Morehouse. Edward Lane, Morehouse Instrument Company 1742 Sixth Ave York, PA PH: web: sales:
|
|
- Lesley Bennett
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Morehouse 1
2 Morehouse Edward Lane, Morehouse Instrument Company 1742 Sixth Ave York, PA PH: web: sales: 2
3 This presentation will cover the calibration procedure, as outlined in ASTM E74 This presentation will also cover, how the standard used to perform the calibration affects the combined uncertainty of the UUT (Unit Under Test) 3
4 Calibrations done in accordance with ASTM E74-13A Calibration Hierarchy and Uncertainty Analysis 4
5 Morehouse 5
6 6
7 By the end of this presentation, you should be able to Understand some of the ASTM E74-13a Standard Have the resources to calculate an expanded uncertainty for any device calibrated in accordance with ASTM E74-13a 7
8 A2LA Policy R205 - A2LA Policy on Measurement Uncertainty in Calibration A2LA Policy R205 states Every measurement uncertainty shall take into consideration the following standard contributors, even in the cases where they are determined to be insignificant, and documentation of the consideration shall be made: 8
9 These uncertainty contributors are : Repeatability (Type A) Resolution Reproducibility Reference Standard Uncertainty Reference Standard Stability Environmental Factors Calibrations done in accordance with ASTM E74-13a, will test for Repeatability, Resolution, and Reproducibility of the UUT. 9
10 Calibration is the comparison of an unknown (typically referred to as the Unit Under Test or UUT) to a device known within a certain error(typically referred to as the Calibration Standard or Reference Standard) for the purpose of characterizing the unknown Calibration Standards in regards to ASTM E74 are typically characterized as either Primary or Secondary Standards 10
11 Primary Force Standard a deadweight force applied directly without intervening mechanisms such as levers, hydraulic multipliers, or the like, whose mass has been determined by comparison with reference standards traceable to national standards of mass To be a classified as a primary standard the masses of the weights shall be determined within % of their values by comparison with reference standards traceable to national standards of mass 11
12 Require correction for the effects of Local Gravity Air Buoyancy Must be adjusted to within % or better (N.I.S.T weights are adjusted to within U = %, Morehouse U= %) Made from stable materials with good surface finish (Stainless Steel preferred material) 12
13 Secondary Force Standard an instrument or mechanism, the calibration of which has been established by comparison with primary force standards. In order to perform calibrations in accordance with ASTM E74 your force standard must be calibrated with primary standards 13
14 Secondary Force Standard Range of use limited by loading ranges established by the standard ASTM E74 Class AA Load Range for calibration of secondary standard load cells. This is found by multiplying the lower limit factor by 2000 (.05 %) 5:1 ratio ASTM E74 Class A Load Range for calibration of testing machine. This is found by multiplying the lower limit factor by 400 (.25 %) 4:1 ratio. Range of use cannot be less than the lowest applied force. Loading range cannot be less than 400 for Class A or 2000 for Class AA times the resolution. 14
15 Temperature Stabilization It is recommended that a device be kept in the area or lab where it is to be calibrated for the device to stabilize in the environment. A good rule of thumb is to allow 24 hours for temperature stabilization. Recommended Temperature is 23 degrees C Electrical Stabilization Depending on the equipment common practice is to allow minutes to warm up. Exercise the instrument to be calibrated. The instrument should be set up in the machine and exercised to the maximum force that is to be applied during the actual calibration. Typically we recommend 3-4 exercise cycles; most standards require a minimum of 2 exercise cycles. 15
16 At least 30 force applications are required (we typically recommend 3 runs of 11 or 33 force applications) At least 10 must be different forces and each force must be applied at least twice. Either 15 forces applied twice for 30 force applications or 11 forces applied 3 times for 33 force applications. There should be at least one calibration force for each 10% interval throughout the loading range and if the instrument is to be used below 10% of its capacity a low force should be applied. This low force must be greater than the resolution of the device multiplied by 400 for Class A or 2000 for Class AA devices 16
17 30 +points reduces standard measurement error 17
18 ASTM E74 requires that the temperature be monitored during calibration as close to the device as possible and that the temperature change not exceed +/- 1 degree C during calibration. Temperature corrections must be applied to non-compensated devices. Deflection generally increases by % for each 1 degree C increase in temperature. If the calibration laboratory is not operating at 23 degrees C they should make corrections by correcting the applied force accordingly. 18
19 Randomization of Loading Conditions Shift or rotate the UUT in the calibration machine before repeating any series of forces (suggestion is to rotate 0, 120 and 240 degrees) For Tension and Compression calibration, intersperse the loadings. Be sure to re-exercise the UUT prior to any change in setup. Zero Return during calibration - This is lab-dependent and it is recommended that no more than 5 forces be applied before return to zero. 19
20 Deflection calculation Methods Method B Deflection readings should be calculated as the difference between readings at the applied force and the average or interpolated zero force readings before and after the applied force readings. Method A Deflection readings are calculated as the difference between the deflection at the applied force and the initial deflection at zero force. 20
