ψ n = E n ψ m ψ n (.7) So ψ m ψ n = ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E m (.8) According to the definition of ψ n ψ n = m n c m () ψ m (.9) we have c m () = ψ m ψ n = ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E m (.3) And therefore,

5 8 Phys46.nb ψ n = m n ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E m (.3) So ψ n = ψ n + λ ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n + m n (.3) E n - E m..7. Second order H ψ n + H ' ψ n = E n ψ n + E n ψ n + E n ψ n (.33) Here, we first compute the energy correction E n. This is done by multiplying on both sides ψ n ψ n H ψ n + ψ n H ' ψ n = ψ n E n ψ n + ψ n E n ψ n + ψ n E n ψ n (.34) ψ n E n ψ n + ψ n H ' ψ n = ψ n E n ψ n + E n ψ n ψ n + E n (.35) The second term on the r.h.s. is zero, because we required ψ n ψ n = at the beginning. E n = ψ n H ' ψ n (.36) Bottom line: to compute the second order perturbation, we need to know wavefunction at the first order. This conclusion is in fact generically true. We need wavefunction at lower order to compute energy correction at one order higher. E n = ψ n H ' ψ n = m n ψ n H ' ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E m = m n ψ n H ' ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E m ψ n H ' ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n E n = E n + λ ψ n H ' ψ n + λ + Oλ 3 m n (.38) E n - E m (.37) The we compute the second order correction for the wavefunction m n ψ n. To do that, we multiply both sides of the equation with ψ m where ψ m H ψ n + ψ m H ' ψ n = ψ m E n ψ n + ψ m E n ψ n + ψ m E n ψ n (.39) E m ψ m ψ n + ψ m H ' ψ n = E n ψ m ψ n + E n ψ m ψ n + E n ψ m ψ n (.4) E n - E m ψ m ψ n = ψ m H ' ψ n - E n ψ m ψ n (.4) ψ m ψ n = ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E n - E m E n - E ψ m ψ n = m m' n ψ m m' n ψ m H ' ψ m' E n - E m m' n ψ m H ' ψ m' E n - E m ψ m' H ' ψ m' E n - E m H ' ψ n E n - E m' ψ m' H ' ψ n E n - E m' ψ m' - m' n ψ n H ' ψ n E n - E m - m' n ψ n H ' ψ n E n - E m ψ m ψ m' ψ m' H ' ψ n E n - E m' ψ m' H ' ψ n δ m,m' = E n - E m' H ' ψ n ψ n H ' ψ n ψ m H ' ψ n - E n - E m' n m' E n - E m = (.4) According to the definition of ψ n We have ψ n = m n c m () ψ m (.43) c m () = ψ m ψ n (.44)

6 Phys46.nb 9 and thus ψ n = m n m' n ψ m H ' ψ m' E n - E m ψ m' H ' ψ n - ψ n H ' ψ n ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E m' E n - E m ψ m (.45)..8. Third order Same as the second order, we can use the same method to show that E n 3 = ψ n H ' ψ n (.46) So, ψ n H ' ψ m ψ m H ' ψ m' ψ m' H ' ψ n E 3 n = m n - ψ n H ' ψ n ψ m H ' ψ n ψ n H ' ψ m m' n E n - E m E n - E m' E n - E m (.47) And one can keep doing this for higher and higher order..9. Summary For a Hamiltonian H = H + λ H (.48) assuming that we know all the eigenstates of H ψ n ), and we know the expectation values ψ m H ' ψ m for any two eigenstates of H, ψ m and ψ m ), then we can write down eigenstates of H as a power series expansions of λ ψ n H ' ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n E n = E n + λ E n + λ E n + = E n + λ ψ n H ' ψ n + λ + m n (.49) E n - E m and ψ n = ψ n + λ ψ n + λ ψ n + = ψ n + λ ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n + m n (.5) E n - E m... Second order perturbation always reduces the energy of the ground state One key conclusion from the perturbation theory is that the second order correction always makes the energy of the ground state lower (in comparison to the unperturbed one). This can be seen by looking at E E n = m n ψ n H ' ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E m = m n ψ n H ' ψ m E n - E m In the numerator, ψ n H ' ψ m is the complex conjugate of ψ m H' ψ n, so it is ψ n H ' ψ m, which is non-negative (.5) ψ n H ' ψ m (.5) The denominator E n - E m <, if n is the ground state for the unperturbed Hamiltonian (if it is the ground state, then its eigenenergy must be smaller than eigenenergy of any other states). And therefore ψ n H ' ψ m (.53) E n - E m So ψ n H ' ψ m E n = m n E n - E m (.54) The equal sign only arise when ψ n H ' ψ m = for ALL m n. (if this is the case, we don t need to do perturbation theory. The first order perturbation become exact). As long as we ignore this very special case, we find that E n < for the ground state, regardless of details.

7 Phys46.nb This conclusion is very important in quantum mechanics, because in many systems, the first order perturbation of the ground state happens to be zero. E n =. There, E n = E n + λ E n + (.55) The energy correction is dominated by the second order term, which must be negative for the ground state. Without any calculation, we know immediately that E n < E n (.56) In the first homework, we will see that this relation implies that the speed of light in a (linear) medium can only be slower than the vacuum. (i.e., if E n > E n, we will violate the special relativity)..3. Brillouin-Wigner Perturbation Theory.3.. Negative sides of Rayleigh Schrödinger perturbation theory The perturbation theory discussed above is known as Rayleigh Schrödinger perturbation theory. It is presented for most of the textbooks. However, this approach has some limitations and is not sufficient enough for some cases.. Too complicated to go to higher order (e.g. third order or fourth order correction). The physical meaning is less clear (Why do we need to sum over all other quantum state? How should we think about the sum.) 3. One needs to compute energy and wavefunctions at the same time (if we only want to know the eigenenergy, can we compute only energy without bothering to do wavefunction?) One way to resolve these problems: Brillouin-Wigner Perturbation Theory.3.. Brillouin-Wigner Perturbation Theory Brillouin-Wigner Perturbation Theory considers the same setup and the final conclusions are exactly the same. However it has a couple of advantages. It offers a nice and simple physical interpretation (a baby version of Feynman diagrams used in quantum field theory). It is easier to compute higher order corrections (If we want to compute the eigenenergy using a computer, this perturbation theory just needs one very simple iteration) 3. One can compute energy along, without worry about wavefunctions. Let s start from the same setup (H + λ H ') ψ n = E n ψ n (.57) where ψ n represents the same unnormalized eigenstate of H ψ n = ψ n + m n c n ψ m (.58) We can rewrite the equation above as (E - H ) ψ n = λ H ' ψ n (.59) and ψ n = λ (E - H ) - H ' ψ n (.6) Note: here (E - H ) - is the matrix inverse, instead of a number inverse, because H is an operator, instead of a number. Q: What is a function of operator? e.g, f (Q )? A: First, we write down the same function as a number function and do a power-law expansion f (x) = a + a x + a x + (.6)

8 Phys46.nb then, f (Q ) represents the same power series, but with number x substitute by operator Q f (Q ) = a + a Q + a Q + (.6) where Q = Q Q, etc. Here, the inverse function of operator (E - H ) - shall be understood the same way Because E - x = E + x E + x we know that E - H - = E + H E + H E 3 + (.63) Now, back to the derivation above: E 3 + (.64) λ ψ m ψ n = ψ m λ (E - H ) - H ' ψ n = E - E ψ m H ' ψ n (.65) m Remember that from the definition, of ψ n ψ n = ψ n + m n c m ψ m (.66) we have ψ m ψ n = c m (.67) for any m n. And thus, we get ψ n = ψ n + λ ψ m m n E - E ψ m H ' ψ n (.68) m If we define a quantum operator X as R = m n ψ m E - E m ψ m (.69) we get Thus, ψ n = ψ n + λ R H ' ψ n (.7) I - λ R H ' ψ n = ψ n (.7) where I is the identity operator So, ψ n = I - λ R H ' - ψ n (.7) Again, we emphasize that here, I - λ R H ' - represent matrix inverse. For matrix inverse, we can use Taylor expansions to write it out. We know that ( - a) - = + a + a + a 3 + (.73) So similarly, we have I - λ R H ' - = I + λ R H ' + λ R H ' R H ' + λ 3 R H ' R H ' R H ' + (.74) So we have ψ n = I - λ R H ' - ψ n = ψ n + λ R H ' ψ n + λ R H ' R H ' ψ n + λ 3 R H ' R H ' R H ' ψ n + (.75)

