Attachment K. Supplemental Shear Test Information

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Attachment K. Supplemental Shear Test Information"

Transcription

1 Attachment K. Supplemental Shear Test Information Computer Program Due to the iterative nature of shear design following the General Procedure in Article of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications a computer program was developed in order to help speed up the calculation process. The program was created through the use of the software, Mathcad, v. 14.0, copyrighted by Parametric Technology Corporation. The main program appears in Figure K-1, with the supplemental subroutines shown in Figure K-2. There was a third program, also developed using Mathcad, that helped to interpolate the tabularized values for and found in Appendix B5 of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications. This program is not presented here due to the size of the program rendering the program impractical to display. Although the equations used in Article are certainly easier than interpolating the tabularized values, the initial research started prior to having access to the latest design code. Furthermore, the results using the and equations proved to be even more conservative than the original LRFD method. Although not nearly as iterative in nature, a computer program was also developed for calculating the shear strength following the Simplified Procedure for Prestressed and Nonprestressed Sections in Article of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications. That program is given in K-1

2 calc ShearStrengthCheckFinal "NG" iterations 0 iterations.tot 0 for i 1 rows P assume 28 i while iterations iterations 1 for ShearStrengthCheckFinal x_ x critical.assume if i 1 1 for 1 rows P assume rows i 1 rows "NG" P assume.old P i assume i if rows P assume rows old i i for i 1 rows P assume.old P assume P assume.old i rows P assume old old i rows P assume P assume rows P assume P assume.old rows Passume P assume rows P assume if rows P assume rows old LiveLoad LoadSpacing x bearing x bearing.roller DeadLoad DeadLoad 9 DeadLoad 8 Load Live P assume ShearSpan L span DeadLoad Dead Load L span ShearSpan w beam DC 1 DC 2 DW P diaphragm V assume 1.00 DeadLoad LiveLoad 3 kip M assume DeadLoad DeadLoad LiveLoad 4 kipft V p V p. cg harp cg harp. f c'c f c'deck if f c'deck 0 f c' 1 1. f c'c otherwise for i 1 rows Num straight cg straight Num harp cg harp i cg ps i Num strand d pi h c cg ps i c c calc A ps f pu A s.bot A s.top f y f c'c 1 b eff b v h flange Figure K-1. Mathcad program used to calculate the design shear strength of a girder. k d p K-2

3 c c calc A ps f pu A s.bot A s.top f y f c'c 1 b eff b v h flange k d p for i 1 rows c i f ps.maxi f pu 1 k d pi 2 l d.psi f ps.maxi 3 f pe f ps f ps. l d.ps f ps.max f y s.yield E s Num strand.bot Num strand.bot. cg harp cg ps.bot cg ps.bot. cg straight cg harp h c Num straight for i 1 rows d p.boti h c cg ps.bot i d s.bot h i c cg s.bot i A ps.bot Num i strand.bot A i strand d ei A ps.bot f i psi d p.boti A s.bot f i y d s.bot i A ps.bot f i psi si d c ei c i i A s.bot f i y i return "Tension steel does not yield at x.dist (inches)" in if si s.yield a i 1 c i a i d vi max d ei 0.9d 2 ei 0.72h c M assumei max M assume1i V assumei V pi d vi v u v u. V assume V p d v MinReinforcingCheck l d.mild l d.mild. d long.rebar f c' f y IsTopBarEffectApplicableIsLongSteelEpoxyCoatedLongSteelCoverLongSteelCl for i 1 rows i x bearing RedFactor x.psi if x l disti x bearing l d.psi d.psi A ps.bot. xi 1 if i x bearing l d.psi Num strand.bot A i strand RedFactor x.psi Figure K-1 (cont.) Mathcad program used K-3 to calculate the design shear strength

4 A ps.bot. xi Num strand.bot A i strand RedFactor x.ps i x i bearing RedFactor x.s if x i l dist x d.mild i bearing l d.mild A s.bot. xi 1 if x i bearing l d.mild A s.bot RedFactor i x.s i iterate A ps.bot. x A s.bot. x f ps c d p M assume d v V assume V p cg harp v u MinReinforcingCheck 1 2 iterations.tot iterations.tot if method "General" 3 V r V r. d v s v.design V p for i 1 rows ShearStrengthCheck "OK" if V i ri V assume 0.1kip V i ri V assume 0kip i if V ri V assume 0.1kip V i ri V assume 0kip i ShearStrengthCheck "NG!!!" i ShearStrengthSum ShearStrengthSum 1 1 V assume i 2 V r V i assume 0.01kip i 5 V assume 1.00DeadLoad i i DeadLoad 7 i P assume i 2L span ShearSpan LoadSpacing V assume 1.00DeadLoad 5 i i DeadLoad 7 i L span 2ShearSpan LoadSpacing V assume 1.00 DeadLoad 5 i i DeadLoad 7 i 2ShearSpan LoadSpacing x_x critical.assume 2 vect_elemnt x.critical for ShearStrengthCheckFinal if if i 1 1 d v.critical d v vect_elemntx.critical1 critical vect_elemntx.critical1 in 1 rows vect_elemnt x.critical 1 rows vect_elemnt x.critical d v.critical critical "OK" if ShearStrengthSum 0 iterations 500 d v vect_elemnt x.critical vect_elemntx.critical K-4 i 1.00 DeadLoad 9 i 1.00 DeadLoad 9 i 1.00 DeadLoad 9 kip L span kip L span kip L span Figure K-1 (cont.) Mathcad program used to calculate the design shear strength if if if x d Sh x d

5 critical vect_elemntx.critical 1 x critical.assume max d v.critical 2 d v.criticalcot critical 180 V n.critical x critical 0 0 for if ( ) i 1 rows vect_elemnt x.critical V n.criticali V r vect_elemnt x.criticali x criticali vect_elemnt x.criticali 1 rows vect_elemnt x.critical V n.critical V rvect_elemntx.critical if rowsvect_elemnt x.critical 1 x critical vect_elemnt x.critical for i 1 rows calc "Simple" if method "Simple" N i u 0 MinReinforcingCheck "OK" h i c 16in calc "General" if method "General" i "error" otherwise V r P assume kip kip in x critical in V n.critical kip iterations iterations.tot calc MinReinforcingCheck s Figure K-1 (cont.) Mathcad program used to calculate the design shear strength K-5

6 in 2 kip 1.6 if h 24in 1.0 if h 24in "error" otherwise f c' f r.v 0.20 ksi ksi if FineAggType "sand" 0.17 "error" f c' ksi ksi otherwise if FineAggType "lightweight" cg harp. cg harp 0 for i 1 rows cg harpi cg harp.end i x bearing tan harp if i HarpDist cg harpi cg harp.ms if i HarpDist cg harpi "error" otherwise cg harp A rebar ( rrebarsize) for i 1 r A rebari if RebarSize 1.9 i A rebari if RebarSize 2 i A rebari if RebarSize 2.5 i A rebari 0.11 if RebarSize 3 i A rebari 0.20 if RebarSize 4 i A rebari 0.31 if RebarSize 5 i A rebari 0.44 if RebarSize 6 i A rebari 0.60 if RebarSize 7 i A rebari 0.79 if RebarSize 8 i A rebari 1.00 if RebarSize 9 i A rebari 1.27 if RebarSize 10 i A rebari 1.56 if RebarSize 11 i A rebari 0 if RebarSize 0 i in 2 A rebar K-6 Figure K-2. Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1.

7 v 1 if ConcreteType "NWC" ConcreteType "LWC" Value_f ct "specified" 4.7 f ct f c' ksi 4.7 f ct f c' ksi if ConcreteType "LWC" Value_f ct "specified" 4.7 f ct f c' ksi 0.85 if ConcreteType "LWC" Value_f ct "not specified" FineAggType "sand" 0.75 if ConcreteType "LWC" Value_f ct "not specified" FineAggType "lightweight" "error" otherwise MinReinforcingCheck "OK" if r v f c' ( ksi) "NG!!!" if v f c' ( ksi) b v s v.design r f yv b v s v.design r f yv A vr A vr "error" otherwise 0.85 if f c'deck 4ksi 1. f c'deck x x m o x_ x critical.assume f c'deck max if f ksi c'deck 4ksi x 0 x 0 1 m 1 for i 1 12 ( ) if 0.1ShearSpan( i 1) x critical.assume x critical.assume 0.1ShearSpan( i) x x i 1 critical.assume n i 1 if 0.1ShearSpan( i 1) ShearSpan x critical.assume ShearSpan x critical.assume 0.1ShearSpan for x ShearSpan x i 2 critical.assume o i 2 i 2 13 m 2 if i n m 3 if i o ( break) if i 13 1 x critical.assume 2 ShearSpan x 0.1ShearSpan( i m) otherwise i X x 1 X 2 n o in if o 0 ( nin ) if o 0 "error" otherwise K-7 X Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1.