21 LOAD REVERSAL OR DESCENDING LOADING If a force measuring device is to be used to measure forces during decreasing load sequences, then it must be calibrated in this manner. Separate calibration curves can be used for Ascending values and Descending Values A combined curve may also be used though the STD DEV of the combined curve will be much higher than using separate curves. 21
22 Criteria for Use of Higher Degree Curve Fits Resolution must exceed 50,000 counts An F distribution test is used to determine the appropriate best degree of fit (instructions for this test can be found in the Annex A1 of the ASTM E74 Standard) The Standard deviation for the established curve fit is calculated as before using all the individual deflection values 22
23 Criteria for Lower Load Limit Uncertainty = 2.4 * STD DEV This corresponds to a 98.2 % Coverage Factor Based on Uncertainty or Resolution whichever is higher Class A 400 times the uncertainty or resolution Class AA 2000 times the uncertainty or resolution NOTE: Any instrument that is either modified or repaired should be recalibrated Recalibration is required for a permanent zero shift exceeding 1.0 % of full scale 23
24 Recalibration Interval Secondary Standards should be calibrated or verified annually to ensure that they do not change more than % over the loading range Instruments used as Class A devices (Typically used to calibrate testing machines) should be calibrated or verified annually to ensure that they do not change more than 0.16 % over the loading range. If the Calibration device is stable to within 0.16 % over the loading range then the calibration interval can be 2 years as long as the UUT continues to meet the stability criteria 24
25 Deviations from the fitted curve These are the differences between the fitted curve and the observed values Standard Deviation is the square root of the sum of all the deviations squared/nm-1 N = sample size, m = the degree of polynomial fit Calibration equation Deflection or Response = A0+A1(load)+A2(load)^2+ A5(load)^5 LLF is 2.4 times the standard deviation Class A range is 400 times the LLF. Class AA range is 2000 times the LLF. 25
26 Substitution of Electronic Instruments The indicating device used in the original calibration and the device to be substituted shall have been calibrated and the measurement uncertainty determined The uncertainty of each device shall be less than 1/3 of the uncertainty for the force measurement system. Excitation amplitude, wave form, and frequency shall be maintained Cable substitutions should be verified with a transducer simulator 26
27 Allow UUT to come to room temperature Warm up Instrumentation Select Test points Fixture UUT in Test Frame Exercise UUT 2-4 times Apply 1 st series of forces (Run1) Rotate the UUT 120 degrees if possible for run 2 Apply 2 nd series of forces (Run2) IF UUT IS COMPRESSION AND TENSION SWITCH TO OTHER MODE AFTER FINISHING RUN 2 AND EXERCISE AND REPEAT ABOVE STEPS Rotate the UUT another 120 degrees if possible for run 3 Apply 3rd series of forces (Run3) 27
28 Uncertainty BIPM/SI National Metrology Institute (NMI) Primary Reference Laboratory Morehouse Instrument Company Accredited Calibration Service Supplier Working Standards Instrument/Equipment Measurement Traceability: 1. Unbroken Chain of Comparisons 2. Measurement Uncertainty 3. Documented Procedure 4. Technical Competence 5. Realization of SI Units 6. Periodic Recalibration 7. Measurement Assurance 28
29 10,000 LBF LOAD CELL TYPE A UNCERTAINTY.5 LBF NMI Primary Standards Accredited Cal. Lab Working Standards Field Measurement NIST ( %) TOTAL TEST UNCERTAINTY LBF MOREHOUSE (0.001 %) TOTAL TEST UNCERTAINTY LBF SECONDARY STANDARDS (0.04 %) TOTAL TEST UNCERTAINTY LBF WORKING STANDARDS (0.1 %) TOTAL TEST UNCERTAINTY LBF FIELD MEASUREMENT (1 %) TOTAL TEST UNCERTAINTY LBF 29
30 BIPM/SI NMI Primary Standards Accredited Cal. Lab Working Standards Field Measurement N.I.S.T % MOREHOUSE % SECONDARY STANDARDS 0.04 % The further away from calibration by primary standards the larger the Overall Uncertainty will become 30
31 The next example will deal with an uncertainty analysis that is in the ASTM E74-13a standard as an appendix. Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Resolution are all accounted for in the ASTM E74 uncertainty or LLF (Lower Limit Factor). 31
32 We will gather some necessary information and run through a sample expanded uncertainty calibration. We will need the following: 1. Calibration Report for the Device 2. The uncertainty of the instrument(s) that were used to perform the calibration 3. Calibration History (if available) 4. Manufacturer s Specification Sheet 5. Error Sources, if known 6. Dissemination Error, if known 32
33 Type A Uncertainty To do a type A uncertainty analysis, information will be needed from the calibration report. The ASTM E74 LLF or Uncertainty from the report should be entered into the spreadsheet. In ASTM E74-13a, Uncertainty has been changed to LLF (Lower Limit Factor). 33
34 Type A and B uncertainty analysis COMPANY LOAD CELL MANUFACTURER SAMPLE MOREHOUSE ENTER LOAD CELL S/N P-7768 YOUR CAPACITY LBF CALIBRATION ASTM E74 Uncertainty for K= LBF INFORMATION THE LOWEST FORCE AT WHICH THE SECONDARY STANDARD WILL BE USED 1000 LBF IN PRIMARY FORCE CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY K= % HIGHLIGHTED PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY K=1 (IF APPLICABLE) COLUMNS CAL DATE 10/27/2010 Using the Excel sheet available at content/uploads/2013/11/type-a-and-b-uncertainty-analysis- ASTM-E74-1.xls We will enter the load cell S/N, Capacity, ASTM Uncertainty which was.237 LBF, Lowest force the standard will be used, and the Uncertainty of the standard used to perform the calibration at k=1. 34
