Multivariable Control Exam
|
|
- Ethelbert Clarke
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Department of AUTOMATIC CONTROL Multivariable Control Exam Exam 4 8 Grading All answers must include a clear motivation and a well-formulated answer. AnswersmaybegiveninEnglishorSwedish.Thetotalnumberofpointsis5.The maximum number of points is specified for each subproblem. Accepted aid The textbook Glad& Ljung, standard mathematical tables like TEFYMA, an authorized Formelsamling i Reglerteknik / Collection of Formulas and a pocket calculator. Handouts of lecture notes and lecture slides are also allowed. Results The results will be reported via LADOK.
2 . Consider the feedback system in Figure. v n r e u y Σ 4 Σ Σ s Figure ThesysteminProblem. a. Giveastatespacerealizationofthesystemwithinputsr,vandnand outputse,uandy. (p) b. Determine the entries of the transfer matrix P er (s) P ev (s) P en (s) P ur (s) P uv (s) P un (s) P yr (s) P yv (s) P yn (s) mappingtheinputsr,vandntotheoutputse,uandy. (p) c. After permutation (re-ordering) of the inputs and outputs, the step responsesofthesystemhavebeenplottedinfigure.determinethenew order of inputs and outputs. ( p) Time (sec) Figure Stepresponse plotsfor Problem.Theinputsandoutputshavebeen reordered.
3 d. Suppose that the load disturbance v and the measurement disturbance n arebothconstant andzero,whilethereference signal r isazero-mean stochastic process withspectral density Φ r (ω) =.Determine the ω spectral density of e. ( p) a. Thefirstorderprocesscanbewritten Combining this with gives the state realization b. The transfer matrix is P er (s) P ev (s) P en (s) ẋ= xuv u=4e=4(r y)=4[r (xn)=4r 4x 4n r ẋ= }{{} 6x 4 4 v A }{{} n B e r u = 4 x 4 4 v y n }{{}}{{} C D P ur (s) P uv (s) P un (s) =C(sI A) BD P yr (s) P yv (s) P yn (s) = 4 4 () = c. ThestartingpointsofthestepresponsesshouldbegivenbytheD-matrix, sotheinputorderis(n,v,r)andtheoutputorderis(e,y,u). d. Thespectrumofeisgivenbytheformula Φ e (ω)=p er (iω)φ r (ω)p er (iω) ( = 4 ) ( iω6 ω 4 ) iω6 = (ω 4) (ω 36)(ω ) 3
4 . Yourbosshasheardthatyouaregreatatautomaticcontrolandwants somehelpfindingagoodcontrollerfortheprocessp(s)= s e.5s. a. Hewantsafastsystem;thebandwidth ω b shouldbeatleastrad/s.ifit is possible, find a stabilizing controller that meets the specification. If it is not possible, explain why. ( p) b. Yourbossgetsalittleimpatientandtriestofindacontrollerhimself.He claimsthathewillgetafastenoughsystemwiththecontroller C(s)= 5s e.5s. s HeshowsyouthemarginplotoftheopenloopsystemPCwhereeverything looksnice,seefigure3.youdohoweverseeaverybigproblemwiththis design.whatistheproblemthatyouneedtoexplaintoyourboss? (p) 5 Bode Diagram Gm = Inf, Pm = 7.7 deg (at.9 rad/s) Magnitude (abs) 9 Phase (deg) 5 (rad/s) Frequency Figure3 Marginplotfortheopenloopsysteminproblemb. a. It is not possible to fulfill the specification due to the fundamental limitation onthebandwidthofatime-delayedsystem.asystemontheformg(s)= G (s)e sl,whereg isarationalfunction,willhavethelimitedbandwidth ω B </Lwhichinthiscasemeansthatyoucangetabandwidthofat most rad/s. b. You can not realize acontroller withthefactor e.5s init, since sucha controller would be non-causal. 3. Consider the double integrator [ ẋ= x z=[ x. [ u, 4
5 a. Find the LQR controller that minimizes ( ) z T (t)z(t)u T (t)u(t) dt. (.5 p) b. Determinethestationaryvalueu (r)oftheoptimalinputuwhenthereferencevalueforzisr. (.5p) c. Find the LQR controller that minimizes ( (z(t) r) (u(t) u (r)) ) dt. (p) a. The fastidious would start by ascertaining controllability of the system. Sincewearenot,weskipthatstep.Let [ s s S= s s 3 be the unique positive definite solution to the Riccati equation M T Q MA T SSA (SBQ, )Q (SBQ,) T =, where [ A=, B= [, M=[, Q =I, Q =I, Q, =. This yields [ T [ [ [ [ T s s s s [ s s 3 s s 3 [ [ [ s s T [ s s = s s 3 s s 3 [ [ [ [ s s [s s 3 = 4 s s s s 3 [ s s s s 3 s s s 3 4s s =. 3 s =, s =, s =s s 3, s 3 = s = 6, 4s s 3 = 6. 5
