FOOTING FIXITY EFFECT ON PIER DEFLECTION
|
|
- Aron Craig
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Publications Department of Civil and Environmental Enineerin Fall FOOTING FIXITY EFFECT ON PIER DEFECTION Jen-kan Kent Hsiao Yunyi Jian Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Follow this and additional works at: Recommended Citation Hsiao, Jen-kan K. and Jian, Yunyi. "FOOTING FIXITY EFFECT ON PIER DEFECTION." International Journal of Bride Enineerin (IJBE) Vol., No. No. (Fall 04): pp This Article is brouht to you for free and open access by the Department of Civil and Environmental Enineerin at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact
2 International Journal of Bride Enineerin (IJBE), Vol., No., (04), pp. 0-0 FOOTING FIXITY EFFECT ON PIER DEFECTION J. Kent Hsiao and Alexander Y. Jian, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Enineerin, USA ABSTRACT: The rotational restraint coefficient at the top of a pier and the rotational restraint coefficient at the bottom of the pier (that is, the deree of fixity in the foundation of the pier) are used to determine the effective lenth factor of the pier. Moreover, the effective lenth factor of a pier is used to determine the slenderness ratio of the pier, while the deree of fixity in the foundation of a pier is used to perform the first-order elastic analysis in order to compute the pier deflection. Finally, the slenderness ratio of the pier is used to determine if the effect of slenderness shall be considered in the desin of the pier, while the manitude of the pier deflection resultin from the first-order analysis is used to determine if the second-order force effect (the p- effect) shall be considered in the desin of the pier. The computations of the slenderness ratio and the deflection of a pier, however, have conventionally been carried out by assumin that the base of the pier is riidly fixed to the footin, and the footin in turn, is riidly fixed to the round. Other derees of footin fixity have been nelected by the conventional approach. In this paper, two examples are demonstrated for the slenderness ratio computation and the first-order deflection analysis for bride piers with various derees of footin fixity (includin footins anchored on rock, footins not anchored on rock, footins on soil, and footins on multiple rows of end-bearin piles) recommended by the AASHTO RFD Bride Desin Specifications. The results from the examples indicate that the deree of footin fixity should not be nelected since it sinificantly affects the manitude of the slenderness ratio and the deflection of the pier. KEYWORDS: Bride desin; Deflection; Foundations; Piers; ateral loads. INTRODUCTION A sinle pier, as shown in Fi., and a bent with multiple piers, as shown in Fi., are the substructures of brides. The sinle pier and the bent with multiple piers are considered as a sway cantilever element and a sway frame, respectively, in the lonitudinal direction. For piers not braced aainst sidesway, the slenderness effects
3 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection must be considered where the slenderness ratio is or larer []. The slenderness ratio is calculated as Kl u /r where : K l u r is the effective lenth factor of a pier, is the unbraced lenth of a pier, and is the radius of yration of the cross section of a pier. Fiure. Sinle pier Fiure. Bent with multiple piers The effective lenth factor (K) of a cantilever pier in the lonitudinal direction, as shown in Fi., or a pier in a sway frame in the lonitudinal direction as shown in Fi. can be obtained by usin the Alinment Chart for Determinin Effective enth Factor, K, for Unbraced Frames, presented in the AASHTO RFD Bride Desin Specifications [] or by usin the followin two equations []: For K <, K 4 0. G a 0. G b 0. 0G G a b () For K, K 0. 9 πa ab () Ga Gb in which: a G G a b
4 J. Kent Hsiao, Alexander Y. Jian b 6 G G a b 6 An alternate equation [] to compute the K value is K.6Ga Gb 4.0 Ga Gb 7.5 () G G 7.5 a b where: in which: G E c I c c E I EcIc G c E I (4) is the rotational restraint coefficient at the column (pier) end [the subscripts a and b refer to the two ends of the column (pier) under consideration], is the modulus of elasticity of the column, is the moment of inertia of the column, is the unbraced lenth of the column, is the modulus of elasticity of the beam, is the moment of inertia of the beam, and is the unsupported lenth of the beam. When computin the G value, I c should be replaced by 0.70 I c and I should be replaced by 0.5 I [4,5,6], in order to take into account the influence of axial loads, the presence of cracked reions in the member, and the effects of the duration of the loads. Note that I c is the moment of inertia of the ross concrete section of the column and I is the moment of inertia of the ross concrete section of the beam. The AASHTO RFD Bride Desin Specifications [] recommends that in the absence of a more refined analysis, the followin G values can be used for various footin conditions: G =.5 for footins anchored on rock, G =.0 for footins not anchored on rock, G = 5.0 for footins on soil, and G =.0 for footins on multiple rows of end-bearin piles. In addition, the Specifications specify that the moment on a compression member may be increased by multiplyin the moment by a moment manification factor if the sidesway ( ) of the compression member due to factored lateral or ravity loads calculated by conventional first-order elastic frame analysis is reater than l u /500. Similar to the computation of the G value, 0.70 I c
