Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors
|
|
- Aron Corey Park
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors Colin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, U. Maryland, U.C. - Davis May, 2008 May, / 41
2 1. Introduction OLS regression with individual-level data (i) with cluster or grouping (g) y ig = x 0 ig β + u ig, i = 1,..., N g, g = 1,..., G. E.g. y ig is (log) wage of ith individual who lives in state g and x ig includes regressor correlated within state g and u ig is error correlated within state g. May, / 41
3 Default OLS standard errors based on s 2 (X 0 X) 1 that ignore clustering can greatly understate true standard errors. See Moulton (1986, 1990). olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
4 Default OLS standard errors based on s 2 (X 0 X) 1 that ignore clustering can greatly understate true standard errors. See Moulton (1986, 1990). Standard solution is to get cluster-robust (CR) standard errors. This is the cluster option in Stata. olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
5 Default OLS standard errors based on s 2 (X 0 X) 1 that ignore clustering can greatly understate true standard errors. See Moulton (1986, 1990). Standard solution is to get cluster-robust (CR) standard errors. This is the cluster option in Stata. If the number of clusters G is small then: 1. CR standard errors are downwards biased (too small) 2. t statistic is not standard normal distributed 3. t-tests using standard normal critical values over-reject. olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
6 Default OLS standard errors based on s 2 (X 0 X) 1 that ignore clustering can greatly understate true standard errors. See Moulton (1986, 1990). Standard solution is to get cluster-robust (CR) standard errors. This is the cluster option in Stata. If the number of clusters G is small then: 1. CR standard errors are downwards biased (too small) 2. t statistic is not standard normal distributed 3. t-tests using standard normal critical values over-reject. This paper is concerned with better inference when there are few clusters. olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
7 Wrong standard errors and critical values: 5% May, / 41
8 Outline of Talk 1 Introduction 2 Cluster-Robust Inference 3 Cluster Bootstrap (without and with re nement) 4 Monte Carlo Simulations 5 Bertrand, Du o and Mullainathan (2004) Simulations 6 Gruber and Poterba (1994) Application 7 Conclusion May, / 41
9 2.1 OLS with Cluster Errors Model for G clusters with N g individuals per cluster: OLS estimator y ig = x 0 ig β + u ig, i = 1,..., N g, g = 1,..., G, y g = X g β + u g, g = 1,..., G, y = Xβ + u, bβ = ( G g =1 N g i=1 x ig x 0 ig ) 1 ( G g =1 N g i=1 x ig y ig ) = ( G g =1 X0 g X g ) 1 ( G g =1 X g y g ) = (X 0 X) 1 X 0 y. May, / 41
10 OLS with Clustered Errors As usual bβ = β + (X 0 X) 1 X 0 u = β + (X 0 X) 1 ( G g =1 X g u g ). olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
11 OLS with Clustered Errors As usual bβ = β + (X 0 X) 1 X 0 u = β + (X 0 X) 1 ( G g =1 X g u g ). Assume independence over g with u g [0, Σ g = E[u g ug 0 ]]. olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
12 OLS with Clustered Errors As usual bβ = β + (X 0 X) 1 X 0 u = β + (X 0 X) 1 ( G g =1 X g u g ). Assume independence over g with u g [0, Σ g = E[u g ug 0 ]]. Then β b a N [β, V[ β]] b with V[ b β] = (X 0 X) 1 ( G g =1 X g Σ g X 0 g )(X 0 X) 1. May, / 41
13 OLS with Clustered Errors If ignore clustering the default OLS variance estimate should be in ated by approximately where τ j ' 1 + ρ xj ρ u ( N g 1), ρ xj is the within cluster correlation of x j ρ u is the within cluster error correlation N g is the average cluster size. Moulton (1986, 1990) showed that could be large even if ρ u small. e.g. N G = 81, ρ x = 1 and ρ u = 0.1 then ρ = 9. Should correct for clustering but Σ g is unknown. May, / 41
14 2.2 Moulton-type Standard Errors Assume a random e ects (RE) model u ig = α g + ε ig α g iid[0, σ 2 α] ε ig iid[0, σ 2 ε ]. olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
15 2.2 Moulton-type Standard Errors Assume a random e ects (RE) model u ig = α g + ε ig α g iid[0, σ 2 α] ε ig iid[0, σ 2 ε ]. Then Σ g = σ 2 ui Ng + σ 2 αe Ng e 0 N g and we use bv RE [ b β] = (X 0 X) 1 ( G g =1 X g b Σ g X 0 g )(X 0 X) 1, where bσ g = bσ 2 ui Ng + bσ 2 αe Ng e 0 N g, and bσ 2 ε and bσ 2 α are consistent. olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
16 2.2 Moulton-type Standard Errors Assume a random e ects (RE) model u ig = α g + ε ig α g iid[0, σ 2 α] ε ig iid[0, σ 2 ε ]. Then Σ g = σ 2 ui Ng + σ 2 αe Ng e 0 N g and we use bv RE [ b β] = (X 0 X) 1 ( G g =1 X g b Σ g X 0 g )(X 0 X) 1, where bσ g = bσ 2 ui Ng + bσ 2 αe Ng e 0 N g, and bσ 2 ε and bσ 2 α are consistent. Weakness is strong distributional assumptions. May, / 41
17 2.3 Cluster-Robust Variance Estimates The cluster-robust variance estimate (CRVE) bv CR [ b β] = (X 0 X) 1 ( G g =1 X g eu g eu 0 g X 0 g )(X 0 X) 1, provides a consistent estimator of V CR [ b β] if plim 1 G G g =1 X g eu g eu g 0 X 0 g = plim 1 G G g =1 X g g X 0 g. olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
18 2.3 Cluster-Robust Variance Estimates The cluster-robust variance estimate (CRVE) bv CR [ b β] = (X 0 X) 1 ( G g =1 X g eu g eu 0 g X 0 g )(X 0 X) 1, provides a consistent estimator of V CR [ b β] if plim 1 G G g =1 X g eu g eu g 0 X 0 g = plim 1 G G g =1 X g g X 0 g. bv CR [ b β] yields cluster-robust standard errors. May, / 41
19 2.3 Cluster-Robust Variance Estimates The cluster-robust variance estimate (CRVE) bv CR [ b β] = (X 0 X) 1 ( G g =1 X g eu g eu 0 g X 0 g )(X 0 X) 1, provides a consistent estimator of V CR [ b β] if plim 1 G G g =1 X g eu g eu g 0 X 0 g = plim 1 G G g =1 X g g X 0 g. bv CR [ b β] yields cluster-robust standard errors. If OLS residuals are used then eu g = bu g = y g X g b β. Then bv CR [ b β] is downwards-biased for V[ b β]. May, / 41
20 2.4 Alternative Cluster-Robust Variance Estimates Stata cluster options uses eu g = p cbu g where c = G G 1 N 1 N k ' G G 1. Bell and McCa rey (2002) instead use r G 1 eu g = G [I N g H gg ] 1 bu g. Then bv CR [ b β] is the jackknife estimate of the variance of the OLS estimator. This leads to downwards-biased CRVE if in fact Σ g = σ 2 I. Angrist and Lavy (2002) use this. We call this CR3 as generalizes HC3 of MacKinnon and White (1985). May, / 41
