CDS 101/110a: Lecture 102 Control Systems Implementation


 Paula Marsh
 11 months ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 CDS 101/110a: Lecture 102 Control Systems Implementation Richard M. Murray 5 December 2012 Goals Provide an overview of the key principles, concepts and tools from control theory  Classical control  frequency domain, inner loop methods  Modern control  state space feedback, estimation Briefly describe how controllers are implemented in modern systems Reading: Åström and Murray, Feedback Systems, Ch 211
2 Main Principles of Control Management of Uncertainty Feedback allows high performance in the presence of uncertainty (parameters, noise,...) Example: repeatable performance of amplifiers with 5X component variation Key idea: accurate sensing to compare actual to desired, correction thru computation & actuation Design of Dynamics Feedback allows the dynamics of a system to be modified Example: stability augmentation for highly agile, unstable aircraft Key idea: interconnection gives closed loop that modifies natural behavior Maintaining Modularity Feedback can maintain input/output properties, providing simplified abstractions for higher levels Enables layered design abstractions by hiding details of dynamics and uncertainty CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 2
3 Frequency Response, Transfer Functions, Block Diagrams y ss = A G(i ) sin( t + arg G(i )) 101 Phase (deg) Magnitud e G(s) =C(sI A) 1 B + D G y2 u 1 = G y2 u 2 G y1 u 1 = n 1n 2 d 1 d Frequency (rad/sec) Parallel Σ Feedback Σ CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 3
4 Design Patterns for Control Systems Frequency Domain Control State Space Control Reference input shaping Feedback on output error Compensator dynamics shape closed loop response Uncertainty in process dynamics + external disturbances and noise Goals: stability, performance (tracking), robustness Environment Explicit computation of trajectories given a model of the process and environment CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 4
5 Linearization Around an Equilibrium Point 2 Linearize around x=x e x π 0 2π x 1 Remarks In examples, this is often equivalent to small angle approximations, etc Only works near to equilibrium point Full nonlinear model Linear model (honest!) CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 5
6 0 Stability of Linear Systems Q: when is the system asymptotically stable? Stability is determined by the eigenvalues of the matrix A Simple case: diagonal system More generally: transform to Jordan form Stable if λ i 0 Asy stable if λ i < 0 Unstable if λ i > 0 Asy stable if Re(λ i ) < 0 Unstable if Re( λ i ) > 0 Indeterminate if Re( λ i ) = 0 Form of eigenvalues determines system behavior Linearization captures behavior near eq pt local nonlinear stability CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 6
7 Step and Frequency Response Effect of eig values on step response Complex eigenvalues with small real part lead to oscillatory response Frequency of oscillations ω i MATLAB: step Imag Axis Polezero map ω p Real Axis Amplitude Step Response T 2π/ω p Time (sec.) Effect of eig values on freq response Eigenvalues determine break points for frequency response Complex eigenvalues lead to peaks in response function near ω I MATLAB: bode Phase (deg); Magnitude (db) Bode Diagrams 0 ω p Frequency (rad/sec) CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 7
8 Control Design Concepts System description: single input, single output system (MIMO also OK) Stability: stabilize the system around an equilibrium point Given equilibrium point x e R n, find control law u=α(x) such that Reachability: steer the system between two points Given x 0, x f R n, find an input u(t) such that x 0 xf Tracking: track a given output trajectory Given y d(t), find u=α(x,t) such that y(t) y d (t) t CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 8
9 Canonical Feedback Example: PID Control d e u r + C(s) + P(s) y 1 Three term controller Present: feedback proportional to current error Past: feedback proportional to integral of past error  Insures that error eventual goes to 0  Automatically adjusts setpoint of input Future: derivative of the error  Anticipate where we are going PID design Choose gains k, k i, k d to obtain the desired behavior Stability: solutions of the closed loop dynamics should converge to eq pt Performance: output of system, y, should track reference Robustness: stability & performance properties should hold in face of disturbances and plant uncertainty CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 9