5 4 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection should be used for the moment of inertia of the column and 0.5 I should be used for the moment of inertia of the beam [6, 7] for the first-order elastic frame analysis. The aforementioned moment manification factor may be taken as: Pu P K e (5) where: P u K P e is the moment manification factor, is the factored axial load, is the stiffness reduction factor (0.75 for concrete members), and is the Euler bucklin load. The Euler bucklin load shall be determined as: EI P e (6) Kl where: E is the modulus of elasticity, I is the moment of inertia about the axis under consideration, K is the effective lenth factor in the plane of bendin, and is the unsupported lenth of a compression member. l u u In lieu of a more precise calculation, EI in Eq.(6) shall be taken as the reater of: or EcI EsIs EI 5 (7) E c I d d EI.5 (8) where: E c is the modulus of elasticity of concrete, I is the moment of inertia of the ross concrete section about the centroidal axis, is the modulus of elasticity of lonitudinal steel, E s
6 J. Kent Hsiao, Alexander Y. Jian 5 I s β d is the moment of inertia of lonitudinal steel about the centroidal axis, and is the ratio of the maximum factored permanent load moment to the maximum factored total load moment. The determination of the effective lenth factor and the computation of the deflection of a pier, however, have been conventionally carried out by assumin that the base of the pier is riidly fixed to the footin, and the footin in turn, is riidly fixed to the round. The deree of fixity in the foundation has been nelected by the conventional approximate approach. The accuracy of the approximate approach, therefore, is questionable. Two approaches for the determination of the effective lenth factor and the computation of the deflection of piers are presented in this paper. Approach I is an approximate approach which assumes the bases of the piers are riidly fixed to the round, while Approach II is a refined approach which considers the deree of fixity in the foundation of the piers. Results from both approaches are then compared with each other. APPROACH I AN APPROXIMATE APPROACH Considerin the sinle pier in the lonitudinal direction, as shown in Fi., Approach I (an approximate approach) treats the base of the pier as rotationally fixed and translationally fixed, and, additionally, treats the top of the pier as rotationally free and translationally free, as shown in Fi.. In addition, considerin the piers in the bent in the lonitudinal direction, as shown in Fi., Fiure. Ideal condition for a cantilever sinle pier in the lonitudinal direction Fiure 4. Ideal condition for piers in a bent in the lonitudinal direction
7 6 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection Approach I treats the bases of the piers as rotationally fixed and translationally fixed, and, additionally, treats the tops of the piers as rotationally fixed and translationally free as shown in Fi. 4. The desin value of the effective lenth factor, K, therefore, is. and. for the pier in Fis. and 4, respectively []. In Approach I, the idealized conditions of the pier(s), as shown in Fis. and 4, are also used to compute the deflection of a cantilever sinle pier and the piers in a bent, respectively, in the lonitudinal direction. APPROACH II A REFINED APPROACH In this approach, the deree of fixity in the pier s foundation is considered by usin an appropriate G value (correspondin to the deree of fixity in the pier s foundation) at the bottom of the pier. In addition, the rotational riidity at the top of the pier in the pier cap of a bent in the lonitudinal direction is also considered. In order to achieve the appropriate G value at the bottom of a cantilever sinle pier in the lonitudinal direction, a tie beam is introduced to the base of the pier, as shown in Fi. 5(a). Similarly, in order to achieve the appropriate G values at the foundations of the piers in a bent in the lonitudinal direction, a continuous tie beam is introduced to the bases of the piers, as shown in Fi. 6(a). The structure shown in Fis. 5(a) and 6(a) can be treated as the substructure shown in Fis. 5(b) and 6(b), respectively. The pinned ends of the tie beam shown in Fis. 5(a) and 6(a) are located at the inflection points of the tie beam in the swin structure shown in Fis. 5(b) and 6(b), respectively. The inflection point in the tie beam in each bay is assumed to be located at the midspan of the bay width. In Approach II, Fis. 5(a) and 6(a) are used as the structural systems to compute the deflection of a cantilever sinle pier and a bent with multiple piers, respectively, in the lonitudinal direction. / / (a) Fiure 5. Modified structural system for a cantilever sinle pier in the lonitudinal direction
8 J. Kent Hsiao, Alexander Y. Jian 7 / / (b) Fiure 5. Modified structural system for a cantilever sinle pier in the lonitudinal direction / / (a) / / (b) Fiure 6. Modified structural system for a bent with multiple piers in the lonitudinal direction
9 8 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection 4 PIER DEFECTION COMPUTATION EXAMPES USING APPROACHES I & II Two examples are demonstrated for the computation of pier and bent deflections in the lonitudinal direction due to lateral and ravity loads. Concrete with a modulus of elasticity, E = 5,00 MPa, is used for the pier and the bent. Example : Compute the deflection in the lonitudinal direction of the pier subjected to the factored lateral force (70 kn) and ravity load (6000 kn), as shown in Fi. 7, for the followin four different footin conditions: () the footin anchored on rock, () the footin not anchored on rock, () the footin on soil, and (4) the footin on multiple rows of end-bearin piles. 70 kn 6000 kn 0.6 m.8 m 0.6 m. m Elevation Fiure 7. oaded sinle pier illustrated for Example Side view Approach I: Referrin to the pier in the lonitudinal direction shown in Fi. 7, the base of the pier is treated as rotationally and translationally fixed for all four different footin conditions, while the top of the pier is treated as rotationally and translationally free, as shown in Fi.. Therefore, the desin value of the effective lenth factor of the pier is.. The pier heiht is 0.6 m. For a rectanular compression member, the radius of yration (r) may be taken as 0.0 times the overall dimension in the direction in which stability is bein considered [].