21 2.5 Cluster-Robust Wald Tests Two-sided Wald tests of H 0 : β 1 = β 0 1 against H a : β 1 6= β 0 1 where β 1 is a scalar component of β. Use the Wald test statistic w = b β 1 β 0 1 s b β 1, where s b β is standard error from bv CR [ β]. b 1 Asymptotically N [0, 1] and reject at α = 0.05 if jwj > In nite samples w has much fatter tails than standard normal. Stata uses T (G 1) for critical values. And even this may over-reject. Donald and Lang (2004) propose alternative two-step estimator and T (G 2). May, / 41
22 3. Cluster Bootstraps Bootstrap due to Efron (1979) Alternative asymptotic approximation for distribution of a statistic. View the sample as the population and obtaining B resamples leading to B realizations of the statistic. There are many, many ways to bootstrap. A bootstrap without asymptotic re nement e.g. bootstrap estimate of standard error. No better than regular asymptotic theory. Popular as it may be simpler to implement. A bootstrap with asymptotic re nement e.g. bootstrap-t method. Asymptotically better than regular asymptotic theory. Hopefully better in nite samples (use Monte Carlos to con rm). Applied microeconometricians rarely use asymptotic re nement. May, / 41
23 3.1 Pairs Cluster Bootstrap-T Procedure 1 Do B iterations of this step. On the b th iteration: 1 Form a sample of G clusters f(y1, X 1 ),..., (y G, X G )g by resampling with replacement G times from the original sample. 2 Calculate the Wald test statistic w b = b β 1,b s b β 1,b bβ 1, where - bβ 1,b is OLS estimate using the bth pseudo-sample - s b β is its standard error estimated using CR method 1,b - bβ 1 is the original sample OLS estimate. 2 The empirical distribution of w1,..., w B estimates distribution of w. Reject H 0 at level α if and only if w < w [α/2] or w > w [1 α/2], where w[q] denotes the qth quantile of w1,..., w B. [e.g. w = 2.10, w[.025] = 2.32, w [.975] = 1.87 do not reject.] May, / 41
24 3.2 Asymptotic Re nement Consider two-sided nonsymmetric test of nominal size 0.5. Actual size = O(G 0.5 ) by conventional asymptotics. Actual size = O(G 1 ) using preceding bootstrap -t. So bootstrap-t o ers an asymptotic re nement. Key is to bootstrap an asymptotically pivotal statistic, one whose distribution does not depend on unknown parameters. w is asymptotically pivotal but bβ is not. May, / 41
25 3.3 Wild Cluster Bootstrap-T Procedure 1 Obtain the OLS estimator b β and OLS residuals bu g, g = 1,..., G. [Best to use residuals that impose H 0 ]. 2 Do B iterations of this step. On the b th iteration: 1 For each cluster g = 1,..., G, form bu g = bu g or bu g = bu g each with probability 0.5 and hence form by g = X 0 g b β + bu g. This yields wild cluster bootstrap resample f(by 1, X 1),..., (by G, X G )g. 2 Calculate the OLS estimate bβ 1,b and its standard error s bβ and given 1,b these form the Wald test statistic wb = ( bβ 1,b bβ 1 )/s b β. 1,b 3 Reject H 0 at level α if and only if w < w [α/2] or w > w [1 α/2], where w [q] denotes the qth quantile of w 1,..., w B. May, / 41
26 Wild bootstrap proposed by Wu (1986) for regression in the nonclustered case (heteroskedastic errors). Theory by Liu (1988) and Mammen (1993). Horowitz (1997, 2001) provides a Monte Carlo demonstrating good size properties. We use Rademacher weights that provide re nement if b β is symmetrically distributed Mammen weights can be used if b β is asymmetrically distributed. Davidson and Flachaire (2001) provide theory and simulation to support using Rademacher weights even in the asymmetric case. Here we have extended the wild bootstrap to a clustered setting. A brief application by Brownstone and Valletta (2001) also does this. Davidson and MacKinnon (1999) advocate imposing the null hypothesis. May, / 41
27 3.4 Bootstraps with Few Clusters - For cluster pairs bootstrap-t possible unordered recombinations of the data 2G 1 G combinations for G = 5 and 92, 378 combinations for G = 10 - implementation problems can still arise e.g. with binary regressor. For wild cluster bootstrap-t - 2 G possible recombinations - 32 combinations for G = 5 and 1, 024 combinations for G = 10 - but implementation problems less likely to arise e.g. with binary regressor. May, / 41
28 3.6 Test Methods Used in This Paper Method Bootstrap? Re nement? H 0 impos 1. Assume iid (default se s) No 2. Moulton-type correction se No 3. Cluster-robust se No 4. CR3 cluster-robust se No 5. Pairs Cluster Bootstrap-se Yes No 6. Residual Cluster Bootstrap se Yes No 7. Wild Cluster Bootstrap-se Yes No 8. Pairs Cluster BCA Yes Yes 9. BDM Bootstrap-t Yes No No 10. Pairs Cluster Bootstrap-t Yes Yes No 11. Pairs Cluster CR3 Bootstrap-t Yes Yes No 12. Residual Cluster Bootstrap-t Yes No Yes 13. Wild Cluster Bootstrap-t Yes Yes Yes May, / 41
29 4. Monte Carlo Simulations Dgp has β 0 = 1 and β 1 = 1 in y ig = β 0 + β 1 x ig + u ig, i = 1,..., 30, g = 1,..., G. We consider G = 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30. olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
30 4. Monte Carlo Simulations Dgp has β 0 = 1 and β 1 = 1 in y ig = β 0 + β 1 x ig + u ig, i = 1,..., 30, g = 1,..., G. We consider G = 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30. Test H 0 : β 1 = 1 vs H a : β 1 6= 1 at 5%: Wald test statistic: t = b β 1. s b β olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
31 4. Monte Carlo Simulations Dgp has β 0 = 1 and β 1 = 1 in y ig = β 0 + β 1 x ig + u ig, i = 1,..., 30, g = 1,..., G. We consider G = 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30. Test H 0 : β 1 = 1 vs H a : β 1 6= 1 at 5%: Wald test statistic: t = b β 1. s b β Actual rejection rate computed using S = 1, 000 Monte Carlo simulations. Monte Carlo se = p ba(1 ba)/s = if ba = May, / 41
32 4.1 Monte Carlo: Homoskedastic Clustered Errors Table 1: Errors correlated within group but homoskedastic. Dgp is y ig = α + βx ig + u ig = α + β (z g + z ig ) + (ε g + ε ig ) z g N [0, 1], z ig N [0, 1] ) ρ x = 0.5 ε g N [0, 1], ε ig N [0, 1] ) ρ u = 0.5. This is classic random e ects model for both the error and the regressor. Expect Moulton correction and residual bootstrap to do well. May, / 41