10 r + e C(s) d 1 + Determine stability from (open) loop transfer function, L(s) = P(s)C(s). Use principle of the argument from complex variable theory (see reading) Enables loop shaping: design open loop to enable closed loop properties Thm (Nyquist). Consider the Nyquist plot for loop transfer function L(s). Let P # RHP poles of L(s) N # clockwise encirclements of 1 Z # RHP zeros of 1 + L(s) Then Z = N + P u P(s) Nyquist Criterion y To: Y(1) j j Imag + r R Nyquist Diagrams From: U(1) iω < 0 ω=+i ω=i iω > 0 Real ω=0 N= Nyquist D contour Take limit as r 0, R Trace from 1 to +1 along imaginary axis Trace frequency response for L(s) along the Nyquist D contour Count net # of clockwise encirclements of the 1 point Real Axis CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 10
11 The Art of Loop Shaping Loop Shaping for Stability & Performance Steady state error, bandwidth, tracking response Specs can be on any input/output response pair L(s) 1 BW GM L(s) < 1 Main ideas Performance specs give bounds on loop transfer function Use controller to shape response Gain/phase relationships constrain design approach Standard compensators: proportional, lead, PI PM H yr = L 1+L H yd = P 1+L Things to remember (for homework and exams) Always plot Nyquist to verify stability/robustness Check gang of 4 to make sure that noise and disturbance responses also look OK ( H < 1) H n = C 1+L H er = 1 1+L CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 11
12 Example: Magnetic Levitation System Nominal design gives low perf Not enough gain at low frequency Try to adjust overall gain to improve low frequency response Works well at moderate gain, but notice waterbed effect Bode integral limits improvement Must increase sensitivity at some point 10 Sensitivity Function Electromagnet Ball Magnitude (db) CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 IR receivier IR transmitter Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS Frequency (rad/sec) Fix: redesign
13 Robust Control Theory (CDS 212) Model components as I/O operators Δ W 2 y( ) = P(u( ), d( ), w( )) d disturbance signal d P W 1 z z output signal Δ uncertainty block C W 1 W 2 performance weight uncertainty weight Goal: guaranteed performance in presence of uncertainty for all Compare energy in disturbances to energy in outputs Use frequency weights to change performance/uncertainty descriptions Can I get X level of performance even with Y level of uncertainty? Generalizations to nonlinear systems (along trajectories) available [Tierno et al] CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 13
14 Digital implementation Sample inputs at fixed rate (eg 10 Hz) For each sample, compute the desired output Send output to actuators ( analog) Use input filter to avoid aliasing (signal changing faster than sampling) Implementing Control Laws Control law computation State space (easy): u = K x + kr r Transfer function tf2ss H(s) =C(sI A) 1 ẋ = Ax + Bu B! y = Cx c2d! x(t + h) =x(t)+h Ax(t)+Bu(t) y(t) =Cx(t)  Actual implementations are smarter, but mainly transparent (SIMULINK code) CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 14
15 Alice 300+ miles of fully autonomous driving 8 cameras, 8 LADAR, 2 RADAR 12 Core 2 Duo CPUs + Quad Core ~75 person team over 18 months Software 25 programs with ~200 exec threads 237,467 lines of executable code Example: Alice (DGC07) Team Caltech, Apr 07 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 15
16 DGC07 System Architecture Logging/ Visualization LADAR (6) Simulation Feature Classificat n Process Manager Systems Health Manager World Map Mission Planner Traffic Planner Linux, TCP/IP,... Stereo/Road Finding Gimbaled Sensor Elevation Mapping Obstacle Detect/Track Obstacle Map Vehicles Path Planner Path Follower Actuation Interface Application of existing controls technology in Alice Receding horizon (optimizationbased) control for path planning with obstacles; ~100 msec iteration rate Multilayer sensor fusion: sensor bus allows different combinations of sensors to be used for perceptors + fusion at map level Low level (inner loop) controls: PID w/ antiwindup (but based on a feasible trajectory from RHC controller) Team Caltech, Apr 07 Sensing Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS Vehicle State Estimator Navigation Vehicle Properties Highly modular Rapidly adaptable Constantly viable Resilient??? 16
