AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR
|
|
- Coleen Nash
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AND JOSEF TEICHMANN Abstract. We show that stochastically continuous, time-homogeneous affine processes on the canonical state space R m Rn are always regular. In the paper of Duffie, Filipovic, and Schachermayer 23 regularity was used as a crucial basic assumption. It was left open whether this regularity condition is automatically satisfied, for stochastically continuous affine processes. We now show that the regularity assumption is indeed superfluous, since regularity follows from stochastic continuity and the exponentially affine behavior of the characteristic function. For the proof we combine classic results on the differentiability of transformation semigroups with the method of the moving frame which has been recently found to be useful in the theory of SPDEs. 1. Introduction A Markov process X taking values in D := R m Rn is called affine if there exist C-valued functions 1 Φt, u and ψt, u such that 1.1 E x [ e Xt,u ] = Φt, u exp x, ψt, u, for all x D, and for all t, u R ir d with d = m + n. We also assume that X is stochastically continuous, i.e. X t X s in probability as t s. Stochastic processes of this type have been studied for the first time in the seventies, where on the state space D = R they have been obtained as continuous-time limits of classic Galton-Watson branching processes with and without immigration see Kawazu and Watanabe More recently, affine processes have attracted renewed interest, due to several applications in mathematical finance, where they are used as flexible models for asset prices, interest rates, default intensities and other economic quantities see Duffie et al. 23 for a survey. The process X is said to be regular, if the functions Φ and ψ are differentiable with respect to t, with derivatives that are continuous in t, u. This technical condition is of crucial importance for the theory of affine processes, as developed in Duffie et al. 23. Under the assumption of regularity, it is possible to show that an affine process X is a semi-martingale possibly killed at a state-dependent rate, and in fact to completely characterize all affine processes in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions on their semi-martingale characteristics. Likewise, regularity Key words and phrases. affine processes, regularity, characteristic function, semiflow. MSC 2: 6J25, 39B32. The first and the third author gratefully acknowledge the support from the Austrian Science Fund FWF under grant Y328 START prize. The second and third author gratefully acknowledge the support from the Austrian Science Fund FWF under grant P19456, from the Vienna Science and Technology Fund WWTF under grant MA13 and by the Christian Doppler Research Association CDG. 1 We are using upper case Φ but lower case ψ for consistency with the notation of Duffie et al. 23; see Remark 2.3 for a detailed discussion. 1
2 2 MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AND JOSEF TEICHMANN allows to represent the characteristic function of X as the solution of so-called generalized Riccati differential equations which determine the fundamental functions Φ and ψ. Without regularity it is a priori not clear how we can locally characterize the process e.g. in terms of its infinitesimal generator or of its semi-martingale characteristics and therefore such processes are not well-parameterized families of models a situation which could be compared to the theory of Lévy processes without knowledge on the Lévy-Khintchine formula. Therefore in Duffie et al. 23 the authors assume regularity at the very beginning of their classification of affine processes. Without the assumption of stochastic continuity there are simple examples of non-regular Markov processes with the affine property 1.1, based on introducing jumps at fixed non-random times; see e.g. Duffie et al. 23, Remark In contrast, if one assumes stochastic continuity for an affine process, to the best of our knowledge it was not now known in general whether such a process is regular or not. Regularity has been shown in several special cases: Kawazu and Watanabe 1971 show automatic regularity for a single-type continuous branching process with immigration, which corresponds to an affine process with state space D = R. Dawson and Li 26 show regularity of affine processes under moment conditions. In Keller-Ressel 28b regularity of an affine process under a mixed homogeneity and positivity condition is shown. The approaches in the two latter publications are all based on the general techniques from Montgomery and Zippin 1955 for continuous global flows of homeomorphisms, which have been extended in Filipović and Teichmann 23 to continuous local semi-flows. One of the most fascinating aspects of the regularity problem for affine processes is the close connection to the Hilbert s fifth problem, whose history and mathematical development can be found in Montgomery and Zippin The reason is that the functions Φ and ψ defined by 1.1 satisfy certain functional equations, namely 1.2 ψt + s, u = ψt, ψs, u, Φt + s, u = Φt, ψs, u Φs, u, for s, t with initial conditions ψ, u = u and Φ, u = 1 and for all u in Q, a large enough subset of C d see Section 2 for the exact definition of Q. Such functional equations are non-linear relatives of the multiplicative Cauchy functional equation 1.3 At + s = AtAs, A = id d. formulated for instance in a set of d d matrices M d C, simply by defining ψt, u = Atu. It is well-known that the only continuous solutions of the Cauchy equation are the exponentials At = exptβ, where β is a d d matrix. In particular all continuous solutions of 1.3 are automatically differentiable even analytic with respect to t, with derivatives that are continuous in u. Hilbert s fifth problem asks whether this assertion can be extended to more general functional equations such as 1.2: Assuming that ψt, u and Φt, u satisfy 1.2, and are differentiable in u, are they necessarily differentiable in t? The problem has been answered positive; for a precise formulation and a proof in the more general context of transformation groups see Montgomery and Zippin 1955, Chapter V.5.2, e.g. Theorem 3. From the point of view of stochastics this means that moment conditions roughly speaking the existence of a first moment of X means differentiability of ψ with respect to u imply t-differentiability of ψ and
3 AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR 3 Φ, and thus regularity. This has already been observed in Dawson and Li 26. However, moment conditions on the process X are not natural in the present context of affine processes, and the question remained open, whether the moment conditions in Dawson and Li 26 can simply be dropped. We show in this article that the answer is again positive in the general case, and that any stochastically continuous affine process is automatically regular. There is one well-known case where moment conditions can be dropped, namely homogeneous affine processes, i.e., affine processes with ψt, u = u for t, u R ir d. In this case Φ simply satisfies Cauchy s functional equation Φt+s, u = Φt, uφs, u and therefore regularity, that is differentiability of Φ, follows by the classical result on 1.3. This is precisely the case of Lévy processes. Whence in the light of differentiability of functional equations of the type 1.2 the results of this paper truly extend Montgomery and Zippin 1955 since no differentiability in u is assumed. We introduce the basic definitions and some notation in Section 2 and show preliminary results in Section 3. In Section 4 we show regularity of an affine process subject to a condition of semi-homogeneity. Finally we show in Section 5 that all stochastically continuous, affine processes defined on the domain D = R m Rn are regular by reducing the general question to