The number 6. Gabriel Coutinho 2013
|
|
- Jocelin McCoy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The number 6 Gabriel Coutinho 2013 Abstract The number 6 has a unique and distinguished property. It is the only natural number n for which there is a construction of n isomorphic objects on a set with n elements, invariant under all permutations of the set, but not in natural bijection with the set. I will talk about this fact and a closely related result. This is based on Chapter 6 of Cameron and Van Lint [1]. 1 A distinguished property of 6 Theorem 1. The number 6 is the only natural number n that satisfies the following property: If E is an n-set, then there is a construction of exactly n isomorphic objects on E whose union is invariant under the permutations of E, but none correspond in natural way to an element of E. Some clarification is needed here. Neither the meaning of object nor that of natural is clear. I will make it even worse, and provide a bad definition for one, and an incomplete for the other. An object on a set E is a construction that can be made using the elements of E and set-theoretical operations, such as taking the union. An object on E corresponds naturally to a point of E if the automorphism group of the object is the stabilizer of that point in S n. Despite such abstract formulation, we will see that this theorem has a very concrete interpretation. In particular, the shape of such objects will arise naturally throughout the proof. The idea of the proof is to analyse the automorphism group the objects defined by 1
2 the automorphisms of the ground set which do not change the object. The skeleton and the muscle of the proof is in Cameron and Van Lint [1]. Here I will add all the fat it deserves. Proof. Let O be one of such objects. Let H be the automorphism group of O, in the sense that H is the subgroup of S n that fixes O. By hypothesis, there are n 1 objects isomorphic to O defined on E, and H is the automorphism group of each of them. Because S n fixes the union of such objects, either an element of S n fixes O or maps it to some of the other objects, therefore H has n left classes, and hence its index in S n is n. Fact 1: H is transitive. Proof: If not, consider a natural k satisfying 0 < k < n such that H fixes a k-subset F of E. Let K be the full group of automorphisms of E that fixes F, K S n. Note that H K. Now K has ( ) n k left classes on S n, as S n acts transitively on k-subsets. Hence its index is ( n k), and Thus H K [S n : K] [S n : H]. ( ) n n. k This is only possible for k = 1 or k = n 1, which is essentially the same case, but is anyway contrary to the assumption that none of the objects is in natural correspondence to an element of E. Fact 2: H is primitive - meaning that it is transitive and it preserves no non-trivial partition of E. Proof: Being transitive, the only possible way H could preserve a partition would be if such partition had parts of same size. Now suppose that k is the number of parts of a non-trivial partition P preserved by H, all of the parts of P of same size and 1 < k n/2. Let K be the full automorphism group of P, hence H K S n. Note that there are: k!) such partitions, therefore this is k the index of K in S n (as it is the number of left cosets). 2
3 Again, we have that the index of K must divide the index of H: k!) k n This is certainly possible for k = 1 and k = n, cases in which the partition is trivial. Now observe that k!) k k!(n/k) 1. For k 3 and n 8, we have that k! (n/k) 1 > k k n n, hence a contradiction. For k = 3 and n = 6, k!) k For k = 2 and n 8, we have that = 15 > 6. k!) k > 2(n/2) 1 n, again a contradiction. Finally, for n = 6 we have and for n = 4, we have k!) k = 10 > 6, k!) k = 3 that does not divide 4. We therefore observe that there is no valid choice for k but for 1 or n, concluding that H is primitive. Fact 3: H contains no 3-cycle. Proof: Suppose to the contrary that it does. Consider the relation in E defined by a b whenever a = b or there is a 3-cycle σ H acting as σ(a) = b. We claim that this is an equivalence relation. It is clearly reflexive and symmetric. To see transitivity, note that if a b and b c, we have either of the following: 3
4 (abx) H and (bcy) H, and therefore (bcy) (xba) (ycb) (abx) = (abc), hence a c. (abx) H and (bcx) H, and therefore (abx) (bcx) = (cab), hence a c. Also, if a b c, then as we saw above, (abc) H. Now suppose partitioned H into more than one equivalence class. As we saw above, H cannot fix such classes, so consider a permutation τ that maps some elements of a class C 1 to some class C 2, and some other elements to a class C i, where i can be anything but 2. Suppose, for example, a, b, c C 1 and τ(b) C 2 and τ(a) C i. Now observe that τ (abc) τ 1 = (τ(a)τ(b)τ(c)) H, a contradiction to the fact that τ(a) and τ(b) lie on different classes. Therefore must be a universal relation, in the sense that any two elements are related. Hence H contains all 3-cycles and must be the alternating subgroup of S n. Its index in S n for any n is 2, and hence n = 2. Thus H is trivial, and therefore fixes a point, a contradiction to the fact that H is transitive. Fact 4: H contains no transposition. Proof: Observe that we could follow the same argument as above, being even easier to show that an analogous relation is of equivalence. If, as above, such equivalence relation is not universal, we would find a contradiction to the fact that H is primitive. If it were universal, we would end up finding that H is S n itself, as all the transpositions generate S n, again a contradiction. Now let us analise where the transpositions of S n are. We have ( ) n 2 transpositions distributed among the n 1 left (or right) cosets of H. If two transpositions moving a common point lay on the same coset, we would have (ab)(bc) 1 = (abc) H, a contradiction. Therefore each coset must contain n 2 pairwise disjoint transpositions, what defines a factor of E. Fact 5: If (a b) and (c d) are the transpositions in the same left coset, then for any element h H are in the same left coset. (h(a) h(b)) and (h(c) h(d)) 4
