THE BANACH SPACE S IS COMPLEMENTABLY MINIMAL AND SUBSEQUENTIALLY PRIME
|
|
- Gillian Jenkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE BANACH SPACE S IS COMPLEMENTABLY MINIMAL AND SUBSEQUENTIALLY PRIME G. ANDROULAKIS AND TH. SCHLUMPRECHT Abstract We first include a result of the second author showing that the Banach space S is complementably minimal. We then show that every block sequence of the unit vector basis of S has a subsequence which spans a space isomorphic to its square. By the Pe lczyński decomposition method it follows that every basic sequence in S which spans a space complemented in S has a subsequence which spans a space isomorphic to S (i.e. S is a subsequentially prime space).. Introduction The Banach space S was introduced by the second author as an example of an arbitrarily distortable Banach space [4]. In [8] the space S was used to construct a Banach space which does not contain any unconditional basic sequence. In this paper we are concerned with the question whether or not S is a prime space. We will present two partial results: In Section 2 we include a result proved by the second author some time ago but not published until now [5], that S is complementably minimal, and thereby answer a question of P. G. Casazza, who asked whether or not l p, p, and c 0 are the only complementably minimal spaces. In Section 3 we prove that S is subsequentially prime. Let us recall the above notions. A Banach space X is called prime [2] if every complemented infinite dimensional subspace of X is isomorphic to X. A. Pe lczyński [3] showed that the spaces c 0 and l p ( p < ) are prime, and J. Lindenstrauss [] showed that this is also true for the space l. New prime spaces were constructed by W.T. Gowers and B. Maurey [9]. But it is still open whether or not l p, p, and c 0 are the only prime spaces with an unconditional basis. A space X is called minimal (a notion due to H. Rosenthal) if every infinite dimensional subspace of X contains a subspace isomorphic to X, and X is called complementably minimal [5] if every infinite dimensional subspace of X contains a subspace which is isomorphic to X and complemented in X. P.G. Casazza and E. Odell [4] showed that Tsirelson s space T [6], as described in [6], fails to have a minimal subspace. On the other hand it was shown by P.G. Casazza, W.B. Johnson and L. Tzafriri [3] that the space T is minimal but not complementably minimal. Since S is complementably minimal, either S is prime, or there exists a complemented subspace X of S such that X and S give a negative solution to the Schroeder-Bernstein problem for Banach spaces (see [2] for a detailed discussion of this question): if two space are isomorphic to complemented subspaces of each other must they be isomorphic? Negative solutions to the Schroeder-Bernstein problem for Banach spaces are given by W.T. Gowers [7], and W.T. Gowers and B. Maurey [9], but to our knowledge it 99 Mathematics Subject Classification. 46B03, 46B20. Research of both authors supported by NSF.
2 is open whether or not there are two Banach spaces X and Y, both having an unconditional basis, so that X is complemented in Y and Y is complemented in X, but so that X and Y are not isomorphic. The following terminology was suggested to us by D. Kutzarova. Definition. A Banach space X with a basis is called subsequentially prime if for every basic sequence (x i ) of X such that the closed linear span of (x i ) is complemented in X, there exists a subsequence (y i ) such that the closed linear span of (y i ) is isomorphic to X. As mentioned above, we will show that the space S is subsequentially prime. We do not know if S is prime, we even do not know whether or not the closed linear span of a block basis which is complemented in S is isomorphic to S. We will need some notations. Let c 00 be the linear span of finitely supported real sequences, and let (e i ) denote its standard basis. For x c 00, supp(x) = {i N : x i 0} denotes the support of x. For a finite set A the cardinality of A is denoted by #A. If E, F N we write E < F if max E < min F, and we write x < y for x, y c 00 if supp(x) < supp(y). A sequence (x i ) i in c 00 is a block sequence of (e i ) if x < x 2 <.... For x = i N x ie i c 00 and E N E(x) is the projection of x onto the span of (e i ) i E, i.e. E(x) = i E x ie i. Recall [4] that the norm of S is the unique norm on the completion of c 00 which satisfies the implicit equation: n () x = x l sup E i x 2 n, E i N,,...,n f(n) E <E 2 <...<E n where l denotes the norm of l and f(n) = log 2 (n + ), for n N. For x S and l N, l 2, we define x l := sup E <E 2 <...<E l l E i (x), We note that l, 2 l <, is an equivalent norm on S and we observe that for x S and 2 l < we have x x l x and x = sup x l. 2 l Finally we put for any 2 r < and x S x r := sup x l. l r l N { } Two sequences (x i ), (y i ) in S are called c-equivalent, for some c, and we write (x i ) c (y i ), if a i x i c a i y i for all (a i ) c 00, where for c and a, b 0 we write a c b to denote that (/c)a b ca. If (x i ) and (y i ) are c-equivalent for some c > we write (x i ) (y i ). A basic sequence (x n ) is called c-subsymmetric if it is c-unconditional and c-equivalent to all of its subsequences. For two Banach spaces X and Y we write X c Y if there is an isomorphism T between X and Y with T T c and we write X Y if X c Y for some c. 2
3 If (x n ) is a sequence in a Banach space [x n : n N] denotes the closed linear span of (x n ). If not said otherwise, all statements in the following sections refer to the space S. We would like to thank P.G. Casazza and D. Kutzarova for valuable discussions. 2. The Banach space S is complementably minimal The goal of this section is the proof of the following Theorem. Theorem 2.. S is complementably minimal. First recall the following result which follows from Lemma 5 of [4]. Proposition 2.2. l is block finitely represented in each block basis of (e i ), i.e., if ε > 0 and m N, and if (y n ) is a block basis of (e i ) then there is a block basis (z i ) m of (y n ) which is ( + ε)-equivalent to the unit basis of l m (i.e., m α iz i m +ε α i for (α i ) m R) The proof of the following statement can be compiled from the proof of Theorem 3 of [4]. Since the statement is crucial for our main result we include its proof. Lemma 2.3. Let ε > 0 and l N. Then there is an n = n(ε, l) N with the following property: If m n and if y = m m x i, where (x i ) m is a normalized block basis of (e i ) which is ( + ε/2)-equivalent to the unit basis of l m, then sup E <E 2 <...<E l l E i (y) y + ε + ε. Proof. Let n N so that 4l n ε and assume m n and (x i) m are given as in the statement. Furthermore, let E < E 2 <... < E l be finite subsets of N. Since (e i ) is -unconditional we can assume that the E j s are intervals in N. This implies that for each j {, 2,..., l} there are at most two elements i, i 2 {,..., m} so that E j supp(x is ) and supp (x is )\E j, s =, 2. For j =, 2,..., l, let Ẽ j = {supp(x i ) : i m and supp(x i ) E j }. It follows that if y = m m x i, then E i (y) Ẽi(y) 2 and from the assumption that m (x i ) m is ( + ε/2)-equivalent to the l m -unit-basis we deduce that l E j (y) 2l l m + Ẽj(y) = 2l m + l x i m which finishes the proof. 2l m + m supp(x i ) Ẽj m ( x i + ε/2) ε + y ε + The following theorem essentially proves that S is minimal. We postpone its proof. Theorem 2.4. Let (ε n ) R + with ε n < and let (y n ) be a normalized block basis of (e n ) with the following properties: There is a sequence k n in N so that for all n N k (2) sup E i (y n ) + ε n k k n E <E 2 <...<E k 3