35 Type A and B uncertainty analysis COMPANY LOAD CELL MANUFACTURER SAMPLE MOREHOUSE ENTER LOAD CELL S/N P-7768 YOUR CAPACITY LBF CALIBRATION ASTM E74 Uncertainty for K= LBF INFORMATION THE LOWEST FORCE AT WHICH THE SECONDARY STANDARD WILL BE USED 1000 LBF IN PRIMARY FORCE CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY K= % HIGHLIGHTED PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY K=1 (IF APPLICABLE) COLUMNS CAL DATE 10/27/2010 The uncertainty of the standard or standards that were used to perform the calibration should be found somewhere on the certificate of calibration with a coverage factor. This coverage factor is typically 2, so you will need to reduce this to k=1. 35
36 Type A Uncertainty % Uncertainty Description Uncertainty Distribution Divisor Standard Uncertainty Squared ASTM E74 Uncertainty % at the lowest calibration force to be used % normal E E-09 Combined Type A Uncertainty 9.88E E-09 The information from the ASTM E74 report is your Type A uncertainty. To get this, we are dividing the uncertainty or LLF by the lowest force this instrument is going to be used at. Then we divide by 2.4 the ASTM E74 coverage factor to reduce this to the uncertainty or LLF at k=1 (above). 36
37 Type B Uncertainty % Uncertainty Description Uncertainty Distribution Divisor Degrees of Standard Freedom Uncertainty Squared % Contribution u^4/df PRIMARY OR SECONDARY CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY 0.001% normal E E % E-24 PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY (IF APPLICABLE) 0.000% normal E E % E+0 STABILITY OF THE SECONDARY STANDARD OVER TIME 0.005% rectangular E E % 6.95E-21 TEMPERATURE ERROR +/- FROM INSTRUMENT SPEC SHEET % rectangular E E % E-24 POTENTIAL ERROR SOURCES IF KNOWN (MISALIGNMENT ETC) 0.005% rectangular E E % 6.95E-21 DISSEMINATION ERROR (FOR CALIBRATION LABORATORIES) 0.005% rectangular E E % 6.95E-21 Combined Uncertainty 1.04E E % 36.79E-15 Next, we will be looking at the type B uncertainty. If the system was calibrated in accordance with ASTM E74 and consisted of a meter and load cell, then we will treat the ASTM E74 uncertainty or LLF as a system uncertainty, and there would not be a need to look at the Electrical Calibration Standard Uncertainty. 37
38 PRIMARY OR SECONDARY CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY 0.001% normal PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY (IF APPLICABLE) 0.000% normal The first type B uncertainty component to examine is the uncertainty of the standards used to perform the calibration. The can usually be found on the calibration laboratory s scope of accreditation. In this example, the load cell was sent in with an indicator, so we will only consider the Primary Force Standard Uncertainty, which was dead weight with an uncertainty of 0.001% for K=1. 38
39 STABILITY OF THE SECONDARY FORCE STANDARD OVER TIME 0.005% rectangular E E-10 This can be determined by comparing the previous calibration with the current calibration. The # to be used should be the number of the lowest calibration force that will be used for calibration. If you do not have any previous calibration data, then the suggestion would be to contact the manufacturer or use a conservative number based on similar systems. 39
40 Calibration History can be found from taking the difference from one calibration to the next, or looking at several calibrations, if available. In this example, I would opt to use the % change of %. This is the highest % change throughout the loading range. 40
41 A less conservative way to approach change from previous would be to take the Standard Deviation of all of the change from previous numbers. 41
42 UNCERTAINTY EXAMPLE Creep Error (OPTIONAL) CREEP ERROR FOUND ON LOAD CELL SPEC SHEET 0.002% rectangular E E-11 Creep error This can usually be found on the manufacturer s spec sheet, and is usually % reading for 20 minutes. Since we typically hold the force for around 30 seconds when performing the calibration, the creep error is much lower. If the end user replicates holding the force for 30 seconds, then the creep error of the system should be better than % or non existent if the end user is applying force for the same amount of time. A creep test can be performed and is included in the new ASTM revision for those using method A. 42
43 MISALIGNMENT ERROR (SEE ASTM E1012) AND/OR SIDE LOAD SENSITIVITY FROM LOAD CELL SPEC SHEET 0.005% rectangular E E-10 A well aligned calibration machine may demonstrate bending less than 2 %. The % can usually be found on the load cell spec sheet under Side Load Sensitivity. Note: If using a Morehouse UCM and Morehouse Ultra Precision Load Cell the Morehouse press will transfer the force applied to the load cell at an angle of no more than 1/16 th inch measured off centerline of the load cell. (This number is usually 0.05 % *.0625 =.003%) 43
44 DISSEMINATION ERROR (FOR CALIBRATION LABORATORIES) 0.005% rectangular E E-10 Dissemination Error Assuming we have compared results with primary standards accurate to % of applied force, and we achieved actual measurement results comparing 2 standards, each calibrated with primary standards against one another that suggested our measurements to be within %, we will use this number for Dissemination Error. 44
45 TEMPERATURE ERROR +/- FROM LOAD CELL SPEC SHEET % rectangular E E-11 Temperature Error - This is found from the load cell spec sheet. It is usually in terms of % of reading/100 per degree F or C. This number should then be multiplied by the maximum temperature difference from the temperature at which the calibration was performed. If the manufacturer s spec sheet suggests.0015 % per degree C and you are operating within +/- 1 degree, then use this number. If you are +/- 2 Degrees C, then use.003 %. 45
