Lecture 2: Controllability of nonlinear systems

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Lecture 2: Controllability of nonlinear systems"

Transcription

1 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 1 Lecture 2: Controllability of nonlinear systems Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 3 See arjan (under teaching) for info on course schedule and homework sets. Take-Home Exam I on homepage on March 16.

2 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 2 Recall: Kinematic model of the unicycle ẋ 1 = u 1 cosx 3 ẋ 2 = u 1 sinx 3 ẋ 3 = u 2 written as a system with two input vector fields and zero drift vector field cosx 3 ẋ = sin x 3 u 1 + u 2 1 The Lie bracket of the two input vector fields is given as sinx 3 sinx 3 cosx 3 = cosx 3 1

3 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 3 which is a vector field that is independent from the two input vector fields. Claim: This new independent direction guarantees controllability of the unicycle system. Interpretation of the Lie bracket: Proposition 1 Let X, Y be two vector fields such that [X, Y ] = Then the solution flows of the vector fields are commuting. In fact, we may find local coordinates x 1,...,x n such that X = x 1, Y = x 2 Thus, the Lie bracket [X, Y ] characterizes the amount of non-commutativity of the vector fields X, Y.

4 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 4 In fact, let the control strategy u = col(u 1, u 2 ) be defined by (1, ), t [, ε), ε > (, 1), t [ε, 2ε) u(t) = ( 1, ), t [2ε, 3ε) (, 1), t [3ε, 4ε), Then the motion of the system is described by x(4ε) = x + ε 2 [g 1, g 2 ](x ) + O(ε 3 ). which indicates controllability, since [g 1, g 2 ] is everywhere independent from g 1, g 2. This formula holds in general. This is enough for systems with two inputs and three state variables, but what can we do if the dimension of the state is > 3?

5 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 5 Answer: consider higher-order Lie brackets. y r θ ϕ x r Example 2 Consider the cart with fixed rear axis x 1 cos(ϕ + θ) d x 2 sin(ϕ + θ) = u dt ϕ sinθ 1 + θ 1 with u 1 the driving input, and u 2 the steering input. u 2

6 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 6 Define g 1 (x) = cos(x 3 + x 4 ) sin(x 3 + x 4 ), g sin(x 4 ) 2 (x) = } {{ } Drive. 1 }{{} Steer

7 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 7 Compute [Steer, Drive] = g 1 x g 2 g 2 x g 1 sin(x 3 + x 4 ) sin(x 3 + x 4 ) cos(x 3 + x 4 ) cos(x 3 + x 4 ) = cos(x 4 ) sin(x 3 + x 4 ) cos(x 3 + x 4 ) = =: Wriggle. cos(x 4 ) 1

8 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 8 Another independent direction is obtained by the third-order Lie bracket sin(x 3 ) cos(x 3 ) [Wriggle, Drive] = =: Slide. This shows that you can manoeuver your car into any parking lot by applying controls corresponding to the Slide direction, i.e., by applying the control sequence {Wriggle, Drive, Wriggle, Drive}.

9 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 9 What to do with the drift vector field? The system ẋ = f(x) + g(x)u can be considered as a special case of ẋ = g 1 (x)u 1 + g 2 (x)u 2, with u 1 = 1. This means that care has to be taken with respect to brackets involving f: [f, g], [g, [f, g]], [f, [f, g]],...

10 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 1 Example 3 Consider the system on R 2 ẋ 1 = x 2 2 ẋ 2 = u. Compute the Lie brackets of the vector fields f(x) = x2 2, g(x) = 1, yielding [f, g](x) = 2x 2, [[f, g], g](x) = 2. Clearly, we have obtained two independent directions. However, since x 2 2, the x 1 -coordinate is always non-decreasing. Hence, the system is not really controllable.

11 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 11 A weaker form of controllability: local accessibility Let V be a neighborhood of x, then R V (x, t 1 ) denotes the reachable set from x at time t 1, following the trajectories which remain in the neighborhood V of x for t t 1, i.e., all points x 1 for which there exists an input u( ) such that the evolution of the system for x() = x satisfies x(t) V, t t 1, and x(t 1 ) = x 1. Furthermore, let R V t 1 (x ) = R V (x, τ). τ t 1 Definition 4 (Local accessibility) A system is said to be locally accessible from x if R V t 1 (x ) contains a non-empty open subset of X for all non-empty neighborhoods V of x and all t 1 >. If the latter holds for all x X then the system is called locally accessible.

12 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 12 Definition 5 (Accessibility algebra) Consider the system ẋ = f(x) + g 1 (x)u g m (x)u m The accessibility algebra C are the linear combinations of repeated Lie brackets of the form [X k, [X k 1, [, [X 2, X 1 ] ]]], k = 1, 2,..., where X i, is a vector field in the set {f, g 1,...,g m }. This linear space is a Lie algebra under the Lie bracket. Definition 6 The accessibility distribution C is the distribution generated by the accessibility algebra C: C(x) = span{x(x) X vector field in C}, x X

13 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 13 Intermezzo: Distributions on manifolds A distribution D on a manifold X is specified by a subspace D(x) T x X for all x X. Let X 1, X 2,...,X k be vector fields on X. Then D(x) = span(x 1 (x), X 2 (x),...,x k (x)). defines a distribution. A distribution D is called involutive if, whenever f, g D, also [f, g] D. The distribution D is called constant-dimensional whenever the dimension of D(x) is constant.

14 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 14 Example 7 Let X = R 3 and D = span(f 1, f 2 ), where f 1 (x) = 2x 2 1, f 2(x) = 1. x 2 Since f 1 and f 2 are linearly independent, we have that dim(d(x)) = 2, for all x. Furthermore, we have [f 1, f 2 ](x) = f 2 x (x)f 1(x) f 1 x (x)f 2(x) = 1.