regularity of semi-homogeneous processes of Section Affine processes Definition 2.1 Affine process. An affine process is a time-homogeneous Markov process X t, P x t,x D with state space D = R m Rn, whose characteristic function is an exponentially-affine function of the state vector. This means that there exist functions Φ : R ir d C and ψ : R ir d C d such that 2.1 E x [ e Xt,u ] = Φt, u exp x, ψt, u, for all x D, and for all t, u R ir d. Remark 2.2. The set ir d denotes the purely imaginary numbers in C d, that is ir d = { u C d : Re u = }. Remark 2.3. The above definition differs in one detail from the definition given in Duffie et al. 23: In their article the right hand side of 2.1 is defined in terms of a function φt, u as exp φt, u + x, ψt, u, whereas we formulate the equation in terms of Φt, u = expφt, u. In particular, we do not assume a priori that Φt, u. Their difference is subtle, but will play a role in Lemma 2.5 below, where we extend Φt, u to a larger subset Q of the complex numbers. Essentially, the advantage of using Φt, u is the following: if Φt, u is well-defined on a set that is not simply connected, its logarithm φt, u might only be defined as a multivalued function. Note that our definition using Φt, u is very close to that of Kawazu and Watanabe Assumption 2.4. We will assume throughout this article that X is stochastically continuous, i.e. for t s, the random variables X t converge to X s in probability, with respect to all P x x D. Note that the existence of a filtered space Ω, F, F t t, where the process X t t is defined, is already implicit in the notion of a Markov process we largely
4 4 MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AND JOSEF TEICHMANN follow Rogers and Williams 1994, Chapter III in our notation and precise definition of a Markov process. P x represents the law of the Markov process X t t started at x, i.e. we have that X = x, P x -almost surely. Let us at this point introduce some additional notation: We write I = {1,..., m} and J = {m + 1,..., m + n} for the index sets of the R m -valued component and the Rn -valued component of X respectively. For some vector x R d we denote by x = x I, x J its partition in the corresponding subvectors, and similarly for the function ψt, u = ψ I t, u, ψ J t, u. Also, x i denotes the i-th element of x, and e i i {1,...,d} are the unit vectors of R d. We will often write f u x := exp u, x for the exponential function with u C d and x D. A special role will be played by the set 2.2 U = { u C d : Re u I, Re u J = } ; note that U is precisely the set of all u C d, for which x f u x is a bounded function on D. We also define 2.3 U = { u C d : Re u I <, Re u J = }. Lemma 2.5. Let X t t be an affine process. Then 2.4 Q = { t, u R U : E [f u X t ] }, is open in R U and there exists a unique continuous extension of Φt, u and ψt, u to Q, such that 2.1 holds for all t, u Q. If t, u R U \ Q, then E x [f u X t ] = for all x D. Remark 2.6. From the facts that {} U Q and that Q is open in R U we can deduce the following: For every u U there exists t u >, such that t, u Q for all t [, t u. Proof. We adapt the proof of Duffie et al. 23, Lemma 3.1: For t, u, x R U D define gt, u, x = E x [f u X t ]. We show that for fixed x D the function gt, u, x is jointly continuous in t, u: Let t k, u k be a sequence converging in U to t, u. By stochastic continuity of X it holds that X tk X t in probability P x, and thus also in distribution. By dominated convergence we may therefore conclude that gt k, u k, x = E x [f uk X tk ] E x [f u X t ] = gt, u, x, and thus that gt, u, x is continuous in t, u. It follows that Q is open in R U. Because of the affine property 2.1 it holds that 2.5 gt, u, xgt, u, ξ = gt, u, x + ξgt, u, for all t, u R ir d and x, ξ D. But both sides of 2.5 are continuous functions of u U, and moreover analytic in U. This follows from well-known properties of the Laplace transform and the extension to its strip of regularity, cf. Duffie et al. 23, Lemma A.2. By the Schwarz reflection principle, 2.5 therefore holds for all u U. Assume now that t, u R U \ Q, such that gt, u, =. Then it follows from 2.5 that E x [f u X t ] = gt, u, x = for all x D, as claimed in the Lemma. On the other hand, for all t, u Q it holds that Φt, u, such that we can define hx = Φt, u 1 gt, u, x. The function
5 AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR 5 hx is measurable and satisfies hxhξ = hx + ξ for all x, ξ D. Moreover h by definition of Q. Using a standard result on measurable solutions of the Cauchy equation cf. Aczél 1966, Sec. 2.2 we conclude that there exists a unique continuous extension of ψt, u such that Φt, u 1 gt, u, x = e ψt,u,x, and the proof is complete. From this point on, Φt, u and ψt, u are defined on all of Q, and given by the unique continuous extensions of Lemma 2.5. We can now give a precise definition of regularity of an affine process: Definition 2.7. An affine process X is called regular, if the derivatives 2.6 F u = t Φt, u t=, Ru = t ψt, u t= exist and are continuous functions of u U. Remark 2.8. In Duffie et al. 23 F u is defined in a slightly different way, as the derivative of φt, u at t =. However the definitions are equivalent, since Φt, u = expφt, u and thus Φt, u t = e φ,u φt, u t= t = t= t t= φt, u. Proposition 2.9. Let X be a stochastically continuous affine process. The functions Φ and ψ have the following properties: i Φ maps Q to the unit disc {u C : u 1}. ii ψ maps Q to U. iii Φ, u = 1 and ψ, u = u for all u U. iv Φ and ψ enjoy the semi-flow property : Suppose that t, s and t + s, u Q. Then also t, u Q and s, ψt, u Q, and it holds that 2.7 Φt + s, u = Φt, u Φs, ψt, u, ψt + s, u = ψs, ψt, u. v Φ and ψ are jointly continuous on Q. vi With the remaining arguments fixed, u I Φt, u and u I ψt, u are analytic functions in {u I : Re u I < ; t, u Q}. vii Let t, u, t, w Q with Re u Re w. Then Φt, u Φt, Re w Re ψt, u ψt, Re w. Proof. Let t, u Q. Clearly E x [f u X t ] E x [ f u X t ] 1. On the other hand E x [f u X t ] = Φt, uf ψt,u x by Lemma 2.5. Since f u 1 if and only if u U, we conclude that Φt, u 1 and ψt, u U for all t, u Q and have shown i and ii. Assertion iii follows immediately from E x [f u X ] = f u x. For iv suppose that t + s, u Q, such that 2.8 E x [f u X t+s ] = Φt + s, uf ψt+s,u x by Lemma 2.5. Applying the law of iterated expectations and the Markov property of X it holds that 2.9 E x [f u X t+s ] = E x [E x [f u X t+s F s ]] = E x [ E Xs [f u X t ] ].
6 6 MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AND JOSEF TEICHMANN If t, u Q then the inner expectation and consequently the whole expression evaluates to, which is a contradiction to the fact that t+s, u Q. It follows that E Xs [f u X t ] = Φt, uf ψt,u X s. If s, ψt, u Q then the outer expectation in 2.9 evaluates to, which is also a contradiction. Thus also s, ψt, u Q, as claimed, and we can write 2.9 as E x [f u X t+s ] = E x [ Φt, uf ψt,u X s ] = Φs, u Φt, ψs, uf ψt,ψs,u x, for all x D. Comparing with 2.8 the semi-flow equations 2.7 follow. Assertions v and vi can be derived directly from the proof of Lemma 2.5. To show vii note that E x [f u X t ] E x [ f u X t ] = E x [ f Re u X t ] E x [ f Re w X t ], for all x D. If t, u and t, w are in Q, we deduce from the affine property 2.1 that Φt, u exp x, Re ψt, u Φt, Re w exp x, ψt, Re w. Inserting first x = and then Ce i with C > arbitrarily large yields the assertion. Finally we show one additional technical property concerning the existence of derivatives of Φ and ψ with respect to u, on the interior of U. Lemma 2.1. Let X be a stochastically continuous affine process. For i I, the derivatives Φt, u, ψt, u u i u i exist and are continuous for t, u U Q. Proof. Let i I and let K be a compact subset of U. It holds that 2.1 exp u, X t u i = X i t exp Re u, Xt. The right hand side is uniformly bounded for all t R, u K, and thus in particular uniformly integrable. We may conclude that u i E [ x e Xt,u ] exists and is a continuous function of t, u R K for any x D. If in addition t, u Q, then Lemma 2.5 states that E [ x e Xt,u ] = Φt, u exp x, ψt, u. Since K was an arbitrary compact subset of U the claim follows. 3. Affine Processes are Feller Processes In this section we prove the Feller property for all affine processes. For regular affine processes, this has been shown in Duffie et al. 23; here we give a proof that does not require a regularity assumption. The key to the proof are the following properties of the function ψt, u for a given stochastically continuous affine process X, which will also be used in the proof of our main result in Section 5: Property A: ψt,. maps U to U. Property B: ψ J t, u = e βt u J for all t, u Q, with β a real n n-matrix. Let us give here an intuitive example illustrating the second property, which has already been observed in Dawson and Li 26, Prop 2.1 and Cor. 2.1: Consider