10 J. Kent Hsiao, Alexander Y. Jian 9 Therefore, the radius of yration of the pier about the transverse axis can be computed as.8 m 0. = m. The transverse axis slenderness ratio of the pier, therefore, can be computed as: Kl r. 0.6m 0.549m 9.6 Since the slenderness ratio is larer than, the slenderness effects on the pier must be considered. From the first-order elastic analysis usin 0.70 I c as the moment of inertia for the pier bendin about the transverse axis, the deflection at the top of the pier can be computed as: Fh EI kn 5. mm 70kN ,60mm 0mm 80mm 9.4mm where: F is the factored lateral load, h is the heiht of the pier, E is the modulus of elasticity of the pier, and I is the moment of inertia of the pier. Since the deflection, 9.4 mm, is larer than l u /500 (= 6.9 mm), the deflection (which corresponds to the bendin moment at the base of the pier) due to the factored lateral load must be multiplied by the moment manification factor, δ. From Eq. (5), the moment manification factor can be computed as: Pu P K e 6000kN kn.065 where P e Kl EI u kn 0,60mm mm. 0 5 kn Assumin that Eq. (8) controls over Eq. (7) and β d = 0 (there is no factored permanent load moment about the transverse axis of the pier), one has:
11 0 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection EI E c I.5 d kn 5. mm 0mm 80mm kn mm Therefore, the final deflection of the pier in the lonitudinal direction due to the slenderness effects is: = (.065) (9.4 mm) = 9.7 mm Table summarizes the results obtained from Approach I. Note that this table includes all of the four footin conditions: () the footin anchored on rock, () the footin not anchored on rock, () the footin on soil, and (4) the footin on multiple rows of end-bearin piles. Table. Deflections of the pier in Example computed by Approach I footin condition effective lenth factor slenderness ratio pier base rotation (rad) deflection calculated by first-order analysis moment manification factor, δ final deflection of the pier all mm mm Approach II: Referrin to the pier in the lonitudinal direction shown in Fi. 7, assin G a =.5 for footins anchored on rock, G a =.0 for footins not anchored on rock, G a = 5.0 for footins on soil, and G a =.0 for footins on multiple rows of end-bearin piles as per the G values recommended by the AASHTO RFD Bride Desin Specifications []. Since the top of the pier is rotationally free about the transverse axis of the pier and translationally free alon the lonitudinal direction of the pier, G b = at the top of the pier. From Eq. () or the Alinment Chart for Determinin Effective enth Factor, K, for Unbraced Frames, presented in the AASHTO RFD Bride Desin Specifications [], one has: K =.5 for the footin anchored on rock, K =.9 for the footin not anchored on rock, K =.4 for the footin on soil, and K =. for the footin on multiple rows of end-bearin piles. Since the transverse axis slenderness ratios (Kl u /r) of the pier with four different footin conditions are all larer than, the slenderness effects on the pier must be considered for all of the four different footin conditions. In order to use the 0.70 I c value as the moment of inertia for the pier bendin about its transverse axis, a reduced cross section of.68 m. m (as shown in Fi. 8)
12 J. Kent Hsiao, Alexander Y. Jian is used to replace the oriinal cross section of.8 m. m for the pier. Also, referrin to Fi. 5(a), a modified structural system with different lenths of added tie beams is made, as shown in Fi. 8, in order to achieve the appropriate G values at the base of the pier for the four different footin conditions. 70 kn.68 m Joint b. m 0.6 m. m.68 m Joint a / = 5.54 m / = 5.54 m.08 m.08 m 5.80 m 5.80 m 0.6 m 0.6 m for G a =.5 for G a =.0 for G a = 5.0 for G a =.0 Fiure 8. Modified structural system for Approach II in Example For example, as shown in Fi. 5(b) and Fi. 8, if / = 5.54 m for the tie beam, the span lenth of the tie beam will be =.08 m on each side of joint a. Therefore, the G a value at the base of the pier can be computed usin Eq. (4) as: G a EcI E c I c E c E.m.68m 0.6m.m.68m.08m.5
13 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection Considerin the pier with G a =.5 for the footin anchored on rock, the deflection at the top of the pier due to the factored lateral force (70 kn) alon the lonitudinal direction of the bent can be computed usin the followin steps: () Referrin to Fi. 9(a), the bendin moment at the base of the pier (at joint a ) can be computed as: M ab = 70 kn 0.6 m = 797 kn-m. () The end moments at joint a of the tie beam therefore can be computed as: M ad = M ac = M ab / = 797 kn-m / = 99 kn-m. () Referrin to Fi. 8, the moment of inertia about the transverse axis of the pier and the tie beam can be computed as: I = (0 mm)(680 mm) / = mm 4. (4) Referrin to Fi. 9(b), the rotation at joint a of the tie beam can be computed as θ a = [(M ad )(l ad )] / [(E ad )(I ad )] = [(,99,000 kn-mm)(5,540 mm)] / [(5. kn/mm )( mm 4 )] = rad. (5) Referrin to Approach I, when the base of the pier is considered riidly fixed to the round, the deflection at the top of the pier was computed as 9.4 mm. Since the rotation at the base of the pier is θ a = rad for the condition in which the footin is anchored on rock (G a =.5), the total deflection (includin the deflection caused by the rotation at the base of the pier) can be computed as: = 9.4 mm + (0,60 mm)( ) = 5.89 mm. Since the deflection, 5.89 mm, is larer than l u /500 (= 6.9 mm), the deflection due to the factored lateral load must be multiplied by the moment manification factor. Similar to the procedure shown in Approach I, the moment manification factor can be computed by usin Eq. (5) as: Pu P K e 6000kN kn.095 Note that K =.5 has been used for the computation of P e. Therefore, the final deflection of the pier in the lonitudinal direction due to the slenderness effects is: = (.095) (5.89 mm) = 7.40 mm
14 J. Kent Hsiao, Alexander Y. Jian 70 kn b θ a 0.6 m c θ a a d 5.54 m θ a 5.54 m (a) M ad a θ a d l ad = 5.54 m (b) Fiure 9. Joint rotation at the base of the pier with G a =.5 The deflections in the lonitudinal direction of the pier for four different footin conditions are computed usin Approach II and are summarized as shown in Table, where the footin conditions are () the footin anchored on rock, () the footin not anchored on rock, () the footin on soil, and (4) the footin on multiple rows of end-bearin piles. Table. Deflections of the pier in Example computed by Approach II footin condition () () () (4) effective lenth factor slenderness ratio pier base rotation (rad) deflection calculated by first-order analysis 5.89 mm.66 mm.66 mm.65 mm moment manification factor, δ final deflection of the pier 7.40 mm 5.66 mm 7.7 mm 4.7 mm
15 4 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection Example : Compute the deflection in the lonitudinal direction of the bent subjected to the factored lateral and ravity loads, as shown in Fi. 0, for the followin four different footin conditions: () footins anchored on rock, () footins not anchored on rock, () footins on soil, and (4) footins on multiple rows of end-bearin piles. Approach I: Referrin to the bent in the lonitudinal direction shown in Fi. 0, the bases of the piers are treated as rotationally and translationally fixed for all four different footin conditions, while the tops of the piers are treated as rotationally fixed and translationally free (since the cap of the piers is treated as a riid element), as shown in Fi. 4. Therefore, the desin value of the effective lenth factor of the piers is... m 850 kn 850 kn 850 kn 850 kn 60 kn. m. m 6.0 m.07 m Dia. (Typ.) 6.0 m.07 m Dia. 4.7 m Elevation Side view Fiure 0. oaded bent with multiple piers illustrated for Example The unbraced lenth of each of the piers is 6.0 m. For a circular compression member, the radius of yration (r) may be taken as 0.5 times the diameter []. Therefore, the radius of yration of each of the piers can be computed as.07 m 0.5 = 0.68 m. The transverse axis slenderness ratio of each of the piers, therefore, can be computed as: Kl u r. 6.0m 0.68m 7.
