Topic # Feedback Control Systems
|
|
- Griffin Bailey
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Topic # Feedback Control Systems State-Space Systems Full-state Feedback Control How do we change the poles of the state-space system? Or, even if we can change the pole locations. Where do we put the poles? Heuristics Linear Quadratic Regulator How well does this approach work?
2 Fall Pole Placement Approach So far we have looked at how to pick K to get the dynamics to have some nice properties (i.e. stabilize A) λ i (A) λ i (A BK) Classic Question: where should we put these closed-loop poles? Approach #1: use time-domain specifications to locate dominant poles roots of: s 2 + 2ζω n s + ω 2 n = 0 Then place rest of the poles so they are much faster than the dominant behavior. Example: could keep the same damped frequency w d and then move the real part to be 2 3 times faster than real part of dominant poles ζω n Just be careful moving the poles too far to the left because it takes a lot of control effort Rules of thumb for 2nd order response: 10-90% rise time t r = ζ + 1.4ζ2 ω n Settling time (5%) t s = ζω 3 n Time to peak amplitude t p = π ω n 1 ζ 2 Peak overshoot M p = e ζω nt p
3 Fall Approach #2: Could also choose closed-loop poles to mimic a system that has performance similar to what you want Just set pole locations equal to those of the prototype system. Various options exist Bessel Polynomial Systems of order k G p (s) = 1 B k (s) 1.2 G Step response k = Step response of G p for various k 0.2 k Time (sec) Roots of normalized bessel polynomials corresponding to a settling time of 1 second Pole locations of B 1 (s) ± j , ± j ± j5.0723, ± j , ± j ± j ± j7.5300, ± j4.4018, ± j , ± j8.7519, ± j5.6786, ± j ± j9.9715, ± j6.9278, ± j4.1057, ± j , ± j , ± j8.1557, ± j5.3655, ± j ± j , ± j9.3777, ± j6.6057, ± j3.9342, ± j Figure 1: Bessel root locations. All scaled to give settling times of 1 second, which you can change to t s by dividing the poles by t s. Figure by MIT OpenCourseWare.
4 Fall Procedure for an n th order system: Determine the desired settling time t s Find the k = n polynomial from the table. Divide pole locations by t s Form desired characteristic polynomial Φ d (s) and use acker/place to determine the feedback gains. Simulate to check performance and control effort. Example: with A = so that n = k = 3. G(s) = s(s + 4)(s + 1) B = Want t s = 2 sec. So there are 3 poles at: /2 = and ( ± i)/2 = ± i Use these to form Φ d (s) and find the gains using acker The Bessel approach is fine, but the step response is a bit slow (little overshoot allowed)
5 Fall Approach #3: Select the poles to match the n th order polynomial that was designed to minimize the ITAE integral of the time multiplied by the absolute value of the error J IT AE = in response to a step function. 0 t e(t) dt Both Bessel and ITAE are tabulated in FPE-508. Comparison for k = 3 (Given for ω 0 = 1 rad/sec, so slightly different than numbers given on previous page) φ B d = (s )(s ± i) IT AE φd = (s )(s ± 1.068i) So the ITAE poles are not as heavily damped. Some overshoot Faster rise-times. Problem with both of these approaches is that they completely ignore the control effort required the designer must iterate.