6 This gives the optimal state feedback gain L=Q (SBQ,) T = Thus, the sought controller is [ T [ 6 =[ 6. 6 u(x)= [ 6x. b. In stationarity we have ż=mẋ=ẋ ẋ = ẋ = ẋ. () Instationaritywealsohave u=,whichtogetherwiththesecondstate equation yields = u=ẋ. () Combining the two state equations with equations() and() yields in stationarity u=x =ẋ = ẋ =. The stationary input value u (r)= isthusnecessaryinorderforz=rinstationarity,foranyr. c. The integral is minimized with the LQR controller u= Lxl r r, where Lwasdeterminedinproblema.,andl r ischosentogetunitary stationary gain in the closed-loop system, that is ( ([ l r =(M(BL A) B) = [ [ [ ) [ ) 6 ( [ [ ) ( [ [ ) 6 = [ = [ 6 ( [ ) = [ =. Thus, the sought controller is u(x,r)= [ 6xr. Notethatthesolutionisentirelyindependentofu,whichitwouldhave beenevenifu werenon-zero. 4. 6
7 a. Consider control of the process If a proportional controller P(s)= s. C(s)=K isused,forwhatvaluesof K willtheclosed-loopsysteminfigure4be stable? (p) r Σ e C u P y Figure 4 Block diagram of the closed-loop system in Problem 4. b. Consider the situation where C instead is an unknown time-varying functionk(t),withanupperandlowerlimitof±α.thatis,foralltimes α K(t) α. For what positive values of α can stability of the closed-loop system be guaranteed? Hint: Use the small-gain theorem! (3 p) a. The closed-loop transfer function is given by s K s G(s)= P(s)C(s) K P(s)C(s) = = K sk. The closed-loop system is thus(asymptotically) stable if and only K>. b. Werewritetheblockdiagramintoaformcompatiblewiththesmallgain theorem, which yields the block diagram in Figure 5. r Σ e C u y P Figure 5 Block diagram of the closed-loop system in Problem 4. 7
8 Since both C and P are stable systems, we can apply the small gain theorem. Since P is linear, time-invariant and SISO, its system gain is P =sup G(iω) =sup ω ω iω =sup ω ω =. ForCwehave C =sup e= = α. K e e =sup e= (K(t) e(t)) dt (e(t)) dt The small gain theorem thus gives stability if C P < C < P α<. sup e= α (e(t)) dt (e(t)) dt 5. ConsiderasystemS describedby [ [ ẋ= x u, y=[ x. a. Compute the Hankel singular values. ( p) b. Balancedtruncationisperformedtoyieldafirst-orderapproximationS of theoriginalsystems.provideanupperboundon S S.Notethatyou donotneedtocalculates. (p) a. Let [ [ s s o o S=, O= s s 3 o o 3 be the controllability and observability Gramians, respectively. The controllability Gramian is found as the unique symmetric solution of the Lyapunov equation ASSA T BB T = [ [ [ [ s s s s s s 3 s s 3 [ [ s s s s s s s s s 3 s 4=, s s =, s s 3 = s s s 3 s =, s =, s 3 =. [ [ = [ 4 = 8
9 The observability Gramian is found as the unique symmetric solution of the Lyapunov equation A T OOAC T C= [ [ [ [ o o o o o o 3 o o 3 [ [ o o o o 3 o o o o o 3 o o =, o o 3 =, o 3 4= o o 3 o 3 o =, o =, o 3 =. [ [ = [ = 4 The Gramians are thus [ S=, O= TheHankelsingularvalues σ aregivenby [ =det(so σ I)= 3 σ 4 3 σ =(3 σ ) 8= σ 4 6σ σ =3± 8. Since the Hankel singular values are positive, we get b. Wehave σ=. 3± 8= 3± = (± ) = ±. S S S (u) S (u) =sup u= u supσ r =σ r, u= where σ r isthehankelsingularvalueofthetruncated state. Thus,by choosing σ r =,weobtain S S. 6. Consider a system described by the following transfer function matrix G(s)= [ s s s s s s Suggest a suitable transformation for doing decoupled control and provide the overall structure of the controller.(you do not have to design any specific controller for the decoupled systems) ( p) 9