5 Proof: As (cd) (ab)h, let (cd) = (ab)g, g H. We have Thus h(a b)h 1 = (h(a) h(b)). (h(c) h(d)) = h(c d)h 1 = h(a b)gh 1 = (h(a) h(b))hgh 1 (h(a) h(b))h. Therefore an element of H either preserves one of the collections of n/2 transpositions or maps one to another. Thus H preserves a factorization of E. There are (n 1) factors on a factorization of E. We pick one and note that an element of H either fixes it or maps it to some other. So the stabilizer of a factor in H, say F, has index at most n 1 (using the Orbit-Stabilizer Lemma and Lagrange s theorem). Its index on S n is therefore at most n(n 1). However, there are (n 1)!! = (n 1)(n 3) factors in E, what can be easily seen by elementary counting arguments. They are all permuted transitively in S n, so this is the index of the stabilizer of the same factor in S n, say F. Now therefore F F S n [S n : F ] [S n : F ], (n 1)(n 3) n(n 1). This implies that n 6. Remember that n is even. If n = 2 or n = 4, there is just one factorization. Hence these cases are excluded. So n = 6 is the only possible case. We construct 6 isomorphic factorization on a set of size 6. It is easier at this point to think of our 6-set as the complete graph K 6. Theorem 2. There are 6 factorizations on a set of size 6, any two of them isomorphic. Furthermore, two disjoint factors are contained in a unique factorization. 5
6 Proof. Let us build a factorization. The union of two disjoint factors of a complete graph is a graph where every vertex has degree 2. Hence it is a union of disjoint cycles. As n = 6, it must be a 6-cycle. The remaining 9 edges are either between vertices at distance 3 or at distance 2 in such cycle. There are 3 of the first type and 6 of the second. It is easy to see that 3 edges of the second type cannot form a factor, hence any factor now must have 1 edge of the first type and 2 of the second. It is also easy to see that fixed an edge of the first type, the other two are determined. Therefore all factorizations have the same structure, hence they are isomorphic. Each factorization contains 10 pairs of disjoint factors, and each pair of factors determines a factorization. There are 15 factors in the graph, and for each we can build 8 disjoint factors. So there ate 60 pairs of disjoint factors in total. Easy double-counting implies that there are 6 factorizations. 2 The outer automorphisms of S n In this section, we will prove that S 6 is the only symmetric group that admits an outer automorphism. First, we will understand what this means. Then we will see how this is related to the past section. Given a group G and an element a G, we call conjugation by a the mapping: ϕ a : G G g aga 1. Observe that each ϕ a is a group automorphism. Any automorphism of this form will be called an inner automorphism of G. Moreover, ϕ a ϕ b = ϕ ab, so the set of all such automorphisms form a subgroup of the automorphisms group of G, denoted by Inn(G) Any automorphism of a group which is not an inner automorphism is called an outer automorphism. A very important fact about S n is that an inner automorphism preserves the cycle type of a permutation. The following fact, whose proof is trivial, is the key to prove this statement: Proposition 1. Let a S n and consider the transposition (i j) S n. Then a(i j)a 1 = (a(i) a(j)). 6
7 Corollary 2.1. An inner automorphism preserves cycle type. Moreover, if two permutations have the same cycle type, there is an inner automorphism mapping one to the other. Using the corollary above, we have: Corollary 2.2. Let θ be an automorphism of S n. Then permutations of same cycle type are mapped by θ to permutations of same cycle type. In other words, θ naturally induces a bijection between the cycle types. Proof. Let a and b be permutations of same cycle type. Let ϕ g be the inner automorphism that maps a to b. Then: θ(b) = θ(ϕ g (a)) = ϕ θ(g) θ(a) Hence θ(b) and θ(a) have the same cycle type. 2.1 Number 6 again It is easier to prove the theorem below than to prove Theorem 1. This is compensated by the fact that it is easier to construct the factorizations of K 6 than an outer automorphism of S 6. Here I will prove the theorem below using Theorem 1, probably to understand better the connection between these results. Theorem 3. Except for n = 6, no symmetric group S n admits an outer automorphism. Proof. Let θ be an outer automorphism. Observe that it maps the transpositions containing a fixed element i [n] to permutations of same cycle type. The collection of such permutations is an object O i, and the permutation θ(i j) maps a permutation of O i to one of O j. That is because θ(i j) 1 θ(i k)θ(i j) = θ(k j). Moreover, any permutation g S n can be written as g = θ(h), and h is a product of transpositions, hence the collection of the objects O i is invariant under S n. The automorphism θ maps transpositions to permutations of order 2 which are not transpositions, that is, disjoint union of transpositions. If θ(i j) is a permutation that fixes i and j, then (i j) is a permutation that fixes θ(i j) but not i. Suppose θ(i j) does not fix i. Because it is a union of at least two transposition, let k be such that θ(i j)[i] = i 1 and θ(i j)[k] = i 2, 7