9 Phys46.nb So we find that ψ n k = R H ' k ψ n (.76) Previous, we found that E n = ψ n E n = ψ n E n 3 = ψ n H ' ψ n H ' ψ n H ' ψ n (.77) (.78) (.79) In fact, we can use the same procedure to show that for kth order, E n k = ψ n H ' ψ n k- (.8) Because we have found that ψ n k- = R H ' k- ψ n E n k = ψ n H ' ψ n k- = ψ n H ' R H ' k- ψ n (.8) So, we have E n = ψ n H ' ψ n E n = ψ n H ' R H ' ψ n = ψ n H ' ψ m m n E n - E ψ m H ' ψ n (.83) m E n 3 = ψ n H ' R H ' R H ' ψ n = m n m' n ψ n H ' ψ m E n - E m ψ m (.8) H ' ψ m' E n - E ψ m' H ' ψ n (.84) m'... (.85) From these formula we see a pattern.. For any E nk, if we look at the formula from right to left, one always start from unperturbed state ψ n and eventually goes back to the same state ψ n.. In the path from ψ n to ψ n, we go through several intermediate states ψ m, ψ m'. For kth order perturbation, we have k - intermediate states. 3. To turn from a state to another along the path (e.g. from n to m or from m to m in E n3 ), we use the perturbation H ' 4. For each intermediate state,we have an denominator.3.3. Diagrammatic representation We can represent the E n k using diagrams. En-Em. For each intermediate state, we represent as a solid line with integer m labeling the state. En-Em. For each ψ m H ' ψ m', we represent it as a dot. And we use V m m' to represent ψ m H ' ψ m' 3. Connect everything together in the same order as in E n k 4. At the two ends of the line, we use two short line to present that we start from and end at the same state ψ n First order:

10 Phys46.nb 3 Second order: Third order By making the line longer, we can write down easily perturbation terms to any order. Relations to QFT: In QFT, we use very similar diagrams, known as the Feynman diagrams. There, solid lines are propagator of a particle ω-ϵ where ω is frequency, pretty much the same as energy E n and ϵ is the unperturbed energy of the particle (energy ignore interactions between particles). In faction, the diagrams we show here are baby versions of the diagrams of Feynman. Physics meaning discussed in class: (example: two electrons exchange photons to get E&M interactions) How to compute the energy using Brillouin-Wigner Perturbation Theory? First, let s define some abbreviation to make the formula shorter, V ij = ψ i and thus H ' ψ j (.86) E n = E n + λ V nn + λ V n m V m n E n - E m + λ3 V n m V m m' V m' n E n - E m E n - E m' + λ 4 V n m V m m' V m' m'' V m'' n +... E n - E m E n - E m' E n - E m'' (.87) Here all the ms are summed over but they cannot be the same as n. It may looks like that we can find E n using this formula, but it is not quite the case yet. This is because on the r.h.s., the denominator contains also E n, i.e. IT is a equation for E n and E n arises on both sides. This equation can be solved easily using iterative method (e.g. using a computer code). One start from zeroth order, and then go to first, second, third order, every time we need E n in the kth order calculation, we just use the (k - )th order E n on the r.h.s.. Here is how it is done First run E n () = E n + λ V nn (.88) Second run V n m V m n E () n = E n + λ V nn + λ E () n - E m (.89) Third run E n (3) = E n + λ V nn + λ V n m V m n E n () - E m + λ3 V n m V m m' V m' n E n () - E m E n () - E m' (.9) Fourth run

11 4 Phys46.nb V n m V m n E (4) n = E n + λ V nn + λ E (3) n - E + V n λ3 m V m m' V m' n m E (3) n - E m E (3) n - E m' + λ 4 V n m V m m' V m' m'' V m'' n E n (3) - E m E n (3) - E m' E n (3) - E m'' (.9)... Another option is using analytic methods, as will be discussed below Preparation Consider the following function f (x) = x g(x) = x + a x + b x + c x (.9) If we want to keep f (x) to O(x n ), we only need to keep g(x) to Ox n-. Similarly, for the following function f (x) = x g(x) = x + a x + b x + c x (.93) If we want to keep f (x) to O(x n ), we only need to keep g(x) to Ox n-. This will be something that useful for us latter.3.6. iterative method E n = E n + λ V nn + λ V n m V m n E n - E m + λ3 V n m V m m' V m' n E n - E m E n - E m' + λ 4 V n m V m m' V m' m'' V m'' n +... E n - E m E n - E m' E n - E m'' (.94) Zeroth order (no E n on the l.h.s., so job done) E n = E n + O(λ) (.95) First order (no E n on the l.h.s., so job done) E n = E n + λ V nn + Oλ (.96) Second order, we use E n obtained at zeroth order for the λ term E n = E n + λ V nn + λ V n m V m n E n - E + Oλ3 = E n + λ V nn + λ V n m V m n m E n - E + Oλ3 (.97) m This is because the third term on the r.h.s. already has a λ prefactor. Thus to keep to Oλ, we only need to keep the denominator to Oλ. Third order, E n = E n + λ V nn + λ V n m V m n E n - E m + λ3 V n m V m n E n + λ V nn + λ E n + λ V nn - E m V n m V m m' V m' n + Oλ 4 = E n - E m E n - E m' + λ 3 V n m V m m' V m' n + Oλ 4 E n - E m E n - E m' (.98) In the λ term, we now need to keep to O(λ). In the λ 3 term, we just need to keep E n to the zeroth order. For the λ term, we can expand it for small λ λ V n m V m n E n + λ V nn - E m = λ V n m V m n E n - E m - λ3 V n m V m n E n - E m V nn E n - E m + (.99) So E n = E n + λ V nn + λ V n m V m n E n - E + V n m V m m' V m' n λ3 m E n - E m E n - E m' - V n m V m n V n n E n - E m + Oλ4 (.) Fourth order,

12 Phys46.nb 5 V n m V m n E n = E n + λ V nn + λ + E n + λ V nn + λ Vn m' Vm' n - E En -Em' m λ 3 V n m V m m' V m' n E n + λ V nn - E m E n + λ V nn - E m' + λ 4 V n m V m m' V m' m'' V m'' n + Oλ 5 E n - E m E n - E m' E n - E m'' (.) E n = E n + λ V nn + λ V n m V m n E n - E + V n m V m m' V m' n λ3 m E n - E m E n - E m' - V n m V m n V n n E n - E m + V n m V λ 4 m m' V m' m'' V m'' n E n - E m E n - E m' E n - E m'' - V n m V m n E n - E m V n m' V m' n E n - E m' + V n m V m n V V n m V E n - E m 3 nn m m' V m' n V n n - + E n - E m E n - E m' (.) Oλ 5.4. Degenerate Perturbation Theory In the previous section, we studied the effect of a small perturbation λ H ' on an eigenstate of H, ψ n. The key assumption there is that before we turn on the perturbation (i.e. at λ = ), the eigenenergies of all other eigenstates of H are very far away from E n E n - E m > > ψ i λ H ' ψ j (.3) This section, we will consider the opposite situation, where there is at least one other eigenstate of H which has the same eigenenergy as ψ n. Two states having the same eigenenergy is known as degeneracy. So this perturbation theory is known as the degenerate perturbation theory..4.. Why non-degenerate perturbation theory fails in the presence of degeneracy? In the presence of degeneracy, the perturbation theory that we learned before will fail. To see this, we just need to look at the second order perturbation of the eigenenergy ψ n H ' ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n E n = E n + λ E n + λ E n + = E n + λ ψ n H ' ψ n + λ + m n (.4) E n - E m Here, we focus on the second order correction: λ m n ψ n H ' ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E m (.5) If H has another eigenstate ψ n' with the same eigenenergy, at least one term in this sum will have zero in the denominator and thus will diverge, i.e., when E n = E n', En -En', and thus the theory becomes ill-defined. NOTE: the same divergence will arise also in higher order corrections. But there is no divergence in the first order correction E n. In power-law expansions, infinite coefficient doesn t always mean singularity. It means that we missed something in the lower order correction. Here is a simple example: Let s consider a function f (x), which can be written as the following Taylor expansion at small x f (x) = a + a x + a x + (.6) Now, assume that I made a mistake in the Taylor expansion for the coefficient a. Instead of the correction value, a, I used a wrong coefficient for the linear term, say b. f (x) = a + b x + (a - b ) x + a x + (.7) In other words, here I missed part of the linear term, (a - b ) x. And thus coefficients of the higher order terms will also need to be adjusted to absorb this mistake. Let s try to use the x term to correct this error, i.e. f (x) = a + b x + a - b + a x + (.8) x

13 6 Phys46.nb Let me define b = a + a-b x f (x) = a + b x + b x + (.9) Now, once again, I wrote my function as a power-law expansion. Because I used a wrong coefficient for the linear term, b, my second order term needs to use this new coefficient. This new coefficient b is infinite at small x. This is transparent if we notice that when x b = a + a - b x (.) Bottom line: infinite coefficient in the second order term (and higher order term) means that the first order result is incorrect and needs to be revised..4.. What to do? Here, let s first take another look at the second order correction E n = m n ψ n H ' ψ m ψ m H ' ψ n E n - E m (.) As we know, the problem arises because E n = E m for certain m, and thus we get =. To avoid this singularity, the only thing that we need to do is to request that the numerator also vanish whenever the denominator is zero. i.e., if E n = E m, we must make sure that ψ m H ' ψ n =. NOTE: the two factors in the numerator are complex conjugate to each other: ψ n H ' ψ m = ψ m H ' ψ n *, and thus if one of them is zero, the other is also zero. Bottom line: For degenerate states, before we start the procedure described in the non-degenerate perturbation theory, we need to first make sure that for any degenerate states, ψ m H ' ψ n =.4.3. Whenever there is an degeneracy, we have an option to choose the basis A good example, a free particle. Consider a free particle with mass m. H = p m = - ħ m d d x (.) The eigenstates of H arises in pairs (i.e. there is a degeneracy for any excited states). The static Schrodinger equation here is - ħ m d dx ψ(x) = E ψ(x) (.3) It is a second order differential equation and we know the solution are just plane waves ψ = A e i k x + B e -i k x (.4) The eigenenergy for this state is E = p m = (ħ k) m, i.e. the kinetic energy. Here, A and B are two arbitrary coefficients. For each fixed k, we have one eigenenergy E = (ħ k) m, but infinite number of eigenstates ψ = A e i k x + B e -i k x, i.e. a degeneracy. This example is known as two-fold degeneracy, or we say that two states have the same energy. The reason we say two states here is because not all the eigenstates are linear independent. In fact, we just need two states, e i k x and e -i k x, all other eigenstates can be written as linear superposition of these two. Bottom line: two-fold degeneracy means that any linear combination of these two states is an eigenstate of H with the same eigenenergy. Now, let s look at the same second order differential equation again. - ħ m d dx ψ(x) = E ψ(x) (.5) we know that we can also write the solution for this equation as ψ = C cos k x + D sin k y (.6)