17 Final Exam CDS 101: Four questions, worth a total of 40 points. Time limit = 2 hours CDS 110: Five questions, worth a total of 80 points. Time limit = 3.5 hours Point values listed for each part (most parts are 5 points each) Make sure to answer the right parts of the problems (some are 101 or 110 only) Answer as completely as possible and explain your work Exam is due at 5 pm, 14 Dec Must be handed in to Anissa Scott in 107 STL OK to turn in the exam to homework box outside 102 Steele, but at your own risk Please write your solutions in a fresh exam book (blue book) Exam is open book Course text (Astrom and Murray) + optional texts (see web page) are OK Course handouts, posted lecture notes, problem sets, posted solutions are OK Handwritten notes are OK. No other materials allowed. Computers and MATLAB/Python are OK for numerical calculations OK to use for computing numerical values and making plots, but not required Symbolic computations using Mathematica, MATLAB,... are not allowed (nor needed) All of your answers must be hand written or hand drawn (do not turn in code or plots) No use of the Internet (except MATLAB licenses, course materials [.caltech.edu]) CDS 101/110, 5 Dec 2012 Richard M. Murray, Caltech CDS 17
EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8 am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control StateSpace Systems Closedloop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationToday (10/23/01) Today. Reading Assignment: 6.3. Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10
Today Today (10/23/01) Gain/phase margin lead/lag compensator Ref. 6.4, 6.7, 6.10 Reading Assignment: 6.3 Last Time In the last lecture, we discussed control design through shaping of the loop gain GK:
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid 
More informationAnalysis of SISO Control Loops
Chapter 5 Analysis of SISO Control Loops Topics to be covered For a given controller and plant connected in feedback we ask and answer the following questions: Is the loop stable? What are the sensitivities
More informationExam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time
Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (559L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages
More informationSAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE SAMPLE SOLUTION TO EXAM in MAS501 Control Systems 2 Autumn 2015 Lecturer: Michael Ruderman Problem 1: Frequencydomain analysis and control design (15 pt) Given is a
More informationControl Systems II. ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017. G. Ducard
Control Systems II ETH, MAVT, IDSC, Lecture 4 17/03/2017 Lecture plan: Control Systems II, IDSC, 2017 SISO Control Design 24.02 Lecture 1 Recalls, Introductory case study 03.03 Lecture 2 Cascaded Control
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationCDS 110b: Lecture 21 Linear Quadratic Regulators
CDS 110b: Lecture 21 Linear Quadratic Regulators Richard M. Murray 11 January 2006 Goals: Derive the linear quadratic regulator and demonstrate its use Reading: Friedland, Chapter 9 (different derivation,
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 24: Compensation in the Frequency Domain Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Lead Compensators Performance Specs Altering
More informationLecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore
Lecture 6 Classical Control Overview IV Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science  Bangalore Lead Lag Compensator Design Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst.
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 23, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 23, Guzzella Ch. 23 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationCONTROL OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS
AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND SYSTEM THEORY CONTROL OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS Gianluca Palli Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell Energia Elettrica e dell Informazione (DEI) Università di Bologna Email: gianluca.palli@unibo.it
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationFREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCYRESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequencyresponse methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationReactive Protocol Synthesis for for Embedded Control Software
Reactive Protocol Synthesis for for Embedded Control Software Richard M. Murray Control & Dynamical Systems California Institute of Technology Necmiye Ozay (Michigan) Ufuk Topcu (Penn) Nok Wongpiromsarn
More informationAnalysis of DiscreteTime Systems
TU Berlin DiscreteTime Control Systems 1 Analysis of DiscreteTime Systems Overview Stability Sensitivity and Robustness Controllability, Reachability, Observability, and Detectabiliy TU Berlin DiscreteTime
More informationControl System Design
ELEC4410 Control System Design Lecture 19: Feedback from Estimated States and DiscreteTime Control Design Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
More informationx(t) = x(t h), x(t) 2 R ), where is the time delay, the transfer function for such a e s Figure 1: Simple Time Delay Block Diagram e i! =1 \e i!t =!