8 with i i 1 and k i 2. Then (i 1 i 2 ) maps θ(i j) to θ(k j) but fixes i. At any case, the stabilizer of i in S n is not equal to the automorphism group of O i. So the objects O i with i [n] are isomorphic, their union is invariant under S n, but their automorphism group is not the stabilizer of any point. That all together implies that n = 6 by Theorem 1. Theorem 4. S 6 admits an outer automorphism. Observe that this outer automorphism must map each transposition to a permutation that resembles a 1-factor, hence the transpositions containing a particular element will define a 1-factorization. This implies that for any two outer automorphisms θ and σ, there will be an inner automorphism ϕ such that θ = σϕ. In particular, Aut(S 6 )/Inn(S 6 ) = 2. There are many constructions of an outer automorphism for S 6. Inspired by what we did before, we could just select a 1-factorization of [6] and associate its 1-factors to the transpositions containing 1. As such transpositions generate S n, we would need only to prove that this is a well-defined bijection. There is an easier and nicer way though. Proof. In general, the group S n can be embedded in S n+1 by considering the stabilizer of an element. The great thing here is that there is a copy of S 5 in S 6 which acts transitively on [6]: it does not fix an element at all. To construct such embedding, consider the 24 permutations of S 5 that are cycles of length 5. The order of such cycles is 5, therefore these 24 permutations can be partitioned into the non-identity elements of six distinct subgroups of S 5. Voilà: S 5 acts transitively by conjugation on these 6 subgroups. Each element of S 5 can be hence identified with a permutation of S 6 once such six subgroups are numbered. Moreover, the kernel of this homomorphism is a normal subgroup of S 5, hence the only non-trivial possible choice would be A 5. But clearly (123) is not on the kernel, hence the kernel is trivial and this homomorphism is injective. Let H be the image of S 5 in S 6 which is a transitive subgroup. Observe that H has index 6, and call L the set of its right cosets. As L = 6, the full group of symmetries of L is S 6. However S 6 acts on L in other way: by right multiplication, permuting its elements. Therefore the correspondence φ between an element of S 6 and the permutation that it induces on the right cosets of H is a endomorphism of S 6. It is injective because any permutation fixing H must 8
9 be contained in H, so the kernel of this endomorphism is a subgroup of H. But H has index 6, and S 6 has no normal subgroup of index greater or equal than 6. Thus φ is an automorphism of S 6. Finally, observe that φ maps every element of H to a permutation that fixes the coset He = H, so H is mapped to the subgroup stabilizer of a point. If φ were an inner automorphism, say ϕ a, it would have to map a transitive group to a transitive group. This is because given elements i and j of [6], there is a permutation of h H that maps a 1 (i) to a 1 (j) because H is transitive. Hence aha 1 maps i to j, and ϕ a (H) is transitive. Therefore φ is not an inner automorphism, and we are done. References [1] Peter J Cameron and Jacobus Hendricus Van Lint. Designs, graphs, codes, and their links. Cambridge University Press,
Definitions. Notations. Injective, Surjective and Bijective. Divides. Cartesian Product. Relations. Equivalence Relations
Page 1 Definitions Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:23 AM Notations " " means "equals, by definition" the set of all real numbers the set of integers Denote a function from a set to a set by Denote the image of
More informationGroups and Symmetries
Groups and Symmetries Definition: Symmetry A symmetry of a shape is a rigid motion that takes vertices to vertices, edges to edges. Note: A rigid motion preserves angles and distances. Definition: Group
More informationPermutation groups/1. 1 Automorphism groups, permutation groups, abstract
Permutation groups Whatever you have to do with a structure-endowed entity Σ try to determine its group of automorphisms... You can expect to gain a deep insight into the constitution of Σ in this way.
More informationIndependent generating sets and geometries for symmetric groups
Independent generating sets and geometries for symmetric groups Peter J. Cameron School of Mathematical Sciences Queen Mary, University of London Mile End Road London E1 4NS UK Philippe Cara Department
More informationMODEL ANSWERS TO THE FIFTH HOMEWORK
MODEL ANSWERS TO THE FIFTH HOMEWORK 1. Chapter 3, Section 5: 1 (a) Yes. Given a and b Z, φ(ab) = [ab] = [a][b] = φ(a)φ(b). This map is clearly surjective but not injective. Indeed the kernel is easily
More informationSUPPLEMENT ON THE SYMMETRIC GROUP
SUPPLEMENT ON THE SYMMETRIC GROUP RUSS WOODROOFE I presented a couple of aspects of the theory of the symmetric group S n differently than what is in Herstein. These notes will sketch this material. You
More informationMath 250A, Fall 2004 Problems due October 5, 2004 The problems this week were from Lang s Algebra, Chapter I.
Math 250A, Fall 2004 Problems due October 5, 2004 The problems this week were from Lang s Algebra, Chapter I. 24. We basically know already that groups of order p 2 are abelian. Indeed, p-groups have non-trivial
More informationSchool of Mathematics and Statistics. MT5824 Topics in Groups. Problem Sheet I: Revision and Re-Activation
MRQ 2009 School of Mathematics and Statistics MT5824 Topics in Groups Problem Sheet I: Revision and Re-Activation 1. Let H and K be subgroups of a group G. Define HK = {hk h H, k K }. (a) Show that HK
More informationfor all i = 1,..., k and we are done.