6 Fall Linear Quadratic Regulator An alternative approach is to place the pole locations so that the closed-loop system optimizes the cost function: [ J LQR = y(t) T Qy(t) + u(t) T Ru(t) ] dt 0 where: y T Qy = x T (C T QC)x {assume D = 0} is the State Cost u T Ru is called the Control Cost with penalty R Basic form of Linear Quadratic Regulator problem. State cost written using output y T Qy, but we could define a new system output z = C z x that is not based on a physical sensor measurement. [ J LQR = x T (t)(cz T QC z )x(t) + ρ u(t) T u(t) ] dt 0 Selection of z used to isolate the system states you are most concerned about, and thus would like to be regulated to zero. R = ρi effectively sets the controller bandwidth MIMO Optimal control is a time invariant linear state feedback u(t) = K lqr x(t) where K lqr found by solving an Algebraic Riccati Equation (ARE) K lqr Details to follow. 0 = A T P + P A + C T QC P BR 1 B T P = R 1 B T P
7 Fall Figure 2: Example #1: G(s) = (s+8)(s+14)(s+20) with control penalty ρ and 10ρ
8 Fall Figure 3: Example #2: G(s) = 0.94 s with control penalty ρ and 10ρ
9 Fall Figure 4: Example #3: G(s) = (s 8)(s 14)(s 20) with control penalty ρ and 10ρ
10 Fall Figure 5: Example #4: G(s) = (s 1) (s+1)(s 3) with control penalty ρ and 10ρ
11 Fall Figure 6: Example #5: G(s) = 10ρ (s 2)(s 4) (s 1)(s 3)(s s+4)s 2 with control penalty ρ and
12 Fall Regulator Summary Dominant second and prototype design approaches (Bessel and ITAE) place the closed-loop pole locations with no regard to the amount of control effort required. Designer must iterate on the selected bandwidth (ω n ) to ensure that the control effort is reasonable. LQR selects closed-loop poles that balance between state errors and control effort. Easy design iteration using R Sometimes difficult to relate the desired transient response to the LQR cost function. Key thing is that the designer is focused on system performance issues rather than the mechanics of the design process
13 Fall LQR Examples - (step4.m) 1 % LQR examples for % Fall % Jonathan How, MIT 4 set(0, DefaultLineLineWidth,2) 5 6 if 1 7 clear all;fig=1; 8 % system 9 G=tf(8*14*20,conv([1 8],conv([1 14],[1 20]))); 10 [a,b,c,d]=ssdata(g); 11 R=1e-3; 12 k=lqr(a,b,c *c,r); 13 k2=lqr(a,b,c *c,10*r); figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 16 % find the feedforward gains 17 Nbar=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k)*b); 18 Nbar2=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k2)*b); sys1=ss(a-b*k,b*nbar,c,d); 21 sys2=ss(a-b*k2,b*nbar2,c,d); t=[0:.005:1]; 24 [y,t,x]=step(sys1,t); 25 [y2,t2,x2]=step(sys2,t); figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 28 plot(t,y, --,t2,y2, LineWidth,2);axis([ ]) 29 grid; 30 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthEast ) 31 xlabel( time (sec), FontSize,14);ylabel( Y output, FontSize,14); 32 title( Step Response, FontSize,14) 33 hold on 34 plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*y2(end), r-- ); 35 plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*9*y2(end), r-- ); 36 hold off text(.4,.6,[ K=,num2str(k)], FontSize,14) 39 text(.4,.8,[ Nbar=,num2str(Nbar)], FontSize,14) 40 set(gca, FontSize,14) 41 print -dpng -r300 srl12.png if 1 44 figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 45 f=logspace(-1,2,400); 46 gcl1=freqresp(sys1,f); 47 gcl2=freqresp(sys2,f); 48 loglog(f,abs(squeeze(gcl1)),f,abs(squeeze(gcl2)), LineWidth,2);%grid 49 axis([ ]) 50 xlabel( Freq (rad/sec), FontSize,14);ylabel( G_{cl}, FontSize,14) 51 title( Closed-loop Freq Response, FontSize,14) 52 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthWest ) 53 set(gca, FontSize,14) 54 print -dpng -r300 srl13.png 55 end end % if %%%%%%%%% 60 if 1 61 clear all 62 fig=4; G=tf(8*14*20,conv([1-8],conv([1-14],[1-20]))) 65 [a,b,c,d]=ssdata(g); 66 R=.1 67 k=lqr(a,b,c *c,r); 68 k2=lqr(a,b,c *c,10*r);