7 AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR 7 an affine process with one-dimensional state space D = R, and the property that Φt, u = 1. Then for any initial value x R E x [f iy X t ] = e xψt,iy and E x [f iy X t ] = e xψt,iy are both characteristic functions, and moreover reciprocal to each other. But a well-known result cf. Lukacs 196, Thm states that the only characteristic functions, whose reciprocals are also characteristic functions correspond to degenerate distributions, i.e. Dirac measures. Here, this implies that ψt, iy = iymt, for mt a deterministic function. Moreover, by the Markov property mt + s = mtms, which is Cauchy s functional equation with the unique continuous solution mt = e λt m, for some λ R. Hence, ψt, iy is necessarily of the form e λt iy and satisfies therefore Property B. As we shall show, the argument can be extended to the case of arbitrary Φt, u and to the general state space D = R m Rn. The next Lemma is the first step in this direction: Lemma 3.1. Let X be a stochastically continuous affine process. Let K {1,..., d}, k {1,..., d}, and let t n n N be a sequence such that t n. Define Ω K := { y R d : y i = for i K }, and suppose that Re ψ k t n, iy = for all y Ω K and n N. Then there exist ζ k t n R K and an increasing sequence of positive numbers R n such that R n and ψ k t n, iy = ζ k t n, iy K for all y Ω K with y < R n. For the proof we will use the following result: Lemma 3.2. Let Θ be a positive definite function on R d with Θ = 1. Then for all y, z R d. Θy + z ΘyΘz 2 1 Θy 2 1 Θz 2 1 Proof of Lemma 3.2. The result follows from considering the matrix Θ Θy Θz M Θ y, z := Θy Θ Θy + z, y, z R d, y z, Θz Θy + z Θ which is positive semi-definite by definition of Θ. The inequality is then derived from the fact that det M Θ y, z. See Jacob 21, Lemma for details. Proof of Lemma 3.1. As the characteristic function of the possibly defective random variable X tn under P x, the function y E x [f iy X tn ] is positive definite for any x D, n N. We define now for every y Ω K, c >, and n N, the function 1 Θy; n, c := Φt n, Ece k [f iy X tn ] = Φt n, iy Φt n, exp c ψ k t n, iy. Clearly, as a function of y Ω K, also Θy; n, c is positive definite. In addition it satisfies Θ; n, c = exp c ψ k t n, = 1, for large enough n, say n N, by the following argument: It should be obvious, that expc ψ k t n, is always a real quantity. By assumption, ψ k t n, is purely imaginary, such that it must be an
8 8 MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AND JOSEF TEICHMANN integer multiple of π for all n N. But ψ k, =, and ψ k t, is continuous in t by Proposition 2.9, and we conclude ψ k t n, = for large enough n. Thus, for n N, we may apply Lemma 3.2 to Θ, and conclude that for any y, z Ω K, c > and n N 3.1 Θy + z; n, c Θy; n, c Θz; n, c 2 1. For compact notation we define the abbreviations r 1 = Φt n, iy + z Φt n,, r 2 = Φt n, iyφt n, iz Φt n, 2, α 1 = Arg Φt n, iy + z, α 2 = Arg Φt n, iyφt n, iz Φt n, Φt n, 2, β 1 = Im ψ k t n, iy + z, β 2 = Im ψ k t n, iy + Im ψ k t n, iz, where we suppress the dependency on y, t, z for the moment. It holds that r 1 e α1+cβ1i r 2 e α2+cβ2i 2 = r r2 2 2r 1 r 2 cos α 1 α 2 + β 1 β 2 c Using the elementary inequality 2r 1 r 2 r1 2 + r2, 2 we derive } 2r 1 r 2 {1 cos α 1 α 2 + β 1 β 2 c r 1 e α1+cβ1i r 2 e α2+cβ2i 2, which combined with inequality 3.1 yields 3.2 r 1 r 2 1 cos α 1 α 2 + β 1 β 2 c 1 2. Define now R n = for n < N, and { R n := sup ρ : r 1 y, t n, zr 2 y, t n, z > 1 } 2 for y, z Ω K with y ρ, z ρ for n N. Note that R n : This follows from r 1 y,, z = r 2 y,, z = 1 for all y, z Ω K, and the continuity of r 1 and r 2. Suppose that β 1 β 2 = Im ψ k t n, iy + z Im ψ k t n, iy Im ψ k t n, iz for any n N and y, z Ω K with y < R n, z < R n. Then there exists an c > such that cos α 1 α 2 + β 1 β 2 c = 1. Inserting into 3.2 we obtain < r 1r 2 1 cos α 1 α 2 + β 1 β 2 c 1 2, a contradiction. We conclude that 3.3 β 1 β 2 = Im ψ k t n, iy + z Im ψ k t n, iy Im ψ k t n, iz =, for all y, z Ω K with y < R n, z < R n. Equation 3.3 is nothing but Cauchy s first functional equation. Since ψt,. is continuous, it follows that Im ψ k is a linear function of y K. In addition, Re ψ k t n, y is zero, by assumption, such that there exists some real vector ζ k t n with 3.4 ψ k t n, iy = ζ k t n, iy K. for all y Ω K with y < R n, and the Lemma is proved..
9 AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR 9 We use the above Lemma to show the following Proposition, which implies Property B of ψ, that was introduced at the beginning of the section: Proposition 3.3. Let X t t be a stochastically continuous affine process on D = R m Rn and denote by J its real-valued components. Then there exists a real n nmatrix β such that ψ J t, u = e tβ u J for all t, u Q. Proof. Consider the definition of U in 2.2. Since ψt, u takes by Proposition 2.9 values in U it is clear that Re ψ J t, iy = for any t, y R R d. Fix now some t > and define t n := t /n for all n N. We can apply Lemma 3.1 with K = {1,..., d} and any choice of k J, to obtain a sequence R n even independent of k, such that 3.5 ψ J t n, iy = Ξt n iy, for all y R d with y < R n. Here Ξt n denotes the real n d-matrix formed by concatenating the column vectors ζ k t n k=1,...,d obtained from Lemma 3.1. Let i I, n N, define Ω n := {ω C : ω R n, t n, e i ω Q}, and consider the function h n : Ω n C n : ω ψ J t n, ωe i Ξt ωe i. This is an analytic function on Ω n and continuous on Ω n. According to the Schwarz reflection principle, h n can be extended to an analytic function on an open superset of Ω n. But 3.5 implies that the function h n takes the value on a subset with an accumulation point in C. We conclude that h n is zero everywhere. In particular we have that = Re ψ J t n, ωe i Ξt n Re ωe i = Ξt n Re ωe i, for all ω Ω n. This can only hold true, if the i-th column of Ξt n is zero. Since i I was arbitrary we have reduced 3.5 to 3.6 ψ J t n, u = Ξ t n u J, for all t n, u Q, such that u J < R n. Here Ξ t n denotes the n n-submatrix of Ξt n that results from dropping the zero-columns. Fix an arbitrary u U with t, u Q. By Proposition 2.9 we know that also t, u Q for all t [, t ], such that R := sup { ψ K t, u : t [, t ]} is well-defined. Since ψt, u is continuous, R is finite. Choose N such that R n > R for all n N. Using the semi-flow equation we can write ψ J t, u as n ψ J t, u = ψ J tn, ψt n, u = n 1 = Ξ t n ψ J t n, u = = Ξ t n n u ; for any n N. Thus, the functional equation ψt, u = Ξ t u J actually holds for all t, u Q. Another application of the semi-flow property yields then, that Ξ t + s = Ξ tξ s, for all t, s. Since Ξ = 1, Ξ is continuous and satisfies the second Cauchy functional equation, it follows that Ξ t = e βt for some real n n-matrix β, which completes the proof. The next proposition shows that also Property A holds true for ψ, as we have claimed at the beginning of the section. Proposition 3.4. Suppose that t, u Q. If u U, then ψt, u U.