8 Load Live ft V assume V assume kip ShearSpan ShearSpan ft LoadSpacing LoadSpacing ft L span L span ft for i 1 rows i x% i ShearSpan if i ShearSpan V LLi M LLi V assumei 2L L span ShearSpan LoadSpacing span V assumei 2L L span ShearSpan span LoadSpacing x disti if ShearSpan i i ShearSpan LoadSpacing V LLi V assumei L L span 2ShearSpan span LoadSpacing if M LLi V assumei 2L L span ShearSpan span i ShearSpan LoadSpacing LoadSpacing x disti V assumei i ShearSpan V assumei V LLi ( 2ShearSpan LoadSpacing) L span M LLi V assumei ( 2ShearSpan LoadSpacing) L L span i span ans augment x% V LL M LL ans Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1. K-8

9 Dead Load x dist ft L span L span ft x bearing x bearing ft x bearing.roller x bearing.roller ft ShearSpan ShearSpan ft w beam w beam klf DC 1 DC 1 klf DC 2 DC 2 klf DW DW klf P diaphragm P diaphragm kip for i 1 rows i x% i ShearSpan w beam V beami x 2L bearing L span x bearing.roller 2 w beam x bearing.roller x span L bearing L span x bearing.roller w beam i x bearing span w beam M beami x 2L bearing L span x bearing.roller 2 w beam x bearing.roller 1 x span L bearing L span x bearing.roller i span 2 w beam x i bea L span V diaphragmi P diaphragm if i 3 K-9 Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1.

10 L span V diaphragmi P diaphragm if i 3 V diaphragmi 0 otherwise L span M diaphragmi P diaphragm i if i 3 M diaphragmi L span P diaphragm 3 otherwise DC 1 V DC1i x 2L bearing L span x bearing.roller 2 DC 1 x bearing.roller x span L bearing L span x bearing.roller DC 1 i x bearing V span diaphragmi DC 1 M DC1i 2L x bearing L span x bearing.roller 2 DC 1 x bearing.roller 1 x span L bearing L span x bearing.roller i span 2 DC 1 x 2 dist x i bearing M diaphragmi DC 2 V DC2i x 2L bearing L span x bearing.roller 2 DC 2 x bearing.roller x span L bearing L span x bearing.roller DC 2 i x bearing span DC 2 M DC2i 2L x bearing L span x bearing.roller 2 DC 2 x bearing.roller 1 x span L bearing L span x bearing.roller i span 2 DC 2 x 2 dist x i bearing DW V DWi x 2L bearing L span x bearing.roller 2 DWx bearing.roller x span L bearing L span x bearing.roller DW i x bearing span DW M DWi 2L x bearing L span x bearing.roller 2 DWx bearing.roller 1 x span L bearing L span x bearing.roller i span 2 DW x 2 dist x i bearing ans augment x% V beam M beam V DC1 M DC1 V DC2 M DC2 V DW M DW ans Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1. K-10

11 V p 0 V p. for i 1 rows f pe i x bearing V pi Num l harp A strand sin harp if i x bearing l t i L span HarpDistRatio t V pi f pe Num harp A strand sin harp if i x bearing l t i L span HarpDistRatio V pi 0 if i L span HarpDistRatio "error" otherwise V p f ps 0 f ps. l d f ps.max for i 1 rows f pe i x bearing f psi if x l disti x bearing l t t i x bearing l t f psi f pe f l di l ps.maxi f pe if x t disti x bearing f psi f ps.maxi if i x bearing l di l t i x bearing l di f psi "error" otherwise f ps c calc for c i 1 rows d pi 10 6 in if d pi 0 c i A ps f pu A s.bot f i y 0.85f c'c 1 b eff ka ps A s.top f y f pu d pi A ps f pu A s.bot f i y A s.top f y 0.85 f c'c b eff b v h flange c if c h i f i flange pu 0.85f c'c 1 b v ka ps d pi Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1 K-11

12 A long.rebar A rebar rowsd long.rebar for i l d.mild. d long.rebar d long.rebar 1.25A long.rebari f y d long.rebari f y l dbi max 0.4 in f c' ksi in 8 ksi 1i 1.0 if IsTopBarEffectApplicable "No" 1.4 if IsTopBarEffectApplicable "Yes" "error" otherwise 2i 1.0 if IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated "No" d long.rebari d long.rebari 1.5 if IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated "Yes" LongSteelCover 3 in LongSteelClearSpacing 6 in 8 8 d long.rebari d long.rebari 1.2 if IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated "Yes" LongSteelCover 3 in LongSteelClearSpacing 6. in 8 8 "error" otherwise 12i min f ct 10 6 ksi if f ct 0 Value_f ct "not specified" 3i 1 if ConcreteType "NWC" f c' ksi max if ConcreteType "LWC" Value_f f ct ct "specified" 1.3 if ConcreteType "LWC" Value_f ct "not specified" FineAggType "lightweight" 123i 1 rows d long.rebar l d.mildi 1.2 if ConcreteType "LWC" Value_f ct "not specified" FineAggType "sand" "error" 12i 3i l dbi 123i otherwise l d.mild1 Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the K-12 main calculation program given in Figure K-1.

13 Num strand.bot. cg harp Num strand.bot 0 for i 1 rows Num strand.bot Num i strand Num harp cg harpi 2in 1 if 2 h c Num strand.bot Num i strand Num harp 2 cg harpi 2in 1 2 h 1 if c cg harpi 2 h c 1 Num strand.bot Num i strand Num harp 4 cg harpi 2 h 1 if c cg harpi 2in 2 h c 1 Num strand.bot Num i strand if cg harpi 2in 2 h c Num strand.bot "error" otherwise i Num strand.bot x1 x2 x3 x x. 180 for i 1 rows ( ) x1i x2i M assume i d vi M assume i d vi 0.5 N u 0.5 V assume V pi i cot i 2 E s A s.bot. xi E p A ps.bot. xi 0.5 N u 0.5 V assume V pi i E s A s.bot. xi cot i E p A ps.bot. xi A ps.bot. xi f po A ps.bot. xi f po x3i M assume i d vi 0.5 N u 0.5 V assume V pi i 2 E beam A ct E s A s.bot. xi cot i xi x1i if MinReinforcingCheck "OK" i x1i 0 E p A ps.bot. xi x2i if MinReinforcingCheck "NG!!!" i x2i 0 x3i if x1i 0 x2i 0 A ps.bot. xi f po x Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1. K-13

14 cg ps.bot. cg straight cg harp h c Num straight for i 1 rows 1 cg ps.bot cg i straight if cg harpi 2in 2 h c Num straight cg straight 2 cg harpi 2in 1 cg ps.bot cg i Num straight 2 harpi 2in 2 h 1 if c cg harpi 2 h c Num straight cg straight 2 cg harpi 2in cg harpi 1 cg ps.bot cg i Num straight 4 harpi 2 h 1 if c cg harpi 2in 2 h c Num straight cg straight 6cg harpi cg ps.bot if cg harpi 2in i cg ps.bot Num straight h c v 1 s x s xe v for i v u. V assume V p d v MinReinforcingCheck ( ) V assume i v V pi v 1i v b v d vi s xi d vi 1.38in s xei min s xi 80in a g 0.63in v i 1 rows v 1i if MinReinforcingCheck "OK" f i c' v s xei in if MinReinforcingCheck "NG!!!" i Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1. K-14

15 L R r L R u rows cg harp x v u MinReinforcingCheck ( ) Num strand.bot Num strand.bot. cg harp for i 1 1 v u1. v u1 v u x u MinReinforcingCheck v u2. v u2 v u x u MinReinforcingCheck xl. xl v u x u MinReinforcingCheck xr. xr v u x u MinReinforcingCheck for i 1 1 MinOK1 1L. MinOK1 1L v u1. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinOK2 1L. MinOK2 1L v u1. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG1 1L. MinNG1 1L v u1. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG2 1L. MinNG2 1L v u1. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck for i 1 1 MinOK1 1R. MinOK1 1R v u1. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinOK2 1R. MinOK2 1R v u1. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG1 1R. MinNG1 1R v u1. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG2 1R. MinNG2 1R v u1. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck for i 1 1 MinOK1 1L. MinOK1 1L v u1. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinOK2 1L. MinOK2 1L v u1. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG1 1L. MinNG1 1L v u1. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG2 1L. MinNG2 1L v u1. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck for i 1 1 MinOK1 1R. MinOK1 1R v u1. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinOK2 1R. MinOK2 1R v u1. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG1 1R. MinNG1 1R v u1. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG2 1R. MinNG2 1R v u1. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck for i 1 1 MinOK1 2L. MinOK1 2L v u2. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinOK2 2L. MinOK2 2L v u2. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG1 2L. MinNG1 2L v u2. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG2 2L. MinNG2 2L v u2. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck for i 1 1 Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Error! K-15