4 ( kn ) (3) max supp(y n ) ε n f. 3 Then (y n ) is equivalent to (e n ). Proof of Theorem 2. By the usual perturbation argument we only have to show that every block basis (z n ) of (e n ) has a further block basis which is equivalent to (e n ). Letting for example ε i = 2 i, i =, 2,..., we have to find a normalized block (y n ) of (z n ) and a sequence (k n ) in N so that (2) and (3) of Theorem 2.4 are satisfied. Indeed, put k 0 = and assume that k 0 < k <... < k n and y < y 2 <... < y n are already defined for some n 0. By Remark 2.2 and Lemma 2.3 we can choose y n+ > y n in the linear span of (z i ) so that condition (2) of Theorem 2.4 is satisfied. Since lim i f(i) = we then can choose k n+ so that (3) is true. In order to show that S is complementably minimal we first observe that () implies that every normalized block basis (y n ) of (e n ) dominates (e n ), i.e., that α iy i α ie i, for all (α i ) c 00. Secondly we apply the following more general Proposition which finishes the proof of Theorem 2.. Proposition 2.5. Let Z be a Banach space with a c u -unconditional basis (e n ), c u. Assume furthermore that there is a c d > 0 so that every normalized block basis (y n ) of (e n ) c d -dominates (e n ) (i.e., c d α i y i α i e i for all (α i ) c 00 ). Then a subspace of Z generated by a normalized block of (e n ) which is equivalent to (e n ) is complemented in Z. Proof. Without loss of generality we can assume that (e n ) is a normalized and bimonotone basis of Z (i.e. [m, n](z) z for all z = z ie i Z, and m n in N). Assume that (y n ) is a block of (e i ) which is c e -equivalent to (e i ). Using the assumption that (e n ) is normalized and bimonotone we find yn Z, for n N, with = yn = yn(y n ) and supp(yn) [ + max(supp(y n )), max(supp(y n ))] (where y 0 = 0 and max( ) = 0). Define T = yn y n, x y n yn(x). We have to show that T is well defined and bounded on Z, then it easily follows that it is a projection on [y n : n N]. Let x = a i e i, with (a i ) c 00. We can write x = x i = x i u i, with x i = [ + max(supp(y i )), max(supp(y i ))](x) and u i = x i / x i if x i 0, and u i = e max suppyi, otherwise. Then it follows that T (x) = y n yn(x n ) c u xn y n cu c e xn e n c u c e c d xn u n = cu c e c d x, which proves the claim. Let x S. If l is the smallest element of N, so that x = x l we call l the character of x and write char(x) = l. If x = x l we write char(x) =. The next Lemma makes the following qualitative statement precise: If x c 00, if r > is big enough, and if E < E 2 <... < E l, l r, are subsets of N so that x r = l E i (x), then for most of the E i s the character of E i (x) is much bigger than r. 4
5 Lemma 2.6. There is a constant d > so that for all r R + with f(r) > d 2, x r d f(r) sup l r E <E 2 <...<E l l E i (x) r f(r) if x c 00 with x r x l. Proof. From the logarithmic behavior of f we deduce that there is a constant c > 2 so that the following inequalities hold (4) f(ξ) f(ξ)/c, whenever ξ 2, (5) cf(ξ) f(ξξ ) f(ξ), whenever ξ, ξ c, (6) f(ξ / f(ξ) ) c f(ξ), whenever ξ c, and (7) f(ξ ν ) cνf(ξ) whenever ξ c and ν. Choose d = 4c 3, let r R + such that f(r) > d 2. In order to verify that this choice works let x S with x r x. Let l r and E < E 2 <... < E l so that x r = l E i (x). For r, R R, with 2 r < R, let M = M( r, R) := { i l : char ( E i (x) ) [ r, R[ } and for i M let l i [ r, R[ be the character of E i (x). We choose for each i M finite subsets of E i, E i < E2 i <... < El i i so that E i (x) = f(l i ) 5 l i E i j(x).
6 Now we observe that the set {E i : i / M} i M {Ei j : j l i } is well ordered by < and its cardinality is l # M + i M l i which is at least l and at most l R. Thus we deduce: (8) Solving for (9) x r = i M l E i (x) l f(l # M + E i (x) + l i ), i/ M i M i M l f(l R) E i (x) + f(l i ) E i (x) li, i/ M i M f(l R) f(l R) [ l E i (x) + i M( ] ) f( r) Ei (x) [ l E i (x) + c f( r) ] E i (x) i M l i Ej(x) i (using (4)). i M E i(x) leads to the following inequalities [ ] E i (x) cf(l R) l f(l R) E i (x) f( r) = c f(l R) f( r) x r c 2 f( R) f( r) x r c 2 f( R) f( r)f(r) x r (using 5). Choosing for the pair of numbers ( r, R) the values (2, r / f(r) ), (r / f(r), r), (r, r f(r) ), and (r f(r), r f(r) ) we deduce from the inequalities (6) and (7) in each case that c, which implies together with (9) that f(r) and, thus, that yielding the lemma. x r 2 char (E i (x))<r f(r) E i (x) d x r + f(r) 4c3 f(r) x r, l E i (x) r f(r), f( R) f( r)f(r) Remark. Note that in the proof of Lemma 2.6 the only properties of the function f which were needed was that fact that it was increasing and that there is a c > 2 so that the inequalities (4) - (7) hold. 6
7 Thus if l 0 N and g : [l 0, ) (, ) is an increasing function so that there is a c > l 0 for which (4) (whenever ξ l 0 ), (5),(6) and (7) hold then the conclusion of Lemma 2.6 holds for the completion of c 00 under the norm defined implicitly by x = x l sup l l 0,E <E 2 <...E l g(l) l E i (x), whenever x c 00. Proof of Theorem 2.4. Let (y n ), (k n ) and (ε n ) be given as in the statement of Theorem 2.4 and let d be as in Lemma 2.6. For r we put r 0 := r and, assuming r k was already defined, we let r k+ = r f(r k) k. From the properties of the function f it follows that there is an R > so that the value (0) β(r) := f(9r k) d f(r k ) is finite whenever r R. (α i ) m R. () m k=0 f(rk ) By induction we will show that for every m N and every α i y i r β(r) max i 0 [ α i0 + α i e i + i>i 0 ] m α i ε i, Since r is equivalent to for all r, since ε i <, and since α i y i α i e i max i N α i for (α i ) c 00 this would prove the assertion of Theorem 2.4. For m = the claim is trivial. Assume it is true for all positive integers smaller than some m > and let r R, (α i ) m c 00. Let y = m α iy i. If y r = y l the assertion follows easily since y l max i m α i. Otherwise we can use Lemma 2.6 in order to find an l r and finite subsets of N, E < E 2 <... < E l so that (with γ(r) = /( d/ f(r))) (2) y r γ(r) l E j (y) r f(r). We can assume that for all j l, E j m supp(y i). For j =, 2,..., l we put E j := E j supp(y s(j) ), E 2 j := E j supp(y t(j) ) and E 3 j = E j \(E j E 2 j ) where s(j) := min{i : E j supp(y i ) } and t(j) := max{i : E j supp(y i ) }. We put Ẽ := {E j, E 2 j, E 3 j, j l}\{ } and note that Ẽ can be ordered into Ẽ = {Ẽ, Ẽ2,..., Ẽ l} with l l 3l and Ẽ < Ẽ2 <... < Ẽ l. Secondly we observe that Ẽ can be partitioned into m + sets Ẽ0, Ẽ,..., Ẽm defined in the following way: Ẽ 0 := {E Ẽ : E fits with (supp(y i)) i N } (where we say that E fits with a sequence (A n ) of disjoint subsets of N if and only if for all n, E A n implies that A n E) and for i m we let Ẽi := { E : E Ẽ and E supp(y i) }. For i =,..., m we let l i := # Ẽi (note that Ẽi may be empty) and let i 0 = if for all i m, l i k i otherwise put i 0 := max{i m : l i > k i }. 7