33 Monte Carlo: Homoskedastic Clustered Errors May, / 41
34 Monte Carlo Simulations 1 iid errors: p 1 + (N G 1)ρ x ρ u = p 8.25 = 2.87 and Pr[jzj > 1.96/2.87] = 0.50 as G!. 2 Moulton: rejection rate that if t T (G 2). 3 CR: Improvement, but not as good as Moulton. 4 CR3: Better still. 5 Pairs cluster bootstrap-se: similar to CR. 6 Residual cluster bootstrap-se: close to 0.5 (why?) 7 Wild cluster bootstrap-se: close to 0.5 (why?) May, / 41
35 Monte Carlo: Homoskedastic Clustered Errors May, / 41
36 Monte Carlo Simulations 8. Pairs-cluster bootstrap BCA - similar to CR in row 3. So no re nement. 9. BDM bootstrap-t uses iid s b β not cluster-robust s bβ. So no re nement. But still big improvement on Pairs cluster bootstrap-t. Good. Some over-rejection. 11. Pairs CR3 bootstrap-t. Similar to Residual cluster bootstrap-t. Works well. 13. Wild cluster bootstrap-t. Works well. May, / 41
37 Monte Carlo: Heteroskedastic Clustered Errors Table 3: Errors correlated within group and heteroskedastic. Dgp is y ig = α + βx ig + u ig = α + β (z g + z ig ) + (ε g + ε ig ) z g N [0, 1], z ig N [0, 1] ) ρ x = 0.5 ε g N [0, 1], ε ig N [0, 9 (z g + z ig ) 2 ] ) ρ u < 0.5. No longer classic random e ects model for both the error and the regressor. Find that Moulton-type correction breaks down. The bootstrap-t methods work well (surprising for residual bootstrap). May, / 41
38 Monte Carlo: Heteroskedastic Clustered Errors May, / 41
39 Monte Carlo: Heteroskedastic Clustered Errors May, / 41
40 Monte Carlo: Variations for G=10 If reject when jtj > t 8;.025 = rather than 1.96 then methods 2-7 do better. As increase cluster size then as expected default OLS does much worse while methods 2-13 change little. If have four regressors rather than one (each 0.5 (z g + z ig )) then expect similar results though more noise. May, / 41
41 Monte Carlo: Variations for G=10 May, / 41
42 Monte Carlo: Variations for G=10 May, / 41
43 Bootstrap for BDM Study Use BDM data on 21 years and up to G = 50 states. y ig = α g + γ i + β 1 I ig + u ig : i is year; g is state. y ig is a year-state measure of excess earnings (after control for age and education). olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
44 Bootstrap for BDM Study Use BDM data on 21 years and up to G = 50 states. y ig = α g + γ i + β 1 I ig + u ig : i is year; g is state. y ig is a year-state measure of excess earnings (after control for age and education). I ig is a binary policy change indicator. Randomly occurs in half the states. When occurs between sixth and fteenth year. Once only change from 0 to 1. olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
45 Bootstrap for BDM Study Use BDM data on 21 years and up to G = 50 states. y ig = α g + γ i + β 1 I ig + u ig : i is year; g is state. y ig is a year-state measure of excess earnings (after control for age and education). I ig is a binary policy change indicator. Randomly occurs in half the states. When occurs between sixth and fteenth year. Once only change from 0 to 1. Actual rejection rate: fraction of times jwj = j(bβ 1 0)/s b β 1 j > olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
46 Bootstrap for BDM Study Use BDM data on 21 years and up to G = 50 states. y ig = α g + γ i + β 1 I ig + u ig : i is year; g is state. y ig is a year-state measure of excess earnings (after control for age and education). I ig is a binary policy change indicator. Randomly occurs in half the states. When occurs between sixth and fteenth year. Once only change from 0 to 1. Actual rejection rate: fraction of times jwj = j(bβ 1 0)/s b β 1 j > Power against β 1 = 0.02: fraction of 400 times jwj > [Do OLS of y ig + (0.02I ig ) on I tg.] olin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, Cluster U. Maryland, Bootstrap U.C. - Davis () May, / 41
47 Bootstrap for BDM Study Get BDM s result that assuming iid errors leads to massive over-rejection. Get BDM s result that cluster robust with G = 6 has over-rejection. Moulton-type correction does surprisingly poorly. Problems with pairs cluster bootstrap-t. For 3 out of 6 states there was no policy change and I g = 0: Pr[all 6 I g = 0] = (1/2) 6 = 1/64. Find that wild cluster bootstrap-t does well. May, / 41
48 Bootstrap for BDM Study May, / 41
49 Bootstrap for BDM Study May, / 41
50 Bootstrap for BDM Study: With individual data Similar to with aggregate data. May, / 41
51 6. Gruber and Poterba Model for whether have private insurance is y ijt = α 1 + α 2 SELF ijt + α 3 POST ijt + β 1 SELF ijt POST ijt + u jt, where i denotes individual, j denotes employer type, t denotes year SELF ijt = 1 if individual i is self-employed at time t POST ijt = 1 if the year is 1987, 1988 or Di erence-in-di erence analysis controlling for clustered errors. Treat years as clusters G = 8 (following Donald and Lang (2004). Aggregated employment-year data. Then CR se is compared to without clustering. Individual-level data results similar to aggregate. May, / 41
52 7. Conclusion At the least should have small-sample correction of standard errors and use a T distribution with G or fewer degrees of freedom. Cluster pairs bootstrap-t is better than Cluster pairs BCA. But can run into problems implementing if binary cluster-invariant regressor and few clusters. Cluster Wild bootstrap-t works well, though is designed just for OLS. May, / 41
53 Some References Angrist and Lavy (2002), The E ect of High School Matriculation Awards: Evidence from Randomized Trials, NBER Working Paper Number Arellano, M. (1987), Computing Robust Standard Errors for Within-Group Estimators, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49, Bell, R.M. and D.F. McCa rey (2002), Bias Reduction in Standard Errors for Linear Regression with Multi-Stage Samples, Survey Methodology, Bertrand, M., E. Du o, and S. Mullainathan (2004), How Much Should we Trust Di erences-in-di erences Estimates, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Davison, A.C. and D. Hinkley (1997), Bootstrap methods and their Applications, Cambridge. Donald, S. and K. Lang (2004), Inferences with Di erences in Di erences and Other Panel Data, October 22, Efron, B. and R. J. Tibsharani (1993), An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman and Hall. May, / 41