14 Fall % find the feedforward gains 71 Nbar=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k)*b); 72 Nbar2=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k2)*b); sys1=ss(a-b*k,b*nbar,c,d); 75 sys2=ss(a-b*k2,b*nbar2,c,d); t=[0:.005:1]; 78 [y,t,x]=step(sys1,t); 79 [y2,t2,x2]=step(sys2,t); figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 82 plot(t,y, --,t2,y2, LineWidth,2);axis([ ]) 83 grid; 84 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthEast ) 85 xlabel( time (sec), FontSize,14);ylabel( Y output, FontSize,14); 86 title( Step Response, FontSize,14) 87 hold on 88 plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*y2(end), r-- ); 89 plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*9*y2(end), r-- ); 90 hold off text(.4,.6,[ K=,num2str(k)], FontSize,14) 93 text(.4,.8,[ Nbar=,num2str(Nbar)], FontSize,14) 94 set(gca, FontSize,14) 95 print -dpng -r300 srl22.png if 1 98 figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 99 f=logspace(-1,2,400); 100 gcl1=freqresp(sys1,f); 101 gcl2=freqresp(sys2,f); 102 loglog(f,abs(squeeze(gcl1)),f,abs(squeeze(gcl2)), LineWidth,2);%grid 103 axis([ ]) 104 xlabel( Freq (rad/sec), FontSize,14);ylabel( G_{cl}, FontSize,14) 105 title( Closed-loop Freq Response, FontSize,14) 106 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthWest ) 107 set(gca, FontSize,14) 108 print -dpng -r300 srl23.png 109 end end % if %%%%%%%%%%%%%% if clear all 116 fig=7; G=tf(.94,[ ]); 119 [a,b,c,d]=ssdata(g); 120 R= k=lqr(a,b,c *c,r); 122 k2=lqr(a,b,c *c,10*r); % find the feedforward gains 125 Nbar=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k)*b); 126 Nbar2=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k2)*b); sys1=ss(a-b*k,b*nbar,c,d); 129 sys2=ss(a-b*k2,b*nbar2,c,d); t=[0:.01:30]; 132 [y,t,x]=step(sys1,t); 133 [y2,t2,x2]=step(sys2,t); figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 136 plot(t,y, --,t2,y2, LineWidth,2);axis([ ]) 137 grid; 138 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthEast ) 139 xlabel( time (sec), FontSize,14);ylabel( Y output, FontSize,14); 140 title( Step Response, FontSize,14) 141 hold on 142 plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*y2(end), r-- );
15 Fall plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*9*y2(end), r-- ); 144 hold off text(15,.6,[ K=,num2str(k)], FontSize,14) 147 text(15,.8,[ Nbar=,num2str(Nbar)], FontSize,14) 148 set(gca, FontSize,14) 149 print -dpng -r300 srl32.png if figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 153 f=logspace(-3,3,400); 154 gcl1=freqresp(sys1,f); 155 gcl2=freqresp(sys2,f); 156 loglog(f,abs(squeeze(gcl1)),f,abs(squeeze(gcl2)), LineWidth,2);%grid 157 axis([ ]) 158 xlabel( Freq (rad/sec), FontSize,14);ylabel( G_{cl}, FontSize,14) 159 title( Closed-loop Freq Response, FontSize,14) 160 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthWest ) 161 set(gca, FontSize,14) 162 print -dpng -r300 srl33.png 163 end end % if %%%%%%%%%%%% 168 if clear all 170 fig=10; G=tf([1-1],conv([1 1],[1-3])); 173 [a,b,c,d]=ssdata(g); 174 R= k=lqr(a,b,c *c,r); 176 k2=lqr(a,b,c *c,10*r); % find the feedforward gains 179 Nbar=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k)*b); 180 Nbar2=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k2)*b); sys1=ss(a-b*k,b*nbar,c,d); 183 sys2=ss(a-b*k2,b*nbar2,c,d); t=[0:.01:10]; 186 [y,t,x]=step(sys1,t); 187 [y2,t2,x2]=step(sys2,t); figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 190 plot(t,y, --,t2,y2, LineWidth,2);axis([ ]) 191 grid; 192 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthEast ) 193 xlabel( time (sec), FontSize,14);ylabel( Y