46 COMPANY TRANSDUCER MANUFACTURER TRANSDUCER S/N ENTER P-7768 YOUR CAPACITY LBF CALIBRATION ASTM E74 LLF for K= LBF INFORMATION THE LOWEST FORCE OR TORQUE POINT USED IN THE LOADING RANGE 1000 LBF IN PRIMARY FORCE CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY K= % HIGHLIGHTED PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY K=1 (IF APPLICABLE) CAL DATE Type A and B uncertainty analysis For ASTM E74 Calibrations MOREHOUSE MOREOUSE CALCULATED VALUES TRANSDUCER UNCERTAINTY IN % FOR FULL SCALE K= % TRANSDUCER UNCERTAINTY IN % FOR FULL SCALE K= % TRANSDUCER UNCERTAINTY IN % FOR LOWEST FORCE APPLIED K = % TRANSDUCERUNCERTAINTY IN % FOR LOWEST FORCE APPLIED K = % 2/11/14 Type A Uncertainty % COLUMNS Degrees of Standard Uncertainty Description Uncertainty Distribution Divisor Squared % Contribution u^4/df Freedom Uncertainty ASTM E74 OR E2428 LLF % at the lowest calibration force or torque to be used % normal E E % 2.97E-18 Combined Type A Uncertainty 98.75E E E E-18 Type B Uncertainty % Uncertainty Description Uncertainty Distribution Divisor Degrees of Standard Freedom Uncertainty Squared % Contribution u^4/df PRIMARY OR SECONDARY CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY 0.001% normal E E % E-24 PRIMARY ELECTRICAL CALIBRATION STANDARD UNCERTAINTY (IF APPLICABLE) 0.000% normal E E % E+0 STABILITY OF THE SECONDARY STANDARD OVER TIME 0.005% rectangular E E % 6.95E-21 TEMPERATURE ERROR +/- FROM INSTRUMENT SPEC SHEET % rectangular E E % 56.26E-24 POTENTIAL ERROR SOURCES IF KNOWN (MISALIGNMENT ETC) 0.005% rectangular E E % 6.95E-21 DISSEMINATION ERROR (FOR CALIBRATION LABORATORIES) 0.005% rectangular E E % 6.95E-21 Combined Uncertainty E E % 2.99E-18 Effective Degrees of Freedom Coverage Factor (k) = Expanded Uncertainty E-6 Review of everything we entered 46
47 MOREOUSE LBF SERIAL NO P-7768 % Force Applied COMBINED UNCERTAINTY FOR K= % % LBF 10.00% % LBF 20.00% % LBF 30.00% % LBF 40.00% % LBF 50.00% % LBF 60.00% % LBF 70.00% % LBF 80.00% % LBF 90.00% % LBF % % LBF Summary After all the data has been entered, the Big U or Expanded Uncertainty for this 10K load cell that had an ASTM E74 uncertainty or LLF of.237 LBF (K=2.4) is now % and LBF for K=2 at full scale capacity. 47
48 This example is just a guideline for calculating expanded uncertainty. The actual uncertainty components in your system may vary. 48
Calibration Traceability Guidelines
Calibration Traceability Guidelines Check the website of accrediting bodies for the accredited laboratories individual scope of accreditation www.a2la.org ts.nist.gov/standards/accreditation/index.cfm
More informationUncertainty Propagation for Force Calibration Systems
Uncertainty Propagation for Force Calibration Systems Morehouse Instruments Figure 1. Measurement Uncertainty Pyramid Introduction There are several labs operating throughout the world, whom do not follow
More informationMEASUREMENT TRACEABILITY AND ERRORS RELATED TO FORCE MEASUREMENT
MEASUREMENT TRACEABILITY AND ERRORS RELATED TO FORCE MEASUREMENT Henry Zumbrun II, President Morehouse Instrument Company 1742 Sixth Ave York, PA 17403 PH: 717-843-0081 web: www.mhforce.com info: hzumbrun@mhforce.com
More informationAn Introduction to the Differences Between the Two Most Recognized Force Standards
An Introduction to the Differences Between the Two Most Recognized Force Standards Morehouse Instrument Company Introduction Morehouse has been performing both ASTM E74 and ISO 376 calibrations for more
More informationISO 376 Calibration Uncertainty C. Ferrero
ISO 376 Calibration Uncertainty C. Ferrero For instruments classified for interpolation, the calibration uncertainty is the uncertainty associated with using the interpolation equation to calculate a single
More informationA61-02 CALA Guidance on Traceability Revision 1.2 October 15, 2012
Revision 1.2 October 15, 2012 PAGE II TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... 1 GUIDANCE...2 1.0 Introduction... 2 2.0 Uncertainty and Traceability... 2 3.0 Need for Traceability... 3 3.1 What does traceability
More informationPRELIMINARY DRAFT INDIAN STANDARD METHOD FOR CALIBRATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF TORQUE MEASURING DEVICES INCLUDING TORQUE WRENCH TESTER
For BIS Use Only Doc: PGD 34(1203)P PRELIMINARY DRAFT INDIAN STANDARD METHOD FOR CALIBRATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF TORQUE MEASURING DEVICES INCLUDING TORQUE WRENCH TESTER Not to be reproduced without the
More informationEA-10/14. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices. Publication Reference PURPOSE
Publication Reference EA-10/14 EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices PURPOSE This document has been produced by EA to improve harmonisation in determining the calibration
More informationGuidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices
European Association of National Metrology Institutes Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices EURAMET/cg-14/v.01 Previously EA-10/14 July 2007 Calibration Guide EURAMET/cg-14/v.01
More informationSPECIFIC CRITERIA for CALIBRATION LABORATORIES IN MECHANICAL DISCIPLINE : Force Proving Instruments
NABL 122-06 NATIONAL ACCREDITATION BOARD FOR TESTING AND CALIBRATION LABORATORIES SPECIFIC CRITERIA for CALIBRATION LABORATORIES IN MECHANICAL DISCIPLINE : Force Proving Instruments Reviewed by MASTER
More informationUncertainty of Calibration. Results in Force Measurements
Publication Reference EAL-G Uncertainty of Calibration Results in Force Measurements PURPOSE This document has been produced to improve the harmonization in determination of uncertainties in force measurements.
More informationCALIBRATION REPORT FOR THERMOHYDROMETER
CALIBRATION REPORT FOR THERMOHYDROMETER SAMPLE CUSTOMER S/N: XXXXX Report Number: Y205188 Page 1 of 5 Report No. Y205188 ICL CALIBRATION LABORATORIES, INC. ISO/IEC 17025 and ANSI/NCSL Z540-1 accredited
More informationVocabulary of Metrology
Vocabulary of Metrology For Understating Uncertainty and Traceability Prepared by: Kim, Sang Ho Engineering Team Leader Modal Shop, Inc A PCB Group Company SI National Metrology Institute Secondary Calibration
More informationSAMPLE. Accuracy Calibration Certificate. Mettler Toledo 1900 Polaris Parkway Contact: Instrument Type: EURAMET cg-18 v. 4.0 Sample ACC WI v.1.