1 TimeDelay Systems 1.1 Introduction Recitation Notes: Time Delays and Nyquist Plots Review In control systems a challenging area is operating in the presence of delays. Delays can be attributed to acquiring
More informationAdditional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 14)
Appendix J Additional ClosedLoop Frequency Response Material (Second edition, Chapter 4) APPENDIX CONTENTS J. ClosedLoop Behavior J.2 Bode Stability Criterion J.3 Nyquist Stability Criterion J.4 Gain
More informationCDS 101/110: Lecture 6.2 Transfer Functions
CDS 11/11: Lecture 6.2 Transfer Functions November 2, 216 Goals: Continued study of Transfer functions Review Laplace Transform Block Diagram Algebra Bode Plot Intro Reading: Åström and Murray, Feedback
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the splane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More information1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise
EE C128 / ME134 Problem Set 6 Solution Fall 2011 1 (20 pts) Nyquist Exercise Consider a close loop system with unity feedback. For each G(s), hand sketch the Nyquist diagram, determine Z = P N, algebraically
More informationDistributed RealTime Control Systems
Distributed RealTime Control Systems Chapter 9 Discrete PID Control 1 Computer Control 2 Approximation of Continuous Time Controllers Design Strategy: Design a continuous time controller C c (s) and then
More informationProfessor Fearing EE C128 / ME C134 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall 2010 Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley
Professor Fearing EE C8 / ME C34 Problem Set 7 Solution Fall Jansen Sheng and Wenjie Chen, UC Berkeley. 35 pts Lag compensation. For open loop plant Gs ss+5s+8 a Find compensator gain Ds k such that the
More informationModeling and Control Overview
Modeling and Control Overview D R. T A R E K A. T U T U N J I A D V A N C E D C O N T R O L S Y S T E M S M E C H A T R O N I C S E N G I N E E R I N G D E P A R T M E N T P H I L A D E L P H I A U N I
More informationTradeoffs and Limits of Performance
Chapter 9 Tradeoffs and Limits of Performance 9. Introduction Fundamental limits of feedback systems will be investigated in this chapter. We begin in Section 9.2 by discussing the basic feedback loop
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3. 8. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #24 Wednesday, March 10, 2004 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Remedies We next turn to the question
More informationTuning PI controllers in nonlinear uncertain closedloop systems with interval analysis
Tuning PI controllers in nonlinear uncertain closedloop systems with interval analysis J. Alexandre dit Sandretto, A. Chapoutot and O. Mullier U2IS, ENSTA ParisTech SYNCOP April 11, 2015 Closedloop
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)
More informationSchool of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University. ME375 Feedback Control  1
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? OpenLoop vs ClosedLoop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? ClosedLoop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More information100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =
1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot
More informationRobust Performance Example #1
Robust Performance Example # The transfer function for a nominal system (plant) is given, along with the transfer function for one extreme system. These two transfer functions define a family of plants
More informationr +  FINAL June 12, 2012 MAE 143B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic
MAE 43B Linear Control Prof. M. Krstic FINAL June, One sheet of handwritten notes (two pages). Present your reasoning and calculations clearly. Inconsistent etchings will not be graded. Write answers
More information6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski. Solutions to Problem Set 1 1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Solutions to Problem Set 1 1 Problem 1.1T Consider the
More informationCDS 101: Lecture 8.2 Tools for PID & Loop Shaping
CDS : Lecture 8. Tools for PID & Loop Shapig Richard M. Murray 7 November 4 Goals: Show how to use loop shapig to achieve a performace specificatio Itroduce ew tools for loop shapig desig: ZieglerNichols,
More informationUniversity of Alberta ENGM 541: Modeling and Simulation of Engineering Systems Laboratory #7. M.G. Lipsett & M. Mashkournia 2011
ENG M 54 Laboratory #7 University of Alberta ENGM 54: Modeling and Simulation of Engineering Systems Laboratory #7 M.G. Lipsett & M. Mashkournia 2 Mixed Systems Modeling with MATLAB & SIMULINK Mixed systems
More informationMethods for analysis and control of. Lecture 6: Introduction to digital control
Methods for analysis and of Lecture 6: to digital O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.inpg.fr www.lag.ensieg.inpg.fr/sename 6th May 2009 Outline Some interesting books:
More informationD G 2 H + + D 2
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.302 Feedback Systems Final Exam May 21, 2007 180 minutes Johnson Ice Rink 1. This examination consists
More information16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2
16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 2 September 22, 2010 In this recitation, we will consider two problems from Chapter 8 of the Van de Vegte book. R +  E G c (s) G(s) C Figure 1: The standard block diagram
More informationFall 線性系統 Linear Systems. Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) FengLi Lian. NTUEE Sep07 Jan08
Fall 2007 線性系統 Linear Systems Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) FengLi Lian NTUEE Sep07 Jan08 Materials used in these lecture notes are adopted from Linear System Theory & Design, 3rd.