16 K-16

17 for i 1 1 MinOK1 2R. MinOK1 2R v u2. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinOK2 2R. MinOK2 2R v u2. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG1 2R. MinNG1 2R v u2. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG2 2R. MinNG2 2R v u2. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck for i 1 1 MinOK1 2L. MinOK1 2L v u2. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinOK2 2L. MinOK2 2L v u2. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG1 2L. MinNG1 2L v u2. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG2 2L. MinNG2 2L v u2. xl. u MinReinforcingCheck for i 1 1 MinOK1 2R. MinOK1 2R v u2. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinOK2 2R. MinOK2 2R v u2. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG1 2R. MinNG1 2R v u2. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck MinNG2 2R. MinNG2 2R v u2. xr. u MinReinforcingCheck for i 1 1 1L MinOK1 1L. MinOK2 1L. MinNG1 1L. MinNG2 1L. 1R MinOK1 1R. MinOK2 1R. MinNG1 1R. MinNG2 1R. 1L MinOK1 1L. MinOK2 1L. MinNG1 1L. MinNG2 1L. 1R MinOK1 1R. MinOK2 1R. MinNG1 1R. MinNG2 1R. 2L MinOK1 2L. MinOK2 2L. MinNG1 2L. MinNG2 2L. 2R MinOK1 2R. MinOK2 2R. MinNG1 2R. MinNG2 2R. 2L MinOK1 2L. MinOK2 2L. MinNG1 2L. MinNG2 2L. 2R MinOK1 2R. MinOK2 2R. MinNG1 2R. MinNG2 2R. for i 1 rows Li 2Li if v u2.i v u1.i 0 v u2.i v ui 1Li 2Li v u2.i v u1.i Ri 2Ri if v u2.i v u1.i 0 v u2.i v ui 1Ri 2Ri v u2.i v u1.i ri Ri if xr.i xl.i 0 2Li 2Ri otherwise otherwise Li Ri xr.i xi xr.i xl.i Ri otherwise Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the K-17 main calculation program given in Figure K-1.

18 Li Ri xr.i xi xr.i xl.i Li 2Li if v u2.i v u1.i 0 Ri otherwise v u2.i v ui 1Li 2Li v u2.i v u1.i Ri 2Ri if v u2.i v u1.i 0 v u2.i v ui 1Ri 2Ri v u2.i v u1.i i Ri if xr.i xl.i 0 2Li 2Ri otherwise otherwise Li Ri xr.i xi xr.i xl.i Ri otherwise r V c V s V n V r V r. d v s v.design V p 180 for i 1 rows V ci i v V si A vi f yv ( ) f c' ksib v d vi d vi cot i V n1 V c V s V p V n f c' b v d v V p for i 1 rows V ni min V n1i V n2i V r V r v V n cot( ) s v.design i sin( ) Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1. K-18

19 iterate for i 1 rows if method "Simple" N u 0 MinReinforcingCheck "OK" h 1 c 16in ri 45 2 i otherwise AngleCheck "NG" iterations 0 Num strand.bot while AngleCheck "NG" iterations iterations 1 Num strand.bot. cg harp iterations.tot iterations.tot 1 sum 0 x x1 x2 x3 x 180 for i 1 rows ( ) x1i x2i M assume i d vi M assume i d vi 0.5 N u 0.5 V assume V i pi cot i 2 E s A s.bot. xi E p A ps.bot. xi 0.5 N u 0.5 V assume V pi i E s A s.bot. xi cot i E p A ps.bot. xi A ps.bot. xi f po A ps.bot. xi f po x3i M assume i d vi 0.5 N u 0.5 V assume V pi i 2 E beam A ct E s A s.bot. xi cot i xi x1i if MinReinforcingCheck "OK" i x1i 0 E p A ps.bot. xi x2i if MinReinforcingCheck "NG!!!" i x2i 0 x3i if x1i 0 x2i 0 A ps.bot. xi f po x 1 r cg harp x v u MinReinforcingCheck 2 cg harp x v u MinReinforcingCheck 180 for i 1 rows Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the K-19 main calculation program given in Figure K-1.

20 for if i 1 rows ri.0005 i sum sum 1 1 i 2 r i i AngleCheck "OK" if sum 0 iterations 50 r iterations x Figure K-2 (cont.) Subroutines used in the main calculation program given in Figure K-1. K-20

21 calc ShearStrengthCheckFinal "NG" iterations 0 while iterations iterations 1 for iterations 1 rowsp assume i x_ x critical.assume 1 if i 1 1 rows for 1 rows P assume.oldi P assumei for i 1 rows P assume.old P assume P assume.oldi rows Passume if rowsp assume rows rowsp assume P assumerows Passume K-21 if rowsp assume rows P assume P assume.old LiveLoad Load Live P assume ShearSpanLoadSpacingL span DeadLoad Dead Load L span x bearing x bearing.roller ShearSpanw beam DC 1 DC 2 DWP diaphragm LiveLoad if LiveLoad V assume 1.00 DeadLoad 5 DeadLoad DeadLoad LiveLoad 3 kip M assume 1.00 DeadLoad 6 DeadLoad DeadLoad LiveLoad 4 kip ft M DC1 DeadLoad 6 kipft V d DeadLoad 5 DeadLoad 7 DeadLoad 9 kip Figure K-3. Mathcad program used to calculate the shear strength following the Simplified Procedure.

22 K-22

23 V d DeadLoad 5 DeadLoad 7 DeadLoad 9 kip V i V assume V d M max M assume DeadLoad 6 DeadLoad 8 DeadLoad 10 kip ft V p. V p cg harp cg harp. f c'c f c'deck if f c'deck 0 1 f c' otherwise 1. f c'c f y s.yield E s Num strand.bot Num strand.bot. cg harp cg ps.bot cg ps.bot. cg straight.bot cg harp h c Num straight.bot for i 1 rows cg psi d pi h c cg psi Num straight cg straight Num strand Num harp cg harpi c d i pi 10 6 in if d pi 0 c i A ps f pu A s.boti f y 0.85f c'c 1 b eff A s.top f y ka ps f pu d pi A ps f pu A s.boti f y A s.top f y 0.85 f c'c b eff b v h flange c if c h i f i flange pu 0.85f c'c 1 b v ka ps d pi c i f ps.maxi f pu 1 k d pi 2 l d.psi f ps.maxi 3 f pe f ps f ps. l d.ps f ps.max for i 1 rows A ps.bot Num i strand.bot A i strand d p.boti h c cg ps.bot i d s.bot h i c cg s.bot i Figure K-3 (cont.) Mathcad program used to calculate the shear strength following the Simplified Procedure. K-23

24 d s.bot h i c cg s.bot i d ei A ps.bot f psi d p.boti A i s.bot f i y d s.boti A ps.bot f psi i si d c ei c i i A s.bot f i y i return "Tension steel does not yield at x.dist" in if si s.yield a i 1 c i a i d vi max d ei 0.9d 2 ei 0.72h c f c' f r.v 0.20 ksi ksi if FineAggType "sand" 0.17 "error" f c' ksi ksi e strand y b cg ps l t 60 for i 1 rows P f.cpei otherwise f pe A strand f pe A strand "error" if FineAggType "lightweight" i x bearing Num strand if x l disti x bearing l t t Num strand if i x bearing l t otherwise P f.cpei P f.cpei e strand i f cpei A beam S b DeadLoad 6 kip ft i M crei S bc f r.v f cpei S b f V c' ii M crei V cii max 0.02 v ksib ksi v d vi V di 0.06 M v maxi P f.pci f pci f psi A strand V cwi 0.06 v Num strand f c' ksi ksi b vd vi P f.pci P f.pci e strand y i b y bc M DC1i y b y bc if y A beam I beam I bc h top.flange beam P f.pci P f.pci e strand i y b h top.flange M DC1i y b h top.flange if y A beam I beam I bc h top.flange beam f c' ksi 0.30 f ksi pci b v d vi V pi K-24 Figure K-3 (cont.) Mathcad program used to calculate the shear strength following the Simplified Procedure.

