Bottom-Up Parsing. Canonical Collection of LR(0) items. Part II
|
|
- Estella Miller
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2 ottom-up Prsing Prt II 1 Cnonil Colletion of LR(0) items CC_LR(0)_I items(g :ugmented_grmmr){ C = {CLOURE({ })} ; repet{ foreh(i C) foreh(grmmr symol X) if(goto(i,x) && GOTO(I,X) C) C = C {GOTO(I,X)}; }until(no new sets of items re dded to C) return C; }
2 4 LR(0) utomton G : ugmented grmmr LR(0) utomton for G Q, q0, GOTO: Q (T G N G ) Q, F where: Q = F = items(g ), q0 = CLOURE({ }) 3 Constrution of the LR(0) utomton for the expression grmmr: E E E E + T T T T* F F F (E) id
3 E E E E + T T T T* F F F (E) id 5 E E E E + T T T T* F F F (E) id id I 0 E >.E E >. E+T E >.T T >.T*F T >.F F >.(E) F >.id ( F E I + I 6 T 1 E > E+. T E > E. T >. T*F E > E. + T T >.F F F >.(E) F >.id ( T I 2 E > T. T > T.*F * I 7 T > T*.F F >.(E) F >. id id I 5 I 4 F ( I 9 E > E+T. T > T.*F I 3 I 10 T > T*F. * I 7 I 3 T > F. id I 5 I 4 I 5 F > id. id I 4 F > (. E ) E >. E + T E >.T T >. T * F T >. F F >. ( E ) F >. id E F T I 8 F > ( E. ) E > E. + T I 2 ) + I 6 I 11 F > ( E ). ( I 3 6
4 8 E E E E + T T T T* F F F (E) id F E + T I 0 I 1 I 6 T id F $ ( id ept ( I 9 * I 2 * id I 7 ( F I 10 I 5 + I 8 ) I 11 T I 4 id E ( F I 3 7 hift-redue prsing using LR(0) utomton Push(I0); repet{ //egin to sn the input from left to right Ii = top() nd next input symol ; if (Ij = GOTO(Ii,)) then shift nd Ij; // Push() // push(ij). else if ( β Ii) then{ perform redue y β ; go to the stte Ij = GOTO(I,) nd push nd Ij into the stk //where I is the stte on the top_of stk //fter removing β nd the orresponding sttes; } _exit(rejet if none of the ove n e done); _exit(report onflits if more thn one n e done); } until EOF is seen
5 MODEL OF N LR PRER input 1... i... n $ s m s m-1 : : $ LR Prsing Progrm output stk CTION GOTO 9 I0,...,In enumertion of items(g') I0= CLOURE({ʼ }) Q = {0,...,n} s Is GOTO(s,X)=s' GOTO(Is,X)= Is' Proposition: if GOTO(s',X)=s nd GOTO(s",Y)=s then X=Y s Q we ssoite unique symol X s T G N G to s 0 if GOTO(s',X)=s then X s = X. Moreover, X 0 represents the symol $ (ottom of the stk) Q, 0, GOTO: Q (TGʼ NGʼ) Q, F Fix for G' finite ijetive enumertion p: {1,...,n} G'-produtions, s.t. p(1)= ' 10
6 12 Construt the LR(0) utomton for the grmmr C Ce C df 11 C Ce C df ept
7 C Ce C df!"#$%&'()*+,--,./01!"#$%&'&()*+&,-..-/012 3%4%#*&5)*("&)+*6()7&$6#)7%89 (:&;& &α<β&*6%)&#==&,>31?0β2@ε&*+&,-..-/0<2 (:&;& &α<&*6%)&#==&,-..-/0;2&*+&,-..-/0<2 (:&;& &α<β&#)=&ε&(8&()&,>31?0β2&*6%)&#==&,-..-/0;2& *+&,-..-/0<2 Follow 1 ()={$} Follow 1 ()={f,$} Follow 1 ()={f,$} Follow 1 (C)={e,f,$} 13 C Ce C df!"#$%&'()*+,--,./01!"#$%&'&()*+&,-..-/012 3%4%#*&5)*("&)+*6()7&$6#)7%89 (:&;& &α<β&*6%)&#==&,>31?0β2@ε&*+&,-..-/0<2 (:&;& &α<&*6%)&#==&,-..-/0;2&*+&,-..-/0<2 (:&;& &α<β&#)=&ε&(8&()&,>31?0β2&*6%)&#==&,-..-/0;2& *+&,-..-/0<2 Follow 1 ()={$} Follow 1 ()={f,$} Follow 1 ()={f,$} Follow 1 (C)={e,f,$} 14
8 15 terminls nd $ PRING TLE non terminls tte CTION GOTO i = CTION[i,] G = GOTO[j,] j G CTION[i,]= s j (shift symol j (nmely Xj)) CTION[i,]= r k (redue prodution p(k)) CTION[i,]= ept CTION[i,]= error 16
9 LR-PRER CONFIGURTION onfigurtion stk remining input ( 0 s 1... s m, i i+1... n $ ) top right-sententil form X0 Xs 1... Xs m i i+1... n 17 EHVIOR OF THE LR PRER ( s 0 s 1... s m, i i+1... n $ ) CTION[sm,i] = shift s symol Xs ( s 0 s 1... s m s, i+1... n $ ) ( s 0 s 1... s m, i i+1... n $ ) CTION[sm,i] = redue k ( s 0 s 1... s m-r s, i i+1... n $ ) p(k)= β β = r s=goto[s m-r, ] symol Xs 18
10 20 EHVIOR OF THE LR PRER ( s 0 s 1... s m, i i+1... n $ ) CTION[sm,i] = ept end of prsing ( s 0 s 1... s m, i i+1... n $ ) CTION[sm,i] = error error reovery routine 19 LR-prsing lgorithm
11 F E + T T id F $ ( id ept ( * 2 7 F id ( + ) 5 8 id T E 4 ( F 3 9 * X 1 = E X 2 = T X 3 = F X 4 = ( X 5 = id X 6 = + X 7 = * X 8 = E X 9 = T X 10 = F X 11 = ) 21 X 1 = E X 2 = T X 3 = F X 4 = ( X 5 = id X 6 = + X 7 = * X 8 = E X 9 = T X 10 = F X 11 = ) id id + id 22
12 24 X 1 = E X 2 = T X 3 = F X 4 = ( X 5 = id X 6 = + X 7 = * X 8 = E X 9 = T X 10 = F X 11 = ) 23 1.G : ugmented grmmr, with enumertion p of produtions; 2.onstrut the LR(0) utomton (nonil item set C={I0,...,In}, I0=CLOURE[ ] GOTO funtion); 3.foreh stte i: () if ( α β Ii && GOTO[Ii,]=Ij) dd shift j to CTION[i,]; () if ( α Ii && ) foreh ( FOLLOW()) dd redue p -1 ( α) to CTION[i,]; () if ( Ii) dd ept to CTION[i,$] 4. foreh (stte i,k && symol ) if (GOTO[Ij,]=Ik) dd k to GOTO[s,] 5. if (CTION[i,] is undefined) dd error to CTION[i,] 6. if (GOTO[i,] is undefined) dd error to GOTO[i,]
13 26 25 LR-prsing lgorithm
