Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems


 Blaise Hunt
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems
2 Transfer Functions Transfer functions of CT systems can be found from analysis of Differential Equations Block Diagrams Circuit Diagrams 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 2
3 Transfer Functions A circuit can be described by a system of differential equations L d dt R t L d d 1i 1 i1t i2t ()+ ( ()) ( ()) vg t dt dt = () t d i t i t 1 2() ( 1 ) i2 d vc 0 R2i2 t 0 dt C λ λ ( ) () + ( ) + ( )+ ()= 0 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 3
4 Transfer Functions Using the Laplace transform, a circuit can be described by a system of algebraic equations ()+ () ()= () R I s sl I s sl I s V s sl I s sl I 1 s sc I s R I s () ()+ ()+ ()= 0 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 4 g
5 Transfer Functions A circuit can even be described by a block diagram. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 5
6 Transfer Functions A mechanical system can be described by a system of differential equations () d 1 ( ) s1[ 1() 2() ]= 1 1 ( ) Ks1[ x1() t x2() t ] Ks2x2()= t m2x ( 2 t) f t K x t K x t x t m x t or a system of algebraic equations. () d 1() s1[ 1() 2() ]= 1 1() s1[ 1() 2() ] s2 2()= 2 2() 2 F s K sx s K X s X s m s X s 2 K X s X s K X s m s X s 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 6
7 Transfer Functions The mechanical system can also be described by a block diagram. Time Domain Frequency Domain 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 7
8 System Stability System stability is very important A continuoustime LTI system is stable if its impulse response is absolutely integrable This translates into the frequency domain as the requirement that all the poles of the system transfer function must lie in the open left halfplane of the s plane (pp ) Open left halfplane means not including the ω axis 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 8
9 System Interconnections Cascade Parallel 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 9
10 E(s) System Interconnections Error signal Feedback () H 1 s Forward path transfer function or the plant () H 2 s Feedback path transfer function or the sensor. ()= () () T s H1 s H2 s Loop transfer function H E()= s X() s H2() s Y() s Y()= s H1() s E() s Y s H s ()= s () X() s = 1() 1+ H1() s H2() s T()= s H1() s H2() s H1() s H()= s 1+ T() s 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 10
11 Analysis of Feedback Systems Beneficial Effects H ()= K s + KH () s If K is large enough that KH 2 ()>> s 1 then H() s. This H s means that the overall system is the approximate inverse of the system in the feedback path. This kind of system can be useful for reversing the effects of another system. 2 () 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 11
12 Analysis of Feedback Systems A very important example of feedback systems is an electronic amplifier based on an operational amplifier Let the operational amplifier gain be H 1 ()= s () Vo s A Ve () s = 1 0 s p 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 12
13 Analysis of Feedback Systems The amplifier can be modeled as a feedback system with this block diagram. The overall gain can be written as V V () s A Z f s () s = () s 1 + A0 Zi s 1 p 0 0 i ()+ s Zf() s p 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 13
14 Analysis of Feedback Systems If the operational amplifier lowfrequency gain,, is very large (which it usually is) then the overall amplifier gain reduces at lowfrequencies to V Z 0() s f s V() s () Z s i i () A 0 the gain formula based on an ideal operational amplifier. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 14
15 Analysis of Feedback Systems 7 If A = 10 and p= 100 then H ( j100)= j If A = 10 and p= 100 then H ( j100)= j The change in overall system gain is about 0.001% for a change in openloop gain of a factor of 10. The halfpower bandwidth of the operational amplifier itself is 15.9 Hz (100/2π). The halfpower bandwidth of the overall amplifier is approximately 14.5 MHz, an increase in bandwidth of a factor of approximately 910,000. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 15
16 Analysis of Feedback Systems Feedback can stabilize an unstable system. Let a forwardpath transfer function be 1 H 1()= s, p > s p This system is unstable because it has a pole in the right halfplane. If we then connect feedback with a transfer function, K, a constant, the overall system gain becomes H s 1 s p K ()= + and, if K > p, the overall system is now stable. 0 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 16
17 Analysis of Feedback Systems Feedback can make an unstable system stable but it can also make a stable system unstable. Even though all the poles of the forward and feedback systems may be in the open left halfplane, the poles of the overall feedback system can be in the right halfplane. A familiar example of this kind of instability caused by feedback is a public address system. If the amplifier gain is set too high the system will go unstable and oscillate, usually with a very annoying highpitched tone. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 17
18 Analysis of Feedback Systems As the amplifier gain is increased, any sound entering the microphone makes a stronger sound from the speaker until, at some gain level, the returned sound from the speaker is a large as the originating sound into the microphone. At that point the system goes unstable (pp ). Public Address System 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 18
19 Analysis of Feedback Systems Stable Oscillation Using Feedback Prototype Feedback System Feedback System Without Excitation 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 19
20 Analysis of Feedback Systems Stable Oscillation Using Feedback Can the response be nonzero when the excitation is zero? Yes, if the overall system gain is infinite. If the system transfer function has a pole pair on the ωaxis, then the transfer function is infinite at the frequency of that pole pair and there can be a response without an excitation. In practical terms the trick is to be sure the poles stay on the ω axis. If the poles move into the left halfplane the response attenuates with time. If the poles move into the right halfplane the response grows with time (until the system goes nonlinear). 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 20