076-00-067-ACC-S Mettler Toledo, LLC 900 Polaris Parkway Columbus, OH 0.800.METTLER Customer SAMPLE Accuracy Calibration Certificate Company: Address: City: Zip / Postal: State / Province: Mettler Toledo
More informationSAMPLE. Accuracy Calibration Certificate. Instrument Type: EURAMET cg-18 v. 4.0 Sample ACC ISO17025 WI v.1.0
076-0-067-ACC-USL-S Mettler Toledo, LLC 900 Polaris Parkway Columbus, OH 0.800.METTLER Customer Accredited by the American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (ALA) CALIBRATION CERT #788.0 SAMPLE
More informationConversion Formulas Potential Measurement Errors What is involved in building a Primary Torque Standard Proper Handling techniques
FUNDEMENTALS OF TORQUE CALIBRATION 1 Lesson Objectives Introduction Definition and Examples of Torque Conversion Formulas Torque Calibration Traceability Standard Types of Torque Standards ASTM E2428 BS7882
More informationDocument No: TR 12 Issue No: 1
ESTIMATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT BY CALIBRATION LABORATORIES AND SPECIFICATION OF CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY ON SCHEDULES OF ACCREDITATION Prepared by: SADCAS Technical Manage Approved
More informationSPECIFIC CRITERIA for CALIBRATION LABORATORIES IN MECHANICAL DISCIPLINE : Torque Measuring Devices
NABL 122-10 NATIONAL ACCREDITATION BOARD FOR TESTING AND CALIBRATION LABORATORIES SPECIFIC CRITERIA for CALIBRATION LABORATORIES IN MECHANICAL DISCIPLINE : Torque Measuring Devices Reviewed by MASTER COPY
More informationAccuracy Calibration Certificate
gl06-0-067-acc Mettler Toledo Service Business Unit Industrial 900 Polaris Parkway Columbus, OH 0-800-- Services Provided By: Customer Accuracy Calibration Certificate Company: Sample Company Test Address:
More informationR SANAS Page 1 of 7
ESTIMATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT BY CALIBRATION LABORATORIES AND SPECIFICATION OF CALIBRATION AND MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY ON SCHEDULES OF ACCREDITATION Approved By: Chief Executive Officer:
More informationSCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z
SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 MTS FIELD SERVICE 14000 Technology Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Hugh Casper Phone: 518 852 3977 CALIBRATION Valid To: September 30,
More information2.1. Accuracy, n- how close the indication of the thermometer is to the true value.
AASHTO Accreditation Policy and Guidance on Thermometer Selection and Records Revised: January 25, 2018 Revision #: 0 1. Objective 1.1. The purpose of this document is to clearly define acceptance criteria
More informationWGFF Guidelines for CMC Uncertainty and Calibration Report Uncertainty
WGFF Guidelines for CMC Uncertainty and Calibration Report Uncertainty October 21, 2013 Summary The Working Group for Fluid Flow (WGFF) defines Calibration and Measurement Capability (CMC) uncertainty
More informationStandard Practices for Air Speed Calibration Testing
Standard Practices for Air Speed Calibration Testing Rachael V. Coquilla Bryza Wind Lab, Fairfield, California Air speed calibration is a test process where the output from a wind measuring instrument
More informationCalibration of Temperature Block Calibrators
European Association of National Metrology Institutes Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators EURAMET cg-13 Version 2.0 (03/2011) Previously EA-10/13 Calibration Guide EURAMET cg-13 Version 2.0 (03/2011)
More information< Final report > Report on the APMP.M.F-S1 supplementary comparison for 2 MN Force
< Final report > Report on the APMP.M.F-S1 supplementary comparison for 2 MN Force Kazunaga Ueda*, Toshiyuki Hayashi*, Hiroshi Maejima*, Rolf Kumme**, Dirk Röske**, Mark Seidel** * National Metrology of
More informationSCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z
SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 ARCONIC POWER AND PROPULSION RESEARCH CENTER 1500 S. Warner St. Whitehall, MI 49461-1895 Michelle McDonald Phone: 231 894 7586 CALIBRATION
More informationLoadcell Calibration - Evaluation of Uncertainties
Loadcell Calibration - Evaluation of Uncertainties This document is a revision of the evaluation issued in June 2015. Novatech s calibration laboratory is not UKAS accredited due to the high number of
More informationCMM Uncertainty Budget
Table of Contents Purpose...3 Scope...3 Measurement Example...3 Uncertainty Groups...4 Probe Group...5 Calibration Artifact Group...6 Environment Group...7 CMM Group...8 Part Group...10 Conversion of Potential
More informationEA-10/13. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators. Publication Reference PURPOSE
Publication Reference EA-10/13 EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators PURPOSE This document been produced by EA to improve the harmonisation in the calibration of temperature
More informationTechnical Procedure for Measurement Assurance
Technical Procedure for Measurement Assurance 1.0 Purpose - This procedure specifies the required elements for measurement assurance in the Drug Chemistry Sections of the State Crime Laboratory. 2.0 Scope
More informationTYPICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY DEFINED BY AN FPG8601 FORCE BALANCED PISTON GAUGE
TYPICAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY DEFINED BY AN FPG8601 FORCE BALANCED PISTON GAUGE Michael Bair and Pierre Delajoud 2002 DEC 10 Revised 2004 MAR 26 FORWARD FPG8601 is a pressure standard designed
More informationExtending Transducer Calibration Range by Extrapolation
Introduction Extending Transducer Calibration by olation by LaVar Clegg Force and torque transducers must be calibrated in a laboratory in order to be useful in their intended application. Applications
More informationCALIBRATION CERTIFICATE # 503
CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE # 503 Calibration date : 2011-02-23 Certificate issued : 2012-04-18 Company name Company address City, Province, Canada CLAS 2009-02 Calibration of Mass flow meter Micro Motion
More informationCERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION
CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION 12100 WEST 6TH AVE LAKEWOOD, CO 80228 ANAB AC-2489.02 Manufacturer: Ruska Instruments Corp. Model Number: 7250i : Pressure Calibrator Serial Number: 69718 ID: TE10768 As-Found:
More informationGlossary Innovative Measurement Solutions
Glossary GLOSSARY OF TERMS FOR TRANSDUCERS, LOAD CELLS AND WEIGH MODULES This purpose of this document is to provide a comprehensive, alphabetical list of terms and definitions commonly employed in the
More informationP103d Annex: Policy on Estimating Measurement Uncertainty for Construction Materials & Geotechnical Testing Labs Date of Issue 09/13/05
P103d Annex: Policy on Estimating Measurement Uncertainty for Construction Materials & Geotechnical Testing Labs Date of Issue 09/13/05 This document provides guidance on the estimation of uncertainty
More informationCertification of a High Capacity Force Machine for Testing of Load Cells According to OIML R60