14 ' C C Ce df Exerise: Construt the PRING TLE 27 ' C q2 '!" q8 C!d"f!"!" C Ce df Prse tle omplete. Press "prse" to use it. q2 '!" q0 '!"!"!"!" q8 C!d"f!"!" q0 '!"!"!"!" q4 d!"ce!"!"c q10 FIRT C!d"f q1!" q4 d!"ce!"!"c q10 C!d"f q1!" f q5!" f q5!" q11 C!df" q11 C!df" q3!" FOLLOW {, } { f, $ } { } { f, $ } C { d } { f, e, $ } {, } { $ } q3!" C q6!"ce C!"df!"C q7!c"!c"e C q6 e q7!c"!c"e!"ce C!"df!"C q9!ce" e q9!ce" 28
15 30 ' C C Ce df q2 '!" q8 C!d"f!"!" q0 '!"!"!"!" d q1!" q4!"ce!"!"c q5!" f q11 q10 C!df" C!d"f q3!" C q6 q7!c"!c"e!"ce C!"df!"C e q9!ce" Prse tle omplete. Press "prse" to use it. FIRT FOLLOW {, } { f, $ } { } { f, $ } C { d } { f, e, $ } {, } { $ } q1 29 q2 q0!" q3!" '!" q8 C!d"f!"!" '!"!"!"!" q4 d!"ce!"!"c q5!" Construting n LR-prsing Tle I0=CLOURE[ ] GOTO funtion); q11 q10 C!df" C!d"f C q6 q7!c"!c"e!"ce C!"df!"C e q9!ce" 1.G : ugmented grmmr, with enumertion p of produtions; 2.onstrut the LR(0) utomton (nonil item set C={I0,...,In}, 3.foreh stte i: () if ( α β Ii && GOTO[Ii,]=Ij) dd shift j to CTION[i,]; () if ( α Ii && ) foreh ( FOLLOW()) dd redue p -1 ( α) to CTION[i,]; () if ( Ii) dd ept to CTION[i,$] 4. foreh (stte i,k && symol ) if (GOTO[Ij,]=Ik) dd k to GOTO[s,] 5. if (CTION[i,] is undefined) dd error to CTION[i,] 6. if (GOTO[i,] is undefined) dd error to GOTO[i,]
16 ' Prse tle omplete. Press "prse" to use it. FIRT FOLLOW { } {, } {, } { } { } { $ } q0!" '!" q1 '!" q9!" q4 q0!" '!"!"!"!"!" q1 '!" q9!" q0 q2!" '!"!"!"!" q1 q7 '!"!" q8 q4!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!" q7!" q3!"!"!" q4 q9!"!"!"!" q2!" q12!" q8!" q8 q3!"!"!"!" q12!" q2!"!"!" q7!" q6!"!"!" q6!"!"!" q3!"!"!" q12!" q5!" q10!" q11!" q5!" q6 q10!"!"!"!" q11!" q5!" q10!" q11!" 31 Do eleted Do tep Do ll Next Prse ' Prse tle omplete. Press "prse" to use it. FIRT $ FOLLOW { } {, } 0{, } s2 { } 1 { } 1 { $ } 2 s4 3 3 s6 s7 5 4 s4 s9 8 q0 q2 q3 q5 5 s10!"!"!"!" rse tle omplete. Press "prse" to use it. 6 s6 s7 11 '!"!"!" 7 r5 FIRT FOLLOW!"!" Next Prse tle omplete. to use it. } 8 s12 rse Press { }"prse" {, } {, { } 9 r3 r3 q10 { } {, } { } {, } { $ } { } q7 10 r1 { } { $ } q4!" q9 11 r4!" q6 12!" r2 r2!" q1!"!" q8 q12 q11!"!" q0 q2 q3 q5 '!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!" '!" q0!" '!" q1 '!" q9!" $ 0 s s4 3 3 s6 s7 5 q4!"!"!" q7!" 4 s4 s9 8!"!"!" q6 q10!" 32
17 it is not miguous Item set? 33 Item set : Prsing tle? 34
18 36 Item set : = if ( α Ii && ) foreh ( FOLLOW()) dd redue p -1 ( α) to CTION[i,]; prsing tle shift 6 CTION[2,=] symol = FOLLOW(R) nd therefore: redue R L CTION[2,=] onflit! 35 Vile prefix prefix of right-sententil forms tht n pper on the top of the stk Not ll prefixes of right-sententil forms n pper on the stk, however, sine the prser must not shift pst the hndle Exmple: TCK: (, (E, nd (E), ut not (E)* (E) is hndle (the prser must redue it to F efore shifting *)
19 38 Vile prefix: prefix of right-sententil forms tht n pper on the top of the stk nd tht does not ontinue pst the right end of the rightmost hndle of tht sententil form. prefix γ of αβ, where ' * αw αβw rm rm β 1 β 2 is vlid for vile prefix αβ 1 if ' * αw αβ 1 β 2 w rm rm 37 β 1 β 2 is vlid for vile prefix αβ 1 if ' * αw αβ 1 β 2 w rm rm if β 2 ε then shift if β 2 =ε then redue β 1 possile onflits Two vlid items my tell us to do different things for the sme vile prefix. ome of these onflits n e resolved y looking t the next input symol THEOREM: the set of vlid items for vile prefix γ is extly the set of items rehed from the initil stte long the pth leled γ in the LR(0) utomton for the grmmr
20 Item set : = Prsing tle shift 6 CTION[2,=] symol = FOLLOW(R) nd therefore: redue R L CTION[2,=] Conflit! 39 LR(1) PRING Grmmr: L = R R L R id R L shift 6 CTION[2,=] symol = FOLLOW(R) nd therefore: redue R L CTION[2,=] there is no right-sententil form of the grmmr tht egins R =... Thus stte 2, whih is the stte orresponding to vile prefix L only, should not relly ll for redution of tht L to R $L $R 40
21 In LR(1) prsing, if α i, nd FOLLOW(), then we perform the redution α However, it is possile tht when stte i is on the top of the stk, we hve the vile prefix βα on the top of the stk, nd β nnot e followed y. In this se, we nnot perform the redution α. 41 LR(1) items n LR(1) item is in the form of [ α β,] 1.the first field α β is n LR(0) item 2.the seond field is terminl elonging to suset (possily proper) of FOLLOW[]. Intuition: perform redution sed on n LR(1) item [ α, ] only when the next symol is. Insted of mintining FOLLOW sets of vile prefixes, we mintin FIRT sets of possile future extensions of the urrent vile prefix. [ α β, ] is vlid for vile prefix γ if there exists derivtion where γ = δα w = w' or w=ε nd =$. ' * δw δαβw rm rm γ 42