8 From (2) we deduce now that (recall that r = r f(r) ) (3) y r γ(r) γ(r) l [ l + γ(r) i<i 0 + γ(r) Ẽj(y) r ( ) Ẽj α i y i r + i<i 0 l ( ] ) r l Ẽj i>i 0, E i i>i 0 α i y i l Ẽj(α i0 y i0 ) r α i E j (y i ) + γ(r)f( l) α i0 f( l) α i E E i E(y i ) + γ(r) l Ẽj(y i0 ) ( ) E α i y i r. E E 0 i>i 0 If i 0 we deduce that the first term in the above sum, can be estimated as follows (we use condition (3) of the statement of Theorem 2.4 and note that from the choice of i 0 it follows that l l/3 l i0 /3 k i0 /3 k i /3 for i < i 0 ): γ(r) i<i 0 l α i E j (y i ) γ(r) i α i f(k i<i i /3) # supp(y 0 i) γ(r) ε i α i. 0 The second term can be estimated as follows: γ(r)f( l) α i0 f( l) l Ẽj(y i0 ) γ(r)f(3l) α i0 y i0 γ(r)f(3r) α i0. f(r) By condition (2) of the statement of Theorem 2.4 and the definition of i 0 we deduce that E E i E(y i ) + ε i, if i > i 0 and E i. Thus, we observe for the third term that γ(r) i>i 0, E i α i E E i E(y i ) γ(r) i>i 0, E i ( + ε i ) α i. For the last term we apply the induction hypothesis and find for each E E 0 an i E {i > i 0 : supp(y i ) E} {0} so that ( [ ] ) r β(r ) E E0 α ie + α i e i + α i ε i. E E 0 E i>i 0 α i y i i>i E supp(y i ) E supp(y i ) E Let A = { {i} : i > i 0, E i } { {i E } : E E 0 } { {i > ie : supp(y i ) E} : E E 0 } \{ } and note that A consists of subsets of {i 0 +, i } has at most 3 l 9l elements and 8
9 is well ordered by <. Finally we deduce from (3) and the above estimates that y r γ(r) α i ε i + γ(r)f(3r) α i0 + γ(r) m α i + γ(r) m ε i α i f(r) i<i 0 β(r) + γ(r)β(r ) + γ(r)β(r ) [ α ie + γ(r)β(r ) E E 0 E E 0 α i ε i supp(y i ) E E E 0 α i0 + f(r) f(9r) A A i>i 0, E i i>i E, supp(y i ) E ( m ) m ] A α i e i + ε i α i i=i 0 +, E i α i e i (Note that β(r) = β(r )γ(r)f(9r)/f(r)) [ β(r) α i0 + f(r) f(9l) m m ] α i e i + ε i α i (since # A 9l) f(9r) i=i 0 + [ m m ] β(r) α i0 + α i e i + ε i α i (since l r). This proves the induction step and completes the proof of Theorem The Banach space S is subsequentially prime The main result of this section is the following Theorem. Theorem 3.. The space S is subsequentially prime. Theorem 3. will essentially follow from A. Pe lczyński s decomposition method and the following theorem. Theorem 3.2. Let (x i ) be a normalized block sequence of (e i ) in S and let (k i ) be a subsequence of N. There exists a subsequence (y i ) of (x i ) with the following property: If (s i ) and (t i ) are strictly increasing in N, and s i, t i k i, for i N, then (y si ) and (y ti ) are equivalent. Before giving the proof of Theorem 3.2 we need a result, for which we introduce the following norm on c 00. For l 3 define g(l) = log 2 ( + l ) and let be the norm which is implicitly defined by 2 l x = x l sup E i (x), whenever x c 00. l 3,E <E 2 <...E l g(l) Lemma 3.3. The norm is equivalent to the norm on S. Proof. First note that since g(l + ) whenever l 2 it follows that. Thus, we only have to show that for some constant C it follows that C. The proof will be similar to the proof of Theorem
10 For l and r [3, ) let l and r be defined as l and r respectively. Let d > be chosen so that the statement of Lemma 2.6 holds (see Remark after proof of Lemma 2.6), i.e. so that (4) x r d g(r) sup l r E <E 2 <...<E l g(l) l E i (x) r g(r) if r R + with g(r) > d 2, and x c 00 with x r x l. For r [3, ) we define r 0 = r and, assuming that r k had been defined, let r k+ = r g(r k) k. Then we deduce that there is an R 3 so that for all r R g(2r k ) β(r) = k=0 d g(r k ) g(rk ) is finite. By induction on m N we prove that for each x c 00 so that #supp(x) m and r R it follows that (5) x r β(r) x. Assume that (5) is true for all z c 00 for which #supp(z) < m and assume that x c 00 with #supp(x) = m. If x r = x l the claim follows immediately. Otherwise it follows from (4) that for some l r, l N, and some choice of E < E 2 <... E l we have x r d l E i (x) g(l) r g(r) g(r) β(r g(r) ) d l E i (x) (By the induction hypothesis) g(l) = g(r) β(r) g(2r) g(l) g(r) l E i (x) β(r) x (Since g(r) g(2r) g(l) g(2l) = g(l) ) which finishes the induction step and the proof of Lemma 3.3 Proof of Theorem 3.2. First we note that we can assume that lim n x n l = 0. Indeed, from Theorem 2.4 it follows that there is a normalized block (z k ) in S which is equivalent to the unit vector basis (e k ) and has the property that lim n z n l = 0. Thus, we could replace each x n by the vector x n in the span of (z k ) whose coordinates with respect to the z k s are the coordinates of x n with respect to the e k s. Let ε > 0, and y c 00 with y = and y ε/2. We can write y as y = l(y,ε) y(i, ε), where l(y, ε) N and y(, ε) < y(2, ε) <... y(l(y, ε), ε) such that y(i, ε) ε for i =, 2,..., l(y, ε). Further more we could choose the y(i, ε) s to have maximal support in the following sense. First we choose y(i, ε) = [, n ](y) with n N being the largest n N, n max supp(y), so that [, n](y) ε, then we choose n 2 > n being the largest n N, n supp(y), so that [n +, n 2 ](y) ε. We can continue this way until we have exhausted 0
11 the support of y. This defines l(y, ε) and the vectors (y(i, ε)) l(y,ε) uniquely and from the assumption that y ε/2 it follows that ε/2 y(i, ε) for all i {, 2,... l(y, ε) }. From the definition of the norm of S is follows that l(y, ε) f(l(y, ε)) ε l(y,ε) 2 y(i, ε) y = f(l(y, ε)) l(y,ε) y(i, ε) l(y, ε)ε. Thus for ε > 0 there are two numbers H(ε) h(ε) in N, with h(ε), if ε 0, and so that for any y c 00 with with y = and y ε/2 it follows that h(ε) l(y, ε) H(ε). We now apply this splitting procedure to the elements of our sequence (x n ). By induction on n N we find an infinite subset M n of N, with N M M 2... M n and min M < min M 2 <... min M n, numbers ε(n) > 0 and p(n) N satisfying the following three properties. (6) (7) (8) For all m M n we have l(ε(n), x m ) = p(n). For any choice of n s 0 < s <... s kn+ and n t 0 < t <... t kn+ in M n it follows that (x sj (i, ε(n))) 0 j kn+,i p(n) +ε(n) (x tj (i, ε(n))) 0 j kn+,i p(n). n If n > it follows that x min Mi l < f(h(ε(n)))2 n and p(n )ε(n) < 2 n. =i For n = we simply choose ε() = (thus l(x n, ε()) = ), p() =, and using compactness and the usual stabilization argument we can pass to a subsequence M of N so that (7) holds. Assuming we made our choices of M j, ε(j), and p(j), for all j < n, we first choose ε(n) so that (8) is satisfied (recall that h(ε), for ε 0), and then again using compactness and the usual stabilization argument we can pass to an M n M n \ {min M n } and find a p(n) N so that x m ε(n)/2 whenever m M n and so that (6) and (7) are satisfied. For n N we now define y n = x min(mn) and y n (i, j) = y n (i, ε(j)) if i n and j p(i), and prove the following claim by induction on N N: Claim: For every n N, every K, L {, 2,..., p(n)}, every (α i ) n+n+ i=0 R, and every choice of n s 0 < s... s n+n+ and n t 0 < t... t n+n+ with s i, t i k i+n, for i = 0,..., n + N +, it follows for (9) (20) that p(n) x = α 0 y s0 (n, j) + j=k p(n) x = α 0 y t0 (n, j) + j=k N α i y si + α N+n+ N α i y ti + α N+n+ (2) x c(n) [ max E( x) + F ( x) ] E<F where (22) c(n) = N 2 i + ε(i) i=n L L y sn+n+ (n, j), and y tn+n+ (n, j)