10 Wenoticethatthefirstoutputisdrivenbythedifferenceofthecontrolsignal,thesecondoutputisdrivenbythesum,wecanthusmakeacoordinate change in the output of our controllers exploiting this information. 7. u = Fû, Û = C Y, Û = C Y [.5.5 F =.5.5 [ s = Y = GFÛ= Û s s WethusseethatthischoiceofFcompletelydecouplesoursystem. a. Design an internal model controller for the system P(s)= s s. s4 Ifyouhavethepossibilitytodecidethecrossoverfrequency ω c fortheopen loop of any of the subsystems, choose your design parameters such that ω c =rad/s. (3p) b. Internal model controllers can also be designed by solving a convex optimization problem of the form min Q T T Q. HereT andt canbechosensothat ( WS S T T Q= W T T wheres=(ipc) isthesensitivityfunctionandt=pc(ipc) is thecomplementarysensitivityfunctionandw S aswellasw T areweighting functions. After finding the optimal Q, the controller can be obtained as C=(I QP) Q.FindexpressionsforT andt intermsofageneral processpaswellasgeneralweightingfunctionsw S andw T. Hint:UseST=I! ), (p)
11 a. By following the recommendations in the book for how to handle nonminimumphasezerosandhowtomakeqproperweget Q(s)= s s The corresponding controller is given by C(s)=(I Q(s)P(s)) Q(s)= = s λs λs s s. s4 λs s (s ) s s4 λs = λs λs s s4 λs. Q(s)= The open-loop transfer function is P(s)C(s) = s s s4 s s4 λs = s. λs Ifwechoosethedesignparameter λ=.5,thesubsystem(,)willgetthe crossoverfrequency ω c =rad/s. b. WefirstsolvethecontrollerequationforQ,thatis Thus C=(I QP) Q (I QP)C=Q C=QQPC C(IPC) =Q. ( ) ( ) ( ( WS S WS (I T) ) WS I PC(IPC) ) T T Q= = = ( W T T W T T W ) T PC(IPC) ( ) ( ) ( ) WS (I PQ) WS WS P = = Q. W T PQ W }{{} T P }{{} T T
Exam in Systems Engineering/Process Control
Department of AUTOMATIC CONTROL Exam in Systems Engineering/Process Control 7-6- Points and grading All answers must include a clear motivation. Answers may be given in English or Swedish. The total number
More informationExam in Systems Engineering/Process Control
Department of AUTOMATIC CONTROL Exam in Systems Engineering/Process Control 27-6-2 Points and grading All answers must include a clear motivation. Answers may be given in English or Swedish. The total
More informationExam in FRT110 Systems Engineering and FRTN25 Process Control
Department of AUTOMATIC CONTROL Exam in FRT Systems Engineering and FRTN5 Process Control June 5, 5, 4: 9: Points and grades All answers must include a clear motivation. Answers may be given in English
More informationExam in Automatic Control II Reglerteknik II 5hp (1RT495)
Exam in Automatic Control II Reglerteknik II 5hp (1RT495) Date: August 4, 018 Venue: Bergsbrunnagatan 15 sal Responsible teacher: Hans Rosth. Aiding material: Calculator, mathematical handbooks, textbooks
More informationExercises Automatic Control III 2015
Exercises Automatic Control III 205 Foreword This exercise manual is designed for the course "Automatic Control III", given by the Division of Systems and Control. The numbering of the chapters follows
More informationContents lecture 5. Automatic Control III. Summary of lecture 4 (II/II) Summary of lecture 4 (I/II) u y F r. Lecture 5 H 2 and H loop shaping
Contents lecture 5 Automatic Control III Lecture 5 H 2 and H loop shaping Thomas Schön Division of Systems and Control Department of Information Technology Uppsala University. Email: thomas.schon@it.uu.se,
More informationMAE 143B - Homework 9
MAE 43B - Homework 9 7.2 2 2 3.8.6.4.2.2 9 8 2 2 3 a) G(s) = (s+)(s+).4.6.8.2.2.4.6.8. Polar plot; red for negative ; no encirclements of, a.s. under unit feedback... 2 2 3. 4 9 2 2 3 h) G(s) = s+ s(s+)..2.4.6.8.2.4
More informationFEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control
FEL3210 Multivariable Feedback Control Lecture 8: Youla parametrization, LMIs, Model Reduction and Summary [Ch. 11-12] Elling W. Jacobsen, Automatic Control Lab, KTH Lecture 8: Youla, LMIs, Model Reduction
More informationRobust Multivariable Control