More informationPole Placement Design
Department of Automatic Control LTH, Lund University 1 Introduction 2 Simple Examples 3 Polynomial Design 4 State Space Design 5 Robustness and Design Rules 6 Model Reduction 7 Oscillatory Systems 8 Summary
More informationPole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsalab, CNRSINPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsalab.fr www.gipsalab.fr/ o.sename based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
More informationControl System Design
ELEC ENG 4CL4: Control System Design Notes for Lecture #22 Dr. Ian C. Bruce Room: CRL229 Phone ext.: 26984 Email: ibruce@mail.ece.mcmaster.ca Friday, March 5, 24 More General Effects of Open Loop Poles
More informationThe Nyquist criterion relates the stability of a closed system to the openloop frequency response and open loop pole location.
Introduction to the Nyquist criterion The Nyquist criterion relates the stability of a closed system to the openloop frequency response and open loop pole location. Mapping. If we take a complex number
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 13: Stability Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 13: Stability p.1/20 Outline InputOutput
More informationState Feedback and State Estimators Linear System Theory and Design, Chapter 8.
1 Linear System Theory and Design, http://zitompul.wordpress.com 2 0 1 4 State Estimator In previous section, we have discussed the state feedback, based on the assumption that all state variables are
More informationThe Generalized Nyquist Criterion and Robustness Margins with Applications
51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 1013, 2012. Maui, Hawaii, USA The Generalized Nyquist Criterion and Robustness Margins with Applications Abbas EmamiNaeini and Robert L. Kosut Abstract
More informationContrôle de position ultrarapide d un objet nanométrique
Contrôle de position ultrarapide d un objet nanométrique présenté par Alina VODA alina.voda@gipsalab.grenobleinp.fr sur la base de la thèse de Irfan AHMAD, coencadrée avec Gildas BESANCON plateforme
More informationECE382/ME482 Spring 2005 Homework 7 Solution April 17, K(s + 0.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
ECE382/ME482 Spring 25 Homework 7 Solution April 17, 25 1 Solution to HW7 AP9.5 We are given a system with open loop transfer function G(s) = K(s +.2) s 2 (s + 2)(s + 5) (1) and unity negative feedback.
More informationProportional, Integral & Derivative Control Design. Raktim Bhattacharya
AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Proportional, ntegral & Derivative Control Design Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Feedback Control Systems
EE C128 / ME C134 Feedback Control Systems Lecture Additional Material Introduction to Model Predictive Control Maximilian Balandat Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science University of
More informationControl System. Contents
Contents Chapter Topic Page Chapter Chapter Chapter3 Chapter4 Introduction Transfer Function, Block Diagrams and Signal Flow Graphs Mathematical Modeling Control System 35 Time Response Analysis of
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observerbased output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More information10 Transfer Matrix Models
MIT EECS 6.241 (FALL 26) LECTURE NOTES BY A. MEGRETSKI 1 Transfer Matrix Models So far, transfer matrices were introduced for finite order state space LTI models, in which case they serve as an important
More informationELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 LeadLag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such
More informationDynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis
Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 OpenLoop Process The study of dynamics was limited to openloop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More information6.302 Feedback Systems Recitation 16: Compensation Prof. Joel L. Dawson
Bode Obstacle Course is one technique for doing compensation, or designing a feedback system to make the closedloop behavior what we want it to be. To review:  G c (s) G(s) H(s) you are here! plant For
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS
Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table
More information2.010 Fall 2000 Solution of Homework Assignment 8
2.1 Fall 2 Solution of Homework Assignment 8 1. Root Locus Analysis of Hydraulic Servomechanism. The block diagram of the controlled hydraulic servomechanism is shown in Fig. 1 e r e error + i Σ C(s) P(s)
More informationDesired Bode plot shape
Desired Bode plot shape 0dB Want high gain Use PI or lag control Low freq ess, type High low freq gain for steady state tracking Low high freq gain for noise attenuation Sufficient PM near ω gc for stability
More information2 Lyapunov Stability. x(0) x 0 < δ x(t) x 0 < ɛ
1 2 Lyapunov Stability Whereas I/O stability is concerned with the effect of inputs on outputs, Lyapunov stability deals with unforced systems: ẋ = f(x, t) (1) where x R n, t R +, and f : R n R + R n.