14 Phys46.nb 7 i.e., instead of using exponentials, we can use sin or cos functions to represent plane waves. Here, once again we find infinite number of eigenstates with the same eigenenergy, and once again, they are not all independent. We just need two states cos k x or sin k x. And all other eigenstates are just linear superpositions of they two. So, again, we reach the same conclusion, the system have a two-fold degeneracy. But early on, we said that the two states are e i k x and e -i k x, but now for the two degenerate states, we use cos k x or sin k x. These different choices are just different basis to represent all the eigenstates. We can choose to use e i k x and e -i k x or cos k x or sin k x. There is no difference between them. In fact, we can choose any two linear independent states ψ = A e i k x + B e -i k x ψ = A e i k x + B e -i k x (.7) (.8) And then, we can say that we have two degenerate states ψ (x) and ψ (x). and then, we can represent any other eigenstates (with the same eigenenergy) as ψ(x) = X ψ (x) + Y ψ (x) (.9) Q: Why do we usually use e i k x and e -i k x or cos k x or sin k x? Why not use e i k x and cos k x. A: There is no problem (mathematically) if we choose to use e i k x and cos k x. However, for convenience, it is usually better using orthonormal bases dx ei k x * e i k x = π δ(k - k ) (.) dx (cos k x)* sin k x = (.) Q: Why do we use e i k x and e -i k x more often than cos k x or sin k x in quantum mechanics? A: For H, there is little difference between the two choices. However, if we consider other quantum operators, like momentum, e i k x and e -i k x is a better choice. This is because e i k x and e -i k x are eigenstates of the momentum operator too! So they have not only well-defined energy, but also well defined momenta (ħ k and -ħ k respectively). cos k x or sin k x don t have well defined momentum. They have 5% chance having momentum ħ k and another 5% chance having momentum -ħ k. Bottom line: when you cannot decide which choice of basis is better, look at another quantum operator. These conclusions are true generically. Let s start from two-fold degenerate. Assuming that for H, there are two degenerate eigenstates: H ψ a = E ψ a (.) and H ψ b = E ψ b (.3) We assume that these two states are orthogonal to each other (otherwise, we make them orthogonal, using Gram-Schmidt procedure). We assume that ψ a H ' ψ b. Here we first prove a fact: if ψ a and ψ b are both eigenstates of H and they have the same eigenvalue E, then any linear superposition of ψ a and ψ b is also an eigenstate of H with the same eigenenergy. Let's define ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b H ψ = H α ψ a + β ψ b = α H ψ a + β H ψ b = α E ψ a + β E ψ b = E α H ψ a + β H ψ b = E ψ (.4) Bottom line: if H has two degenerate eigenstates ψ a and ψ b, we have infinite eigenstates with the same eigenvalue ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b To represent these infinite eigenstates, we need to choose two states as basis, e.g. ψ a and ψ b. Then, any eigenstates with eigenenergy E can be written as a superposition of them. When we have one set of basis, we know that we can choose another set of basis (i.e. we can change to a different set of basis): for example, we can define ψ and ψ, where ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b (.5)

15 8 Phys46.nb ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b (.6) Here, we request ψ and ψ to be orthogonal to each other (otherwise, we make them orthogonal, using Gram-Schmidt procedure) ψ ψ = ψ a α * + ψ b β * α ψ a + β ψ b = α * α + β * β = (.7) and we assume that ψ and ψ are normalized ψ ψ = ψ a α * + ψ b β * α ψ a + β ψ b = α * α + β * β = α + β = (.8) ψ ψ = ψ a α * + ψ b β * α ψ a + β ψ b = α * α + β * β = α + β = (.9) Bottom line, instead of our old states ψ a and ψ b, we can use ψ and ψ instead as our basis Which basis shall we use? As mentioned above, in general, ψ a H ' ψ b. If so, the native perturbation theory will have singularity at the second order. Now, we learned that we can choose to use a different set of unperturbed eigenstates ψ and ψ, so can we make ψ H ' ψ =? If so, it will save the day and get ride of the singularity. The way to do it is very simple. As we know early on, if we cannot decide which basis to use, we shall look at another quantum operator. Here we do have one more quantum operator, which is H '. We first write down a matrix W = ψ a H ' ψ a ψ a H ' ψ b ψ b H ' ψ a ψ b H ' ψ b To make the formula shorter, we define (.3) W ij = ψ i H ' ψ j (.3) So W = W aa W ba W bb (.3). W is a Hermitian matrix (W = W), so its eigenvalues are real This is pretty straightforward to prove, because ψ X ψ * = ψ X ψ. In particular, if X is an Hermitian operator (the quantum operator of any physics observable is Hermitian), we have X = X and thus ψ X ψ * = ψ X ψ. Thus it is easy to notice that W aa = W aa * and W bb = W bb * and W ba = * (.33) W = W * = Waa* W ba * * W bb * = Waa W bb = W (.34). W has two eigenvalues E + and E -, and each of them has a vector, α β for E + and α β for E - Waa α = E W ba W bb β + α β (.35) and Waa α = E W ba W bb β - α β (.36) where E + and E - are the two eigenvalues. 3. We can use these two eigenvectors to define our ψ and ψ as ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b (.37) (.38) As will be shown below, these two states are precisely what we should use for the perturbation theory.

16 Phys46.nb 9 4. The two eigenvalues are the first order corrections to the eigenenergy E = E + λ E + + Oλ E = E + λ E - + Oλ (.39) (.4) Q: Why we have two eigenenergies here? A: Because we started from two degenerate eigenstates. At λ =, the two states ψ and ψ have the same energy. Now, if we turn on a small perturbation λ H ', we find that these two states (in general) have different eigenenergies. One of them is E = E + λ E + + Oλ and the other E = E + λ E - + Oλ. NOTE #: We say that the perturbation lifted the degeneracy. NOTE #: After we lift the degeneracy, ψ and ψ no longer have the same energy. If the perturbation is small enough, we can now do non-degenerate perturbation theory, i.e. problem solved A key conclusion: in quantum mechanics, perturbations will in general lift all degeneracy, unless there is a reason saying that the degeneracy shall not be lifted. In general, in the study of qua tum physics, we can never include all terms in the Hamiltonian in our theoretical calculation. We always need some approximations (i.e. drop some small/unimportant part of the Hamiltonian). For example. in the study of a Hydrogen atom, we ignored relativistic effects. We also ignored the magnetic interactions between the electron and the nucleon (remember that both particles have spin. Whenever a charged particle starts to spin, there is a magnetic dipole. Because both the electron and the proton have magnetic dipoles, there should be an dipole-dipole interaction between them, which was ignored). In addition,we also ignored the earth magnetic field, which is always in presence when we do an experiment (unless we screen it out using some special devices.) Let s use H real to represent the full Hamiltonian of a real system and H model to represent the Hamiltonian that we used to theoretically analyze the system. We know that these two are not the same, because we always need some approximation to simplify a real problem, i.e. H real = H model + δh (.4) we can treat δh as a perturbation. Now here comes the questions, if we found that two (or more) states have the same eigenenergy (degeneracy) using H model, are these states really degenerate in a real system? The general answer is no (unless there is a reason), because our first order degenerate perturbation theory told as that any small perturbation will in general lift the degeneracy. The only except is: if there is a reason (usually based on symmetry) to tell us that W aa is exactly the same as W bb and = W ba = precisely. (in a real physics system, in most of the case, we cannot say that the value of a quantity is precisely this number. What we really mean is that there is an argument to show that the difference between W aa and W bb is unmeasurably small and and W ba is unmeasurably small) Prove: ψ H ' ψ = Here the proof contains two steps: first ψ H ' ψ = ( α * β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β (.4) and then we will show ( α * β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = (.43) The first step is very straightforward (it is from the definition of ψ and ψ ) ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b (.44) (.45) so