15 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 15 [f 1, f 2 ] D if and only if rank(f 1 (x), f 2 (x), [f 1, f 2 ](x)) = 2, for all x. However, rank(f 1 (x), f 2 (x), [f 1, f 2 ](x)) = rank for all x. Hence, D is not involutive. 2x x 2 1 = 3,

16 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 16 Let D be a nonsingular distribution on X, generated by the independent vector fields f 1,...,f r. Then D is said to be integrable if for each x X, there exists a neighborhood N of x and n r real-valued independent functions h 1 (x),...,h n r (x) defined on N, such that h 1 (x),...,h n r (x) satisfy the partial differential equations for all indices i = 1,...,r, j = 1,...,n r. Frobenius theorem h j x (x)f i(x) =, (1) A constant-dimensional distribution is integrable if and only if it is involutive. The necessity of involutivity for complete integrability is easily seen. Indeed, suppose that (1) is satisfied. This is the same as L fi h j =

17 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 17 It follows that L [fi,f k ]h j = L fi L fk h j L fk L fi h j = Since the functions h 1 (x),...,h n r (x) are independent, this implies that the Lie brackets [f i, f k ] are (pointwise) linear combinations of the vector fields f 1,...,f r, and are thus contained in the distribution D. A geometric description of Frobenius theorem is as follows. Let the independent functions h 1 (x),...,h n r (x) satisfy (1). Then their level sets, i.e., all sets of the form {x h 1 (x) = c 1,...,h n r (x) = c n r } for arbitrary constants c 1,...,c n r, are well-defined r-dimensional submanifolds of X, to which all the vector fields f 1,...,f r are tangent, and, as a consequence, also all their Lie brackets are tangent.

18 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 18 Example 8 Consider the following set of partial differential equations = x 1 φ x 1 + x 2 φ x 2 + x 3 φ x 3 = φ x 3 Define the vector fields f 1 (x) = x 1 x 2, f 2(x) =. x 3 1 It is checked that D := span(f 1, f 2 ) has constant dimension = 2 on the set X = {x R 3 x x 2 2 } (that is, R 3 excluding the x 3 -axis), and is involutive. Thus, by Frobenius theorem, D is integrable.

19 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 19 Consequently, for each x X, there exists a neighborhood N of x and a real-valued function φ(x) with dφ(x) that satisfies the given set of partial differential equations. In fact, φ(x) = lnx 1 lnx 2 is a (global) solution. Note that the solution is not unique. In particular, φ(x) = tan 1 x 2 x 1 is also a global solution.

20 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 2 By construction, the accessibility distribution C is involutive. Theorem 9 (Local accessibility) A sufficient condition for the system to be locally accessible from x X is dimc(x) = n (2) If this holds for all x X then the system is locally accessible. Conversely, if the system is locally accessible then (2) holds for all x in an open and dense subset of X. We call (2) the accessibility rank condition at x.

21 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 21 Key idea of the proof Consider the system ẋ = f(x) + g 1 (x)u g m (x)u m and its generated system vector fields F = {X u 1,...,u m such that X(x) = f(x) + g 1 (x)u g m (x)u m } Then for every k n there exists a submanifold N k around x of dimension k given as N k = {x x = X t k k Xt k 1 k 1 Xt 1 1 (x ), σ i < t i < τ i } with X i F. Indeed, suppose for a certain k < n we cannot construct N k+1. This means that all system vector fields X F are tangent to N k, and hence all vector fields f, g 1,...,g m. This also means that all Lie brackets of these vector fields are tangent to N k, and thus dim C(x) k, which is a contradiction.

22 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 22 If there is no drift vector field then we obtain real controllability: Theorem 1 Consider ẋ = g 1 (x)u 1 + g 2 (x)u g m (x)u m If dimc(x) = n for all x X then the system is controllable. Consider the map (t 1,...,t n ) X t n n X t n 1 n 1 Xt 1 1 (x ), σ i < t i < τ i having image N n, which is an n-dimensional open part of X. Now let s 1,...,s n be such that σ i < s i < τ i. Then the map (t 1,...,t n ) ( X 1 ) s 1 ( X 2 ) s 2 ( X n ) s n X t n n X t n 1 n 1 Xt 1 1 (x ), σ i < t i < τ i has an image which is an open neighborhood of x. Thus the reachable set R(x ) from x contains an open neighborhood of x.

23 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 23 Suppose now that the reachable set is smaller than X. Then take any point on the boundary of the reachable set R(x ). Then the set of points reachable from this point is again open. Contradiction. Thus the unicycle and the cart are indeed controllable. Note that the actual construction of the input functions which steers the system from x to x 1 has not been addressed.

24 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 24 Sometimes local accessibility is heavily depending on the flow of the drift vector field; consider for example the system ẋ 1 = 1 ẋ 2 = u This system is locally accessible, but of course very far from controllability. In order to improve the situation we look at a stronger form of accessibility: local strong accessibility A system is locally strongly accessible from x if for any neighborhood V of x the set R V (x, t 1 ) contains a non-empty set for any t 1 > sufficiently small. If the latter holds for all x X then the system is called locally strongly accessible. (The example given above is not locally strongly accessible.)

25 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 25 Define C as the smallest algebra which contains g 1,...,g m and satisfies [f, w] C for all w C. Define the corresponding involutive distribution C (x) := span{x(x) X vector field in C }. We refer to C and C as the strong accessibility algebra and the strong accessibility distribution, respectively.

26 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 26 Notice that the strong accessibility algebra C does not contain the drift vector field f). Theorem 11 (Strong accessibility) A sufficient condition for the system to be locally strongly accessible from x is dimc (x) = n Furthermore, the system is locally strongly accessible if this holds for all x. Conversely, if the system is locally strongly accessible then it holds for all x in an open and dense subset of X. The system given before: ẋ 1 = x 2 2 ẋ 2 = u. is not only locally accessible, but also locally strongly accessible, since g(x) and [[f, g], g](x) are everywhere independent.