Certification of a High Capacity Force Machine for Testing of Load Cells According to OIML R60 Bernd Meißner Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Weighing Instruments Laboratory Braunschweig Abstract
More informationReview of Anemometer Calibration Standards
Review of Anemometer Calibration Standards Rachael V. Coquilla rvcoquilla@otechwind.com Otech Engineering, Inc., Davis, CA Anemometer calibration defines a relationship between the measured signals from
More informationAppendix A: Laboratory Report Format
Appendix A: Laboratory Report Format This appendix contains details on the format for formal written laboratory reports in the form of author's instructions. Author's Instructions for ME354 Formal Lababoratory
More informationMETHODS TO CONFIRM THE MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY OF THE FORCE STANDARD MACHINES AFTER REINSTALLATION
IMEKO 22 nd TC3, 12 th TC5 and 3 rd TC22 International Conferences 3 to 5 February, 2014, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa METHODS TO CONFIRM THE MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY OF THE FORCE STANDARD MACHINES
More informationPOWER UNDERSTANDING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN DP FLOW DEVICES
Proceedings of the ASME 2014 Power Conference POWER2014 July 28-31, 2014, Baltimore, Maryland, USA POWER2014-32205 UNDERSTANDING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN DP FLOW DEVICES Michael S. Hering Rosemount DP
More informationPTB S 16.5 MN HYDRAULIC AMPLIFICATION MACHINE AFTER MODERNIZATION
IMEKO 22 nd TC3, 15 th TC5 and 3 rd TC22 International Conferences 3 to 5 February, 2014, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa PTB S 16.5 MN HYDRAULIC AMPLIFICATION MACHINE AFTER MODERNIZATION R. Kumme
More informationTechnical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5
Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5 2017-03-06 revised 2018-02-13 (changed schedule) Task and Purpose of the Comparison According to the rules set up by the CIPM MRA the consultative
More informationPOWER QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE. Version 4 October Power-Quality-Oct-2009-Version-4.doc Page 1 / 12
POWER QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE Version 4 October 2009 Power-Quality-Oct-2009-Version-4.doc Page 1 / 12 MEASNET 2009 Copyright all rights reserved This publication may not be reproduced or utilized
More informationNew Thermometer Guidance Document from AASHTO Accreditation Program. Maria Knake Asphalt Binder ETG Meeting May 10, 2018
New Thermometer Guidance Document from AASHTO Accreditation Program Maria Knake Asphalt Binder ETG Meeting May 10, 2018 Background Mercury reduction initiatives have hastened the need to find suitable
More informationVersion 4.0 (09/2017) Version 3.0 (02/2015) Version 2.0 (03/2011) Version 1.0 (07/2007) EURAMET e.v. Bundesallee 100 D Braunschweig Germany
Guidelines on the Calibration of Temperature Block Calibrators Authorship and Imprint This document was developed by the EURAMET e.v., Technical Committee for Thermometry. Authors: Yves Hermier (LNE-INM,
More informationThe Determination of Uncertainties in Bend Tests on Metallic Materials
Manual of Codes of Practice for the Determination of Uncertainties in Mechanical Tests on Metallic Materials Code of Practice No. 09 The Determination of Uncertainties in end Tests on Metallic Materials
More informationISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 7500-1 Third edition 2004-08-15 Metallic materials Verification of static uniaxial testing machines Part 1: Tension/compression testing machines Verification and calibration
More informationCertificate of Accreditation
PERRY JOHNSON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION, INC. Certificate of Accreditation Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc. has assessed the Laboratory of: (Hereinafter called the Organization) and hereby declares
More informationProcess Accuracy Ratio vs Process Uncertainty Ratio (Risk Mitigation: Calibration and the Customer s Process)
1. Abstract The requirements for the process accuracy may be dictated by the requirements of the expected output of the process or product. The ratio between the process accuracy (i.e., the acceptance
More informationMetallic materials Brinell hardness test. Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 6506-3 Third edition 2014-10-01 Metallic materials Brinell hardness test Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks Matériaux métalliques Essai de dureté Brinell Partie 3: Étalonnage
More informationThe Fundamentals of Moisture Calibration
The Fundamentals of Moisture The following guide will provide you with a basic knowledge of humidity calibration, help you to understand your requirements and select an appropriate solution. 1 Why Humidity
More informationGuide to the Uncertainty of Force Measurement
April 1999 Guide to the Uncertainty of Force Measurement Liam Maybank, Andy Knott, and David Elkington Centre for Mechanical and Acoustical Metrology National Physical Laboratory Queens Road Teddington
More informationInfrared Thermometer Calibration A Complete Guide
Infrared Thermometer Calibration A Complete Guide Application note With proper setup and planning, infrared calibrations can be accurate. The steps outlined below should be followed to perform accurate
More information1.11 Measurement Uncertainty
Document #: 4968 Page 1 of 10 1.11 Measurement Uncertainty In an effort to comply with accreditation requirements, and because scientific measurements in general are subject to variability, a budget estimating
More informationModel 791 Calibration Plate for Tiltmeters and Inclinometers
User s Manual Model 791 Calibration Plate for Tiltmeters and Inclinometers Serial No. Baseline, L Date measured By mm Introduction The Model 791 Calibration Plate is designed for calibrating any tiltmeter
More informationUnderstanding the uncertainties associated with using the 5128A RHapid Cal portable humidity generator
Understanding the uncertainties associated with using the 5128A RHapid Cal portable humidity generator Introduction Humidity generators are mechanical devices that provide stable temperature and humidity
More informationDemonstrating Competency and Equivalency of Two Commercial SPRT Calibration Facilities
Demonstrating Competency and Equivalency of Two Commercial SPRT Calibration Facilities T. J. Wiandt 1,2 1 Fluke Corporation, Hart Scientific Division, American Fork, Utah United States. 2 E-mail: tom.wiandt@hartscientific.com
More informationProcedure for Uncertainty Determination for Calibration Consoles
Category: ELECTRICITY Procedure: EL-ENG-09-01 Page: 1 of 19 Procedure for Uncertainty Determination for Calibration Consoles Adnan Rashid Senior Electrical Engineer Engineering and Laboratory Services
More informationCalibration of Volumetric Glassware. Prepared by Allan Fraser May 2016 APPLICATION Note 1
Calibration of Volumetric Glassware Prepared by Allan Fraser May 2016 APPLICATION Note 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... i LIST OF TABLES... ii 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Purpose... 1 Scope... 1 Principle...