16 J. Kent Hsiao, Alexander Y. Jian 5 Since the slenderness ratio is larer than, the slenderness effects on the piers must be considered. Usin 0.70 I c as the moment of inertia for each of the piers bendin about the transverse axis, the deflection at the top of each of the piers in the lonitudinal direction of the bent can be computed by usin the first-order elastic analysis as: Fh EI 60kN / 4 kn 5. mm mm 55mm 4 4.5mm where: F is the factored lateral load applied to each of the piers, h is the heiht of each of the piers (measured from the top of the footin to the bottom of the pier cap), E is the modulus of elasticity of the piers, and I is the moment of inertia of each of the piers. Since the deflection due to the factored lateral load is.5 mm, which is less than l u /500 (= 4.07 mm), the deflection does not need to be increased by bein multiplied by the moment manification factor. Therefore, δ =.0. Table summarizes the results obtained from Approach I. Note that this table includes all of the four footin conditions: () footins anchored on rock, () footins not anchored on rock, () footins on soil, and (4) footins on multiple rows of endbearin piles. Table. Deflections of the bent in Example computed by Approach I footin condition K value of exterior piers K value of interior piers Kl u of r exterior piers Kl u of r interior piers bent deflection calculated by firstorder analysis moment manification factor, δ final deflection of the bent all mm.0.5 mm Approach II: In order to use the 0.70 I c value as the moment of inertia for the piers bendin about the transverse axis, a reduced cross section of m dia. is used to replace the oriinal cross section of.07 m dia. for the piers. Also, in order to use the 0.5 I value as the moment of inertia for the pier cap bendin about the transverse axis, a reduced cross section of m m is used to replace the oriinal cross section of. m. m for the pier cap. In addition, referrin to
17 6 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection Fi. 6(a), a modified structural system is made for the bent in the lonitudinal direction, as shown in Fi.. In the modified structural system, a continuous tie beam is added to the bases of the piers in order to achieve the appropriate G values at the foundations of the piers in the bent in the lonitudinal direction. The cross section of the added tie beam is m m, m m, 0.49 m 0.49 m, and 0.64 m 0.64 m for G a =.5,.0, 5.0, and.0, respectively. For example, if the cross section of the tie beam is m m, the G a value at each of the pier base can be computed by usin Eq. (4) as: G a EcI E c I c E E c 0.978m 4 6.7m 0.579m 0.579m 4.7m 4.5 Note that G a =.5 is for footins anchored on rock, G a =.0 is for footins not anchored on rock, G a = 5.0 is for footins on soil, and G a =.0 is for footins on multiple rows of end-bearin piles. Also note that the pier heiht shown in Fi. is measured from the top of the footin to the mid-heiht of the pier cap. 60 kn m m (Pier cap) 6.7 m m dia. (Typ. for piers). m 4.7 m. m Fiure. Modified structural system for Approach II in Example
18 J. Kent Hsiao, Alexander Y. Jian 7 Referrin to Fi., one has G b = 0. at each of the tops of the interior piers and G b = 0.44 at each of the tops of the exterior piers by usin Eq. (4). With the G a and G b values of each pier in the bent determined, the effective lenth factor, K, of each pier in the bent can be determined by usin Eq. () or the Alinment Chart for Determinin Effective enth Factor, K, for Unbraced Frames, presented in the AASHTO RFD Bride Desin Specifications []. The determined K values of the exterior and interior piers for the four different footin conditions are summarized in Table 4. Also, as shown in Table 4, since the slenderness ratios (Kl u /r) of all of the piers with four different footin conditions in the direction in which stability is bein considered are all larer than, the slenderness effects on all of the piers must be considered for all of the four different footin conditions. Table 4. Deflections of the bent in Example computed by Approach II footin condition K value of exterior piers K value of interior piers Kl u of r exterior piers Kl u of r interior piers bent deflection calculated by firstorder analysis moment manification factor, δ final deflection of the bent () mm.0.94 mm () mm mm () mm mm (4) mm.0.5 mm Referrin to Fi., the deflection of the bent due to the factored lateral force (60 kn) alon the lonitudinal direction can be computed by usin the computer software SAP000 [8]. The results are shown in Table 4. Since both of the deflections (.94 mm and.5 mm) of the bent with footin conditions () and (4) are less than l u /500 (= 4.07 mm), these deflections do not need to be increased by bein multiplied by the moment manification factor. Therefore, δ =.0. However, since both of the deflections (4.87 mm and 5.75 mm) of the bent with footin conditions () and () are larer than l u /500, these deflections must be multiplied by the moment manification factor, δ. Considerin the bent with footin condition (), the moment manification factor can be computed by usin Eq. (5) as: Pu P K e kN 80,85kN 86,86kN.048
19 8 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection where and P EI kn mm e 80,85kN (for exterior piers) Kl mm u P EI kn mm e 86,86kN (for interior piers) Kl.4 600mm u Assumin that Eq. (8) controls over Eq. (7) and β d = 0 (there is no factored permanent load moment about the transverse axis of the pier), one has: EI E c I.5 d kn 5. mm mm kn mm Therefore, the final deflection of the bent with footin condition () due to the slenderness effects is: = (.048) (4.87 mm) = 5.0 mm Usin the same approach, the moment manification factor, δ, and the final deflection of the bent with footin condition () can be computed and the results are shown in Table 4. 5 CONCUSIONS The computation of the deflection of a sinle cantilever pier has conventionally been carried out by assumin that the base of the pier is riidly fixed to the round. Similarly, the computation of the deflection in the lonitudinal direction of a bent with multiple piers has conventionally been carried out not only by assumin that the bases of the piers are riidly fixed to the round but also by assumin that the tops of the piers are rotationally fixed to the pier cap. The rotational restraint coefficient(s) at the base of a sinle cantilever pier, as well as at the bases and tops