More informationHomework 7  Solutions
Homework 7  Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationTransfer func+ons, block diagram algebra, and Bode plots. by Ania Ariadna Bae+ca CDS Caltech 11/05/15
Transfer func+ons, block diagram algebra, and Bode plots by Ania Ariadna Bae+ca CDS Caltech 11/05/15 Going back and forth between the +me and the frequency domain (1) Transfer func+ons exist only for
More information06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance.
Chapter 06 Feedback 06 Feedback Control System Characteristics The role of error signals to characterize feedback control system performance. Lesson of the Course Fondamenti di Controlli Automatici of
More informationEEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems
EEE 84: Introduction to feedback systems Summary 6 8 8 x 7 7 6 Level() 6 5 4 4 5 5 time(s) 4 6 8 Time (seconds) Fig.. Illustration of BIBO stability: stable system (the input is a unit step) Fig.. step)
More informationStudio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st Order Dynamic System RC LowPass Filter
Studio Exercise Time Response & Frequency Response 1 st Order Dynamic System RC LowPass Filter i i in R out Assignment: Perform a Complete e in C e Dynamic System Investigation out of the RC LowPass
More informationPerformance of Feedback Control Systems
Performance of Feedback Control Systems Design of a PID Controller Transient Response of a Closed Loop System Damping Coefficient, Natural frequency, Settling time and Steadystate Error and Type 0, Type
More informationIntro. Computer Control Systems: F8
Intro. Computer Control Systems: F8 Properties of statespace descriptions and feedback Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 22 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se F7: Quiz! 2
More informationLoopShaping Controller Design from InputOutput Data
LoopShaping Controller Design from InputOutput Data Kostas Tsakalis, Sachi Dash, ASU Honeywell HTC ControlOriented ID: Uncertainty description compatible with the controller design method. (LoopShaping
More informationDesign of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process
Design of Decentralised PI Controller using Model Reference Adaptive Control for Quadruple Tank Process D.Angeline Vijula #, Dr.N.Devarajan * # Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering Sri Ramakrishna
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 1: Introduction. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 1, Guzzella Ch. 1. Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 1: Introduction Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 1, Guzzella Ch. 1 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control DMAVT ETH Zürich September 22, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationINTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS IN A MANDATORY CONTROL COURSE
INTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS IN A MANDATORY CONTROL COURSE Yves Piguet Roland Longchamp Calerga Sàrl, av. de la Chablière 35, 4 Lausanne, Switzerland. Email: yves.piguet@calerga.com Laboratoire d automatique,
More informationChapter 5. Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup. 5.1 The Canonical Setup
Chapter 5 Standard LTI Feedback Optimization Setup Efficient LTI feedback optimization algorithms comprise a major component of modern feedback design approach: application problems involving complex models
More informationTime Response of Systems
Chapter 0 Time Response of Systems 0. Some Standard Time Responses Let us try to get some impulse time responses just by inspection: Poles F (s) f(t) splane Time response p =0 s p =0,p 2 =0 s 2 t p =
More informationPower System Control
Power System Control Basic Control Engineering Prof. Wonhee Kim School of Energy Systems Engineering, ChungAng University 2 Contents Why feedback? System Modeling in Frequency Domain System Modeling in
More informationGoodwin, Graebe, Salgado, Prentice Hall Chapter 11. Chapter 11. Dealing with Constraints
Chapter 11 Dealing with Constraints Topics to be covered An ubiquitous problem in control is that all real actuators have limited authority. This implies that they are constrained in amplitude and/or rate
More information1 Steady State Error (30 pts)
Professor Fearing EECS C28/ME C34 Problem Set Fall 2 Steady State Error (3 pts) Given the following continuous time (CT) system ] ẋ = A x + B u = x + 2 7 ] u(t), y = ] x () a) Given error e(t) = r(t) y(t)
More informationLaboratory 11 Control Systems Laboratory ECE3557. State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint
Laboratory 11 State Feedback Controller for Position Control of a Flexible Joint 11.1 Objective The objective of this laboratory is to design a full state feedback controller for endpoint position control
More informationChapter 13 Digital Control
Chapter 13 Digital Control Chapter 12 was concerned with building models for systems acting under digital control. We next turn to the question of control itself. Topics to be covered include: why one
More informationAA/EE/ME 548: Problem Session Notes #5
AA/EE/ME 548: Problem Session Notes #5 Review of Nyquist and Bode Plots. Nyquist Stability Criterion. LQG/LTR Method Tuesday, March 2, 203 Outline:. A review of Bode plots. 2. A review of Nyquist plots
More informationAnalysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain
Chapter 6 Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain 6. Concepts of feedback control Given a system, we can classify it as an open loop or a closed loop depends on the usage of the feedback.