12 Since by Lemma 3.3 is an equivalent norm on S (and therefore also the norm c 00 x max E<F E(x) + F (x) has this property) the claim implies the theorem. For N = 0 the claim follows directly from (7). Assume the claim to be true for Ñ < N and let x and x be given as in (9) and (20). We choose l N so that x = x l. If l < p(k n ) we let i 0 = 0, and other wise we choose i 0 N {0} so that p(k i0 +n) l < p(k i0 +n+). We split x into three vectors x (), x (2) and x (3) as follows. If i 0 = 0 we let x () = 0, otherwise we put p(n) (23) x () = α 0 y s0 (n, j) + j=k (i 0 ) N α i y si. and x () is defined as x (), by replacing the s i s by t i s. From (8) and the choice of i 0 it follows that (note that h(ε(s i0 + )) h(ε(s i0 )) p(s i0 ) p(k n+i0 ) l) (24) x () l max α i 0 i n+n (i 0 ) N i=0 y si l x f(h(ε(s i 0 ))) Secondly, if we let { p(n) (25) x (2) α0 j=k = y s 0 (n, j) + (k n+) N α i y si if i 0 = 0 (kn+i0 +) N i=(i 0 ) N+ α iy si if i 0 0 x 2 n i 0. and x () is defined as x (), by replacing the s i s by t i s. We deduce from (7) that (26) x (2) ( + ε(s i0 )) x (2) ( + ε(n + i 0 )) x (2). Finally we let (27) x (3) = x x () x (2) = N i=k n+i0 +2 p(n) α i y si + α N+n+ y sn+n+ (n, j) and, again, define x (3) as x (3), by replacing the s i s by t i s. Choose E <... E l so that x (3) l = l E j (x (3) ). Note that for any i k n+i0 + 2 it follows that s i k n+i n k n+i0 + 2 and by (8) it follows that lε(k n+i0 + 2) p(k n+i0 + )ε(k n+i0 + 2) < 2 k n+i 0 2 n i 0. Let n = k n+i n. For each j =, 2... l we can perturb E j into a set F j (by possibly taking some part of the support of some y si (n, u) away at the beginning of E j and adding some part of the support of some y sj (n, v) at the end of E j ) so that for each j =, 2... l, each i k n+i0 + 2, and each u =, 2,... p(n ) F j either contains supp(y si (n, u) or is disjoint of it, and so that (28) x (3) l = l F j (x (3) ) +lε(n ) max α i 0 i N+n+ 2 j=l l F j (x (3) ) + 2 n i0 x.
13 To each of the F j (x (3) ) we can apply the induction hypothesis and obtain a splitting of each F j = {supp(y ti (n, u)) : i i 0 + 3, u p(n ) and supp(y si (n, u)) F j } ( F j is the x (3) version of x (3) ) into G j and H j, with G j < H j so that x (3) l 2 n i0 x + l (29) c(n ) G j ( x (3) ) + H j ( x (3) ) 2 n i 0 x + c(n ) x (3) (for the last inequality recall the definition of and the fact that g(2l) = ). Finally, putting (24), (26) and (29) together, observing that, the fact that c(n) 2 n i n i 0 + ε(n + ) + c(n ) we obtain x = x l x () l + x (2) + x (3) l x 2 n i 0 + ( + ε(n + i 0 )) x (2) + 2 n i 0 x + c(n ) x (3) c(n ) sup( E( x) + F ( x)) + [2 n i n i0 + ε(n + )] x E<F c(n) sup( E( x) + F ( x) ), E<F which finishes the induction step and the proof of the theorem. Proof of Theorem 3.. Let (x n ) be a seminormailzed basic sequence in S whose closed linear span is complemented in S. Since S is reflexive we can assume, by passing to an appropriate subsequence, that for some a S, x n = a + z n where z n is weakly null. Since a is element of the closed linear span of (x n ) and (x n ) is a seminormailzed basic sequence it follows that a = 0 and, thus that (x n ) is semi normalized and weakly null. By applying the usual perturbation argument it we can assume that (x n ) is a seminormalized block sequence and therefore apply Theorem 3.2 with k n = 2n + for n N to obtain a subsequence (y n ) so that (y n ), (y 2n+ ) and (y 2n ) are equivalent. In particular it follows for Y = [y n : n N] that Y Y Y (the complemented sum of Y with itself). Since S has a subsymmetric basis, it also follows that S S S. This means that we are in the position to apply Pe lczyński s decomposition method [3], which is so elegant that we cannot restrain ourselves to repeat it here. We write S = U Y (note that with [x i : i N] also Y is complemented in S) and Y = V S. Then it follows that which proves our claim. S U Y U Y Y S Y S V S S V Y, References [] C. Bessaga, A. Pe lczyński, On subspaces of a space with an absolute basis, Bull. Acad. Sci. Pol. 6, (958), [2] P.G. Casazza, The Schroeder-Bernstein Property for Banach spaces, Contemporary Math. 85, (989), [3] P.G. Casazza, W.B. Johnson, L. Tzafriri, On Tsirelson s space, Israel Journal of Math. 7, (984), [4] P.G. Casazza, E. Odell, Tsirelson s space and minimal subspaces, Longhorn Notes, University of Texas,
14 [5] P.G. Casazza, Th.J. Shura, Tsirelson s Space, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 363, Springer Verlag (989). [6] T. Figiel, W.B. Johnson, A uniformly convex Banach space which contains no l p, Composito Math. 29, (974), [7] W.T. Gowers, A solution to the Schroeder-Bernstein problem for Banach spaces, Bull. London Math. Soc. 28 (996), no. 3, [8] W.T.Gowers, B. Maurey, The unconditional basic sequence problem, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (993), no. 4, [9] W.T. Gowers, B. Maurey, Banach spaces with small spaces of operators, Math. Ann. 307 (997), no. 4, [0] D. Kutzarova, P.K. Lin, Remarks about Schlumprecht space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2000) no. 7, [] J. Lindenstrauss, On complemented subspaces of m, Israel Journal of Math. 5, (967), [2] J. Lindenstrauss, L. Tzafriri, Classical Banach spaces I, sequence spaces, Springer Verlag (977). [3] A. Pe lczyński, Projections in certain Banach spaces, Studia Math. 9, (960), [4] Th. Schlumprecht, An arbitrarily distortable Banach space, Israel J. Math. 76 (99), [5] Th. Schlumprecht, A complementably minimal Banach space not containing c 0 or l p, Seminar notes in Functional Analysis and Partial Differential Equations, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, (992). [6] B.S. Tsirelson, Not every Banach space contains an embedding of l p or c 0, Functional Anal. Appl. 8, (974), 38 4 (translated from the Russian). Department of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, giorgis@math.sc.edu Department of Mathematics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, schlump@math.tamu.edu 4
Boundedly complete weak-cauchy basic sequences in Banach spaces with the PCP
Journal of Functional Analysis 253 (2007) 772 781 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa Note Boundedly complete weak-cauchy basic sequences in Banach spaces with the PCP Haskell Rosenthal Department of Mathematics,
More informationSOME MORE WEAK HILBERT SPACES
SOME MORE WEAK HILBERT SPACES GEORGE ANDROULAKIS, PETER G. CASAZZA, AND DENKA N. KUTZAROVA Abstract: We give new examples of weak Hilbert spaces. 1. Introduction The Banach space properties weak type 2
More informationA PROPERTY OF STRICTLY SINGULAR 1-1 OPERATORS
A PROPERTY OF STRICTLY SINGULAR - OPERATORS GEORGE ANDROULAKIS, PER ENFLO Abstract We prove that if T is a strictly singular - operator defined on an infinite dimensional Banach space X, then for every
More informationSUBSPACES AND QUOTIENTS OF BANACH SPACES WITH SHRINKING UNCONDITIONAL BASES. 1. introduction
SUBSPACES AND QUOTIENTS OF BANACH SPACES WITH SHRINKING UNCONDITIONAL BASES W. B. JOHNSON AND BENTUO ZHENG Abstract. The main result is that a separable Banach space with the weak unconditional tree property