FINITE PERMUTATION GROUPS AND FINITE CLASSICAL GROUPS 23 5. Primitivity and related notions In this section we study some key properties of group actions. We will use this material in the next chapter
More informationExamples: The (left or right) cosets of the subgroup H = 11 in U(30) = {1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29} are
Cosets Let H be a subset of the group G. (Usually, H is chosen to be a subgroup of G.) If a G, then we denote by ah the subset {ah h H}, the left coset of H containing a. Similarly, Ha = {ha h H} is the
More informationChapter 5 Groups of permutations (bijections) Basic notation and ideas We study the most general type of groups - groups of permutations
Chapter 5 Groups of permutations (bijections) Basic notation and ideas We study the most general type of groups - groups of permutations (bijections). Definition A bijection from a set A to itself is also
More informationMODEL ANSWERS TO HWK #4. ϕ(ab) = [ab] = [a][b]
MODEL ANSWERS TO HWK #4 1. (i) Yes. Given a and b Z, ϕ(ab) = [ab] = [a][b] = ϕ(a)ϕ(b). This map is clearly surjective but not injective. Indeed the kernel is easily seen to be nz. (ii) No. Suppose that
More informationBASIC GROUP THEORY : G G G,
BASIC GROUP THEORY 18.904 1. Definitions Definition 1.1. A group (G, ) is a set G with a binary operation : G G G, and a unit e G, possessing the following properties. (1) Unital: for g G, we have g e
More informationAbstract Algebra II Groups ( )
Abstract Algebra II Groups ( ) Melchior Grützmann / melchiorgfreehostingcom/algebra October 15, 2012 Outline Group homomorphisms Free groups, free products, and presentations Free products ( ) Definition
More informationREU 2007 Discrete Math Lecture 2
REU 2007 Discrete Math Lecture 2 Instructor: László Babai Scribe: Shawn Drenning June 19, 2007. Proofread by instructor. Last updated June 20, 1 a.m. Exercise 2.0.1. Let G be an abelian group and A G be
More informationNotas de Aula Grupos Profinitos. Martino Garonzi. Universidade de Brasília. Primeiro semestre 2018
Notas de Aula Grupos Profinitos Martino Garonzi Universidade de Brasília Primeiro semestre 2018 1 Le risposte uccidono le domande. 2 Contents 1 Topology 4 2 Profinite spaces 6 3 Topological groups 10 4
More informationThe Outer Automorphism of S 6
Meena Jagadeesan 1 Karthik Karnik 2 Mentor: Akhil Mathew 1 Phillips Exeter Academy 2 Massachusetts Academy of Math and Science PRIMES Conference, May 2016 What is a Group? A group G is a set of elements
More informationMath 3140 Fall 2012 Assignment #3
Math 3140 Fall 2012 Assignment #3 Due Fri., Sept. 21. Remember to cite your sources, including the people you talk to. My solutions will repeatedly use the following proposition from class: Proposition
More information0 Sets and Induction. Sets
0 Sets and Induction Sets A set is an unordered collection of objects, called elements or members of the set. A set is said to contain its elements. We write a A to denote that a is an element of the set
More informationGroup Actions Definition. Let G be a group, and let X be a set. A left action of G on X is a function θ : G X X satisfying:
Group Actions 8-26-202 Definition. Let G be a group, and let X be a set. A left action of G on X is a function θ : G X X satisfying: (a) θ(g,θ(g 2,x)) = θ(g g 2,x) for all g,g 2 G and x X. (b) θ(,x) =
More informationMATH 436 Notes: Cyclic groups and Invariant Subgroups.
MATH 436 Notes: Cyclic groups and Invariant Subgroups. Jonathan Pakianathan September 30, 2003 1 Cyclic Groups Now that we have enough basic tools, let us go back and study the structure of cyclic groups.
More informationPermutation Groups and Transformation Semigroups Lecture 4: Idempotent generation
Permutation Groups and Transformation Semigroups Lecture 4: Idempotent generation Peter J. Cameron University of St Andrews Shanghai Jiao Tong University November 2017 Idempotent generation We are interested
More informationModern Algebra I. Circle the correct answer; no explanation is required. Each problem in this section counts 5 points.
1 2 3 style total Math 415 Please print your name: Answer Key 1 True/false Circle the correct answer; no explanation is required. Each problem in this section counts 5 points. 1. Every group of order 6
More informationThe following results are from the review sheet for the midterm.
A. Miller M542 Galois Theory Spring 2000 For the material on Galois theory we will be assuming that the fields all have characteristic zero. When we get to solvability by radicals we will assume that all
More informationCLASSIFICATION OF GROUPS OF ORDER 60 Alfonso Gracia Saz
CLASSIFICATION OF GROUPS OF ORDER 60 Alfonso Gracia Saz Remark: This is a long problem, and there are many ways to attack various of the steps. I am not claiming this is the best way to proceed, nor the
More informationbut no smaller power is equal to one. polynomial is defined to be
13. Radical and Cyclic Extensions The main purpose of this section is to look at the Galois groups of x n a. The first case to consider is a = 1. Definition 13.1. Let K be a field. An element ω K is said
More informationHomework 7 Solution Chapter 7 - Cosets and Lagrange s theorem. due: Oct. 31.