Lecture 2 Anders Helmersson anders.helmersson@liu.se ISY/Reglerteknik Linköpings universitet Today s topics Today s topics Norms Today s topics Norms Representation of dynamic systems Today s topics Norms
More informationProblem Set 4 Solution 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Problem Set 4 Solution Problem 4. For the SISO feedback
More informationCourse Outline. FRTN10 Multivariable Control, Lecture 13. General idea for Lectures Lecture 13 Outline. Example 1 (Doyle Stein, 1979)
Course Outline FRTN Multivariable Control, Lecture Automatic Control LTH, 6 L-L Specifications, models and loop-shaping by hand L6-L8 Limitations on achievable performance L9-L Controller optimization:
More information6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski. Solutions to Problem Set 1 1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Solutions to Problem Set 1 1 Problem 1.1T Consider the
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationDisturbance modelling
Lecture 3 Disturbance modelling This section reviews the main aspects in disturbance modelling and the corresponding relations of descriptions in the time and frequency domain, respectively. We will also
More informationAn LQ R weight selection approach to the discrete generalized H 2 control problem
INT. J. CONTROL, 1998, VOL. 71, NO. 1, 93± 11 An LQ R weight selection approach to the discrete generalized H 2 control problem D. A. WILSON², M. A. NEKOUI² and G. D. HALIKIAS² It is known that a generalized
More informationPrüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 29. 8. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationStability and Robustness 1
Lecture 2 Stability and Robustness This lecture discusses the role of stability in feedback design. The emphasis is notonyes/notestsforstability,butratheronhowtomeasurethedistanceto instability. The small
More informationModel reduction of coupled systems
Model reduction of coupled systems Tatjana Stykel Technische Universität Berlin ( joint work with Timo Reis, TU Kaiserslautern ) Model order reduction, coupled problems and optimization Lorentz Center,
More informationEL2520 Control Theory and Practice
So far EL2520 Control Theory and Practice r Fr wu u G w z n Lecture 5: Multivariable systems -Fy Mikael Johansson School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Stockholm, Sweden SISO control revisited: Signal
More informationFRTN 15 Predictive Control
Department of AUTOMATIC CONTROL FRTN 5 Predictive Control Final Exam March 4, 27, 8am - 3pm General Instructions This is an open book exam. You may use any book you want, including the slides from the
More informationFRTN10 Multivariable Control, Lecture 13. Course outline. The Q-parametrization (Youla) Example: Spring-mass System
FRTN Multivariable Control, Lecture 3 Anders Robertsson Automatic Control LTH, Lund University Course outline The Q-parametrization (Youla) L-L5 Purpose, models and loop-shaping by hand L6-L8 Limitations
More informationProfessor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley
Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the
More informationSiMpLIfy: A Toolbox for Structured Model Reduction
SiMpLIfy: A Toolbox for Structured Model Reduction Martin Biel, Farhad Farokhi, and Henrik Sandberg ACCESS Linnaeus Center, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,
More informationThe Q-parametrization (Youla) Lecture 13: Synthesis by Convex Optimization. Lecture 13: Synthesis by Convex Optimization. Example: Spring-mass System
The Q-parametrization (Youla) Lecture 3: Synthesis by Convex Optimization controlled variables z Plant distubances w Example: Spring-mass system measurements y Controller control inputs u Idea for lecture