10 1 MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AND JOSEF TEICHMANN Proof. For a contradiction, assume there exists t, u Q such that u U, but ψt, u U. This implies that there exists k I, such that Re ψ k t, u =. Let Q t,k = {ω C : Re ω ; t, ωe k Q}. From the inequalities of Proposition 2.9.vii we deduce that 3.8 = Re ψ k t, u ψ k t, Re ω e k, and thus that ψ k t, Re ω e k = for all ω Q t,k with Re u k Re ω. By Proposition 2.9.vi, ψ k t, ωe k is an analytic function of ω. Since it takes the value zero on a set with an accumulation point, it is zero everywhere, i.e. ψ k t, ωe k = for all ω Q t,k. The same statement holds true for t replaced by t/2: Set λ := Re ψ k t/2, u. If λ =, we can proceed exactly as above, only with t/2 instead of t. If λ <, then we have, by another application of Proposition 2.9.vii, that = Re ψ k t, u = Re ψ k t/2, ψt/2, u ψ k t/2, λe k ψ k t/2, Re ωe k, for all ω Q t/2,k such that λ Re ω. Again we use that an analytic function that takes the value zero on a set with accumulation point, is zero everywhere, and obtain that ψ k t/2, ωe k = for all ω Q t/2,k. Repeating this argument, we finally obtain a sequence t n, such that 3.9 ψ k t n, ωe k = for all ω Q tn,k. We can now apply Lemma 3.1 with K = {k}, which implies that ψ k is of the linear form ψ k t n, ωe k = ζ k t n ω, for all ω Q tn,k with ω R n, where ζ k t n are real numbers, and R n. Note that since ζ k t n 1 as t n, we have that ζ k t n > for n large enough. Choosing now some ω with Re ω < it follows that Re ψ k t n, ω e k < with strict inequality. This is a contradiction to 3.9, and the assertion is shown. We are now prepared to show the main result of this section: Theorem 3.5. Every stochastically continuous affine process X is a Feller process. Remark 3.6. As an immediate Corollary to this theorem, every stochastically continuous affine process has a càdlàg version, see for instance Rogers and Williams Proof. By stochastic continuity of X t t and dominated convergence, it follows immediately that P t fx = E x [fx t ] fx as t for all f C D and x D. To prove the Feller property of X t t it remains to show that P t C D C D: For u I C m with Re u I < and g Cc R n, i.e. a smooth function with bounded support, define the functions hx; u I, g = e u I,x I f iy x J gy dy R n mapping D to C, and the set P := { hx; u I, g : u I C d, Re u I <, g C c R n }. Denote by LP the set of complex linear combinations of functions in P. From the Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma it follows that f R n iy x J gy dy vanishes at infinity, and thus that LP C D. It is easy to see that LP is a subalgebra of C D, that is in addition closed under complex conjugation and multiplication. Note
11 AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR 11 that the product of two Fourier transforms of compactly supported functions g 1, g 2 is the Fourier transform of a compactly supported function, namely g 1 g 2. It is also straight-forward to check that LP is point separating and vanishes nowhere i.e. there is no x D such that hx = for all h LP. Using a suitable version of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem e.g. Semadeni 1971, Corollary 7.3.9, it follows that LP is dense in C D. Fix some t R and let hx P. By Lemma 2.5 it holds that E x [f u X t ] = Φt, u exp x, ψt, u whenever t, u Q, and E x [f u X t ] = whenever t, u Q. Moreover, by Proposition 3.3 we know that ψ J t, u = e βt u J for all t, u Q. Thus, writing u = u I, iy, we have 3.1 ] P t hx = E [ R x f ui,iyx t gy dy = E x [ f ui,iyx t ] gy dy = n R n = E x [ f ui,iyx t ] gy dy = = {u U:t,u Q} {u U:t,u Q} Φt, u I, iy exp x I, ψ I t, u I, iy + x J, e tβ iy gy dy. Since u I, iy U it follows by Proposition 3.4 that also Re ψ I t, u I, iy < for any y R n. This shows that P t hx as x I. In addition, as a function of x J, 3.1 can be interpreted as the Fourier transformation of a compactly supported density. The Riemann-Lebesgue Lemma then implies that P t hx as x J, and we conclude that P t h C D. The assertion extends by linearity to every h LP, and finally by the density of LP to every h C D. This proves that the semi-group P t t maps C D into C D, and hence that X t t is a Feller process. 4. All semi-homogeneous affine processes are regular Definition 4.1. We say that a stochastically continuous affine process is semihomogeneous, if for all x D, t, u R ir d 4.1 E x [ e Xt,u ] = e x J,u J E x I, [ e Xt,u ]. The above condition is equivalent to the statement that for any y of the form y =, y J, the law of X t + y under P x equals the law of X t under P x+y. If this held true for any y D we would speak of a space-homogeneous Markov process. Since we impose the condition only for y of the form, y J, we call the process semi-homogeneous. Note that semi-homogeneous affine processes are frequently encountered in mathematical finance: Affine stochastic volatility models e.g. the Heston model are typically based on a semi-homogeneous affine process; see Keller-Ressel 28a. Combining Definition 4.1 with the affine property 2.1, it is easy to see that the following holds: Lemma 4.2. A stochastically continuous affine process is semi-homogeneous, if and only if ψ J t, u = u J for all t, u R ir d or equivalently for all t, u Q. The main result of this section is the following:
12 12 MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AND JOSEF TEICHMANN Theorem 4.3. Every semi-homogeneous, stochastically continuous affine process is regular. Our proof uses the techniques originally presented in Montgomery and Zippin 1955 for continuous transformation groups, and follows in part the proof of Dawson and Li 26, Theorem 4.1. Proof. To simplify calculations we embed Φt, u and ψt, u into the extended semi-flow Υt, u, that is we set Q := Q C and define 4.2 Υ : Q C d+1 ψt, u, t, u 1,... u d, u d+1 1,..., u d. Φt, u 1,..., u d u d+1 Note that all vectors u have now a d + 1-th component added; this component will be assigned to the non-negative components I, such that under slight abuse of notation we now write I = {1,..., m, d + 1}. The semi-flow property is preserved by Υt, u, i.e. Υt + s, u = Υt, Υs, u for all t + s, u Q. The semi-homogeneity condition on X implies that Υ J t, u = u J for all t, u Q. Clearly, the time derivative exists and vanishes, i.e., t Υ Jt, u = t= for all u U C. In the rest of the proof we thus focus on the remaining not space-homogeneous components. Let u Û := U C be fixed and assume that t, s R are small enough such that Φt + s, u, ψt + s, u and their u-derivatives are always well-defined cf. Lemma 2.1. Denote by Υ I u I t, u the Jacobian of Υ I with respect to u I. Using a Taylor expansion we have that 4.3 Υ I r, Υt, u dr Υ I t, u dr = Υ I u I r, u dr Υ I t, u u I + + o Υ I t, u u I. On the other hand, using the semi-flow property of Υ we can write the left side of 4.3 as 4.4 = Υ I r, Υt, u dr +t t Υ I r, u dr Υ I r, u dr = Υ I r, u dr = = +t s Υ I r + t, u dr Υ I r, u dr Υ I r + s, u dr Υ I r, u dr = Υ I r, u dr = Υ I r, u dr. Denoting the last expression by Is, t and combining 4.3 with 4.4 we obtain 1 s lim Is, t t Υ I t, u u I = 1 s Υ I r, u dr s u I. Define Ms, u := 1 Υ I s u I r, u dr. Note that as s, it holds that Ms, u Υ I u I, u = I I the identity matrix. Thus for s small enough Ms, u =, and
13 AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR 13 we conclude that lim t t Υ It, u u I = = lim t Is, t st Ms, u 1 = Υ I s, u u I s Ms, u 1. The right hand side of 4.5 is well-defined and finite, implying that also the limit on the left hand side is. Thus, combining 4.3 and 4.4, dividing by st and taking the limit t we obtain Υ I t, u u I lim t t = Υ Is, u u I s Ms, u 1. Again we may choose s small enough, such that Ms, u is invertible, and the right hand side of the above expression is well-defined. The existence and finiteness of the right hand side then implies the existence of the limit on the left. In addition the right hand side is a continuous function of u Û, such that also the left hand side is. Adding back the components J, for which a time derivative trivially exists recall that ψ J t, u = u J for all t, we obtain that Υt, u u 4.6 Ru := lim = t t t t= Υt, u exists and is a continuous function of u Û. Denoting the first d components of Ru by Ru and the d + 1-th component by F u we can disentangle the extended semi-flow Υ, drop the d + 1-th component of u, and see that 4.7 F u := t t= Φt, u and Ru := t t= ψt, u are likewise well-defined and continuous on U. To show that X t t is regular affine it remains to show that 4.7 extends continuously to U: To this end let t n, x D, u U, and rewrite 4.7 as Φt n, u exp x, ψt n, u u F u + x, Ru = lim = n t { n f u x E x [f u X tn ] 1 = lim n t n { = lim n 1 t n D x = lim n 1 t n e ξ,u 1 } e ξ x,u p tn x, dξ 1 = D p tn x, dξ + p } t n x, D 1 t n where p t x, dξ is the transition kernel of the Markov process X t t, and p t x, dξ is its shifted transition kernel p t x, dξ := p t x, dξ + x. The right hand side of 4.8 can be regarded as a limit of log-characteristic functions of infinitely divisible sub-stochastic measures 2. That is, there exist infinitely divisible sub-stochastic measures µ n x, dξ, such that exp F u + x, Ru = lim n e u,ξ µ n x, dξ, R d for all u U. { 2 Note that exp 1 t n D x e ξ,u 1 } p tx, dξ is the characteristic function of a compound Poisson distribution with intensity 1 and jump measure p t n tx, dξ.,