25 f c' V cwi 0.06 v ksi 0.30 f ksi pci b v d vi V pi V ci min V cii V cwi cot 1 if V i cii V cwi V si f pci min 1 3 v f c' ksi if A vi f yv d vi cot cot( ) sin( ) i s v.designi V cii V cwi V n1 V c V s V n f c' b v d v V p for i 1 rows ShearStrengthCheck i V ri v min V n1i V n2i "OK" if V ri V assumei 0.1kip V ri V assumei 0kip if V ri V assumei 0.1kip V ri V assumei 0kip ShearStrengthCheck "NG!!!" i ShearStrengthSum ShearStrengthSum 1 1 V assumei 2 V r V assumei 0.01kip i P assume.ri P assumei i DeadLoad 7 i i V assumei DeadLoad 1.00 DeadLoad 9 kip L span P assumei 2L span ShearSpan LoadSpacing V assumei 1.00 DeadLoad 5 i DeadLoad 7 i 1.00 DeadLoad 9 i kip L span L span 2ShearSpan LoadSpacing V assumei 1.00 DeadLoad 5 i DeadLoad 7 i 1.00DeadLoad 9 i kip L span 2ShearSpan LoadSpacing vect_elemnt x.critical for i 1 1 x_x critical.assume 2 in ShearStrengthCheckFinal "OK" if ShearStrengthSum 0 iterations 500 d v.critical d v if rows vect_elemntx.critical1 vect_elemnt x.critical 1 d v.critical d v if vect_elemnt x.critical rowsvect_elemnt x.critical 1 if if if i ShearSpan ShearSpan i ShearSpan 1 x critical.assume max d v.critical 2 d v.critical cot vect_elemntx.critical1 if rowsvect_elemnt x.critical 1 1 K-25 Figure K-3 (cont.) Mathcad program used to calculate the shear strength following the Simplified Procedure.

26 1 x critical.assume max d v.critical 2 d v.critical cot vect_elemntx.critical1 if 1 x critical.assume max d v.critical 2 d v.critical cot vect_elemntx.critical if V n.critical x critical 0 0 for i ( ) 1 rows vect_elemnt x.critical V n.criticali V r vect_elemnt x.criticali x criticali vect_elemnt x.criticali otherwise V n.critical V r vect_elemnt x.critical x critical vect_elemntx.critical if rowsvect_elemnt x.critical 1 rowsvect_elemnt x.critical 1 rowsvect_elemnt x.critical 1 Figure K-3 (cont.) Mathcad program used to calculate the shear strength following the Simplified Procedure. Beam Example Following the General Procedure using Appendix B5 The following calculations are for a simply-supported, Type II prestressed girder with a cast-inplace composite deck, containing a typical amount of shear reinforcement found in such a girder spanning 60 ft. As discussed in Section , for the actual beam in this example, a portion of the girder was removed from the original 60-ft design such that that girder was shortened by some distance between the harping points. The drawing details for this example beam, T2.8.Typ, is shown in Figure A-2. The parameters that are necessary to perform the calculations are given the section below. Inputs Programming mechanism used for setting the lightweight concrete modifier. In this example, the assumption is that the lightweight concrete should not have a modifier; hence the concrete is assumed to be normal weight. K-26

27 the splitting tensile strength was assumed to be unspecified height of the beam web width distance from bottom of beam to beam centroid distance from top of beam to beam centroid girder spacing, which in this case, is the width of the deck thickness of the haunch structural depth of the deck area of concrete in the flexural tension zone, as defined in A distance from the extreme compression flange to the webflange intersection number of unharped tendons number of unharped tendons near the bottom of the beam number of harped tendons centroid of the unharped tendons centroid of the harped tendons at the end of the beam centroid of the harped tendons at the harping location K-27 centroid of the unharped tendons near the bottom of the beam

28 strand diameter distance from the support to the harping location yield strength of the stirrups stirrup size area of a double-legged stirrup angle of the stirrups relative to the longitudinal axis of the beam area of the mild steel reinforcement at the top of the girder distance from the extreme compression fiber to the steel in the top of the girder distance from the girder bottom to the centroid of the mild steel distance from the bottom of the girder to the centroid of the mild steel used for tension reinforcement size of the longitudinal mild reinforcement stirrup spacing, listed at distinct points along the shear span; see calculation for variable below area of mild reinforcing steel in the bottom of the beam, listed at distinct points along the shear span; see explanation for variable below. area of the mild steel in the longitudinal direction K-28

29 additional parameters for dead load that were all set to equal zero since the beam being tested was a stand-alone structure with a cast-in-place composite deck distance from the end of the beam to the center of bearing of the pin support distance from the end of the beam to the center of bearing of the roller support assumed distance from the support to the critical section axial force, assumed to be equal to zero resistance factor for shear, assumed to be equal to zero for analysis purposes programming mechanism used to calculate the shear strength following A (if applicable) or A Note that individual values for P assume are listed at distinct locations along the shear span (see the calculations for below. Each value is the assumed load applied by each of the actuators, whose locations are specified by the parameters ShearSpan and LoadSpacing, that would result in a shear failure at the corresponding section indicated in. Ordinarily, the calculation would start with an arbitrary value for all of the section locations, say 150 kips or 250 kips. However, for the purposes of this example, the given P assume values are used to mitigate the number of iterations necessary to reach convergence. Subsequent calculations will require knowing the location of the sections for which the shear strength is being calculated. Those locations are defined by the term, given in this example in terms of the distance from the support closest to the point loads: K-29

30 where each location is a tenth point along the length of the shear span, with the exception of the critical section, which in this case, is assumed to be 36.5 in. K-30

31 Basic Geometry Calculations Area of unharped prestessing tendons along the bottom of the girder. Angle of the harped tendon, relative to the longitudinal axis of the beam K-31 depth from the top of the composite section to the centroid of the mild steel reinforcement at the bottom of the beam.

32 centroid of the harped tedons Note that the centroid of the harped tendons changes along the length of the shear span. Thus, the example above and all other example calculations that are dependent on the location of the section give a detailed calculation at a specific location, = 5.73 in., which is the second location given in the parameter. The results for all sections are then given at the end of each specific calculation. K-32

33 Basic Material Calculations modululs of rupture for shear calculations As discussed earlier, although the concrete in this beam was actually lightweight concrete, the assumption was that the lightweight modifier was not necessary. Hence, this example assumes that lightweight concrete behaves similarly to normal weight concrete. K-33

34 Load Effects Live Loads For a simply-supported beam subjected to two point loads, the shear at any point along the beam within the shear span, V LL, can be calculated as K-34

35 The moment at the same locations, M LL, can be calculated as Dead Loads The uniformly distributed forces due to the weight of the beam, the haunch and the deck are calculated as: K-35

36 where DC 1 is the dead load of the composite structure. There were no other dead loads present. These results can be used to calculate the shear and moment due to composite dead loads, V DC1 and M DC1, respectively, as: K-36

37 Total Load Effects Given the assumed live loads, the total assumed shear and moment in the girder, V assume and M assume1 are the sum of the live and dead loads given in Sections 0 and 0 above, such that: K-37

38 Calculate the Shear Resistance Determine and Calculate the Effective Shear Depth of the Beam, d v Calculate the Depth of the Compression Block, c Assuming that the depth of the compression block is less than the thickness of the deck, and thus the compressive strength of the concrete, f c'c, is that of the deck concrete, f c'deck, then K-38

39 Calculate the Stress in the Prestressing Strands, f ps Let f ps.max be the stress in the steel according to Eq in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications, and l d.ps be the development length of the prestress. Then, K-39

40 K-40

41 Find the Effective Depth, d e The centroid of the prestressing steel in the flexural tension region of the beam is calculated as: K-41

42 Therefore, d p.bot and d s.bot, the depths from the top of the composite section to the centroid of the prestressing steel and mild steel, respectively, that are on the flexural tension side of the beam, are calculated as: In order to calculate the area of strand in the flexural tension side of the beam, the number of strands is determined as: K-42

43 Consequently, the area of strand in the flexural tension side of the beam is: Using the information above, the effective depth, d e, is calculated as: K-43

44 Ensure that the mild steel in the flexural tension side yields: K-44

45 Since the strain in the steel is greater than the yield strain, all assumptions used in calculating the depth of the compression block, c, are validated. Find the effective shear depth, d v Find the Factored Moment, M assume According to Article of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications, the factored moment used in determining and should not exceed K-45

46 M u V u -V p d v ( K - 1 ) where V p is calculated as: Therefore, the assumed moment in the girder at the time of failure, M assume, is the maximum of M assume1 found in ( K - 1 ): K-46

47 Find The Average Factored Shear Stress on the Concrete, v u Check for Minimum Reinforcement Requirements Calculate v u K-47

48 Determine the Reduced Area of Steel, A ps.bot. x and A s.bot. x According the Article , if the full development length has not been reached at a given section, then the area of steel must be reduced proportionately to the ratio of the length of the steel at that section versus the development length. K-48