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.fa] 26 Oct 1993
arxiv:math/9310217v1 [math.fa] 26 Oct 1993 ON COMPLEMENTED SUBSPACES OF SUMS AND PRODUCTS OF BANACH SPACES M.I.Ostrovskii Abstract. It is proved that there exist complemented subspaces of countable topological
More informationA Banach space with a symmetric basis which is of weak cotype 2 but not of cotype 2
A Banach space with a symmetric basis which is of weak cotype but not of cotype Peter G. Casazza Niels J. Nielsen Abstract We prove that the symmetric convexified Tsirelson space is of weak cotype but
More informationON JAMES' QUASI-REFLEXIVE BANACH SPACE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 67, Number 2, December 1977 ON JAMES' QUASI-REFLEXIVE BANACH SPACE P. G. CASAZZA, BOR-LUH LIN AND R. H. LOHMAN Abstract. In the James' space /, there
More informationBANACH SPACES WITHOUT MINIMAL SUBSPACES - EXAMPLES
BANACH SPACES WITHOUT MINIMAL SUBSPACES - EXAMPLES VALENTIN FERENCZI AND CHRISTIAN ROSENDAL Abstract. We analyse several examples of spaces, some of them new, and relate them to several dichotomies obtained
More informationOn the unconditional subsequence property
Journal of Functional Analysis 58 010) 604 615 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa On the unconditional subsequence property Edward Odell, Bentuo Zheng Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Austin,
More informationTHE DUAL FORM OF THE APPROXIMATION PROPERTY FOR A BANACH SPACE AND A SUBSPACE. In memory of A. Pe lczyński
THE DUAL FORM OF THE APPROXIMATION PROPERTY FOR A BANACH SPACE AND A SUBSPACE T. FIGIEL AND W. B. JOHNSON Abstract. Given a Banach space X and a subspace Y, the pair (X, Y ) is said to have the approximation
More informationAn Asymptotic Property of Schachermayer s Space under Renorming
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 50, 670 680 000) doi:10.1006/jmaa.000.7104, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on An Asymptotic Property of Schachermayer s Space under Renorming
More informationUPPER ESTIMATES FOR BANACH SPACES. A Dissertation DANIEL BECKER FREEMAN
UPPER ESTIMATES FOR BANACH SPACES A Dissertation by DANIEL BECKER FREEMAN Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
More informationSOME ISOMORPHIC PREDUALS OF `1. WHICH ARE ISOMORPHIC TO c 0. Helmut Knaust. University of Texas at El Paso. Abstract
SOME ISOMORPHIC PREDUALS OF `1 WHICH ARE ISOMORPHIC TO c 0 Helmut Knaust Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Texas at El Paso El Paso TX 79968-0514, USA Abstract We introduce property (F
More informationSemi-strongly asymptotically non-expansive mappings and their applications on xed point theory
Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Volume 46 (4) (2017), 613 620 Semi-strongly asymptotically non-expansive mappings and their applications on xed point theory Chris Lennard and Veysel Nezir
More informationON UNCONDITIONALLY SATURATED BANACH SPACES. 1. Introduction
ON UNCONDITIONALLY SATURATED BANACH SPACES PANDELIS DODOS AND JORDI LOPEZ-ABAD Abstract. We prove a structural property of the class of unconditionally saturated separable Banach spaces. We show, in particular,
More informationON COMPLEMENTED SUBSPACES OF SUMS AND PRODUCTS OF BANACH SPACES
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 124, Number 7, July 1996 ON COMPLEMENTED SUBSPACES OF SUMS AND PRODUCTS OF BANACH SPACES M. I. OSTROVSKII (Communicated by Dale Alspach) Abstract.
More informationON SUBSPACES OF NON-REFLEXIVE ORLICZ SPACES
ON SUBSPACES OF NON-REFLEXIVE ORLICZ SPACES J. ALEXOPOULOS May 28, 997 ABSTRACT. Kadec and Pelczýnski have shown that every non-reflexive subspace of L (µ) contains a copy of l complemented in L (µ). On
More informationWeakly null sequences with upper l p -estimates
Weakly null sequences with upper l p -estimates Helmut Knaust* and Edward Odell Department of Mathematics The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas 78712 1. Introduction A Banach space X has property
More informationNine 20+ Year Old Problems in the. Geometry of Banach Spaces. or: (What I have been doing this millenium) Bill Johnson
Nine 20+ Year Old Problems in the Geometry of Banach Spaces or: (What I have been doing this millenium) Bill Johnson With a LOT of help! WBJ and E. Odell, The diameter of the isomorphism class of a Banach
More informationON A QUESTION OF HASKELL P. ROSENTHAL CONCERNING A CHARACTERIZATION OF c 0 AND l p
Bull. London Math. Soc. 36 (2004) 396 406 C 2004 London Mathematical Society DOI: 10.1112/S0024609303003047 ON A QUESTION OF HASKELL P. ROSENTHAL CONCERNING A CHARACTERIZATION OF c 0 AND l p VALENTIN FERENCZI,
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.fa] 26 Oct 1993
arxiv:math/9310218v1 [math.fa] 26 Oct 1993 STRUCTURE OF TOTAL SUBSPACES OF DUAL BANACH SPACES M.I.Ostrovskii I. Let X be a Banach space, X its dual. The unit ball and the unit sphere of X are denoted by
More informationBANACH SPACES WHOSE BOUNDED SETS ARE BOUNDING IN THE BIDUAL
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 31, 006, 61 70 BANACH SPACES WHOSE BOUNDED SETS ARE BOUNDING IN THE BIDUAL Humberto Carrión, Pablo Galindo, and Mary Lilian Lourenço Universidade
More informationSubsequences of frames
Subsequences of frames R. Vershynin February 13, 1999 Abstract Every frame in Hilbert space contains a subsequence equivalent to an orthogonal basis. If a frame is n-dimensional then this subsequence has
More informationWEAKLY NULL SEQUENCES IN L 1
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 0, Number 1, January 007, Pages 5 36 S 0894-0347(06)00548-0 Article electronically published on September 19, 006 WEAKLY NULL SEQUENCES IN L 1 WILLIAM
More informationDEFINABILITY UNDER DUALITY. 1. Introduction
DEFINABILITY UNDER DUALITY PANDELIS DODOS Abstract. It is shown that if A is an analytic class of separable Banach spaces with separable dual, then the set A = {Y : X A with Y = X } is analytic. The corresponding
More informationCLASSES OF STRICTLY SINGULAR OPERATORS AND THEIR PRODUCTS
CLASSES OF STRICTLY SINGULAR OPERATORS AND THEIR PRODUCTS GEORGE ANDROULAKIS, PANDELIS DODOS, GLEB SIROTKIN AND VLADIMIR G. TROITSKY Abstract. Milman proved in [18] that the product of two strictly singular
More informationCLASSES OF STRICTLY SINGULAR OPERATORS AND THEIR PRODUCTS
CLASSES OF STRICTLY SINGULAR OPERATORS AND THEIR PRODUCTS G. ANDROULAKIS, P. DODOS, G. SIROTKIN, AND V. G. TROITSKY Abstract. V. D. Milman proved in [18] that the product of two strictly singular operators
More informationSOME BANACH SPACE GEOMETRY
SOME BANACH SPACE GEOMETRY SVANTE JANSON 1. Introduction I have collected some standard facts about Banach spaces from various sources, see the references below for further results. Proofs are only given
More informationNon-linear factorization of linear operators
Submitted exclusively to the London Mathematical Society doi:10.1112/0000/000000 Non-linear factorization of linear operators W. B. Johnson, B. Maurey and G. Schechtman Abstract We show, in particular,
More informationL p +L and L p L are not isomorphic for all 1 p <, p 2
L p +L and L p L are not isomorphic for all 1 p