21 Analysis of Feedback Systems Stable Oscillation Using Feedback A real example of a system that oscillates stably is a laser. In a laser the forward path is an optical amplifier. The feedback action is provided by putting mirrors at each end of the optical amplifier. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 21
22 Analysis of Feedback Systems Stable Oscillation Using Feedback Laser action begins when a photon is spontaneously emitted from the pumped medium in a direction normal to the mirrors. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 22
23 Analysis of Feedback Systems Stable Oscillation Using Feedback If the roundtrip gain of the combination of pumped laser medium and mirrors is unity, sustained oscillation of light will occur. For that to occur the wavelength of the light must fit into the distance between mirrors an integer number of times. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 23
24 Analysis of Feedback Systems Stable Oscillation Using Feedback A laser can be modeled by a block diagram in which the K s represent the gain of the pumped medium or the reflection or transmission coefficient at a mirror, L is the distance between mirrors and c is the speed of light. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 24
25 Analysis of Feedback Systems The RouthHurwitz Stability Test The RouthHurwitz Stability Test is a method for determining the stability of a system if its transfer function is expressed as a ratio of polynomials in s. Let the numerator be N(s) and let the denominator be D D 1 D()= s a s + a s + L+ a s+ a D D /10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 25
26 Analysis of Feedback Systems The RouthHurwitz Stability Test The first step is to construct the Routh array. D a a a L a D D 2 D 4 0 D 1 a a a L 0 D 1 D 3 D 5 D 2 b b b L 0 D 2 D 4 D 6 D 3 c c c L 0 D 3 D 5 D 7 M M M M M M 2 d d e f D even D a a a L a D D 2 D 4 1 D 1 a a a L a D 1 D 3 D 5 0 D 2 b b b L 0 D 2 D 4 D 6 D 3 c c c L 0 D 3 D 5 D 7 M M M M M M 2 d d e f D odd 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 26
27 Analysis of Feedback Systems The RouthHurwitz Stability Test The first two rows contain the coefficients of the denominator polynomial. The entries in the following row are found by the formulas, b D 2 = a a D a a a D 2 D 1 D 3 D 1 b D 4 = a a D a a a D 4 D 1 D 5 The entries on succeeding rows are computed by the same process based on previous row entries. If there are any zeros or sign changes in the a D column, the system is unstable. The number of sign changes in the column is the number of poles in the right halfplane (pp ). D /10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 27
28 Analysis of Feedback Systems Root Locus Common Type of Feedback System System Transfer Function H()= s 1 KH1() s + KH () s H () s 1 2 ()= () () Loop Transfer Function T s KH s H s 1 2 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 28
29 Analysis of Feedback Systems Root Locus Poles of H(s) Zeros of 1 + T(s) T is of the form T P s K s Q s ()= () () () () P Poles of H(s) Zeros of 1 + K s Q s Poles of H(s) Q()+ s KP()= s 0 or Q() s + P ()= s 0 K 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 29
30 Analysis of Feedback Systems Root Locus K can range from zero to infinity. For K approaching zero, using Q s KP s ()+ ()= 0 the poles of H are the same as the zeros of Q()= s 0 which are the poles of T. For K approaching infinity, using Q() s + P ()= s 0 K the poles of H are the same as the zeros of P()= s 0 which are the zeros of T. So the poles of H start on the poles of T and terminate on the zeros of T, some of which may be at infinity. The curves traced by these pole locations as K is varied are called the root locus. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 30
31 Analysis of Feedback Systems Root Locus K Let H 1 ()= s and let H. s+ 1 s 2 2 ()= s 1 Then ()= T s ( )( + ) K s+ 1( s 2) Root Locus ( ) + No matter how large K gets this system is stable because the poles always lie in the left halfplane (although for large K the system may be very underdamped). 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 31
32 Analysis of Feedback Systems Root Locus Let K H 1 ()= s s+ 1 s 2 s 3 ()= and let H 2 s 1. ( )( + )( + ) Root Locus At some finite value of K the system becomes unstable because two poles move into the right halfplane. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 32
33 Analysis of Feedback Systems Root Locus Four Rules for Drawing a Root Locus 1. Each rootlocus branch begins on a pole of T and terminates on a zero of T. 2. Any portion of the real axis for which the sum of the number of real poles and/or real zeros lying to its right on the real axis is odd, is a part of the root locus. 3. The root locus is symmetrical about the real axis... 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 33
34 Analysis of Feedback Systems Root Locus.. 4. If the number of finite poles of T exceeds the number of finite zeros of T by an integer, m, then m branches of the root locus terminate on zeros of T which lie at infinity. Each of these branches approaches a straightline asymptote and the angles of these asymptotes are at the angles, kπ, k = 135,,,... m with respect to the positive real axis. These asymptotes intersect on the real axis at the location, σ = 1 ( finite poles finite zeros) m 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 34
35 Analysis of Feedback Systems Root Locus Examples 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 35
36 Analysis of Feedback Systems Gain and Phase Margin Real systems are usually designed with a margin of error to allow for small parameter variations and still be stable. That margin can be viewed as a gain margin or a phase margin. System instability occurs if, for any real ω, T( jω)= 1 a number with a magnitude of one and a phase of π radians. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 36