14 14 MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AND JOSEF TEICHMANN Let now θ R d with θ I < and θ J = note that θ U and consider the exponentially tilted measures e θ,ξ µ n x, dξ. Their characteristic functions converge to exp F u + θ + x, Ru + θ. Thus, by Lévy s continuity theorem, there exists µ x, dξ such that e θ,ξ µ n x, dξ µ x, dξ weakly. On the other hand, by Helly s selection theorem, µ n x, dξ has a vaguely convergent subsequence, which converges to some measure µx, dξ. By uniqueness of the weak limit we conclude that µx, dξ = e θ,ξ µ x, dξ. Thus we have that for all x D and u U with Re u in a neighborhood of θ, 4.9 exp F u + x, Ru = lim e u,ξ µ n d, dξ = n R d = lim e u θ,ξ e θ,ξ µ n x, dξ = e u θ,ξ µ x, dξ = e u,ξ µx, dξ. n R d R d R d But the choice of θ was arbitrary, such that 4.9 extends to all u U. Applying dominated convergence to the last term of 4.9 shows that both F and R have a continuous extension to all of U, which we also denote by F and R respectively. It remains to show that 4.7 remains valid on U: Let u U and u n n N U such that u n u. Remember that by Proposition 3.4 u n U implies that also ψt, u n U for any t. Thus we have 4.1 Rψs, u ds = = lim u n u lim Rψs, u n ds = lim u n u u n u Rψs, u n ds = t ψs, u n ds = lim u n u ψt, u n u n = ψt, u u. Since the left hand side of 4.1 is t-differentiable, also the right hand side is, and we obtain Ru = t ψt, u t= for all u U. A similar calculation as above can be made upon replacing R with F, resulting in F u = t Φt, u t= for all u U, and thus showing that the semi-homogeneous affine process X t t is regular. 5. All affine processes are regular In this final section we reduce the question of regularity of general stochastically continuous affine processes to stochastically continuous, semi-homogeneous affine processes. Recall that for those processes we have shown regularity in the preceding section. The transformation of general affine processes to semi-homogeneous processes is based on the method of the moving frame, which has been successfully applied in the context of SPDEs several times; see for instance Filipović, Tappe, and Teichmann 28 and Filipović, Tappe, and Teichmann 29. Theorem 5.1. Every stochastically continuous affine process X is regular. Proof. By Theorem 3.5 X is a Feller process, and thus has a càdlàg version. Clearly, choosing a càdlàg version will not alter the functions Φt, u and ψt, u defined by 2.1. Furthermore, we know by Proposition 3.3 that 5.1 ψ J t, u = exptβu J for t, u Q and a real n n matrix β. We define the d d matrix idm 5.2 K =, β
15 AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR 15 and the transformation T 5.3 Z t = T [X] t := X t K X s ds, transforming the process X path-by-path into a process Z. Note that the transformation is well-defined due to the càdlàg property of the trajectories, and preserves the stochastic continuity of X. Moreover, the transformation can be inverted by 5.4 T 1 [Z] t = Z t + K exp t sk Z s ds, which is seen directly by inserting 5.3 and integrating by parts. We claim that the transformed process Z = T [X] is a semi-homogeneous affine process. For this purpose we calculate the conditional characteristic function: Let u ir d, and for each N N and k {,..., N}, define t k = kt/n, such that t,..., t N, is an equidistant partition of [, t] into intervals of mesh t/n. By writing the time-integral as a limit of Riemann sums, and using dominated convergence we have that 5.5 E x [exp u, Z t+s F s ] = exp lim N Ex [ exp u, K u, X t+s t N X r dr Ku, N 1 k= X s+tk F s ] With the shorthands h := t/n and Σ n := n k= X s+t k, and using the tower law as well as the affine property of X t t, the expectation on the right side can be written as [ E x exp E x [ exp ] u, X t+s h Ku, Σ N 1 Fs h Ku, Σ N 2 E x [ exp = id d hku, X t+s Fs+tN 1 Φh, id d hku [ ψh, E x ] exp idd hku, X s+tn 1 h Ku, ΣN 2 Fs.. ] ] Fs = Applying the tower law N 1-times in the same way conditioning on F s+tn 1, F s+tn 2,..., F s+t1, respectively we arrive at the equation ] E [exp x u, X t+s t N 1 Ku, X s+tk F s N k= = pn 1; t, u exp X s, qn 1; t, u, where the quantities pn 1; t, u and qn 1; t, u are defined through the following recursion: 5.6a p; t, u = 1, pk + 1; t, u = Φ h, id d hkqk; t, u pk; t, u, 5.6b q; t, u = u, qk + 1; t, u = ψ h, id d hkqk; t, u, Since the Riemannian sums in 5.5 converge point by point, we conclude that the quantities pn 1; t, u and qn 1; t, u converge to some functions pt, u, qt, u
16 16 MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AND JOSEF TEICHMANN as N, and thus 5.7 E x [exp u, Z t+s F s ] = pt, u exp qt, u, X s u, K X r dr for all t, s and u ir d. Let now q J t, u denote the J-components of qt, u. Based on the recursion 5.6 and the fact that ψ J t, u = e βt u J it holds that q J t, u = lim etβ id n tβ N 1uJ = e tβ e tβ u J = u J. N N Thus we can rewrite 5.7 as E x [exp u, Z t+s F s ] = pt, u exp q I t, u, Zs I + uj, Zs J which shows that Z is indeed a stochastically continuous, semi-homogeneous affine process. By Theorem 4.3 such a process is regular. Hence, the functions F u = t pt, u t= and Ru = t qt, u t= exist and satisfy the admissibility conditions in Duffie et al. 23, Def By Duffie et al. 23, Thm. 2.7, the functions F u and Ru+Ku are also admissible, and thus define a regular affine process X. Using now the Feynman-Kac formula in Duffie et al. 23, Prop. 11.2, it is seen that the transformation T transforms the regular affine process X into the regular affine process T [ X] characterized by F u and Ru that is into a process equal in law to Z. We have shown that T [X] = Z and T [ X] = Z, where equality is understood in law. Since the transformation T can be inverted path-by-path, we conclude that X = X in law, and thus that X is regular. Remark 5.2. The intuition behind the moving frame transformation used above is the following: given the process X we first construct a a time-dependent coordinate transformation Y t = exp K t X t, the moving frame. In the moving frame the process X becomes time-dependent, but can be re-scaled in order to arrive at a time-homogeneous process by the stochastic integral dz t = exp K t dy t. The stochastic integral can be defined by integration by parts, i.e., Z t = exp K t Y t K exp K t Y r dr, which yields the transformation formula 5.3. The method of the moving frame is therefore an operation which allows to remove or change the linear drift of an affine process. Remark 5.3. Now that we have shown that every stochastically continuous affine process X is regular, all the results of Duffie et al. 23 on regular affine processes apply to X. It follows in particular that the set Q, introduced in 2.4 is actually equal to U, and hence simply connected. Thus, the logarithm φt, u = log Φt, u is uniquely defined by choosing the main branch of the complex logarithm, and we can write E x [ e Xt,u ] = exp φt, u + x, ψt, u, for all t, u U, as in Duffie et al. 23.
17 AFFINE PROCESSES ARE REGULAR 17 References J. Aczél. Functional Equations and their Applications. Academic Press, D. A. Dawson and Zenghu Li. Skew convolution semigroups and affine Markov processes. The Annals of Probability, 343: , 26. D. Duffie, D. Filipovic, and W. Schachermayer. Affine processes and applications in finance. The Annals of Applied Probability, 133: , 23. Damir Filipović and Josef Teichmann. Regularity of finite-dimensional realizations for evolution equations. Journal of Functional Analysis, 197: , 23. Damir Filipović, Stefan Tappe, and Josef Teichmann. Jump-diffusions in Hilbert spaces: Existence, stability and numerics. arxiv/81.523, Preprint 28. Damir Filipović, Stefan Tappe, and Josef Teichmann. Term structure models driven by Wiener process and Poisson measures: Existence and positivity. arxiv/ , Preprint 29. Niels Jacob. Pseudo Differential Operators and Markov Processes, volume I. Imperial College Press, 21. Kiyoshi Kawazu and Shinzo Watanabe. Branching processes with immigration and related limit theorems. Theory of Probability and its Applications, XVI1: 36 54, Martin Keller-Ressel. Moment explosions and long-term behavior of affine stochastic volatility models. arxiv: , forthcoming in Mathematical Finance, 28. Martin Keller-Ressel. Affine Processes Contributions to Theory and Applications. PhD thesis, TU Wien, 28. Eugene Lukacs. Characteristic Functions. Charles Griffin & Co Ltd., 196. Deane Montgomery and Leo Zippin. Topological Transformation Groups. Interscience Publishers, Inc., L.C.G. Rogers and David Williams. Diffusions, Markov Processes and Martingales, Volume 1. Cambridge Mathematical Library, 2nd edition, Zbigniew Semadeni. Banach spaces of continuous functions. Polish Scientific Publishers, ETH Zürich, D-Math, Rämistrasse 11, CH-892 Zürich, Switzerland address: University of Vienna, Faculty of Mathematics, Nordbergstrasse 15, 19 Vienna, Austria address: ETH Zürich, D-Math, Rämistrasse 11, CH-892 Zürich, Switzerland address:
Affine Processes are regular
Affine Processes are regular Martin Keller-Ressel kemartin@math.ethz.ch ETH Zürich Based on joint work with Walter Schachermayer and Josef Teichmann (arxiv:0906.3392) Forschungsseminar Stochastische Analysis
More informationA NOTE ON STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS AS L 2 -CURVES
A NOTE ON STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS AS L 2 -CURVES STEFAN TAPPE Abstract. In a work of van Gaans (25a) stochastic integrals are regarded as L 2 -curves. In Filipović and Tappe (28) we have shown the connection
More informationREGULARITY OF AFFINE PROCESSES ON GENERAL STATE SPACES
REGULARITY OF AFFINE PROCESSES ON GENERAL STATE SPACES MARTIN KELLER-RESSEL, WALTER SCHACHERMAYER, AN JOSEF TEICHMANN Abstract. We consider a stochastically continuous, affine Markov process in the sense
More informationWiener Measure and Brownian Motion
Chapter 16 Wiener Measure and Brownian Motion Diffusion of particles is a product of their apparently random motion. The density u(t, x) of diffusing particles satisfies the diffusion equation (16.1) u
More informationA Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations
A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations Michael Röckner Reference: C. Prevot, M. Röckner: Springer LN in Math. 1905, Berlin (2007) And see the references therein for the original
More informationWe denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.