More informationUNCERTAINTY SCOPE OF THE FORCE CALIBRATION MACHINES. A. Sawla Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Bundesallee 100, D Braunschweig, Germany
Measurement - Supports Science - Improves Technology - Protects Environment... and Provides Employment - No and in the Future Vienna, AUSTRIA, 000, September 5-8 UNCERTAINTY SCOPE OF THE FORCE CALIBRATION
More information792A AC/DC Transfer Standard
92A AC/DC Transfer Standard Technical Data Support for your most demanding ac measurement requirements ppm total uncertainty Traceable to national standards range: 2 mv to 00 V Frequency range: Hz to 1
More informationA Method for Verifying Traceability in Effective Area for High Pressure Oil Piston-Cylinders
A Method for Verifying Traceability in Effective Area for High Pressure Oil Piston-Cylinders Abstract Speaker/Author: Michael Bair Fluke Calibration 4765 East Beautiful Lane Phoenix, AZ 85042 Ph: 602 773
More informationAutomated volume measurement for weihts using acoustic volumeter
IMEKO 20th TC3, 3rd TC16 and 1st TC22 International Conference Cultivating metrological knowledge 27th to 30th November, 2007. Merida, Mexico. Automated volume measurement for weihts using acoustic volumeter
More informationSCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z
SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 LAKE SHORE INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. 2230 Caughey Road Erie, PA 16506 Suzanne R. Zuba / James B. Cross Phone: 814 838 3539 CALIBRATION
More informationCertificate of Accreditation
PERRY JOHNSON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION, INC. Certificate of Accreditation Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc. has assessed the Laboratory of:. Av. Rio Consulado # 2614, Col. San Juan de Aragón
More informationUNCERTAINTY IN TORQUE CALIBRATION USING VERTICAL TORQUE AXIS ARRANGEMENT AND SYMMETRICAL TWO FORCE MEASUREMENT
UNCERTAINTY IN TORQUE CALIBRATION USING VERTICAL TORQUE AXIS ARRANGEMENT AND SYMMETRICAL TWO FORCE MEASUREMENT Dieter Kenzler 1, Jörg Oblasser 2, Andreas Subaric-Leitis 2 and Christian Ullner 2 1 ) SCHATZ
More informationSpecific Accreditation Guidance. Infrastructure and Asset Integrity. Measurement Uncertainty in Geotechnical Testing
Specific Accreditation Guidance Infrastructure and Asset Integrity Measurement Uncertainty in Geotechnical Testing January 2018 Copyright National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia 2018 This
More informationMETHODS FOR CERTIFYING MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT. Scott Crone
METHODS FOR CERTIFYING MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT Scott Crone North American Sales Manager AMETEK Calibration Instruments 8600 Somerset Drive Largo, Florida 33773 USA INTRODUCTION Like any other piece of equipment,
More informationINVESTIGATION OF THE CALIBRATION CAPABILITIES OF A 1 KN M AND 10 KN M REFERENCE CALIBRATION MACHINE
IMEKO 23 rd TC3, 13 th TC5 and 4 th TC22 International Conference 30 May to 1 June, 2017, Helsinki, Finland INVESTIGATION OF THE CALIBRATION CAPABILITIES OF A 1 KN M AND 10 KN M REFERENCE CALIBRATION MACHINE
More informationTechnical Procedure for General Laboratory Equipment
Technical Procedure for General Laboratory Equipment 1.0 Purpose - This procedure specifies the required elements for the use of general laboratory equipment. 2.0 Scope - This procedure applies to all
More informationAN EXPLANATION OF THE DG-1000 ACCURACY SPECIFICATIONS
WHITE PAPER AN EXPLANATION OF THE DG-1000 ACCURACY SPECIFICATIONS The Energy Conservatory Minneapolis, MN Introduction: The purpose of this document is to explain the details of the accuracy specifications
More informationAPPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY
APPENDIX G EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY Table of Contents 1. SCOPE... 2 2. REFERENCES... 2 3. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS... 2 4. BACKGROUND... 4 5. EVALUATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY POLICY... 5
More informationIMPORTANT FEATURES OF ESTIMATION & INTERPRETATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY. B. Bhattacharya, K. Ramani, P.H. Bhave
IMPORTANT FEATURES OF ESTIMATION & INTERPRETATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY By B. Bhattacharya, K. Ramani, P.H. Bhave 1. INTRODUCTION In the last few years a lot of awareness has been created regarding
More informationSCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z
SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 & ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 ALABAMA SCALE & INSTRUMENT MARSHALL, INC. d.b.a. ASI Calibration Labs - Texas 1006 East End Blvd North Marshall, TX 75672 Lawson Hill
More informationReliable Test Results
Intelligent testing Johannes J.Bührle - Agenda Reliable test results are a fundamental and highly topical aspect of materials testing. Using suitable examples we would like to show you how we view this
More informationROLE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF UNCERTAINTY IN HV MEASUREMENT OF PORCELAIN INSULATORS A CASE STUDY
International Conference on Ceramics, Bikaner, India International Journal of Modern Physics: Conference Series Vol. (01) 8 5 World Scientific Publishing Company DOI: 10.11/S010195101019 ROLE AND SIGNIFICANCE
More informationDesignation: D (Reapproved 2009)
Designation: D3702 94 (Reapproved 2009) Standard Test Method for Wear Rate and Coefficient of Friction of Materials in Self- Lubricated Rubbing Contact Using a Thrust Washer Testing Machine 1 This standard
More information792A AC/DC Transfer Standard
92A AC/DC Transfer Standard Technical Data Support for your most demanding ac measurement requirements ppm total uncertainty Traceable to national standards range: 2 mv to 00 V Frequency range: Hz to 1
More informationM3003 EDITION 2 JANUARY 2007
M3003 EDITION 2 JANUARY 2007 The Expression of Uncertainty and Confidence in Measurement JH 2007 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 Introduction 2 2 Overview 4 3 More detail 10 4 Type A evaluation of standard uncertainty
More informationISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Metallic materials Vickers hardness test Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 6507-3 Third edition 2005-12-15 Metallic materials Vickers hardness test Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks Matériaux métalliques Essai de dureté Vickers Partie 3: Étalonnage
More informationUnderstanding uncertainties associated with the 5128A RHapid-Cal Humidity Generator
Understanding uncertainties associated with the 5128A RHapid-Cal Humidity Generator Technical Note The Fluke Calibration 5128A RHapid-Cal Humidity Generator provides a portable, stable test environment
More informationCERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION
Issued By Transmille Ltd. Date of Issue 20 January 2016 0324 Approved Signatory Transmille Ltd. Unit 4, Select Business Centre Lodge Road Staplehurst, Kent. TN12 0QW. TEL 01580 890700 FAX 01580 890711
More informationParametric Study of Shaft Subjected To Pure Bending
Page167 Parametric Study of Shaft Subjected To Pure Bending Amar Kumar Patel*, Akash Kumar Patel**, Prajnasu Biswal***, & Satya Narayan Tripathy**** *Mechanical Department, Gandhi Institute of Engineering
More informationMeasurement Uncertainty Knowing the Unknown
Measurement Uncertainty Knowing the Unknown Anish Shah FOUNDER and Chief Metrology Officer at Metrologized, LLC, a company founded in 2014 to further the metrology knowledge-base within the manufacturing
More informationA compression load cell, with strain gauges, tested as a part of a weighing instrument. Manufacturer : Molen or Precia Molen.