37 Analysis of Feedback Systems Gain and Phase Margin So to be guaranteed stable, a system must have a T whose magnitude, as a function of frequency, is less than one when the phase hits π or, seen another way, T must have a phase, as a function of frequency, more positive than  π for all T greater than one. The difference between the a magnitude of T of 0 db and the magnitude of T when the phase hits  π is the gain margin. The difference between the phase of T when the magnitude hits 0 db and a phase of  π is the phase margin. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 37
38 Analysis of Feedback Systems Gain and Phase Margin 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 38
39 Analysis of Feedback Systems SteadyState Tracking Errors in UnityGain Feedback Systems A very common type of feedback system is the unitygain feedback connection. The aim of this type of system is to make the response track the excitation. When the error signal is zero, the excitation and response are equal. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 39
40 Analysis of Feedback Systems SteadyState Tracking Errors in UnityGain Feedback Systems The Laplace transform of the error signal is E()= s () X s + H () s 1 1 The steadystate value of this signal is (using the finalvalue theorem) lim e lim E lim X () s ()= t s ()= s s t s 0 s 0 1 H s u( ) + () If the excitation is the unit step, A t, then the steadystate error is A lim e t lim t s 0 1 H s ()= + () 1 1 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 40
41 Analysis of Feedback Systems SteadyState Tracking Errors in UnityGain Feedback Systems If the forward transfer function is in the common form, N N 1 2 bn s + bn 1s + Lb2s + bs 1 + b0 H 1 ()= s D D 1 2 as D + ad 1s + Las 2 + as 1 + a0 then 1 a0 lim e()= t lim N N 1 2 = t s 0 bn s + bn 1s + Lb2s + bs 1 + b0 a0 + b0 1+ D D 1 2 as D + ad 1s + Las 2 + as 1 + a0 If a 0 = 0 and b 0 0 the steadystate error is zero and the forward transfer function can be written as N N 1 2 bn s + bn 1s + b2s + bs 1 + b0 H 1 ()= s 1 2 sas ( D D D + ad 1s + as 2 + a) L 1 which has a pole at s = 0. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 41 L
42 Analysis of Feedback Systems SteadyState Tracking Errors in UnityGain Feedback Systems If the forward transfer function of a unitygain feedback system has a pole at zero and the system is stable, the steadystate error with step excitation is zero. This type of system is called a type 1 system (one pole at s = 0 in the forward transfer function). If there are no poles at s = 0, it is called a type 0 system and the steadystate error with step excitation is nonzero. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 42
43 Analysis of Feedback Systems SteadyState Tracking Errors in UnityGain Feedback Systems The steadystate error with ramp excitation is Infinite for a stable type 0 system Finite and nonzero for a stable type 1 system Zero for a stable type 2 system (2 poles at s = 0 in the forward transfer function) 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 43
44 Block Diagram Reduction It is possible, by a series of operations, to reduce a complicated block diagram down to a single block. Moving a PickOff Point 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 44
45 Block Diagram Reduction Moving a Summer 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 45
46 Block Diagram Reduction Combining Two Summers 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 46
47 Block Diagram Reduction Move PickOff Point 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 47
48 Block Diagram Reduction Move Summer 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 48
49 Block Diagram Reduction Combine Summers 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 49
50 Block Diagram Reduction Combine Parallel Blocks 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 50
51 Block Diagram Reduction Combine Cascaded Blocks 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 51
52 Block Diagram Reduction Reduce Feedback Loop 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 52
53 Block Diagram Reduction Combine Cascaded Blocks 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 53
54 Definitions: Mason s Theorem Number of Paths from Input to Output  N p Number of Feedback Loops  N L Transfer Function of ith Path from Input to Output  P i () s Loop transfer Function of ith Feedback Loop  T i () s N L i i j i j k i= 1 ith loopand ith, jth, kth j th loop not loops not sharing a signal sharing a signal ()= + ()+ () ()+ () () ()+ s 1 T s T s T s T s T s T s L 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 54
55 Mason s Theorem The overall system transfer function is H()= s N p i= 1 P () s () s i () s i () where i () s is the same as s except that all feedback loops which share a signal with the ith path, P i () s, are excluded. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 55
56 Mason s Theorem 10 P 1 ()= s s ()= + 1 P 2 s s 3 ()= + s H()= s N p i= 1 N p = 2 N L = ss+ 8 = 1+ 3 s s+ Pi() s i() s = () s ( 8) s s ss+ 8 ( ) ()= ()= 1 s 2 s 1 s+ 8 11s 30 2 s+ 3 s 8s 3 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 56 = ( )( + ) ( ) + + ( )
57 System Responses to Standard Signals N s Let H s be proper in s. Then the Laplace transform D s ()= () () of the unit step response is Y()= s H ()= s 1 N() s N s sd() s = 1() D s () + If the system is stable, the inverse Laplace transform of is called the transient response and the steadystate ( ) H0 response is. s Unit Step Response K s K = H0 ( ) () () N s 1 D s 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 57
58 System Responses to Standard Signals N s Let H s be proper in s. If the Laplace transform of the D s ()= () () excitation is some general excitation, X(s), then the Laplace transform of the response is N s Y D X N ()= s () s s D () s ()= () () s N D x x () s N s N x s () s = 1() D() s + 1() Dx() s same poles as system same poles as excitation 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 58
59 System Responses to Standard Signals Unit Step Response A Let H()= s. Then the unit step response is y s 1 p ()= ( ) () pt t A 1 e u t 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 59
60 System Responses to Standard Signals Let Unit Step Response ()= Η s s 2 2 Aω 0 + 2ζω s+ ω (pp ) 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 60
61 System Responses to Standard Signals Let ()= Η s s 2 2 Aω 0 + 2ζω s+ ω Unit Step Response /10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 61