output, FontSize,14); 194 title( Unstable, NMP system Step Response, FontSize,14) 195 hold on 196 plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*y2(end), r-- ); 197 plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*9*y2(end), r-- ); 198 hold off text(5,.6,[ K=,num2str(k)], FontSize,14) 201 text(5,.8,[ Nbar=,num2str(Nbar)], FontSize,14) 202 set(gca, FontSize,14) 203 print -dpng -r300 srl42.png if figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 207 f=logspace(-2,2,400); 208 gcl1=freqresp(sys1,f); 209 gcl2=freqresp(sys2,f); 210 loglog(f,abs(squeeze(gcl1)),f,abs(squeeze(gcl2)), LineWidth,2);%grid 211 axis([ ]) 212 xlabel( Freq (rad/sec), FontSize,14);ylabel( G_{cl}, FontSize,14) 213 title( Closed-loop Freq Response, FontSize,14) 214 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthWest ) 215 set(gca, FontSize,14) 216 print -dpng -r300 srl43.png
16 Fall end end % if %%%%%%%%%%%% 222 clear all 223 fig=13; G=tf(conv([1-2],[1-4]),conv(conv([1-1],[1-3]),[1 2*.2*2 2^2 0 0])); 226 [a,b,c,d]=ssdata(g); 227 R= k=lqr(a,b,c *c,r); 229 k2=lqr(a,b,c *c,10*r); % find the feedforward gains 232 Nbar=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k)*b); 233 Nbar2=inv(-c*inv(a-b*k2)*b); sys1=ss(a-b*k,b*nbar,c,d); 236 sys2=ss(a-b*k2,b*nbar2,c,d); t=[0:.01:10]; 239 [y,t,x]=step(sys1,t); 240 [y2,t2,x2]=step(sys2,t); figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 243 plot(t,y, --,t2,y2, LineWidth,2);axis([ ]) 244 grid; 245 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthEast ) 246 xlabel( time (sec), FontSize,14);ylabel( Y output, FontSize,14); 247 title( Unstable, NMP system Step Response, FontSize,14) 248 hold on 249 plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*y2(end), r-- ); 250 plot(t2([1 end]),[.1.1]*9*y2(end), r-- ); 251 hold off text(1,.6,[ K=,num2str(k)], FontSize,14) 254 text(1,.8,[ Nbar=,num2str(Nbar)], FontSize,14) 255 set(gca, FontSize,14) 256 print -dpng -r300 srl52.png if figure(fig);clf;fig=fig+1; 260 f=logspace(-2,2,400); 261 gcl1=freqresp(sys1,f); 262 gcl2=freqresp(sys2,f); 263 loglog(f,abs(squeeze(gcl1)),f,abs(squeeze(gcl2)), LineWidth,2);%grid 264 axis([ ]) 265 xlabel( Freq (rad/sec), FontSize,14) 266 ylabel( G_{cl}, FontSize,14) 267 title( Closed-loop Freq Response, FontSize,14) 268 legend([ \rho=,num2str(r)],[ \rho=,num2str(10*r)], Location, SouthWest ) 269 set(gca, FontSize,14) 270 print -dpng -r300 srl53.png 271 end
Topic # Feedback Control
Topic #5 6.3 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Full-state Feedback Control How do we change the poles of the state-space system? Or,evenifwecanchangethepolelocations. Where do we put the poles? Linear
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems
Topic #12 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems State-Space Systems Full-state Feedback Control How do we change location of state-space eigenvalues/poles? Or, if we can change the pole locations where do
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #15 16.31 Feedback Control Systems State-Space Systems Open-loop Estimators Closed-loop Estimators Observer Theory (no noise) Luenberger IEEE TAC Vol 16, No. 6, pp. 596 602, December 1971. Estimation
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #16 16.31 Feedback Control Systems State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Fall 2007 16.31 16 1 Combined Estimators and Regulators
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems
Topic #16 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Add reference inputs for the DOFB case Reading: FPE 7.8, 7.9 Fall 2010 16.30/31 16 2 Reference Input - II On page 15-6, compensator implemented with reference
More informationControl Systems. Design of State Feedback Control.