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.fa] 14 May 2008
DEFINABILITY UNDER DUALITY arxiv:0805.2036v1 [math.fa] 14 May 2008 PANDELIS DODOS Abstract. It is shown that if A is an analytic class of separable Banach spaces with separable dual, then the set A = {Y
More informationSEPARABLE LIFTING PROPERTY AND EXTENSIONS OF LOCAL REFLEXIVITY
Illinois Journal of Mathematics Volume 45, Number 1, Spring 21, Pages 123 137 S 19-282 SEPARABLE LIFTING PROPERTY AND EXTENSIONS OF LOCAL REFLEXIVITY WILLIAM B. JOHNSON AND TIMUR OIKHBERG Abstract. A Banach
More informationCOMMUTATORS ON (Σ l q ) p. 1. Introduction
COMMUTATORS ON (Σ l q ) p DONGYANG CHEN, WILLIAM B. JOHNSON, AND BENTUO ZHENG Abstract. Let T be a bounded linear operator on X = (Σ l q ) p with 1 q < and 1 < p
More informationSMALL SUBSPACES OF L p R. HAYDON, E. ODELL AND TH. SCHLUMPRECHT
SMALL SUBSPACES OF L p. HAYDON, E. ODELL AND TH. SCHLUMPECHT Abstract. We prove that if X is a subspace of L p ( < p < ), then either X embeds isomorphically into l p l or X contains a subspace Y, which
More informationA DECOMPOSITION THEOREM FOR FRAMES AND THE FEICHTINGER CONJECTURE
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9939(XX)0000-0 A DECOMPOSITION THEOREM FOR FRAMES AND THE FEICHTINGER CONJECTURE PETER G. CASAZZA, GITTA KUTYNIOK,
More informationS. DUTTA AND T. S. S. R. K. RAO
ON WEAK -EXTREME POINTS IN BANACH SPACES S. DUTTA AND T. S. S. R. K. RAO Abstract. We study the extreme points of the unit ball of a Banach space that remain extreme when considered, under canonical embedding,
More informationQUOTIENTS OF ESSENTIALLY EUCLIDEAN SPACES
QUOTIENTS OF ESSENTIALLY EUCLIDEAN SPACES T. FIGIEL AND W. B. JOHNSON Abstract. A precise quantitative version of the following qualitative statement is proved: If a finite dimensional normed space contains
More informationAPPROXIMATE ISOMETRIES ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL NORMED SPACES
APPROXIMATE ISOMETRIES ON FINITE-DIMENSIONAL NORMED SPACES S. J. DILWORTH Abstract. Every ε-isometry u between real normed spaces of the same finite dimension which maps the origin to the origin may by
More informationHAAR NEGLIGIBILITY OF POSITIVE CONES IN BANACH SPACES
HAAR NEGLIGIBILITY OF POSITIVE CONES IN BANACH SPACES JEAN ESTERLE, ÉTIENNE MATHERON, AND PIERRE MOREAU Abstract. We discuss the Haar negligibility of the positive cone associated with a basic sequence
More informationThe Kadec-Pe lczynski theorem in L p, 1 p < 2
The Kadec-Pe lczynski theorem in L p, 1 p < 2 I. Berkes and R. Tichy Abstract By a classical result of Kadec and Pe lczynski (1962), every normalized weakly null sequence in L p, p > 2 contains a subsequence
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF SUBSPACES AND QUOTIENTS OF REFLEXIVE BANACH SPACES WITH UNCONDITIONAL BASES
A CHARACTERIZATION OF SUBSPACES AND QUOTIENTS OF REFLEXIVE BANACH SPACES WITH UNCONDITIONAL BASES W. B. JOHNSON AND BENTUO ZHENG Abstract. We prove that the dual or any quotient of a separable reflexive
More informationUPPER AND LOWER ESTIMATES FOR SCHAUDER FRAMES AND ATOMIC DECOMPOSITIONS. K. BEANLAND, D. FREEMAN, AND R. LIU. i=1. i=1
UPPER AND LOWER ESTIMATES FOR SCHAUDER FRAMES AND ATOMIC DECOMPOSITIONS. K. BEANLAND, D. FREEMAN, AND R. LIU Abstract. We prove that a Schauder frame for any separable Banach space is shrinking if and
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.fa] 17 May 2018
CHARACTERIZATIONS OF ALMOST GREEDY AND PARTIALLY GREEDY BASES S. J. DILWORTH AND DIVYA KHURANA arxiv:1805.06778v1 [math.fa] 17 May 2018 Abstract. We shall present new characterizations of partially greedy
More informationON STRICTLY SINGULAR OPERATORS BETWEEN SEPARABLE BANACH SPACES
ON STRICTLY SINGULAR OPERATORS BETWEEN SEPARABLE BANACH SPACES KEVIN BEANLAND AND PANDELIS DODOS Abstract. Let X and Y be separable Banach spaces and denote by SS(X, Y ) the subset of L(X, Y ) consisting
More informationBanach spaces without local unconditional structure
arxiv:math/9306211v1 [math.fa] 21 Jun 1993 Banach spaces without local unconditional structure Ryszard A. Komorowski Abstract Nicole Tomczak-Jaegermann For a large class of Banach spaces, a general construction
More informationAnn. Acad. Rom. Sci. Ser. Math. Appl. Vol. 8, No. 1/2016. The space l (X) Namita Das
ISSN 2066-6594 Ann. Acad. Rom. Sci. Ser. Math. Appl. Vol. 8, No. 1/2016 The space l (X) Namita Das Astract In this paper we have shown that the space c n n 0 cannot e complemented in l n n and c 0 (H)
More informationA subspace of l 2 (X) without the approximation property
A subspace of l (X) without the approximation property by Christopher Chlebovec A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Mathematics) Department
More informationThe Threshold Algorithm
Chapter The Threshold Algorithm. Greedy and Quasi Greedy Bases We start with the Threshold Algorithm: Definition... Let be a separable Banach space with a normalized M- basis (e i,e i ):i2n ; we mean by
More informationHAIYUN ZHOU, RAVI P. AGARWAL, YEOL JE CHO, AND YONG SOO KIM
Georgian Mathematical Journal Volume 9 (2002), Number 3, 591 600 NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS AND ITERATIVE METHODS IN UNIFORMLY CONVEX BANACH SPACES HAIYUN ZHOU, RAVI P. AGARWAL, YEOL JE CHO, AND YONG SOO KIM
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.fa] 21 Mar 2000
SURJECTIVE FACTORIZATION OF HOLOMORPHIC MAPPINGS arxiv:math/000324v [math.fa] 2 Mar 2000 MANUEL GONZÁLEZ AND JOAQUÍN M. GUTIÉRREZ Abstract. We characterize the holomorphic mappings f between complex Banach
More informationAlmost Invariant Half-Spaces of Operators on Banach Spaces
Integr. equ. oper. theory Online First c 2009 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland DOI 10.1007/s00020-009-1708-8 Integral Equations and Operator Theory Almost Invariant Half-Spaces of Operators on Banach
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.fa] 2 Jan 2017
Methods of Functional Analysis and Topology Vol. 22 (2016), no. 4, pp. 387 392 L-DUNFORD-PETTIS PROPERTY IN BANACH SPACES A. RETBI AND B. EL WAHBI arxiv:1701.00552v1 [math.fa] 2 Jan 2017 Abstract. In this
More information2.2 Annihilators, complemented subspaces
34CHAPTER 2. WEAK TOPOLOGIES, REFLEXIVITY, ADJOINT OPERATORS 2.2 Annihilators, complemented subspaces Definition 2.2.1. [Annihilators, Pre-Annihilators] Assume X is a Banach space. Let M X and N X. We
More informationFragmentability and σ-fragmentability
F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE 143 (1993) Fragmentability and σ-fragmentability by J. E. J a y n e (London), I. N a m i o k a (Seattle) and C. A. R o g e r s (London) Abstract. Recent work has studied
More informationAsymptotic Versions of Operators and Operator Ideals
Convex Geometric Analysis MSRI Publications Volume 34, 1998 Asymptotic Versions of Operators and Operator Ideals VITALI MILMAN AND ROY WAGNER Abstract. The goal of this note is to introduce new classes
More informationINSTITUTE of MATHEMATICS. ACADEMY of SCIENCES of the CZECH REPUBLIC. A universal operator on the Gurariĭ space