Sep. 1 0, 008 Distributions Distributions are generalized functions. Some familiarity with the theory of distributions helps understanding of various function spaces which play important roles in the study
More informationSEPARABLE TERM STRUCTURES AND THE MAXIMAL DEGREE PROBLEM. 1. Introduction This paper discusses arbitrage-free separable term structure (STS) models
SEPARABLE TERM STRUCTURES AND THE MAXIMAL DEGREE PROBLEM DAMIR FILIPOVIĆ Abstract. This paper discusses separable term structure diffusion models in an arbitrage-free environment. Using general consistency
More informationLecture 12. F o s, (1.1) F t := s>t
Lecture 12 1 Brownian motion: the Markov property Let C := C(0, ), R) be the space of continuous functions mapping from 0, ) to R, in which a Brownian motion (B t ) t 0 almost surely takes its value. Let
More informationON ADDITIVE TIME-CHANGES OF FELLER PROCESSES. 1. Introduction
ON ADDITIVE TIME-CHANGES OF FELLER PROCESSES ALEKSANDAR MIJATOVIĆ AND MARTIJN PISTORIUS Abstract. In this note we generalise the Phillips theorem [1] on the subordination of Feller processes by Lévy subordinators
More informationSTOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS DRIVEN BY PROCESSES WITH INDEPENDENT INCREMENTS
STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS DRIVEN BY PROCESSES WITH INDEPENDENT INCREMENTS DAMIR FILIPOVIĆ AND STEFAN TAPPE Abstract. This article considers infinite dimensional stochastic differential equations
More informationON THE REGULARITY OF SAMPLE PATHS OF SUB-ELLIPTIC DIFFUSIONS ON MANIFOLDS
Bendikov, A. and Saloff-Coste, L. Osaka J. Math. 4 (5), 677 7 ON THE REGULARITY OF SAMPLE PATHS OF SUB-ELLIPTIC DIFFUSIONS ON MANIFOLDS ALEXANDER BENDIKOV and LAURENT SALOFF-COSTE (Received March 4, 4)
More informationAsymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimator for the growth rate for a jump-type CIR process
Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimator for the growth rate for a jump-type CIR process Mátyás Barczy University of Debrecen, Hungary The 3 rd Workshop on Branching Processes and Related
More informationLecture 21 Representations of Martingales
Lecture 21: Representations of Martingales 1 of 11 Course: Theory of Probability II Term: Spring 215 Instructor: Gordan Zitkovic Lecture 21 Representations of Martingales Right-continuous inverses Let
More informationLogarithmic scaling of planar random walk s local times
Logarithmic scaling of planar random walk s local times Péter Nándori * and Zeyu Shen ** * Department of Mathematics, University of Maryland ** Courant Institute, New York University October 9, 2015 Abstract
More informationBrownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3
Brownian Motion Contents 1 Definition 2 1.1 Brownian Motion................................. 2 1.2 Wiener measure.................................. 3 2 Construction 4 2.1 Gaussian process.................................
More informationPROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS
PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING 218. HOMEWORK PROBLEMS PROF. YURI BAKHTIN Instructions. You are allowed to work on solutions in groups, but you are required to write up solutions on your own. Please
More informationBrownian motion. Samy Tindel. Purdue University. Probability Theory 2 - MA 539
Brownian motion Samy Tindel Purdue University Probability Theory 2 - MA 539 Mostly taken from Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus by I. Karatzas and S. Shreve Samy T. Brownian motion Probability Theory
More information16 1 Basic Facts from Functional Analysis and Banach Lattices
16 1 Basic Facts from Functional Analysis and Banach Lattices 1.2.3 Banach Steinhaus Theorem Another fundamental theorem of functional analysis is the Banach Steinhaus theorem, or the Uniform Boundedness
More informationFiltrations, Markov Processes and Martingales. Lectures on Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, Braunschweig, Lecture 3: The Lévy-Itô Decomposition
Filtrations, Markov Processes and Martingales Lectures on Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, Braunschweig, Lecture 3: The Lévy-Itô Decomposition David pplebaum Probability and Statistics Department,
More informationPoint Process Control
Point Process Control The following note is based on Chapters I, II and VII in Brémaud s book Point Processes and Queues (1981). 1 Basic Definitions Consider some probability space (Ω, F, P). A real-valued
More informationINVARIANT MANIFOLDS WITH BOUNDARY FOR JUMP-DIFFUSIONS
INVARIANT MANIFOLDS WITH BOUNDARY FOR JUMP-DIFFUSIONS DAMIR FILIPOVIĆ, STFAN TAPP, AND JOSF TICHMANN Abstract. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for stochastic invariance of finite dimensional
More informationON THE FRACTIONAL CAUCHY PROBLEM ASSOCIATED WITH A FELLER SEMIGROUP
Dedicated to Professor Gheorghe Bucur on the occasion of his 7th birthday ON THE FRACTIONAL CAUCHY PROBLEM ASSOCIATED WITH A FELLER SEMIGROUP EMIL POPESCU Starting from the usual Cauchy problem, we give
More informationPoisson random measure: motivation
: motivation The Lévy measure provides the expected number of jumps by time unit, i.e. in a time interval of the form: [t, t + 1], and of a certain size Example: ν([1, )) is the expected number of jumps
More informationON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM
ON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM OLEG ZUBELEVICH DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS THE BUDGET AND TREASURY ACADEMY OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 7, ZLATOUSTINSKY MALIY PER.,
More informationINTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY
INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYTIC GEOMETRY KRZYSZTOF KURDYKA 1. Analytic functions in several variables 1.1. Summable families. Let (E, ) be a normed space over the field R or C, dim E
More informationFunctional Limit theorems for the quadratic variation of a continuous time random walk and for certain stochastic integrals
Functional Limit theorems for the quadratic variation of a continuous time random walk and for certain stochastic integrals Noèlia Viles Cuadros BCAM- Basque Center of Applied Mathematics with Prof. Enrico
More informationThe first order quasi-linear PDEs
Chapter 2 The first order quasi-linear PDEs The first order quasi-linear PDEs have the following general form: F (x, u, Du) = 0, (2.1) where x = (x 1, x 2,, x 3 ) R n, u = u(x), Du is the gradient of u.