17 Phys46.nb ψ H ' ψ = ψ a α * + ψ b β * H ' α ψ a + β ψ b = ψ a α * + ψ b β * α H ' ψ a + β H ' ψ b = α * α ψ a H ' ψ a + α * β ψ a H ' ψ b + β * α ψ b H ' ψ a + β * β ψ b H ' ψ b (.46) The r.h.s. of the equation is in fact exactly the same, if we remember the definition of the W matrix W ij = ψ i H ' ψ j ( α * β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = α * α W aa + α * β + β * α W ba + β * β W bb (.47) So, we proved that ψ H ' ψ = ( α * β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β For the second step, we first consider the situation that E + E -. According to the eigenequations, we have W aa α = E W ba W bb β - α β (.48) If we multiply on both sides (α *, β * ), we get (α *, β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = (α *, β * ) E - α β = E - (α *, β * ) α β (.49) Similarly, if we start from the other eigenequation Waa α = E W ba W bb β + α β (.5) we get (α *, β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = (α *, β * ) E + α β = E + (α *, β * ) α β (.5) If we take a conjugate on both sides (α *, β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = E + (α *, β * ) α β (.5) here we used the fact that W is Hermitian and thus W = W. Notice that we have shown and (α *, β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = E + (α *, β * ) α β (.53) (α *, β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = E - (α *, β * ) α β (.54) If E + E - the only way that these two equations can both be valid is that (α *, β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = E + (α *, β * ) α β = E - (α *, β * ) α β = (.55) So we proved that ψ H ' ψ =. Q: what will happen is E + = E -? A: Turns out that this is the simple case. If E + = E -, as will be shown below, = ψ a H ' ψ b =. So, there is no divergence from the beginning. We can start the perturbation theory without worrying about these divergence First order perturbation The calculation described above provides to us the zeroth order wavefunctions (i.e., we should use ψ or ψ ), instead of ψ a or ψ b as our unperturbed wavefunction). As we learned early on (in non-degenerate perturbation theory), the first order correction of energy is just E n = ψ n H ' ψ n (.56) i.e., we use the zeroth order wavefunction and compute the expectation value for H '. Here, for the zeroth order wavefunctions, we have two of them, ψ and ψ, so we need to compute the first order energy correction for each of them. And we will prove in this section

18 Phys46.nb E = ψ H ' ψ = E + (.57) and E = ψ H ' ψ = E - (.58) i.e., the first order energy corrections for ψ and ψ are precisely the two eigenvalues of the W matrix. ψ H ' ψ = ψ a α * + ψ b β * H ' α ψ a + β ψ b = ψ a α * + ψ b β * α H ' ψ a + β H ' ψ b = α * α ψ a H ' ψ a + α * β ψ a H ' ψ b + β * α ψ b H ' ψ a + β * β ψ b H ' ψ b (.59) If we remember the definition of the W matrix W ij = ψ i H ' ψ j, we realized immediately that this formula is exactly the same as ( α * β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = α * α W aa + α * β + β * α W ba + β * β W bb (.6) So we found E = ψ H ' ψ = ( α * β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β (.6) Because α β is an eigenvector of B Waa α = E W ba W bb β + α β (.6) E = ψ H ' ψ = ( α * β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = E + ( α * β * ) α β (.63) Because we have required α β to be normalized, ( α * β * ) α β = α * α + β * β = E = ψ H ' ψ = ( α * β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = E + ( α * β * ) α β = E + (.64) Similarly, we can show that E = ψ H ' ψ = ( α * β * ) Waa W ba W bb α β = E - ( α * β * ) α β = E - (.65).4.8. Eigenvalues of the matrix W In this part, we review basic ideas of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. We starts from the eigenequation defined in the previous section W aa W ba W bb α β = E α β (.66) This means that W aa α + β = E α W ba α + W bb β = E β (.67) (.68) These two equations have an obvious and trivial solution α = β =. This solution is NOT what we want and we will not consider this trivial solution. To get a nontrivial solution, the eigenvalue E cannot be an arbitrary value. It can only be one of two values, as will be seeing below. Using the first equation, we get α = E - W aa β (.69) Using the second equation, we get α = E - W bb W ba β (.7) The first relation means

19 Phys46.nb α β = E - W aa but the second relation requires α β = E - W bb W ba So we have α β = = E - W bb E - W aa W ba (.7) (.7) (.73) In general, E-Waa E-W bb, so we find an contradiction. This contradiction means that for a general value of E, we will only have the trivial W ba solution α = β =. To get a nontrivial solution, we have to request E-Waa = E-W bb. This equation is often written in a different form W ba E - W aa = E - W bb W ba (E - W aa ) (E - W bb ) = W ba (E - W aa ) (E - W bb ) - W ba = - det E - Waa = -W ba E - W bb or equivalently det E E - Waa W ba W bb = det (E - W) = (.74) (.75) (.76) (.77) (.78) (.79) Here, W is the matrix that we define above W = W aa W ba W bb (.8) and number E here means E times the identity matrix E* = E E (.8) det (E - W) = means (W aa - E) (W bb - E) - W ba = (.8) And thus E - (W aa + W bb ) E + (W aa W bb - W ba ) = (.83) By definition, tr W = W aa + W bb and det W = W aa W bb - W ba. Therefore, we can write the same equation as E - tr WE + det W = (.84) This equation has two solutions E ± = tr W ± (tr W) - 4 det W (.85) As shown above, these two solutions, E ± are the first order correction to the eigenenergy. In the perturbation theory, the eigenenergies of these two quantum states are E = E + E + λ + Oλ (.86) and

20 Phys46.nb 3 E = E + E - λ + Oλ (.87) at small λ. Comment #. tr W and det W are both real. This is straightforward to prove, if we notice that W is Hermitian. Because W aa = W aa* and W bb = W bb* and W ba = *, W aa and W bb are real. And W ba = is also real, so tr W = W aa + W bb and det W = W aa W bb - W ba are both real. Comment #. (tr W) - 4 det W. Therefore, E ± are both real. (tr W) - 4 det W = (W aa + W bb ) - 4 W aa W bb + 4 W ba = (W aa - W bb ) + 4 (.88) here we used the fact that * = W ba. Comment #3. There are in general two possible situations (a) If (tr W) - 4 det W >, E + > E -. i.e. the two eigenvalues are NOT the same. (b) If W aa = W bb and = W ba =, (tr W) - 4 det W =, and thus E + = E - = tr W. The situation (b) is the easy case, because = W ba = means ψ a H ' ψ b =. Remember that the problem we had from the beginning is that the second order correction will diverge, ψa H' ψ b ψ b H' ψa, because E Ea -E a = E b. For situation (b), the numerator is zero, so there is no b divergence. And thus we can just do non-degenerate perturbation theory. The situation (a) is the more generic case. There, as we have shown early on, the perturbation H ' lift the degeneracy Eigenvectors of the matrix W In this section, we will assume that (tr W) - 4 det W >, i.e. situation (a) discussed in the previous section. We have two eigenvalues. For each eigenvalue, we can solve for the corresponding eigenvector. For the eigenvalue E + = tr W+ (tr W) -4 det W, we have Waa α = E W ba W bb β + α β (.89) and for the other eigenvalue E - = tr W- (tr W) -4 det W, we have Waa α = E W ba W bb β - α β (.9) We will use the first one as example (equation for E + ). There, the matrix equation can be written as two separate equations W aa α + β = E + α W ba α + W bb β = E + β (.9) (.9) Using the first equation, we get α = E + - W aa β (.93) Using the second equation, we get α = E + - W bb W ba β (.94) These two relations are actually identical, because for any eigenvalue E, we have E-Waa In addition, we know that α * α + β * β =, i.e. the normalization condition. So we have = E-W bb W ba as we proved early on. α = β = W ab +(E + - W aa ) E + - W aa W ab +(E + - W aa ) (.95) (.96) Similarly, we have

21 4 Phys46.nb α = β = W ab +(E - - W aa ) E - - W aa W ab +(E - - W aa ) (.97) (.98) In conclusion, we found that ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b = +(E + - W aa ) ψ a + E + - W aa W ab +(E + - W aa ) ψ b (.99) ψ = α ψ a + β ψ b = +(E - - W aa ) ψ a + E - - W aa W ab +(E - - W aa ) ψ b (.).4.. the very special case In general, we expect E + E -, i.e. the generacy is lifted. What will happen if E + = E -. From the equation E ± = tr W ± (tr W) - 4 det W (.) we know that E + = E - can only arise when (tr W) - 4 det W =, i.e. (tr W) - 4 det W =. As shown above (tr W) - 4 det W = (W aa - W bb ) + 4 (.) Both the two terms on the r.h.s. are non-negative, and thus if we want the whole thing to be zero, we must have (W aa - W bb ) = (.3) and 4 = (.4) i.e., W aa = W bb and =. With W aa = W bb and =, W is actually proptional to an identity matrix. W = W aa W aa = W aa (.5) This situation is highly unlikely to arise (unless there is a reason) because, in general, the W matrix has four free values to pick W aa, W bb, the real part of and the imaginary part of (note : W aa and W bb are real, so they don t have imaginary part. note : W ba is the complex conjugate of, so we don t need to consider it here as a seperate degree of freedom). If you have four real values, what is the probability for these four real values to satisify that W aa matches exactly W bb without any error bar, and both the real and imarginaly parts of vanishes exactly without any error bar? Without a reason, the chance is zero. So this is a sitation that we don t need to worry much, unless there is a reason. In most cases, such a specal case arises due to symmetry. For example, time reversal symmetry tells us that there should be two degenerate states (a state and its time reversal state). Then, for H these two states degenerates and for H, they should still be degenerate, so E + = E -. For that situation, it turns out that one can directly start from non-degenrate pertubation theory (no singularities will arise), although the states are degenerate. We will dicuss a more generic situation later, which covers this case..4.. Review: quantum states and quantum operators as matrices Once we choose a set of basis, any quantum state can be written as a vector (i.e., a N-by- matrix). For a complete set of basis, { ψ i }, we can write any quantum states as ψ = i c i ψ i (.6)