Test certificate Page 1 of 4 Issued by Hugo de Grootplein 1 3314 EG Dordrecht The Netherlands Notified Body Number 0122 In accordance with Applicant In respect of Paragraph 8.1 of the European Standard
More informationUser Manual. Stick-Style Water-Resistant Infrared Thermometer with 8:1 Distance-to-Sight Ratio. Model with NIST-Traceable Calibration
User Manual Stick-Style Water-Resistant Infrared Thermometer with 8:1 Distance-to-Sight Ratio with NIST-Traceable Calibration Model 20250-09 THE STANDARD IN PRECISION MEASUREMENT Introduction The Digi-Sense
More informationMEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY OF ROTATING TORQUE TRANSDUCERS WHEN USED IN PARTIAL LOAD RANGES
XVIII IMEKO WORLD CONGRESS Metrology for a Sustainable Development September, 17, 006, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY OF ROTATING TORQUE TRANSDUCERS WHEN USED IN PARTIAL LOAD RANGES Georg
More informationENSC387: Introduction to Electromechanical Sensors and Actuators LAB 3: USING STRAIN GAUGES TO FIND POISSON S RATIO AND YOUNG S MODULUS
ENSC387: Introduction to Electromechanical Sensors and Actuators LAB 3: USING STRAIN GAUGES TO FIND POISSON S RATIO AND YOUNG S MODULUS 1 Introduction... 3 2 Objective... 3 3 Supplies... 3 4 Theory...
More informationCalibration, traceability, uncertainty and comparing measurement results. Workshop 16 March 2015 VSL, Delft The Netherlands
Calibration, traceability, uncertainty and comparing measurement results Workshop 16 March 2015 VSL, Delft The Netherlands 1 Calibration Calibrating an instrument involves comparing the measurements of
More informationAfter publication, this Indian Standard will supersede the following Indian Standards:
For Comments Only Doc: PGD 26(1110)W Draft Indian Standard SPECIFICATION FOR NON-AUTOMATIC WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS PART 1 TERMINOLOGY AND DEFINITIONS ICS No. 01.040.17; 17.100 Not to be reproduced without
More informationACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE FOR ROMET ROTARY METER BODIES AND/OR MECHANICAL NON-CONVERTING AND CONVERTING MODULES
ACCEPTANCE PROCEDURE FOR ROMET ROTARY METER BODIES AND/OR MECHANICAL NON-CONVERTING AND CONVERTING MODULES (RPB-01) Approved by: Date: SECTION PAGE # 1.0 Scope 2.0 Definitions 3.0 References 4.0 Inspection
More informationSIM FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON UP TO 10 kn
SIM FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON UP TO 10 kn Jorge C. Torres-Guzmán, Daniel A. Ramírez-Ahedo Centro Nacional de Metrología, CENAM.. ABSTRACT A comparison in the quantity of force was carried out among the
More informationASTM C STEADY-STATE HEAT FLUX MEASUREMENTS AND THERMAL TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES BY MEANS OF THE HEAT FLOW METER APPARATUS
Page 1 of 10 ASTM C 518 04 STEADY-STATE HEAT FLUX MEASUREMENTS AND THERMAL TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES BY MEANS OF THE HEAT FLO METER APPARATUS Rockwool Premium Plus Insulation Project No. 3194876SAT-001A
More informationMeasurement & Uncertainty - Basic concept and its application
Measurement & Uncertainty - Basic concept and its application Feb. 7. 2012 JongOh CHOI (choijongoh@kriss.re.kr) Knowledge and measurement When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it
More informationStudy for the requalification of Inmetro's Primary Hardness Standardization Machine for Vickers HV3 scale
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Study for the requalification of Inmetro's Primary Hardness Standardization Machine for Vickers HV3 scale To cite this article: J T Filho et al 2015
More informationUncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter
NPL REPORT DQL-AC 002 Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter Richard Payne April 2004 April 2004 ABSTRACT Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter Richard Payne
More informationCertificate of Accreditation
PERRY JOHNSON LABORATORY ACCREDITATION, INC. Certificate of Accreditation Perry Johnson Laboratory Accreditation, Inc. has assessed the Laboratory of: (Hereinafter called the Organization) and hereby declares
More informationSHENZHEN MORLAB COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
SAR Reference Dipole Calibration Report Ref : ACR.189.7.16.SATU.A SHENZHEN MORLAB COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD FL3, BUILDING A, FEIYANG SCIENCE PARK, NO.8 LONGCHANG ROAD, BLOCK 67, BAOAN DISTRICT,
More information