More informationSome SDEs with distributional drift Part I : General calculus. Flandoli, Franco; Russo, Francesco; Wolf, Jochen
Title Author(s) Some SDEs with distributional drift Part I : General calculus Flandoli, Franco; Russo, Francesco; Wolf, Jochen Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 4() P.493-P.54 Issue Date 3-6 Text
More informationAn introduction to some aspects of functional analysis
An introduction to some aspects of functional analysis Stephen Semmes Rice University Abstract These informal notes deal with some very basic objects in functional analysis, including norms and seminorms
More informationMATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA
MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA For ω, consider an integral of the form I(ω) = e iωf(x) u(x) dx, where u Cc (R n ) complex valued, with support in a compact set K, and f C (R n ) real valued. Thus, I(ω)
More informationPROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS
PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING 15. HOMEWORK PROBLEMS PROF. YURI BAKHTIN Instructions. You are allowed to work on solutions in groups, but you are required to write up solutions on your own. Please
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 23 Dec 2001
arxiv:math/0112260v1 [math.dg] 23 Dec 2001 VOLUME PRESERVING EMBEDDINGS OF OPEN SUBSETS OF Ê n INTO MANIFOLDS FELIX SCHLENK Abstract. We consider a connected smooth n-dimensional manifold M endowed with
More informationConvergence of Feller Processes
Chapter 15 Convergence of Feller Processes This chapter looks at the convergence of sequences of Feller processes to a iting process. Section 15.1 lays some ground work concerning weak convergence of processes
More informationMetric Spaces and Topology
Chapter 2 Metric Spaces and Topology From an engineering perspective, the most important way to construct a topology on a set is to define the topology in terms of a metric on the set. This approach underlies
More informationUSING FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND SOBOLEV SPACES TO SOLVE POISSON S EQUATION
USING FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND SOBOLEV SPACES TO SOLVE POISSON S EQUATION YI WANG Abstract. We study Banach and Hilbert spaces with an eye towards defining weak solutions to elliptic PDE. Using Lax-Milgram
More informationAn invariance result for Hammersley s process with sources and sinks
An invariance result for Hammersley s process with sources and sinks Piet Groeneboom Delft University of Technology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, and University of Washington, Seattle March 31, 26 Abstract
More informationON CONTINUITY OF MEASURABLE COCYCLES
Journal of Applied Analysis Vol. 6, No. 2 (2000), pp. 295 302 ON CONTINUITY OF MEASURABLE COCYCLES G. GUZIK Received January 18, 2000 and, in revised form, July 27, 2000 Abstract. It is proved that every
More informationApplications of Ito s Formula
CHAPTER 4 Applications of Ito s Formula In this chapter, we discuss several basic theorems in stochastic analysis. Their proofs are good examples of applications of Itô s formula. 1. Lévy s martingale
More informationThe Asymptotic Theory of Transaction Costs
The Asymptotic Theory of Transaction Costs Lecture Notes by Walter Schachermayer Nachdiplom-Vorlesung, ETH Zürich, WS 15/16 1 Models on Finite Probability Spaces In this section we consider a stock price
More informationON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTEGRABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS
1 2 3 ON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTERABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS HONYU HE Abstract. In this paper, we study matrix valued positive definite functions on a unimodular group. We generalize two important
More informationthe convolution of f and g) given by
09:53 /5/2000 TOPIC Characteristic functions, cont d This lecture develops an inversion formula for recovering the density of a smooth random variable X from its characteristic function, and uses that
More informationStochastic Partial Differential Equations with Levy Noise
Stochastic Partial Differential Equations with Levy Noise An Evolution Equation Approach S..PESZAT and J. ZABCZYK Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences' CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents
More informationTOPOLOGICAL GROUPS MATH 519
TOPOLOGICAL GROUPS MATH 519 The purpose of these notes is to give a mostly self-contained topological background for the study of the representations of locally compact totally disconnected groups, as
More informationStability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games
Stability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games Alberto Bressan ) and Khai T. Nguyen ) *) Department of Mathematics, Penn State University **) Department of Mathematics,
More informationChapter 3: Baire category and open mapping theorems
MA3421 2016 17 Chapter 3: Baire category and open mapping theorems A number of the major results rely on completeness via the Baire category theorem. 3.1 The Baire category theorem 3.1.1 Definition. A
More informationSPACES ENDOWED WITH A GRAPH AND APPLICATIONS. Mina Dinarvand. 1. Introduction
MATEMATIČKI VESNIK MATEMATIQKI VESNIK 69, 1 (2017), 23 38 March 2017 research paper originalni nauqni rad FIXED POINT RESULTS FOR (ϕ, ψ)-contractions IN METRIC SPACES ENDOWED WITH A GRAPH AND APPLICATIONS
More informationContinued fractions for complex numbers and values of binary quadratic forms
arxiv:110.3754v1 [math.nt] 18 Feb 011 Continued fractions for complex numbers and values of binary quadratic forms S.G. Dani and Arnaldo Nogueira February 1, 011 Abstract We describe various properties
More informationLecture Characterization of Infinitely Divisible Distributions
Lecture 10 1 Characterization of Infinitely Divisible Distributions We have shown that a distribution µ is infinitely divisible if and only if it is the weak limit of S n := X n,1 + + X n,n for a uniformly
More informationAN EFFECTIVE METRIC ON C(H, K) WITH NORMAL STRUCTURE. Mona Nabiei (Received 23 June, 2015)
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 46 (2016), 53-64 AN EFFECTIVE METRIC ON C(H, K) WITH NORMAL STRUCTURE Mona Nabiei (Received 23 June, 2015) Abstract. This study first defines a new metric with
More information3 Integration and Expectation
3 Integration and Expectation 3.1 Construction of the Lebesgue Integral Let (, F, µ) be a measure space (not necessarily a probability space). Our objective will be to define the Lebesgue integral R fdµ
More informationUNCERTAINTY FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS FOR FINANCE
Surveys in Mathematics and its Applications ISSN 1842-6298 (electronic), 1843-7265 (print) Volume 5 (2010), 275 284 UNCERTAINTY FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS FOR FINANCE Iuliana Carmen Bărbăcioru Abstract.
More informationCorrection to: Yield curve shapes and the asymptotic short rate distribution in affine one-factor models
Finance Stoch (218) 22:53 51 https://doi.org/1.17/s78-18-359-5 CORRECTION Correction to: Yield curve shapes and the asymptotic short rate distribution in affine one-factor models Martin Keller-Ressel 1
More information1.3.1 Definition and Basic Properties of Convolution
1.3 Convolution 15 1.3 Convolution Since L 1 (R) is a Banach space, we know that it has many useful properties. In particular the operations of addition and scalar multiplication are continuous. However,
More informationTools from Lebesgue integration
Tools from Lebesgue integration E.P. van den Ban Fall 2005 Introduction In these notes we describe some of the basic tools from the theory of Lebesgue integration. Definitions and results will be given
More informationChapter One. The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity
Chapter One The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity Our story begins with a classical situation: convolution with homogeneous, Calderón- Zygmund ( kernels on R n. Let S n 1 R n denote the unit sphere
More informationEXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018
EXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018 While these notes are under construction, I expect there will be many typos. The main reference for this is volume 1 of Hörmander, The analysis of liner
More informationReflected Brownian Motion
Chapter 6 Reflected Brownian Motion Often we encounter Diffusions in regions with boundary. If the process can reach the boundary from the interior in finite time with positive probability we need to decide
More informationNotes on Complex Analysis
Michael Papadimitrakis Notes on Complex Analysis Department of Mathematics University of Crete Contents The complex plane.. The complex plane...................................2 Argument and polar representation.........................
More informationLecture 19 L 2 -Stochastic integration
Lecture 19: L 2 -Stochastic integration 1 of 12 Course: Theory of Probability II Term: Spring 215 Instructor: Gordan Zitkovic Lecture 19 L 2 -Stochastic integration The stochastic integral for processes
More informationAn Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications
An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications WILLIAM FELLER (1906-1970) Eugene Higgins Professor of Mathematics Princeton University VOLUME II SECOND EDITION JOHN WILEY & SONS Contents I
More informationJournal of Complexity. New general convergence theory for iterative processes and its applications to Newton Kantorovich type theorems
Journal of Complexity 26 (2010) 3 42 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Complexity journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jco New general convergence theory for iterative processes
More informationLecture 9 Metric spaces. The contraction fixed point theorem. The implicit function theorem. The existence of solutions to differenti. equations.