27 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 27 Let us apply the theory developed above to a linear system ẋ = Ax + m b i u i, x R n, i=1 where b 1,...,b m are the columns of the input matrix B. Clearly, the Lie brackets of the constant input vector fields given by the input vectors b 1,...,b m are all zero, i.e., [b i, b j ] =, for all i, j = 1,...,m. Furthermore, the Lie bracket of the linear drift vector field Ax with an input vector field b i yields the constant vector field [Ax, b i ] = Ab i. The Lie brackets of Ab i with Ab j or b j are again all zero, while [Ax, Ab i ] = A 2 b i.

28 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 28 Hence we conclude that C is spanned by all constant vector fields b i, Ab i, A 2 b i,..., i m, together with the linear drift vector field Ax, i.e., C = {Ax, b i, Ab i, A 2 b i...,a n 1 b i, i = 1,...,m}. while C = columns of (B, AB, A 2 B...,A n 1 B) We see that for linear systems the rank condition for strong accessibility coincides with the Kalman rank condition for controllability. Hence, if we would not have known anything special about linear systems, then at least a linear system which satisfies the Kalman rank condition is locally strongly accessible.

29 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 29 Example 12 (Actuated rotating rigid body) Consider ω 1 A 1 ω 2 ω 3 α 1 ω 2 = A 2 ω 3 ω 1 + u 1 + α 2 u 2 ω 3 A 3 ω 1 ω 2 with α 1, α 2. Here the constants A 1, A 2, A 3 are determined by the moments of inertia a 1, a 2, a 3. Compute [g 1, f](ω) = α 1 A 2 ω 3 [g 2, f](ω) = α 1 A 3 ω 2 α 2 A 1 ω 3 α 2 A 3 ω 1

30 DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems 3 On the other hand [g 2, [g 1, f]] = α 1 α 2 A 3 Thus the system is locally strongly accessible if A 3 which is equivalent to a 1 a 2. In fact, this is the if and only if condition. Indeed, if A 3 = then ω 3 =, showing that the system is not locally strongly accessible. Remark 13 Due to the specific properties of the drift vector field, i.c. Poisson stability, it can be shown that the system is in fact controllable if and only if the two first moments of inertia a 1 and a 2 are different.)

Disturbance Decoupling Problem

Disturbance Decoupling Problem DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 21 1 Disturbance Decoupling Problem Lecture 4 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 7 The disturbance decoupling problem is a typical example

More information

Controllability, Observability & Local Decompositions

Controllability, Observability & Local Decompositions ontrollability, Observability & Local Decompositions Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Lie Bracket Distributions ontrollability ontrollability Distributions

More information

Mathematics for Control Theory

Mathematics for Control Theory Mathematics for Control Theory Geometric Concepts in Control Involutivity and Frobenius Theorem Exact Linearization Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Reading materials

More information

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools 1. Manifold, Diffeomorphism 1.1. The Implicit Function Theorem ϕ : U R n R n p (0 p < n), of class C k (k 1) x 0 U such that ϕ(x 0 ) = 0 rank Dϕ(x) = n p x U

More information

Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control

Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control DISC Systems and Control Theory of Nonlinear Systems, 2010 1 Stabilization and Passivity-Based Control Lecture 8 Nonlinear Dynamical Control Systems, Chapter 10, plus handout from R. Sepulchre, Constructive

More information

MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems

MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems Input-Output and Input-State Linearization Zero Dynamics of Nonlinear Systems Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University

More information

Math 4377/6308 Advanced Linear Algebra I Dr. Vaughn Climenhaga, PGH 651A HOMEWORK 3

Math 4377/6308 Advanced Linear Algebra I Dr. Vaughn Climenhaga, PGH 651A HOMEWORK 3 Math 4377/6308 Advanced Linear Algebra I Dr. Vaughn Climenhaga, PGH 651A Fall 2013 HOMEWORK 3 Due 4pm Wednesday, September 11. You will be graded not only on the correctness of your answers but also on

More information

Math 152 Take Home Test 1

Math 152 Take Home Test 1 Math 5 Take Home Test Due Monday 5 th October (5 points) The following test will be done at home in order to ensure that it is a fair and representative reflection of your own ability in mathematics I

More information

Distributions, Frobenious Theorem & Transformations

Distributions, Frobenious Theorem & Transformations Distributions Frobenious Theorem & Transformations Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Drexel University Outline Distributions & integral surfaces Involutivity Frobenious Theorem

More information

Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability

Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability Chap. 3. Controlled Systems, Controllability 1. Controllability of Linear Systems 1.1. Kalman s Criterion Consider the linear system ẋ = Ax + Bu where x R n : state vector and u R m : input vector. A :

More information

2.3. VECTOR SPACES 25

2.3. VECTOR SPACES 25 2.3. VECTOR SPACES 25 2.3 Vector Spaces MATH 294 FALL 982 PRELIM # 3a 2.3. Let C[, ] denote the space of continuous functions defined on the interval [,] (i.e. f(x) is a member of C[, ] if f(x) is continuous

More information

Mathematical Systems Theory: Advanced Course Exercise Session 5. 1 Accessibility of a nonlinear system

Mathematical Systems Theory: Advanced Course Exercise Session 5. 1 Accessibility of a nonlinear system Mathematical Systems Theory: dvanced Course Exercise Session 5 1 ccessibility of a nonlinear system Consider an affine nonlinear control system: [ ẋ = f(x)+g(x)u, x() = x, G(x) = g 1 (x) g m (x) ], where