More informationFirstOrder LowPass Filter!
Filters, Cost Functions, and Controller Structures! Robert Stengel! Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546! Princeton University, 217!! Dynamic systems as lowpass filters!! Frequency response of dynamic
More informationSeparation Principle & FullOrder Observer Design
Separation Principle & FullOrder Observer Design Suppose you want to design a feedback controller. Using fullstate feedback you can place the poles of the closedloop system at will. U Plant Kx If the
More informationPM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers
PM diagram of the Transfer Function and its use in the Design of Controllers Santiago Garrido, Luis Moreno Abstract This paper presents the graphical chromatic representation of the phase and the magnitude
More informationProblem 1 (Analysis of a Feedback System  Bode, Root Locus, Nyquist) Consider the feedback system defined by the open loop transfer function 1.
1 EEE480 Final Exam, Spring 2016 A.A. Rodriguez Rules: Calculators permitted, One 8.5 11 sheet, closed notes/books, open minds GWC 352, 9653712 Problem 1 (Analysis of a Feedback System  Bode, Root Locus,
More informationMath 312 Lecture Notes Linear Twodimensional Systems of Differential Equations
Math 2 Lecture Notes Linear Twodimensional Systems of Differential Equations Warren Weckesser Department of Mathematics Colgate University February 2005 In these notes, we consider the linear system of
More informationAdvanced Digital Controls
Advanced Digital Controls University of California, Los Angeles Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Report Author David Luong Winter 8 Table of Contents Abstract 4 Introduction..5 Physical
More informationFEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS
FEEDBAC CONTROL SYSTEMS. Control System Design. Open and ClosedLoop Control Systems 3. Why ClosedLoop Control? 4. Case Study  Speed Control of a DC Motor 5. SteadyState Errors in Unity Feedback Control
More informationConsensus Protocols for Networks of Dynamic Agents
Consensus Protocols for Networks of Dynamic Agents Reza Olfati Saber Richard M. Murray Control and Dynamical Systems California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125 email: {olfati,murray}@cds.caltech.edu
More informationControl Systems 2. Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits. Roy Smith
Control Systems 2 Lecture 4: Sensitivity function limits Roy Smith 2017314 4.1 Inputoutput controllability Control design questions: 1. How well can the plant be controlled? 2. What control structure
More informationState Feedback and State Estimators Linear System Theory and Design, Chapter 8.
1 Linear System Theory and Design, http://zitompul.wordpress.com 2 0 1 4 2 Homework 7: State Estimators (a) For the same system as discussed in previous slides, design another closedloop state estimator,
More informationLecture 7:Time Response PoleZero Maps Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order Systems and Pole Dominance Criterion
Cleveland State University MCE441: Intr. Linear Control Lecture 7:Time Influence of Poles and Zeros Higher Order and Pole Criterion Prof. Richter 1 / 26 FirstOrder Specs: Step : Pole Real inputs contain
More informationSimulation Study on Pressure Control using Nonlinear Input/Output Linearization Method and Classical PID Approach
Simulation Study on Pressure Control using Nonlinear Input/Output Linearization Method and Classical PID Approach Ufuk Bakirdogen*, Matthias Liermann** *Institute for Fluid Power Drives and Controls (IFAS),
More informationIntegral action in state feedback control
Automatic Control 1 in state feedback control Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 1 Academic year 21211 1 /
More information