49 Calculate the Development Length of the Mild Reinforcement K-49

50 K-50

51 Determine the Area Reduction Factors Calculate the Reduced Area of Steel, A s.bot. x and A ps.bot. x K-51

52 Determine and Even within each iteration for calculating the shear strength of a girder, the process for finding itself can be iterative. The reason is because, the predicted crack angle relative to the horizontal axis, depends on the longitudinal strain at mid-depth of the beam, x, which in turn, depends on, according to Article B5.2. If following the General Procedures in Article , then this process is not as iterative because the cracking angle was removed from the equation for longitudinal strain as a conservative simplification. If using Appendix B5, one must assume an initial value for the cracking angle and then repeat the calculation until a value for converges. In the case of this example, which again, follows the tabularized method in Appendix B5 for finding and, the assumed values for (in radians) at specific sections along the length of the shear span are: K-52

53 Having assumed, and knowing all of the other necessary parameters, one can calculate x as: K-53

54 Using the results for x and for v u, foundpreviously, one can go to the tables in Appendix B5 of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications to obtain and. Note that Article B5.2 states that if x is greater than zero, then the initial value for x should not be greater than if at least the minimum transverse reinforcement is used or if the beam has less than the minimum transverse reinforcement. Hence, in this example, most of the values for x along the length of the shear span were taken as As discussed earlier, a separate computer program was developed to facilitate linear interpolation of these values using the ranges given in the aforementioned tables. That program is not discussed here, but is a relatively basic routine. Using the values for x and v u, the resulting values for and are: Note that the results for are quite similar to the assumed cracking angle, assume. In terms of degrees, is: Calculate the Concrete Contribution to the Shear Resistance, V c K-54

55 Calculate the Steel Contribution to the Shear Resistance, V s K-55

56 Calculate the Nominal Shear Resistance Reiterate with New Value for P assume In order to refine the calculations for the nominal shear strength, the engineer might need to assume a different value for the externally applied load to the beam, P assume, based on a revised K-56

57 input for the shear in the beam, V assume. The new V assume can be taken as the midpoint between the original V assume and V n found in Section 0 above. In the case of this example, Therefore, the new assumed load from each of the two actuators located at the distances indicated by the parameters ShearSpan and LoadSpacing that would result in a shear failure However, note that P assume.new is practically the same as P assume given in Section 0. In this case, the calculations for the shear strength have converged, resulting in the shear strengths at the various sections along the shear span, indicated by V n in Section 0. The lowest value in V n is taken as the beam s shear strength, provided that the distance from the support to the corresponding section is not less than the critical section. The critical section, x critical, depends on K-57

58 the effective shear depth and the theoretical cracking angle, which in turn, are indirectly dependent on the critical section. Hence, finding x critical is also iterative in nature, and this iteration has been incorporated into the program indicated in Figure K-1. Using x critical.assume = in., which is the eighth element in the parameter, the shear depth at the critical section, d v.critical is the eighth element in d v. Likewise, the corresponding cracking angle at the critical section is the eighth element of given in radians as Thus, x critical can be calculated as: Again, note that the calculated value for x critical is the same as x critical.assume, so no further iterations are required. So, for this example, the smallest shear strength given in V n is kip at = in. However, since the distance to this section is less than the critical section, the nominal shear strength for the beam should be taken as kip, which is rounded to 222 kip. K-58

59 Inputs and Detailed Results for Shear Calculations Following the General Procedure Using Appendix B5 Beam T2.8.Typ.1 Inputs c (pcf) t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) 8865 A ct (in 2 ) 243 f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 6090 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 5829 Num strand c.deck (pcf) Num straight 18 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 3605 Num straight.bot 16 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 3585 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 5 E slab (ksi) 3566 cg straight 7.00 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 36 cg harp.end 29 LongSteelClearSpacing 3.38 A beam (in 2 ) 369 cg harp.ms 4 LongSteelCover 1.75 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.75 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) 41 A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller 6 S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 17.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-59

60 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-60

61 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-61

62 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-62 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

63 OK Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-63

64 Beam T2.8.Typ.2 Inputs c (pcf) t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) 8890 A ct (in 2 ) 243 f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 6090 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 6088 Num strand c.deck (pcf) Num straight 18 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 3605 Num straight.bot 16 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 3585 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 5 E slab (ksi) 3210 cg straight 7.00 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 36 cg harp.end 29 LongSteelClearSpacing 3.38 A beam (in 2 ) 369 cg harp.ms 4 LongSteelCover 1.75 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.75 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) 41 A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller 64.5 S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 17.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-64

65 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot (in 2 ) cg harp h c L span A ps harp f po (ft) (in 2 ) (rad) (ksi) f r.v (psi) K-65

66 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-66

67 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-67 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

68 OK OK OK Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-68

69 Beam T2.8.Min.1 Inputs c (pcf) t struct 8 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) 8890 A ct (in 2 ) 243 f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 6090 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 5360 Num strand c.deck (pcf) 125 Num straight 18 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 3605 Num straight.bot 16 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 3585 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 5 E slab (ksi) 3240 cg straight 7.00 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 36 cg harp.end 29 LongSteelClearSpacing 3.38 A beam (in 2 ) 369 cg harp.ms 4 LongSteelCover 1.75 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.75 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller 6 S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch HarpDist (ft) 17.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-69

70 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-70

71 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-71

72 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-72 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

73 OK Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-73

74 Beam T2.8.Min.2 Inputs c (pcf) t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) 8890 A ct (in 2 ) 243 f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 6090 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 5360 Num strand c.deck (pcf) 125 Num straight 18 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 3605 Num straight.bot 16 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 3580 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 5 E slab (ksi) 3240 cg straight 7.00 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 36 cg harp.end 29 LongSteelClearSpacing 3.38 A beam (in 2 ) 369 cg harp.ms 4 LongSteelCover 1.75 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.75 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) 41 A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller 69 S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 17.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-74

75 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-75

76 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-76

77 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-77 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

78 OK OK OK Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-78

79 Beam BT.8N.Typ.1 Inputs c (pcf) 150 t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 69.8 f c ' (psi) 8860 A ct (in 2 ) f yv (ksi) 69.8 f ci ' (psi) 6183 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 4890 Num strand c.deck (pcf) 127 Num straight 28 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 4823 Num straight.bot 28 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 4670 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 5 E slab (ksi) 2940 cg straight 3.68 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 45 cg harp.end 41 LongSteelClearSpacing 3.75 A beam (in 2 ) cg harp.ms 4.25 LongSteelCover 2 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.68 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) A strand (in 2 ) A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller 6 S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 26.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-79

80 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot (in 2 ) cg harp h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-80

81 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-81

82 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-82 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

83 OK OK OK Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-83

84 Beam BT.8N.Typ.2 Inputs c (pcf) 150 t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 69.8 f c ' (psi) 8570 A ct (in 2 ) f yv (ksi) 69.8 f ci ' (psi) 6183 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 4990 Num strand c.deck (pcf) 127 Num straight 28 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 4950 Num straight.bot 28 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 4670 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 5 E slab (ksi) 3110 cg straight 3.68 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 45 cg harp.end 41 LongSteelClearSpacing 3.75 A beam (in 2 ) cg harp.ms 4.25 LongSteelCover 2 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.68 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller 113 S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 26.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-84

85 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-85

86 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-86

87 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-87 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

88 OK OK OK K-88

89 Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-89

90 Beam BT.8.Typ.1 Inputs c (pcf) t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) 9080 A ct (in 2 ) f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 6330 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 5580 Num strand c.deck (pcf) Num straight 28 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 3590 Num straight.bot 28 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 3790 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 5 E slab (ksi) 3600 cg straight 3.68 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 45 cg harp.end 41 LongSteelClearSpacing 3.75 A beam (in 2 ) cg harp.ms 4.25 LongSteelCover 2 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.68 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) 59 A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller 6 S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 26.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-90

91 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-91

92 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-92

93 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-93 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

94 OK OK OK K-94

95 Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-95

96 Beam BT.8.Typ.2 Inputs c (pcf) t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) 9080 A ct (in 2 ) f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 6330 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 6690 Num strand c.deck (pcf) Num straight 28 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 3590 Num straight.bot 28 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 3790 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 5 E slab (ksi) 4050 cg straight 3.68 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 45 cg harp.end 41 LongSteelClearSpacing 3.75 A beam (in 2 ) cg harp.ms 4.25 LongSteelCover 2 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.68 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) 59 A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 26.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-96

97 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-97

98 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-98

99 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-99 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

100 OK OK OK K-100

101 Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-101

102 Beam BT.10.Typ.1 Inputs c (pcf) t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) 8890 A ct (in 2 ) f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 6120 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 4130 Num strand c.deck (pcf) Num straight 28 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 3910 Num straight.bot 28 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 4230 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 6 E slab (ksi) 3160 cg straight 3.68 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 45 cg harp.end 41 LongSteelClearSpacing 1 A beam (in 2 ) cg harp.ms 4.25 LongSteelCover 2 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.68 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller 6 S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 26.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-102