Homework 7 Solution Chapter 7 - Cosets and Lagrange s theorem. due: Oct. 31. 1. Find all left cosets of K in G. (a) G = Z, K = 4. K = {4m m Z}, 1 + K = {4m + 1 m Z}, 2 + K = {4m + 2 m Z}, 3 + K = {4m +
More information3. G. Groups, as men, will be known by their actions. - Guillermo Moreno
3.1. The denition. 3. G Groups, as men, will be known by their actions. - Guillermo Moreno D 3.1. An action of a group G on a set X is a function from : G X! X such that the following hold for all g, h
More information6 Cosets & Factor Groups
6 Cosets & Factor Groups The course becomes markedly more abstract at this point. Our primary goal is to break apart a group into subsets such that the set of subsets inherits a natural group structure.
More informationDefinition List Modern Algebra, Fall 2011 Anders O.F. Hendrickson
Definition List Modern Algebra, Fall 2011 Anders O.F. Hendrickson On almost every Friday of the semester, we will have a brief quiz to make sure you have memorized the definitions encountered in our studies.
More informationGroup Theory
Group Theory 2014 2015 Solutions to the exam of 4 November 2014 13 November 2014 Question 1 (a) For every number n in the set {1, 2,..., 2013} there is exactly one transposition (n n + 1) in σ, so σ is
More informationCONSEQUENCES OF THE SYLOW THEOREMS
CONSEQUENCES OF THE SYLOW THEOREMS KEITH CONRAD For a group theorist, Sylow s Theorem is such a basic tool, and so fundamental, that it is used almost without thinking, like breathing. Geoff Robinson 1.
More informationFROM GROUPS TO GALOIS Amin Witno
WON Series in Discrete Mathematics and Modern Algebra Volume 6 FROM GROUPS TO GALOIS Amin Witno These notes 1 have been prepared for the students at Philadelphia University (Jordan) who are taking the
More informationSF2729 GROUPS AND RINGS LECTURE NOTES
SF2729 GROUPS AND RINGS LECTURE NOTES 2011-03-01 MATS BOIJ 6. THE SIXTH LECTURE - GROUP ACTIONS In the sixth lecture we study what happens when groups acts on sets. 1 Recall that we have already when looking
More informationThe L 3 (4) near octagon
The L 3 (4) near octagon A. Bishnoi and B. De Bruyn October 8, 206 Abstract In recent work we constructed two new near octagons, one related to the finite simple group G 2 (4) and another one as a sub-near-octagon
More informationNormal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups 3-20-2014 A subgroup H < G is normal if ghg 1 H for all g G. Notation: H G. Every subgroup of an abelian group is normal. Every subgroup of index 2 is normal. If H
More informationEXERCISES ON THE OUTER AUTOMORPHISMS OF S 6
EXERCISES ON THE OUTER AUTOMORPHISMS OF S 6 AARON LANDESMAN 1. INTRODUCTION In this class, we investigate the outer automorphism of S 6. Let s recall some definitions, so that we can state what an outer
More informationCosets and Lagrange s theorem
Cosets and Lagrange s theorem These are notes on cosets and Lagrange s theorem some of which may already have been lecturer. There are some questions for you included in the text. You should write the
More informationPart V. 17 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets. Lebesgue Integration Theory
Part V 7 Introduction: What are measures and why measurable sets Lebesgue Integration Theory Definition 7. (Preliminary). A measure on a set is a function :2 [ ] such that. () = 2. If { } = is a finite
More informationDISTINGUISHING PARTITIONS AND ASYMMETRIC UNIFORM HYPERGRAPHS
DISTINGUISHING PARTITIONS AND ASYMMETRIC UNIFORM HYPERGRAPHS M. N. ELLINGHAM AND JUSTIN Z. SCHROEDER In memory of Mike Albertson. Abstract. A distinguishing partition for an action of a group Γ on a set
More informationCourse 311: Abstract Algebra Academic year
Course 311: Abstract Algebra Academic year 2007-08 D. R. Wilkins Copyright c David R. Wilkins 1997 2007 Contents 1 Topics in Group Theory 1 1.1 Groups............................... 1 1.2 Examples of Groups.......................