INSTITUTE of MATHEMATICS Academy of Sciences Czech Republic INSTITUTE of MATHEMATICS ACADEMY of SCIENCES of the CZECH REPUBLIC A universal operator on the Gurariĭ space Joanna Garbulińska-Wȩgrzyn Wiesław
More informationBanach spaces whose duals are isomorphic to l 1. Edward Odell
1 Banach spaces whose duals are isomorphic to l 1 Edward Odell The University of Texas at Austin Richmond, Virginia November 7, 2009 2 The dual of c 0 is isometric to l 1 : c 0 = l 1. Many spaces have
More informationThe Polynomial Numerical Index of L p (µ)
KYUNGPOOK Math. J. 53(2013), 117-124 http://dx.doi.org/10.5666/kmj.2013.53.1.117 The Polynomial Numerical Index of L p (µ) Sung Guen Kim Department of Mathematics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu
More informationON VECTOR-VALUED INEQUALITIES FOR SIDON SETS AND SETS OF INTERPOLATION
C O L L O Q U I U M M A T H E M A T I C U M VOL. LXIV 1993 FASC. 2 ON VECTOR-VALUED INEQUALITIES FOR SIDON SETS AND SETS OF INTERPOLATION BY N. J. K A L T O N (COLUMBIA, MISSOURI) Let E be a Sidon subset
More informationConvergence of Banach valued stochastic processes of Pettis and McShane integrable functions
Convergence of Banach valued stochastic processes of Pettis and McShane integrable functions V. Marraffa Department of Mathematics, Via rchirafi 34, 90123 Palermo, Italy bstract It is shown that if (X
More informationUNCONDITIONALLY CONVERGENT SERIES OF OPERATORS AND NARROW OPERATORS ON L 1
UNCONDITIONALLY CONVERGENT SERIES OF OPERATORS AND NARROW OPERATORS ON L 1 VLADIMIR KADETS, NIGEL KALTON AND DIRK WERNER Abstract. We introduce a class of operators on L 1 that is stable under taking sums
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.fa] 28 Feb 1992
COMPLEXITY OF WEAKLY NULL SEQUENCES arxiv:math/9202204v1 [math.fa] 28 Feb 1992 Dale E. Alspach and Spiros Argyros Abstract. We introduce an ordinal index which measures the complexity of a weakly null
More informationOn metric characterizations of some classes of Banach spaces
On metric characterizations of some classes of Banach spaces Mikhail I. Ostrovskii January 12, 2011 Abstract. The first part of the paper is devoted to metric characterizations of Banach spaces with no
More informationarxiv:math.fa/ v1 2 Oct 1996
ON WIDE-(s) SEQUENCES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS TO CERTAIN CLASSES OF OPERATORS arxiv:math.fa/9610209 v1 2 Oct 1996 H. Rosenthal Department of Mathematics The University of Texas at Austin Austin, TX 78712-1082
More informationIntroduction and Preliminaries
Chapter 1 Introduction and Preliminaries This chapter serves two purposes. The first purpose is to prepare the readers for the more systematic development in later chapters of methods of real analysis
More informationFrame expansions in separable Banach spaces
Frame expansions in separable Banach spaces Pete Casazza Ole Christensen Diana T. Stoeva December 9, 2008 Abstract Banach frames are defined by straightforward generalization of (Hilbert space) frames.
More informationGeneralized metric properties of spheres and renorming of Banach spaces
arxiv:1605.08175v2 [math.fa] 5 Nov 2018 Generalized metric properties of spheres and renorming of Banach spaces 1 Introduction S. Ferrari, J. Orihuela, M. Raja November 6, 2018 Throughout this paper X
More informationNOTES ON VECTOR-VALUED INTEGRATION MATH 581, SPRING 2017
NOTES ON VECTOR-VALUED INTEGRATION MATH 58, SPRING 207 Throughout, X will denote a Banach space. Definition 0.. Let ϕ(s) : X be a continuous function from a compact Jordan region R n to a Banach space
More informationThe Rademacher Cotype of Operators from l N
The Rademacher Cotype of Operators from l N SJ Montgomery-Smith Department of Mathematics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65 M Talagrand Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University, 3 W
More informationD I S S E R T A T I O N E S M A T H E M A T I C A E
POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK, INSTYTUT MATEMATYCZNY D I S S E R T A T I O N E S M A T H E M A T I C A E (ROZPRAWY MATEMATYCZNE) KOMITET REDAKCYJNY BOGDAN BOJARSKI redaktor WIES LAW ŻELAZKO zastȩpca redaktora ANDRZEJ
More informationIntroduction to Bases in Banach Spaces
Introduction to Bases in Banach Spaces Matt Daws June 5, 2005 Abstract We introduce the notion of Schauder bases in Banach spaces, aiming to be able to give a statement of, and make sense of, the Gowers
More informationTHE SEMI ORLICZ SPACE cs d 1
Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics Volume 36 Number 2 (2012), Pages 269 276. THE SEMI ORLICZ SPACE cs d 1 N. SUBRAMANIAN 1, B. C. TRIPATHY 2, AND C. MURUGESAN 3 Abstract. Let Γ denote the space of all entire
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.oc] 21 Mar 2015
Convex KKM maps, monotone operators and Minty variational inequalities arxiv:1503.06363v1 [math.oc] 21 Mar 2015 Marc Lassonde Université des Antilles, 97159 Pointe à Pitre, France E-mail: marc.lassonde@univ-ag.fr
More informationThe small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results)
The small ball property in Banach spaces (quantitative results) Ehrhard Behrends Abstract A metric space (M, d) is said to have the small ball property (sbp) if for every ε 0 > 0 there exists a sequence
More informationA COUNTEREXAMPLE TO A QUESTION OF R. HAYDON, E. ODELL AND H. ROSENTHAL
A COUNTEREXAMPLE TO A QUESTION OF R. HAYDON, E. ODELL AND H. ROSENTHAL G. ANDROULAKIS Abstract: We give an example of a compact metric space K, anopen dense subset U of K, and a sequence (f n )inc(k) which
More informationA note on a construction of J. F. Feinstein
STUDIA MATHEMATICA 169 (1) (2005) A note on a construction of J. F. Feinstein by M. J. Heath (Nottingham) Abstract. In [6] J. F. Feinstein constructed a compact plane set X such that R(X), the uniform
More informationTHERE IS NO FINITELY ISOMETRIC KRIVINE S THEOREM JAMES KILBANE AND MIKHAIL I. OSTROVSKII
Houston Journal of Mathematics c University of Houston Volume, No., THERE IS NO FINITELY ISOMETRIC KRIVINE S THEOREM JAMES KILBANE AND MIKHAIL I. OSTROVSKII Abstract. We prove that for every p (1, ), p
More informationFUNCTION BASES FOR TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES. Yılmaz Yılmaz
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 33, 2009, 335 353 FUNCTION BASES FOR TOPOLOGICAL VECTOR SPACES Yılmaz Yılmaz Abstract. Our main interest in this
More informationInto a Hilbert Space
ariv:math/0410427v1 [math.fa] 19 Oct 2004 l p (p > 2) Does Not Coarsely Embed Into a Hilbert Space William B. JOHNSON and N. Lovasoa RANDRIANARIVONY 1 A (not necessarily continuous) map f between two metric
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.fa] 31 Mar 1994
arxiv:math/9403211v1 [math.fa] 31 Mar 1994 New proofs of Rosenthal s l 1 theorem and the Josefson Nissenzweig theorem Ehrhard Behrends Abstract. We give elementary proofs of the theorems mentioned in the
More informationStrong subdifferentiability of norms and geometry of Banach spaces. G. Godefroy, V. Montesinos and V. Zizler
Strong subdifferentiability of norms and geometry of Banach spaces G. Godefroy, V. Montesinos and V. Zizler Dedicated to the memory of Josef Kolomý Abstract. The strong subdifferentiability of norms (i.e.