Control Systems Design of State Feedback Control chibum@seoultech.ac.kr Outline Design of State feedback control Dominant pole design Symmetric root locus (linear quadratic regulation) 2 Selection of closed-loop
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Deterministic LQR Optimal control and the Riccati equation Weight Selection Fall 2007 16.31 17 1 Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Have seen the solutions to the
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #1 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Motivation Basic Linear System Response Fall 2007 16.31 1 1 16.31: Introduction r(t) e(t) d(t) y(t) G c (s) G(s) u(t) Goal: Design a controller G c (s) so that the
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationHomework Assignment 3
ECE382/ME482 Fall 2008 Homework 3 Solution October 20, 2008 1 Homework Assignment 3 Assigned September 30, 2008. Due in lecture October 7, 2008. Note that you must include all of your work to obtain full
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationChapter 3. State Feedback - Pole Placement. Motivation
Chapter 3 State Feedback - Pole Placement Motivation Whereas classical control theory is based on output feedback, this course mainly deals with control system design by state feedback. This model-based
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationCourse Outline. Higher Order Poles: Example. Higher Order Poles. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. State Space Design. 1 G(s) = s(s + 2)(s +10)
Amme 35 : System Dynamics Control State Space Design Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 1 Mar Introduction 2 8 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 15 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane
More informationMAE 143B - Homework 7
MAE 143B - Homework 7 6.7 Multiplying the first ODE by m u and subtracting the product of the second ODE with m s, we get m s m u (ẍ s ẍ i ) + m u b s (ẋ s ẋ u ) + m u k s (x s x u ) + m s b s (ẋ s ẋ u
More information16.31 Homework 2 Solution
16.31 Homework Solution Prof. S. R. Hall Issued: September, 6 Due: September 9, 6 Problem 1. (Dominant Pole Locations) [FPE 3.36 (a),(c),(d), page 161]. Consider the second order system ωn H(s) = (s/p
More informationTopic # Feedback Control Systems
Topic #20 16.31 Feedback Control Systems Closed-loop system analysis Bounded Gain Theorem Robust Stability Fall 2007 16.31 20 1 SISO Performance Objectives Basic setup: d i d o r u y G c (s) G(s) n control
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 9 Solutions. HW 9 Solutions. 10(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
1. Pole Placement Given the following open-loop plant, HW 9 Solutions G(s) = 1(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) design the state-variable feedback controller u = Kx + r, where K = [k 1 k 2 k 3 ] is the feedback
More informationAutonomous Mobile Robot Design
Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic: Guidance and Control Introduction and PID Loops Dr. Kostas Alexis (CSE) Autonomous Robot Challenges How do I control where to go? Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic:
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationPrinciples of Optimal Control Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 16.323 Principles of Optimal Control Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 16.323 Lecture
More information6.1 Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K., the closed-loop characteristic equation is K + z 0.
6. Sketch the z-domain root locus and find the critical gain for the following systems K (i) Gz () z 4. (ii) Gz K () ( z+ 9. )( z 9. ) (iii) Gz () Kz ( z. )( z ) (iv) Gz () Kz ( + 9. ) ( z. )( z 8. ) (i)
More informationEngraving Machine Example
Engraving Machine Example MCE44 - Fall 8 Dr. Richter November 24, 28 Basic Design The X-axis of the engraving machine has the transfer function G(s) = s(s + )(s + 2) In this basic example, we use a proportional
More informationECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 7 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW7 AP9.5 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = K(s +.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) (1) and unity negative feedback.
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More information5. Observer-based Controller Design
EE635 - Control System Theory 5. Observer-based Controller Design Jitkomut Songsiri state feedback pole-placement design regulation and tracking state observer feedback observer design LQR and LQG 5-1
More informationReview: transient and steady-state response; DC gain and the FVT Today s topic: system-modeling diagrams; prototype 2nd-order system
Plan of the Lecture Review: transient and steady-state response; DC gain and the FVT Today s topic: system-modeling diagrams; prototype 2nd-order system Plan of the Lecture Review: transient and steady-state
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems
Topic #17 16.30/31 Feedback Control Systems Improving the transient performance of the LQ Servo Feedforward Control Architecture Design DOFB Servo Handling saturations in DOFB Fall 2010 16.30/31 17 1 LQ
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #4 16.31 Feedback Control Stability in the Frequency Domain Nyquist Stability Theorem Examples Appendix (details) This is the basis of future robustness tests. Fall 2007 16.31 4 2 Frequency Stability
More informationTime Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuous-time, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
More informationProfessor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley
Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 6.2 Solutions. PI Controller For the system G = K (s+)(s+3)(s+8) HW 6.2 Solutions in negative feedback operating at a damping ratio of., we are going to design a PI controller
More informationMODERN CONTROL DESIGN
CHAPTER 8 MODERN CONTROL DESIGN The classical design techniques of Chapters 6 and 7 are based on the root-locus and frequency response that utilize only the plant output for feedback with a dynamic controller
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationMeeting Design Specs using Root Locus
Meeting Design Specs using Root Locus So far, we have Lead compensators which cancel a pole and move it left, speeding up the root locus. PID compensators which add a zero at s=0 and add zero, one, or
More informationECSE 4962 Control Systems Design. A Brief Tutorial on Control Design
ECSE 4962 Control Systems Design A Brief Tutorial on Control Design Instructor: Professor John T. Wen TA: Ben Potsaid http://www.cat.rpi.edu/~wen/ecse4962s04/ Don t Wait Until The Last Minute! You got
More information] [ 200. ] 3 [ 10 4 s. [ ] s + 10 [ P = s [ 10 8 ] 3. s s (s 1)(s 2) series compensator ] 2. s command pre-filter [ 0.