More informationSome notes on Coxeter groups
Some notes on Coxeter groups Brooks Roberts November 28, 2017 CONTENTS 1 Contents 1 Sources 2 2 Reflections 3 3 The orthogonal group 7 4 Finite subgroups in two dimensions 9 5 Finite subgroups in three
More informationChordal Coxeter Groups
arxiv:math/0607301v1 [math.gr] 12 Jul 2006 Chordal Coxeter Groups John Ratcliffe and Steven Tschantz Mathematics Department, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37240, USA Abstract: A solution of the isomorphism
More informationUMASS AMHERST MATH 411 SECTION 2, FALL 2009, F. HAJIR
UMASS AMHERST MATH 411 SECTION 2, FALL 2009, F. HAJIR HOMEWORK 2: DUE TH. OCT. 1 READINGS: These notes are intended as a supplement to the textbook, not a replacement for it. 1. Elements of a group, their
More informationRohit Garg Roll no Dr. Deepak Gumber
FINITE -GROUPS IN WHICH EACH CENTRAL AUTOMORPHISM FIXES THE CENTER ELEMENTWISE Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of Masters of Science In Mathematics
More informationScott Taylor 1. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS. Definition 1.1. Let A be a set. An equivalence relation on A is a relation such that:
Equivalence MA Relations 274 and Partitions Scott Taylor 1. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS Definition 1.1. Let A be a set. An equivalence relation on A is a relation such that: (1) is reflexive. That is, (2) is
More informationThe cycle polynomial of a permutation group
The cycle polynomial of a permutation group Peter J. Cameron School of Mathematics and Statistics University of St Andrews North Haugh St Andrews, Fife, U.K. pjc0@st-andrews.ac.uk Jason Semeraro Department
More informationFINITE IRREFLEXIVE HOMOMORPHISM-HOMOGENEOUS BINARY RELATIONAL SYSTEMS 1
Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 40, No. 3, 2010, 83 87 Proc. 3rd Novi Sad Algebraic Conf. (eds. I. Dolinka, P. Marković) FINITE IRREFLEXIVE HOMOMORPHISM-HOMOGENEOUS BINARY RELATIONAL SYSTEMS 1 Dragan Mašulović
More informationMath 3140 Fall 2012 Assignment #2
Math 3140 Fall 2012 Assignment #2 Due Fri., Sept. 14. sources. Remember to cite your Exercise 2. [Fra, 4, #9]. Let U be the set of complex numbers of absolute value 1. (a) Show that U is a group under
More informationMAIN THEOREM OF GALOIS THEORY
MAIN THEOREM OF GALOIS THEORY Theorem 1. [Main Theorem] Let L/K be a finite Galois extension. and (1) The group G = Gal(L/K) is a group of order [L : K]. (2) The maps defined by and f : {subgroups of G}!
More informationMA554 Assessment 1 Cosets and Lagrange s theorem
MA554 Assessment 1 Cosets and Lagrange s theorem These are notes on cosets and Lagrange s theorem; they go over some material from the lectures again, and they have some new material it is all examinable,
More informationGALOIS GROUPS AS PERMUTATION GROUPS
GALOIS GROUPS AS PERMUTATION GROUPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction A Galois group is a group of field automorphisms under composition. By looking at the effect of a Galois group on field generators we can
More informationFibers, Surjective Functions, and Quotient Groups
Fibers, Surjective Functions, and Quotient Groups 11/01/06 Radford Let f : X Y be a function. For a subset Z of X the subset f(z) = {f(z) z Z} of Y is the image of Z under f. For a subset W of Y the subset
More informationDIGRAPHS WITH SMALL AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS THAT ARE CAYLEY ON TWO NONISOMORPHIC GROUPS
DIGRAPHS WITH SMALL AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS THAT ARE CAYLEY ON TWO NONISOMORPHIC GROUPS LUKE MORGAN, JOY MORRIS, AND GABRIEL VERRET Abstract. Let Γ = Cay(G, S) be a Cayley digraph on a group G and let A =
More information2) e = e G G such that if a G 0 =0 G G such that if a G e a = a e = a. 0 +a = a+0 = a.
Chapter 2 Groups Groups are the central objects of algebra. In later chapters we will define rings and modules and see that they are special cases of groups. Also ring homomorphisms and module homomorphisms
More informationMath 594, HW2 - Solutions
Math 594, HW2 - Solutions Gilad Pagi, Feng Zhu February 8, 2015 1 a). It suffices to check that NA is closed under the group operation, and contains identities and inverses: NA is closed under the group
More information2. Prime and Maximal Ideals
18 Andreas Gathmann 2. Prime and Maximal Ideals There are two special kinds of ideals that are of particular importance, both algebraically and geometrically: the so-called prime and maximal ideals. Let
More informationSection I.6. Symmetric, Alternating, and Dihedral Groups
I.6. Symmetric, alternating, and Dihedral Groups 1 Section I.6. Symmetric, Alternating, and Dihedral Groups Note. In this section, we conclude our survey of the group theoretic topics which are covered
More informationSupplement. Dr. Bob s Modern Algebra Glossary Based on Fraleigh s A First Course on Abstract Algebra, 7th Edition, Sections 0 through IV.
Glossary 1 Supplement. Dr. Bob s Modern Algebra Glossary Based on Fraleigh s A First Course on Abstract Algebra, 7th Edition, Sections 0 through IV.23 Abelian Group. A group G, (or just G for short) is
More informationTHE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP
THE EULER CHARACTERISTIC OF A LIE GROUP JAY TAYLOR 1 Examples of Lie Groups The following is adapted from [2] We begin with the basic definition and some core examples Definition A Lie group is a smooth
More informationMA441: Algebraic Structures I. Lecture 26
MA441: Algebraic Structures I Lecture 26 10 December 2003 1 (page 179) Example 13: A 4 has no subgroup of order 6. BWOC, suppose H < A 4 has order 6. Then H A 4, since it has index 2. Thus A 4 /H has order
More informationDefinitions, Theorems and Exercises. Abstract Algebra Math 332. Ethan D. Bloch
Definitions, Theorems and Exercises Abstract Algebra Math 332 Ethan D. Bloch December 26, 2013 ii Contents 1 Binary Operations 3 1.1 Binary Operations............................... 4 1.2 Isomorphic Binary
More informationMAT1100HF ALGEBRA: ASSIGNMENT II. Contents 1. Problem Problem Problem Problem Problem Problem
MAT1100HF ALEBRA: ASSINMENT II J.A. MRACEK 998055704 DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO Contents 1. Problem 1 1 2. Problem 2 2 3. Problem 3 2 4. Problem 4 3 5. Problem 5 3 6. Problem 6 3 7.