More informationLec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action
Lec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action November 22, 2017 Lund University, Department of Automatic Control Controllability and Observability Example of Kalman decomposition 1 s 1 x 10 x
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-2 Control Systems Implementation
CDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-2 Control Systems Implementation Richard M. Murray 5 December 2012 Goals Provide an overview of the key principles, concepts and tools from control theory - Classical control -
More informationAutomatic Control A. A.A. 2016/2017 July 7, Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Meccanica. Prof. Luca Bascetta.
Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Meccanica Automatic Control A Prof. Luca Bascetta A.A. 2016/2017 July 7, 2017 Name: Surname: University ID number: Signature: This file consists of 8 pages (including
More informationStep Response Analysis. Frequency Response, Relation Between Model Descriptions
Step Response Analysis. Frequency Response, Relation Between Model Descriptions Automatic Control, Basic Course, Lecture 3 November 9, 27 Lund University, Department of Automatic Control Content. Step
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 9. 8. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -
More informationCME 345: MODEL REDUCTION
CME 345: MODEL REDUCTION Balanced Truncation Charbel Farhat & David Amsallem Stanford University cfarhat@stanford.edu These slides are based on the recommended textbook: A.C. Antoulas, Approximation of
More informationFRTN10 Multivariable Control Lecture 1
FRTN10 Multivariable Control Lecture 1 Anton Cervin Automatic Control LTH, Lund University Department of Automatic Control Founded 1965 by Karl Johan Åström (IEEE Medal of Honor) Approx. 50 employees Education
More informationCDS Solutions to Final Exam
CDS 22 - Solutions to Final Exam Instructor: Danielle C Tarraf Fall 27 Problem (a) We will compute the H 2 norm of G using state-space methods (see Section 26 in DFT) We begin by finding a minimal state-space
More informationAutomatic Control II Computer exercise 3. LQG Design
Uppsala University Information Technology Systems and Control HN,FS,KN 2000-10 Last revised by HR August 16, 2017 Automatic Control II Computer exercise 3 LQG Design Preparations: Read Chapters 5 and 9
More information10 Transfer Matrix Models
MIT EECS 6.241 (FALL 26) LECTURE NOTES BY A. MEGRETSKI 1 Transfer Matrix Models So far, transfer matrices were introduced for finite order state space LTI models, in which case they serve as an important
More informationModel reduction for linear systems by balancing
Model reduction for linear systems by balancing Bart Besselink Jan C. Willems Center for Systems and Control Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science University of Groningen, Groningen,
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries
. AERO 632: of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Preliminaries Signals & Systems Laplace
More informationLecture 2. FRTN10 Multivariable Control. Automatic Control LTH, 2018
Lecture 2 FRTN10 Multivariable Control Course Outline L1 L5 Specifications, models and loop-shaping by hand 1 Introduction 2 Stability and robustness 3 Specifications and disturbance models 4 Control synthesis
More informationNAME: ht () 1 2π. Hj0 ( ) dω Find the value of BW for the system having the following impulse response.
University of California at Berkeley Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Professor J. M. Kahn, EECS 120, Fall 1998 Final Examination, Wednesday, December 16, 1998, 5-8 pm NAME: 1.
More informationApplied Analysis (APPM 5440): Final exam 1:30pm 4:00pm, Dec. 14, Closed books.