More informationThe Measure Problem. Louis de Branges Department of Mathematics Purdue University West Lafayette, IN , USA
The Measure Problem Louis de Branges Department of Mathematics Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-2067, USA A problem of Banach is to determine the structure of a nonnegative (countably additive)
More informationJónsson posets and unary Jónsson algebras
Jónsson posets and unary Jónsson algebras Keith A. Kearnes and Greg Oman Abstract. We show that if P is an infinite poset whose proper order ideals have cardinality strictly less than P, and κ is a cardinal
More informationDecomposition of Riesz frames and wavelets into a finite union of linearly independent sets
Decomposition of Riesz frames and wavelets into a finite union of linearly independent sets Ole Christensen, Alexander M. Lindner Abstract We characterize Riesz frames and prove that every Riesz frame
More informationTHE ALTERNATIVE DUNFORD-PETTIS PROPERTY FOR SUBSPACES OF THE COMPACT OPERATORS
THE ALTERNATIVE DUNFORD-PETTIS PROPERTY FOR SUBSPACES OF THE COMPACT OPERATORS MARÍA D. ACOSTA AND ANTONIO M. PERALTA Abstract. A Banach space X has the alternative Dunford-Pettis property if for every
More informationTHE RANGE OF A VECTOR-VALUED MEASURE
THE RANGE OF A VECTOR-VALUED MEASURE J. J. UHL, JR. Liapounoff, in 1940, proved that the range of a countably additive bounded measure with values in a finite dimensional vector space is compact and, in
More informationPh.D. THESIS. Asymptotic Structures in Banach Spaces
Ph.D. THESIS Asymptotic Structures in Banach Spaces Bünyamin Sarı University of Alberta Release Form Name of Author: Bünyamin Sarı Title of Thesis: Asymptotic Structures in Banach Spaces Degree: Doctor
More informationShih-sen Chang, Yeol Je Cho, and Haiyun Zhou
J. Korean Math. Soc. 38 (2001), No. 6, pp. 1245 1260 DEMI-CLOSED PRINCIPLE AND WEAK CONVERGENCE PROBLEMS FOR ASYMPTOTICALLY NONEXPANSIVE MAPPINGS Shih-sen Chang, Yeol Je Cho, and Haiyun Zhou Abstract.
More informationCOEFFICIENT QUANTIZATION FOR FRAMES IN BANACH SPACES
COEFFICIENT QUANTIZATION FOR FRAMES IN BANACH SPACES P. G. CASAZZA, S. J. DILWORTH, E. ODELL, TH. SCHLUMPRECHT, AND A. ZSÁK Abstract. Let e i ) be a fundamental system of a Banach space. We consider the
More informationEXTENSION OF BILINEAR FORMS FROM SUBSPACES OF L 1 -SPACES
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Mathematica Volumen 27, 2002, 91 96 EXENSION OF BILINEAR FORMS FROM SUBSPACES OF L 1 -SPACES Jesús M. F. Castillo, Ricardo García and Jesús A. Jaramillo Universidad
More informationQuotients of Banach Spaces and Surjectively Universal Spaces
ESI The Erwin Schrödinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria Quotients of Banach Spaces and Surjectively Universal Spaces Pandelis Dodos Vienna, Preprint
More informationThe lattice of closed ideals in the Banach algebra of operators on a certain dual Banach space
The lattice of closed ideals in the Banach algebra of operators on a certain dual Banach space Niels Jakob Laustsen, Thomas Schlumprecht, and András Zsák Abstract In this paper we determine the closed
More informationA REMARK ON THE GEOMETRY OF SPACES OF FUNCTIONS WITH PRIME FREQUENCIES.
1 A REMARK ON THE GEOMETRY OF SPACES OF FUNCTIONS WITH PRIME FREQUENCIES. P. LEFÈVRE, E. MATHERON, AND O. RAMARÉ Abstract. For any positive integer r, denote by P r the set of all integers γ Z having at
More informationWeak-Star Convergence of Convex Sets
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 13 (2006), No. 3+4, 711 719 Weak-Star Convergence of Convex Sets S. Fitzpatrick A. S. Lewis ORIE, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA aslewis@orie.cornell.edu www.orie.cornell.edu/
More informationREAL RENORMINGS ON COMPLEX BANACH SPACES
REAL RENORMINGS ON COMPLEX BANACH SPACES F. J. GARCÍA PACHECO AND A. MIRALLES Abstract. In this paper we provide two ways of obtaining real Banach spaces that cannot come from complex spaces. In concrete
More informationFREE SPACES OVER SOME PROPER METRIC SPACES
FREE SPACES OVER SOME PROPER METRIC SPACES A. DALET Abstract. We prove that the Lipschitz-free space over a countable proper metric space is isometric to a dual space and has the metric approximation property.
More informationWeak Topologies, Reflexivity, Adjoint operators
Chapter 2 Weak Topologies, Reflexivity, Adjoint operators 2.1 Topological vector spaces and locally convex spaces Definition 2.1.1. [Topological Vector Spaces and Locally convex Spaces] Let E be a vector
More informationTHE TRACE FORMULA IN BANACH SPACES. Dedicated to the memory of Joram Lindenstrauss
THE TRACE FORMULA IN BANACH SPACES W. B. JOHNSON AND A. SZANKOWSKI Abstract. A classical result of Grothendieck and Lidskii says that the trace formula (that the trace of a nuclear operator is the sum
More informationWeak and strong moments of l r -norms of log-concave vectors
Weak and strong moments of l r -norms of log-concave vectors Rafał Latała based on the joint work with Marta Strzelecka) University of Warsaw Minneapolis, April 14 2015 Log-concave measures/vectors A measure
More information