22 Phys46.nb 5 where c i are complex numbers. Here, we find that if we want to describe a state, we just need to know all the coefficient c i. We can write these c i as a vector c c c 3 (.7) These coefficients are c i = ψ i ψ (.8) To see this, we multiply ψ j for both sides of ψ = i c i ψ i ψ j ψ = i c i ψ j ψ i = i c i δ ij = c j Bottom line: a quantum state is a column vector ψ c c c 3 = ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ 3 ψ (.9) (.) Conjugate states is the represented by the conjugate vector. By definition, we know that ψ = i ψ i c i * (.) so, we can write all these c * i as a row vector ( c * c * c * 3 ) = ( ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ 3 ) (.) Here, we used the fact that ψ ψ i is the complex conjugate of ψ i ψ Inner produce of two states are product of a row vector and a column vector If we know two quantum states ψ c c c 3 (.3) and ϕ d d d 3 (.4) then, we know so ϕ ( d * d * d 3 * ) (.5) ϕ ψ ( d * d * d 3 * ) Q: How about a quantum operator? c c c 3 = d * c + d * c + d 3 * c 3 + (.6) A: Once we choose a set of basis, a quantum operator is a matrix. To understand this, we just need to realize that a quantum operator transforms a quantum state into a different state X ψ = ϕ (.7) As we have known, ψ is a column vector, and ϕ is another column vector. Which object transfers a column vector to a different column

23 6 Phys46.nb vector? We know that a matrix can do such a job x x x 3 x x x 3... x 3 x 3 x 33 c c c 3 = x c + x c + x 3 c 3 + x c + x c + x 3 c 3 + x 3 c + x 3 c + x 33 c 3 + = d d d 3 (.8) So a quantum operator is really similar to a matrix. In fact, the matrix elements x ij s are very easy to compute x ij = ψ i X ψ j (.9) Q: How about eigenvalues and eigenstates? A: Matrices also have eigenvalues and eigenstates x x x 3 x x x 3... x 3 x 3 x 33 c c c 3 = W c c c 3 (.). The matrix of a Hermitian operator is a Hermitian matrix. An N N Hermitian matrix has N eigenvalues,each of which has an eigenvector 3. Eigenvalues of the matrix is the same as the eigenvalues of the corresponding quantum operator 4. Each eigenvector corresponds to a eigenstate, i.e. If c c c 3 is an eigenvector with eigenvalue W, then ψ = i c i ψ i is an eigenstate of X with eigenvalue W. Final conclusion: for a quantum system, we just needs to play with matrices Only one problem: these matrices are huge ( ) It is extremely hard to handle big matrices (say million by million). So this approach doesn t make our life easier..4.. Degenerate perturbation theory H = H + λ H ' (.) Using eigenstates of H as basis, then H corresponds to a diagonal matrix H ψ i = E i ψ i (.) where i =,, 3, and we request this is an orthonormal basis ψ i ψ j = δ ij (.3) a matrix element of the matrix is So, ψ i H ψ j = ψ i E j ψ j = E j ψ i ψ j = E j δ i, j (.4) H E E... E 3 (.5) This conclusion is generically true. If we use the eigenstates of an operator as our basis, then this operator is a diagonal matrix (i.e. off-diagonal terms are all zero). And along the diagonal line, we just have all the eigenvalues of this quantum operator. λ H ' λ ψ H ' ψ ψ H ' ψ ψ H ' ψ 3 ψ H ' ψ ψ H ' ψ ψ H ' ψ 3... ψ 3 H ' ψ ψ 3 H ' ψ ψ 3 H ' ψ 3 (.6)

24 Phys46.nb 7 In general, H ' is NOT an diagonal matrix H = H + λ H ' E E... E 3 + λ ψ H ' ψ ψ H ' ψ ψ H ' ψ 3 ψ H ' ψ ψ H ' ψ ψ H ' ψ 3... ψ 3 H ' ψ ψ 3 H ' ψ ψ 3 H ' ψ 3 E + λ ψ H ' ψ λ ψ H ' ψ λ ψ H ' ψ 3 λ ψ H ' ψ E + λ ψ H ' ψ λ ψ H ' ψ 3... ψ 3 H ' ψ λ ψ 3 H ' ψ E 3 + λ ψ 3 H ' ψ 3 This is a very large matrix and is very hard to handle in general. However, if there are degenerate states, H =... E E = (.7) (.8) i.e., two of the eigenvalues of H coincides, or say two of two numbers along the diagonal line of the matrix of H happens to be the same, the we don t need to handle the whole big matrix, if λ is small. Here, we can do degenerate perturbation theory, and to the first order, we can forget all other quantum states and only look at the two degenerate ones. What does this mean? Remember, that in general, a set of complete basis contains infinite number of states ψ i with i =,,. As a result, the matrix of a quantum operator has dimension, ψ i X ψ j with i =,, and j =,,. Now, if we only limit ourselves to the two degenerate states ψ a and ψ b, then the matrix of our quantum operator only has dimensions, because my i and j here can only be a or b X ψ a X ψ a ψ a X ψ b ψ b X ψ a ψ b X ψ b For H, its matrix is H E E (.9) (.3) and for H ', the matrix is H ' ψ a H ' ψ a ψ a H ' ψ b ψ b H ' ψ a ψ b H ' ψ b (.3) So our H is H = H + λ H ' E + λ ψ a H ' ψ a λ ψ a H ' ψ b λ ψ b H ' ψ a E + λ ψ b H ' ψ b (.3) The eigenvalues of this matrix are E + λ E + and E + λ E -. And the eigenvector is the same as we computed in previous section Bottom line: for degenerate perturbation, we can drop all other states (with different eigenenergies), and consider a much smaller Hilbert space (only the degenerate states are considered here). Then, our Hamiltonian becomes a very small matrix, and we can diagonalize this small matrix. The eigenvalues are the eigenenergies to the first order. And the eigenvectors give us eigenwavefunctions to zeroth order n-fold degeneracy If H as n-fold degeneracy, and we want to do perturbation theory for these n degenerate states, we just ignore all other states and only keep these n states. H E E... E n n (.33)

Minimal coupling and Berry s phase

Minimal coupling and Berry s phase Phys460.nb 63 5 Minimal coupling Berry s phase Q: For charged quantum particles (e.g. electrons), if we apply an E&M field (E or B), the particle will feel the field. How do we consider the effect E B

More information

5.5. Representations. Phys520.nb Definition N is called the dimensions of the representations The trivial presentation

5.5. Representations. Phys520.nb Definition N is called the dimensions of the representations The trivial presentation Phys50.nb 37 The rhombohedral and hexagonal lattice systems are not fully compatible with point group symmetries. Knowing the point group doesn t uniquely determine the lattice systems. Sometimes we can

More information

Solutions Final exam 633

Solutions Final exam 633 Solutions Final exam 633 S.J. van Enk (Dated: June 9, 2008) (1) [25 points] You have a source that produces pairs of spin-1/2 particles. With probability p they are in the singlet state, ( )/ 2, and with

More information

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from?

Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from? 110 Phys460.nb 7 Second quantization: where quantization and particles come from? 7.1. Lagrangian mechanics and canonical quantization Q: How do we quantize a general system? 7.1.1.Lagrangian Lagrangian

More information

Physics 221A Fall 2018 Notes 22 Bound-State Perturbation Theory

Physics 221A Fall 2018 Notes 22 Bound-State Perturbation Theory Copyright c 2018 by Robert G. Littlejohn Physics 221A Fall 2018 Notes 22 Bound-State Perturbation Theory 1. Introduction Bound state perturbation theory applies to the bound states of perturbed systems,

More information

2 Canonical quantization

2 Canonical quantization Phys540.nb 7 Canonical quantization.1. Lagrangian mechanics and canonical quantization Q: How do we quantize a general system?.1.1.lagrangian Lagrangian mechanics is a reformulation of classical mechanics.

More information

Perturbation Theory 1

Perturbation Theory 1 Perturbation Theory 1 1 Expansion of Complete System Let s take a look of an expansion for the function in terms of the complete system : (1) In general, this expansion is possible for any complete set.