22 Exmples of LR(1) items Grmmr: = = rm rm vile prefix n reh [, ] = = rm rm vile prefix n reh [,$] [ α β, ] is vlid for vile prefix γ if there exists derivtion ' * δw δαβw rm where γ = δα w = w' or w=ε nd =$. rm 43 Finding ll LR(1) items Ides: redefine the losure funtion. uppose [ α β,] is vlid for vile prefix γ δα. In other words, = δ ω = δ αβ ω. rm rm γ ω is ɛ or sequene of terminls. Then for eh prodution η, ssume βω derives the sequene of terminls eω. γ γ γ = rm δα βω = rm δα eω = rm δαη eω Thus [ η,] is lso vlid for γ for eh FIRT(β). Note is terminl. o FIRT(β) =FIRT(βω). [ α β, ] is vlid for vile prefix γ if there exists derivtion ' * δw δαβw rm rm γ where γ = δα w = w' or w=ε nd =$. 44
23 46 set_of_items CLOURE(I: set_of_items){ J=I; repet{ foreh ( [ α β,] J) foreh ( γ G) foreh ( FIRT[β]) J = J {[ γ,]}; }until (no more new items re dded to J) return J; } 45 set_of_items GOTO(I set_of_items, X:symol){ J= ; foreh([ α Xβ,] I) J = J {[ αx β,]}; return CLOURE(J); }
24 48 CC_LR(1)_I items(g :ugmented_grmmr){ C = {CLOURE({[,$]})} ; repet{ foreh(i C) foreh(grmmr symol X) if(goto(i,x) && GOTO(I,X) C) C = C {GOTO(I,X)}; }until(no new sets of items re dded to C) return C; } 47 1.G : ugmented grmmr, with enumertion p of produtions; 2.onstrut the LR(1) utomton (nonil item set C={I0,...,In}, I0=CLOURE[[,$]] GOTO funtion); 3.foreh stte i: () if ([ α β,] Ii && GOTO[Ii,]=Ij) dd shift j to CTION[i,]; // is terminl () if ([ α,] Ii && ) dd redue p -1 ( α) to CTION[i,]; () if ([,$] Ii) dd ept to CTION[i,$] 4. foreh (stte i,k && symol ) if (GOTO[Ij,]=Ik) dd k to GOTO[s,] 5. if (CTION[i,] is undefined) dd error to CTION[i,] 6. if (GOTO[i,] is undefined) dd error to GOTO[i,]
25 50 Exmple for onstruting LR(1) losures Grmmr: CC C C d losure 1 ({[, $]}) = {[, $], [ CC, $], [C C, /d], J=I; [C d, /d]} Note: repet{ FIRT(ɛ$) = {$} FIRT(C$) = {, d} [C foreh C, /d] ( mens γ G) set_of_items CLOURE(I: set_of_items){ } foreh ( [ α β,] J) [Cforeh C, ] ( nd FIRT[β]) J = J {[ γ,]}; [C C, d]. }until (no more new items re dded to J) return J; tion 1 GOTO 1 stte d $ C 0 s3 s ept 2 s6 s7 5 3 s3 s4 8 4 r3 r3 5 r1 6 s6 s7 9 7 r3 8 r2 r2 9 r2 49 Exmple for onstruting LR(1) losures Grmmr: CC C C d losure 1 ({[, $]}) = {[, $], [ CC, $], [C C, /d], [C d, /d]} Note: FIRT(ɛ$) = {$} FIRT(C$) = {, d} [C C, /d] mens [C C, ] nd [C C, d]. set_of_items CLOURE(I: set_of_items){ J=I; repet{ foreh ( [ α β,] J) foreh ( γ G) foreh ( FIRT[β]) J = J {[ γ,]}; }until (no more new items re dded to J) return J; }
26 52 Exmple for onstruting LR(1) losures Grmmr: CC C C d losure 1 ({[, $]}) = {[, $], [ CC, $], [C C, /d], [C d, /d]} Note: FIRT(ɛ$) = {$} FIRT(C$) = {, d} [C C, /d] mens [C C, ] nd [C C, d]. set_of_items CLOURE(I: set_of_items){ J=I; repet{ foreh ( [ α β,] J) foreh ( γ G) foreh ( FIRT[β]) J = J {[ γ,]}; }until (no more new items re dded to J) return J; } 51 set_of_items CLOURE(I: set_of_items){ J=I; repet{ foreh ( [ α β,] J) foreh ( γ G) foreh ( FIRT[β]) J = J {[ γ,]}; }until (no more new items re dded to J) return J; }
27 54 Exmple for onstruting LR(1) losures Grmmr: CC C C d losure 1 ({[, $]}) = {[, $], [ CC, $], [C C, /d], [C d, /d]} Note: FIRT(ɛ$) = {$} FIRT(C$) = {, d} [C C, /d] mens [C C, ] nd [C C, d]. tion 1 GOTO 1 stte d $ C 0 s3 s ept 2 s6 s7 5 3 s3 s4 8 4 r3 r3 5 r1 6 s6 s7 9 7 r3 8 r2 r2 9 r2 53 LLR(1) prser Lookhed LR The method tht is often used in prtie. Most ommon syntti onstruts of progrmming lnguges n e expressed onveniently y n LLR(1) grmmr [DeRemer 1969]. LR(1) nd LLR(1) lwys hve the sme numer of sttes. Numer of sttes is out 1/10 of tht of LR(1). imple oservtion: n LR(1) item is of the form [ α β,] We ll α β the first omponent. Definition: in n LR(1) stte, set of first omponents is lled its ore.
28 56 1.G : ugmented grmmr, with enumertion p of produtions; 2.onstrut the LR(1) utomton (nonil item set C={I0,...,In}, I0=CLOURE[[,$]] GOTO funtion); 3.foreh stte i: () if ([ α β,] Ii && GOTO[Ii,]=Ij) dd shift j to CTION[i,]; // is terminl () if ([ α,] Ii && ) dd redue p -1 ( α) to CTION[i,]; () if ([,$] Ii) dd ept to CTION[i,$] 4. foreh (stte i,k && symol ) if (GOTO[Ij,]=Ik) dd k to GOTO[s,] 5. if (CTION[i,] is undefined) dd error to CTION[i,] 6. if (GOTO[i,] is undefined) dd error to GOTO[i,] 55 Intuition for LLR(1) grmmrs In n LR(1) prser, it is ommon thing tht severl sttes only differ in lookhed symols, ut hve the sme ore. To redue the numer of sttes, we might wnt to merge sttes with the sme ore. If I 4 nd I 7 re merged, then the new stte is lled I 4,7. fter merging the sttes, revise the GOT O 1 tle ordingly. Merging of sttes n never produe shift-redue onflit tht ws not present in one of the originl sttes. I 1 = {[ α,],...} For I 1, one of the tions is to perform redue when the lookhed symol is. I 2 = {[ β γ,],...} For I 2, one of the tions is to perform shift on input. Merging I 1 nd I 2, the new stte I 1,2 hs shift-redue onflits. However, we merge I 1 nd I 2 euse they hve the sme ore. Tht is, [ α,] I 2 nd [ β γ,d] I 1. The shift-redue onflit lredy ours in I 1 nd I 2. Merging of sttes n produe new redue-redue onflit.