54 Some References Hall, P. (1992), The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion, New York: Springer-Verlag. Horowitz, J. L. (1997), Bootstrap Methods in Econometrics: Theory and Numerical Performance, in Kreps and Wallis eds., Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 7 Kauermann, G. and R.J. Carroll (2001), A Note on the E ciency of Sandwich Covariance Matrix Estimation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, Liang, K.-Y., and S.L. Zeger (1986), Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models, Biometrika, 73, MacKinnon, J.G. and H. White (1985), Some Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimators with Improved Finite Sample Properties, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 29, Mancl, L.A. and T.A. DeRouen, A Covariance estimator for GEE with Improved Finite- Sample Properties, Biometrics, 57, May, / 41
55 Some References Moulton, B.R. (1986), Random Group E ects and the Precision of Regression Estimates, Journal of Econometrics, 32, Moulton, B.R. (1990), An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the E ects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Units, Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, Sherman, M. and S. le Cressie (1997), A Comparison Between Bootstrap Methods and Generalized Estimating Equations for Correlated Outcomes in Generalized Linear Models, Communications in Statistics, White, H. (1984), Asymptotic Theory for Econometricians, San Diego, Academic Press. Wooldridge, J.M. (2003), Cluster-Sample Methods in Applied Econometrics, American Economic Review, 93, May, / 41
Wild Bootstrap Inference for Wildly Dierent Cluster Sizes
Wild Bootstrap Inference for Wildly Dierent Cluster Sizes Matthew D. Webb October 9, 2013 Introduction This paper is joint with: Contributions: James G. MacKinnon Department of Economics Queen's University
More informationRobust Inference with Multi-way Clustering
Robust Inference with Multi-way Clustering Colin Cameron, Jonah Gelbach, Doug Miller U.C. - Davis, U. Arizona, U.C. - Davis February 2010 February 2010 1 / 44 1.1 Introduction Moulton (1986, 1990) and
More information11. Bootstrap Methods
11. Bootstrap Methods c A. Colin Cameron & Pravin K. Trivedi 2006 These transparencies were prepared in 20043. They can be used as an adjunct to Chapter 11 of our subsequent book Microeconometrics: Methods
More informationA Practitioner s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference
A Practitioner s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference A. C. Cameron and D. L. Miller presented by Federico Curci March 4, 2015 Cameron Miller Cluster Clinic II March 4, 2015 1 / 20 In the previous episode
More informationA better way to bootstrap pairs
A better way to bootstrap pairs Emmanuel Flachaire GREQAM - Université de la Méditerranée CORE - Université Catholique de Louvain April 999 Abstract In this paper we are interested in heteroskedastic regression
More informationHeteroskedasticity-Robust Inference in Finite Samples
Heteroskedasticity-Robust Inference in Finite Samples Jerry Hausman and Christopher Palmer Massachusetts Institute of Technology December 011 Abstract Since the advent of heteroskedasticity-robust standard
More informationEmpirical Methods in Applied Microeconomics
Empirical Methods in Applied Microeconomics Jörn-Ste en Pischke LSE October 007 1 Nonstandard Standard Error Issues The discussion so far has concentrated on identi cation of the e ect of interest. Obviously,
More informationBootstrapping Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator
Bootstrapping Heteroskedasticity Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator by Emmanuel Flachaire Eurequa, University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne December 2001 Abstract Recent results of Cribari-Neto and Zarkos
More informationThe Exact Distribution of the t-ratio with Robust and Clustered Standard Errors
The Exact Distribution of the t-ratio with Robust and Clustered Standard Errors by Bruce E. Hansen Department of Economics University of Wisconsin October 2018 Bruce Hansen (University of Wisconsin) Exact
More informationWILD CLUSTER BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVALS*
L Actualité économique, Revue d analyse économique, vol 91, n os 1-2, mars-juin 2015 WILD CLUSTER BOOTSTRAP CONFIDENCE INTERVALS* James G MacKinnon Department of Economics Queen s University Abstract Confidence
More informationRobust Inference with Clustered Data
Robust Inference with Clustered Data A. Colin Cameron and Douglas L. Miller Department of Economics, University of California - Davis. This version: Feb 10, 2010 Abstract In this paper we survey methods
More informationCasuality and Programme Evaluation
Casuality and Programme Evaluation Lecture V: Difference-in-Differences II Dr Martin Karlsson University of Duisburg-Essen Summer Semester 2017 M Karlsson (University of Duisburg-Essen) Casuality and Programme
More informationInference in difference-in-differences approaches
Inference in difference-in-differences approaches Mike Brewer (University of Essex & IFS) and Robert Joyce (IFS) PEPA is based at the IFS and CEMMAP Introduction Often want to estimate effects of policy/programme
More informationThe Exact Distribution of the t-ratio with Robust and Clustered Standard Errors
The Exact Distribution of the t-ratio with Robust and Clustered Standard Errors by Bruce E. Hansen Department of Economics University of Wisconsin June 2017 Bruce Hansen (University of Wisconsin) Exact
More informationTECHNICAL WORKING PAPER SERIES ROBUST INFERENCE WITH MULTI-WAY CLUSTERING. A. Colin Cameron Jonah B. Gelbach Douglas L. Miller
TECHNICAL WORKING PAPER SERIES ROBUST INFERENCE WITH MULTI-WAY CLUSTERING A. Colin Cameron Jonah B. Gelbach Douglas L. Miller Technical Working Paper 327 http://www.nber.org/papers/t0327 NATIONAL BUREAU
More informationWild Cluster Bootstrap Confidence Intervals