More information

CONTROL OF THE NONHOLONOMIC INTEGRATOR

CONTROL OF THE NONHOLONOMIC INTEGRATOR June 6, 25 CONTROL OF THE NONHOLONOMIC INTEGRATOR R. N. Banavar (Work done with V. Sankaranarayanan) Systems & Control Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Mumbai -INDIA. banavar@iitb.ac.in Outline

More information

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f)) 1. Basic algebra of vector fields Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over R. Recall that V = {L : V R} is defined to be the set of all linear maps to R. V is isomorphic to V, but there is no canonical

More information

3.2 Frobenius Theorem

3.2 Frobenius Theorem 62 CHAPTER 3. POINCARÉ, INTEGRABILITY, DEGREE 3.2 Frobenius Theorem 3.2.1 Distributions Definition 3.2.1 Let M be a n-dimensional manifold. A k-dimensional distribution (or a tangent subbundle) Δ : M Δ

More information

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Fall Last updated: November 26, (Under construction.)

THEODORE VORONOV DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS. Fall Last updated: November 26, (Under construction.) 4 Vector fields Last updated: November 26, 2009. (Under construction.) 4.1 Tangent vectors as derivations After we have introduced topological notions, we can come back to analysis on manifolds. Let M

More information

Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that for all x M, v(x) T x M.

Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that for all x M, v(x) T x M. 5 Vector fields Last updated: March 12, 2012. 5.1 Definition and general properties We first need to define what a vector field is. Definition 5.1. A vector field v on a manifold M is map M T M such that

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 28 Jul 2016

arxiv: v1 [math.dg] 28 Jul 2016 Nilpotent approximation of a trident snake robot controlling distribution Jaroslav Hrdina Aleš Návrat and Petr Vašík arxiv:67.85v [math.dg] 8 Jul 6 Brno University of Technology Faculty of Mechanical Engineering

More information

Gait Controllability for Legged Robots

Gait Controllability for Legged Robots ill Goodwine and Joel urdick Gait ontrollability for Legged Robots ill Goodwine Notre Dame May 8, 998 Joel urdick altech Outline:. Introduction and ackground 2. Mathematical Preliminaries, tratified ystems

More information

Math 128A: Homework 2 Solutions

Math 128A: Homework 2 Solutions Math 128A: Homework 2 Solutions Due: June 28 1. In problems where high precision is not needed, the IEEE standard provides a specification for single precision numbers, which occupy 32 bits of storage.

More information

KALMAN S CONTROLLABILITY RANK CONDITION: FROM LINEAR TO NONLINEAR

KALMAN S CONTROLLABILITY RANK CONDITION: FROM LINEAR TO NONLINEAR KALMAN S CONTROLLABILITY RANK CONDITION: FROM LINEAR TO NONLINEAR Eduardo D. Sontag SYCON - Rutgers Center for Systems and Control Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903

More information

MAT137 Calculus! Lecture 9

MAT137 Calculus! Lecture 9 MAT137 Calculus! Lecture 9 Today we will study: Limits at infinity. L Hôpital s Rule. Mean Value Theorem. (11.5,11.6, 4.1) PS3 is due this Friday June 16. Next class: Applications of the Mean Value Theorem.

More information

Calculus I Exam 1 Review Fall 2016

Calculus I Exam 1 Review Fall 2016 Problem 1: Decide whether the following statements are true or false: (a) If f, g are differentiable, then d d x (f g) = f g. (b) If a function is continuous, then it is differentiable. (c) If a function

More information

Convexity of the Reachable Set of Nonlinear Systems under L 2 Bounded Controls

Convexity of the Reachable Set of Nonlinear Systems under L 2 Bounded Controls 1 1 Convexity of the Reachable Set of Nonlinear Systems under L 2 Bounded Controls B.T.Polyak Institute for Control Science, Moscow, Russia e-mail boris@ipu.rssi.ru Abstract Recently [1, 2] the new convexity

More information

Observability. Dynamic Systems. Lecture 2 Observability. Observability, continuous time: Observability, discrete time: = h (2) (x, u, u)

Observability. Dynamic Systems. Lecture 2 Observability. Observability, continuous time: Observability, discrete time: = h (2) (x, u, u) Observability Dynamic Systems Lecture 2 Observability Continuous time model: Discrete time model: ẋ(t) = f (x(t), u(t)), y(t) = h(x(t), u(t)) x(t + 1) = f (x(t), u(t)), y(t) = h(x(t)) Reglerteknik, ISY,

More information

Global Formulation and Control of a Class of Nonholonomic Systems

Global Formulation and Control of a Class of Nonholonomic Systems Dissertations and Theses 4-8 Global Formulation and Control of a Class of Nonholonomic Systems Muhammad Rehan Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Engineering Commons,

More information

EN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 2: System Models January 28, 2015

EN Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 2: System Models January 28, 2015 EN53.678 Nonlinear Control and Planning in Robotics Lecture 2: System Models January 28, 25 Prof: Marin Kobilarov. Constraints The configuration space of a mechanical sysetm is denoted by Q and is assumed

More information

Nonholonomic Constraints Examples

Nonholonomic Constraints Examples Nonholonomic Constraints Examples Basilio Bona DAUIN Politecnico di Torino July 2009 B. Bona (DAUIN) Examples July 2009 1 / 34 Example 1 Given q T = [ x y ] T check that the constraint φ(q) = (2x + siny

More information

Robotics. Control Theory. Marc Toussaint U Stuttgart

Robotics. Control Theory. Marc Toussaint U Stuttgart Robotics Control Theory Topics in control theory, optimal control, HJB equation, infinite horizon case, Linear-Quadratic optimal control, Riccati equations (differential, algebraic, discrete-time), controllability,

More information

Topic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis

Topic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Topic # 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Analysis of Nonlinear Systems Lyapunov Stability Analysis Fall 010 16.30/31 Lyapunov Stability Analysis Very general method to prove (or disprove) stability of

More information

Nonholonomic Behavior in Robotic Systems

Nonholonomic Behavior in Robotic Systems Chapter 7 Nonholonomic Behavior in Robotic Systems In this chapter, we study the effect of nonholonomic constraints on the behavior of robotic systems. These constraints arise in systems such as multifingered

More information

Feedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 2016.

Feedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 2016. Feedback Linearization Lectures delivered at IIT-Kanpur, TEQIP program, September 216 Ravi N Banavar banavar@iitbacin September 24, 216 These notes are based on my readings o the two books Nonlinear Control

More information

2.10 Saddles, Nodes, Foci and Centers

2.10 Saddles, Nodes, Foci and Centers 2.10 Saddles, Nodes, Foci and Centers In Section 1.5, a linear system (1 where x R 2 was said to have a saddle, node, focus or center at the origin if its phase portrait was linearly equivalent to one

More information

A Sufficient Condition for Local Controllability

A Sufficient Condition for Local Controllability A Sufficient Condition for Local Controllability of Nonlinear Systems Along Closed Orbits Kwanghee Nam and Aristotle Arapostathis Abstract We present a computable sufficient condition to determine local

More information

Iowa State University. Instructor: Alex Roitershtein Summer Homework #5. Solutions

Iowa State University. Instructor: Alex Roitershtein Summer Homework #5. Solutions Math 50 Iowa State University Introduction to Real Analysis Department of Mathematics Instructor: Alex Roitershtein Summer 205 Homework #5 Solutions. Let α and c be real numbers, c > 0, and f is defined

More information

MATH 31BH Homework 5 Solutions

MATH 31BH Homework 5 Solutions MATH 3BH Homework 5 Solutions February 4, 204 Problem.8.2 (a) Let x t f y = x 2 + y 2 + 2z 2 and g(t) = t 2. z t 3 Then by the chain rule a a a D(g f) b = Dg f b Df b c c c = [Dg(a 2 + b 2 + 2c 2 )] [

More information

ARW Lecture 04 Point Tracking

ARW Lecture 04 Point Tracking ARW Lecture 04 Point Tracking Instructor: Chris Clark Semester: Summer 2016 1 Figures courtesy of Siegwart & Nourbakhsh Planning Based Control Prior Knowledge Operator Commands Localization Path Planning

More information

Robotics, Geometry and Control - A Preview

Robotics, Geometry and Control - A Preview Robotics, Geometry and Control - A Preview Ravi Banavar 1 1 Systems and Control Engineering IIT Bombay HYCON-EECI Graduate School - Spring 2008 Broad areas Types of manipulators - articulated mechanisms,

More information

Integral Jensen inequality

Integral Jensen inequality Integral Jensen inequality Let us consider a convex set R d, and a convex function f : (, + ]. For any x,..., x n and λ,..., λ n with n λ i =, we have () f( n λ ix i ) n λ if(x i ). For a R d, let δ a

More information

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann

10. Smooth Varieties. 82 Andreas Gathmann 82 Andreas Gathmann 10. Smooth Varieties Let a be a point on a variety X. In the last chapter we have introduced the tangent cone C a X as a way to study X locally around a (see Construction 9.20). It

More information

MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory

MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control. Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory MCE/EEC 647/747: Robot Dynamics and Control Lecture 8: Basic Lyapunov Stability Theory Reading: SHV Appendix Mechanical Engineering Hanz Richter, PhD MCE503 p.1/17 Stability in the sense of Lyapunov A

More information

Math Fall 08 Final Exam Review

Math Fall 08 Final Exam Review Math 173.7 Fall 08 Final Exam Review 1. Graph the function f(x) = x 2 3x by applying a transformation to the graph of a standard function. 2.a. Express the function F(x) = 3 ln(x + 2) in the form F = f

More information

Lyapunov Stability Theory

Lyapunov Stability Theory Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous

More information

Chapter 3 Numerical Methods

Chapter 3 Numerical Methods Chapter 3 Numerical Methods Part 3 3.4 Differential Algebraic Systems 3.5 Integration of Differential Equations 1 Outline 3.4 Differential Algebraic Systems 3.4.1 Constrained Dynamics 3.4.2 First and Second

More information

DRAFT - Math 102 Lecture Note - Dr. Said Algarni

DRAFT - Math 102 Lecture Note - Dr. Said Algarni Math02 - Term72 - Guides and Exercises - DRAFT 7 Techniques of Integration A summery for the most important integrals that we have learned so far: 7. Integration by Parts The Product Rule states that if

More information

= F (b) F (a) F (x i ) F (x i+1 ). a x 0 x 1 x n b i

= F (b) F (a) F (x i ) F (x i+1 ). a x 0 x 1 x n b i Real Analysis Problem 1. If F : R R is a monotone function, show that F T V ([a,b]) = F (b) F (a) for any interval [a, b], and that F has bounded variation on R if and only if it is bounded. Here F T V

More information

This Week. Professor Christopher Hoffman Math 124

This Week. Professor Christopher Hoffman Math 124 This Week Sections 2.1-2.3,2.5,2.6 First homework due Tuesday night at 11:30 p.m. Average and instantaneous velocity worksheet Tuesday available at http://www.math.washington.edu/ m124/ (under week 2)

More information

CSL361 Problem set 4: Basic linear algebra

CSL361 Problem set 4: Basic linear algebra CSL361 Problem set 4: Basic linear algebra February 21, 2017 [Note:] If the numerical matrix computations turn out to be tedious, you may use the function rref in Matlab. 1 Row-reduced echelon matrices

More information

6.0 INTRODUCTION TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

6.0 INTRODUCTION TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 6.0 Introduction to Differential Equations Contemporary Calculus 1 6.0 INTRODUCTION TO DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS This chapter is an introduction to differential equations, a major field in applied and theoretical