EEE480 Exam 2, Spring 204 A.A. Rodriguez Rules: Calculators permitted, One 8.5 sheet, closed notes/books, open minds GWC 352, 965-372 Problem (Analysis of a Feedback System) Consider the feedback system
More informationPositioning Servo Design Example
Positioning Servo Design Example 1 Goal. The goal in this design example is to design a control system that will be used in a pick-and-place robot to move the link of a robot between two positions. Usually
More informationThe output voltage is given by,
71 The output voltage is given by, = (3.1) The inductor and capacitor values of the Boost converter are derived by having the same assumption as that of the Buck converter. Now the critical value of the
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Illinois Institute of Technology Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering.4 Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #9 Solution Posted: Sunday, Dec., 7. The.4 Tower system. The system parameters are
More informationOverview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros)
Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationTime Response of Systems
Chapter 0 Time Response of Systems 0. Some Standard Time Responses Let us try to get some impulse time responses just by inspection: Poles F (s) f(t) s-plane Time response p =0 s p =0,p 2 =0 s 2 t p =
More informationAnalysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain
Chapter 6 Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain 6. Concepts of feedback control Given a system, we can classify it as an open loop or a closed loop depends on the usage of the feedback.
More informationDigital Control: Summary # 7
Digital Control: Summary # 7 Proportional, integral and derivative control where K i is controller parameter (gain). It defines the ratio of the control change to the control error. Note that e(k) 0 u(k)
More information1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole
EECS C8/ME C34 Fall Problem Set 9 Solutions (3 pts) Dominant Pole For the following transfer function: Y (s) U(s) = (s + )(s + ) a) Give state space description of the system in parallel form (ẋ = Ax +
More informationStability of CL System
Stability of CL System Consider an open loop stable system that becomes unstable with large gain: At the point of instability, K( j) G( j) = 1 0dB K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) K( j) G( j) =± 180 o 180 o Closed
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 5
Outline Outline Outline 1 What is 2 Outline What is Why use? Sketching a 1 What is Why use? Sketching a 2 Gain Controller Lead Compensation Lag Compensation What is Properties of a General System Why use?
More informationClassify a transfer function to see which order or ramp it can follow and with which expected error.