29 LLR(1) trnsition digrm d I 0!>., $!>. CC, $ C!>. C, /d C!>.d, /d C I 3 C!>.C, /d C!>.C, /d C!>.d, /d I 2!> C.C, $ C!>.C, $ C!>.d, $ I 1!>., $ C d I 5!> CC., $ I 6 C!>.C, $ C!>.C, $ C!>.d, $ C d C d I 8 C!> C., /d I 9 C!> C., $ I 4 C!> d., /d I 7 C!> d., $ 57 Possile new onflits from LLR(1) My produe new redue-redue onflit. For exmple (textook pge 267, Exmple 4.58), grmmr: d f e e The lnguge reognized y this grmmr is {d, e, d, e}. You my hek tht this grmmr is LR(1) y onstruting the sets of items. You will find the set of items {[,d], [,e]} is vlid for the vile prefix, nd {[,e], [,d]} is vlid for the vile prefix. Neither of these sets genertes onflit, nd their ores re the sme. However, their union, whih is {[, d/e], [, d/e]}, genertes redue-redue onflit, sine redutions y oth nd re lled for on inputs d nd e. 58
30 60 How to onstrut LLR(1) prsing tle Nive pproh: Construt LR(1) prsing tle, whih tkes lots of intermedite spes. Merging sttes. pe nd/or time effiient methods to onstrut n LLR(1) prsing tle re known. Construting nd merging on the fly. 59 ummry LLR(1) LLR(1) LL(1) LR(1) LR(1) LR(1) LR(1) LR(0) LR(1) nd LLR(1) n lmost express ll importnt progrmming lnguges issues, ut LLR(1) is esier to write nd uses muh less spe. LL(1) is esier to understnd nd uses muh less spe, ut nnot express some importnt ommon-lnguge fetures. My try to use it first for your own pplitions.
31 62 miguous grmmrs re not too d... miguous grmmrs unmiguous grmmrs LR(1) miguous grmmrs often provide shorter, more nturl speifition thn their equivlent unmiguous grmmrs. 61 miguity from preedene nd ssoitivity Preedene nd ssoitivity re importnt lnguge onstruts. Exmple: G 1 : E E + E E E (E) id miguous, ut esy to understnd nd mintin! G 2 : E E + T T T T F F F (E) id Unmiguous, ut diffiult to understnd nd mintin!
32 64 LR(0) sttes input: id+id id the prser enters stte 7 fter proessing id+id 63 miguity from dngling-else Grmmr: ttement Other ttement if Condition then ttement if Condition then ttement else ttement When seeing if C then else there is shift/redue onflit, we lwys fvor shift. Intuition: fvor longer mth. Need mehnism to let user speify the defult onflithndling rule when there is shift/redue onflit.
Overview HC9. Parsing: Top-Down & LL(1) Context-Free Grammars (1) Introduction. CFGs (3) Context-Free Grammars (2) Vertalerbouw HC 9: Ch.
Overview H9 Vertlerouw H 9: Prsing: op-down & LL(1) do 3 mei 2001 56 heo Ruys h. 8 - Prsing 8.1 ontext-free Grmmrs 8.2 op-down Prsing 8.3 LL(1) Grmmrs See lso [ho, Sethi & Ullmn 1986] for more thorough
More informationCS 573 Automata Theory and Formal Languages
Non-determinism Automt Theory nd Forml Lnguges Professor Leslie Lnder Leture # 3 Septemer 6, 2 To hieve our gol, we need the onept of Non-deterministi Finite Automton with -moves (NFA) An NFA is tuple
More informationThe University of Nottingham SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE A LEVEL 2 MODULE, SPRING SEMESTER MACHINES AND THEIR LANGUAGES ANSWERS
The University of ottinghm SCHOOL OF COMPUTR SCIC A LVL 2 MODUL, SPRIG SMSTR 2015 2016 MACHIS AD THIR LAGUAGS ASWRS Time llowed TWO hours Cndidtes my omplete the front over of their nswer ook nd sign their
More informationCS311 Computational Structures Regular Languages and Regular Grammars. Lecture 6
CS311 Computtionl Strutures Regulr Lnguges nd Regulr Grmmrs Leture 6 1 Wht we know so fr: RLs re losed under produt, union nd * Every RL n e written s RE, nd every RE represents RL Every RL n e reognized
More informationNondeterministic Automata vs Deterministic Automata
Nondeterministi Automt vs Deterministi Automt We lerned tht NFA is onvenient model for showing the reltionships mong regulr grmmrs, FA, nd regulr expressions, nd designing them. However, we know tht n
More informationCS241 Week 6 Tutorial Solutions
241 Week 6 Tutoril olutions Lnguges: nning & ontext-free Grmmrs Winter 2018 1 nning Exerises 1. 0x0x0xd HEXINT 0x0 I x0xd 2. 0xend--- HEXINT 0xe I nd ER -- MINU - 3. 1234-120x INT 1234 INT -120 I x 4.
More informationClosure Properties of Regular Languages
Closure Properties of Regulr Lnguges Regulr lnguges re closed under mny set opertions. Let L 1 nd L 2 e regulr lnguges. (1) L 1 L 2 (the union) is regulr. (2) L 1 L 2 (the conctention) is regulr. (3) L
More informationCS 314 Principles of Programming Languages
C 314 Principles of Progrmming Lnguges Lecture 6: LL(1) Prsing Zheng (Eddy) Zhng Rutgers University Ferury 5, 2018 Clss Informtion Homework 2 due tomorrow. Homework 3 will e posted erly next week. 2 Top
More informationProject 6: Minigoals Towards Simplifying and Rewriting Expressions
MAT 51 Wldis Projet 6: Minigols Towrds Simplifying nd Rewriting Expressions The distriutive property nd like terms You hve proly lerned in previous lsses out dding like terms ut one prolem with the wy
More informationThe transformation to right derivation is called the canonical reduction sequence. Bottom-up analysis
Bottom-up nlysis Shift-reduce prsing. Constructs the derivtion tree from ottom to top. Reduces the string to the strt symol. Produces reverse right derivtion. Exmple: G(E): 1. E E + T 2. T 3. T T * F 4.