More information

Observability and forward-backward observability of discrete-time nonlinear systems

Observability and forward-backward observability of discrete-time nonlinear systems Observability and forward-backward observability of discrete-time nonlinear systems Francesca Albertini and Domenico D Alessandro Dipartimento di Matematica pura a applicata Universitá di Padova, 35100

More information

This lecture: basis and dimension 4.4. Linear Independence: Suppose that V is a vector space and. r 1 x 1 + r 2 x r k x k = 0

This lecture: basis and dimension 4.4. Linear Independence: Suppose that V is a vector space and. r 1 x 1 + r 2 x r k x k = 0 Linear Independence: Suppose that V is a vector space and that x, x 2,, x k belong to V {x, x 2,, x k } are linearly independent if r x + r 2 x 2 + + r k x k = only for r = r 2 = = r k = The vectors x,

More information

Output Feedback and State Feedback. EL2620 Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Observers. Nonlinear Controllers. ẋ = f(x,u), y = h(x)

Output Feedback and State Feedback. EL2620 Nonlinear Control. Nonlinear Observers. Nonlinear Controllers. ẋ = f(x,u), y = h(x) Output Feedback and State Feedback EL2620 Nonlinear Control Lecture 10 Exact feedback linearization Input-output linearization Lyapunov-based control design methods ẋ = f(x,u) y = h(x) Output feedback:

More information

The theory of manifolds Lecture 2

The theory of manifolds Lecture 2 The theory of manifolds Lecture 2 Let X be a subset of R N, Y a subset of R n and f : X Y a continuous map. We recall Definition 1. f is a C map if for every p X, there exists a neighborhood, U p, of p

More information

Math 147, Homework 1 Solutions Due: April 10, 2012

Math 147, Homework 1 Solutions Due: April 10, 2012 1. For what values of a is the set: Math 147, Homework 1 Solutions Due: April 10, 2012 M a = { (x, y, z) : x 2 + y 2 z 2 = a } a smooth manifold? Give explicit parametrizations for open sets covering M

More information

Spacecraft Attitude Control using CMGs: Singularities and Global Controllability

Spacecraft Attitude Control using CMGs: Singularities and Global Controllability 1 / 28 Spacecraft Attitude Control using CMGs: Singularities and Global Controllability Sanjay Bhat TCS Innovation Labs Hyderabad International Workshop on Perspectives in Dynamical Systems and Control

More information

Chapter 2: Linear Independence and Bases

Chapter 2: Linear Independence and Bases MATH20300: Linear Algebra 2 (2016 Chapter 2: Linear Independence and Bases 1 Linear Combinations and Spans Example 11 Consider the vector v (1, 1 R 2 What is the smallest subspace of (the real vector space

More information

Equivalence of dynamical systems by bisimulation

Equivalence of dynamical systems by bisimulation Equivalence of dynamical systems by bisimulation Arjan van der Schaft Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente P.O. Box 217, 75 AE Enschede, The Netherlands Phone +31-53-4893449, Fax +31-53-48938

More information

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X. Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2

More information

The Implicit Function Theorem

The Implicit Function Theorem The Implicit Function Theorem Case 1: A linear equation with m = n = 1 (We ll say what m and n are shortly.) Suppose we know that x and y must always satisfy the equation ax + by = c. (1) Let s write the

More information

Implicit Functions, Curves and Surfaces

Implicit Functions, Curves and Surfaces Chapter 11 Implicit Functions, Curves and Surfaces 11.1 Implicit Function Theorem Motivation. In many problems, objects or quantities of interest can only be described indirectly or implicitly. It is then

More information

Linearization problem. The simplest example

Linearization problem. The simplest example Linear Systems Lecture 3 1 problem Consider a non-linear time-invariant system of the form ( ẋ(t f x(t u(t y(t g ( x(t u(t (1 such that x R n u R m y R p and Slide 1 A: f(xu f(xu g(xu and g(xu exist and

More information

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups

1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups An undergraduate approach to Lie theory Slide 1 Andrew Baker, Glasgow Glasgow, 12/11/1999 1 Smooth manifolds and Lie groups A continuous g : V 1 V 2 with V k R m k open is called smooth if it is infinitely

More information

Linear Algebra Lecture Notes-I

Linear Algebra Lecture Notes-I Linear Algebra Lecture Notes-I Vikas Bist Department of Mathematics Panjab University, Chandigarh-6004 email: bistvikas@gmail.com Last revised on February 9, 208 This text is based on the lectures delivered

More information

MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems

MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems MCE693/793: Analysis and Control of Nonlinear Systems Introduction to Nonlinear Controllability and Observability Hanz Richter Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Definition of

More information

SCORE. Exam 3. MA 114 Exam 3 Fall 2016

SCORE. Exam 3. MA 114 Exam 3 Fall 2016 Exam 3 Name: Section and/or TA: Do not remove this answer page you will return the whole exam. You will be allowed two hours to complete this test. No books or notes may be used. You may use a graphing

More information

June 2011 PURDUE UNIVERSITY Study Guide for the Credit Exam in (MA 262) Linear Algebra and Differential Equations

June 2011 PURDUE UNIVERSITY Study Guide for the Credit Exam in (MA 262) Linear Algebra and Differential Equations June 20 PURDUE UNIVERSITY Study Guide for the Credit Exam in (MA 262) Linear Algebra and Differential Equations The topics covered in this exam can be found in An introduction to differential equations

More information

Feedback Linearization

Feedback Linearization Feedback Linearization Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey May 14, 2015 1 Introduction Consider a class o single-input-single-output (SISO) nonlinear systems o the orm ẋ = (x) + g(x)u (1) y = h(x) (2)