Dr. J. Tani, Prof. Dr. E. Frazzoli 5-059-00 Control Systems I (Autumn 208) Exercise Set 0 Topic: Specifications for Feedback Systems Discussion: 30.. 208 Learning objectives: The student can grizzi@ethz.ch,
More informationGoals for today 2.004
Goals for today Block diagrams revisited Block diagram components Block diagram cascade Summing and pickoff junctions Feedback topology Negative vs positive feedback Example of a system with feedback Derivation
More informationPole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsa-lab, CNRS-INPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsa-lab.fr www.gipsa-lab.fr/ o.sename -based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY
Open-Loop controller An Open-Loop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, non-linear dynamics and parameter
More information1 Steady State Error (30 pts)
Professor Fearing EECS C28/ME C34 Problem Set Fall 2 Steady State Error (3 pts) Given the following continuous time (CT) system ] ẋ = A x + B u = x + 2 7 ] u(t), y = ] x () a) Given error e(t) = r(t) y(t)
More informationEE363 homework 2 solutions
EE363 Prof. S. Boyd EE363 homework 2 solutions. Derivative of matrix inverse. Suppose that X : R R n n, and that X(t is invertible. Show that ( d d dt X(t = X(t dt X(t X(t. Hint: differentiate X(tX(t =
More informationReturn Difference Function and Closed-Loop Roots Single-Input/Single-Output Control Systems
Spectral Properties of Linear- Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 2018! Stability margins of single-input/singleoutput (SISO) systems! Characterizations
More informationECE 3793 Matlab Project 3
ECE 3793 Matlab Project 3 Spring 2017 Dr. Havlicek DUE: 04/25/2017, 11:59 PM What to Turn In: Make one file that contains your solution for this assignment. It can be an MS WORD file or a PDF file. Make
More informationD(s) G(s) A control system design definition
R E Compensation D(s) U Plant G(s) Y Figure 7. A control system design definition x x x 2 x 2 U 2 s s 7 2 Y Figure 7.2 A block diagram representing Eq. (7.) in control form z U 2 s z Y 4 z 2 s z 2 3 Figure
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 8 - Solutions HW 8 - Solutions. Transient Response Design via Gain Adjustment For a transfer function G(s) = in negative feedback, find the gain to yield a 5% s(s+2)(s+85) overshoot
More information6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN
6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN When the whole sate vector is not available for feedback, i.e, we can measure only y = Cx. 6.1 Review of observer design Recall from the first class in linear systems that a simple
More information(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =
126 INTRDUCTIN T CNTR ENGINEERING 10( s 1) (a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: (. 02s 1)(. 001s 1) (b) Find the expected percent overshoot for a step input for the closed-loop system
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationPrinciples of Optimal Control Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 16.323 Principles of Optimal Control Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 16.323 Lecture
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS
Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table
More informationTopic # /31 Feedback Control Systems. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #15 16.3/31 Feedback Control Systems State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Reading: FPE 7.6 Fall 21 16.3/31 15 2 Combined
More informationTransient Response of a Second-Order System
Transient Response of a Second-Order System ECEN 830 Spring 01 1. Introduction In connection with this experiment, you are selecting the gains in your feedback loop to obtain a well-behaved closed-loop
More informationChapter 12. Feedback Control Characteristics of Feedback Systems
Chapter 1 Feedbac Control Feedbac control allows a system dynamic response to be modified without changing any system components. Below, we show an open-loop system (a system without feedbac) and a closed-loop
More informationCHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION
CHAPTER 7 : BODE PLOTS AND GAIN ADJUSTMENTS COMPENSATION Objectives Students should be able to: Draw the bode plots for first order and second order system. Determine the stability through the bode plots.
More informationSolution to HW State-feedback control of the motor with load (from text problem 1.3) (t) I a (t) V a (t) J L.
EE/ME 7: Advanced Linear Systems Solution Solution to HW Name On each item, grading is, or (full points, /2 points, points) EE/ME 7: Advanced Linear Systems Solution State-feedback control of the motor
More informationSome New Results on Linear Quadratic Regulator Design for Lossless Systems
Some New Results on Linear Quadratic Regulator Design for Lossless Systems Luigi Fortuna, Giovanni Muscato Maria Gabriella Xibilia Dipartimento Elettrico Elettronico e Sistemistico Universitá degli Studi
More informationControl System Design
ELEC4410 Control System Design Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States and Discrete-Time Control Design Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
More informationECE 3793 Matlab Project 3 Solution
ECE 3793 Matlab Project 3 Solution Spring 27 Dr. Havlicek. (a) In text problem 9.22(d), we are given X(s) = s + 2 s 2 + 7s + 2 4 < Re {s} < 3. The following Matlab statements determine the partial fraction
More informationLecture 10. Numerical Solution in Matlab
6. Lecture Numerical Solution in Matlab Spr 6 6. Numerical Solutions Most of the problems of interest so far have been complicated by the need to solve a two point boundary value problem. That plus the
More informationSoftware Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques
Software Engineering 3DX3 Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques Dr. Ryan Leduc Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Material based on Control Systems Engineering by N. Nise. c 2006, 2007
More informationPlan of the Lecture. Goal: wrap up lead and lag control; start looking at frequency response as an alternative methodology for control systems design.