More informationConvert the NFA into DFA
Convert the NF into F For ech NF we cn find F ccepting the sme lnguge. The numer of sttes of the F could e exponentil in the numer of sttes of the NF, ut in prctice this worst cse occurs rrely. lgorithm:
More informationParsing and Pattern Recognition
Topics in IT Prsing nd Pttern Recognition Week Context-Free Prsing College of Informtion Science nd Engineering Ritsumeikn University this week miguity in nturl lnguge in mchine lnguges top-down, redth-first
More informationNON-DETERMINISTIC FSA
Tw o types of non-determinism: NON-DETERMINISTIC FS () Multiple strt-sttes; strt-sttes S Q. The lnguge L(M) ={x:x tkes M from some strt-stte to some finl-stte nd ll of x is proessed}. The string x = is
More informationFABER Formal Languages, Automata and Models of Computation
DVA337 FABER Forml Lnguges, Automt nd Models of Computtion Lecture 5 chool of Innovtion, Design nd Engineering Mälrdlen University 2015 1 Recp of lecture 4 y definition suset construction DFA NFA stte
More informationSEMANTIC ANALYSIS PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES. Norbert Zeh Winter Dalhousie University 1/28
SEMNTI NLYSIS PRINIPLES OF PROGRMMING LNGUGES Norbert Zeh Winter 2018 Dlhousie University 1/28 PROGRM TRNSLTION FLOW HRT Soure progrm (hrter strem) Snner (lexil nlysis) Front end Prse tree Prser (syntti
More informationSemantic Analysis. CSCI 3136 Principles of Programming Languages. Faculty of Computer Science Dalhousie University. Winter Reading: Chapter 4
Semnti nlysis SI 16 Priniples of Progrmming Lnguges Fulty of omputer Siene Dlhousie University Winter 2012 Reding: hpter 4 Motivtion Soure progrm (hrter strem) Snner (lexil nlysis) Front end Prse tree
More informationChapter 4 State-Space Planning
Leture slides for Automted Plnning: Theory nd Prtie Chpter 4 Stte-Spe Plnning Dn S. Nu CMSC 722, AI Plnning University of Mrylnd, Spring 2008 1 Motivtion Nerly ll plnning proedures re serh proedures Different
More informationGeneral idea LR(0) SLR LR(1) LALR To best exploit JavaCUP, should understand the theoretical basis (LR parsing);
Bottom up prsing Generl ide LR(0) SLR LR(1) LLR To best exploit JvCUP, should understnd the theoreticl bsis (LR prsing); 1 Top-down vs Bottom-up Bottom-up more powerful thn top-down; Cn process more powerful
More informationFinite State Automata and Determinisation
Finite Stte Automt nd Deterministion Tim Dworn Jnury, 2016 Lnguges fs nf re df Deterministion 2 Outline 1 Lnguges 2 Finite Stte Automt (fs) 3 Non-deterministi Finite Stte Automt (nf) 4 Regulr Expressions
More informationCSCI565 - Compiler Design
CSCI565 - Compiler Deign Spring 6 Due Dte: Fe. 5, 6 t : PM in Cl Prolem [ point]: Regulr Expreion nd Finite Automt Develop regulr expreion (RE) tht detet the longet tring over the lphet {-} with the following
More informationNFA DFA Example 3 CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Equivalence of DFAs and NFAs. Equivalence of DFAs and NFAs (cont.
NFA DFA Exmple 3 CMSC 330: Orgniztion of Progrmming Lnguges NFA {B,D,E {A,E {C,D {E Finite Automt, con't. R = { {A,E, {B,D,E, {C,D, {E 2 Equivlence of DFAs nd NFAs Any string from {A to either {D or {CD
More informationMinimal DFA. minimal DFA for L starting from any other
Miniml DFA Among the mny DFAs ccepting the sme regulr lnguge L, there is exctly one (up to renming of sttes) which hs the smllest possile numer of sttes. Moreover, it is possile to otin tht miniml DFA
More informationRegular languages refresher
Regulr lnguges refresher 1 Regulr lnguges refresher Forml lnguges Alphet = finite set of letters Word = sequene of letter Lnguge = set of words Regulr lnguges defined equivlently y Regulr expressions Finite-stte
More informationFormal languages, automata, and theory of computation
Mälrdlen University TEN1 DVA337 2015 School of Innovtion, Design nd Engineering Forml lnguges, utomt, nd theory of computtion Thursdy, Novemer 5, 14:10-18:30 Techer: Dniel Hedin, phone 021-107052 The exm
More informationTechnische Universität München Winter term 2009/10 I7 Prof. J. Esparza / J. Křetínský / M. Luttenberger 11. Februar Solution
Tehnishe Universität Münhen Winter term 29/ I7 Prof. J. Esprz / J. Křetínský / M. Luttenerger. Ferur 2 Solution Automt nd Forml Lnguges Homework 2 Due 5..29. Exerise 2. Let A e the following finite utomton:
More informationCS103B Handout 18 Winter 2007 February 28, 2007 Finite Automata
CS103B ndout 18 Winter 2007 Ferury 28, 2007 Finite Automt Initil text y Mggie Johnson. Introduction Severl childrens gmes fit the following description: Pieces re set up on plying ord; dice re thrown or
More informationChapter 4 Regular Grammar and Regular Sets. (Solutions / Hints)
C K Ngpl Forml Lnguges nd utomt Theory Chpter 4 Regulr Grmmr nd Regulr ets (olutions / Hints) ol. (),,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (),, (c) c c, c c, c, c, c c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c c,c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c,
More informationIntermediate Math Circles Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Finite Automata II. Nickolas Rollick a b b. a b 4
Intermedite Mth Circles Wednesdy, Novemer 14, 2018 Finite Automt II Nickols Rollick nrollick@uwterloo.c Regulr Lnguges Lst time, we were introduced to the ide of DFA (deterministic finite utomton), one
More informationAssignment 1 Automata, Languages, and Computability. 1 Finite State Automata and Regular Languages
Deprtment of Computer Science, Austrlin Ntionl University COMP2600 Forml Methods for Softwre Engineering Semester 2, 206 Assignment Automt, Lnguges, nd Computility Smple Solutions Finite Stte Automt nd
More informationPrefix-Free Regular-Expression Matching
Prefix-Free Regulr-Expression Mthing Yo-Su Hn, Yjun Wng nd Derik Wood Deprtment of Computer Siene HKUST Prefix-Free Regulr-Expression Mthing p.1/15 Pttern Mthing Given pttern P nd text T, find ll sustrings
More informationReview for the Midterm
Review for the Midterm Stephen A. Edwrds Columi University Fll 2018 The Midterm Structure of Compiler Scnning Lnguges nd Regulr Expressions NFAs Trnslting REs into NFAs: Thompson s Construction Building
More informationChapter 2 Finite Automata
Chpter 2 Finite Automt 28 2.1 Introduction Finite utomt: first model of the notion of effective procedure. (They lso hve mny other pplictions). The concept of finite utomton cn e derived y exmining wht
More informationCompiler Design. Spring Lexical Analysis. Sample Exercises and Solutions. Prof. Pedro C. Diniz
University of Southern Cliforni Computer Siene Deprtment Compiler Design Spring 7 Lexil Anlysis Smple Exerises nd Solutions Prof. Pedro C. Diniz USC / Informtion Sienes Institute 47 Admirlty Wy, Suite
More informationDesigning finite automata II
Designing finite utomt II Prolem: Design DFA A such tht L(A) consists of ll strings of nd which re of length 3n, for n = 0, 1, 2, (1) Determine wht to rememer out the input string Assign stte to ech of
More information@#? Text Search ] { "!" Nondeterministic Finite Automata. Transformation NFA to DFA and Simulation of NFA. Text Search Using Automata
g Text Serh @#? ~ Mrko Berezovský Rdek Mřík PAL 0 Nondeterministi Finite Automt n Trnsformtion NFA to DFA nd Simultion of NFA f Text Serh Using Automt A B R Power of Nondeterministi Approh u j Regulr Expression
More informationCS 275 Automata and Formal Language Theory
CS 275 Automt nd Forml Lnguge Theory Course Notes Prt II: The Recognition Problem (II) Chpter II.6.: Push Down Automt Remrk: This mteril is no longer tught nd not directly exm relevnt Anton Setzer (Bsed
More informationNondeterministic Finite Automata
Nondeterministi Finite utomt The Power of Guessing Tuesdy, Otoer 4, 2 Reding: Sipser.2 (first prt); Stoughton 3.3 3.5 S235 Lnguges nd utomt eprtment of omputer Siene Wellesley ollege Finite utomton (F)
More informationPetri Nets. Rebecca Albrecht. Seminar: Automata Theory Chair of Software Engeneering
Petri Nets Ree Alreht Seminr: Automt Theory Chir of Softwre Engeneering Overview 1. Motivtion: Why not just using finite utomt for everything? Wht re Petri Nets nd when do we use them? 2. Introdution:
More informationCMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages
CMSC 330: Orgniztion of Progrmming Lnguges Finite Automt 2 CMSC 330 1 Types of Finite Automt Deterministic Finite Automt (DFA) Exctly one sequence of steps for ech string All exmples so fr Nondeterministic
More informationHomework Solution - Set 5 Due: Friday 10/03/08
CE 96 Introduction to the Theory of Computtion ll 2008 Homework olution - et 5 Due: ridy 10/0/08 1. Textook, Pge 86, Exercise 1.21. () 1 2 Add new strt stte nd finl stte. Mke originl finl stte non-finl.