62 System Responses to Standard Signals ()= () () N s Let H s be proper in s. If the excitation is a suddenly D s applied, unitamplitude cosine, the response is N s Y()= s () D s s which can be reduced and inverse Laplace transformed into (pp ) y()= t N D L 1 1 () s () s If the system is stable, the steadystate response is a sinusoid of same frequency as the excitation but, generally, a different magnitude and phase. s 2 () + 2 ω 0 ( ) () H jω cos ω t H jω u t + ( 0) 0 + ( 0) 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 62
63 PoleZero Diagrams and Frequency Response If the transfer function of a system is H(s), the frequency response is H(jω). The most common type of transfer function is of the form, ( H s A s z s z s z 1) ( 2) L( N ) ()= s p s p L s p Therefore H(jω) is ( )( ) ( ) 1 2 ( )( ) ( N ) ( )( ) ( ) H j A j ω z j z j z 1 ω 2 L ω ( ω)= jω p jω p L jω p 1 2 D D 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 63
64 Let H s H( jω)= PoleZero Diagrams and ()= + 3 Frequency Response s s 3 jω 3 jω + 3 The numerator, jω, and the denominator, jω + 3, can be conceived as vectors in the s plane. ( ) = H jω 3 jω jω + 3 ( ) H( jω)= { 3+ jω jω + 3 = 0 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 64
65 PoleZero Diagrams and Frequency Response lim H( jω) = lim ω 0 ω 0 3 jω jω + 3 = 0 lim H( jω) = lim + + ω 0 ω 0 3 jω jω + 3 = 0 lim H( j ω) = ω lim ω 3 jω jω + 3 = 3 lim H( j ω) = ω + lim ω + 3 jω jω + 3 = 3 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 65
66 PoleZero Diagrams and Frequency Response π π lim H( jω)= 0 = ω lim π H ( jω )= 0 = + ω 0 2 π 2 lim ω π π H( j ω)= 2 2 = 0 lim H ( j π π ω )= = 0 ω /10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 66
67 Butterworth Filters The squared magnitude of the transfer function of an nth order, unitygain, lowpass Butterworth filter with a corner frequency of 1 radian/s is 2 ( ) = 1 + ω H jω 1 2n This is called a normalized Butterworth filter because its gain is normalized to one and its corner frequency is normalized to 1 radian/s. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 67
68 Butterworth Filters A Butterworth filter transfer function has no finite zeros and the poles all lie on a semicircle in the lefthalf plane whose radius is the corner frequency in radians/s and the angle between the pole locations is always π/n radians. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 68
69 Butterworth Filters Frequency Transformations A normalized lowpass Butterworth filter can be transformed into an unnormalized highpass, bandpass or bandstop Butterworth filter through the following transformations (pp ). Lowpass to Highpass s ω c s Lowpass to Bandpass s 2 s + ωω L s ω ω H H ( ) L Lowpass to Bandstop s ( ) s ωh ω 2 s + ωω L L H 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 69
70 Standard Realizations of Systems There are multiple ways of drawing a system block diagram corresponding to a given transfer function of the form, N k bs k N N Y s k bn s bn s bs b H()= s () 1 N N N X() s = = 0 = L+ + 1 k s + an 1s + L+ a1s+ a0 as k = 0 k 1 0, a N = 1 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 70
71 Standard Realizations of Systems Canonical Form The transfer function can be conceived as the product of two transfer functions, and H H 2 1 ()= s () Y1 s 1 N N 1 X() s = s + a s + L+ a s+ a 1 N Y s N N 1 ()= s () bn s bn 1s bs b Y () s = L 1 0 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 71
72 Standard Realizations of Systems Canonical Form The system can then be realized in this form, 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 72
73 Standard Realizations of Systems Cascade Form The transfer function can be factored into the form, H s A s ()= z s p 1 1 s z s p 2 s zn L L s p s p s p s p 2 N N+ 1 N+ 2 D and each factor can be realized in a small canonicalform subsystem of either of the two forms, and these subsystems can then be cascade connected. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 73
74 Standard Realizations of Systems Cascade Form A problem that arises in the cascade form is that some poles or zeros may be complex. In that case, a complex conjugate pair can be combined into one secondorder subsystem of the form, 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 74
75 Standard Realizations of Systems Parallel Form The transfer function can be expanded in partial fractions of the form, K1 K2 KD H()= s + + L+ s p s p s p 1 Each of these terms describes a subsystem. When all the subsystems are connected in parallel the overall system is realized. 2 D 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 75
76 Standard Realizations of Systems Parallel Form 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 76
77 StateSpace Analysis In larger systems it is important to keep the analysis methods systematic to avoid errors One popular method for doing this is through the use of state variables State variables are signals in a system which, together with the excitations, completely characterize the state of the system As the system changes dynamically the state variables change value and the system moves on a trajectory through state space 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 77
78 StateSpace Analysis State space is an Ndimensional space where N is the order of the system The order of a system is the number of state variables needed to characterize it State variables are not unique, there can be multiple correct sets 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 78
79 StateSpace Analysis There are several advantages to statespace analysis Reduction of the probability of analysis errors Complete description of the system signals Insight into system dynamics Can be formulated using matrix methods and the system state can be expressed in two matrix equations Combined with transform methods it is very powerful 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 79
80 StateSpace Analysis To illustrate statespace methods, let the system be this circuit Let the state variables be the capacitor voltage and the inductor current and let the output signals be v t and i t. out () () R 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 80