Plan of the Lecture Review: design using Root Locus; dynamic compensation; PD and lead control Today s topic: PI and lag control; introduction to frequency-response design method Goal: wrap up lead and
More information1 x(k +1)=(Φ LH) x(k) = T 1 x 2 (k) x1 (0) 1 T x 2(0) T x 1 (0) x 2 (0) x(1) = x(2) = x(3) =
567 This is often referred to as Þnite settling time or deadbeat design because the dynamics will settle in a Þnite number of sample periods. This estimator always drives the error to zero in time 2T or
More informationCDS 101/110: Lecture 3.1 Linear Systems
CDS /: Lecture 3. Linear Systems Goals for Today: Describe and motivate linear system models: Summarize properties, examples, and tools Joel Burdick (substituting for Richard Murray) jwb@robotics.caltech.edu,
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall K(s +1)(s +2) G(s) =.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering. Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #7 Solution Posted: Friday, Nov., 7. Nise problem 5 from chapter 8, page 76. Answer:
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014
EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014 December 19, 2014 Your PRINTED FULL NAME Your STUDENT ID NUMBER Number of additional sheets 1. No computers, no tablets, no connected device (phone etc.) 2. Pocket
More informationCourse roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system
ME45: Control Systems Lecture Time response of nd-order systems Prof. Clar Radcliffe and Prof. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Modeling Laplace transform Transfer
More informationToday (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
More information2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 2.004 Dynamics and Control II Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8 I * * Massachusetts
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 8: Response Characteristics Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Characteristics of the Response Stability Real Poles
More informationControl Systems. University Questions
University Questions UNIT-1 1. Distinguish between open loop and closed loop control system. Describe two examples for each. (10 Marks), Jan 2009, June 12, Dec 11,July 08, July 2009, Dec 2010 2. Write
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationDue Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5
Due Wednesday, February 6th EE/MFS 599 HW #5 You may use Matlab/Simulink wherever applicable. Consider the standard, unity-feedback closed loop control system shown below where G(s) = /[s q (s+)(s+9)]
More informationUNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS
ENG0016 UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING BENG (HONS) IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SEMESTER 1 EXAMINATION 2017/2018 ADVANCED BIOMECHATRONIC SYSTEMS MODULE NO: BME6003 Date: Friday 19 January 2018
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Dynamic Response
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Dynamic Response Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. . Previous Class...........
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #7 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems What are state-space models? Why should we use them? How are they related to the transfer functions used in classical control design and how do we develop
More informationDepartment of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering M. E- CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERING CL7101 CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN Unit I- BASICS AND ROOT-LOCUS DESIGN PART-A (2 marks) 1. What are the
More information9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design
9. Two-Degrees-of-Freedom Design In some feedback schemes we have additional degrees-offreedom outside the feedback path. For example, feed forwarding known disturbance signals or reference signals. In
More informationSuppose that we have a specific single stage dynamic system governed by the following equation:
Dynamic Optimisation Discrete Dynamic Systems A single stage example Suppose that we have a specific single stage dynamic system governed by the following equation: x 1 = ax 0 + bu 0, x 0 = x i (1) where
More informationChapter 5 HW Solution
Chapter 5 HW Solution Review Questions. 1, 6. As usual, I think these are just a matter of text lookup. 1. Name the four components of a block diagram for a linear, time-invariant system. Let s see, I
More informationPrinciples of Optimal Control Spring 2008
MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 16.323 Principles of Optimal Control Spring 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 16.323 Lecture
More informationTransient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n
Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2
More informationDigital Control: Part 2. ENGI 7825: Control Systems II Andrew Vardy
Digital Control: Part 2 ENGI 7825: Control Systems II Andrew Vardy Mapping the s-plane onto the z-plane We re almost ready to design a controller for a DT system, however we will have to consider where
More informationControl of Manufacturing Processes
Control of Manufacturing Processes Subject 2.830 Spring 2004 Lecture #18 Basic Control Loop Analysis" April 15, 2004 Revisit Temperature Control Problem τ dy dt + y = u τ = time constant = gain y ss =
More information