103 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-103

104 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-104

105 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-105 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

106 OK OK OK K-106

107 Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-107

108 Beam BT.10.Typ.2 Inputs c (pcf) 129 t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) 9730 A ct (in 2 ) f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 6123 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 4930 Num strand c.deck (pcf) 129 Num straight 28 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 4060 Num straight.bot 28 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 4230 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 6 E slab (ksi) 3270 cg straight 3.68 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 45 cg harp.end 41 LongSteelClearSpacing 1 A beam (in 2 ) cg harp.ms 4.25 LongSteelCover 2 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.68 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 26.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-108

109 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-109

110 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-110

111 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-111 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

112 OK OK OK K-112

113 Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-113

114 Beam BT.10.Min.1 Inputs c (pcf) 129 t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) 9730 A ct (in 2 ) f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 6120 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 5170 Num strand c.deck (pcf) Num straight 28 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 4060 Num straight.bot 28 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 4230 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 6 E slab (ksi) 3200 cg straight 3.68 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 45 cg harp.end 41 LongSteelClearSpacing 1 A beam (in 2 ) cg harp.ms 4.25 LongSteelCover 2 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.68 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) 59 A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller 6 S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 26.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-114

115 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-115

116 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-116

117 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-117 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

118 OK OK OK K-118

119 Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-119

120 Beam BT.10.Min.2 Inputs c (pcf) t struct 8.5 f y (ksi) 67.3 f c ' (psi) A ct (in 2 ) f yv (ksi) 67.3 f ci ' (psi) 8940 h flange 8.5 E s (ksi) f c.deck (psi) 5860 Num strand c.deck (pcf) Num straight 28 A s.top (in 2 ) 0 E beam (ksi) 4140 Num straight.bot 28 d top 9.5 E beam.i (ksi) 4230 Num harp 6 d long.rebar 6 E slab (ksi) 3410 cg straight 3.68 IsLongSteelEpoxyCoated No h 45 cg harp.end 41 LongSteelClearSpacing 1 A beam (in 2 ) cg harp.ms 4.25 LongSteelCover 2 I beam (in 4 ) cg straight.bot 3.68 IsTopBarEffectApplicable No L beam (ft) 59 A strand (in 2 ) 0.15 A long.rebar (in2) 0.31 b v ShearSpan y b f pu (ksi) 270 x bearing 6 y t f pe (ksi) x bearing.roller S (ft) 7 E p (ksi) x critical.assume t haunch 1 HarpDist (ft) 26.5 A ct (in 2 ) cg s.bot cg s s v.design A v (in 2 ) P assume assume (rad) K-120

121 Basic Geometry and Material Calculations d s A ps.bot cg harp (in 2 ) h c L span (ft) A ps (in 2 ) harp (rad) f po (ksi) f r.v (psi) 1 K-121

122 Load Effect Calculations V LL M LL V DC1 M DC1 V assume M assume1 M assume V p K-122

123 Calculations for and cg ps d p c a f ps.max (ksi) l d.ps f ps (ksi) cg ps.bot d p.bot d s.bot Num strand.bot RedFactor x.s RedFactor x.ps A ps.bot (in 2 ) d e s d v v u A s.bot.x (in 2 ) A ps.bot.x (in 2 ) K-123 x (rad) MinReinfCheck OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK

124 OK OK OK K-124

125 Final Results for Shear Strength V c V s V n1 V n2 V n K-125

126 Beam Example Following the Simplified Procedure for Prestressed and Nonprestressed Sections Additional Inputs and Basic Calculations The same scenario provided in Section 0 is used for example calculations following Article in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Specifications. The same information and calculations presented previously apply here, with the exception that the values in P assume are: Additional required inputs and basic calculations for using this procedure include: Load Effects Since the amount of assumed live load changed from the original example, the shear and moment due to that assumed live load are calculated as: K-126

127 Using the dead load calculations from previously, the total shear and moment assumed to be in the beam are calculated as: Additionally, the maximum shear and moment due to externally applied loads, V i and M max are: K-127

128 where, in the case of this example, the terms V d and M d are equivalent to V DC1 and M DC1. Calculate the Shear Resistance Determine the Concrete Contribution to the Shear Resistance Calculate V ci Calculate f cpe, the Compressive Stress in the Concrete Due to Effective Prestress Forces K-128

129 Calculate the Moment Due to Externally Applied Loads Causing Cracking, M cre In the case of this example, M dnc, the total unfactored dead load moment acting on the noncomposite section is simply M DC1. K-129

130 Calculate V ci Calculate V cw Determine the Compressive Stress at the Composite Centroid, f pc K-130

131 Determine V cw K-131

132 Calculate V c Calculate the Steel Contribution to the Shear Resistance Determine cot K-132

133 Find V s Determine the Nominal Shear Resistance Note that for V n1, V p is taken as zero. Since V n2 is the same as what was calculated previously, the nominal shear resistance is calculated as: K-133

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes

Appendix J. Example of Proposed Changes Appendix J Example of Proposed Changes J.1 Introduction The proposed changes are illustrated with reference to a 200-ft, single span, Washington DOT WF bridge girder with debonded strands and no skew.

More information

Appendix K Design Examples

Appendix K Design Examples Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.

More information

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications

A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications A.2 AASHTO Type IV, LRFD Specifications A.2.1 INTRODUCTION A.2.2 DESIGN PARAMETERS 1'-5.0" Detailed example showing sample calculations for design of typical Interior AASHTO Type IV prestressed concrete

More information

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties

3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties Description his application calculates gross section moment of inertia neglecting reinforcement, moment of inertia

More information

NCHRP Project High Performance/High-Strength Lightweight Concrete for Bridge Girders and Decks

NCHRP Project High Performance/High-Strength Lightweight Concrete for Bridge Girders and Decks NCHRP Project 18-15 High Performance/High-Strength Lightweight Concrete for Bridge Girders and Decks Bernie Kassner, Research Scientist Virginia Center for Innovation and Research Michael Brown Associate

More information

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Topics Addressed Design of

More information

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections 4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015

More information

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge

Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge Design of a Balanced-Cantilever Bridge CL (Bridge is symmetric about CL) 0.8 L 0.2 L 0.6 L 0.2 L 0.8 L L = 80 ft Bridge Span = 2.6 L = 2.6 80 = 208 Bridge Width = 30 No. of girders = 6, Width of each girder

More information

3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection

3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection Description his application calculates the spacing for shear reinforcement of a concrete beam supporting a uniformly

More information

CSiBridge. Bridge Rating

CSiBridge. Bridge Rating Bridge Rating CSiBridge Bridge Rating ISO BRG102816M15 Rev. 0 Proudly developed in the United States of America October 2016 Copyright Copyright Computers & Structures, Inc., 1978-2016 All rights reserved.

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular Beams Diagonal Tension

More information

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT

PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified

More information

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear

Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear Lecture 06 Design of Reinforced Concrete Beam for Shear By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk 1 Topics Addressed Shear Stresses in Rectangular

More information

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension Chapter 8. and Diagonal Tension 8.1. READING ASSIGNMENT Text Chapter 4; Sections 4.1-4.5 Code Chapter 11; Sections 11.1.1, 11.3, 11.5.1, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.5.5.1, and 11.5.6 8.2. INTRODUCTION OF SHEAR

More information

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:

Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order: GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of semi-integral abutments. For general requirements and guidelines on

More information

Why are We Here? AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Metal Pipe Section 12.7 Concrete Pipe Section Plastic Pipe Section 12.12

Why are We Here? AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Metal Pipe Section 12.7 Concrete Pipe Section Plastic Pipe Section 12.12 Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 1 Josh Beakley March 2011 Why are We Here? AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Metal Pipe Section 12.7 Concrete Pipe Section 12.10 Plastic Pipe

More information

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design Elmer E. Marx, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Michael Keever, California Department

More information

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.

Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement. Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab

More information

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3.

Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on Exam 3. ES230 STRENGTH OF MTERILS Exam 3 Study Guide Exam 3: Wednesday, March 8 th in-class Updated 3/3/17 Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will be on

More information

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams

Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Chapter 8: Bending and Shear Stresses in Beams Introduction One of the earliest studies concerned with the strength and deflection of beams was conducted by Galileo Galilei. Galileo was the first to discuss

More information

Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges

Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges Presentation at 2003 TRB Meeting, Washington, D.C. UNIVERSITY Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges F. N. Catbas, A. E. Aktan, K. Ciloglu, O. Hasancebi, J. S. Popovics Drexel

More information

ORIGIN 0. PTC_CE_BSD_7.2_us_mp.mcdx. Mathcad Enabled Content Copyright 2011 Knovel Corp.