Lecture 9 Metric spaces. The contraction fixed point theorem. The implicit function theorem. The existence of solutions to differential equations. 1 Metric spaces 2 Completeness and completion. 3 The contraction
More informationRegularity of the density for the stochastic heat equation
Regularity of the density for the stochastic heat equation Carl Mueller 1 Department of Mathematics University of Rochester Rochester, NY 15627 USA email: cmlr@math.rochester.edu David Nualart 2 Department
More informationOn m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry
On m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry Ognjen Milatovic Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of North Florida Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA. Abstract
More informationNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE Department of Mathematics MA4247 Complex Analysis II Lecture Notes Part II
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE Department of Mathematics MA4247 Complex Analysis II Lecture Notes Part II Chapter 2 Further properties of analytic functions 21 Local/Global behavior of analytic functions;
More informationµ X (A) = P ( X 1 (A) )
1 STOCHASTIC PROCESSES This appendix provides a very basic introduction to the language of probability theory and stochastic processes. We assume the reader is familiar with the general measure and integration
More informationExponential Mixing Properties of Stochastic PDEs Through Asymptotic Coupling
Exponential Mixing Properties of Stochastic PDEs Through Asymptotic Coupling September 14 2001 M. Hairer Département de Physique Théorique Université de Genève 1211 Genève 4 Switzerland E-mail: Martin.Hairer@physics.unige.ch
More informationThe Skorokhod problem in a time-dependent interval
The Skorokhod problem in a time-dependent interval Krzysztof Burdzy, Weining Kang and Kavita Ramanan University of Washington and Carnegie Mellon University Abstract: We consider the Skorokhod problem
More informationAnalysis II: The Implicit and Inverse Function Theorems
Analysis II: The Implicit and Inverse Function Theorems Jesse Ratzkin November 17, 2009 Let f : R n R m be C 1. When is the zero set Z = {x R n : f(x) = 0} the graph of another function? When is Z nicely
More informationHarmonic Functions and Brownian motion
Harmonic Functions and Brownian motion Steven P. Lalley April 25, 211 1 Dynkin s Formula Denote by W t = (W 1 t, W 2 t,..., W d t ) a standard d dimensional Wiener process on (Ω, F, P ), and let F = (F
More informationMA3111S COMPLEX ANALYSIS I
MA3111S COMPLEX ANALYSIS I 1. The Algebra of Complex Numbers A complex number is an expression of the form a + ib, where a and b are real numbers. a is called the real part of a + ib and b the imaginary
More informationNotes on uniform convergence
Notes on uniform convergence Erik Wahlén erik.wahlen@math.lu.se January 17, 2012 1 Numerical sequences We begin by recalling some properties of numerical sequences. By a numerical sequence we simply mean
More information1.5 Approximate Identities
38 1 The Fourier Transform on L 1 (R) which are dense subspaces of L p (R). On these domains, P : D P L p (R) and M : D M L p (R). Show, however, that P and M are unbounded even when restricted to these
More information1 Independent increments
Tel Aviv University, 2008 Brownian motion 1 1 Independent increments 1a Three convolution semigroups........... 1 1b Independent increments.............. 2 1c Continuous time................... 3 1d Bad
More informationStochastic Processes
Stochastic Processes A very simple introduction Péter Medvegyev 2009, January Medvegyev (CEU) Stochastic Processes 2009, January 1 / 54 Summary from measure theory De nition (X, A) is a measurable space
More informationMODULUS OF CONTINUITY OF THE DIRICHLET SOLUTIONS
MODULUS OF CONTINUITY OF THE DIRICHLET SOLUTIONS HIROAKI AIKAWA Abstract. Let D be a bounded domain in R n with n 2. For a function f on D we denote by H D f the Dirichlet solution, for the Laplacian,
More informationON MARTIN HAIRER S THEORY OF REGULARITY STRUCTURES
ON MARTIN HAIRER S THEORY OF REGULARITY STRUCTURES JOSEF TEICHMANN 1. Introduction Martin Hairer received the Fields medal at the ICM in Seoul 2014 for his outstanding contributions to the theory of stochastic
More informationMath 4263 Homework Set 1
Homework Set 1 1. Solve the following PDE/BVP 2. Solve the following PDE/BVP 2u t + 3u x = 0 u (x, 0) = sin (x) u x + e x u y = 0 u (0, y) = y 2 3. (a) Find the curves γ : t (x (t), y (t)) such that that
More informationAffine processes on positive semidefinite matrices
Affine processes on positive semiefinite matrices Josef Teichmann (joint work with C. Cuchiero, D. Filipović an E. Mayerhofer) ETH Zürich Zürich, June 2010 C. Cuchiero, D. Filipović, E. Mayerhofer, J.
More informationBoundedly complete weak-cauchy basic sequences in Banach spaces with the PCP
Journal of Functional Analysis 253 (2007) 772 781 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa Note Boundedly complete weak-cauchy basic sequences in Banach spaces with the PCP Haskell Rosenthal Department of Mathematics,
More informationMORE NOTES FOR MATH 823, FALL 2007
MORE NOTES FOR MATH 83, FALL 007 Prop 1.1 Prop 1. Lemma 1.3 1. The Siegel upper half space 1.1. The Siegel upper half space and its Bergman kernel. The Siegel upper half space is the domain { U n+1 z C
More informationConvexity in R n. The following lemma will be needed in a while. Lemma 1 Let x E, u R n. If τ I(x, u), τ 0, define. f(x + τu) f(x). τ.
Convexity in R n Let E be a convex subset of R n. A function f : E (, ] is convex iff f(tx + (1 t)y) (1 t)f(x) + tf(y) x, y E, t [0, 1]. A similar definition holds in any vector space. A topology is needed
More informationTHE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS
THE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS OGNJEN MILATOVIC Abstract. We consider H V = M +V, where (M, g) is a Riemannian manifold (not necessarily
More informationCOMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS
Series Logo Volume 00, Number 00, Xxxx 19xx COMPLETELY INVARIANT JULIA SETS OF POLYNOMIAL SEMIGROUPS RICH STANKEWITZ Abstract. Let G be a semigroup of rational functions of degree at least two, under composition
More informationA Note on the Central Limit Theorem for a Class of Linear Systems 1
A Note on the Central Limit Theorem for a Class of Linear Systems 1 Contents Yukio Nagahata Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of Engineering Science Osaka University, Toyonaka 560-8531, Japan.
More informationLECTURE 5: THE METHOD OF STATIONARY PHASE
LECTURE 5: THE METHOD OF STATIONARY PHASE Some notions.. A crash course on Fourier transform For j =,, n, j = x j. D j = i j. For any multi-index α = (α,, α n ) N n. α = α + + α n. α! = α! α n!. x α =
More informationAn essay on the general theory of stochastic processes
Probability Surveys Vol. 3 (26) 345 412 ISSN: 1549-5787 DOI: 1.1214/1549578614 An essay on the general theory of stochastic processes Ashkan Nikeghbali ETHZ Departement Mathematik, Rämistrasse 11, HG G16
More informationLecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University
Lecture Notes in Advanced Calculus 1 (80315) Raz Kupferman Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University February 7, 2007 2 Contents 1 Metric Spaces 1 1.1 Basic definitions...........................
More informationIntroduction and Preliminaries
Chapter 1 Introduction and Preliminaries This chapter serves two purposes. The first purpose is to prepare the readers for the more systematic development in later chapters of methods of real analysis
More informationLet (Ω, F) be a measureable space. A filtration in discrete time is a sequence of. F s F t
2.2 Filtrations Let (Ω, F) be a measureable space. A filtration in discrete time is a sequence of σ algebras {F t } such that F t F and F t F t+1 for all t = 0, 1,.... In continuous time, the second condition
More informationPOWER SERIES AND ANALYTIC CONTINUATION
POWER SERIES AND ANALYTIC CONTINUATION 1. Analytic functions Definition 1.1. A function f : Ω C C is complex-analytic if for each z 0 Ω there exists a power series f z0 (z) := a n (z z 0 ) n which converges
More informationIntroduction to self-similar growth-fragmentations
Introduction to self-similar growth-fragmentations Quan Shi CIMAT, 11-15 December, 2017 Quan Shi Growth-Fragmentations CIMAT, 11-15 December, 2017 1 / 34 Literature Jean Bertoin, Compensated fragmentation
More informationHOPF S DECOMPOSITION AND RECURRENT SEMIGROUPS. Josef Teichmann
HOPF S DECOMPOSITION AND RECURRENT SEMIGROUPS Josef Teichmann Abstract. Some results of ergodic theory are generalized in the setting of Banach lattices, namely Hopf s maximal ergodic inequality and the
More informationBohl exponent for time-varying linear differential-algebraic equations
Bohl exponent for time-varying linear differential-algebraic equations Thomas Berger Institute of Mathematics, Ilmenau University of Technology, Weimarer Straße 25, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany, thomas.berger@tu-ilmenau.de.
More informationSome Terminology and Concepts that We will Use, But Not Emphasize (Section 6.2)
Some Terminology and Concepts that We will Use, But Not Emphasize (Section 6.2) Statistical analysis is based on probability theory. The fundamental object in probability theory is a probability space,
More informationNotation. General. Notation Description See. Sets, Functions, and Spaces. a b & a b The minimum and the maximum of a and b
Notation General Notation Description See a b & a b The minimum and the maximum of a and b a + & a f S u The non-negative part, a 0, and non-positive part, (a 0) of a R The restriction of the function
More informationThe Skorokhod reflection problem for functions with discontinuities (contractive case)
The Skorokhod reflection problem for functions with discontinuities (contractive case) TAKIS KONSTANTOPOULOS Univ. of Texas at Austin Revised March 1999 Abstract Basic properties of the Skorokhod reflection
More informationMATH MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS. Contents
MATH 3969 - MEASURE THEORY AND FOURIER ANALYSIS ANDREW TULLOCH Contents 1. Measure Theory 2 1.1. Properties of Measures 3 1.2. Constructing σ-algebras and measures 3 1.3. Properties of the Lebesgue measure
More informationMalliavin Calculus: Analysis on Gaussian spaces
Malliavin Calculus: Analysis on Gaussian spaces Josef Teichmann ETH Zürich Oxford 2011 Isonormal Gaussian process A Gaussian space is a (complete) probability space together with a Hilbert space of centered
More informationAffine realizations with affine state processes. the HJMM equation
for the HJMM equation Stefan Tappe Leibniz Universität Hannover 7th General AMaMeF and Swissquote Conference Session on Interest Rates September 7th, 2015 Introduction Consider a stochastic partial differential
More information