More informationThe Symmetric Groups
Chapter 7 The Symmetric Groups 7. Introduction In the investigation of finite groups the symmetric groups play an important role. Often we are able to achieve a better understanding of a group if we can
More informationGENERATING SETS KEITH CONRAD
GENERATING SETS KEITH CONRAD 1 Introduction In R n, every vector can be written as a unique linear combination of the standard basis e 1,, e n A notion weaker than a basis is a spanning set: a set of vectors
More informationSolutions of exercise sheet 6
D-MATH Algebra I HS 14 Prof. Emmanuel Kowalski Solutions of exercise sheet 6 1. (Irreducibility of the cyclotomic polynomial) Let n be a positive integer, and P Z[X] a monic irreducible factor of X n 1
More information120A LECTURE OUTLINES
120A LECTURE OUTLINES RUI WANG CONTENTS 1. Lecture 1. Introduction 1 2 1.1. An algebraic object to study 2 1.2. Group 2 1.3. Isomorphic binary operations 2 2. Lecture 2. Introduction 2 3 2.1. The multiplication
More informationTwo subgroups and semi-direct products
Two subgroups and semi-direct products 1 First remarks Throughout, we shall keep the following notation: G is a group, written multiplicatively, and H and K are two subgroups of G. We define the subset
More informationCONJUGATE FACTORIZATIONS OF FINITE GROUPS. Communicated by Patrizia Longobardi. 1. Introduction
International Journal of Group Theory ISSN (print): 2251-7650, ISSN (on-line): 2251-7669 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015), pp. 69-78. c 2015 University of Isfahan www.theoryofgroups.ir www.ui.ac.ir CONJUGATE FACTORIZATIONS
More information1.1 Definition. A monoid is a set M together with a map. 1.3 Definition. A monoid is commutative if x y = y x for all x, y M.
1 Monoids and groups 1.1 Definition. A monoid is a set M together with a map M M M, (x, y) x y such that (i) (x y) z = x (y z) x, y, z M (associativity); (ii) e M such that x e = e x = x for all x M (e
More informationTree sets. Reinhard Diestel
1 Tree sets Reinhard Diestel Abstract We study an abstract notion of tree structure which generalizes treedecompositions of graphs and matroids. Unlike tree-decompositions, which are too closely linked
More informationThe alternating groups
Chapter 1 The alternating groups 1.1 Introduction The most familiar of the finite (non-abelian) simple groups are the alternating groups A n, which are subgroups of index 2 in the symmetric groups S n.
More informationLecture 8: Equivalence Relations
Lecture 8: Equivalence Relations 1 Equivalence Relations Next interesting relation we will study is equivalence relation. Definition 1.1 (Equivalence Relation). Let A be a set and let be a relation on
More informationGALOIS GROUPS OF CUBICS AND QUARTICS (NOT IN CHARACTERISTIC 2)
GALOIS GROUPS OF CUBICS AND QUARTICS (NOT IN CHARACTERISTIC 2) KEITH CONRAD We will describe a procedure for figuring out the Galois groups of separable irreducible polynomials in degrees 3 and 4 over
More informationElements of solution for Homework 5
Elements of solution for Homework 5 General remarks How to use the First Isomorphism Theorem A standard way to prove statements of the form G/H is isomorphic to Γ is to construct a homomorphism ϕ : G Γ
More informationAlgebra-I, Fall Solutions to Midterm #1
Algebra-I, Fall 2018. Solutions to Midterm #1 1. Let G be a group, H, K subgroups of G and a, b G. (a) (6 pts) Suppose that ah = bk. Prove that H = K. Solution: (a) Multiplying both sides by b 1 on the
More informationMath 2070BC Term 2 Weeks 1 13 Lecture Notes
Math 2070BC 2017 18 Term 2 Weeks 1 13 Lecture Notes Keywords: group operation multiplication associative identity element inverse commutative abelian group Special Linear Group order infinite order cyclic
More informationPermutation Groups. John Bamberg, Michael Giudici and Cheryl Praeger. Centre for the Mathematics of Symmetry and Computation
Notation Basics of permutation group theory Arc-transitive graphs Primitivity Normal subgroups of primitive groups Permutation Groups John Bamberg, Michael Giudici and Cheryl Praeger Centre for the Mathematics
More informationIIT Mumbai 2015 MA 419, Basic Algebra Tutorial Sheet-1
IIT Mumbai 2015 MA 419, Basic Algebra Tutorial Sheet-1 Let Σ be the set of all symmetries of the plane Π. 1. Give examples of s, t Σ such that st ts. 2. If s, t Σ agree on three non-collinear points, then
More informationTC10 / 3. Finite fields S. Xambó
TC10 / 3. Finite fields S. Xambó The ring Construction of finite fields The Frobenius automorphism Splitting field of a polynomial Structure of the multiplicative group of a finite field Structure of the
More informationMath 121. Fundamental Theorem and an example
Math 121. Fundamental Theorem and an example Let K/k be a finite Galois extension and G = Gal(K/k), so #G = [K : k] by the counting criterion for separability discussed in class. In this handout we will
More informationOvergroups of Intersections of Maximal Subgroups of the. Symmetric Group. Jeffrey Kuan
Overgroups of Intersections of Maximal Subgroups of the Symmetric Group Jeffrey Kuan Abstract The O Nan-Scott theorem weakly classifies the maximal subgroups of the symmetric group S, providing some information
More informationGROUPS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS. 1. introduction
GROUPS AND THEIR REPRESENTATIONS KAREN E. SMITH 1. introduction Representation theory is the study of the concrete ways in which abstract groups can be realized as groups of rigid transformations of R
More information9. Finite fields. 1. Uniqueness
9. Finite fields 9.1 Uniqueness 9.2 Frobenius automorphisms 9.3 Counting irreducibles 1. Uniqueness Among other things, the following result justifies speaking of the field with p n elements (for prime
More informationALGEBRA HOMEWORK SET 2. Due by class time on Wednesday 14 September. Homework must be typeset and submitted by as a PDF file.