20 J. Kent Hsiao, Alexander Y. Jian 9 of the piers in a bent in the lonitudinal direction, have completely been nelected by the conventional approach (which is classified as Approach I in this paper). In this paper, two examples, one for a sinle cantilever pier and the other for a bent with multiple piers, are demonstrated for the slenderness ratio computation and the first-order deflection analysis for the pier(s) by usin two approaches. Approach I is an approximate approach assumin the footins are riidly fixed to the round, while Approach II is a refined approach considerin various derees of footin fixity. The various derees of footin fixity include () footins anchored on rock, () footins not anchored on rock, () footins on soil, and (4) footins on multiple rows of end-bearin piles, as specified by the AASHTO RFD Bride Desin Specifications. Example indicates that Approach II results in the larest moment manification factor of δ =.9 (for the footin on soil condition), while the δ value resulted from Approach I is only.065. That is, the percentae of moment increase that resulted from Approach II is 9. %, which is about times of that (6.5 %) of the result from Approach I. Also, Approach II results in the larest deflection of 7.7 mm (for the footin on soil condition) which is about 4 times of that (9.7 mm) of the result from Approach I. Example indicates that Approach II results in the larest moment manification factor of δ =.057 (for the footins on soil condition), while the moment manification factor can be nelected in Approach I (that is δ =.0). Also, Approach II results in the larest deflection of 6.08 mm (for the footins on soil condition), which is about 4 times of that (.5 mm) of the result from Approach I. The results from the examples indicate that the deree of footin fixity should not be nelected since it sinificantly affects the manitude of the bendin moment(s) and the deflection(s) of the pier(s). REFERENCES [] American Association of State Hihway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO RFD Bride Desin Specifications, American Association of State Hihway and Transportation Officials, Washinton, DC, 0. [] Duan,, Kin, WS, Chen, WF, K-factor equation to alinment charts for column desin, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 90, No., pp. 4-48, May-June, 99. [] Dumonteil, P, Simple equations for effective lenth factors, Enineerin Journal, AISC, rd quarter, pp. -5, 99. [4] Portland Cement Association, Notes on ACI 8-08 Buildin Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, I, 008. [5] Hassoun, MN, Al-Manaseer,A, Structural Concrete Theory and Desin, 4 th Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 008. [6] McCormac, JC, Brown, RH, Desin of Reinforced Concrete, 9 th Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 04.
21 0 Footin fixity effect on pier deflection [7] Wiht, JK, MacGreor, JG, Reinforced Concrete, Mechanics & Desin, 6 th Ed., Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 0. [8] SAP000 Version 4.., SAP000 Manuals, Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley, CA, 00.
According to the Ratio of Height to Least Lateral Dimension: (ACI Code and ACI Code ) < 22, when member is braced against sideways.
CHAPTER 5 COLUMN 5.1 INTRODUCTION Columns are structural elements used primarily to support compressive loads. All practical columns are members subjected not only to axial load but also to bendin moments,
More information4.3 Moment Magnification
CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column
More informationConsideration of Slenderness Effect in Columns
Conideration of Slenderne Effect in Column Read Ainment Text: Section 9.1; Code and Commentary: 10.10, 10.11 General Short Column - Slender Column - Strenth can be computed by coniderin only the column
More informationNOVEL FLOWCHART TO COMPUTE MOMENT MAGNIFICATION FOR LONG R/C COLUMNS
NOVEL FLOWCHART TO COMPUTE MOMENT MAGNIFICATION FOR LONG R/C COLUMNS Abdul Kareem M. B. Al-Shammaa and Ehsan Ali Al-Zubaidi 2 Department of Urban Planning Faculty of Physical Planning University of Kufa
More informationε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
More informationWhere and are the factored end moments of the column and >.
11 LIMITATION OF THE SLENDERNESS RATIO----( ) 1-Nonsway (braced) frames: The ACI Code, Section 6.2.5 recommends the following limitations between short and long columns in braced (nonsway) frames: 1. The
More informationDesign of Chevron Gusset Plates
017 SEAOC CONENTION PROCEEDINGS Desin of Chevron Gusset Plates Rafael Sali, Director of Seismic Desin Walter P Moore San Francisco, California Leih Arber, Senior Enineer American Institute of Steel Construction
More informationMODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS
MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexural-torsional buckling Built-up members READING:
More informationRELIABILITY OF EXPOSED COLUMN-BASE PLATE CONNECTION IN SPECIAL MOMENT-RESISTING FRAMES
October 1-17, 008, Beijin, China RELIABILITY OF EXPOSED COLUMN-BASE PLATE CONNECTION IN SPECIAL MOMENT-RESISTING FRAMES A. Aviram 1, B. Stojadinovic, and A. Der Kiurehian 3 1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department
More informationENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:
More informationCompression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:
More informationCritical Load columns buckling critical load
Buckling of Columns Buckling of Columns Critical Load Some member may be subjected to compressive loadings, and if these members are long enough to cause the member to deflect laterally or sideway. To
More informationKarbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi
Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering
More informationDesign of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
More informationneeded to buckle an ideal column. Analyze the buckling with bending of a column. Discuss methods used to design concentric and eccentric columns.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Discuss the behavior of columns. Discuss the buckling of columns. Determine the axial load needed to buckle an ideal column. Analyze the buckling with bending of a column. Discuss methods
More informationCHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS
4.1. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS A column is a vertical structural member transmitting axial compression loads with or without moments. The cross sectional dimensions of a column
More informationEquivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams
University of Alberta Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Master of Engineering Report in Structural Engineering Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams
More information3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties
CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties Description his application calculates gross section moment of inertia neglecting reinforcement, moment of inertia
More informationTowards The. Design of Super Columns. Prof. AbdulQader Najmi
Towards The Design of Super Columns Prof. AbdulQader Najmi Description: Tubular Column Square or Round Filled with Concrete Provided with U-Links welded to its Walls as shown in Figure 1 Compression Specimen
More informationSeismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures. CASE STUDY #1 Three Storey Office Building Vancouver, B.C. Canada
Seismic Desin of Reinforced Concrete Structures CASE STUDY #1 Three Storey Office Buildin Vancouver, B.C. Canada SOFTEK Services Ltd. #75 1500 Maycrest Way Richmond, BC, Canada V6V N8 Tel: (604) 7-777
More informationLecture Slides. Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. The McGraw-Hill Companies 2012
Lecture Slides Chapter 4 Deflection and Stiffness The McGraw-Hill Companies 2012 Chapter Outline Force vs Deflection Elasticity property of a material that enables it to regain its original configuration
More informationEntrance exam Master Course
- 1 - Guidelines for completion of test: On each page, fill in your name and your application code Each question has four answers while only one answer is correct. o Marked correct answer means 4 points
More information(a) 1m s -2 (b) 2 m s -2 (c) zero (d) -1 m s -2
11 th Physics - Unit 2 Kinematics Solutions for the Textbook Problems One Marks 1. Which one of the followin Cartesian coordinate system is not followed in physics? 5. If a particle has neative velocity
More informationAnnex - R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).
More informationFRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
FRAME ANALYSIS Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction 3D Frame: Beam, Column & Slab 2D Frame Analysis Building
More informationDEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy)
DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy) The deflection of a uniformly loaded flat plate, flat slab, or two-way slab supported by beams on column lines can be calculated by an equivalent method that
More informationMarch 24, Chapter 4. Deflection and Stiffness. Dr. Mohammad Suliman Abuhaiba, PE
Chapter 4 Deflection and Stiffness 1 2 Chapter Outline Spring Rates Tension, Compression, and Torsion Deflection Due to Bending Beam Deflection Methods Beam Deflections by Superposition Strain Energy Castigliano
More informationA Study of Computer Modeling Techniques to Predict the Response of Floor Systems Due to Walking
A Study of Computer Modelin Techniques to Predict the Response of Floor Systems Due to Walkin by Jason Daniel Perry Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Virinia Polytechnic Institute and State University
More informationResearch work in this thesis deals with the effects of lateral loads in the longitudinal
ABSTRACT POSSIEL, BENJAMIN ALLEN. Point of Fixity Analysis of Laterally Loaded Bridge Bents. (Under the direction of Dr. Mohammed Gabr and Dr. Mervyn Kowalsky.) Research work in this thesis deals with
More informationChapter 9: Column Analysis and Design
Chapter 9: Column Analysis and Design Introduction Columns are usually considered as vertical structural elements, but they can be positioned in any orientation (e.g. diagonal and horizontal compression
More informationAppendix J. Example of Proposed Changes
Appendix J Example of Proposed Changes J.1 Introduction The proposed changes are illustrated with reference to a 200-ft, single span, Washington DOT WF bridge girder with debonded strands and no skew.
More informationNonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using wframe to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability.
DESCRIPTION Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using wframe to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability. Moment hinges are based on Caltrans material
More information1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6
Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L
More informationStructural Steel Design Project
Job No: Sheet 1 of 6 Rev Worked Example - 1 Made by Date 4-1-000 Checked by PU Date 30-4-000 Analyse the building frame shown in Fig. A using portal method. 15 kn C F I L 4 m 0 kn B E H K 6 m A D G J 4
More informationSway Column Example. PCA Notes on ACI 318
Sway Column Example PCA Notes on ACI 318 ASDIP Concrete is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com Example 11.2 Slenderness Effects for Columns in a Sway Frame Design columns C1 and C2 in the
More informationLecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
More informationPost Buckling of Non Sway Axially Restrained Columns Under Thermal(Fire) Loads
Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Theses Theses and Dissertations 12-1-2014 Post Buckling of Non Sway Axially Restrained Columns Under Thermal(Fire) Loads Bikash Khanal Southern Illinois
More information999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01
DESCRIPTION Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using several methods to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability. 1. SAP2000 Nonlinear with axial-moment
More informationAccordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.
C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional
More informationFlexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal Unbraced Lengths
Proceedings of the Annual Stability Conference Structural Stability Research Council San Antonio, Texas, March 21-24, 2017 Flexural-Torsional Buckling of General Cold-Formed Steel Columns with Unequal
More informationCOLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS)
COLUMNS: BUCKLING (DIFFERENT ENDS) Buckling of Long Straight Columns Example 4 Slide No. 1 A simple pin-connected truss is loaded and supported as shown in Fig. 1. All members of the truss are WT10 43
More informationModule 10. Compression Members. Version 2 CE IIT, Kharagpur
Module 10 Compression Members Lesson 27 Slender Columns Instructional Objectives: At the end of this lesson, the student should be able to: define a slender column, give three reasons for its increasing
More informationDr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection
Example: Continuous beam deflection Analyze the short-term and ultimate long-term deflections of end-span of multi-span beam shown below. Ignore comp steel Beam spacing = 3000 mm b eff = 9000/4 = 2250
More informationThis Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced concrete columns when the ACI code is selected.
COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 2001 CONCRETE FRAME DESIGN ACI-318-99 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced
More informationRoadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.
Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab
More informationModeling for control of a three degrees-of-freedom Magnetic. Levitation System
Modelin for control of a three derees-of-freedom Manetic evitation System Rafael Becerril-Arreola Dept. of Electrical and Computer En. University of Toronto Manfredi Maiore Dept. of Electrical and Computer
More information3.4 Analysis for lateral loads
3.4 Analysis for lateral loads 3.4.1 Braced frames In this section, simple hand methods for the analysis of statically determinate or certain low-redundant braced structures is reviewed. Member Force Analysis
More informationINELASTIC RESPONSES OF LONG BRIDGES TO ASYNCHRONOUS SEISMIC INPUTS
13 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, 24 Paper No. 638 INELASTIC RESPONSES OF LONG BRIDGES TO ASYNCHRONOUS SEISMIC INPUTS Jiachen WANG 1, Athol CARR 1, Nigel
More informationSUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4).
SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS Columns with Pinned Supports Step 1: Step : Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4). From the column tables, determine the effective length KL using
More informationSeismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design
Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department
More informationVertical acceleration and torsional effects on the dynamic stability and design of C-bent columns
Vertical acceleration and torsional effects on the dynamic stability and design of C-bent columns A. Chen, J.O.C. Lo, C-L. Lee, G.A. MacRae & T.Z. Yeow Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury,
More informationPROPOSED SATSANG HALL TECHNICAL REPORT
PROPOSED SATSANG HALL - VERTICAL STRIP V1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADAPT CORPORATION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM 1733 Woodside Road, Suite
More informationExternal Pressure... Thermal Expansion in un-restrained pipeline... The critical (buckling) pressure is calculated as follows:
External Pressure... The critical (buckling) pressure is calculated as follows: P C = E. t s ³ / 4 (1 - ν ha.ν ah ) R E ³ P C = Critical buckling pressure, kn/m² E = Hoop modulus in flexure, kn/m² t s
More informationCivil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 3 1.1 Background... 3 1.2 Failure Modes... 5 1.3 Design Aspects...
More informationMulti Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000
26/01/2016 Marco Donà Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000 1 General principles Link object connects two joints, i and j, separated by length L, such that specialized structural behaviour may
More informationINELASTIC SEISMIC DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVALENT LINEARIZATION
INEASTIC SEISMIC DISPACEMENT RESPONSE PREDICTION OF MDOF SYSTEMS BY EQUIVAENT INEARIZATION M. S. Günay 1 and H. Sucuoğlu 1 Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical University,
More informationReinforced concrete structures II. 4.5 Column Design
4.5 Column Design A non-sway column AB of 300*450 cross-section resists at ultimate limit state, an axial load of 700 KN and end moment of 90 KNM and 0 KNM in the X direction,60 KNM and 27 KNM in the Y
More informationCIV 207 Winter For practice
CIV 07 Winter 009 Assignment #10 Friday, March 0 th Complete the first three questions. Submit your work to Box #5 on the th floor of the MacDonald building by 1 noon on Tuesday March 31 st. No late submissions
More informationUNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING. BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
TW21 UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BEng (HONS) CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2016/2017 MATHEMATICS & STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS MODULE NO: CIE4011 Date: Wednesday 11 th January 2017 Time:
More informationServiceability Deflection calculation
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning
More informationAN ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR DEFLECTION OF LATERALLY LOADED PILES
Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 149-154 (003) 149 AN ANAYTICA MODE FOR DEFECTION OF ATERAY OADED PIES Jen-Cheng iao* and San-Shyan in** Key words: pile, lateral load, inclinometer,
More informationBuckling analysis of thin-walled members via semi-analytical finite strip transfer matrix method
Special Issue Article Bucklin analysis of thin-walled members via semi-analytical finite strip transfer matrix method Advances in Mechanical Enineerin 16, ol. 8() 1 11 Ó The Author(s) 16 DOI: 1.11/168811661
More informationRigid and Braced Frames
RH 331 Note Set 12.1 F2014abn Rigid and raced Frames Notation: E = modulus of elasticit or Young s modulus F = force component in the direction F = force component in the direction FD = free bod diagram
More informationPUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT
Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified
More informationChapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams
Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Introduction One of the earliest studies concerned with the strength and deflection of beams was conducted by Galileo Galilei. Galileo was the first to discuss
More informationPES Institute of Technology
PES Institute of Technology Bangalore south campus, Bangalore-5460100 Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty name : Madhu M Date: 29/06/2012 SEM : 3 rd A SEC Subject : MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Subject
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK. Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK Subject code/name: ME2254/STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Year/Sem:II / IV UNIT I STRESS, STRAIN DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART A (2 MARKS)
More informationQUESTION BANK. SEMESTER: V SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE 6501 / STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS-I
QUESTION BANK DEPARTMENT: CIVIL SEMESTER: V SUBJECT CODE / Name: CE 6501 / STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS-I Unit 5 MOMENT DISTRIBUTION METHOD PART A (2 marks) 1. Differentiate between distribution factors and carry
More informationReg. No. : Question Paper Code : B.Arch. DEGREE EXAMINATION, APRIL/MAY Second Semester AR 6201 MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES I
WK 4 Reg. No. : Question Paper Code : 71387 B.Arch. DEGREE EXAMINATION, APRIL/MAY 2017. Second Semester AR 6201 MECHANICS OF STRUCTURES I (Regulations 2013) Time : Three hours Maximum : 100 marks Answer
More informationCase Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.
ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building
More informationresearch report Design Example for Analytical Modeling of a Curtainwall and Considering the Effects of Bridging (All-Steel Design Approach)
research report Design Example for Analytical Modeling of a Curtainwall and Considering the Effects of Bridging (All-Steel Design Approach) RESEARCH REPORT RP18- August 018 Committee on Specifications
More informationTHE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS
EUROSTEEL 2002, Coimbra, 19-20 September 2002, p.987-996 THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS Fernando C. T. Gomes 1 ABSTRACT The Eurocode 3 proposes a classification of beam-to-column
More informationName :. Roll No. :... Invigilator s Signature :.. CS/B.TECH (CE-NEW)/SEM-3/CE-301/ SOLID MECHANICS
Name :. Roll No. :..... Invigilator s Signature :.. 2011 SOLID MECHANICS Time Allotted : 3 Hours Full Marks : 70 The figures in the margin indicate full marks. Candidates are required to give their answers
More informationSlenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )
Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a
More informationFailure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas
Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!