More information

REMARKS ON THE TIME-OPTIMAL CONTROL OF A CLASS OF HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS. Eduardo D. Sontag. SYCON - Rutgers Center for Systems and Control

REMARKS ON THE TIME-OPTIMAL CONTROL OF A CLASS OF HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS. Eduardo D. Sontag. SYCON - Rutgers Center for Systems and Control REMARKS ON THE TIME-OPTIMAL CONTROL OF A CLASS OF HAMILTONIAN SYSTEMS Eduardo D. Sontag SYCON - Rutgers Center for Systems and Control Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903

More information

Exam 3 Solutions. Multiple Choice Questions

Exam 3 Solutions. Multiple Choice Questions MA 4 Exam 3 Solutions Fall 26 Exam 3 Solutions Multiple Choice Questions. The average value of the function f (x) = x + sin(x) on the interval [, 2π] is: A. 2π 2 2π B. π 2π 2 + 2π 4π 2 2π 4π 2 + 2π 2.

More information

LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES

LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES 1. Proper actions Suppose G acts on M smoothly, and m M. Then the orbit of G through m is G m = {g m g G}. If m, m lies in the same orbit, i.e. m = g m for

More information

Section x7 +

Section x7 + Difference Equations to Differential Equations Section 5. Polynomial Approximations In Chapter 3 we discussed the problem of finding the affine function which best approximates a given function about some

More information

A nemlineáris rendszer- és irányításelmélet alapjai Relative degree and Zero dynamics (Lie-derivatives)

A nemlineáris rendszer- és irányításelmélet alapjai Relative degree and Zero dynamics (Lie-derivatives) A nemlineáris rendszer- és irányításelmélet alapjai Relative degree and Zero dynamics (Lie-derivatives) Hangos Katalin BME Analízis Tanszék Rendszer- és Irányításelméleti Kutató Laboratórium MTA Számítástechnikai

More information

SMSTC (2017/18) Geometry and Topology 2.

SMSTC (2017/18) Geometry and Topology 2. SMSTC (2017/18) Geometry and Topology 2 Lecture 1: Differentiable Functions and Manifolds in R n Lecturer: Diletta Martinelli (Notes by Bernd Schroers) a wwwsmstcacuk 11 General remarks In this lecture

More information

Fact: Every matrix transformation is a linear transformation, and vice versa.

Fact: Every matrix transformation is a linear transformation, and vice versa. Linear Transformations Definition: A transformation (or mapping) T is linear if: (i) T (u + v) = T (u) + T (v) for all u, v in the domain of T ; (ii) T (cu) = ct (u) for all scalars c and all u in the

More information

Chapter 7: Techniques of Integration

Chapter 7: Techniques of Integration Chapter 7: Techniques of Integration MATH 206-01: Calculus II Department of Mathematics University of Louisville last corrected September 14, 2013 1 / 43 Chapter 7: Techniques of Integration 7.1. Integration

More information

i = f iα : φ i (U i ) ψ α (V α ) which satisfy 1 ) Df iα = Df jβ D(φ j φ 1 i ). (39)

i = f iα : φ i (U i ) ψ α (V α ) which satisfy 1 ) Df iα = Df jβ D(φ j φ 1 i ). (39) 2.3 The derivative A description of the tangent bundle is not complete without defining the derivative of a general smooth map of manifolds f : M N. Such a map may be defined locally in charts (U i, φ

More information

Geometric Control Theory: Nonlinear Dynamics and Applications

Geometric Control Theory: Nonlinear Dynamics and Applications San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Summer 2016 Geometric Control Theory: Nonlinear Dynamics and Applications Geoffrey A. Zoehfeld San Jose

More information

i=1 β i,i.e. = β 1 x β x β 1 1 xβ d

i=1 β i,i.e. = β 1 x β x β 1 1 xβ d 66 2. Every family of seminorms on a vector space containing a norm induces ahausdorff locally convex topology. 3. Given an open subset Ω of R d with the euclidean topology, the space C(Ω) of real valued

More information

Review: control, feedback, etc. Today s topic: state-space models of systems; linearization

Review: control, feedback, etc. Today s topic: state-space models of systems; linearization Plan of the Lecture Review: control, feedback, etc Today s topic: state-space models of systems; linearization Goal: a general framework that encompasses all examples of interest Once we have mastered

More information

7.5 Partial Fractions and Integration

7.5 Partial Fractions and Integration 650 CHPTER 7. DVNCED INTEGRTION TECHNIQUES 7.5 Partial Fractions and Integration In this section we are interested in techniques for computing integrals of the form P(x) dx, (7.49) Q(x) where P(x) and

More information

with a given direct sum decomposition into even and odd pieces, and a map which is bilinear, satisfies the associative law for multiplication, and

with a given direct sum decomposition into even and odd pieces, and a map which is bilinear, satisfies the associative law for multiplication, and Chapter 2 Rules of calculus. 2.1 Superalgebras. A (commutative associative) superalgebra is a vector space A = A even A odd with a given direct sum decomposition into even and odd pieces, and a map A A

More information

Volumes of Solids of Revolution Lecture #6 a

Volumes of Solids of Revolution Lecture #6 a Volumes of Solids of Revolution Lecture #6 a Sphereoid Parabaloid Hyperboloid Whateveroid Volumes Calculating 3-D Space an Object Occupies Take a cross-sectional slice. Compute the area of the slice. Multiply

More information

Contents. 2.1 Vectors in R n. Linear Algebra (part 2) : Vector Spaces (by Evan Dummit, 2017, v. 2.50) 2 Vector Spaces

Contents. 2.1 Vectors in R n. Linear Algebra (part 2) : Vector Spaces (by Evan Dummit, 2017, v. 2.50) 2 Vector Spaces Linear Algebra (part 2) : Vector Spaces (by Evan Dummit, 2017, v 250) Contents 2 Vector Spaces 1 21 Vectors in R n 1 22 The Formal Denition of a Vector Space 4 23 Subspaces 6 24 Linear Combinations and

More information

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION

GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION GEOMETRIC QUANTIZATION 1. The basic idea The setting of the Hamiltonian version of classical (Newtonian) mechanics is the phase space (position and momentum), which is a symplectic manifold. The typical

More information

2) Let X be a compact space. Prove that the space C(X) of continuous real-valued functions is a complete metric space.