More informationAlgorithm Design and Analysis
Algorithm Design nd Anlysis LECTURE 8 Mx. lteness ont d Optiml Ching Adm Smith 9/12/2008 A. Smith; sed on slides y E. Demine, C. Leiserson, S. Rskhodnikov, K. Wyne Sheduling to Minimizing Lteness Minimizing
More informationTypes of Finite Automata. CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Comparing DFAs and NFAs. NFA for (a b)*abb.
CMSC 330: Orgniztion of Progrmming Lnguges Finite Automt 2 Types of Finite Automt Deterministic Finite Automt () Exctly one sequence of steps for ech string All exmples so fr Nondeterministic Finite Automt
More informationCS415 Compilers. Lexical Analysis and. These slides are based on slides copyrighted by Keith Cooper, Ken Kennedy & Linda Torczon at Rice University
CS415 Compilers Lexicl Anlysis nd These slides re sed on slides copyrighted y Keith Cooper, Ken Kennedy & Lind Torczon t Rice University First Progrmming Project Instruction Scheduling Project hs een posted
More informationParse trees, ambiguity, and Chomsky normal form
Prse trees, miguity, nd Chomsky norml form In this lecture we will discuss few importnt notions connected with contextfree grmmrs, including prse trees, miguity, nd specil form for context-free grmmrs
More informationTypes of Finite Automata. CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Comparing DFAs and NFAs. Comparing DFAs and NFAs (cont.) Finite Automata 2
CMSC 330: Orgniztion of Progrmming Lnguges Finite Automt 2 Types of Finite Automt Deterministic Finite Automt () Exctly one sequence of steps for ech string All exmples so fr Nondeterministic Finite Automt
More informationThoery of Automata CS402
Thoery of Automt C402 Theory of Automt Tle of contents: Lecture N0. 1... 4 ummry... 4 Wht does utomt men?... 4 Introduction to lnguges... 4 Alphets... 4 trings... 4 Defining Lnguges... 5 Lecture N0. 2...
More informationNormal Forms for Context-free Grammars
Norml Forms for Context-free Grmmrs 1 Linz 6th, Section 6.2 wo Importnt Norml Forms, pges 171--178 2 Chomsky Norml Form All productions hve form: A BC nd A vrile vrile terminl 3 Exmples: S AS S AS S S
More information1 PYTHAGORAS THEOREM 1. Given a right angled triangle, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.
1 PYTHAGORAS THEOREM 1 1 Pythgors Theorem In this setion we will present geometri proof of the fmous theorem of Pythgors. Given right ngled tringle, the squre of the hypotenuse is equl to the sum of the
More informationFormal Languages Simplifications of CFGs
Forml Lnguges implifictions of CFGs ubstitution Rule Equivlent grmmr b bc ubstitute b bc bbc b 2 ubstitution Rule b bc bbc ubstitute b bc bbc bc Equivlent grmmr 3 In generl: xz y 1 ubstitute y 1 xz xy1z
More informationThe University of Nottingham SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE A LEVEL 2 MODULE, SPRING SEMESTER LANGUAGES AND COMPUTATION ANSWERS
The University of Nottinghm SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE LEVEL 2 MODULE, SPRING SEMESTER 2016 2017 LNGUGES ND COMPUTTION NSWERS Time llowed TWO hours Cndidtes my complete the front cover of their nswer ook
More informationTable of contents: Lecture N Summary... 3 What does automata mean?... 3 Introduction to languages... 3 Alphabets... 3 Strings...
Tle of contents: Lecture N0.... 3 ummry... 3 Wht does utomt men?... 3 Introduction to lnguges... 3 Alphets... 3 trings... 3 Defining Lnguges... 4 Lecture N0. 2... 7 ummry... 7 Kleene tr Closure... 7 Recursive
More informationAlgorithm Design and Analysis
Algorithm Design nd Anlysis LECTURE 5 Supplement Greedy Algorithms Cont d Minimizing lteness Ching (NOT overed in leture) Adm Smith 9/8/10 A. Smith; sed on slides y E. Demine, C. Leiserson, S. Rskhodnikov,
More informationGrammar. Languages. Content 5/10/16. Automata and Languages. Regular Languages. Regular Languages
5//6 Grmmr Automt nd Lnguges Regulr Grmmr Context-free Grmmr Context-sensitive Grmmr Prof. Mohmed Hmd Softwre Engineering L. The University of Aizu Jpn Regulr Lnguges Context Free Lnguges Context Sensitive
More information= state, a = reading and q j
4 Finite Automt CHAPTER 2 Finite Automt (FA) (i) Derterministi Finite Automt (DFA) A DFA, M Q, q,, F, Where, Q = set of sttes (finite) q Q = the strt/initil stte = input lphet (finite) (use only those
More informationAP Calculus BC Chapter 8: Integration Techniques, L Hopital s Rule and Improper Integrals
AP Clulus BC Chpter 8: Integrtion Tehniques, L Hopitl s Rule nd Improper Integrls 8. Bsi Integrtion Rules In this setion we will review vrious integrtion strtegies. Strtegies: I. Seprte the integrnd into
More informationRegular expressions, Finite Automata, transition graphs are all the same!!