Wild Cluster Bootstrap Confidence Intervals James G MacKinnon Department of Economics Queen s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 jgm@econqueensuca http://wwweconqueensuca/faculty/macinnon/ Abstract
More informationBootstrapping heteroskedastic regression models: wild bootstrap vs. pairs bootstrap
Bootstrapping heteroskedastic regression models: wild bootstrap vs. pairs bootstrap Emmanuel Flachaire To cite this version: Emmanuel Flachaire. Bootstrapping heteroskedastic regression models: wild bootstrap
More informationEconometrics II. Nonstandard Standard Error Issues: A Guide for the. Practitioner
Econometrics II Nonstandard Standard Error Issues: A Guide for the Practitioner Måns Söderbom 10 May 2011 Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg. Email: mans.soderbom@economics.gu.se. Web: www.economics.gu.se/soderbom,
More informationA Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 7: Cluster Sampling. Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August 2008
A Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 7: Cluster Sampling Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August 2008 1. The Linear Model with Cluster Effects 2. Estimation with a Small Number of roups and
More informationInference Based on the Wild Bootstrap
Inference Based on the Wild Bootstrap James G. MacKinnon Department of Economics Queen s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6 email: jgm@econ.queensu.ca Ottawa September 14, 2012 The Wild Bootstrap
More informationLecture 4: Linear panel models
Lecture 4: Linear panel models Luc Behaghel PSE February 2009 Luc Behaghel (PSE) Lecture 4 February 2009 1 / 47 Introduction Panel = repeated observations of the same individuals (e.g., rms, workers, countries)
More informationSmall-Sample Methods for Cluster-Robust Inference in School-Based Experiments
Small-Sample Methods for Cluster-Robust Inference in School-Based Experiments James E. Pustejovsky UT Austin Educational Psychology Department Quantitative Methods Program pusto@austin.utexas.edu Elizabeth
More informationInference about Clustering and Parametric. Assumptions in Covariance Matrix Estimation
Inference about Clustering and Parametric Assumptions in Covariance Matrix Estimation Mikko Packalen y Tony Wirjanto z 26 November 2010 Abstract Selecting an estimator for the variance covariance matrix
More informationBootstrap Testing in Econometrics
Presented May 29, 1999 at the CEA Annual Meeting Bootstrap Testing in Econometrics James G MacKinnon Queen s University at Kingston Introduction: Economists routinely compute test statistics of which the
More informationSmall sample methods for cluster-robust variance estimation and hypothesis testing in fixed effects models
Small sample methods for cluster-robust variance estimation and hypothesis testing in fixed effects models arxiv:1601.01981v1 [stat.me] 8 Jan 2016 James E. Pustejovsky Department of Educational Psychology
More informationRobust Inference with Clustered Errors
Robust nference with Clustered Errors Colin Cameron Univ. of California - Davis Keynote address at The 8th Annual Health Econometrics Workshop, University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz Medical Campus..
More informationThe Wild Bootstrap, Tamed at Last. Russell Davidson. Emmanuel Flachaire
The Wild Bootstrap, Tamed at Last GREQAM Centre de la Vieille Charité 2 rue de la Charité 13236 Marseille cedex 02, France by Russell Davidson email: RussellDavidson@mcgillca and Emmanuel Flachaire Université
More informationClustering as a Design Problem
Clustering as a Design Problem Alberto Abadie, Susan Athey, Guido Imbens, & Jeffrey Wooldridge Harvard-MIT Econometrics Seminar Cambridge, February 4, 2016 Adjusting standard errors for clustering is common
More informationRobust Inference for Regression with Clustered Data
Robust nference for Regression with Clustered Data Colin Cameron Univ. of California - Davis Joint work with Douglas L. Miller (UC - Davis). Based on A Practitioners Guide to Cluster-Robust nference, Journal
More informationRobust Standard Errors in Small Samples: Some Practical Advice
Robust Standard Errors in Small Samples: Some Practical Advice Guido W. Imbens Michal Kolesár First Draft: October 2012 This Draft: December 2014 Abstract In this paper we discuss the properties of confidence
More informationINFERENCE WITH LARGE CLUSTERED DATASETS*
L Actualité économique, Revue d analyse économique, vol. 92, n o 4, décembre 2016 INFERENCE WITH LARGE CLUSTERED DATASETS* James G. MACKINNON Queen s University jgm@econ.queensu.ca Abstract Inference using
More informationSmall sample methods for cluster-robust variance estimation and hypothesis testing in fixed effects models
Small sample methods for cluster-robust variance estimation and hypothesis testing in fixed effects models James E. Pustejovsky and Elizabeth Tipton July 18, 2016 Abstract In panel data models and other
More informationPanel Data. March 2, () Applied Economoetrics: Topic 6 March 2, / 43
Panel Data March 2, 212 () Applied Economoetrics: Topic March 2, 212 1 / 43 Overview Many economic applications involve panel data. Panel data has both cross-sectional and time series aspects. Regression
More informationNBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ROBUST STANDARD ERRORS IN SMALL SAMPLES: SOME PRACTICAL ADVICE. Guido W. Imbens Michal Kolesar
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ROBUST STANDARD ERRORS IN SMALL SAMPLES: SOME PRACTICAL ADVICE Guido W. Imbens Michal Kolesar Working Paper 18478 http://www.nber.org/papers/w18478 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC
More information12E016. Econometric Methods II 6 ECTS. Overview and Objectives
Overview and Objectives This course builds on and further extends the econometric and statistical content studied in the first quarter, with a special focus on techniques relevant to the specific field
More informationCluster-Robust Inference
Cluster-Robust Inference David Sovich Washington University in St. Louis Modern Empirical Corporate Finance Modern day ECF mainly focuses on obtaining unbiased or consistent point estimates (e.g. indentification!)