More information11 Free vibrations: one degree of freedom
11 Free vibrations: one deree of freedom 11.1 A uniform riid disk of radius r and mass m rolls without slippin inside a circular track of radius R, as shown in the fiure. The centroidal moment of inertia
More informationModule 3. Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Displacement Method
odule 3 Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures by the Displacement ethod Lesson 21 The oment- Distribution ethod: rames with Sidesway Instructional Objectives After reading this chapter the student
More informationPractical Design to Eurocode 2
Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (Any questions beforehand? use Questions on the GoTo Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction,
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 0 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic Loads
More informationStructural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach Course: Eurocode 3 Module 7 : Worked Examples Lecture 20 : Simple braced frame Contents: 1. Simple Braced Frame 1.1 Characteristic
More informationStructural Analysis III Moment Distribution
Structural Analysis III oment Distribution 2008/9 Dr. Colin Caprani 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 4 1.1 Overview... 4 1.2 The Basic Idea... 5 2. Development... 10 2.1 Carry-Over... 10 2.2 Fixed End oments...
More informationSTRENGTH ESTIMATION OF END FAILURES IN CORRUGATED STEEL SHEAR DIAPHRAGMS
SDSS Rio STABILITY AND DUCTILITY OF STEEL STRUCTURES Nobutaka Shimizu et al. (Eds.) Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, September 8 -, STRENGTH ESTIMATION OF END FAILURES IN CORRUGATED STEEL SHEAR DIAPHRAGMS Nobutaka
More informationMoment Distribution Method
Moment Distribution Method Lesson Objectives: 1) Identify the formulation and sign conventions associated with the Moment Distribution Method. 2) Derive the Moment Distribution Method equations using mechanics
More informationChapter 5 Compression Member
Chapter 5 Compression Member This chapter starts with the behaviour of columns, general discussion of buckling, and determination of the axial load needed to buckle. Followed b the assumption of Euler
More informationA Mathematical Model for the Fire-extinguishing Rocket Flight in a Turbulent Atmosphere
A Mathematical Model for the Fire-extinuishin Rocket Fliht in a Turbulent Atmosphere CRISTINA MIHAILESCU Electromecanica Ploiesti SA Soseaua Ploiesti-Tiroviste, Km 8 ROMANIA crismihailescu@yahoo.com http://www.elmec.ro
More informationSabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
More informationStructural Analysis III Moment Distribution
Structural Analysis III oment Distribution 2009/10 Dr. Colin Caprani 1 Contents 1. Introduction... 4 1.1 Overview... 4 1.2 The Basic Idea... 5 2. Development... 10 2.1 Carry-Over Factor... 10 2.2 Fixed-End
More informationStructural Analysis Lab
Structural Analysis Lab Session 4 Shear Walls With Openings Group 3 Daniel Carroll James Loney Brian Keating Eoghan Russell Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Modelling of structure... 3 Theoretical Calculations...
More informationThe Influence of a Weld-Affected Zone on the Compressive and Flexural Strength of Aluminum Members
Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses 2013 The Influence of a Weld-Affected Zone on the Compressive and Flexural Strength of Aluminum Members Shengduo Du sd034@bucknell.edu
More informationREINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)
For updated version, please click on http://ocw.ump.edu.my REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1 Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials) by Dr. Sharifah Maszura Syed Mohsin Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth
More informationDES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood Members
DES140: Designing for Lateral-Torsional Stability in Wood embers Welcome to the Lateral Torsional Stability ecourse. 1 Outline Lateral-Torsional Buckling Basic Concept Design ethod Examples In this ecourse,
More informationPHY 133 Lab 1 - The Pendulum
3/20/2017 PHY 133 Lab 1 The Pendulum [Stony Brook Physics Laboratory Manuals] Stony Brook Physics Laboratory Manuals PHY 133 Lab 1 - The Pendulum The purpose of this lab is to measure the period of a simple
More informationFLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES
UNIT - I FLEXIBILITY METHOD FOR INDETERMINATE FRAMES 1. What is meant by indeterminate structures? Structures that do not satisfy the conditions of equilibrium are called indeterminate structure. These
More information9.5 Compression Members
9.5 Compression Members This section covers the following topics. Introduction Analysis Development of Interaction Diagram Effect of Prestressing Force 9.5.1 Introduction Prestressing is meaningful when
More informationExperimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections
Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections *Zeyu Zhou 1) Bo Ye 2) and Yiyi Chen 3) 1), 2), 3) State Key Laboratory of Disaster
More informationREVIEW FOR EXAM II. Dr. Ibrahim A. Assakkaf SPRING 2002
REVIEW FOR EXM II. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering b Dr. Ibrahim. ssakkaf SPRING 00 ENES 0 Mechanics of Materials Department of Civil and Environmental
More informationThe Bionic Lightweight Design of the Mid-rail Box Girder Based on the Bamboo Structure
Wenmin Chen 1, Weian Fu 1, Zeqian Zhan 1, Min Zhan 2 Research Institute of Mechanical Enineerin, Southwest Jiaoton University, Chendu, Sichuan, China (1), Department of Industrial and System Enineerin,
More informationSIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEFORMATIONS OF RC FRAMES DURING FIRE EXPOSURE
SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEFORMATIONS OF RC FRAMES DURING FIRE EXPOSURE M.A. Youssef a, S.F. El-Fitiany a a Western University, Faculty of Engineering, London, Ontario, Canada Abstract Structural
More informationMechanical Design in Optical Engineering
OPTI Buckling Buckling and Stability: As we learned in the previous lectures, structures may fail in a variety of ways, depending on the materials, load and support conditions. We had two primary concerns:
More information18.Define the term modulus of resilience. May/June Define Principal Stress. 20. Define Hydrostatic Pressure.
CE6306 STREGNTH OF MATERIALS Question Bank Unit-I STRESS, STRAIN, DEFORMATION OF SOLIDS PART-A 1. Define Poison s Ratio May/June 2009 2. What is thermal stress? May/June 2009 3. Estimate the load carried
More information