CSI 3104 /Winter 2011: Introduction to Forml Lnguges Chpter 7: Kleene s Theorem Chpter 7: Kleene s Theorem Regulr expressions, Finite Automt, trnsition grphs re ll the sme!! Dr. Neji Zgui CSI3104-W11 1
More informationCS 330 Formal Methods and Models
CS 330 Forml Methods nd Models Dn Richrds, George Mson University, Spring 2017 Quiz Solutions Quiz 1, Propositionl Logic Dte: Ferury 2 1. Prove ((( p q) q) p) is tutology () (3pts) y truth tle. p q p q
More informationData Structures and Algorithm. Xiaoqing Zheng
Dt Strutures nd Algorithm Xioqing Zheng zhengxq@fudn.edu.n String mthing prolem Pttern P ours with shift s in text T (or, equivlently, tht pttern P ours eginning t position s + in text T) if T[s +... s
More informationLecture 6: Coding theory
Leture 6: Coing theory Biology 429 Crl Bergstrom Ferury 4, 2008 Soures: This leture loosely follows Cover n Thoms Chpter 5 n Yeung Chpter 3. As usul, some of the text n equtions re tken iretly from those
More informationCounting Paths Between Vertices. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs. Isomorphism of Graphs
Isomorphism of Grphs Definition The simple grphs G 1 = (V 1, E 1 ) n G = (V, E ) re isomorphi if there is ijetion (n oneto-one n onto funtion) f from V 1 to V with the property tht n re jent in G 1 if
More information5. (±±) Λ = fw j w is string of even lengthg [ 00 = f11,00g 7. (11 [ 00)± Λ = fw j w egins with either 11 or 00g 8. (0 [ ffl)1 Λ = 01 Λ [ 1 Λ 9.
Regulr Expressions, Pumping Lemm, Right Liner Grmmrs Ling 106 Mrch 25, 2002 1 Regulr Expressions A regulr expression descries or genertes lnguge: it is kind of shorthnd for listing the memers of lnguge.
More informationExercises Chapter 1. Exercise 1.1. Let Σ be an alphabet. Prove wv = w + v for all strings w and v.
1 Exercises Chpter 1 Exercise 1.1. Let Σ e n lphet. Prove wv = w + v for ll strings w nd v. Prove # (wv) = # (w)+# (v) for every symol Σ nd every string w,v Σ. Exercise 1.2. Let w 1,w 2,...,w k e k strings,
More informationCSCI 340: Computational Models. Kleene s Theorem. Department of Computer Science
CSCI 340: Computtionl Models Kleene s Theorem Chpter 7 Deprtment of Computer Science Unifiction In 1954, Kleene presented (nd proved) theorem which (in our version) sttes tht if lnguge cn e defined y ny
More informationFirst Midterm Examination
Çnky University Deprtment of Computer Engineering 203-204 Fll Semester First Midterm Exmintion ) Design DFA for ll strings over the lphet Σ = {,, c} in which there is no, no nd no cc. 2) Wht lnguge does
More information2.4 Theoretical Foundations
2 Progrmming Lnguge Syntx 2.4 Theoretil Fountions As note in the min text, snners n prsers re se on the finite utomt n pushown utomt tht form the ottom two levels of the Chomsky lnguge hierrhy. At eh level
More informationTutorial Worksheet. 1. Find all solutions to the linear system by following the given steps. x + 2y + 3z = 2 2x + 3y + z = 4.
Mth 5 Tutoril Week 1 - Jnury 1 1 Nme Setion Tutoril Worksheet 1. Find ll solutions to the liner system by following the given steps x + y + z = x + y + z = 4. y + z = Step 1. Write down the rgumented mtrix
More informationCS 373, Spring Solutions to Mock midterm 1 (Based on first midterm in CS 273, Fall 2008.)
CS 373, Spring 29. Solutions to Mock midterm (sed on first midterm in CS 273, Fll 28.) Prolem : Short nswer (8 points) The nswers to these prolems should e short nd not complicted. () If n NF M ccepts
More informationChapter 3. Vector Spaces. 3.1 Images and Image Arithmetic
Chpter 3 Vetor Spes In Chpter 2, we sw tht the set of imges possessed numer of onvenient properties. It turns out tht ny set tht possesses similr onvenient properties n e nlyzed in similr wy. In liner
More information1 From NFA to regular expression
Note 1: How to convert DFA/NFA to regulr expression Version: 1.0 S/EE 374, Fll 2017 Septemer 11, 2017 In this note, we show tht ny DFA cn e converted into regulr expression. Our construction would work
More information1.4 Nonregular Languages
74 1.4 Nonregulr Lnguges The number of forml lnguges over ny lphbet (= decision/recognition problems) is uncountble On the other hnd, the number of regulr expressions (= strings) is countble Hence, ll
More informationNon Deterministic Automata. Linz: Nondeterministic Finite Accepters, page 51
Non Deterministic Automt Linz: Nondeterministic Finite Accepters, pge 51 1 Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA) Alphbet ={} q 1 q2 q 0 q 3 2 Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA) Alphbet ={} Two choices
More informationChapter Five: Nondeterministic Finite Automata. Formal Language, chapter 5, slide 1
Chpter Five: Nondeterministic Finite Automt Forml Lnguge, chpter 5, slide 1 1 A DFA hs exctly one trnsition from every stte on every symol in the lphet. By relxing this requirement we get relted ut more
More informationRunning an NFA & the subset algorithm (NFA->DFA) CS 350 Fall 2018 gilray.org/classes/fall2018/cs350/
Running n NFA & the suset lgorithm (NFA->DFA) CS 350 Fll 2018 gilry.org/lsses/fll2018/s350/ 1 NFAs operte y simultneously exploring ll pths nd epting if ny pth termintes t n ept stte.!2 Try n exmple: L
More informationCS 275 Automata and Formal Language Theory
CS 275 utomt nd Forml Lnguge Theory Course Notes Prt II: The Recognition Prolem (II) Chpter II.5.: Properties of Context Free Grmmrs (14) nton Setzer (Bsed on ook drft y J. V. Tucker nd K. Stephenson)
More informationCS 311 Homework 3 due 16:30, Thursday, 14 th October 2010
CS 311 Homework 3 due 16:30, Thursdy, 14 th Octoer 2010 Homework must e sumitted on pper, in clss. Question 1. [15 pts.; 5 pts. ech] Drw stte digrms for NFAs recognizing the following lnguges:. L = {w
More informationFirst Midterm Examination
24-25 Fll Semester First Midterm Exmintion ) Give the stte digrm of DFA tht recognizes the lnguge A over lphet Σ = {, } where A = {w w contins or } 2) The following DFA recognizes the lnguge B over lphet
More informationHarvard University Computer Science 121 Midterm October 23, 2012
Hrvrd University Computer Science 121 Midterm Octoer 23, 2012 This is closed-ook exmintion. You my use ny result from lecture, Sipser, prolem sets, or section, s long s you quote it clerly. The lphet is
More information1 Nondeterministic Finite Automata
1 Nondeterministic Finite Automt Suppose in life, whenever you hd choice, you could try oth possiilities nd live your life. At the end, you would go ck nd choose the one tht worked out the est. Then you
More informationIntroduction to Olympiad Inequalities
Introdution to Olympid Inequlities Edutionl Studies Progrm HSSP Msshusetts Institute of Tehnology Snj Simonovikj Spring 207 Contents Wrm up nd Am-Gm inequlity 2. Elementry inequlities......................