ORIGIN 0. PTC_CE_BSD_7.2_us_mp.mcdx. Mathcad Enabled Content Copyright 2011 Knovel Corp. PC_CE_BSD_7._us_mp.mcdx Copyright 011 Knovel Corp. Building Structural Design homas P. Magner, P.E. 011 Parametric echnology Corp. Chapter 7: Reinforced Concrete Column and Wall Footings 7. Pile Footings

More information

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering 4300:401-301 July 9, 2013 Steel Design Sample Quiz 2 1. The W10 x 54 column shown has both ends pinned and consists of A992 steel (F y = 50 ksi, F u

More information

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1.

Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and turned in Part 1. NAME CM 3505 Fall 06 Test 2 Part 1 is to be completed without notes, beam tables or a calculator. Part 2 is to be completed after turning in Part 1. DO NOT turn Part 2 over until you have completed and

More information

ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted

ERRATA for PE Civil Structural Practice Exam ISBN Copyright 2014 (July 2016 Second Printing) Errata posted Errata posted 8-16-2017 Revisions are shown in red. Question 521, p. 47: Question 521 should read as follows: 521. The W10 22 steel eam (Fy = 50 ksi) shown in the figure is only raced at the center of

More information

3.5 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part IV)

3.5 Analysis of Members under Flexure (Part IV) 3.5 Analysis o Members under Flexure (Part IV) This section covers the ollowing topics. Analysis o a Flanged Section 3.5.1 Analysis o a Flanged Section Introduction A beam can have langes or lexural eiciency.

More information

Therefore, for all members designed according to ACI 318 Code, f s =f y at failure, and the nominal strength is given by:

Therefore, for all members designed according to ACI 318 Code, f s =f y at failure, and the nominal strength is given by: 5.11. Under-reinforced Beams (Read Sect. 3.4b oour text) We want the reinforced concrete beams to fail in tension because is not a sudden failure. Therefore, following Figure 5.3, you have to make sure

More information

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003

Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Curved Steel I-girder Bridge LFD Guide Specifications (with 2003 Edition) C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. The BEST Center University of Maryland October 2003 Guide Specifications (1993-2002) 2.3 LOADS 2.4 LOAD COMBINATIONS

More information

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas

Failure in Flexure. Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas Introduction to Steel Design, Tensile Steel Members Modes of Failure & Effective Areas MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND PLANNING LECTURE VIII Dr. Jason E. Charalambides Failure in Flexure!

More information

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS

APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS APPENDIX D SUMMARY OF EXISTING SIMPLIFIED METHODS D-1 An extensive literature search revealed many methods for the calculation of live load distribution factors. This appendix will discuss, in detail,

More information

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement

Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections

More information

APPENDIX G I-BEAM SUMMARIES 0.6-IN. STRAND G-1

APPENDIX G I-BEAM SUMMARIES 0.6-IN. STRAND G-1 APPENDIX G I-BEAM SUMMARIES.6-IN. STRAND G-1 Concrete Compressive Strength Embedment Length(L e ) Span Failure Mode Maximum Load Maximum Shear Maximum Moment Maximum Deflection attained Rebound after complete

More information

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).

More information

Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011

Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011 Direct Design and Indirect Design of Concrete Pipe Part 2 Josh Beakley March 2011 Latest in Design Methods? AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications 2010 Direct Design Method for Concrete Pipe 1993? LRFD5732FlexuralResistance

More information

db = 23.7 in B C D 96 k bf = 8.97 in tf = in k = 1.09 in 13 Fy = 50 ksi Fu = 65 ksi Member A-B, Interior column: A E

db = 23.7 in B C D 96 k bf = 8.97 in tf = in k = 1.09 in 13 Fy = 50 ksi Fu = 65 ksi Member A-B, Interior column: A E line B1, second floor. t = thickness of connected part Pu = factored load to be resisted d = diameter of the bolt eb = one-half the depth of the beam, in. ec = one-half the depth of the column, in. Hub

More information

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram

ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case

More information

Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary

Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary Bridge Design Spring 2012 Example Bridge Deck Design for Assign. 3 Summary 1 / 2 Geometry Material Properties N gird 6 f' c 4 ksi S 8.00 ft 1 0.85 b f 0 in f r 0.740 ksi = 0.37 * SQRT( f' c ) L over 3.25

More information

Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements

Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Interaction Diagram Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Interaction Diagram - Dumbbell Concrete Shear Wall Unsymmetrical Boundary Elements Investigate the capacity for the irregular

More information

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads

Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads Lecture-03 Design of Reinforced Concrete Members for Flexure and Axial Loads By: Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com Prof.

More information

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges

FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges FHWA Bridge Design Guidance No. 1 Revision Date: July 21, 2008 Load Rating Evaluation of Gusset Plates in Truss Bridges By Firas I. Sheikh Ibrahim, PhD, PE Part B Gusset Plate Resistance in Accordance

More information

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams

Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Chapter 7: Bending and Shear in Simple Beams Introduction A beam is a long, slender structural member that resists loads that are generally applied transverse (perpendicular) to its longitudinal axis.

More information

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE 6.1 GENERAL It shall be in accordance with JSCE Standard Specification (Design), 6.1. The collapse mechanism in statically indeterminate structures shall not be considered.

More information

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines:

NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: Law of Sines: NME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: EXM 3 PST PROBLEMS (LESSONS 21 TO 28) 100 points Thursday, November 16, 2017, 7pm to 9:30, Room 200 You are allowed to use a calculator and drawing equipment, only.

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 04 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Compression Members By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering

More information

By Dr. Mohammed Ramidh

By Dr. Mohammed Ramidh Engineering Materials Design Lecture.6 the design of beams By Dr. Mohammed Ramidh 6.1 INTRODUCTION Finding the shear forces and bending moments is an essential step in the design of any beam. we usually

More information

Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel

Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girders with high strength steel * Hyun Sung Joo, 1) Jiho Moon, 2) Ik-Hyun sung, 3) Hak-Eun Lee 4) 1), 2), 4) School of Civil, Environmental and Architectural

More information

ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS

ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS ES230 STRENGTH OF MATERIALS Exam 1 Study Guide. Exam 1: Wednesday, February 8 th, in-class Updated 2/5/17 Purpose of this Guide: To thoroughly prepare students for the exact types of problems that will

More information

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual)

Lecture Example. Steel Deck (info from Vulcraft Steel Roof and Floor Deck Manual) 1 / 8 Geometry beam span L 40 ft Steel Wide Flange Beam: beam spacing s beam 10 ft F y 50 ksi construction live load LL construc 20 psf row 148 live load LL 150 psf unit weight of concrete UW conc 145

More information

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes

More information

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown?

5. What is the moment of inertia about the x - x axis of the rectangular beam shown? 1 of 5 Continuing Education Course #274 What Every Engineer Should Know About Structures Part D - Bending Strength Of Materials NOTE: The following question was revised on 15 August 2018 1. The moment

More information

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web:     Ph: Serial : IG1_CE_G_Concrete Structures_100818 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 011-451461 CLASS TEST 018-19 CIVIL ENGINEERING

More information

The subject of this paper is the development of a design

The subject of this paper is the development of a design The erformance and Design Checking of Chord-Angle Legs in Joist Girders THEODORE V. GALAMBOS ABSTRACT The subject of this paper is the development of a design checking method for the capacity of the outstanding

More information

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures

Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent

More information

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder 16 PLATE GIRDERS II 1.0 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the current practice for the design of plate girders adopting meaningful simplifications of the equations derived in the chapter on Plate Girders

More information

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column:

APRIL Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications. Topics covered in this month s column: APRIL 2015 DR. Z s CORNER Conquering the FE & PE exams Formulas, Examples & Applications Topics covered in this month s column: PE Exam Specifications (Geotechnical) Transportation (Horizontal Curves)

More information

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23

More information

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS This module of CIE 428 covers the following subjects Column theory Column design per AISC Effective length Torsional and flexural-torsional buckling Built-up members READING:

More information

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis.

This procedure covers the determination of the moment of inertia about the neutral axis. 327 Sample Problems Problem 16.1 The moment of inertia about the neutral axis for the T-beam shown is most nearly (A) 36 in 4 (C) 236 in 4 (B) 136 in 4 (D) 736 in 4 This procedure covers the determination

More information

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes

More information

MECE 3321: Mechanics of Solids Chapter 6

MECE 3321: Mechanics of Solids Chapter 6 MECE 3321: Mechanics of Solids Chapter 6 Samantha Ramirez Beams Beams are long straight members that carry loads perpendicular to their longitudinal axis Beams are classified by the way they are supported

More information

***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com

***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com Spreadsheet Title: Last Revision 8/27/2005 ***All blue fields with double frames are used for input.*** by DesignSpreadsheets.com www.designspreadsheets.com email: info@designspreadsheets.com Project I-Girder

More information

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC. BENDING STRESS The effect of a bending moment applied to a cross-section of a beam is to induce a state of stress across that section. These stresses are known as bending stresses and they act normally

More information

Homework No. 1 MAE/CE 459/559 John A. Gilbert, Ph.D. Fall 2004

Homework No. 1 MAE/CE 459/559 John A. Gilbert, Ph.D. Fall 2004 Homework No. 1 MAE/CE 459/559 John A. Gilbert, Ph.D. 1. A beam is loaded as shown. The dimensions of the cross section appear in the insert. the figure. Draw a complete free body diagram showing an equivalent

More information

This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced concrete columns when the ACI code is selected.