81 StateSpace Analysis Two differential equations in the two state variables, called the state equations, characterize the circuit, i ()= t v () t L 1 L C 1 v i v i C t G 1 C C ()= t () ()+ t () t C L C in Two more equations called the output equations define the responses in terms of the state variables, v out ()= t v () t i t Gv t C R ()= () C 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 81
82 StateSpace Analysis The state equations can be written in matrix form as i v L() t () t C = 0 1 C 1 L G C i v () t () t C [ iin() t ] and the output equations can be written in matrix form as v i out R () t () t i = G v L C L C () t () t iin t + 0 () 0 [ ] 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 82
83 StateSpace Analysis A block diagram for the system can be drawn directly from the state and output equations. 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 83
84 StateSpace Analysis The state and output equations can be written compactly as q ( t)= Aq()+ t Bx() t where ()= q t i v L C () t () t ()= y t y()= t Cq()+ t Dx() t 1 0 A = L B = G C C C vout() t R() t C = 0 1 i 0 G D = 0 0 [ in ] x()= t i () t 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 84
85 StateSpace Analysis The solution of the state and output equations can be found using the Laplace transform. sq() s q( + 0 )= AQ()+ s BX() s or [ si A] Q()= s BX()+ s q( + 0 ) Multiplying both sides by si A ()= [ ] 1 () [ ] 1 [ ] 1 ()+ ( 0 + ) [ ] Q s si A BX s q The matrix, si A, is conventionally designated by the symbol, Φ s. Then ()= ()[ ()+ ( )]= () ()+ ()( ) + + Q s Φ s BX s q 0 Φ s BX s Φ s q zero state response zero input response 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 85
86 StateSpace Analysis The timedomain solution is then + ()= () ()+ ()( ) q t φ t Bx t φ t q zero state response zero input response L where φ() t Φ s and φ t is called the state transition matrix. () () 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 86
87 StateSpace Analysis To make the example concrete, let the excitation and initial conditions be and let i()= t Au() t q( + 0 )= 1 R=, C = 1, L = 1 3 ( ) = Φ()= s si A 1 1 s L 1 C s G + C 1 i v = ( + 0 ) L + C 0 ( ) 0 = 1 G 1 s + C L 1 s C 2 G s + C s 1 + LC 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 87
88 StateSpace Analysis Solving for the states in the Laplace domain, ()= Q s slc s C s G C s 1 G L s LC C s LC 1 s + G C s 1 G + + s + LC C s 1 + LC Substituting in numerical component values, ()= Q s 1 ss ( + s+ ) s + 3s+ 1 1 s s + s s + 3s+ 1 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 88
89 StateSpace Analysis Inverse Laplace transforming, the state variables are ()= q t t e e t e e t t u() t and the response is t e e y()= t q x t G + = e e t t u() t or ()= y t t e e t e e t t u() t 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 89
90 StateSpace Analysis In a system in which the initial conditions are zero (the zeroinput response is zero), the matrix transfer function can be found from the state and output equations. or The response is () ( )= ()+ () + sq s q 0 AQ s BX s 123 = 0 1 ()=[ ] ()= () () Q s si A BX s Φ s BX s ()= ()+ ()= () ()+ ()= () + Y s CQ s DX s CΦ s BX s DX s CΦ s B D X s and the matrix transfer function is ()= () + H s CΦ s B D [ ] () 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 90
91 StateSpace Analysis Any set of state variables can be transformed into another valid set through a linear transformation. Let q 1 () t be the initial set and let q 2 t be the new set, related to by Then 1 and using q t T q t, where () q 1 () t q ()= t Tq () t 2 1 ( 2 t)= 1 ( t)= ( 1 1()+ t 1 () t )= 1 1()+ t 1 () t ()= () q Tq T A q B x TA q TB x ( t)= ()+ t ()= t ()+ t () t q TA T q TB x A q B x 2 1 A = TA T B = TB 2 1 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 91
92 StateSpace Analysis By a similar argument, where C = ()= ()+ () y t C q t D x t C T Transformation to a new set of state variables does not change the eigenvalues of the system. D = D 2 1 5/10/04 M. J. Roberts  All Rights Reserved 92
(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationCHAPTER 1 Basic Concepts of Control System. CHAPTER 6 Hydraulic Control System
CHAPTER 1 Basic Concepts of Control System 1. What is open loop control systems and closed loop control systems? Compare open loop control system with closed loop control system. Write down major advantages
More informationChemical Process Dynamics and Control. Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University
Chemical Process Dynamics and Control Aisha Osman Mohamed Ahmed Department of Chemical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Red Sea University 1 Chapter 4 System Stability 2 Chapter Objectives End of this
More information7.4 STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE TO DRAW THE ROOT LOCUS DIAGRAM
ROOT LOCUS TECHNIQUE. Values of on the root loci The value of at any point s on the root loci is determined from the following equation G( s) H( s) Product of lengths of vectors from poles of G( s)h( s)
More informationAlireza Mousavi Brunel University
Alireza Mousavi Brunel University 1 » Control Process» Control Systems Design & Analysis 2 OpenLoop Control: Is normally a simple switch on and switch off process, for example a light in a room is switched
More informationEEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems
EEE 84: Introduction to feedback systems Summary 6 8 8 x 7 7 6 Level() 6 5 4 4 5 5 time(s) 4 6 8 Time (seconds) Fig.. Illustration of BIBO stability: stable system (the input is a unit step) Fig.. step)
More informationLecture 1 Root Locus
Root Locus ELEC304Alper Erdogan 1 1 Lecture 1 Root Locus What is RootLocus? : A graphical representation of closed loop poles as a system parameter varied. Based on RootLocus graph we can choose the
More informationROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)
C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s)  H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closedloop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)
More informationME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Spring 2016 MIDTERM EXAMINATION II
ME 30 CONTROL SYSTEMS Spring 06 Course Instructors Dr. Tuna Balkan, Dr. Kıvanç Azgın, Dr. Ali Emre Turgut, Dr. Yiğit Yazıcıoğlu MIDTERM EXAMINATION II May, 06 Time Allowed: 00 minutes Closed Notes and
More informationGeneralizing the DTFT!