More informationFinite Sample Performance of A Minimum Distance Estimator Under Weak Instruments
Finite Sample Performance of A Minimum Distance Estimator Under Weak Instruments Tak Wai Chau February 20, 2014 Abstract This paper investigates the nite sample performance of a minimum distance estimator
More informationFNCE 926 Empirical Methods in CF
FNCE 926 Empirical Methods in CF Lecture 11 Standard Errors & Misc. Professor Todd Gormley Announcements Exercise #4 is due Final exam will be in-class on April 26 q After today, only two more classes
More informationBOOTSTRAPPING DIFFERENCES-IN-DIFFERENCES ESTIMATES
BOOTSTRAPPING DIFFERENCES-IN-DIFFERENCES ESTIMATES Bertrand Hounkannounon Université de Montréal, CIREQ December 2011 Abstract This paper re-examines the analysis of differences-in-differences estimators
More informationSmall-sample cluster-robust variance estimators for two-stage least squares models
Small-sample cluster-robust variance estimators for two-stage least squares models ames E. Pustejovsky The University of Texas at Austin Context In randomized field trials of educational interventions,
More informationMore efficient tests robust to heteroskedasticity of unknown form
More efficient tests robust to heteroskedasticity of unknown form Emmanuel Flachaire To cite this version: Emmanuel Flachaire. More efficient tests robust to heteroskedasticity of unknown form. Econometric
More informationA Practitioner s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference
A Practitioner s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference A. Colin Cameron Douglas L. Miller Cameron and Miller abstract We consider statistical inference for regression when data are grouped into clusters, with
More information8. Nonstandard standard error issues 8.1. The bias of robust standard errors
8.1. The bias of robust standard errors Bias Robust standard errors are now easily obtained using e.g. Stata option robust Robust standard errors are preferable to normal standard errors when residuals
More informationPreliminaries The bootstrap Bias reduction Hypothesis tests Regression Confidence intervals Time series Final remark. Bootstrap inference
1 / 171 Bootstrap inference Francisco Cribari-Neto Departamento de Estatística Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Recife / PE, Brazil email: cribari@gmail.com October 2013 2 / 171 Unpaid advertisement
More informationDay 1A Ordinary Least Squares and GLS
Day 1A Ordinary Least Squares and GLS c A. Colin Cameron Univ. of Calif.- Davis Frontiers in Econometrics Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics. Based on A. Colin Cameron and Pravin K. Trivedi (2009,2010),
More informationModified Variance Ratio Test for Autocorrelation in the Presence of Heteroskedasticity
The Lahore Journal of Economics 23 : 1 (Summer 2018): pp. 1 19 Modified Variance Ratio Test for Autocorrelation in the Presence of Heteroskedasticity Sohail Chand * and Nuzhat Aftab ** Abstract Given that
More informationEnvironmental Econometrics
Environmental Econometrics Syngjoo Choi Fall 2008 Environmental Econometrics (GR03) Fall 2008 1 / 37 Syllabus I This is an introductory econometrics course which assumes no prior knowledge on econometrics;
More informationInference for Clustered Data
Inference for Clustered Data Chang Hyung Lee and Douglas G. Steigerwald Department of Economics University of California, Santa Barbara March 23, 2017 Abstract This article introduces eclust, a new Stata
More informationA Course on Advanced Econometrics
A Course on Advanced Econometrics Yongmiao Hong The Ernest S. Liu Professor of Economics & International Studies Cornell University Course Introduction: Modern economies are full of uncertainties and risk.
More informationBootstrap Methods in Econometrics
Bootstrap Methods in Econometrics Department of Economics McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T7 by Russell Davidson email: russell.davidson@mcgill.ca and James G. MacKinnon Department of Economics
More informationRobust covariance estimator for small-sample adjustment in the generalized estimating equations: A simulation study
Science Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics 2014; 2(1): 20-25 Published online February 20, 2014 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/sjams) doi: 10.11648/j.sjams.20140201.13 Robust covariance
More informationDiagnostics for the Bootstrap and Fast Double Bootstrap
Diagnostics for the Bootstrap and Fast Double Bootstrap Department of Economics and CIREQ McGill University Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 2T7 by Russell Davidson russell.davidson@mcgill.ca AMSE-GREQAM Centre
More informationPreliminaries The bootstrap Bias reduction Hypothesis tests Regression Confidence intervals Time series Final remark. Bootstrap inference
1 / 172 Bootstrap inference Francisco Cribari-Neto Departamento de Estatística Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Recife / PE, Brazil email: cribari@gmail.com October 2014 2 / 172 Unpaid advertisement
More informationSize and Power of the RESET Test as Applied to Systems of Equations: A Bootstrap Approach
Size and Power of the RESET Test as Applied to Systems of Equations: A Bootstrap Approach Ghazi Shukur Panagiotis Mantalos International Business School Department of Statistics Jönköping University Lund
More informationNotes on Generalized Method of Moments Estimation
Notes on Generalized Method of Moments Estimation c Bronwyn H. Hall March 1996 (revised February 1999) 1. Introduction These notes are a non-technical introduction to the method of estimation popularized
More informationOn GMM Estimation and Inference with Bootstrap Bias-Correction in Linear Panel Data Models
On GMM Estimation and Inference with Bootstrap Bias-Correction in Linear Panel Data Models Takashi Yamagata y Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, Heslington, York, UK January
More informationChapter 2. Dynamic panel data models
Chapter 2. Dynamic panel data models School of Economics and Management - University of Geneva Christophe Hurlin, Université of Orléans University of Orléans April 2018 C. Hurlin (University of Orléans)
More informationDay 3B Nonparametrics and Bootstrap
Day 3B Nonparametrics and Bootstrap c A. Colin Cameron Univ. of Calif.- Davis Frontiers in Econometrics Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics. Based on A. Colin Cameron and Pravin K. Trivedi (2009,2010),
More informationEconometrics - 30C00200
Econometrics - 30C00200 Lecture 11: Heteroskedasticity Antti Saastamoinen VATT Institute for Economic Research Fall 2015 30C00200 Lecture 11: Heteroskedasticity 12.10.2015 Aalto University School of Business
More information4.8 Instrumental Variables
4.8. INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES 35 4.8 Instrumental Variables A major complication that is emphasized in microeconometrics is the possibility of inconsistent parameter estimation due to endogenous regressors.