More informationFormal Languages and Automata
Moile Computing nd Softwre Engineering p. 1/5 Forml Lnguges nd Automt Chpter 2 Finite Automt Chun-Ming Liu cmliu@csie.ntut.edu.tw Deprtment of Computer Science nd Informtion Engineering Ntionl Tipei University
More informationSystem Validation (IN4387) November 2, 2012, 14:00-17:00
System Vlidtion (IN4387) Novemer 2, 2012, 14:00-17:00 Importnt Notes. The exmintion omprises 5 question in 4 pges. Give omplete explntion nd do not onfine yourself to giving the finl nswer. Good luk! Exerise
More informationDiscrete Structures, Test 2 Monday, March 28, 2016 SOLUTIONS, VERSION α
Disrete Strutures, Test 2 Mondy, Mrh 28, 2016 SOLUTIONS, VERSION α α 1. (18 pts) Short nswer. Put your nswer in the ox. No prtil redit. () Consider the reltion R on {,,, d with mtrix digrph of R.. Drw
More informationUnit 4. Combinational Circuits
Unit 4. Comintionl Ciruits Digitl Eletroni Ciruits (Ciruitos Eletrónios Digitles) E.T.S.I. Informáti Universidd de Sevill 5/10/2012 Jorge Jun 2010, 2011, 2012 You re free to opy, distriute
More informationKleene s Theorem. Kleene s Theorem. Kleene s Theorem. Kleene s Theorem. Kleene s Theorem. Kleene s Theorem 2/16/15
Models of Comput:on Lecture #8 Chpter 7 con:nued Any lnguge tht e defined y regulr expression, finite utomton, or trnsi:on grph cn e defined y ll three methods We prove this y showing tht ny lnguge defined
More informationCS 330 Formal Methods and Models Dana Richards, George Mason University, Spring 2016 Quiz Solutions
CS 330 Forml Methods nd Models Dn Richrds, George Mson University, Spring 2016 Quiz Solutions Quiz 1, Propositionl Logic Dte: Ferury 9 1. (4pts) ((p q) (q r)) (p r), prove tutology using truth tles. p
More informationArrow s Impossibility Theorem
Rep Voting Prdoxes Properties Arrow s Theorem Arrow s Impossiility Theorem Leture 12 Arrow s Impossiility Theorem Leture 12, Slide 1 Rep Voting Prdoxes Properties Arrow s Theorem Leture Overview 1 Rep
More information22: Union Find. CS 473u - Algorithms - Spring April 14, We want to maintain a collection of sets, under the operations of:
22: Union Fin CS 473u - Algorithms - Spring 2005 April 14, 2005 1 Union-Fin We wnt to mintin olletion of sets, uner the opertions of: 1. MkeSet(x) - rete set tht ontins the single element x. 2. Fin(x)
More informationArrow s Impossibility Theorem
Rep Fun Gme Properties Arrow s Theorem Arrow s Impossiility Theorem Leture 12 Arrow s Impossiility Theorem Leture 12, Slide 1 Rep Fun Gme Properties Arrow s Theorem Leture Overview 1 Rep 2 Fun Gme 3 Properties
More informationCS 310 (sec 20) - Winter Final Exam (solutions) SOLUTIONS
CS 310 (sec 20) - Winter 2003 - Finl Exm (solutions) SOLUTIONS 1. (Logic) Use truth tles to prove the following logicl equivlences: () p q (p p) (q q) () p q (p q) (p q) () p q p q p p q q (q q) (p p)
More informationCompiler Design. Fall Lexical Analysis. Sample Exercises and Solutions. Prof. Pedro C. Diniz
University of Southern Cliforni Computer Science Deprtment Compiler Design Fll Lexicl Anlysis Smple Exercises nd Solutions Prof. Pedro C. Diniz USC / Informtion Sciences Institute 4676 Admirlty Wy, Suite
More informationHomework 3 Solutions
CS 341: Foundtions of Computer Science II Prof. Mrvin Nkym Homework 3 Solutions 1. Give NFAs with the specified numer of sttes recognizing ech of the following lnguges. In ll cses, the lphet is Σ = {,1}.
More informationName Ima Sample ASU ID
Nme Im Smple ASU ID 2468024680 CSE 355 Test 1, Fll 2016 30 Septemer 2016, 8:35-9:25.m., LSA 191 Regrding of Midterms If you elieve tht your grde hs not een dded up correctly, return the entire pper to
More informationAlpha Algorithm: Limitations
Proess Mining: Dt Siene in Ation Alph Algorithm: Limittions prof.dr.ir. Wil vn der Alst www.proessmining.org Let L e n event log over T. α(l) is defined s follows. 1. T L = { t T σ L t σ}, 2. T I = { t
More informationCS 275 Automata and Formal Language Theory
CS 275 Automt nd Forml Lnguge Theory Course Notes Prt II: The Recognition Problem (II) Chpter II.5.: Properties of Context Free Grmmrs (14) Anton Setzer (Bsed on book drft by J. V. Tucker nd K. Stephenson)
More informationCoalgebra, Lecture 15: Equations for Deterministic Automata
Colger, Lecture 15: Equtions for Deterministic Automt Julin Slmnc (nd Jurrin Rot) Decemer 19, 2016 In this lecture, we will study the concept of equtions for deterministic utomt. The notes re self contined
More informationLecture 08: Feb. 08, 2019
4CS4-6:Theory of Computtion(Closure on Reg. Lngs., regex to NDFA, DFA to regex) Prof. K.R. Chowdhry Lecture 08: Fe. 08, 2019 : Professor of CS Disclimer: These notes hve not een sujected to the usul scrutiny
More informationCSE 401 Compilers. Today s Agenda
CSE 401 Compilers Leture 3: Regulr Expressions & Snning, on?nued Mihel Ringenurg Tody s Agend Lst?me we reviewed lnguges nd grmmrs, nd riefly strted disussing regulr expressions. Tody I ll restrt the regulr
More informationFor convenience, we rewrite m2 s m2 = m m m ; where m is repeted m times. Since xyz = m m m nd jxyj»m, we hve tht the string y is substring of the fir
CSCI 2400 Models of Computtion, Section 3 Solutions to Homework 4 Problem 1. ll the solutions below refer to the Pumping Lemm of Theorem 4.8, pge 119. () L = f n b l k : k n + lg Let's ssume for contrdiction
More informationPART 2. REGULAR LANGUAGES, GRAMMARS AND AUTOMATA
PART 2. REGULAR LANGUAGES, GRAMMARS AND AUTOMATA RIGHT LINEAR LANGUAGES. Right Liner Grmmr: Rules of the form: A α B, A α A,B V N, α V T + Left Liner Grmmr: Rules of the form: A Bα, A α A,B V N, α V T
More informationExercise 3 Logic Control
Exerise 3 Logi Control OBJECTIVE The ojetive of this exerise is giving n introdution to pplition of Logi Control System (LCS). Tody, LCS is implemented through Progrmmle Logi Controller (PLC) whih is lled
More information