The Transform Generaliing the DTFT! The forward DTFT is defined by X e jω ( ) = x n e jωn in which n= Ω is discretetime radian frequency, a real variable. The quantity e jωn is then a complex sinusoid
More informationFeedback design for the Buck Converter
Feedback design for the Buck Converter Portland State University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland, Oregon, USA December 30, 2009 Abstract In this paper we explore two compensation
More informationDynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis
Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the splane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationReview of Linear TimeInvariant Network Analysis
D1 APPENDIX D Review of Linear TimeInvariant Network Analysis Consider a network with input x(t) and output y(t) as shown in Figure D1. If an input x 1 (t) produces an output y 1 (t), and an input x
More informationa. Closedloop system; b. equivalent transfer function Then the CLTF () T is s the poles of () T are s from a contribution of a
Root Locus Simple definition Locus of points on the s plane that represents the poles of a system as one or more parameter vary. RL and its relation to poles of a closed loop system RL and its relation
More informationTransient Response of a SecondOrder System
Transient Response of a SecondOrder System ECEN 830 Spring 01 1. Introduction In connection with this experiment, you are selecting the gains in your feedback loop to obtain a wellbehaved closedloop
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS BRANCH : ECE YEAR : II SEMESTER: IV 1. What is control system? 2. Define open
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationPower System Operations and Control Prof. S.N. Singh Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur. Module 3 Lecture 8
Power System Operations and Control Prof. S.N. Singh Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur Module 3 Lecture 8 Welcome to lecture number 8 of module 3. In the previous
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a lineartimeinvariant
More informationUnit 7: Part 1: Sketching the Root Locus. Root Locus. Vector Representation of Complex Numbers
Root Locus Root Locus Unit 7: Part 1: Sketching the Root Locus Engineering 5821: Control Systems I Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science Memorial University of Newfoundland 1 Root Locus Vector Representation
More informationSchool of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by:
Root Locus Motivation Sketching Root Locus Examples ME375 Root Locus  1 Servo Table Example DC Motor Position Control The block diagram for position control of the servo table is given by: θ D 0.09 See
More informationI What is root locus. I System analysis via root locus. I How to plot root locus. Root locus (RL) I Uses the poles and zeros of the OL TF
EE C28 / ME C34 Feedback Control Systems Lecture Chapter 8 Root Locus Techniques Lecture abstract Alexandre Bayen Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science University of California Berkeley
More informationKINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
KINGS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK SUB.NAME : CONTROL SYSTEMS STAFF NAME: Mr. P.NARASIMMAN BRANCH : ECE Mr.K.R.VENKATESAN YEAR : II SEMESTER
More informationDefinitions. Decade: A tentoone range of frequency. On a log scale, each 10X change in frequency requires the same distance on the scale.
Circuits II EECS 3220 Lecture notes on making Bode plots Definitions Network Transfer Function: The function H s Xout s X in s where X out represents the voltage or current response of the network to X
More informationSAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequencydomain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a
More information1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise
EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically
More informationLecture 17 Date:
Lecture 17 Date: 27.10.2016 Feedback and Properties, Types of Feedback Amplifier Stability Gain and Phase Margin Modification Elements of Feedback System: (a) The feed forward amplifier [H(s)] ; (b) A
More informationPerformance of Feedback Control Systems
Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steadystate Error and Type 0, Type
More informationSolutions to SkillAssessment Exercises
Solutions to SkillAssessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part
More informationNotes for ECE320. Winter by R. Throne
Notes for ECE3 Winter 45 by R. Throne Contents Table of Laplace Transforms 5 Laplace Transform Review 6. Poles and Zeros.................................... 6. Proper and Strictly Proper Transfer Functions...................
More informationESE319 Introduction to Microelectronics. Feedback Basics
Feedback Basics Stability Feedback concept Feedback in emitter follower Onepole feedback and root locus Frequency dependent feedback and root locus Gain and phase margins Conditions for closed loop stability
More informationLow Pass Filters, Sinusoidal Input, and Steady State Output
Low Pass Filters, Sinusoidal Input, and Steady State Output Jaimie Stephens and Michael Bruce 524 Abstract Discussion of applications and behaviors of low pass filters when presented with a steadystate
More informationELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such
More informationAnalysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain
Chapter 6 Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain 6. Concepts of feedback control Given a system, we can classify it as an open loop or a closed loop depends on the usage of the feedback.
More informationEE482: Digital Signal Processing Applications
Professor Brendan Morris, SEB 3216, brendan.morris@unlv.edu EE482: Digital Signal Processing Applications Spring 2014 TTh 14:3015:45 CBC C222 Lecture 05 IIR Design 14/03/04 http://www.ee.unlv.edu/~b1morris/ee482/
More informationOverview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piecewise linear approximations Firstorder terms Secondorder terms (complex poles & zeros)
Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piecewise linear approximations Firstorder terms Secondorder terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.
More informationCHAPTER 5 : REDUCTION OF MULTIPLE SUBSYSTEMS
CHAPTER 5 : REDUCTION OF MULTIPLE SUBSYSTEMS Objectives Students should be able to: Reduce a block diagram of multiple subsystems to a single block representing the transfer function from input to output
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationTransient response via gain adjustment. Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = 2. The closed loop transfer function is. s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2 n
Design via frequency response Transient response via gain adjustment Consider a unity feedback system, where G(s) = ωn 2. The closed loop transfer function is s(s+2ζω n ) T(s) = ω 2 n s 2 + 2ζωs + ω 2
More informationLearn2Control Laboratory
Learn2Control Laboratory Version 3.2 Summer Term 2014 1 This Script is for use in the scope of the Process Control lab. It is in no way claimed to be in any scientific way complete or unique. Errors should
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY
OpenLoop controller An OpenLoop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, nonlinear dynamics and parameter
More informationRoot Locus Methods. The root locus procedure
Root Locus Methods Design of a position control system using the root locus method Design of a phase lag compensator using the root locus method The root locus procedure To determine the value of the gain
More informationFEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS
FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and ClosedLoop Control Systems 3. Why ClosedLoop Control? 4. Case Study  Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. SteadyState Errors in Unity Feedback Control
More informationHomework 7  Solutions
Homework 7  Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationCONTROL SYSTEM STABILITY. CHARACTERISTIC EQUATION: The overall transfer function for a. where A B X Y are polynomials. Substitution into the TF gives:
CONTROL SYSTEM STABILITY CHARACTERISTIC EQUATION: The overall transfer function for a feedback control system is: TF = G / [1+GH]. The G and H functions can be put into the form: G(S) = A(S) / B(S) H(S)
More informationAnalysis of DiscreteTime Systems
TU Berlin DiscreteTime Control Systems 1 Analysis of DiscreteTime Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin DiscreteTime
More informationPoles, Zeros and System Response
Time Response After the engineer obtains a mathematical representation of a subsystem, the subsystem is analyzed for its transient and steady state responses to see if these characteristics yield the desired
More informationTime Response of Systems
Chapter 0 Time Response of Systems 0. Some Standard Time Responses Let us try to get some impulse time responses just by inspection: Poles F (s) f(t) splane Time response p =0 s p =0,p 2 =0 s 2 t p =
More informationLTI Systems (Continuous & Discrete)  Basics
LTI Systems (Continuous & Discrete)  Basics 1. A system with an input x(t) and output y(t) is described by the relation: y(t) = t. x(t). This system is (a) linear and timeinvariant (b) linear and timevarying
More informationME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION
ME 375 Final Examination Thursday, May 7, 2015 SOLUTION POBLEM 1 (25%) negligible mass wheels negligible mass wheels v motor no slip ω r r F D O no slip e in Motor% Cart%with%motor%a,ached% The coupled
More informationPD, PI, PID Compensation. M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada
PD, PI, PID Compensation M. Sami Fadali Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada 1 Outline PD compensation. PI compensation. PID compensation. 2 PD Control L= loop gain s cl = desired closedloop
More informationStability and Frequency Compensation
類比電路設計 (3349)  2004 Stability and Frequency ompensation hingyuan Yang National hunghsing University Department of Electrical Engineering Overview Reading B Razavi hapter 0 Introduction In this lecture,
More informationECE 3620: Laplace Transforms: Chapter 3:
ECE 3620: Laplace Transforms: Chapter 3: 3.13.4 Prof. K. Chandra ECE, UMASS Lowell September 21, 2016 1 Analysis of LTI Systems in the Frequency Domain Thus far we have understood the relationship between
More informationVALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE
VALLIAMMAI ENGINEERING COLLEGE SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur 603 203 DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING QUESTION BANK V SEMESTER IC650 CONTROL SYSTEMS Regulation 203 Academic Year 207 8 Prepared
More informationDynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationEECE 301 Signals & Systems Prof. Mark Fowler
EECE 3 Signals & Systems Prof. Mark Fowler Note Set #9 CT Systems: Laplace Transform Transfer Function Reading Assignment: Section 6.5 of Kamen and Heck /7 Course Flow Diagram The arrows here show conceptual
More informationDESIGN MICROELECTRONICS ELCT 703 (W17) LECTURE 3: OPAMP CMOS CIRCUIT. Dr. Eman Azab Assistant Professor Office: C
MICROELECTRONICS ELCT 703 (W17) LECTURE 3: OPAMP CMOS CIRCUIT DESIGN Dr. Eman Azab Assistant Professor Office: C3.315 Email: eman.azab@guc.edu.eg 1 TWO STAGE CMOS OPAMP It consists of two stages: First
More informationQ. 1 Q. 25 carry one mark each.
Q. Q. 5 carry one mark each. Q. Consider a system of linear equations: x y 3z =, x 3y 4z =, and x 4y 6 z = k. The value of k for which the system has infinitely many solutions is. Q. A function 3 = is
More informationChapter 10 Feedback. PART C: Stability and Compensation
1 Chapter 10 Feedback PART C: Stability and Compensation Example: Noninverting Amplifier We are analyzing the two circuits (nmos diff pair or pmos diff pair) to realize this symbol: either of the circuits
More informationECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 6 Solution April 17, (s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/20) + 1]
ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 6 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW6 P8.17 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = 4(s/2 + 1) s(2s + 1)[(s/8) 2 + (s/2) + 1] (1) and unity negative
More informationTransform Representation of Signals
C H A P T E R 3 Transform Representation of Signals and LTI Systems As you have seen in your prior studies of signals and systems, and as emphasized in the review in Chapter 2, transforms play a central
More informationChapter 5. Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup. 5.1 The Canonical Setup
Chapter 5 Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup Efficient LTI feedback optimization algorithms comprise a major component of modern feedback design approach: application problems involving complex models
More information12.7 Steady State Error
Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/01 106 1.7 Steady State Error For first order systems we have noticed an overall improvement in performance in terms of rise time and settling time. But there
More information100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =
1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot
More informationDigital Signal Processing IIR Filter Design via Bilinear Transform
Digital Signal Processing IIR Filter Design via Bilinear Transform D. Richard Brown III D. Richard Brown III 1 / 12 Basic Procedure We assume here that we ve already decided to use an IIR filter. The basic
More informationTransfer func+ons, block diagram algebra, and Bode plots. by Ania Ariadna Bae+ca CDS Caltech 11/05/15
Transfer func+ons, block diagram algebra, and Bode plots by Ania Ariadna Bae+ca CDS Caltech 11/05/15 Going back and forth between the +me and the frequency domain (1) Transfer func+ons exist only for
More informationControl System. Contents
Contents Chapter Topic Page Chapter Chapter Chapter3 Chapter4 Introduction Transfer Function, Block Diagrams and Signal Flow Graphs Mathematical Modeling Control System 35 Time Response Analysis of
More information16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2
16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 September 22, 2010 In this recitation, we will consider two problems from Chapter 8 of the Van de Vegte book. R +  E G c (s) G(s) C Figure 1: The standard block diagram
More informationRoot locus 5. tw4 = 450. Root Locus S51 S O L U T I O N S