Applied Analysis APPM 44: Final exam 1:3pm 4:pm, Dec. 14, 29. Closed books. Problem 1: 2p Set I = [, 1]. Prove that there is a continuous function u on I such that 1 ux 1 x sin ut 2 dt = cosx, x I. Define
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014
EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014 December 19, 2014 Your PRINTED FULL NAME Your STUDENT ID NUMBER Number of additional sheets 1. No computers, no tablets, no connected device (phone etc.) 2. Pocket
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 10-1 Robust Performance
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 1-1 Robust Performance Richard M. Murray 1 December 28 Goals: Describe how to represent uncertainty in process dynamics Describe how to analyze a system in the presence of uncertainty
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 5. 2. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -
More informationIterative Rational Krylov Algorithm for Unstable Dynamical Systems and Generalized Coprime Factorizations
Iterative Rational Krylov Algorithm for Unstable Dynamical Systems and Generalized Coprime Factorizations Klajdi Sinani Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
More informationL2 gains and system approximation quality 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 24: MODEL REDUCTION L2 gains and system approximation quality 1 This lecture discusses the utility
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationFinal exam: Automatic Control II (Reglerteknik II, 1TT495)
Uppsala University Department of Information Technology Systems and Control Professor Torsten Söderström Final exam: Automatic Control II (Reglerteknik II, TT495) Date: October 6, Responsible examiner:
More informationME 234, Lyapunov and Riccati Problems. 1. This problem is to recall some facts and formulae you already know. e Aτ BB e A τ dτ
ME 234, Lyapunov and Riccati Problems. This problem is to recall some facts and formulae you already know. (a) Let A and B be matrices of appropriate dimension. Show that (A, B) is controllable if and
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Model reduction. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Lecture: Automatic Control 2 Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 2010-2011 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 2010-2011 1 / 17 Lecture:
More informationH 2 Optimal State Feedback Control Synthesis. Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
H 2 Optimal State Feedback Control Synthesis Raktim Bhattacharya Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University Motivation Motivation w(t) u(t) G K y(t) z(t) w(t) are exogenous signals reference, process
More informationReturn Difference Function and Closed-Loop Roots Single-Input/Single-Output Control Systems
Spectral Properties of Linear- Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 2018! Stability margins of single-input/singleoutput (SISO) systems! Characterizations
More informationSubject: Optimal Control Assignment-1 (Related to Lecture notes 1-10)
Subject: Optimal Control Assignment- (Related to Lecture notes -). Design a oil mug, shown in fig., to hold as much oil possible. The height and radius of the mug should not be more than 6cm. The mug must
More informationContents lecture 6 2(17) Automatic Control III. Summary of lecture 5 (I/III) 3(17) Summary of lecture 5 (II/III) 4(17) H 2, H synthesis pros and cons:
Contents lecture 6 (7) Automatic Control III Lecture 6 Linearization and phase portraits. Summary of lecture 5 Thomas Schön Division of Systems and Control Department of Information Technology Uppsala
More informationZeros and zero dynamics
CHAPTER 4 Zeros and zero dynamics 41 Zero dynamics for SISO systems Consider a linear system defined by a strictly proper scalar transfer function that does not have any common zero and pole: g(s) =α p(s)
More informationChapter 9 Observers, Model-based Controllers 9. Introduction In here we deal with the general case where only a subset of the states, or linear combin
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 9 Observers,
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 14, am. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 14, 211 81-11 am Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth 1 points total. Problem Points Score 1 16 2 12
More informationScalable Control of Positive Systems. Traffic Networks Need Control. The Power Grid Needs Control. Towards a Scalable Control Theory
Scalable Control of Positive Systems Anders Rantzer LCCC Linnaeus Center Lund University Sweden The Dujiangyan Irrigation System (5 B.C.) Water Still a Control Challenge! A scarce resource with different
More informationLecture 7 (Weeks 13-14)
Lecture 7 (Weeks 13-14) Introduction to Multivariable Control (SP - Chapters 3 & 4) Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 7 (Weeks 13-14) p.