More information

Physics 115C Homework 2

Physics 115C Homework 2 Physics 5C Homework Problem Our full Hamiltonian is H = p m + mω x +βx 4 = H +H where the unperturbed Hamiltonian is our usual and the perturbation is H = p m + mω x H = βx 4 Assuming β is small, the perturbation

More information

Physics 202 Laboratory 5. Linear Algebra 1. Laboratory 5. Physics 202 Laboratory

Physics 202 Laboratory 5. Linear Algebra 1. Laboratory 5. Physics 202 Laboratory Physics 202 Laboratory 5 Linear Algebra Laboratory 5 Physics 202 Laboratory We close our whirlwind tour of numerical methods by advertising some elements of (numerical) linear algebra. There are three

More information

The Schrodinger Equation and Postulates Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case:

The Schrodinger Equation and Postulates Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: The Schrodinger Equation and Postulates Common operators in QM: Potential Energy Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case Time Total energy = Hamiltonian To find out about

More information

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization:

Summary of free theory: one particle state: vacuum state is annihilated by all a s: then, one particle state has normalization: The LSZ reduction formula based on S-5 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate scattering amplitude. Summary of free theory:

More information

1 Mathematical preliminaries

1 Mathematical preliminaries 1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical

More information

26 Group Theory Basics

26 Group Theory Basics 26 Group Theory Basics 1. Reference: Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics by Michael Tinkham. 2. We said earlier that we will go looking for the set of operators that commute with the molecular Hamiltonian.

More information

Topological insulator with time-reversal symmetry

Topological insulator with time-reversal symmetry Phys620.nb 101 7 Topological insulator with time-reversal symmetry Q: Can we get a topological insulator that preserves the time-reversal symmetry? A: Yes, with the help of the spin degree of freedom.

More information

6.1 Nondegenerate Perturbation Theory

6.1 Nondegenerate Perturbation Theory 6.1 Nondegenerate Perturbation Theory Analytic solutions to the Schrödinger equation have not been found for many interesting systems. Fortunately, it is often possible to find expressions which are analytic

More information

Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 27 The Variational Method

Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 27 The Variational Method Copyright c 2018 by Robert G. Littlejohn Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 27 The Variational Method 1. Introduction Very few realistic problems in quantum mechanics are exactly solvable, so approximation methods

More information

10 Time-Independent Perturbation Theory

10 Time-Independent Perturbation Theory S.K. Saiin Oct. 6, 009 Lecture 0 0 Time-Independent Perturbation Theory Content: Non-degenerate case. Degenerate case. Only a few quantum mechanical problems can be solved exactly. However, if the system

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i.

Quantum Mechanics Solutions. λ i λ j v j v j v i v i. Quantum Mechanics Solutions 1. (a) If H has an orthonormal basis consisting of the eigenvectors { v i } of A with eigenvalues λ i C, then A can be written in terms of its spectral decomposition as A =

More information

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen

Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen Physics 4 Lecture 7 Total Angular Momentum for Hydrogen Lecture 7 Physics 4 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, April th, 008 We have the Hydrogen Hamiltonian for central potential φ(r), we can write: H r = p

More information

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function

1 Quantum field theory and Green s function 1 Quantum field theory and Green s function Condensed matter physics studies systems with large numbers of identical particles (e.g. electrons, phonons, photons) at finite temperature. Quantum field theory

More information

(Again, this quantity is the correlation function of the two spins.) With z chosen along ˆn 1, this quantity is easily computed (exercise):

(Again, this quantity is the correlation function of the two spins.) With z chosen along ˆn 1, this quantity is easily computed (exercise): Lecture 30 Relevant sections in text: 3.9, 5.1 Bell s theorem (cont.) Assuming suitable hidden variables coupled with an assumption of locality to determine the spin observables with certainty we found

More information

The Particle in a Box

The Particle in a Box Page 324 Lecture 17: Relation of Particle in a Box Eigenstates to Position and Momentum Eigenstates General Considerations on Bound States and Quantization Continuity Equation for Probability Date Given:

More information

Physics 342 Lecture 17. Midterm I Recap. Lecture 17. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

Physics 342 Lecture 17. Midterm I Recap. Lecture 17. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Physics 342 Lecture 17 Midterm I Recap Lecture 17 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monday, March 1th, 28 17.1 Introduction In the context of the first midterm, there are a few points I d like to make about

More information

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 19 The Stark Effect in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 19 The Stark Effect in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 19 The Stark Effect in Hydrogen and Alkali Atoms In these notes we will consider the Stark effect in hydrogen and alkali atoms as a physically interesting example of bound

More information

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case

The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy. Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics Common operators in QM: Potential Energy Often depends on position operator: Kinetic Energy 1-D case: 3-D case Time Total energy = Hamiltonian To find out about the

More information

Statistical Interpretation

Statistical Interpretation Physics 342 Lecture 15 Statistical Interpretation Lecture 15 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, February 29th, 2008 Quantum mechanics is a theory of probability densities given that we now have an

More information

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd.

Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd. Time Independent Perturbation Theory Contd. A summary of the machinery for the Perturbation theory: H = H o + H p ; H 0 n >= E n n >; H Ψ n >= E n Ψ n > E n = E n + E n ; E n = < n H p n > + < m H p n

More information

Quantum Mechanics Solutions

Quantum Mechanics Solutions Quantum Mechanics Solutions (a (i f A and B are Hermitian, since (AB = B A = BA, operator AB is Hermitian if and only if A and B commute So, we know that [A,B] = 0, which means that the Hilbert space H

More information

Quantum field theory and Green s function

Quantum field theory and Green s function 1 Quantum field theory and Green s function Condensed matter physics studies systems with large numbers of identical particles (e.g. electrons, phonons, photons) at finite temperature. Quantum field theory

More information

Degenerate Perturbation Theory. 1 General framework and strategy

Degenerate Perturbation Theory. 1 General framework and strategy Physics G6037 Professor Christ 12/22/2015 Degenerate Perturbation Theory The treatment of degenerate perturbation theory presented in class is written out here in detail. The appendix presents the underlying

More information

The quantum state as a vector

The quantum state as a vector The quantum state as a vector February 6, 27 Wave mechanics In our review of the development of wave mechanics, we have established several basic properties of the quantum description of nature:. A particle

More information

Quantum Mechanics-I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 21 Square-Integrable Functions

Quantum Mechanics-I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras. Lecture - 21 Square-Integrable Functions Quantum Mechanics-I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture - 21 Square-Integrable Functions (Refer Slide Time: 00:06) (Refer Slide Time: 00:14) We

More information

Continuous quantum states, Particle on a line and Uncertainty relations

Continuous quantum states, Particle on a line and Uncertainty relations Continuous quantum states, Particle on a line and Uncertainty relations So far we have considered k-level (discrete) quantum systems. Now we turn our attention to continuous quantum systems, such as a

More information

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 5 Sep 2017

arxiv: v1 [hep-ph] 5 Sep 2017 A First Step Towards Effectively Nonperturbative Scattering Amplitudes in the Perturbative Regime Neil Christensen, Joshua Henderson, Santiago Pinto, and Cory Russ Department of Physics, Illinois State

More information

Approximation Methods in QM

Approximation Methods in QM Chapter 3 Approximation Methods in QM Contents 3.1 Time independent PT (nondegenerate)............... 5 3. Degenerate perturbation theory (PT)................. 59 3.3 Time dependent PT and Fermi s golden

More information

Topic 2: The mathematical formalism and the standard way of thin

Topic 2: The mathematical formalism and the standard way of thin The mathematical formalism and the standard way of thinking about it http://www.wuthrich.net/ MA Seminar: Philosophy of Physics Vectors and vector spaces Vectors and vector spaces Operators Albert, Quantum

More information

Magnets, 1D quantum system, and quantum Phase transitions

Magnets, 1D quantum system, and quantum Phase transitions 134 Phys620.nb 10 Magnets, 1D quantum system, and quantum Phase transitions In 1D, fermions can be mapped into bosons, and vice versa. 10.1. magnetization and frustrated magnets (in any dimensions) Consider

More information

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS

MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS Introduction Quantum theory of angular momentum Quantum theory of a particle in a central potential - Hydrogen atom - Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator (a model of

More information

LS coupling. 2 2 n + H s o + H h f + H B. (1) 2m

LS coupling. 2 2 n + H s o + H h f + H B. (1) 2m LS coupling 1 The big picture We start from the Hamiltonian of an atomic system: H = [ ] 2 2 n Ze2 1 + 1 e 2 1 + H s o + H h f + H B. (1) 2m n e 4πɛ 0 r n 2 4πɛ 0 r nm n,m Here n runs pver the electrons,

More information

Mathematical Introduction

Mathematical Introduction Chapter 1 Mathematical Introduction HW #1: 164, 165, 166, 181, 182, 183, 1811, 1812, 114 11 Linear Vector Spaces: Basics 111 Field A collection F of elements a,b etc (also called numbers or scalars) with

More information

Electrons in a periodic potential

Electrons in a periodic potential Chapter 3 Electrons in a periodic potential 3.1 Bloch s theorem. We consider in this chapter electrons under the influence of a static, periodic potential V (x), i.e. such that it fulfills V (x) = V (x

More information

Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM)

Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM) Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM) Note: This is a collection of several formulae and facts that we will use throughout the course. It is by no means a complete discussion of QM, nor will I attempt

More information

P3317 HW from Lecture 7+8 and Recitation 4

P3317 HW from Lecture 7+8 and Recitation 4 P3317 HW from Lecture 7+8 and Recitation 4 Due Friday Tuesday September 25 Problem 1. In class we argued that an ammonia atom in an electric field can be modeled by a two-level system, described by a Schrodinger