Root Locus S51 S O L U T I O N S Root locus 5 Note: All references to Figures and Equations whose numbers are not preceded by an "S" refer to the textbook. (a) Rule 2 is all that is required to find the
More informationClass 12 Root Locus part II
Class 12 Root Locus part II Revising (from part I): Closed loop system K The Root Locus the locus of the poles of the closed loop system, when we vary the value of K Comple plane jω ais 0 real ais Thus,
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS
Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table
More information10 Transfer Matrix Models
MIT EECS 6.241 (FALL 26) LECTURE NOTES BY A. MEGRETSKI 1 Transfer Matrix Models So far, transfer matrices were introduced for finite order state space LTI models, in which case they serve as an important
More informationLecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
More informationFrequency Response Analysis
Frequency Response Analysis Consider let the input be in the form Assume that the system is stable and the steady state response of the system to a sinusoidal inputdoes not depend on the initial conditions
More informationUniversity of Alberta ENGM 541: Modeling and Simulation of Engineering Systems Laboratory #7. M.G. Lipsett & M. Mashkournia 2011
ENG M 54 Laboratory #7 University of Alberta ENGM 54: Modeling and Simulation of Engineering Systems Laboratory #7 M.G. Lipsett & M. Mashkournia 2 Mixed Systems Modeling with MATLAB & SIMULINK Mixed systems
More informationDriven RLC Circuits Challenge Problem Solutions
Driven LC Circuits Challenge Problem Solutions Problem : Using the same circuit as in problem 6, only this time leaving the function generator on and driving below resonance, which in the following pairs
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationProfessor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley
Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the
More informationLecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control
ME 233, UC Berkeley, Spring 2014 Xu Chen Lecture 13: Internal Model Principle and Repetitive Control Big picture review of integral control in PID design example: 0 Es) C s) Ds) + + P s) Y s) where P s)
More information8. Active Filters  2. Electronic Circuits. Prof. Dr. Qiuting Huang Integrated Systems Laboratory
8. Active Filters  2 Electronic Circuits Prof. Dr. Qiuting Huang Integrated Systems Laboratory Blast From The Past: Algebra of Polynomials * PP xx is a polynomial of the variable xx: PP xx = aa 0 + aa
More informationEEL2216 Control Theory CT1: PID Controller Design
EEL6 Control Theory CT: PID Controller Design. Objectives (i) To design proportionalintegralderivative (PID) controller for closed loop control. (ii) To evaluate the performance of different controllers
More informationD G 2 H + + D 2
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.302 Feedback Systems Final Exam May 21, 2007 180 minutes Johnson Ice Rink 1. This examination consists
More informationChapter 7 : Root Locus Technique
Chapter 7 : Root Locus Technique By Electrical Engineering Department College of Engineering King Saud University 1431143 7.1. Introduction 7.. Basics on the Root Loci 7.3. Characteristics of the Loci
More informationAutonomous Mobile Robot Design
Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic: Guidance and Control Introduction and PID Loops Dr. Kostas Alexis (CSE) Autonomous Robot Challenges How do I control where to go? Autonomous Mobile Robot Design Topic:
More informationProfessor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 2 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley
Professor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 2 Solution Fall 21 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley 1. (15 pts) Partial fraction expansion (review) Find the inverse Laplace transform of the following
More informationELEG 305: Digital Signal Processing
ELEG 305: Digital Signal Processing Lecture : Design of Digital IIR Filters (Part I) Kenneth E. Barner Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Delaware Fall 008 K. E. Barner (Univ.
More informationV. IIR Digital Filters
Digital Signal Processing 5 March 5, V. IIR Digital Filters (Deleted in 7 Syllabus). (dded in 7 Syllabus). 7 Syllabus: nalog filter approximations Butterworth and Chebyshev, Design of IIR digital filters
More information8 sin 3 V. For the circuit given, determine the voltage v for all time t. Assume that no energy is stored in the circuit before t = 0.
For the circuit given, determine the voltage v for all time t. Assume that no energy is stored in the circuit before t = 0. Spring 2015, Exam #5, Problem #1 4t Answer: e tut 8 sin 3 V 1 For the circuit
More informationNADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni
NADAR SARASWATHI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY Vadapudupatti, Theni625531 Question Bank for the Units I to V SE05 BR05 SU02 5 th Semester B.E. / B.Tech. Electrical & Electronics engineering IC6501
More informationEssence of the Root Locus Technique
Essence of the Root Locus Technique In this chapter we study a method for finding locations of system poles. The method is presented for a very general setup, namely for the case when the closedloop
More informationFREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequencyresponse methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationStability Condition in Terms of the Pole Locations
Stability Condition in Terms of the Pole Locations A causal LTI digital filter is BIBO stable if and only if its impulse response h[n] is absolutely summable, i.e., 1 = S h [ n] < n= We now develop a stability
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We
More informationESE319 Introduction to Microelectronics Bode Plot Review High Frequency BJT Model
Bode Plot Review High Frequency BJT Model 1 Logarithmic Frequency Response Plots (Bode Plots) Generic form of frequency response rational polynomial, where we substitute jω for s: H s=k sm a m 1 s m 1
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid 
More informationAn Internal Stability Example
An Internal Stability Example Roy Smith 26 April 2015 To illustrate the concept of internal stability we will look at an example where there are several polezero cancellations between the controller and
More informationNOTICE WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS: The copyright law of the United States (title 17, U.S. Code) governs the making of photocopies or
NOTICE WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS: The copyright law of the United States (title 17, U.S. Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Any copying
More informationANALOG AND DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING CHAPTER 3 : LINEAR SYSTEM RESPONSE (GENERAL CASE)
3. Linear System Response (general case) 3. INTRODUCTION In chapter 2, we determined that : a) If the system is linear (or operate in a linear domain) b) If the input signal can be assumed as periodic
More informationS.E. Sem. III [EXTC] Circuits and Transmission Lines
S.E. Sem. III [EXTC] Circuit and Tranmiion Line Time : Hr.] Prelim Quetion Paper Solution [Mark : 80 Q.(a) Tet whether P() = 5 4 45 60 44 48 i Hurwitz polynomial. (A) P() = 5 4 45 60 44 48 5 45 44 4 60
More information