More informationMarkov-Switching Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables. Chang-Jin Kim 1
Markov-Switching Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables by Chang-Jin Kim 1 Dept. of Economics, Korea University and Dept. of Economics, University of Washington First draft: August, 2002 This version:
More informationRecitation 5. Inference and Power Calculations. Yiqing Xu. March 7, 2014 MIT
17.802 Recitation 5 Inference and Power Calculations Yiqing Xu MIT March 7, 2014 1 Inference of Frequentists 2 Power Calculations Inference (mostly MHE Ch8) Inference in Asymptopia (and with Weak Null)
More informationWhat s New in Econometrics? Lecture 14 Quantile Methods
What s New in Econometrics? Lecture 14 Quantile Methods Jeff Wooldridge NBER Summer Institute, 2007 1. Reminders About Means, Medians, and Quantiles 2. Some Useful Asymptotic Results 3. Quantile Regression
More informationDifference-in-Differences Estimation
Difference-in-Differences Estimation Jeff Wooldridge Michigan State University Programme Evaluation for Policy Analysis Institute for Fiscal Studies June 2012 1. The Basic Methodology 2. How Should We
More informationSupplement to Randomization Tests under an Approximate Symmetry Assumption
Supplement to Randomization Tests under an Approximate Symmetry Assumption Ivan A. Canay Department of Economics Northwestern University iacanay@northwestern.edu Joseph P. Romano Departments of Economics
More informationRecent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using Micro-Level Data
Recent Advances in the Field of Trade Theory and Policy Analysis Using Micro-Level Data July 2012 Bangkok, Thailand Cosimo Beverelli (World Trade Organization) 1 Content a) Classical regression model b)
More informationAn Encompassing Test for Non-Nested Quantile Regression Models
An Encompassing Test for Non-Nested Quantile Regression Models Chung-Ming Kuan Department of Finance National Taiwan University Hsin-Yi Lin Department of Economics National Chengchi University Abstract
More informationDiscussion Paper Series
INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO AUTÓNOMO DE MÉXICO CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIÓN ECONÓMICA Discussion Paper Series Size Corrected Power for Bootstrap Tests Manuel A. Domínguez and Ignacio N. Lobato Instituto Tecnológico
More informationVolume 30, Issue 1. The finite-sample properties of bootstrap tests in multiple structural change models
Volume 30, Issue 1 The finite-sample properties of bootstrap tests in multiple structural change models Jamel JOUINI FSEGN and LEGI-EPT, Université 7 Novembre de Carthage, Tunisia Mohamed Boutahar Faculté
More informationLecture Notes on Measurement Error
Steve Pischke Spring 2000 Lecture Notes on Measurement Error These notes summarize a variety of simple results on measurement error which I nd useful. They also provide some references where more complete
More informationBootstrap Tests: How Many Bootstraps?
Bootstrap Tests: How Many Bootstraps? Russell Davidson James G. MacKinnon GREQAM Department of Economics Centre de la Vieille Charité Queen s University 2 rue de la Charité Kingston, Ontario, Canada 13002
More informationReview of Econometrics
Review of Econometrics Zheng Tian June 5th, 2017 1 The Essence of the OLS Estimation Multiple regression model involves the models as follows Y i = β 0 + β 1 X 1i + β 2 X 2i + + β k X ki + u i, i = 1,...,
More informationQED. Queen s Economics Department Working Paper No Bootstrap and Asymptotic Inference with Multiway Clustering
QED Queen s Economics Department Working Paper o 1386 Bootstrap and Asymptotic Inference with Multiway Clustering James G MacKinnon Queen s University Morten Ørregaard ielsen Queen s University Matthew
More informationEcon 273B Advanced Econometrics Spring
Econ 273B Advanced Econometrics Spring 2005-6 Aprajit Mahajan email: amahajan@stanford.edu Landau 233 OH: Th 3-5 or by appt. This is a graduate level course in econometrics. The rst part of the course
More informationThe Case Against JIVE
The Case Against JIVE Related literature, Two comments and One reply PhD. student Freddy Rojas Cama Econometrics Theory II Rutgers University November 14th, 2011 Literature 1 Literature 2 Key de nitions
More informationQED. Queen s Economics Department Working Paper No. 1355
QED Queen s Economics Department Working Paper No 1355 Randomization Inference for Difference-in-Differences with Few Treated Clusters James G MacKinnon Queen s University Matthew D Webb Carleton University
More informationInference in Differences-in-Differences with Few Treated Groups and Heteroskedasticity
Inference in Differences-in-Differences with Few Treated Groups and Heteroskedasticity Bruno Ferman Cristine Pinto Sao Paulo School of Economics - FGV First Draft: October, 205 This Draft: October, 207
More informationA Practitioner's Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference
A Practitioner's Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference A. Colin Cameron and Douglas L. Miller Department of Economics, University of California - Davis. This version: September 30, 2013 Abstract Note: Sections
More informationeconstor Make Your Publications Visible.