More information

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19

Page 404. Lecture 22: Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 2008/11/19 Date Revised: 2008/11/19 Page 404 Lecture : Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Basis Date Given: 008/11/19 Date Revised: 008/11/19 Coordinate Basis Section 6. The One-Dimensional Simple Harmonic Oscillator: Coordinate Basis Page

More information

129 Lecture Notes Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

129 Lecture Notes Relativistic Quantum Mechanics 19 Lecture Notes Relativistic Quantum Mechanics 1 Need for Relativistic Quantum Mechanics The interaction of matter and radiation field based on the Hamitonian H = p e c A m Ze r + d x 1 8π E + B. 1 Coulomb

More information

conventions and notation

conventions and notation Ph95a lecture notes, //0 The Bloch Equations A quick review of spin- conventions and notation The quantum state of a spin- particle is represented by a vector in a two-dimensional complex Hilbert space

More information

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation

The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) are solutions of time-independent Schrödinger equation Lecture 17 Page 1 Lecture 17 L17.P1 Review Schrödinger equation The general solution of Schrödinger equation in three dimensions (if V does not depend on time) is where functions are solutions of time-independent

More information

Models in condensed matter physics

Models in condensed matter physics 1 CM Theory of everything Models in condensed matter physics Let us consider how to write a Hamiltonian for a system that has N A atoms. For simplicity, let us assume they are all identical (generalization

More information

The Schrodinger Wave Equation (Engel 2.4) In QM, the behavior of a particle is described by its wave function Ψ(x,t) which we get by solving:

The Schrodinger Wave Equation (Engel 2.4) In QM, the behavior of a particle is described by its wave function Ψ(x,t) which we get by solving: When do we use Quantum Mechanics? (Engel 2.1) Basically, when λ is close in magnitude to the dimensions of the problem, and to the degree that the system has a discrete energy spectrum The Schrodinger

More information

II. The Machinery of Quantum Mechanics

II. The Machinery of Quantum Mechanics II. The Machinery of Quantum Mechanics Based on the results of the experiments described in the previous section, we recognize that real experiments do not behave quite as we expect. This section presents

More information

An operator is a transformation that takes a function as an input and produces another function (usually).

An operator is a transformation that takes a function as an input and produces another function (usually). Formalism of Quantum Mechanics Operators Engel 3.2 An operator is a transformation that takes a function as an input and produces another function (usually). Example: In QM, most operators are linear:

More information

Linear Algebra in Hilbert Space

Linear Algebra in Hilbert Space Physics 342 Lecture 16 Linear Algebra in Hilbert Space Lecture 16 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Monday, March 1st, 2010 We have seen the importance of the plane wave solutions to the potentialfree Schrödinger

More information

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10

Review of scalar field theory. Srednicki 5, 9, 10 Review of scalar field theory Srednicki 5, 9, 10 2 The LSZ reduction formula based on S-5 In order to describe scattering experiments we need to construct appropriate initial and final states and calculate

More information

Harmonic Oscillator I

Harmonic Oscillator I Physics 34 Lecture 7 Harmonic Oscillator I Lecture 7 Physics 34 Quantum Mechanics I Monday, February th, 008 We can manipulate operators, to a certain extent, as we would algebraic expressions. By considering

More information

Phys460.nb Back to our example. on the same quantum state. i.e., if we have initial condition (5.241) ψ(t = 0) = χ n (t = 0)

Phys460.nb Back to our example. on the same quantum state. i.e., if we have initial condition (5.241) ψ(t = 0) = χ n (t = 0) Phys46.nb 89 on the same quantum state. i.e., if we have initial condition ψ(t ) χ n (t ) (5.41) then at later time ψ(t) e i ϕ(t) χ n (t) (5.4) This phase ϕ contains two parts ϕ(t) - E n(t) t + ϕ B (t)

More information

Path integral in quantum mechanics based on S-6 Consider nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of one particle in one dimension with the hamiltonian:

Path integral in quantum mechanics based on S-6 Consider nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of one particle in one dimension with the hamiltonian: Path integral in quantum mechanics based on S-6 Consider nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of one particle in one dimension with the hamiltonian: let s look at one piece first: P and Q obey: Probability

More information

Quantum Mechanics- I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Quantum Mechanics- I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Quantum Mechanics- I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture - 6 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics II (Refer Slide Time: 00:07) In my last lecture,

More information

2. As we shall see, we choose to write in terms of σ x because ( X ) 2 = σ 2 x.

2. As we shall see, we choose to write in terms of σ x because ( X ) 2 = σ 2 x. Section 5.1 Simple One-Dimensional Problems: The Free Particle Page 9 The Free Particle Gaussian Wave Packets The Gaussian wave packet initial state is one of the few states for which both the { x } and

More information

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II

REVIEW REVIEW. Quantum Field Theory II Quantum Field Theory II PHYS-P 622 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory Chapters: 13, 14, 16-21, 26-28, 51, 52, 61-68, 44, 53, 69-74, 30-32, 84-86, 75,

More information

Quantum Field Theory II

Quantum Field Theory II Quantum Field Theory II PHYS-P 622 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory Chapters: 13, 14, 16-21, 26-28, 51, 52, 61-68, 44, 53, 69-74, 30-32, 84-86, 75,

More information

20 The Hydrogen Atom. Ze2 r R (20.1) H( r, R) = h2 2m 2 r h2 2M 2 R

20 The Hydrogen Atom. Ze2 r R (20.1) H( r, R) = h2 2m 2 r h2 2M 2 R 20 The Hydrogen Atom 1. We want to solve the time independent Schrödinger Equation for the hydrogen atom. 2. There are two particles in the system, an electron and a nucleus, and so we can write the Hamiltonian

More information

I. Perturbation Theory and the Problem of Degeneracy[?,?,?]

I. Perturbation Theory and the Problem of Degeneracy[?,?,?] MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Chemistry 5.76 Spring 19 THE VAN VLECK TRANSFORMATION IN PERTURBATION THEORY 1 Although frequently it is desirable to carry a perturbation treatment to second or third

More information

Page 52. Lecture 3: Inner Product Spaces Dual Spaces, Dirac Notation, and Adjoints Date Revised: 2008/10/03 Date Given: 2008/10/03

Page 52. Lecture 3: Inner Product Spaces Dual Spaces, Dirac Notation, and Adjoints Date Revised: 2008/10/03 Date Given: 2008/10/03 Page 5 Lecture : Inner Product Spaces Dual Spaces, Dirac Notation, and Adjoints Date Revised: 008/10/0 Date Given: 008/10/0 Inner Product Spaces: Definitions Section. Mathematical Preliminaries: Inner

More information

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers

Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers Ket space as a vector space over the complex numbers kets ϕ> and complex numbers α with two operations Addition of two kets ϕ 1 >+ ϕ 2 > is also a ket ϕ 3 > Multiplication with complex numbers α ϕ 1 >

More information

Eigenvectors and Hermitian Operators

Eigenvectors and Hermitian Operators 7 71 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Basic Definitions Let L be a linear operator on some given vector space V A scalar λ and a nonzero vector v are referred to, respectively, as an eigenvalue and corresponding

More information

[Disclaimer: This is not a complete list of everything you need to know, just some of the topics that gave people difficulty.]

[Disclaimer: This is not a complete list of everything you need to know, just some of the topics that gave people difficulty.] Math 43 Review Notes [Disclaimer: This is not a complete list of everything you need to know, just some of the topics that gave people difficulty Dot Product If v (v, v, v 3 and w (w, w, w 3, then the

More information

Particle Physics Dr. Alexander Mitov Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation

Particle Physics Dr. Alexander Mitov Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation Dr. A. Mitov Particle Physics 45 Particle Physics Dr. Alexander Mitov µ + e - e + µ - µ + e - e + µ - µ + e - e + µ - µ + e - e + µ - Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation Dr. A. Mitov Particle Physics 46 Non-Relativistic

More information

Quantum Mechanics- I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Quantum Mechanics- I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Quantum Mechanics- I Prof. Dr. S. Lakshmi Bala Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Madras Lecture - 4 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics I In today s lecture I will essentially be talking

More information

Generators for Continuous Coordinate Transformations

Generators for Continuous Coordinate Transformations Page 636 Lecture 37: Coordinate Transformations: Continuous Passive Coordinate Transformations Active Coordinate Transformations Date Revised: 2009/01/28 Date Given: 2009/01/26 Generators for Continuous

More information

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson. Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation. Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)

Particle Physics. Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson. Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation. Non-Relativistic QM (Revision) Particle Physics Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof. Mark Thomson + e - e + - + e - e + - + e - e + - + e - e + - Handout 2 : The Dirac Equation Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 45 Non-Relativistic QM (Revision)

More information

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics

Rotations in Quantum Mechanics Rotations in Quantum Mechanics We have seen that physical transformations are represented in quantum mechanics by unitary operators acting on the Hilbert space. In this section, we ll think about the specific

More information

MTH Linear Algebra. Study Guide. Dr. Tony Yee Department of Mathematics and Information Technology The Hong Kong Institute of Education

MTH Linear Algebra. Study Guide. Dr. Tony Yee Department of Mathematics and Information Technology The Hong Kong Institute of Education MTH 3 Linear Algebra Study Guide Dr. Tony Yee Department of Mathematics and Information Technology The Hong Kong Institute of Education June 3, ii Contents Table of Contents iii Matrix Algebra. Real Life

More information

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 7, February 1, 2006

Chem 3502/4502 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 2006 Christopher J. Cramer. Lecture 7, February 1, 2006 Chem 350/450 Physical Chemistry II (Quantum Mechanics) 3 Credits Spring Semester 006 Christopher J. Cramer ecture 7, February 1, 006 Solved Homework We are given that A is a Hermitian operator such that

More information

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours.

Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours. Quantum Physics III (8.06) Spring 2007 FINAL EXAMINATION Monday May 21, 9:00 am You have 3 hours. There are 10 problems, totalling 180 points. Do all problems. Answer all problems in the white books provided.

More information

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send to

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send  to Teoretisk Fysik KTH Advanced QM (SI2380), Lecture 2 (Summary of concepts) 1 PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send email to langmann@kth.se) The laws of QM 1. I now discuss the laws of QM and their

More information

Physics 342 Lecture 23. Radial Separation. Lecture 23. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I

Physics 342 Lecture 23. Radial Separation. Lecture 23. Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Physics 342 Lecture 23 Radial Separation Lecture 23 Physics 342 Quantum Mechanics I Friday, March 26th, 2010 We begin our spherical solutions with the simplest possible case zero potential. Aside from

More information

ECE 501b Homework #4 Due: 10/22/2012

ECE 501b Homework #4 Due: 10/22/2012 1. Game Strategy: Consider a multiplayer boardgame that takes place on the following board and with the following rules: 7 8 9 10 6 11 5 12 4 3 2 1 The board contains six squares that are property (the

More information

A Review of Perturbation Theory

A Review of Perturbation Theory A Review of Perturbation Theory April 17, 2002 Most quantum mechanics problems are not solvable in closed form with analytical techniques. To extend our repetoire beyond just particle-in-a-box, a number

More information

c 1 v 1 + c 2 v 2 = 0 c 1 λ 1 v 1 + c 2 λ 1 v 2 = 0

c 1 v 1 + c 2 v 2 = 0 c 1 λ 1 v 1 + c 2 λ 1 v 2 = 0 LECTURE LECTURE 2 0. Distinct eigenvalues I haven t gotten around to stating the following important theorem: Theorem: A matrix with n distinct eigenvalues is diagonalizable. Proof (Sketch) Suppose n =

More information

7.4. Why we have two different types of materials: conductors and insulators?

7.4. Why we have two different types of materials: conductors and insulators? Phys463.nb 55 7.3.5. Folding, Reduced Brillouin zone and extended Brillouin zone for free particles without lattices In the presence of a lattice, we can also unfold the extended Brillouin zone to get

More information

Harmonic Oscillator with raising and lowering operators. We write the Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator in one dimension as follows:

Harmonic Oscillator with raising and lowering operators. We write the Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator in one dimension as follows: We write the Schrödinger equation for the harmonic oscillator in one dimension as follows: H ˆ! = "!2 d 2! + 1 2µ dx 2 2 kx 2! = E! T ˆ = "! 2 2µ d 2 dx 2 V ˆ = 1 2 kx 2 H ˆ = ˆ T + ˆ V (1) where µ is

More information

Page 684. Lecture 40: Coordinate Transformations: Time Transformations Date Revised: 2009/02/02 Date Given: 2009/02/02

Page 684. Lecture 40: Coordinate Transformations: Time Transformations Date Revised: 2009/02/02 Date Given: 2009/02/02 Page 684 Lecture 40: Coordinate Transformations: Time Transformations Date Revised: 2009/02/02 Date Given: 2009/02/02 Time Transformations Section 12.5 Symmetries: Time Transformations Page 685 Time Translation

More information

QFT. Chapter 14: Loop Corrections to the Propagator

QFT. Chapter 14: Loop Corrections to the Propagator QFT Chapter 14: Loop Corrections to the Propagator Overview Here we turn to our next major topic: loop order corrections. We ll consider the effect on the propagator first. This has at least two advantages:

More information

Special Theory of Relativity Prof. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 15 Momentum Energy Four Vector

Special Theory of Relativity Prof. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 15 Momentum Energy Four Vector Special Theory of Relativity Prof. Shiva Prasad Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 15 Momentum Energy Four Vector We had started discussing the concept of four vectors.

More information

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory

Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology June 2002 Last Revised: June 2003 1 Introduction The purpose of these

More information

ECE 487 Lecture 5 : Foundations of Quantum Mechanics IV Class Outline:

ECE 487 Lecture 5 : Foundations of Quantum Mechanics IV Class Outline: ECE 487 Lecture 5 : Foundations of Quantum Mechanics IV Class Outline: Linearly Varying Potential Triangular Potential Well Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation Things you should know when you leave Key

More information

Intermission: Let s review the essentials of the Helium Atom

Intermission: Let s review the essentials of the Helium Atom PHYS3022 Applied Quantum Mechanics Problem Set 4 Due Date: 6 March 2018 (Tuesday) T+2 = 8 March 2018 All problem sets should be handed in not later than 5pm on the due date. Drop your assignments in the

More information

Phase transition and spontaneous symmetry breaking

Phase transition and spontaneous symmetry breaking Phys60.nb 111 8 Phase transition and spontaneous symmetry breaking 8.1. Questions: Q1: Symmetry: if a the Hamiltonian of a system has certain symmetry, can the system have a lower symmetry? Q: Analyticity:

More information

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 16 Bloch s Theorem and Band Structure in One Dimension

Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 16 Bloch s Theorem and Band Structure in One Dimension Physics 221A Fall 1996 Notes 16 Bloch s Theorem and Band Structure in One Dimension In these notes we examine Bloch s theorem and band structure in problems with periodic potentials, as a part of our survey

More information

Atomic Systems (PART I)

Atomic Systems (PART I) Atomic Systems (PART I) Lecturer: Location: Recommended Text: Dr. D.J. Miller Room 535, Kelvin Building d.miller@physics.gla.ac.uk Joseph Black C407 (except 15/1/10 which is in Kelvin 312) Physics of Atoms

More information

Department of Physics, Princeton University. Graduate Preliminary Examination Part II. Friday, May 10, :00 am - 12:00 noon

Department of Physics, Princeton University. Graduate Preliminary Examination Part II. Friday, May 10, :00 am - 12:00 noon Department of Physics, Princeton University Graduate Preliminary Examination Part II Friday, May 10, 2013 9:00 am - 12:00 noon Answer TWO out of the THREE questions in Section A (Quantum Mechanics) and

More information

CHMY 564 Homework #3 2Feb17 Due Friday, 10Feb17

CHMY 564 Homework #3 2Feb17 Due Friday, 10Feb17 564-17 Lec 11 Mon 6feb17 CHMY 564 Homework #3 2Feb17 Due Friday, 10Feb17 1. (a) Find the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the x component of linear momentum. (b) Why can a momentum eigenfunction never

More information

ECE 487 Lecture 6 : Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics I Class Outline:

ECE 487 Lecture 6 : Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics I Class Outline: ECE 487 Lecture 6 : Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics I Class Outline: Time-Dependent Schrödinger Equation Solutions to thetime-dependent Schrödinger Equation Expansion of Energy Eigenstates Things you

More information

Quantum Measurements: some technical background

Quantum Measurements: some technical background Quantum Measurements: some technical background [From the projection postulate to density matrices & (introduction to) von Neumann measurements] (AKA: the boring lecture) First: One more example I wanted

More information

3.23 Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Materials

3.23 Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Materials MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 3.23 Electrical, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Materials Fall 2007 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms.

More information

Chapter 6. Q. Suppose we put a delta-function bump in the center of the infinite square well: H = αδ(x a/2) (1)

Chapter 6. Q. Suppose we put a delta-function bump in the center of the infinite square well: H = αδ(x a/2) (1) Tor Kjellsson Stockholm University Chapter 6 6. Q. Suppose we put a delta-function bump in the center of the infinite square well: where α is a constant. H = αδ(x a/ ( a Find the first-order correction

More information

Identical Particles. Bosons and Fermions

Identical Particles. Bosons and Fermions Identical Particles Bosons and Fermions In Quantum Mechanics there is no difference between particles and fields. The objects which we refer to as fields in classical physics (electromagnetic field, field

More information

Problem 1: A 3-D Spherical Well(10 Points)

Problem 1: A 3-D Spherical Well(10 Points) Problem : A 3-D Spherical Well( Points) For this problem, consider a particle of mass m in a three-dimensional spherical potential well, V (r), given as, V = r a/2 V = W r > a/2. with W >. All of the following

More information

0 + E (1) and the first correction to the ground state energy is given by

0 + E (1) and the first correction to the ground state energy is given by 1 Problem set 9 Handout: 1/24 Due date: 1/31 Problem 1 Prove that the energy to first order for the lowest-energy state of a perturbed system is an upper bound for the exact energy of the lowest-energy

More information

P3317 HW from Lecture and Recitation 10

P3317 HW from Lecture and Recitation 10 P3317 HW from Lecture 18+19 and Recitation 10 Due Nov 6, 2018 Problem 1. Equipartition Note: This is a problem from classical statistical mechanics. We will need the answer for the next few problems, and

More information