ALGEBRA HOMEWORK SET 2 JAMES CUMMINGS (JCUMMING@ANDREW.CMU.EDU) Due by class time on Wednesday 14 September. Homework must be typeset and submitted by email as a PDF file. (1) Let H and N be groups and
More informationLatin squares: Equivalents and equivalence
Latin squares: Equivalents and equivalence 1 Introduction This essay describes some mathematical structures equivalent to Latin squares and some notions of equivalence of such structures. According to
More informationTRANSPOSITIONS IN FINITE SYMMETRIC GROUPS. Lynnette Gilmore Peter Lorimer*
TRANSPOSITIONS IN FINITE SYMMETRIC GROUPS Lynnette Gilmore Peter Lorimer* (received 17 October 1972; revised 10 September 1973) The symmetric group S^ on a set E is the group of all bisections or permutations
More informationGROUPS AS SQUARES OF DOUBLE COSETS
Martino Garonzi University of Padova joint work with John Cannon, Dan Levy, Attila Maróti, Iulian Simion December 3rd, 2014 Let G be a group and let A G. A double coset of A is a set of the form AgA :=
More informationBoolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices
Boolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices Stan Gudder Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver CO 80208 Frédéric Latrémolière Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver
More informationTwisted Projective Spaces and Linear Completions of some Partial Steiner Triple Systems
Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie Contributions to Algebra and Geometry Volume 49 (2008), No. 2, 341-368. Twisted Projective Spaces and Linear Completions of some Partial Steiner Triple Systems Ma lgorzata
More information7 Semidirect product. Notes 7 Autumn Definition and properties
MTHM024/MTH74U Group Theory Notes 7 Autumn 20 7 Semidirect product 7. Definition and properties Let A be a normal subgroup of the group G. A complement for A in G is a subgroup H of G satisfying HA = G;
More informationFinite affine planes in projective spaces
Finite affine planes in projective spaces J. A.Thas H. Van Maldeghem Ghent University, Belgium {jat,hvm}@cage.ugent.be Abstract We classify all representations of an arbitrary affine plane A of order q
More informationORBITAL DIGRAPHS OF INFINITE PRIMITIVE PERMUTATION GROUPS
ORBITAL DIGRAPHS OF INFINITE PRIMITIVE PERMUTATION GROUPS SIMON M. SMITH Abstract. If G is a group acting on a set Ω and α, β Ω, the digraph whose vertex set is Ω and whose arc set is the orbit (α, β)
More informationFINITE GROUP THEORY: SOLUTIONS FALL MORNING 5. Stab G (l) =.
FINITE GROUP THEORY: SOLUTIONS TONY FENG These are hints/solutions/commentary on the problems. They are not a model for what to actually write on the quals. 1. 2010 FALL MORNING 5 (i) Note that G acts
More informationQUIVERS AND LATTICES.
QUIVERS AND LATTICES. KEVIN MCGERTY We will discuss two classification results in quite different areas which turn out to have the same answer. This note is an slightly expanded version of the talk given
More informationSection III.15. Factor-Group Computations and Simple Groups
III.15 Factor-Group Computations 1 Section III.15. Factor-Group Computations and Simple Groups Note. In this section, we try to extract information about a group G by considering properties of the factor
More information8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions
70 Andreas Gathmann 8. Prime Factorization and Primary Decompositions 13 When it comes to actual computations, Euclidean domains (or more generally principal ideal domains) are probably the nicest rings
More informationAlgebraic Tractability Criteria for Infinite-Domain Constraint Satisfaction Problems
Algebraic Tractability Criteria for Infinite-Domain Constraint Satisfaction Problems Manuel Bodirsky Institut für Informatik Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin May 2007 CSPs over infinite domains (May 2007)
More informationReachability relations and the structure of transitive digraphs
Reachability relations and the structure of transitive digraphs Norbert Seifter Montanuniversität Leoben, Leoben, Austria Vladimir I. Trofimov Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia November
More informationRepresentations and Linear Actions
Representations and Linear Actions Definition 0.1. Let G be an S-group. A representation of G is a morphism of S-groups φ G GL(n, S) for some n. We say φ is faithful if it is a monomorphism (in the category
More information