This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced concrete columns when the ACI code is selected. COMPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 2001 CONCRETE FRAME DESIGN ACI-318-99 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced

More information

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension but strong in compression Steel tendon is first stressed

More information

INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATIO ON QUANTIFIED VISIBLE DAMAGES OF R/C STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATIO ON QUANTIFIED VISIBLE DAMAGES OF R/C STRUCTURAL MEMBERS Paper N 1458 Registration Code: S-H1463506048 INFLUENCE OF LOADING RATIO ON QUANTIFIED VISIBLE DAMAGES OF R/C STRUCTURAL MEMBERS N. Takahashi (1) (1) Associate Professor, Tohoku University, ntaka@archi.tohoku.ac.jp

More information

B U I L D I N G D E S I G N

B U I L D I N G D E S I G N B U I L D I N G D E S I G N 10.1 DESIGN OF SLAB P R I O D E E P C H O W D H U R Y C E @ K 8. 0 1 7 6 9 4 4 1 8 3 DESIGN BY COEFFICIENT METHOD Loads: DL = 150 pc LL = 85 pc Material Properties: c = 3000

More information

Chapter 4. Test results and discussion. 4.1 Introduction to Experimental Results

Chapter 4. Test results and discussion. 4.1 Introduction to Experimental Results Chapter 4 Test results and discussion This chapter presents a discussion of the results obtained from eighteen beam specimens tested at the Structural Technology Laboratory of the Technical University

More information

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.

Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building

More information

Chapter 12. Static Equilibrium and Elasticity

Chapter 12. Static Equilibrium and Elasticity Chapter 12 Static Equilibrium and Elasticity Static Equilibrium Equilibrium implies that the object moves with both constant velocity and constant angular velocity relative to an observer in an inertial

More information

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6 Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016 CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite

More information

1/29/2010 Page 2 of 65 1/29/2010 Page 3 of 65 1/29/2010 Page 4 of 65 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 5 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number 09-118 West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn

More information

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1. C3 Flexural Members C3.1 Bending The nominal flexural strength [moment resistance], Mn, shall be the smallest of the values calculated for the limit states of yielding, lateral-torsional buckling and distortional

More information

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.

Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0. Example (8.1): Using the ACI Code approximate structural analysis, design for a warehouse, a continuous one-way solid slab supported on beams 4.0 m apart as shown in Figure 1. Assume that the beam webs

More information

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:

More information

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture

twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete

More information

Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns

Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns Appendix G Analytical Studies of Columns G.1 Introduction Analytical parametric studies were performed to evaluate a number of issues related to the use of ASTM A103 steel as longitudinal and transverse

More information

Chapter 2. Design for Shear. 2.1 Introduction. Neutral axis. Neutral axis. Fig. 4.1 Reinforced concrete beam in bending. By Richard W.

Chapter 2. Design for Shear. 2.1 Introduction. Neutral axis. Neutral axis. Fig. 4.1 Reinforced concrete beam in bending. By Richard W. Chapter 2 Design for Shear By Richard W. Furlong 2.1 Introduction Shear is the term assigned to forces that act perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of structural elements. Shear forces on beams are

More information

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter Chapter 1 Materials 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter A Area of concrete cross-section C s Constant depending on the type of curing C t Creep coefficient (C t = ε sp /ε i ) C u Ultimate creep coefficient

More information

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System

AISC LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Model: Verification11_3 Typical Floor Beam #10 W21x44 (10,3,10) AISC 360-05 LRFD Beam Design in the RAM Structural System Floor Loads: Slab Self-weight: Concrete above flute + concrete in flute + metal

More information

(Round up to the nearest inch.)

(Round up to the nearest inch.) Assignment 10 Problem 5.46 LRFD First, select the lightest weight W14 column. Use the recommended design value for K for the pinned-fixed support condition specified (ref. Commentary, Appendix 7, AISC

More information

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages

A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages A Simply supported beam with a concentrated load at mid-span: Loading Stages P L/2 L PL/4 MOMNT F b < 1 lastic F b = 2 lastic F b = 3 lastoplastic 4 F b = Plastic hinge Plastic Dr. M.. Haque, P.. (LRFD:

More information

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola Mechanics of materials branch of mechanics that studies the internal effects of stress and strain in a solid body. stress is associated with the

More information

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi Chapter 05 Structural Steel Design According to the AISC Manual 13 th Edition Analysis and Design of Beams By Dr. Jawad Talib Al-Nasrawi University of Karbala Department of Civil Engineering 71 Introduction

More information

PROPOSED SATSANG HALL TECHNICAL REPORT

PROPOSED SATSANG HALL TECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED SATSANG HALL - VERTICAL STRIP V1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADAPT CORPORATION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM 1733 Woodside Road, Suite

More information

CONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state

CONNECTION DESIGN. Connections must be designed at the strength limit state CONNECTION DESIGN Connections must be designed at the strength limit state Average of the factored force effect at the connection and the force effect in the member at the same point At least 75% of the

More information

[5] Stress and Strain

[5] Stress and Strain [5] Stress and Strain Page 1 of 34 [5] Stress and Strain [5.1] Internal Stress of Solids [5.2] Design of Simple Connections (will not be covered in class) [5.3] Deformation and Strain [5.4] Hooke s Law

More information

8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F y = 36 ksi F t = 21 ksi F c = 10 ksi. 6 ft. 10 k 10 k

8 ft. 5 k 5 k 5 k 5 k. F y = 36 ksi F t = 21 ksi F c = 10 ksi. 6 ft. 10 k 10 k E 331, Fall 2004 HW 2.0 Solution 1 / 7 We need to make several decisions when designing a truss. First, we need to determine the truss shape. Then we need to determine the height of the truss and the member

More information

County: Any Design: BRG Date: 9/2007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 9/2007. For prestr. beams, assume 12" top flange, therefore take 4" from CL Gird.

County: Any Design: BRG Date: 9/2007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 9/2007. For prestr. beams, assume 12 top flange, therefore take 4 from CL Gird. County: Any Design: BRG Date: 9/2007 Hwy: Any Ck Dsn: BRG Date: 9/2007 SLAB DESIGN EXAMPLE Design: Using AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications - 4 th Ed. and TxDOT LRFD Bridge Design Manual 8" Slab

More information

Example Stayed beam with two pylons

Example Stayed beam with two pylons Example Stayed beam with two pylons A roof structure is a stayed beam. The roof span is 300 ft. Stay vertical run is 20 ft. The deck is weighs 12 PSF. Beams have a transverse spacing equal to 40 feet.

More information

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS

SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0 kn OK Design shear force, V d 4223 kn

More information

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0

More information

Mechanics of Solids notes

Mechanics of Solids notes Mechanics of Solids notes 1 UNIT II Pure Bending Loading restrictions: As we are aware of the fact internal reactions developed on any cross-section of a beam may consists of a resultant normal force,

More information

Generation of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces

Generation of Biaxial Interaction Surfaces COPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 2002 CONCRETE FRAE DESIGN BS 8110-97 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how the program checks column capacity or designs reinforced

More information

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.) ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures III. Compression Members C. C. Fu, Ph.D., P.E. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department University of Maryland Compression Members Following subjects are covered:

More information

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads

Chapter Objectives. Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads Chapter Objectives Design a beam to resist both bendingand shear loads A Bridge Deck under Bending Action Castellated Beams Post-tensioned Concrete Beam Lateral Distortion of a Beam Due to Lateral Load

More information

Derivation of minimum steel ratio: based on service applied stresses

Derivation of minimum steel ratio: based on service applied stresses MATEC Web of Conferences, () DOI:./ matecconf/ Derivation of minimum steel ratio: based on service applied stresses Humam AL Sebai,*, Salah Al Toubat University of Sharjah, Sharjah city, UAE Abstract.

More information

Crack Control for Ledges in Inverted T Bent Caps

Crack Control for Ledges in Inverted T Bent Caps Crack Control for Ledges in Inverted T Bent Caps Research Report 0-1854-5 Prepared for Texas Department of Transportation Project 0-1854 By Ronnie Rong-Hua Zhu Research Associate Hemant Dhonde Research

More information