econstor Make Your Publications Visible A Service of Wirtschaft Centre zbwleibniz-informationszentrum Economics MacKinnon, James G Working Paper Thirty years of heteroskedasticity-robust inference Queen's
More informationBootstrapping Long Memory Tests: Some Monte Carlo Results
Bootstrapping Long Memory Tests: Some Monte Carlo Results Anthony Murphy and Marwan Izzeldin University College Dublin and Cass Business School. July 2004 - Preliminary Abstract We investigate the bootstrapped
More informationA Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 18: Missing Data. Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August Linear model with IVs: y i x i u i,
A Course in Applied Econometrics Lecture 18: Missing Data Jeff Wooldridge IRP Lectures, UW Madison, August 2008 1. When Can Missing Data be Ignored? 2. Inverse Probability Weighting 3. Imputation 4. Heckman-Type
More informationEconometrics of Panel Data
Econometrics of Panel Data Jakub Mućk Meeting # 1 Jakub Mućk Econometrics of Panel Data Meeting # 1 1 / 31 Outline 1 Course outline 2 Panel data Advantages of Panel Data Limitations of Panel Data 3 Pooled
More informationBirkbeck Working Papers in Economics & Finance
ISSN 1745-8587 Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics & Finance Department of Economics, Mathematics and Statistics BWPEF 1809 A Note on Specification Testing in Some Structural Regression Models Walter
More informationOrdinary Least Squares Regression
Ordinary Least Squares Regression Goals for this unit More on notation and terminology OLS scalar versus matrix derivation Some Preliminaries In this class we will be learning to analyze Cross Section
More informationDay 2A Instrumental Variables, Two-stage Least Squares and Generalized Method of Moments
Day 2A nstrumental Variables, Two-stage Least Squares and Generalized Method of Moments c A. Colin Cameron Univ. of Calif.- Davis Frontiers in Econometrics Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics. Based
More informationWooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 15: Instrumental variables and two stage least squares
Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Chapter 15: Instrumental variables and two stage least squares Many economic models involve endogeneity: that is, a theoretical relationship does not fit
More informationTesting Linear Restrictions: cont.
Testing Linear Restrictions: cont. The F-statistic is closely connected with the R of the regression. In fact, if we are testing q linear restriction, can write the F-stastic as F = (R u R r)=q ( R u)=(n
More informationLongitudinal Data Analysis Using Stata Paul D. Allison, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: May 18-19, 2017, Chicago, Illinois
Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Stata Paul D. Allison, Ph.D. Upcoming Seminar: May 18-19, 217, Chicago, Illinois Outline 1. Opportunities and challenges of panel data. a. Data requirements b. Control
More informationLECTURE 13: TIME SERIES I
1 LECTURE 13: TIME SERIES I AUTOCORRELATION: Consider y = X + u where y is T 1, X is T K, is K 1 and u is T 1. We are using T and not N for sample size to emphasize that this is a time series. The natural
More informationThe Number of Bootstrap Replicates in Bootstrap Dickey-Fuller Unit Root Tests
Working Paper 2013:8 Department of Statistics The Number of Bootstrap Replicates in Bootstrap Dickey-Fuller Unit Root Tests Jianxin Wei Working Paper 2013:8 June 2013 Department of Statistics Uppsala
More informationDOCUMENTS DE TRAVAIL CEMOI / CEMOI WORKING PAPERS
DOCUMENTS DE TRAVAIL CEMOI / CEMOI WORKING PAPERS A SAS macro for estimation and inference in differences-in-differences applications with only a few treated groups Nicolas Moreau 1 http://cemoi.univ-reunion.fr
More informationAN EVALUATION OF PARAMETRIC AND NONPARAMETRIC VARIANCE ESTIMATORS IN COMPLETELY RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS. Stanley A. Lubanski. and. Peter M.
AN EVALUATION OF PARAMETRIC AND NONPARAMETRIC VARIANCE ESTIMATORS IN COMPLETELY RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS by Stanley A. Lubanski and Peter M. Steiner UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 018 Background To make
More informationSome Monte Carlo Evidence for Adaptive Estimation of Unit-Time Varying Heteroscedastic Panel Data Models
Some Monte Carlo Evidence for Adaptive Estimation of Unit-Time Varying Heteroscedastic Panel Data Models G. R. Pasha Department of Statistics, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan E-mail: drpasha@bzu.edu.pk
More informationQED. Queen s Economics Department Working Paper No The Size Distortion of Bootstrap Tests
QED Queen s Economics Department Working Paper No. 936 The Size Distortion of Bootstrap Tests Russell Davidson GREQAM, Queen s University James G. MacKinnon Queen s University Department of Economics Queen
More informationA Simple, Graphical Procedure for Comparing Multiple Treatment Effects
A Simple, Graphical Procedure for Comparing Multiple Treatment Effects Brennan S. Thompson and Matthew D. Webb May 15, 2015 > Abstract In this paper, we utilize a new graphical
More informationEconometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data Jeffrey M. Wooldridge / The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England Contents Preface Acknowledgments xvii xxiii I INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
More informationx i = 1 yi 2 = 55 with N = 30. Use the above sample information to answer all the following questions. Show explicitly all formulas and calculations.
Exercises for the course of Econometrics Introduction 1. () A researcher is using data for a sample of 30 observations to investigate the relationship between some dependent variable y i and independent
More informationLeast Squares Estimation-Finite-Sample Properties
Least Squares Estimation-Finite-Sample Properties Ping Yu School of Economics and Finance The University of Hong Kong Ping Yu (HKU) Finite-Sample 1 / 29 Terminology and Assumptions 1 Terminology and Assumptions
More informationWarwick Economics Summer School Topics in Microeconometrics Instrumental Variables Estimation
Warwick Economics Summer School Topics in Microeconometrics Instrumental Variables Estimation Michele Aquaro University of Warwick This version: July 21, 2016 1 / 31 Reading material Textbook: Introductory
More informationRegression with a Single Regressor: Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals
Regression with a Single Regressor: Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals (SW Chapter 5) Outline. The standard error of ˆ. Hypothesis tests concerning β 3. Confidence intervals for β 4. Regression
More information