More information3 Gramians and Balanced Realizations
3 Gramians and Balanced Realizations In this lecture, we use an optimization approach to find suitable realizations for truncation and singular perturbation of G. It turns out that the recommended realizations
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 24: H2 Synthesis Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 4, 2011 E. Frazzoli (MIT) Lecture 24: H 2 Synthesis May
More informationChapter 6 Balanced Realization 6. Introduction One popular approach for obtaining a minimal realization is known as Balanced Realization. In this appr
Lectures on ynamic Systems and Control Mohammed ahleh Munther A. ahleh George Verghese epartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 6 Balanced
More informationH Loop Shaping for Systems with Hard Bounds
H Loop Shaping for Systems with Hard Bounds Wolfgang Reinelt Department of Electrical Engineering Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden WWW: http://www.control.isy.liu.se/~wolle/ Email: wolle@isy.liu.se
More informationDesign and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes
Design and Tuning of Fractional-order PID Controllers for Time-delayed Processes Emmanuel Edet Technology and Innovation Centre University of Strathclyde 99 George Street Glasgow, United Kingdom emmanuel.edet@strath.ac.uk
More informationDECENTRALIZED CONTROL DESIGN USING LMI MODEL REDUCTION
Journal of ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 58, NO. 6, 2007, 307 312 DECENTRALIZED CONTROL DESIGN USING LMI MODEL REDUCTION Szabolcs Dorák Danica Rosinová Decentralized control design approach based on partial
More informationChapter 6 Balanced Realization 6. Introduction One popular approach for obtaining a minimal realization is known as Balanced Realization. In this appr
Lectures on ynamic Systems and Control Mohammed ahleh Munther A. ahleh George Verghese epartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 6 Balanced
More informationCDS Solutions to the Midterm Exam
CDS 22 - Solutions to the Midterm Exam Instructor: Danielle C. Tarraf November 6, 27 Problem (a) Recall that the H norm of a transfer function is time-delay invariant. Hence: ( ) Ĝ(s) = s + a = sup /2
More informationCHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER
114 CHAPTER 5 ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS OF THE CONTROLLER 5.1 INTRODUCTION Robust control is a branch of control theory that explicitly deals with uncertainty in its approach to controller design. It also refers
More informationModule 5: Design of Sampled Data Control Systems Lecture Note 8
Module 5: Design of Sampled Data Control Systems Lecture Note 8 Lag-lead Compensator When a single lead or lag compensator cannot guarantee the specified design criteria, a laglead compensator is used.
More informationFinal exam: Automatic Control II (Reglerteknik II, 1TT495)
Uppsala University Department of Information Technology Systems and Control Professor Torsten Söderström Final exam: Automatic Control II (Reglerteknik II, TT495) Date: October 22, 2 Responsible examiner:
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 13: Stability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 13: Stability p.1/20 Outline Input-Output
More informationChapter Robust Performance and Introduction to the Structured Singular Value Function Introduction As discussed in Lecture 0, a process is better desc
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter Robust
More informationGrades will be determined by the correctness of your answers (explanations are not required).
6.00 (Fall 2011) Final Examination December 19, 2011 Name: Kerberos Username: Please circle your section number: Section Time 2 11 am 1 pm 4 2 pm Grades will be determined by the correctness of your answers
More informationLinear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013
Linear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013 Abstract As in optimal control theory, linear quadratic (LQ) differential games (DG) can be solved, even in high dimension,
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3. 8. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationLecture 15: H Control Synthesis
c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, 2010. Optimal Control for Linear Systems: Lecture 15 p. 1/14 Lecture 15: H Control Synthesis Example c A. Shiriaev/L. Freidovich. March 12, 2010. Optimal Control
More informationEECE 460. Decentralized Control of MIMO Systems. Guy A. Dumont. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia
EECE 460 Decentralized Control of MIMO Systems Guy A. Dumont Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of British Columbia January 2011 Guy A. Dumont (UBC EECE) EECE 460 - Decentralized
More informationEL2520 Control Theory and Practice
EL2520 Control Theory and Practice Lecture 8: Linear quadratic control Mikael Johansson School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Stockholm, Sweden Linear quadratic control Allows to compute the controller
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationBalanced Truncation 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 2004: MODEL REDUCTION Balanced Truncation This lecture introduces balanced truncation for LTI
More informationBalancing of Lossless and Passive Systems
Balancing of Lossless and Passive Systems Arjan van der Schaft Abstract Different balancing techniques are applied to lossless nonlinear systems, with open-loop balancing applied to their scattering representation.