2) Let X be a compact space. Prove that the space C(X) of continuous real-valued functions is a complete metric space. University of Bergen General Functional Analysis Problems with solutions 6 ) Prove that is unique in any normed space. Solution of ) Let us suppose that there are 2 zeros and 2. Then = + 2 = 2 + = 2. 2)

More information

THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, CORK COLÁISTE NA hollscoile, CORCAIGH UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, CORK. Summer Examination 2009.

THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, CORK COLÁISTE NA hollscoile, CORCAIGH UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, CORK. Summer Examination 2009. OLLSCOIL NA héireann, CORCAIGH THE NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, CORK COLÁISTE NA hollscoile, CORCAIGH UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, CORK Summer Examination 2009 First Engineering MA008 Calculus and Linear Algebra

More information

Complex Dynamic Systems: Qualitative vs Quantitative analysis

Complex Dynamic Systems: Qualitative vs Quantitative analysis Complex Dynamic Systems: Qualitative vs Quantitative analysis Complex Dynamic Systems Chiara Mocenni Department of Information Engineering and Mathematics University of Siena (mocenni@diism.unisi.it) Dynamic

More information

Overview of Fourier Series (Sect. 6.2). Origins of the Fourier Series.

Overview of Fourier Series (Sect. 6.2). Origins of the Fourier Series. Overview of Fourier Series (Sect. 6.2. Origins of the Fourier Series. Periodic functions. Orthogonality of Sines and Cosines. Main result on Fourier Series. Origins of the Fourier Series. Summary: Daniel

More information

1 The Local-to-Global Lemma

1 The Local-to-Global Lemma Point-Set Topology Connectedness: Lecture 2 1 The Local-to-Global Lemma In the world of advanced mathematics, we are often interested in comparing the local properties of a space to its global properties.

More information

Math Homework 3 Solutions. (1 y sin x) dx + (cos x) dy = 0. = sin x =

Math Homework 3 Solutions. (1 y sin x) dx + (cos x) dy = 0. = sin x = 2.6 #10: Determine if the equation is exact. If so, solve it. Math 315-01 Homework 3 Solutions (1 y sin x) dx + (cos x) dy = 0 Solution: Let P (x, y) = 1 y sin x and Q(x, y) = cos x. Note P = sin x = Q

More information

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions 24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice

More information

Mathematics of Physics and Engineering II: Homework problems

Mathematics of Physics and Engineering II: Homework problems Mathematics of Physics and Engineering II: Homework problems Homework. Problem. Consider four points in R 3 : P (,, ), Q(,, 2), R(,, ), S( + a,, 2a), where a is a real number. () Compute the coordinates

More information

Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization

Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization 72 CHAPTER 7 Optimality Conditions for Constrained Optimization 1. First Order Conditions In this section we consider first order optimality conditions for the constrained problem P : minimize f 0 (x)

More information

4. We accept without proofs that the following functions are differentiable: (e x ) = e x, sin x = cos x, cos x = sin x, log (x) = 1 sin x

4. We accept without proofs that the following functions are differentiable: (e x ) = e x, sin x = cos x, cos x = sin x, log (x) = 1 sin x 4 We accept without proofs that the following functions are differentiable: (e x ) = e x, sin x = cos x, cos x = sin x, log (x) = 1 sin x x, x > 0 Since tan x = cos x, from the quotient rule, tan x = sin

More information

1 Relative degree and local normal forms

1 Relative degree and local normal forms THE ZERO DYNAMICS OF A NONLINEAR SYSTEM 1 Relative degree and local normal orms The purpose o this Section is to show how single-input single-output nonlinear systems can be locally given, by means o a

More information

CHAPTER 1. Introduction

CHAPTER 1. Introduction CHAPTER 1 Introduction Linear geometric control theory was initiated in the beginning of the 1970 s, see for example, [1, 7]. A good summary of the subject is the book by Wonham [17]. The term geometric

More information

LECTURE 8: THE SECTIONAL AND RICCI CURVATURES

LECTURE 8: THE SECTIONAL AND RICCI CURVATURES LECTURE 8: THE SECTIONAL AND RICCI CURVATURES 1. The Sectional Curvature We start with some simple linear algebra. As usual we denote by ( V ) the set of 4-tensors that is anti-symmetric with respect to

More information

Math 6455 Nov 1, Differential Geometry I Fall 2006, Georgia Tech

Math 6455 Nov 1, Differential Geometry I Fall 2006, Georgia Tech Math 6455 Nov 1, 26 1 Differential Geometry I Fall 26, Georgia Tech Lecture Notes 14 Connections Suppose that we have a vector field X on a Riemannian manifold M. How can we measure how much X is changing

More information

Partial Derivatives October 2013

Partial Derivatives October 2013 Partial Derivatives 14.3 02 October 2013 Derivative in one variable. Recall for a function of one variable, f (a) = lim h 0 f (a + h) f (a) h slope f (a + h) f (a) h a a + h Partial derivatives. For a

More information

Midterm 1 Solutions Thursday, February 26

Midterm 1 Solutions Thursday, February 26 Math 59 Dr. DeTurck Midterm 1 Solutions Thursday, February 26 1. First note that since f() = f( + ) = f()f(), we have either f() = (in which case f(x) = f(x + ) = f(x)f() = for all x, so c = ) or else

More information