More informationHankel Optimal Model Reduction 1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.242, Fall 2004: MODEL REDUCTION Hankel Optimal Model Reduction 1 This lecture covers both the theory and
More informationLecture 8. Applications
Lecture 8. Applications Ivan Papusha CDS270 2: Mathematical Methods in Control and System Engineering May 8, 205 / 3 Logistics hw7 due this Wed, May 20 do an easy problem or CYOA hw8 (design problem) will
More informationGramians based model reduction for hybrid switched systems
Gramians based model reduction for hybrid switched systems Y. Chahlaoui Younes.Chahlaoui@manchester.ac.uk Centre for Interdisciplinary Computational and Dynamical Analysis (CICADA) School of Mathematics
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Feedback Control Systems
EE C128 / ME C134 Feedback Control Systems Lecture Additional Material Introduction to Model Predictive Control Maximilian Balandat Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science University of
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response- Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to
More informationExam. 135 minutes, 15 minutes reading time
Exam August 6, 208 Control Systems II (5-0590-00) Dr. Jacopo Tani Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes, 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 35 Number of Points: 47 Permitted aids: 0 pages (5 sheets) A4.
More informationContents. 1 State-Space Linear Systems 5. 2 Linearization Causality, Time Invariance, and Linearity 31
Contents Preamble xiii Linear Systems I Basic Concepts 1 I System Representation 3 1 State-Space Linear Systems 5 1.1 State-Space Linear Systems 5 1.2 Block Diagrams 7 1.3 Exercises 11 2 Linearization
More informationEE 4343/ Control System Design Project LECTURE 10
Copyright S. Ikenaga 998 All rights reserved EE 4343/5329 - Control System Design Project LECTURE EE 4343/5329 Homepage EE 4343/5329 Course Outline Design of Phase-lead and Phase-lag compensators using
More informationLecture 6. Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems. Eugenio Schuster.
Lecture 6 Chapter 8: Robust Stability and Performance Analysis for MIMO Systems Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 6 p. 1/73 6.1 General
More informationLecture 3. Chapter 4: Elements of Linear System Theory. Eugenio Schuster. Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University.
Lecture 3 Chapter 4: Eugenio Schuster schuster@lehigh.edu Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics Lehigh University Lecture 3 p. 1/77 3.1 System Descriptions [4.1] Let f(u) be a liner operator, u 1 and u
More informationIDENTIFICATION FOR CONTROL
IDENTIFICATION FOR CONTROL Raymond A. de Callafon, University of California San Diego, USA Paul M.J. Van den Hof, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands Keywords: Controller, Closed loop model,
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More information5. Observer-based Controller Design
EE635 - Control System Theory 5. Observer-based Controller Design Jitkomut Songsiri state feedback pole-placement design regulation and tracking state observer feedback observer design LQR and LQG 5-1
More informationFinal exam: Computer-controlled systems (Datorbaserad styrning, 1RT450, 1TS250)
Uppsala University Department of Information Technology Systems and Control Professor Torsten Söderström Final exam: Computer-controlled systems (Datorbaserad styrning, RT450, TS250) Date: December 9,
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Thu. May 4, 25 5-8 pm Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 4 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 3
More informationCDS Final Exam
CDS 22 - Final Exam Instructor: Danielle C. Tarraf December 4, 2007 INSTRUCTIONS : Please read carefully! () Description & duration of the exam: The exam consists of 6 problems. You have a total of 24
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Deterministic LQR Optimal control and the Riccati equation Weight Selection Fall 2007 16.31 17 1 Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Have seen the solutions to the
More informationExam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time
Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (5-59-L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages
More information